Swedish Property Market
Transcription
Swedish Property Market
RUBRIK A Swedish Property Market – Focus on Eight Cities TH E ME: PR OP E RTY HOLDING S OF I NDUST RI AL CO M PANI E S SP RI NG 2 0 1 4 RUBRIK B Welcome to Swedish Property Market! Swedish Property Market is targeted at those of you who are active in the property sector, and who have business considerations as your primary driving force. The report provides an instantaneous picture of the Swedish property market in a broad sense. Here, you will find facts on rental levels, yields, assessed values, etc., not only in major urban areas, but also for Sweden’s principal regional markets. It is probably the broadest compilation that is openly presented. However, what is probably more important is that we have chosen to link our factual descriptions to trends and opportunities, and to present the principal players in each specific market. In this way, we aim to contribute to the generation of new forms of business. By virtue of our membership in NAI Global, the world’s most extensive network of property consultants, and also our widespread office network in Sweden, with a presence in 17 regions, we have unique knowledge of and a broad network in, the property market. We are now placing this at your disposal. ContentPage News and trends 2 NAI Svefa Property Index 3 Macroeconomics4 Property holdings of industrial companies 6 Stockholm12 Göteborg14 Malmö16 Uppsala18 Linköping20 Helsingborg22 Jönköping24 Umeå26 About Swedish Property Market 28 About NAI Svefa 29 About NAI Svefa Analys 30 Contact us 31 Mikael Lundström Group CEO NAI Svefa This brochure, including texts, illustrations, images and other material is protected under the Swedish Act on Copyright in Literary and Artistic Works (1960:729). This protection includes the exclusive right to exploit the work by making copies of it and by making it available to the public, be it in the original or an altered manner, in translation or adaptation, in another literary or artistic form, or in another technical manner. Please contact NAI Svefa for a licence to use part or all of this brochure. Publisher: Svefa Holding AB Legally responsible publisher: Mikael Lundström Graphic design: Soformia AB Cover photo: ABB Printing: Sib-Tryck Holding AB Translation: The Bugli Company AB Focus on eight cities Theme: Property holdings of industrial companies A warm welcome to the spring edition of Swedish Property Market – Focus on Eight Cities. As growth is accelerating and the Swedish general election approaches, will we see continued investment in the residential segment and public properties in 2014? We provide our view on the market, current trends, challenges and opportunities for players in the property market. The report contains analyses and market data from eight sub-markets in Sweden, our own NAI Svefa Property Index and a common theme featured throughout the report. In this issue, we have decided to take a closer look at the property holdings of large industrial companies. We analyse their property portfolios and offer guidance on business opportunities given that property is one of these companies’ principal assets. Many industrial companies are faced with the choice of owning or renting, and in many cases there are several attractive opportunities for developing the properties once the machines have become obsolete. Despite a slowdown in the economy and low growth, the Swedish property market has largely remained resilient and properties are continuing to attract capital. In the long term, properties in general and residential properties in particular have also proven to be a stable and sound investment. A comparison between the annual average total yield in various property segments according to IPD/ Swedish Property Index and the trend on the Stockholm Stock Exchange over the past ten years lends support to investments in properties, particularly in residential properties, from an overall risk and return perspective. The range of transactions of this type that have set the tone, involving public-utility housing companies and municipalities, will probably decline since we are now in an election year. With improved opportunities for a favourable return on alternative investment types, risk appetites will increase with a greater interest in investments in offices, retail, warehouses/logistics and projects. This suggests broader demand in the Swedish property market in 2014, while the players managing pension assets that are focused on residential properties and public properties will likely become less dominant. Significant investment interest in recent years has been directed to property owners with core operations that do not involve properties, with public properties in particular being highly attractive investments. Long-term leases are usually signed in conjunction with sales and, with the public sector as the tenant; the investor purchases a stable and guaranteed cash flow. It will not be a long step until the market is expanded and the properties of large industrial companies again become the focus of market interest. What are the drivers behind a sale and what are the advantages of owning or leasing one’s own premises? The theme of this edition describes the property holdings of large industrial companies and the driving forces behind ABB’s changes in property holdings, that influenced several of these large industrial companies. The theme also reoccurs throughout the report with interesting opportunities in the local markets. The NAI Svefa Property Index has been devised to provide players in the Swedish property market with an indicator offering a basis for comparing the various sub-markets. Since the first survey was conducted in 2009, Stockholm has been ranked in first place every year and there is a large gap between Stockholm and the other sub-markets. In the spring survey, Stockholm achieved a score of 91, compared with Göteborg which came second with a score of 63 and Uppsala third with 61. Jönköping continues to report very strong performance and retained its fourth place, a ranking that is higher than significantly larger sub-markets such as Linköping and Malmö. Linköping and Västerås were the highest climbers, each advancing two places, while Malmö and Växjö fell two places. Accordingly, Sweden’s third urban area, Malmö is only ranked ninth in the NAI Svefa Property Index. We hope that you enjoy this report, and that it will inspire new and exciting business opportunities! Åsa Henninge Head of Analysis NEWS AND TRENDS 2 News and trends MORE PROPERTY COMPANIES ON THE STOCK MARKET The caution of banks is a probable reason for property companies’ increased interest in the stock exchange. Several property companies need to secure capital to increase their scope for action and to enable expansion or to replace existing bank financing. The stock exchange, combined with an IPO, is an attractive option. A stock exchange listing has several other advantages, the most obvious being that it is easier for existing owners to exit or increase ownership diversity as opposed to through direct sales. Compared with the construction and property companies listed on the stock exchange in the 1980s, today’s listed property companies can be said to be narrower and slightly more “sexy” with many opportunities for stable yield and growth in value. The timing is opportune with a recession and a high level of expectation reflected in the industrial companies’ share prices; a climate in which property companies with their underlying secure and stable cash flows appear very attractive. CHALLENGES LIE IN BUILDING TO REMOVE THE HOUSING SHORTAGE According to the Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning (SNBHBP), the number of municipalities reporting shortages of housing is increasing and a full 80% of Swedish municipalities say that they have a lack of rental units. The price trend in the private housing market has been strong in several sub-markets since the latter half of the 1990s and, in several cases, there are essentially no vacancies in the residential rental market in growth areas. Demand for predominantly residential buildings is high in the Swedish property market in general and in growth areas in particular, the value trend is positive and the average total yield over the past ten years is 9.8% per year according to IPD. The economic driving forces for acquiring land and producing new homes are linked to the expected value in a completed state and, with a strong housing market and demand that is outstripping supply, the conditions should be in place today for increased residential construction in many municipalities. So why is more housing not being built? In the increasingly heated debate on the lack of housing, municipalities seem to lay the blame on the central government and vice versa, while building proprietors blame all of the rules that cause delays, complicate the process and make it more expensive. Criticism from the SNBHBP is based on the utility-value system, and it claims that this rent-setting system is leading to socioeconomic welfare losses due to lower new construction than would have been the case without the price-regulating mechanisms. The government is looking for the key to success in every possible way, and it will be exciting to see whether fiscal stimuli will be proposed to make the production of new residential rental units more attractive and, if so, how this will be implemented. VERY ATTRACTIVE MARKET FOR HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY Democratic trends clearly speak in favour of public properties in residential care and homes for the elderly. The age structure of the Swedish population has changed radically in the past 100 years. The longer average life expectation and changes in age structure will lead to a sharp increase in elderly care needs in future years. Over the next 20 years, Statistics Sweden’s population forecast suggests that the number of people aged 65 and above will increase by 620,000 and the number of those over the age of 80 will rise by 350,000. The sale of public properties is a market that has grown from 0 to 100 in 20 years. From initially having been a closed market, public properties have now become attractive investments and companies have been formed that focus on longterm ownership and management of public properties, such as those that manage institutional capital for the Swedish National Pension Funds. A clear advantage is that public properties are usually encompassed by long leases. When a sale is agreed, a lease is signed with the user, thus providing stable and, with a county council or municipality as a tenant, relatively secure cash flows. As a result of long leases with payment-assured tenants, the lease/ vacancy risk is small and the investment is less dependent on the economy and location. At the same time, increased demand is met with a greater desire among municipalities to sell. According to a survey carried out by Dagens Samhälle, four of ten municipalities would consider selling part of their property portfolio. HOT HOUSING MARKET ADDS NEW MOMENTUM TO CO-OPERATIVE APARTMENT CONVERSIONS In 2013, conversions of rental apartments into cooperative apartments were noted in sub-markets that have not previously had a tradition of conversions. The population trend in the past ten years has been positive in 149 of Sweden’s 249 municipalities. Annual population growth in about 40 municipalities exceeds 1%. For those municipalities that for some reason are not included in the “hot” list for major investments in residential properties, there is much to suggest that a conversion and sale to a tenant-owner association could be a successful alternative. A growing population together with a small injection of new residential properties is generating strong underlying demand, a shortage of housing and considerable price increases in the private housing market. Accordingly, the conditions for generating profit from a conversion to cooperative apartments are in place in several sub-markets. INVESTMENT NEEDS AND MAINTENANCE DEBT PROVIDING CONDITIONS FOR PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS Something that is starting to be talked about in the public sector is the possibility of private investments in infrastructure. The maintenance debt is gigantic and several Swedish municipalities are also facing an investment boom and greatly need to expand their public services. In Sweden, public properties, or social infrastructure, became a hot investment segment in the 2000s, while almost 100% of investments in transport infrastructure continue to be made using government funds. With the national system currently in place, whereby local and regional infrastructure investments are definitely not among the priorities, infrastructure investments are limited by the national budget. If the public sector wants to work together with the private sector, there is no shortage of investors that have communicated a willingness to invest in Swedish infrastructure. NAI NAISVEFA SVEFAFASTIGHETSINDEX PROPERTY INDEX 3 N A I S V E FA P R O P E RT Y I N D E X Spring Autumn SpringAutumn SpringAutumn Municipality201420132013 201220122011 1 Stockholml91 91 9291 8989 2 Göteborgl 63 61 6464 6463 3 Uppsalal61 59 6160 5758 4 Jönköping l54 55 5251 4849 5 Lundl53 53 5858 5760 6 Helsingborg l51 50 5450 5150 7 Halmstad s l48 47 4845 4543 7 Linköping s l48 45 5047 4851 9 Malmö t l47 48 5555 5556 9 Umeå l47 45 5050 4750 11 Luleå l45 44 4442 4037 12 Örebro l43 43 4948 4342 13 Västerås s l40 37 5046 4747 14 Karlstad t l 39 40 4539 4341 15 Borås s l36 34 3633 3436 16 Växjö t l35 38 4541 3841 16 Norrköping l35 34 3532 3230 18 Östersund s l 34 32 3535 3232 19 Kalmar t l31 33 3731 3534 19 Sundsvall s l31 30 3737 3333 21 Gävle l28 29 3431 2931 21 Falun s l 28 27 3531 2832 23 Eskilstuna l25 25 2523 1920 24 Trollhättan l 20 16 1415 1420 s t T he direction of the arrows shows the change in ranking from the previous edition of Swedish Property Market – Focus on Eight Cities, No. 2 2013. A change can be seen in the spring survey of the NAI Svefa Property Index with 18 of 24 sub-markets now showing an unchanged or higher index compared with the autumn survey. This indicates that growth is slowly picking up, and with it also the underlying demand in the Swedish property market. l l l The colour of the dots shows the city’s perfor- mance in relation to the average. A green dot indicates a better performance than average, a yellow dot a performance in line with average and a red dot a performance worse than average. MACRO ECONOMICS 4 The Swedish economy and development in the property market Following more than a year of weak growth, the future outlook of the Swedish economy is brighter. Despite a slowdown in the economy and low growth, or perhaps due to the recession, the Swedish property market has essentially remained resistant and properties are continuing to attract capital. The strongest performance has been in urban areas, and in the residential properties and public properties segments. Meanwhile, low growth is fuelling reluctance to invest in production capacity, which is impacting demand and thus exacerbating the risks in the industrial segment. Growth in the Swedish economy was weak in 2013, but future indicators have become stronger. The labour market situation has improved and confidence among Swedish households and companies has risen. Combined with the slightly brighter outlook for the global economy and gradually higher global demand, conditions are being created for growth to accelerate this year. The improvement is clearest in the US, but it is also apparent that the Eurozone has passed the deepest point of the recession and is now gradually recovering. GDP is growing again, although recovery is slow and major challenges remain. Several countries continue to suffer in the wake of the financial and debt crisis, while national debt, weak banks and underlying structural problems must also still be addressed to improve competitiveness. This means that domestic demand will remain weak in many Eurozone countries and it will be a long time before the zone has normalised. Rising growth in the external economic environment is contributing to a gradual increase in demand for Swedish export goods, which is in turn leading to industrial recovery. With rising demand, both in the external environment and domestic markets, and an increased use of resources, investments in the business sector will also eventually start to accelerate. The weak investment climate is thus expected to bottom out and start picking up again. However, capacity utilisation in the manufacturing industry is expected to remain low, which is why a recovery is expected to take some time. This suggests that we can expect a significantly slower recovery compared with the upswing in 2004 – 2007 following the burst of the IT bubble. The current upturn is largely being driven by private consumption. The already favourable conditions for households have further improved with the unexpectedly strong employment trend. Income for Swedish households is continuing to trend well, while both the stock market and housing prices have risen in the past year, which means that household wealth is rising. An increase in household consumption is essential for growth. Households have a high level of savings that they are expected to reduce as their confidence in the future builds. Combined with rising employment, lower taxes and low interest rates, this contributes to the healthy conditions for consumption increase and, accordingly, there are strong indications that private consumption will continue to hold the baton regarding growth in future years. The Riksbank believes that monetary policies must remain expansive to support the economy and encourage inflation to rise. The repo rate is expected to remain at its currently low level throughout 2014. It is expected to be hiked gradually once inflation has accelerated and recovery is on firmer ground. In its eagerness to show voters that it is taking responsibility and protecting national finances, several analysts believe that the government, with its cautious fiscal policy, is missing the chance to improve conditions for growth. Fiscal stimulus packages are needed to boost recovery and further strengthen conditions on the labour market. It is desirable from both a growth and property-market standpoint to have fiscal stimulus packages to make the production of new residential rental units more attractive, which would promote growth and strengthen the performance of the property market. In this new economic geography, jobs move to where people want to live, which is why the shortage of housing is a fundamental challenge to competitiveness and growth. SWEDEN’S DEVELOPMENT – 8 YEARS % % 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 The Swedish Public Employment Service’s most recent interview survey of more than 11,000 workplaces showed that employers had positive expectations in a one-year scenario. They expect demand for goods and services to gradually strengthen and recruitment plans are positive. According to the Public Employment Service’s forecasts, employment figures are set to rise by 61,000 and 55,000 in 2014 and 2015, respectively. Despite the creation of many new jobs in 2013, unemployment increased marginally from 8.0% in 2012 to 8.1% in 2013 in the 16 – 64 age category, with MACRO EKONOMICS 5 unemployed non-students accounting for 5.5 percentage points. Unemployment is expected to fall to 7.8% and 7.4% in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The number of those out of work is expected to decline from 400,000 in 2013 to 375,000 in 2015. The considerable growth in the labour force is offsetting any clear decline in unemployment. The private services sector remains the employment engine and employment figures are rising in many of these industries. Higher private consumption benefits such sectors as retail, hotels and restaurants and personal services. Although industry is the sector that has been hit hardest by the weaker global economy, optimism about the future rose markedly in the autumn and the decline in employment slowed. In 2014, a stronger employment trend is expected in the urban counties than in other parts of the country. These counties are expected to represent about 75% of the increase in employment in 2014, corresponding to more than 45,000 jobs. As in the past, the trend is strongest in Stockholm County, but many new jobs are arising in Västra Götaland and Skåne. Skåne is also benefiting from the strengthening of the Danish economy. It is interesting that employment is expected to rise in all counties. Despite a slowdown in the economy and low growth, the Swedish property market has largely remained resilient and properties are continuing to attract capital. In the long term, properties in general and residential properties in particular have also proven to be a stable and relatively sound investments. From an overall risk and return perspective, a comparison between the annual average yield and the value trend in various property segments according to IPD/Swedish Property Index, and the trend on the Stockholm Stock Exchange, measured as the share price trend and dividends according to Six Return Index over the past ten years, lends support to investments in properties, particularly in residential properties. The annual average shows that an investment in a rental residential apartment building has generated a yield of 9.3% over the past ten years, compared with the Stockholm Stock Exchange’s average of 15.6%. What speaks in favour of properties, particularly housing investments, is that the total yield has largely been positive for the entire period and, in fact, ever since the crisis in the 1990s, with the exception of the slight downturn in 2008. This can be compared with the stock market, which has experienced a significantly more volatile return, fluctuating from +70% to – 40%. Since we are now approaching a general election, the range of transactions of the type that have hithertoset the tone, involving public-utility housing companies and municipalities, will probably decline. With improved opportunities for returns from alternative investment types, risk appetites will increase with interest in residential properties to decline in favour of investments in offices, retail, warehouse/logistic properties and projects. The players managing pension assets and that focus on residential properties will thus probably not be as dominant in the market. This suggests broader demand in the Swedish property market in 2014. For the rental market for commercial premises, NAI Svefa believes that there will be strong demand for modern office premises in several sub-markets and, with the right design in the form of efficient and compact offices, conditions are in place for realising new-build projects in several of Sweden’s regional cities. Today, an investment in new builds in several sub-markets can be more attractive than acquiring from the existing portfolio. With a higher influx of modern, efficient premises, the downside risks in the existing portfolio will increase, particularly in the segment of buildings from the 1980s and 1990s with relatively higher prices per square meter and often inefficient premises. Increasingly positive signals are also emerging from the rental market for commercial premises. Nevertheless, the most probable scenario is that we will see a continued dampened performance in 2014 which will affect demand in the Swedish property market. NAI Svefa’s opinion is that in 2014 we will mainly see unchanged rental levels, with lower risks of vacancies in line with the increase in recovery of the Swedish economy. TOTAL YIELD % % 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 -20 -20 -40 -40 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Retail Offices Industrial Residential Other SIXRX PROPERTY HOLDINGS OF INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES 6 Property holdings of industrial companies The strategies of industrial companies regarding the properties in which they conduct operations differ. Some companies choose to sell all of their property portfolios, such as Ericsson. Others opt to include the property operation in their own business, as is the case for Volvo. A third alternative is to own certain properties in which the companies have operations, as ABB did when it first sold its entire property portfolio and later bought back parts of it. Of the ten largest property owners in terms of total taxed industrial area, six are commercial companies. The largest of the industrial companies in terms of total tax assessed area and tax assessment value is AB Volvo. The company owns properties with a tax assessed area of about 2,000,000 square metres, of which industrial premises account for about 80% and offices for the remainder. The properties have a tax assessment value of about SEK 6.85 billion. The properties are primarily situated in the Municipality of Göteborg, with a tax assessed area totalling approximately 1,050,000 square metres. The reason why most of the properties are situated in Göteborg is that a large amount of Volvo’s production and head office and associated functions is located in the municipality. AB Volvo has no directly owned properties, instead they are owned exclusively by subsidiaries. The company also has a separate business area, Volvo Group Real Estate, which manages and administers the Volvo Group’s properties. The company also leases premises to external players, such as Volvo Cars. In general, the properties owned by the large industrial companies, in terms of tax assessed area, are not concentrated to any single municipality but are spread throughout most of Sweden. For instance, Lantmännen owns properties in 124 municipalities, while Volvo Cars owns properties in six municipalities. Owning properties in so many locations naturally involves many difficulties. In many cases, the companies have attempted to address these challenges in the same way as Volvo and ABB by incorporat- ing properties as a business area, support function or subsidiary. For example, Lantmännen, which is an economic association, has its own property company with about 20 employees, tasked with administering property management, sales and development. Despite these attempts to centralise control of a diverse property portfolio, it is difficult to efficiently manage properties in a large number of provincial locations. Accordingly, there is reason to continuously evaluate property holdings and the value inherent in owning property, compared with the capital used in the core operations, particularly in attractive property markets. In these markets, property owners and tenants are less dependent on each other since there are alternatives for both parties. The party best suited to owning the property should be the party that can optimise the yield and provide the production resources represented by the premises at the lowest cost and risk. The greatest opportunities are found in properties with a low degree of specialised adaptation, for example, offices or warehouses in a functioning and attractive market. For properties with a higher degree of specialisation, it is more difficult to find alternative uses and it can also be difficult to find property owners who are willing to invest large sums in adapting the premises in line with the way the operations develop and change. PERCENTA GE OF COMMER CIAL P R EMISES IKEA l Lantmännen l AB Volvo l SSAB l ILLIQUID M A RKET S BillerudKorsnäs l Sandvik l SCA l Stora Enso l Södra Skogsägarna l LIQUID MAR K ETS Scania l Volvo Cars l PROPERTY HOLDINGS OF INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES 7 MUNICIPALITY WITH TOTAL TAX ASSESSMENT HOLDINGS INCL. HIGHEST SHARE OF TAX VALUE SUBSIDIARIES, COMPANY* SUBSIDIARIES MUNICIPALITIES** ASSESSMENT VALUE, SEK ’000 SEK ’000 AB Volvo Vehicle manufacturing 53 properties with a tax assessed area of 2,009,525 sq. m., divided between 1,611,151 sq. m. industrial (80.2%) and 397,242 sq. m. premises (19.8%) 23 municipalities Göteborg 4,346,190 6,846,769 Volvo Cars Car manufacturing 18 properties with a tax assessed area 1,314,955 sq. m., divided between 1,289,908 sq. m. industrial (98.1%) and 25,047 sq. m. premises (1.9%) 6 municipalities Göteborg 3,642,162 4,549,853 Stora Enso Pulp and paper industry Forest industry 85 properties with a tax assessed area of 1,242,390 sq. m., divided between 1,195,999 sq. m. industrial (96.3%) and 42,551 sq. m. premises (3.4%) 24 municipalities Hammarö 1,182,663 4,569,391 SSAB Steel industry 36 properties with a tax assessed area of 1,165,591 sq. m., divided between 1,109,762 sq. m. industrial (95.2%) and 53,916 sq. m. premises (4.6%) 12 municipalities Luleå 1,403,878 3,153,339 Lantmännen Grain, foodstuffs 230 properties with a tax assessed area 124 municipalities of 965,984 sq. m., divided between 930,161 sq. m. industrial (96.3%) and 34,116 sq. m. premises (3.5%) Norrköping 906,460 2,835,174 Södra Forest industry Skogsägarna 68 properties with a tax assessed area of 804,885 sq. m., divided between 784,378 sq. m. industrial (97.5%) and 18,665 sq. m. premises (2.3%) 127 municipalities Varberg 1,019,106 2,898,236 Billerud Pulp and paper Korsnäs industry Forestry 67 properties with a tax assessed area of 814,922 sq. m., divided between 762,495 sq. m. industrial (93.6%) and 47,627 sq. m. premises (5,8%) 8 municipalities Gävle 1,332,705 3,653,147 Sandvik Technical industriy 61 properties with a tax assessed area of 778,119 sq. m., divided between 724,254 sq. m. industrial (93.1%) and 53,707 sq. m. premises (6.9%) 9 municipalities Sandviken 1,370,680 1,721,028 Scania Vehicle manufacturing 28 properties with a tax assessed area of 628,072 sq. m., divided between 560,662 sq. m. industrial (89.3%) and 67,410 sq. m. premises (10.7%) 13 municipalities Södertälje 2,604,494 3,163,101 SCA Graphic Pulp and paper industry 71 properties with a tax assessed area of 570,691 sq. m., divided between 558,347 sq. m. industrial (97.8%) and 11,534 sq. m. premises (2.0%) 10 municipalities Sollefteå 1,945,051 5,890,364 IKEA Furniture industry 38 properties with a tax assessed area of 1,060,761 sq. m., divided between 523,344 sq. m. industrial (49.3%) and 527,417 sq. m. premises (50.7%) 14 municipalities Jönköping 973,119 6,753,668 INDUSTRY * Vattenfall is excluded, despite the company’s size, since the property holdings primarily comprise special-purpose properties. ** Only municipalities where properties with a tax assessed area are located. Source: Datscha / Real property register PROPERTY HOLDINGS OF INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES 8 From real estate to production resource Industrial and commercially operating companies in Sweden have built up significant property portfolios as a natural production resource over many years. The view of these properties has changed in recent decades and several industrial and commercially operating companies have sold large parts of their property holdings. What is the driving force behind these sales and what structures have been utilised? Have capital requirements promoted these sales or is it the result of a belief in efficiency enhancement and that the capital locked in the properties can generate a higher yield elsewhere in the operation? For ABB, one of the largest industrial companies in the world, the answer could be said to be a combination of the two. Discussions took place within ABB at an early stage suggesting that its properties were an unexploited asset and the first major property deal in Sweden took place in the 1980s based on a sale and leaseback structure. The deal was ground-breaking at the time and the underlying rationale was that the capital tied up in the properties could generate a better yield if it was invested in the operations. At the time, Financial Services was a key part of ABB and some of the money obtained from the property deal was also invested in the financial market. Nordisk Renting (NR), then part of the bank Nordea, was chosen as the buyer, and was considered to be a reliable and long-term player. The structure worked well, with property-related issues remaining local and NR willing to make further investments in the Swedish properties. In autumn 2000, ABB made use of a repurchase clause in the structure with NR, but the properties were again put on the market. These sales were then part of a financial strategy aimed at reducing net debt and strengthening the balance sheet. The property portfolio comprised offices and industrial and warehouse premises totalling 1.1 million square metres in 35 different municipalities, with a large number situated in Västerås (475,000 square metres) and Ludvika (190,000 square metres). The deal was completed in 2002 and, this time, the buyer was London and Regional Properties (LRP). As part of the sale, ABB signed different leases with LRP ranging from between 1.5 and 25 years. ABB invested much time and energy in ensuring that the leases were correctly structured. Mannheimer Swartling was involved in this work and strengthened the leases, whereby ABB retained right of access to most of the premises. The need to have right of access simultaneously had a negative impact on the market’s willingness to pay, and the sale coincided with a major setback in the market in the wake of the September 11 attacks. LRP later sold the property portfolio, mainly to Kungsleden in autumn 2007, and probably made a healthy profit in a market that had recovered and with a tenant that by that time had become financially much stronger. The most recent transactions in the ABB portfolio took place in 2010 and 2011 when ABB bought back properties in Ludvika and Karlskrona. These properties contain manufacturing of high-voltage products and cables and comprise modern, high-tech industrial facilities, unlike any other in the world. How then were the property-related issues discussed at ABB during this period? What lessons were learnt? The experiences gained from selling these properties were generally positive. Divesting the properties gave ABB the vital capital contribution needed at the time of the sale. With hindsight, the current Head of ABB’s property department, Lars Åkerstedt, says that certain properties perhaps should not have been sold and that the repurchases of the most strategic properties, such as in Ludvika, were proof of this. But not selling was never an option; it was the right thing to do at the time. The repurchases in 2010-2011 also resulted from major investment requirements in highly specialised properties situated in locations where property investors were not necessarily queuing to invest billions. Selling a property when the current lessee is the only potential tenant, as was the case for ABB in Ludvika, results in the property owner and tenant becoming dependent on each other to a greater extent. In such a situation, it was better to buy back these specific properties. Today, ABB would probably opt for leasing to cover its premises requirements in a “functioning market” – where there are alternative tenants – while it would choose to own the properties itself if the market were small and the properties highly specialised. Another important lesson for a successful sale is to ensure the right formulation of the leases that constitute the central framework characterising the relationship between the property owner and tenant. ABB attached great importance to the structure of the leases to retain its right of access to the premises, yet with the aim of creating flexible use and permitting it to vacate areas if needs changed. However, what is regulated in the leases needs to be carefully considered and strike a balance between maximising the tenant’s interests and the market’s possibility of pricing the leases. Otherwise, there is the risk of “winning the battle but losing the war.” PROPERTY HOLDINGS OF INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES 9 What conclusions can we draw from the sale of ABB’s property portfolio? In a property with a low degree of specialisation, such as an office, in a functioning liquid market, property owners and tenants are less dependent on each other since there are alternative solutions for both parties. The property owner can find new tenants, while the tenant can find new premises. It is difficult however to find alternative tenants for a highly specialised property that is also located in a less liquid market, which means that the tenant and landlord will be “in each other’s laps” and the relationship between the two will become very important as both have very limited options. Based on this rationale, a consensus on such issues as management and investment becomes more important and any lack of consensus could lead to a time-consuming negative processes. What was previously an internal decision-making process has now become an external negotiation requiring resources. As a result, an industrial company considering divesting its properties needs to find an operational property owner that can develop alongside it in times of change, should the company intend to sell properties in a non-functioning market. However, there is every reason for industrial and commercial companies to review their property holdings in locations that are attractive, particularly where alternative tenants can take over the premises if the operations change. The condition here is that the company believes that the capital received from a sale of the properties will generate a higher yield if invested in the core operations. To take a position in such an ownership/lease issue, it is important to evaluate a company’s own view of risks, obligations and opportunities associated with properties. The argument of “focusing on core operations” becomes something of a cliché if these issues are not analysed. The manner in which production premises are to be acquired should be a matter of weighing specific advantages against the disadvantages offered by the various options. The player best suited to owning a property is the one whose decisions lead to the optimal use of resources. The long-term owner should, in theory, value the property higher than other players and assess risks, obligations and opportunities associated with the property differently. The matter is complex and both external and internal factors come into play. There are no clear solutions or simple answers. Instead a decision should be backed up by an analysis that centres on the company’s own right of access and flexibility requirements and on some of the key issues involved in property ownership. – How are we to manage and assess the various risks – technical risks, lease and vacancy risks, market risks and financial risks – associated with ownership of a property? – How successful will we be at managing the properties compared with a player that has property management as its core operations? Are there any differences in operating and maintenance expenses? Are there any differences in the ability to maximise income? Are there any differences in how we manage the vacancies that arise? – What does the capital tied up in the properties cost us? Are there any differences in capital expenses? COMPARISON BETWEEN THREE ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF “ACQUIRING” PRODUCTION PREMISES OW NING L E AS E – R E NT I NG Strategic control of the property Full control Long-term control via purchase option L E ASE – NOR MAL L E AS E Limited control, partly dependent on length of lease Management Full responsibility Often full responsibility Limited responsibility, check list Exposure to change in value of property Full exposure to both upside and downside No downside, but most of upside via purchase option (often at a fixed price) No risk or opportunity for downside or upside Freed up capital The LTV ratio on the property 100% of the value of the property, depends on the bank’s position but risk of classification as a (normally 50 – 60%) and the financial lease company’s industry, etc. 100% of the value of the property Interest-rate exposure related to the property Full, but dependent on type of loan, etc. No interest-rate risk Full, but option of locking interest rate into the lease PROPERTY HOLDINGS OF INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES 10 After the machines have been turned off There is a high willingness to invest in property-development projects in Swedish cities and growth areas and work is being conducted in creating new development rights for residential properties and a “mixed-use city” in several locations. There are also many opportunities in several towns and cities to convert former industrial land into more qualitative purposes. Industrial and port areas, often situated in what are considered to be attractive, central locations close to public transport stations and water in their respective sub-markets, are being converted into residential properties and businesses. Redesigning the city is a slow process involving many stakeholders. It is naturally important for meeting the demands of a growing population and is a factor for success in the continued development and attractiveness of the city. The Industrilandskapet (Industrial landscape) area in Norrköping is one of Sweden’s most successful examples of converting industrial areas into a modern mixed-use city. A clear trend in the entire industrialised world, including Sweden, is that the service sector is growing increasingly strong. According to the trade association Almega, the percentage of employees in the service sector has increased over a 20-year period from 37% in 1993 to 46% in 2012. Most of this increase can be attributed to the growth of knowledge-intensive sectors. The percentage of people employed in this category over the same period rose from 14% to 23%, a trend that in all probability will continue in the future. The transition from an industrial society into a knowledge society has been, is and will continue to be testing for many towns and cities in Sweden. Once the unavoidable and healthy transition to a knowledge society has begun, it will put great pressure on the remaining industrial companies which, faced with stiff competition from low-cost countries, will essentially have only one choice – enhance efficiency and save costs or disappear. Efficiency can be enhanced in many ways, one being automatic rather than manual production and another relocating production abroad. Whichever method is used, it will often lead to the industrial companies’ properties being used differently within the same industry or standing empty. The latter is what happened in Norrköping. The industrialisation of Norrköping began as early as the 16th century with flour mills being placed at Kvarnholmen, which later lent its name to the Holmen mill, which was founded at the start of the 17th century. Over the coming centuries, the Holmen mill flourished together with the growth of the textile and paper industry. During this time, both of these industries subsequently came to establish themselves in the area that now makes up the Industrilandskapet area in central Norrköping. The beginning to the end of the use of this area as a production site was in 1970 when the textile operations were closed. These operations had been subject to considerable pressure in the preceding decades as competition from low cost countries intensified. The discontinuation of the textile operations was followed in 1986 by the closure of the paper mill when Holmen decided to build a new facility in Braviken and this marked the end of an unbroken 377-year industrial epoch in the area. What happens after the machines have been turned off? Although the period following a major closure is often difficult in the shape of high unemployment and dented self-confidence, it results in a valuable process of renewal. The old production premises used in several of the towns and cities where such closures had taken place have often started to be used for different types of operations and thus have been able to rejuvenate the premises and city. Although Holmen’s relocation to Braviken had not led to any mass unemployment in Norrköping in that sense, it triggered such a process. However, it could be said that this process had in fact started before then. After the Industrilandskapet area had fallen more and more into disrepair in the 1960s and 1970s, opinions differed as to what should be done with Industrilandskapet and no clear answer emerged, although popular opinion during this period increasingly agreed that the older buildings should preserved. When the operations were closed, Holmen owned the entire factory itself and announced a Nordic architectural competition to receive proposals on what could be done with its now empty buildings. 47 entries were submitted and two winners were crowned. The two winning proposals were from Kai Wartiainen and Alexis Pontvik. In summary, Wartiainen’s proposal concerned partly demolishing and partly preserving the buildings, while Pontvik’s proposal was largely based on tearing down the buildings. Holmen, which by then had relocated to Braviken, did not want to be involved in property development and thus sold the properties to Holmenbyggarna, a company jointly founded by Fastighets AB L E Lundberg (Lundbergs) and what was then SIAB (now NCC) in 1988 for the purpose of developing the Holmen area. In 2005, Lundbergs became the sole owner of the jointly owned company. At this point, all of the relevant players wondered what could be done with the area and tried to reach a joint agreement on what was worth preserving and what was not. Holmenbyggarna’s opinion was that it was important for history to have a role in the area’s future, which was part of the reason that Kai Wartiainen’s proposal was ultimately chosen. Complications seemed inevitable since the exterior of the buildings was, in many respects, governed by its PROPERTY HOLDINGS OF INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES 11 content. However, it was generally agreed that everything went relatively smoothly, largely due to fact that the frame of the buildings was still highly flexible with solid architecture, which meant that extensive changes could be made in the interior. Generally speaking, many challenges had to be faced during the development process, including giving the area an identity. It was not possible to restore some parts of the buildings despite the desire to preserve most of the older structure. When buildings was demolished in the early 1990s, there was strong criticism from many camps that far too much had been torn down. One reason for this is thought to be that many people found it difficult to visualise what the “finished” Industrilandskapet area would look like. A key element in dispersing any uncertainty among those involved and the local inhabitants was the completion of the Louis De Geer Concert Hall, which is considered to be a gem in the area and a milestone in its development. It helped create an identity for this area and lead the way forward. Once the concert hall had been opened, it was easier to visualise what the area would look like and the further development of other buildings in the area had a platform to work from. Another key element in the development of the area was the emergence of the decision to build a local campus for Linköping University in the city. The area needed to be filled with business to drive development forward, and it could not be empty for too long. Accordingly, great importance was afforded to attracting business to the area and it was highly significant that the campus was to be situated there, not only for the area but also for the entire city. The fact that there were no excessively detailed regulations for the development of Industrilandskapet was considered to be another success factor. This allowed for productive and constructive dialogue between all of the parties involved, and thus creativity was not hampered. As a result, complex challenges could be overcome by means of cooperation and innovative solutions. The next step towards the development of Industrilandskapet is considered to be the addition of housing to the area. Demand for housing in Norrköping had not previously been deemed to be sufficiently high to warrant any significant construction of new residential properties. The population level also declined for a few years in the 1990s, which was naturally not an ideal backdrop for residential construction. However, the city is now growing, partly due to the increase in the number of students. If the city wants to keep these students after they have finished their education, skilled jobs are important but attractive housing also needs to be available. An example of new residential construction is the Katscha project opposite “Strykjärnet” in Industrilandskapet, a project featuring exclusive residential properties designed by Kai Wartiainen together with Ingrid Reppen. Another example is the Lundbergs project involving 400 homes in Industrilandskapet scheduled for competition in 2020. The addition of residential properties to the area has become the final piece of the jigsaw in the development of Industrilandskapet. As one player put it, the area is now “vibrant also in the evenings.” Old meets new. That is how we can describe Industrilandskapet. All in all, the area is a good example of how the conversion of empty industrial buildings can create a brand new area for new purposes based on former factory buildings. There are several successful examples of conversions of former industrial areas, but not all have such an attractive location as Industrilandskapet in Norrköping. However, a common element of the journey from empty premises to new use is that it is usually lined with pitfalls and complex challenges in both the early stages and the development phase. Complex development projects of this type, which are often the case when former industrial areas are converted, require cooperation between the public and private sectors. It is important to focus on a dialogue, to avoid detailed regulations as far as possible and to analyse market and profitability aspects at an early stage and throughout the entire process so that the project favours a willingness to invest and has the ability to be implemented in the market, and so that the addition of new space meets the prevailing demand. FOCUS STOCKHOLM 12 Stockholm 91 Jonas Åkerberg [email protected] The trend in the housing market is starting to accelerate in many locations throughout Stockholm. Tenant-owner associations remain strong buyers with low yield requirements. Transaction activity was also high for commercial properties. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES The largest owners of residential properties in Stockholm are the public-utility housing companies, Familjebostäder, Stockholmshem and Svenska Bostäder, and the private players Einar Mattson, SKB and Wallenstam. The Stockholm region is experiencing significant population growth, thus imposing demands for increased residential construction. In conjunction with the expansion of the metro system, an agreement, based on the Stockholmsförhandlingen, was signed for the construction of approximately 78,000 residential properties along the four new railway line extensions, of which 46,000 will be within the City of Stockholm. In Östermalm, Veidekke is constructing 12 eight-storey buildings. The project is called Svea Fanfar and encompasses a total of 350 exclusive apartments, with the first stage involving 93 apartments. In December, Bulten 23, a 3D-property of 7,800 sqm in Södermalm, was divested for an assessed value of SEK 370 million, corresponding to about SEK 47,500/sqm. The seller was Bonnier Fastigheter and the buyer a tenant-owner association. The yield was confirmed at about 1.8%. COMMERCIAL RENTAL PROPERTIES Some of the major owners of commercial properties are AMF Fastigheter, Atrium Ljungberg, Fabege and Vasakronan. Several large transactions took place in Stockholm in the autumn. AMF acquired the centrally located property Jericho 34 encompassing 21,500 sqm, mainly offices and shops. The purchase price was estimated at about SEK 1.6 billion, corresponding to about SEK 74,500/sqm and an estimated yield of slightly more than 4.5%. In September, the US hotel chain Host Hotels & Resorts made its first purchase in the Nordics with the acquisition of the Snäckan 1 property, more widely known as the Sheraton building. The purchase price was estimated at about SEK 950 million for 22,000 sqm and slightly more than 450 rooms. In Stadshagen in western Kungsholmen, Alecta acquired “Västerport” from CS Euroreal. The building was completed by NCC in 2008 –2009 and is a certified GreenBuilding. The building contains 21,500 sqm of offices. The price was estimated at SEK 800 million, corresponding to SEK 37,000/sqm. SPECIAL-PURPOSE PROPERTIES Major owners of special-purpose properties are Akademiska Hus, Jernhusen and Locum. The new entrance and casualty department at St. Göran’s Hospital will be opened at the start of 2016. The project, which was awarded to Arcona, encompasses 5,050 sqm of gross total area and involves an investment of about SEK 260 million for Locum. Capacity is then expected to be increased by 30,000 patients per year. Akademiska Hus is planning extensive production of new buildings in Albano and the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Campus is also being developed with several projects; for example, detailed development plans are being prepared for 600 student apartment together with KTH. NAI SVEFA PROPERTY INDEX 2014:1 2013:2 2013:1 2012:22012:1 Index 91 91 92 9189 Ranking 1 1 1 11 MARKET DATA, MARCH 2014 Rent (SEK/Sq. m.) OF F I CE Yield % Assessed values (SEK/Sq. m.) AA 3,700 – 5,200 4.25 –5.00 55,000 – 90,000 Primary 2,200 – 4,300 4.75 –5.75 40,000 – 65,000 Secondary 1,600 – 3,200 5.25 –6.75 20,000 – 40,000 Tertiary 5.50 –7.75 9,000 – 25,000 4.50 –6.25 65,000 –150,000 900 – 2,400 R E TAI L AA 2,000 –15,000 Primary 1,500 – 8,000 5.00 –6.75 40,000 –100,000 Secondary 900 – 4,500 5.75 –7.75 25,000 – 45,000 Tertiary 700 – 2,000 6.25 –7.75 10,000 – 25,000 Primary 700 – 1,300 6.50 –8.75 5,000 – 12,000 Secondary 600 – 850 7.00 –8.75 4,500 – 8,000 Tertiary 550 – 850 7.25 –9.00 3,500 – 6,000 AA 1,350 – 2,150 1.50 –4.00 22,000 – 48,000 Primary 1,175 – 2,150 1.50 –4.00 20,000 – 40,000 Secondary 1,075 – 1,675 3.25 –5.25 13,000 – 34,000 Tertiary 4.50 –6.00 8,000 – 28,000 I NDUST R I AL R E SI DE NT I AL 1,050 – 1,400 FOCUS STOCKHOLM 13 Location breakdown, industrial, primarily and secondary locations INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE PROPERTIES The largest owners in the industrial and warehouse properties segment in Stockholm are Brostaden (Castellum), Corem, Fabege, Klövern and Sagax. The sharp population growth is exerting pressure on converting centrally located business and industrial areas to residential properties. In Älvsjö, M2 Gruppen acquired the industrial property Sjöbotten 1 of 41,000 sqm for an assessed value of SEK 450 million. The property contains retail premises, offices and warehouses. Klövern divested the site leasehold for Varmvattnet 3 in Akalla for SEK 180 million after having owned it for only 18 months. The leasehold comprises 15,000 sqm of retail and workshop space. The buyer was I.A. Hedin Fastighet, which also conducts operations in the property. IN FOCUS: ERICSSON/TELEFONPLAN Telefonplan in the urban district of Midsommarkransen in southern Stockholm is home to a large slice of Swedish industrial history. This is where L M Ericsson’s telephone factory opened in 1948, a factory that in its time was considered to be one of the most hightech plants in Sweden. Residential properties were built around the factory and the area surrounding Telefonplan was named LM City. Ericsson no longer has a presence in the area since the company’s last functions started to be relocated at the end of 2009. Prior to that, it had already relocated a large amount of its operations to Kista and the decision in 2002 to move the head office to Kista marked Ericson’s intention to transfer the company to that part of the city. This development followed on from Drott’s acquisition of large parts of Ericsson’s property portfolio in 2000, which primarily included properties in Kista but also at Telefonplan. After Ericsson gradually left Telefonplan, other operations have moved in to the area, and it is now home to, for example, the University College of Arts, Crafts and Design). An extensive city-development project is currently underway in the area, encompassing the three districts of Telefonfabriken, Tvålflingan and Timotejen where about 2,000 new residential properties will be built. As part of one of these projects – The Brick – ALM Equity will convert Ericsson’s old office property into 600 apartments for young people. Other building proprietors at Telefonplan are HSB, JM, Lean Equity, SSM Bygg & Fastighet, Stena Fastigheter and Vasakronan. TRANSACTIONS Object Property type Date 1 Varmvattnet 3 Retail & workshop Jan-14 180,000 2 Jericho 34 Office, retail & residential Dec-13 3 Murmästaren 3 Office 4 Bulten 23 5 Sjöbotten 1 * Purchase price assessed by NAI Svefa Price (SEK ’000) Area (sqm.) Seller Buyer 14,800 Klövern I A Hedin Fastighet 1,600,000 21,500 Allianz AMF Fastigheter Dec-13 490,000 16,100 Balder Vasakronan Residential Dec-13 370,000* 7,800 Bonnier Fastigheter Brf Bulten 12 Retail, office & warehouse Dec-13 450,000* 41,000 AB Stockholm Sjöbotten 1 M2 Gruppen FOCUS GÖTEBORG 14 Göteborg 63 Hans Hurtig [email protected] There was a high pace of production of new residential properties towards late 2013. Several high-profile transactions took place on the commercial market, such as Bäckebol HomeCenter and Platzer’s acquisition in connection with its stock exchange listing in November. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES The municipal property management company, Förvaltnings AB Framtiden, with its subsidiaries, owns the dominant part of residential properties in Gothenburg. Stena Fastigheter, Stiftelsen Göteborgs Studentbostäder, Wallenstam and Willhem hold the bulk of the remaining stock. About 1,000 new residential properties were completed in Gothenburg in the second half of 2013, mainly in Lundby. According to the overall plan, about 1,600 new apartments are to be built around the new transport hub in Gamlestaden. Another housing development area in Göteborg is south of Askim, where the first turf will be cut for the new urban district in Hovås. A total of 1,200 residential properties will be built close to Brottkärrsmotet. According to the City of Göteborg’s Production Plan for 2014–2016, planning work for about 4,800 residential properties will begin during this period. The proposed detailed development plans will mainly create residential properties in Backa, Lundby, Majorna and Krokslätt. 160 centrally located residential properties are planned at Heden. COMMERCIAL RENTAL PROPERTIES The largest owners in the segment are Eklandia (Castellum), the Municipality, Platzer, Vasakronan, Volvo and Wallenstam. Transaction activity in the second half of 2013 increased from a weak year-earlier period. Platzer was active in a couple of large acquisitions prior to its listing in November last year. Centrumhuset, the Tingstadsvassen 3:8 property, at Backaplan was acquired from AxFast in the same month. The building comprises 4,800 sqm of shops and the underlying property value is assessed at about SEK 166 million. The company also acquired the newly developed office property Tennet, Gullbergsvass 5:26, close to the central station, from Skanska. The building has a floor area of about 16,700 sqm. The purchase price was SEK 630 million. One of the transactions that attracted most attention was KF Fastigheter’s sale of seven retail centres throughout Sweden to Starwood Capital Group. The portfolio includes Bäckebol HomeCenter with its 42,500 sqm in northern Hisingen. SPECIAL-PURPOSE PROPERTIES In addition to the Municipality, Akademiska Hus, Chalmersfastigheter, Vasakronan and Västfastigheter are major owners of special-purpose properties in Göteborg. In December 2013, Hemsö acquired the healthcare facility Brämaregården 80:1 in Kvillebäcken. The seller was Tornstaden and the purchase price SEK 90 million, or some 27,000 SEK/sqm. The newly built property includes a health centre, national dental service and a chemist. The Bergsjön health centre will be extended in 2014. A building permit with 3D-property formation has been granted for 1,500 sqm above the existing multi-storey car park. NAI SVEFA PROPERTY INDEX 2014:1 2013:2 2013:1 2012:22012:1 Index 63 61 64 6464 Rating 2 2 2 22 MARKET DATA, MARCH 2014 Rent (SEK/Sq. m.) Yield % Assessed values (SEK/Sq. m.) AA 1,700 – 2,600 5.00 –6.25 18,000 – 40,000 Primary 1,400 – 2,200 5.50 –6.50 11,000 – 35,000 Secondary 1,000 – 2,200 6.25 – 7.25 6,000 – 20,000 Tertiary 650 – 1,600 6.75 – 8.50 4,000 – 13,000 AA 4,000 – 9,000 4.75 – 5.75 30,000 – 95,000 Primary 1,500 – 7,500 5.00 – 6.25 20,000 – 75,000 Secondary 1,000 – 4,000 5.00 – 6.75 10,000 – 27,500 Tertiary 6.25 – 8.00 2,500 – 12,500 OF F I CE R E TAI L 700 – 1,500 I NDUST R I AL Primary 500 – 950 7.00 – 8.25 5,000 – 11,000 Secondary 450 – 700 7.75 – 8.75 4,000 – 8,000 Tertiary 350 – 550 8.25 – 9.25 3,000 – 5,000 AA 1,125 – 1,725 2.75 – 3.75 22,000 – 40,000 Primary 1,075 – 1,675 3.00 – 4.25 16,000 – 35,000 Secondary 1,025 – 1,625 3.50 – 5.25 11,000 – 28,000 Tertiary 4.75 – 7.00 6,500 – 16,000 R E SI DE NT I AL 975 – 1,425 FOCUS GÖTEBORG 15 Location breakdown, industrial, primarily and secondary locations INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE PROPERTIES Eklandia (Castellum), the Municipality of Göteborg and Volvo are the largest owners of industrial and warehouse properties in Göteborg. The number of transactions declined slightly in 2013 compared with the preceding year. In October, Kungsleden acquired two warehouse and retail properties in Högsbo for a price of SEK 56 million, corresponding to about SEK 8,400/sqm. The seller was Wallexia Fastigheter and the largest tenants are Möblera Huset and Elgross´n. Following Kungsleden’s acquisition of a portfolio from GE Capital Real Estate, the company also took over a large stock of industrial properties in Göteborg, primarily situated in the Högsbo industrial area. The total rentable area of these properties in Göteborg is about 47,000 sqm. IN FOCUS: AB VOLVO AB Volvo has a significant presence in Göteborg with its various operations. In total, the company owns properties with a total area for tax purposes of about 1,030,000 sqm, making Volvo the second largest property owner in the Municipality in terms of total area for tax purposes. In addition to the properties utilised by the Parent Company and its subsidiaries, a number of premises are leased to companies such as Volvo Cars, the third largest property owner in the Municipality. AB Volvo has grouped its property portfolio in the subsidiary Volvo Group Real Estate, which accounts for property maintenance, development and workplace service. In 2007, the subsidiary changed its name from Danafjord and its assignment was expanded by the Parent Company to include managing and assuming responsibility for all properties in the Group. The Group is focusing on its core operations, as visible from the sale of operations including Volvo Aero and Volvo Rents. It was announced at AB Volvo’s Capital Market Day in December 2013 that the company was considering divesting its holdings of non-strategic properties. TRANSACTIONS Object Property type Date Price (SEK ’000) Area (sqm.) 1 Nordstaden 33:3 (Hasselbladshuset) Office Dec-13 600,000* 2 Gullbergsvass 5:26 (Tennet) Office Dec-13 3 Bäckebol HomeCenter (part of portfolio) Retail 4 Arendal 764:718 (Arkenhuset) 5 Tingstadsvassen 3:8 (Centrumhuset) * Purchase price assessed by NAI Svefa Seller Buyer 14,700 Credit Suisse Alecta 630,000 16,700 Skanska Platzer Nov-13 3,900,000 205,000 KF Fastigheter Starwood Capital Group Hotel Nov-13 150,000* 12,500 Higab Port of Gothenburg Retail Nov-13 166,000 4,754 AxFast Platzer FOCUS MALMÖ 16 Malmö 47 Per Wieslander [email protected] There is a major focus on investments to develop Malmö into an events city. However, the World Village of Women Sports initiative has been discontinued. In the housing market, interest from tenant-owner associations has risen again. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES The public-utility company, MKB Fastighets AB, is the largest holder of rental residential apartment buildings in Malmö. Akelius, Heimstaden, HSB, Stena Fastigheter and Willhem are other major players in the market. Residential rents in the municipal company MKB will be raised by 1.4% from 1 April. The rent increase is a result of a negotiated agreement with the Swedish Union of Tenants, region southern Skåne. The agreement is valid for two years and entails a 1.6% increase in rents from January 2015. The low rate of inflation and low interest-rate forecasts mean that rent increases can be kept at a lower level than in recent years and, despite this, can reflect expected changes in the utility value. Following a period of low activity by tenant-owner associations, the market has now turned around and the number of conversions has increased slightly in Malmö. Conversions into cooperative apartments primarily took place in the areas around Möllevången, Gamla Staden and in Slottsstaden. Private players are continuing to show considerable interest in smaller units. and businesses in the same environment and for it to become an international centre focusing on women’s sport and health. However, the project has stalled and will now be discontinued. NAI SVEFA PROPERTY INDEX 2014:1 2013:2 2013:1 2012:22012:1 Index 47 48 55 5555 Rating 9 7 5 55 MARKET DATA, MARCH 2014 Rent (SEK/Sq. m.) OF F I CE Yield % Assessed values (SEK/Sq. m.) AA 2,100 – 2,450 5.25 – 6.00 27,000 – 40,000 Primary 1,750 – 2,300 5.75 – 6.50 16,000 – 25,000 Secondary 1,200 – 1,800 6.25 – 7.25 8,000 – 17,000 Major owners of Malmö properties mainly comprising commercial premises are Briggen (Castellum), Stena Fastigheter, Vasakronan and Wihlborgs. Visitor and tourism-based revenue in Malmö has increased by more than 50% over the past ten years. A key reason for this is the extensive investments made in infrastructure, which have improved accessibility, both to Malmö and within the city itself. Another reason is the wider choice of new, attractive premises for meetings, congresses and trade fairs. Malmö is developing into a major events city. The aim is to pursue this further and attract a greater number of large-scale conferences. Several projects are under way to this end, such as the construction of a new concert and congress hall and, in particular, more hotels. In addition to the hotel in Malmö Live, there are two hotel projects in Hyllie, Skanska’s project on Universitetsholmen and the conversion of Skånska Dagbladet’s premises to a hotel. Tertiary 7.50 – 8.50 5,000 – 7,000 5.25 – 5.75 40,000 – 60,000 SPECIAL-PURPOSE PROPERTIES R E SI DE NT I AL COMMERCIAL RENTAL PROPERTIES Folksam, Hemsö, Kungsleden, the County Council and the City of Malmö are major owners of special-purpose properties in Malmö. The multi-billion investment in World Village of Women Sports (WVWS) was discontinued when Malmö University instead decided to move into Kockum’s former vehicle repair shop in Västra Hamnen. One of the underlying ideas of WVWS was to combine sports, education 800 – 1,300 R E TAI L AA 3,500 – 5,500 Primary 3,000 – 4,500 5.50 – 6.25 30,000 – 40,000 Secondary 1,200 – 2,500 6.25 – 7.00 10,000 – 20,000 Tertiary 700 – 1,300 7.25 – 8.50 5,000 – 12,000 Primary 650 – 1,000 7.25 – 8.00 4,000 – 8,500 Secondary 500 – 800 7.75 – 8.75 3,500 – 6,000 Tertiary 400 – 700 8.50 – 9.50 2,750 – 4,000 AA 1,375 – 1,675 3.00 – 3.75 22,000 – 30,000 Primary 1,375 – 1,675 3.25 – 4.50 17,000 – 25,000 Secondary 1,150 – 1,525 4.00 – 5.50 15,000 – 20,000 Tertiary 5.25 – 6.25 9,000 – 13,000 I NDUST R I AL 1,150 – 1,525 FOCUS MALMÖ 17 Location breakdown, industrial, primarily and secondary locations INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE PROPERTIES Briggen (Castellum), Klövern and Wihlborgs are the major owners of industrial and warehouse properties in Malmö. Early in the year, Wihlborgs acquired the property Sunnanå 12:27 in the Municipality of Burlöv just outside Malmö based on a company transaction. The seller was AxFast. The logistics property has a site area of about 53,000 sqm, with a rentable area of about 14,500 sqm. The property contains three buildings – an office block, a terminal and a warehouse. The net purchase price was reportedly SEK 181 million. The buildings were constructed in 2008 and TransFargo is the sole tenant. The Sunnanå area is situated adjacent to the outer ring road and Highway 11, which means that it is considered to be a natural part of the Malmö property market. IN FOCUS: VARVSSTADEN During the 1870s, Kockums Mekaniska Verkstad started to manufacture vessels in the area that is now known as Varvsstaden (“shipyard city”). At its peak, the company had 6,000 employees and was Malmö’s largest employer for a long time. Due to the profitability problems that the Swedish shipyard industry had suffered from in the 1970s and 1980s, the government decided in 1986 to close down the operations. In 2005, Peab acquired the Kockums area and began planning the conversion of the area into 2,000 residential properties and 5,000 new workplaces. Commercial operations can already be found here in the form of companies in the Media Evolution City owned by Wihlborgs and in the form of SVT South, which has been located in the area since 2010. The new production area encompasses a total of about 300,000 sqm and the conversion will take place over the next 20 – 30 years with the vision of the area being completed by 2030. The aim of the transformation of Varvsstaden is for it to be a compact and attractive city district that contributes to the Västra Hamnen area remaining at the forefront of city development. TRANSACTIONS Object Property type Date Price (SEK ’000) Area (sqm.) Seller Buyer 1 Sunnanå 12:27 Industrial & logistics Jan-14 181,000 14,500 AxFast Wilhborgs 2 Värdshuset 3 (+ property in Märsta) Office Dec-13 417,000 11,300 Annehem SPP Fastigheter 3 Rosenborg 1 & 2 Residential Nov-13 105,000 5,165 Private individual Brf Rosenborg 4 Jägersro Center (part of portfolio) Retail Nov-13 3,900,000 205,000 KF Fastigheter Starwood Capital Group 5 Drivan 5 Residential Nov-13 18,250 886 Heimstaden Brf Drivan FOCUS UPPSALA 18 Uppsala 61 Petter Sandberg [email protected] The Municipality has an aggressive target for residential construction. The chances of meeting this target are favourable following the acquisition of the land area in Ulleråker. The office market is also bustling with activity in the form of rentals, acquisitions and projects. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES The city’s public-utility housing companies, Uppsalahem and Rikshem, are the largest owners of residential properties. Other leading players in Uppsala are the private property owners Heimstaden, HSB and Stena Fastigheter. In recent years, Uppsala has grown by about 3,000 – 4,000 inhabitants per year, an increase that the Municipality expects to continue in the future. The Municipality’s updated target is to build 3,000 apartments per year. Several city-development projects have been initiated to meet this demand. The Municipality signed an agreement to acquire a 774,000 sqm land site in Ulleråker from Uppsala County Council in 2014. The transactions amounts to just over SEK 1.8 billion and will enable construction of about 6,000 – 8,000 apartments, of which 30% will be rental units and the remainder cooperative apartments. The money that the County Council will receive from the sale will, in turn, be used to part-finance the remodelling and new build of the university hospital. COMMERCIAL RENTAL PROPERTIES The largest owners of commercial rental property in Uppsala are Aspholmen (Castellum), Atrium Ljungberg, Klövern, Storebrand, Uppsala Akademiförvaltning and Vasakronan. A slight increase in rental levels has been noted for offices in recent years due to weak rises in demand, particularly for modern and centrally located properties. Klövern continued to consolidate its position in Uppsala through both rentals and acquisitions. In November, it was announced that the company was to acquire two centrally located office and retail properties from Aspholmen. The total rentable area is about 10,700 sqm, with the Willys supermarket as the largest tenant. The Municipality of Uppsala announced that Skanska Sweden together with Utopia Arkitekter had won the competition for land allocation for the Resenären office project and the immediately surrounding area in Uppsala transport hub. The aim is to create both the most sustainable office building in the Nordic countries and a new profile building. SPECIAL-PURPOSE PROPERTIES Akademiska Hus, the Municipality, the County Council and Vasakronan are the largest owners in the special-purpose properties segment. The expansion of the university has meant that its administration is spread over several locations in the city. Accordingly, the university intends, together with Akademiska Hus, to construct a new administration building in the Plantskolan district, with Uppsala Castle and the botanic gardens as its closest neighbours. The building will primarily be used for office and administration purposes, but will also house teaching and service premises. The detailed development plan has not yet gained legal force. NAI SVEFA PROPERTY INDEX 2014:1 2013:2 2013:1 2012:22012:1 Index 61 59 61 6057 Rating 3 3 3 33 MARKET DATA, MARCH 2014 Rent (SEK/Sq. m.) OF F I CE Primary Yield % Assessed values (SEK/Sq. m.) 1,100 – 2,500 5.25 – 6.75 10,500 – 23,000 Secondary 900 – 1,600 6.00 – 7.50 7,000 – 14,000 Tertiary 700 – 1,100 6.25 – 7.75 5,000 – 9,000 2,200 – 4 500 4.75 – 6.00 15,000 – 41,000 Secondary 800 – 3,600 5.25 – 7.00 7,000 – 17,000 Tertiary 700 – 1,200 6.50 – 7.50 5,000 – 10,000 Primary 550 – 1,000 6.00 – 7.50 4,000 – 8,000 Secondary 450 – 750 6.50 – 8.00 3,500 – 5,500 Tertiary 350 – 550 7.00 – 8.25 1,500 – 4,000 1,025 – 1,625 3.25 – 4.50 12,000 – 23,500 Secondary 1,025 – 1,425 3.25 – 5.50 10,000 – 16,500 Tertiary 5.25 – 6.75 7,000 – 11,000 R E TAI L Primary I NDUST R I AL R E SI DE NT I AL Primary 1,025 – 1,425 FOCUS UPPSALA 19 Location breakdown, industrial, primarily and secondary locations INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE PROPERTIES Major owners in the segment are Aspholmen (Castellum), Fresenius, Klövern and the Municipality of Uppsala. The overall plan allows for the city to become more concentrated with the central industrial areas converted to housing areas and industry being relocated to the outskirts of the city. Transaction activity remains low. Most sales have involved smaller units in established industrial areas. RSSA Fastigheter acquired an industrial property in Librobäck for just over SEK 12 million in October. The demand for modern warehouse and logistics premises is high. In December, Klövern signed a seven-year lease with Ica Fastigheter for the construction of a 2,700 sqm transhipment terminal in Fyrislund. The rental value is SEK 39 million. IN FOCUS: PHARMACIA/UPPSALA BUSINESS PA RK Pharmacia was a large Swedish pharmaceutical company that in its heyday was one of the largest employers in Uppsala. The company was founded in 1911 in Stockholm, but moved to Uppsala in 1951 to expand and be closer to the university. Pharmacia, which was listed through its Parent Company Fortia in 1969, had its head office, research and production in Uppsala for many years However, this all changed when state-owned Procordia bought the company and merged it with an industry colleague, and the head office was relocated to Stockholm. The operations in Uppsala started to be divested following another merger, this time with Upjohn. Instead, the head office now moved to London and two years later to New York. In 2002, the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer bought Pharmacia for USD 60 billion and the final parts of the operations were sold. In 2006, Pfizer sold the remaining about 55,000 sqm property, which at the time had an occupancy rate of nearly 50%, for SEK 225 million to Klövern and Pfizer was also asked to vacate its premises no later than 2009. In spite of its problems, Klövern succeeded in finding tenants for large parts of the premises. A number of tenants are pharmaceutical companies started by Pharmacia employees or spun off from Pharmacia. TRANSACTIONS Object Property type Date 1 Kronåsen 3:1 Undeveloped land* Mar-14 1,835,000 774,000 2 Kvarngärdet 56:9 Undeveloped land* Nov-13 31,000 3 Svartbäcken 19:1 Retail, warehouse & sport Oct-13 4 Fyrislund 6:2 Retail 5 Dragarbrunn 6:2 Retail & residential * Residential properties Price (SEK ’000) Area (sqm.) Seller Buyer Uppsala County Council Uppsala Municipality 1,530 NCC Brf Klaviaturen 30,790 2,970 Svartbäcken 19:1 KB Tunabackar Utveckling Oct-13 206,000 22,000 Sep-13 15,000 1,260 Fyrislund-Fastigheten KB Fastighetsaktiebolaget Hermius 14 Private individual Kvalitetsbostäder Uppsala FOCUS LINKÖPING 20 Linköping 48 Elenore Pellams [email protected] Transaction activity in Linköping has generally been low recently. However, Rikshem made its first purchase in the city, a healthcare and elderly care facility. Corallen is planning on developing retail facilities in Djurgården. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES Major owners of residential properties in Linköping are the municipal-owned Stångåstaden with a holding of about 320 properties and a residential area slightly exceeding 1,120,000 sqm. Other large owners are Botrygg, HSB, Hyresbostäder i Sverige, Mannersons Fastighets AB, Riksbyggen and Willhem. Transaction volumes have been low since mid-year 2013, with only a few sales of residential properties. The buyers and sellers have mainly been private individuals and the properties were mainly smaller units with a rentable area of less than 400 sqm. A package of four properties in Möjetorp in the southern parts of the area was sold in August last year. The transaction took place between two private individuals for a purchase price of SEK 15.7 million, corresponding to about SEK 7,200/sqm. In 2013, nearly 600 residential properties were added to Linköping, of which about 70% were rental units; a year-on-year increase of about 35%. COMMERCIAL RENTAL PROPERTIES The major players in the commercial rental market in Linköping are Corallen (Castellum), Garnisonsfastigheter, Henry Ståhl, Ikano, Klövern, the Municipality, Lilium, Lundbergs and Sankt Kors. In October 2013, Corallen purchased the Jägmästaren 1 property in Djurgården, which contains a development right for retail and parking premises. In total, Corallen intends to build about 12,000 sqm of retail premises and some 400 parking spaces. Citygross has already been confirmed as a tenant for 7,000 sqm. The property is to be certified Miljöbyggnad and occupancy is scheduled for spring 2015. Land conditions in the area require additional foundation work. The purchase price was about SEK 17.8 million, about SEK 400/sqm. In November 2013, Klövern sold the Epåletten 14 property along Nygatan in what is deemed to be a primary location for offices. The largest tenant is the Östergötland County Council. The purchase price was some SEK 27 million, corresponding to about SEK 16,900/sqm. The yield is estimated at about 5.7%. SPECIAL-PURPOSE PROPERTIES The largest owner of special-purpose properties in Linköping is the Municipality of Linköping via the subsidiary Lejonfastigheter. Akademiska Hus, Botrygg, Hemsö and the County Council are also major owners of special-purpose properties. Rikshem acquired Idrottsplatsen 1 in September 2013, which was the company’s first acquisition in Linköping. The seller was HSB Östergötland. The property comprises just over 2,400 sqm of healthcare and elderly care facilities with 44 apartments, and is fully leased to the Municipality of Linköping. A new activity park for young people will be built in Södra Ekkällan in 2014. NAI SVEFA PROPERTY INDEX 2014:1 2013:2 2013:1 2012:22012:1 Index 48 45 50 4748 Rating 7 9 8107 MARKET DATA, MARCH 2014 Rent (SEK/Sq. m.) OF F I CE Primary Yield % Assessed values (SEK/Sq. m.) 1,200 – 1,700 6.00 – 7.00 8,000 – 17,000 Secondary 900 – 1,550 6.75 – 7.75 5,000 – 9,000 Tertiary 600 – 900 7.75 – 9.00 3,000 – 5,500 2,000 – 5,000 5.50 – 6.75 15,000 – 40,000 Secondary 1,000 – 5,000 6.50 – 8.25 6,000 – 15,000 Tertiary 600 – 1,100 8.25 – 10.00 3,000 – 8,000 Primary 400 – 700 7.50 – 9.25 3,000 – 7,500 Secondary 350 – 550 8.25 – 10.00 2,500 – 4,500 Tertiary 300 – 450 9.50 – 11.00 1,800 – 3,500 1,100 – 1,450 4.00 – 5.25 10,000 – 21,000 Secondary 1,100 – 1,350 4.50 – 5.75 7,000 – 16,000 Tertiary 5.75 – 6.75 5 500 – 10,000 R E TAI L Primary I NDUST R I AL R E SI DE NT I AL Primary 1,050 – 1,325 FOCUS LINKÖPING 21 Location breakdown, industrial, primarily and secondary locations INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE PROPERTIES In Linköping, Saab is a major owner of industrial property holding about 220,000 sqm. Cloetta, Klövern, the Municipality of Linköping and Scan are also key property owners. Transaction volumes for industrial properties are usually low, as was the case again in 2013. Prices vary between SEK 1,500 and 6,700/sqm. One of the larger properties sold since mid-year 2013 is Grynnan 10 in Tornby, a small industrial property encompassing about 2,600 sqm. The property was sold for SEK 14.1 million, about SEK 5,400/sqm. The seller was a private individual and the buyer Hammer Property. The telecom company Ericsson is investing in the construction of two data centres for research and development, one of which will be in Mjärdevi. IN FOCUS: SAAB AEROSPACE The defence group Saab is the second largest property owner in Linköping after the Municipality in terms of total area for tax purposes, and is the largest in terms of tax assessed industrial area with about 289,000 and 220,000 sqm, respectively, in the Tannefors 1:107 property. The property is situated in Tannefors and forms a large area. The site area is about 3,200,000 sqm and, apart from Saab’s operations, it also houses Linköping City Airport. The airport is owned by Saab but the Municipality is responsible for the commercial operations according to an agreement from 2011. In December 2013, Municipality of Linköping took a further step in taking over the operations of the airport when the municipal company Sankt Kors acquired the terminal building and a land area for car parks from Saab. A new 11,000 sqm office building for about 750 employees is now being built for Saab on the property. Occupancy is scheduled for summer 2014. Further expansion for Saab in the future is possible if Brazil’s purchase of new fighter aircraft goes ahead. This could lead to increased production and more employees for Saab. TRANSACTIONS Object Property type Date Price (SEK ’000) Area (sqm.) 1 Epåletten 14 Office 2 Grynnan 10 Nov-13 27,000 16,000 Industrial & office Oct-13 14,100 2,623 3 Jägmästaren 1 Development right* Oct-13 17,800 44,400 4 Idrottsplatsen 1 Care Sep-13 Unknown 2,400 HSB Östergötland Rikshem Aug-13 15,700 2,000 Private individual Private individual 5 Portfolio of 4 residential properties Residential * Commercial Seller Buyer Klövern Unknown Private individual Hammer Property Municipality of Linköping Corallen FOCUS HELSINGBORG 22 Helsingborg 51 Charlotte Pettersson [email protected] Several key housing trends are noticeable in Helsingborg. In the office market, new production is taking place in Berga and an extension of Knutpunkten is planned, two welcome additions of modern premises to the Helsingborg market. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES Major players in the housing market are municipal-owned Helsingborgshem, Akelius, Rikshem and Wallenstam. Wallenstam has several residential property projects in progress. The company has been allocated land of about 14,300 sqm in gross total area at Maria Station and one of the company’s major projects was initiated at Ringstorpshöjden in October. The project will result in 200 apartments and is scheduled for completion in late 2015. Riksbyggen recently completed a cooperative apartment project in the same area. However, the sale of the final remaining apartments is progressing slowly. The consequence of a high number of ongoing residential projects in the city is that several building proprietors have chosen to reduce project volumes in future residential property projects, or to postpone them or even completely abandon their development plans. In Ringstorp, JM has decided to postpone a rental unit project, while HSB has pulled out of a project that was to result in almost 200 cooperative apartments. Peab has chosen to halve the project volume of its residential-property project on Filbornavägen. COMMERCIAL RENTAL PROPERTIES Briggen (Castellum), Diligentia, Ikea Fastigheter, Norrporten and Wihlborgs are the main players in the commercial properties segment. Wihlborgs will begin the enlargement project at the Knutpunkten station building in the spring. This project will add about 10,000 sqm of office space to the Helsingborg market and the first round of occupancy is planned for the end of 2015. Wihlborgs has also commenced construction of Berga Tower, an eight-storey office building in the Berga business area. The building will contain about 4,800 sqm of rentable area and the first four storeys have already been leased. These projects are welcome additions to the Helsingborg office market since the need for modern office premises is great, particularly in central locations. The consequences of growing online shopping and the expansion of Väla out-of-town shopping centre can start to be seen in the shops in the city centre, where the Söder urban district, in particular, has suffered from lower sales and increased vacancies. SPECIAL-PURPOSE PROPERTIES Major owners of public properties are the City of Helsingborg, the County Council, Vita Falken and Wihlborgs. Municipal company Kärnfastigheter began the extension of the Fullriggaren care facility at Råån in southern Helsingborg in 2013 A new building of 36 care apartments will be built together with the existing care facility. Occupancy is scheduled for the summer. Region Skåne has applied for a change in the detailed development plan regarding the hospital area. The change involves a development right for a new building comprising 35,000 – 40,000 sqm of care facilities and offices. NAI SVEFA PROPERTY INDEX 2014:1 2013:2 2013:1 2012:22012:1 Index 51 50 54 5051 Rating 6 6 6 76 MARKET DATA, MARCH 2014 Rent (SEK/Sq. m.) OF F I CE Primary Yield % Assessed values (SEK/Sq. m.) 1,400 – 2,000 6.50 – 7.00 12,000 – 17,000 Secondary 900 – 1,500 7.00 – 8.25 7,000 – 10,000 Tertiary 800 – 1,100 8.00 – 9.00 4,500 – 7,000 2,750 – 4,000 6.00 – 7.00 28,000 – 37,000 Secondary 1,200 – 2,000 7.00 – 8.00 9,000 – 14,000 Tertiary R E TAI L Primary 600 – 900 7.50 – 9.00 4,000 – 8,000 Primary 500 – 800 7.50 – 8.50 3,500 – 7,500 Secondary 400 – 600 7.75 – 9.25 2,500 – 4,500 Tertiary 350 – 550 8.75 – 10.00 1,500 – 3,000 1,150 – 1,525 3.50 – 4.50 16,000 – 25,000 Secondary 1,150 – 1,525 3.75 – 4.75 8,000 – 15,000 Tertiary 5.25 – 7.25 5,000 – 9,000 I NDUST R I AL R E SI DE NT I AL Primary 1,000 – 1,525 FOCUS HELSINGBORG 23 Location breakdown, industrial, primarily and secondary locations INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE PROPERTIES Major players in the warehouse and industrial property segment are Briggen (Castellum), Kemira Kemi and Wihlborgs. The warehouse and logistics segment is continuing to expand in the Helsingborg property market. Logistic Contractor has been commissioned by Ica Fastigheter to construct an extension encompassing 44,000 sqm of high bay warehouse adjacent to its existing central warehouse. The total area of the plan will be 100,000 sqm once it is completed. In September, JE Group sold an office and office property at Berga for the equivalent of SEK 8,800/sqm. Instead, JE Group intends to invest in the new property-construction project at Väla Södra where there are plans to build 9,000 sqm of office and warehouse premises over the next few years. IN FOCUS: IKEA Ikea, which was founded in Älmhult in Småland, has two large offices in Sweden. The largest office is situated in Älmhult, but the Swedish head office is in Helsingborg. The Helsingborg office is located in a property called Sockerbruket in the central parts of the city. The property, which is designated Castor and Pollux 1, has an area for tax purposes of about 8,700 sqm and was acquired from the Municipality in 2003 for SEK 15 million when the company relocated its office from Helsingør in Denmark. IKEA also owns a store at Väla in Helsingborg comprising about 38,000 sqm. The company’s IT department is also located in the city, but in premises leased by Alecta. The IT department will move into Sockerbruket when the head office relocates to Svågertorp in Malmö in 2015. Some 400 will be affected when the company moves its global support functions to a new building next to the Ikea store. Two of the reasons for the move away from Helsingborg is that the company wants a larger recruitment base and wants to be close to Copenhagen’s Kastrup Airport. TRANSACTIONS Object Property type Date Price (SEK ’000) Area (sqm.) Seller Buyer Wihlborgs Elite Hotell Skåne County Council Lönnbacken 1 Terminalen 2 site (leasehold) Hotel Jan-14 318,000 13,213 2 Sippan 33 Care Dec-13 8,000 732 3 Skrinnaren 2 Residential Nov-13 19,800 1,597 Private individuals Skrinnaren 4 Ridskolan 3 Residential Oct-13 110,000 8,765 Hyreshem Helsingborg Stenbocken 5 Skäran 1 Development right* Oct-13 16,800 14,300 Municipality of Helsingborg Wallenstam * Residential properties FOCUS JÖNKÖPING 24 Jönköping 54 Per Skrealid [email protected] VätterHem is an active building proprietor in locations such as Strandängen, which is a key development area. Development of the commercial premises at Atollen is continuing. Property developers are showing considerable interest in the conversion area of Södra Munksjön. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES Municipal-owned Vätterhem is the largest player in the Jönköping housing market. Other large owners include Brandtornet, CA Fastigheter, Din Bostad (Balder), Ekblads, HSB, Jönköpings Bygginvest, Lundbergs, Lustgården, the M2 Group and Wilhelm. Jönköping has had a housing shortage for many years. Skanska, working on assignment from VätterHem, has commenced work on the first stage of 4-8-storey buildings containing 80 apartments in the new residential area Strandängen on Lake Vättern. The contract is worth about SEK 145 million. Skanska has the option of additional stages in the area, with a total of nine apartment buildings with about 100 apartments and 15 town houses. The area will comprise a total of 700 apartments. At the start of the year, NCC began work on an eight-storey building containing 32 rental units with a view over Lake Vättern, also on contract from VätterHem. The order value is about SEK 39 million. At Norra Munksjön, where Jönköping Castle once stood, VätterHem is constructing a six-storey tower block and 34 rental units. In connection with this project, Riksbyggen is building 28 cooperative apartments. COMMERCIAL RENTAL PROPERTIES The local market is dominated by such players as Alecta, Corallen (Castellum), Ekblads, Lundbergs, Norrporten and Tosito. HSB Göta purchased Vinkelhaken 6 from Epab. The property is situated in Österängen, has 10,000 sqm of rentable area and is essentially fully leased to about ten tenants. The property is near the E4 motorway and will potentially be HSB Göta’s future head office. The two first stages of Atollen are being completed. The 110 cooperative apartments and rental units have essentially all been sold or leased. The commercial premises, comprising about 3,000 sqm of office and 13,000 sqm of retail space with some 30 stores, are in the process of being leased. In March, Skandia will move its regional office to Atollen. Other tenants include Wetterhälsan’s new healthcare facility, the first Best of Brands store outside Stockholm, Team Sportia and the Kronan chemist. Building proprietors are Corallen, Ekblads, HSB Göta and the Municipality of Jönköping. The entire project will be completed in 2015. SPECIAL-PURPOSE PROPERTIES Jönköping University properties, the County Council, Månsarps Förvaltning and Norrporten are major owners of special-purpose properties. In September 2013, Rikshem purchased the Lärlingen 9 property from HSB Gambrinus, a 4,200 sqm property comprising healthcare and elderly care premises constructed in 1991. This is Rikshem’s first acquisition in Jönköping. Jönköping Energi has commissioned Peab to construct a new office building and measurement station adjacent to the combined heating power plant at Torsvik. The contract is valued at SEK 101 million and encompasses 7,300 sqm. The building is scheduled for completion in November. NAI SVEFA PROPERTY INDEX 2014:1 2013:2 2013:1 2012:22012:1 Index 54 55 52 5148 Rating 4 4 7 67 MARKET DATA, MARCH 2014 Rent (SEK/Sq. m.) OF F I CE Primary Yield % Assessed values (SEK/Sq. m.) 1,300 – 2,000 6.00 – 7.00 12,000 – 18,000 Secondary 700 – 1,500 6.75 – 8.50 6,000 – 13,000 Tertiary 800 – 1,200 7.50 – 9.00 4,000 – 8,000 5.50 – 7.00 15,000 – 40,000 R E TAI L Primary 1,500 – 4,500 Secondary 800 – 1,800 6.25 – 8.00 7,000 – 15,000 Tertiary 500 – 1,100 7.00 – 9.00 3,000 – 9,000 Primary 400 – 750 6.75 – 8.50 3,000 – 8,000 Secondary 350 – 600 8.00 – 10.00 2,500 – 6,000 Tertiary 300 – 550 8.25 – 10.00 1,750 – 4,500 Primary 925 – 1,375 3.50 – 4.50 12,000 – 24,000 Secondary 875 – 1,325 4.00 – 5.00 10,000 – 19,000 Tertiary 800 – 1,225 4.50 – 6.00 7,000 – 12,000 I NDUST R I AL R E SI DE NT I AL FOCUS JÖNKÖPING 25 Location breakdown, industrial, primarily and secondary locations INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE PROPERTIES Corallen (Castellum), Husqvarna and Ikea are the major owners of industrial and warehouse properties in Jönköping. Jönköping has one of the better logistics locations in Sweden. The market has been stable for many years but there are now some vacant areas. The Torsvik logistics area has been supplemented with Stigamo in the south, with access to the E4 motorway. In Jönköping, several transactions took place in the conversion area of Södra Munksjön. The city’s property developers have shown widespread interest in the area and several property owners have made sales and are instead developing their operations to other industrial areas, such as Torsvik and Österängen. Most acquisitions took place via company purchases at prices of SEK 7,000-13,000/sqm and yields of less than 7%. IN FOCUS: HUSQVARNA Much of the listed engineering group Husqvarna Group’s product development and production is located in Huskvarna. The company is the largest private employer in the Municipality with about 1,590 employees at year-end 2012. It is also one of the largest property owners in the Municipality of Jönköping in terms of area for tax purposes, owning about 160,000 sqm. Like many other industrial companies, Husqvarna has faced a shift from a production to a services society in the West and cost pressure from other parts of the world. This trend has also had an immense impact on the property portfolio since production efficiency continuously needs to be enhanced to meet the external competition. An example of this is when Husqvarna announced at the end of 2012 that it was to cut personnel in Huskvarna by 300 due to the market situation, which followed relocation of parts of production in Huskvarna to Poland. In conjunction with the move to Poland, parts of the operations that were previously situated in Tandsbyn were relocated to Huskvarna. However, the opposite trend is now emerging with insourcing operations in parts of the West, meaning when a company starts producing something that a sub-supplier previously did. An example is when Husqvarna announced in spring 2013 that it was to start proprietary production of power saw chains and was therefore investing a total of about SEK 1.0 billion to this end. The relocation also means that about 100 new jobs will be created. TRANSACTIONS Object Property type Date 1 Vattenpasset 6 Industrial Jan-14 12,000 2,209 2 Vinkelhaken 6 Office & retail Dec-13 70,000 – 80,000* 10,040 3 Överdraget 8 Industrial Nov-13 22,000 4 Vägporten 2 Industrial Oct-13 5 Lärlingen 9 Care & elderly care Sep-13 * Purchase price assessed by NAI Svefa Price (SEK ’000) Area (sqm.) Seller Buyer Karlströms Fstg i Jönköping Corallen EPAB HSB Göta Holding 3,300 Överdraget i Jönköping Municipality of Jönköping 21,000 3,000 AB Rydheims Tryckeri Ell-Eff Fastigheter 45,000 – 55,000* 4,200 HSB Gambrinus Rikshem FOCUS UMEÅ 26 Umeå 47 Martina Gustavsson [email protected] The need for new residential properties in Umeå is extensive. There has been considerable activity in the retail segment, with the opening of Utopia and the forthcoming establishment of IKEA at Söderslätt. The new culture centre, Kulturväven, will be completed during 2014. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES The municipal housing company Bostaden manages almost half of the rental apartments in Umeå. The largest private player is Lerstenen. Other players with significant portfolios are Akelius, Diös, Franklin Fastigheter and Umehem. The need to build more residential properties to meet the population growth in Umeå is extensive. The municipal housing company Bostaden’s housing queues indicate waiting times of about eight to ten years for a two-bedroom apartment in central parts of the city. The family-owned property company Mofab will complete 56 rental units in the Vaktposten district during the spring. Lerstenen, with Forspro as part owner, has obtained a building permit for 119 apartments at Sandåkern and 64 apartments on the southern side of Lake Nydalasjön at Tomtebo. Lerstenen has also acquired two sites close to the city centre where plans are in place for an additional 130 apartments. Sales of town houses on the roof of the Forsete district have started. These town houses are being developed by Balticgruppen and are being sold as condominiums. Occupancy is scheduled for the autumn. COMMERCIAL RENTAL PROPERTIES own the new public baths in the Nanna district. The approximately 12,000 sqm swimming centre is scheduled for completion at yearend 2015. Umeå’s new culture centre along the quay, Kulturväven, is taking shape and will be completed by year-end. The project will comprise 25,000 sqm and is being conducted by Väven in Umeå, which is owned by the Municipality of Umeå and Balticgruppen. NAI SVEFA PROPERTY INDEX Index 47 45 50 5047 Rating 9 9 8 79 MARKET DATA, MARCH 2014 Rent (SEK/Sq. m.) OF F I CE Primary Yield % Assessed values (SEK/Sq. m.) 1,200 – 2,000 6.50 – 7.75 11,000 – 19,000 Secondary 950 – 1,400 7.25 – 8.00 8,000 – 12,000 Tertiary 750 – 950 8.25 – 9.25 4,000 – 8,000 2,000 – 3,800 6.25 – 7.00 20,000 – 30,000 Secondary 900 – 2,000 6.50 – 7.50 8,000 – 20,000 Tertiary 700 – 1,100 7.25 – 8.25 4,500 – 8,000 Primary 450 – 750 7.50 – 9.00 4,000 – 8,000 Secondary 400 – 700 7.75 – 9.50 2,000 – 5,000 Tertiary 350 – 650 8.00 – 10.00 1,500 – 4,500 1,000 – 1 550 4.25 – 5.50 12,000 – 25,000 Secondary 900 – 1,400 5.25 – 6.00 9,000 – 16,000 Tertiary 850 – 1,100 5,75 – 6,75 7,000 – 12 000 Property owners holding significant portfolios are Balticgruppen, Diös, Gazette, Lerstenen, Norrporten and Umehem. New retail establishments and healthy growth are contributing to a strong construction boom. It has now been confirmed that Ikea will open at Söderslätts Retail Park, with construction scheduled to commence in the summer. A shopping centre with about 70 new shops, supermarkets and a hamburger restaurant is also planned in the area. The Utopia shopping centre in central Umeå opened in September 2013 with shops and restaurants, and Lidl opened a store at Ålidhem in December 2013. These establishments are resulting in increased retail competition in Umeå, but also a greater choice, and thus contributing to a more attractive shopping city. Although the rental market for offices in Umeå is relatively stable, the forecast predicts increasing vacancies for older offices in less attractive areas. The range of central office premises is expected to rise and the trend is that companies are moving to modern and space-efficient promises in prime locations. SPECIAL-PURPOSE PROPERTIES Primary Significant players in the segment are Akademiska Hus, Akelius, Bäckbacka, Gazette, the County Council and the Municipality. Umeå Badhus is a municipal company that was founded to construct and 2014:1 2013:2 2013:1 2012:22012:1 R E TAI L Primary I NDUST R I AL R E SI DE NT I AL FOCUS UMEÅ 27 Location breakdown, industrial, primarily and secondary locations INDUSTRIAL AND WAREHOUSE PROPERTIES The largest owners in the segment are Kungsleden, Norrmejerier, SCA and Volvo. A player that has invested heavily in Umeå is NP3 Fastigheter. The first investment was the Kedjan 6 property, a showroom comprising about 1,350 sqm of customised space for Porsche. The purchase price is based on a property value of about SEK 20 million. Another five properties were subsequently acquired in Umeå last year. The company has also signed an agreement with Skanska regarding the sale of the Cisternen 1 property for an underlying property value of SEK 88.5 million. Skanska will be a tenant in the property that will be about 4,000 sqm when the rebuilding and extension work has been completed. Occupancy is scheduled for December 2015. IN FOCUS: VOLVO TRUCKS Volvo Trucks is the largest property owner in Umeå in terms of taxable industrial area since the company owns the Böleå 1:77 property with about 146,000 sqm of industrial premises and other premises comprising about 7,000 sqm. The plant is one of the largest manufacturing industries in Norrland and Volvo is also the largest private employer in the Municipality with about 2,000 employees. Like many other companies, Volvo is focusing on its core business and, partly for this reason, the company decided at the end of 2013 to close its cabin assembly operations in Umeå and relocate them to Göteborg where a large part of truck manufacturing already takes place. This means that the workforce is expected to be cut by 500 employees, while the plant will specialise in sheet-metal pressing, welding and painting for cabins. The relocation of cabin production will take place over a two-year period and it is not yet clear whether it will mean that the buildings on the property will be converted. A disadvantage of the Volvo plant in Umeå is its geographic location far away from other Volvo plants and the markets in which trucks are sold. TRANSACTIONS Object Property type Date Price (SEK ’000) Area (sqm.) 1 Cisternen 1 Office 2 Kyrkstugan 8 Residential Jan-14 88,500 4,000 Dec-13 6,090 370 3 Spänningen 5 Industrial & warehouse Nov-13 9,000* 1,686 4 Jagaren 9 Residential Sep-13 5,500 5 Långmyran 13 Residential Sep-13 6,800 * Purchase price assessed by NAI Svefa Seller Buyer Skanska NP3 Fastigheter URT Fastigheter Mål och Vision i Sverige North Investors NP3 Fastigheter 433 Private individual Private individual 540 Forsgrens Fastighetsförvaltning Longmire Fast ABOUT SWEDISH PROPERTY MARKET 50 About Swedish Property Market Swedish Property Market Focus on Eight Cities was first published in autumn 2009 and has since been issued twice annually. In 2011, the Swedish Property Market report series was supplemented by the Focus on Forest Properties report, which is issued annually, with the latest edition being released in April 2014. Swedish Property Market Focus on Eight Cities spring 2014 contains analyses and data on eight submarkets in Sweden and on assessed values in March 2014. A table of assessed values is available for each local area. The criteria for the division into the various sub-markets has been based on the area’s yield in addition to rental and price levels; in other words, an assessment of the attractiveness of the property market. Several sub-markets with the same location assessment can occur in the same municipality and also at the same or somewhat varying levels. Market information for each city and local area is categorised at minimum and maximum levels. The purpose of the division into these levels is to illustrate a normal distribution in which most of the entries are distributed. The minimum level reflects an average of the lower entries; in other words, it does not pertain to the very lowest entries. Similarly, the maximum level reflects the average of the higher quotations. The table contains detailed market information on the following local categories: office, retail, industry and residential. For residential properties, residential properties are defined as properties with type code 320 or 321, whereby the portion accounted for by commercial premises is less than 30% of the total area. For residential properties, the levels for buildings pertain to value years from 1990 through 2008 or an equivalent standard. A residential apartment is defined as an apartment with three rooms and a kitchen, of around 75 – 80 square metres, with a normal standard for the age category. Retail and office properties are defined as properties with type code 325. Retail premises are defined as business premises of about 200 square metres located at street level. The retail area accounts for about 75% of the total area. The standard is normal for retail premises built during the past decade. Office premises are defined as premises of about 150 – 300 square metres. Standard and space efficiency are normal for an office built during the past decade. Industrial properties are defined as production premises with about 400 – 1,000 square metres of premises of a standard that is normal for a building erected some time in the past 15 years. Ceiling height is around 4.0 – 4.5 metres. For industrial properties, the area must also include (in addition to the manufacturing or warehouse premises) appropriate office and staff areas. Stated utility value/market rent levels for the various property types in the area are given as rent plus heating and water bills for residential, retail and offices, and as rent without heating for industrial properties. Rent for premises is set according to a “normal rental contract”, which means that it does not include property tax. Should the normal market situation reflect discounts, this is taken into account in the rent level. For each area, there is a map showing the location breakdown for industrial premises, where the red area shows the primary locations, light red the secondary locations while the remainder are tertiary locations. n n The NAI Svefa Property Index has been produced to provide players in the Swedish property market with an indicator offering a basis for successful investment decisions. The index is a ranking system for property markets in the local areas, where the basis for analysis consists of official municipal statistics, investment data from the relevant property market and NAI Svefa’s own assessments and indicators. Ten parameters have been assessed on a scale of 0 to 10, which provide for a maximum score on the NAI Svefa Property Index of 100. RUBRIK A Svensk Fastighetsmarknad – Fokus Skog 2013 ABOUT NAI SVEFA 51 About NAI Svefa NAI Svefa offers cutting-edge competencies and professional advice in valuation, analysis, community planning, property development, transactions & leasing, property information and forest properties & farms. Our clients range from large property companies, investors, construction companies and banks to smaller local players in the property market and the public sector. They all appreciate our combination of property expertise and business intelligence. With strong local presence, membership of the international NAI Global network and access to proprietary, market-leading information systems, our consultation is based on extensive knowledge of local, regional and global property markets. ANALYSIS AND ADVICE With local market presence throughout Sweden, out accumulated expertise and the market’s best databases, we offer expert consultation and comprehensive analyses that shed light on new business opportunities and provide decision support for your operations. What does the business analysis for the customer’s property company look like? What markets should the customer focus on? Should the property holdings be changed? What actions would maximise the total return? Is the customer’s management and organisation effective? Is the customer paying the right tax for his property? What development right content creates the best potential in respect of the customer’s development properties? – Our analyses will show the choices available, while also providing advice on the route the customer should take. VALUATION We are Sweden’s leading appraisal firm and have more than 30 property appraisers who value all types of objects and property portfolios. Combined with the best geographic coverage in the market and databases that are totally unbiased, we offer a comprehensive overview of the Swedish property market. The systems we use for property extracts, property searches and local price information are so well developed that we also sell them to banks, credit institutions and major property owners. NAI Svefa is also Sweden’s only nation-wide independent appraiser of forest properties and farms. Our appraisals are frequently used as documentation in legal situations, negotiations and for credit grants. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY PLANNING We take concepts and visions through the detailed planning and implementation phases, and act as strategic advisors and project managers throughout the entire planning and implementation phases on behalf of both private individuals and municipal actors. We have long experience of handling political processes and working with the support of and in dialogue with concerned parties. We work together with government agencies, municipalities, private developers and property owners, thus providing us with an understanding of the perspective of all the parties involved. This enables us to offer an efficient and quality-assured process for all the parties concerned. With our solid expertise in Swedish property law as a foundation, we provide property-registration services that add value to property holdings and guide customers through property law and administrative processes. We help all parties concerned to reach an agreement on land access routes in conjunction with the planning and expansion of infrastructure. TRANSACTIONS AND LEASING The Transactions unit works exclusively with qualified brokerage services in connection with the purchase and sale of commercial and public properties and property companies, development properties and properties for future development, as well as other advisory services in conjunction with transactions. With NAI’s international network of more than 9,000 employees in 55 countries, the largest markets and largest players are within reach. In conjunction with property development and transactions, or as a separate service, we engage in the brokerage and rental of commercial premises, such as offices, stores and logistics facilities. We conduct project renting, market research, consultation and needs analyses. CORPORATE MANAGEMENT Mikael Lundström Gustav Källén Ylva Melhus Mikael Holmström Chief Executive Officer Deputy Chief Executive Officer CFO Senior Advisor Business Area Managers Åsa Henninge Analysis Peter Möller Property Information Mattias Leksell Property Development Helena Dalhamn Land Development Paul Nord Forest Properties and Leasing Peter Wiklund Transactions and Renting Jan Tärnell Valuation FACTS Owners: Staff-owned since 1997 Number of employees: 120 Sales: SEK 150 M Quality and Environment: Certified in accordance with ISO 9001 and 14 001 Global network: Via our global network, NAI Global, we have access to information from property markets in 55 countries. ABOUT NAI SVEFA ANALYSIS 30 About NAI Svefa Analysis Behind every successful property ownership is a razor-sharp analysis. Behind every feasible property-development project is always an understanding of trends in the market and social development. With expertise in property economics, property ownership and social development, we have the ability to understand our customers’ business logic and identify opportunities and needs. Our combined analysis forms the basis for our consultation. NAI Svefa Analysis is active throughout Sweden and works with both public-sector and private clients. Our offering extends from market analysis at the early phases of projects to strategic analyses of property portfolios in preparation for restructurings, business planning and investment decisions and determining the measures to include in regular property management, or ahead of decisions to liquidate or develop property, usually with a company’s board of directors or management teams as the client. Together with 120 dedicated co-workers, we have considerable experience of putting together at short notice project organisations for various types of complex property inquiries, staffed by employees with solid experience of and specialist expertise in property inquiries at early project stages as well as in strategic planning and development of private, public-sector and public-utility property holdings. Our analysis and advice are tailored to satisfy the customer’s specific challenges and needs. MARKET ANALYSIS Location, sub-market, price and demand analyses. Description of market conditions ahead of a new establishment, investment or pricing or as a basis for an annual report, business plan or strategic work. EARLY STAGES OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES Analyses ahead of the acquisition of land, a planning process or a property-development project in order to create conditions to ensure feasibility and to recommend the optimal content of development rights. TAX CONSULTANCY Analysis of a property’s specific characteristics and special conditions, development and design, as well as rental conditions as a basis for filing a tax return on a property and for applying for an adjustment of a property taxation decision. Åsa Henninge Affärsområdeschef Analys [email protected] +46 31 708 32 85 Daniel Fex [email protected] +46 40 660 13 41 PORTFOLIO ANALYSES Analysis of property holdings in order to optimise yields and increase the efficiency of property management and as a basis for making decisions about changes in a portfolio and/or in ownership and management structures. The results of the analysis provide a foundation for determining the property strategy that is to be formulated and contains proposals on which properties, over the long term, should be owned, developed or divested. REFERENSUPPDRAG – NAI SVEFA ANALYS P O R T F O L I O A N A LY S I S 2013 – 14 Client: Värmdö Municipality Assignment: Analysis of property portfolio, property strategy and implementation Description: Analysis of market conditions for public properties and portfolio analysis as a basis for providing advice concerning property strategy. M A R K E T A N A LY S I S A N D P O R T F O L I O A N A LY S I S 2013 Client: Akademiska Hus Assignment: Market and portfolio analysis. Description: Analysis of market conditions for educational and research premises and portfolio analysis in respect of tenant, rents and residual value, as well as projects as a basis for preparing an annual report, in addition to advice concerning property strategy. ESTABLISHMENT STRATEGY MUNICIPALITY OF NORRKÖPING 2 013 – 14 Client: Municipality of Norrköping Assignment: Market analysis and establishment strategy. Description: In cooperation with the municipality and on the basis of the sub-areas’ physical and market conditions, to formulate an establishment strategy for various industrial segments. The purpose of the establishment strategy is to provide support in the establishment of business operations, using a structured process aimed at finding the optimal location in this market for each operation. Kristian Ekbom [email protected] +46 8 402 18 91 Marcus Gyllestål [email protected] +46 31 708 32 93 Thomas Green [email protected] +46 40 660 81 46 RUBRIK 31 Contact us HEAD OFFICE Drottninggatan 78 Box 3316 103 66 Stockholm Tel: +46 8-441 15 50 LULEÅ Bryggeriet Västra Varvsgatan 3, vån 3B 972 36 Luleå Tel: +46 920-21 11 00 STOCKHOLM MALMÖ FALUN MORA GÄVLE NORRKÖPING GÖTEBORG SUNDSVALL HÄRNÖSAND UMEÅ JÖNKÖPING VÄNERSBORG KARLSTAD VÄXJÖ Kyrkogatan 12 803 20 Gävle Tel: +46 26-17 54 40 Ullevigatan 19 411 40 Göteborg Tel: +46 31-711 63 00 Brunnshusgatan 6 871 31 Härnösand Tel: +46 611-247 05 Södra Strandgatan 3 553 20 Jönköping Tel: +46 36-30 71 10 Våxnäsgatan 3, 2 tr 653 40 KARLSTAD Tel: +46 54-10 03 20 Vasastrand 11 Box 493 701 49 Örebro Tel: +46 19-10 01 20 ÖSTERSUND Drottninggatan 78 Box 3316 103 66 Stockholm Tel: +46 8-441 15 50 Trotzgatan 35 791 72 Falun Tel: +46 23-480 30 ÖREBRO Nordenskiöldsgatan 6 211 19 Malmö Tel: +46 40-660 81 40 Strandgatan 8 792 30 Mora Tel: +46 250-158 58 Skolgatan 1B 602 25 Norrköping Tel: +46 11-13 46 60 Storgatan 29 852 30 Sundsvall Tel: +46 72-244 37 72 Västra Norrlandsg. 11D 903 27 Umeå Tel: +46 90-12 75 25 Sundsgatan 16 462 33 Vänersborg Tel: +46 521-621 00 Kronobergsg. 14, 1 tr 352 33 Växjö Tel: +46 470-74 60 60 Postgränd 8A 831 30 Östersund Tel: +46 63-10 75 40 www.naisvefa.se