Map and Database Construction for an Historic Cemetery: Methods
Transcription
Map and Database Construction for an Historic Cemetery: Methods
56 Johan Liebens Map and Database Construction for an Historic Cemetery: Methods and Applications ABSTRACT Accurate maps and databases can be beneficial for research and management of cemeteries, but such documents have rarely been linked for historic cemeteries. This paper focuses on the mapping and inventorying of historic St. Michael’s Cemetery in Pensacola, Florida, and on potential applications of the results to other cemeteries. The mapping involved a global positioning system receiver to establish reference points and a total station survey of individual marked graves, borders, and fences. Grave inscriptions and marker attributes were recorded on a microcassette recorder and transcribed into a spreadsheet. All data were imported into a geographic information system to produce an accurate digital map and database. The map and database are suited to examine architectural trends and influences, historical social issues, evolving funerary customs, demographic trends, and cemetery management matters. The fully interactive map and database are available on the Web and can potentially serve archaeologists, historians, geographers, genealogists, geologists, forensic scientists, and anthropologists. Introduction Cemeteries are potential treasure troves of information. They have long been recognized as “mirrors of society” that reflect social structure, cultural customs, mortuary behavior, and architectural trends (Francaviglia 1971; Schepartz et al. 1999). Cemeteries have been studied by scientists from a wide variety of academic disciplines, including history (Kroger 1989; Weinstein 1992), archaeology (Raemsch and Jamison 1999), anthropology (Dethlefsen et al. 1977; Prowse and Lovell 1996; Lazenby 1998; Smith 2000), environmental science (Santarsiero et al. 2000), soil science (Spongberg and Becks 2000a; 2000b), geology (Turco et al. 1997; McNeill 1999; Schreiber and Meierding 1999), epidemiology (Grauer and Roberts 1996; Waldron 2001), pathology (Buzon et al. 2000; Haas et al. 2000; Henneberg and Avagliano 2000; Slaus et Historical Archaeology, 2003, 37(4):56–68. Permission to reprint required. Accepted for publication 2 July 2002. al. 2000), forensics (Cox and Bell 1999), teaching (Capelle and Smith 1998), and genealogy. In some of these disciplines, e.g., history, archaeology, soil science, geology, and epidemiology, maps are used frequently, but spatially highly accurate maps linked to databases do not seem to be employed when cemeteries are studied. In archaeology, for instance, very detailed and accurate large-scale sketches of study sites are often made, but this approach is not extended to the study of cemeteries. Nevertheless, a good map is an indispensable part of cemetery research (Thompson 1989). Stand-alone maps and databases of cemeteries exist but are frequently of low quality. Older, paper documents often only include a list of names, grave ID numbers, and a simple map or sketch of the cemetery (e.g., St. Paul’s Episcopal Church 1977; Cooper and McAninch 1984). Most of these documents have little attribute documentation for the markers, although some researchers describe the marker material and sometimes the condition of the marker (Cooper and McAninch 1984). Modern survey techniques and a computer-aided design program were used to make a map of part of Vicksburg National Cemetery (Schultz 1987), but attributes of the graves were not recorded. A state-of-the-art survey with a global positioning system (GPS) receiver, laser range finder, and geographic information system (GIS) data processing was conducted at Fort Benning, Georgia, in support of an archaeological survey of an area containing a potential Paleo-Indian burial ground (Briuer et al. 1997). The map does not include details of the burial ground, nor is it accompanied by specific information on the graves (this information was to be generated in the main phase of the study). Historic Colonial Cemetery in Savannah, Georgia, was mapped with a laser transit (total station), but the map “required considerable fine tuning in order to make it a realistic representation of the cemetery” (Trinkley and Hacker 1999:9). In some areas graves were so close together that they could not be mapped separately. These acknowledged shortcomings suggest that the map may not be entirely accurate and true JOHAN LIEBENS—Map and Database Construction for an Historic Cemetery to scale. No systematic documentation of the individual inscriptions and markers accompanies the Colonial Cemetery map. On the Internet, many maps and databases of cemeteries are available, and some are intended for archaeological, historical, or genealogical research. Many of these maps are simple hand drawings (Christensen 2001) or generalized maps (Burrows 2001a; Educational, Historic, and Memorial Assoc. 2001). Very few Web sites show the location of individual graves, one exception being Ida Mission Cemetery in Little Rock, Arkansas (Ida Mission Cemetery Assoc. 2001). The name index on this site lists the grave ID numbers but is not linked to the map. Most of the on-line cemetery databases are nonsearchable lists of the names of the occupants of the graves, the dates of birth and death, and, sometimes, general references to the block or section number of the cemetery (Burrows 2001b; JewishGen 2001). Some of the databases unsystematically give additional information such as the names of spouses or children or the epitaphs (Bartosh Rule 2001; Beers 2001). Other Web sites list only the names and dates of those deceased deemed to be of historic or other importance (Princeton Online 2001; University City Historical Society 2001). Some of these sites include active links from the map to the database (North Carolina Department of Public Instruction 2001; University City Historical Society 2001). One of the more advanced Web sites of a cemetery was developed for the funeral artwork at Monumental Cemetery in Milan, Italy (Celati et al. 1995). This site includes a map, names and dates of some of the deceased, photographs of the monuments, and advanced search and interactive capabilities. The present study was undertaken because spatially highly accurate maps and closely linked databases of historic cemeteries, or even methodologies for the development of these maps and databases, do not seem to exist despite a large interest in cemeteries, historic and present. The principal objective of the study was to examine the feasibility of integrating precision surveys using modern electronic equipment, detailed grave attribute recording, and computer-based mapping in GIS to map, inventory, analyze, and manage cemeteries. A second objective of the study was to assess the suitability of the GIS format and the World Wide Web for dissemi- 57 nating this type of information to the general public and scientific community. St. Michael’s Cemetery in Pensacola, Florida, offered an opportunity to conduct this research because of a renewed interest in its preservation. The St. Michael’s Cemetery Foundation was established in 1985 to provide for the restoration, preservation, and maintenance of the cemetery, which was in a state of disrepair at the time. Improvements were slow in coming, in part because few written records for the cemetery existed. For instance, it was not known how many graves were present at the cemetery, where the graves were, how many open plots were available, how the cemetery was laid out, etc. When the desire arose recently to increase preservation and restoration efforts, it became clear that good baseline data, i.e., a map and database, were needed. This paper will focus on the methods that were employed to create the map and database and on potential applications of the resulting GIS data for the cemetery. Brief History of St. Michael’s Cemetery There is some evidence, based on church fee records, that the site of St. Michael’s Cemetery was being used as a burial ground by the Catholic Church as early as 1786 (Thompson 1988). This date would make it one of the two earliest extant nonnative cemeteries in Florida, the other being Tolomato Cemetery in St. Augustine (Coomes 1976). The first formal record of St. Michael’s Cemetery dates from 1810 in the form of a survey that was ordered in 1807 by the Spanish Intendant General in response to a request by the Catholic Church. Various maps show that the cemetery remained in use throughout the 19th century. An account by Union troops stationed in Pensacola during the Civil War indicates that some destruction occurred at that time as soldiers were ordered to destroy headstones and monuments ostensibly so that their field of fire was not obstructed, and the enemy was not protected. Several newspaper reports and photographs from the late-19th and early-20th century indicate that the cemetery was in an unkempt state and overgrown with shrubbery and vines (Thompson 1988). When a genealogical survey was conducted in the 1930s, about 1,500 marked graves were identified. Other evidence such as fencing, curbing, 58 HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 37(4) and coping, however, suggested the presence of more than 2,700 graves. Although interments continued throughout the second half of the 20th century, many areas remained in a state of disrepair. Acts of vandalism, defacing markers, and destroying or damaging monuments occasionally occurred in that period and as recently as 1999. Originally established as 30 arpents, approximately 25 acres, St. Michael’s Cemetery was reduced over time to its current size of about 8 acres. Originally St. Michael’s Cemetery was assigned to the Catholic inhabitants of Pensacola, but people of all faiths have been buried at St. Michael’s over the years. The cemetery is, therefore, a true cultural resource that represents an across-the-board record of burial customs, funerary art, architecture, etc. It is also an historic resource with the graves of individuals such as Joseph Noriega, Jr. (1788–1827), the first mayor of Spanish Pensacola; Dorothy Walton (1759–1832), wife of George Walton, a signer of the Declaration of Independence; Stephen R. Mallory (1812–1876), U.S. senator from Florida and secretary of the Confederate Navy (Figure 1); Eugenio Sierra (1750–1849), surgeon for the Spanish Army; and Francisco Moreno (1791–1882), vice-consul of Spain during the colonial period. Because of its cultural and historic heritage, St. Michael’s Cemetery is on the National Register of Historic Places, is part of a national register historic district in downtown Pensacola, and is on the state list of archaeological sites. Methods FIGURE 1. Grave of Stephen Russell Mallory and his wife Angela Moreno. Stephen Mallory was U.S. Senator from Florida from 1852 to 1861 and secretary of the Confederate Navy. FIGURE 2. Total station, mounted on tripod and placed over point of known coordinates. St. Michael’s Cemetery was mapped with a total station (Figure 2), a surveying instrument that combines an electronic transit with an electronic distance measuring (EDM) device. The transit part of the instrument measures horizontal and vertical angles accurately and consistently with respect to reference directions, i.e., zero marks, set by the operator. The distance-measuring device emits an infrared signal that is bounced off a target and received back by the EDM device. Using the phase difference between the outgoing and incoming signal, the device can determine the distance to the target. With the horizontal and vertical angles and the distance to the target, the three-dimensional coordinates of the target can be calculated, given that the total station is set up at a point of known coordinates and that a second point of known coordinates can be surveyed. To obtain a strong return signal for the EDM device, a reflecting prism was used as the target in the present study (Figure 3). The prism was mounted on a pointed rod that was placed at the four corners of each grave and surveyed each time with the total station. The accuracy of the equipment, as per the manufacturers specifications, is 5 arcsec for the transit and ±(3+2 ppm)mm for the EDM device (Sokkia 1997). The 2 ppm means that 2 mm have to be added to the accuracy for every 1,000 m of measured distance. Raw survey data (i.e., angles and distance) were transferred JOHAN LIEBENS—Map and Database Construction for an Historic Cemetery FIGURE 3. Prism, needed to obtain strong return signal, is placed at corner of a grave and held vertically. in real time from the total station to an electronic field book. The field book converted the data to coordinates and stored the raw data and the coordinates together with a unique ID number for each point. The coordinates and ID numbers for all surveyed points were subsequently downloaded to a personal computer as a text file and imported into GIS software. Each set of four consecutive points in the text file was automatically connected with a line to create a polygon (i.e., a rectangle) representing a grave. As mentioned above, the coordinates of a surveyed point can be calculated by the electronic field book if the coordinates for the total station and one additional point are known. Because no points of known coordinates were available at or near the cemetery, a differential GPS was used to survey reference points at strategic locations in the cemetery. The accuracy of the GPS was about 0.5 m (Liebens 2000). This accuracy 59 is an order of magnitude larger than that of the total station but is still more than adequate for this type of work because the positional accuracy of these two points only affects the apparent location of the cemetery with respect to surrounding features (streets, buildings, etc.). It does not affect the internal accuracy of the cemetery map. The inscriptions on the grave markers and information about the markers were dictated into a microcassette recorder. In total, 22 attributes were recorded (first name, middle initial, last name, suffix, maiden name, date of birth, year of birth, date of death, year of death, birthplace, affiliation, sex, age, number of persons per grave [as indicated on marker], marker orientation, marker material, marker preservation [on a fivestep scale], design motifs on marker [two largest ones], epitaph, enclosure material, comment). The ID number for the first surveyed corner of each grave was also recorded as an attribute to be able to link the marker information to the GIS map. To ensure consistency in the recording of the information, a cheat sheet with all acceptable entries for the marker characteristics was used. The recorded information was transcribed into a spreadsheet with a Dictaphone system, imported into the GIS software, and linked to the corresponding graves. To verify the correctness and completeness of the map and database, 35 teams (of two volunteers each) field checked a section of the cemetery with a printed version of the map and database. Discussion of Methods Fieldwork Two types of conspicuous human error occurred in the total station survey. In one type, the four corners of a grave were not surveyed consistently in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction. Because the import module of the GIS assumed that all points were surveyed consecutively and had to be connected in order, bow ties would result (Figure 4a). These bow ties could be identified visually on the map and edited manually. In the other type of error, a corner was surveyed twice or skipped. Because the import module assumed that each feature, i.e., each grave, consisted of exactly four corners, this error led to graves 60 HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 37(4) FIGURE 4. Distortions resulting from errors in field survey: a, bow ties resulting from not surveying four corners consecutively; b, distortions resulting from surveying a corner twice or skipping a corner. being odd shaped or connected to each other (Figure 4b). This was also easily seen on-screen and could be edited manually. Manual editing was practicable because relatively few of these mistakes were made in the survey. Verification of the field data by the volunteers resulted in the addition of a few omitted graves to the map and some additions and corrections to the database. The corrections were recorded on paper in the field and subsequently entered manually into the GIS. Although this verification process did not reveal systematic or major errors, it is a worthwhile effort to ensure optimal quality of the map and database. Part of the survey was hampered by the presence of large oak trees and grave markers that blocked the view of the total station. To resolve this problem, the total station was relocated several times after the first systematic survey of the cemetery to new strategic positions from which the remaining unsurveyed graves were visible. Graves overgrown with vegetation or covered with soil and debris also posed a problem (Figure 5). In some cases, all corners could be uncovered with a shovel and surveyed, but in other cases only three corners could be surveyed, and the grave had to be manually edited in the GIS. Initially, attributes were entered into a spreadsheet in the field, but the laptop computer locked up due to the unavoidable rough handling. More rugged laptops, built for use in the field, would FIGURE 5. Partially overgrown grave of which one corner could not be surveyed. JOHAN LIEBENS—Map and Database Construction for an Historic Cemetery stand up to the rough handling but are very expensive. The current method of using a microcassette recorder involves a transcription but uses inexpensive equipment and can keep pace with the survey. Filling out a form for each marker and typing it in the office proved to be somewhat slower in the field and could not always keep pace with the survey. The main difficulty in constructing the database was that some inscriptions on highly weathered markers were unreadable. Although rubbing techniques to bring out inscriptions exist, it was not practical to employ them in this type of survey because of their time-consuming nature. Also, the Association for Gravestone Studies and many other cemetery preservation organizations have argued against grave rubbing as it can, over time, damage markers. Accuracy Estimates and Alternative Methods Although the theoretical accuracy of a total station is ample for this type of work, independent quality assurance and quality control measures were implemented to ensure the overall quality of the map. At the beginning of each field day, two reference points with known coordinates were surveyed, in addition to the two required for the set up, and the measured coordinates were compared to the true coordinates. This allowed the surveyor to detect and correct any mistake in the instrument setup before surveying graves. After the fieldwork was completed, draft maps showed that a small number of graves had been surveyed twice by mistake. Zooming in with the GIS and measuring the offset between the overlapping, twice-measured graves revealed errors of 3 to 5 cm. Other survey methods such as large-scale aerial photograph interpretation and survey-grade GPS mapping can potentially be employed for this type of survey. The methods were, however, impractical at St. Michael’s Cemetery because of the dense tree cover in parts of the cemetery. In principle, existing paper maps could have been scanned or digitized into the GIS but, as is often the case with this kind of document, adequate metadata with information about the source, quality, coordinate system, etc., of the maps were unavailable. 61 Results and Applications General Results A total of 3,200 marked graves are present at St. Michael’s Cemetery. The field survey, excluding the volunteer field check, took a threeperson crew 20 days. Importing the survey and attribute data into a GIS, manually editing the minor errors present, and producing a map for hard copy and Web publishing required eight person-days. The oldest currently marked grave at St. Michael’s Cemetery dates from 1811, the earliest year of birth on a marker is from 1767. It is possible that older graves are present, since the undulating ground surface suggests that many unmarked graves exist. The existence of numerous unmarked graves would be consistent with findings at other historical cemeteries (Hall 1978; Trinkley and Hacker 1999). These potential sites of unmarked graves were not mapped because precisely locating them with a probe or any other method is a very time-consuming task and outside the scope of this project. However, the usefulness of this type of map and database can benefit greatly from including the location of unmarked graves. The map of St. Michael’s Cemetery shows that it is not laid out systematically in sections or rows. Thematic maps depicting interments from a given time period show that, although somewhat concentrated in certain areas, graves of a given time period can be found throughout the cemetery (Figure 6). These observations suggest that there never was a well-planned development of St. Michael’s Cemetery and are consistent with the scarcity of written records and with findings at other cemeteries predating the Rural Cemetery Movement of the mid-19th century (Sloane 1991). However, it is also possible that the lack of concentrations of coeval graves is due to the presence of large family plots with interments from different time periods. When grouping the data per half-century time period, data show that the first half of the 20th century accounts for the most marked graves (39%). This fact reflects both the declining number of interments during the second half of the 20th century, due to space limitation and the dilapidated state of the cemetery, and declin- 62 HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 37(4) built in that period (only 16% of the graves date from the same period) (Figure 7). This increase in monuments coincided with an economic expansion that brought to Pensacola wealth associated with timber harvesting, sawmills, shipping, and boat building. The increase may also be a reflection of the popular coeval social movement called the Beautification of Death (Bell 1990). The economic growth of Pensacola ended about 1920; in 1924 the last monument of that era was constructed. Monuments would not be built again until the 1960s and 1970s. During the 20th century architectural diversity at St. Michael’s Cemetery decreased gradually, and in the second half of the century, 94% of the markers were headboards, ledgers, or a combination of the two. The materials used for the grave markers also changed over time. In the 19th century marble FIGURE 6. Graves dating to second half of 19th century. No systematic development is apparent as graves are spread throughout cemetery. ing numbers of visually identifiable graves from before 1900, due to deterioration and destruction of the markers. Additionally, many of the earliest graves may never have been marked. Potential Applications of Database Systematic quantitative data generated by studies like the present one are superior to other cemetery maps and databases in that they are fully searchable and that maps, tables, graphs, and statistics of attributes can be produced quickly and with little effort by anyone with a basic computer knowledge. A simple search of the database by marker type, for instance, reveals some clear historical architectural trends at St. Michael’s Cemetery. Proportionally more box tombs and obelisks were built in the first half of the 19th century than in any other half-century. In the second half of the 19th century, monuments also became popular as more than half of the extant monuments were FIGURE 7. Monument marking the grave of Daniel F. Sullivan (1833–1884), a prominent lumber baron. The monument is the most imposing marker in St. Michael’s Cemetery. A photograph from 1896 shows that a large cross was at the top of the monument. JOHAN LIEBENS—Map and Database Construction for an Historic Cemetery was the dominant material, accounting for 65% of extant markers from the first half of the century and 74% of extant markers from the second half of the century. This dominance of marble as the material of choice for grave markers in the 19th century is consistent with findings in New England (Deetz 1988). In the first half of the 20th century, granite became popular at St. Michael’s Cemetery and turned into the most widely utilized material (44% of all extant markers) in the second half of the century. At that time, a variety of other materials was also used regularly, including marble, concrete, and a combination of concrete with marble or granite. Two wooden markers remain at St. Michael’s Cemetery, but their age is not known (Figure 8). Obviously, the permanence of the various materials affects current numbers, but these results illustrate the potential applicability of this type of systematic database. The majority of the markers face east (92%), as is to be expected at a predominantly Christian cemetery. However, the number of eastfacing burials increased considerably with time (Table 1). More complex cross tabulations can also be generated in the GIS with relative ease (Table 2). The quantitative information in this table, for example, would be of interest to geologists, engineers, architects, or historians studying weathering of rock and building materials. Of the 3,200 marked graves at St. Michael’s Cemetery, 1,118 are of women and 1,310 are of men. On the other graves, the sex is not indicated. The proportions of the various marker types and design motifs differ less than 1% between graves of men and women and, thus, are virtually identical for both sexes. The only significant variations were found for simple ledgers (24% of graves of women, 21% of graves TABLE 1 ORIENTATION OF MARKERS PER HALF-CENTURY Time period % east facing % west facing % south facing 1800–1849 1850–1899 1900–1949 1950–1999 55 81 96 97 40 15 4 2 5 3 0 0 Total 92 7 1 63 FIGURE 8. One of the two remaining wooden grave markers at St. Michael’s Cemetery. Historical accounts and photographs indicate that many wooden markers and fences were present at St. Michael’s cemetery during the 19th century and as late as the 1930s. of men) and flower motifs (on 27% of graves of women, 21% of graves of men). This information indicates that at St. Michael’s Cemetery the burial treatment for men and women was very similar. A possible explanation is that, especially in historic times, the status of a woman was based primarily on the reputation of her family (Mackie 1988). These data might also be further cross tabulated per time period to examine the changing socio-economic status of women, for instance. An examination of the distribution of age at death shows clear trends and variations with time (Figure 9). In the first half of the 19th century, infant mortality was high, and mortality between 30 and 55 years of age was relatively high, then declined thereafter. The oldest individual noted was 86 at the time of his death. In the second 64 HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 37(4) TABLE 2 NUMBER OF GRAVES FOR THE TWO MOST COMMON ORIENTATIONS PER HALF CENTURY AND SELECTED MARKER MATERIALS E 1800–1849 1850–1899 Concrete 1 15 Concrete and granite 0 5 Concrete and marble 1 26 Granite 2 27 W 1900–1949 1950–1999 1800–1849 1850–1899 1900–1949 1950–1999 77 59 1 5 4 0 100 118 0 1 1 0 141 51 5 6 2 1 309 231 1 8 11 10 Limestone 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 Marble 24 304 504 71 17 49 25 2 Marble and brick 5 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 Marble and granite 0 2 3 3 0 0 1 0 Sandstone 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 Sandstone and marble 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 34 391 1140 533 25 69 44 13 half of the 19th century a similar trend existed, but infant mortality was lower and the maximum age was higher. In the first half of the 20th century middle age mortality declined, but mortality after 60 years increased because of the higher survival rate to that age. In the second half of the 20th century infant mortality was lowest, and mortality remained relatively low until 40–60 years of age. These trends and variations over time have been established long ago and are well known (Bell 1994), but their clear presence in this graph suggests that this type of systematic quantitative database may be suited for more FIGURE 9. Mortality rate versus age for half-century time periods. Lines represent 3-year moving average. Line for 1800–1849 is jagged due to relatively low number of graves from that period. detailed or local analyses of mortality. However, caution has to be exercised when interpreting and extending demographic data from grave markers (Hall 1978; Goodman et al. 1988). Potential Applications of Map Although the previous examples show possible uses of the database, the greatest value of this type of data lies in its potential for spatial analysis in support of management of historic and modern cemeteries. One of the issues at St. Michael’s Cemetery and other historic cemeteries is new interments. Because of the seemingly uncontrolled development of St. Michael’s Cemetery, it is unclear if open spaces for new burials exist, how many exist, where they are, or how large they are. Simple GIS operations can address these questions. A buffer zone of a given width in which future burials are prohibited can be drawn automatically around all mapped features such as graves, roads, walkways, buildings, and fences. The features and their buffer zones can then be recoded in GIS to indicate their unavailability, leaving only areas available for new burials showing on the map. Analysis of this type of map and the associated database reveals that in the case of St. Michael’s Cemetery, there are 223 open spaces scattered JOHAN LIEBENS—Map and Database Construction for an Historic Cemetery 65 FIGURE 10. Example of viewshed analysis: a, location of observation points at two entrances (stars) and selected monuments (rectangles); b, areas visible from both observation points (white), visible from one observation point (gray), and from no observation point (black); c, available space (black) and occupied land (white) based on 5 ft. buffer around all existing features; d, maps b and c combined, showing in black the available space that can not be seen from either observation point and, thus, is suited for the location of new building. 66 throughout the cemetery, ranging in size from 3.5 to 12,080 ft2. This type of map can also be overlaid on a map of historically important graves to assist in the location of interpretative trails, benches, walkways, etc., and can be updated with minimal effort if new burials occur or unmarked graves are identified by probing or other means. Another issue at St. Michael’s Cemetery is planning the location of a new caretaker’s building. This involves not only identifying available space but also selecting an area that is generally hidden from view. GIS allows the researcher to make a map of invisible areas based on the input of height, size, and location of observation points and obstacles. The resulting “view-shed” analysis map can be combined with the map of the available open spaces to produce a plan of the open spaces that cannot be seen from the observation points and, thus, may be suited for the construction of the new building (Figure 10). Web Site The complete map and database of St. Michael’s Cemetery were posted <http: //uwfgis.evr.uwf.edu/~evrgis/UWFmaps.htm> on the Web with interactive mapping service software. The Web site is fully interactive, has map navigation tools and supports Boolean searches and queries on all attributes. Feedback received from the public indicates that a large interest in this type of information exists, but that the advanced features of the interactive mapping service software are confusing to the layperson. Several requests for traditional paper maps were received. As a result, a parallel Web page with simple functionality was established for the general public. Visitors to the site have now provided ancillary information that has been added to the database. Conclusions Cemeteries have been studied by scientists from a variety of disciplines, including some in which maps are commonly used. Spatially highly accurate maps and databases of cemeteries, however, are scarce in the literature and on the Internet. Nevertheless, scientific research and management of cemeteries, both historic HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 37(4) and recent, can greatly benefit from the use of maps and databases with very accurate locational information. This study has shown that a high quality map of a cemetery and an extensive, systematic database can be constructed efficiently with electronic survey instruments and inexpensive attribute collecting methods. The resulting map and database can be manipulated in GIS, allowing thematic maps, tables, graphs, and statistics of grave attributes to be generated expeditiously. Results of this study indicate that, among many other potential applications, these maps and databases can facilitate analysis of funerary architecture, changes in the use of building materials, historical aspects of social and gender issues, and mortality trends. These maps and databases are also valuable tools for the management of cemeteries, for instance to locate sites for new interments, buildings, walkways, etc. Posting on the Internet of interactive versions of this type of map and database has become possible, thanks to relatively new software. The Internet makes the information easily accessible to scientists and the general public. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of the efforts of many, including students and faculty at the University of West Florida, members of St. Michael’s Cemetery Preservation Board, and community volunteers. Kim Carter helped with the field survey as my student assistant, Teresa Aberle and Kristal Flanders assisted with GIS operations. The original manuscript greatly benefited from the suggestions by three reviewers and the editor. This project was financially supported by the University of West Florida. REFERENCES BARTOSH RULE, SUSAN 2001 Allison-Friendship Cemetery <http://www.threelegged-willie.org/cemetery/allison1.htm> 15 December. BELL, EDWARD L. 1990 The Historical Archaeology of Mortuary Behavior: Coffin Hardware from Uxbridge, Massachusetts. Historical Archaeology, 24(3):54–78. 1994 Vestiges of Mortality and Remembrance: A Bibliography on the Historical Archaeology of Cemeteries. Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ. BEERS, JAYNE L. 2001 Fairfield Cemetery Greens Fork, Indiana. <http:// www.waynet.org/people/genealogy/fairfield/a-l.htm> 15 December. JOHAN LIEBENS—Map and Database Construction for an Historic Cemetery BRIUER, FREDERICK L., JANET E. SIMMS, AND LAWSON M. SMITH 1997 Site Mapping, Geophysical Investigation, and Geomorphic Reconnaissance at Site 9 ME 395 Upatoi Town, Fort Benning, Georgia. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. BURROWS, BILL 2001a Rock Island County National Cemetery Map <http:// www.rootsweb.com/~ilrockis/cemetery/nc-map.htm> 15 December. 2001b Rock Island County National Cemetery at Rock Island. <http://www.rootsweb.com/~ilrockis/cemetery/ natcembe.htm> 15 December. BUZON, M. R., P. L. WALKER, F. DRAYER, AND S. KERR 2000 Health and Disease in Nineteenth-Century San Francisco: Skeletal Evidence from a Forgotten Cemetery. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 30:115. CAPELLE, J., AND M. SMITH 1998 Using Cemetery Data to Teach Population Biology and Local History. American Biology Teacher, 60(9): 690–693. CELATI, A., E. NEGRONI, M. PADULA, L. PALUMBO, M. PERUCCA, G. RUBBIA RINALDI, AND A. DELLA VENTURA 1995 Virtual Museums: Enjoy the Monumental Cemetery of Milano through Internet <http://www.isoc.org/HMP/ PAPER/108/html/paper.html> 15 December. CHRISTENSEN, JAN 2001 Cemetery Map of Gjerpen Church <http: //www.slekt.org/cemetery/cemetery-map.html> 15 December. COOMES, CHARLES S. 1976 Tolomato Cemetery. El Escribano, 13(4):108. COOPER, PATRICIA I., AND GLEN MCANINCH 1984 Map and Historical Sketch of the Old Athens Cemetery Jackson Street. Old Athens Cemetery Foundation, Inc., Athens, GA. COX, M., AND L. BELL 1999 Recovery of Human Skeletal Elements from a Recent UK Murder Inquiry: Preservational Signatures. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44(5):945–950. DEETZ, JAMES F. 1988 Material Culture and Worldview in Colonial AngloAmerica. In The Recovery of Meaning, Mark P. Leone and Parker B. Potter, editors, pp. 219–233. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. DETHLEFSEN, EDWIN S., L. CABOT BRIGGS, AND LEO P. BIESE 1977 The Clement Site: Analysis of Skeletal Material. Man in the Northeast, 13:86–90. EDUCATIONAL, HISTORIC, AND MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION 2001 Plan of Gray Cemetery <http://www.korrnet.org/ oldgray/map.htm> 15 December. 67 FRANCAVIGLIA, RICHARD V. 1971 The Cemetery As an Evolving Cultural Landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 61(3):501–509. GOODMAN, ALAN H., T. R. BROOKE, A. C. SWEDLUND, AND G. J. ARMELAGOS 1988 Biocultural Perspectives on Stress in Prehistoric, Historical, and Contemporary Population Research. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 31:169–202. GRAUER, A. L., AND C. A. ROBERTS 1996 Paleoepidemiology, Healing, and Possible Treatment of Trauma in the Medieval Cemetery Population of St. Helen-on-the-Walls, York, England. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 100(4):531–544. HAAS, C., A. ZINK, G. PALFI, U. SZEIMIES, AND A. NERLICH 2000 Detection of Leprosy in Ancient Human Skeletal Remains by Molecular Identification of Mycobacterium Leprae. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 114(3):428–436. HALL, ROBERTA L. 1978 A Test of Paleodemographic Models. Antiquity, 43(4):715–729. American HENNEBERG, R., AND G. AVAGLIANO 2000 Dental Health of Slaves from the Cemetery of Ponte di Ferro near Ancient Poseidonia (Paestum) Italy, 6th–4th c BCE. Living Conditions or Fluorosis? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 30:177. IDA MISSION CEMETERY ASSOCIATION 2001 Ida Mission Cemetery Map. Ida Mission Cemetery Association <http://www.aristotle.net/~delton/ Cemeteries/Pulaski/idamap.htm> 15 December. JEWISHGEN, INC. 2001 Ivano-Frankivsk Cemetery Inscriptions. JewishGen, Inc. <http://www.jewishgen.org/yizkor/stanislawowcemetery/cemetery-list.html> 15 December. KROGER, J. 1989 Jewish Cemeteries in the Surroundings of Amsterdam: The Burial Register of the Jewish Cemetery at Muiderberg As a Source of Biographical, Demographical, and Socio-historical Information. Studia Rosenthaliana, 23(2):188–190. LAZENBY, R. A. 1998 Second Metacarpal Midshaft Geometry in an Historic Cemetery Sample. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 106(2):157–167. LIEBENS, JOHAN 2000 A Simple Method to Evaluate the Impact of Tropical Cyclones on Coastlines: Hurricane Georges and the Gulf Coast. Shore & Beach, 68(1):17–24. MACKIE, NORMAN V. 1988 The Social Aspects of Funerary Monuments in Colonial Tidewater Virginia. Material Culture, 20(3):39–55. 68 HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 37(4) MCNEILL, G. W. 1999 Variations in the Weathering Rate of Scottish Gravestones As an Environmental Signature of Atmospheric Pollution. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 21:365–370. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 2001 Historic Oakwood Cemetery. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction <http: //www.itpi.dpi.state.nc.us/oakwood/default.html> 15 December. PRINCETON ONLINE 2001 The Princeton Cemetery of the Nassau Presbyterian Church. Princeton Online <http: //www.princetonol.com/groups/cemetery/mon.html> 15 December. PROWSE, T. L., AND N. C. LOVELL 1996 Concordance of Cranial and Dental Morphological Traits and Evidence for Endogamy in Ancient Egypt. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 101(2): 237–246. RAEMSCH, C. A., AND T. R. JAMISON 1999 A Bioarchaeological Study of the Late-Seventeenth Century Cemetery at Onondaga. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, S28:227. SANTARSIERO, A., D. CUTILLI, G. CAPPIELLO, AND L. MINELLE 2000 Environmental and Legislative Aspects Concerning Existing and New Cemetery Planning. Microchemical, 67(1–3):141–145. SCHEPARTZ, L. A., D. CONING, AND A. D. FREEMAN 1999 Modern Cemeteries As Research Resources: The Spring Grove Project. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, S28:243. SMITH, S. 2000 Shape Variation of the Human Pollical Distal Phalanx and Metacarpal. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 113(3):329–348. SOKKIA CO., LTD. 1997 Set 5F Operator’s Manual, p. 177. Sokkia Co., Ltd. SPONGBERG, A. L., AND P. M. BECKS 2000a Organic Contamination in Soils Associated with Cemeteries. Journal of Soil Contamination, 9(2): 87–97. 2000b Inorganic Soil Contamination from Cemetery Leachate. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 117(1–4):313–327. ST. PAUL’S EPISCOPAL CHURCH 1977 The Epitaphs in St. Paul’s Cemetery, August 1855–October 1977. St. Paul’s Episcopal Church, Summerville, SC. THOMPSON, SHARYN 1988 A Preliminary Survey and Evaluation of the Historical and Cultural Resources of St. Michael’s Cemetery, p. 116. Saint Michael Cemetery Foundation Inc, Pensacola, FL. 1989 Florida’s Historic Cemeteries. Historic Tallahassee Preservation Board, Tallahassee, FL. TRINKLEY, MICHAEL, AND DEBI HACKER 1999 Identification and Mapping of Historic Graves at Colonial Cemetery, Savannah, Georgia. Chicora Foundation, Research Series 54, 46. TURCO, M. J., H. D. MAHER, AND P. REEDER 1997 A Pilot Study of Electromagnetic Conductivity and Microtopographic Surveys in Mapping Pioneer Gravesites in Loess, Mormon Pioneer Cemetery, Omaha, Nebraska. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program, 29:76. SCHREIBER, K., AND T. C. MEIERDING UNIVERSITY CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY SCHULTZ, RANN R. WALDRON, H. A. SLAUS, M., D. ORLIC, AND M. PECINA WEINSTEIN, ROCHELLE 1999 Spatial Patterns and Causes of Marble Tombstone Weathering in Western Pennsylvania. Physical Geography, 20(3):173–188. 1987 A Computer-Generated Atlas of Vicksburg National Cemetery, Mississippi. Master’s thesis, p. 188, San Francisco State University, CA. 2000 Osteochondromain in a Skeleton from an EleventhCentury Croation Cemetery. Croation Medical Journal, 41(3):336–340. SLOANE, DAVID C. 1991 The Last Great Necessity: Cemeteries in American History. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. 2001 Woodlands Cemetery. University City Historical Society <http://uchs.net/Woodlands/woodlandsceme tery.html#q59> 15 December. 2001 Are Plague Pits of Particular Use to Paleoepidemiologists? International Journal of Epidemiology, 30(1):104–108. 1992 Stones of Memory: Revelations from a Cemetery in Curacao. American Jewish Archives, 44(1):81–140. JOHAN LIEBENS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA 11000 UNIVERSITY PARKWAY PENSACOLA, FL 32514