chemo? no chemo?
Transcription
chemo? no chemo?
CHEMO? NO CHEMO? The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay helps you find an answer ® Oncotype DX helps clarify one of the most difficult treatment questions by providing an individualized Recurrence Score® result that assesses the benefit of chemotherapy and the likelihood of breast cancer recurrence.1,2 Do all patients have the same magnitude of benefit from chemotherapy? CHEMO? Landmark NSABP B-20 trial of 651 estrogen receptor–positive (ER-positive), node-negative breast cancer patients found1: • The addition of chemotherapy provided only a 4% absolute benefit, measured as the proportion of patients free of distant recurrence at 10 years Proportion of all patients free of distant recurrence at 10 years1 92% Proportion without distant recurrence 1.0 0.9 0.8 88% 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 P =.02 0.3 n Tam + chemo 424 Tam 227 0.2 0.1 Events 30 26 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Years The Oncotype DX® Breast Cancer Assay is the only test that provides patients with an individual score validated to predict chemotherapy benefit and the likelihood of distant recurrence.1-3 2 ABSOLUTE BENEFIT % FROM TAM + CHEMO 4 Providing predictive and prognostic information for a broad range of patients NO CHEMO? The Oncotype DX® Breast Cancer Assay1,2: • Analyzes the expression of 21 genes • Predicts chemotherapy benefit • Indicates the 10-year risk of distant recurrence Eligible ER-positive breast cancer patients extend along a biologic continuum1,2,4-7 ER-positive, tamoxifen-treated, or AI-treated4 stage i pT1, N0 included in asco and nccn guidelines5,6 ® ® pT2-3, N0 stage ii pT1-3, N1mi* included in nccn guidelines6 pT0-2, N1 stage iii† pT3, N1 certain node-positive patients4,7 AI=aromatase inhibitor; ASCO=American Society of Clinical Oncology; NCCN=National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cancer Network. ASCO and NCCN do not endorse any product or therapy. *T1b moderate/poorly differentiated or unfavorable features/1c/2/3, N1mi, M0; HER2-negative. † Consider patients from a subset of stage IIIa as indicated; not all stage III patients. The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay is the only multigene expression assay incorporated in both the ASCO® and NCCN® guidelines.5,6 3 Accurate, precise, and reproducible CHEMO? Why RT-PCR was chosen for the Oncotype DX® Breast Cancer Assay3: • Precise, accurate, and highly reproducible over a wide dynamic range • Minimizes variability that may result from: —Tissue preparation method, type of fixative, and fixation time —Tumor block age, storage, and variability in preparation —Sample heterogeneity • Can be assayed using fixed tissue from core biopsy or surgical excision samples Fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sample. Genomic Health’s® surgical pathologists take additional steps to ensure accuracy3 • Perform manual microdissection • Clear sample contaminants • Enrich for invasive tumor tissue With a success rate >97% in generating an accurate result, you can feel confident in the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay.8 4 Helping you find an individualized answer with genomics NO CHEMO? 21 genes identified through a rigorous selection process2 • 447 patients with ER-positive and ER-negative, and node-positive and node-negative breast cancer were examined • 250 breast cancer–associated genes were analyzed 21-gene panel used to develop the Recurrence Score® algorithm2 PROLIFERATION Ki-67 STK15 Survivin Cyclin B1 MYBL2 INVASION Stromelysin 3 Cathepsin L2 ESTROGEN OTHER ER PR Bcl-2 SCUBE2 GSTM1 CD68 BAG1 HER2 REFERENCE GRB7 HER2 Beta-actin GAPDH RPLPO GUS TFRC 16 cancer genes • Several identified with a consistent and strong statistical association to breast cancer recurrence • Others with robust predictive power for chemotherapy benefit 5 reference genes • Normalize gene expression • Provide quality control Gene expression levels determine the Recurrence Score (RS) result2 RS = +0.47 × –0.34 × +1.04 × +0.10 × +0.05 × –0.08 × –0.07 × HER2 group score Estrogen group score Proliferation group score Invasion group score CD68 GSTM1 BAG1 5 The proven prognostic utility of the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay ® CHEMO? Validated in NSABP B-14 • Prospective analysis on archived tissue2 • 668 patients treated with tamoxifen2 • ER-positive, node-negative2 Rate of distant recurrence at 10 years (%) 10-year rate of distant recurrence was significantly lower for patients with low Recurrence Score® values2 30.5 % 35 30 95% Cl 23.6%-37.4% 25 14.3 % 20 15 6.8 % 10 ALL PATIENTS %= IN STUDY (n=668) 15 95% Cl 8.3%-20.3% 95% Cl 4%-9.6% 5 0 RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE <18 LOW RISK RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE 18-30 INTERMEDIATE RISK RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE ≥31 HIGH RISK CI=confidence interval. The majority of patients had low Recurrence Score values2 51% RS <18 27% RS ≥31 22% RS 18-30 Prognostic: any measurement available at the time of diagnosis or surgery associated with clinical outcome in the absence of systemic adjuvant therapy or following the standard of care treatment.3 6 Adding critical information to your treatment decision NO CHEMO? Provides significant information about recurrence risk, independent of age and tumor size (P<.001)2 Multivariate COX analysis2 VARIABLE HAZARD RATIO 95% CI P-VALUE Age at surgery 0.71 (0.48, 1.05) .08 Clinical tumor size 1.26 (0.86, 1.86) .23 Recurrence Score® 3.21* (2.23, 4.61) <.001 *The hazard ratio for the Recurrence Score is calculated relative to an increment of 50 units. May predict the magnitude of tamoxifen benefit, as shown in a follow-up study to NSABP B-14 (n=645)9† INTERMEDIATE RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE (18-30) 93% 1.0 0.8 Proportion without distant recurrence Proportion without distant recurrence LOW RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE (<18) 86% 0.6 0.4 P =.039 Placebo Tam 0.2 0.0 n 0 2 4 171 142 6 8 Proportion without distant recurrence Years 10 12 16 14 1.0 80% 0.8 0.6 0.4 n Placebo Tam 0.2 0.0 62% P =.02 0 2 4 85 69 6 HIGH RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE (≥31) 8 10 12 14 16 Years 1.0 70% 69% 0.8 0.6 0.4 P =.82 Placebo Tam 0.2 0.0 n 0 2 4 99 79 6 8 10 12 14 16 Years Results should not be used to indicate that tamoxifen should not be given to the high-risk group.3 † • Patients with high ER scores (and low Recurrence Score values) saw the largest benefit from treatment with tamoxifen9 7 The proven predictive utility of the Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay ® CHEMO? Validated in NSABP B-20 • Prospective analysis on archived tissue1 • 651 patients treated with tamoxifen or tamoxifen plus CMF/MF1 • ER-positive, node-negative1 Proportion without distant recurrence Low Recurrence Score® value (<18); little to no chemotherapy benefit1 97% 96% 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 P =.61 0.3 n Tam + chemo 218 Tam 135 0.2 0.1 Events 8 4 0.0 0 2 4 6 Years 8 10 12 Proportion without distant recurrence Intermediate Recurrence Score value (18-30); no substantial chemotherapy benefit1* 91% 1.0 0.9 0.8 89% 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 P =.39 0.3 Tam + chemo Tam 0.2 0.1 Events 89 45 9 4 0.0 0 8 n 2 4 6 Years 8 10 12 *Clinically important benefit cannot be excluded. Helping you predict the benefit of chemotherapy in node-negative patients NO CHEMO? High Recurrence Score® value (≥31); large chemotherapy benefit1 Proportion without distant recurrence 1.0 88% 0.9 ABSOLUTE BENEFIT % FROM TAM + CHEMO 28 0.8 0.7 0.6 60% 0.5 0.4 P<.001 0.3 n Tam + chemo 117 Tam 47 0.2 0.1 Events 13 18 0.0 0 2 4 6 Years 8 10 12 Absolute increase in proportion free of distant recurrence (mean ± SE) Large reduction in 10-year distant recurrence for high-risk patients treated with chemotherapy1 40% 30% 20% 10% 0 -10% RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE <18 RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE 18-30 RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE ≥31 (n=353) (n=134) (n=164) Predictive: any measurement associated with benefit or lack of benefit from a particular therapy.3 9 Additional insight may help guide your treatment decision CHEMO? NSABP B-20 trial (n=651)1 Recurrence Score value 100 Recurrence Score® value <18 18-30 ≥31 80 60 40 41% 24% 28% 19% 20 14% 21% 22% 21% 44% 55% 50% 60% 0 <40 (n=63) 40-49 50-59 (n=226) (n=166) ≥60 (n=196) Patient age P=.018 • Younger patients can have low Recurrence Score values1 • Older patients can have high Recurrence Score values1 NSABP B-20 trial (n=651)1 Recurrence Score value 100 80 60 40 16% 25% 30% 33% 20 20% 19% 23% 21% 64% 56% 46% 46% 0 ≤1 cm (n=110) 1.1-2 cm (n=318) 2.1-4 cm (n=196) Clinical tumor size >4 cm (n=24) P=.001 • Patients with larger tumors can have low Recurrence Score values1 • Patients with smaller tumors can have high Recurrence Score values1 10 Providing independent, significant data beyond traditional measures NO CHEMO? NSABP B-20 trial (n=651)1 Recurrence Score value 100 grading by pathologist at local hospital 80 60 40 20 0 12% 16% 22% 22% 42% 22% 73% 56% 36% WELL (n=77) MODERATE (n=339) POOR (n=163) Tumor grade (site) Recurrence Score value 100 Recurrence Score® value <18 18-30 ≥31 P<.001 grading by pathologist at central lab 80 60 40 20 0 5% 12% 12% 24% 61% 19% 83% 64% 19% WELL (n=119) MODERATE (n=340) POOR (n=190) Tumor grade (central) P<.001 • Significant proportions of high-grade tumors have low Recurrence Score values1 • Even low-grade tumors can have high Recurrence Score values1 Nearly 1 in 3 adjuvant treatment recommendations were changed based on the Recurrence Score results in a decision impact study.10 11 Providing independent recurrence risk information across a biologic continuum CHEMO? Validated in Trans ATAC • Prospective analysis on archived tissue4 • 1,231 postmenopausal patients treated with tamoxifen or Al4 • 1,178 ER-positive, node-positive, and node-negative4 Comparative risks were seen in node-negative patients and patients with 1 to 3 nodes who had low Recurrence Score® values3,4 100 Mean 95% Cl 9-year risk of distant recurrence (%) 90 4+ POSITIVE NODES n=63 (31 EVENTS) 80 70 60 1-3 POSITIVE NODES 50 n=243 (43 EVENTS) 40 NODENEGATIVE 30 n=872 (72 EVENTS) 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Recurrence Score value Oncotype DX® is the only multigene expression assay incorporated in the NCCN® guidelines to help guide chemotherapy treatment decisions in patients with micrometastases.6 12 Helping you predict the benefit of chemotherapy in node-positive patients NO CHEMO? • Prospective analysis on archived tissue7 • 367 postmenopausal patients treated with tamoxifen or tamoxifen plus CAF7 • HR-positive, node-positive7 Validated in SWOG 8814 Strong chemotherapy benefit seen only in the high Recurrence Score® value group7 • No substantial benefit in Breast Cancer Specific Survival from anthracycline based chemotherapy for node-positive patients with lower Recurrence Score values INTERMEDIATE RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE (18-30) 92% 1.00 Breast cancer−specific survival Breast cancer−specific survival LOW RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE (<18) 87% 0.75 0.50 P =.56 0.25 0.0 Tam only CAF-T 0 2 4 n Events 55 91 4 10 Years 6 8 10 1.00 81% 0.75 70% 0.50 P =.89 0.25 0.0 Tam only CAF-T 0 2 4 n Events 46 57 11 10 Years 6 8 10 Breast cancer−specific survival HIGH RECURRENCE SCORE VALUE (≥31) 1.00 73% 0.75 0.50 P =.033 0.25 0.0 Tam only CAF-T 0 2 4 n Events 47 71 20 18 Years 6 54% 8 10 Half of adjuvant treatment recommendations for node-positive patients were changed based on the Recurrence Score result in a decision impact survey11 • For 33.3% of patients tested with Oncotype DX®, their treatment was changed from chemotherapy plus hormonal therapy to hormonal therapy alone • For 9.4% of patients tested with Oncotype DX, their treatment was changed from hormonal therapy alone to chemotherapy plus hormonal therapy 13 The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer report ® CHEMO? Page 1 of 3 Genomic Health, Inc. 301 Penobscot Drive Redwood City, CA 94063 USA Toll Free Tel 866-ONCOTYPE (866-662-6897) Worldwide Tel +1 650-569-2080 www.oncotypeDX.com PATIENT REPORT Patient/ID: Doe, Jane Sex: Female DOB: 01/01/1950 Medical Record/Patient #: 556677771 Date of Surgery: 9/25/2008 Specimen Type/ID: Breast/SURG-0001 BREAST CANCER ASSAY DESCRIPTION Requisition: R00003G Order Received: 10/15/2008 Date Reported: 10/23/2008 Client: Community Medical Center Ordering Physician: Dr. Harry D Smith Submitting Pathologist: Dr. John P Williams Submitting Pathologist: Dr. Sally M Jones Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay uses RT-PCR to determine the expression of a panel of 21 genes in tumor tissue. The Recurrence Score® is calculated from the gene expression results. The Recurrence Score range is from 0-100. The first page of the report contains the individualized Recurrence Score® result between 0 and 100. RESULTS Breast Cancer = Recurrence Score 6 The findings summarized in the Clinical Experience sections of this report are applicable to the patient populations defined in each section. It is unknown whether the findings apply to patients outside these criteria. CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: PROGNOSIS FOR NODE NEGATIVE, ER-POSITIVE PATIENTS The Clinical Validation study included female patients with Stage I or II, Node Negative, ER-Positive breast cancer treated with 5 years of tamoxifen. Those patients who had a Recurrence Score of 6 had an Average Rate of Distant Recurrence of 5% (95% CI: 3%-7%) The following results are from a clinical validation study of 668 patients from the NSABP B-14 study. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2817-26. Recurrence Score vs Distant Recurrence in Node Negative, ER-Positive Breast Cancer Prognosis Estimate of the likelihood of distant recurrence at 10 years. Laboratory Director: Patrick Joseph, MD CLIA Number 05D1018272 This test was developed and its performance characteristics determined by Genomic Health, Inc. The laboratory is regulated under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) as qualified to perform high-complexity clinical testing. This test is used for clinical purposes. It should not be regarded as investigational or for research. These results are adjunctive to the ordering physician's workup. Online Ordering and Reports Available — Please contact Customer Service at [email protected] © 2004-2010 Genomic Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Oncotype DX and Recurrence Score are registered trademarks of Genomic Health, Inc. GHI004 Rev017 • The report also contains predictive information about chemotherapy benefit, validated in the NSABP B-20 study1 • For node-positive patients, the report also includes both predictive and prognostic information, as validated in the SWOG 8814 study7 14 Helping to make a more informed decision with quantitative data NO CHEMO? Page 3 of 3 Genomic Health, Inc. 301 Penobscot Drive Redwood City, CA 94063 USA Toll Free Tel 866-ONCOTYPE (866-662-6897) Worldwide Tel +1 650-569-2080 www.oncotypeDX.com PATIENT REPORT Patient/ID: Doe, Jane Sex: Female DOB: 01/01/1950 Requisition: R00003G Order Received: 10/15/2008 Date Reported: 10/23/2008 QUANTITATIVE SINGLE GENE REPORT The Oncotype DX assay uses RT-PCR to determine the RNA expression of the genes below. These results may differ from ER, PR, or HER2 results reported using other methods or reported by other laboratories.1 The ER, PR, and HER2 Scores are also included in the calculation of the Recurrence Score. ER Score = Positive The ER Score positive/negative cut-off of 6.5 units was validated from a study of 761 samples using the 1D5 antibody (immunohistochemistry) and 607 samples using the SP1 antibody (immunohistochemistry). The standard deviation for the ER Score is less than 0.5 units.2 Clinical Experience: For ER positive breast cancer, the magnitude of tamoxifen benefit increases as the ER Score increases from 6.5 to12.5.3 Please note: The Average Rate of Distant Recurrence reported on Page 1 based on the Recurrence Score was determined in patients who received 5 years of tamoxifen treatment and takes into account the magnitude of tamoxifen benefit indicated by the ER Score. PR Score = Positive Quantitative ER, PR, and HER2 scores, which are highly concordant with IHC and FISH3,12,13 The PR Score positive/negative cut-off of 5.5 units was validated from a study of 761 samples using the PR636 antibody (immunohistochemistry) and another study of 607 samples using the PR636 antibody (immunohistochemistry). The standard deviation for the PR Score is less than 0.5 units.2 HER2 Score = Negative The HER2 positive cut-off of 11.5 units, equivocal range from 10.7 to 11.4 units, and negative cut-off of < 10.7 units were validated from concordance studies of 755 samples using the HercepTest™ assay (immunohistochemistry) and another study of 568 samples using the PathVysion® assay (FISH). The standard deviation for the HER2 score is less than 0.5 units.4 Genomic Health® accepts all early-stage breast cancer samples to help confirm or clarify ER status References: 1. ER Score based on quantitative ESR1 expression (estrogen receptor); PR Score based on quantitative PGR expression (progesterone receptor); HER2 Score based on quantitative ERBB2 expression. 2. ASCO Breast Cancer Symposium 2007 Abstracts #87 by S.S. Badve et al., and #88 by F.L. Baehner et al. 3. ASCO Annual Meeting 2005 Abstract #510 by S. Paik et al. 4. ASCO Breast Cancer Symposium 2008 Abstracts #13 by F.L. Baehner et al., and #41 by F.L. Baehner et al. Laboratory Director: Patrick Joseph, MD CLIA Number 05D1018272 This test was developed and its performance characteristics determined by Genomic Health, Inc. The laboratory is regulated under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) as qualified to perform high-complexity clinical testing. This test is used for clinical purposes. It should not be regarded as investigational or for research. These results are adjunctive to the ordering physician's workup. Online Ordering and Reports Available — Please contact Customer Service at [email protected] © 2004-2010 Genomic Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Oncotype DX and Recurrence Score are registered trademarks of Genomic Health, Inc. GHI004 Rev017 Sign up now for the Customer Portal at https://online.genomichealth.com: • Online ordering • Online results • Important customer information postings Call Customer Service at 866-ONCOTYPE to open an account. 15 The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay helps you find an answer ® CHEMO? NO CHEMO? A personalized approach to breast cancer treatment • V alidated through an extensive suite of studies, across a continuum of more than 4,000 ER-positive patients in 13 clinical studies1,2,4,7 • O nly test incorporated in both the ASCO® and NCCN® guidelines to help guide chemotherapy treatment decisions5,6 • C linical utility in node-negative and certain node-positive, ER-positive breast cancer patients1,2,4-7 • C hanged adjuvant treatment recommendations for a significant proportion of both node-negative and node-positive patients10,11 • Genomic Health® is committed to making Oncotype DX available to your patients3 —Extensively reimbursed, with more than 95% of privately insured lives and Medicare beneficiaries covered for the test, as well as expanding coverage in node-positive patients —Provides numerous services to ease the reimbursement process for you, your staff, and your patients through the Genomic Access Program (GAP) • Genomic Health is a CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited reference laboratory Oncotype DX is now available for patients with stage II colon cancer, expanding Genomic Health’s technology to other cancer types. For Customer Service, please contact 866-ONCOTYPE (866-662-6897) or e-mail [email protected] within the United States, and +1-650-569-2028 or e-mail [email protected] outside the United States. www.oncotypeDX.com References: 1. Paik S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(23):3726-3734. 2. Paik S, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2817-2826. 3. Data on file. Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA. 4. Dowsett M, et al. Risk of distant recurrence using Oncotype DX in postmenopausal primary breast cancer patients treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. Abstract presented at: 31st Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 10-14, 2008; San Antonio, TX. Abstract 53. 5. Harris L, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5287-5312. 6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology™: breast cancer: V.1.2009. http://www.nccn.org. Published December 2, 2008. Accessed December 22, 2009. 7. Albain KS, et al; for The Breast Cancer Intergroup of North America. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(1):55-65. 8. Anderson JM, et al. Molecular characterization of breast cancer core biopsy specimens by gene expression analysis using standardized quantitative RT-PCR. Poster presented at: 32nd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 9-13, 2009; San Antonio, TX. Poster 6021. 9. Paik S, et al. Expression of the 21 genes in the Recurrence Score assay and tamoxifen clinical benefit in the NSABP study B-14 of node negative, estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(16S)(suppl). Abstract 510. 10. Lo SS, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection [published online ahead of print January 11, 2010]. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2119. 11. Oratz R, et al. Effect of a 21-gene reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay on treatment recommendations for patients with lymph node–positive and estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. Poster presented at: 32nd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 9-13, 2009; San Antonio, TX. Poster 2031. 12. Badve SS, et al. Estrogen- and progesterone-receptor status in ECOG 2197: comparison of immunohistochemistry by local and central laboratories and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction by central laboratory. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15):2473-2481. 13. Baehner FL, et al. A Kaiser-Permanente populationbased study of ER and PR expression by the standard method, immunohistochemistry (IHC), compared to a new method, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Presented at: 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Symposium; September 7-8, 2007; San Francisco, CA. Abstract 88. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and ASCO are registered trademarks of ASCO; National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and NCCN are registered trademarks of NCCN. ASCO and NCCN do not endorse any product or therapy. Genomic Health, Oncotype DX, and Recurrence Score® are registered trademarks of Genomic Health, Inc. © 2010 Genomic Health, Inc. All rights reserved. GHI201 12/10