Regular Meeting - December 15, 2014

........ .cirloF._MA.NASSAs,·viRGiNIA.
1)/i,Jt~
· ·· ·· . .... ' ' ·····-··" .... ... """rtrJ:·p,n-mh It"
City Council
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
J. Steven Randolph. V1ce Mayor
Marc T. AvE'ni
Andrew l. HarrovE>r
tan T. loveJOY
Jl)nathan L Way
Ma1k D. WolfE'
AGENDA
City Manaser
W. Patnc~ Pate
Qhllerk
AndI ea P. Madden
REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIl CHAMBERS - CITY HALL
MONDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2014
5:30 P.M . ORDER OF BUSINESS
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CHIEF OF POLICE REPORT
COUNCIL TIME
MAYOR TIME
CONSENT AGENDA
.ACTION ITEMS
All matters listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed. There will be no
separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be
removed from the consent agenda and considered separately.
1.
Approve Minutes of Regular Meeting of December 8, 2014.
Andrea P. Madden, City Clerk.)
(Staff:
Page 2
2.
Consideration of Resolution #R-2015-22 Honoring Council Member J.
Steven Randolph upon His Retirement from the Manassas City Council
after Twenty-Eight Years of Dedicated Service to the City and Its
Residents. (Staff: Andrea P. Madden, City Clerk.)
5
3.
Consideration of Resolution #R-2015-23 Honoring Council Member
Andrew L. Harrover upon His Retirement from the Manassas City Council.
(Staff: Andrea P. Madden, City Clerk.)
9
4.
(Reserved for any item to be added)
SUGGESTED MOTION #1:
"I move that Items #, #and # be removed from the Consent Agenda and
be added as Items #, # and #, respectively, and that the remaining
Consent Agenda items be approved as it now appears and the readings of
the ordinances be dispensed".
SUGGESTED MOTION #2:
"I move that the consent agenda be approved and the readings of the
ordinances be dispensed".
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
5.
ACTION ITEM: Second Reading of Uncodified Ordinance #0-2015-09 for
Utilities - Stormwater Management Service.
Director of Public Works and Utilities.)
6.
7.
8.
9.
(Staff:
1 Minute
Michael Moon,
13
ACTION ITEM: Second Reading of Ordinance #0-2015-10 Adding Chapter
1 Minute
118 Article VI to the Code of Ordinances, City of Manassas, Virginia
(2002), Relating to a Stormwater Management Utility. (Staff: Michael
Moon, Director of Public Works and Utilities.)
15
Consideration of Resolution #R-2015-27 Concerning an
Appeal by the City of Manassas Water and Sewer Department of a
Decision of the City of Manassas Architectural Review Board Denying the
Demolition of the Elevated Water Storage Tank Located at 9000 Quarry
Street. (Staff: Allison Whitworth, Planner, Community Development.)
20 Minutes
First Reading of Ordinance #0-2015-13 to Approve REZ
#2014-02: Manassas Station, at 9002 and 9004 Prince William Street.
(Staff: Matthew Arcieri, Planning and Zoning Services Manager.)
20 Minutes
ACTION ITEM:
ACTION ITEM:
(Reserved for changes from consent agenda)
17
37
Agenda,.Oecember 15'"2014
Page 3
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A.
Staff Items (Less than three minutes each)
B.
Other Items
10.
(Reserved for changes from consent agenda)
NEW BUSINESS
A.
Staff Items (Less than three minutes each)
B.
Other Items
11.
(Reserved for changes from consent agenda)
AWARDS, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
tllil~lflllfilflllrll
12.
(Reserved for changes from consent agenda)
CITIZENS' TIME
tlliillifliilli-fil
13.
The citizens' time portion of the agenda is set aside for those citizens who
wish to address the Council for less than three minutes each. Citizens
need not give prior notice to the City to speak during the citizens' time
portion of the agenda. Citizens may address the Council for longer than
three minutes if they ask the City Manager for a place on the agenda at
least four working days before the meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
·----~
<"O
'
,.
o••• ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' " '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' .,, ,
" ''
'''
....
PAGE NO.
-~~~--,,_,,_.,,,,,,,
'---~---~-~-~--~~~
5
ITEM NO.
MEETING DATE:
December 15, 2014
TIME ESTIMATE:
Consent
AGENDA ITEM
TITLE:
Consideration of Resolution #R-2015-22 Honoring Council Member J. Steven
Randolph upon His Retirement from the Manassas City Council After TwentyEight Years of Dedicated Service to the City and Its Residents
DATE THIS ITEM
WAS LAST
CONSIDERED BY
COUNCIL:
'F
SU'
ISS
Approve Resolution.
DATION:
BOARD/COMMISSION/
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY MANAGER:
x
Approve
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
wJ1
Approve
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
COMMENTS:
DISCUSSION
(IF NECESSARY):
BUDGET/FISCAL
IMPACT:
NA
STAFF:
Andrea P. Madden, City Clerk 703-257-8280
If Council Illembers have queMions, you are urged to call the r>tajfperson who prepared this agenda statement prior to meeting.
MOTION:
SECOND:
RE:
December 15,2014
Regular Meeting
Res No. R-2015-22
HONORING COUNCIL MEMBER J. STEVEN RANDOLPH UPON HIS
RETIREMENT FROM THE MANASSAS CITY COUNCIL AFTER
TWENTY-EIGHT YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY
AND ITS RESIDENTS
WHEREAS, while Council Member J. Steven Randolph (Mr. Randolph) grew
up in the Atlanta, Georgia and Charlotte, North Carolina area, thirty-two years ago a job in
publishing brought Mr. Randolph to the Northern Virginia area and his love and passion for
history brought him to the City of Manassas; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Randolph's commitment to the City of Manassas began while
a resident of Georgetown South where he served on the Board of Trustees; and
WHEREAS, while his children, Warren and Jennifer, were attending Baldwin
Elementary School, he became President of Baldwin's PTA and realized that one way to
accomplish goals in the City was to run for Council; and
WHEREAS, with the help of friends, associates and neighbors, Mr. Randolph
literally ran a campaign as an Independent from "off the kitchen table" winning his first
election to the City Council in 1986 and has been successfully reelected every four years since
that time; and
WHEREAS, since his first term, Mr. Randolph has worked side-by-side with
six Mayors, including the late Edgar E. Rohr, John M. Weber, Robert L. Browne, the late Dr.
Marvin L. Gillum, Douglas S. Waldron and Harry J. Parrish II, to fulfill the needs of the City;
and
WHEREAS, since his first election in 1986, Mr. Randolph has served on and
chaired various Council committees including the Utility Committee, the Legislative
Committee, the Cable TV Committee, the Lake Manassas Committee, the Building and
Property Committee, Public Safety/Social Services Committee, the City/Schools Finance
Committee, Economic Development Committee, Land Use Committee, Budget/Finance
Committee, the Ad Hoc Legislative Committee and the Personnel Committee where he has
served almost continuously since 1986; and
WHEREAS, realizing the importance of communication between City Council
and residents, Mr. Randolph was instrumental in instituting a Citizens Time at Regular Council
Meetings where citizens could speak on any topic for a specified time and the Town Hall
Meeting concept that literally brought the City Departments to citizens on a regular basis at
designated city elementary schools; and
7
December 15, 2014
Regular Meeting
Res. No. R-2015-22
Page Two
WHEREAS, although Mr. Randolph reflected that at times it would have been
advantageous to run as a member of the majority party, he has always run as an Independent
and says that he remains a "proud Independent;" and
WHEREAS, some of the projects that have matured during Mr. Randolph's
twenty-eight year term include the City's partnering with the Virginia Railway Express
bringing rail commuter service to Manassas, the creation of the Harris Pavilion, an almost
entire rebuilding of Osbourn High School, reuse of the Hopkins Candy Factory into the Center
for the Arts, the completion and dedication of the new City Hall, the parking garage, the Hylton
Performing Arts Center and Freedom Center, just to name a few; and
WHEREAS, Council Member Randolph's community activities have included
serving as president of the Baldwin Elementary School PTA, serving as Director of the Greater
Manassas Jaycees, President of the Catherton Area Civic Association, serving as a member of
the Board of the Prince William Chorale and coaching both youth soccer and basketball teams.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Harry J. Parrish II, Mayor
of the City of Manassas and on behalf of the Manassas City Council, hereby publicly
commend, recognize, and thank
Council9rf.em6er J. Steven ~ntfo{ph
For his outstanding service to the City of Manassas and its citizens. The Manassas City
Council wishes Mr. Randolph a successful relocation to North Carolina where he will be able
to spend much quality time with his grandchildren and good health, happiness and fulfillment
that he has so richly has earned in his retirement.
Harry J. Parrish II
Mayor
December 15, 2014
Regular Meeting
Res. No. R-2015-22
Page Three
ATTEST:
Andrea P. Madden
Votes:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent from Vote:
Absent from Meeting:
City Clerk
.........AGENDA.STAIEMEN.I
ww
wW
w
_q,___
. P.AGE ..N.O•.. .
•
3
ITEM NO. - - MEETING DATE:
December 15,2014
TIME ESTIMATE:
Consent
AGENDA ITEM
TITLE:
Consideration of Resolution #R-2015-23 Honoring Andrew L Harrover Upon His
Retirement from the Manassas City Council.
DATE THIS ITEM
WAS LAST
CONSIDERED BY
COUNCIL:
SUMMARY OF
ISSUE/TOPIC:
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution.
BOARD/COMMISSION/
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY MANAGER:
x
viii
Approve
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
Approve
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
COMMENTS:
DISCUSSION
(IF NECESSARY):
BUDGET/FISCAL
IMPACT:
NA
STAFF:
Andrea P. Madden, City Clerk 703-257-8280
If Council ;t/embers have questions, yau are urged to call the staffperson who prepared this agemla statement prior to meeting.
JO
MOTION:
SECOND:
RE:
December 15,2014
Regular Meeting
Res No. R-2015-23
HONORING COUNCIL MEMBER ANDREW L. HARROVER UPON
HIS RETIREMENT FROM THE MANASSAS CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, Council Member Andrew L. Harrover (Mr. Harrover) is a lifelong resident of Manassas, Virginia born in January 1966 when Manassas was still a small
town with a total population of less than 10,000 citizens; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Harrover's official service to the City of Manassas began
when he was elected to the City Council on May 2, 2006 and reelected again on May 4, 201 0;
and
WHEREAS, in July 2008, 2010 and 2012, Mr. Harrover was elected by his
fellow council members to serve as Vice Mayor to Mayor Harry J. Parrish II; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Harrover has worked side-by-side with former Mayor,
Douglas S. Waldron and current Mayor, Harry J. Parrish II, to fulfill the needs of the City in
working on a multitude of important issues including education, overcrowding in the city,
public safety and the quality of life for all Manassas City citizens; and
WHEREAS, since he was elected Councilman in 2006, Mr. Harrover has
served continuously on the Budget/Finance Committee and the Economic/Community
Development and Land Use Committee and as council liaison on the Airport Commission and
the Manassas Historic Resources Board; and
WHEREAS, early in his first tenn in office, Mr. Harrover conceived and
presented to council Manassas Next, an ambitious program that included several positive steps
to help propel the City forward; and
WHEREAS, over his past eight years of service to the City, Mr. Harrover has
witnessed many positive changes in the City, and among his city council accomplishments are
many downtown economic projects including the Battle Street and Main Street Streetscapes
that have helped promote positively the Old Town area, the groundbreaking, completion and
opening of the Parking Garage on Prince William Street, the creation of the Technology Zone
and Arts and Tourism District in the Old Town that has helped to positively revitalize the
downtown area, and the many new housing developments that have seen their birth during this
eight-year period; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Harrover was also very instrumental in formulating and
supporting Education Fonvard, a plan to help provide quality education for the students in the
Manassas City School System; and
j/
December 15, 2014
Regular Meeting
Res. No. 2015-23
Page2
WHEREAS, when Mr. Harrover is not attending meetings or working at his
business at Matrix Corporation, he spends his leisure time biking the trails and roadways in and
around the Commonwealth and over the years has been able to log thousands of miles in that
process; and
WHEREAS, not only has Mr. Harrover served the City in a variety of
capacities, but he has also been an active member in the Kiwanis Club of Bull Run serving as
its president, has served on the Board of Directors for SERVE and has served as Vestry for
Trinity Episcopal Church in Manassas; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Harrover's current deep interest lies in an organization called
Matthew's Center, where he serves as a Board member for this organization that is dedicated to
enhancing the lives of children and families affected by autism; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hanover is married to Sarah, and has one daughter, Erin who
currently is attending Osbourn High School; and
WHEREAS, following his time of service to the City of Manassas and its
citizens, Mr. Harrover is anxiously awaiting the day when he will be able to devote more time
to his business and his family.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Harry J. Parrish II, Mayor
of the City of Manassas and on behalf of the Manassas City Council, hereby publicly
commend, recognize, and thank
Council9rf.em6er )f:n4rew £. Jfarrover
For his superb service to the City of Manassas and its citizens. Further, the Manassas City
Council wishes Andy good health and happiness in all his future endeavors.
Harry J. Parrish II
Mayor
December 15, 2014
Regular Meeting
Res. No. R-2015-23
Page Three
ATTEST:
Andrea P. Madden
Votes:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent from Vote:
Absent from Meeting:
City Clerk
PAGe NO.. J3 ························~·
AGENCASlATeMiiiN+·····
ITEM NO.
MEETING DATE:
December 15, 2014
TIME ESTIMATE:
1 Minute
AGENDA ITEM TITLE:
Second Reading of Uncodified Ordinance #0-2015-09 for Utilities Management Service.
DATE THIS ITEM WAS
LAST CONSIDERED
BY COUNCIL:
September 23, 2014- Council Work Session.
November 17, 2014- Opened Public Hearing.
December 8, 2014- First Reading of Ordinance.
SUMMARY OF
ISSUE/TOPIC:
On December 8, 2014, the Manassas City Council voted to approve Uncodified
Ordinance #0-2015-09 on first reading; however, the vote was not unanimous and a
separate roll call is required.
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Uncodified Ordinance #0-2015-09 for establishing stormwater utility fee on
second reading.
BOARD/COMMISSION/
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY MANAGER:
X
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
COMMENTS:
DISCUSSION
(IF NECESSARY):
BUDGET/FISCAL
IMPACT:
$515,070 in revenue in FY 2015 (Half Year).
STAFF:
Michael Moon, Director of Public Works & Utilities, 703-257-8226
If Council 1~femben.· have questions, you are urged to call the staffperson who prepared this agenda statement prior to meeting.
Stormwater
11
"" ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,, , , ,.. ,,.
~ <I
· ~.".'"'
. { i/ ''- /
..
. " -"
'!1>
..·
·.
.
\..)
:~
.
'
:.
..
~: :.
.
.~
··..
': '\. >,,,
~
•····· .·.
...
· ..·
.
·:
'··
(
. /:1
,, ~··I
.
~
\
.,
ITEM NO. _t""'"n__
MEETING DATE:
December 15, 2014
TIME ESTIMATE:
1 Minute
AGENDA ITEM TITLE:
Second Reading of Ordinance #0-2015-1 0 Adding Chapter 118 Article VI to the Code of
Ordinances, City of Manassas, Virginia (2002), Relating to a Stormwater Management
Utility
DATE THIS ITEM WAS
LAST CONSIDERED
BY COUNCIL:
September 23, 2014- Council Work Session.
November 17, 2014- Opened Public Hearing.
December 8, 2014- First Reading of Ordinance.
SUMMARY OF
ISSUE/TOPIC:
On December 8, 2014, the Manassas City Council voted to approve Ordinance #02015-1 0 on first reading; however, the vote was not unanimous and a separate roll call
is required.
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Ordinance #0-2015-1 0 for establishing stormwater utility fee on first reading.
BOARD/COMMISSION/
COMMITIEE:
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY MANAGER:
COMMENTS:
x
Approve
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
W P{/ Approve
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
-@ -
DISCUSSION
(IF NECESSARY):
BUDGET/FISCAL
IMPACT:
$515,070 in revenue in FY 2015 (Half Year).
STAFF:
Michael Moon, Director of Public Works & Utilities, 703-257-8226
lfCouncilliJembers have questions, you are urged tiJ call the staffperson who prepared this agenda statemem prior to meeting.
·~.
"!>.
' .t
. '
'\...
::·.
'· ..
.
'·
-·
EAGEJiO.. L2
ITEM NO. _7.L-__
·~~. .AG.ENDA.S.IATEM.ENT . .
MEETING DATE:
December 15, 2014
TIME ESTIMATE:
20 minutes
AGENDA ITEM TITLE:
concerning an appeal by the City of
Consideration of Resolution #R-2015-27
Manassas Water and Sewer Department of a decision of the City of Manassas
Architectural Review Board denying the demolition of the elevated water storage tank
located at 9000 Quarry Street.
DATE THIS ITEM WAS
LAST CONSIDERED
BY COUNCIL:
April 28, 2014
(Approved motion to defer action for 6 months to allow time for further study and
consideration of alternatives for the future of the water tower.)
SUMMARY OF
ISSUE/TOPIC:
Consideration of an appeal pursuant to Section 130-555 of the City of Manassas Zoning
Ordinance. The City of Manassas Water and Sewer Department has filed an appeal of
the City's Architectural Review Board decision denying a Certificate of Appropriateness
to demolish the elevated water storage tank located at 9000 Quarry Street. The Public
Hearing was held March 17, 2014.
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution #R-2015-27 A to UPHOLD the decision of the Architectural Review
Board and DENY demolition of the water tank.
BOARD/COMMISSION/ Architectural Review Board
COMMITTEE:
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY MANAGER:
X
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
COMMENTS:
DISCUSSION
(IF NECESSARY):
Section 130-546 of the Historic Overlay District (HOD):
(e) Demolition of a contributing or historic structure. The ARB shall issue a certificate of
appropriateness to raze, or demolish, a contributing or historic structure if the ARB finds
that the structure meets at least two of the following criteria:
(1) The structure is not of such architectural or historic interest that its removal would
be a significant detriment of the public interest.
(2) The structure is not of such significance that it would qualify on its own merit as a
national, state landmark or local historic structure.
(3) The structure is not of such old and uncommon design, texture and/or material
that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty and/or expense.
(4) The structure is not preserving or protecting an area of historic interest in the city.
See attachments:
1. Letter from the Citizens Advisory Committee on the Historic Old Town
Manassas Water Tower dated 11/15/14
2. Memorandum from Tony H. Dawood dated 12/1/14
BUDGET/FISCAL
IMPACT:
$180,000-$200,000 for total rehabilitation of water tank
STAFF:
Allison Whitworth, Planner, Community Development (703) 257-8247.
If Council 1Hembers have questions, you are urged to call the staffperson who prepared this agenda statement prior to meeting.
MOTION:
SECOND:
RE:
December 15, 2014
Regular Meeting
Resolution #2015-27A
Appeal by the City of Manassas Water and Sewer Department of a Decision
of the City of Manassas Architectural Review Board to Deny the
Demolition of the Elevated Water Storage Tank Located at 9000 Quarry
Street
WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Board (ARB) met in regular session on
February 11, 2014 and heard ARB Case #2014-4000014, requesting approval to demolish the
elevated water storage tank located at 9000 Quarry Street; and
WHEREAS, the ARB denied the application finding that the criteria for
demolition set forth in Section 130-546 (e) of the City of Manassas Zoning Ordinance is not
satisfied; and
WHEREAS, the applicant, pursuant to Section 130-155 of the City of Manassas
Zoning Ordinance filed an appeal to the Manassas City Council on February 21, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the Manassas City Council held a public hearing on the matter on
March 17, 2014 after full compliance with all state code public hearing notice and
requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Manassas City Council has determined that the structure is of
such architectural and historic interest that its removal would be a significant detriment to the
public interest, that the structure is of such significance that it would qualify on its own merit as
a local historic structure, that the structure is of such old and uncommon design that it could not
be reproduced without great difficulty and expense, and that the structure is preserving or
protecting an area ofhistoric interest in the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Manassas City Council
does hereby UPHOLD the decision of the Architectural Review Board on ARB Case #20144000014;and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Manassas City Council does hereby
DENY the appeal of the City of Manassas Water and Sewer Department and PROHIBIT the
demolition of the elevated water storage tank located at 9000 Quarry Street.
Harry J. Parrish II
On behalf of the City Council
Of Manassas, Virginia
Mayor
December 15, 2014
Regular Meeting
Resolution #2015-27 A
Page Two
ATTEST:
Andrea Madden
Votes:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent from Vote:
Absent from Meeting:
City Clerk
MOTION:
SECOND:
RE:
December 15, 2014
Regular Meeting
Resolution #2015-27B
Appeal by the City of Manassas Water and Sewer Department of a Decision
of the City of Manassas Architectural Review Board to Deny the
Demolition of the Elevated Water Storage Tank Located at 9000 Quarry
Street
\VHEREAS, the Architectural Review Board (ARB) met in regular session on
February 11, 2014 and heard ARB Case #2014-4000014, requesting approval to demolish the
elevated water storage tank located at 9000 Quarry Street; and
WHEREAS, the ARB denied the application finding that the criteria for
demolition set forth in Section 130-546 (e) of the City of Manassas Zoning Ordinance is not
satisfied; and
WHEREAS, the applicant, pursuant to Section 130-155 of the City of Manassas
Zoning Ordinance filed an appeal to the Manassas City Council on February 21, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the Manassas City Council held a public hearing on the matter on
March 17, 2014 after full compliance with all state code public hearing notice and
requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Manassas City Council has determined that the structure is not
of such architectural and historic interest that its removal would be a significant detriment to
the public interest, that the structure is not of such significance that it would qualify on its own
merit as a local historic structure, that the structure is not of such old and uncommon design
that it could not be reproduced without great difficulty and expense, and that the structure is not
preserving or protecting an area of historic interest in the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Manassas City Council
does hereby REVERSE the decision of the Architectural Review Board on ARB Case #20 144000014;and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Manassas City Council does hereby
GRANT the appeal of the City of Manassas Water and Sewer Department and ALLOW the
demolition of the elevated water storage tank located at 9000 Quarry Street.
Harry J. Parrish II
On behalf of the City Council
Of Manassas, Virginia
Mayor
d./
December 15,2014
Regular Meeting
Resolution #2015-278
Page Two
ATTEST:
Andrea Madden
Votes:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent from Vote:
Absent from Meeting:
City Clerk
November 15,2014
Dear Mayor and members of Council.
We write in our individual and collective capacities as active participants in efforts
to protect and promote the historic resources of our city and, in particular, Old
Town Manassas.
Old Town Manassas is what makes Manassas unique in terms of its remarkable
sense of place, intact historical fabric, and lively mix of uses that create a destination
that attracts residents, tourists and other visitors. The essence of Old Town
Manassas is its historic structures, which, taken collectively, define its visual feel
and ambiance.
For those who recognize the value and economic development potential of Old
Town, the first duty is to protect the historic integrity of the place itself. That means
protecting and developing as historic resources notable structures that people and
historians most recognize as visual landmarks of Manassas. Among such landmarks
are the Manassas Train Station, Harry J. Parrish Old Town Hall, the Old County
Courthouse, and the Historic 1914 Water Tower.
The significance of the Tower is objectively demonstrable:
• It meets the definition of Historic Structure as codified in City Ordinance;
• It was formally surveyed by the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission;
• It is listed as a "Contributing Structure" in the local Manassas Historic
District;
• It is identified as one of four remaining "landmarks" in the Old Town Sector
Plan;
• Following thorough analyses by consulting historians hired by the City, it was
concluded that the Tower is a valuable historic resource and recommended
that it should be retained;
• City Community Development staff have repeatedly evaluated the Tower
according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for historic structures
and recommended to Council that the Tower be retained; and
• It has been evaluated by Alexa McDowell, one of the foremost experts on
Historic American Water Towers, as a structure demonstrating such historic
integrity and historic relevance as to merit pursuit of its it nomination for
listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
Retaining the 1914 Water Tower as a historic resource is necessary to keep the
historic integrity of Old Town intact. The Tower contributes to the unique visual
branding of Old Town and the City and, as experts consulted by the City have
opined, the Tower is valuable for wayfinding to Old Town from significant distances,
all gateway corridors and other approaches to Manassas.
There is strong support in the community for preserving the Tower, not just
because of familiarity, nostalgia and the sense of home many people associate with
the Tower, but also because of appreciation for its historical significance and iconic
value in branding Manassas in support of our economic development objectives.
More than 600 of our neighbors have joined the Facebook page supporting the
preservation of the Historic Water Tower.
The challenge appears to be in identifying resources for the continued upkeep of the
Tower, and in addressing this we find ourselves in a bit of a chicken-and-egg
situation. There are scores of grants potentially available to the City to help fund the
structure's ongoing preservation, but in order to access such grants, intermediate
steps must be taken that require modest up-front investment. The first of these
steps, as recommended by the City's consultants, is the completion of an intensive
level architectural survey of the Tower (A surveillance level architectural survey has
already been completed on behalf of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources).
In order to access the most significant grants available over the long term, the
ultimate goal would be to attain listing of the Tower on the National Register of
Historic Places.
In order to move the process forward, those of us signing this letter have formed a
committee representative of organizational, commercial and individual
stakeholders in Old Town Manassas with the objective of raising money to fund the
modest up-front investment needed to complete the intensive level architectural
survey, thereby facilitating access to grant moneys for the follow-on steps required
to preserve the tower over the long-term. We are very encouraged in this pursuit in
that we have already received commitments over the course of just a few days to
raise more than 25% of the $8,000 total cost of the survey. Historic Manassas, Inc.·
has also generously offered to assist in identifying potential funding sources in
support of this effort.
From a local taxpayer standpoint, it seems difficult to justify the $30,000-40,000 net
cost of razing the Tower, most especially if grants to cover the cost of maintaining it
are a reasonable possibility.
Given the historic significance of the 1914 Water Tower, strong community interest
in its future, our positive momentum, and the unrecoverable cost of its demolition,
we are hopeful that you will enhance the likelihood of success in our efforts by not
taking up consideration of demolishing the Tower at this time.
Respectfully and with warm regards,
Citizens Advisory Committee on the Historic Old Town Manassas Water Tower
2
Citizens Advisory Committee on the Historic Old Town Manassas Water Tower:
Jan Alten
Owner, Opera House Gourmet; Member, Old Town Business Association;
Historic District Home Owner and Resident
Steve Hersch
Director, Manassas Historic Landmarks Preservation Corp.; City Resident
Hugh and Kerry Ickrath
Historic District Home Owners and Residents
Don Kline
Director, Historic Manassas, Inc.
Jimmy Lunsford
Director, Historic Manassas, Inc.;
Director, Manassas Historic Landmarks Preservation Corp.;
City Resident
Rich Meyer
Historic District Home Owner and Resident
Mark Olsen
Owner, Olde Towne Landscaping, Inc; President, Historic Manassas, Inc;
Member, Manassas Cemeteries Advisory Board; Member, Beautification Committee
Tom Waters
Director, Historic Manassas, Inc.; Vice Chairman, Architectural Review Board;
Member, Historic Resources Board; Historic District Home Owner and Resident
Martha Wilson
Member, Planning Commission; Historic District Home Owner and Resident
3
CITY OF MANASSAS
PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES
DEPARTMENT
December 1. 2014
TO:
Elizabeth Via-Gossman. Commun~y Development Director
FROM:
Tony H. Dawood, P"K, Deputy
RE:
Fire House Tank
D~PWU, Water& Sewer
'\
I am requesting the attached memorandum he induded in the December 8, 2014 City Council
meeting agenda package relative to the Fire House Tank. By \\'ay of background, on July 7th at a
CouncH Work Session the request to demolish the Fire House Tank was remanded to the December
Council meeting in order to provide the Interested citizens time to establish other funding sources to
maintain the tank as a historical structure.
In response to Mr. Jonathan Way's recent questions regarding the costs associated with maintaining
the tank as a water storage facility vs. an historical :st:ructure the attached agenda statement and
supporting documentation provides the necessary response,
Finally, please be advised that Utility Staff via your agenda statement is requesting Council,
flU!'l'U11llt to SecJ30-555 (g) of the Codified Ordinance, to reverse the findings of the Architectural
Review Board on the-ir decision to deny a Certiticate of Appropriateness to demolish the Fire House
elevated stl"'rage tank.
Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information.
0{
.AGENDA.SIAIEMENI.
PAGE.N~.;,;.;N·~.;,;.;
··············
ITEM NO.
MEETING DATE:
July 7, 2014
TIME ESTIMATE:
30 Minutes
AGENDA ITEM TITLE:
Consideration of the City of Manassas Water & Sewer Department request to demolish the
elevated water storage tank (Fire House Tank) at Quarry Road and to appeal the decision
by the Architectural Review Board (ARB), Case #2014-4000014, to prohibit demolition.
DATE THIS ITEM WAS
LAST CONSIDERED
BY COUNCIL:
April 28, 2014
SUMMARY OF
ISSUE/TOPIC:
Demolition of the Fire House Tank was Initially included in the 2010 City of Manassas
CIP. Due to limited storage capacity the cost to maintain the tank far exceeds the
storage value for the City.
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
Work session is to provide an opportunity for Council to provide specific direction to staff
and interested private parties that may be interested in preserving the tank on this issue.
BOARDICOMMISSIONI
COMMITTEE:
Architectural Review Board
RECOMMENDATION:
..!._ Approve
_
Disapprove
Reviewed
Sea Comments
CITY MANAGER:
_ _ Approve
_
Disapprove _
Reviewed _
See Comments
COMMENTS:
None
DISCUSSION
(IF NECESSARY):
Consideration of an appeal pursuant to Section 130..555 of the City's Zoning Ordinance.
The City's Water & Sewer Department filed an appeal of the City's Architectural Review
Board denying a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the existing Fire House water
storage tank. A public hearing was held on April 28, 2014 and the City Council voted to
defer action for 6 months on this Item to allow additional time to determine if other private
groups may deeire to assume responsibility of the tank and the cost of maintenance. Also,
staff was directed to investigate the cost to maintain the tank as a non--functioning water
storage facility. Based on our investigation, a dry tank will require structural Inspection
every five (5) years and internal and external painting with a protective coating every ten
(10) to fifteen (15) years. A recent quote obtained from Tank Industry Consultants
estimates the cost to perform a total rehabilitation will be $100,000- $200,000, including
inspections.
BUDGETIFISCAL
IMPACT:
STAFF:
$100,000- $200,000
or PWU, Water & Sewer (703) 257-8380
June 30, 2014
TANK
INDUSTRY
CONSULTANTS
7740 West New York Street
Indiaoapolit,lndilna 46214
317/271-3100- Phone
317/271-3300- FAX
Mr. Tony H. Dawood, P.E.
Deputy Director of Water & Sewer
City of Manassas
8500 Public Works Drive
Manassas, Virginia 20110
RE:
75,000 Gallon Fire House Steel legged Tank
Dear Mr. Dawood:
Plainfield, ntmois
815 I 556-8335
Pittsbursh. Pennsylvania
412 I 262-1586
El P1180, Texas
91 5 /790-0790
Houston. Texas
2811367-3511
Thank you for contacting Tank Industry Consultants regarding the 75,000 Gallon Fire
House Steel legged Tank. As discussed, the cost for completely cleaning and
repainting the exterior of the tank of this size and style including containment may
be in the ballpark of $180,000.
In order for Tank Industry Consultants to develop a detailed Kope of work required
to maintain the Fire House Tank, Tank Industry Consultants would need to evaluate
the tank.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have further questions. I can be reached
at (412) 721-9322.
Yours truly,
Nicole A. Clarke
Manager, Eastern Region
cc:
Mr. Gregory R. Stein, P.E.
Mr. Patrick Brown, P.E.
Mrs. Penni Snodgrass
An Employee-Owned Company
" , .,
.. ., , . ...
..
·---"""""' "'" ""•• "'''""·-"
...
----.. .... ..................._._..______
..............................- -- ····'"
_.__._.,,_
City of Manassas
Fire House Tank
Options Review
& Expense Outlook
July 2. 2014
o.rtpdon
ODdoM"
1
Retire and Demolish - Request bids for demolition and removal.
2
Retire and Preserve- Disconnect from water system, interior and exterior paint and
structural Inspection.
3
Continue Operation and Perform Necessary Maintenance- Water system interface
replacement and upgrades, exterior paint and structural inspection.
ttem Delcrlptlon
A Exterior Paint
8 Interior Paint In dry tank
c Structural Inspection
Altitude Valve Replacement & SCADA upgrade
0
E Operating O&M and Energy
F
Preservation O&M
G Demolition
Summary
Option 1
Option 2
Option 3
lnltl•l Cost
$40,000
$193,000
$223,000
20YearCost
$0
$312,000
$512,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
SChedule
Cost
180,000 20yrs
40,000 20yrs
8,000 5 yrs
20,000 Onetime
15,000 Annual
5,000 Annual
40,000 Onetime
oPtiOns
2,3
3
2,3
2
2
3
1
Total
$40,000
$505,000
$735,000
Fire House Tank Expense Outlook
$800,000 ,....--- -- -- -- - -- -- -$700,000 .i----···------ - -- - - ---
- -- - - - -- -
- - - ··-
$600,000 +-------------------~
$500,000 +-- - -- - - - -- · $400,000 -1---- -- -- - - - - 1-.
$300,000
.t--- -- - - - -- - -1
$200,000
.f..------ - -- --
+-----------~
$0-l---__.
_ _ _ _--r-_____
$100,000
Option 1
Option 2
T.,.k MM4u:•IICII Opdonl
"Structul'll ,..n 111d ather requirements 1re unkrlown 1\ this t1me1nd Mlllncnt&M llq)eiUti if l•ntlfled.
I= . .,_. .
. . ..,.....,~ ~ . . . ..-. ~........ .... ··'-·. ····~ · ~ . .·--·-- ·.-···4> ··· ... ,....... .._....,......... . ..... ........ .. .......,. ~ ._. ... ··~ ,... ,, ., ····· ...... .......... ~· ............................ ... ........... ... -.... ... .. ,.. . .. ............ . - . . . .. ' . .... .............. ,..... ..
tEOl
:t
.
.I
j
J
I
DEal)
I
&zoll
il
:J..
i
1
tmri I
:I
!
.¥
Uotl
§
noel
I
i
!
J ozor
J
5l01: •
I
I
I
~
~
g
~
"'
..., c~ 41:SJ- ·s; ~
c ~ : o I
.,
"'
~
~
0
~ .,
0 c: ~ f
:r :8 K
~
.uu..
~~ 8-JS
~
,.(
r..
I
I
•
I
..
I
1..
I
I.,
II
I
I
,...
I
I
I
l
I
J
J
I
'r
1
I
J
Jl a
ji 1
;
I
I 11
il !1 II
j
jJ
....
""
I
Ill
[..
I•
"'
,
I
,
I• I•
,I!.. ,I!..
I! I!..
i! I!
I! I! II
lw J.o
I!
1- ...
,
f.. ,..
1..
""
..
I
..
ii
,
i
,..
I
I'"
I!
I•
I!,..
I!
,..
!
[..
I!
I!..
~
,
i
I ,I!.. ,I!....i!
,...
I
I
,I..! ,I!..
...
a
,... D I""! ,..,!
I!,... ,I!...
I
I
,...
f! r!
Ji
... I•
[1[1
I~~ ': I! ~
)Jcau aw••J jll
•J
I•
:;;
I-I•
1..
~~,.. I
""
j
II
i
I
..
,
• I! I!
[.. 1..
,..
c . u ow ...
~
~
,
,I!... r...J
I!.. I,..,S
I!,.. ,!I..
i
I
,
Ia
I!
I
I! ~..
[.. I•
,
I
I"
I
,
r. .
[
I
I II,..
I"
I
[
.. l...
I! II
I!.. I!..
I
,I!.. ~
1..
,
..
,..,
I!
~
i
li
)I
11
1..
I'" ,.
...
I!. ,/!...
.. I•
i
I
II ij i·
1
I! I!
~ l
..
I! I! I!
,..
I
,..
..
I
J I
I
I
I I
1
I
I
1
f 11 1I
,..
,
1...
~
l
• -r
.,~
I
I
~
__
I
I
l
!
•II, I!.. ~ ~ •ill! ,I..! I
II
I
.. .. I I!,.. ~....
.! ! I
I! I!...
.. I
..
,..
I
I
I
!
l
.
:
not •
I
.j
I•
I~
~
;!
""
.. ,r!...
I!. ,~..
:
[
lil,l.. ~!!!~ [~
..
jJ··
uo.w ..
•J
3o
March 10,2014
Hon. Harry J. Parrish, II, Mayor, and City Council
City of Manassas
Ciry Hall
9027 Center Street
Manassas, Virginia 20110
Dear Mayor Parrish and Members t)fthc Manassas City Council,
fA A,'1.0. rt
Cc.cJI.I"-1<..
QT'( tAGf-.
j\t..l (~ p..tO!J,..;
Lt""l...
Jo\+..;
V\A
o,,.:~SG. ~
I am writing in regard to the 1914 Manassas water tower on Quarry Street, which l understand is
being considered for demolition. MY opinion about the structure's historical significance and,
specifically, its potential for individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places was
requested by Stephen Hersch, Nancy Hersch Ingram, and Jimmy and Susie Lunsfor~ on behalf of
a community of supporters tor the preservatioo. of the water tower.
Before entering into a discussion about the water tower, Jet me first after rny credentials as a
qualific,d professional. With a graduate degree from Iowa State University, I meet the
proFessional requirements of the Secretary of the Interior. I have becK working as an architectural
historian in the Midwest since establishing AKA Y Consulting in 200 I. llirct:tly applicable to the
Manassas resource, I have consider.oablc experience in the evaluation and documentation of water
towers. I have evaluated numerous water towers for the purpose of determining their potential tor
National Register listing and I have photo-docwnented dozens more for the historic record.
Further, in 2012, I successfully nominated the Elk River Water Tower to the National Regisfillt'-of
Historic Places.
The F.lk River Water Tower in Elk River, Minnesota, was listed on the National Register of
Historic Places as a structure significant for its association with the history of community
planning and development in Elk River, specifically as it relates to the provision of a ready water
source for fire protection. Without adequate fire protection until the 1920 construction of the Elk
River water tower, property in the village was lost to ftre with dramatic effect- its downtown was
a near complete loss in 1898. With fire insurance companies threatening signiticant increases in
insurance rates due to the absence of adequate fire protection in Elk River, tbc Village Counci l
moved to create a fire dcpartrn~nt and to construct a waterworks system -a move that created a
measure of stability and ultimately allowed Elk River to grow into the community it is today. The
Elk River Water Tower marks that significant development in community history.
In addition, the Elk River Water Tower is significant as an example of a specific type oFwater
tower, the hemispherical bottom. The elevated steel water tank was developed in the .1890s and
by the early twentieth century was the typical rype utilized in communities across the nation.
One<! a common landmark on the American landscape, this panicular fonn of water tower is
quickly vanishing as the requirements of communities grow beyond the capacity of the early
rower.; and they are thus replaced by larger capacity structures.
3/
"··
.·....
:"·:.
.
'
'., .:.~
'<
.
•
. • . ''t
. .
-1· ~
.
.........~ .
..
It is obvious that the 19 14 Manassas water tower has much in common with the tower at Elk
River. As in Elk River in 1898, Manassas sutlcred a massive t1re in 1905 that led to devastating
loss of property and high fire insurance rates that threatened the town's economic prospects.
The Manassas water tower's historic tie to local tire protection etl(n1s is well documented in
local news accounts from 1913 and 1914 detailing the efforts of Manassas citizens and town
fathers to establish utilities in Manassas, a herculean undertaking at the time. Its impact is
perhaps most apparent in the very existence of historic buildings that remain despite tires that
occurred in the period after the tower's construction. In addition, like the Elk River tower, the
Manassas resource is an example of a hemispherical bottom form with a high level of historic
integrity retained.
Previous historical surveys and evaluations ofManassas have recognized the significance of the
1914 water tower. In addition to being recorded as a contributing resource to the local
Manassas Historic District, it was concluded in the 2012 "Manassas Water Tower Analysis"
that "the water tower represents the era when Manassas changed from being a small town to a
modern municipality,'' noting specifically that "the 1914] water tower is a remarkably intact
and very visible reminder of the infrastructure needed to help Manassas grow into the city it is
now." The project report specifically recommended that an intensive level architectural survey
of the tower he undertaken for review and comment by the Virginia Dcpamncnt of Historic
Resources (DHR) and that the City of Manassas "continue to maintain the water tower for its
historical significance."
r
Manassas City staff shares that opinion, recently recommending that the Manassas Architectural
Review Board (ARB), consistent with the Manassas Historic District Guidelines, deny the
request tor demolition "due to [the tower's] historic significance to the city as a visible symbol
of its development and as a prominent fixture in the skyline for over a hundred years.'' In
citizen comments to the ARB, it was also astutely noted that the tower is a landmark in Old
Town that presents a potential to draw visitors. The ARB's vote to deny the request to demolish
the tower was uuanimous.
I am in frrm agreement that the Manassas Water Tower bears the potential for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places as a structure significant in its association with growth and
development in Manassas in the years after the turn of the 20111 century and as a structure that
exemplifies the hemispherical bottom form associated with water tower design during that erd.
I concur that an intensive level survey and evaluation of the 1914 Manassas Water Tower be
undertaken for review by the Virginia DHR. The work of the survey and evaluation would
focus on developing a thorough historic context specific to t.hc role of the tower as it factored
into Manassas commWlity development, including how its significance contrasts with the later
water tower located adjacent to the historic ntilroad depot. It would also examine and document
the 1914 tower for the purpose of placing it within the context of Virginia water towers l)f a
similar construction ern and tower type. Further, should the evaluation support a case for
registration and the OHR concur with that finding, I recommend that a National Register
nomination of the water tower be completed.
2
....
-:·:; .
;, ~-
The existence of the local Old Town Manassas Historic District (designated in 1984) and the
Manassas National Register Historic District (designated in 198R) arc evidence of the City's
commitment to the preservation of its historic resources. At the time those districts were
created, the potential significance of water towers was rarely considered. After all, water
towers were commonplace and utilitarian, making them easy to overlook. Today, some 30
years later, with landmark water towers being demolished at an alarming rate, we can
recognize the impenttivc to protect those few remaining for which historic signiticance and
a high level uf integrity merit their preservation.
l understand that the Manassas Water Tower is likely the only remaining historic resource in
Manassas not currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places that displays both the
requisite historic significance and the high degree of historic integrity and intactness to
potentially meet the National Park Service standards justifying an individual listing on the
National Register. l also understand that other remaining resources of sufficient historic
significance. most notably the Anna burg House and the Manassas and Confederate Cemeteries,
likely no longer meet the standards for such a listing, as the historic integrity and intactness of
those properties have been irreversibly compromised. In such a context, the destruction of the
Manassas Water Tower, perhaps the lone remaining Wllistcd structure in the City of Manassas
meriting a place on the National Register of Historic Places would represent a particularly
consequential loss and harm forever the historic fabric of Manassas.
Although Virginia is outside my typical service area, I am pleased to have been asked to
comment on the water tower. T have considered the importance of water towers in some
depth, pondering their impact on the American landscape and their role not just in the
development of a community's infrastructure and fire protection system, but as visual
symbols of place and borne. Driving through the rural countryside of the Midwest, we arc
guick.>d to our destination by water towers and I believe that experience transcends
geographical differences. Water towers remain integral to our sense of coming home and
with many towers being demolished it is increasingly imponant to save those that continue
to stand as enduring symbols of our community.
If I can be of further service, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Best regards,
II
II. '•
'I
vr/~&1 JfrvLjtst.·tlt
Alexa McDowell, Historian/Architcctuml Historian
3
cc: Pat Pate, City of Manassa~
Elizabeth Via-Gossman, City of Manassas
John Weber, Manassas Utility Commission
Keith Mueller. Manassas Historic Resources Board
Tom Waters, Manassas Architectural Review Boar<.l
Ann Hanover-Thomas, Manassas Museum Associates
Debbie Haight, Historic Manassas, Inc
Stephen Nelson, Discover Prince William & Manassas, VA
David Edwards, Virginia Department of Historic Resources
Joanic Evans, Virginia Department of Historic Resources
N<mcy Hersch Ingram
Stephen Hersch
Jimmy and Susie Lunsford
4
A Special Meeting of the Council of the City of Manassas, Virginia was held in the
Second Floor Conference Room at City Hall on the above date with the following present:
Mayor Harry J. Parrish II, Vice Mayor Andrew L. Harrover, Council Member Marc T. Aveni, lan
T. Lovejoy, J. Steven Randolph, Jonathan L. Way and Mark D. Wolfe; City Manager W. Patrick
Pate, Treasurer Robin R. Perkins, City Clerk Andrea P. Madden, Public Works and Utilities
Director Mike C. Moon, Deputy Director of Water and Sewer Tony Dawood, Community
Development Director Elizabeth S. Via-Gossman, Development Services Manager Jamie S.
Collins, Police Chief Doug W. Keen, Lieutenant Bill Hutchinson, Fire and Rescue Chief Brett R.
Bowman, Deputy Fire and Rescue Chief Wade House, and Public Affairs Specialist Patty Prince.
Mayor Parrish called the meeting to order at 5:31p.m.
The City Clerk reported that the news media had been notified of the Special Meeting
in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act.
The City Clerk read the Notice of Special Meeting acknowledged by all Council
Members stating that the Special Meeting was called for the following purposes:
1. As per the attached agenda dated July 7, 2014;
2. Other pertinent business for the operation of the City.
Item 1 of the Agenda: Work Session on the City of Manassas Water and Sewer
Department Request to Demolish the Elevated Water Storage Tank (Fire House Tank) at
Quarry Road and to Appeal the Decision by the Architectural Review Board (ARB), Case #20144000014, to Prohibit Demolition.
Deputy Director of Water and Sewer, Tony Dawood, explained that the City's Water
and Sewer Department filed an appeal of the Architectural Review Board's denial of a
Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the existing water storage tank located next to the
Fire Station. A public hearing regarding the appeal was held on April 28, 2014 and the City
Council voted to defer action for six months to allow additional time to determine if private
groups would be interested in assuming responsibility for tank rehabilitation and
maintenance. Staff was asked at that time to investigate the cost to maintain the tank as a
non-functioning water storage facility. Based on research, staff has concluded that a dry tank
will require structural inspection every five years and internal and external painting with a
protective coating every ten to fifteen years. A recent quote obtained from Tank Industry
Consultants estimates the cost to perform a total rehabilitation from $180,000 to $200,000,
including inspections.
Mayor Parrish asked who requested that the tank be demolished originally.
Mr. Dawood responded that the City of Manassas' Water and Sewer Department
made the request with the support ofthe Utility Commission. Additionally, the Manassas City
Fire and Rescue Department and the Manassas Volunteer Fire Company support removal of
the tank to allow for improved access.
Council Member Lovejoy commented that the estimates for repair and maintenance
have increased and asked for an explanation.
3
Mr. Dawood explained that OSHA requirement must be met and the cost of tank
maintenance is increasing in the area.
Council Member Randolph asked if anyone was interested in placing antennas on top
of the tank, which may generate some revenue.
Mr. Dawood stated that the antenna currently on the tower belongs to the City and is
no longer in use. There have been no inquiries from other organizations interested in placing
antennas on the tower.
Vice Mayor Harrover stated that the increase in the estimates was concerning.
Council Member Wolfe asked about the time frame associated with the painting and
maintenance.
Mr. Dawood explained that the work should be completed within one year.
Council Member Wolfe responded that he saw no harm in waiting six months to make
a decision on the appeal.
Council Member Aveni asked if there was a formal group working to save the water
tower.
Mayor Parrish indicated there was a campaign on Facebook and Council Member
Wolfe indicated paperwork was filed by Steven Hersch to form a 501(c)(3).
Council Member Way commented that in his opinion, the costs associated with
maintaining the water tower were too much for too little benefit.
The City Council felt it was necessary to provide the public with the amount of money
that must be raised before the Council would consider allowing a private entity to take
responsibility for the tower. The City Council agreed on $180,000 as the required amount.
COUNCIL MEMBER WOLFE MOVED that the City Council defer action on the ARB
appeal until December 15, 2014 to allow interested parties the time to raise $180,000 in cash
assets. Seconded by Vice Mayor Harrover. Roll call: AYES - Aveni, Harrover, Lovejoy,
Randolph, Way and Wolfe. MOTION CARRIED.
Item 2 of the Agenda: Work Session on Residential Permit Parking Districts.
Mr. Moon made a presentation to the City Council on the various parking district
options available.
General discussion regarding costs associated with enforcement, signage, and permit
costs occurred. The current budget includes costs associated with parking districts, including
the addition of a Revenue Specialist in the Treasurer's Office.
Council Member Randolph stated that citizens have complained to him about cars
parked in front of their mailboxes.
3lP............ ..........
'"",
~.
,.
' ·< ·· ..· · . ...
'
'
'
' "'""'- . '
.·.......
'/
............... PAGEN0~32
············AGE.NQASTATEMEMT
ITEM NO.
8'
-----
MEETING DATE:
December 15, 2014
TIME ESTIMATE:
20 Minutes
AGENDA ITEM TITLE:
First reading of Ordinance #0-2015-13 to approve REZ #2014-02: Manassas Station,
at 9002 and 9004 Prince William Street.
DATE THIS ITEM WAS
LAST CONSIDERED
BY COUNCIL:
December 8, 2014
SUMMARY OF
ISSUE/TOPIC:
To consider a request to rezone ±3.5 acres of land from 1-1, Light Industrial with
Proffers and Historic Overlay District (HOD) to B-3.5, City Center Transitional District
with proffers and HOD. The applicant is requesting this rezoning to accommodate the
construction of a new 140 unit multi-family residential building. This site is located in
the Downtown Sector Plan of the City of Manassas Comprehensive Plan and
assigned with a Mixed Use designation in the sector plan's land use map.
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Ordinance #0-2015-13 approving REZ #2014-02 as proffered.
BOARD/COMMISSION/
COMMITTEE:
Planning Commission- July 2, 2014 (recommended denial 5/1)
Planning Commission- November 5, 2014 (recommended denial 3/2)
City Council - November 24, 2014 (motion to deny, tie vote 3/3; motion failed on
December 8, 2014)
RECOMMENDATION:
~~Approve
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
CITY MANAGER:
IIJJ!L Approve
Disapprove
Reviewed
See Comments
DISCUSSION
(IF NECESSARY):
See attached Ordinance #0-2015-13.
BUDGET/FISCAL
IMPACT:
See economic analysis in November 17, 2014 staff report
STAFF:
Matthew Arcieri, Planning & Zoning Services Manager (703) 257-8232.
If Gnmcil i\Jembers hat•e questions, ymt are urged M call the staffperso11 who prepared this age11da
.~tatemem prior
to meeting.
ORDINANCE #0-2015-13
First Reading
Second Reading
Enacted
Etiective
December 15,2014
AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE REZONING #2014-02:
Manassas Station
WHEREAS, Prince Properties, LLC has applied to rezone approximately ±3.5
acres of land from I-1, Light Industrial and Historic Overlay District (HOD) to B-3.5, City
Center Transitional and HOD as proffered November 21, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development staff has reviewed the application and
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL subject to specific protiers; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 2014
and November 5, 2014, after full compliance with all state code public hearing notice and
posting requirements and RECOM.WENDS DENIAL; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Manassas held a public hearing on
November 17, 2014 and November 24, 2014, after full compliance with all state code
public hearing notice and posting requirements; and
WHEREAS, among the purposes of zoning called out in Chapter 15.2-2283 of
the Code of Virginia is to "facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive, and
harmonious community"; and
\VHEREAS, among the matters to be considered in drawing and applying zoning
ordinances and districts called out in Chapter 15.2-2284 of the Code of Virginia is: "the
existing use and character of the property"; and
WHEREAS, the City Council upon careful consideration finds that approval of
REZ #2014-02 as proffered, is justified by public necessity and convenience and general
welfare and is consistent with reasonable zoning practices, and that the cumulative effect of
the activities permitted with this rezoning will not be detrimental to the character of the
adjacent land and is in reasonable harmony with the City's land use plan and policies.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of
Manassas, Virginia, meeting in regular session this the 15th day of December, 2014, that
REZ # 2014-02 is hereby APPROVED and accepts the attached protiers dated November
21, 2014.
3
Harry J. Parrish II
MAYOR
On behalf of the City Council of
Manassas, Virginia
ATTEST:
Andrea P. Madden
MOTION:
SECOND:
RE:
ACTION:
Votes:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent from Vote:
Absent from Meeting:
City
Proffer Statement
:\IANASSAS STATION
R(•zoning #20 14-02
Owner:
Prince Properties. LLC
Applicant/Contract Purchaser:
Christopher Land, LLC (the "Applicant")
Subject Property:
9002 and 9004 Prince William Street, Trv1 100-49-0
(Parcels 1 and
(the "Property")
Acreage:
Approximately 3.5 acres
Rezoning:
I-1, Light Industrial, with ProtTers (REZ 2001-03 ), to B3.5, City Center Transitional, District
HOD, I listoric Overlay District
Date:
June 25,2014
Revision Date:
November 21, 2014
The undersigned hereby proffers that the development of the Property shall be in
substantial conformance with the conditions set forth in this submission, unless an amendment is
mutually agreed upon by the Manassas City Council and Applicant.
The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or
reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any
proviSion
the prot1ers. Any improvements proffered herein shall be provided at the time of the
development of that portion of the site adjacent to the improvement unless otherwise specified.
The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include \Vithin its meaning the current and all
future 0\\ners and successors in interest. These protlers are intended to run with the land only
and shall not create
personal liability on any person who no longer owns an interest in the
land affected by the profter. These proffers shall supersede all prior protTers afTccting the
Property
Land Use
The maximum number of multi-family dwelling units (either
to
constructed on the Property shall
140.
Development
or condominium
the Property
be in
coni{Jrmance with the generalized
"Generalized Development
Station" ("'the
Bmvman Consulting, Ltd. dated December. 2013,
14. (sheet 4
3. The Applicant shall include an addendum in all rental or purchase agreements
expressly informing tenants or purchasers of the proximity of the adjacent active train
tracks and train station, and adjacent commercial and industrial uses, which may have
an impact on occupancy ofthe Property.
4. The Applicant shall guarantee that there is one parking space per bedroom.
5. The Applicant shall not permit subleasing of apartment units.
Architecture
I. The design of the building shall be constructed \vith an appearance in substantial
con fom1ance with the Certificate of Appropriateness granted by the City
Architectural Review Board (the "ARB") on June 10, 2014. Minor modifications may
be made to the building design provided that any such modifications are approved by
the ARB.
The courtyard/area near the entrance to the building shall be as shown on the Detail
Plan (sheet 5 of 6 of the entitled "Generalized Development Plan
Manassas
Station", as prepared by Bowman Consulting, Ltd. dated December, 2013, last
revised June 1 L 2014). The courtyard shall be approved by the ARB.
3. Project identitication sign age shall be as shown on the lllustrative Details (sheet 6 of
6 ofthe entitled "Generalized Development Plan Manassas Station", as prepared by
Bowman Consulting, Ltd. dated December, 2013, last revised June 1 L 2014) This
sign shall conform to the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance and shall be
entrance on Prince William Street The sign shall be approved by
located ncar the
the ARB.
4. Lighting:
a. All exterior lighting fixtures shall conform to City Historic District Design
Guidelines and the Illustrative Details sheet (sheet 6 of 6). Lighting shall be
subject to the appmval of the ARB.
b. Street lights along Prince \Villiam Street shall be substantially similar to those
Ilistoric District.
in other areas of the
.:;
The Applicant shall provide that HV
equipment will be situated either on the root:
in interior closets with louvered venting to the exterior of the building, or on the
ground.
ground units
ll be screened by natural materials including, but not
or
materials. Any rooftop units
be
limited to shrubs, wood
screened from adjacent residentially zoned
2
Landscaping
6. The Applicant shall landscape and proYide fencing on the Property consistently with
the "Illustrntiw Details Plan - tvtanassas Station", prepared by Btnvman Consulting
!teL dated December, 2013. last revised March
2014 (sheet 5 of 5 ). Such
landscaping may be moditied at site plan subject to the approval of the City Arborist.
7. The Applicant shall provide and install City approved street trees of 4
caliper or
larger along the Property frontage of Prince William Street in the locations generally
depicted on the GOP.
8. ·rhe BMP Facility shall be in the location depicted on the GDP and in substantial
conformance with that shown on the "BMP Facility Exhibit," as prepared by
Bowman Consulting, Ltd. dated September, 2014, subject to minor modifications in
connection with tina! engineering. 1\otvvithstanding anything to the contrary in this
ProtTcr Statement, however, the Applicant shall provide both detention and treatment
of stormwater underground if feasible, and if approved by the City during site plan
review. If not feasible. or if not approved as provided, the Applicant will construct the
BMP facilities above and below ground as otherwise proffered herein and as shovvn
on the GOP. If the City approves underground detention and treatment, the Applicant
shall in any event landscape the BMP facility site in a manner substantially similar to,
and subject to approval by the City, as would otherwise have been required.
Transportation
9. The Applicant shall contribute to the City a sum that is the difference between the
amount to be contributed by the City of Manassas Public Schools, pursuant to
Condition 10 of Special Use Permit# 2014-05 (for the construction ofNew Baldwin
Elementary and Intermediate School), for the mitigation of tratlic, up to a total
contribution of $117,000. This contribution shall be paid prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy and may he used by the City as it deems necessary to
mitigate traffic in the vicinity of the Property.
10. The Applicant shall preclude by covenants and/or rental agreement the parking on the
Property of boats, trailers and recreational vehicles, except when such parking is
temporary for the purpose of providing a service. The Applicant shall provide
homeowners and;or renters v.ith a list of off-site storage locations for boats and
recreational vehicles. This shall not prelude parking of construction vehicles during
development of the Property.
1 I. In order to preclude the use
the City-owned public commuter parking adjacent to
the Property by residents of the project, the Applicant shall discourage by covenants
and/or rental
the use of
adjacent commuter parking lot for overflow
by such
12. The Applicant shall contribute a sum of $50,000 to the City for purposes of providing
public parking improvements in Old Town. Said contribution shall be paid prior to
release of performance bonds on the project.
Schools
13. The Applicant shall contribute to the City of ~1anassas the sum of $4,799 per
residential dwelling unit actually constructed on the Property. to be used for schools.
This contribution shall be paid after the completion of final inspection and prior to the
issuance of a cer1ificate of occupancy for any unit in the building pursuant to the
provisions ofVa. Code. Ann. §15.2-2303.1:1.
Public Safetv
14. The Applicant shall contribute to the City of Manassas the sum of $870 per
residential dwelling unit actually constructed on the Property, to be used for public
safety purposes. Said contribution shall be paid after the completion of tina!
inspection and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any unit in the
building pursuant to the provisions of Va. Code. Ann. § 15.2-2303.1:1.
15. The Applicant shall contribute to the City of Manassas the sum of $45 per residential
d\velling unit constructed on the Property to be used for parks purposes. This
contribution shall be paid after the completion of tina! inspection and prior to the
issuance of a ccrtiticate of occupancy t(Jr any unit in the building pursuant to the
provisions ofVa. Code. Ann. §15.2-2303.1:1.
Construction Activitv
16. Adjacent property owners shall be notified at least two weeks prior to the
commencement
site clearing. A copy of said letter shall be sent to the Department
of Community Development.
Escalator Clause
17. In the event that the monetary contributions set t(mh in the Profter Statement are paid
to the
within thirty six (36) months of approval of the Rezoning. as applied for,
be in the amounts stated herein. Any monetary contributions
said contributions
\Vhich arc paid to the City after thirty six
months following
required
he adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer
approval of this Rezoning
published by the United
Department of Labor, such that at the
percentage change in the
contributions
paid
shall be adjusted by
from the
thirty six (
months
approval
to the most recently
!able
to the
contributions are
paid, subject to a
4
I\lodifications
18. Pursuant to the
of the City of
Zoning Ordinance § I 30-4 71.(1),
the following modifications are hereby made a part of this rezoning:
a.
The required parking requirement of Zoning Ordinance § 130-20 I (a) for
multi-t'i.1mily residential dwellings is reduced to 210 spaces to serve as primary
parking for
unit. Covenants and/or rental agreements shall provide that
second
0\vned by the 0\Vner or renter of any unit are not guanmteed
an on-site parking space.
b. The buffer requirement of Zoning Ordinance § 130-47l(f) (4) for a B-3.5
zoned property that abuts any residential district line is hereby reduced as
depicted on the GOP and buffers and fencing shall be provided as shown
thereon.
c.
The requirement of Zoning Ordinance § I 30-4 71 (g)( 4) that on-site parking
shall not be readily visible from public right-of-way is hereby modified for the
parking located ncar the western property line as shown on the GOP.
d. The requirement of DCSM § 9-590 requiring private streets and/or travel
\vays carrying in excess of 600 VPD to have at least two entrances to a public
roadway is hereby modified. The Applicant is proposing one entrance due to
the curvature of Tudor Lane.
[SIGNATURE APPEARS ON THE FOLLOWING I>AGEJ
5
Proffer Statement
MANASSAS STATION
Rezoning #2014-02
SIGNATURE PAGE
Prince Properties, LL.C.
6
MANASSAS
STATION
GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CITY OF MANASSAS, VIRGINIA
JUNE 11, 2014
Af'PUC,.t•J~i
Christopher Compames, LLC
1C4ft1 'MiJTE GHANiTE ORNE
SUffli 103
Q,.t.)(TGN, VlRQiNJA 2112.4
11.Y'~:{R~Y
Walsh, Colucci, I~ubeiey & Walsh, P.C.
•ltD Pf~E O'W..I.I"M PARKWAY
SUITE 300
PRINe~::
Wll.UAM, VIRGiN~ Ut9?
"w;:r;£TtgT
[lcvereatlx"& Associates
Ltd.
VICINITY MAP
SCAlE: 1" =2,000'
'I HEKEBY PROFER TMA T TilE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY OF TtilS APPLICATION
SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL
CONFORMANCE WITH THE
CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE
SUBMISSION, UNLESS AN AMEND·
MLNT 1 HERETO IS Ml!TUALL Y
AGREED UPON UY THE CITY
COUNCIL AND THE tJNOEHSIGNED.'
DNIJ.lnSNO::>
UeWMOS
~
~
~
~i
~~
"I HEREBY PROFER THAT THe
DEVELOPMENT OF rHE SUBJECT
PROPERTY OE THIS APPLICATION
SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL
CONFORMANCE WHH THE
CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN Hit
SUBMISSION, UNLESS AN AMEND·
MENT THERETO IS MUTUALLY
AGREED UPON BY THE CITY
COUNCIL AND THE UNDERSlGNEO"
••a.:. . ,......
-~~ ·~,
.. . ' .. ,
. .. . .
.: :: :~
#.,.
...::;.
: ·:. ~· :
~ (
,.
...
........ ,:..: ··,...: / '
.,
f
·.
I
z
()
1-
,.
:i
........
,...
.;'~:. .
:.
.. . .
:·
~
;:
~ :~·;..":''
t~
''i:.~:.:.:..·.
'I >tt!RCOY >'1{0>e R li'AT YHII
Dt:\/El.OF..u:l<r Of !liE SLIISJI(CT
noo.
PROPI:R TY OF THIS AP1't ICA
CONFORMANCE WITh! HE
CONOITIONS SI1T FO~T H IN THf
SotiMISSION. VNt.ESS AA AM~ND·
l\I€ NT l !'IEHHOIS 1.1\JliJI\llY
" GRE:E D UPON 8~ 'n1f CfTY
COU'-CI. "HO THE UNDfRSIG>.ED •
-
I'RI..CE PROPERTIU, ' , C.
aYO.k,uv (!IA«!it." ,
lHLE.. (5(.;~~(Jj?'U;:;
......-.---
"
z
.....
~:
... ·
::HAI.t 8E IN SUBSTANTIAl
<t
•
~
··
.
i
-- <J) f
·~·
(,f)
~ <! ~
~
., IIi ~
';.:
"' <.,')
..,,. .
·. 1
<-
l
.. _.,.......,
·~
~
!
50
ONI.L,nSNO:>
UI!WMOS
... . . ····•"
.... ','J
···~ : ~i't
='
,..____
__;
'.. .:
·,
, ..
'·-..
•.. :
. ,:
..
r. ~! J!
,.
~.!
1: .,
~
..'
f
...~
ii
~
II'
I
I
_I
::lJ
~ !:::
~
,_
"'
,_
Sl
DNil1nSNO~
ueWMOS
NOll\;/1 c_; S VSSVi~VW
··---·-·-·---.,t::<:r·--·-·
..,_ - - - - -..
\
I \
1~..
\ '
';
.. ,.
...
~~;~~
·•
·:
L
~
-
_.. ___ __,_ . ..
~
- ·-·--
...
c
-
. :.&: ,~·
··I
'·
·~
- -·- a -n- ·
co
ftl~
i~
oz
,
m~
•
~
,,;,;.;.~~ ·;:,,,
~.#'~ :..t~:
rl
.......
' ••
1}
..,
i
IJ ' i ~
t
l 11'i II
ti I!
...
~
i
7.
0
J,. • •
~
a~
~ ·""' I
t
~~
~
~
<
v")
1.()
~ "'-{
e:;; z<
1
ao ......o,.. ~ <"'-' ..-~~(
· "" th"V> II' . .... f .; -... ollt ... ...
., ..... .., \rt
;:,..~~1'!'!.~·~ ~·..~;,!:, ~ ':"~,~r()',"', ,
ill
.... ,.:...;~ .~ .....,._, • •GI " '"" ~'-Ct.-...; ..;" '"""-­
"'"'' ""*•:l(C ")"',.... •"".-'U311'~ :.H.,_,,
~'~ "~"''
I>
b
I:'
• · ~1'1
.,;,.....II
i
(/~-·.,.. J<tM ~UA o, ' ,..1;1 ~ 0
..:-= :.;:.~.: ,.~~~
~~_;l·.~·~.~.~
..-
W~tt· E.llll:.ln ~~ ~
........
..., ........ ., ......, .. . ..) ...
·~=·~-·l•
;~
~ ~
)~
•l~M 0 ...,._<ol-1' ....~l•'l. o"!ll!'"' ~ . . ; .(.~ :..
~
' -'.
.... ., ..:a .. 1,.....
..,.
u · -,~
' t hli.RCRY P~OFE R lHit':' 'itoti
:J~vtLOPI,Ii:.O,T
f>i€ SlJeJ£~ T
.;:,f(OfoJE'RTY C'f 1 h o& "WLSCAJI(.:H
or
.......,..,____.._.
·· · ··~-
SHA:. :
·--.: ;::-:·.::..:·;":
.&JSU.S$.0,.., U!"t...t:.SS AA A."nLN:;.
MEJrcT TUEf\£ r'O IS Mt.HIJAI.I v
.·;~~f.S.*;t
~E ltt S\.:flS"!'AP1f\-\l
C'.Ottrok~ .,.r;r, : Tr~
CON(MftOHS :ik r;.·c~,T H IN lt~l:
ACREF.O l...'PON GY ':'~it. CITY
"-- '1.- ··- ··- .
CC.VNCll AHU tHf. <.!N::>(IISt\it;fl\ ·
"
I • I
/
•'
/~
''
'
'' --- _ _ _ _ ---.-AW<__ _ _ - - -
FastS~ El&l(ii4fiOI'I
/j
B
•
H
.,
..
. - -.
'
'
-~-.
/
Elevation Key
'I Hd{L~) ~<!Of£~''"'' :h<
OLVCL
(WMlo~TQf
PROP~RT~
T>lt
OF TH,S
~L'RIHOT
A,._,..L~A"'ON
SHAt-c BE I~ W><S1A~fiAL
C!Nt'QH>AA~[ VJITH TH£
CQN,JI'<ONO Of1 FORTM Ifill-~
~-·BM SSLQN UNlES~ "-~""'l'-J-.0
fl.fNT 'HIORfTC IS
~VTUALL Y
AGRIOW UPO~ BY Hll:' Cl'f'<
COu~CI._ A~(L TH~ ,;~RSIO~~V
-
PreiJrnlnry ll'lly -
Nat 10 ICBifl
Entry Elevation (View t 1)
··- -- Coonyard Mew 12)
Pnnce William Street (V;ew t 3)
"'t
ht.Rf. 8V~0Ft:K fhAT TM£:
;)~'ll:l OI'M:IIT 0> 111;; Wt\Ji:<.:T
u;u;)l'f.l(lYOf TttiS APP,,Cf,ll())l
!it !At I 6~ ,,.. SVb.\TANfiAl
CON~OIUU...Cii 'h1fH T"f
COI'<DIT10f.IS
m
FOR f H IN • NL
SV~MISS IO IC. UI'<U,:,S 1<H ""~ NCJ
1A£HT TH!l~UO r~ M-'l\MLc Y
AGREEO U~ON tiY Tt<E ClfV
COIJNCil. AN;J Tl1~ UNOt'~St :;.,'l o ·
-
~:;;&lQ:~~
- ·-·---·
....-
mu~
South Side Elevation (View #4)
"~ HC't~_t'yy PUVi.tH l HA ( TuE
OtVl:L::lPMtl(; :;f <t<F SU6J~C~
Pf\01-'f/ RW Of rMIS '-~'~'"CA T;ON
Sl lA<.L B~ IN SUOST.AtllW
COP<f.ORM"NCE w :T" T'l£
C()o<()l flONS SIO 1 ~ ORT't<IN HIE
SUUMISSIO'I. UP<1 f!'S '-" 'Mo'ID·
MoN l rtER£10 1$ M\JTvALL.Y
AGK.!.eO uP01< B~ lttE c :rr
COuNCIL N<O T><£ u.<OfRSIGNF.O.'
PRI~C.E "~OPERTIE~ :~ . .
tA.J'fUlit?l~
~i xrrrpnx;.----- :::-::.
8Y
'..tO
Y
.
''"
'l'oll
P!Wiminlwy only ·Hoi to leollja
!
•
East Side Elevation (View ts)
., HERlev ~vr €R r .-..r Til£
U£\tfLOPUE-"'f Of= fi1C S VtiJfC'!'
Pf.tOP!R:l Y Of 'fH'iS A.PPuCf, T!ON
S..,_LL II£ oN 6t.aSTAAT"'-
CONf OR... NC!o WITt1 IH{
CO..OI!IONS S~l FOR1>1 ,.. ~1--,1;
• VIIM•SSION U"'LESS M AM;: NO.
...... t TkEf\HO IS Mo.ITo.:AU y
AGilE ED UPOI< BY Ttl< C1 tv
COUN\~Il AHO "'!'1-if. UN.O~F'<S.(",Ni:i) ·
PttiNC'..S f'"'OI'FH lit 'S, I ,,C
~~1rl(,E
itTP.i'iiU..<----:=~-:_~
-·
,,
'
North Side Etevation (View #116)
West Side Elevation (View #7)
· t hFREBl I'ROHA fMI 11-r
~
d.C P\If" l Of l:tt' Sl)fl.J(Cl
PROO'\-.RTY 01' nilS M>PUCJ\TIO.'<
5""'-\.llf 1~ G'JiiSTANI IAl
:;Q>;~O.O.w.NCE 'M l H • HE
CO/'oOITIONS $Eff~T.,"' 1Hc
SU ~ Mt SSION . UHI.ESS -'\>I AM ~ KO ·
t.IE NI!Hl~flTOI ~ INJ:UO.... Y
AGRE~O UP0-. 1!• t Hf. Cll'r
CO\JIICil ANO Tl'il' i/NCEIW<JNf.P '
PAA~::fd'f«li'I;H I I£5 dC
-
. JJ .
'f.2. ;~ ..l..
,
.
'
'd};:':!~~Prellln•rMV M ly - Hol lo +
nnf ~.J:1'/Yit <
~
t
tt (~Uf ~OH:A
Tt-u\T !i"E
ex I\.L.CPioll:NT or :><t ~WJ~.u
I
f't<C>'£RrY Of lt<lS A<>PUC:AI IOO<
I
"'lllll llf. 1'\ SIJ~SII'IC I lA!
OOHFOFt.....,."CE W1TH Yilt '
Pt<INC£ >'HOPEI\TIES, .~ C
·
·
d .t'>r t
~
~}! aXJ.V)f,..i.'
11nt. ,)'LD'jO:~.:=-- ......___
....
It
CONDHICNS SET fORTH IN 111e
SIJIJ..ISSION \Jr.J:SS AN .....f. NO.
MENT T"I:'RE!Oll> MOII.A~~ Y
ACR€EO iJPOH 8 Y Yh" :;JTY
COUNCI\ A.'oO THL \INilfRSIQN£C'
p~...,
....
r1
-. - ~
·-·· --.. ··-·
Prince William StllNit Elevation (Views 'IS, 1 & 3)
i
I
l
~ Hf.~t:SYP RCIFE~'!'t~!
I
tHE
i;
:ltYHO I~AUH
OF ·;11~ SUBJECT
:>ROPERTV Cll- THIS At'>',•CATIC«
S >IAU 8f IN SiJIISTIII<'I "'l
CON~OfUAI'HCf WIT; l .,~
(',ONOIUOHS $E:I fORCtt t« h t:.:
~valo!ISS IO!i. VHU:.~ Ni AM~ N ~·
~'(Nl ,.H>RHO IS IIUlUAL l Y
AGf<[£1) UPON 8 '! llil! CI'N
COLJNC:l AN() THE VI<OEf<.S>Co<EO.
f'l<li>'C~ Pf'QPf,RTI~.S.l . l
C
1JYu..~.tk1&~ '2
...
Trr~'~jjxxc-·
~·
__ ,, _..··-_ ,.
-