plant variety protection office guidelines for the conduct of tests for
Transcription
plant variety protection office guidelines for the conduct of tests for
Republic of the Philippines Department of Agriculture BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION OFFICE GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY Table of Contents 1. SUBJECT OF THESE GUIDELINES ……………………………………………….……………………………………………. 2. MATERIAL REQUIRED ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2.3.1 General ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2.3.2 Hybrid varieties ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2.3.3 Panicles ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3. METHOD OF EXAMINATION ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 3.1 Duration of Tests …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3.2 Testing Place …………………………………………………….………………………………………….………………………….. 3.3 Conditions for Conducting Examination ………..…………………………………………………………………………… 3.3.1 Characteristics on plants or parts of plants to be selected in a particular way ……………. 3.3.2 Timing of the examination …………………………………………………………………………...…………………….. 3.3.3 Type of observation – visual or measurement …………………………………….……………………… 3.4 Test Design ……………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………. 3.5 Number of Plants/Parts of Plants to be Examined ……………………………….……………………………... 3.6 Additional Tests …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4. ASSESSMENT OF DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY …………………………………………….………. 4.1 Distinctness …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 4.1.1 General Recommendation ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4.1.2 Consistent Differences …………………………………………………………………………………………………….…. 4.1.3 Clear Differences ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4.2 Uniformity ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4.2.1 Uniformity assessment by off-types …………………………………………………………...………………………. 4.2.2 Hybrid varieties …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…. 4.2.3 Single panicle-rows ……………………………………………………………………………………………….………….. 4.3 Stability ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…. 5. GROUPING OF VARIETIES AND ORGANIZATION OF THE GROWING TRIAL ……………………………………. 6. INTRODUCTION TO THE TABLE OF CHARACTERISTICS …………………………………………………………………. 6.1 Categories of Characteristics ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6.1.1 Standard Test Guidelines Characteristics …………………………………………………………………………… 6.1.2 Asterisked Characteristics …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6.2 States of Expression and Corresponding Notes ……………………………………………………………………..…… 6.3 Types of Expression …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6.4 Example Varieties …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6.5 Legend …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7. TABLE OF CHARACTERISTICS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 8. EXPLANATIONS ON THE TABLE OF CHARACTERISTICS …………………………………………………………………. 9. LITERATURE ………………………………………………………………………………………........................................................ 10. TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE ……………………………………………………………………………………….……………….. Page 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 22 32 33 1. Subject of these Guidelines 1.1 2. These Test Guidelines apply to all varieties of Oryza sativa L. Material Required 2.1 The competent authorities decide on the quantity and quality of the plant material required for testing the variety and when and where it is to be delivered. Applicants submitting material from a Country other than that in which the testing takes place must ensure that all customs formalities and pytosanitary requirements are complied with. 2.2 The material is to be supplied in the form of seed. 2.3 The minimum quantity of seeds, to be supplied by the applicant, should be: 2.3.1 General: 500 grams 2.3.2 Hybrid varieties: If requested, an additional 500 grams of seed of each component (A, B and R parental lines) should be submitted. 2.3.3 Panicles: If requested by the competent authority, at least 50 panicles should also be submitted. The panicles should be well-developed and not affected by any pest or disease. They should contain a sufficient number of viable seeds to establish a satisfactory row of plants for observation. 3. 2.4 The seed should meet the minimum requirements for germination rate (at least 85%), analytical purity 1.1%, health and moisture content not greater than 14%. In cases where the seed is to be stored, the germination capacity should be as high as possible and should be stated by the applicant. 2.5 The seeds should not have undergone any treatment, which would affect the expression of the characteristics of the variety, unless the competent authorities allow or request such treatment. If it has been treated, full details of the treatment must be given. Method of Examination 3.1 Duration of Tests The minimum duration of tests should be 2 independent growing cycles (1 wet and 1 dry). 3.2 Testing Place The tests should normally be conducted in one place. If any characteristic of the variety, which is relevant for the examination of DUS, cannot be seen in that place, the variety may be tested in an additional place. 3.3 Conditions for Conducting the Examination The tests should be carried out under conditions ensuring satisfactory growth for the expression of the relevant characteristics of the variety and for the conduct of the examination. 3.3.1 Characteristics on plants or parts of plants to be selected in a particular way Characteristics containing the following notes in the second column of the Table of Characteristics should be examined as indicated below: A Leaf: Unless otherwise indicated, all observation on the leaf should be made on the penultimateleaf. 3.3.2 Timing of the examination The optimum stage of development for the assessment of each characteristic is indicated by a number in the second column of the Table of Characteristics. The stages of development denoted by these numbers are described at the end of Chapter 8. 3.3.3 Type of observation – visual or measurement The recommended method of observing the characteristics is indicated by the following key in the second column of the Table of Characteristics: MG: MS: VG: VS: 3.4 single measurement of a group of plants or parts of plants measurement of a number of individual plants or parts of plants visual assessment by a single observation of a group of plants or parts of plants visual assessment by observation of individual plants or parts of plants Test Design 3.4.1 The design of the tests should be such that plants or parts of plants may be removed for measurement or counting without prejudice to the observations which must be made up to the end of the growing cycle. 3.4.2 Each test cycle should be designed to result in a total of at least 400 plants for each candidate variety, which should be divided into two or more replications. Single panicle- rows if test on panicle-rows are conducted, at least 20 panicle-rows should be observed. 3.5 Number of Plants / Parts of Plants to be Examined Unless otherwise indicated, all observations made on individual plants or determined by measurement or counting should be made on at least 10 plants or parts taken from each of the 10 plants. 3.6 Additional Tests 3.6.1 4. In cases where morphological characteristics are insufficient to distinguish candidate variety, additional tests including phenol test on lemma, DNA finger printing etc. maybe conducted. Assessment of Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability 4.1 Distinctness 4.1.1 Recommendation It is of particular importance for users of this Test Guidelines to consult the General Introduction prior to making decisions regarding distinctness. However, the following points are provided for elaboration or emphasis in these Test Guidelines. 4.1.2 Consistent Differences The minimum duration of tests recommended in section 3.1 reflects, in general, the need to ensure that any differences in a character are sufficiently consistent. 4.1.3 Clear Differences Determining whether a difference between two varieties is clear depends on many factors, and should consider, in particular, the type of expression of the characteristic being examined, i.e. whether it is expressed in a qualitative, quantitative, or pseudoqualitative manner. Therefore, it is important that users of these Test Guidelines are familiar with the recommendations contained in the General Introduction prior to making decisions regarding distinctness. 4.2 Uniformity It is of particular importance for users of these Test Guidelines to consult the General Introduction prior to making decisions regarding uniformity. However, the following points are provided for elaboration or emphasis in these Test Guidelines. 4.2.1 Uniformity assessment by off-types For the assessment of uniformity of characteristics on the plot as a whole (visual assessment by a single observation of a group of plants or parts of plants), a population standard of 0.1% with an acceptance probability of at least 95% should be applied. In the case of a sample size of 400 plants the maximum number of off- types allowed would be 1. 4.2.2 Hybrid varieties For the assessment of uniformity of single hybrid, a population standard of 1% with an acceptance probability of at least 95% should be applied. In the case of a sample size of 400 plants the maximum number of off-types allowed would be 11. 4.2.3 Single panicle-rows For the assessment of uniformity of characteristics on single panicle-rows, plants or parts of plants (visual assessment by observations of a number of individual panicle-rows, plants or parts of plants), a population standards of 1% with an acceptance probability of at least 95% should be applied. In the case of a sample size of 20 panicles the maximum number of aberrant panicle-rows, plants or parts of plants should not exceed 1. 4.3 5. Stability 4.3.1 In practice, it is not usual to perform tests of stability that produce results as certain as those of the testing of distinctness and uniformity. However, experience has demonstrated that, for many types of variety, when a variety has been shown to be uniform, it can also be considered to be stable. 4.3.2 Where appropriate, or in cases of doubt, stability may be tested, either by growing a further generation, or by testing 500 grams seed or plant stock to ensure it exhibits the same characteristics as those shown by the previous material supplied. Grouping of Varieties and Organization of the Growing Trial 5.1 The selection of varieties of common knowledge to be grown in the trial with the candidate varieties and the way in which these varieties are divided into groups to facilitate the assessment of distinctness is aided by the use of grouping characteristics. 5.2 Grouping characteristics are those in which the documented states of expression, even when produced at different locations, can be used, either individually or in combination with other such characteristics: (a) to select varieties of common knowledge that can be included from the growing trial used for examination of distinctness; and (b) to organize the growing trial so that similar varieties are grouped together. 5.3 The following have been agreed as useful grouping characteristics: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) 5.4 6. Basal leaf: sheath color (characteristic no. 1) Days of heading (50% of plants with heads) (characteristic no. 18) Culm length (excluding panicle; excludingfloating rice)(characteristic no. 22) Decorticated grain: length (characteristic no. 49) Decorticated grain: color (characteristic no. 52) Endosperm type: (characteristic no. 52) Guidance for the use of grouping characteristics, in the process of examining distinctness, is provided through the General Introduction Introduction to the Table of Characteristics 6.1 Categories of Characteristics 6.1.1 Standard Test Guidelines Characteristics Standard Test Guidelines characteristics are those which are approved by UPOV for examination of DUS and from which members of the Union can select suitable characteristics for their particular cir cum sta nces . 6.1.2 Asterisked Characteristics Asterisked characteristics (denoted by *) are those included in the Test Guidelines which are important for the International Harmonization of variety descriptions and should always be examined for DUS and included in the variety descriptions by all members on the Union, except when the state of expression of a preceding characteristics or regional environmental conditions render this inappropriate. 6.2 States of Expression and Corresponding Notes States of expression are given for each characteristic to define the characteristic and to harmonize descriptions. Each state of expression is allocated a corresponding numerical note for ease of recording of data and for the production and exchange of the description. 6.3 Types of Expression An explanation of the types of expression of characteristics (qualitative, quantitative and pseudoqualitative) is provided in the General Introduction. 6.4 Reference Varieties Where appropriate, example varieties are provided to clarify the state of expression of each characteristic. 6.5 Legend (*) Asterisked characteristic – see Section 6.1.2 (QL) Qualitative characteristic – see Section 6.3 (QN) Quantitative characteristic – see Section 6.3 (PQ) Pseudo-Qualitative characteristic– see section 6.3 (+) See Explanation on the Table of Characteristics on Chapter 8. Stage of development: see Section 3.3.2 MG-MS-VG-VS: see Section 3.3.3 7. Table of Characteristics Trait No. 1. 2. Method of Examination 30 VS 40 VG a 3. 40 VG a Characteristics Example Varieties Basal leaf: sheath color green IR64 IR47, 1 light purple IR68 2 purple lines Dinorado (80805) 3 purple C4-63 4 light Palawan 3 medium dark Inilang-ilang 5 IR42, Binirhen 7 Leaf: intensity of green color Leaf: anthocyanin coloration absent present 1 C4-63 4. 40 VG a Note 9 Leaf: distribution of anthocyanin coloration tips only 1 margins only PSB Rc34, Makapilay pusa 2 blotches only uniform Dinorado (80385) 3 IR1552 4 Trait No. 5. Method of Examination 40 VG a 6. 40 VG a Characteristics Example Varieties Note Leaf sheath: anthocyanin coloration absent 1 present 9 Leaf sheath: intensity of anthocyanin coloration light purple purple 3 Lines purple 5 7 7. 40 VS a 8. (*) 9. 40 VS 40 VS a 10. (+) Leaf: pubescence of blade surface glabrous Dinorado Binirhen, (47125) (53012), Azucena 3 intermediate Dinorado (30-386) 5 pubescent C4-63, IR 7 absent IR 1 present C4-63 9 absent IR 1 present C4-63 9 Leaf: anthocyanin coloration of auricles Leaf: anthocyanin coloration of collar Leaf: shape of ligule VS a truncate 3 acute 5 cleft C4-63, IR 7 Trait No. 11. Method of Examination 40 VS Characteristics Example Varieties Leaf: color of ligule colorless IR green light purple purple stripes purple 12. 40 MS a 13. 40 MS a 14. (*) (+) 15. (*) (+) 60 VG 90 VG Note 1 2 3 Burdagol 4 C4-63 5 Leaf: length of blade (actual measurement) Short <30 cm 3 Medium 31-60 cm 5 Long >60 cm 7 Leaf: width of blade Narrow <1 cm Medium 1-2 cm Broad > 2 cm 3 C4-63 5 7 Flag leaf: attitude of blade (early observation) (actual measurement) erect IR70 1 semi-erect IR64 3 horizontal C4-63 5 descending Palawan 1 7 erect IR70 1 semi-erect IR64 3 Flag leaf: attitude of blade (late observation) Trait No. Method of Examination Characteristics horizontal Example Varieties C4-63 descending 16. 17. (+) 40 VS 40 VS 19. (*) 65 VS 7 absent 1 present 9 Culm: Angle erect spreading 55 VG 5 Culm: kneeing ability (for floating rice only) semi-erect open 18. (*) Note Palawan, Milfor, C4-63, IR70 1 3 Milagrosa (53182) 5 Milagrosa (44634,44635),U-Van 7 early (< 70) IR50 1 early (71-80) PSB Rc28, IR72 3 medium (81-90) IR68 5 late (91-100) PSB Rc18 IR42, 7 very late (> 101) IR70 9 Days of heading (50% of plants with heads) very Lemma: anthocyanin coloration of apex absent 1 red U-Van 3 light purple Inilang-ilang, Kinandang- itim, Rinamos 5 purple deep purple 7 9 Trait No. 20. (*) 21. (+) 22. (*) Method of Examination 65. VS Characteristics 70 VS IR64 2 yellow light 3 purple Tapol white 4 purple C4-63, Maroyaw 5 Culm: thickness thin (< 5mm) thick (> 1 5mm) 9 Culm: length (excluding panicle; excluding floating rice) 1 short (51-70 cm) U-Van, IR19961 medium (71-90 cm) Tejeremas, Dinorado 53012, Azucena (47124), Burdagol, Sinandomeng long (91-110 cm) very long (> 110 cm) 24. 70 VS 70 VS 1 light green very short (< 50 cm) 23. (*) Note Spikelet: color of stigma white 70. VS Example Varieties 3 5 7 Milfor, Tapol, Dinorado 8385, 8386 9 Culm: anthocyanin coloration of nodes absent 1 present 9 Culm: intensity of anthocyanin coloration of nodes light purple Acc 46969 3 Trait No. Method of Examination Characteristics purple deep Example Varieties Acc 21165, 21485 purple 25. 70 VS Note 5 7 Culm: anthocyanin coloration of internodes light gold C4-63, Maroyaw Tapol 3 purple lines purple white Palawan (7353) 5 7 26. (*) (+) 72-90 MS Panicle: length of main axis very short (< 11cm) 1 short (11-20cm) 3 medium (21-30cm) IR64, IR42, IR72 5 long (31-40cm) very Azucena, Milfor 7 long (> 40cm) 27. (*) (+) 90 MS 9 Panicle: curvature of main axis erect 1 semi-erect 3 drooping C4-63 deflexed 28. (+) 70 5 7 Panicle: number per plant few (<8) NPT 3 medium (8-16) PSB Rc28 5 many (>16) PSB Rc14, PSB Rc4 7 Trait No. 29. Method of Examination 60 Characteristics Example Varieties Note Panicle: awns absent present 1 9 30. 31. (*) 60 VS 70-80 Panicle: color of awns (early observation) light green Tue, Linangan 3 red Masapay, Ganilunan, Paray Kikog kabayo 5 purple Kasignayan, red, Rinamos 7 Sinenan Panicle: distribution of awns tip –awned Basmati Rinamos 1 short & partly awned Gamilunan 3 short & fully awned Kasignayan 5 long&partlyawned Tue, Masapay, Sineman Red 7 long & fully awned 32. 90 VS Panicle: color of Awns (late observation) straw 9 Tue yellowishgold brown reddish brown light red 1 2 Masapay, Gamilunan, ParayQikogKabayo 3 4 red 5 light purple 6 purple 7 8 Trait No. Method of Examination Characteristics Example Varieties black 33. (*) 60-80 VS 9 Spikelet: density of pubescence of lemma glabrous Binirhen 1 hairs on lemma keel 3 hairs on upper portion Momay, Pinili, Milagrosa (44634) Linangan, Azucena (47125) short hairs IR64, IR70 7 long hairs ( velvety) 34. (+) 80-90 90 5 9 Spikelet: apicular color white Kinilala IR18, 1 straw IR25 2 brown Ginunting, Tinawon, Tapol 3 red Milfor, Tapol white 4 purple Palawan 1, C463 5 black 35. (+) Note 6 Panicle: presence secondary branching absent present 1 9 36. (+) 90 Panicle: type of secondary branching weak Tue, Tagpis, Wagwag 3 strong clustering Hambas, Kinandang Patong 5 7 37. (*) (+) 90 Panicle: type of branches compact 3 Trait No. Method of Examination Characteristics intermediate open Example Varieties Azucena (47124), Makunting Milagrosa (53182), Sinampaga 38. (+) 90 VG Note 5 7 Panicle: exsertion well exserted C4-63 1 moderately-well exserted exserted 3 partly exserted 5 enclosed 7 9 39. 40. (+) 41. (+) 90 VG 92 VG 92 MS Days of maturity very early (< 100) IR50 1 early (101-110) PSB Rc28 3 medium (111-120) Binirhen, PSB Rc18, Maligaya1 5 late (121-130) PSB Rc58 7 very late (>130) Pirurutong NB, Milagrosa (5159), Macan Sapac, Maroyaw 9 early Milagrosa (5826) 3 intermediate IR1909, Paray Qikog Kabayo 5 late Azucena (328), Rinamos, C4-63 7 Leaf: senescene Sterile lemma: Length Trait No. Method of Examination Characteristics short (<1.5mm) 92 MS Note Pinili, Milagrosa (5159), Maligaya 1, Kinandang itim, Carinosa, Milfor, Palawan 1 medium (1.6-2.5mm) 3 long (>2.5 mm but less than the lemma length 5 extra long (> 2.5 mm but greater than the lemma length) 7 Wagwag 2 9 straw IR64 1 gold Maroyaw Gamilunan 3 red Rinamos, Binuhangin 5 asymmetrical 42. Example Varieties Sterile lemma: color purple 43. 44. 92 MS 92. MS 7 Grain: weight of 1000 fully developed grains by 14 % MC very low Binuhangin, Macunting 1 low Iniput- ibon, Milagrosa 3 medium Azucena 5 high very Burdagol 7 high Lenkibe-N, Taigsiyan 9 very short (<5.52mm) short Mag 7, Macunting 1 (5.52-6.84mm) Kinandong itim, SDS 29, SDS65, Sinonay 3 medium (6.85-8.17mm) Kaibig, SDS60, QZN 58 5 Grain: length Trait No. 45. Method of Examination 92. MS Characteristics Example Varieties long (8.18-9.5mm) Palawan 353, Binerhen 7 very long (>9.5mm) Pinili, Azucena 328, QZN 8, Carinosa, Pirurutong B 9 Grain: width narrow (1.20-1.72mm) medium (1.74-2.36mm) 46. 92 VS 92 1 Wagwag, Raminad 3 broad (2.37-3.0mm) 5 very broad (>3.0mm) 7 Lemma and Palea: color White 0 Straw Milagrosa, Azucena 1 Gold and gold furrows Binirhen, Inilang-Ilang, Dayaqqot Queen, Pilit, Cofegei 2 Brown spots Abalayan, Malagaya, Tapol 3 Brown furrow Binicol, Anadi 4 Brown (Tawny) Ifugao rice, IR 612895 5 Reddish and light purple Megamunin, Pong Kangkep 6 Purple spots Balatinao, Minoro 7 Purple furrow Cernyj, Sempong 8 Purple Kala Joha, Kasha Black 47. Note Decorticated grain: length 9 10 Trait No. (*) 48. 49. (*) (+) 50. (*) Method of Examination 92 92 92 Characteristics Example Varieties Note short (<5.4mm) 1 medium (5.5-6.5mm) 3 long (6.6-7.4mm) 5 very long (> 7.5mm) 7 Decorticated grain: width narrow (< 1.1mm) medium 3 (1.1-2.49mm) broad 5 (>2.49mm) 7 Decorticated grain: shape (in lateral View) round (<1.5mm) Makunting 1 semi-round (1.5-1.99mm) Kinandang Patong 3 halfspindle-shaped (2.-2.49mm) Burdagol, Binerhen 5 spindle-shaped (2.5-2.99mm) long Intan 7 spindle-shaped (> 2.99 mm) Azucena 9 IR 1 Decorticated grain: color white light yellow light brown 2 variegated brown dark Silagadong, 30333, Milagrosa Dinorado 3 brown Lenkibe-N 4 Dinorado 5 Trait No. Method of Examination Characteristics Example Varieties light red red Note 6 Kamoros, Kinandang Pula, Lubang Pula 7 Pirurutong NBB 8 Pirurutong NBA 9 Malagaya Tapol 2&3 10 Endosperm: type glutinous IR45, Malagkit songsong 1 non-glutinous IR64 3 Malagkit Songsong, Ukian Abalayan, Pirurutong 1 variegated purple purple dark purple/black 51. (+) 52. (+) 92 92 Endosperm: amylosecontent(%) waxy (0-2%) very Low (2.1-10%) low (10.1-20%) intermediate (20.1-25%) high (>25%) 53. (+) 90 Pilit Mamitani, Pelet Bulawan 3 IR65, UPLRI IR64, PSB Rc28 PSB Rc56, PSB Rc66 5 7 9 Varieties with Endosperm of Polished grain NonWaxy only: Expression of white Core less than 5% 1 5-10% 3 11-20% 5 21-40% 7 Trait No. Method of Examination Characteristics Example Varieties more than 40% 54. (+) 55. (+) 90 92 Note 9 Varieties with Endosperm of Polished Grain NonWaxy only: expression of white Belly less than 5% 1 5-10% 3 11-20% 5 21-40% 7 more than 40% 9 Alkali digestion low intermediate 1 high intermediate high 3 5 7 56. (*) 92 Decorticated grain: aroma absent present IR 1 Binerhen, Azucena, Dinorado 9 8. Explanations on the Table of Characteristics Trait No. 1: Coleoptile : color Trait No. 14: Leaf shape of ligule Trait No. 15 and 16: Flag leaf: attitude of blade (early and late observation) 1 erect 3 semi-erect 5 horizontal 7 reflexed Trait No. 24, 25, 26: Lemma: anthocyanin coloration and 41: Spikelet: color and tip Trait No. 28: Stem: thickness At the lowest internode Trait No. 33 and 34: Panicle: length of main axis (33) and curvature of main axis (34) 1 erect 3 semi-erect 5 drooping 7 deflexed Trait No. 43 and 44: Panicle: secondary branching 0 absent 2 strong 1 weak 3 clustering Trait No. 45: Panicle: attitude of branches 1 erect 3 erect to semi-erect 5 semi-erect 7 semi-erect to spreading 9 spreading Trait No. 46: Panicle: exsertion 7 partly exserted 5 exserted 1 well exserted Trait No. 48: Leaf: senescence The leaves below the flag leaf are observed at the time of harvest for their retention of greenness. State (3), leaves are dead when the grains have become fully ripened; state (5), intermediate (there must be 1 leaf which retains its color); state (7), 2 or more leaves retain their color at maturity. Trait No. 49: Sterile lemma: length The measurement is made on each of the two sterile lemmas. Trait No. 54 and 55: Grain: phenol reaction of lemma (54) Varieties with phenol reaction of lemma present only: Grain: coloration with phenol (55) Method of Testing: Place hulls from 10 grains into a petri dish of 5 cm diameter, and add 5 ml of 1.5% phenol solution; cover the petri dish, and keep at room temperature (not very cold) for one day. Trait No. 58: Decorticated grain: shape (in lateral view) Note round semi-round half spindle-shaped spindle-shaped long spindle-shaped 1 2 3 4 5 Length/ Width < 1.50 1.50-1.99 2.00-2.49 2.50-2.99 >3.00 Trait No. 60: Endosperm: presence of amylose How to differentiate: By observation, glutinous rice has waxy grains, and non-glutinous rice are non-waxy to transparent with various grades according to the amylose content of the endosperm. When it is necessary to differentiate glutinous rice and rice with very low amylose content, chemical analysis is needed. Note: In general, the amylose content of glutinous rice of pure line variety is 0% However, many commercial varieties; especially local, traditional varieties may contain 1-4% of amylose. This is because the waxy gene is recessive, and when outcrossed by ordinary rice pollen, the endosperm becomes non-glutinous. Also, some methods of testing may result in a low % of amylose. Research on chemical structure of waxy rice is still in progress in Japan. Recently various genes (named “dull” genes) for producing semi-waxy rice have been identified At present, amylose content of those semi-waxy rice is not less than 5% though it is not sure if further lower amylose lines will be bred in the future. The three categories can be simply defined by reaction to KI-I solution; glutinous type endosperm is stained to reddish purple, non-glutinous type to dark blue purple, and intermediate type to reddish – blue purple. Intermediate rice is non-glutinous but with very low amylose, the type which is recently commanding reputation among consumers in East Asian countries. KI-I solution is prepared by mixing 0.1 % I2 solution and 0.2 % KI solution. Trait No.61: Endosperm: content ofamylose Method ISO 6647 should be used. Modified from IRRI system by rounding due to variability of data especially in cool climates, and adding a rank of very high amylose content considering rice in some area of southern India. Further discussion may be needed for alternative definition, not using percentage of amylose, but just describing as very low, low, intermediate, high and very high. Trait No. 62: Varieties with endosperm of amylose absent only. Polished grain: expression of white core Trait No. 63: Varieties with endosperm of amylose absent only. Polished grain: expression of white belly Ad. 64: Alkali digestion Alkali digestion is much easier to test and simpler to observe, and is parallel to results of testing gelatinization temperature. Notes 1.0-2.5 corresponding to gelatilization temperature of 74.53.55.4 to 70-74 C and notes 5.5-7 to 55-59 C (Juliano and Villareal: Grain Quality Evaluation of World Rices, IRRI, 1993) Trait No. 65: Decorticated grain: aroma The main component of the aroma in rice is the 2-acetyl-1pyrroline (AcPy). To vaporize this chemical, 10 ml. of a 1.7% solution of KOH should be added to 2 gram of decorticated grains. The aroma, which is similar to that in pop-corn, is released within ten minutes. The level of expression is determined by reference to the example varieties. Decimal Code for the Growth Stages of Cereals 2-digit Code 00 01 02 03 04 05 General Description Germination Dry seed Start of imbibition Imbibition complete Radicle emerged from Freekes’ Scale Additional Remarks on Wheat, Barley, Rye, Oats and Rice 2-digit Code 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 General Description caryosis Coleoptile emerged from caryopsis Leaf just at coleoptile tip Seedling growth First leaf through coleoptile 30 First leaf unfolded 2 leaves unfolded 3 leaves unfolded 4 leaves unfolded 5 leaves unfolded 6 leaves unfolded 7 leaves unfolded 8 leaves unfolded 9 or more leaves unfolded Germination Main shoot only Main shoot and 1 tiller Main shoot and 2 tillers Main shoot and 3 tillers Main shoot and 4 tillers Main shoot and 5 tillers Main shoot and 6 tillers Main shoot and 7 tillers Main shoot and 8 tillers Main shoot and 9 or more tillers Stem elongation Pseudo stem erection (2) 31 1st node detectable 32 33 2nd node detectable 3rd detectable 34 35 4th node detectable 5th node detectable 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Freekes’ Scale Additional Remarks on Wheat, Barley, Rye, Oats and Rice } } } } 1 } } } } } } } } 2 } } } } }3 } } } } } } } } } } } } 4- 5 6} } 7} } } } } } } } Second leaf visible (Less than 1 cm) 50% of laminae unfolded In rice: vegetative lag phase Jointing stage Above crown nodes 2-digit Code 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 General Description 6th node detectable Flag leaf just visible Flag leaf ligule/collar just visible Booting - Freekes’ Scale } 8 Additional Remarks on Wheat, Barley, Rye, Oats and Rice 9 Pre-boot stage In rice: opposite auricle stage Little enlargement of the inflorescence, Early-boot stage Flag leaf sheath extending Boots just visibly swollen Boots swollen Flag leaf sheath opening First awns visible Inflorescence emergence } Fist spikelet of } inflorescence just } visible } } ¼ of inflorescence emerged } } ½ of inflorescence emerged } } }3/4 of inflorescence emerged } } } Emergence of Inflorescence } completed Anthesis } } Mid-boot stage } } 10 Late-boot stage } } } } } } } } } N} } S} N } } } S N } } } S N } } } S N } S } N 10.1 In awned forms only N = non-synchronous crops S = synchronous crops 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 2-digit Code 61 62 63 64 General Description } beginning of anthesis } 70 71 72 73 74 75 } }Anthesis half - way } } }Anthesis complete } Milk development Caryopsis watery ripe Early milk Medium milk 76 - 77 78 79 80 81 83 84 85 Late milk Dough development Early dough Soft dough 86 87 88 Hard dough - 89 Ripening Caryopsis hard (difficult to divide by thumbnail (3) 65 66 67 68 69 90 91 Freekes’ Scale } } S } } } N } } } N Additional Remarks on Wheat, Barley, Rye, Oats and Rice 10.51 Not easily detectable in barley In rice: Usually immediately Following heading 10.52 S 10.53 S 10.54 } } } } } } ] } } } 11.1 } Increase in solids of liquid endosperm } notable when crushing the caryopsis } between fingers Fingernail impression not held 11. 2 } } Fingernail impression held, inflorescence Losing chlorophyll 11. 3 In rice: Terminal spikelets ripened. In rice: 50 % of spikelets ripened 2-digit Code General Description Caryopsis hard (can no longer be dented by thumbnail) (4) Caryopsis loosening in daytime Over-ripe, straw dead and collapsing Seed dormat Viable seed giving 50% germination Seed not dormant Secondary dormarcy induced Secondary dormancy lost 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 Freekes’ Scale 11. 4 Additional Remarks on Wheat, Barley, Rye, Oats and Rice In rice: Over 90% of spikelets ripened (5) Risk of grain loss by shedding Transplanting and recovery (rice only) Uprooting of seedlings Rooting Recovery of shoots Resumption of vegetative growth T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 Reproduced from EUCARPIA Bulletin No. 7, 1974, pages 49-52, with the kind permission of the authors For further information, see J.C. Zadoks, T.T. Chang and C.F. Konzak, EUCARPIA bulletin No 7, 1974, pages 42-52. Notes on the Table (1) Stage of seedling inoculation with rust in the greenhouse (2) Only applicable to cereals with a prostrate or semi-prostrate early growth habit (3) Ripeness for binder (ca. 16% water content). Chlorophyll of inflorescence largely lost. (4) Ripeness for combine harvester (< 16% water content) (5) Optimumharvesttime. 9. Literature International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants(upov.int/test_guidelines) 10. Technical Questionnaire Application date: (not to be filled in by the applicant) TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE To be completed in connection with an application for plant breeders’ rights 1. Subject of theTechnical Questionnaire 1.1 Latin Name 1.2 Common Name 2. Applicant Name Address Telephone No. Fax No. E-mail address Breeder (if different from applicant) 4. Information on the breeding scheme and propagation of the variety 4.1 Breeding Scheme 4.2 Method of Propagating the Variety 4.2.1 Type of material (a) Line Male fertile line [ ] Male sterile line [ ] (b) Hybrid (c) other (specify) In the case of hybrid varieties, the production scheme for the hybrid and for each component, the information according to the following Chapters 5 to 7 should be provided on a separate sheet. Single Hybrid (SH) (……female parent……) x (….male parent…..) N.B. In case of use ofmalesterility system,pleaseindicate the name of the maintainer lineof the parental line. 4.3 other information 5. Characteristics of the variety to be indicated (the number in brackets refers to the corresponding characteristics in Test Guidelines; please mark the note which best corresponding). Characteristics 5.1 Basal leaf: sheath color (2) green Example Varieties Note 1 light purple 2 purple lines purple 5.2 Leaf: anthocyanin coloration of auricles (10) absent present 3 4 1 9 5.3 Time of healing (50% of plants with heads) very early early medium late Very late 1 3 5 7 9 5.4 Stem: length (excluding panicle; excluding (29) floating rice) very short short medium long very long 1 3 5 7 9 Characteristics 5.5 Decorticated grain: (56) Very short Example Varieties Note 1 Short Medium 3 Long 5 Very long 7 9 5.6 Decorticated grain: color (59) White 1 2 Light brown 3 Variegated brown Dark 4 brown 5 Light red Red 6 Variegated purple 7 Purple 8 Dark purple 9 6. Similar varieties and difference from these varieties Denominations(s) of variety(ies) similar to your candidate variety Characteristic(s) in which your candidate variety differs from the similar variety(ies) Describe the expression of the characteristics(s) for the similar variety(ies) Describe the expression of the characteristics(s) for your candidate variety (Example) Plant: Height e.g. note 3 e.g. short e.g. 90 cm note 7 Tall 130 cm 7. Additional information which may help in the examination of the variety 7.1 In addition to the information provided in section 5 and 6, are there any additional characteristics, which may help to distinguish the variety? 7.1.1 Resistance to pest and diseases Yes [ ] No [ ] No [ (if yes, please provide details) 7.1.2 Other Yes [ ] ] (if yes, please provide details) 7.2 Special conditions for the examination of the variety 7.1.3 Are there any special conditions for growing the variety or conducting the examination? Yes 7.1.4 [ ] No [ ] If yes, please give details: 7.3 Other information 8. Authorization (a) Does the variety require prior authorization for please under legislation concerning the protection of the environmental, human and animal health? Yes [ ] No [ ] No [ ] (b) Hassuch authorization been obtained? Yes [ ] If the answer to (b) is yes, please attach a copy of the authorization. (End of Document)