doc11_OSAC_IAI_OSAC update Forensic Document
download 
Report Transcription
11_OSAC_IAI_OSAC update Forensic Document
The Transition Scientific Working Groups (SWGs) left FBI, no longer funded. SWGs adopted by National Institute of Standards and Technology. Renamed Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC). Nearly all of the former SWG’s represented. 2 The Re-organization Five Scientific Area Committees formed: • Biology/DNA, • Chemistry/Instrumental Analysis, • Crime Scene/Death Investigation, • Digital/Multimedia, • Physics/Pattern. 3 The Re-organization Physics/Pattern: • • • • • Questioned Documents, Blood Stain Pattern Analysis, Friction Ridge, Firearms & Toolmarks, Footwear & Tire Tread. 4 5 Other Committees Legal Resource Quality Infrastructure Human Factors 6 Top Authority Forensic Science Standards Board (FSSB) 7 Questioned Documents Physics/Pattern Rigo Vargas International Association for Identification August 2015 Subcommittee Leadership Position Name Organization Term Email Chair Rigo Vargas [Individual] 3 [email protected] Vice Chair Christopher Saunders South Dakota State University 2 [email protected] Executive Secretary Mark Lancaster Northern Kentucky University 3 [email protected] KAVI Liaison Mark Goff Michigan Department of State Police 3 [email protected] Quality Liaison Peter Tytell [Individual] 4 [email protected] Legal Liaison David Parrett Forensic Document Examination Services, LLC 3 [email protected] Human Factor Liaison Mara Merlino Kentucky State University 4 [email protected] 9 Subcommittee Members # Name Organization Term Email 1 Carl McClary Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco and Explosives 2 [email protected] 2 Lisa Hanson Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Forensic Science Laboratory 3 [email protected] 3 Ted Burkes Federal Bureau of Investigation 2 [email protected] 4 Thomas Riley Riley, Welch, and LaPorte 3 [email protected] 5 Peter Tytell [Individual] 4 [email protected] 6 Rigo Vargas Mississippi Forensic Laboratory 3 [email protected] 7 Elaine Wooton Department of Homeland Security 4 [email protected] 8 Hector Maldonado Federal Bureau of Investigation 2 [email protected] 9 Kesha White Florida Department of Law Enforcement 3 [email protected] 10 David Parrett Forensic Document Examination Services, LLC 3 [email protected] 10 Subcommittee Members # Name Organization Term Email 11 Karen Nobles Forensic Document Services 3 [email protected] 12 Gary Licht Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation Criminalistics Laboratory 4 [email protected] 13 Mara Merlino Kentucky State University 4 [email protected] 14 Mark Goff Michigan Department of State Police 3 [email protected] 15 Mark Lancaster Northern Kentucky University 3 [email protected] 16 John Osborn Self-Placeholder 2 [email protected] 17 Christopher Saunders South Dakota State University 2 [email protected] 18 Derek Hammond United States Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory 2 [email protected] 19 Joseph Stephens United States Secret Service 4 [email protected] 20 Brett Bishop Washington State Patrol 4 [email protected] 11 Discipline Description Questioned Documents • The Subcommittee on Forensic Document Examination will focus on standards and guidelines related to the discipline, including: • (1) source of handwriting, (2) source of machine-produced documents, typewriting, or other impressions and marks, (3) materials and devices involved in the production of documents, (4) genuineness and alterations, (5) preservation and/or restoration of legibility, (6) documentation and reporting, and (7) training and competency. 12 First - Standards already processed through an SDO Suggested OSAC Process: (Registry, SDO, Canvass) Title Organization E2285-08 Standard Guide for Examination of Mechanical Checkwriter Impressions ASTM Registry E2286-08a Standard Guide for Examination of Dry Seal Impressions ASTM Registry E2287-09 Standard Guide for Examination of Fracture Patterns and Paper Fiber Impressions on Single-Strike Film Ribbons and Typed Text ASTM Registry E2288-09 Standard Guide for Physical Match of Paper Cuts, Tears, and Perforations in Forensic Document Examinations ASTM Registry E2289-08 Standard Guide for Examination of Rubber Stamp Impressions ASTM Registry E2291-03 Standard Guide for Indentation Examinations ASTM Registry 13 Standards already processed through an SDO Title Organization Suggested OSAC Process: (Registry, SDO, Canvass) E2388-11 Standard Guide for Minimum Training Requirements for Forensic Document Examiners ASTM Registry E2494-08 Standard Guide for Examination of Typewritten Items ASTM Registry E2710-11 Standard Guide for the Restoration and Preservation of Charred Documents ASTM Registry E2711-11 Standard Guide for the Restoration and Preservation of Liquid Soaked Documents ASTM Registry 14 Second - Task Groups formed to address high priority standard revisions OSAC Process: Task Group Leader Title Organization Standard for Examination of Handwritten Items SWGDOC AAFS SDO Gary Licht Standard for Scope of Work of Forensic Document Examiners SWGDOC AAFS SDO Lisa Hanson Terminology Relating to the Examination of Questioned Documents SWGDOC AAFS SDO Carl McClary Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Document Examiners SWGDOC AAFS SDO Elaine Wooton Standard for Minimum Training Requirements for Forensic Document Examiners SWGDOC AAFS SDO Brett Bishop 15 Third - Current standards to be addressed at a later date Title Organization SWGDOC Standard for Examination of Altered Documents SWGDOC AAFS SDO SWGDOC Standard for Test Methods for Forensic Writing Ink Comparison SWGDOC AAFS SDO Standard Guide for Examination of Documents Produced with Toner Technology SWGDOC AAFS SDO SWGDOC Standard for Examination of Documents Produced with Liquid Ink Jet Technology SWGDOC AAFS SDO SWGDOC Standard for Non-destructive Examination of Paper SWGDOC AAFS SDO SWGDOC Standard for Writing Ink Identification SWGDOC AAFS SDO SWGDOC Standard for Use of Image Capture and Storage Technology in Forensic Document Examination SWGDOC AAFS SDO 16 OSAC Process: Fourth - Drafts never out for comment Title Organization Suggested OSAC Process: (Registry, SDO, Canvass) Case Review SWGDOC AAFS SDO Document Dating SWGDOC AAFS SDO Folds and Creases SWGDOC AAFS SDO Line Intersections SWGDOC AAFS SDO Initial Assessment of Evidence SWGDOC AAFS SDO Note Taking SWGDOC AAFS SDO Sequence of Strokes SWGDOC AAFS SDO Thermal Printing SWGDOC AAFS SDO Writing Instruments SWGDOC AAFS SDO 17 Fifth - Documents Slated to be Written Title Organization Suggested OSAC Process: (Registry, SDO, Canvass) Chemical Examination of Paper SWGDOC/OSAC AAFS SDO Examination of Counterfeit Documents SWGDOC/OSAC AAFS SDO Classification of Typewriter Type Styles SWGDOC/OSAC AAFS SDO Classification of Conventional Printing Processes SWGDOC/OSAC AAFS SDO Continuing Education and Professional Development of Forensic Document Examiners SWGDOC/OSAC AAFS SDO Classification of Facsimile Devices Using Terminal Transmitting Identifier / Receiving Transmission Identifier SWGDOC/OSAC AAFS SDO 18 Summary • First step: Get standards from Topic 1 into the OSAC Registry • Second Step: Work to complete the 5 standards involved in Task Groups • Keep track of any interdisciplinary effects our standards may have on other subcommittees • Work with the Researchers and Human Factors committees to create better standards 19
