TOWNSHIP OF MORRIS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SPECIAL
Transcription
TOWNSHIP OF MORRIS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SPECIAL
TOWNSHIP OF MORRIS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES MAY 11, 2015 Call to Order The special meeting of the Township of Morris Board of Adjustment was called to order on Monday evening, May 11, 2015, at 7:30 P.M. in the Municipal Building, 50 Woodland Avenue, Township of Morris. Statement of Adequate Notice Chairman Kronk issued the following: “I hereby announce and state that adequate notice of this meeting was provided by the Secretary of this Board of Adjustment by preparing a notice dated May 6, 2015 specifying the time, date and place of this meeting, posting such notice on the bulletin board in the Municipal Building; filing said notice with the Clerk of the Township of Morris; forwarding the notice to the Morris County Daily Record and the Morris News Bee, and forwarding, by mail, the said notice to all persons on the request list, and I hereby hand a copy of such notice to the Secretary of the Board of Adjustment for inclusion in the minutes of this meeting, all of the above actions being in accordance with N.J.S.A. 10:4-6, et seq., Open Public Meetings Act.” The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mr. Timothy Kronk, Chairman Roll call of Board Members and Professionals Members Present Timothy Kronk, Chairman Kathleen Kalaher Thomas Luby Donnell Williams Paul Woodford Rick Haan John Christensen Joen L. Ferrari, Alt. 1 Paul Staudt, Alt. 2 Members Absent NONE Also Present Mr. Rich Oller, Board Attorney Mr. Paul Phillips, Board Planner Mr. James Slate, Twp. Engineer Ms. Sonia Santiago, Board Secretary Township of Morris Board of Adjustment Special Meeting Minutes May 11, 2015 Regular Meeting BA-03-14 Block 1101, Lot 19.01, 11 Holmes Court, RA-35 zone. Section C. Robert S. Cappy Applicant proposes construction of an in-ground pool, patio and pool equipment creating a side yard setback for the proposed pool equipment of 17 feet where 30 feet is required, a combined side yard setback of 63.4 feet where 75 feet is required and a rear yard setback of 24 feet for the proposed pool and 20 feet for the proposed pool patio where 50 feet is required. Proof of Publication and Affidavit of Service filed and approved by the Board Secretary and Board Attorney. Ms. Diane Hickey, attorney for the applicant entered her appearance and presented the application to the Board. The following professionals being sworn in by the Board attorney appeared to be heard. Richard B. Schommer, Jr., Professional Engineer The following exhibits were submitted as evidence. A-1 Colored Rendering of the site plan Summary of Testimony- Richard Schommer, Professional Engineer Mr. Schommer stated that the property narrows towards the back, it is in the RA-35 zone. Presently there is a single family home with a patio, deck area and a gazebo. There is also a retaining wall in the rear of the property and along the southern side of the property is a 30 foot storm sewer easement. The shape of the property and the fixtures that exist on the property today leaves us with an area in the back within the building envelope as a usable rear yard area for construction of the swimming pool and pool patio. The ordinance requires that the pool and pool deck complies with the principal building setback requirements which are a side yard of 30 feet and the rear yard is 50 feet. Given the shape of the property and the structures that exist there today only leaves us with a small area for the construction of the pool. The rear of the property is actually open space property and it is owned by the Township which is a detention basin and it will not be developed. The proposal is to construct a 20 x 40 in-ground swimming pool and a pool patio. The pool equipment is located near an existing retaining wall and some existing vegetation and we think that would be a great area to place the pool equipment. Previously, we had the pool and pool patio shifted further to the north closer to the neighbors property line and we have changed that to eliminate the side yard setback for the pool and the pool patio. The pool patio is defined as the decking around the pool, from a zoning view point patios can be located 5 feet from the property line. We have maintained a 30 foot setback to the pool decking and 35 feet setback from the pool. With respect to the side yard setback to the north and neighbors property line we will conform to the setbacks the pool will be 35 feet where 30 feet is required the pool deck will be 30 feet where 30 feet is required. The pool equipment will be 17 feet from the property line. Because of the location of the property and the physical features that exist there, you will not be able to see the pool equipment. We are also proposing a row of evergreens to be planted which will grow very large and provide additional buffer. Towards the rear behind the property is Township property which is a detention basin, we still need a variance, the requirement is to meet the same setback that is required by the dwelling which is 50 feet, the closest point will be 20 feet for the decking and the pool will be at 24 feet where 50 feet is required. The other variance is the combined side yard setback with the pool equipment on the north side and the deck to the south side will create a combined side yard setback of 63.4 feet where 75 feet is required. Township of Morris Board of Adjustment Special Meeting Minutes May 11, 2015 He further testified that the house, driveway and patio are the only things on the property today and are fully conforming. In terms of variance relief this is a dimensional variance and the hardship criteria are appropriate given the shape of the property and the structures that exist on the property and the remaining space that we have within the building envelope to place a conforming pool. Under the hardship we are abide to a piece of property that the shape of the property creates a hardship upon the applicant. The only way to create a pool in conformity with the ordinance would be to place it close to the house and it would require removal and demolition of substantial portion of existing improvements that are present on the property today. In addition to the hardship some aspect of the c2 flexible criteria applies by placing the pool in this location and allowing deviation to the rear with respect to the open space, he doesn’t see this creating an impact to properties in the rear and it allows the pool to be placed in this area and if we look at the purposes of zoning, purpose G is to provide sufficient space and appropriate location for a variety of uses including recreational uses and including both public and private to meet the needs of our citizens and to provide a desirable visual environment. To place this pool not right behind the house where you have to remove existing features to allow to be setback further, it’s a better design. Under either scenarios the variance can be granted without substantial impairment to the zone plan or zoning ordinance, the principal relief is to the rear. There is no dwelling close to the setbacks the closest property to the rear is several feet away and we see no detriment. To the extent that there is no impact to the neighbors, we believe the planting proposed along northern side will be effective; in respect to the pool equipment which requires a variance, the proposed location at the bottom of the retaining walls and screening with vegetation and screened by the existing shed is the most appropriate location for the equipment. It will not be visible to the neighbors. A discussion was carried regarding the pool location and the pool equipment among the Board members and the applicant’s professional. The meeting was opened for questions or comments of the witness; the following person appeared to be heard. Ajay Sawhney 15 Holmes Court Closed at 8:01pm Ms. Hickey stated that based on the testimony and evidence presented she would ask the Board to approve the application. Applicant agreed to the enclosure of the pool equipment with a solid fence and it will meet the noise requirements. Applicant is to submit Landscaping plan to the Township Engineer for review and approval. Conditions of approval; applicant must comply to pool enclosure, provide a solid enclosure for the pool equipment to the satisfaction of the Township Engineer to mitigate noise, modify the landscaping plan to provide additional buffer and play set to be removed. Mr. Williams moved, seconded by Mr. Luby that approval be granted to the application of Robert S. Cappy thereby permitting on Block 1101, Lot 19.01 the construction of an in-ground pool, patio and pool equipment and that the Board attorney be authorized to prepare a formal resolution memorializing the action taken by the Board, same to be presented for consideration at the June 22, 2015 meeting. Roll Call: (Voting Members) Kathleen Kalaher Thomas Luby Donnell Williams Paul Woodford YES YES YES NO Township of Morris Board of Adjustment Special Meeting Minutes May 11, 2015 Rick Haan Mr. Christensen Timothy Kronk YES YES YES Application approved 6-1 Mr. Christensen, Mr. Kronk and Mr. Staudt recused themselves from the following application. Mr. Luby is seated as Chairman at this time. A Certified Shorthand Reporter was present for the following application. See attached transcript. Morristown Unitarian Fellowship BA-12-14 Block 9401, Lot 6, 21 Normandy Heights Road, RA-25 zone, Section D. Continuation from the October 27, 2014, February 23, 2015 and March 23, 2015 public hearings, applicant proposes to construct a new fellowship hall addition to the existing structure with other related site improvements. Proof of Publication and Affidavit of Service filed and approved by the Board Secretary and Board Attorney. Mr. Lawrence A. Calli, attorney for the applicant entered his appearance and presented the application to the Board. The following professionals being sworn in by the Board Attorney appeared to be heard. Allison Miller, Reverend Steven Parker, Church Board Member The following exhibits were submitted as evidence. OM-2 copy of the notice of the hearing referencing March 23, 2015 A-1 Pamphlet of Church Events dated January 4, 2015 A-2 Letter to Mayor and Township Committee dated 5-10-72 OM-3 Copy of Newspaper Article dated January 16, 2015 titled “She is still going the Distance” The meeting was opened to the public; for questions of Reverend Miller, the following persons appeared to be heard. Mr. Jay Delaney, attorney for Daniel and June Meehan, 4 Pond Hill Road David Dunham 9 Normandy Heights Road Roger Merritt 28 Normandy Heights Road Closed at 8:57 pm Summary of Testimony – Steven C. Parker, Member of the Board Mr. Parker stated that there has been a lot of discussion of what is happening at our location. Mr. Parker stated that professional staff uses the building five days a week. Our primary function is on Sunday we conduct over 130 worship services per year and when you actually look at the religious education or the Sunday school program, we have over 320 religious education classes in the course of every year. As you know there is a lot of work that is done by the committee and volunteers, those committee meets at least once or twice a month primarily on weekday evenings. We also have a choir and a children’s choir. They each practice 40 times a year for regular choir practice and then extra practices for the performances that they do, they do concerts during the course of the year and a lot of other events throughout the year such as, Halloween party, auction, fundraiser art exhibits, jazz concert in the spring, Township of Morris Board of Adjustment Special Meeting Minutes May 11, 2015 we have two picnics throughout the year, a fundraiser for South America and sit down dinners, which are well attended. The fellowship has two women’s groups and two men’s groups and a meditation group. They meet weekly, bimonthly and monthly depending on which group it is. Then we do a tremendous amount of adult education and covenant circle work. We also have adult education classes going on a year round basis and we have our share of weddings, memorial services and baby dedications. Mr. Parker reviewed exhibit A-1 which consisted of a pamphlet of order of service and what’s happening at Morristown Unitarian Fellowship entitled “The Journey Within” dated January 4, 2015. Mr. Parker stated that they make a tremendous amount of use of the building seven days a week and most evenings. They don’t have a big social space anywhere in the old mansion. They use the sanctuary for any large event and that only holds approximately 125 people. They sometimes have to turn people away. When we sat down with the architects, we basically said give us a room big enough to seat 200 people at tables. We also asked for additional bathrooms, kitchen right next to the big seating area and a couple of extra classrooms that are sprinklered. All we have asked is because of our needs which constitute 90% of the use. The building is not available much to outside users because of our own needs. He further stated that the purpose for doing this kind of external use that we do, these accessory uses, this is a great opportunity to leverage the building to help bring forward the kind of things that we believe in and support as part of our belief system. We look for users that are congruent with our faith system and views are a little unique. The thing that holds us together as a religious organization isn’t the belief in a particular type of deity, but basically a set of guiding moral principles that we try to agree to live our lives by. Mr. Parker proceeded to describe the different uses in the church. Churches are integral part of the community. Our building was designated a shelter in 1962. Mr. Parker proceeded to describe the different type of activities that goes on in churches. Recess taken at 9:20 pm Meeting reconvened at 9:30 pm Mr. Parker further stated that he has approximately 15 years with the church and what’s being going on at the Fellowship has been going on since 1957. There was a question regarding concerts. We have had concerts where we bring in outside musicians and usually a couple of those over the course of the year and those are open to the general public. We have raised money for impoverished people. If you go back in the 60’s 70 or 80’s you see the same things. Mr. Parker reviewed exhibit A-2 with the Board which consisted of a letter dated May 10, 1972 submitted to the Mayor and the Township Committee stating the uses of the Church. He further stated that on street parking is not acceptable by the neighbors and for us; we are making a huge improvement on the parking. Mr. Parker stated that they had members of the project team do informal parking counts to test a bunch of use situations so that they could feed that information to the professional design team and he offered the parking counts to the Board. He stated that they offer two worship services on Sundays. He stated that that peak parking is kind of in between them when half the people are actually in the first service and the other half are beginning to arrive ready for the second service. The parking counts range from 99 to 117 and that was spinning 15 to 20 cars onto the street. Mr. Parker stated that Monday thru Thursday the volume is less and the parking is cleared by 9:30 pm and that the higher volume is Friday thru Sunday. A discussion was carried regarding the church events and the amount of people attending the events and the parking. The meeting was opened to the public for questions of the witness; the following persons appeared to be heard. Township of Morris Board of Adjustment Special Meeting Minutes May 11, 2015 Mr. Schkolnick, attorney for Michelle Rechler, 26 Normandy Heights Road Mr. Jay Delaney, attorney for Daniel & June Meehan, 4 Pond Hill Road Roger Howard 20 Normandy Heights Road David Dunham 9 Normandy Heights Road Padma Gadde 15 Normandy Heights Road Larry Cutler 1 Woodruff Road Mr. Woodford moved seconded by Mr. Luby and unanimously carried the application is adjourned and carried to the May 18, 2015 without further notice. Other Matters – none to be heard With no further business for consideration by the Township of Morris Board of Adjustment, on motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 11:03 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Sonia Santiago, Secretary Township of Morris Board of Adjustment Approved: July 27, 2015