Russell County, Kentucky - Kentucky Geological Survey

Transcription

Russell County, Kentucky - Kentucky Geological Survey
1000
r
se C
er C
r
Coo
p
1000
1000
800
1000
1000
0
100
e
yn
a
W
800
#4
S
A power transmission line from nearby Wolf Creek Dam crosses southern
Russell County near Creelsboro. Power line right-of-ways must be taken into
account for land-use planning purposes. Photo by Bart Davidson, Kentucky
Geological Survey.
800
800
1000
UB
US
H
FA
PR
ING
S
MI
LL
S
Z
BE
JA
100
800
0
800
1000
800
RUSSELL
COUNTY
1000
0
#3
S
The Creelsboro Arch, locally known as the Rockbridge, in southwestern
Russell County, is formed from limestone in the Mississippian Fort Payne
formation. While not officially a state park, it is protected by the landowner
and is a common destination for tourists and artists. Photo by Bart
Davidson, Kentucky Geological Survey.
0
Cub Cr
0
Jabez V&
3277
ø
÷
#
S
0
100
1000
y
yne
#
S
r
ub C
eC
Littl
Co
#
S
#
S
unt
"196
!
S
##
S
800
ty
n
u
o
C
127
1000
100
800
1000
1000
800
0
100
1000
tt Br
S
#
S#
Wa
800
0
100
800
1000
1000
1000
800
LAKE
CUMBERLAND
800
Bucke
100
Goo
Br
Jones
1000
800
800
r
800
600
600
PH
IL
EL
I
N
D
#
S
1000
800
V&Rowena
Br
100
0
100
D
1000
LE
NN
VIL
OW
ST
ME
JA
CU
MB
CITERL
Y AN
Copyright 2005 by the University
of Kentucky, Kentucky Geological
Survey
For information on obtaining copies
of this map and other Kentucky
Geological Survey maps and
publications call:
Public Information Center
859.257.3896
877.778.7827 (toll free)
View the KGS World Wide Web
site at:
www.uky.edu/kgs
800
DU
R
SP USS
RIN EL
GS L
RO
BO
LS
CRWOL
DA EEK F
M
D
1000
kin C
##
Puckett
#
S
800
#
S
1000
600
Coe Cr
600
600
LIE
R
PE
NT
EE
CR
#
S
0
RUSSELL
MO
VIL
LE
ND
A
#
S
#
S
800
1000
AM
A
McFarland Cr
Perkins Cr
rk
Jobbes Fo
0
100
100
0
0
ey Cr
Rams
800
Millers Cr
ily Cr
Br
1000
1000
1000
100
800
1000
0
100
r
sy C
Grea
1000
lby
Se
1000
k Cr
Mud L
ic
1000
1000
Little
0
100
100
0
1000
ell C
r
Rus
s
0
100
ty
oun
ir C
Ada
1000
1000
Mill C
r
1000
1000
1000
Indian
V& Hills
0
0
100
800
#
S
800
"196
!
100
1383
ø
÷
V&#SOno
#
S
#
S
0
#
S
V& Vinnie
100
Cr
1000
Mud Lick
800
more
800
800
800
Pump
800
"76
!
Lick Cr
#
S
6
y
unt
Co
#
S
1000
#
S
ki
las
Pu
#
S
#
S
#
S
1680
ø
÷
Concealed fault
Fault
#
S
800
D
Artificial fill
Watershed divide
County line
3 Photo location
50-foot contour interval
igator Cr
ig
a
# tor C
r
1000
Syca
0
E Fork All
All
#
S
D
Faults
#
S
800
600
100
r
r
800
Cr
yB
Ro
B
dom
Free
Dudley Cr
Jim C
r
tle
Lit
r
800
1000
Salem B
rk
800
Bledsoe Cr
Cr
800
800
800
se
0
800
800
o
Go
L
Fo
800
1000
800
o rk
800
ily Cr
#
S
800
100
800
0
Sinkholes
rk
W
V&#S Whittle
800
#
100
1000
1000
State Br
#
S
800
##
#
#
NUNN
PARKWAY
#
S
#
S#
S
800
1000
800
st F
Fork
r Fo
Eli
V&
0
100
S#
#
S#
S
Cr
Water Wells
#
S
Domestic
#
S
Industrial
#
S
Monitoring
#
S
Public
Incorporated city
Wetlands > 1 acre
(U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, 2003)
Wildlife management area
Source-water protection area, zone 1
1000
#
S
0
/(
800
"
!
100
800
Ea
ey
Turk
Clea
0
100
800
V& Karlus
#
S
#
3525
100
Geology of Kentucky
Learn more about Kentucky Geology at www.uky.edu/kgs/geology/
rk
Fo
Severe to moderate
limitations.
Possible rock
excavation.
y
ne
Severe limitations.
Reservoir may leak
where rocks are
fractured. Sinks
possible.
Ca
Slight limitations.
Reservoir may leak
where rocks are
fractured.
1000
#
S
800
800
7.5-Minute
Map Index
1000
Severe to slight limitations, depending on
activity and topography. Possible steep
wooded slopes.
#8
S
1000
1000
#
S
800
800
Severe to moderate limitations.
Rock excavation
may be required.
800
800
Severe to moderate
limitations.
Possible rock
excavation.
nty
0
Slight to moderate
limitations. Reservoir may leak where
rocks are fractured.
800
#
S
Cr
#
ø
÷
#
S
S
##
S
1611
ø
÷
#
S
#
800
#7
S
X
100
Slight to moderate
limitations. Reservoir may leak where
rocks are fractured.
Cou
Long
Bottom V&
Ind
#
S
S
#
Br
Severe to slight limitations, depending on
activity and topography. Possible steep
wooded slopes.
ø
÷
1730
#
S
#
S
"6 19
!
wn
Severe to slight limitations, depending
on activity and topography. Possible
steep wooded
slopes.
#
S
0
#
S
To
Slight to moderate Severe limitations.
limitations. Reser- Possible rock
voir may leak where excavation.
rocks are fractured.
Sinks possible.
V& Manntown
tle
Lit
ian
"910
!
800
Slight to moderate
limitations. Reservoir may leak where
rocks are fractured.
Sinks possible.
ton
800
#
S
800
Clin
#
600
#
S
#
S
100
#
#
#
# ##
######
#
### #
## #
### ## #
# # # ######
## #
X
#
## # #
#
S
"92
!
D
D
#
S
76
#
S
Cr
1000 #S
##
S
S
1000
Severe to slight limitations, depending on
activity and topography. Possible steep
wooded slopes.
er
##
#
#
S
600
#
S
#
S
#
S
3278
ø
÷
#
S
#
S
V& Freedom
kfis
c
Bla
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
r
hC
Salem
#
S
Clifty
D
#
S
#
S
#
S
2284
#
V& Helm
#
S
#
600 ###
##
#
# ###
r
#
ick C
## # Salt L
#
600 #
Riv
800
#
#
#
# #
800
4
/(
800
Moderate to severe Severe limitations.
limitations. Reser- Possible rock
voir may leak where excavation.
rocks are fractured.
Sinks possible.
land
#
800
#
#
0
#
#
#
600
Moderate to severe
limitations. Reservoir may leak where
rocks are fractured.
Sinks possible.
800
D
-
V& Sewellton
ø
÷
#
S
School
Oil and Gas Wells
X Gas well
# Oil well
Spring
#
S
#
S
127
1000
#
1000
#
X
100
Lily
Jamestown
Elementary
3281
ø
÷
1000
ber
#
S
Severe to slight limitations, depending on
activity and topography. Possible steep
wooded slopes.
#
#
S
JAMESTOWN
#
S
rk
800
Cum
#
#
V&#S
"
!
#
#
S
#
S
D
D
55
#
Cr
Moderate limitations.
Possibility of thin
soils and rock
excavation.
Creelsboro
#
V& Ribbon
#
S
#
S
800
#
Lick
Slight limitations.
Reservoir may leak
where rocks are
fractured.
800
Rock
Slight to moderate
limitations. Reservoir may leak where
rocks are fractured.
Sinks possible.
Moderate limitations.
Highly variable
amount of rock and
earth excavation.
#
S
3
"
!
Rose
Crossroads V&
#
S#
S#
S
#
S #
S
#
S
#
S
6 19
#
S
# Mo
# ore
sF
o
- V&D
#
S
Big
"6 19
!
0
r
Bob B
#
S
#
S
#
S
-
#
S
#
#S
S
1000
#
S
#
S
"92
!
r
100
00ll Cr
8Mi
#
S
V& Esto
r
1000
#
S
"
!
#
S
#
S
eC
Olga V& #S
#
--
V& Middlestown
#
S
1000
#
S
800
#
D
800
379
#
S
Bethel Cr
600
1000
/(
#
S
"
!
ll Cr
"
!
#
S
#
S
RCHS
RCMS
"910
!
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
379
1000
ter #
Cr
r
ø
- ÷
#
S
1000
Cr
Severe limitations.
Slight limitations.
Reservoir may leak Steep slopes.
where rocks are
fractured.
Damron Cr
rty
800
XLes
#
#
on C
800
#
##
#
S
#
S
#
S#
#
SS
#
S
Salem
Elem
#
S
#
S
127
"379
!
800
#
##
##
##S
##S
800
Buttler Cr
Moderate limitations.
Highly variable
amount of rock and
earth excavation.
#
X
#
S
2#S
#
#
#
#
ppl
3281
ø
÷
# # #
#
##
#
# #
#
# #
#
# # # 1058
#
# ##
#
# # # # ## # ##
# ##
Union
# # ##Chapel
# # #
#
#
S# #
#
# ## #
#
#
# #
# #
#
379
#
X
#
S
#
S
Br
#5
S
#
S
#
S
1000
Libe
1000
Cabin Fork Cr
Severe limitations.
Steep slopes.
#
#
S
1
0
Old
Olga
V&
800
Slight limitations.
Reservoir may leak
where rocks are
fractured.
Severe limitations.
Steep slopes.
High groundwater
table possible.
Moderate to severe
limitations. Refer to
soil report (Fehr,
1982).
Moderate limitations.
Highly variable
amount of rock and
earth excavation.
Cri
# # #
#
##
#
000
#
#
#S # ## #1
#
# #
# ### ## #### X
#
#
##
# ##
#
#
#
# # ##
# # ##
# # #
X
1058
ø
÷
D
Potts Br
Slight limitations.
Reservoir may leak
where rocks are
fractured.
Severe limitations.
Leaky reservoir
material. Refer to
soil report (Fehr,
1982).
Underground
Utilities
"
!
#
S
"430
!
#
S
S
#
S#
"
!
#
S
#
S
#
S
100
Cr
#
##
# #
#
#
X#
ern
"55 1000
!
#
800
Severe limitations.
Leaky reservoir
material. Refer to
soil report (Fehr,
1982).
Reservoir
Embankments
800
0
100
3280
ø
÷
1000 #
##
###
#### #
#
## #
Reservoir
Areas
RUSSELL SPRINGS
1000
#
S
V& Fonthill
#
S
80
#
S
#
S
1000
cus
Cr
Clif
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
Rouse B
#
S
#
S
0
#
S
#
S
EXPLANATION
100
Casey County
p Cr
am
on C
nche
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
Cr
Pu
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
r
ty C
"832
!
nt V
Cro
Severe limitations.
Rock excavation;
locally, upper few
feet may be rippable.
Steep slopes.
Possible expansion
of shales.
Severe to moderate limitations.
Rock excavation
may be required.
Possible steep
slopes.
Slight limitations.
ick
0
100
Big
Br
Blakey
Mou
800
Fair to good
foundation
material. Difficult
to excavate.
Severe to moder- Severe limitations. Moderate limitations.
ate limitations. Rock Rock excavation; Rock excavation.
excavation; locally, locally, upper few Steep slopes.
upper few feet may feet may be rippable.
be rippable. Steep Steep slopes.
slopes. Possible ex- Possible expansion
pansion of shales. of shales.
Severe to moder- Severe to moder- Severe to moderate limitations.
ate limitations.
ate limitations.
Rock excavation Rock excavation
Rock excavation
may be required. may be required. may be required.
Possible steep
Possible steep
Possible steep
slopes.
slopes.
slopes.
3 Miles
dL
1870
ø
÷
#
S
V& Jericho
#
S
3017
ø
÷
#
S#
S
ose
#
S
#
S
S
#
S#
92
#
S
#
S
600
9. Siltstone,
dolomite
and chert
Severe to moderate limitations.
Rock excavation.
Possible steep
slopes and
narrow ravines.
1000
V& Bryan
#
#
800
Fair to good
foundation
material. Difficult
excavation.
Possible expansion of shales.
Severe limitations.
Rock excavation.
Possible steep
slopes.
1000
800
800
0
100
8. Shale and
dolomite
Severe limitations.
Rock excavation
may be required.
Steep slopes
along major drainages.
2
600
Very good
foundation
material. Difficult
to excavate.
Severe limitations. Severe limitations.
Rock excavation;
Steep slopes.
locally, upper few
feet may be rippable.
Steep slopes.
Slight to moderate
limitations.
1
600
7. Dolomite
and limestone/siltstone
Slight to moderate
limitations.
0
ty
Severe limitations. Impermeable rock. Locally fast drainage
through fractures and
sinks to water table;
possible groundwater
contamination.
Severe limitations. Impermeable rock. Locally fast drainage
through fractures and
sinks to water table;
possible groundwater
contamination.
Severe limitations. Impermeable rock. Locally fast drainage
through fractures and
sinks to water table;
possible groundwater
contamination.
Severe limitations. Thin
soils and impermeable
rock. Fast drainage
through fractures to
water table; possible
groundwater
contamination.
Check to see if area
is flood prone. If not,
slight limitations
based on type of
structures. Refer to
soil report (Fehr,
1982).
Slight to moderate
limitations.
1
San
un
Fair to very good
foundation
material. Difficult
to excavate.
Extensive
Recreation
Severe limitations. Severe limitations.
Rock excavation;
Steep slopes.
locally, upper few
feet may be rippable.
Steep slopes.
Possible expansion
of shales.
Slight limitations.
Moderate limitations.
Rock excavation;
Steep to moderate
locally, upper few
slopes.
feet may be rippable. Steep slopes
along major drainages. Possible expansion of shales.
Severe to slight lim- Severe to slight limiitations, depending tations, depending
on topography. Rock on activity and topography. Possible
excavation. Local
drainage problems. steep wooded
slopes.
Sinks common.
Groundwater contamination possible.
Moderate to slight Severe to slight limilimitations, depend- tations, depending
ing on topography. on activity and toRock excavation. pography. Possible
Local drainage prob- steep wooded
lems. Sinks common. slopes.
#
#
#
Co
Severe limitations. Thin
soils and impermeable
rock. Fast drainage
through fractures to
water table; possible
groundwater
contamination.
Scale 1:48,000
1 inch equals 3/4 mile
nd
6. Limestone,
dolomite,
and shale
Fair to good
foundation
material. Difficult
to excavate.
Possible expansive shales.
Severe limitations.
Rock excavation;
locally, upper few
feet may be rippable.
Steep slopes.
Possible expansion
of shales.
Check to see if area
is flood prone. If not,
slight limitations
based on type of
structures. Refer to
soil report (Fehr,
1982).
Severe limitations.
Steep slopes.
100
800
1000
5. Limestone,
shale, and
siltstone
Slight limitations.
Refer to soil report
(Fehr, 1982).
Intensive
Recreation
#
rla
Fair to good foun- Severe limitations. Im4. Sandstone,
conglomerate, dation material. Diffi- permeable rock. Thin
cult to excavate.
soils.
and minor
shale
Moderate to severe Slight to moderate Slight to moderate
limitations. Check limitations. Refer to limitations. Refer to
area to determine if soil report (Fehr,
soil report (Fehr,
flood prone. Base- 1982).
1982).
ments can be wet.
Refer to soil report
(Fehr, 1982).
Severe to moder- Severe limitations. Moderate limitations.
ate limitations.
Rock excavation; Rock excavation.
Rock excavation; locally, upper few Steep slopes.
locally, upper few feet may be rippable.
feet may be
Steep slopes.
rippable. Steep
Possible expansion
slopes. Possible of shales.
expansion of
shales.
Severe to moder- Severe limitations. Moderate limitations.
Rock excavation; Rock excavation.
ate limitations.
Rock excavation; locally, upper few Steep slopes.
locally, upper few feet may be rippable.
feet may be ripSteep slopes.
pable. Steep slopes. Possible expansion
Possible expansion of shales.
of shales.
Severe to moder- Severe limitations. Moderate limitations.
ate limitations.
Rock excavation; Rock excavation.
Rock excavation; locally, upper few Steep slopes.
locally, upper few feet may be rippable.
feet may be rip- Steep slopes.
pable. Steep
slopes.
Moderate limitations. Moderate limitations. Slight limitations.
Rock excavation; Rock excavation; Rock excavation.
locally, upper few locally, upper few Steep slopes
along major drainfeet may be ripfeet may be rippable. Steep slopes pable. Steep slopes ages.
along major drain- along major drainages. Possible ex- ages. Possible expansion of shales. pansion of shales.
Severe limitations. Moderate limitations. Moderate limitations.
Rock excavation Rock excavation. Rock excavation.
Local drainage
may be required. Local drainage
problems. Sinks
problems. Sinks
Steep slopes
common.
along major drain- common.
ages.
Light Industry
and Malls
00 #
# 8
##
#
#
#
# # # # # ###
# # # # ##
## #
# ## ##
#
#
S
#
#
#
##
#
0 #
N
be
Fair to good foun- Severe limitations. Imdation material. Diffi- permeable rock. Thin
cult to excavate.
soils.
Possible expansive shales.
Access
Roads
D
#
Glable Br
800
Fair to good foun- Severe limitations. Imdation material. Diffi- permeable rock. Thin
soils.
cult to excavate.
Possible expansive shales.
EPA recommends action be taken if indoor levels exceed 4 picocuries per liter
(pCi/L), which is 10 times the average outdoor level. Some EPA representatives
believe the action level should be lowered to 2 picocuries per liter; other scientists
dissent and claim the risks estimated in this chart are already much too high for
low levels of radon. The action level in European countries is set at 10 picocuries
per liter. Note that this chart is only one estimate; it is not based upon any scientific
result from a study of a large population meeting the listed criteria (from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1986).
m
Cu
3. Shale, sandstone, limestone, and
siltstone
Slight limitations.
Easy to excavate.
Refer to soil report
(Fehr, 1982).
Highways
and
Streets
T
800
Planning Guidance by Rock Unit Type
Residence
with
Basement
H
s Cr
r
urner B
#
##
#
800
2. Shale, siltstone, sandstone, and
coal
Fair to good
foundation material;
easily excavated.
Refer to soil report
(Fehr, 1982).
Septic
System
ne
ca
urri
nold
#
S
"619
!
800
1. Alluvium,
landslide,
and terrace
deposits
Foundation
and
Excavation
Rey
#
S
0
100
Rock Unit
800
D
LAND USES
Septic tank disposal system—A septic tank disposal system consists of a septic tank and a filter field. The filter field
is a subsurface tile system laid in such a way that effluent from the septic tank is distributed with reasonable uniformity
into the soil.
Residences—Ratings are made for residences with and without basements because the degree of limitation is
dependent upon ease and required depth of excavation. For example, excavation in limestone has greater limitation
than excavation in shale for a house with a basement.
Highways and streets—Refers to paved roads in which cuts and fills are made in hilly topography, and considerable
work is done preparing subgrades and bases before the surface is applied.
Access roads—These are low-cost roads, driveways, etc., usually surfaced with crushed stone or a thin layer of
blacktop. A minimum of cuts and fills are made, little work is done preparing a subgrade, and generally only a thin
base is used. The degree of limitation is based on year-around use and would be less severe if not used during the
winter and early spring. Some types of recreation areas would not be used during these seasons.
Light industry and malls—Ratings are based on developments having structures or equivalent load limit requirements of
three stories or less, and large paved areas for parking lots. Structures with greater load limit requirements would normally
need footings in solid rock, and the rock would need to be core drilled to determine the presence of caverns, cracks, etc.
Intensive recreation—Athletic fields, stadiums, etc.
Extensive recreation—Camp sites, picnic areas, parks, etc.
Reservoir areas—The floor of the area where the water is impounded. Ratings are based on the permeability of the rock.
Reservoir embankments—The rocks are rated on limitations for embankment material.
Underground utilities—Included in this group are sanitary sewers, storm sewers, water mains, and other pipes that require
fairly deep trenches.
#
S
Go
#
S
#
S
#
S
V& Royville
#
S
#
S
"76
!
#
S
#
S
#
S#
S
S#
#
S#
S
#
S
r
#
S
1000
1000
LIMITATIONS
Slight—A slight limitation is one that commonly requires some corrective measure but can be overcome without a great deal
of difficulty or expense.
Moderate—A moderate limitation is one that can normally be overcome but the difficulty and expense are great enough that
completing the project is commonly a question of feasibility.
Severe—A severe limitation is one that is difficult to overcome and commonly is not feasible because of the expense involved.
le
Litt
nC
#
A cattle watering trough, probably fed from the nearby water well. Such wells
are often the most economical source of water for rural communities. Photo
by Bart Davidson, Kentucky Geological Survey.
In source-water protection areas, activities are
likely to affect the quality of the drinking-water
source. For more information, see
kgsweb.uky.edu/download/water/swapp/swapp.htm.
Honey
Acre
V& #S
S
##
S
Little Goose Cr
#
S
Russell
-Springs
Elem
#
S
#
S
#5
S
Source-Water Protection Areas
#
#
S
0
#
S
V& Decatur
#
S
#
S
#
S
100
Humble
V&
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
127
dso
800
1000
#
S
#
S#
S
/(
Hu
#
S
#
127
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
#
S
Cr
ty
Clif
/(
#
1000
#
S
In the northwestern third of Russell County about three-quarters of the
drilled wells yield enough water for domestic use. Throughout the rest
of the county, only a few wells yield enough water for a domestic supply,
except in areas close to the Cumberland River in the southern end of
the county. In the southern end of the county most wells are adequate for
a domestic supply, especially wells that penetrate small solution openings
within the limestone bedrock.
For more information on the groundwater resources of the county, see
Carey and Stickney (2004).
800
1000
V& Sycamore
Flat #S
#
S
#
S
"80
!
# #
#
V& Webbs
Cross
Roads
O
#
S
Radon gas, although not widely distributed in Kentucky in amounts above the Environmental
Protection Agency's maximum recommended limit of 4 picocuries per liter, can be a local problem.
Unit 6 on the map may contain high levels of uranium or radium, parent materials for radon gas.
This unit and several other limestones in the state locally contain the phosphate mineral apatite.
Uranium is sometimes part of the apatite structure, and when the limestone weathers away the
phosphates containing uranium become concentrated in the soil and ultimately can give rise
to high levels of radon. Homes in these areas should be tested for radon, but the homeowner
should keep in mind that the health threat results from relatively high levels of exposure over long
periods, and the remedy may simply be additional ventilation of the home.
#
#
Groundwater Availability
#
S
#
#
1545
ø
÷
#
S
D
Radon
FOUNDATION AND EXCAVATION
The terms "earth" and "rock" excavation are used in the engineering sense; earth can be excavated by hand tools,
whereas rock requires heavy equipment or blasting to remove.
1729
ø
÷
2283
ø
÷
1000
NUNN
PARKWAY
Faults are common geologic structures across Kentucky,
and have been mapped in many of the Commonwealth's
counties. The faults shown on this map represent seismic
activity that occurred several million years ago at the latest.
There has been no activity along these faults in recorded
history. Seismic risk associated with these faults is very low.
Faults may be associated with increased fracturing of bedrock in the immediately adjacent area. This fracturing may
influence slope stability and groundwater flow in these
limited areas.
PLANNING TABLE DEFINITIONS
#
#
#
#
"76
!
Cr
live
nt
Mou
1000
1000
Mapped Surface Faults
Sinkholes such as this one (right center) may appear overnight when the soil
plug at their base collapses into a fracture or cave in the underlying limestone.
Photo by Bart Davidson, Kentucky Geological Survey.
#
#
1000
V& Sano
#
S
The term "karst" refers to a landscape characterized by sinkholes, springs,
sinking streams (streams that disappear underground), and underground drainage
through solution-enlarged conduits or caves. Karst landscapes form when slightly
acidic water from rain and snowmelt seeps through soil cover into fractured and
soluble bedrock (usually limestone, dolomite, or gypsum).
Sinkholes are depressions on the land surface into which water drains underground.
Usually circular and often funnel-shaped, they range in size from a few feet to
hundreds of feet in diameter. Springs occur when water emerges from underground
to become surface water. Caves are solution-enlarged fractures or conduits large
enough for a person to enter.
These cattle are resting near a pond that is probably a sinkhole pond, meaning
that it is connected to the limestone aquifer by fractures in the bedrock, but is
plugged with soil. Cattle feedlots or pastures such as this can cause increased
nitrates in groundwater if the ponds or feedlots drain into the aquifer. Photo
by Bart Davidson, Kentucky Geological Survey.
#
#
S
A problem of considerable concern in this area is the swelling
of some of the clay minerals in shales such as units 2, 3, 5,
and 8. This process is exacerbated when the shale contains the
mineral pyrite (fool's gold), such as is the case in the Chattanooga
Shale (unit 8). Pyrite is a common mineral and can be found
distributed throughout the black shale, although it is not always present
and may be discontinuous both vertically and horizontally. In the
presence of moisture and oxygen, pyrite oxidizes and produces
sulfuric acid. The acid reacts with calcium carbonates found in water,
the rock itself, crushed limestone, and concrete. This chemical reaction
produces sulfate and can form the mineral gypsum, whose crystallization
can cause layers of shale to expand and burst, backfill to swell, and
concrete to crack and crumble. It can heave the foundation, the slab and
interior partitions resting on it, and can even damage upper floors and
interior partitions. This phenomenon has been responsible for extensive
damage to schools, homes, and businesses in Kentucky.
We strongly suggest that anyone planning construction on these shales
seek professional advice from a geologist or engineer familiar with the
problem.
#6
S
k
Sulphur Cr
Karst Geology
#1
S
For
#
Swelling Shales and Soils
The Chattanooga
Shale (unit 8),
shown at left, is
the equivalent of
the New Albany
Shale in Estill County,
which is well known
for exhibiting pyrite
expansion. The telltale
yellow weathering
usually denotes the
presence of pyrite.
Care must be taken
to check for swelling
shales when building
on this material.
Photo by Bart
Davidson, Kentucky
Geological Survey.
Ellis
#
Geology adapted from Ciszak (2004), Conley (2004), Johnson (2004a, b),
Lambert (2004a, b), Murphy (2004a, b), Mullins and Thompson (2004),
Petersen (2004), Zhang (2004a, b), and Zhang and Melton (2004).
Sinkhole data from Paylor and others (2004). Thanks to Jim Currens,
Kentucky Geological Survey, for karst illustrations.
Constructed between 1941 and 1950, Wolf Creek Dam is a comprehensive
flood-control system for the Cumberland River. It impounds Lake Cumberland,
one of the largest lakes in Kentucky and a vital source of tourism for Kentucky.
Photo by Bart Davidson, Kentucky Geological Survey.
This map is not intended to be used for selecting individual sites. Its purpose is to inform
land-use planners, government officials, and the public in a general way about geologic
bedrock conditions that affect the selection of sites for various purposes. The properties
of thick soils may supercede those of the underlying bedrock and should be considered
on a site-to-site basis. At any site, it is important to understand both the soils and the
underlying rock. For further assistance, contact Bart Davidson, Kentucky Geological
Survey, 859-257-5500 x162. For more information, and to make custom maps of your
local area, visit our Land-Use Planning Internet Mapping Web Site at
kgsmap.uky.edu/website/kyluplan/viewer.htm.
1000
#
S
Acknowledgments
#7
S
For Planning Use Only
#
S
1000
#2
S
T. Jeffrey Adams
Don Molden Multiple Services Inc.
Bart Davidson and Daniel I. Carey
Kentucky Geological Survey
reek
ms C
Willia1000
Never use sinkholes as dumps. All waste, but especially pesticides, paints, household chemicals,
automobile batteries, and used motor oil, should be taken to an appropriate recycling center or landfill.
Make sure runoff from parking lots, streets, and other urban areas is routed through a detention basin
and sediment trap to filter it before it flows into a sinkhole.
Make sure your home septic system is working properly and that it's not discharging sewage into a
crevice or sinkhole.
Keep cattle and other livestock out of sinkholes and sinking streams. There are other methods
of providing water to livestock.
See to it that sinkholes near or in crop fields are bordered with trees, shrubs, or grass buffer
strips. This will filter runoff flowing into sinkholes and also keep tilled areas away from sinkholes.
Construct waste-holding lagoons in karst areas carefully, to prevent the bottom of the lagoon from
collapsing, which would result in a catastrophic emptying of waste into the groundwater.
If required, develop a groundwater protection plan (410KAR5:037) or an agricultural waterquality plan (KRS224.71) for your land use.
(From Currens, 2001)
#
0
100
Limestone terrain can be subject to subsidence
hazards, which usually can be overcome
by prior planning and site evaluation. "A"
shows construction above an open
cavern, which later collapses. This is one
of the most difficult situations to detect,
and the possibility of this situation
beneath a structure warrants insurance
protection for homes built on karst terrain.
In "B," a heavy structure presumed to lie
above solid bedrock actually is partially
supported on soft, residual clay soils that
subside gradually, resulting in damage to
the structure. This occurs where inadequate
site evaluation can be traced to lack of
geophysical studies and inadequate
core sampling. "C" and "D" show the
close relationship between hydrology
and subsidence hazards in limestone
terrain. In "C," the house is situated on
porous fill (light shading) at a site where
surface and groundwater drainage move
supporting soil (darker shading) into
voids in limestone (blocks) below. The
natural process is then accelerated by
infiltration through fill around the home.
"D" shows a karst site where normal
rainfall is absorbed by subsurface
conduits, but water from infrequent
heavy storms cannot be carried away
quickly enough to prevent flooding of
low-lying areas. Adapted from AIPG (1993).
Luttre
Residential Construction
Environmental Protection
800
Generalized Geologic Map
for
Land-Use Planning:
Russell County, Kentucky
James C. Cobb, Director and State Geologist
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, LEXINGTON
MAP AND CHART 94
Series XII, 2005
Little L
Kentucky Geological Survey
8
#
S
Wolf Creek National Fish Hatchery, located next to Wolf Creek Dam, pro-
duces over a million pounds of trout annually. Water feeding the hatchery
comes from Lake Cumberland at a rate of 10,000 gallons per minute, and is
between 40 and 65 degrees Fahrenheit. Photo by Bart Davidson, Kentucky
Geological Survey.
Additional Planning Resources
Listed below are Web sites for several agencies and organizations that may be of
assistance with land-use planning issues in Russell County:
www.russellcountyky.com/—Russell County C hamber of Commerce
ces.ca.uky.edu/russell/—University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service
www.lcadd.org/—Lake Cumberland Area Development District
www.thinkkentucky.com/edis/cmnty/cw077/—Kentucky Economic Development
Information System
www.uky.edu/KentuckyAtlas/21207.html—Kentucky Atlas and Gazetteer, Russell
County
quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/21/21207.html—U.S. Census data
kgsweb.uky.edu/download/kgsplanning.htm—Planning information from the
Kentucky Geological Survey
References Cited
American Institute of Professional Geologists, 1993, The citizens' guide to geologic hazards: 134 p.
Carey, D.I., and Stickney, J.F., 2004, Groundwater resources of Russell County, Kentucky: Kentucky
Geological Survey, ser. 12, County Report 104,
www.uky.edu/kgs/water/library/gwatlas/Russell/Russell.htm.
Ciszak, E.A., 2004, Spatial database of the Faubush quadrangle, Pulaski and Russell Counties,
Kentucky: Kentucky Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data
DVGQ-802. Adapted from Thaden, R.E., and Lewis, R.Q., Sr., 1969, Geologic map of the
Faubush quadrangle, Pulaski and Russell Counties, Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey
Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-802, scale 1:24,000.
Conley, T.J., 2004, Spatial database of the Creelsboro quadrangle, Kentucky: Kentucky
Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data DVGQ-204. Adapted
from Thaden, R.E., and Lewis, R.Q., Sr., 1963, Geology of the Creelsboro quadrangle, Kentucky:
U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-204, scale 1:24,000.
Currens, J.C., 2001, Protecting Kentucky's karst aquifers from nonpoint-source pollution: Kentucky
Geological Survey, ser. 12, Map and Chart 27, 1 sheet.
Fehr, J.C., 1982, Soil survey of Russell County, Kentucky: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Soil Conservation Service, 93 p.
Johnson, T.L., 2004a, Spatial database of the Cumberland City quadrangle, southern Kentucky:
Kentucky Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data DVGQ-475.
Adapted from Lewis, R.Q., Sr., and Thaden, R.E., 1965, Geologic map of the Cumberland City
quadrangle, southern Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map
GQ-475, scale 1:24,000.
Johnson, T.L., 2004b, Spatial database of the Jamestown quadrangle, Kentucky: Kentucky
Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data DVGQ-182. Adapted
from Thaden, R.E., and Lewis, R.Q., Sr., 1962, Geology of the Jamestown quadrangle, Kentucky:
U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-182, scale 1:24,000.
Lambert, J.R., 2004a, Spatial database of the Amandaville quadrangle, Kentucky: Kentucky
Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data DVGQ-186. Adapted
from Taylor, A.R., 1962, Geology of the Amandaville quadrangle, Kentucky: U.S.
Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-186, scale 1:24,000.
Lambert, J.R., 2004b, Spatial database of the Wolf Creek Dam quadrangle, Kentucky: Kentucky
Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data DVGQ-177. Adapted
from Lewis, R.Q., Sr., and Thaden, R.E., 1962, Geology of the Wolf Creek Dam quadrangle,
Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-177, scale 1:24,000.
Murphy, M.L., 2004a, Spatial database of the Mill Springs quadrangle, south-central Kentucky: Kentucky
Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data DVGQ-1057. Adapted
from Lewis, R.Q., Sr., 1972, Geologic map of the Mill Springs quadrangle, south-central
Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1057, scale 1:24,000.
Murphy, M.L., 2004b, Spatial database of the Montpelier quadrangle, Kentucky: Kentucky
Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data DVGQ-337. Adapted
from Lewis, R.Q., Sr., and Thaden, R.E., 1964, Geology of the Montpelier quadrangle, Kentucky:
U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-337, scale 1:24,000.
Mullins, J.E., and Thompson, M.F., 2004, Spatial database of the Russell Springs quadrangle,
Kentucky: Kentucky Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data
DVGQ-383. Adapted from Lewis, R.Q., Sr., and Thaden, R.E., 1965, Geology of the Russell
Springs quadrangle, Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-383, scale
1:24,000.
Paylor, R.L., Florea, L., Caudill, M., and Currens, J.C., 2004, A GIS coverage of karst sinkholes in
Kentucky: Kentucky Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digital Publication 5, 1 CD-ROM.
Petersen, C., 2004, Spatial database of the Dunnville quadrangle, Kentucky: Kentucky
Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data DVGQ-367. Adapted
from Maxwell, C.H., 1965, Geology of the Dunnville quadrangle, Kentucky: U.S. Geological
Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-367, scale 1:24,000.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986, A citizen's guide to radon, what is it and what to do
about it: U.S. EPA, OPA-86-004.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2003, National Wetlands Inventory, www.nwi.fws.gov/.
Zhang, Q., 2004a, Spatial database of the Eli quadrangle, Kentucky: Kentucky Geological Survey, ser. 12,
Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data DVGQ-393. Adapted from Thaden, R.E., and
Lewis, R.Q., Sr., 1965, Geology of the Eli quadrangle, Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey
Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-393, scale 1:24,000.
Zhang, Q., 2004b, Spatial database of the Jabez quadrangle, Russell and Wayne Counties,
Kentucky: Kentucky Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data
DVGQ-483. Adapted from Thaden, R.E., and Lewis, R.Q., Sr., 1966, Geologic map of the Jabez
quadrangle, Russell and Wayne Counties, Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic
Quadrangle Map GQ-483, scale 1:24,000.
Zhang, Q., and Melton, C.E., 2004, Spatial database of the Phil quadrangle, Kentucky: Kentucky
Geological Survey, ser. 12, Digitally Vectorized Geologic Quadrangle Data DVGQ-395. Adapted
from Maxwell, C.H., 1965, Geology of the Phil quadrangle, Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey
Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-395, scale 1:24,000.

Similar documents

Generalized Geologic Map for Land-Use Planning: Hancock County

Generalized Geologic Map for Land-Use Planning: Hancock County is a subsurface tile system laid in such a way that effluent from the septic tank is distributed with reasonable uniformity into the soil. Residences—Ratings are made for residences with and withou...

More information

Generalized Geologic Map for Land-Use Planning

Generalized Geologic Map for Land-Use Planning Solis and Terry (2000), Solis and Venard (2000a-d), Tyra (2003), and Venard and Solis (2000). Thanks to Rankin Powell, Union County Agriculture and Natural Resources agent, and Gough Farms for phot...

More information

Generalized Geologic Map for Land

Generalized Geologic Map for Land Most wells in valley bottoms are adequate for domestic supply; however, the volume of groundwater available becomes progressively less on hillsides and ridges. Quite a few high-volume wells (more t...

More information

Carter County, Kentucky - Kentucky Geological Survey

Carter County, Kentucky - Kentucky Geological Survey requirements of three stories or less, and large paved areas for parking lots. Structures with greater load limit requirements would normally need footings in solid rock, and the rock would need to...

More information

Larue County, Kentucky - Kentucky Geological Survey

Larue County, Kentucky - Kentucky Geological Survey River and its major tributaries, about three-quarters of the wells yield enough water for a domestic supply. In the rest of the county, very few wells yield enough water for a domestic supply, exce...

More information