tiger vii discretionary grant program application

Transcription

P o rt C a n a v era l
Inland Port Logistics Center Road
Improvement and Stormwater
D.O.T. National Infrastructure Investments
FY2015 TIGER VI Discretionary Grant Program
Application
TIGER VII DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM
APPLICATION
PROJECT TITLE:
INLAND PORT LOGISTICS CENTER ROAD IMPROVEMENT
AND STORMWATER
TYPE OF PROJECT:
Road – New Capacity
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
Capital
APPLICANT:
CANAVERAL PORT AUTHORITY
Local Government
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Cocoa, Florida 32926
Brevard County
Congressional District: FL-15th District
PROJECT AREA:
Urban Area
AMOUNT OF TIGER
FUNDS REQUESTED:
$12,252,000
APPLICATION AND
PROJECT CONTACT
INFORMATION:
John E. Walsh
Phone: (321) 783-7831 Extension 233
Fax: (321) 783-4651
Email: [email protected]
Canaveral Port Authority
445 Challenger Road, Suite 301
Cape Canaveral, FL 32920
Table of Contents
I.
Table of Contents
II.
III.
IV.
V.
a.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................................3
PROJECT LOCATION...................................................................................................................4
PROJECT PARTIES ......................................................................................................................7
SELECTION CRITERIA .................................................................................................................8
Primary Criteria - LONG-TERM OUTCOMES ...................................................................................... 9
i.
State of Good Repair ......................................................................................................................... 9
ii.
Economic Competitiveness ............................................................................................................. 10
iii.
Quality of life. .................................................................................................................................. 11
iv.
Environmental Sustainability .......................................................................................................... 12
v.
Safety .............................................................................................................................................. 12
b.
Secondary Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 13
i.
Innovation ....................................................................................................................................... 13
ii.
Partnership...................................................................................................................................... 13
c.
Detailed Benefit Cost Analysis ........................................................................................................ 13
i.
Understanding the Market ............................................................................................................. 13
ii.
Traffic Forecast Methodology and Assumptions ............................................................................ 16
iii.
Methodology and Assumptions for Calculating Non-Monetized Benefits ..................................... 17
iv.
Monetized Benefits ......................................................................................................................... 20
v.
Project Costs ................................................................................................................................... 21
vi.
Benefit-Cost Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 21
VI. PROJECT READINESS ...............................................................................................................21
VII. FEDERAL WAGE RATE CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................22
VIII. APPENDIX A – SUPPLEMENTARY..............................................................................................22
Appendix A –Project Location Maps
Appendix B – Letters of Support
Appendix C – Other Schedules and ILC Information
Page 2 of 22
II.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Canaveral Port Authority (CPA) is requesting $12.3 million in TIGER funds to help advance critical
investments being made in its Inland Port Logistics Center (ILC). Specifically the TIGER funds would
help advance the construction of roadway capacity improvements along the key access road to the
ILC as well as construct onsite roads including storm water ponds and utilities. These roadway
improvements are critical to the success of the ILC; they will ensure efficient and safe access to
logistics services and warehouse/distribution center capacity. CPA is investing significantly in its
cargo operation, an operation that will be dependent on the new
logistics services provided by the ILC. Award of a grant will help
State Route 524
minimize the impact of long haul truck movements along U.S.
highways by supporting Port Canaveral’s ability to serve the Orlando
Metro Market.
No Class A high bay logistics distribution center or warehouse exists
in Brevard County to serve new cargo distribution and logistics
clients. In late 2014 CPA purchased the 271 acre parcel located in the
southeast quadrant of the intersection of State Road 524 and
Interstate 95 (I-95), Brevard County Florida. This planned project has
entitlements from the City of Cocoa for up to 1,000,000 square feet
of industrial/business park, 810,000 square feet of commercial, 675
multi-family units and 270 hotel rooms. The entitlements are capable
of being modified/converted in accordance with the City of Cocoa
Development Order. Located strategically at the intersection of State
Road 524 and I-95, this location provides highway access ideal for
logistics centers.
The existing approved entitlements from the City of Cocoa and low
per acre cost will provide the opportunity to attract large cargo users
that require logistics/processing space while allowing CPA to keep
Port property for waterside priority uses. As an Inland Port, this will
provide the logistics center needed by the growing cargo
development of CPA and Brevard County businesses, as well as serve
the freight mobility needs in central Florida and beyond. With the
ownership of this property, CPA has a vested interest in the
development of logistics center, serving the needs of the Port,
surrounding cities, Brevard County and central Florida. TIGER grant
funding for the development of the logistics center road
improvements, utilities, infrastructure and stormwater is the crucial
next step in moving this project forward.
An ILC’s success is driven by its ability to provide quality logistics and
transportation services. Access to the interstate highway system,
intermodal rail, a deep water seaport, and an international airport, combined with reliable
connections to a large consumer market is critical. Site selection decisions are often driven by the
ability to illustrate these services and connections exist.
Page 3 of 22
Reduced congestion along roadway and rail corridors is essential in supporting international trade
and efficient supply chains. As our international gateways (airport and seaports) grow and expand,
it is critical that the landside transportation and logistics requirements are similarly identified and
expanded in a way that protects the quality of life in host communities while ensuring competitive
access to the market place. CPA’s ILC has all of these advantages available and the roadway capacity
improvement projects will help advance its development by providing safe and reliable access from
Port Canaveral to the ILC and from the ILC to the Orlando Metro Market via State Route 524 (SR
524); and access to the full ILC foot print via the internal roadway network. In addition, the
improvements to SR 524 will improve regional mobility for both cargo and passenger traffic.
SR 524 congestion is a growing problem. Anticipated growth projections will result in increased
congestion and delay, and reduced safety. The introduction of increased truck traffic along the
corridor will further reduce level of service and increase the risk of accidents. Widening of SR 524, in
conjunction with the development of the ILC, will improve transportation efficiencies and safety,
create new and expanded economic opportunities, provide improved access to jobs and businesses,
and support existing and future land use. This project will provide convenience for users such as:
shippers and receivers of cargo, warehouse tenants, emergency vehicles, local residents and other
regular users commuting to and from their jobs in the area.
This roadway improvement project and ILC development will promote “Ladders of Opportunity” for
all of Brevard County and the neighboring counties. This will create economic opportunities such as
new jobs, community revitalization that benefits the entire Brevard County population, an expanded
foreign trade zone to attract value added services and manufacturing, and an increased supply of
commercial real estate for warehousing and distribution purposes.
III.
PROJECT LOCATION
This project is located in the City of Cocoa in Brevard County, Florida as shown and described in
Figure 1. It is part of the Palm Bay–Melbourne–Titusville Metropolitan Statistical Area. The major
roads in the area and their distance from the project site are the following:
•
.5 mile to I-95
•
2.2 miles east of SR 520
•
3 miles to SR 528
•
3.3 miles to US Highway 1
• 12 miles to Port Canaveral
The Florida East Coast Rail (FEC) runs through Cocoa and the Space Coast Area Transit operates a
public bus service in Cocoa and vicinity. Figure 2 illustrates the SR 525 corridor to be widened.
a) 2013 Demographics
Population
Avg. HH Income
Median HH Income
3 Miles
21,294
$51,604
$38,860
5 Miles
46,620
$52,994
$37,668
10 Miles
148,835
$67,217
$50,610
SR 524 is the central spine serving homes, industrial and manufacturing activities, small businesses,
parks and recreation, Eastern Florida State College and University of Central Florida. Cocoa is
considered a mixed-use urban economically distressed city.
Page 4 of 22
Figure 1: Project Location
Figure 2: SR 524 Corridor to be Widened
Legend:
1. Grissom Ridge Commerce Park
2. Summer Breeze – residential
3. Grissom Parkway Industrial Park
4. Ocean Potion Warehouse/Office
5. Greensboro Park – residential
6. Home Depot
7. London Cove – mixed use
8. Flamingo Lands – Office
9. Shoppes at the Landing
10. Cocoa Landings – Multi-family
11. Adamson Creek – residential
12. Cocoa Conservation Area
13. CPA Inland Port – mixed use
14. Santa Barbara – Multi-family
15. Emerald Lakes – residential
16. Brevard Commerce Park
17. Einstein Montessori School
18. Fern Meadows – residential
19. Mike Erdman Toyota
20. Sam’s Club
Source: City of Cocoa
Page 5 of 22
Statement of Work:
1) The SR-524 Logistics center development will widen 1.1 miles of SR-524 to a four-lane grassed
median cross section with landscaping and include dedicated east-bound and west-bound
turn lanes into the site at the three proposed entrances. The proposed intersections along
SR-524 will be signalized.
2) Inland Port onsite improvements will include 3.3 miles of an internal roadway network
consisting of new 4-lane (1.6 miles) and extra-wide 2-lane (1.6 miles) and a south-bound
access extension to Townsend Road (0.6 miles).
3) Onsite utility improvements will include the installation of storm water, potable water,
sanitary sewer, electric, lighting, irrigation and fire protection to accommodate the proposed
commercial warehousing space.
Figure 3 provides an illustration of the ILC and its internal roadway network. The areas highlighted
are the components included in the budget for this TIGER application. In addition to the information
contained in this document, a project website has also been developed which provides additional
background information. For more illustrations see Appendix A. The project website is:
www.portcanaveral.com/TIGER VII
Figure 3: Inland Port Logistics Center Conceptual Plan
Inland Port Logistics Center Conceptual Plan - the areas highlighted are the components included in the budget for this
TIGER application.
Page 6 of 22
IV.
PROJECT PARTIES
The Canaveral Port Authority (CPA) is requesting TIGER to fund $12,252,000 which is 50 percent of
the total project cost of $24,504,000.
CPA is currently the only party funding this project. Although, the City of Cocoa is unable to partner
at this time, there is an existing Development Order between the City of Cocoa and the former
owner which was transferred to the Port as the new owner, dated 10/26/2010, expiring this year,
where a funding commitment provision is established for the SR 524 improvements. There is a
possibility that this provision can be extended or revised dependent on future discussions between
the Port CEO, the City of Cocoa Manager and the City Council but this has not happened prior to the
Port’s TIGER grant application submittal. In addition, CPA will be submitting an application to the
Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council (FSTED) for this project to be
included in their 5-year work program and to be considered for funding in fiscal year 2016-2017.
Budget:
Table 1 provides an overview of the proposed budget.
Table 1: Project Budget
FUNDING SUMMARY
Construction Cost
Roadway Construction - SR524
Site Entrance Intersection & Landscaping - SR524
Site Entrance Signalization - SR524
SR-524 Stormwater Management
Internal 4-Lane Roadways - ILC Area
Internal 2-Lane Roadways - ILC Area
Townsend Road Extension (2-Lane)
Traffic Circle and Feature - ILC Area
Onsite Stormwater Management & Utilities- ILC Area
Subtotal - Construction
Contingency
Construction Administration
Total Construction Cost
Total by Funding Type - Roads
Total Project
Cost
Funding
Non-Federal
Federal
CPA
TIGER
$ 5,390,000
$ 1,250,000
$ 500,000
$
750,000
$ 3,850,000
$ 3,520,000
$ 1,320,000
$ 1,100,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 19,180,000
$ 3,836,000
$ 1,488,000
$ 24,504,000
$ 24,504,000
$ 2,695,000
$ 625,000
$ 250,000
$ 375,000
$ 1,925,000
$ 1,760,000
$ 660,000
$ 550,000
$ 750,000
$ 9,590,000
$ 1,918,000
$ 744,000
$ 12,252,000
$12,252,000
Percent Match
50%
Page 7 of 22
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,695,000
625,000
250,000
375,000
1,925,000
1,760,000
660,000
550,000
750,000
9,590,000
1,918,000
744,000
12,252,000
12,252,000
50%
V.
SELECTION CRITERIA
The Port Canaveral Inland Port Logistics Center (ILC) will have substantial impacts on the region’s
economic competitiveness. The project is a critical component of the port’s cargo development
strategy. Cargo destined for the Orlando Metro Market will continue to increase as the region
grows, ultimately becoming the largest region in Florida, the third largest state in the U.S. The ability
of Port Canaveral to compete for and handle cargo destined for this market will create a more
efficient supply chain for cargo, reducing truck mileage, decreasing overall transportation costs,
lowering infrastructure maintenance, and improving quality of life and environmental sustainability.
This ILC is vital to the current and future/forecast growth of the Orlando Metro Market. It will
provide warehousing and distribution facilities required to support the inbound cargo at Port
Canaveral destined for the greater Orlando Metro Market. Without the support of the Port and its
ILC project, the Orlando Metro Market and surrounding population will experience higher prices due
to cargo being handled less efficiently at competing ports and being trucked into the region from
much greater distances.
The Orlando Metro Market region’s population (defined as Brevard, Volusia, Indian River, Orange,
Osceola, and Seminole counties) is estimated to grow by 1.2 million or a 39 percent increase by 2040
as illustrated in Table 2.1 This region will account for almost 20 percent of Florida’s growth over this
time period. This increase in population, combined with continued growth in annual tourists, will
significantly increase the demand for consumer goods. Expansion of the Orlando International
Airport (MCO) also will create additional opportunities for growth in tourism and business markets
for both the domestic and international travelers.
Table 2. Orlando Metro Market Population Forecast
County
Orange
Osceola
Seminole
Brevard
Volusia
Indian River
Market Total
Florida
2015
1,251,729
288,361
431,074
548,424
498,978
143,755
3,162,321
19,259,543
2040
1,840,695
532,472
541,133
677,451
595,077
193,699
4,380,527
25,603,577
2015-2040
47%
85%
26%
24%
19%
35%
39%
33%
CAGR
1.6%
2.6%
1.0%
0.9%
0.7%
1.3%
1.4%
1.2%
Increase
588,966
244,111
110,059
129,027
96,099
49,944
1,218,206
6,344,034
Source: http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/population-demographics/data/Medium_Projections.pdf
With this significant growth happening now and anticipated to continue in the coming decades, Port
Canaveral must be in a position to handle a significant volume of cargo; to do so requires
investments in key secondary logistics infrastructure consisting of logistics parks that provide
warehouse/distribution center capacity. Port Canaveral’s ILC will be a key stimulus project for the
port and the region, creating a more efficient way to serve the large and growing consuming
population base in Central Florida.
1
http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/population-demographics/data/Medium_Projections.pdf
Page 8 of 22
This grant application provides the opportunity for the development of the ILC to be accelerated.
Port Canaveral is aggressively advancing the development of its cargo facilities focused on the
container market. As part of this process, the port recognized the need for supporting landside
capacity. With the purchase of the ILC site, the port is advancing its cargo operation at the waterside
(deepening to accommodate larger ships), terminal side (container terminal development), and land
side (ILC with roadway improvements) simultaneously.
A successful grant will help optimize the supply chain in the short term, supporting port growth,
eliminating long haul truck movements, generating high paying jobs, increasing the competitive
environment for regional businesses, and supporting environmental sustainability and quality of life.
With trade patterns shifting and anticipated to further shift with competition of the Panama Canal
expansion, and with Port Canaveral aggressively investing in its cargo infrastructure, now is the time
to accelerate this project and the grant is a key part of that process. A TIGER grant would ensure
that the ILC advances on schedule; without the grant the project will advance at a much slower rate.
With and without conditions are presented below:
•
With Grant. Development of the ILC advances on the defined schedule. Construction would
begin when the grant funding became available. Internal and external roadway
improvements will be constructed as part of site preparation and development helping
ensure the entire site is shovel ready as new tenants are identified. In addition, the necessary
capacity will be available to help support Port Canaveral’s cargo expansion forecasts. Finally,
the impacted roadways will operate more efficiently and more safely from day one of the site
opening its doors.
•
Without Grant. Development of the ILC advances, but more slowly, with the roadway
improvements, both internal and external. coming on line over time. This will result in
parcels of land being available as opposed to the site as a whole. The time to reach full build
out will double. This will impact Port Canaveral’s ability to achieve its cargo forecasts as
shippers elect to use more distant competitor ports; some cargo will be lost permanently.
The region will experience a greater number of long haul truck trips. Roadway conditions
around the site will worsen as capacity is brought on line, resulting in a reactive environment
as opposed to proactive one, creating less safe operating conditions.
The key difference between with and without grant conditions is the development schedule.
The with grant schedule will achieve full capacity out by year 8; the without grant schedule will
achieve full capacity by year 15. The benefit of the grant consists of the additional cargo handled at
the ILC prior to the build out under without grant conditions (e.g., benefits accrue from 2018 thru
2031). Additional scenario details can be found in the Benefit-Cost Analysis section. The potential
long-term outcomes and selection criteria for the ILC will are discussed below and include: state of
good repair, economic competitiveness, quality of life, sustainability, safety, innovation, and
partnerships.
a. Primary Criteria - LONG-TERM OUTCOMES
i.
State of Good Repair
The State of Good Repair will be comprised of the value of avoided roadway pavement damage due
to reduced truck vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) from shorter haul movements for cargo handled at
Port Canaveral and the ILC. The development of the ILC will reduce truck VMT by replacing long haul
movements from distance seaports with short haul truck movements moving from Port Canaveral to
the ILC and from the ILC to the Orlando Metro Market.
Page 9 of 22
The calculation measures the avoided truck VMT created by moving cargo through Port Canaveral
and the ILC based on average pavement damage cost per truck mile of travel. The total state of
good repair benefit is $14.8 million (non-discounted) in avoided pavement damage over the 30 year
analysis period.
ii.
Economic Competitiveness
The Economic Competitiveness is measured based on two factors: travel time savings for truck
drivers; and savings on truck operating costs including maintenance and fuel. The savings is based
on reduced VMT as a result of serving the Orlando Metro Market from Port Canaveral and the ILC
versus competitor ports and distribution centers located in Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Tampa,
Jacksonville, and Savannah.
The benefit-cost analysis assumes that the completed project will serve containerized cargo moving
through Port Canaveral to the Orlando Metro Market and that such movements will on average
result in trips 70 miles shorter than when handled at competitor facilities. Without the grant, a
greater proportion of the demand generated by the Orlando Metro Market will be handled by
competing ports. The result is an estimated total of 172.0 million truck VMT avoided over the thirty
year analysis period resulting in an estimated $289.3 million (non-discounted) in cost savings over the
30 year period.
Short-Term and Long-Term Job Creation
Job creation and economic stimulus related to this project may be attributed to temporary
construction activity and permanent jobs related to the logistics park.
The short-term jobs created due to the roadway improvements and site development will initially be
engineers, planners, surveyors, skilled heavy equipment operators, and construction workers. The
construction impacts are a one-time only impact as a result of the construction activity of the
proposed project. The estimated $23.02 million in project cost was used to estimate the direct and
indirect short-term job impacts. The result using this method is approximately 228 jobs during the
construction phase as shown in Table 3.
The long-term estimates of jobs and economic activity generated by this project are based on the
volume of TEUs estimated to be handled at the ILC. This throughput phases in over time as capacity
comes on line. It is important to note that these impacts are not cumulative. For example, these
impacts cannot be added together to determine a total impact. Year 1 impacts represent the jobs
created by 7,997 TEUs. Year 10 impacts reflect the impact of 151,465 TEUs. With the grant award,
the project will generate 28 jobs in the first year and 526 jobs in year 10, as shown in Table 4.
Page 10 of 22
Table 3: Short-term Economic Impacts (Construction Jobs)
CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS
$23.02 Million
JOBS
Direct
Induced
Indirect
TOTAL JOBS
93
86
50
228
PERSONAL INCOME ($ MILLIONS)
Direct
Re-spending/Local Consumption
Indirect
TOTAL INCOME
3.3
7.4
2.3
$12.90
BUSINESS REVENUE ($ MILLIONS)
$23.00
LOCAL PURCHASES ($ MILLIONS)
$4.20
STATE AND LOCAL TAXES ($ MILLIONS)
$1.20
Source: Martin & Associates, Inc.
Table 4: Long-term Economic Impacts (Permanent Jobs)
Year 1
2018
Year 5
2022
Year 10
2026
12
13
3
28
185
203
44
432
225
247
54
526
PERSONAL INCOME ($ MILLIONS)
Direct
Re-spending/Local Consumption
Indirect
TOTAL INCOME
0.5
1.2
0.1
$1.90
8.3
18.7
2
$29.00
10.1
22.7
2.5
$35.30
BUSINESS REVENUE ($ MILLIONS)
$1.30
$20.30
$24.70
LOCAL PURCHASES ($ MILLIONS)
$0.20
$3.70
$4.50
STATE AND LOCAL TAXES ($ MILLIONS)
$0.20
$2.70
$3.20
ECONOMIC IMPACTS
JOBS
Direct
Induced
Indirect
TOTAL JOBS
Source: Martin & Associates, Inc.
iii.
Quality of life.
The quality of life criteria is focused on land use choices that reduce VMT, increased accessibility, and
property value increases. The ILC will increase the value of the property it is developed on, will
provide access to new high paying jobs, and will help reduce VMT on U.S. roadways. In addition, the
new roadway capacity will benefit the local community and the new retail and services (e.g., gas
station, hotel) will provide additional value. While this interpretation of quality of life may differ
from the traditional interpretation, the project will support efforts to create and maintain a vibrant
community.
The project is anticipated to generate 526 full time jobs and reduce truck VMT by 172.0 million. The
project will serve as an incubator for the supply chain and logistics industry, including long term
success of Port Canaveral’s container operation. The long term benefits of this project will improve
the quality of life for the surrounding community.
Page 11 of 22
iv.
Environmental Sustainability
The environmental sustainability criteria are focused on environmental benefits from reduced
emissions. This project promotes environmentally sustainable transportation by decreasing truck
VMT and reducing emissions and fuel consumption. The avoidance of 172.0 million truck VMT due to
shorter haul movements will result in a reduction of 10.7 million gallons of diesel fuel over 30 years,
despite a net growth in cargo tonnage.
The emissions benefits of the reduced truck VMT focused on the following emission types: NOx,
PM10, VOCs, SOx, and CO2. Emissions rates for trucks were estimated using the California Life-Cycle
Benefit/Cost Analysis Model (Version 5.0) and applied to the VMT estimates. The emissions were
then monetized using the TIGER VII guidance, resulting in avoided emissions as follows: 120
thousand metric tons of CO2, 25 metric tons of VOCs, 110 metric tons of NOx, and 9 tons of PM10,
and 1 ton of SOx over the analysis period. Overall, this leads to a total emissions benefit of $11.0
million (non-discounted) over the 30 year analysis period with the value of CO2 emissions discounted
at 3 percent. Table 5 summarizes the emissions avoided.
Table 5: Metric Tons of Emissions Avoided Over 30 Year Analysis Period
Avoided Emissions
CO2
VOCs
NOx
PM10
SOx
Tons
119,864
25
110
9
1
Source: California Life-Cycle Benefit/Cost Analysis Model (Version 5.0) and Cambridge Systematics
supplemental analysis.
v.
Safety
The safety criteria are focused on prevented accidents (property damage), injuries, and fatalities.
The proposed project would contribute to promoting DOT’s long-term safety goals through
decreasing the likelihood and cost of accidents by reducing truck VMT. The reductions in accidents
were estimated by the following crash categories: fatal, non-fatal injury, and property damage using
FDOT’s Statewide Mileage, Travel, and Accident Data. Cost estimates by type of accident from US
Department of Transportation were then applied to the number of accidents by type to monetize
the benefits associated with fewer accidents. The result is an avoidance of 3 fatalities, 60 injuries,
and 164 property damage only crashes and monetized safety benefits of $52.0 million over the 30
year analysis.
Non-monetized Safety Benefits:
As part of the development plan for the ILC, the Canaveral Port Authority has agreed to provide land
to the City of Cocoa for the construction of a new fire station. This station would provide additional
resources to respond to emergencies in the surrounding communities as well as provide services to
the logistics park itself.
Page 12 of 22
b. Secondary Criteria
i.
Innovation
The Canaveral Port Authority is using an innovative approach to accelerate the development of the
logistics park. Specifically, the port will work with prospective partners to develop design/build
agreements to streamline the efficiencies of bringing capacity on line. In addition, working in
conjunction with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD), two wetland preserve
areas will be left untouched; by incorporating these areas into the design, the port has eliminated
the need to mitigate negative impacts.
ii.
Partnership
The Canaveral Port Authority strongly supports the development and use of Public/Private
Partnerships as part of its on and off port investments. The development of the logistics park will
include a variety of partnerships with companies, developers, the city, and the state. The
development order in place today demonstrates the state’s and city’s support and commitment to
the development of this site and the City of Cocoa has provided a letter of support for the project.
CPA continues to work with the City of Cocoa to formalize a partnership agreement.
c. Detailed Benefit Cost Analysis
The Benefit-Cost Analysis for this application is based upon the reduction in truck VMT resulting from
cargo handled through Port Canaveral and the ILC as compared to being handled at competitor
ports. The widening and improvement to SR 524 and the construction of internal roadways as part
of the ILC development represent critical investments necessary to support an accelerated
development of the facility. Without a grant award the project will advance at a much slower rate,
delaying and reducing the benefits of the project. The benefit-cost analysis captures only
incremental benefits and costs due to the project implementation. The benefits are based on
available traffic data, site development orders, planning data, and Port Canaveral staff input.
Detailed assumptions and parameters are provided in the tables below. This analysis focused on the
five major long-term outcomes outlined by the TIGER program: state of good repair; economic
competitiveness; quality of life; sustainability; and safety. Non-monetized and monetized benefits
were calculated for an analysis period of 30 years, beginning in 2018 and ending in 2047. Monetized
benefits were summed and discounted at rates of 3% and 7% annually.
i.
Understanding the Market
Estimates of reduced truck VMT due to the roadway improvements, the development of the ILC, and
expansion of Port Canaveral’s container operation are based on the impact of handling cargo
destined for the Orlando Metro Market through these facilities as opposed to competitor ports and
facilities in Tampa, Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Jacksonville, and Savannah. The Orlando Metro Market
served by Port Canaveral has conservatively been defined as a six county region including Brevard,
Volusia, Indian River, Seminole, Orange, and Osceola. On average, this market can be served by a
truck trip of 58 miles; the competitor ports range from 84 miles to 282 miles with an average shorter
distance of 70 miles. These distances are illustrated in Figure 4. The difference in mileage yields the
avoided truck VMT; the with and without grant conditions impact the time necessary to develop the
facilities and attract the cargo (8 years with grant; 15 years without grant). The cargo represents
new demand created by the growing Central Florida market. The six county area will see 1.2 million
new residents by 2040. Port Canaveral has developed cargo forecasts amounting to 400,000 TEUs
by 2040. The ILC, owned and developed by the Canaveral Port Authority, will help generate and
serve this cargo. The following summarizes the with grant and without grant scenarios:
Page 13 of 22
•
The without grant scenario assumes Port Canaveral advances the ILC project on a 15 year
schedule. Construction would commence in 2017. Roadway improvements would be
restricted to partial accessibility to the site as an initial phase. SR 524 improvements would
be initiated after thresholds were exceeded in a reactive nature. The Port would be limited
to marketing parts of the site as opposed to the entire site. Amenities would come on line
later, further impacting the marketability of the site. Eventually the site would reach full
build however it is assumed the delay would result in some traffic lost permanently.
•
The with grant scenario assumes Port Canaveral advances the ILC on a 7 year schedule.
Construction would commence with the grant award in 2017 and the ramp up of cargo would
begin in 2018. The roadway improvements (internal and external) would be constructed as
part of the initial site development activities, ensuring the entire site was accessible and that
the public roadways had sufficient capacity to operate safely and efficiently.
Page 14 of 22
Figure 4: Illustration of Connections to Orlando Market
Source: Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Page 15 of 22
ii.
Traffic Forecast Methodology and Assumptions
Detailed truck trip forecasts for the ILC were developed by Cambridge Systematics based on site
development plans (shown below in Table 6) and port container forecasts provided by the Canaveral
Port Authority. These forecasts compare the difference in truck activity with and without the grant;
this amounted to a 8 year vs. 15 year development timeline.
Table 6: Development Plans by Square Feet for With and Without Grant Conditions
Year
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
Total
With Grant
Warehouse
Office
135000
125000
450000
125000
517000
150000
500000
150000
500000
245000
115000
95000
2557000
550000
Without Grant
Warehouse
Office
60000
25000
75000
50000
100000
50000
125000
50000
225000
50000
225000
25000
146000
50000
146000
50000
250000
50000
250000
50000
250000
50000
250000
50000
245000
115000
95000
2557000
550000
Source: Canaveral Port Authority
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 8th edition was used to estimate
general and truck trips to be generated by the proposed ILC. Based on the development schedules and
truck trip generation rates for high-cube warehouse, truck traffic was estimated for with and without
grant scenarios, as shown In Table 7. Assumptions applied in the calculation are documented below:
1.
As soon as a warehouse is developed at the proposed ILC, truck trips will be generated.
2. When warehouses are developed at the proposed site on a delayed schedule due to
transportation infrastructure insufficiency (without grant), the portion of market demand
that cannot be served by the proposed site and Port Canaveral will be served by long haul
trucks from ILCs serving Port of Savannah (30%), Jaxport (30%), Port Everglades and Port
Miami (30% total), and Port Tampa Bay (10%). Therefore, the total number of truck trips
generated remains the same under with and without grant scenarios. The difference is the
vehicle miles traveled (VMT) under difference scenarios to serve the demand of the Orlando
Metro Market.
Page 16 of 22
Table 7: Traffic Forecasts - Truck Trips Generated with and without Grant
Truck Traffic Forecast withoutGrant
Truck Traffic Forecast with Grant
Year
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
Total
ILC Warehouse
Estimated Annual
ILC Warehouse
Development Schedule Truck Trips Generated Development Schedule
with Grant
by the Proposed Site
without Grant
135,000
27,031
60,000
585,000
117,134
135,000
1,102,000
220,652
235,000
1,602,000
320,766
360,000
2,102,000
420,880
585,000
2,347,000
469,936
810,000
2,462,000
492,963
956,000
2,557,000
511,984
1,102,000
2,557,000
511,984
1,352,000
2,557,000
511,984
1,602,000
2,557,000
511,984
1,852,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,102,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,347,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,462,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
2,557,000
511,984
2,557,000
69,146,000
13,845,005
56,872,000
Estimated Truck Trips Estimated Truck
Generated by the
Trips Generated at
Proposed Site
ILCs of Other Ports
12,014
15,017
27,031
90,103
47,054
173,598
72,082
248,684
117,134
303,747
162,185
307,751
191,419
301,544
220,652
291,333
270,709
241,275
320,766
191,218
370,823
141,161
420,880
91,104
469,936
42,048
492,963
19,022
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
511,984
11,387,399
2,457,605
iii.
Methodology and Assumptions for Calculating Non-Monetized Benefits
As described in the traffic forecast methodology and assumptions, the difference in traffic patterns
between with and without grant scenarios is the VMT generated. The following methodology and
assumptions were used to calculate the average truck distance under the two scenarios (illustrated
in Figure 5). The resulted average distance is 32 miles for truck trips generated from the proposed
ILC, and 102 miles for truck trips from the ILCs of other ports.
Page 17 of 22
Figure 5: Methodology to Calculate Average Truck Trip Distance
Average Truck Trip Distance Calculation Methodology:
Calculation Assumptions and Steps:
Ports
Port Canaveral
Port of Savannah
Jaxport
Port Everglades/Port Miami
Port Tampa Bay
Distance A
(miles)
Distance B
(miles)
X%
Truck Trips through Proposed Logistic Park
44
14
60%
Truck Trips through ILCs of Other Ports
282
0
50%
144
0
50%
226
0
50%
84
0
50%
Y%
Market
Share
Average
Distance
(miles)
40%
100%
32
50%
50%
50%
50%
30%
30%
30%
10%
102
Assumptions:
1. Distance A and B for truck trips through the proposed site are measured distances between
Orlando and the proposed site location, and between the proposed site location and Port
Canaveral. Distance A for truck trips through ILCs of other ports are measured distances
between Orlando and the ports assuming all ILCs are closely located around their Ports.
2. X% and Y% are estimated based on the mix of trucks (single-unit trucks vs. combination
trucks) generated given the ILC’s distance from the Orlando Metro Market.
Source: Canaveral Port Authority and Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Based on the average truck trip distances under with and without grant scenarios, non-monetized
benefits of the grant were calculated. Calculations of the non-monetized benefits are provided in
Table 8. All factors and values applied in the calculation of these non-monetized benefits are also
provided under Table 6.
Page 18 of 22
Table 8: Non-Monetized Benefits
Truck Flow with Grant
Years
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
Total
Truck Trips with Truck Distance with
Grant
Grant
27,031
32
117,134
32
220,652
32
320,766
32
420,880
32
469,936
32
492,963
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
511,984
32
13,845,005
960
Truck Flow without Grant
Truck Trips without Grant Truck Distance without Truck Trips without Truck Distance without
Grant (through Port
Grant (through other Grant (through other
Truck VMT with Truck Ton-miles (through Port Canaveral) Part A
Canaveral) - Part A
Ports) - Part B
Ports) - Part B
Grant
with Grant
864,987
8,302,513
12,014
32
15,017
102
3,748,279
35,977,555
27,031
32
90,103
102
7,060,860
67,773,103
47,054
32
173,598
102
10,264,517
98,523,150
72,082
32
248,684
102
13,468,175
129,273,197
117,134
32
303,747
102
15,037,967
144,340,720
162,185
32
307,751
102
15,774,808
151,413,230
191,419
32
301,544
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
220,652
32
291,333
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
270,709
32
241,275
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
320,766
32
191,218
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
370,823
32
141,161
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
420,880
32
91,104
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
469,936
32
42,048
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
492,963
32
19,022
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
16,383,503
157,255,739
511,984
32
102
443,040,154 4,252,485,471
11,387,399
960
2,457,605
3,060
Source: Canaveral Port Authority and Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Average Truck Distance
Average Tons per Truck
Average Travel Speed
Average Truck Travel Time
Loaded truck rate at ILCs
Through the Proposed Logistics Park
Values
Unit
32
miles
17.42
tons
60
mph
32
minutes
55%
Through ILCs at Other Ports
Values
Unit
102
miles
17.42
tons
68
mph
90
minutes
55%
Source: Average Tons per Truck was derived from the FAF database; distances and travel time were obtained using Google Maps.
Page 19 of 22
Changes between with and without Scenarios
Truck VMT without
Grant
1,916,187
10,055,479
19,212,732
27,672,389
34,730,447
36,580,559
36,882,904
36,776,783
33,272,783
29,768,783
26,264,783
22,760,783
19,326,863
17,715,023
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
16,383,503
615,072,538
Truck Ton-miles
Avoided Truck VMT
without Grant
(miles)
18,392,372
1,051,200
96,516,709
6,307,200
184,411,874
12,151,872
265,611,217
17,407,872
333,357,414
21,262,272
351,115,566
21,542,592
354,017,601
21,108,096
352,999,006
20,393,280
319,366,142
16,889,280
285,733,279
13,385,280
252,100,415
9,881,280
218,467,551
6,377,280
185,507,345
2,943,360
170,036,227
1,331,520
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
157,255,739
5,903,724,546
172,032,384
Avoided Ton-miles
(ton-miles)
10,089,859
60,539,155
116,638,771
167,088,067
204,084,217
206,774,846
202,604,371
195,743,267
162,110,403
128,477,539
94,844,676
61,211,812
28,251,605
12,780,488
1,651,239,075
Avoided Truck Driver
Travel Time (hours)
14,484
86,907
167,440
239,863
292,972
296,835
290,848
280,999
232,717
184,435
136,154
87,872
40,556
18,347
2,370,430
To summarize, the analysis quantified a series of important non-monetized benefits, documented in
Table 9:
• Avoided Truck VMT. The TIGER VII project will eliminate 172.0 million truck vehicle miles of
travel (VMT) over the analysis period.
• Avoided Truck Ton-Miles. At 17.42 tons per loaded truck, the TIGER VII project will eliminate
1.7 billion truck ton-miles over the analysis period.
• Avoided Fuel Consumption. The fuel savings from avoided truck travel is estimated at 10.7
million gallons of diesel fuel over 30 years, as estimated based on ton-miles per gallon data.
• Net Reduction in Emissions. The production of emissions is proportional to the gallons of
fuel burned, the type of fuel, and the specifications of the engine burning the fuel.
Emissions avoided were estimated using the California Life-Cycle Benefit/Cost Analysis
Model (Version 5.0). The result is a total reduction of: 120 thousand metric tons of CO2, 25
metric tons of VOCs, 110 metric tons of NOx, and 9 tons of PM10, and 1 ton of SOx over the
analysis period.
• Net Reduction in Large Truck Crashes. Rates of heavy truck crashes per truck VMT were
developed from FMCSA and applied to the reduced VMT to estimate the corresponding
reduction in large truck crashes. The result is an avoidance of 3 fatalities, 60 injuries, and
164 property damage only crashes over the 30 year analysis.
Table 9: Major Non-Monetized Benefits for 30 Year Analysis Period
Non-Monetized Benefits
Total Avoided Truck VMT
Total Avoided Truck Ton-Miles
Net Reduction in Fuel Consumption (Gallons)
Net Reduction in CO2, Metric Tons
Net Reduction in VOCs, Metric Tons
Net Reduction in NOx, Metric Tons
Net Reduction in PM10, Metric Tons
Net Reduction in SOx, Metric Tons
Net Reduction in Large Truck Fatalities
Net Reduction in Large Truck Injuries
Net Reduction in Large Truck Property Damage Only
iv.
Value
172 million
1.7 billion
10.7 million
119,864
25
110
9
1
3
60
164
Monetized Benefits
The monetized benefits for the 30 year analysis period are shown below for four of the five selection
criteria. State of Good Repair is comprised of the value of avoided roadway pavement due to
reduced truck VMT. The calculation considers truck VMT avoided and the average pavement damage
cost per truck mile of travel. Economic Competitiveness is comprised of the direct travel time
savings and operating cost savings to truck drivers based on the number of truck trips generated by
the site and the reduced truck trip VMT per trip. Sustainability is the social value of emissions. Safety
is comprised of the value of avoided fatal, non-fatal injury, and property damage crashes involving
heavy trucks. These benefits are summarized in Table 10.
Page 20 of 22
Table 10: Major Monetized Non-Discounted Benefits in Millions of Dollars for 30 Year Analysis
Period
Monetized Benefits
Value
State of Good Repair (Pavement)
Economic Competitiveness (Travel Time Savings & Truck
Operating Costs Savings)
Sustainability (emissions)1
Safety
Total
1) CO2 monetized benefits are discounted at 3 percent
$14.8 million
$289.3 million
Percent of
Total
4.0%
78.8%
$11.0 million
$52.0 million
$367.1 million
3.0%
14.2%
100.0%
v.
Project Costs
Project costs were provided by Port Canaveral with supplemental analysis conducted by Cambridge
Systematics.
Costs
•
Total construction costs for the roadway improvements proposed in the grant application
are 24.5 million. The total project costs were estimated by the Canaveral Port Authority.
•
CPA is requesting 50 percent or $12.25 million in this TIGER VII application. The remaining
funds will be provided by CPA and the City of Cocoa.
vi.
Benefit-Cost Analysis
The summary results of the benefit-cost analysis are below in Table 11. The results of the benefit-cost
analysis show that the project demonstrates net positive benefits resulting in a benefit-cost ratio of
9.7 using a seven percent discount rate, and 12.3 using a three percent discount rate. Therefore the
project will generate $9.70 in long-term benefits per dollar spent over the 30 year analysis period,
assuming a seven percent discount rate.
Table 11: Benefit-Cost Summary
Value of Discounted Benefits
Discounted Project Cost
Benefit Cost Ratio
VI.
3% discount rate
$276,173,286
$22,424,631
12.3
7% discount rate
$193,875,342
$20,002,563
9.7
PROJECT READINESS
Regulatory construction permits are required from state and federal agencies. The attached
schedule indicates the timeline for the design documents and construction permits. The Inland Port
Logistics Center on-site design documents have been initiated. The design documents and permits
for the supporting SR-524 improvements will be initiated in April 2016 and will be completed with all
construction permits by June 2017. The NEPA documentation will be initiated only after TIGER award
Page 21 of 22
notification, and will be completed within 9-12 months, prior to the June 2017 funding obligation.
This project will be shovel- ready and all funds will be obligated prior to the June 2017 deadline.
Summary - Project Schedule:
TASK
SR 524 Improvements
Engineering & Permitting
Road Construction
ILC Roads, Stormwater & Utilities
Engineering & Permitting
Road Construction
Stormwater & Utilities
VII.
ESTIMATED
COMPLETION DATE
2017 - 1st Quarter
2019 - 3rd Quarter
2016 - 2nd Quarter
2018 - 4th Quarter
2017 - 4th Quarter
FEDERAL WAGE RATE CERTIFICATION
A Federal Wage Rate Certification is attached at the end of this application narrative. The
Canaveral Port Authority agrees to adhere to all Federal and State requirements relating to
wages and labor in conjunction with this grant project.
VIII.
APPENDIX A – SUPPLEMENTARY
GLOSSARY:
CAGR
CO2
CPA
FDOT
FMCSA
FSTED
HH
Compound Annual Growth Rate
Carbon Dioxide
Florida Department of Transportation
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development
Household
ILC
MCO
NEPA
NOx
PM10
SF
SJRWMD
SOx
SR
TEU
VMT
VOCs
Inland Logistics Center
Orlando International Airport
National Environmental Policy Act
Nitrogen Oxides
Particulate Matter up to 10 micrometers in size
Square Foot
St. John’s River Water Management District
Sulfur Oxides
State Route
Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit
Vehicle Miles Traveled
Volatile Organic Compounds
Page 22 of 22
APPENDIX A
MAPS
TIGER VII Application – Inland Port Logistics Center Road Improvements and Stormwater
Project Location: SR 524, Cocoa, FL 32926
PORT CANAVERAL, FL
PROJECT LOCATION
4
SHEET KEYNOTES
LEGEND
1. LOCATION OF FUTURE ROADWAY/INTERCHANGE
WIDENING.
SR-524 IMPROVEMENTS
Inches
INTERNAL 4 LANE
ROADWAYS
0
INTERNAL 2 LANE
ROADWAYS
1
2
1
0
E
1
OFFICE
OFFICE
FLEX
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
100' ROW SECTION
225,000 SF
NOTICE
The information in this document was prepared by ATKINS, Inc. While ATKINS has taken all
reasonable steps to assure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, it
cannot guarantee that changes or alterations to this document will not be made by persons
other than ATKINS personnel after the document leaves the possession of ATKINS. Changes
or alterations may be safety related and result in damage to property, personal injury or death.
If verification of the information contained in this document is needed, contact should be made
directly with ATKINS.
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
95,000 SF
76' ROW
TOWNSEND
ROAD
1
ND
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
ND
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
PO
POND
COX ROAD
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
76' ROW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
5
POND
PO
76' ROW SECTION
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
SF
115,000
I-9
245,000 SF
POND
146,000 SF
POND
WAREHOUSE/DISTRIBUTION
WL13
1
146,000 SF
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
POND
100' ROW
1 MILLION SF
WETLAND
PRESERVE
This document must be compared to the original hard copy, with certified raised seal if
applicable, in order to insure the accuracy of the information contained therein and to further
insure that no changes, alterations or modifications have been made to the document. No
reliance should ever be made on a documentation transmitted or reviewed by computer or
other electronic means unless it is first compared to the original. ATKINS makes no
warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy of the information contained in any
document transmitted or reviewed by computer or other electronic means.
225,000 SF
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
FU
1
Filename:G:\PROJECTS\100044084 - SR524&I95 CPA Stockpile Plan\CAD\xref\CONCEPT - Plot Date:6.2.2015 - Plotted By:Day, Donald R
EXISTING POWER POLES
AND OVERHEAD WIRE
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
L
100' ROW
100' ROW
SIGNATURE
JEFFREY LUCAS, P.E.
FLORIDA REG. NO. 71621
EXISTING 290' FPL EASEMENT
225,000 SF
DATE
135,000 SF
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
TE
EL
HO
RETAIL
POND
750
ONSITE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
P
OFFICE
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
,00
300
D
ON
125,000 SF (3)
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
F (
3)
OFFICE
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
125,000 SF (3)
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
5
0S
SR
500
RETAIL
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
24
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
PO
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
ND
250
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
FULL SIZE: 1" = 250'
TRAFFIC CIRCLE
W
PR ETL
ES AN
ER D
VE
FIR
125
Rev.
Description
Date
By
10'
BERM
10'
BERM
POND WIDTH VARIES
4:1 BACK TO
EXISTING
4:1 SIDE SLOPES
4:1 BACK TO
EXISTING
Ch
k'd
Ap
p'd
Suitability
Drawing Status
CORPORATE OFFICE:
4030 W. BOY SCOUT BLVD
LOCAL OFFICE:
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33607
FBPR CERTIFICATE OF
7175 MURRELL ROAD
AUTHORIZATION NO.24
MELBOURNE, FL 32940
TEL. 321.242.4942
www.atkinsglobal.com
FAX. 321.242.6101
Copyright C Atkins Limited (2015)
Client
BOTTOM WIDTH
VARIES
TYPICAL POND SECTION
Project Title
SR 524 &CENTER
I-95
LOGISTICS
TRANSPORT
& MASTER
STOCKPILING
CONCEPTUAL
PLAN
PLAN OVERLAY
Drawing Title
CONCEPT PLAN EXHIBIT
Scale
Designed
Drawn
Checked
Authorized
Date
Date
Date
Date
1"=250'
Original Size
ARCH D
Drawing Number
C-1
Revision
PROJECT LOCATION
TIGER VII – Inland Port Logistics Road Improvement and Stormwater
Project Location – Highways, Intersections, Airport
PROJECT
LOCATION
TIGER VII – Inland Port Logistics Road Improvement and Stormwater
Demographics – Project Location
Source: Florida High Speed Rail
TIGER VII - Inland Port Logistics Center Road Improvement and Stormwater
S.R. 524 Corridor
Port Canveral Inland Logistics and Business Park
1-2-4 hour drive time
May 08, 2015
©2015 Esri
Made with Esri Business Analyst
www.esri.com/ba
800-447-9778
Try it Now!
Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX B
LETTERS OF SUPPORT
FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Representative Tom Goodson
District 50
District Office:
400 South Street, Suite 1C
Titusville, FL 32780
(321) 383-5151
(321) 383-5153 (fax)
Tallahassee Office:
218 House Office Building
402 South Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1300
(850) 717-5050
Email: [email protected]
June 2, 2015
The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Secretary Foxx:
I am pleased to provide this letter in support of the Canaveral Port Authority’s efforts to obtain a TIGER grant. The goal
of their proposed project, Inland Port Logistics Center, will facilitate the creation of jobs, assist local businesses and create
new cargo business for Central Florida. This project promotes the President’s Ladders of Opportunity. I respectfully
request your consideration of this organization’s application for federal funding.
The Canaveral Port Authority is growing its cargo operation. Future growth will be dependent on logistics services and
warehouse/distribution center capacity. The Inland Port Logistics Center will provide part of this capacity but roadway
improvements are required. These roadway improvements will accommodate efficient access to the Inland Port which
will offer superior logistics, the availability of large buildings, close proximity to rail and highways, ample truck parking,
less traffic congestion and economic incentives. Furthermore, funding for this project will have a profound impact on the
local businesses in Brevard County, all of Central Florida and the Florida east coast.
Again, I encourage your consideration of this worthy cause. If I can be of further assistance in this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me at the address below.
Sincerely,
Tom Goodson
State Representative, District 50
Agriculture and Natural Resources Subcommittee, Chair
State Affairs Committee ** Local and Federal Affairs Committee
Insurance and Banking Subcommittee ** Energy and Utilities Subcommittee
May 6, 2015
The Honorable Anthony Foxx
Secretary
Washington DC 20590
The American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) is writing to express its strong
support for public seaports’ applications for this year’s TIGER awards. AAPA has been a
strong advocate for the program since its inception in 2009. TIGER has made real
improvements in our nation’s maritime transportation system and needed investments
in our freight infrastructure.
Founded in 1912, the AAPA is the unified and collective voice of the seaport industry in
the Americas. AAPA empowers port authorities, maritime industry partners and service
providers to serve their global customers and create economic and social value for their
communities. Our activities, resources and partnerships connect, inform and unify
seaport leaders and maritime professionals in all segments of the industry who deliver
prosperity around the western hemisphere. Our letter today is on behalf of our U.S.
members.
AAPA’s recently released freight infrastructure report, the “State of Freight” outlines the
integral role that TIGER has played in integrating ports into the planning process and
has helped facilitate the role ports and TIGER have contributed in developing the freight
network. With over 95% response rate to the survey, 71% of our AAPA ports say they
are working with their state on their state freight plans and 63% are part of freight
advisory committees. Port eligibility for TIGER and available funding has driven this
engagement.
One of the continued values of TIGER from a maritime perspective is that it leverages
considerable private, state and local investments in seaport infrastructure. Since 2009
TIGER grants have leveraged over $700 million in maritime projects alone. Ports are
incubators for public private partnerships and the combination of tools and the availability of TIGER funding will allow our ports to facilitate and finance projects that might
otherwise lay dormant.
For example, these grants have helped fund seaport intermodal connectors and facilities
(including rail, road and short sea shipping); wharf and dock rehabilitation and expansion; improvements in yards, piers, breakwaters and cranes; and improvements overall
to rail movements throughout the U.S. to improve freight mobility.
American seaports and their private-sector partners annually spend more than $9 billion collectively in marine terminal capital improvements that help handle freight and
cruise passengers more efficiently. TIGER grant investments in port projects move these
projects forward.
The governments of Canada and Mexico are making large investments in their freight
transportation system, including their seaports. Goods imported and exported do not
need to go through U.S. ports. If we do not maintain our infrastructure, more freight will
flow through neighboring countries. In order to keep these important maritime jobs at
home, the U.S. government must make significant investments in seaport infrastructure.
The “State of Freight” survey called for $28.9 billion in need of freight landside infrastructure investments by 2025. TIGER is the primary tool the federal government has in
helping ports make landside improvements.
As the Department of Transportation begins to evaluate the applications for this seventh
round of TIGER funds, we strongly urge you to provide 25 percent or more of the funds
for seaport, last mile freight related projects to help maintain and expand the maritime
infrastructure that is so critical to this nation’s exports and imports, which are vital to
our nation’s economy and standard of living, as well as U. S. jobs.
Sincerely,
Kurt J. Nagle
President and CEO
2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way, Bldg. B
Viera, Florida 32940
Telephone: (321) 690-6890
Fax: (321) 690-6827
www.spacecoasttpo.com
June 2, 2015
I am pleased to provide this letter in support of the Canaveral Port Authority’s efforts to obtain a
TIGER grant. The goal of their proposed project, Inland Port Logistics Center, will facilitate the
creation of jobs, assist local businesses and create new cargo business for Central Florida. This project
promotes the President’s Ladders of Opportunity. I respectfully request your consideration of this
organization’s application for federal funding.
The Canaveral Port Authority is growing its cargo operation. Future growth will be dependent on
logistics services and warehouse/distribution center capacity. The Inland Port Logistics Center will
provide part of this capacity but roadway improvements are required. These roadway improvements
will accommodate efficient access to the Inland Port which will offer superior logistics, the availability
of large buildings, close proximity to rail and highways, ample truck parking, less traffic congestion
and economic incentives. Furthermore, funding for this project will have a profound impact on the
local businesses in Brevard County, all of Central Florida and the Florida east coast.
Again, I encourage your consideration of this worthy cause. If I can be of further assistance in this
matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below.
Sincerely,
Robert Kamm
Executive Director
CareerSource
careersourcebrevard.com
BREVARD
June 1, 2015
CareerSource Brevard (CSB) is pleased to provide this letter in support of the
Canaveral Port Authority's efforts to obtain a TIGER grant. The goal of their proposed
project, Inland Port Logistics Center, will facilitate the creation of jobs, assist local
businesses and create new cargo business for Central Florida. This project promotes
the President's Ladders of Opportunity. CSB respectfully request your consideration of
this organization's application for federal funding.
The Canaveral Port Authority is growing its cargo operation. Future growth will be
dependent on logistics services and warehouse/distribution center capacity. The Inland
Port Logistics Center will provide part of this capacity but roadway improvements are
required. These roadway improvements will accommodate efficient access to the
Inland Port which will offer superior logistics, the availability of large buildings, close
proximity to rail and highways, ample truck parking, less traffic congestion and
economic incentives. Furthermore, funding for this project will have a profound impact
on the local businesses in Brevard County, all of Central Florida and the Florida east
coast.
Again, CSB encourages your consideration of this worthy cause.
Sincerely,
Marci Brilley
Vice President of Operations
CareerSource Brevard - Titusvi
3880 S. Washington Ave.
Suite 214 I Titusville. FL 32780
CareerSource Brevard - Rockledge
295 Barnes Blvd.
Rockledge. FL 32955
CareerSource Brevard - Palm E
5275 Babcock St. NE
Suite SB I Palm Bay. FL 32905
CareerSource Brevard - Board
297 Barnes Blvd.
Rockledge. FL 32955
GT USA
445 Challenger Road
Cape Canaveral, Florida 32920
May 27, 2015
I am pleased to provide this letter in support of the Canaveral Port Authority’s efforts to obtain a
TIGER grant. The goal of their proposed project, Inland Port Logistics Center, will facilitate the
creation of jobs, assist local businesses and create new cargo business for Central Florida. This
project promotes the President’s Ladders of Opportunity. I respectfully request your consideration
of this organization’s application for federal funding.
The Canaveral Port Authority is growing its cargo operation. Future growth will be dependent on
logistics services and warehouse/distribution center capacity. The Inland Port Logistics Center will
provide part of this capacity but roadway improvements are required. These roadway improvements
will accommodate efficient access to the Inland Port which will offer superior logistics, the
availability of large buildings, close proximity to rail and highways, ample truck parking, less traffic
congestion and economic incentives. Furthermore, funding for this project will have a profound
impact on the local businesses in Brevard County, all of Central Florida and the Florida east coast.
Again, I encourage your consideration of this worthy cause. If I can be of further assistance in this
matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below.
Sincerely,
Richard T. Clark
Richard Clark
Operations Manager
321-985-3425
RClark.USA@Gulftainer .com
PETcHEM, INC.
6626A GORDON ROAD
WILMINGTON, NC 28411
www.petchemtugs.com
TELEPHONE (910) 399-7810
FAx (910) 399-7809
[email protected]
June 2,2015
Washington
20590
DC
I am pleased to provide this letter in support of the Canaveral Port Authority's efforts to obtain a
TIGER grant. The goal of their proposed project, inland Port Logistics Center, will facilitate the
creation ofjobs, assist local businesses and create new cargo business for Central Florida. This
project promotes the President's Ladders of Opportunity. I respectfully request your
consideration of this organization's application for federal funding.
The Canaveral Port Authority is growing its cargo operation. Future $owth will be dependent
on logistics services and warehouse/distribution center capacity. The Inland Port Logistics
Center will provide part of this capacrty but roadway improvements are required. These
roadway improvements will accommodate effrcient access to the Inland Port which will offer
superior logistics, the availability of large buildings, close proximity to rail and highways, ample
truck parking, less traffic congestion and economic incentives. Furthermore, funding for this
project will have a profound impact on the local businesses in Brevard County, all of Central
Florida and the Florida east coast.
Again, I encourage your consideration of this worthy cause. If I can be of further assistance in
this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address above.
Sincerely,
PETCHEM INC.
APPENDIX C
OTHER SCHEDULES
AND
ILC INFORMATION
Project Schedule R1
6/4/2015
g
g ,
g
SR‐524 Inland Logistics Center Design, Permitting and Construction Timeline
Begin
Group
Finish
Activity
Duration
(months)
2015
Q1
Q2
2016
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Onsite ILC Improvements (Design & Permitting)
Topographic Survey
Geotechnical Investigation
60% E i
60% Engineering Drawings
i D
i
SJRWMD Permit
Site Plan Approval (City of Cocoa)
Issued for Construction Drawings
Bidding and Award (Including Commission Approval)
Jul‐15
Jul‐15
S 15
Sep‐15
Dec‐15
Dec‐15
Dec‐15
Apr‐16
Apr
16
Jun‐16
Sep‐15
Sep‐15
D 15
Dec‐15
Jun‐16
Apr‐16
Feb‐16
Jun‐16
Jun
16
Aug‐16
2
2
3
6
4
2
2
2
Apr‐16
Apr‐16
May‐16
Aug‐16
A 16
Aug‐16
Aug‐16
Feb‐17
Apr‐17
May‐16
May‐16
Aug‐16
Nov‐16
F b 17
Feb‐17
Dec‐16
Apr‐17
May‐17
1
1
3
3
6
4
2
1
Jun‐17
Jun‐17
Feb‐18
Aug‐18
Feb‐18
Aug‐16
A 16
Aug‐16
Dec‐17
Feb‐18
Aug‐18
Dec‐18
May‐18
Sep‐24
S 20
Sep‐20
6
8
6
4
3
96
48
SR‐524 Improvements (Design & Permitting
Topographic Survey
Geotechnical Investigation
SJRWMD Permit
FDOT A
l
FDOT Approval
Bidding and Award (Including Commission Approval)
ILC Improvements Construction Phase:
Onsite Stormwater Management
Internal 4‐Lane Roadways
Internal 2‐Lane Roadways
Townsend Road Extension
Traffic Circle and Feature
Buildout of Warehouse Space
B ild t f Offi S
Buildout of Office Space
SR‐524 Improvements Construction Phase:
SR 524 4
SR‐524
4‐Lane
Lane Roadway Widending
Roadway Widending
SR‐524 Site Entrance Intersection & Landscaping
SR‐524 Entrance Signalization
Jun‐17
Jun
17
Jun‐17
Jun‐17
Jun‐19
Jun
19
Feb‐18
Feb‐18
24
8
8
Critical Path Activity
Non Critical Path Activity
1 of 1
2017
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
2018
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
2019
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Inland Port Logistics Center Site Development Plan
Inland Port Logistics Center
Property Highlights:
• Located on SR 524 at the I-95 interchange (Exit# 202) in Brevard County.
• 4,305’ frontage directly on SR 524.
• Only 12 miles to Port Canaveral with over 4 million cruise passengers per year.
• Master Development Order in place with City of Cocoa.
• Excellent visibility from I-95 in Cocoa, Florida – Brevard County.
• 88 acres of wetlands have been conceptually approved for impact and successfully
mitigated.
Inland Port Logistics Center
Building Elevations - Warehouses
GRANTS.GOV
GRANT APPLICATION
PACKAGE
Grant Application Package
Opportunity Title:
FY 2015 National Infrastructure Investments
Offering Agency:
CFDA Number:
20.933
CFDA Description:
National Infrastructure Investments
Opportunity Number:
DTOS59-15-RA-TIGER7
Competition ID:
TIGER7-FY15
Opportunity Open Date:
05/05/2015
Opportunity Close Date:
Agency Contact:
06/05/2015
Robert Mariner
TIGER Program Director
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: 202-366-8914
This opportunity is only open to organizations, applicants who are submitting grant applications on behalf of a company, state, local or
tribal government, academia, or other type of organization.
Application Filing Name:
Select Forms to Complete
Mandatory
Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424)
Attachments
Optional
Instructions
Show Instructions >>
This electronic grants application is intended to be used to apply for the specific Federal funding opportunity referenced here.
If the Federal funding opportunity listed is not the opportunity for which you want to apply, close this application package by clicking on the
"Cancel" button at the top of this screen. You will then need to locate the correct Federal funding opportunity, download its application and
then apply.
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 8/31/2016
Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
* 1. Type of Submission:
* 2. Type of Application:
Preapplication
New
Application
Continuation
Changed/Corrected Application
Revision
* 3. Date Received:
* If Revision, select appropriate letter(s):
* Other (Specify):
4. Applicant Identifier:
06/05/2015
5a. Federal Entity Identifier:
5b. Federal Award Identifier:
State Use Only:
6. Date Received by State:
7. State Application Identifier:
8. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
* a. Legal Name:
* b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN):
* c. Organizational DUNS:
59-6002482
0847233780000
d. Address:
* Street1:
445 Challenger Road
Street2:
Suite 301
* City:
Cape Canaveral
County/Parish:
* State:
FL: Florida
Province:
* Country:
USA: UNITED STATES
* Zip / Postal Code:
32920-4100
e. Organizational Unit:
Department Name:
Division Name:
f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application:
Prefix:
* First Name:
Connie
Middle Name:
* Last Name:
Rosado
Suffix:
Title:
Organizational Affiliation:
* Telephone Number: 321-783-7831 ext. 246
* Email: [email protected]
Fax Number:
* 9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type:
D: Special District Government
Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type:
Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type:
* Other (specify):
* 10. Name of Federal Agency:
11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:
20.933
CFDA Title:
National Infrastructure Investments
* 12. Funding Opportunity Number:
DTOS59-15-RA-TIGER7
* Title:
FY 2015 National Infrastructure Investments
13. Competition Identification Number:
TIGER7-FY15
Title:
14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.):
Add Attachment
* 15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project:
Inland Port Logistics Center Road Improvement and Stormwater
Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions.
Add Attachments
Delete Attachments
View Attachments
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
16. Congressional Districts Of:
* a. Applicant
* b. Program/Project
FL-015
FL-015
Attach an additional list of Program/Project Congressional Districts if needed.
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
17. Proposed Project:
* a. Start Date:
* b. End Date:
01/01/2016
07/31/2022
18. Estimated Funding ($):
* a. Federal
12,252,000.00
* b. Applicant
12,252,000.00
* c. State
0.00
* d. Local
0.00
* e. Other
0.00
* f. Program Income
0.00
* g. TOTAL
24,504,000.00
* 19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process?
a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on
.
b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.
c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.
* 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes," provide explanation in attachment.)
Yes
No
If "Yes", provide explanation and attach
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications** and (2) that the statements
herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances** and agree to
comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may
subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001)
** I AGREE
** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency
specific instructions.
Authorized Representative:
Prefix:
* First Name:
John
Middle Name:
* Last Name:
Walsh
Suffix:
* Title:
Port Director and CEO
* Telephone Number: 321-783-7831 ext. 233
Fax Number:
* Email: [email protected]
* Signature of Authorized Representative:
Connie Rosado
* Date Signed:
06/05/2015
ATTACHMENTS FORM
Instructions: On this form, you will attach the various files that make up your grant application. Please consult with the appropriate
Agency Guidelines for more information about each needed file. Please remember that any files you attach must be in the document format
and named as specified in the Guidelines.
Important: Please attach your files in the proper sequence. See the appropriate Agency Guidelines for details.
1) Please attach Attachment 1
CPA_Narrative.pdf
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
APPENDIX A_Maps.pdf
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
APPENDIX B_Letters of Support
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
APPENDIX C_Other.pdf
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment
Add Attachment
Delete Attachment
View Attachment

tiger vii discretionary grant program application

Transcription

Similar documents

Proceeds go to support NJROTC scholarships and the Port

Vice Chairman, Wayne Justice, Canaveral Port Authority

Napoleon Container Terminal

Subcutaneous Port Catheter (Port, porta

January 17, 2011 - Village of Port Clements

PDF 1mb - Marina Adelaide

the perfect condo in port aransas!

$6,300 - Zwolle Tamale Fiesta

#104 300 Klahanie Drive • Port Moody

The project incorporates two types of new architecture