The Changing Face of Third-Party Logistics.

VALUE
VISIBILITY
EVOLUTION
EXECUTION
STRATEGY
SYNERGY
The Changing Face of
3
rd
PARTY
LOGISTICS
By Benjamin H. Gordon
The third party logistics (3PL)
industry is undergoing a huge
transition. Currently competing
in a highly fragmented, high
growth market, 3PL providers
will soon be swept up in a massive wave of consolidations. This
trend will be driven by three factors: the increased demand for
lead logistics providers, the emergence of new technology, and an
increase in cash-rich buyers seeking logistics targets. Shippers
need to start scrutinizing their
providers are positioned to survive in the new era.
Benjamin H. Gordon is managing director of BG Strategic Advisors, which
provides advisory services in strategy, technology, and finance to logistics
and supply chain companies.
50
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT REVIEW
· MARCH/APRIL 2003
www.scmr.com
TERRY ALLEN
3PLs and decide how well these
W
e are living in an unprecedented time of consolidation in the supply chain management industry. In the
past three years, we have witnessed such mega-mergers as Deutsche Post-AEI-Danzas, UPS-Fritz, Kuehne
& Nagel-USCO, and Exel-Mark VII. The conventional
wisdom holds that these large deals, which were all completed from 1999 to 2001, are a relic of history and that
no mergers of this magnitude remain to be done.
But I will argue that the exact opposite is true. The logistics industry
is actually in the early stages of a massive wave of even greater consolidation that will reward a small number of third-party logistics (3PL)
companies with tremendous value. As shippers look to simplify their
vendor base, as new technology allows large 3PLs to serve the midmarket cost effectively, and as acquisitions and investment capital fuel the
growth of leading service providers, a handful of “mega-winners” will
come to dominate the 3PL marketplace.
These developments will also have a major impact on how 3PL users
select and use their service providers. Smart shippers already treat their
3PLs as true business partners. They integrate 3PLs into their business
and rely on them for critical supply chain functions. Given this dependency, it’s all the more vital for shippers to understand their 3PLs’ longterm viability amidst a rapidly changing marketplace.
As the 3PL landscape shifts, who will be the winners? How should
users of these services respond? This article provides some answers, lay-
ing out a roadmap to help both
providers and users of thirdparty services navigate a dynamic 3PL market.
An Industry in
Transition
Modern third-party logistics
providers have emerged recently as
a result of transportation deregulation in the 1980s and the shipper
emphasis on “core competencies” in
the 1990s. As a result, outsourcing
has taken off. In the last decade,
according to research by investment banker Lazard Freres and
BG Strategic Advisors, the 3PL
category has grown at a rate
greater than 20 percent per year. It
has produced stock market darlings
like Expeditors, CH Robinson, and
Landstar. And it has spawned an
entire industry of small and midsized
logistics providers — which number
approximately 1,000 today.
Many observers have predicted that the
logistics provider industry will continue to
expand at a rate of 15-20 percent annually.
A recent Lazard Freres study shows that
MARCH/APRIL 2003
51
Third Party Logistics
Available Market Share for
Companies Below Top 50
while 37 percent of high-volume
EXHIBIT 1
shippers outsourced transportation
The Logistics Market Today:
in 2000, 73 percent expected to do
High-Growth
but Extremely Fragmented
so by 2005. As the outsourcing
trend continues, the 3PL industry
90%
will benefit.
80%
Less frequently noted is the
Value-Added
70%
Warehousing
enormous fragmentation in the
logistics industry. Exhibit 1 shows
60%
Air/Ocean
that all four of the core logistics sec50%
Transportation
tors—warehousing, transportation
Slow-Growth,
High-Growth,
Management
40%
Fragmented
Fragmented
management, air/ocean freight forDedicated
warding, and dedicated contract
30%
(DCC)
Slow-Growth,
High-Growth,
carriage—are growing at a rate of
20%
Consolidated
Consolidated
15-25 percent annually. Yet the
10%
exhibit also shows that the market
Parcel
share available for small companies
0%
(defined as all companies below the
-10%
top 50) is between 30 and 80 per-20%
cent. To put this in perspective, the
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
parcel industry is growing at 4 perAnnual Market Growth Rate
cent, and the market share available
Source: Armstrong & Associates, BG Strategic Advisors Analysis
for small companies is zero.
This combination of high growth and high fragmentation industry has accelerated across both modes and geographies
makes the logistics industry ripe for consolidation. A growing (see Exhibit 2). Domestically, the UPS acquisition of Fritz
market supports a broad range of successful companies that allowed the transportation and warehousing giant to add
attract expansion-minded buyers. At the same time, fragmen- expertise and scale in a new mode (freight forwarding).
tation translates into a plethora of small acquisition opportu- Similarly, the Exel acquisition of Mark VII enabled a warenities for larger, cash-rich companies. Further, as the market housing and freight-forwarding leader to add domestic surinevitably matures, businesses that were used to 20+ percent face transportation management. By the same token, global
growth will likely supplement their organic operations with powerhouses have sought to acquire platforms in the United
acquisitions.
States. Deutsche Post’s purchase of AEI/Danzas, Kuehne &
Within the individual sectors of the logistics industry, no Nagel’s merger with USCO, and APL’s acquisition of GATX
one player dominates. For example, Exhibit 2 shows that all reflect this cross-geography trend.
Danzas/AEI, holds 60 percent of the revenues generated by
the top seven companies in the sector of air and ocean freight The Consolidation Drivers
forwarding. However, if the chart were to be expanded to There are three main sources of this powerful consolidation:
include the U.S. revenues for all global freight forwarding shippers’ quest for lead logistics providers (LLPs), new gamecompanies, Danzas/AEI’s market share would drop to less changing technologies, and the emergence of deep-pocketed
than 25 percent. Further, when calculated as a percentage of logistics acquirers.
the overall logistics market, its true market share would drop
to just six percent. The chart also shows that only two compa- The Shipper Quest for LLPs
nies have greater than 2x relative market share in their sec- First, shippers’ need for greater accountability and control
tors—Exel in warehousing and Danzas/AEI in freight for- over their outsourced activities has given rise to a new type of
warding. But even those two combined enjoy less than ten logistics management company — the lead logistics provider
percent market share in the overall outsourced logistics mar- (LLP). These large LLPs are emerging as the “supply chain
masters” for their customers. They offer shippers a wide
ket.
Historically, winners have stayed in their corners. range of outsourcing services through a single point of conDanzas/AEI enjoys strength in freight forwarding, Schneider tact. They also provide broad geographical coverage as well as
and Penske head up asset-based transportation, Exel stands sophisticated technology capabilities. Typically, the LLPs rely
out in warehousing, and various players compete for leader- on a network of smaller 3PL subcontractors to deliver these
ship in asset-light surface transportation and software. No services.
Pioneers in using LLPs include giants such as General
one company currently enjoys a top-two market share posiMotors and Nortel, which both chose recently to outsource
tion in more than one sector.
In the last three years, however, consolidation in the billions of dollars in logistics spending. GM sought an LLP
52
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT REVIEW
· MARCH/APRIL 2003
www.scmr.com
with the technology capabilities to cut dealer order-entry
cycles from 60 days down to 15. (See the sidebar on page
56.) Nortel was looking for a logistics partner to help it free
up hundreds of millions of dollars in working capital and
inventory.
Few companies can meet the broad range of requirements
demanded by these large initiatives. Those that can possess a
broad range of capabilities, including:
䡲 Multimodal expertise across services including truckload, less than truckload, intermodal, air, ocean, and warehousing.
䡲 Global geographic scope across all locations relevant to
the client’s supply chain.
䡲 Complex management skills to perform “master contracting” solutions, where the LLP manages other, smaller
3PLs in subcontracting relationships.
䡲 Analytical know-how to provide shippers with a
thoughtful, strategy-led approach that identifies opportunities
for outsourcing to add value.
䡲 Powerful technology systems to manage massive flows
of data, synthesize them into meaningful reports, and recommend courses of action.
䡲 The financial resources to provide solutions such as the
upfront purchase of a shipper’s logistics division, combined with
a willingness to enter into risk and reward-sharing contracts.
The few companies that can meet these requirements are
part of an elite group—less than a dozen worldwide. As large
shippers continue to seek providers who possess LLP-level
capabilities, third-party providers will feel the pressure to
expand the scale of their operations.
EXHIBIT 2
3PL Industry: Consolidation Across Modes and Geographies
U.S. Logistics Market Map: Top 50 Companies
Total = $27 Billion for the Top 50
International Acquirors
Kuehne & Nagel
Deutsche Post
100%
Exel/Mark VII
Merger
Fritz/UPS
Merger
$7.2B
$6.7B
$6.7B
$4.5
Airborne Logistics
Other
Werner Dedicated
Swift
Other
NFI
Standard
Kenco
DSC
Other
US&T
Genco
JB Hunt
Dedicated
USCO
BAX
UTi
Expeditors
80%
Fritz
USF
Logistics
EGL
2001e Revenues ($M)
Uti/Standard
Merger
APL
60%
Ryder
Dedicated
north
American
40%
NFI
Transplace
Hub Group
EXE
Manhattan
Associates
Exel (Mark VII)
Schneider Logistics
CAT Logistics
Descartes
FedEx
Logistics
APL (GATX)
CH
Robinson
Tibbett &
Britten
Manugistics
Menlo
TNT Logistics/
CTI
Ryder
Logistics
Schneider
Dedicated
Danzas AEI
$2.3B
i2
20%
Exel
Americas
Penske
Logistics
UPS
Logistics
0%
0%
20%
Air/Ocean
www.scmr.com
40%
Asset-Based
Trasportation
60%
Value-Added
Warehouse
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT REVIEW
80%
Non-Asset-Based
Surface
Transportation
100%
Software
· M A R C H / A P R I L 2 0 0 3 53
Third Party Logistics
New Game-Changing Technologies
The second major factor driving consolidation is technology.
A growing number of shippers are coming to rely on their
3PLs for sophisticated and costly technology solutions. Many
leading-edge 3PLs specialize in understanding new technologies and use them to bring substantial value to shippers.
Users increasingly rely on their logistics providers for expertise in complex technologies such as transportation management systems (TMS), warehousing management systems
(WMS), supply chain event management (SCEM), and international trade logistics systems (ITLS).
Shippers can benefit from tapping the knowledge that 3PLs
gain from working with multiple customers. A logistics
provider may purchase a TMS and implement it for 20 different accounts. Through this experience, it can gain valuable
expertise on how to get the most productivity out of the technology. In addition, tech-savvy 3PLs can provide their shippers
with a better understanding of the latest technologies.
Shippers, for their part, can gain powerful cost advantages by
leveraging a service provider’s purchasing power to gain volume
discounts and by paying only for those modules they need. Not
surprisingly, technology has become a key component in many
Fortune 1000 companies’ decision to outsource logistics.
As Exhibit 4 shows, companies that can afford the upfront
investments in technology systems can achieve powerful savings
in the form of operational efficiencies. For a 3PL generating more
than $10 million in revenues, for example, a Web-based, fullyautomated system can cut the cost of a transportation transaction
by over 80 percent. Those 3PLs that cannot afford such technology investments will suffer a crippling competitive disadvantage.
Sophisticated systems are becoming a powerful lever for
separating the strong from the weak. I know of one situation
where CH Robinson displaced a mid-sized freight broker by
providing the Fortune 500 customer with a sophisticated
order management system (OMS). The OMS integrated
directly into the customer’s ERP system. Once CH Robinson
had control of the customers’ orders, it was able to route
them wherever it deemed appropriate. Not surprisingly, they
54
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT REVIEW
· MARCH/APRIL 2003
EXHIBIT 3
What GM and Nortel Do Today,
The Midmarket May Do Tomorrow
Less-Penetrated
Higher-Growth
Five-Year Forecast Growth Rate
The Vector and Nortel LLP contracts are particularly
important because they may be early adopter models for the
rest of the industry. As Exhibit 3 shows, what the largest
companies of the Fortune 100 do, the rest of the market
tends to follow over time. Just as automotive giants like GM
and Ford led the way toward outsourcing in the early 1990s,
so too may the adoption of LLPs provide a model for midsized companies in the coming decade.
The lead logistics provider movement will create two key
consequences for 3PLs. First, it will increasingly reward
those large companies that can meet the stringent requirements demanded by shippers. Second, it will have a ripple
effect on the 3PLs that are forced to serve as subcontractors to
the LLPs. These smaller providers face a distinct risk of margin
compression, technology compliance, reduction in growth
opportunities, and outright termination at the hands of LLPs.
Fortune 401-500
20%
301-400
15%
201-300
101-200
10%
1-100
Fully-Penetrated
Slower-Growth
5%
0
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Percentage of Fortune 500 Companies
Using Outsourcing
As midmarket outsourcing grows, large
logistics companies will pursue aggressively.
Source: Armstrong & Associates, BG Strategic Advisors
were channeled, more often than not, to CH Robinson internally for brokerage execution. By the same token, a major factor in GM’s outsourcing decision was Vector’s ability to provide global supply chain visibility.
The technology bar will only continue to rise. UPS Logistics,
for example, has made aggressive investments in building out a
logistics and technology-consulting group with a mix of thirdparty and proprietary solutions. It helps that UPS has invested
more than $11 billion in technology over the past 10 years. Very
few companies will have the resources and wherewithal to keep
up with these giants and their investments.
The next battleground for technology adoption in logistics
will be the midmarket. Web-based transportation and warehousing management systems now enable large 3PL companies to reach smaller customers. Schneider Logistics provides
a good example of this capability. Historically, this large service provider would not do business with midsized companies.
As Schneider’s former Senior Vice President of Business
Development Bob DeVos recounted, “If you were under $50
million in freight spend, I didn’t even take your call.” But now,
with its Web-based SUMIT system in place, Schneider
expects to serve a much broader range of customers more cost
effectively. As the Schneider example shows, technology lowers the threshold size of customers that big 3PLs can reach.
This only intensifies the pressures on midsized logistics companies to keep pace with new technology offerings.
Deep-Pocketed Logistics Acquirers
The third driver of consolidation is the emergence of cashrich buyers seeking logistics targets. In the last three years
alone, we have seen such major acquisitions as:
䡲 Kuehne & Nagel buying USCO Logistics for $400 million.
䡲 UPS buying Fritz for $500 million.
www.scmr.com
䡲 Deutsche Post buying AEI for $1.2 billion.
䡲 Deutsche Post buying Danzas for $1.2 billion.
䡲 TPG buying CTI for $650 million.
䡲 APL buying GATX for $210 million.
In many cases, large European players have pursued U.S.
platforms in order to expand their geographic coverage and
tap into the high-growth U.S. market, which at 20 percent is
expanding at more than double the rates of Europe. For
instance, Kuehne & Nagel (K&N) was seeking a leader in
U.S. value-added warehousing with a focus on the high technology and telecommunications industries. With USCO,
K&N gained instant scale and credibility in North America.
Similarly, the Dutch post office, TPG, wanted a top position
in automotive logistics and found what they were looking for
in CTI. Global buyers have paid premiums as high as 19
times cash flow in a bid to establish beachheads in the $1
trillion U.S. supply chain market.
North American buyers have tended to pay lower prices
than their European counterparts but still find substantial
value in acquisitions that can provide leadership in complementary services. For instance, UPS acquired Fritz in order to
bolster its global freight-forwarding network. Conversely, UTi
acquired Standard Logistics in October 2002 to add valueadded warehousing capabilities to its forwarding expertise.
These major acquisitions will only continue. In a rapidly
evolving marketplace, time can be more important than
money. Buyers will continue to be attracted by the ability to
gain new customers, geographies, services, technologies, and
talented managers, which they can realize more quickly
through an acquisition than by organic growth. Further,
wealthy buyers—UPS alone generates $2 billion in annual
cash flow—possess ample resources to fund major investments in the market.
One particularly interesting trend is the recent emergence of
the private equity firm in this space. These firms tend to invest
in private companies where they see unique opportunities for
growth and profitability. Many private equity firms today are
excited about the logistics services market because they see an
EXHIBIT 4
The Power of Technology to Cut Costs
and Improve Efficiencies
$50
$42
$40
$30
$21
$20
$14
$8
$10
0
Phone/Fax
Dispatch
System
TMS:
Traditional
TMS:
Web-Based
Cost of a Transportation Transaction, Fully-Loaded
Source: BGSA analysis. Assumptions: $100,000 fully loaded cost per rep, 240 working
days/year, 10 loads/day phone/fax, 20 loads/day dispatch, 30 loads/day TMS (trad.),
50 loads/day TMS (Web)
www.scmr.com
opportunity to (1) consolidate markets that exhibit economies
of scale in marketing, purchasing, and technology; and (2)
accelerate the growth of leading companies in niche markets.
In the last four years, top-tier investment firms have
stepped into the logistics sector. Recent examples include:
䡲 Eos Partners’ investment in NewBreed, a warehousingbased company that has evolved into sophisticated supply
chain network design and implementation for customers like
the U.S. Postal Service, Verizon Wireless, and Siemens
Medical Solutions.
䡲 GTCR’s investment in Cardinal, a leading transportation management company focused on dedicated delivery and
logistics consulting for companies like 7-Eleven and Home
Depot.
䡲 Code Hennessy and Simmons’ multiple investments in
May Logistics, a top regional warehousing and logistics company, and Mail Contractors of America, the largest private
transporter of bulk mail for the U.S. Post Office.
䡲 Heritage Partners’ investment in APX, which provides
package delivery, package sortation, and direct delivery solutions at a postage discount of approximately 40-45 percent of
typical post office rates.
Many of these private-equity-backed logistics companies
are growing revenues and profits at greater than 30 percent
through organic expansion and acquisitions.
We can expect to see more of these investments. With
$120 billion in private equity capital sitting on the sidelines, a
record level of funding exists. My discussions with more than
20 investment firms in the past year suggest that a substantial
amount of that capital will be deployed in the supply chain
marketplace.
This infusion of smart capital from private equity investors
will accelerate the acquisition and consolidation trend. If private equity investors commit 5 percent of their total capital to
the sector and continue to grow their portfolio companies at
30 percent annually, within 10 years their companies could
control $64 billion in logistics services. This would amount to
more than 20 percent of the expected market for 2012.
Where will it end? Again, a comparative industry analysis
may help to frame this question. In 10 years, the logistics sector may end up looking like other, more mature transportation
markets. In 1971, when Fred Smith launched Federal Express,
the parcel industry was extremely fragmented. The top two
players back then represented less than 20 percent of the total
market. Today, FedEx and UPS have successfully consolidated
the parcel market, and combined they own a commanding
80+–percent market share. A similar pattern is likely to emerge
in the 3PL industry.
Implications for 3PLs: The Winners?
Logistics companies that can successfully position their businesses to benefit from these trends will enjoy an exciting
future. These will be the companies with broad multimodal
capabilities, geographic scope, and technological leadership.
For the majority of companies in this industry, however,
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT REVIEW
· M A R C H / A P R I L 2 0 0 3 55
Third Party Logistics
one overriding question emerges: What can you do if you are
not FedEx, UPS, or Deutsche Post? If you’re not a multibillion dollar company, but you do have the size, capabilities,
and ambition to continue profitable growth in midst of this
marketplace, how should you evolve to maximize your opportunity?
Smart, midsized companies have two main options. First,
they can invest aggressively in niche strategies and technologies that create differentiation and drive growth. Second, they
can find a “big brother” with deep pockets and position the
business for a merger or sale. Successful models exist for
both options.
NewBreed, Cardinal, May Logistics, MCA, and APX are all
examples of private equity-backed companies that pursued a
differentiated, technology-led strategy and raised capital to
build out their model. All five companies have deployed large
amounts of funding to build sophisticated technology systems
and national networks. Today, each is a formidable competitor
in its target market.
USCO and RoadLink USA represent variations on the second option. In USCO’s case, the warehousing company saw an
opportunity to meet its customers’ needs for worldwide solutions and found a global merger partner in Kuehne & Nagel. In
RoadLink USA’s case, several intermodal drayage companies
joined forces to compete more effectively. They are now able
to provide their customers with a single point of contact; superior tracking, routing, billing, and management systems
through pooled resources; and higher overall service levels.
There is a third option: do nothing. However, while midsized logistics companies may continue to enjoy growth and
profitability for the next two to four years, the longer-term
market dynamics will require continual evolution and reinvestment to ensure differentiation and growth. The status
quo is not a winning choice in the long run.
Implications for 3PL Users: What to Do?
For users, the increasing consolidation of the 3PL industry
has profound implications on choosing and using service
providers. Smart shippers already monitor their logistics partners on the basis of daily operational metrics, such as on-time
delivery rates and costs per ton-mile. But with the landmark
changes in the marketplace, they will need to do even more.
Specifically, they will need to analyze their 3PLs’ strategic
positioning, ability to invest in the future, and viability.
Some new key questions 3PL users should be asking center on the following:
䡲 Business needs: How are your company’s needs changing, and what impact does that have on how you select a
3PL? For example, a company pursuing low-cost manufacturing may choose to source raw materials from Asia, in which
GM’s Big Outsourcing Push
n December of 2000, General Motors announced that it was
forming a joint venture with Menlo Logistics called Vector SCM
(supply chain management). This $6 billion startup would handle all of GM’s outsourced logistics, serving as the primary point of
contact for dozens of 3PLs that once worked with GM directly.
Vector was a massive deal—costing more than 600 times the
average logistics-outsourcing contract of $10,000 and representing nearly 10 percent of the entire $65 billion outsourced logistics
industry to date. GM performed exhaustive analyses of several
major logistics companies before selecting Menlo, a division of
CNF. The two companies now share board seats and equity stakes.
GM’s motivation included the desire to slash dealer car-purchase and ordering cycles from 60 days down to 15. (These efficiencies are highlighted in the accompanying graphic.) The efficiencies are driven by a logistics technology platform known as
“Vector Vision.” With this integrated system, GM is seeking to
create a clearer view of its global logistics operations and a truly
electronic supply chain. The system allows them to perform realtime modifications at all steps in the car delivery process.
“This will enable us to know exactly what is in transit, identify
a vehicle that matches a customer’s order, and redirect it from its
original destination of a dealer’s inventory to a customer instead,”
explains Harold Kutner, Group Vice President of GM’s Worldwide
Purchasing and Production Control & Logistics.
Vector, and initiatives like it, will continue to push the industry
toward consolidation for several reasons. The Vector mandate is
I
56
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT REVIEW
· MARCH/APRIL 2003
driven by specialized, sophisticated technological systems that few
companies can afford. In addition, those midsized logistics companies that used to work directly with GM will now be forced into
subcontracting relationships with Vector. Over time, these 3PLs
may see narrower margins, reduced growth opportunities, and the
risk of being switched out of large accounts. As a result, outsourcing arrangements like Vector may have a major ripple effect on
the 3PL industry.
GM's Vector Vision
Before Vector Vision
Order Cycle
60 Days
Fragmented
view of their
global logistics
operations
Untimely
inventory
information
Long
delivery
times to
dealers
With Vector Vision
Order Cycle
15 Days
• Accuracte and reliable delivery
• Single system to capture
all EDI (electronic data interchange) links
• Better management of all material and finished
vehicles in the GM pipeline
Source: Line 56, Manufacturing.net
www.scmr.com
Those 3PLs
that cannot
afford
investments
case the choice of a freight forwarding partner
partner, in order to develop these capabilispecializing in Asian-U.S. trade lanes will be a
ties.
critical strategic decision. A shipper focused
䡲 Viability: Ultimately, does your 3PL have
on economic value-added (EVA) may seek to
what it takes to survive and succeed in the
maximize high returns off of low capital
coming era of consolidation? Amidst the
in changing customer priorities, increasing cominvested, which could lead it to select a 3PL
willing and able to purchase its logistics assets
petitive intensity, and marketplace volatility,
sophisticated
in exchange for a long-term contract.
many companies will be unable to move fortechnology will
䡲 Lead logistics provider: Will your busiward. Will your 3PL be one of them?
ness be better served by a lead logistics
For a frightening example of the risks
suffer a crippling
provider, a series of best-of-breed providers by
involved in avoiding these questions, just
competitive
geography or service offering, or the status
look at the recent failures of freight bill
quo? GM and Nortel concluded that a LLP
audit and payment companies like STI,
disadvantage.
would provide accountability, technologyUnited Traffic Management Systems, and
based visibility solutions to reduce inventory,
Computrex. Large companies like Formica,
and aggressive reductions in the working capATOFINA, Bridgestone/Firestone, Pella,
ital that would free up hundreds of millions
QVC, and dozens of other Fortune 500 cusof dollars in cash. In contrast, others have
tomers chose these companies partly on the
found that a strategy of several regional bestbasis of low prices. They lost millions of dolof-breed players provides many of the benelars in the ensuing bankruptcies.
fits of an LLP without the risks of complete
The more likely risk is that a shipper will
dependency on one party.
pick a 3PL that lacks the resources and vision
䡲 Technology: Can your current 3PL(s) keep up with the fast to evolve in an increasingly dynamic industry. For instance, a
pace of technology innovation that your business will require provider that does not make the necessary investments in a
over the next two to four years? Logistics companies are already productivity-enhancing TMS, WMS, or SCEM system may
expected to provide expertise in such technologies as TMS, place its customers at a competitive disadvantage. Similarly, a
WMS, SCEM, and ITLS systems. As supply chain technology shipper may choose a 3PL that is unwilling or unable to
continues to develop further, shippers will turn to 3PLs for expand into new geographies and needed service offerings. In
advice on new categories such as radio-frequency identification the long run, these strategic factors can dwarf operational met(RFID) tags, which can provide continuous tracking of inventory rics in terms of their impact on a shipper’s business.
at the SKU level. Finally, post-Sept. 11 security requirements,
such as the ocean carrier 24-hour rule, are fueling demand for Asking the Hard Questions
new tracking and monitoring systems. Top 3PLs will be expect- The 3PL market today stands at a crossroads. As shippers
ed to provide clients with expertise on all of these fronts. In demand broader solutions, technology companies bring innoeffect, these logistics providers will need to evolve into supply vations to market, and a flood of capital chases differentiated
chain consulting firms that can also provide execution capabili- companies, the pace of change promises only to accelerate.
These dynamics will pose major challenges and opportunities
ties.
䡲 Scope: Does your 3PL have the scope of services and to both users and service providers, demanding the attention
locations that you will need in the future? As shippers look of all supply chain professionals.
To emerge as winners, 3PLs will need to carve out a diffor integrated supply chain solutions, 3PLs are developing
sophisticated service combinations. For example, NFI ferentiated square on the chessboard. Consolidation is an
Industries is adding contract-manufacturing capabilities to unmistakable reality. The choice—raise capital to pursue a
augment its warehousing and transportation operations. niche strategy, sell to a larger player, or harvest the busiJacobson Companies has added not just co-packing but also ness—is not easy. However, just as UPS and FedEx achieved
temporary staffing services. These value-added services domination in the once-fragmented parcel industry, today’s
logistics providers who pick a unique strategy and make the
enable a 3PL to solve larger problems for their clients.
䡲 Capital: Will your 3PL have the resources to reinvest in necessary investments can be big winners going forward.
Shippers also face important decisions. Should you pick a
continued growth? Standard Logistics, a highly-regarded
regional warehousing company, evaluated its Fortune 500 global logistics partner, a series of regional 3PLs, or a matrix of
customer needs and assessed the likely capital requirements best-of-breed providers by service offering? Does your 3PL
for continued success. Standard concluded that it should understand what drives value in your business? Is your partner
merge with a larger company that could provide the resources well positioned to succeed amidst the changing marketplace?
to fund expansion. As shippers demand expanded geographi- Shippers who understand changing market requirements and
cal coverage and services, 3PLs will be pressed to make the pick winning 3PLs can develop superior supply chain stratenecessary investments, or alternatively select the right merger gies that deliver a powerful competitive edge.
www.scmr.com
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT REVIEW
· M A R C H / A P R I L 2 0 0 3 57