performance of sweetpotato varieties in the caprivi, okavango and
Transcription
performance of sweetpotato varieties in the caprivi, okavango and
IN THECAPRIVI, VARIETIES OF SWEETPOTATO PERFORMANCE REGIONS AND OHANGWENA OKAVANGO BIANCARUSCH Namibia Windhoek, PrivateBag13'184, Research Agronomy Division WaterandRuralDevelopment, Ministryof Agriculture, ABSTRACT Twenty-fivesweetpotatovarietieswere evaluatedat Mashare AgriculturalDevelopmentInstituteand Sachinga,Baganiand MaheneneResearchStationsduringthe 1997/98season.The season was characterizedby low and erratic rainfall,which started late in the season. Resultsobtainedunder these conditionsallowed evaluationof drought toleranceof the differentvarieties expressed in terms of yield potentialand maturity.Varietieswith high yield potentialand early maturity o e r f o r m e d b e s t u n d e r t h e c o n d i t i o n so f e r r a t i c a n d unpredictablerainfall.Advancedvarietyevaluationshouldbe repeated for more growing seasons. Planting materialsof the besfperformingvarietieswill be multipliedand shouldbe evaluatedby farmers in collaborationwith FarmingSystems Researchunits or the DirectorateExtensionand Engineering Services. INTRODUCTION Encouragingresults obtained previouslyfrom sweetpotato varietyevaluations(Lenhardt& Rusch,1996;Rusch' 1997)' high interest shown by farmers and further support by the SouthernAfrican Root Crops ResearchNetwork(SARRNET) through the Namibian Root Crops Research Project led to planning and approval of further evaluationof sweetpotato varietiesduringthe 1997/98season. Entriesfor the advanced evaluationtrialswere the elevenvarietiesthat performedbest i n t h e p r e l i m i n a r yv a r i e t ye v a l u a t i o n sd u r i n gt h e 1 9 9 6 / 9 7 season. The 1997/98seasonwas characterizedby relatively low and erraticrainfallthat started late' DevelAgricultural at Mashare trialinspection Figure1. Sweetpotato oomentInstitute. The trial layoutwas a randomizedcompleteblockdesignwiih andtwo 3.3mrowsper blockin the preliminary threereplications and four 4.5m rows per block in the advancedtrials (Carey& Reynoso, 1996). Cuttingswere spaced at 0.30m between plantsand 1.2mbetweenrows. Onlytip cuttingswere usedfor trial purposes. In the Kavangoand Caprivi regionsthe trials were grownunderdrylandconditionswith vines plantedon the flat. The trialat MaheneneResearchStationwas irrigatedand heaped.Rainfallat Mashare,Baganiand Sachingaduringthe 1997/98growingseasonis shown in Table1. lrrigationwas appliedat MashareADI shortlyafter plantingand in April to save the trial from the severedrought. Bagani lnstitute, Development at MashareAgricultural Table1.Rainfall Stationduringthe 1997/9B Research StationandSachinga Research season METHOD lnitialevaluationof nineteenintroducedimprovedsweetpotato varietieswith one localcheckwas repeatedin a preliminary varietyevaluationtrial at BaganiResearchStation.The trial w a s p l a n t e do n ' 1 6J a n u a r Y1 9 9 8 . '14 Advancedvarietyevaluationtrialswere plantedon January 1998 at MashareAgriculturalDevelopmentInstitute(ADl) in t h e K a v a n g or e g i o n ( F i g u r e 1 ) , o n 1 5 J a n u a r y 1 9 9 8 a t SachingaResearchStationin the Capriviregionand on 20 J a n u a r y 1 9 9 8 a t M a h e n e n e R e s e a r c hS t a t i o n i n t h e Ohangwenaregion.The trial entriesconsistedof the eleven varietiesselectedfrom the preliminaryvariety best-performing and one ortwo locallycollected 1996197 during trials evaluation varietiesas checks. Variety names and origin are shown in AnnexA. 70 The grey area indicatesthe rain Beforeplanting,2:3:2 (22) fertilizerwas broadcastat 200 kg/ ha and at MaheneneResearchStationa side dressingof125 kg/ha LAN was appliedsix weeks after planting(Soenarjo, 1995). Trialswere harvestedapproximatelyfour monthsafier plantingon 12 May 1998 at SachingaResearchStation,13 May 1998at BaganiResearchStation(Figure2), 18 May 1998 AGRICOLA2OOO The yield of the varietiesshown in Table3 was at a relatively low level in terms of sweetpotatoproductionalthoughit is c o m p a r a b l et o l o c a l l yo b s e r v e dp e a r l m i l l e t y i e l d s . T h e previousselectionof SP2013,SP2017and SP2007Aas bestperformingvarietieswas confirmedby the results. SP2006 showed good performanceunder dryland conditionsand shouldbe includedin the 1998i99advancedvarietyevaluation trials. The mass per plant producedby SP2003was one of the highest,yieldwas howeverstronglydecreasedby the high proportionof crackedtubers. varieties Table2. Drymattercontentof sweetpotato evaluated during the 1997/98 seasonat BaganiResearch Station Variety Dry mass(%) Variety SP2OOTA sP2016 35.3" sP2002 34.6 ub sP201 8 sP201 0 sP2014 34.3 abc 33.4 abc 33.4 abc sP2009 sP2003 sP2006 sP2019 SP2OOTB 32.8 b" sP201 3 28.2 d 27.3 d. 26.8 d" 26.0 "t 24.3'e sP2017 2 4 . 0s 2 2 . 9s .ttb F t55.945 0.007 P sP2001 32.6" lvlean CV zY.l SE Dry mass(%) 0.001 a,b'c'd'e,r'svalues with differentsuperscriptsdiffersignificantly Figure2. Sweetpotato trialharvestat BaganiResearch Station. at MashareADI and 8 June 1998 at MaheneneResearch Station. For the advancedtrialsonly the two rniddlerows of each plot were harvestedfor data recording. Data were analyzedby using SigmaStatANOVAand MS Excel.In the preliminaryvariety evaluationtrial the varieties SP2004, SP2012,SP2015and the localcheckSP1006did not produce any tubersand were left out of the analysis. The tuber dry matter content was determinedafter harvest using a drying was calculatedfrom the numberof oven. The establishment cuttings that were alive fourteen days after planting. Marketabletubers were those that were more than 3 cm in diameter at the thickest place. Yield was calculated by proportionwith the mass multiplication of the establishment per ha calculatedfrom massper plantand furthermultiplication with the proportionmarketablemassfrom whichthe proportion crackedtuber mass was subtracted. RESULTSAND DISCUSSION Figure3. Sweetpotato tastetestingat BaganiResearch Station. 1. Preliminary sweetpotato variety evaluation trial 2. Althoughthe trial receivedonly 194.5mm of rainafterplanting, varieties. a smallharvestwas possiblefor the best-performing The taste of varieties with high dry matter content is often most popular. AGRICOLA2OOO Advanced sweet potato variety evaluation trials Yieldperformanceis only shownfor MaheneneResearchStation as sweetpotatovarietyevaluationswere performedat this stationfor the first time duringthe 1997/98season. 71 Table3. performanceof sixteensweetpotatovarietiesin the Variety sP2013 sP2017 SP2OOTA sP2006 sP2016 sP2019 sP2010 sP2009 sP2003 sP2001 sP2008 sP2018 sP2011 SP2OOTB sP2014 (o/o) Fetahlishment vI.zn 100.00 95.80 "b 93.10 "b" 80.60 b" 100.00" 87.50 ub" 76.40" Mean CV SE 91.58 5.400 0.014 F 5. /OC 46.56 0.074 b" 0.072 b' 0.087 b" 0.063 b" 0.080 b" 98.50 " 0.00 2.258 2.O25 87.50 "b 1.96 1.630 82.40 .b 85.30 "b 94.80 " 17.50 0.00 1.452 1.211 41.49 83.80 uo 10.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.83 1.186 0.806 98.50 " 96.30 " 92.00" 81.20 ^b 0.050 b" 0.028 0.085 32.84 0.012 7.545 0.001 Totalmass MarketableCrackedmass Yeld perplant(kg) mass(%) perplant(kg) (Uha) 21.016 0.00 95 0.794 " sP2017 'b 19.379 0.00 94 sP2009 0.748 "b 17.975 0.01 97 sP2019 0.678 "b" 1 7.129 0.00 92 sP2013 0.669 "b"d 1 1.906 0 . 0 0 92 sP2018 0.471 ub"d 11.817 0.00 87 SP2OOTA 0.491 10.947 0.00 81 sP2002 0.487 "o'o abd 9.083 0.07 93 sP2003 0.429 b"d 8.314 0.02 89 sP2010 0.363 b"d 6.116 0.07 97 0.301 sP2011 "d 5.713 0.03 92 0.253 sP2012 d 1.207 0.02 85 0.075 Local Variety 0.477 91 Q.021 SE 0.040 25.78 0.01 0.006 5.54 5.799 H * 53.91 75,79 19.828 <0.001 0.048 <0.001 11.717 *TheH statisticis usedfoTANOVAon Ranksanalysiswhen data is not which normallydistributed.Valuesshownfor varietiesare medianson tfre anatysis is based instead of means' Different letters indicate significantlYdifferentvalues ",ui,avalues withina columndiffersignificantly withdifferentsuperscripts Resu|tsshowninTab|e4indicatethatthevarietiesperforming the top best in the Kavango and Caprivi region were also by Evaluations Station' Research performers at l\4ahenene resulted iurt"r" duringa farmer'sday heldafterharvesting of yield, marketability on based in selectionof fourvarieties yield' highest the with Varieties (Figure 3). tubersandtaste 72 7 1 . 1 0' 88.86 5.449 0.728 0.685 0.661 0.614 36.11 11.43 0.581 12.77 1.607 0.461 3.913 in the Table4. Performanceof twelvesweetpotatovarietiesevaluated StaResearch Mahenene at 1997/98 trial evaluation variety advanced tion. Mean 90.40" 3.695 0.013 0.001 P ", va[res wth differentsuperscriptswithina columndiffersignificantly CV F P 3.939 ?782 9 1. 1 0 " 0.027' 0.038" 95.80 "b 77.80 b" 3.99 13'68 0.00 9 1. 7 0 ^ 0.034 97.20 "b 84.60 "b 92.5U 0.180 "b u.u45 0.027 " 98.60 " Yield (Uha) Mass Cracked (%) Marketable Mass (%) 0 . 1 9 9" 91.70 ub" 98.60 " Mass per Plant (kg) 0 . 1 8 1" b 0.183 "b 94.40 "o 80.60 b" sP2002 station 1997/98preliminaryvarietyevaluationtrial at BaganiResearch 0.001 acceptabletaste and leastcrackedor misformedtuberswere i d e n t i f i e da s S P 2 0 1 7 ,S P 2 0 0 2 , S P 2 0 0 9 a n d S P 2 0 0 7 A ' AlthoughSP2018and SP2019showedhighyields,theirround tubershapewas seenas less marketablethan the longitudinal shapes. SP2013was not taken into considerationbecauseit yield had a virus infection.Table5 shows sweetpotatovariety potentialin terms of tuber formationand maturitywhich could be well evaluatedduring the 1997/98 season with the low rainfallat Mashareand SachingaResearchStations' Potentialyield of the'evaluatedvarietieswas measured by the total number of tubers initiated. The potentialfor early maturity was reflected in the proportion marketabletubers shown in Table 5. Varietiesthat could produce a relatively high proportionof marketabletubers from plantingin mid Lanuarythroughto the'last rains in mid April were perceived as early maturing.Earlymaturingvarietieswith high potential haveshownthe highestyieldsduringthe 1997/98rainyseason (Figure4). -A 1600/0 g B 8.0 .C ' l3=; soi;" 3 3 & : x f xf iF ffi& mnfuffieffi g- *- &Kl ffi | 4.0E E l3it ffilffil l #l f f i l , r . o P E Wl-l&ll q E { g e P ; 6.6 9 EilE8E*,.T, N d N c d 0 & a Frgwe 4 Comparisonof percentagemarketabletubers at Mashare StaAgriculturalDevelopmentInstitute(A) and MaheneneResearch Agricultural plant Mashare at tion (B) and total numberof tubers per (D) of ten Developmentlnstitute(C) and MaheneneResearchStation season' sweetpotatovarietiesevaluatedduringthe 1997/98 AGRICOLA2OOO Table5. Totalnumberof tubersper plantand proportionmarketabletubersharvestedfrom advancedsweetpotatovarietyevaluationtrialsduring 1997198at MaheneneResearchStation,MashareAgriculturalDevelopmentInstituteand SachingaResearchStation Variety 2002 LM 88.014 2003 JaponTS 20074 XushuA 2009 Tts 2534 2010Tts 3290 Total number of tubers per plant Mahenene Mashare Sachinga 6.896 " 3 . 1 6 7^ 1.192 2.480 d"l 6.617 .b 4.450 b"d cde 0.357 "f 4.064 "b 0.444 1.107 0.864 2.674 bcd 'l .$$Q oet 201'l Naveto 1.696 "f 0.6241 0.940 0.000 20'13Blesbok 2017 Kudu 4.959 abc 3.202 abc 0.889 6.664 ub 4.076 "d 6.696 "b 1 . 1 5 0f 4.192. 1.383 0.610 2018 Mafutha 2019 Ribbok Local1** Local2** Mean SE CV 3.251 2.948 abcd Marketabletubers (%) Mahenene Mashare Sachinga 44.3 59.2 b" 3 53.'l 99.4 17 43.1 62.0 b" 13 54.0 76.8 abc 0 oz.o 74.7 53.5 64.2 60.0 2.385 cde 1.218 0.723 r 0.905 "' 0.000 0.000 4.191 2.236 u . 3/ 5 14.21 u:z35 21.97 24.216 <0.001 0.799 0.107 U.U;l5 33.36 22.59 55.947 <0.001 1.244 r.35V F (H- for Sachinga) 28.281 P <0.001 6'1.9 50.7 59.1 56.8 o.322 b" b" b" ub b" 63.1 b" 58.7 b" 64.9 72.6 71.0 80.0 71.9 53.3" 69.4 0.022 10.69 5.779 <0.00'1 J 0 x 0 10 U 0 6.4 0.017 103.64 54.U66 <0.001 . The H statisticis usedfoTANOVAon Ranksanalysiswhen data is not normallydistributed.Valuesshownfor varietiesare medianson whichthe analysisis based insteadof means. * SPl010 at Mahenene,SP1005at Mashare,SP1016at Sachinga *" SP2012at Mahenene,SP1003at Mashare,SP'1024at Sachinga ANNEXA RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that, due to the unusuallylow rainfallduring the 1997/98 season, advanced variety evaluation is repeated in the 1998/99 season to consolidate the findings. Planting materials of the best-performing varieties will be multiplied and should be evaluated by farmers in collaboration with Farming Systems Research units orthe Directorate Extension and Engineering Services. REFERENCES procedures CAREY E.E. & D.M. REYNOSO.1996.Recommended for the evaluationof pathogen-tested sweet potatoclonesfrom ClP. C/PResearchGuide 6, ClP, Lima, Peru. LENHARDT,P.J. & B. RUSCH. 1996. The NamibianRoot Crops ResearchProject:Sweetpotatoand cassavaresearchin northern Namibia. MAWRD DARTAnnual ProgressReporf 1995/96. RUSCH, B. 1997. The NamibianRoot Crops ResearchProject: Evaluationof SweetPotatoCultivarsin the Okavangoand Caprivi. MAWRD DARTAnnual ProgressReport 1996197. SOENARJO,R. 1995.Betterculturalpracticesfor cassavaand sweet polato. Luapula Regional Research Station, Mansa, Zambia. AGRICOLA2OOO Sweetpotatovariety names and origin Variety Origin sP 2001 sP 2002 sP 2003 sP 2004 sP 2005 sP 2006 Name LM 88.002 LMBB.O14 JaoonTresmesinoSelecto Camote Yuca Zapallo Yan Shu '1 SP 2OO7A Xushu1B A SF 2OO7B sP 2008 l m b y3 1 0 2 ctP ctP Peru Peru Peru sP 2009 s P2 0 1 0 sP 2011 sP2012 sP 20't3 sP 2014 s P 2 0 15 sP 2016 sP2017 sP2018 sP2019 sP 1001 sP 1003 sP 1005 sP 1006 sP1010 sP'1012 sP1016 sP 1024 Tts 2634 Tts 3290 Naveto Chingovwa Blesbok Borrie Bosbok Brondal Koedoe Mafutha Ribbok Oshana Kavandja Shinguru Shinguru Ogongo Epalela Kanjoro Choto China China Unknown Burundi IITA IITA PapuaNew Guinea Zambia SouthAfrica South Africa SouthAfrica SouthAfrica South Africa South Africa SouthAfrica Oshana Caprivi (Shadikongoro Caprivi Caprivi (Bagani) Oshana Omusati(Epalela) Caprivi(Mpacha) Caprivi 73