212610 - Ontario

Transcription

212610 - Ontario

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # 212610
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Record of Site Condition Number
Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry
Certification Date
Current Property Use
Intended Property Use
Certificate of Property Use Number
Applicable Site Condition Standards**
Property Municipal Address
212610
2014/04/25
2013/11/25
Industrial
Community
No CPU
Stratified Site Conditions Standard, with Nonpotable Ground Water, Medium and Fine
Textured Soil, for Community property use
980 Lansdowne Avenue, Ontario, M6H 3Z4
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.
Filed Record of Site Condition # 212610 on 2014/04/25
1 of 44
RSC Information
Each field marked by an asterisk ( * ) must be completed.
Is the property used, or has it ever been used, in whole or in part for an industrial use or as a garage;
a bulk liquid dispensing facility, including a gasoline outlet; or for the operation of dry cleaning equipment? *
Yes
No
Is the property being used or has the property ever been used, in whole or in part
(a) for quarrying to excavate consolidated or unconsolidated aggregate; or
(b) for that aspect of the production of oil and gas consisting of the presence of an oil well or gas well on, in or under the property? *
Yes
No
Is the property currently used for an agricultural or other use, or a community use, an institutional use, a parkland use or a residential use? *
Yes
No
Select Type of RSC *
Phase 1 and 2 RSC
Phase 1 and 2 RSC with RA
2 of 44
Owner Information
Owners' General Information
Submitting Owner's Information
RSC Property Information
Environmental Condition
Owner's Information
Is the submitting owner(s) a Receiver for the Property? *
Yes
No
Is the submitting owner(s) represented by an Agent? *
Contaminant Concentrations
ESA Information
Yes
No
QP Profile Information
Certification Statement
Supporting Documents
3 of 44
Owner Information
Owner's Information
Type of Owner *
Owner Name *
Firm, Corporation or Partnership
Emsatec Canada Inc.
Street Number *
Street Name *
Apt No. /RR No.
940
Lansdowne Avenue
City, Town or Village *
Province *
Postal Code *
Country
ESA Information
Toronto
Ontario
M6H 3Z4
Canada
Submitting Owner's Contact Information
Contact First Name *
Contact Last Name *
Tom
Falus
Phone Number * (including area code)
Fax Number (including area code)
(416) 483-1066
Email Address
[email protected]
Owner's Information
Type of Owner *
Owner Name *
Firm, Corporation or Partnership
Edgewood Holdings Ltd.
Street Number *
Street Name *
940
Lansdowne Avenue
Apt No. /RR No.
Province *
Postal Code *
Country
Toronto
Ontario
M6H 3Z4
Canada
Owner's Contact Information
Contact First Name *
Contact Last Name *
Tom
Falus
Phone Number * (including area code)
(416) 483-1066
Fax Number (including area code)
Email Address
[email protected]
4 of 44
Owner Information
Property Address
Does the Property have a Municipal Address?
Property Address
Yes
Municipality Information
No
Property Reference Number
Geographical Reference/Area of
RSC Property
Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s)
*
Is the property administered by MNR under the Public Lands Act?
*
Yes
No
Street Number * Street Name *
980
Apt No. /RR No.
Lansdowne Avenue
Province *
Postal Code *
Toronto
Ontario
M6H 3Z4
ESA Information
5 of 44
Owner Information
Municipality & Property Address Information
Property Address
Lower or Single Tier Municipality *
Toronto
Tier of Municipality
Single Tier
RSC Property
The District Office of MOE *
Toronto District Office
Address of District Office of MOE
5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1
ESA Information
6 of 44
Owner Information
Municipality & Property Address Information
Property Address
Assessment Roll Number
1904003201000721
RSC Property
Property Identifier Number (PIN #)
213250364LT
ESA Information
7 of 44
Owner Information
Geo Reference & Other Properties Details
Geographical References
Property Address
UTM Coordinates
Datum
NAD 83
Zone *
RSC Property
17
Easting *
625,095.00
Northing *
4,836,340.00
ESA Information
Area of RSC Property
Total Area of RSC Property in Hectares *
0.062
8 of 44
Owner Information
Previous Submission Information
Previously Filed Record of Site Condition Number:
Property Address
Previously Filed Transition Notice Number:
RSC Property
ESA Information
9 of 44
Owner Information
Site Condition Information
Other Site Condition Information
Site Conditions for 2011 Generic
Standards
Is the RSC being submitted using the transition provision under Section 21.1 of the Regulation?
*
Yes
No
Risk Assessment Information
Property Use and Certification
Date
Additional Ground Water
Information
Remedial Action and Mitigation
Details
Area(s) of Potential Environmental
Concern
Table of Current/Past Property Uses
of Phase One Property
ESA Information
10 of 44
Owner Information
Standards
Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards
Is Property:
(i) Within an area of natural significance? or
Does Property:
(ii) Include or is adjacent to an area of natural significance or part of such an area? or
(ii) Include land that is within 30 m of an area of natural significance or part of such an area.
Yes
Date
No
Information
Details
Soil at the property has:
(i) a pH value for Surface Soil less than 5 or greater than 9 or
(ii) a pH value for Subsurface Soil less than 5 or greater than 11.
*
*
Yes
No
Concern
ESA Information
Is qualified person of the opinion that, given the characteristics of the property and the certifications the
qualified person would be required to make in a record of site condition in relation to the property as specified
in Schedule A, it is appropriate to apply this section to the property? *
Yes
No
What is the intended use of the property? *
Community
Is the property a shallow soil property?
*
Yes
No
Does the property include or is the property adjacent to a water body or does it include land that is within
30 metres of a water body? *
Yes
No
What is the Assessment/Restoration approach?
*
Background
Full Depth Generic
Stratified
What is the ground water condition for the property?
*
Potable
Non-potable
What is the texture of the soil?
*
Coarse
Medium and Fine
Applicable 2011 Generic Standard Table Number : TABLE 5
11 of 44
Owner Information
Has a Certificate of Property Use (CPU) been issued under section 168.6 of the Act for the RSC property?
Yes
No
Standards
Date
Information
Details
Concern
ESA Information
12 of 44
Owner Information
Property Use and Certification Date
Current Property Use and Certification Date
What is the current use of the property? *
Industrial
Standards
Certification Date *
2013/11/25
Date
Information
Details
Concern
ESA Information
13 of 44
Owner Information
Standards
Data
Information
Additional Ground Water Information
Has municipality been notified of non-potable ground water on site?
*
Yes
No
Municipality notified of non-potable water by?
*
Owner
QP
Local/Lower tier municipality non-potable water notification date *
2013/10/18
Details
Concern
ESA Information
14 of 44
Owner Information
Remedial Action & Mitigation
Soil Control or Treatment Measures
Standards
Identify the estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have
been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the
soil as measured in, or equivalent to, in-ground volume in cubic metres, and indicate the remediation process or
processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
Not applicable.
Data
Information
Identify the estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC
property as measured in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres.
1.5 cubic metres.
Details
Concern
Identify the estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the
RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property not
including any soil that may have been remediated off the property and brought back to the property as measured
in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres.
Not applicable.
ESA Information
Indicate if any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the
RSC property boundary has been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation.
Yes, As part of the remediation of the RSC property all fill materials were removed from the then-existing
ground surface to a depth of up to 3 metres across the entire RSC property. The excavation extended past
the RSC property boundaries and on to neighboring lands at the same municipal address. Verification
samples collected from the outer perimeter walls and floor of the excavated area, all satisfied the currently
applicable SCS.
15 of 44
Owner Information
Remedial Action & Mitigation
Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Standards
Identify and describe any ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property
prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing; or are or will be required for the
RSC property after the certification date.
Not applicable.
Data
Information
Identify the estimated volume in litres of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Not applicable.
Details
Concern
ESA Information
Other Treatment Measures
Other than the activities identified in the in the Soil or Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures above,
identify any constructed works that, prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing,
were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the
RSC property; or after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement
of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
Not applicable.
Indicate whether there are any monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or
replacement of any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC
property, after the certification date, and whether any monitoring requirements or requirements for care,
maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works are ground water management measures
or soil management measures.
Not applicable.
16 of 44
Owner Information
Potential Environmental Concern
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Are there areas of potential environmental concern? *
Yes
Standards
Data
Information
No
Click here for Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Form
Current and Past Property Use
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Click here for Table of Current and Past Property Use Form
Details
Area(s) of Potential
Environmental Concern
Table of Current/Past Property
Use of Phase One Property
ESA Information
17 of 44
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in SOIL
Contaminants Measured in
GROUND WATER
General Information Related to Soil Media
Is there no soil on, in or under the property? *
(Note there is “no soil” if either there is no soil on, in or under the property OR the soil present is not sufficient
to investigate, sample and analyze in a manner which will meet the requirements and objectives
of a phase two environmental site assessment)
Yes
No
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
18 of 44
Owner Information
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Surface Soil
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 1-30 *
Type of Measurement *
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1****
Minimum Detectable
5
65
µg/g
GROUND WATER
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2
Minimum Detectable
10
250
µg/g
Measured
54
2500
µg/g
SEDIMENTS
Minimum Detectable
50
6600
µg/g
Antimony
Measured
0.8
50
µg/g
Arsenic
Measured
4
18
µg/g
Barium
Measured
62
670
µg/g
Beryllium
Measured
0.5
10
µg/g
Cadmium
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1.9
µg/g
Chromium Total
Measured
18
160
µg/g
Cobalt
Measured
9.7
100
µg/g
Copper
Measured
22
300
µg/g
Lead
Measured
41
120
µg/g
Molybdenum
Measured
0.6
40
µg/g
Boron (Hot Water Soluble)*
Measured
0.29
2
µg/g
Nickel
Measured
20
340
µg/g
Selenium
Measured
0.4
5.5
µg/g
Silver
Minimum Detectable
0.2
50
µg/g
Thallium
Minimum Detectable
0.4
3.3
µg/g
Uranium
Minimum Detectable
0.5
33
µg/g
Vanadium
Measured
25
86
µg/g
Zinc
Measured
46
340
µg/g
Chromium VI
Minimum Detectable
0.2
10
µg/g
Cyanide (CN-)
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.051
µg/g
Mercury
Minimum Detectable
0.1
20
µg/g
Electrical Conductivity
Measured
0.366
1.4
mS/cm
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Minimum Detectable
0.1
1.1
µg/g
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
Measured
8.71
12
Naphthalene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
28
µg/g
Acenaphthylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.17
µg/g
ESA Information
Total # of Contaminants 101
19 of 44
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 31-60 *
Acenaphthene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
96
µg/g
GROUND WATER
Fluorene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
69
µg/g
Phenanthrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
16
µg/g
SEDIMENTS
Anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.74
µg/g
Fluoranthene
Measured
0.05
9.6
µg/g
Pyrene
Measured
0.06
96
µg/g
Benz[a]anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.96
µg/g
Chrysene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
9.6
µg/g
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.96
µg/g
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.96
µg/g
Benzo[a]pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.3
µg/g
Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.95
µg/g
Dibenz[a h]anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.1
µg/g
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
9.6
µg/g
Phenol
Minimum Detectable
0.5
9.4
µg/g
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Chlorophenol, 2-
Minimum Detectable
0.1
3.9
µg/g
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Minimum Detectable
0.1
14
µg/g
Dimethylphenol, 2,4-
Minimum Detectable
0.2
440
µg/g
Dichlorophenol, 2,4-
Minimum Detectable
0.1
4.2
µg/g
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
16
µg/g
Chloroaniline p-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
0.53
µg/g
Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) ***
Minimum Detectable
0.05
85
µg/g
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-
Minimum Detectable
0.1
4.2
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
10
µg/g
Biphenyl 1,1'-
Minimum Detectable
0.1
210
µg/g
Dimethylphthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Dinitrotoluene, 2,4 & 2,6-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1.2
µg/g
Diethyl Phthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Pentachlorophenol
Minimum Detectable
0.1
3.3
µg/g
ESA Information
20 of 44
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 61-90*
Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3'-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1
µg/g
GROUND WATER
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.2
35
µg/g
Dinitrophenol, 2,4-
Minimum Detectable
2
66
µg/g
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
25
µg/g
Vinyl Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.02
0.25
µg/g
Bromomethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Trichlorofluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
5.8
µg/g
Acetone
Minimum Detectable
0.5
28
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.48
µg/g
Methylene Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
9.3
µg/g
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
Minimum Detectable
0.05
3.2
µg/g
Dichloroethane, 1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.02
21
µg/g
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
0.5
88
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis-
Minimum Detectable
0.02
37
µg/g
Chloroform
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.18
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.05
µg/g
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
12
µg/g
Carbon Tetrachloride
Minimum Detectable
0.05
1.5
µg/g
Benzene
Minimum Detectable
0.02
0.4
µg/g
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.68
µg/g
Trichloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.61
µg/g
Bromodichloromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
18
µg/g
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
0.5
210
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.11
µg/g
Toluene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
78
µg/g
Dibromochloromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
13
µg/g
Ethylene dibromide
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Tetrachloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
21
µg/g
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.11
µg/g
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
21 of 44
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 91-120*
Chlorobenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2.7
µg/g
GROUND WATER
Ethylbenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
19
µg/g
Bromoform
Minimum Detectable
0.05
1.7
µg/g
Styrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
43
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.094
µg/g
Dichlorobenzene, 1,3-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
12
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.84
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
8.5
µg/g
Xylene Mixture
Minimum Detectable
0.05
30
µg/g
Dichloropropene,1,3-
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.21
µg/g
Hexane (n)
Minimum Detectable
0.05
88
µg/g
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
22 of 44
Owner Information
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Subsurface Soil
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Contaminant 1-30 *
Minimum Detectable
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
5
65
µg/g
Measured
18
250
µg/g
Measured
82
7200
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
50
8000
µg/g
Antimony
Measured
0.8
63
µg/g
Arsenic
Measured
6
47
µg/g
Barium
Measured
95
8600
µg/g
Beryllium
Measured
0.8
60
µg/g
Boron (total)
Measured
8
7900
µg/g
Cadmium
Minimum Detectable
0.48
7.9
µg/g
Chromium Total
Minimum Detectable
0.5
18000
µg/g
Cobalt
Measured
26
2500
µg/g
Copper
Measured
13.3
5600
µg/g
Lead
Measured
26
1000
µg/g
Molybdenum
Minimum Detectable
14
1200
µg/g
Nickel
Minimum Detectable
27
510
µg/g
Selenium
Minimum Detectable
0.4
1200
µg/g
Silver
Minimum Detectable
0.2
490
µg/g
Thallium
Minimum Detectable
0.4
33
µg/g
Uranium
Measured
0.6
300
µg/g
Vanadium
Measured
35
160
µg/g
Zinc
Measured
66
24000
µg/g
Chromium VI
Minimum Detectable
0.2
40
µg/g
Cyanide (CN-)
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.051
µg/g
Mercury
Minimum Detectable
0.1
30
µg/g
Measured
0.1
4.1
µg/g
Naphthalene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
220
µg/g
Acenaphthylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.17
µg/g
Acenaphthene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
620
µg/g
Fluorene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
69
µg/g
23 of 44
Owner Information
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 31-60 *
Phenanthrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
300
µg/g
Anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.74
µg/g
Fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
360
µg/g
Pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2900
µg/g
Benz[a]anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
36
µg/g
Chrysene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
360
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
36
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
36
µg/g
Benzo[a]pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
3.6
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
36
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
3.6
µg/g
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
360
µg/g
Phenol
Minimum Detectable
0.5
53
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
16
µg/g
Chlorophenol, 2-
Minimum Detectable
0.1
23
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
14
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.2
440
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
52
µg/g
Measured
1
22
µg/g
Chloroaniline p-
Measured
0.5
0.53
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
85
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
4.2
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.1
30
µg/g
Biphenyl 1,1'-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
210
µg/g
Dimethylphthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.5
17
µg/g
Diethyl Phthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.5
µg/g
Pentachlorophenol
Minimum Detectable
0.1
3.3
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.5
25
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.2
8300
µg/g
24 of 44
25 of 44
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 61-90*
Dinitrophenol, 2,4-
Minimum Detectable
1
66
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
25
µg/g
Vinyl Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.02
0.28
µg/g
Bromomethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
5.8
µg/g
Acetone
Minimum Detectable
0.5
28
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.53
µg/g
Methylene Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.05
9.8
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
11
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
3.4
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.02
45
µg/g
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
0.5
380
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.02
43
µg/g
Chloroform
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.19
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.05
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
12
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
1.7
µg/g
Benzene
Minimum Detectable
0.02
4.4
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.75
µg/g
Trichloroethylene
Measured
0.49
0.69
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
63
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.5
210
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.13
µg/g
Toluene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
78
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
61
µg/g
Ethylene dibromide
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Tetrachloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
21
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.14
µg/g
Chlorobenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2.7
µg/g
Ethylbenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
19
µg/g
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
26 of 44
27 of 44
Owner Information
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 91-120*
Bromoform
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2.7
µg/g
Styrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
75
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.11
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
67
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.97
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
68
µg/g
Xylene Mixture
Minimum Detectable
0.05
30
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.24
µg/g
Hexane (n)
Minimum Detectable
0.05
88
µg/g
28 of 44
29 of 44
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in Ground Water
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 1-30 *
Minimum Detectable
25
750
µg/L
GROUND WATER
Minimum Detectable
100
150
µg/L
Measured
160
500
µg/L
SEDIMENTS
Minimum Detectable
100
500
µg/L
Antimony
Measured
0.9
20000
µg/L
Arsenic
Measured
5.7
1900
µg/L
Barium
Measured
171
29000
µg/L
Beryllium
Minimum Detectable
0.5
67
µg/L
Boron (total)
Measured
241
45000
µg/L
Cadmium
Measured
0.3
2.7
µg/L
Chromium Total
Minimum Detectable
2
810
µg/L
Cobalt
Measured
3.3
66
µg/L
Copper
Measured
4.4
87
µg/L
Lead
Measured
0.8
25
µg/L
Molybdenum
Measured
15.2
9200
µg/L
Nickel
Measured
2.3
490
µg/L
Selenium
Measured
1.8
63
µg/L
Silver
Minimum Detectable
0.2
1.5
µg/L
Thallium
Minimum Detectable
0.3
510
µg/L
Uranium
Measured
14
420
µg/L
Vanadium
Measured
0.5
250
µg/L
Zinc
Measured
7.1
1100
µg/L
Mercury
Minimum Detectable
0.02
2.8
µg/L
Chromium VI
Minimum Detectable
5
140
µg/L
Cyanide (CN-)
Minimum Detectable
2
66
µg/L
Naphthalene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
6400
µg/L
Acenaphthylene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
1.8
µg/L
Acenaphthene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
1700
µg/L
Fluorene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
400
µg/L
Phenanthrene
Minimum Detectable
0.1
580
µg/L
ESA Information
30 of 44
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 31-60 *
Anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.1
2.4
µg/L
GROUND WATER
Fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
130
µg/L
Pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
68
µg/L
SEDIMENTS
Benz[a]anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
4.7
µg/L
Chrysene
Minimum Detectable
0.1
1
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.75
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.4
µg/L
Benzo[a]pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.01
0.81
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
0.2
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
0.52
µg/L
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Minimum Detectable
0.2
0.2
µg/L
Phenol
Minimum Detectable
1
12000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
300000
µg/L
Chlorophenol, 2-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
3300
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
20000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
39000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.3
4600
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
850
µg/L
Chloroaniline p-
Minimum Detectable
1
400
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1800
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
230
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.2
1600
µg/L
Biphenyl 1,1'-
Minimum Detectable
0.5
2200
µg/L
Dimethylphthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.5
38
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
2900
µg/L
Diethyl Phthalate
Minimum Detectable
0.5
38
µg/L
Pentachlorophenol
Minimum Detectable
0.5
62
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
640
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.5
140
µg/L
Dinitrophenol, 2,4-
Minimum Detectable
10
11000
µg/L
ESA Information
31 of 44
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 61-90*
Minimum Detectable
0.1
15
µg/L
GROUND WATER
Minimum Detectable
0.8
4400
µg/L
Bromomethane
Minimum Detectable
0.68
56
µg/L
SEDIMENTS
Minimum Detectable
0.8
2500
µg/L
Acetone
Measured
43
130000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
1.2
17
µg/L
Methylene Chloride
Minimum Detectable
1.2
5500
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.8
17
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.8
1400
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
1.2
3100
µg/L
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Measured
2.5
1500000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.8
17
µg/L
Chloroform
Minimum Detectable
0.8
22
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.8
12
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
1.2
6700
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.8
8.4
µg/L
Benzene
Minimum Detectable
0.8
430
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.8
140
µg/L
Trichloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.8
17
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.8
85000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
4
580000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.8
30
µg/L
Toluene
Measured
1.2
18000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.4
82000
µg/L
Ethylene dibromide
Minimum Detectable
0.4
0.83
µg/L
Tetrachloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.8
17
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.4
28
µg/L
Chlorobenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.4
630
µg/L
Ethylbenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.4
2300
µg/L
Bromoform
Minimum Detectable
0.4
770
µg/L
ESA Information
32 of 44
Owner Information
Measured
*
Concentration
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
Contaminant 91-120*
Styrene
Measured
0.4
9100
µg/L
GROUND WATER
Measured
0.4
15
µg/L
Measured
0.4
9600
µg/L
Measured
0.4
67
µg/L
Measured
0.4
9600
µg/L
Measured
1.2
45
µg/L
Xylene Mixture
Measured
0.8
4200
µg/L
Hexane (n)
Measured
0.8
520
µg/L
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
33 of 44
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in Sediments
Has sediment sampling been conducted at the property?
*
Yes
No
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
34 of 44
Owner Information
Laboratory Information
Laboratory Name *
AGAT Laboratories
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
35 of 44
Owner Information
ESA Information
ESA Reports
Phase One ESA Reports
The date the last work on the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance
components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done.
ESA Information
Phase Two ESA Reports
2013/11/30
*
Type of Report *
Phase One ESA
Report Title *
Date of Report * Author of Report *
Name of Consulting
Organization
Phase I Environmental
2013/12/02
Site Assessment
T.A. McIelwain,
Part of Block
P.Eng.,
7,Golder
Part
QP,
ofAssociates
Block
Dulce O,
Reyes,
Plan
Ltd.M-208
M.Sc. at 98
Phase One Reports and Other
Documents
Phase Two Reports and Other
Documents
36 of 44
Owner Information
ESA Information
ESA Reports
The date the last work on the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site
investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done.
ESA Information
2013/11/25
*
Type of Report *
Phase Two ESA
Report Title *
Date of Report * Author of Report *
Name of Consulting
Organization
Phase II Environmental
2013/12/30
Site Assessment
T.A. McIelwain,
Part of Block
P.Eng.,
7,
Golder
Part
QP,
of
Associates
Kelly
BlockOullahan,
O, Plan
Ltd. M-208
B.Sc. at 9
Documents
Documents
37 of 44
Owner Information
ESA Information
Reports and Other Documents
Phase 1 Reports and Other Documents
ESA Information
List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 1 ESA relied on in certifying
the information set out in Section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 1 ESA
Report Title
Date of Report
Author of Report
Name of Consulting
Organization for Report
Documents
Documents
38 of 44
Owner Information
ESA Information
Reports and Other Documents
Phase 2 Reports and Other Documents
List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 2 ESA relied on in making
any certifications in the RSC in relation to the Phase 2 ESA or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 2 ESA
ESA Information
Report Title
Date of Report
Author of Report
Name of Consulting
Organization for Report
Documents
Documents
39 of 44
Owner Information
ESA Information
QP Information
QP Information
First Name *
Middle Name
Last Name *
Thomas
A
McIelwain
Which one of the following licences under
the Professional Engineers Act do you hold? *
Licence Number *
Licence
30502504
Which one of the following memberships under
the Professional Geoscientists Act do you hold? *
None
Is the QP Employed? *
Yes
No
Employer Name *
Golder Associates Ltd.
QP Contact Information
Phone Number *
Fax Number *
Email
(905) 723-2727
(905) 723-2182
[email protected]
*
QP Mailing Address Information
Street Number *
100
Street Name *
Apt No. / RR No.
Scotia Court
Province *
Postal Code *
Whitby
Ontario
L1N 8Y6
40 of 44
Owner Information
QP Certification Statement F
As the qualified person, I certify that: *
ESA Information
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information
gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has
been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as
required by the regulation.
A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the
information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required,
has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as
required by the regulation.
The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only
and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.
As of 2013/11/25, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental
site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling,
there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under
the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property
will be put, as specified in the RSC.
QP Certification Statement
Owner Certification Statement
Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the
supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given
written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of
the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in
which the property is located.
As of 2013/11/25, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase
two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the
applicable stratified site condition standards prescribed by section 39 of the regulation for all
contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC
is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant
Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.
As of 2013/11/25, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant
in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been
performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to
Applicable Site Condition Standards.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site
condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains
a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own
due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information
in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally
accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science
profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held
a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property
which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment
or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are
true as of 2013/11/25.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
I, the qualified person named below, on the date stated below, make all of the stated certifications applicable to
the qualified person in this Part of the record of site condition.
Thomas A McIelwain
2014/02/28
41 of 44
Owner Information
Click here to download Firm, Corp, Other Form
ESA Information
QP Certification Statement
42 of 44
Owner Information
Please note, only PDF attachments will be accepted with the exception of the
Property Specific Standard, which must be an Excel document.
Certificate of Status or equivalent *
Cert Status.pdf
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property *
ESA Information
LegalLetter.pdf
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) *
Deed.pdf
A Current plan of Survey *
Survey.pdf
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern *
Block 7 APECTable.pdf
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property *
TableofCandPUses.pdf
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model *
CSM.pdf
Owner Certification Statement *
Owner Authorization.pdf
43 of 44
44 of 44
Certificate of Compliance
Certificat de conformité
Canada Business Corporations Act
s. 263.1
Loi canadienne sur les sociétés par actions
art. 263.1
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
Corporate name / Dénomination sociale
307662-8
Corporation number / Numéro de société
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the corporation
named above:
JE CERTIFIE, par la présente, que la société cidessus mentionnée :
• exists under the Canada Business
Corporations Act;
• existe en vertu de la Loi canadienne sur les
sociétés par actions;
• has filed the required annual returns; and
• a déposé les rapports annuels exigés; et
• has paid all prescribed fees required.
• a acquitté les droits prescrits.
Marcie Girouard
Director / Directeur
2014-02-20
Issuance date (YYYY-MM-DD)
Date d'émission (AAAA-MM-JJ)
PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER
LAND
PAGE 1 OF 3
REGISTRY
OFFICE #66
PREPARED FOR Belluomini
ON 2013/11/06 AT 11:54:55
21325−0364 (LT)
SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
BLOCK 7, PLAN 66M2496 ; S/T EASEMENT IN FAVOUR OF ROGERS CABLE COMMUNICATIONS INC. AS IN AT2348081 PARTIALLY RELEASED BY AT2454984, AT2982989 AND
AT2982975; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT OVER PART 4 ON PLAN 66R19002 AS IN E548950; SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT OVER BLOCK 7, PLAN 66M2496 IN FAVOUR OF BLOCK
3, PLAN 66M2496 AS IN AT3051154; CITY OF TORONTO
PROPERTY REMARKS:
ESTATE/QUALIFIER:
FEE SIMPLE
ABSOLUTE
RECENTLY:
SUBDIVISION FROM 21325−0357
OWNERS’ NAMES
EDGEWOOD HOLDINGS LIMITED
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
CAPACITY
REG. NUM.
DATE
INSTRUMENT TYPE
PIN CREATION DATE:
2012/04/11
SHARE
AMOUNT
PARTIES FROM
CERT/
CHKD
PARTIES TO
** PRINTOUT INCLUDES ALL DOCUMENT TYPES AND DELETED INSTRUMENTS SINCE: 2012/04/11 **
C305412Z
1986/07/31
APL ANNEX REST COV
C305413
1986/07/31
CHARGE
C
*** DELETED AGAINST THIS PROPERTY ***
CANADIAN GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY LIMITED
E548953
2002/06/07
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
OLYMPIA ELEVATOR SERVICE LIMITED
REMARKS: DELETED PURSUANT TO AT3051156 ON 2012/12/12 BY L.WANG
AT441024
2004/03/26
TRANSFER EASEMENT
APL CH NAME INST
GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
CANADIAN GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY LIMITED
GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA PROPERTY INC.
REMARKS: C305413
AT452297
2004/04/07
TRANSFER OF CHARGE
REMARKS: RE:C305413
AT1511978
2007/07/19
NOTICE
AT1511979
2007/07/19
POSTPONEMENT
$2 CITY OF TORONTO
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
C
CITY OF TORONTO
REMARKS: C305413 TO AT1511978
AT2215114
2009/10/29
TRANSFER EASEMENT
$2 EMSATEC CANADA INC.
ROGERS CABLE COMMUNICATIONS INC.
C
AT2348081
2010/04/09
TRANSFER EASEMENT
$2 EMSATEC CANADA INC.
ROGERS CABLE COMMUNICATIONS INC.
C
NOTE: ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY.
NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL UP.
LAND
PAGE 2 OF 3
REGISTRY
OFFICE #66
ON 2013/11/06 AT 11:54:55
21325−0364 (LT)
REG. NUM.
DATE
INSTRUMENT TYPE
AMOUNT
PARTIES FROM
AT2859313
2011/11/02
CHARGE
66M2496
2012/03/22
PLAN SUBDIVISION
AT2972520
2012/03/22
APL INH ORDER−LAND
CITY OF TORONTO
AT2982967
2012/04/03
NO SUB AGREEMENT
CITY OF TORONTO
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
C
AT2982968
2012/04/03 POSTPONEMENT
REMARKS: AT2859313 TO AT2982967
AVIVA INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982969
REMARKS: C305413 & AT452297 TO AT2982967
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982970
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982971
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC.
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982972
REMARKS: E548953 TO AT2982967
CITY OF TORONTO
C
AT2982987
2012/04/03
APL ANNEX REST COV
AT2982990
2012/04/03
APL DEL INH ORDER
$9,000,000 EMSATEC CANADA INC.
CERT/
CHKD
PARTIES TO
AVIVA INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
C
C
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
REMARKS: EFFECT ALL OF BLOCKS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7, PLAN 66M−2496
C
CITY OF TORONTO
REMARKS: AT2972520.
AT3051154
2012/06/20
TRANSFER EASEMENT
$2 EDGEWOOD HOLDINGS LIMITED
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
REMARKS: PLANNING ACT STATEMENTS
AT3051156
2012/06/20
TRANSFER REL&ABAND
*** COMPLETELY DELETED ***
GENERAL ELECTRIC PROPERTY INC.
EMSATEC CANADA INC.
C
LAND
PAGE 3 OF 3
REGISTRY
OFFICE #66
ON 2013/11/06 AT 11:54:55
21325−0364 (LT)
REG. NUM.
DATE
INSTRUMENT TYPE
AMOUNT
PARTIES FROM
CERT/
CHKD
PARTIES TO
NEUDORFER−KATES CORPORATION
REMARKS: E548953.
AT3051157
2012/06/20
DISCH OF CHARGE
*** COMPLETELY DELETED ***
REMARKS: C305413.
AT3176790
2012/11/16 BYLAW
CITY OF TORONTO
REMARKS: BY−LAW NO. 1415−2012 − TO DESIGNATE THE PROPERTY FORMERLY KNOWN MUNICIPALLY AS 948 LANSDOWNE AVENUE AND 20 FOUNDRY AVENUE AND NOW KNOWN AS 31
FOUNDRY AVENUE (CANADA FOUNDRY COMPANY POWERHOUSE) AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST.
C
AT3261548
2013/03/22 BYLAW
REMARKS: MUNICIPALITY BYLAW 165−2013
C
CITY OF TORONTO
APEC Table
980 Lansdowne Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
04-1182-063 (1007)
Area of Potential
Location of Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern on Phase
One Property
Potentially
Contaminating
Activity
Location of PCA
(on-Site or offSite)
Contaminants of
Potential Concern
Media Potentially Impacted
(Groundwater, soil and/or
Sediment)
A. Vicinity of Historical and
Current
Storage
of
(PCBs)
On-Site (throughout
the Site)
Transformer
Manufacturing,
Processing or Use
Off-Site
within
Building 10 (to the
north
of
the
western portion of
the
Site)
and
Building 18 (to the
east of the Site)
PCBs
Soil, Groundwater
B. On-Site and vicinity of
Off-Site Spur Lines
On-Site
(eastern
portion of Site)
Rail Yards, Tracks
and Spurs
On-Site (within the
eastern portion of
the Site) and offSite
to
the
southeast
and
southwest.
Creosote (PAHs)
Soil, Groundwater
C. Reported Presence of
On-Site Fill Materials
On-Site (throughout
Site)
Importation of Fill
of
Unknown
Quality
On-Site (throughout
the Site)
Metals
inorganics
and
Soil, Groundwater
D.
Reported
on-Site
impacts from historical
industrial
operations
(throughout the Site from
surrounding properties)
On-Site (throughout
Site)
Historical
Chemical
Manufacturing,
Processing
and
Bulk Storage
Off-Site
(from
surrounding
properties to the
north, east, west
and south)
PCBs, PHCs F1-F4,
PAHs, BNAs, VOCs
including BTEX.
Soil, Groundwater
E. Vicinity of Historical offSite Fuel Oil USTs
On-Site
(western
portion of the Site)
Gasoline
and
Associated
Products Storage
in Fixed Tanks
Off-Site (south of
the western portion
of the Site)
PHCs F1-F4, BTEX
Soil, Groundwater
APEC Table
04-1182-063 (1007)
Area of Potential
Location of Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern on Phase
One Property
Potentially
Contaminating
Activity
Location of PCA
(on-Site or offSite)
Contaminants of
Potential Concern
Media Potentially Impacted
(Groundwater, soil and/or
Sediment)
F. Vicinity of Historical
Chemical Manufacturing,
Processing
and
Bulk
Storage
On-Site (throughout
the Site)
Chemical
Manufacturing,
Processing
and
Bulk Storage
Off-Site
(from
properties to the
north, south, east
and west of the
Site)
PHCs F1-F4, PAHs,
BNAs,
VOCs
including BTEX
Soil and Groundwater
Current and Past Uses of the Site
Year(s)
June 7, 1887 to
March 13, 1888
13 March 1888 to
March 20, 1901
Description of Property Use
Property Use
Other Observations from Aerial
Photographs, Fire Insurance
Plans, Etc.
Vacant
Agricultural or
other use
The chain of title indicates the name
of the owner. No aerial photograph
coverage available for prior to 1947.
No other information prior to 1901.
Vacant
Agricultural or
other use
No aerial photograph coverage
available for prior to 1947. The chain
of title indicates that the Phase One
Property was purchased by the
Canadian General Electric Company
Limited in 1901.
Industrial operations of the Canadian
General Electric Company.
Industrial use
No aerial photograph coverage
available for prior to 1947. The Site
appears to consist of paved vacant
land adjacent to off-Site Building 10
in the 1947 aerial photograph.
Successive aerial photographs of
1950, 1963, 1973 and 1983 depict
the Site as paved vacant driveways
and parking areas with temporarily
stored materials (due to the scale of
the photographs, the nature of the
stored materials could not be
confirmed).
Name of Owner
Simeon Herman
The Land
Security
Company
A spur line was historically located along
the eastern portion of the Site, running
from north to south.
March 20, 1901 to
July 31, 1986
Canadian
General Electric
Company Limited
04-1182-063 (1007)
The Site was used as a paved vacant
driveway and parking areas of off-Site
Building 10 from the early 1900s until
approximately 2008.
Based on a 1964 FIP including the
Site area, a spur line was located
along the eastern portion of the Site,
running from north to south.
Year(s)
Property Use
Name of Owner
04-1182-063 (1007)
Plans, Etc.
The 1971 Inspection Report
indicates that an off-Site building
adjacent to the north and west Site
boundaries was constructed in 1904
and used as a power house.
The Canadian General Electric
Shops appear listed at the former
Site address (940 Lansdowne
Avenue) in the 1950 city directories,
and as the Canadian General
Electric Co. Ltd. in the reviewed city
directories of 1960-1980.
In 1986, the Site is sold to Canada Square
Company.
July 31, 1986 to
June 7, 2002
June 7, 2002 to
Present
Canada Square
Development
Corporation Ltd
Emsatec Canada
Inc.
Industrial use
approximately 2008.
approximately 2008.
According to the chain of title, the
Site was sold to the Canada Square
Company in July of 1986.
An aerial photograph of 1992 and a
Google Earth image of 2002 depict
the Site as paved vacant driveways
and parking areas with temporarily
stored materials (due to the scale of
the photographs, the nature of the
stored materials could not be
confirmed).
Industrial use
Phase One Property was sold on
June 2002 to Emsatec Canada Inc.
and Edgewood Holdings Limited,
Year(s)
Property Use
Name of Owner
The Site has consisted of unpaved,
undeveloped land since 2008 to the
present.
The Site has consisted of unpaved,
undeveloped land since 2008 to the
present.
June 7, 2002 to
Present
Edgewood
Holdings Limited
(sale from
Canada Square
Development
Corporation Ltd.)
04-1182-063 (1007)
Plans, Etc.
which are reportedly the current
owners.
Google Earth images of 2005, 2007
depict the Site as paved vacant
driveways and parking areas. The
2012 Google Earth image depicts
the Site as unpaved vacant land
with parked vehicles and inferred
temporary mobile units.
Industrial use
Phase One Property was sold on
June 2002 to Emsatec Canada Inc.
and Edgewood Holdings Limited,
which are reportedly the current
owners.
Google Earth images of 2005, 2007
depict the Site as paved vacant
driveways and parking areas. The
2012 Google Earth image depicts
the Site as unpaved vacant land
with parked vehicles and inferred
temporary mobile units.
PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
The Phase II ESA Conceptual Site Model is described below:
1.0
1.1
SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS
Physical Setting
The Site consists of an approximately 0.15 acre (0.063 ha) irregular-shaped parcel of land which was noted to
consist of vacant, undeveloped land. The Site is located along the south side of Powerhouse Street and
approximately 40 m west of Lansdowne Avenue, in Toronto, Ontario. The Site location is indicated on Figure 1.
Based on information collected as part of this Phase I ESA, prior to 1901, the Site was reportedly owned by a
private individual. The first developed use of the Phase One Property was sometime prior to 1904. In 1901,
according to a chain of title completed for the Site, the Site was purchased by the Canadian General Electric
Company Limited (“GE”). A building adjacent to the north and west boundaries of the Site was constructed in
1904 and used as a power house. The Site was reportedly used as paved parking and a private driveway. GE
sold the Site to the Canada Square Company in July of 1986, which subsequently sold the Site in June 2002 to
Emsatec Canada Inc. and to Edgewood Holdings Limited, the current owners.
The surrounding properties mainly consist of residential and industrial land uses. Surrounding properties were
observed to consist of the following: To the north, Powerhouse Street was followed by a residential condominium
sales office (northwest), and a residential apartment building known as the “Foundry Lofts” at 1100 Lansdowne
Avenue (northeast). To the east, a vacant parcel of land identified as Block 2 North was followed by Lansdowne
Avenue; monitoring well installations were noted within Block 2 North. Further to the east of the Site, a
residential apartments building known as the “Brownstones Rental Residences” at 1111-1201 Lansdowne
Avenue and Brandon Avenue were noted. Vacant, undeveloped parcels of land identified as Block 5 North and
Block 5 were noted immediately south of the Site, including an unpaved driveway and groundwater monitoring
wells. Further to the south, a vacant, undeveloped parcel of land identified as Block 8 was noted. A mobile
building and a fenced property were noted approximately 90 m southeast of the Site. A building (Building 36) is
located approximately 190 m southeast of the Site, within the fenced property and reportedly belongs to General
Electric. Three approximately 1,200 L ASTs (for gasoline (2), and diesel) as well as two 205 L drums (one of
which included a pump) were noted to be located approximately 130 m to the south of the Site, in a fenced area,
over a gravel covered surface. No staining or leaks were noted on the gravel-covered surface in the vicinity of
the ASTs or drums. Three steel containers and an exterior propane storage area were noted to be located
immediately north of the off-Site ASTs. Two approximately 1,100 L plastic totes were noted to be stored over
metal skids over the top of the roof of one of the steel containers. An excavated parcel of land identified as
Block 6 was noted 130 m south of the Site, followed by C.P. Railways. To the west of the Site, Foundry Avenue
is followed by a residential apartment building and C.N. Railways. A Toronto Hydro Electric Station is located
approximately 80 m west of the Site. Figure 2 shows the surrounding land use.
Although the Site is currently not serviced, the majority of the surrounding areas are serviced with municipal
water, sanitary sewers and storm sewers. Services are available for the Site and accessible from the adjacent
streets which could be connected (if needed) during re-development of the Site with a proposed vehicle
roadway. There were no potable water wells observed or reported on-Site or within the study area (i.e. with a
250 m radius of the Site).
Project No: 04-1182-063
May 2013
1/9
It is noted that Golder understands that the Site is proposed to be commercially re-developed as a roadway.
Further, Golder is not aware of any proposed buildings or other structures which may be constructed on the Site
during its future development.
1.2
Topography and Drainage
The Site topography appeared to flat, with areas that appeared to have been backfilled. Surrounding properties
appeared to slope slightly to the south.
No surface water bodies are present within the boundaries of the Site. The nearest surface water body is a
tributary of Grenadier Pond, located approximately 2 km southwest of the Site.
1.3
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
The Site is not considered to be environmentally sensitive, nor is it within 30 metres of an area of natural
significance.
1.4
Shallow Soil Property or Water Body
The Site is not a shallow soil property. All soil borings constructed at the Site encountered a minimum of 6.1
metres of soil. This Site does not include all or part of a water body, nor is it within 30 metres of a water body.
1.5
Geological Conditions
Geological mapping indicates that the surface geology in the vicinity of the Site is expected to consist of glacial
lake deposits underlain by glacial deposits of till (Sharpe, D. R. et al, 1997, Surficial Geology of the Greater
Toronto and Oak Ridges Moraine Area, Southern Ontario; Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 3062, Scale
1:200,000). The Site is situated approximately 300 m south of the glacial Lake Iroquois shoreline bluff (which
approximates Davenport Road in this area), and lies within the glacial lake basin. The glacial lake deposits are
mapped as sand to silty sand ranging from 1 m to 50 m thick. The underlying till is known as the Newmarket Till,
a regional aquitard, which has a matrix of silty sand to sand. Bedrock in the vicinity of the Subject Property is
expected to consist of Upper Ordovician shale, limestone, dolostone and siltstone (Ontario Geological Survey,
1991, Bedrock Geology of Ontario, Southern Sheet; Ontario Geological Survey, Map 2544, Scale 1:1,000,000).
Of the MOE Water Well Records within 500 m of the Site, one water well record indicates that bedrock consists
of shale at a depth of about 24 m below grade.
Based on conditions encountered in the boreholes drilled in 2013, as part of the Phase II ESA activities, the
subsurface conditions included fill material which extended to depths of ground surface to 1.8 metres below
ground surface (“mbgs”) and was generally comprised of sandy silt to clayey silt. Below the fill material, native
sandy silt to clayey silt were encountered which extended beyond the depths investigated (6.1 mbgs). Based on
calculated hydraulic conductivity measurements from on-Site grain size analyses, the hydraulic conductivity for
-6
the soil encountered on Site was estimated to be 5.5 x10 centimetres per second (“cm/s”). The underlying
sandy silt to silty clay till is expected to function as an aquitard.
The soil was previously assessed throughout the Site to limits of native soil established to satisfy the applicable
Site Condition Standards (“SCS”). The soil assessment/remediation involved excavation and testing of fill and
native soil throughout the Site extending to the Site boundaries to a depth of 2.4 mbgs, and backfilling of the
excavation with fill material demonstrated to satisfy the applicable SCS. Following soil remediation at the Site,
Project No: 04-1182-063
May 2013
2/9
this Phase II ESA Site investigation program was designed to assess whether groundwater contamination was
present on Site related to the areas of potential environmental concern, identified in Section 3.1 herein. The
geological cross-section locations are indicated on Figure 3. Figures 4 and 5 provide the geological crosssections of the Site.
1.6
Groundwater Levels, Flow Direction, Hydraulic Gradient
Groundwater elevations and depths as measured in the shallow monitoring wells installed by Golder are
presented on Figure 6, along with the resulting contours and interpreted groundwater flow direction. The
following observations were made:

On October 30, 2013, groundwater levels at the three on-Site shallow monitoring wells (BH13-1, BH13-3
and BH13-5) ranged from 0.79 mbgs to 1.55 mbgs, with elevations ranging from 121.78 metres above sea
level (“masl”) to 122.33 masl. The shallow groundwater flow direction at the Site was inferred to be to the
southwest;

On October 30, 2013, groundwater levels in the three deep monitoring wells (BH13-2, BH13-4 and BH13-6)
ranged in elevation from were 1.50 mbgs and 5.96 mbgs, and 116.88 and 122.02 masl in elevation. Based
on investigations completed on neighbouring properties, groundwater flow in the deep aquifer is generally
to the southeast. The measured elevation in BH13-2 appears to represent a local anomaly that if
representative, would indicate deep squifer flow to the northeast at the RSC property;

The shallow groundwater flow direction at the Site was inferred to be to the southwest. The deep
groundwater flow for the Site was not established and since the monitoring wells in the shallow aquifer
system met the SCS, the deep groundwater flow direction is not required; and,

Based on the groundwater elevation contours of the groundwater monitoring event on October 30, 2013,
the horizontal hydraulic gradient within the shallow aquifer at the Site was estimated to be 0.04 m/m.
1.7
Influence of Subsurface Structure or Utilities
Buildings were not present at the Site at the time of the Phase II ESA field investigation or historically present at
the Site. Utility drawings, dated December 2001, were reviewed as part of the 2013 Phase I ESA which noted
the following (in relation to the Site):

At the time of the 2001 utility drawings, an electrical line crossed the central-eastern portion of the Site
(from west to east), and an electrical line was also noted to cross the central portion of the Site from north
to south. Two electrical vaults (EV2 and EV10) were present along the southern boundary of the Site and
the northwestern corner of the Site (adjacent to off-Site Building 10), respectively.

An underground steam line was located along the western portion of the Site running north-south.
An aboveground steam line crossed the southern portion of the Site from west to east.

At the time of the 2001 utility drawings, no hydrogen chambers or hydrogen lines were located within
the Site.
Project No: 04-1182-063
May 2013
3/9

Water lines were noted across the central portions of the Site, running from north to south (within the
eastern portion of the Site) and from west to east (within the western portion of the Site), respectively.

A manhole was noted immediately exterior to the north of the Site; and a sewer line was noted within the
eastern portion of the Site running from north to south.
At the time of the Site reconnaissance, a concrete pad was noted within the northwestern portion of the Site
which was reportedly historically associated with a hydro vault. Prior to and during the Site remediation,
subsurface utilities within the Site were removed. Historic subsurface utilities may have affected contaminant
distribution however, given that shallow soil impacts within the shallow fill were removed, the likelihood of
contaminant transport via subsurface utilities affecting other areas is considered redundant.
2.0
2.1
SUMMARY OF ONTARIO REGULATION 153/04 PHASE I AND II
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS
Summary of the O. Reg 153/04 Phase I ESA
Table 2 of O. Reg. 153/04 (as amended), identifies potentially contaminating activities (“PCAs”), which if
currently or historically carried out at a site, trigger the need for a Phase II ESA in order to support the filing of a
Record of Site Condition. Based on the information obtained as part of Golder’s Phase I ESA completed in
December 2013, the following PCAs were previously carried out at the Site:

Electrical Equipment or Transformer Manufacturing, Processing or Use - Based on the review of the Ecolog
ERIS report the historical storage of PCBs by the Canadian General Electric Company, at Building 18,
which was historically located immediately to the east of the Site; and, based on observations completed at
the time of the Site visit, the current storage of transformers within Building 10 located adjacent to the west
and north boundaries of the Site is a potentially contaminating activity that represents an area of potential
environmental concern at the Site.

Metal Treatment, Coating, Plating and Finishing - Based on the 1971 PUR, impregnating of transformers
with a resinous varnish compound was carried out in the west side of Building 18. Given the reported
location (inferred to be immediately east of the Site) of these historical activities, this historical metal
impregnating activity is an off-Site potentially contaminating activity.

Railyards, Tracks and Spurs - Based on a 1964 FIP including the Site area, a spur line was located along
the eastern portion of the Site, running from north to south. Given the reported historical use of creosote to
treat railway ties, the historical presence of a rail spur at the Site is a potentially contaminating activity that
represents an area of potential environmental concern at the Site.

Heating Oil Manufacturing, Processing, Use, Storage, Handling or Disposal - Based on Golder’s review of
Insurance Maps and Reports, five, 32,730 L (7,200 gallon) fuel oil USTs were noted immediately south of
the Site in the 1964 FIP. According to the Site Representative, underground piping associated with the fuel
oil USTs was historically located within the western portion of the Site. The historical presence of fuel oil
underground piping is a potentially contaminating activity that represents an area of potential environmental
concern at the Site.
Project No: 04-1182-063
May 2013
4/9

Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality - Based on information reviewed as part of the Phase I ESA,
fill materials were historically placed within the GE property (including the Site) prior to the construction of
the on-Site buildings in the early 1900’s. In addition, based on a review of historical aerial photographs, a
driveway was located within the eastern portion of the Site, between off-Site Building 10 and off-Site
Building 18; and, based on a 1964 FIP, a concrete tunnel was historically present within the western portion
of the Site, running from south to north; which was historically removed and the area was backfilled. The
suspect presence of fill materials at the Site is considered a potentially contaminating activity that
represents an area of potential environmental concern at the Site.

Photographic Processing – Based on a review of the EcoLog ERIS Report, off-Site Building 26 was listed at
940 Lansdowne Avenue under company name Claremont Graphic with one record for photoprocessing
wastes during the years 1995-2001, immediately west of the Site. The off-Site historical photoprocessing
activities are considered an off-Site potentially contaminating activity.

Chemical Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage – Based on Golder’s review of available historical
information for the Site and the Phase One Study Area, the historical chemical manufacturing, processing
and bulk storage activities at Building 28 (including three lacquer USTs and six varnish tanks immediately
south/southwest of Building 28) – approximately 35 m west of the Site; historical off-site chemicals
warehouse Building 5 - 40 m north of the Site, and historical off-Site oil water separator located
approximately 25 m north of the northern portion of the Site, are considered an off-Site potentially
contaminating activity.

Iron and Steel Manufacturing and Processing – Based on a review of available historical FIPs and PURs,
for the Site and surrounding areas, the off-Site historical ‘foundry’ activities associated with Building 13,
located approximately 35 m to the north of the Site and Building 29, located approximately 45 m to the
north of the Site (including spray paint booths, and chemical storage within Building 13) are considered an
off-Site potentially contaminating activity.
Other Potentially Contaminating Activities were assessed and not considered to be sources of APECs to the
Phase One Property given their distance to the Site, the inferred groundwater direction, and the subsurface
conditions. Golder completed a Phase I ESA at the Site in December 2013 which identified the following areas
of potential environmental concern (“APECs”):
(A) Historical and current storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (“PCBs”) (throughout the Site from offSite properties) – Based on the review of the Ecolog ERIS report the historical storage of PCBs by the
Canadian General Electric Company, at Building 18, which was historically located immediately to the east
of the Site; and, based on observations completed at the time of the Site visit, the current storage of
transformers within Building 10 located immediately to the north of the Site is a potentially contaminating
activity that represents an area of potential environmental concern at the Site. Contaminants of concern
consist of PCBs.
(B) Historical Spur Lines (within eastern portion of the Site, from former on-Site spur line and off-Site
spur line immediately west of the Site) - Based on a 1964 FIP including the Site area, a spur line was
formerly located within the eastern portion of the Site, between off-Site Building 10 and off-Site Building 18.
Given the reported historical use of creosote to treat railway ties, the historical presence of rail spurs at the
Project No: 04-1182-063
May 2013
5/9
Site is a potentially contaminating activity that represents an area of potential environmental concern at the
Site. Contaminants of concern consist of creosote (PAHs).
(C) Fill materials (throughout the Site) – Based on information reviewed as part of the Phase I ESA, fill
materials were historically placed within the GE property (including the Site) prior to the construction of the
on-Site buildings in the early 1900’s. In addition, based on a review of historical aerial photographs, a
driveway was located within the eastern portion of the Site, between off-Site Building 10 and off-Site
Building 18; and, based on a 1964 FIP, a concrete tunnel was historically present within the western portion
of the Site, running from south to north; which was historically removed and the area was backfilled. The
suspect presence of fill materials at the Site is considered a potentially contaminating activity that
represents an area of potential environmental concern at the Site. The presence of fill materials at the Site
is a potentially contaminating activity that represents an area of potential environmental concern at the Site.
Contaminants of concern consist of metals and inorganic parameters.
(D) Reported on-Site impacts from historical industrial operations (throughout the Site from surrounding
properties) - Based on a review of previous reports, groundwater concentrations of PCBs, benzo (g, h, i)
perylene, indeno (1, 2, 3-dc pyrene), bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phtalate, and pyrene, were detected in the
surrounding properties in the vicinity of the Site (Block 2 south) at concentrations above the MOE Table 3
Standards. A number of areas of overburden and groundwater impacts were reportedly noted off-Site. In
general, the areas of reported impact within the former GE property (off-Site and on-Site) were interpreted
to be associated with various source areas (i.e., the north, and south portions of historical Building 18,
Building 36, the south yard and, to a lesser degree, the south parking lot, including a likely storage area
between historical Building 24 and historical Building 26 (to the south of the Site). The historical industrial
operations in the vicinity of the Site that resulted in the presence of PCBs, PAHs and BNAs within the
properties surrounding the Site, represent an off-Site potentially contaminating activity. Contaminants of
concern consist of PCBs, PHCs F1-F4, PAHs, BNAs, VOCs including BTEX.
(E) Historical off-Site Fuel Oil USTs (western portion of the Site) - Based on Golder’s review of Insurance
Maps and Reports, five, 32,730 L (7,200 gallon) fuel oil USTs were noted immediately south of the western
portion of the Site in the 1964 FIP. The reported historical presence of these fuel oil USTs immediately
south of the Site is a potentially contaminating activity that represents an area of potential environmental
concern. Contaminants of concern consist of PHCs F1-F4 and BTEX. It is inferred that buried fuel
distribution lines were historically present beneath the Site, that connected the USTs to boilers within the
former Building 10 (the Power House) located immediately north of the Site. Golder understands that the
fuel distribution lines were removed concurrently with the UST removal, prior to the commencement of the
current Phase II ESA.
(F) Off-Site Historical Chemical Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage – Based on Golder’s review
of available historical information for the Site and the Phase One Study Area, the historical chemical
manufacturing, processing and bulk storage activities at Building 28 (including three lacquer USTs and six
varnish tanks immediately south/southwest of Building 28) – approximately 35 m west of the Site; historical
off-site chemicals warehouse Building 5 - 40 m north of the Site, and historical off-Site oil water separator
located approximately 25 m north of the northern portion of the Site, are considered an off-Site potentially
contaminating activity that represents an area of potential environmental concern. Contaminants of concern
consist of PHCs F1-F4, PAHs, BNAs, VOCs including BTEX.
Project No: 04-1182-063
May 2013
6/9
The soil remediation performed prior to the commencement of the current Phase II ESA reportedly addressed
the APECs described above in relation to potential soil impacts. As such, the O. Reg 153/04 Phase II ESA was
developed to address the APECs identified in the O. Reg 153/04 Phase I ESA in groundwater and to confirm the
soil quality as it existed at the Site during the current Phase II ESA.
The list of PCAs and APECs with descriptions is included in the “APEC Table” as part of the RSC filing. The
location of PCAs and APECs is shown in Figure 7.
2.2
Results of the O. Reg 153/04 Phase II ESA
The Phase II ESA was completed following the primary soil assessment/remediation and backfilling activities at
the Site. As part of the Phase II ESA investigation, the policies, procedures and protocols utilized by Golder
during the completion of this prior remediation were assessed by the Qualified Person and found to be in
substantial compliance with the Regulation. Based on the results of the Phase II ESA completed in September
and October 2013, the following was noted:

The Phase I ESA identified the following constituents of concern: PHC F1-F4, Metals and Inorganics, PAHs,
PCBs, VOCs and BNAs (refer to Section 2.1);

No significant pathways for migration were identified during the delineation of the contaminants. The
contaminants were not present in groundwater. No evidence suggesting any effect of the climatic or
meteorological conditions on the migration of the contaminants were found. No utilities or subsurface
structures were discovered to be present in the contaminated areas. Some of the contaminants found were
volatile. Models for the potential release and transport mechanisms, exposure pathways and human and
ecological receptors located on-Site in relation to the contaminants are displayed on Figure 8;

The soil assessment/remediation activities undertaken prior to the commencement of the Phase II ESA
activities reported herein were successful in that all soil verification samples were confirmed to satisfy the
applicable SCS. The excavation activities and post-excavation confirmatory sampling results are
summarized in Section 3.3 and described in detail in Appendix J of the Phase II ESA. The results indicate
that the concentrations of the parameters of concern in the final confirmatory soil samples from the
excavation limits met the applicable SCS; and,

Groundwater samples from all monitoring wells located in the shallow and deep aquifers beneath the Site
that were installed as part of this Phase II ESA had concentrations of the constituents of concern (PHCs
F1–F4, PAHs, BNAs, VOCs, PCBs and/or metals and inorganics, including vinyl chloride) below the SCS. It
is noted that groundwater samples from two monitoring wells (BH13-4 and BH13-6) were not collected due
to the low volume of water within the well during the two monitoring events.
2.3
Summary of Soil Remediation
Prior to the commencement of the current Phase II ESA, the fill materials throughout the eastern portion of the
Site were removed from the Site as part of the decommissioning and off-Site removal and disposal of five fuel oil
USTs and the associated distribution piping system, that was previously used to provide fule to boilers
historically housed with Building 10 (the power House) located north of the Site, to generate steam, and steamgenerated electricity for the former GE industrial operations. The excavated areas were historically backfilled
with “clean” fill material. No documentation of this soil removal or backfilling activities was provided to Golder.
Project No: 04-1182-063
May 2013
7/9
Further, the depth of excavation associated with these fuel system decommissioning activities was completed to
a uniform depth of 2.4 mbgs.
The area of the previous excavation on the Site immediately south of former
Building 10 was not backfilled. The south wall of the previous excavation was not sampled during the current soil
verification program as the south end of the excavation extended beyond the property boundary of the Site.
Nevertheless, the lands to the south of the Site comprise a part of Block 5N of the larger redevelopment tract,
and those lands have recently been remediated, verified and are the subject of a recently filed Record of Site
Condition that has been shown to satisfy the applicable SCS.
A soil assessment/remediation was carried out in September 2013 prior to the completion of the current Phase II
ESA, with supplemental excavation and confirmatory sampling completed in November 2013. The soil
assessment/remediation program included the excavation and testing of fill and native soil throughout the Site
extending to the Site boundaries to a depth of 2.4 mbgs. The findings of the Soil Remediation are as follows:

South of Building 10, the soil quality within this exposed (un-backfilled) area was assessed through the
collection of floor verification samples. The area to the east of Building 10, reportedly comprised of clean fill
material imported to the Site prior to the commencement of the remedial activities, was sampled to confirm
its suitability as on-Site backfill, and then temporarily removed to expose the walls and floor of the
excavation and to allow for collection of confirmatory soil samples. The excavation extended to the
property boundaries of the Site (approximately 0.15 acre) to a depth of 2.4 mbgs to facilitate the testing of
fill and native soils throughout the Site for the constituents of concern;

Confirmatory soil samples were collected by Golder in accordance with O. Reg. 153/04 (as amended) at
representative locations from the exposed soil in the walls and floors of the excavation. As part of the
confirmatory testing program, soil samples indicating the greatest evidence of potential for impact, based
on visual and/or olfactory evidence of chemical impact, headspace vapour concentrations, sample location
and/or sample depth, were submitted to the analytical laboratory for analysis of PHC F1 to F4, VOCs,
PAHs, BNAs, PCBs and/or metals and inorganics. Results from the analysis of soil samples from the final
limits of the excavation indicated all analytical results were below the applicable MOE Table 5 standards
with the exception of two samples along the north wall of the Site that contained modest exceedances of
the SCS for trichloroethylene. All the floor samples met the SCS for surface soils. The lateral distribution
of the confirmatory soil samples is shown on Figure 9;

Remedial efforts at the north wall of the Site included the excavation of soil at two remedial excavations
(NWSA1 and NWSA7), each approximately 0.5 square meters in area to a depth of 1.5 mbgs, completed to
delineate beneath the previously identified trichloroethylene impacts. Approximately 1.5 cubic metre of
impacted soil encountered along the north wall of the excavation was excavated, removed from the Site
and transported off-Site (to Block 2 South) for subsequent removal by a MOE-licensed carrier to an
approved waste receiver. The results of the soil samples from the final limits of the excavations, including
two floor and two wall confirmation samples from each remedial excavation indicated all the VOC analytical
results were below the SCS (compared to surface standards). The extent of former contamination and
locations of excavation confirmation samples are displayed on Figures 10A and 10B; and,

Ten backfill samples were collected and submitted for analysis of PHC F1 to F4, VOCs, PAHs, BNAs,
PCBs and/or metals and inorganics. All backfill samples met the SCS (compared to surface standards) and
Project No: 04-1182-063
May 2013
8/9
thus were used as on-Site backfill material. The backfill material was spread evenly throughout the Site.
Upon completion, the ground surface topography of RSC property was relatively level.
\\golder.gds\gal\whitby\active\_2004\1182 environmental\0-100\04-1182-063 neudorfer emp landsowne\rsc supporting documents\block 7\7. phase ii csm\04-1182-063 2014'4'8 block 7 ph
ii revised csm.docx
Project No: 04-1182-063
May 2013
9/9
!
NIA
!
SITE LOCATION
!
!
UE
4836000
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
T
N
AVE
E
TRE
TON
ING
OSS
UE
VEN
NE A
OW
S
LAM
HAL
E
ENU
GTO
N AV
U
VEN
CE A
A
L
WAL
EET
STR
!
ET
TRE
IN S
FER
DUF
SD
LAN
IN
SYM
AV
PIN
LAP
NUE
AVE
Y
ET
R
T RE
GEA
NT S
O
P
DU
!
OAD
!
!
!
4836000
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
RT R
W
SHA
!
NUE
AVE
E
ENU
E
E
SS
RIVE
E NU
S AV
T RE
ET W
LEG
CO L
T
RE E
E ST
ES T
E
625000
626000
500
627000
0
500
SCALE 1:20,000
PROJECT
TITLE
1,000
METRES
PHASE II CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
PART OF BLOCK 7, PART OF BLOCK O, PLAN M-208,
AT 980 LANSDOWNE AVENUE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
KEY PLAN
REFERENCE
Base Data - MNR NRVIS, obtained 2004
Produced by Golder Associates Ltd under licence from
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, © Queens Printer 2008
Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: NAD 83 Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17
D
RO A
LLE
DA
URT
SVA
D
RO A
DU
N
O
ERC
DO V
E
ENU
RONC E
IAN
IND
ED
KSID
PAR
624000
UE
VEN
AN A
V
L
SY
K AV
N UE
AVE
O
BLO
T
WES
EET
R
T
RS
C
BRO
ARK
HP
4835000
!
4837000
!
!
TON
T
HIG
G:\Projects\2004\04-1182-063_Neudorfer\GIS\MXDs\Reporting\1007\Phase_II_CSM\041182063_1007_Block7_Phase_II_CSM_01.mxd
IVE
!
GH
LAU
E
TRE
UE
VEN
DE A
U
VEN
KE A
A
L
N
GLE
A DR
!
ET
T RE
RS
LE S
KEE
SI
BER
M
U
H
NUE
AVE
!
AD
NPO
DAVE
!
LE
OS
RO
ON
WIN
!
AD
AD
N RO
ESTO
R
EE T
ST R
E
T
N ET
OD
WO
OAK
D
RO A
!
N
The Junction
AN
!
4835000
!
TO
W
OLD
ES
ON
CT I
JUN
T
WES
!
!
NUE
AVE
E DO
CAL
!
ST C
NUE
AVE
R
I
A
L
!
!
W
O
³
Oakwood
4838000
D
R OA
627000
4837000
!
R
RS
OGE
626000
OD
WO
OAK
Silverthorne
4838000
625000
!
624000
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-0063(1007)
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
DEC. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 1
625200
625400
³
LEGEND
4836600
625000
4836600
624800
Block 7 Site Boundary
Phase I Study Area
Surrounding Property
4836400
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
1. Earlscourt Park
2. Residential Houses
3. Primerose Avenue Parkette
4. Residential Apartment Buildings
5. Residential, Foundry Lofts -1100 Lansdowne Avenue
(Historical Foundry Building)
6. Building 15 - Historical Offices Building
7. Vacant Former Building 28 (Historical Chemical Building)
8. Building 10 - Historical Powerhouse Building
9. Residential, Brownstones Rental Residences 1111 - 1201 Lansdowne Avenue
10. Toronto Hydro-Electric Station
11. Vacant Former Building 18 (Historical Transformer
Manufacturing)
12. Lounsbury Foods Limited - 11 Wiltshire Avenue
13. Residential Apartments Building - Former Building 24
(Historical Transformer Manufacturing)
14. Former Building 36 - Historical Storage Building
15. General Electric - Hitachi
16. Residential Apartment Buildings
17. Commercial Offices - New Moon Kitchen - 1 Wiltshire
Avenue
18. Construction Materials and Debris
4836200
NOTES:
4836200
4836400
,
%
1. All locations are approximate.
REFERENCE
Imagery: Bing Maps © 2012 Microsoft Corporation and its data suppliers
Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: NAD 83 Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17N
50
PROJECT
TITLE
25
0
50
100
METRES
SCALE 1:2,500
TORONTO, ONTARIO
PHASE I STUDY AREA
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1007)
624800
625000
625200
625400
150
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
DEC. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 2
625060
625080
625100
³
LEGEND
@
A
Deep Monitoring Well
@
A
Shallow Monitoring Well
#
*
4836360
4836360
4836340
4836340
A
Geological Cross Section Location
NOTES:
REFERENCE
Base Survey by: Holding Jones Vanderveen Inc. Entitled "Plan of Survey of Part of
Block 7 Registered Plan 66M-2496 City of Toronto". Dated November 12, 2013.
2.5 1.25
PROJECT
TITLE
0
2.5
5
7.5
METRES
SCALE 1:200
TORONTO, ONTARIO
GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1007)
625060
625080
625100
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
DEC. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 3
LEGEND
WEST
A
EAST
A'
132
132
130
130
BOREHOLE
IDENTIFICATION
BH 13-1
(O/S 12.4 m W)
DENOTES ACTUAL
BOREHOLE LOCATION
WHERE BOREHOLES
HAVE BEEN
SHIFTED FOR VISUAL
PRESENTATION
BOREHOLE OFFSET
DISTANCE AND LOCATION
RELATIVE TO CROSS
SECTION LINE
SIMPLIFIED
STRATIGRAPHY
MONITORING WELL
EXCAVATION FLOOR/WALL SAMPLES MET APPLICABLE
MOE 2011 SITE CONDITION STANDARDS
128
128
SIMPLIFIED STRATIGRAPHY
Pre- and Post-Remediation
Ground Surface
West Property
Boundary
East Property
Boundary
126
BH13-4
(O/S 0.5 m s)
BH13-2
BH13-3
(O/S 0.0 m)
Depth of Excavation
(O/S 0.4 m N)
FILL
SILTY SAND
SANDY SILT TILL
CLAYEY SILT
CONCRETE
SANDY SILT
126
BH13-1
(O/S 0.1 m S)
124
124
ELEVATION (m)
ASPHALT
Perched Aquifer
Shallow Groundwater
122
NW SA10
EBW SA5
122
NOTES
1. All location are approximate.
2. For detailed soil stratigraphy and groundwater conditions,
refer to Record of Borehole sheets.
3. Figure 3 indicates the location of the cross section.
4. Ground water elevation data obtained on October 20, 2013.
FL5
FL2
120
120
Aquitard
118
the MOE Water Well Records within 500 m of the Site, one
water well record indicates that bedrock consists of shale at a
depth of about 24 m below grade.
6. All measured soil chemical parameters were compared to the
MOE 2011 Table 5 Standards for medium to fine textured
soils and Industrial/Commercial/Community Property Use.
118
Deep Groundwater
SCALE
VERTICAL
116
116
HORIZONTAL
114
114
112
0
50
100
150
DISTANCE (m)
200
112
250
PART OF BLOCK 7, PART OF BLOCK O, PLAN M-208
TORONTO, ONTARIO
GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION A-A'
FIGURE 4
LEGEND
WEST
B
EAST
B'
BOREHOLE
IDENTIFICATION
BH 13-6
(O/S 0.2 m W)
132
132
130
DENOTES ACTUAL
BOREHOLE LOCATION
WHERE BOREHOLES
HAVE BEEN
SHIFTED FOR VISUAL
PRESENTATION
BOREHOLE OFFSET
DISTANCE AND LOCATION
RELATIVE TO CROSS
SECTION LINE
SIMPLIFIED
STRATIGRAPHY
130
MONITORING WELL
128
128
SIMPLIFIED STRATIGRAPHY
Pre- and Post-Remediation
Ground Surface
West Property
Boundary
126
126
BH13-3
(O/S 0.2 m NE)
BH13-4
FILL
SILTY SAND
SANDY SILT TILL
CLAYEY SILT
CONCRETE
SANDY SILT
East Property
Boundary
Depth of Excavation
O/S 0.3 m SW)
BH13-5
(O/S 0.3 m NE)
124
ELEVATION (m)
EXCAVATION FLOOR/WALL SAMPLES MET APPLICABLE
MOE 2011 SITE CONDITION STANDARDS
BH13-6
(O/S 0.2 m N)
124
ASPHALT
Perched Aquifer
122
Shallow Groundwater
EBWSA3
122
NOTES
FL7
120
120
1. All location are approximate.
2. For detailed soil stratigraphy and groundwater conditions,
refer to Record of Borehole sheets.
3. Figure 3 indicates the location of the cross section.
4. Groundwater elevation data obtained Oct. 30, 2013.
Aquitard
118
118
Deep Groundwater
the MOE Water Well Records within 500 m of the Site, one
water well record indicates that bedrock consists of shale at a
depth of about 24 m below grade.
6. All measured soil chemical parameters were compared to the
MOE 2011 Table 5 Standards for medium to fine textured
soils and Industrial/Commercial/Community Property Use.
SCALE
116
116
114
114
112
0
50
100
150
200
112
250
VERTICAL
HORIZONTAL
PART OF BLOCK 7, PART OF BLOCK O, PLAN M-208
TORONTO, ONTARIO
DISTANCE (m)
GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTION B-B'
FIGURE 5
625060
625080
625100
³
LEGEND
@
A
Deep Monitoring Well
@
A
Shallow Monitoring Well
4836360
4836360
4836340
4836340
Inferred Groundwater Flow Direction
122.2
Groundwater Contours (m asl)
(122.33)
Groundwater Elevation (m asl),
Measured October 30, 2013
NOTES:
2. masl = meters above sea level.
REFERENCE
2.5 1.25
0
2.5
5
METRES
SCALE 1:200
PROJECT
TITLE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
(SHALLOW AQUIFER)
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1007)
625060
625080
7.5
625100
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
DEC. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 6
625060
625080
625100
³
LEGEND
!
(
"
)
Area of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC)
Potentrially Contaminating Activity (PCA)
4836360
4836360
Area of Actual or Potential Environmental Concern (APEC)
Historical and current storage of PCBs
A
4836340
55
Historical On‐Site spur line
Railyards, tracks and spurs
46
C
Reported presence of fill materials
30
D
Historical fuel oil distribution piping
Importation of fill of unknown quality
Heating oil manufacturing, processing, use storage, handling or distribution
Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
Vicinity of Historical off‐Site Fuel Oil USTs Vicinity of Historical Chemical Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage
F
4836340
Transformer manufacturing processing and use
B
E
Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA) MOE PCA #
Description
APEC Description
28
28
Chemical Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage
8
Location of APEC/PCA
Eastern portion of the Site/Building 18 and Off‐
Site building 10 Eastern portion of the Site/Between Off‐Site Building 18 and Of‐Site Building 10
Throughout the Site/Throughout the Site
Western portion of th Site the Site/Between Off‐
Site building 10 and Off‐Site fuel USTs
On‐Site (western portion of the Site) / Off‐Site (south of the western portion of the Site)
On‐Site (throughout the Site) / Off‐Site (from properties to the north, south, east and west of the Site)
NOTES:
REFERENCE
2.5 1.25
0
2.5
5
METRES
SCALE 1:200
PROJECT
7.5
TORONTO, ONTARIO
TITLE
AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
AND POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ACTIVITIES
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1007)
625060
625080
625100
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
DEC. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 7
PROJECT
TITLE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL FOR HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL
RECEPTORS PRIOR TO THE REMEDIATION OF SOILS POTENTIALLY
CONTAMINATED WITH PHCS, VOCS, PAHS, BNAS, PCBS AND/OR
METALS AND INORGANICS
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1007)
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
DEC. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 8
³
LEGEND
4836360
4836340
625100
4836360
625080
4836340
625060
#
Verification Subsurface Wall Sample Submitted
for Analysis
#
Verification Surface Wall Sample Submitted for
Analysis
#
Verification Surface Floor Sample Submitted for
Analysis
NOTES:
2. masl = meters above sea level.
REFERENCE
2.5 1.25
PROJECT
TITLE
0
2.5
5
SCALE 1:200
TORONTO, ONTARIO
REMEDIATION PLAN
PROJECT NO. 04-1182-063(1007)
625060
625080
625100
7.5
METRES
Whitby, Ontario
DESIGN
GIS
CHECK
REVIEW
JT
DEC. 2013
SCALE AS SHOWN
REV. 0.0
FIGURE 9

212610 - Ontario

Transcription

Similar documents

88TH RSC HOW TO GUIDE FOR DTS INVITATIONAL

GS GSPro GSElite - Arizona Wholesale Supply

Angiosperm Latin Name: Cyperus involucratus Common Name

Record of Site Condition # 209366 Record of Site

and Print - RSC Custom Graphics

Technical Sheet - Microbes Biosciences

Record of Site Condition # 212289 Record of Site

211988 - Ontario.ca