Cultural Arts Facilities Feasibility Study

Transcription

Cultural Arts Facilities
Feasibility Study
PHASE TWO REPORT
SEPTEMBER 2006
AMS Planning & Research
915 D Street
Petaluma, CA 94952
707.778.8445
http://AMS-online.com
Orem Cultural Arts Feasibility Study
Contents
Summary .............................................................................................................................1
Facility Alternatives...........................................................................................................4
NEW ARTS FACILITIES FOR OREM ............................................................................4
1. SCERA Center for the Arts ..........................................................................................4
Scope of Work ..............................................................................................................5
Architectural Description of Work .................................................................................6
Design Features ............................................................................................................6
SCERA Theater Renovation Plan - Description of Work .................................................9
2. Arts Education Center ................................................................................................ 10
3. Orem Heritage Museum ............................................................................................. 11
4. Children’s Museum.................................................................................................... 11
The Timpanogos Storytelling Festival .......................................................................... 11
Option – Combining the Children’s Museum and Heritage Museum............................... 11
Project Budget Estimate ................................................................................................. 12
Phasing ...................................................................................................................... 12
SCERA Park Master Plan ............................................................................................ 13
Management and Operations..........................................................................................14
Governance, Management and Staffing........................................................................... 14
Operating Estimate ........................................................................................................ 14
Children’s Museum ..................................................................................................... 14
Arts Education Center ................................................................................................. 15
Heritage Museum........................................................................................................ 16
APPENDICES
A. Preliminary Space Requirements
B. Concept Plans
SCERA Center
SCERA Park Arts District
C. SCERA Center Structural and Building Systems Report
D. Project Budget Detail
September 2006
Summary
In May 2006, AMS Planning & Research was retained to conduct a feasibility study for cultural
facilities for the City of Orem. The impetus for the study was a voter-approved tax (CARE Tax)
in November 2005 to fund the development of cultural and recreational facilities for the
community. The feasibility study has been conducted in two phases. The first phase of study
comprised an analysis of community interest (including surveys of arts organizations, artists,
educational institutions, and business) in new cultural arts facilities, assessment of the market
potential for arts and cultural programs, research into program opportunities, evaluation of
existing and planned cultural facilities in the area, and comparable case studies. Initial
recommendations were presented to City Council in July 2006 for continued examination of the
feasibility of four facilities — renovations to the SCERA Center, a Heritage Museum, a
Children’s Museum, and an arts education facility. Phase two of the study, the results of which
are summarized in this report, entailed defining the recommended facilities, cost projections, site
considerations, and management and operating estimates.
The following summarizes the key recommendations:
1. Renovation of SCERA Center
SCERA Center for over 70 years has been operated as a private non profit provider of a range of
cultural programs. The Center is currently undertaking plans for renovations to its lobby and
auditorium which are projected to cost up to $1 million, funded primarily by a corporate
sponsorship from Xango. The theater is to be renamed in recognition of the gift.
This feasibility study outlines a more extensive renovation of the SCERA Center, focusing on its
technical deficiencies in providing first class facilities for the live performing arts, and increasing
the theater’s seating capacity to expand its programming options and competitiveness.
The proposed renovation would provide a new state of the art stagehouse with advanced scenery
handling capabilities and a stage suitable for a full orchestra, ballet company or musical theater
production. Technical support spaces, including dressing rooms and a loading dock, would be
built. A balcony seating area would be added, increasing the seating capacity from 600 to 900. A
new larger lobby with a glass frontage onto State Street would be built, giving the Center a
striking new image. Additional upgrades would be done to the administrative support spaces and
performing arts classrooms.
The total estimated cost for the proposed renovations as outlined in the report is approximately
$40 million. While this estimate seems to be a considerable sum, on the basis of cost per square
foot it is calculated as $246 (construction cost) which compares to over $400 per square foot for
a comparable new building with similar facilities.
2. Arts Education Center
SCERA currently provides a range of performing arts classes at their Center and the proposed
renovations to the Center as outlined in this report incorporate expanded spaces. This feasibility
study recommends the creation of an arts education building that would provide classrooms for
the visual arts, including painting, ceramics, photography and other arts and crafts. Space for the
immensely successful Timpanogos Storytelling Festival to expand its programming year-round
would be included along with a gallery to exh ibit art by local artists and touring shows.
September 2006
Page 1
An arts education building of about 22,000 square feet is envisioned, with up to 7 purposedesigned and multipurpose classrooms. The estimated budget to construct and equip the facility
would be about $10 millio n. Classes and programs at the facility would attract an estimated 7 to
10,000 annually plus attendees at events and exhibits. Annual operating cost (i.e., funding
requirement) would be in the range of $150-175,000.
3. Children’s Museum
Over the past few years a citizen’s group has been striving to establish a children’s museum in
Orem. Their efforts have resulted in securing a tentative commitment from a local developer for
an unused warehouse in a central area of Orem. The museum has suffered from a lack of
resources and the limited organizational capacity of its volunteer base.
This study supports and recommends establishment of a Children’s Museum. The Museum,
which would initially comprise up to 12,000 square feet, should reflect the needs and interests of
Orem families, perhaps focusing on the heritage of the community. (This may offer an
opportunity to partner or combine with the Heritage Museum discussed below.) A program focus
on the region’s heritage would provide the museum with a distinct image from other existing
children’s museums in the region such as in Logan and Salt Lake City and one being planned at
Thanksgiving Point. This study recommends that the preferred location for a Children’s Museum
would be proximate to the SCERA Center, becoming an important element in an Arts District
(see below for further details).
The estimated cost for a children’s museum is $5 to $7 million. Annual attendance would be in
the range of 20 to 40 thousand and operating cost would be between $150,000 to $250,000 (net
funding requirement).
4. Heritage Museum
The Orem Heritage Museum is currently accommodated in a room at the SCERA Center and is
operated by a dedicated core of volunteers. A preliminary analysis of the museum’s (existing and
potential) collections and a review of similar museums suggests a building of about 10,000 to
14,000 sq. ft. to fully accommodate the collections and future programming opportunities for the
museum. Co-location with the other facilities outlined in this report could reduce the overall
requirement and offer administrative efficiencies. Exhibits would focus on Orem history and
artifacts and one gallery would be available for special exhibits and multi-media presentations.
A professionally operated museum would require a staff of 2 to 3 persons and an annual operating
budget of $150 to $200,000 (net funding requirement after admissions and fees). Attendance is
estimated at 5,000 to 20,000 annually.
5. Additional Considerations
1. Combining Facilities
Three of the new arts facilities described in this report could be combined into one or two
buildings. Continued planning and discussion with potential partners, such as the Children’s
Museum or the Orem Heritage Museum, could result in shared and joint use of space,
collaborative programs, and administrative coordination or consolidation.
September 2006
Page 2
2. SCERA Park Arts District and Master Plan
We have noted the potential to establish a much-needed focus for the arts in Orem and an
opportunity to create a “sense of place” for the community by concentrating the proposed
new arts facilities in SCERA Park contiguous to the SCERA Center which is now the focus
of considerable activity and community pride.
3. Arts Funding
The proposed new arts facilities and renovated SCERA Center will require ongoing financial
support. The Heritage Museum, Children’s Museum and Arts Education Center, if built as
separate facilities, may require annual funding o$600 to $800,000. SCERA Center, which
receives minimal annual support from the City, has indicated a desire for public fundin g,
perhaps as much as $1 million, to support their ongoing development and operation. As
planning progresses for the new facilities, more detailed operating plans will be necessary,
including the feasibility of establishing operating endowments, private fundraising or other
sources of ongoing funding.
September 2006
Page 3
Facility Alternatives
NEW ARTS FACILITIES FOR OREM
Based on the research and recommendations in Phase One of the Feasibility Study, AMS has
recommended that four facilities be considered. These are: 1) renovation of the SCERA theater,
2) a new arts education center, 3) a heritage museum and 4) a children’s museum. To aid in
planning and budgeting, preliminary space programs were developed for each component.
Detailed space requirements are provided in Appendix A; the table below provides a summary.
Figure 1: Building Space Requirements
Component
Proposed facilities
Total Building Requirement
(minimum footprint)
Theater improvements and
additions
86,000
(includes existing building)
Seven classrooms,
administration, support,
exhibit space
22,000
(±15,000)
Three exhibit galleries, two
classrooms, exhibition support
space, offices, museum store
12,000
(±12,000)
Exhibit space, classrooms,
exhibit support, offices
12,000
(±10,000)
SCERA Arts Center
Arts Education Center
Orem Heritage Museum
Children’s Museum
The following outlines recommended renovations/expansion to the SCERA Center theater that
meet the needs for a performing arts facility to serve the community and then a description of
each new facility and its components.
1. SCERA Center for the Arts
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP Arts Studio, conducted a preliminary visual and programmatic
evaluation of the SCERA theater building and the surrounding site to explore the viability of
developing an expanded performing arts capability and accommodate other arts facilities as
identified in the initial phase of the feasibility study.
The SCERA Center for the Arts, based in Orem, Utah, was founded in 1933 as a family-focused
provider of entertainment, culture, recreation and education for the citizens of Sharon Tract which
became the city of Orem. In 1942 a movie theater was built to provide a setting for the screening
of popular family films and occasional live entertainment. The theater was intended to provide
activity to “touch the soul, improve the mind, and unify the family.”
September 2006
Page 4
SCERA Theater in 1942
The original building, built of reinforced concrete, included a small lobby and refreshment area,
box office, restrooms, a 749-seat single level movie house, shallow stage house with limited
wings, and basement support areas.
The facility continued to function adequately until 1996 at which point it was determined that an
expansion was necessary. This included an additional performance space of 459 seats, lobby
expansion (including “gallery” space), administrative expansion, rehearsal and education spaces,
and a room which serves a heritage museum.
SCERA Theater addition
Scope of Work
The following goals were identified:
•
•
Increased seating capacity for the SCERA theater to ±900 seats
Lobby expansion and renovation to accommodate the projected increased attendance
•
•
•
Amenities (Scoop) renovation and public facilities expansion
Adding a full stage house to the SCERA theater to provide state-of-the-art capability
Small theater renovation
•
•
Administrative expansion and relocation
Artistic and technical support expansion for both halls
•
•
Education wing addition
Relocation of Heritage Museum to a new site
September 2006
Page 5
•
Potential new arts education building
•
Potential new children’s museum
The space programs developed to guide the planning is shown in the Appendix.
Architectural Description of Work
Introduction
Our research, interviews and meetings with arts groups, arts presenters and educators, as well as
analysis of existing and planned performance venues and the market analysis, have provided us
with many insights into the needs and desires for new performance facilities. Potential interest in
a performance facility with about 1,000 seats was expressed by some local organizations. This
facility would meet the needs for a full range of music, theater, dance, and musical theater
performances as well as meetings, conferences, film and public assembly events for businesses,
government agencies, educational institutions, social organizations and others.
The user research indicates that local demand for performance uses of a large venue is moderately
strong and will depend upon many factors, including the future stability of the region’s major
performing arts organizations and the cost of using the theater. Examples of local users include
the Utah Valley Symphony, Utah Regional Ballet and several choral groups.
Figure 2, below illustrates the types of uses and the technical requirements for each.
Figure 2: Proposed Uses – Large Theater
Proposed Uses
Performance Type
Stage Requirements
Choral and
Instrumental Music
Symphony, band, choirs
40 – 130 performers plus chorus of up
to 100, excellent natural acoustics with
high reverberation value
Dance
Ballet, Jazz, Tap, Modern, Folk, Ethnic
Fully staged ballet with up to 60
dancers, Recitals for up to 100 children,
Orchestra (in pit)
Opera, Musical
Theater
Musicals and theater productions by
local and touring companies
Up to 60 performers, orchestra up to 40
musicians (in pit), extensive scenery
Stage Plays
Full repertoire of plays
Large range of cast sizes, extensive
scenery flying
Community Events
Wide range of assembly types
Minimal stage
Touring Arts
Programs
Popular, jazz, folk, ethnic recitals,
Broadway, children’s theater
Up to 60 performers. Orchestra pit,
scenery flying
Design Features
A modern performing arts facility should incorporate features that enable it to be flexible yet
provide a first-class environment for music and theatrical performances for performers and
audiences alike. The chart below indicates the major spaces and their features that should be
incorporated into a first-class facility.
It should be noted that the description below is for a theater facility that would be a “showcase”
venue and not incorporate extensive set, prop or costume construction spaces. Equipment and
September 2006
Page 6
support facilities for touring companies (e.g., laundry, wardrobe repair, storage) are included. A
well designed theater should allow for multiple uses of spaces such as the lobby, green room,
meeting rooms and practice rooms.
September 2006
Page 7
Figure 3: Design and Technical Features – Large Theater
Feature
Description
Auditorium
Excellent sight lines and acoustics for every seat; maximum distance from
stage to farthest seat should be 80 feet; multiple levels to enable flexible
seating capacity
Stage
Generous stage dimensions; full fly system; proscenium arch with apron
or thrust; orchestra pit.
Lobby
Allow minimum 6 sq. ft. per person; suitable for informal performances,
meetings, receptions, wall hanging system for art exhibits
Rehearsal
Minimum size of stage playing area, dance floor, portable mirrors; music
rehearsal rooms with risers, “sectional” rehearsal rooms
Dressing Rooms
At least 60 performers, include showe rs and toilets, green room, “star”
dressing rooms (2 person), two 4 -6 person rooms, two 8-12 person
rooms, on-stage “quick-change room, plus one (dividable) or two chorus
dressing room for up to 25 each.
Set Production Shops
Not included
Offices
Accommodate staff of ±15
Storage
Plentiful “live” storage and permanent storage for equipment, supplies
and orchestra instruments
Box Office
Central box office with minimum three windows
Concessions
Built-in counters in lobby plus portable concessions
Food Service
Catering service kitchen for receptions, social events, meetings, etc.
Floors
Resilient floor for all stages and large rehearsal room
Sound System
Reinforcement, stage monitor, intercom, sound effects, hearing impaired
system
Stage lighting
Computer system (dimmer per circuit) for theaters
Acoustics
Adjustable acoustics for music and speech using retractable drapes and
reflectors (to adjust reflection and reverberation); acoustical shell on
stage, acoustical separation of rooms to enable spaces to be used
simultaneously. Very low ambient noise.
Parking
On-site parking; ideal is one parking space for 2.5 seats.
Handicapped access
Required throughout building for performers, technicians, staff and public
Restrooms
To serve maximum audiences in lobby and front of house. Restrooms to
serve administrative and technical staff offices and rehearsal rooms.
September 2006
Page 8
SCERA Theater Renovation Plan - Description of Work
Level 1
The existing lobby is expanded to include a new box office and support spaces as well as
expanded restrooms to meet current building code requirements. The existing gallery area is
modified in footprint to extend the sweeping arc of the lobby and to provide access to the new
education wing. The lobby, stretching along State Street could be faced with glass, offering a
strong visual connection to the center for passersby.
The existing refreshments area (Scoop) is modified to allow access to a new corridor between the
two halls to satisfy code requirements for emergency egress. A new corridor on the north side of
the main hall allows for disabled and public access from this face of the complex. Sound and light
locks are provided for the main hall, as well as for the second hall at both audience levels.
The stage area of the main hall is replaced by a new stage house which is asymmetrically placed
on the site, made necessary by the existence of the small theater on the south. A stage crossover
and technical support spaces are provided behind the new stage house. A lift is provided at the
stage apron that in the lowered position will accommodate an orchestra pit and raised to extend
the stage apron.
Within the main hall itself, a balcony level is inserted above the main floor; the roof level will be
raised to allow for appropriate natural acoustic volume for larger-scale musical performances and
the like. Two options for additional seating are possible, one adding 250 seats or alternatively,
adding 306 seats for a total of 845 seats or 896 seats.
The existing small theater is retained essentially as is although it has been assumed in the budget
estimate that all spaces throughout the building will be renovated to provide a higher level of
finish.
New support spaces (storage, rehearsal) are provided to the south of the small theater,
A new education wing is proposed on the south side that includes two rehearsal halls, a dance
studio and multipurpose classrooms. An enclosed hallway links the education wing to the lobby,
providing direct public access from the parking lot at the east side of the building. This enables
use of the classrooms without necessitating opening the entire building.
Separate loading docks are envisioned for each theater to facilitate operational efficiency.
Level 2
An extended lobby anchors the complex, related in plan and section to the main floor. Open stairs
at each end of the sweeping arc at the façade link the two levels. An aperture in the upper lobby
between the two halls visually connects it with the lower lobby.
The upper level includes circulation corridors around the main hall and additional restrooms.
The main hall balcony also includes new control rooms as well as sound and light locks. The
small theater balcony is modified to expand the control room (to meet ADA requirements) and
provide vestibules similar to the main hall.
Adjacent to and south of the second hall, the existing space is reconfigured to accommodate
administrative offices.
September 2006
Page 9
The rehearsal halls are visible from the second level, allowing viewers to see “theater in action”.
A roof terrace is provided above the classrooms.
Basement
The basement level below the large theater is modified in organization to provide artistic support
space including dressing and green rooms to serve both theaters, wardrobe, lighting, sound,
rigging and drapery support spaces and building services areas. New basement area is provided
below and to the north and east of the new large theater stage for artistic support functions, as
well as building services space.
PARKING
Current parking availability for SCERA park and the SCERA Center has been studied by the City
Development Services Department. The study enumerated 512 parking stalls that serve SCERA
Park and an additional 101 stalls available adjacent to the SCERA Center. SCERA Center also
contracts with the Lincoln Square commercial complex to use about 200 parking stalls on the
contiguous property. The City of Orem Municipal Zoning regulations (Section 22-15-4) indicates
that for theaters, one parking space for 3.5 seats is required. The plans outlined above indicate
that the SCERA theater seating can be increased by either 96 or 147 seats. Following the zoning
regulations, additional dedicated parking for 27 or 42 vehicles will be required.
PHASING POTENTIAL
We have considered possible phasing of the renovation and expansion. One scenario might start
with renovation and reconstruction of the large theater stage and auditorium seating. A second
phase might include the lobby and amenities renovation and expansion. A third phase would
include the new education wing.
2. Arts Education Center
The Arts Education Center would accommodate a wide range of arts classes in specially designed
teaching studios and art exhibit spaces. The following spaces are proposed:
•
•
Drawing and Painting
Photography
•
•
•
Ceramics
Computer Graphics/Digital Design
Three Dimensional Art/Sculpture
•
•
Children’s art
General Purpose Classroom
•
Art exhibition space(s)
The building would comprise approximately 22,000 sq. ft. Additional spaces, such as studios for
individual artists might be included, and made available for rent to local or visiting artists. The
studios should be designed so visitors can witness “artists in action.” If the facility were built as
part of another building, several of the administrative and support spaces could be combined to
reduce the overall requirement.
September 2006
Page 10
Potential collaboration with UVSC’s Woodbury Museum should be explored. Options for
collaboration may include using their expert advice on planning and programming, developing
joint programs, or sharing exhibition space. A Museum representative has expressed interest in a
range of opportunities.
3. Orem Heritage Museum
The Orem Heritage Museum exhibit is currently accommodated in a room of about 1,500 sq. ft.
on the second floor of the SCERA Center. Based on review of comparable museums and a
preliminary analysis of the museum’s collections and goals, a building of about 10,000 to 14,000
sq. ft. is indicated. If co-located with other facilities, several administrative and support spaces
could be combined to reduce the overall requirement. Two dedicated exhibit halls would focus on
Orem history and artifacts and one gallery would be available for special exhibits and multimedia presentations.
4. Children’s Museum
The Children’s Museum is envisioned as at least a 9,000 to 12,000 sq. ft. building with dedicated
exhibits designed for young people from toddlers through pre-teens, or perhaps older youths. The
scale and scope of this facility may be determined in collaboration with local organizations with
an interest in a children’s museum such as The Utah Valley Children’s Museum or the
Timpanogos Storytelling Festival. The management of Thanksgiving Point has indicated to the
consultants that they plan to open a children’s museum at their site and they may also have an
interest in collaborating with a museum in Orem. At this time, it is recommended that decisions
regarding specific elements for this facility (number and purpose of individual spaces – exhibit,
teaching/interactive, play) be reserved pending discussion with these potential partners.
The Timpanogos Storytelling Festival
Space for the Timpanogos Storytelling Festival should be integrated into the facilities, whether
the Children’s Museum, Arts Education Center or the Heritage Museum. The rapid growth of the
17-year old Festival, which attracted an attendance of 24,600 for their Fall 2006 event, has
fomented an immediate need for additional office space. Spaces for storytelling workshops during
the Festival, and for occasional use throughout the year, should be allowed for. These spaces
could be shared with other activities of the museum or arts center. The Festival also foresees use
of a large multipurpose theater for lectures and presentations both during the Fall festival and
year-round.
Option – Combining the Children’s Museum and Heritage Museum
Consideration should be given to combining the Heritage Museum with the Children’s Museum.
There is significant public interest in Orem’s history and the Heritage Museum has attracted a
strong core of volunteers and a modest visitation. The Children’s Museum has also engaged a
core of volunteers who are committed to the creation of a facility for the community’s youth.
Combining these two efforts would draw on the strengths of these groups and create a distinctive
niche for a museum in Orem. A combined museum would offer children and families
opportunities to explore Orem’s history using both traditional displays of artifacts, stories of local
people and events, and hands-on interactive exhibits. The museum’s programs could tie in with
Social Studies Core Curriculum standards of the Utah State Office of Education as well as other
subjects and potentially draw large numbers of school tours.
September 2006
Page 11
Project Budget Estimate
AMS/SOM have prepared order of magnitude budget estimates for the construction/renovation of
the recommended facilities based on research into recently completed comparable facilities. The
table below summarizes the estimates; the variation in per square foot construction costs is related
to the location, design and functional components of the facility. The following assumptions have
been made:
•
Construction costs are based on 2006 costs
•
Soft costs include professional fees & expenses, furnishings, fixtures and equipment,
owners costs (financing, legal fees, permits, testing, owner’s staff and management)
•
Theater systems and exhibit design and construction
Figure 4: Estimated Project Budgets
Component
Area
Total
Construction
cost
(per sq.ft.)
Soft Costs
Equipment,
Exhibits
Estimated
Project Budget
($million)
SCERA Center
86,000
$250 - $275
$15.5 million
$2.5 million
$39.5 – $41.7
Arts Education
Center
22,000
$250 - $300
$2.75 million
$1.0 million
$9.25 - $10.4
Heritage
Museum
10,000 –
12,000
$275 - $300
$1.8 million
$2.0 million
$6.6 – $7.0
Children’s
Museum
9,000 –
12,000
$250 - $300
$1.4 - $2.0
million
$1.2 million
$4.9 - $7.0
Phasing
As noted above the project to renovate the SCERA Center could be phased, starting with the
theater renovation, followed by lobby and public space improvements and the new educational
classrooms. A preliminary breakdown of costs for a three phase project is shown below.
Figure 5: Project Phasing
Component
Estimated
cost
Auditorium, seating, balcony addition, stage addition
and equipment
$26 million
Lobbies, public spaces
$ 8 million
Administration, classrooms
$ 5 million
September 2006
Page 12
SCERA Park Master Plan
Locating these facilities in SCERA Park would offer a unique opportunity to establish a
significant arts complex that would complement the expanded and renovated SCERA Theater.
As shown in the illustrations in the Appendix, these facilities might be located on an “Avenue for
the Arts” to the north and east of SCERA theater along 720 South Street. Closing this street
between State Street and 400 East Street to vehicular traffic (either permanently or on special
occasions) would enable the street to serve as a site for festivals and special events. Some of the
properties on 720 South Street are owned by the City, others would need to be acquired. Certain
of the existing office buildings may be suitable for renovation to meet the program needs.
Improvements to SCERA Park to improve its image from passing vehicular traffic is
recommended. This could be accomplished by an expanded planting and landscape plan, a
pathway network which interconnects the new and existing facilities, and public art. Views of the
Park and water park could be improved by relocating or masking the parking lot on the east side
of State Street with landscaping. All parking and service access to the Park should be limited to
perimeter locations which are screened from surrounding areas.
The plan and concepts outlined herein for expansion and improvements to the facilities and
SCERA Park site require substantial further study and discussion. An enhanced SCERA Park and
SCERA Theater would provide Orem and its citizens an extraordinary opportunity to create first
class arts facilities and an outstanding park and festival site in the heart of the city.
September 2006
Page 13
Management and Operations
This section of the report provides preliminary recommendations related to operating the
proposed arts facilities as described in this report. Since the sites have not been designated and
plans not prepared, these operational estimates are inherently very tentative. The focus is on the
Arts Education Facilities, the Heritage Museum and the Children’s Museum, as it is anticipated
that operation of the SCERA Center will be the concern of SCERA, an independent non-profit
organization.
The following is a list of general assumptions regarding the operating analysis:
−
−
−
−
−
−
Facilities would be owned and operated by the City of Orem.
All estimates are made assuming a “base-stable” year of operations, assumed to be
the third year after opening.
Funds will be in place to build the facilities, capitalize their initial years of operation;
they will be debt free on opening.
Pre-opening costs that will be required during the planning and development are not
included. Such costs would include personnel and any fundraising expenses. The
funding requirement for these expenses, which would be approximately equal to one
year’s operating budget, should be included in the capital cost for the project.
The estimates include basic programming costs for hosting or presenting exhibits,
classes, gallery functions and other programs.
All estimates are in 2006 dollars.
It should be noted that the projections represent a forecast of the most likely results of operation
and are based on conditions and forecasts of use currently known. It must be recognized that this
is not an exact forecast of activity, given that the buildings will not be operational for several
years.
Governance, Management and Staffing
It is envisioned that the facilities would operate under a City Department Director with each
being administered by a Manager who would oversee a small staff of full and part time workers
and volunteers.
Part time and contract personnel would be employed, such as receptionists, bookkeepers, gallery
workers, development, marketing, etc. Custodial services would be contracted or provided by
City workers. Volunteers will also provide staffing for programs and administrative support.
If a gift shop and/or food service are provided, these could be operated by a non-profit support
organization.
Operating Estimate
Children’s Museum
Based on AMS’s research into comparable museums and review of data from members of the
Association of Children’s Museums, it is estimated that the annual operating budget for the
children’s museum of the size and type envisioned would between $450,000 and $550,000.
September 2006
Page 14
The museum would be staffed by 4 to 5 full time persons (Manager, Assistant, Program
Coordinator, and Visitor Services) and paid and volunteer part time workers.
The principal source of earned revenue for the Children’s Museum would be admissions and fees
for events and classes. We estimate that annual admission would be at least 30,000 with an
admission fee in the range of $3 - $4.00. Additional revenues would be earned through
memberships, events, classes, facility rentals and birthday parties. A museum shop, most likely
operated by a volunteer group could realize $20-$30,000 annually, based on experience at similar
museums.
Children’s museums of the size and type envisioned for Orem typically earn between 40% and
60% of their expenses. The museum would meet the operating shortfall by raising money through
fundraising events, charitable donations and grants, which could range from 25% to more than
60% of the operating budget. As a City-owned and operated museum, it would be anticipated that
the City would provide financial support—at a minimum for the building operations and
maintenance. This would be in the range of $150 - $200,000 annually. The table below provides a
range of anticipated operating budgets for a 10 - 15,000 sq. ft. museum.
Figure 6: Attendance Scenarios - Children’s Museum
Pessimistic
Conservative
Optimistic
20,000
30,000
40,000
Total Annual Budget
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
Earned Revenue
$100,000
$250,000
$330,000
Contributions
$50,000
$75,000
$150,000
Funding Requirement
$250,000
(63%)
$175,000
(35%)
$150,000
(25%)
Annual Attendance
Arts Education Center
Annual operating budgets for arts education facilities similar to that envisioned for Orem can vary
widely depending on the programs offered. The majority of revenue is derived from class fees.
Arts education centers frequently are able to cover direct costs for teachers, supplies and
marketing from class fees. Most publicly-owned arts education centers rely on government
subsidy for staffing and operating overhead. Some, however, receive additional funds from
grants, donations and fundraising events. One example, the Irvine Fine Arts Center, a similar
facility to that described in this report (18,100 sq.ft.) operates on an annual budget of about $1
million and receives an average of $300,000 in city funding in addition to the cost of building
operations. A smaller arts center in Burbank (about 12,000 sq. ft. with a small gallery and 6
classrooms) operates with 5 staff (4 FTE) on an annual budget of about $650,000 and earns about
$350,000 in fees from over 500 visual and performing arts classes a year.
The table below illustrates a range of scenarios for an arts education center as described in this
report.
September 2006
Page 15
Figure 7: Operating Cost Scenarios – Arts Education Center
Pessimistic
Conservative
Optimistic
7,000
8,000
10,000
Total Annual Budget
$500,000
$650,000
$800,000
Earned Revenue
$100,000
$300,000
$500,000
Funding requirement
$400,000
(60%)
$350,000
(34%)
$300,000
(33%)
Annual Attendance
Heritage Museum
Based on AMS’s research into comparable museums and review of data from American
Association of Museums, it is estimated that the annual operating budget for a Heritage Museum
of the size and type envisioned would range between $200,000 and $300,000.
The museum would be staffed by 2 to 3 full time persons (Manager, Program Coordinator)
supported by paid workers and volunteers.
The museum’s primary revenue would likely be derived from fees paid for school tours and a
general admission fee of $3-$4.00. Memberships, a museum shop, facility rentals and events are
other sources of potential revenue.
Heritage museums similar to that envisioned typically earn only small portion of their operating
costs from earned revenue, ranging from 20% to 30%. Donations, grants and fundraising events
could realize an additional 20% to 30%. A City subsidy in the range of $150 - $200,000 annually
may be estimated, including building operations.
Figure 8: Operating Cost Scenarios – Heritage Museum
Pessimistic
Conservative
Optimistic
5,000
12,000
20,000
Total Annual Budget
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
Earned Revenue
$50,000
$75,000
$125,000
Funding requirement
$150,000
(80%)
$175,000
(68%)
$175,000
(58%)
Annual Attendance
September 2006
Page 16
REVISED DRAFT
not for circulation
APPENDIX A: Preliminary Space Requirements
September 2006
OREM Community Art Park Program
Space List
Unit
Multiplier
Net Area
Gross Comments
Performing Arts Center
Main Hall
Performance Spaces
101 Auditorium
102 Stage House
103 Shell Tower Storage
104 Counterweight Pit
105 Dimmer Room
106 Amplifier Rack Room
107 Lighting Control Booth
108 Sound Control Booth
109 Crossover
110 Followspot Booth
111 Projection Booth
Subtotal
Backstage/Support
201 Star Dressing Rooms
202 Group Dressing Rooms
203 Performer's Lounge
204 Backstage Toilets
205 Wardrobe Work Room
206 Wardrobe Storage
207 Fitting Rooms
208 Laundry Room
209 Visiting Company Office
210 Stage Loading Dock
211 Stage Receiving
212 Lighting/AV Workroom
213 Sound Workroom
214 Piano Storage
215 Stands/Chairs Storage
216 Draperies Storage
217 General Storage
218 Crew Lounge
219 Tool Storage
220 Dance Floor Storage
221 Freight Elevator
222 Stage Door Lobby
Subtotal
Building Services
301 Building Engineering
302 Janitorial Office
303 Janitorial Supplies
304 Janitorial Crew
305 Janitors Closets
306 Electrical Closets
307 Telephone Closets
Subtotal
8
40
150
16
150
180
108
108
80
165
165
900
80
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
1
1
7,200
3,200
150
16
150
180
108
108
800
165
165
12,242
175
600
250
35
15
50
35
150
120
10
20
10
10
15
15
10
15
20
5
15
10
10
4
2
1
2
15
20
3
1
1
20
30
15
10
5
20
10
7
15
10
10
15
8
700
1,200
250
70
225
1,000
105
150
120
200
600
150
100
80
300
100
100
300
50
150
150
75
6,175
10
8
10
10
5
6
6
20
10
5
15
6
6
6
200
80
50
150
30
36
36
582
1
900 seats @ 8 sf/seat
80w 40d 70togrid 40 prosc
10 person Rooms
Apron
Shared with second hall
Space List
Unit
Flexible Theater
Performance Spaces
401 Flexible Hall
402 Prop/Crossover
403 Seating Unit Storage
404 Dimmer Room
405 Amplifier Rack Room
406 Control Booth
407 Followspot Booth
Subtotal
Multiplier
Net Area
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Gross Comments
Retain as existing
Retain as existing
Retain as existing
Retain as existing
Retain as existing
Retain as existing
Retain as existing
6,928
Backstage/Support
501 Group Dressing Rooms
502 Backstage Toilets
503 Performers Lounge
504 Wardrobe
505 Visiting Company Office
506 Stage Loading Dock
507 Stage Receiving
Subtotal
300
35
10
10
10
10
-
Front of House
601 Box Office
602 Box Office Manager
603 Box Office Foyer
604 Main Hall Public Lobby
605 Flexible Hall Public Lobby
606 Coatroom
607 Lobby Restroom
608 FOH Storage
609 Program Storage
610 House Manager
611 Public Elevator
612 Donors Lounge
613 Pantry
614 Snack Bar
615 Snack Bar Storage
Subtotal
Rehearsal/Education
701 Main Rehearsal Hall
702 Medium Rehearsal Hall
703 Dance Studio
704 Classrooms
705 Rehearsal Storage
706 Education Restrooms
Subtotal
2
2
20
15
15
10
600
70
200
150
150
100
1,270
50
10
10
900
300
300
45
10
5
8
10
30
10
30
10
3
10
15
7
6
1
42
10
10
8
10
60
8
20
10
150
100
150
6,075
1,800
300
1,890
100
50
64
100
1,800
80
600
100
13,359
70
30
50
900
20
45
22
22
22
3
10
8
1,540
660
1,100
2,700
200
360
6,560
-
2
10 person rooms
outdoor space
See crossover 402
28 womens 14 mens fix/29
5 womens 3 mens fix/29
Space List
Unit
Administration
801 CEO
15
802 Assistant
6
803 Artistic Director
10
804 Assistant
6
805 Facilities Manager
10
806 Assistant
6
807 Development Director
10
808 Assistant
6
809 Finance Director
10
810 Assistant
6
811 Marketing Director
10
812 Assistant
6
813 Interns
48
814 Board Room
15
815 Conference Room
12
816 File Room
8
817 Supply/Copy
8
818 Rest Rooms
35
819 Lunchroom
10
Subtotal
Multiplier
15
8
15
8
10
8
15
8
10
8
10
8
6
22
18
15
15
2
15
3
Net Area
225
48
150
48
100
48
150
48
100
48
100
48
288
330
216
120
120
70
150
2,407
Gross Comments
REVISED DRAFT
not for circulation
APPENDIX B: Concept Plans
September 2006
7
6
ST
ST
ATE
P
PRO
ERT
REE
Y LIN
T
5
A
4
E
3
2
1
B
X
ING E
EXIST O
IC
T
POR
STOR
FOH
608
NCE
EXIST
NG V
ESTIB
ULE
L
FFICE
O
BOX
601
"SCO
TING
EXIS ATED
C
O
REL
E
OFFIC 3
BOX
60
R
E
Y
FO
OP"
D
HALL
MAIN RIUM
O
IT
D
U
A
A:
IT )
101
T O P OOR ARE
8sqf
)
FL
T
S
( 4 ,5 3
N IU M
IR
E
F
C
L
S
A
O
(*TOT ft , T O P R
q
s
4 ,9 8 8
96
ADA
SEAT
T
5SQ.F
-5,14 L LOBBY
L
OBBY
A
L
H
L
)
A
MAIN L LOBBY
TOT
UDES
AL
(INCL EXIBLE H
FL
AND
96 SE
SNAC
614
K BA
160 S
E
EATS
MECH
R
EAT
590 S
/L A Y
OF
LINE
ADA
SEAT
TIO
CULA
COAT
606
ONY
L SE
A
EXIT
AT
ST
S - F IR
FLOO
ME
RE
DIUM
HEAR
702
SAL H
ALL
O
LINE
F BA
LCO
TH
IBLE
FLEX A T S
E
180 S
EATE
R
CORR
IDOR
F
DS
E
STAN /STORAG
S
CHAIR
215
R
MECH
E PIT
USTA
BLE
AN
ICAL
ADA
SEAT
G
E(
" WID
45'-0 ENIUM
C
S
O
PR
IC
PUBL T O R 6 1 1
A
ELEV
BOV
NY A
PED
BOVE
ADJ
MIN.)
ADA
SEAT
S
ROOM
REST
1A
/
7
0
6
LE:9W
FEMA M
:5
OMS
MALE
STRO
D RE
:
NOTE REQUIRE N FIRST
L
E
TOTA D BETWE O R S
E
LO
DIVID ECOND F
S
AND
AL
ATS
37 SE
STAG
N
CO
S
EATS
TOTA
CIR
ADA
IDOR
CORR
ROOM
ANIC
OM
STRO
D RE
:
L
E
TOTA D BETWE O R S
E
LO
DIVID ECOND F
S
AND
ADA
SEAT
S
SEAT
*590
P
DICA
)HAN
(ADA SIBLE
S
E
C
AC
IDOR
CORR
OUT
BALC
162 S
STAIR
S
SEAT
ATS
37
S
ROOM
REST
1B
/
7
0
6
LE:9W
FEMA M
:5
MALE
ATOR
ELEV
ADA
SEAT
R
RRIDO
STAIR
C
OBBY
SOUTH STREET
MA
TRA
IN EN
AGE
E
HOUS ER
RAM
AG
PROG GE MAN
A
610
STOR
609
E
OFFIC
BOX G E R 6 0 2
A
MAN
TE
RIOR
E
E
STAG
R
ND T
PIT A
W)
(BELO
( 9 5 'USE
E H O 102
G
A
T
S
APS
0"X4
0 '- 0 "
)
TER
COUN T PIT
H
WEIG
104
401
TOWE
103
R STO
RAGE
STAIR
IDOR
CORR
E STU
E
STAG
BACK S (4)
T
E
TOIL
T 204
DIO
T
PROPERTY LINE
DANC
703
SEAT
403
MAIN
701
REHE
ARSA
ING
ST
UNIT
ORAG
T
E
ET
STAG
BACK 5 0 2
ING
EXIST
STAIR
L
/C
PROP
DIN
E LOA
STAG 5 0 6
K
C
DO
IDOR
CORR
ROSS
OVER
402
HT
FREIG TOR 221
A
ELEV
ING
DING
E LOA
STAG
210
)
N
O
(APR
T
RU
ERY/T
DELIV D
A
O
L
UN
CKS
ATOR
ELEV
OR
E DO 2
STAG
2
Y 2
LOBB
OR
E DO
S T A G NCE
A
ENTR
IDOR
NOTE:
BUILDING SECTIONS REQUIRED TO
DETERMINE ADA ACCESSABILITY
M
SROO
CLAS 4
70
S
21
TOR-2
LEVA
HT E GE-219
IG
E
A
R
F
20
STOR
GE-2
TOOL STORA -214
E
E
DANC STORAG
O
P IA N
ECEIV
STAIR
CORR
M
SROO
CLAS 4
70
OILET
ER
STAG
211
G
BACK
Y
ENTR
PROPERTY LINE
R
SOVE
CROS
PROPERTY LINE
RAGE
L STO
ARSA 5
S
70
OOM
ESTR
ION R
T
A
C
EDU
706
REHE
109
M
SROO
CLAS 4
70
PARKING
Program 7.Aug.2006
Program Area
= 47,532 sf
+10% Construction Gross
= 4,750 sf
+15% Circulation Gross
= 7,100 sf
Sub-total
= 59,382 sf
+15% M.E.P. Gross = 8,900 sf
Gross
= 68,282 sf
Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
OREM -SCERA THEATER
Orem, Utah
2006 Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP
ASK-005
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP
31 August 2006
7
6
5
A
4
3
ROOF
2
1
STAIR
H 10
BOOT
ROL
T
)
E
N
V
O
C
BO
TING
110 (A
LIGH
S P O T OOTH 111
W
O
FOLL CTION B
E
PROJ
.F T
9 6 S Q LCONY
Y - 6 ,0
A
B
B
B
L
HAL
L LO
L
T O T A ES MAIN IBLE HAL
D
X
U
E
L
FL
(INC
D
N
YA
Y)
LOBB
LOBB
ONY
BALC
ROOF
120 S
7
ATOR
ELEV
EATS
93 SE
C
ATS
Y
HALL
LCON
MAIN ORIUM BA
IT
D
AU
101
93 SE
ATS
EAT
306 S
TOTA
ROOF
D
L-BA
LCON
P
DICA
)HAN
(ADA SIBLE
S
E
ACC
IDOR
CORR
Y
ADA
SEAT
PED
ADA
SEAT
MECH
OPEN
TO B
ROOF
ANIC
E
AL
ROOF
ELOW
OPEN
TO B
ELOW
F
:
ROLS
CONT
STAIR
IC
PUBL T O R 6 1 1
A
ELEV
B
TER
THEA
IBLE
2
FLEX A T S @ 2
E
44 S
S
ROOM
REST
2
607/
OPEN
TO B
ADMIN
TO B
ALCO
NY
G
LE:9W
FEMA M
:4
MALE
OMS
STRO
D RE
:
L
E
TOTA D BETWE O R S
E
LO
DIVID ECOND F
S
AND
ELOW
OPEN
5
M 10
ER R
DIMM IER
IF
L
P
06
AM
RM 1
RACK
4
5
M 4 0 RM 4 0
ER R
K
D IM M IER RAC H 406
IF
T
07
AMPL OL BOO
VE) 4
TR
(ABO
CON
SPOT
W
O
FOLL
ELOW
OPEN
TO B
IDOR
CORR
ISTRA
ELOW
TO
TO
OPEN
W
BELO
TO
OPEN
W
BELO
TION:
R 805
- 8 0 1 M A N A G E TOR 807
CEO
EC
IES
IR
IT
D
IL
T
F A C OPMEN
L
DEVE T A N T 8 0 8 OR 809
T
ASSIS CE DIREC CTOR 811
E
N
FINA TING DIR
E
MARK T A N T 8 1 2
IS
ASS NS 813
R
814
INTE D ROOM
BOAR OOM 816 7
R
81
FILE
OPY
L Y /C
8
S U P P OOMS 81 9
1
R
REST ROOMS 8
H
C
LUN
ING
EXIST
STAIR
OPEN
W
BELO
OPEN
T
TO
OPEN
W
BELO
LOW
O BE
TO
OPEN
W
BELO
ROOF
OPEN
TO B
ELOW
ROOF
ROOF
GARD
EN
Program 7.Aug.2006
Program Area
= 47,532 sf
= 4,750 sf
= 7,100 sf
Sub-total
= 59,382 sf
+15% M.E.P. Gross = 8,900 sf
Gross
= 68,282 sf
Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
OREM -SCERA THEATER
Orem, Utah
ASK-006
31 August 2006
1
BE
PACE
UM S
PLEN SEATING
LOW
MEP
STAG
E PIT
R
IDO
RR
CO
RT:
202
UPPO
GE S ING RMS
A
T
S
3
BACK P D R E S S U N G E 2 0
U
LO
05
2
'S
GRO
R
M
E
RK R
ORM
PERF ROBE WO RAGE 206
D
WAR ROBE STO
D
WAR
ES:
1
ERVIC ERING 30
E
ING S
BUILD G ENGIN ICE 302
IN
F
D
L OF PLIES 303
BUIL
ORIA
P
JANIT RIAL SU W 304
O
E
JANIT RIAL CR TS 305
O
6
SE
JANIT RS CLO OSETS 30
O
L
JANIT RICAL C SETS 307
O
T
ELEC HONE CL
P
T:
TELE
PPOR 5 0 1
E SU
M
STAG SSING R E 503
K
C
A
B
RE
OUNG
UP D
GRO RMERS L
E 505
O
PERF ROBE 504 NY OFFIC
A
D
WAR G COMP
IN
E 615
VISIT
ORAG
R ST
A
B
K
SNAC Y 613
R
PANT
E
STAG
IDOR
CORR
PIT A
ND T
RAPS
17
GE 2 FICE 209
TORA
F
RAL S MPANY O
E
N
E
O
G
ING C
IT
IS
V
R
IDO
RR
CO
M2
KROO
WOR M 213
V
A
OO
TING
LIGH D WORK R AGE 216
R
SOUN RIES STO
E
DRAP
12
STAIR
MEP
HT
FREIG TOR 221
A
ELEV
ATOR
ELEV
ING
EXIST
STAIR
MEP
No existing plan currently available.
This plan diagram limited to
program area laid over existing
First Floor Plan.
Program 7.Aug.2006
Program Area
= 47,532 sf
= 4,750 sf
= 7,100 sf
Sub-total
= 59,382 sf
+15% M.E.P. Gross = 8,900 sf
Gross
= 68,282 sf
Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
BASEMENT PLAN
OREM -SCERA THEATER
Orem, Utah
ASK-007
31 August 2006
41'-0165 "
STAGE
STAGE HOUSE
CORRIDOR
Orem, Utah
SECTION THROUGH MAIN HALL WITH BALCONY OPTIONS A&B
OREM -SCERA THEATER
10'-0"
CROSSOVER
PROSCENIUM OPENING
PIT
ORCHESTRA
63'-0"=HEIGHT
AT 350CUFT/SEAT
30'-0"
9'-0"
VISIO
N LIN
E
PLENUM SPACE
V
LIN
LINE
ES
ON
VISI
N
ISIO
S
81'-0"
EXISTING DEPTH
AUDIENCE CHAMBER
(900 SEATS)
VOLUMETRIC RANGE
FOR ACOUSTIC ENHANCEMENT
FOR 900 SEAT THEATER(BALCONY OPTION A)
ACOUSTICAL VOLUME AT 300 CUFT/SEAT
SEAT
STOR.
54'-0"=HEIGHT
AT 300 CUFT/SEAT
ACOUSTICAL VOLUME AT 350 CUFT/SEAT
19'-6"
MECHANICAL VENTILATION
AND STRUCTURE
A
B
VISIO
N LIN
E
CONTROL
BOOTH
CONTROL
BOOTH
BALCONY OPTION WITH MAIN FLOOR SEATING OF 590
A. 306 SEATS=896 TOTAL
(APPROX. 900 SEATS)
B. 250 SEATS=840 TOTAL
PLENUM SPACE
250 SEATS
BALCONY OPTION B
33'-0"
306 SEATS
BALCONY OPTION A
39'-0"
3'-6"TYP.
16'-6"
31 August 2006
ASK-008
Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"
7
6
ST
ST
ATE
P
PRO
ERT
REE
Y LIN
T
5
A
4
E
3
2
1
B
X
ING E
EXIST O
IC
T
POR
STOR
FOH
608
NCE
EXIST
NG V
ESTIB
ULE
L
FFICE
O
BOX
601
"SCO
TING
EXIS ATED
C
O
REL
OP"
D
HALL
MAIN RIUM
O
IT
D
U
A
A:
IT )
101
T O P OOR ARE
8sqf
)
FL
T
S
( 4 ,5 3
N IU M
IR
E
F
C
L
S
A
O
(*TOT ft , T O P R
q
s
4 ,9 8 8
ADA
SEAT
96
ADA
SEAT
T
5SQ.F
-5,14 L LOBBY
L
OBBY
A
L
H
L
)
A
MAIN L LOBBY
TOT
UDES
AL
(INCL EXIBLE H
FL
AND
96 SE
SNAC
614
K BA
160 S
ATS
B
/L A Y
37
TIO
CULA
P
DICA
)HAN
(ADA SIBLE
S
E
C
AC
IDOR
CORR
OUT
ONY
TOTA
L SE
A
EXIT
AT
ST
S - F IR
FLOO
ME
RE
DIUM
HEAR
702
SAL H
ALL
O
LINE
MECH
E PIT
DANC
703
E STU
E
E
STAG
USTA
PROPERTY LINE
SEAT
403
ARSA
ING
ORAG
BLE
L
ADA
SEAT
T
ROSS
OVER
D
DIN
E LOA
STAG 5 0 6
K
C
DO
402
OR
E DO
S T A G NCE
A
ENTR
R STO
RAGE
R
OILET
S
109
ER
STAG
211
21
TOR-2
LEVA
HT E GE-219
IG
E
A
R
F
20
STOR
GE-2
TOOL STORA -214
E
E
DANC STORAG
O
P IA N
ECEIV
ING
HT
FREIG TOR 221
A
ELEV
DING
E LOA
STAG
210
)
N
O
(APR
T
RU
ERY/T
DELIV D
A
O
L
UN
CKS
A. RENOVATED EXISTING SPACE
B. NEW PUBLIC SUPPORT SPACE
C. NEW & RENOVATED AUDITORIUM
D. NEW STAGE & SUPPORT SPACE
E. NEW EDUCATIONAL SPACE
= 6,928SF
=13,632SF
= 5,120SF
= 9,214SF
= 7,956SF
*SUB-TOTAL AT FIRST FLOOR
= 42,850SF
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE:
BASEMENT
FIRST FLOOR
SECOND FLOOR
*TOTAL:
=24,490SF
=42,850SF
=18,725SF
=86,065SF
M
SROO
CLAS 4
70
PARKING
Orem, Utah
TER
COUN T PIT
H
WEIG
104
OR
E DO 2
STAG
2
Y 2
LOBB
NOTE:
BUILDING SECTIONS REQUIRED TO
DETERMINE ADA ACCESSABILITY
AREA CALCULATION
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
OREM -SCERA THEATER
)
ATOR
STAIR
IDOR
M
SROO
CLAS 4
70
0 '- 0 "
FIRST FLOOR AREA CALCULATION:
CORR
M
SROO
CLAS 4
70
APS
0"X4
ELEV
G
BACK
Y
ENTR
PROPERTY LINE
( 9 5 'USE
E H O 102
G
A
T
S
SOVE
/C
PROP
IDOR
G
CROS
ET
STAG
BACK 5 0 2
CORR
AN
STAIR
E
ING
EXIST
STAIR
DS
E
STAN /STORAG
S
CHAIR
215
ICAL
TOWE
103
T
ST
UNIT
F
D
401
DIO
REHE
R
ND T
PIT A
W)
(BELO
E
STAG
BACK S (4)
T
E
TOIL
T 204
E
MAIN
701
R
IDOR
E(
" WID
45'-0 ENIUM
C
S
O
PR
A
RAGE
L STO
ARSA 5
S
70
OOM
ESTR
ION R
T
A
C
EDU
706
IDOR
LCO
TE
THEA
IBLE
FLEX A T S
E
180 S
REHE
CORR
F BA
CORR
R
IC
PUBL T O R 6 1 1
A
ELEV
BOV
NY A
PED
BOVE
ADJ
MIN.)
ADA
SEAT
S
ROOM
REST
1A
/
7
0
6
LE:9W
FEMA M
:5
OMS
MALE
STRO
D RE
:
L
E
TOTA D BETWE O R S
E
LO
DIVID ECOND F
S
AND
AL
ATS
37 SE
STAG
N
CO
S
EATS
S
SEAT
CIR
ADA
IDOR
CORR
ANIC
OM
STRO
D RE
:
L
E
TOTA D BETWE O R S
E
LO
DIVID ECOND F
S
AND
ADA
SEAT
BALC
162 S
*590
STAIR
MECH
OF
LINE
ADA
SEAT
COAT
606
E
EATS
EAT
590 S
ROOM
S
SEAT
C
R
S
ROOM
REST
1B
/
7
0
6
LE:9W
FEMA M
:5
MALE
ATOR
ELEV
PROPERTY LINE
E
OFFIC 3
BOX
60
R
E
Y
FO
R
RRIDO
STAIR
C
OBBY
SOUTH STREET
MA
TRA
IN EN
AGE
E
HOUS ER
RAM
AG
PROG GE MAN
A
610
STOR
609
E
OFFIC
BOX G E R 6 0 2
A
MAN
TE
RIOR
Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
ASK-005
31 August 2006
7
6
5
A
4
3
ROOF
2
1
STAIR
H 10
BOOT
ROL
T
)
E
N
V
O
C
BO
TING
110 (A
LIGH
S P O T OOTH 111
W
O
FOLL CTION B
E
PROJ
.F T
9 6 S Q LCONY
Y - 6 ,0
A
B
B
B
L
HAL
L LO
L
T O T A ES MAIN IBLE HAL
D
X
U
E
L
FL
(INC
D
N
YA
Y)
LOBB
LOBB
ONY
BALC
ROOF
120 S
EATS
93 SE
ATS
EAT
306 S
TOTA
TO B
C
ATS
ROOF
ROOF
D
L-BA
ADA
SEAT
OPEN
ATOR
ELEV
Y
HALL
LCON
MAIN ORIUM BA
IT
D
AU
101
93 SE
B
7
LCON
P
DICA
)HAN
(ADA SIBLE
S
E
ACC
IDOR
CORR
Y
ADA
SEAT
C
PED
MECH
ANIC
E
AL
ROOF
ELOW
OPEN
TO B
ELOW
F
:
ROLS
CONT
STAIR
IC
PUBL T O R 6 1 1
A
ELEV
A
B
TER
THEA
IBLE
2
FLEX A T S @ 2
E
44 S
S
ROOM
REST
2
607/
OPEN
TO B
ADMIN
TO B
ALCO
NY
G
LE:9W
FEMA M
:4
MALE
OMS
STRO
D RE
:
L
E
TOTA D BETWE O R S
E
LO
DIVID ECOND F
S
AND
ELOW
OPEN
5
M 10
ER R
DIMM IER
IF
L
P
06
AM
RM 1
RACK
4
5
M 4 0 RM 4 0
ER R
K
D IM M IER RAC H 406
IF
T
07
AMPL OL BOO
VE) 4
TR
(ABO
CON
SPOT
W
O
FOLL
ELOW
IDOR
CORR
E
OPEN
TO B
ISTRA
TO
TO
OPEN
W
BELO
TO
OPEN
W
BELO
TION:
R 805
- 8 0 1 M A N A G E TOR 807
CEO
EC
IES
IR
IT
D
IL
T
F A C OPMEN
L
DEVE T A N T 8 0 8 OR 809
T
ASSIS CE DIREC CTOR 811
E
N
FINA TING DIR
E
MARK T A N T 8 1 2
IS
ASS NS 813
R
814
INTE D ROOM
BOAR OOM 816 7
R
81
FILE
OPY
L Y /C
8
S U P P OOMS 81 9
1
R
REST ROOMS 8
H
C
LUN
OPEN
T
TO
OPEN
W
BELO
LOW
O BE
TO
OPEN
W
BELO
A
ING
EXIST
STAIR
ELOW
OPEN
W
BELO
ROOF
OPEN
TO B
ELOW
ROOF
ROOF
GARD
EN
SECOND FLOOR AREA CALCULATION:
B. NEW PUBLIC SUPPORT SPACE
C. NEW & RENOVATED AUDITORIUM
D. NONE AT THIS LEVEL
E. NEW EDUCATIONAL SPACE
= 3,830SF
= 8,671SF
= 5,494SF
*SUB-TOTAL AT SECOND FLOOR
= 18,725SF
BASEMENT
FIRST FLOOR
SECOND FLOOR
*TOTAL:
=24,490SF
=42,850SF
=18,725SF
=86,065SF
= 730SF
Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
AREA CALCULATION
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
OREM -SCERA THEATER
Orem, Utah
ASK-006
31 August 2006
1
C
BE
PACE
UM S
PLEN SEATING
LOW
MEP
STAG
E PIT
R
IDO
RR
CO
A
RT:
202
UPPO
GE S ING RMS
A
T
S
3
BACK P D R E S S U N G E 2 0
U
LO
05
2
'S
GRO
R
M
E
RK R
ORM
PERF ROBE WO RAGE 206
D
WAR ROBE STO
D
WAR
ES:
1
ERVIC ERING 30
E
ING S
BUILD G ENGIN ICE 302
IN
F
D
L OF PLIES 303
BUIL
ORIA
P
JANIT RIAL SU W 304
O
E
JANIT RIAL CR TS 305
O
6
SE
JANIT RS CLO OSETS 30
O
L
JANIT RICAL C SETS 307
O
T
ELEC HONE CL
P
T:
TELE
PPOR 5 0 1
E SU
M
STAG SSING R E 503
K
C
A
B
RE
OUNG
UP D
GRO RMERS L
E 505
O
PERF ROBE 504 NY OFFIC
A
D
WAR G COMP
IN
E 615
VISIT
ORAG
R ST
A
B
K
SNAC Y 613
R
PANT
E
STAG
IDOR
CORR
PIT A
ND T
D
RAPS
17
GE 2 FICE 209
TORA
F
RAL S MPANY O
E
N
E
O
G
ING C
IT
IS
V
STAIR
R
IDO
RR
CO
M2
KROO
WOR M 213
V
A
OO
TING
LIGH D WORK R AGE 216
R
SOUN RIES STO
E
DRAP
12
MEP
HT
FREIG TOR 221
A
ELEV
ATOR
ELEV
ING
EXIST
STAIR
D
MEP
No existing plan currently available.
This plan diagram limited to
program area laid over existing
First Floor Plan.
BASEMENT FLOOR AREA CALCULATION:
= 7,046SF
B. NONE AT THIS LEVEL
C. NEW & RENOVATED AUDITORIUM PLENUM = 5,120SF
D. NEW STAGE & SUPPORT SPACE
= 12,324SF
E. NONE AT THIS LEVEL
AREA CALCULATION
BASEMENT PLAN
OREM -SCERA THEATER
Orem, Utah
*SUB -TOTAL AT BASEMENT FLOOR
=24,490SF
BASEMENT
FIRST FLOOR
SECOND FLOOR
*TOTAL:
=24,490SF
=42,850SF
=18,725SF
=86,065SF
Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
ASK-007
31 August 2006
Existing Park
Existing
ExistingAmphitheater
Amphitheater
Existing Park
Existing
Pool Site
Existing
Pool Site
Potential
ExpansionSites
Sites
PotentialArts
Arts District
District Expansion
Main Street for the Arts
Main Street for the Arts
Existing
Existing
Scera
Scera
Theatre
Potential Arts District Expansion Sites
Potential Arts District Expansion Sites
Theatre
c
APPENDIX C
1.0
STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION
2.0
BUILDING SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SOM
©2006 Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP
1.0
STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION
Seismic Design
The existing 1930-1940 structure would need to be updated to meet current seismic structural
requirements. The newer, 1996 modifications to the original theatre would need to be verified for
seismic behavior, if portions of this 1996 work are deleted in the current 2006 building program
proposal.
New Building Elements – 2006
The proposed new building elements would utilize a combination of new structural steel and
reinforced concrete structural elements, all with new foundations. Interface with the existing
structures would certainly require penetration, and/or removal of existing façade elements,
portions of which may need to remain even under the new renovation program.
Existing Theatre Renovation
The proposed new stage, stage pit/lift, and the staging “fly tower,” at the rear, should be a
completely new structure utilizing structural steel systems, all with new foundation systems
extending below the existing, single basement level. New foundations that should be evaluated
for these elements would include “micro-piles” which can be installed within “tight,” confined
existing conditions.
Introduction of a new balcony within the existing, relatively small theatre, would involve complex
structural work especially with the basement below and the theatre sidewalls, of unknown
construction, being the only source of structural support. All of the new construction work would
need to be completed below the exiting roof structure, as well as, being integrated with the
seismic retrofit. If the existing roof structural system needs to be removed, due to its existing
condition, then a carefully sequenced structural system renovation program, including the
proposed new balcony, could be optimized with respect to construction time and potential final
product. However, a new roof structure would be an additional cost.
From a structural viewpoint, all of the SOM proposed renovations scheme can be designed and
constructed within reasonable cost and construction time feasibility parameters. A careful existing
conditions survey of the existing structural elements would be needed prior to the start of final
design
SOM
SCERA Theater Study
1
2.0
BUILDING SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
Mechanical
Original Building HVAC System
Based on the existing conditions assessment report, mechanical cooling was added to the
building approximately 15 to 20 years ago. It is unclear if this equipment maintains adequate
indoor environmental conditions during theatrical events. Additionally, it is unclear if the air
handling unit and rooftop units provide the code-required amount of outside air to the building. If
outside air needs to be increased to meet code, it is unlikely the equipment can handle the
increased cooling load.
The proposed alterations and additions to the building indicate that the existing outdoor air-cooled
condensing unit will need to be, at a minimum, relocated. However, per ASHRAE 2003
Applications Handbook, the estimated service life for air-cooled condensing units and DX coils is
20 years. Therefore, it is recommended that this equipment be replaced with new sized to meet
the new building loads (people, lighting, etc.), code-required amount of outside air, and minimum
equipment efficiencies per ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2001 Energy Standard for Buildings Except
Low-Rise Residential Buildings. One rooftop unit was replaced two years ago, according to the
existing conditions assessment report. Since this unit has at least 15 years of useful service life,
it should be reused if the unit has adequate capacity to meet the new building loads and minimum
outside air requirements. It is recommended that the projection booth be provided with a
dedicated air conditioning unit to maintain the required environmental conditions for the
equipment housed in this space.
It is recommended that the Staefa Smart II direct digital control (DDC) building automation system
serving the South Addition be extended and all new equipment provided with DDC controls. This
will provide the facility operators with the ability to optimize system performance via programmed
start/stop schedules and early alarm detection and troubleshooting. An additional energy
optimizing recommendation is to provide carbon dioxide sensors in the theater spaces to reduce
outside air quantities during low-occupancy events. The sensors ensure that an acceptable
indoor environment is still achieved with a reduced outside air quantity and energy is conserved
by reducing the amount of outside air that has to be heated or cooled.
It is also recommended that the existing boiler, steam piping, convectors and steam coil that were
abandoned in place be removed. It is encouraged that the materials be discarded via a
comprehensive on-site recycling program to minimize the amount of construction waste delivered
to landfills.
The proposed building envelope upgrades such as window glazing, door glazing, etc. should
meet the minimum performance requirements of ASHRAE 90.1-2001 to minimize heating and air
conditioning loads due to the heat loss and gain through building components.
South Addition HVAC System
Based on the existing conditions assessment report, a semi-custom unit was installed in 1994 to
serve the addition. The unit is equipped with variable frequency drives (VFD) and economizer
capability to provide energy efficient operation. However, the return fan VFD experiences
occasional problems. It is unclear if this equipment maintains adequate indoor environmental
conditions for all spaces served by this unit. Additionally, it is unclear if the unit provides the
code-required amount of outside air to all spaces. If outside air needs to be increased to meet
code, it is unclear if the equipment can handle the increased cooling load.
SOM
SCERA Theater Study
2
The existing unit has been in service for 12 years. Per ASHRAE 2003 Applications Handbook,
the estimated service life for air-cooled condensing units is 20 years. Since the unit has only
been in service for half its estimated life, it is recommended that a detailed analysis be conducted
to determine if it has the capacity to meet the new building loads and minimum required outside
air load.
It is recommended that the projection booth be provided with a dedicated air conditioning unit to
maintain the required environmental conditions for the equipment housed in this space.
New Addition
New building program elements will require heating and air conditioning. The new building
envelope should be designed to exceed the adopted energy code, ASHRAE 90.1-2001.
Optimizing the building envelope will assist in reducing the heating and air conditioning loads.
The new system(s) should be designed to be energy efficient by utilizing a variable air volume
(VAV) system with VFDs on the supply and return fan and VAV boxes for zone temperature
control. All new systems shall be provided with DDC controls and interface with the building
automation system.
Building pressurization should be controlled to minimize untreated outdoor air from entering the
building via glazing leakage and potentially creating indoor air quality issues via formation of
condensation on surfaces.
It is highly recommended that the mechanical systems be designed to optimize the energy use of
the facility via energy efficient systems and building controls to optimize system operation. The
USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council) has created a rating system called LEED® (Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design) that provides guidance on ways to achieve these goals.
Refer to section E. Sustainable Design for more details.
Electrical System
Existing Power Service Entrance and Distribution
The 1994 upgraded 1200 amp 3 phase service would need to be replaced in order to meet the
projected design needs. Based upon the projected increased footprint and the additional HVAC
loads, the power service entrance is likely to require a minimum 480V, 2,500A 3ph, 4w. Note: the
existing 1200A 3ph service panels could be removed and re-installed as remote power
distribution equipment. An option for this site would be to provide two voltage sources to the
building:
1) 480V, 1,6000A 3ph, 4w. to feed Lighting, HVAC and large motor/equipment.
2) 208V, 1,600A 3ph, 4w to feed Receptacles and Technology Based Systems.
The two voltage source Power Service Entrances eliminates in-building transformers which
optimized electrical room/closet footprints.
Telecommunications Service Entrance and Distribution
The Technology based services need to be addressed in order to meet the projected design
needs. Relocation of the facility Utility entrance cabling (SBC, Comcast, etc.) will need to be
upgraded for the projected Technology Based systems. A centralized Telecommunications room
for modern convergent technologies with dedicated UPS power and HVAC methods should be
SOM
SCERA Theater Study
3
employed. Consider the following Technologies centralized to maximize footprint, integration, and
MEP/FP requirements:
•
Audiovisual/Multimedia Centralized Racks/Equipment for:
Projection/Display Systems
Video Systems
Audio Systems
Control Systems
IP Based Video on Demand
•
Data Networking Systems Centralized Racks/Equipment for:
Wired and Wireless LAN/WAN Networking and its applications.
Voice over IP –OR. - PBX.
Convergence (IP based Video, IP Based Video on Demand, Security and
Temperature Control)
•
Stage and Facility Performance Sound, and Building Intercom Systems
•
Centralized Racks/Equipment for:
Performance Sound Control Racks/Equipment
Audio Systems
Control Systems
IP Based Digital Sound on Demand
Convergence (IP based Video, IP Based Sound Integrated to LAN and Digital
Multimedia Control)
•
Stage and Facility Performance Lighting, and Building Lighting Systems
•
Centralized Racks/Equipment for:
Performance Lighting Control Racks/Equipment
Building Energy Efficiency Control Systems
Convergence (IP based Performance Equipment Head end, IP Based Building
EE Lighting fully integrated to LAN and Digital Multimedia Control)
•
Security Systems Centralized Racks/Equipment for Access Control and CCTV
Systems
Wired and Wireless LAN or Proprietary Systems for Access Control.
IP Camera – OR – CCTV Camera Head-ends.
Convergence (IP based CC-Video, Based Building EE Lighting Security Access
Control, and Temperature Control).
•
Temperature Control Systems Centralized Racks/Equipment for Access Control and
CCTV Systems:
Wired and Wireless LAN or Proprietary Systems for Building Management
Control
IP Based Digital (Ethernet Ready with SNMP protocols).
Convergence (IP based BMS, Based Building EE Lighting Security Access
Control, and CCTV).
SOM
SCERA Theater Study
4
•
Technology Systems Cabling Plant:
With convergence of above systems a comprehensive structured cabling solution
would optimize installation cost and minimize repeated labor cost from different
proprietary cabling venders and installers: Inter-Systems backbone cabling
centrally defined pathway means (cable tray, conduits, support hanger, etc)
•
Comprehensive pre-engineered Cable plant design (future proofing)
Life Safety and Building Protection Systems
Lightning Protection System
The entire building would need to be equipped with a UL Master-Labeled listed Lighting
Protection System. All components shall conform to the requirements of UL 96A and
NFPA 780 for the structure. Provide TVSS and GFP protection methods on all Utility
Service Entrances.
Life Safety Lighting and Egress
The entire building would need to be equipped with a UL listed battery units and exits and
a redundant UPS system for the Main Hall Auditorium. Rescue Assistance space and
intercom/lighted annunciation would be employed at designated stairs and main
accessibility pathways.
Life Safety Fire Alarm Detection and Speaker Annunciation System
The entire building would need to be equipped with a UL listed intelligent addressableanalog system with manual and automatic alarm initiation; automatic sensitivity control of
certain smoke detectors; and multiplexed signal transmission dedicated to fire alarm
service only. The entire building would need to be equipped with a UL listed speaker and
handset phone analog system with manual and automatic alarm two-way communication
and annunciation system.
Lighting Systems; Building Interior, Exterior and Site
The current lighting fixtures and control would need to be addressed in order to meet the
projected design and per the Energy Efficiency Codes adapted by the AHJ in 2006. Therefore, all
incandescent lighting fixtures would be replaced with T5 and T8 fluorescent ballast and bulbs
type fixtures. Indirect lighting methods would be employed for wattage-to-square feet ratio
compliance. In addition, room by room day-light harvesting and occupancy sensors would be
used. Finally, intelligent programmable lighting control methods would be employed for building
interior and exterior control. A few of the ASHRAE 90.1-2004 and IECC 2003 Lighting Energy
codes are listed below:
The entire building would need to be equipped with Energy Efficient Lighting per ASHRAE 90.12004 and IECC 2003 which includes requirements for interior and exterior building lighting.
Mandatory individual space control. The energy codes require at least one lighting control for
each room or space enclosed by ceiling-height partitions. These must generally be readily
accessible to occupants, but remote location is allowed to accommodate areas where safety or
security is a concern. Both ASHRAE 90.1 and IECC require that controls to turn off permanently
when unoccupied.
The IECC includes a “bi-level” switching requirement for all spaces with the capability to uniformly
reduce the connected load by 50% with some exceptions.
SOM
SCERA Theater Study
5
Mandatory automatic shutoff. Automatic lighting shutoff of all building lighting is required in both
ASHRAE 90.1 and IECC for buildings larger than 5,000 square feet. This can be done with timescheduling devices, occupant-sensing devices, or a similar signal from another control or alarm
system that indicates the area is unoccupied. IECC 2000 only requires this in spaces larger than
250 square feet.
Mandatory exterior lighting control. Exterior building lighting must be controlled using photocells
(for dawn-to-dusk lighting) or seven-day/seasonal programmable controls with astronomic
correction and 4-hour battery backup. ASHRAE 90.1 exempts covered vehicle entrances and
exits from buildings or parking structures where lighting is required for safety, security, or eye
adaptation.
In addition, ASHRAE 90.1 requires tandem wiring of fixtures when single-lamp magnetic ballasts
are used. Limits are also placed on exit signs with a limit of 5 watts per face for most of the
codes.
Energy code compliance. Compliance with energy codes is typically a combination of
documenting the proposed energy features of the building and passing related inspections. Many
jurisdictions require documentation of the proposed design before issuing building permits. The
form of documentation will depend on what the local jurisdiction requires.
Plumbing System
Fixtures
Given the proposed alterations and additions to this facility it appears that all existing plumbing
fixtures and bathrooms are anticipated to be demolished. It is not evident based upon the
existing conditions assessment report if the plumbing fixtures installed during the 1994 addition
are in compliance with the 1992 Energy Policy Act (EPA-1992) – a requirement of all fixtures
installed per current model plumbing codes. It is required that all new plumbing fixtures installed
during the renovation and additions comply with the minimum flow requirements per the
applicable plumbing codes and EPA-1992.
Piping
All new piping installed during the 1994 addition would be maintained to the extent possible as
this piping is relatively new and well within the 50+ year life expectancy. The underground waste
piping for the original facility appears to have been replaced in areas where problems have been
identified. It is recommended that this existing underground piping (that is any underground
piping installed prior to 1994) be routed clean and inspected using camera inspection technology.
In this way an accurate assessment of the existing conditions of this piping can be made to
determine the future life of this piping system. It is possible that some of this piping could be
maintained despite the age of the original piping, but further analysis should be performed to
assist in determining the disposition of this piping.
An evaluation of the existing sanitary and domestic water piping sizes will need to be conducted
to determine if the new demand of the plumbing fixtures can be accommodated with the existing
accommodations. Attempts can be made during the design to limit the amount of additional water
and waste demand created by utilizing ultra low flow plumbing fixtures such as dual flush water
closets, waterless urinals, and renewable energy sensor faucets.
It is recommended that local hot water heating be provided for the new toilet core areas as the
demand is fairly low and this will limit the need for a separate hot water distribution loop. A water
SOM
SCERA Theater Study
6
heater with storage capacity may be required in the stage area for shower facilities that may be
provided.
It is anticipated at this time that the existing energy source used to generate hot water for both
domestic use and HVAC use will be sufficient to provide energy for hot water for the future
modifications.
Fire Protection System
The existing sprinkler system that is installed in the new portion of the facility shall be modified to
accommodate the proposed modifications. The fire protection system will be required to be
extended to the original building areas (currently not protected) as well as to all renovated spaces
within the facility. Further analysis of the existing water pressures will be required during future
phases to determine the pipe sizing for the sprinkler system.
Sustainable Design
Given the cost of energy today as well as the desire to maintain existing natural resources,
consideration should be given to providing a facility that is high-performance and sustainable.
One such measure of this goal is defined by the USGBC’s (U.S. Green Building Council) rating
system LEED® (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design). Consideration should be
given to constructing a facility utilizing LEED® as a guideline. A meeting with all design,
construction and building operation team members during the schematic design will guide the
team through the achievable rating (certified, silver, gold, etc.) for the project. Further
consideration should be given to the financial incentives available on both a state and federal
level for implementation of sustainable strategies and technologies such as solar powered hot
water, solar hybrid lighting, fuel cells, etc.
SOM
SCERA Theater Study
7
APPENDIX D Preliminary Project Budget – SCERA Center Renovations & Addition
Area
Level 1
A-second hall
B-new lobby
C-main hall
D-new stage house
E-new education wing
Level 2
A-2nd hall balcony and admin
B-new upper lobby
C-main hall
E-new education corridor
Basement Level
A-renovated existing space
C-new and renovated main hall plenum
D-new stage and support space
Area Total
Hard Cost Grand Total
Performance Lighting
Rigging
Concert Enclosure
Variable Acoustics
Loose Equipment
Performance Audio
Audience Seating
Subtotal
Multiplier
$150
$250
$350
$350
$250
$1,039,200
$3,408,000
$1,792,000
$3,224,900
$1,989,000
$11,453,100
Renovated existing space
New public support space
New and renovated main hall
New stage and support space
New education space
3,830
8,671
5,494
730
18,725
$150
$250
$350
$250
$574,500
$2,167,750
$1,922,900
$182,500
$4,847,650
Renovated existing space
New public support space
New and renovated main hall
New education space
7,046
5,120
12,324
24,490
86,065
$150
$150
$250
$1,056,900
$768,000
$3,081,000
$4,905,900
artistic support zone
unconfirmed plenum area
artistic support and building systems
$21,206,650
900
$300
Total Project Cost (2006 dollars)
Hard Cost per square foot
Project cost per square foot
$400,000
$600,000
$350,000
$250,000
$70,000
$600,000
$270,000
$2,540,000
$23,746,650
10%
12%
5%
5%
Total Building Cost
Soft Costs
Comments
6,928
13,632
5,120
9,214
7,956
42,850
Building Cost
Design Contingency
Contractor's Overhead & Profit
Bidding Contingency
Change Order Contingency
Total
$2,374,665
$2,849,598
$1,187,333
$1,187,333
$31,345,578
25%
$7,836,395
$39,181,973
includes fees, expenses, FFE etc.
No escalation included
$246
$455
This analysis was undertaken as a theoretical exercise prepared solely for your benefit and for program confirmation and
such calculations are not to be relied upon by any third party for final calculations, confirmation of the final configuration of
a buildable design, Project financing, cost estimating, tenant leasing or for any other purpose. Because construction costs
are affected by unpredictable fluctuations in the costs of labor, materials and equipment, by contractors’ differing methods
of determining bid prices, by the competitiveness of the bidding, by market conditions and by other factors beyond our
control, our preparation of any estimates of material quantities and/or probable Construction Cost for the Work are
intended solely for informational purposes and we cannot guarantee that quantities, bids or construction costs for the
Work will not vary from such estimates. Our review of your Initial Budget or any Client Approved Budget and quantities
and cost estimates prepared by others shall be general in nature and shall not be deemed to be an indication that we
have made a detailed study of the quantities and probable costs or Construction Cost or that we are responsible for the
accuracy of such estimates.

Cultural Arts Facilities Feasibility Study

Transcription

Similar documents

1994 - 2000 - . . 1846 . . . Location: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll

Baby Shower Packages - Children`s Museum of Phoenix

TAC Update 2/19/16

PIONEERS AND DRIFTERS, COWBOYS AND INDIANS

HP-U-505 MSI.indd

Memberships from Coast to Coast and Everywhere In Between

downloaded here.

Arnhem Open Air Museum Holland in one day!

Saturday, June 16th 2:00 to 5:00 pm Tickets: $15

Future Vilnius