Environmental Site Assessment

Transcription

tll Wallace Kuhl
VVV&assocrarEs
Phase
I Environmental Síte Assessment
CARMAX
Sacramento County, California
WKA No. 9179.01
August 4,2071
Prepared for:
Mr. Greg Toler
CenterPoint lntegrated Solutions, LLC
1240Bergen Parkway, Suite A-250
Evergreen, Colorado 80439
Prepared By:
Wallace-Kuhl & Associates
3050 Industrial Boulevard
Sacramento, Califomia
9 569
1
\\f
wplrsessj:hl
CoRPoRATE OFFrcË
3050 Industriat Bou[evard
West Sacramento, CA 95691
916.372.1434 phone
916.377-2565
fa\
STocKToN OFFtcE
3422 West Hammer Lane, Suite D
Stockton, CA 95219
209.234.7722 phoie
209.234.7727 fãx
Phase
I Environmentql
Site Assessment
RENo OFFTcE
9670 North V¡rg¡n¡a Street
Reno, NV 89506
775.626.0300 phone
775.626.0309 fax
CARMAX
Sacramento County, Califomia
WK,{ No. 9179.01
August 4,2011
Wallace-Kuhl & Associates (WKA), on behalf of the CenterPoint Integrated Solutions, LLC
(CenterPoint) and CarMax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc. (Carmax), prepared this Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment for the Carmax Properly located at East Stockton Boulevard,
Sacramento
Count¡ California. We
declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and
belief, the reporl reviewer meets the definition of Entironmental Professional as defined in
$312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and has the "specifìc qualifications based on education, training, and
experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. W e
have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in confbnnance with the standards
and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part
are included
312." Resumes of the key staff who prepared this report
in Appendix A.
WALLACE.KUHL & ASSOCIATES
h
DENNIS B.
ro \9
NAKAMOTO
No. HG260
CERTIFIED
HYDRO
s
e6y
GEOLOGIST
NancvM. Malaret
Dennis B. Nakamoto, P.G., C.E.G., C.HG.
Project Environmental Scientist
Senior Hydrogeologist
Phase
I Environmental Site Assessment
CARMAX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
.............1
........1
1.1 Purpose.....
............... I
T.2 Scope of Services
.....................2
1.3 Special Terms and Conditions..........
1.4 User Provided lnformation..........
.........3
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
........4
2.1 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics............
....................4
2.2 Site Reconnaissance....
.......4
2.2.1
Municipal Infrastructure and Utilities.....
...................4
2.3 Adjoining Properties
..........4
3.0 INTERVIEWS...........
........5
....................5
3.1 Owner or Key Site Manager..............
.........5
3.2 Occupants (Multi-family or MajoÐ ...... .....
3.3 Past and Present Owners, Operators, andlor Occupants
..........5
..............5
3.4 State and/or Local Government Officials
3.5 Abandoned Properties
........6
4.0 RECORDS REVIEW..
...,...7
4.1 Physical Setting Source(s)
...................7
4.1.1
Regional and Local Geology....
................7
4.1.2
Soil Survey
...........8
4.1.3
Regional and Local Groundwater.............. ................8
4.2 Historical Use lnformation..........
.........8
4.2.1
Sanborn'Maps
......................9
4.2.2
Topographic Maps
...................................9
4.2.3
Oil and Gas Well Maps.........
...................10
4.2.4
Aerial Photographs ................
..................1 I
4.2.5
Ownership Records.....
...........12
Building Department Records
4.2.6
.................13
4.2.1
Local Street Directories
.........13
4.2.8
Zoning and Land Use Records................ ...................13
4.2.9
.....................13
Other Historical Sources.....
4.2.10
Prior Assessments.......
...........13
\\f
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
CARMAX
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
4.3 Environmental Record Sources.....
.......14
4.3.2
Preliminary Screen For Vapor Encroachment Conditions...........17
4.3.3
Environmental Lien Search
.....................17
5.0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............
......19
5.1
Data Gaps.
........19
5.2
Conclusions................
........19
5.3
Recommendations......
........20
5.4
Exceptions and/or Deletions
................20
5.5
Additional Services....
........20
6.0
LIMITATIONS .........
.........21
7.O
REFERENCES .........
.........22
FIGURES
1
Vicinity Map
2
3
4
5
Topographic Map
Parcel Map
Aerial Site Plan
Color Photographs
APPENDICES
A
B
C
D
Resumes
ASTM E 1527-05 User Questionnaire and Helpful Documents Checklist
EDR@ Radius Map Report Executive Summary
Preliminary Screen For Potential Vapor Intrusion Conditions Matrix
Attached CD contains: EDRdr Reports: (Radius Map Report, Aerial Photographic Decade Package, Historical
Topographic Maps, Sanborn Map Search), and Phase I ESA, Carmax (WKA No. 9179.01 dated August 4,2011).
\\f
Phase
I Environmental Site
CARMAX
Assessment
EXECUTTVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was to assess the Carmax
(herein referred to as site) for evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs)
resulting from current and/or former site activities. The site is located along East Stockton
Boulevard, Sacramento County, California (Figures 1,2, and 4) and is comprised
of
approximately 18 acres of undeveloped land having Sacramento County Assessor's Parcel
Number (APN) 115-0130-063 and 115-0130-065 (Figure 3). For the purposes of this report, the
18 acres of undeveloped land
will
be referred to as the parent tract. The proposed Carmax site is
comprisedof the southern 3 acres of 115-0130-063 andthe 5 acres of 115-0130-065 (Figure 3).
The following presents a list of observations and findings identified during the preparation of this
report:
The historical land use research dating back to the late 1800s revealed that the site
appeared to be undeveloped from at least 1894 to at least 1909. The site appeared to be
grass covered land
1952to at least
in 1947. The
l97l
site appeared to be used for agriculture from at least
and has been grass covered, undeveloped land since at least 1981.
Given the documentation reviewed concerning the neighboring agency listed
facilities, none of the facilities reviewed is likely to have a negative impact on the
site. Based on the completion of the vapor encroachment condition (VEC) screening
matrix, WKA concludes a VEC can be ruled out because a VEC does not or is not likely
to exist.
WKA
has performed this ESA in conformance
with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard
Practice E 1527-05 for the Carmax. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in
connection with the site.
\\f
Phase
CARMAX
1.0
1.1
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was to evaluate the Carmax
property (herein referred to as site) for evidence of potential Recognized Environmental
Conditions (RECs) resulting from current and/or former site activities as defined by the American
Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 1527-05 (ASTM, 2005).
According to the ASTM, "this practice is intended to permit a user to satisff one of the
requirements to quali$r for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bonafide
prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA fComprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Actl liability (hereinafter, the "landowner liabilíty protections," or
"LLPs"): that is, the practice that constitutes "all appropriate inquíry into the previous ownership
and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice" as defined at 42
u.s.c. $e601(3sxB)."
This ESA has been performed in general conformance with the ASTM Standard E 1527-05,
CenterPoint Integrated Solutions, LLC's Request for Proposal for Geotechnical and Environmental
Services for Automotive Dealership in Elk Grove, CA, and the scope and limitations defined in
Wallace-Kuhl & Associates (WKA) proposal, 3PR11103, dated June22,20Il.
1.2
WKA
Scope of Services
has completed this ESA for the site shown on Figures
I through 3. Mr.
Greg Toler with
CenterPoint Integrated Solutions, LLC authorized WKA to proceed with this assessment on June
23,20T1 via email.
The scope of this assessment included the following:
Conduct a site recomaissance for visual evidence of surface contamination and potential
sources of subsurface contamination;
Conduct a visual inspection of the adjoiriing properties for evidence of RECs.
t\f
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Page2
Phøse
August
4,20II
Conduct interviews with the following, as available:
.
.
.
.
.
Key site manager,
Major occupants,
Past and present owners, operators,
Government and/or agency personnel, and,
Inquiries conducted at abandoned sites may include interviews with owrlers or
occupants of neighboring or nearby properties;
Conduct a records review, whicli will include the following:
.
Physical setting documents to determine regional geology, general soil information,
and local and regional groundwater conditions,
'
Historical infonnation, including but not limited to, Sanborn maps, topographic
maps, aerial photographs, ownership records, building department recorcls, local
street directories, zoning and land use records, and prior assessments, as available,
.
Environmental records, including federal, state, tribal, and county regulatory agency
lists that will help identifu RECs on the site and the adjoining properties, and,
.
Based on the outcome of the database search, review of specific regulatory agency
files for identifìed contaminated facilities in order to evaluate whether the listed
facilities arehazardous materials threats to the site;
Conduct a preliminary screen for vapor encroachment conditions on the site per ASTM
E2600-10;
Review of the completed ASTM E 1527-05 User Questionnøire (Questionnaire)
regarding Recorded Environmental Liens, activity and use limitations (AULs),
relationship of the purchase price to tlie fair market value of the site, and any specialized
knowledge of the site;
Review of environmental liens and AULs reports, as provided; and
Prepare a f,rnal report of the results of the ESA.
1.3
Special Terms and Conditions
No special terms or conditions to the WKA Professional Services Agreement or the WKA scope
of services were requested or performed during the preparation of this report.
\\f
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Page 3
August 4,2011
WKA to perform a search for recorded
environmental liens and Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) for the site. Discussion regarding
the search is included in Section 4.3.5 of this report.
CenterPoint Integrated Solutions, LLC authorized
1.4
User Provided
Information
WKA provided CenterPoint
of the User Questionnaire and the Helpful Documents
checklist. CenterPoint returned the documents after Mr. Steve Hudak, Real Estate Manager for
a copy
CarMax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc., completed them. Discussion regarding his responses
is provided in the following section. A copy of the completed questionnaire is included in
Appendix B.
In summary, Mr. Hudak was not awate of any records of environmental liens or AULs currently
site. Mr. Hudak stated he does not possess specialized knowledge or
experience related to the site. Mr. Hudak stated that he is not aware of any obvious indicators
that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the site. He said that the site
recorded against the
appears to be vacant land.
Mr. Hudak was aware of existing "Helpful Documents" as defined in Section 10.8.1 of the
ASTM Standard as noted on the "Helpful Documents Checklist" included in Appendix B. He
stated, "all records provided by seller have been forwarded to environmental consultant." In this
context, environmental consultant refers to Wallace-Kuhl & Associates.
WKA received an August 2002Environmental Research Report (ERP) prepared by DCI Services
(DCI), a December 2004 Phase I ESA prepared by Earthtec , Ltd., and an Earthtec, Ltd. letter
report, dated February 1,2005, regarding soil sampling conducted on the property. Discussions
regarding the reports are presented in Section 4.2.10.
\\f
Page 4
August 4,2017
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
2.0
2.1
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site and Vicinitv General Characteristics
The site is located along East Stockton Boulevard in Sacramento County, California (Figures
1
and2). The site is comprised of Sacramento County Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) I 150130-063 and 1 l5-0130-065, totaling approximately l8 acres of undeveloped land (Figure 3).
For the purposes of this report, the 1 8 acres of undeveloped land will be referred to as the parent
tract. The proposed Carmax site is comprised of the southern three acres of 1 1 5-0 I 3 0-063 and
the five acres of 1 15-0130-065 (Figure 3). Surrounding land use consisted residences, vacant land,
and commercial development.
2.2
Site Reconnaissance
A visual site reconnaissance was conducted by WKA on July 6,2011. Figure 4 provides color
photographs of the site taken during the site reconnaissance.
On the day of field reconnaissance the site was undeveloped land. The site had been disked
recently and sparse vegetation was present. A tower and electrical lines were observed
transecting the northern portion of the parent
tract. Infrastructure associated with on-site utilities
was observed on the western portion of the site. Miscellaneous household debris, including food
wrappers, soda containers, and mattresses, were observed along the eastern boundary of the site.
2.2.1 Municipal
Infrastructure and Utilities
Utility District (SMUD) provides electricity to the site. Pacific Gas and
Electric (PG&E) provides natural gas to the site. Sacramento County provides sanitary sewer
Sacramento Municipal
service and the California American Water Company provides potable water to the site.
2.3
Adjoining Properties
The site is bounded to the north by a residence and vacant land. Multi-family residences are
located to the east of the
site. Vacant land and
a commercial
building adjoin the site to the south.
Highway 99 followed by commercial development is located to the west of the site.
\\f
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Phase
Page 5
August 4,2011
INTERVIE\MS
3.0
lnterviews with various persons familiar with the site vicinity, including representatives of public
agencies, were conducted
for the purpose of identif,ring past and present uses, which may have
contributed to RECs on the site. Results of those irferviews are discussed in the followine
sections.
3.1
Owner or Key Site Manager
WKA interviewed Mr. Patrick Gardner, Sierra Holdings, LLC,regarding the site. Mr. Gardner
stated that Sierra 99 Gateway,LLC, the property owner, is an affiliate of Sierra Holdings, LLC.
He said that the property was purchased in February 2007 from SKI,
that the property has been vacant land since
it was purchased
LLC. Mr. Gardner
stated
and that, to the best of his
knowledge, it had been undeveloped for several years prior to the purchase. Mr. Gardner was not
aware ofany underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks having been located at the
site. Mr. Gardner stated that there are no wells or septic tanks at the site. He said that electricity
is provided to the site vicinity by Sacramento Municipal Utility District and natural gas is
provided by Pacific Gas & Electric. The California American Water Company provides potable
water and Sacramento County provides sanitary sewer service to the site vicinity. Mr. Gardner
stated that
in 2009
a water
pipeline for the Freeport Regional Water Authority was installed on
site. He stated there is a large underground vault on the property
associated with the pipeline.
the proposed Carmax
3.2
Occupants (Mutti-family or Major)
The site is unoccupied.
3.3
Past and Present Owners, Operators, and/or Occupants
No information regarding past owners was received by WKA during completion of this report.
3.4
State and/or Local Government Officials
WKA interviewed Ms. Susan Genovese, Sacramento County Environrnental Management
Deparlment (SCEMD), regarding any regulatory files available for the site and surrounding
facilities. Accolding to Ms. Genovese, no regulatory files ale available for the site. She stated
\\f
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Phøse
that files are available for facilities surroundine the
Page 6
August 4,201I
site. Information reviewed
at the
SCEMD is
provided in Section 4.3.
3.5
Abandoned Properties
As referenced in 40 CFR Part 3I2,inthe case of inquiries conducted at "abandoned properties,"
as defined
in $312.23(d), "where there is evidence of potential unauthorized
uses
of the site or
evidence of uncontrolled access to the site, the environmental professional's inquiry must include
interviewing one or more (as necessary) owners or occupants of neighboring or nearby properties
from which it appears possible to have observed uses of, or releases at, such abandoned
properties..." No evidence of potential unauthorized uses, or evidence of uncontrolled access to
the site was observed. The site is not considered an abandoned property and therefore, WKA did
not interview owners or occupants of neighboring properties.
\\f
Page 7
CARMAX
WKA No.9179.01
August 4,2077
4.0
RECORDS REVIEW
The purpose of the records review is to obtain and review information concerning the current and
historical use of the site and adjoining properties that would help identiff the presence of RECs
in connection with the site. The records review included review and discussion of the following,
as available:
a
Physical Setting Source(s);
o
Historical Use Information; and,
o
Environmental Record Sources.
4.1
Physical Setting Source(s)
The site is depicted on the l9T5United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 Minute
topographic map of the Florin, California Quadrangle as undeveloped land. The site is located
within Section 15, Township 7 North, Range 5 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, at an
elevation of approximately +25 feet relative to mean sea level (msl).
4.1.1
Regional and Local Geology
The site is located on the Great Valley geomorphic province of California, alarge, elongate,
northwest-trending structural trough, generally constrained to the west by the Coast Ranges and
to the east by the foothills of the Sierra Nevada Range (Norris and Webb, 1990). The Great
Valley consists of two valleys lying end-to-end, with the Sacramento Valley to the north and the
San Joaquin Valley to the south.
The Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys have been filled to their present elevations with thick
sequences of sediment derived from both marine and continental sources. The sedimentary
deposits range in thickness from relatively thin deposits along the eastern valley edge to more
than 25,000 feet in the south central portion of the Great Valley (Norris and Webb, 1990). The
in age from Jurassic to
Quaternary, with the older deposits being primarily marine in origin. Younger sediments are
continentally derived and were typically deposited in lacustrine, fluvial, and alluvial
sedimentary geologic formations of the Great Valley province vary
environments with their main source being the Sierra Nevada Range.
\\f
I Environmental
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Phase
Page 8
Site Assessment
August 4,201I
The 1981 USGS Geologic Map of the Sacramento Quadrangle, Californiø, shows the site to be
underlain by the Riverbank Formation consisting of gravels, sands, silts and clays deposited as
alluvial fans during the past 500,000 years.
4.1.2
Soil Survey
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) has created a web-based service for accessing soil information. According to the NRCS
Web Soil Survey (WSS) the majority of the near-surface soils on the site consist of San Joaquin
silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, and San Joaquin-Galt complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes (USDA,
20II). A copy of the soil report is included on the attached CD.
4.1.3
Regional and Local Groundwater
The site is located within the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) defined
WKA
DWR monitored groundwater wells within
Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin of the Sacramento River Hydrologic Region.
DWR website and found one
one-half mile of the site (DwR,2011).
searched data on the
Accordingto DWR, the closest well is State Well Number 07N05E15H001M, located on the
southem adjoining property (DWR, undated). The measured groundwater elevations are
summarized in the Hydrograph on Figure
6. Groundwater elevations
were measured in this
well from 1952 to 1988; the depth to groundwater has fluctuated from approximately 51.3 to
107.3 feetbelow ground surface.
Historical Use Information
4.2
Historical information was reviewed to develop a history of the previous uses of the site and
surrounding alea, in order to evaluate the site and adjoining properties for evidence of RECs.
Standard historical sources reviewed during the preparation of this report included the following,
as available:
Maps;
a
Sanbom@
o
Topographic Maps;
o
Oil and Gas Well Maps;
\\f
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Page 9
Phase
a
Aerial Photographs;
a
Ownership Records;
a
Building Department Records;
o
Local Street Directories;
a
Zoning and Land Use Records;
a
Other Historical Sources, and,
o
Prior Assessments.
August 4,2011
Discussion of these historical sources is provided in the following sections.
4.2.I
Sanborn@ Maps
Sanborn@ Maps
with coverage of the site were obtained through Environmental Data Resources,
Inc. (EDR@). EDR@ is a national commercial provider of environmental database information.
Sanborn@ Maps are detailed drawings
of site development, and were typically used by fire
insurance companies to determine site fire insurability. According to EDR@, Sanborn@ Map
coverage of the site is not available (EDR@, 2011a).
4.2.2
Topographic Maps
Historical USGS topographic maps with coverage of the site and outlying land areas were
reviewed. Topographic maps with coverage of the site dated 1894,1909,I94J,1953, 1968, and
1975 were available for review (EDR@, 2011b). Copies of the topographic maps compiled by
EDR@
with coverage of the site are included on the CD attached to the back cover of this report.
Table
1 notes
the changes in the vicinity of the site.
Table I
Year
Scale
Observations
1894
1:125,000
Site: Undeveloped land.
North: Undeveloped land.
East: Undeveloped land.
South: Undeveloped land.
West: Undeveloped land.
\\f
Page 10
August 4,2071
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Table
Year
Scale
Observations
r909
l:31,680
Site: No significant changes noted.
1
North: No significant changes noted.
East: No significant changes noted.
South: No significant changes noted.
1947
l:50,000
West: Upper Stockton Road is depicted followed by undeveloped land.
Site: A transmission line is depicted transecting the northem portion of the parent tract
from southwest to northeast. A trail road is
North: A trail road and structures
are depicted.
East: No signif,rcant changes noted.
West: Upper Stockton Road is labeled
I
953
l:24,000
as
Highways 99 and 50.
Site: A trail road is depicted on the southem portion.
North: Trail road is labeled as Stevenson Avenue and additional structures are
depicted.
South: Structures are depicted.
West: Additional structures are depicted to the west of Highway 99.
r
968
l:24,000
Site: No signif,rcant changes noted.
North: Additional structures are depicted.
West: No significant changes noted.
t975
I:24,000
North: Additional structures are depicted.
South: Additional structures are depicted.
4.2.3 Oil and Gas Well Maps
Review of California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal
Resources (DOGGR) ìli4ap W614, dated January 2010, showed that the site is not located in a
designated natural gas
(DOGGR,2010).
field. No DOGGR wells
are located on or
within at least one mile of the site
\\f
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
I
August 4,2071
Page
1
4.2.4 Aerial Photographs
Historical aerial photographs of the site and general vicinity were compiled by EDR@. photographs
covering the years 1937 , 1947 , 1952, 196l , l97I , 198I, 1993, 1 998, and 2005 were available for
review (EDR@, 2011c). Table 2 notes the changes on the property and in the vicinity.
1":555'
Site: Undeveloped land.
North: Grass-covered land.
East: Undeveloped land.
South: Trail road are visible.
l" :655'
West: Híghway 99 followed by grass-covered land.
Site: Grass-covered land. A powerline tower is visible on the northem portion
and a trail road is visible on the southern portion.
South: Two structures are visible.
I :)))
Site: Berms associated with flood irrigation are visible on the northem portion.
Row crops
visible on the southern portion. A tower associated with electrical
transmission lines is visible on the northem portion of the parent ftact.
are
North: A trail road and struchres are visible.
East: Berms associated with flood irrigation are visible.
South: Additional structures are visible.
t :)f)
West: Several structures are visible to the west of Highway 99.
Site: Row crops are visible.
East: Row crops are visible.
I :JJJ
Site: Grass-covered land.
North: Additional structures are visible.
East: Grass-covered land.
West: Highway 99 is now four-lane road.
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Page 12
Phase
August 4,2011
Table2
Year
Scale
Observations
1981
T :JJJ
North: Additional structures are visible.
West: Structwes to the west of Highway 99 are no longer visible.
t993
l" :666'
South: East Stockton Boulevard is visible. The structures are no longer visible.
West: East Stockton Boulevard is visible. Several commercial-t1pe structures
are visible to the west of Highway 99.
1998
I" :666'
West: Timberlake Way is visible to the west of Highway 99.
2005
t" :604'
East: Multi-family residences are visible.
South: Several commercial-type structures are visible.
West: A new conìmercial-type structure is visible.
2006
l" :604'
North: No signif,rcant changes noted.
4.2.5
Ownership Records
A Chain and Environmental Lien Search Report, dated July 25,2011, was prepared by Fox and
Sprader Enterprises,LLC. According to the Chain and Environmental Lien Search Report, the
current properly owner is Sierra 99
Gateway,LLc, which has owned both parcels since February
2007. Acopy of the Chain and Environmental Lien Search Report is included on the CD
attached to the back cover
of this report.
t\f
Page 13
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Phase
4.2.6 Building Department
August 4,2011
Records
Building permits were researched through the Sacramento County Online Permit Services
website. WKA searched by the appraiser parcel number for permits; however, no permits were
found for either parcel (Sacramento County,
20ll).
4.2.1 Local Street Directories
Local street directories with coverage of the site and adjoining properties were obtained from
EDR@ (EDRo, 2011d). These documents contain business listings based on street number
identifiers. The site address of does not have a physical address; therefore, it was not researched in
city directories. A copy of the EDRÐ City Directory (EDR@, 201 1d) is provided on the CD
attached to the back cover'of this report.
4.2.8
Zoningand Land Use Records
The site is zoned "IBABAA" vacant (Sacramento County,
4.2.9 Other Historical
20Il).
Sources
Review of additional historical sources was not wananted in order f'or the Environmental
Professional to make a cletennination as to evidence of potential RECs on the site.
4.2.10 Prior Assessments
WKA reviewed an August 2}}2Bnvironmental Research Report (ERP) prepared by DCI
Services (DCÐ. The ERP was conducted on 8101 East Stockton Boulevard and amap included
with the report indicates that the property is located to the north of Stevenson Avenue and north
of the site; however, it is possible that the site was included with a larger areathat was researched
in2002- The results of the ERP indicated that the site was not listed on any of the researched
databases. DCI recommended no further state or environmental searches at that time.
WKA reviewed a December 2004 Phase I ESA for the site prepared by Earthtec, Ltd. (Earthtec).
The Phase I ESA was conducted on approximately 18 acres (the parent tract for the current WKA
investigation). The site was fallow, undeveloped land at the time of the December 2004
\\f
I Environmental
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Phase
Page 14
Site Assessment
August 4,2011
investigation. The Phase I ESA reported that the property had been used for agricultural
purposes. It concluded that there was " a moderate potential for the contamination of soils or
groundwater beneath the site" from the use of herbicides or pesticides during historical
agricultural activities. Earthtec stated that "chemicals associated with pest and/or weed control
relating to the historical agricultural land usage could possibly be present in surface soils."
Earthtec recommended, "further assessment of possible contamination at the subject site
regarding the past agricultural uses relating to the possible pesticide and herbicide use."
Earthtec prepared a letter report, dated February 1,2005, regarding soil sampling conducted on
the property. According to the letter report, the soil sampling was conducted to determine
if
residual pesticides and herbicides existed in the surface soils at the site due to historical
agricultural usage as recommended by the December 2004 Phase I ESA. Eight discrete soils
samples were collected across the parent tract at approximately six inches below ground surface
(bgs) and were composited into four samples and tested for chlorinated herbicides by EPA
Method 81514 and organochlorinated pesticides by EPA Method 80814. Laboratory analytical
results indicated that all tested parameters were below laboratory reporting limits. The report
concluded that there is a low potential for widespread contamination relating to past herbicide or
pesticide usage.
4.3
Environmental Record Sources
4.3.1
Regulatory Agency Databases
EDR@ was contacted to
provide a summary of facilities listed on regulatory agency databases
ASTM required Standard Environmental
Record Sources, as well as several Additional Envíronmental Record Sources, as defined in
Sections 8.2.1 and8.2.2 of the ASTM Standard. For additional reference, the Executive
Summary of the EDR@ report is included in Appendix C. A copy of the entire EDR@ report is
(EDR@, 2011e). Table 3 summarizes the researched
included on the CD attached to the back cover of this report.
\\f
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Page 15
Phase
August
4,20II
Table 3
ASTM E
EDR Listed Database
1527-05 Search
No. of Facilities Listed
(within Search Radius)
Distance
rederal NPL Site List
;ederal Delisted NPL Site List
rederal CERCLIS List
ìederal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List
ìederal RCRA CORRACTS Facilities List
;ederal RCRA Generators List:
I{PL
l-mile
0
Delisted NPL
ll2-rile
0
CERCLIS
ll2-rntle
0
CERCLIS NFRAP
ll2-nljle
l-mile
0
CORMCTS
RCRAInfo
RCRA SQG
Small Quantity andLarge Quantity Generatort RCRA LQG
Landfills and Solid Waste Manasement Unit¡ RCRA TSDF
ìederal Institutional Control / Engineering
US
lontrol Registries
ENG Controls
site & adjoining
E'R¡'/^S
ìtate-equivalent NPL (Hist. Cal-Sites)
Aist Cal-Sites
tate-equivalent CERCLI
S
RESPONSE
itate Landfill and/or Solid Vy'aste Disposal Site SItrF/LF 6WIS)
WMUDS/SWAT
¿
0
ll2-mile
site only
US INST Controls
rederal ERNS List
ì
0
0
0
0
site on-ly
0
l-mile
0
ll2-nr.tIe
0
ll2-mile
0
0
r-UST- Reg 5 Geotracket
l/2-mile
0
fribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
lndian LUST
l/2-míle
0
ìtate Registered Underground Storage Tanks
UST
site & adjoining
I
lribal
(ndian UST
site & adjoining
0
ìtate Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks
4ST
site & adjoining
0
itate Institutional Control Reeistries
DEED
site only
0
l2-mlle
0
Jtate Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
Registered Underground Storage Tanks
ìtate Voluntary Cleanup Sites
T/CP
ffitiRécordSources''':.'.:i:.
\üaste
& Substances Sites List
CORTESE
l2-mile
0
)TSC EnviroStor (includes Cal-Sites)
UnviroStor
1-mile
I
JLIC
SLIC - Reg 5
0
Drycleaners
Il2-mile
ll4-mile
IAZNET
TTAZNET
ll
-mile
t9
lacramento Counfv Contaminated Sites
iac Co CS
\ac Co ML
/2-mile
0
l2-mlle
22
-lazardous
leaner Facilities
iacramento County Master List
0
Review of the EDR@report indicates the site is not listed on any of the EDR@databases.
\\f
Page 16
August 4,2011
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
The Methodist Hospital of Sacramento is located approximately 0.1 miles west of the site, across
Highway 99, at 7500 Timberlake Way (also called Hospital Drive). The facility is listed on the
United States EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) database as a Small
Quantity Generator (SQG), Regional Water Quality Conhol Board (RWQCB) Underground
Storage Tonks
gSD
database, the Sacramento County Master List (Sac
ML), andthe
Department of Toxic Substance Control's (DTSC) HazNet database. According to information
reviewed at Sacramento County Environmental Management Department (SCEMD), a 5,150gallon diesel aboveground storage tank (AST), a 1OO-gallon diesel AST, and a 5O0-gallon diesel
AST have been installed at the facility; however, no spills or discharges have been reported for
the tanks. According to a 2008 Notice to Comply, the facility had several violations including the
lack of a chemical inventory, drums that were not labeled, and the storage of empty drums.
Based on the information reviewed during this investigation, this facility is not suspected
of
negatively impacting the site at this time.
The Sacramento Radiology Timberlake facility is located approximately 0.1 miles west of the
site, across Highway 99, at 7601 Timberland Way, Suite 100. The facility is listed on the RCRA
SQG. According to information reviewed at SCEMD, the facility had generated xray photo finisher waste; however, no reports of discharges or spills were located for the facility.
Based on the information reviewed during this investigation, this facility is not suspected of
database as a
negatively impacting the site at this time.
The Putnam Enterprises facility was located 0.13 miles north of the site at 7691 Stevenson
Avenue. Based on the review of parcel data and information at SCEMD, the Putnam's Rainbow
Fountains facility appears to have been located on the same property. The facilities are listed on
the HIST UST, the Sac ML, and the HazNet databases. According to information reviewed at
SCEMD, a 550-ga11on gasoline UST and a 55O-gallon diesel UST were removed from the facility
in January 1990. A SCEMD letter, dated October 17,1990, stated that a site investigation and
remedial action were completed for the facility and no further action was required. Based on the
information reviewed, this facility is not suspected of negatively impacting the site at this time.
The SMUD PCB Substation Site #21is located approximately 0.8 miles northwest of the site
near Highway 99 and Wyndham Road. The facility is listed on the DTSC EnviroStor database.
According to the EDR@report, a sample collected at the facility indicated the presence of PCBs;
however, no additional assessment has been conducted at the facility. Based on the distance
from the facility to the site, this facility is not suspected of negatively impacting the site at this
time.
\\f
Page 17
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Phase
August 4,2017
identified2I facllities and the HazNet database identified 19 facilities
within one-half mile of the site. Fifteen of the Sac ML listed facilities and 13 of the HazNet
The Sac
ML
database
listed facilities are medical offices and would be registered for generating biomedical waste. The
Sam's Club and Costco Wholesale t1464 facllities have USTs associated with gasoline stations
located on their respective properties. WKA reviewed files at SCEMD regarding the Sam's Club
and Costco'Wholesale t1464 facllities and no reports of leaks or discharges from the USTs were
found. The Firestone Complete Auto Care facility is listed on the HazNet database due to the
collection of waste oil at the facility. According to information reviewed at SCEMD, the
Firestone Complete Auto Care facility is in-compliance. The California American Water facility
is listed on the Sac ML and HazNet databases because it stores bleach, diesel fuel, and
fluorosilicic acid. According to the most recent inspection report for the California American
Water facility, no violations were noted at the time of the inspection. Based on the information
reviewed for the facilities listed on the Sac ML and the HazNet databases, the facilities are not
suspected of negatively impacting the site at this time.
4.3.2 Preliminary
Screen For Vapor Encroachment Conditions
WKA conducted a preliminary screening for vapor encroachment conditions (VEC) beneath the
site using the Tier 1 vapor encroachment screening evaluation'. The Tier I screening included
performing a Search Distance Test to identifu if there are any known or suspect contaminated
properties surrounding or upgradient of the site within specif,rc search radii, and a Chemicals of
Concern (COC) Test (for those known or suspect contaminated properties identified within the
Search Distance Test) to evaluate whether or not COC are likely to be present. The Vapor
Encroachment Screening Matrix is included in Appendix D.
Based on the completion of the VEC-screening matrix, a VEC can be ruled out because a VEC
does not or is not
4.3.3
likelv to exist.
Environmental Lien Search
CenterPoint Integrated Solutions, LLC authorized WKA to perform a search for recorded
environmental liens and Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) for the site. According to aJuly 25,
2011 Chain and Environmental Lien Search Report prepared by Fox and Sprader Enterprises,
' The Preliminary Screen for Vapor Enctoachlnerrt Conditions was based on the guidelines
for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Tì'ansactions.
presented in the ASTM E 2600-1 0 Standard Guide
\\f
Phase I Environmentøl Site Assessment
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Page 18
August 4,201I
LLC, no environmental liens or activity or use limitations (AULs) were recorded for the site. A
copy of the Chain and Environmental Lien Search Report is included on the CD attached to the
back cover of this report.
\\f
Page 19
August 4,2011
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
5.0
5.1
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Data Gaps
The time intervals between the Standard Historical Sources (i.e., topographic maps, aerial
photographs, other historical sources) exceeded the ASTM minimum five-year period. However,
the use of the site appears unchanged within the time gaps, and therefore, research of the site use
during the time gaps is not required by the ASTM Standard (Refer to Section 8.3.2.1
-
Intervals
of the ASTM E 1527-05 standard).
It is the opinion of WI(A that no significant data gaps were identified during the preparation of
this report that affects the ability of the Environmental Professional to identif,i RECs on the site.
<)
Conclusions
The historical land use research dating back to the late 1800s revealed that the site appeared to be
undeveloped from at least 1894 to at least 1909. The site appeared to be grass covered land in
1947. The site appeared to be used for agriculture from at least 1952 to at least 1971 and has
been grass covered, undeveloped land since at least 1981.
Given the documentation reviewed concerning the neighboring agency listed facilities, none
of the facilities reviewed is likely to have a negative impact on the site. Based on the
completion of the vapor encroachment condition (VEC) screening matrix, WKA concluded a
VEC can be ruled out because
a
VEC does not or is not likely to exist.
this ESA in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM
Standard Practice E 1527-05 for the Carmax. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs
in connection with the site. Results of surface soil sampling conducted by Earthtec, Ltd. in 2005
WKA
has performed
indicated no residual pesticides or herbicides from historical agricultural operations. No wells,
septic systems, or other permitted structures were located on the site. Based on the conclusions
presented in this report, the risk of environmental impairment is low. Any exceptions to, or
deletions from, this practice are described in Section 5.4 of this report. A full copy of this ESA
report, in a.pdf format, is included on the attached CD.
\\f
I Environmental
CARMAX
Phase
Page20
Site Assessment
August 4,2011
WKA No. 9179.01
5.3
Recommendations
Based on the conclusions presented and the documentation contained herein, no further
assessment is recommended at this time.
5.4
Exceptions and/or Deletions
No exceptions or deletions fÌorn the ASTM E 1527-05 standard were made during the
performance of this ESA.
5.5
Additional Services
Non-scope considerations, such as assessment for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA), wetlands
evaluation, indoor air quality, laboratory testing of the soils and groundwater beneath the site for
environmental contaminants (such as agricultural-related pesticides, termiticides, polychlorinated
biphenyls [PCBs], or arsenic and lead), and assessments for asbestos containing materials and leadbased paint were not included or requested as part of this ESA. Additionally, this ESA included
conducting a Tier 1 vapor encroachment screening
in accordance with the ASTM E 2600-10
Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions.
\\f
Page2l
August 4,2017
I Envíronmental Site Assessment
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Phase
6.0
LIMITATIONS
The statements and conclusions in this report are based upon the scope of work described above
and on observations made only on the date of the field reconnaissance, July 6,
20II. Work was
performed using a degree of skill consistent with that of competent environmental consulting
firms performing similar work in the area. Information regarding the site that is publicly
available
and practically reviewable, as described
in the ASTM standard, was obtained.
Additional research or receipt of information regarding the site that was not disclosed or
available to WKA during this assessment may result in revision of the conclusions. The
conclusions in this report should be reevaluated
if site conditions change. No recommendation is
made as to the suitability of the site for any purpose. The results of this assessment do not
preclude the possibility that materials currently or in the future defined as hazardous are present
on the site, nor do the results of this work guarantee the potability of groundwater beneath the
site. This report is applicable only to the investigated site and should not be used for any other
property. No warranty is expressed or implied.
This report is viable for one year from the publication date of the report provided the following
components are updated within 180 days of the date of purchase or (for transactions not
involving an acquisition) the date of the intended transaction:
Interviews with current owners/occupants and/or in order to identiff changes in site
conditions or uses since the publication date of this report
o
Searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens
o
Visual inspection of the site and of adjoining properties with emphasis on changes in
conditions or uses since the publication date of this report
state, tribal and county databases
o
A current review offederal,
o
The declaration by the environmental professional responsible for the assessment.
Environmental Site Assessmenfs completed more than one year prior to the date of purchase must
be reviewed and updated in order for the Environmental Site Assessmenr to be considered valid
per Section 4.6 (Contínued Viability of Environmental Site Assessment), and Sections 4.7 and8.4
(Prior Assessment Usage) of the ASTM E 1527-05 Standard.
NMM:DBN:mr
H:ldeot3/91'19.01
-
Phase I ESA Cannax
\\f
I Environmental
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
Phase
Page22
Site Assessment
August
7.0
4,201I
REFERENCES
ASTM International.2005. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM Standard E
1527-05, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment Process,100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania (November 2005 ).
ASTM Intemational.2010. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM Standard E
2600-10, Standard Guidefor Vapor Encroachment Screenìng on Property Involved in Real
Estate Trqnsactions, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania (June 201 0).
DCI Services. (DCI), 2002, Environmental Research Report, 810I East Stockton Boulevard,
Sacramento, California, DCI (August 6, 2002).
Earthtec, Ltd. (Earthtec),2004, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Brown Commercial
Center, APN:
1
I5-01300-063, -065, East of East Stockton Boulevard near Auberry Way,
Sacr amento C ounty, C alifo rni a, Earthtec (December 6, 2004).
Earthtec, Ltd. (Earthtec),2005, Brown Commercial Center, APN: I I5-01300-063, -065, East
of
East Stockton Boulevard near Auberry Way, Sacramento County, California, Earthtec
(February 1,2005).
Environmen tal DataResources, Inc. (EDR@)
:
-20lla. Certified Sanborn Map Report, Carmax - Elk Grove, East Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento,
Caliþrnia, Inquiry Number 3 1 08 2 7 4. 3, Milford, Connecticut, (June 28, 201 1).
Hístorical Topographic Map Report, Carmax - Elk Grove, East Stockton
Boulevard, Sacramento, California, Inquiry Number 2954846.4, Milford, Connecticut, (Jvne 27,
-20lIb.
The EDR
2011).
Elk Grove, East Stockton
Boulevard, Sacramento, Caldornia, Inquiry Number 3108274.5, Milford, Connecticut, (July
201i).
-2011c. The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Report Carmax -
1,
-2011d. The EDR City Directory Abstract Carmax - Elk Grove, East Stockton Boulevard,
Sacramento,Inquiry Number 3108274.6, Milford, Connecticut, (June 28,2011).
-2011e. The EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck, Carmax - Elk Grove, East Stockton Boulevard,
Sacramento, Califtrnia,Inquiry Number 3108274.2s, Milford, Connecticut, (June 27,2011).
Norris, R.M., Webb, R. W., 1990, Geology of Caliþrniø Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons,
lnc. New York.
\\f
Page23
August 4,20T1
CARMAX
WKA No. 9179.01
ParcelQuest,20I
l, Detail Report Assessor
Parcel Numbers: 115-0130-063 and 115-0130-065
CA, Retrieved fJuly 20111from the World Wide Web: <http:l/vrvrw.parcelquest.com/>.
State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal
Resources
(DOGGR), 20l0,}i4ap 614 [Well Locations MapJ [map], scale unknown.
State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal
Resources (DOGGR), DOGGR On-line Mapping System (DOMS),
C alifornia
< http ://maps. conservation.
ca.
District
6, Northern
gov/doms/index.html> (February |
l,
20I 1).
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil
Survey, http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html (July, 201I).
Wagner, D.L., et al, State of California Department of Mines and Geology, 1981 , Geologic Map
of the Sacramento Valley and Sierra Foothills, California
[-ap]. 1:250,000, Regional
Geologic Map Series, Map No. 1A (Geology). Capitol Heights, MD: William Heintz Map
Corporation.
\\f
FIGURES
\\f
CARMAX
EL TERRA ZA DR
PINE VALLEY DR
LAY NE LN
INGLEWOOD LN
WHALEW OOD LN
COTTONWOOD LN
PARKGATE WAY
SPENGLER DR
TH O LD
WAY
CLIF FC
RES T DR
BER G
CEONOTHUS CT
UN
DANDELION DR
UNNAME D RD
TA
IN
ZINN IA WAY
ALIS SA WAY
LN
OP
LIP
LO L
SHELDON NORTH DR
O
MARVISTA CT
BE
LL
DR
BLUE MAIDEN WAY
FESTIVAL DR
BOW S T
SHORT RD
AUBERRY DR
S AUBERRY DR
W
AY
AN
AT
T
H
C
HAWLEY WAY
DONS ON WAY
FI
M
VISTA BR
O
KO TO DR
JOCELYN WAY
LONGW ILL WAY
CALVINE RD
MARA NELLO DR
IONA WAY
SERIO WAY
CASSATT WAY
0
OK DR
1,000
Feet
VICINITY MAP
VALLE Y WOOD DR
BELL ROSE LN
WILBUR WAY
DYER CT
COUN TR
Y PARK DR
DARLA WAY
POWER INN RD
COUNTRYFIELD DR
GYAN WAY
CT
A
NT
QU
I
BRUCEVILLE RD
DR
LE
DA
LVD
EL
NB
Y
WA
CLEA RBROOK WAY
WAY
HERMITAGE
SUN DIAL WAY
E DR
SU N N
YBR A
PICKET CT
WINDB REAKE R WAY
UNNAME D RD
VALLEY HI DR
HANFORD WAY
DEL VISTA CIR
CARLIN AVE
LA FIESTA WAY
MAS SIE CT
Y GR
E EN
FR A
DR
NC
ISC
AN
WA
Y
VAL
LE
LANC RAFT DR
SAW YER CIR
LAK ESPRIN G WAY
MODENA WAY
LAP ORTE WAY
Legend
Proposed Carmax property
Parent Tract
AVER Y CT
NEW POIN T DR
DRAIS WAY
KTO
LD
SPLENDID WAY
E DR
MAS TERS S T
W W ING DR
AY
TOC
MELVILL
CT
O O DS DR
ES
SIN
W
TIO GAW
D
BA
AY
YW
BLV
CHAREN TE WAY
DAMA SCAS DR
D
WB
N
TO
RA
Y
MORGAN HILL WAY
FLANNERY WAY
Strawberry Creek
NE
CK
CG
CT
TATE S LN
TO
Y
WA
M
TAW N Y
DR
GE NEVA P OINTE DR
W AY
MO
R W AY
P
YER
RU RAL ES
KI
R WAY
CUTLE
E
OLAN D
IN
S
LO OP LN
TAMBOR WAY
WHITMORE S T
DR
CT
WS
N IS
COTTON LN
SHELBY ST
GR EENS
S TA
FI E
WAY
UE
BL
Adapted from data provided by the Sacramento
Area Council of Governments, 2008.
Projection: NAD 83, California State Plane, Zone II
AY
GU A
LA LA
WILLOW GROVE WAY
WHEATLA ND DR
ALP INMEA D CIR
CALLA WAY TRIAD CIR
SINSKEY CT
HAMP TON COV E WAY
W
MEADOWHAVEN DR
JACINTO RD
JACI NTO AVE
N
RO
LVD
VISALIA WAY
KA
CRANLEIGH AVE
FALM OU TH
Laguna Creek
SUNN YFIE LD WAY
Y
WA
C IR
AY
RG
R IM
LW
EL
BR
SE R
D
LL
HA
BU
CLIFFE WAY CLIFFE WAY
GUS TINE WAY
BO
RL
M ER
E
PL
H AM
STEVENSON AVE
OR CH A RD
CT
TURNBURY DR
SPRIN GARD EN WAY
ADEN WAY
NES RIV
ER BLV
D
GIMRON WAY
DARTFORD DR
WINK LE R WAY
SCENIC HILLS WAY
SHASTA AV E
CALVINE RD
SU NR ISE
BE
NB
KTO Y
TOC AKE W A
TI M
ES
COS UM
TU R BO
SIERRA SUN SET DR
SANNAM WAY
SU M
MA
CULP EPPE R DR
UNION CREE K WAY
SUMMER SUNS ET DR
99
SURR EYW OOD WAY
SNO WY B IRCH WAY
DR
LN
ALP INE FROST DR
A ME
Y
DR
TA
DR
SUN SET DOW NS DR
FOLLETT CT
SITE
UNN
TR
WY
Y
WA
HOS PITAL DR
SUNRISE WOODS WAY
Y
MIS T WA
SUMMER FALLS C IR
RANGEVIEW LN
IR
DC
OO
YW
E
R
I
B
AB
AC
UB
AR
AY
RIGHTWO OD WAY
WAY
COOL FIELD S
T
PK
A
FF
V IS
TC
MA L
R
PA
LN
UN
TH
STA
RO
ND
W
BE
CT
NY
C IR
YO
SU NR ISE
SPEILBERG WAY
RD
IR
DC
RO
HALB RITE WAY
LENH ART RD
NAR ROW GA UGE WAY
D
NV
AR
BO
A
GR
FO
DR
O
ST
EL
WA
Y
AVE
NN
Y
WA
ON
DT
HI
E
WE
KE
Y
WA
B
LIS
OR
AY
TF
W W BR EN
E
LIN
Y
WA
H AR
AN A
AR
A ME
LO
C
W AY
BR O O K
LO
EL
UNN
W AY
LA C
AST
EHR
NS
WY
D
IE L
NF
DRA
DE
YB
MA
DE
ME N
NC
AY
YW
PK
L
GO
IR
AN C
ER
AG H
NT
CE
MO N
LA A
L
LIN D
CARBIDE CT
Beacon Creek
ELSIE AVE
ROE SBORO CIR
WYNDHAM DR
UNNAME D RD
NEWFIELD CIR
HEMINGWAY DR
VICTORY AVE
DR
D
SB
R
FO
HE
M
BA
SU
D
O
DR
EY
DR
UN
LVD
ME
MF
NB
NA
DR
RD
ED
RD
ORCHA RD W OODS CIR
ELSIE AVE
AL L
AV
ALT
UN
MACK RD
M
NA
OR
KTO
YF
TH
C
STO
SE
ER
WHIS PERING PALMS DR
AY
NM
AY
W
WARDE LL WAY
W
BIR DIE CT
SU
A
AUDIA CIR
COTTONGIN WAY
COTTONBALL WAY
GERBER RD
Elder Creek
CH
TELFE R WAY
AN
MILLR OY WAY
BA
M
WATERAS H WAY
MACFADDE N DR
MCTAVISH CIR
STACY AVE
ROB INE TTE RD
CITRUS AV E
LA
TANGERINE AVE
ALB EZZIA LN
REESE RD
AMB LE R S T
FIGURE
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PROJECT MGR
DATE
2,000
1
TJC
NMM
DBN
7/11
WKA NO. 9179.01
SITE
Adapted from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute topographic
map of the Florin quadrangle, California, 1980 acquired from
the California Geospatial Information Library, 2007
Legend
Parent Tract
0
1,000
Feet
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
CARMAX
FIGURE
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PROJECT MGR
DATE
2,000
2
TJC
NMM
DBN
7/11
WKA NO. 9179.01
SITE
Adapted from the Sacramento County Assessor's
Map Book 115, Page 13.
Legend
Parent Tract
0
350
Feet
PARCEL MAP
CARMAX
FIGURE
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PROJECT MGR
DATE
700
3
TJC
NMM
DBN
7/11
WKA NO. 9179.01
Aerial imagery courtesy of ESRI ArcGIS Online
Legend
Parent Tract
0
100
Feet
AERIAL SITE MAP
CARMAX
FIGURE
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PROJECT MGR
DATE
200
4
TJC
NMM
DBN
7/11
WKA NO. 9179.01
Looking southwest at the general view of the parent tract.
Looking west at the tower and electrical lines located on the
northern portion of the parent tract.
Dr
ain
ag
es
Looking at the location of infrastructure associated with a
water pipeline that transects the northern portion of the
proposed Carmax property.
wa
le
Looking northeast across the proposed Carmax site
FIGURE 5
COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS
CARMAX
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
PROJECT MGR
DATE
NMM
DBN
DBN
7/11
WKA NO. 9179.01
APPENDIX A
RESUMES
\\f
tttWallace Kuhl
VVVs,assocrATES
NaNCy M. MaTARET
PRo¡pcr ENvlRoi.rvlENTAL ScrcNrlsr
Ms. Malaret has been employed in the environmental field since 2003. She graduated from University of California, Davis
with a degree in Hydrologic Science.
Ms. Malaret worked for the Florida Department of Health for four years. She assisted with the coordination of sampling
potable water wells throughout the state of Florida. Ms. Malaret used GIS mapping techniques to identifu private potable
wells located ne¿r commercial and industrial facilities that may have contaminated the groundwater. She coordinated the
sampling of the wells and the analysis of water samples collected. She worked with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection to place filters on the private wells with contaminated water. Ms. Malaret also worked with the
Health Assessment Team at the Florida Department of Health. She conducted human health risk assessments based on
groundwater and soil data collected during contamination assessments of industrial facilities. Ms. Malaret used the Agency
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's Public Health Assessment Guidelines to evaluate resident's risk of illness
from exposure to contaminated groundwater and surface soils. Ms. Malaret used Risk Assistant software to determine dose
estimates and compared the results with toxicological studies. Ms. Malaret's human health risk assessments focused on
sites with Volatile Organic Compounds, Semi-volatile Organic Compounds, and metals contamination.
Ms. Malaret has th¡ee years of experience in due diligence. Her Phase I Environmental Site Assessment experience
includes wooded, rural, and urban properties. Her investigations have involved multiple parcel sites with extensive history,
large-scale residential subdivisions, office buildings, gasoline stations, dry cleaners, and heavy equipment manufacturing
and repair facilities. Ms. Malaret has conducted multiple corridor assessments along roadways being prepared for
expansion or improvements. She also conducted aHazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Assessment for the United
States Army Corps of Engineers on a2}-mlle stretch of the St. Johns River in Jacksonville, Florida. Ms. Malaret conducted
soil and groundwater sampling associated with Phase II Environmental Site Assessments. Ms. Malaret coordinated longterm groundwater sampling events for sites with residual petroleum contamination.
Ms. Malaret has worked with communities impacted by contamination, local, state, and federal government agencies, banks
and developers.
Moody Properfy, Vacaville, CA: Ms. Malaret
Mercantile Property, Rancho Cordova, CA: Ms.
managed the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of a
38.5-acre property ofundeveloped land located in
Vacaville to support the redevelopment of the properfy
into a residential development.
Malaret managed the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment of a 4.l-acre properfy developed with a
commercial building. Evaluation of regulatory facilities
within the site vicinity included the former Aeroject
Facility.
Woodmere Property, Folsom, CA: Ms. Malaret
managed the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of
2.S-acre property developed with an offrce building.
Historical research of the property included evaluating
former mining operations at the site.
HIGHER EDUCATION:
University of California, Davis
Bachelor of Science, Hydrologic Science (1999)
a
llt
rrlr
\^ t, ,tlace Ku h
Ylt vvcrl
I
I
t
&
I
ASSOCIATES
DBr'l-Nrs B. NeraMoro
S¡NroR HvrRocpolocrsr
Mr. Nakamoto
has 31 years experience in the frelds of environmental consulting, groundwater studies, site
characterization, remediation construction oversight, and regulatory compliance. As Senior Hydrogeologist, Mr.
Nakamoto manages projects and mentors professionals regarding studies of anthropogenic and naturally occurring
constituents including: petroleum hydrocarbons, metals, chlorinated hydrocarbons, pesticides and herbicides, and
asbestos in soil and groundwater. His projects include sfudies of soil, soil vapor, and groundwater contaminants
with focus on human health risk assessment and identification of environmental risk assessment, groundwater
resource and supply with focus on well design, well rehabilitation and aquifer charactenzation. Mr. Nakamoto is
experienced in implementing remediation actions from excavation and disposal to insitr¡ treatment. Mr. Nakamoto
is experienced in the interpretation of downhole geophysical data from surveys including, electric logs, gamma and
natural gamma logs, neutron logs, and acoustic logs. He is experienced in the groundwater well drilling methods
and the application of well construction methods, including some applications from the petroleum industry. He has
groundwater extraction well designs have successfully addressed issues such as excessive sand production, selective
screen intervals to exclude undesirable groundwater quality and corrosive aquifer conditions.
Sar,Bcrno PRo¡ocr Exppnrnxcp
Risk Based Cleanup, Future Sacred Heart
Elementary School, Sacramento, California: Mr.
Nakamoto worked on behalf of Catholic Health Care
West, Sacramento Diocese and the Sacred Heart
Parish to establish appropriate soil remediation goals
for lead, chlordane, and dieldrin in soil at the future
Sacred Heart Elementary School site. He represented
Sacred Heart Parish in negotiations with Cathohc
approval of a Preliminary Endangerment Assessment
(PEA) on land proposed for residential development
in Rancho Cordova, California. His detailed analyses
of data demonstrated that variability of metal
concentrations in selected soil samples were not
representative of the actual metal concentrations in
site soil. This demonstration allowed DTSC to
concur that soil within the properfy did not pose a
threat to the residential development.
Health Care West to identify appropriate site
characterization and mitigation efforts. He
represented Sacred Heart Parish in meetings with the
California Department of Toxic Substances Control
to establish statistically derived risk-based values to
determine site-specific cleanup levels for the
chemicals present in soil. Mr. Nakamoto also
represented the project during City of Sacramento
Council meetings and Community Relations Building
meetings. He provided technical oversight, on behalf
of Sacred Heart Parish and Catholic Health Care
West, of site remediation activities, including
disposal of RCRA hazardous wastes.
Brownfield Development, Prospective Purchaser
Agreement, Sacramento, California: Mr.
Nakamoto served as the lead environmental
consultant that successfully negotiated a2006
Prospective Purchasers Agreement (PPA) between
the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control
Board (CVRWQCB) and Signature Properties for a
residential development proposed within the area of
large-scale groundwater contamination. Negotiations
with the PPA required focused consensus building
and close coordination with CVRWQCB staff and
counsel.
Preliminary Endangerment Assessment, Rancho
Cordova, California: Mr. Nakamoto assisted a
Land Developer in successfully securing DTSC
Phase I ESA, Oroville, California: Mr. Nakamoto
completed a Phase I ESA for Thermalito Union
School District, Oroville, California that revealed the
proposed school site historically supported
agricultural and automotive repair facility activities.
Based on initial ESA findings, DTSC approved Mr.
Nakamoto's recommendation to include analyzing
soil samples for pesticide residues and metals in
surface soil as a part of the ESA. This resulted in the
District saving considerable time and expense.
7th Street Extension, Sacramento, CA: Performed
Environmental Oversight Authority monitoring for
the $25 million project connecting downtown
Sacramento to the Richards Boulevard (North
Sacramento are) by extending 7' Street across the
former Sacramento Locomotive Works Yard, a
former Superfund property. One element of this
project was the below grade crossing at the Union
Pacific Railroad track line. Excavation at this
location revealed the presence of material suspected
to be foundry slag. Laboratory analysis of carefully
selected samples showed the material'was not
foundry slag. Other issues resolved during this
project included handling and discharge of
groundwater from dewatering activities and
participation in the community relations team
activities.
I\lWallace Kuhl
VVV&assocrarEs
DB¡rNrs B.
Nar¿.uoro
Federal Courthouse Building, Sacramento, CA:
Served as EOA for this project, which was the first
development of the former Sacramento Locomotive
Works Yard Superfund Site. Closely coordinated
with the Cify of Sacramento, DTSC, Union Pacific
Railroad Company, and the Project managers,
General Services Administration. During this
project, several areas ofconcern were studied that
included:
o
r
o
o
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
Features deemed of Archeological interest
Presence of Stoddard's solvent in soil
Presence of oil containing total and soluble
metal concentrations exceeding California
thresholds for hazardous wastes
Fire Station Number
5 Replacement,
Cify of
Sacramento, CA: The initial project involved
preparation and implementation of a work plan for
char acter tzing an historic landfi ll p reviously
identified as lying beneath a portion of the station
properry. Construction of the new Fire Station
building required that a portion of the historic landfill
be excavated. Soil sample analyses revealed total
and soluble lead concentrations in soil at some
locations exceeded hazardous th¡esholds established
by either California or Federal standards.
Preliminary Endangerment Assessments
Various Locations (CA):
-
Adelane High School Parking Lot, Roseville:
Former residential property where weathering of
paint surfaces had resulted in the presence of
lead containing paint chip in soil. Laboratory
analysis of soil samples confrmed the vertical
and lateral distribution of lead containing paint
chips in soil. Excavation activities allowed for
removal of the impacted soil for appropriate
disposal.
pesticide residues in soil historically operated as an
olive orchard. Close coordination with DTSC,
regarding plaruring the sample collection plan,
allowed for DTSC determination that the property
posed no threat to the proposed use as a school
facility.
Thermalito Union School District, Oroville
initial Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
-
The
activities revealed the proposed school site was
historically supported agricultural and automotive
repair facility activities. Based on presenting initial
ESA findings, DTSC approved expanding the ESA
scope to include analyzing soil samples for pesticide
residues and metals in surface soil. Completing the
sampling and analysis activities concurrent with the
ESA resulted in the District saving considerable time
and expense.
Railroad Transportation Facilities, Various
Locations (CA, NV): Conducted studies of soil and
groundwater contamination at various railroad
facilities operated by the Southern Pacific
Transportation Company and the Union Pacific
Railroad Company. These sites were located
throughout California and Nevada. Studies regarding
compliance with the Toxic Pits Cleanup Act (TPCA),
as well as studies of railroad contamination, resulted
in properties being designated Superfund properties.
Contaminants at these properties included:
r
r
.
r
r
Bunker Oil and its related carcinogenic
compounds related to storage tank operations
Metal contamination related to metal works
and refinishing activities
Soil pH and contaminated related to lead acid
battery maintenance activities
Chlorinated solvents related to industrial
cleaning activities
Asbestos related to locomotive rehabilitation
activities
Eureka School Assessment, Granite Bay - PEA
performed to address the potential presence o
HIGHER EDUCATION:
University of California, Davis, California
B.S. Geology (1977)
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
:
Califomia
Professional Geologist No. 3863, California,
Certifred Engineering Geologist No. I 3 53
Certifìed Hydrogeologist No. 260
Oregon
Professional Geologist and an Engineering
Geologist No. E 1535
Wvoming
Professional Geologist No. PG 2157
APPENDIX B
ASTM E 1527 -05 User Questionnaire
and Helpful Documents Checklist
\\f
E rs27-0s usER QUESTTONNAIRE
CARMAX
-
ELK GROVE
In order to qualily for one of the Landowner Liahility Proteuion.r (LLP| offered by the Small
Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revítalization Acl of 2001 (the "Brou,nfìelcls
(if
avaitable) to the
envh'onmental prol'essioncri. Failure to provide this information could result in a delermination
lhal"uII appt'opriale inquiry" is not complete.
Anendmenls"), the lr.r¿rl must provide the following information
(1.) Have you performed a search for environmental cleanup liens and AULs,
Usei Obligatio,ns in the attached proposal, for the property?
as described
under
(2.) Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against lhe property thal are filed or
recorded under federal. tribal, state or local
law? /\
l$u
(3.) Are you aware of any AULs, such as engìneering conn'ols, land use ¡estrictions or
inslitutional controls that are in place at the site a¡rd/or have been filed or recorded in a registry
under federal, tribal, state or local law? e ì
IÙO
(4.) As the as¿r of the report, do you have any specialized knowleclge or experience related
to
property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the satne line of business as
the curre¡rt o¡'for¡nel'occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have
specialized knowledge ofthe chemicals and processes used by this type ofbusiness?
the
r$o
(5.) Does the purchase price being paid f'or this property reasonably reflect the fäir market value
of the property? lt you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the
Iower purchase price is because contami¡ration is known or believed to be present o¡l the
p<tperly?
1eJ
(6J Are you aware of cornmonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the
proryrty that wot¡lcl help the environmental professional to iclentify conditions indicative of
releases or threatened releases? For example, arsuser"No
.q,r,
(a.) Do you know the past uses of the propeny?
(b.) What,
if any, specific chemicals
rqPf
\'D
be ua.ra^k t¡,n)
If so, what were thcy?
are present or once were present atthe property?
NoÞ qvJ^/e- t>Ê q. *l
|t.Ìgr.urttfinerJilrthu'ASt.lv1StandarrJis-rhcp¡rft!scchillg|(|t|scPtncticclj|i2?toconrp|cttî||c,||.jrd,,'|t'lk'l,i
ï,#$"åi,.iJ'i!îì'.ì:i..:.,:...}ïï$'.lliil.li],Jliì:lïl.i,J"ÌI'iiì3ii..",iií:,-l3;i.iìj;iiï|'l.ii¡ii'T,fii',.,J;'lìí;lî;l{l.,J.?hÏÏy
ASI M $ta[dflrdl
"
.
E 1527-05 USER QUBSTIONNAIRE (conr.)
CARMAX _ ELK GROVE
:
Questions ó confinued:
(c.) what. if any, spills or orher che¡:rical releases have taker;¡rrace at the prctperty?
NDrl Èu¡ars ô)r
what, if auy- environrnental cleanups have taken place at
(cl.)
b).r'f
the
4
pro¡tert¡e
þ.u,tøra-
(7.) As the user of'this ESA. based on your knowledge and experience related to
rhe
properry
are there any obviotts indicators that point to the presence or likely prese¡lce of contanlination at
lhe
No. S ,rê Æppæøt To ße A ú4L^+,
¡tropcrty?
ur,-) <uø\¿prà
PrX*\
COMPLETION:
I have conrpleted this lJser Questionnaire to rhe best of my knowledge and provided all
inlb¡r¡ration to lhe envilo¡rmental profèssional as of the following date:
comprercd
'-,,,",
o' Srgu
á
l-lu p*t¿
{Lgnu 4sîAz6
signarure:
¿!#,
phoneNumber:
î
,u,r. J tlu"l Zþ
,?þl\
lt4"?r
¡¿=-
qd{ -1 LL-78'72
Relationship to the Site (i.e.. owner. lender, property manager):
\\q
HELPFUL DOCUMENTS
CARMAX-ELK GROVE
Are you aware of auy of tlrc below-listed reports, as they relate specifìcally to the property?
_Yes _No
(if yes,
please check all that apply):
E
B
Environmental Site Assessment repons (Phase I ESA. Asbeslos sampling reports, etc-)
Environmental Conrplia¡rce Audit reporls
O
GeotechnicalRepons
El
Environmental permits (for example, solid waste disposal permits, hazaldous waste
disposal permits, wastewater pernits, NPDES perrnits, underground injection permits)
0 Registrations for underground or above ground storage tanks
E Registrations for underground injection systents
0 Material Safety Data Sheets
E Conrnrunity Right-to'Know plan
E Safety Plan
D
0
Reports regarding Hydrogeologic conditions on the property or suruounding area
Notices or otl:er conespondence from any govemment agency relating to past or current
violatior:s of'environnrental laws with respect to the properly or relating to environmental
liens encumbering the property
0
0
Hazardous waste generator notices, or reports
Environmental Impact Reports (draft and/or fìnal)
O
Risk âssessntents
B
Recorded AULs
ÞÈL p**?"
t Ptuv tuêt) W SA,¿+ t-I*'te tsæn¿ tro¿r.¡rpô gTo þ
ÞPUlf¿{lr.{|\
If any of the above listed documents are available, willcopies beprovided to WKA for review?
Yes
No
Ca^.r.E¡uf APl-
Completed by:
,rrnu,rr"tMMJ-
\\$
APPENDIX C
EDR@ Radius Map Report Executive Summary
\\f
Garmax - Elk Grove
East Stockton Boulevard
Sacramento, CA 95828
lnquiry N umber: 31 0827 4.2s
June 27,2011
Fanls Roaci
Llíi4ii1
oll irci.:: 8ir0.:i52.ûC¡10
.":4C '"rV¡rÐcle!i
(ç
:
-t
EDRt
i,'4;lfcrd i)
Fnvironmental Data Resourr:es lnc
'í
i
\¡''rì'!'i. aic íi-ìúl. '-ìDni
FORM.STD-TXV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
SECTION
SummaryOverviewMap--Detail MapMapFindingsSummaryMapFindings----OrphanSummaryExecutive
ES1
2
3
----------------
Government Records Searched/Data Currency
Tracking-
4
8
53
GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
AddendumPhysical Setting Source SummaryPhysical Setting SSURGO Soil Map-
- -.
---
Physical Setting Source
Physical Setting Source Map- -
A-2
A-5
A-12
--Source Records Searched-
PhysicalSetting Source Map Findings-Physical Setting
A-1
-
A-14
A-40
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Gopyright and Trademark Notice
This Report conla¡ns certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. lt cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the larget and surrounding properties does not exist from
otheT souTces. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, ¡NC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE, ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARIS¡NG OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIM|TED To A REFUND oF THE AMoUNT pAtD FoR THls REpoRT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS lS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be ¡nterpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase
Environmental Site Assessment peformed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in th¡s Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2011 by Environmental Data Resources, lnc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn
trademarks used herein are the orooertv of their
are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources. Inc. or its affiliates. All other
owners.
TC31O8274.2s Page
1
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Parl 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INF
ADDRESS
EAST STOCKTON BOULEVARD
SACRAMENTO. CA 9582B
COORDINATES
(North):
38.461600 -38" 27'41.8"
(West):
121 .411200 - 121" 24' 40.3"
Uníversal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 10
638621 .1
UIM X (Meters):
4258021.5
UTM Y (Meters):
28 ft. above sea level
Elevation:
Latitude
Longitude
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision:
38121-D4 FLORIN, CA
1980
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo
Source:
from:
2006, 2005
USDA
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR
DAT,ABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL------- -
-
National Priority List
TC3108274.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
EXECUT¡VE SUMMARY
Proposed NPLNPL LIENS- - -
---
-
Proposed National Priority List Sites
-. Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL-
--
"
National Prioriiy List Deletions
Federal CERCLTS /,st
CERCLIS---__
FEDERAL FACILITY-
_ Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
-------
- Federal Facility Site Information
and Liability Information System
listing
Federal CERC¿IS NFRAP sife Lisf
CERC-NFRAP
- CERCLIS
No Further Remedial Aciion Planned
Federal RCRA CORRÁCIS facilities tist
CORRACTS--
- Corrective
Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACfS fSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF-
-
- RCRA - Treatment, Storage and D¡sposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG---
- RCRA-LargeQuantityGenerators
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
US ENG CONTROLS-------- Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL---------. Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS /isf
ERNS--Staúe-
------.
Emergency Response Notification System
and tribal - equivalent NPL
RESPONSE-
------
State Response Sites
State and tribal landfill and/or solid wasfe disposa/ sife /isfs
SWF/LF
--- -
-- Solid Waste Informaiion System
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST_________ --- Geotracker's Leaking Underground
SLIC---------- Statewide SLIC Cases
Fuel Ïank Report
Sacramento Co. CS---------- Toxic Site Clean-Up List
INDIAN LUST____------------ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
-
AST________:-__
Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
TC3108274.2s EXECU-r|VE SUMMARY 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INDIAN
FEMA
UST---- ----------
UST---
State and
Underground Storage ïanks on Indian Land
--. Underground Storage Tank Listing
tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP---------VCP----------
Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
-
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield /isfs
US BROWNFIELDS---------- A Listinq of Brownfields Siies
Local Lists of Landfill
ODI-----------
/
Solid Waste Drsposa/ Sifes
- Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9-
-------- Torres Martinez Reservation lllegal Dump Site Locations
WMUDS/SWAT---------- ---- Waste Management Unit Database
HAULERS- - - - Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
Repori on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
INDIAN ODI---------Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
CDL----Cal-Sites
SCH---------Toxic Pits----CDL--------US
HISI
-- Clandestine Drug Labs
- Historical Calsites Database
- School Property Êvaluation Program
- Toxic Pits Cleanup
Act Sites
Clandestine Drug Labs
US HISI CDL- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - National Clandestine Laboratory Register
-
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
CA FID UST
-
- - --
Facilitv Inventory Database
Local Land Records
2-----LUCIS-------LIENS-------DEED----LIENS
-
CERCLA Lien Information
- Land Use Control Information
-- Environmental LiensListing
----. Deed Restriction Listing
System
Records of Emergency Re/ease Reporfs
HMIRS------CHMIRS-----LDS ------MCS- - --- --
-- Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
- California Hazardous Material Incident Report System
---
Land Disposal Sites Listing
------- MilitaryCleanupSitesListing
Other Ascerta i n able Record s
RCRA-NonGen------------- RCRA - Non Generators
DOTOPS----DOD----------
- IncidentandAccidentData
- Department of Defense Sites
rC3'108274.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FUDS--------CONSENT---ROD---------UMTRA-----MINES-------TRIS---------TSCA-------FTTS----__--FTTS--SSTS----- --lClS---------PADS--------MLTS--------RADINFO----FINDS-------RAATS-------
- Formerly
Used Defense Sites
- Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
- Records Of Decision
- Uranium Mill lailings Sites
------ Mines Master Index File
- Ioxic Chemical Release Inventory System
- Toxic Substances Control Act
- FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
AcI)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
-. FIFRA/ISCA lracking System Administrative Case Listing
HIST
Section 7 Tracking Systems
-.Integrated Compliance Information System
- PCB Activity Database System
- Material Licensing Tracking System
-----
- Radiation Information Database
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
CA BOND EXP. PLAN-------. Bond Expenditure Plan
WDS---------- Waste Discharge System
NPDES------- NPDES Permits Listing
Cortese------- "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List
HIST CORTESE------------- Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List
-
Notify6S-----DRYCLEANERS-
- Proposition65Records
-
-----------
Cleaner Facilities
WIP---------EMI----------INDIAN RESERV-----
-. Well Investigation Program Case List
- Emissions Inventory Data
SCRD DRYCLEANERS-
- State
Indian Reservations
Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
HWT---------- Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
HWP---------. EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE--- - Financial Assurance Information Listing
PCB TRANSFORMER- - - - - - -. PCB Transformer Registration Database
PROC-------- Certified Processors Database
MWMP------- Medical Waste Management Program Listing
COAL ASH DOE------------- Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data
COALASH EPA------------. Coal Combustion Residues Surface lmpoundments List
----
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
EDR Proprietary Records
Manufactured Gas Plants----- EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Historical Auto Stations-. EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations
EDR Historical Cleaners- - - - - - EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners
SURROUNDING SITES
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases-
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information belween sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
r
C310827
4.2s EXECUTIVE SUI\4MARY
4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-SQG: RCRA|nfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
of 1984. Ihe database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat andior
dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quant¡ty
generators (SAGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 0311112011 has revealed that there are 3
RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
lD
SACRAMENTO RADIOLOGY TIMBERLAK 7601 TIMBERLAKE WY STE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.410 mi.) 825
METHODIST HOSPITAL - SACRAMENT 7500 TIMBERLAKE WAY NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.448 mi.) G31
7981 E STOCKTON BLVD NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.497 mí.) H37
COSTCO WHOLESALE NO 464
Lower
Elevation
Address
Direction / Distance Map
Page
30
38
45
RCRA-CESQG: RCRAlnfo is EPA's comprehensive ¡nformation system, providing access to data supporting
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of '1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites whích generate, transport, store, treat and/or
dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally
exempt small quantity generators (CESaGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of
acutely hazardous waste per month.
A review of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 0311112011 has revealed that there is
I RCRA-CESOG site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Address
Equal/Higher Elevation
SAMS CLUB NO 6622
8250 POWER INN
Direction / Distance Map lD
RD
SE 1/4 - 112(0.413
mi.\ F29
Page
35
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Site Mitigation and Brownfields
Reuse Program's (SMBRP's) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contaminaiion or sites for which
there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal
Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State
Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sìtes. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information
that was avaìlable in CalSites, and provides additional site informatìon, including, but not limited to,
identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, propedies where
environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk
characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at
contaminated sites.
A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated
0511012011 has revealed that there is
1 ENVIROSTOR site within approximately 1.25 miles of the target property.
Address
Lower Elevation
#21
SMUD PCB SUBSTATION SITE
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
Direction / Distance Map
HIGHWAY 99 NEAR WYNDHAM.IW 112 - 1 (0.824
mi.) 41
lD
Page
51
TC3108274.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
State and
tribal registered storage tank lists
UST: Ihe Underground Storage Tank database coniains registered USïs. USTs are regulated under
Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources
Control Board's Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database.
A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 0412912011 has revealed that there are 4 UST
sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Address
PROPEL FUELS/ POWER INN
SAM'S CLUB #6622
SHELL
8O9O
POWER INN
8250 POWER INN ROAD
Address
Lower Elevation
METHODIST HOSPITAL OF SACRAMEN
COSTCO WHOLESALE #464 IHMì
Distance Map lD
ENE 1/8 - 114 (0.157 mi.) 6
SE 1/4 - 'tl2 (0.413 mi.) F28
Direction /
Direction /
75OO HOSPITAL DR
7981 STOCKTON BLVD
Distance
Map
lD
WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.388 mi.) D24
NNW 1/4 - 112 (0.497 mi.) H34
Page
11
35
Page
28
+J
/
Solid Waste Disposa/ Sifes
SWRCY: A listing of recycling facilities in California.
A review of the SWRCY list, as provided by EDR, and dated 0212412011 has revealed that there is
SWRCY site within approximately 0.75 miles of the target property.
Lower
Elevation
SWFT TRANSPORTATION INC
Address
7891 E STOCKTON
Direction /
BLVD
NNW 1/2
Distance
- 1 (0.734
mi.)
1
Map lD
Page
40
HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database.
A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there is
HIST UST site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation
PUTNAM'S RAI N BOW FOU NTAIN S
Address
8011
E STOCKTON
Direction /
BLVD
Distance
NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.342
mi.)
1
Map lD
Page
C16
SWEEPS USI: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank
listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1 990's. The listing is no
longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a s¡te on the SWEEPS
list-
A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01i 1994 has revealed that there is
TC3108274.2s EXECUTIVE SUMIVIARY 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 SWEEPS UST site
within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property
Address
Lower Elevation
METHODIST HOSPITAL
Oth
er Asce rta
i n a b I e Re c o
75OO TIMBERLAKE WAY
Direction / Distance
NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.448
mi.)
Map lD
Page
c32
41
rd s
sacramento co' ML: sacramento county Master List. Any business that
has hazardous materials on site hazardous materials storage sites, undeiground storage ianks, waste generators.
A review of the Sacramento C^o. ML list, as provided by EDR, and dated
o2to7l2o11 has revealed that
there are 22 Sacramento Co. ML sites within apþroximately 0.S miles
of the target property.
Equal/Higher
Elevation
SAMS CLUB
CA AMERICAN WATER COUNTRYSIDE
Lower Elevation
MERCY MEDICAL GROUP
Address
8250 POWER INN RD
8230 MEADOWHAVEN DR
Address
Direction /
Distance
Map lD
Page
sE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.413 m¡.)
F27
ESE 1/4 - 112 (0.498 mi.)
t39
34
50
Map lD
Page
mi.) A3
mi.) 4
7
mi.) 88
mi.) B1O
ni.) 811
mi.) 812
mi.) 813
mi.) F14
mi.) B1s
C17
C1B
D20
D21
D2Z
D23
D24
mi.) 30
H3s
H36
8120
8118
7691
7600
7601
TIMBERLAKE WAY STE W 0 - 1/8 (0.113
OCCUPATIONAL ORIHOPEDICS
HOSPITAL DR, #1 ,IO
SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.137
PUTMAN ENTERPRISES
STEVENSON AV
NNW 1/4 - 1t2 (0.278 mi.)
SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY HEALTH CE
HOSPITAL DR SUIT I
NW '1l4 - 112 (0.298
ROBERT J CHURCH DDS
HOSPITAL DR, #205
NW l/4 - 1/2 (0.300
SACRAMENTO ORAL SURGERY
7601 HOSPITALDR,#1048
NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300
JUN M TANIMOTO DDS
7601 HOSPITAL DR SUIT 2
NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300
SACTO RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP
7601 HOSPITAL DR STE 10
NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.s00
MICHAEL H PRESKAR, DDS
7601 HOSPITAL DR #104
NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300
JUN M TANIMOTO DDS
7601 HOSPTTAL DR, #201
Nw 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300
PUTNAM'S RAINBOW FOUNTAINS
8011 STOCKTON BL
NNW 1/4 - 1t2 (0.342 mi.\
BERCO REDWOOD, INC
8OO7 STOCKTON BL
NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.382 mi.)
LAGUNA DENTAL OFFICE
7501 HOSPITAL DR 306
WNWl/4-1/2(0.3ssmi.)
RONALD ¿ RASMUSSE/V DDS
7501 HOSPITAL DR, #302
WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.385 mi.)
ELLIOTT L ADAMS, MD
7501 HOSPITAL DR #206
wNW 1/4 - 112 (0.385 mi.)
LAYNE R TAKEOKA DDS
WNW 1/4 - 112 (0.385 mi.)
75OO HOSPITAL DR
WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.38s mL)
WALGREENS #12365
8275 BRUCEVILLE RD
SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.430
cosrco WHùLESALE#464
7981 E STOCKTON BLVD
NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.497 mi.)
COSTCO WHOLESALE #464HM
798I E STOCKTON BLVD
NNW 1l4 - 112 (O.497 mi.)
9
g
11
j2
13
14
.16
16
17
1s
21
22
23
25
2Z
27
28
38
4J
45
HAZNET: The data is extracted from the cop¡es of hazardous waste
manifests received each year oy
the DTSC' The annual volume of manifests ió typically 700,000-1
,000,000 annuaily, representing approxrmately
350,000-500,000 shipments. Data from non-caiiornia-manifests a
sheets are not included at the
present time' Data are from the manifests submitted without
"ont¡nuaì,on
correction,
ànJìr,ereroru runy .ont"iÃ .ãr"
invalid values for data elem^ents such as generator lD, TSD lo, wasìÀ
catejory, a disposal method. The source
is the Department of Toxic Substance Co-ntrol is the agency
A review of the HAZNEI list,.as provided by EDR, and dated 12131l2oog
has revealed that there are 19
HAZNET sites within approximately 0.5 míles of the target property-
FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE
CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER - CO
Address
8055 ORCHARD LOOP
8230 MEADOWHAVEN DR
lD
Map
SSE 1/4 ESE 1/4 -
33
138
112
112
(0.485 mi.)
(0.498 mi.)
Page
42
48
TC3108274.2s EXECUTTVE SUMMARY
7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Lower Elevation
Address
Direction /
Distance
Map lD
Page
MEDCLINIC DBA CHW MED FOUNDATI
A1
I
AT&T
A2
A3
8120 TIMBERLAKE WAY STE W 0 - 1/8 (0.113 mi.)
8120 TIMBERLAKE WAY
W 0 - 1/8 (0.113 mi.)
MEDCLINIC DBA CHW MED FOUNDATI
8I20 TIMBERLAKE WAY SI
w 118 - 114 (0.137 mi.)
ROBERT J. CHURCH, D.D.S.
7601 HOSPITAL DR. STE.
NW 1/4 - 1i2 (0.300 mi.)
SACRAM ENTO ORAL SU RGERY
7601 HOSPITAL DR.#1048
NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.)
SACTO RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP
7601 HOSPITAL DR STE 1O
NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.)
JUN M TANIMOTO DDS
7601 HOSPTTAL DR,#201
Nw 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.)
PUTNAM'S RAINBOW FOUNTAINS
NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.342 mi.)
LAYNE TAKAOKA DDS
7501 HOSPITALDR#2O2
WNW 1/4 - l/2 (0.385 mi.)
LAGUNA DENTAL OFFICE
WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.385 mi.)
RONALD L RASMUSSEV DDS
7501 HOSPITAL DR,#302
WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.385 mi.)
75OO HOSPITAL DR
WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.388 mi.)
SAC RAM ENTO R AD I O LO GY T IM BERLAK 7601 TIMBERLAKE WY STE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.410 mi.)
CAPITOL RADIOLOGICAL/SACRAM ENT
7601 TIMBERLAKE WAY #10 NW '1l4 - 1/2 (0.410 mi.)
M ETHO D I ST HO S P ITAL . SAC PAM EN T
75OO TIMBERLAKE WAY
NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.448 mi.)
COSTCO WHOLESALE#464
NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.497 mi.)
COSTCO WHOLESALE NO 464
7981 ESTOCKTON BLVD
NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.497 mi.)
T
C31 0827
8
B9
811
10
12
14
fJl3
16
815
19
cí6
20
22
23
25
28
30
33
38
D19
D20
D21
D24
E25
E,26
G31
H35
H37
43
45
4.2s EXECUTIVE SUI\4MARY
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or ínadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 46 records.
Site Name
Database(s)
ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL
WALNUT GROVE WWTP
OSL - RMLR
ELK GROVE RADIO RELAY
ANTHONY SOUZA
ALLEN RANCH - LINCOLN
CHICO . SKYWAY SUBDIVISION
DELTA AIRLINES
PG&E
BIG O TIRES #5087
TTL AUTOMOTIVE ENT INC DBA OILSTOP
TARGET #1 527
VALLEY SLURRY SEAL CO
PACIFIC BELL
TARGET #1 527
CON-WAY FACILITY YARD - SACRAM
ELK HORN BLVD & RIO LINDA AT RR CR
ELK GROVE@FLORIN RD/N OF ELKGROVE
Not Reported
STONE LAKE WILDLIFE INTERSTATE 5 A
PLEASANT GROVE ELEMENTARY
14TH AVE LANDFILL- EAST PIT
SACRAMENTO-YOLO MOSQUITO & VECTOR
SACRAMENTO-YOLO MOSQUITO & VECTOR
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD - RAILROAD
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD - RAILROAD
CALTRANS NORTHGATE MAINT. STATION
ELK GROVE FIRE
ELK GROVE
FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE#35E9
BIG O TIRES #87
CALV|NE 76 #009
PREMIER CAR WASH
AUTO TECH
CALIFORNIAAMERICAN WATER CO
TARGET STORE T-1 527
PACIFIC HEALTH CENTER
-
PHC ADMINISTRATION
PACIFIC HEALTH CENTER
INDUSTRIAL MINERALS - GEO.INTERNAT
FRANKLIN FIELD
LAGUNA CROSSROADS
CAMPUS RECYCLING CENTER
CALTRANS
PRICE CO/DWR - RETENTION POND
FRANKLIN FIELD COUNTY AIRPORT
HIST CORTESE
FINDS,WDS,NPDES
FID,SWEEPS UST
FID,SWEEPS UST
FID,SWEEPS UST
SWEEPS UST
HIST CALSITES,CORTESE, ENVIROSTOR
HAZNET,CHMIRS,ML SACRAMENTO
HAZNET
HAZNET
HAZNET,ML SACRAMENTO
HAZNET
HAZNET
RCRA-SOG,FINDS
RCRA.LOG
HMIRS
ERNS
ERNS
ERNS
ERNS
FINDS
SLIC REGION 2
SLIC REGION 2
SLIC REGION 2
SLIC REGION 2
SLIC REGION 2
SLIC REGION 2
ML SACRAMENTO
ML SACRAMENTO
ML SACRAMENTO
ML SACRAMENTO
ML SACRAMENTO
ML SACRAMENTO
ML SACRAMENTO
ML SACRAMENTO
IVL SACRAMENTO
ML SACRAMENTO
ML SACRAMENTO
ML SACRAMENTO
MINES
CS SACRAMENTO
CS SACRAMENTO
CS SACRAMENTO
CS SACRAMENTO
CS SACRAMENTO
ENVIROSTOR
TC3108?74.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9
OVERVf EW MAP - 3108274.2s
*
Ïarget Property
^
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
+
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
T
ffir
L__ll
i,r
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
ffi Areasofconcern
Indian Reservations BIA
Power transmission lines
il
ñ
Oil & Gas pipelines
1
i
OO-year flood zone
500-year flood zone
National Wetland Inventory
This reporl includes Inleractive Map Layers t0
display and/or hide map informalion. The
legend includes 0nly those icons for the
default mao view.
SITE NAME: Carmax - Elk Grove
CLIENT:
East Slockton Boulevard
Sacramenlo CA 95828
LAT/LONG: 38.4616 | 121.4112
CONïACT: Nancy Malarel
INQUfRY#: 3108274.2s
DATE: June27,2011 5:44pm
ADDRESS:
Copy¡¡ght
Wallace - Kuhl & Associates
ç
201 1 EDR, Inc. (ç 2ù10 T¿le
Atl¡s Bel. 07i2009
DETAIL MAP - 31O8274.2s
Target Property
Sites at elevations hioher than
or equal to the targeiproperty
¡
tl
Siles at elevations lower than
the target property
Sensitive Receptors
,_ .
-,
...!
i2
li-l
Indian Reservations BIA
iii:iiiii Areas of
Concern
I
t\
oit & Gas pipelines
ir
no-year aood zone
N]
soo-y""t flood zone
National Priority List Sites
l'i-l
:' 1! Dept. Defense Sites
Th¡s report includes Interaclive Map Layers t0
display and/or hide map inf0rr¡ali0n. The
legend includes only those icons for lhe
default mao view.
Grove
Boulevard
9sB2B
121.4112
SITE NAME: Carmax - Elk
East Slockton
sacramento CA
LAT/LONG: 38.4616 |
ADDRESS:
I
CLlerut:
Wallace - Kuhl & Assoc¡ates
I CONTACT: Nancy Malarel
I lruoutnv #: 3108274.2s
I DATE: June27,2011 S:45 pm
Copyright ç:
201
I
EDR. ¡nc.
ç
2010 l¿le Atlas Rel. 07/2009
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Database
Target Distance
Property (Miles) <1lB 118-114 114-112 112-1 >1
Total
Plotted
Federal NPL site list
NPL
ProposedNPL
NPL LIENS
1.250
1.250
TP
0
0
NR
0
0
NR
0
0
NR
0
0
NR
0
0
NR
O
1.250
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.250
O
O
O
O
O
O
O.5OO
O
O
O
NR
NR
O
1.250
0
0
0
0
0
0
O.5OO
O.5OO
O.5OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
3
1
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0,750
0.750
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
NR
NR
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
O
1.250
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.250
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
Federal Delísted NPL site list
DelistedNPl
Federal CERCLIS list
CERCL|S0.7500000NR0
FEDERALFACILIry
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP sife Lrsf
CERC-NFRAP
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CoRRACTS
Federal RCRA non-CORRÁCfS
TSD
facílities list
RCRA-TSDFO.TSOOOOONRO
Federal RCRA generators |ist
RCRA-LOG
RCRA-SQG
RCRA-CESQG
O
3
1
Federal institutional controls /
en gi neering control s reg istries
US ENG
US INST
CONTROLS
CONTROL
O
O
Federal ERNS list
ERNS
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
RESPONSE
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
ENVTROSTOR
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposa/ sife /rsfs
swF/lF0.7500000NR0
Sfafe and tribal leaking storage tank lists
1UST0.7500000NR0
sltc0.7s00000NR0
fC31O8274.2s Page
4
ïarget
Database
Property
Sacramento Co. CS
INDIAN LUST
Search
Distance
(Miles)
0.750
0.750
<
1tB
0
0
1t8
-
114
114
-
0
0
0
0
112
UZ
-
|
>1
Total
Plotted
ONRO
ONRO
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
UST
0.500
TP
0.500
0.500
AST
INDIAN UST
FEMA UST
01
NR
00
00
NR
3NRNR4
NRNRNRO
ONRNRO
ONRNRO
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP
VCP
0.750
0.750
NR
NR
0.750
NR
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
/
Solid
Waste Disposa/ Sifes
oDl
WMUDS/SWAÏ
SWRCY
HAULERS
INDIAN ODI
Local Lists of Hazardous waste
0.750
NR
00
00
00
NR
00
TP
1.250
0-500
1.250
TP
TP
NR
00
00
00
NR
NR
TP
0.750
0.750
0.750
DEBRIS REGION 9
ÏP
NR
NR
NRNRNRO
OONRO
OONRO
O1NRl
NRNRNRO
OONRO
/
Contaminated Sites
US CDL
HIST Cal-Sites
SCH
ïoxic Pits
CDL
US HISÏ CDL
NR
NR
NR
NRNRNRO
0000
ONRNRO
0000
NRNRNRO
NRNRNRO
CA FID UST
HIST UST
SWEEPS USI
0.500
0.500
0.500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
NRNRO
NRNRl
NRNRl
Local Land Records
LIÊNS 2
LUCIS
LIENS
DEED
TP
0.750
TP
TP
NR
NR
NRNRNRNRO
000NR0
NRNRNRNRO
NRNRNRNRO
NR
NR
NRNRNRNRO
NRNRNRNRO
NR
Records of Emergency Re/ease Reporfs
HMIRS
TP
CHMIRS
ÏP
TC3108274.2s Page 5
Search
Database
Target
Property
LDS
MCS
Oth
Distance
(Miles)
<
118
-
118
114
-
114
112
NR
NR
NR
TP
TP
1.250
1.250
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
1-250
n
1.250
0.750
0.500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
TP
TP
NR
NR
NR
1t2
-'l
NR
NR
Total
>1
Plotted
NRO
NRO
er Ascertai n a b I e Reco rd s
RCRA-NonGen
DOT OPS
DOD
FUDS
CONSENT
ROD
UMTRA
MINES
TRIS
TSCA
FTTS
HIST FTTS
SSÏS
ICIS
PADS
MLTS
RADINFO
FINDS
RAATS
CA BOND EXP- PLAN
WDS
NPDES
Cortese
HIST CORTESE
Notify 65
DRYCLEANERS
WIP
Sacramento Co. ML
HAZNET
EMI
INDIAN RESERV
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
HWT
HWP
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
PCB TRANSFORMER
PROC
MWMP
COAL ASH DOE
COAL ASH EPA
tf
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
TP
1.250
TP
ÏP
0.750
0.750
1.250
0.s00
0.500
0.500
0.500
TP
1.250
0.750
0.500
1.250
TP
TP
0.750
0.500
TP
0.750
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
0
U
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
1
1
¿
I
NR
NR
0
0
0
rì
0
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
U
0
0
U
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
U
0
0
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
20
lo
NR
0
NR
0
0
n
0
NR
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
NR
0
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
NRO
NRO
00
00
00
00
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
00
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
00
NRO
NRO
NR
NR
NRO
00
NRO
NRO
00
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
NRO
22
,I9
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
EDR
Proprietary Records
EDR Historical Auto Stations
1.250
0.500
00
00
000
NRNRO
TC3108274.2s Page 6
Search
Database
EDR Historical
Target Distance
Property (Miles) <118 1lB-114 114-112 112-1 >1
Cleaners
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
Total
ptotted
0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC3108274.2s Page
7
APPENDIX D
Vapor Encroachment Screening Matrix
\\f
Screen for Vapor Encroachment Conditions Matrix
CARMAX
WKA No.9179.01
for Vapor Encroaclrment Conditions (VEC) rnairix includes a(l)Search Rudius Test,(2) Chemicals
of Concern Test (COC), and (3) a Critical Distance Testltl .
Phase I ESA Screen
(1) Search Radius Test: Are there any known or suspect conta¡ninated sites in the primary area of concern within the
corresponding search radii? (if yes, see attached Table A).
I v", ño
If No, then screening f'or a VEC is complete and no VEC currentl¡, exists. go to #4. If Yes, then:
(2) Chemicals of Concernl2l Test: Are COC likely to be present within
the area of concern for those known or suspect
contaminated sites identified based on the Search Distance Test?
n
lf
yes nNo
lf No, then screening for
a
VEC is conrplete and no VEC currently exists. go to #4. If Yes, then:
Yes, check all COC that apply on attached Table B.
(3) Critical Distance Test: A plume test to deterrnine whether or not COC in the contarninated plunre(s) may
be within
the critical distance.
(3a) Is information related to the contarninated(s) plume available (i.e. isoconcentration maps, site drawings, etc.)?
nY.t !No
(3b)lf1Vo,thenscreeningforaVEC iscornpleteandnoYECcw"renrþ exists, goto#4. If Yes,then:
(3c) ls the site less than l00 feet to the nearest edge of a contarninated [non-petroleum hydrocarbon] plurne(s)?
ny.s nNo
(3d) Is the site less than 30 feet to the nearest edge of a dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon plLrme(s)?
nYes nNo
lf the distance from the nearest edge of a contaminated plume to the nearest existing or planned structltre on the site is less
than 100 feet for non-petroleum hydrocalbon COC, or less than 30 feet for dissolved petloler-rrn hydrocalbons, then it is
presumed that a VEC currently exists beneath the site. If the distance from the nearest edge of the contaminated plLrme is
greater than or eqr-ral to 100 feet for non-petroler-rm hydrocarbons, or 30 feet for dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon chemicals
of concern, then it is presumed unlikely that a VEC cttrrently exists beneath the site.
(4) Is it likely that
n y". E/o
a
VEC currently exists beneath the site?
lf Yes, then recommend performing
a full scope VEC assessment according to ASTM E 2600-10.
[1i Eased on guidanæ presented in lhe ASTIU E 2600-10 SIândard.
[2]Chemicâl(s)of@næm(COC):
Seeâtlachedlablefortypicalchemicalsofconcern(aspresenledinAppendixX6.loflheASTl\4E2600-10Standãrd)

Environmental Site Assessment

Transcription

Similar documents

2015 SPRING WACAC COLLEGE FAIR

See`s Candy Holiday Store

01Bonneville - Riff Raff Customs

AMA Pro Flat Track Championship: May 21 Sacramento Republic v

Brochure - Ridge Capital

WHEN? WHAT? WHERE?

PDF

Great Rates! - SMA America

It was 60 years ago that Naturwood Home Furnishings opened for

Special Event Brochure