El Salvador - Global Health Sciences
Transcription
El Salvador - Global Health Sciences
COUNTRY BRIEFING Eliminating malaria in EL SALVADOR El Salvador reported only 24 cases of malaria in 2010 and is working to enhance its surveillance system to quickly identify and control imported cases. Overview At a Glance 1 24 Reported cases of malaria (92% P. vivax) 0 Deaths from malaria 83 % of population at risk (total population: 6.1 million) 0.003 Annual parasite incidence (cases/1,000 total population/year) 0.02 % Slide positivity rate Source: World Health Organization, World Malaria Report 2011 Malaria Transmission Limits Plasmodium vivax El Salvador reduced its malaria burden by 99 percent between 1990 and 2010, and is categorized in the pre-elimination phase by the World Health Organization (WHO).1 The last reported death from malaria occurred in 1984.2 Plasmodium vivax is the predominant malaria parasite, and since 2001 there have been only 14 reported cases of P. falciparum.1 From 2004 to 2007, more than 40 percent of all cases were imported, and 91 percent of imported cases in 2008 occurred in people between the ages of 15 and 44 who migrated to El Salvador for agricultural or artisanal work.3 Anopheles albimanus is the primary vector; malaria transmission occurs year-round but peaks during the rainy season from May to October.4, 5 Although El Salvador now maintains low transmission with relatively few reported cases, the scattered transmission foci requires a dispersed concentration of malaria activities. San Salvador Province in the central part of the country contains nearly one-third of El Salvador’s population and had 42 percent of all reported malaria cases in 2008.3 Cases were also reported throughout the southwest region along the border with Guatemala, including in the provinces of Ahuachapán, Santa Ana, and Sonsonate, and in the province of La Uniòn along the eastern border with Honduras. Water P. vivax free Unstable transmission (API <0.1) Low stable transmission (0.1≥ API <1.0) Stable transmission (≥1.0 API) 0 MAY 2012 50 100 150 Kilometres P. vivax malaria risk is classified into no risk, unstable risk of <0.1 case per 1,000 population (API), low stable risk of ≥0.1 to <1.0 case per 1,000 population (API), and stable risk of ≥1.0 case per 1,000 population (API). Risk was defined using health management information system data and the transmission limits were further refined using temperature and aridity data. Data from the international travel and health guidelines (ITHG) were used to identify zero risk in certain cities, islands and other administrative areas. 1 COUNTRY BRIEFING Eliminating malaria in EL SALVADOR El Salvador has plans to improve microscopy practices, implement community-driven practices, increase epidemiological surveillance, reduce transmission foci, and control the number of imported malaria cases.3 Furthermore, the malaria program conducts active case detection in areas where temporary employment is found, such as handmade brick and tile factories, plantation estates, and mills. Nearly US$2 million was provided for malaria control in 2008, all of which came from the government.3 With continued support from the government and targeting high-risk-areas by the program, El Salvador is in a good position to eliminate malaria. Progress Toward Elimination In the 1960s, El Salvador averaged more than 160,000 cases of malaria each year, of which 60 percent were P. vivax and 40 percent were P. falciparum.5 To reduce this high caseload, El Salvador implemented mass drug administration and widespread use of indoor residual spraying with DDT. While reductions in mortality and morbidity were achieved, by the 1970s insecticide resistance appeared and spraying with DDT was scaled back.6 During this same period, the cotton industry expanded greatly, causing extensive deforestation, thereby increasing mosquito breeding habitats.6 Seasonal workers from the low-risk highland regions of El Salvador migrated to the high-risk Pacific coastal plains for work and were more susceptible to contracting malaria because of their low levels of malaria immunity, poor housing structures, and limited access to health services.6 The Salvadoran Civil War broke out in 1980, causing a near standstill in health services, industry, and malaria control efforts. The cotton industry collapsed, and seasonal worker migration no longer posed a significant role in malaria transmission.6 The war presented a challenge to malaria control surveillance and vector control; the quality and availability of health services deteriorated and environmental degradation resulting from misuse of land greatly increased the presence of vectors.7 In 1992, the armed conflict ended and thousands of refugees and ex-combatants settled in agricultural communities as part of the national land transfer program; however, most of the land had been deforested during the war. Over the next few years, the malaria program was strengthened, including a new focus on surveillance, vector control, and an increased government role in managing malaria—all of which contributed to a steady decline in cases.3, 8 However, an outbreak occurred in 1996, most likely due to the continuation of poor land management by agricultural industries; it was quickly brought under control and cases declined.1, 9 Reported Malaria Cases 10,000 Number of cases 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 117 85 112 67 49 40 33 20 24 cases cases cases cases cases cases cases cases cases 1,000 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 The number of cases of malaria in El Salvador has been consistently declining over the past two decades, except for an outbreak in 1996. Source: World Health Organization, World Malaria Report 2011 MAY 2012 2 COUNTRY BRIEFING Eliminating malaria in EL SALVADOR Since 2003, in coordination with the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO),10 El Salvador moved away from DDT use and employed alternative malaria control methods such as planting neem trees, which are attributed to playing a role in the declining number of malaria cases due to their antimalarial properties.3, 11 The ministry of health increased funding in 2007 to strengthen the monitoring and control of vector-borne diseases and deliver equipment for thermal fogging and microscopes for malaria surveillance and case management.12 Additionally, the ministry of health published a manual outlining the technical guidelines for proper microscopic diagnosis of malaria and developed certification criteria for malaria-free zones.13 El Salvador reported an extremely low malaria burden in 2010; however, 83 percent of the population is still considered at risk due to the widespread prevalence of the vector and scattered transmission foci.3 Malaria control success has been attributed to: strong human resources; good program management; strong microscopy skills in affected areas; public and private sector collaboration; and large groups of organized community volunteers equipped with malaria testing kits.14 Geographic information system mapping software is currently being implemented to strengthen malaria surveillance and help El Salvador reach national malaria elimination.2 Challenges to Eliminating Malaria Migrant populations El Salvador’s greatest challenge to controlling malaria is managing the threat of malaria importation. Many immigrants from neighboring countries cross into El Salvador in search of employment. In 2007, there were many Nicaraguans and Hondurans living in El Salvador, and even more temporary immigrant workers who came looking for work in the sugar industry.19 To address this challenge, El Salvador is partnering with PAHO to increase cross-border cooperation with Honduras and Nicaragua.19 Conclusion El Salvador has made remarkable progress in reducing its malaria burden and is now close to elimination. The ministry of health is continuing to work with PAHO to develop innovative strategies for malaria elimination, including cross-border collaboration, transmission foci reduction, and engaging at-risk communities in malaria surveillance and control. Eligibility for External Funding15–17 The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Yes U.S. Government’s President’s Malaria Initiative No World Bank International Development Association No Economic Indicators18 GNI per capita (US$) $3,380 Country income classification Lower middle Total health expenditure per capita (US$) $237 Total expenditure on health as % of GDP 7 Private health expenditure as % total health expenditure 38 MAY 2012 3 COUNTRY BRIEFING Eliminating malaria in EL SALVADOR Sources 1. WHO. World Malaria Report 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. 2. Ministerio de Salud – El Salvador. Proyecto DDT/GEF. Qunta Reunion del Comite Directivo. Mexico DF; 2008. 3. PAHO. El Salvador – Informe de la Situacion del Paludismo en las Americas. 2008. 4. Sinka ME, Rubio-Palis Y, Manguin S, Patil AP, Temperley WH, Gething PW, et al. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Americas: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic precis. Parasit Vectors 2010; 3:72. 5. Rachou RG, Lyons G, Moura-Lima M, Kerr JA. Synoptic Epidemiological Studies of Malaria in El Salvador. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1965; 14: 1–62. 6. Packard RM. The Making of a Tropical Disease: A Short History of Malaria: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007. 7. Ugalde A. The health costs of war: can they be measured? Lessons from El Salvador. BMJ 2000; 321 (169). 8. Vargas A. El Salvador Country Brief: Property Rights and Land Markets. Madison: Land Tenure Center - University of Wisconsin; 2003. 9. A. Nájera. Malaria Epidemics Detection and Control Forecasting and Prevention: World Health Organization; 1998. 10. UNEP/WHO/GEF. Countries move toward more sustainable ways to roll back malaria WHO. 2009. 11. PAHO. Lanzamiento del Árbol NIM en el Municipio de Santo Tomás 2008 [cited 2010 3 March 2010]; Available from: http://devserver.paho. org/els/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=67&Itemid=216&lang=en. 12. Ministero de Salud – El Salvador. Ministro de Salud hace entrega de importante equipo para la prevención del Dengue y la Malaria: a personal del Ministerio de Salud. San Salvador; 2007. 13. Ministero de Salud – El Salvador. Manual de Procedimientos Tecnicos Para El Diagnostico Microscopico de la Malaria; 2007. 14. WHO. Informal consultation on malaria elimination: setting up the WHO agenda. World Health Organization Global Malaria Programme; 2006. 15. IDA. International Development Association Eligibility. 2012; Available from: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/IDA/0,,contentMDK:20054572~menuPK:3414210~pagePK:51236175~piPK:437394~theSitePK:73154,00.html. 16. PMI. U.S. Government’s President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI). 2012; Available from: http://www.fightingmalaria.gov/countries/index.html 17. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria. The Global Fund Eligibility List. 2012; Available from: http://www.theglobalfund. org/en/application/applying/ecfp/eligibility. 18. World Bank. World Development Indicators Database. 2012; Available from: http://data.worldbank.org. 19. Migration Information Source. El Salvador: Despite End to Civil War, Emigration Continues, 2007. Available from: http://www.migrationinformation.org/Profiles/display.cfm?ID=636. Transmission Limits Map Sources Guerra, CA, Howes, RE, Patil, AP, Gething, PW, Van Boeckel, TP, Temperley, WH, Kabaria, CW, Tatem, AJ, Manh, BH, Elyazar, IRF, Baird, JK, Snow, RW and Hay, SI. (2010). The international limits and population at risk of Plasmodium vivax transmission in 2009. Public Library of Science Neglected Tropical Diseases, 4(8): e774. Status of malaria in the Americas, 1994–2007: a series of data tables, World Health Organization/Pan American Health Organization (Regional Office for the Americas), Washington D.C., United States of America, URL: http://www.paho.org/English/AD/DPC/CD/mal-americas-2007.pdf (Data year 2006) MAY 2012 4 COUNTRY BRIEFING Eliminating malaria in EL SALVADOR About This Briefing This country briefing was produced through a collaboration of the Global Health Group, in partnership with the National Malaria Control Program in El Salvador. Malaria transmission risk maps were provided by the Malaria Atlas Project (MAP). Funding was provided through a grant to the Global Health Group from the Exxon Mobil Corporation. The Malaria Elimination Initiative at the Global Health Group of the University of California, San Francisco (www.globalhealthsciences.ucsf. edu/global-health-group) convenes the Malaria Elimination Group (www.malariaeliminationgroup.org), and supports countries actively pursuing elimination at the endemic margins of the disease. Funding for the Malaria Elimination Initiative is provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Exxon Mobil Corporation. The Malaria Atlas Project (MAP) provided the malaria transmission maps. MAP is committed to disseminating information on malaria risk, in partnership with malaria endemic countries, to guide malaria control and elimination globally. Find MAP online at: www.map.ox.ac.uk. GlobAL Health Group Project Team Editor: Allison Phillips | Managing Editor: Chris Cotter | Researcher and Content Developer: Janelle Downing | Graphic Designer: Kerstin Svendsen MAY 2012 5