5) Trial Conjurator 2
Transcription
5) Trial Conjurator 2
Report on the Trial to Integrate a GPS GPS Based ACMI onto the Tornado B d ACMI t th T d F3/GR4, Harrier & Jaguar F3/GR4 Harrier & Jaguar Trial Conjurator Trial Conjurator 2 ‐ 2 ‐ RAIDS Sqn Ldr Adrian S Rycroft BSc(Eng), MRAeS, PGCPsy Lecture Content Lecture Content • • • • • • • Overview of a ‘Fixed Range ACMI’ Overview of the ‘Range‐less Overview of the Range less ACMI ACMI’ (RAIDS) (RAIDS) Trial Objectives Aircraft integration Missile Modelling Tool & Security Missile Modelling Tool & Security Trial Program Results Fixed Fixed Range ACMI Range ACMI ACMI Range CENTRAL PROCESSOR DEBRIEF CABIN ACMI Range ACMI Range New Technology New Technology • Global Positioning System (Sat GPS) Gl b l P iti i S t (S t GPS) – No reliance on ground station triangulation. – Universal timing. – DTED & Dobs data available from GPWS DTED & Dobs data available from GPWS • Laser Inertial Nav Platforms. • Digital ‘on‐board’ processing. – Explosion in high fidelity simulation (games) • High Band‐Width Digital Data‐Links – No need for ground‐station processing df d INTERNAL PROCESSOR DEBRIEF CABIN New Capability BVR & IAI (Marconi) • ACMI performance ‘rangeless’ – Live, Live A Live Live A‐to‐A to A Weapon Simulation, Replay. Weapon Simulation Replay • Collision Warning – Air‐to‐Air & Ground • Air Air‐to‐Ground to Ground Weapon Simulation. Weapon Simulation. – Ability to limit ‘dead’ players. • Simulated Ground Threats Si l d G d Th – SAMs, Area Boundaries • Remote Debriefing New Capability BVR & IAI (Marconi) Trial Objectives Trial Objectives Prove the system !!! y (2xGS, 12x Pods) • Inform ‘main buy’ (2 yrs). • Aircraft Integration. Ai ft I t ti – F3 F3, GR4, Harrier • System Performance. • Give it a name!!! Give it a name!!! Airborne Instrumented Debriefing System (R’Less) f g y ( ) AIDS(R) RAIDS Aircraft Integration Aircraft Integration NO FUNDING NO FUNDING • F3 Lead Platform – Radar Missiles R d Mi il • SANS IPT had a poor understanding of system understanding of system. RAIDS as BUS MONITOR RAIDS as BUS MONITOR Data‐Link Main Computer Radar 1, 2 etc RAIDS 1553 MIL DATA BUS 1553 MIL DATA‐BUS RAF ACMI FIT RAF ACMI FIT ACMI Sim Plug RDR Mx MAIN COMPUTER ACMI Pod IR Mx X‐over RAF RAIDS FIT RAF RAIDS FIT COCKPIT RAIDS Pod MAIN COMPUTER (RAIDS OFP) IR Mx X‐over RAIDS OFP: Produced by RAF Software Maintenance Team 1553 D t b & AUDIO fitt d b F3 OEU E i 1553 Data‐bus & AUDIO fitted by F3 OEU Engineers Flown under STF & Service Deviation to RtS Aircraft Integration Aircraft Integration Weapon Simulation: Weapon Simulation: • Missile Modelling Tool: – Security – Validity • Airborne: – Aircraft‐to‐pod requirements – Outcomes O t Missile Modelling Tool Missile Modelling Tool Security & Validity: • Thrust Thrust – profile, amount etc profile amount etc • ‘G’ • Drag & Vmax/Vmin Flt profile – collision, pursuit etc collision, pursuit etc • Flt profile • Aircraft data for pairing • Aircraft data for valid kill • Only ‘kill’ message sent. • No seeker/fusing/warhead data required Missile Modelling Tool Missile Modelling Tool Data Requirements: SA Rdr, Active Rdr, IR S i Semi‐Active Radar: i d – Antenna ‘Look Angle’ at launch and during flight. – Terrain Missile Modelling Tool Missile Modelling Tool Data Requirements: SA Rdr, Active Rdr, IR Active Radar: i d – Tgt position (+/‐) data to ‘active’ boundary. – Terrain Missile Modelling Tool Missile Modelling Tool Data Requirements: SA Rdr, Active Rdr, IR IR: – Antenna ‘Look Angle’ at launch – Terrain – re‐action to re‐action to ‘flares’ flares . Trial Program Trial Program Truth Data Truth Data – 1 RAIDS pod v ACMI pod – 1 RAIDS pod v ac navigation data 1 RAIDS pod v ac navigation data Data‐Link Performance – 1 card v 2, 3, 4 card debrief Weapon Simulation Accuracy Weapon Simulation Accuracy – RAIDS pod v ac weapon sim. – ‘hit’ and ‘miss’ ‘hi ’ d ‘ i ’ Trial Program Trial Program Air‐to‐Air Air to Air Collision Collision – 1000ft ‘bubble’ check – Useable ‘bubble’ bl ‘b bbl ’ – Multi‐ac scenarios Simulated SAM systems Simulated SAM systems Air‐to‐Gnd Collision Air‐to‐Gnd Weapons Trial Results Trial Results • 2 x F3 Fully 2 x F3 Fully ‘RAIDS’ RAIDS capable. capable. • SA & IR Mx SA & IR M validated lid t d • 500ft collision ‘bubble’ • Security validated (GCHQ) • SOPs drafted SOPs drafted Procurement Results Procurement Results • BVR & IAI BVR & IAI – split • 2 Tenders – BVR/Marconi – ‘trialled’. – IAI/MBDA/Cubic – IAI/MBDA/Cubic – paper. paper • MBDA – No integration (Resources & IPR) – Post‐flt Post flt debrief, NO weapons debrief NO weapons – No trial possible
Similar documents
air combat training systems
and real-time kill notification to the pilots. The pods record all in-flight events and data, and also transmit the information to the ground stations. The pods can be mounted on a wingtip weapon s...
More information