Influence of soil chemistry on metal
Transcription
Influence of soil chemistry on metal
Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367 – 378 www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Influence of soil chemistry on metal and bioessential element concentrations in nymphal and adult periodical cicadas (Magicicada spp.) G.R. Robinson Jr. a,⁎, P.L. Sibrell b , C.J. Boughton b , L.H. Yang c a U.S. Geological Survey, 954 National Center, Reston, Virginia, 20192, USA U.S. Geological Survey, 11649 Leetown Road, Kearneysville, West Virginia, 25430, USA Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California, 95616, USA b c Received 26 July 2006; received in revised form 7 December 2006; accepted 8 December 2006 Available online 25 January 2007 Abstract Metal and bioessential element concentrations were measured in three species of 17-year periodical cicadas (Magicicada spp.) to determine how cicada tissue chemistry is affected by soil chemistry, measure the bioavailability of metals from both uncontaminated and lead-arsenate-pesticide contaminated soils, and assess the potential risks of observed metal contamination for wildlife. Periodical cicada nymphs feed on root xylem fluids for 13 or 17 years of underground development. The nymphs then emerge synchronously at high densities, before leaving their nymphal keratin exoskeleton and molting into their adult form. Cicadas are an important food source for birds and animals during emergence events, and influence nutrient cycles in woodland ecosystems. Nymphal exoskeletons and whole adult cicadas were sampled in Clarke and Frederick Counties, Virginia and Berkeley and Jefferson Counties, West Virginia during the Brood X emergence in May and June, 2004. Elements, such as Al, Fe, and Pb, are strongly enriched in the nymphal exoskeleton relative to the adult body; Cu and Zn are enriched in bodies. Concentrations of Fe and Pb, when normalized to relatively inert soil constituents such as Al and Ce, are similar in both the molt exoskeleton and their host soil, implying that passive assimilation through prolonged soil contact (adhesion or adsorption) might control these metal concentrations. Normalized concentrations of bioessential elements, such as S, P, K, Ca, Mn, Cu, Zn, and Mo, and chalcophile (sulfur-loving) elements, such as As, Se, and Au, indicate strong enrichment in cicada tissues relative to soil, implying selective absorption and retention by xylem fluids, the cicada nymphs themselves, or both. Element enrichment patterns in cicada tissues are similar to enrichment patterns observed in xylem fluids from tree roots. Chalcophile elements and heavy metals accumulate in keratin-rich tissues and may bind to sulfhydryl groups. Metal concentrations in the nymphal exoskeleton show a positive correlation with soil metal concentrations, with Au exhibiting particularly strong enrichment in the exoskeleton relative to soil concentrations. Metal concentrations in adult bodies do not correlate with soil chemistry. Bioessential elements S, Ca, Mn, Fe, and Zn differed by sex in adults, whereas Na, Mg, K, Ca, Mn, Fe, Zn, and As differed by species. Body concentrations of Ca differed by site conditions (orchard or reference setting). The high Pb contents of orchard soils contaminated by arsenical pesticide residues might inhibit Ca uptake by cicada nymphs. The adult cicadas contain concentrations of metals similar to, or less than, other invertebrates, such as earthworms. There does not appear to be a dietary ⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 703 648 6113; fax: +1 703 648 6383. E-mail address: [email protected] (G.R. Robinson). 0048-9697/$ - see front matter. Published by Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.031 368 G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 threat to birds or other consumers of adult cicadas based on Maximum Tolerable Dietary Level (MTDL) Guidelines developed for agricultural animals. Published by Elsevier B.V. Keywords: Periodical cicadas (Magicicada spp.); Biogeochemistry; Metals; Orchard; Soil; Keratin; Lead arsenate; Gold 1. Introduction Periodical cicadas are widespread insect herbivores throughout the deciduous forests of the eastern United States. Geographically separate broods of periodical cicadas emerge synchronously at high densities over large areas from underground burrows after 13 to 17 years of nymphal development. During their long underground development, periodical cicada nymphs feed on xylem fluids from tree roots (Williams and Simon, 1995; Day et al., 2002). Periodical cicada emerge at such high densities that they commonly satiate the foraging abilities of their predators. They have been recognized as important events in the geochemical cycles of forest ecosystems (Wheeler et al., 1992; Yang, 2004). This study examined two focus points of the biogeochemical cycle of bioessential elements and metals: 1) differences in source factors between natural soils and soils contaminated with arsenical pesticide residues, and 2) the bioavailability of bioessential elements, metals, and metalloids from these soils through xylem fluids and direct exposure to cicadas. This study addresses four questions: 1. Do concentration levels of metals, metalloids, and bioessential elements in cicada tissues vary systematically with changes in soil chemistry? 2. How does cicada tissue chemistry vary by sex or species? 3. To what degree does cicada tissue chemistry reflect homeostatic processes to regulate the minerals in the Fig. 1. Area of emergence in May–June 2004 of brood X periodic cicada, showing study area in northern Virginia and northeastern West Virginia. Figure modified from online map at College of Mount St. Joseph (2004). G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 369 body by adjusting physiological processes in response to environmental conditions versus passive uptake of constituents from soil by adhesion and/or adsorption? 4. Do concentrations of arsenic and heavy metals in periodical cicadas emerging from contaminated orchard sites represent a risk to birds and other cicada consumers? traveling more than 50 m in a single flight (Karban, 1981). They congregate at chorus centers, often close to their emergence sites. We test the hypothesis that the chemistry of body tissues reflects the concentrations of constituents in the soil zone due to the long residence time and feeding behavior of cicada nymphs in soil. We characterize cicada tissues by species, type and sex, and compare the bioavailability of metals and metalloids with the geochemical behavior of bioessential elements. A sampling program for soils, cicada molt exoskeletons and live mature adults was conducted from May to June 2004 at orchards, former orchards, and nonorchard reference sites in Clarke and Frederick Counties, Virginia and Berkeley and Jefferson Counties, West Virginia. Cicada and soil sampling sites in relation to site conditions are shown in Fig. 2. Sites were mostly located on carbonate bedrock overlain with thin clayrich soils. The orchard locations are based on aerial photographs and topographic maps (showing orchard areas) prepared using information from the time period of extensive use of arsenical pesticides between the 1920s and 1960s. A digital dataset identifying orchard areas where arsenical pesticides were likely used in the study area is available from Reed et al. (2006). Cicada molt exoskeleton samples were collected at emergence sites and adults were collected at emergence sites and chorus centers. Soils and cicadas were sampled at approximately 5 to 6 individual collection points within a 1 km2 area at each site. The sex and species of adults was determined. Cicada samples were frozen until analysis, then dried at 60 °C. Dried adult insects were macerated and analyzed individually; molt exoskeletons were composited into one sample for each individual collection point. Representative soil samples (B horizon) were collected to depths of 15 to 25 cm (depending on depth of regolith) by soil auger and as grab samples. The soil sample intervals overlap much of the observed depth range of 5th instar cicada nymphs, particularly in orchard soils (Maier, 1980). Soil samples were air dried, homogenized, sieved to b 200 micrometers (80 mesh), and pulverized before analysis. Element concentrations in cicada tissue and soil samples were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) following sample digestion in aqua regia using the Ultratrace-2 method performed by Activation Laboratories, Ancaster, Ontario, Canada. Mercury was measured using coldvapor analysis techniques using the Code 1G method performed by Activation Laboratories, Ancaster, Ontario, Canada. Duplicate samples were submitted at a rate of 5% of total samples. Data were accepted if the relative standard deviation was b 15% at five times the 2. Background 2.1. Periodical cicadas Brood X 17-year periodical cicadas (Magicicada spp.) emerged during May-June, 2004, in the eastern United States (Fig. 1). Cicada densities of ≤ 30,000 per hectare to N 3.5 million per hectare are known to occur during emergence in orchard and forest habitats (Williams and Simon, 1995). Other cicada broods emerge in other areas in other years. Cicadas feed on root xylem fluids underground for 13 or 17 years before emerging to molt into their adult form. Cicada nymphs pass through five nymphal instars during their belowground development. Instars are insect developmental periods between successive exoskeleton moltings. The duration of these instars is variable in periodical cicadas, but the fifth nymphal stage typically lasts 5 years or more (Marlatt, 1907; White and Lloyd, 1975), during which time the exoskeleton is not shed until emergence. The feeding depth of cicada nymphs seems to depend largely on the depth of available plant roots. Maier (1980) observed that 5th instar nymphs fed at shallower depths in orchard soils compared to forest soils, and that most 5th instar nymphs were found between 7.6 and 37.5 cm depth. Cicada nymphs have also been observed to feed at depths of more than 60 cm (Williams and Simon, 1995). However, the soils developed over the carbonate bedrock of the study area are typically thin, clay-rich and rocky; tree roots, and likely cicada nymph feeding sites, tend to be localized at shallow depths. Nymphs emerge at dusk over a period of a few days during their 13th or 17th year, depending on the species. Adult cicadas typically shed their nymphal exoskeleton within a few meters of their emergence site the next morning. Adult cicadas have limited dispersal, rarely 3. Materials and methods 3.1. Study area 370 G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 limit of detection for the duplicate samples. Analytical methods, quality assurance and control methods, and laboratory accreditation information are described in more detail in Actlabs (2006). 3.2. Statistical methods Normality tests were done on the geochemical data for soils, cicada bodies and nymphal exoskeletons. Most constituents analyzed for this report were neither normally nor lognormally distributed and a few sample measurements were below detection limits for some elements. Concentrations less than detection limits were reported as one-half the detection limit to calculate sample means. We employed nonparametric methods, which do not require assumptions about the distributions of the data, to compare sample group means. The data for soil site chemistry were grouped by landuse status into orchard and former orchard sites or reference sites. The data for cicada body chemistry were grouped by land-use status, species type, and sex. The cicada exoskeleton samples were not classified according to species or sex and were grouped by land-use status. Tests for differences in chemical distributions in soils by site status and in cicada tissues by site status, sex, and species classifications were performed using Mann– Whitney (binary group) and Kruskal–Wallis (multiple group) tests. The null hypothesis of these tests is that there is no significant difference between the means of the ranks of the concentrations of a chemical constituent among the sample groups (Sokal and Rohlf, 1969; Conover and Iman, 1981; Helsel and Hirsch, 2002). Rejection of the null hypothesis at the 95-percent confidence level (alpha = 0.05) was considered to be evidence supporting the alternative hypothesis, that is, the existence of a significant difference in chemistry between groups. The general linear model (GLM) procedure (SAS Institute Inc., 1999) was used to do the non-parametric tests because the number of samples was not the same for all of the category groups (Helsel and Hirsch, 2002). Multiple comparison tests, based on Kruskal–Wallis rank sums and comparisons of means of ranks (Tukey) tests, were used to identify which groups differed from others (Hollander and Wolfe, 1973). Tukey's significant-difference test (Sokal and Rohlf, 1969; Stoline, 1981; Helsel and Hirsch, 2002) was used Fig. 2. Location of soil and cicada sample sites in Clarke and Frederick Counties, Virginia and Berkeley and Jefferson Counties, West Virginia relative to orchard areas that likely used arsenical pesticides. Orchard areas are from Reed et al. (2006). At each sample site, approximately six individual sample collections were made for each sample type in a 1 km2 area. G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 371 Table 1 Summary of geochemical statistics for sample media, characterized by sample groups Sample group P S K Na Ca Ce Mg Mn Fe Cu Zn Al As Pb Au mg/kg dry weight Hg ug/kg Soil; 72 samples: 45 reference, 27 orchard Mean Total 360 230 1140 90 1590 65.9 2100 769 19550 18.3 43.6 14220 15.2 57.7 Median Total 340 200 1070 80 1350 62.5 1460 690 18240 14.3 36.9 13270 8.1 22.5 Minimum Total 150 90 500 50 110 17.2 560 76 7210 7.0 15.9 6730 2.4 12.3 Maximum Total 780 480 2150 140 4370 125.8 9070 2110 38720 155.5 131.9 27640 263.1 1150.0 Mean Reference 360 220 1150 90 1680 71.6 2000 893 20650 14.4 36.5 15220 6.9 21.6 Std. Error Reference 20 10 60 3 150 3.8 250 78 1490 0.7 1.9 750 0.5 1.0 Mean Orchard 370 230 1130 90 1430 56.4 2250 563 16510 24.7 55.5 12560 28.9 117.9 Std. Error Orchard 30 20 90 4 170 3.6 360 67 1300 5.3 5.2 640 9.5 41.3 Exoskeleton; 55 samples: 36 reference, 19 orchard Mean Total 880 1130 1980 60 Median Total 790 1080 1810 60 Minimum Total 400 750 720 30 Maximum Total 2030 2120 4040 100 Mean Reference 890 1090 2020 60 Std. error Reference 60 40 130 3 Mean Orchard 840 1220 1910 60 Std. error Orchard 90 70 190 3 3140 2790 1650 8010 3290 250 2850 220 Adult body; 127 samples: 71 reference, 56 orchard; Mean Total 6810 4880 7110 270 Median Total 6770 4790 7370 270 Minimum Total 1750 3590 3010 150 Maximum Total 8720 6540 10670 460 Mean Reference 6870 4910 7110 270 Std. error Reference 90 80 140 10 Mean Orchard 6740 4840 7120 260 Std. error Orchard 130 80 170 10 Mean Female 6690 5110 7220 270 Std. error Female 110 70 90 10 Mean Male 6980 4550 6960 280 Std. error Male 90 50 220 10 74 female, 53 male 1300 1.3 1420 1280 1.2 1450 460 0.7 580 2500 3.2 2000 1370 1.3 1430 50 0.0 30 1210 1.3 1410 40 0.1 30 1480 1.2 1440 40 0.0 20 1050 1.4 1400 40 0.1 50 11.7 800 468 3690 10.5 730 420 3280 2.6 410 228 1190 33.2 1740 1140 13420 11.4 740 493 3470 0.8 30 30 280 12.2 900 423 4100 1.5 80 47 620 211 198 32 534 226 13 193 13 268 11 132 8 16.4 12.3 8.9 44.7 12.4 0.4 23.9 2.5 133.8 122.4 25.8 526.3 108.0 9.7 182.5 22.5 2280 1970 610 5830 2250 180 2340 250 6.3 4.8 1.6 32.0 4.3 0.2 10.2 1.8 210 62.4 165.7 220 56.6 161.1 b100 19.1 52.9 480 185.1 395.6 200 64.8 165.0 10 3.7 6.2 210 59.5 166.7 10 3.6 7.4 240 63.4 190.1 10 3.2 5.9 170 61.2 131.7 20 4.4 5.1 b100 b100 b100 b100 b100 2.5 2.6 0.1 4.9 2.6 0.1 2.5 0.1 2.5 0.1 2.6 0.1 b100 b100 b100 10.6 55.9 b0.2 46.7 b0.2 20.3 394.9 203.8 6.4 50.3 3.0 2.0 17.4 76.6 14.8 12.1 14.5 610.6 37.0 4.8 501.8 14.1 1.7 29.2 7.6 132.8 2730.0 690.0 4.1 501.1 22.3 0.3 55.5 5.6 34.2 817.9 64.8 9.6 185.6 36.3 0.4 0.3 0.0 1.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 4.0 b0.2 b0.2 103.5 4.8 1.7 3.0 1.3 4.6 1.7 3.1 1.1 15.3 13.6 6.9 45.6 18.6 6.9 14.3 1.0 16.2 3.3 14.6 1.5 to discriminate which category group or groups of data differed when the analysis of variance rejected the null hypothesis. Rank–order correlation (Spearmans rho) was used to determine if the concentration levels of elements in the paired cicada tissue and soil samples were associated. heavy metal concentrations (Tables 1 and 2), consistent with the presence of Pb-arsenate pesticides residues at these sites (Peryea, 1998). With the exception of As and Pb values, the chemistry of B-horizon soils was similar to other untilled soils in the eastern United States (Shacklette and Boerngen, 1984). 4. Results and discussion 4.2. Cicada tissue chemistry 4.1. Soil chemistry Average adult cicada body concentrations for As, Cu, Hg, Pb, and Zn were 3, 62, 0.015, 0.4, and 166 mg/kg (dry weight), respectively (Table 1). The adult cicadas contained concentrations of metals similar to other invertebrates, such as earthworms (Saxe et al., 2001), consistent with the results of Clark (1992). The average chemistry of adult cicada bodies from orchard sites was compared to the Maximum Tolerable Dietary Level (MTDL) Guidelines (Table 3) developed for small Soil concentrations at the collection sites varied over one order of magnitude for bioessential elements and many metals and over two orders of magnitude for As, Au, and Pb (Table 1). Approximately one third of the soil sites were from orchard sites where arsenical pesticides were used. Relative to non-orchard sites, orchard site soils contain elevated Pb, As and other 372 G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 Table 2 Summary of attained significance levels (p-values) for Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests on element concentrations on sample groups defined by sample criteria Sample Soil Exoskeleton Cicada body criteria site site Site Sex element p-value Ce 0.558 0.908 Na 0.557 0.497 Mg 0.693 0.032 P 0.912 0.633 S 0.912 0.090 K 0.613 0.524 Ca 0.370 0.391 Sr 0.884 0.313 Ba 0.446 0.972 Mn 0.013 0.025 Fe 0.083 0.507 Pb 0.0001 0.0001 Cu 0.018 0.0001 Zn 0.0007 0.0005 As 0.0001 0.0001 Hg 0.128 0.026 n 72 55 (Sample numbers by criteria) Comments Species 0.544 0.224 0.637 0.159 0.674 0.0004 0.528 0.794 0.017 0.458 0.057 0.150 0.676 0.0001 0.205 0.577 0.406 0.010 0.014 0.0001 0.006 0.030 0.0001 0.040 0.648 0.319 0.732 0.086 0.0001 0.004 0.795 0.001 0.001 0.092 0.016 0.809 0.161 0.398 0.097 0.969 0.0001 0.0002 0.307 0.548 0.0003 0.969 0.843 0.232 127 127 127 p-values in bold are different at 95% confidence level M. cassini N M. septendecim, M. septendecula Orchard N reference; M. cassini N M. septendecim or M. septendecula (split by sex) Female N male M. cassini N M. septendecim or M. septendecula (split by sex) Reference N orchard; female N male; M. cassini N M. septendecim, M. septendecula Reference N orchard; female N male; M. cassini N M. septendecim Reference N orchard; female N male; M. cassini N M. septendecim Female N male; M. cassini N M. septendecim Orchard N reference; female N male Orchard N reference Orchard N reference; female N male; M. cassini N M. septendecim, M. septendecula Orchard N reference; M. cassini N M. septendecula Orchard N reference Soil (orchard:reference, 27:45); exoskeleton (orchard:reference, 19:36) Cicada body site (orchard:reference, 56:71) (female:male, 74:53) Cicada body species (M. cassini:M. septendecim:M. septendecula, 74:46:6) The p-values show the probability that the observed differences are due to chance rather than the factor tested; p-values significant at alpha = 0.05 (95% confidence) are shown in bold. The number of samples evaluated in each sample group is denoted by “n”. The comments column identifies the direction of the differences within sample groups by sample criteria and identifies the number of samples tested by sample criteria. barnyard animals and poultry (NRC, 1980, Table 1) to evaluate if the heavy metal content of cicadas pose a dietary threat for birds and other cicada consumers. In all cases, the average cicada body concentrations were less than half of the MTDL guidelines, implying no significant dietary risk to consumers, even if adult cicadas were consumed at twice normal dietary requirements during the emergence event (Clark, 1992). Periodical cicada emergence events coincide with, and provide abundant food for, the nestling–rearing activities of many birds. These nestlings might represent a special population sensitive to heavy metal and toxic element loading. Based on our data and on feeding rates calculated from previous field and lab studies, Red-Winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) nestlings feeding on cicadas may consume between 0.08–0.19 mg As, 0.01– 0.03 mg Pb, 1.8–4.6 mg Cu, and 0.42–1.10 ng Hg from adult cicadas in the first 10–12 days before fledging (Strehl and White, 1986; Yasukawa and Searcy, 1995; Pope et al., 2001; Cartwright et al., 1998; Fiala and Congdon, 1983, A. Clark and L. Yang, personal communication). The xenobiotic metals, such as Pb and Hg, may accumulate and concentrate in specific target organs of the nestlings, such as the liver and kidney (Hunter and Johnson, 1982). However, the concentration levels of As, Pb, Cu, and Hg in adult cicadas from orchard sites contaminated with arsenical pesticide residues are comparable to the concentrations of these elements in Table 3 Chemistry of adult cicada bodies and pre-molt nymph relative to maximum tolerable dietary level limits defined for small animals Site Mn Fe Cu Zn Al As Pb Hg 59 56 200 167 168 500 b100 260 200 2 3 50 0.4 4.2 30 0.01 0.02 2.00 mg/kg dry weight Adult cicada (mean) Nymph (estimated mean) MTDL† (NRC, 1980) Orchard Orchard 193 218 400 210 642 500 † Maximum Tolerable Dietary Level, minimum of poultry–rabbit levels. The estimate of mean cicada nymph chemistry is based on a mass-weighted average of nymphal exoskeleton and adult body means. G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 other food sources, from uncontaminated sites, that are likely to be consumed by nestlings, such as earthworms (Saxe et al., 2001). It is unlikely that these metal loadings exceed the detoxification capacity or homeostatic regulatory capability of the nestlings, although the evaluation of biomagnification of heavy metals in natural ecosystem foodchains is a controversial issue (Laskowski, 1991; van Straalen and Ernst, 1991). Average elemental concentrations in cicada tissues differ by tissue type (Table 1; adult body vs exoskeleton). Bioessential elements, such as Na, K, P, S, and Mg, were concentrated in adult body tissues. Heavy metal concentrations, with the exception of Cu, were low in body tissues. Al, Fe, Ce, Pb, and Au were concentrated in the nymphal exoskeleton. Ca, Mn, As, and Hg show approximately similar distributions. Many nocturnal predators, such as mice and shrews, consume the vulnerable cicada nymphs before they shed their nymphal exoskeleton. Using a mass-weighted average of the mean exoskeleton and adult body chemistry as an estimate of nymph chemistry, we estimate that the mean Al and Fe values for cicada nymph slightly exceed MTDL guidelines, whereas other element concentrations were below the MTDL guidelines (Table 3). The cicada populations sampled in this study appear to constitute a safe diet for birds and small mammals and probably have lower average contamination levels than do other invertebrates that may be consumed in this geographic area. Consistent with the results of Clark (1992), adult cicada bodies have higher concentrations of Cu than host soil and other invertebrates, such as earthworms. Periodical cicadas from areas with histories of Cu contamination may need to be analyzed before the safety of these cicadas can be evaluated. However, Cu is an essential trace element in animal nutrition and efficient homeostatic regulation of Cu is observed in field populations of small mammals in areas of metal contamination (Hunter and Johnson, 1982; Laskowski, 1991). 4.3. Soil and cicada chemistry in relation to site and sample characteristics Mann–Whitney (binary group) and Kruskal–Wallis (multiple group) tests were used to identify differences in chemical distributions in soils by site status and in cicada tissues by site status, sex, and species classifications (Table 2). Cicada exuviae and soils collected from orchard site soils contain elevated Pb, As and other heavy metal concentrations (Cu, Zn) relative to nonorchard (reference) sites (Table 2), consistent with the presence of lead-arsenate and other metal-based pesti- 373 cide residues at these sites (Peryea, 1998). The elevated Mg and Hg contents of cicada exuviae from orchard sites relative to reference sites may reflect interaction effects with other metals in the contaminated soils. The group differences in Mn concentrations between soil (and exoskeleton) by site classification likely reflect natural variation, not contamination, because Mn compounds are not known to have been used as agricultural chemicals. Except for Ca and Sr concentrations, the chemistry of adult cicada bodies collected from orchard sites did not differ from non-orchard sites (Table 2). The lower concentrations of Ca and Sr in cicada bodies from orchard sites cannot be explained by differences in Ca and Sr in the orchard site soils. Calcium and Sr have similar chemical properties. The high Pb contents of orchard soils contaminated by arsenical-pesticide residues might limit Ca uptake and retention by cicada nymph. Lead has been shown to inhibit nutrient assimilation and water uptake in plant roots (Malecka et al, 2001; Burzynski, 1988) and to disrupt Ca-ion channel functions regulated by Ca-channel proteins in animals (Anetor et al, 2005). The inhibition of Ca uptake and retention may occur either at the soil–root tip–xylem fluid interface (where Pb concentrations are highest) or at the cicada nymph–xylem fluid interface. The bioessential elements S, Ca, Mn, Fe, and Zn differed in cicada bodies by sex; all elemental concentrations were greater in female bodies. These sex-based differences may influence the dietary resources available to cicada predators, as female cicadas are preferentially consumed by some predators (Steward et al., 1988; Karban, 1983). Both Red-Winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) and House Sparrows (Passer domesticus) preferentially forage on female cicadas, perhaps due to their higher nutrient content or lack of a disturbance squawk behavior (Steward et al., 1988; Karban, 1983). Concentrations of Na, Mg, K, Ca, Mn, Fe, Zn, and As differed in cicada bodies by species, and these differences persist when the data are split by sex. For all elements, concentrations in M. cassini are greater than in M. septendecim or M. septendecula species (Table 2). The observation of higher elemental concentrations in M. cassini cicadas might reflect different habitat preferences between the different cicada species. M. cassini prefers wetter floodplain sites compared to the drier upland habitats of M. septendecim and M. septendecula (Dybas and Davis, 1962). These wetter habitats might explain the observed species differences in elemental composition either through increased concentration of some elements in these soils, or due to increased absorption and assimilation rates from 374 G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 Table 4 Summary of Spearmans rho rank-correlation coefficients for element concentrations between paired soil and tissue samples Sample Ce Exoskeleton 0.658 Exoskeleton; Ce-normalized data Male body (0.038) Female body (0.298) Na K P (0.196) (− 0.280) (0.265) 0.606 0.351 0.396 S Ca (− 0.028) 0.385 0.499 0.535 (0.124) (− 0.099) (− 0.070) (0.022) (0.110) (0.271) (0.216) (0.078) Mg Fe Cu Pb As Au 0.581 0.786 0.647 0.848 0.473 0.662 0.754 0.907 0.669 0.636 0.747 0.638 (0.108) (−0.060) (0.140) (0.132) (0.094) (−0.005) – 0.444 (0.142) 0.487 (− 0.039) (0.290) (−0.371) – Significant correlations, the probability that the observed correlations are due to the relation tested rather than to chance, at alpha = 0.05 (95% confidence level), are shown without brackets. Ce-normalized data correlation coefficients for cicada bodies are similar to the raw data correlations; most are not significant at 95% confidence. wetter soils. An alternate hypothesis is that since M. cassini is substantially smaller than M. septendecim (Karban, 1983), this species has a higher proportional ratio of body mass to exoskeleton that might lead to a concentration of elements in body tissues. However, M. septendecula is almost the same size as M. cassini, but does not have the same elevation of chemical constituents, favoring the habitat hypothesis. 4.4. Soil–cicada tissue correlation Metal concentrations in nymphal exoskeletons tended to vary in relation to soil chemistry as indicated by the consistency in elemental group differences for exoskeleton and soil chemistry as classified by site (Table 2) and by the rank-correlation (Spearmans rho) coefficients between paired soil and tissue samples (Table 4). Spearman correlation coefficients, relating concentrations of elements such as Ce, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Pb, and As in exoskeleton to soil, were consistently positive and low to moderate (0.385 b r b 0.754) in value (Table 4). For soil and exoskeleton chemical data normalized relative to Ce, a relatively inert soil constituent, the Spearman correlations increased in value and are significant for more elements (Ce-normalized data in Table 4). These results imply that assimilation through prolonged soil contact may influence the concentrations of these elements in the nymphal exoskeleton. In contrast, the cicada body-soil correlation coefficients for these elements were low (− 0.371 b r b 0.487), inconsistent by sex category, and generally not significant at the 95% confidence level. Ce-normalized Spearman correlation coefficients for cicada bodies relative to soil are not shown in Table 4, but were similar to the raw data correlations in being inconsistent by sex category and generally not significant at the 95% confidence level. These data indicate that biological regulation processes influenced cicada body chemistry, consistent with the geochemical features of other soil invertebrates, such as earthworms (Saxe et al., 2001). 4.5. Soil–exoskeleton comparison The soils contained approximately 1 to 12% of Albearing clay minerals, by weight. These clay minerals are relatively insoluble in soil fluids and soil concentrations of Al were high relative to the concentration of Al in soil pore waters and xylem fluids (Smith and Shortle, 2001). The high concentration of Al in cicada exoskeleton, in contrast to the low concentration of Al in the adult cicada body, was likely the result of 1) direct exposure to insoluble clay minerals in soil involving adhesion and adsorption processes, or 2) efficient sequestration of Al derived from xylem fluids by the nymph into exoskeleton. The role of passive assimilation (adhesion–adsorption) resulting from cicada nymph exposure to soil relative to other biological regulation processes was assessed by normalizing the cicada tissue chemistry to relatively insoluble, but abundant, soil constituents such as Al and Ce (the precision for Ce is better than Al for our dataset). For cicada exoskeletons, Al:Ce:Pb ratios were similar to soil ratios and the data follow a 1:1 trend line over two orders of magnitude (Fig. 3A). Concentrations of Pb, Al, and Ce in cicada exoskeleton appear to be largely controlled by soil adsorption or adhesion. Normalized plots for bioessential elements (Ca, P, and Na) indicate correlation with soil chemistry and demonstrate consistent fractionation into exoskeleton tissue (Fig. 3B). These bioessential elements are expected to fractionate into biological tissues. Sulfur and As also preferentially fractionate into exoskeleton (data not shown in graph), but their fractionation appears to be biologically regulated as well as varying as a function of soil chemistry (resulting in weak Cenormalized Spearman correlations, Table 4). Similar plots for chalcophile elements (Cu and Au are shown examples, Fig. 3C and D) exhibit consistent and strong fractionation into exoskeleton tissue from soil. The strong enrichment in Au (fractionation factor of approximately 50) is surprising for a reported bio- G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 375 Fig. 3. Comparison of cicada nymphal exoskeleton geochemistry with soil geochemistry. Element ratios are normalized by Ce or Al concentrations. Ce and Al are considered to be inert and insoluble soil constituents. Element ratios falling along the 1:1 line indicate tissue concentration ratios equivalent to those in host soil. Element ratios falling above the 1:1 line indicate biogeochemical fractionation into the exoskeleton tissue relative to concentrations of inert constituents Ce and Al. nonessential element, but is consistent with some other data reported for keratin samples, such as Desert Tortoise scute (keratin fraction of shell) (Haxel et al., 2000) and other biota (Reith, 2003). 4.6. Cicada tissue–soil comparison The general pattern of biogeochemical fractionation into cicada tissues is shown in the plot of normalized cicada tissue chemistry relative to soil chemistry (Fig. 4).The fractionation factors, shown on the logtransformed Y axis, are cicada tissue chemistry, normalized by Ce concentrations, divided by Ce-normalized soil concentrations. Symbols occur at the median fractionation factor, bounded by the 10–90 percentile envelopes, for the sample population groups. A fractionation factor of 1 indicates a pattern consistent with passive assimilation resulting from soil contact. Fraction factors N 1 indicate preferential incorporation of the element from soil conditions into biological tissues. Normalized concentrations of Al, Pb and the transition metals Fe, Co, and Ni in both exoskeleton (Fig. 4a) and cicada body tissues (Fig. 4b) indicate fractionation ratios of approximately 1, consistent with their concentrations being controlled by passive assimilation through dermal exposure. Bioessential (Ca, P, Na) and chalcophile (Cu, Zn, Mo, Au) elements show strong enrichment in cicada tissues relative to soil and the fractionation patterns are similar for both nymphal exoskeleton and adult body tissues (although the 376 G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 fractionation values are generally higher for the body tissues). The strongest elemental enrichments for both tissue types are for S and for the chalcophile elements, consistent with the hypothesis that chalcophile elements may be bound to sulfhydryl groups in organic tissues. Divergence of the mean fractionation values for male versus female bodies in Fig. 4b indicate preferential enrichment in female bodies of the elements: S, Ca, Cr, Mn, and Mo, consistent with the differences shown in Table 2. Cicadas feed on xylem fluids from plant roots, and xylem sap is one component of the linkage between the soil environment and cicada physiology. We could not identify the host tree for the individual adult cicadas collected in our study and we did not sample tree root sap for comparison with soil chemistry. Although the chemistry of xylem sap in tree roots varies in relation to soil element availability and geochemical discrimination in root uptake by plant species, the ionic chemistry of xylem sap appears to be largely regulated by the plant (physiologic homeostatic control) in response to conditions in their soil environment (Smith and Shortle, 2001). Xylem fluid from various host plants for periodical cicada show similarities in ionic composition (Cheung and Marshall, 1973). We use some limited, but available, data on tree root sap chemistry, in relation to soil data, to illustrate what we believe is likely to be a general pattern of homeostatic control on xylem chemistry relative to soil chemistry (Fig. 4b). The tree root sap (xylem) enrichment values shown in Fig. 4, derived from data for red spruce reported by Smith and Shortle (2001), are not from a host tree for periodical cicada in the study area. However, this data is probably representative of the likely variation in element composition of typical root xylem fluids relative to host soil chemistry. The pattern of geochemical enrichment in cicada tissues relative to soil conditions is similar to those observed in these reference xylem fluids from tree roots. The cicada body composition appears to reflect xylem composition (Fig. 4b) much more than soil composition (Table 4), whereas the nymphal exoskeleton reflects soil (Table 4) better than xylem fluid (Fig. 4). 4.7. Gold in cicada tissues The observed correlation between Au concentrations in paired soil and nymphal exoskeleton samples (Table 4, Fig. 3D) and the strong enrichment in Au concentrations in the nymphal exoskeleton relative to host soil concentrations (Table 1) implies the presence of mechanisms to dissolve and transport Au in the soil Fig. 4. Cicada tissue:soil geochemical ratios normalized relative to Ce. Data are shown for cicada nymphal exoskeleton, adult female bodies, and adult male bodies. Symbols are plotted at the median value of the geochemical ratio for each sample population group, bounded by the 90th and 10th percentile value for the geochemical ratio. Element ratio values of 1 indicate a biogeochemical fractionation similar to cerium, inferred to be an inert soil component. Element ratios N1 indicate preferential incorporation of the element from soil conditions into biological tissues. Tree xylem root sap data is from Smith and Shortle (2001). G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 environment and concentrate Au in keratin-rich tissues at the soil interface. Gold in soils is likely transported as organometallic or chelated compounds (Boyle et al., 1975). Root exudates of cyanogenic plants and some deciduous trees are known to dissolve Au, which can be transported across the root interface and accumulate in plant tissues (Lakin et al, 1974; Shacklette et al., 1970). The Au content of xylem fluid has been observed to be significantly higher than either the aqueous extracts of the plant material or of the soil itself (Kyuregyan and Burnutyan, 1972; Krendelev and Pogrevniak, 1997; Boyle, 1979). In addition, the cicada nymph voids most of the ingested xylem fluid, and this copious dilute urine contains amino acids and other organic compounds that might influence Au accumulation (Cheung and Marshall,1973). The nymph and adjacent soil is exposed to this urine bath for several years. It seems possible that this urine could be similar to xylem fluid in Au concentration. The extreme enrichment of Au in exoskeleton tissues might reflect the solubilization and mobility of Au in the soil environment by organic acids, thiosulfate, and cyanogenic metabolites exuded by tree roots (Reith, 2003; Neumann and Romheld, 2001) or excreted by the cicada nymph from metabolized xylem fluids, coupled with precipitation from these soil fluids into keratin (c.f. Ishikawa and Suyama, 1998). 5. Conclusions Concentrations of potentially toxic elements in adult cicada bodies are low and probably do not pose a significant risk to birds and other consumers that preferentially feed on cicadas during emergence years. These findings support the conclusions of previous studies investigating metal accumulation in cicadas (Clark, 1992). Periodical cicadas can represent a substantial flux of nutrients (Yang, 2004, 2006) and other chemicals from soil environments into aboveground food webs during a substantial resource pulse. These data suggest that Fe, Al, Pb, and As are concentrated in the nymphal exoskeleton, which is shed within hours of emergence. Metal concentrations, except for Cu, are low in adult cicada bodies. The shedding of the nymphal skin may reduce the risk of metal exposure to predators of adult cicadas, but nocturnal consumers of the cicada nymphs, such as mice and shrews, may experience greater exposure to accumulated metals. Normalized concentrations of bioessential and chalcophile elements are enriched in cicada tissues relative to soil. These metals may bind to sulfhydryl groups in organic tissue. The patterns of element enrichment 377 relative to soil concentrations are similar between nymphal exoskeleton and adult body tissues. The enrichment patterns in the tissues are similar to enrichment patterns reported in the literature for tree root sap, implying that cicada nymphs might be able to minimize their internal energy requirements for homeostatic control by utilizing the homeostatic processes exerted by their host tree biology. Although soil chemistry does not appear to strongly influence cicada body chemistry, our data support the hypothesis that high Pb soils might inhibit Ca (and Sr) uptake and retention by cicada nymphs. The strongest fractionation observed is for Au, and might reflect the solubilization and mobility of Au in the soil environment by organic acids, thiosulfate, and cyanogenic metabolites exuded by tree roots and excreted by cicada nymph. Soluble Au has a strong affinity for keratin (c.f. Ishikawa and Suyama, 1998) and Au concentrations measured in nymphal exoskeleton are very high relative to soil conditions. Acknowledgements The authors thank Larry Gough and Helen Folger, U. S. Geological Survey, and an anonymous reviewer for their comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript. The authors also thank Peter Larkins and Brad Reed who prepared figures and graphics. References Actlabs, Method description. http://www.actlabs.com/methods_usa. htm. July 2006. Anetor JI, Akingbola TS, Adeniyi FA, Taylor GO. Decreased total and ionized calcium levels and haematological indices in occupational lead exposure as evidence of the endocrine disruptive effect of lead. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2005;9:15–21. Boyle RW. The geochemistry of gold and its deposits, together with a chapter on geochemical prospecting for the element. Geol Surv Can Bull 1979;280: 584 pp. Boyle RW, Alexander WM, Aslin GEM. Some observations on the solubility of gold. Geological Surv. Canada Paper, vol. 75. 1975. 24 pp. Burzynski M. The uptake and accumulation of phosphorus and nitrates and the activity of nitrate reductase in cucumber seedlings. Acta Soc Bot Pol 1988;57:349–59. Cartwright MA, Beauchamp DA, Bryant MD. Quantifying cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus Clarki) predation on sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus Nerka) fry using a bioenergetics approach. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1998;55:1285–95. Cheung WWK, Marshall AT. Water and ion regulation in cicadas in relation to xylem feeding. J Insect Physiol 1973;19:1801–16. Clark Jr DR. Organochlorines and heavy metals in 17-year cicadas pose no apparent dietary threat to birds. Environ Monit Assess 1992;20:47–54. 378 G.R. Robinson Jr. et al. / Science of the Total Environment 374 (2007) 367–378 College of Mount St. Joseph. 2004 17-year periodical cicada emergence map. http://www.msj.edu/cicada/. May 2004. Conover WJ, Iman RL. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Stat 1981;35:124–9. Day E, Pfeiffer D, Lewis E. Periodical Cicada. Virginia Tech Publication number 444–276; 2002. http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/ entomology/444–276/444–276.html. May. Dybas HS, Davis DD. A population census of seventeen-year periodical cicadas. Ecology 1962;43:432–44. Fiala KL, Congdon JD. Energetic consequences of sexual size dimorphism in nestling red-winged blackbirds. Ecology 1983;64:642–7. Haxel GB, Knight RJ, Berry KH, Homer BL, Chaffe MA. Trace element systematics of desert tortoise shell. Proceedings 25th Desert Tortoise Council Symposium, April 21–24, 2000, Las Vegas, Nevada. http://www.deserttortoise.org/abstract/abstracts2000/ 2000abs15.html. June 2006. Helsel DR, Hirsch RM. Statistical methods in Water Resources. US Geol Surv techniques of water resources investigations, book 4 (chapter A3); 2002. http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/twri/twri4a3/. May 2005. Hollander M, Wolfe DA. Nonparametric statistical inference. New York: John Wiley & Sons, New York; 1973. Hunter BA, Johnson MS. Food chain relationships of copper and cadmium in contaminated grassland ecosystems. Okios 1982;38:108–17. Ishikawa S, Suyama K. Recovery and refining of Au by gold–cyanide ion biosorption using animal fibrous proteins. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1998;70–72:719–28. Karban R. Flight and dispersal of periodical cicadas. Oecologia 1981;49:385–90. Karban R. Sexual selection, body size, and sex-related mortality in the cicada Magicicada cassini. Am Midl Nat 1983;109:324–30. Krendelev FP, Pogrevniak IF. Possibility of searches for ore manifestations of gold and zinc according to their contents in birch sap. Akad Sci USSR Dokl 1997;234:184–7. Kyuregyan EA, Burnutyan RA. Gold in the juice of plants and a method for its detection. Akad Nauk Arm SSR, Izv Nauki Zemie 1972;25:83–5 (Chem Abstr 81: 130520c). Lakin HW, Curtin CG, Hubert AE. Geochemistry of gold in the weathering cycle. US Geol Surv Bull 1974;1330, 80 pp. Laskowski R. Are the top carnivores endangered by heavy metal biomagnifications? Okios 1991;63:387–90. Maier CT. A mole's-eye view of seventeen-year periodical cicada nymphs, Magicicada settendecim. Ann Entomol Soc Am 1980;73:147–52. Malecka A, Jarmuszkiewicz W, Tomaszewska B. Antioxidative defense to lead stress in subcellular compartments of pea root cells. Acta Biochim Pol 2001;48:687–98. Marlatt CL. The periodical cicada. USDA Bur Entomol Bull 1907;71: 181 pp. National Research Council (NRC). Mineral tolerance of domestic animals. Nat Acad Press, Washington D.C., 1980: 577 pp. Neumann G, Romheld V. The release of root exudates as affected by the plant physiological status. In: Pinton R, Varanini Z, Nannipieri Z, editors. The rhizosphere: biochemistry and organic substances at the soil–plant interface. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001. 424 pp. Peryea FJ. Historical use of lead arsenate insecticides, resulting soil contamination and implications for soil remediation. Proc. 16th World Congress of Soil Science. Montpellier, France; 1998. Science Reg. No. 274. Symposium 25. Pope K, Brown ML, Duffy WG, Michaletz PH. A caloric-based evaluation of diet indices for largemouth bass. Environ Biology Fisches 2001;61:329–39. Reed BW, Larkins P, Robinson Jr GR. Digital data set of orchards where arsenical pesticides were likely used in Clarke and Frederick Counties, Virginia and Berkeley and Jefferson Counties, West Virginia. U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 2006–1330; 2006. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1330. October. Reith F. Evidence for a microbially mediated biogeochemical cycle of gold — a literature review. In: Roach IC, editor. Advances in Regolith. CRC LEME; 2003. p. 336–41. SAS Institute Inc. SAS OnlineDoc®. Ver. 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1999. Saxe JK, Impellitteri CA, Peijnenburg WJ, Allen HE. Novel model describing trace metal concentrations in the earthworm, Eisenia Andrei. Environ Sci Technol 2001;35:4522–9. Shacklette HT, Boerngen JG. Element concentrations in soil and other surficial materials of the conterminous United States. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 1270; 1984. Shacklette HT, Lakin HW, Hubert AE, Curtin GC. Absorption of gold by plants. US Geol Surv Bull 1970;1314b: 23 pp. Smith KT, Shortle WC. Conservation of element concentration in xylem sap of red spruce. Trees – Struct. Funct 2001;15:148–53. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry. San Francisco, Calif: W.H. Freeman; 1969. Steward VB, Smith KG, Stephen FM. Red-winged blackbird predation on periodical cicadas. Oecologia 1988;76:348–52. Stoline MR. The status of multiple comparisons — simultaneous inference of all pairwise comparisons in one-way ANOVA designs. Am Stat 1981;35:134–41. Strehl CE, White J. Effects of superabundant food on breeding success and behavior of the red-winged blackbird. Oecologia 1986;70:178–86. van Straalen NM, Ernst WHO. Metal biomagnifications may endanger species in critical pathways. Oikos 1991;62:255–6. Wheeler GL, Williams KS, Smith KG. Role of periodical cicadas (Homoptera:Cicadidae:Magicicada) in forest nutrient cycles. For Ecol Manag 1992;51:339–46. White J, Lloyd M. Growth rates of 17- and 13-year periodical cicadas. Am Midl Nat 1975;94:127–43. Williams KS, Simon C. The ecology, behavior, and evolution of periodical cicadas. Annu Rev Entomol 1995;40:269–95. Yang LH. Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in North American forests. Science 2004;306:1565–7. Yang LH. Interactions between a detrital resource pulse and a detritivore community. Oecologia 2006;147:22-532. Yasukawa K., Searcy W.A. Red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). In: Poole AF, Gill F, editors. The birds of North America, No. 184. The academy of natural sciences, Philadelphia, and the American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.C., 1995.