Quality Growth – New Consumer Experiences Matthew Phillips
Transcription
Quality Growth – New Consumer Experiences Matthew Phillips
Quality Growth – New Consumer Experiences Matthew Phillips, Chief Development Officer Disclaimer Certain statements in this presentation constitute or may constitute forward-looking statements. Any statement in this presentation that is not a statement of historical fact including, without limitation, those regarding the Company’s future expectations, operations, financial performance, financial condition and business is or may be a forward-looking statement. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or implied in any forward-looking statement. These risks and uncertainties include, among other factors, changing economic, financial, business or other market conditions. These and other factors could adversely affect the outcome 2 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 and financial effects of the plans and events described in this presentation. As a result, you are cautioned not to place any reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements reflect knowledge and information available at the date of this presentation and the Company undertakes no obligation to update its view of such risks and uncertainties or to update the forward-looking statements contained herein. Nothing in this presentation should be construed as a profit forecast or profit estimate and no statement in this presentation should be interpreted to mean that the future earnings per share of the Company for current or future financial years will necessarily match or exceed the historical or published earnings per share of the Company. This presentation has been prepared for, and only for the members of the Company, as a body, and no other persons. The Company, its directors, employees, agents or advisers do not accept or assume responsibility to any other person to whom this presentation is shown or into whose hands it may come and any such responsibility or liability is expressly disclaimed. The material in this presentation is not provided for tobacco product advertising or promotional purposes. This material does not constitute and should not be construed as constituting an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any tobacco products. The Company’s products are sold only in compliance with the laws of the particular jurisdictions in which they are sold. Consumer Needs More consumers, more occasions Consumer focus 3 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Future Opportunity Nicotine without tobacco Nicotine by consumption vehicle 100% 80% e-vapour Chewing tobacco 60% Pipe/Rolling tobacco Cigars 40% Snuff 20% 0% 1880 ` Cigarettes Consumers have enjoyed nicotine in different formats for centuries 1895 1910 4 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 1925 1940 1955 1970 1985 2000 2015 Consumers The experience and rituals of smoking but without tobacco Tobacco Combustible tobacco products Heated and hybrid tobacco products 5 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Non-Tobacco e-vapour Nicotine replacement therapy Fontem Ventures • Established Fontem Ventures • Built our know-how • Acquired and developed IP • Acquired blu • Assembling the technology roadmap 6 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Quality, Agility, Discipline E-vapour • Best brand in blu • Pursuing best experience through technology 7 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 • Lean and scalable operating model • Build presence in 4 key markets then scale • Science and regulation will shape category • Licensing 1st generation technology Quality Growth – Our Assets and Strategy in E-vapour Arthur Van Benthem, CEO, Fontem Ventures E-vapour does not Fully Satisfy Smokers …Yet 85% 85% of US smokers are aware of EVPs 57% 57% of US smokers have tried 6.5% • Low conversion rates, despite high awareness and availability • Reflecting smoker dissatisfaction with EVP performance Only 6.5% are loyal users • “an eVape is just not a cigarette” 80% 80% of regular vapers continue to smoke 9 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Endorsement is Building in Europe • “e-cigarettes are 95% less harmful to your health than normal cigarettes” • “helps most smokers to quit tobacco altogether” • “regulation should not be allowed to significantly inhibit the development and use of EVPs” • “today the work of the HCSP shows that e-cigarettes can be considered as a tool for tobacco cessation for smokers… and constitutes a harm reduction tool” 10 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 FDA Deeming Regulations • Near term - compliance and costs will push out least reputable suppliers • Longer term: – quality of EVP products will improve – sales through legitimate retailers – positive impact on our market share and margins • Concern - product authorisation process slows innovation 11 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Expected Growth of E-vapour? 80% in 4 markets today US, UK, France & Italy $34B Wells Fargo 90% in 7 markets by 2020 Plus: China, Poland & Germany Technology & Science Unlocks growth Canaccord $21B Technavio Growth Not linear 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F 12 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Quality Growth – Science of E-vapour Joe Thompson, Director Product Science Answers to the 4 Big Science Questions 14 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 1 2 What impact do EVPs have on consumers? What impact do EVPs have on bystanders? 3 4 Do EVPs re-normalise or act as a gateway to tobacco? What is the addictiveness and health impact of nicotine? Q1 Impact of EVP on Consumers? >98% reduction of harmful chemicals Conventional cigarettes 100% 75% 50% 100% >99% >99% >98% >98% >99% >98% >99% reduction reduction reduction reduction reduction reduction reduction reduction 25% EVP 0% Carbon monoxide Carbonyls Phenolics 15 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Volatiles Metals TSNAs PAA PAH Air Source: Rana Tayyarah, Gerald A. Long. Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2014, 70, 704-710. Q1 Impact of EVP on Consumers? Reduced toxicity in vitro Conventional cigarettes 100% 75% 50% >99% >98% >99% reduction reduction reduction 25% EVP 0% Cytotoxicity (NRU) 16 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Bacterial mutagenicity (Ames) Genotoxicity (IVM) Control Source: Misra, M.; Leverette, R.D.; Cooper, B.T.; Bennett, M.B.; Brown, S.E. Comparative in vitro toxicity profile of electronic and tobacco cigarettes, smokeless tobacco and nicotine replacement therapy products: E-liquids, extracts and collected aerosols. International journal of environmental research and public health 2014, 11, 11325-11347. Q1 Supported by Clinical Trials % change in urine 1-OHP (pyrene exposure) S-PMA (benzene exposure) CEMA (acrylonitrile exposure) % change in blood Nicotine Carboxyhaemoglobin [COHb] (carbon monoxide exposure) (nicotine exposure) MHBMA (1,3-butadiene exposure) Cotinine (nicotine exposure) (0%) (0%) (25%) (25%) (50%) (75%) (100%) (50%) -69% E-cig use -35% -70% Dual use Cessation NNAL (TSNA exposure) -94% E-cig use -30% -94% Dual use Cessation NNN (TSNA exposure) -85% E-cig use -32% -86% Dual use Cessation 3-HPMA (acrolein exposure) -90% E-cig use -26% -84% Dual use Cessation HMPMA (crotonaldehyde exposure) (0%) (75%) -83% -23% -75% -37% -17% -99% -30% +15% -98% E-cig use Dual use Cessation E-cig use Dual use Cessation E-cig use Dual use Cessation (25%) (50%) (75%) (100%) -62% E-cig use -22% -66% Dual use Cessation -93% E-cig use -37% -98% Dual use Cessation -83% E-cig use 17 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 -36% -87% Dual use Cessation -82% E-cig use -33% -88% Dual use Cessation Source: D’Ruiz, C. Evaluation of biomarkers of smoke exposure in adult smokers following dual use and complete substitution of cigarettes with electronic cigarettes. Tobacco Science Research Conference 2015. Q2 Impact Of EVP On Bystanders? Conventional Cigarettes 100% 75% 80% 50% reduction At background level 25% EVP 0% Air Nicotine 18 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Harmful Chemicals Source: Grant O’Connell, Stéphane Colard , Xavier Cahours and John D. Pritchard; An Assessment of Indoor Air Quality before, during and after Unrestricted Use of E-Cigarettes in a Small Room. International journal of environmental research and public health 2015, 12, 4889-4907. Q3 Do EVP Act as a Gateway to Tobacco? • EVP being a gateway to smoking is not evidence based • Two behavioural studies by the UK Centre for Substance Use Research* US study UK study • Investigating EVPs and smoking initiation, relapse and dependency on nicotine • EVPs are a roadblock to smoking initiation, not a gateway • 30,000 vapers enrolled • EVPs de-normalise smoking, rather than re-normalise it 19 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 *Studies funded by Fontem Ventures Q4 Addictiveness and Health Impact of Nicotine? Nicotine is regarded addictive • Nicotine is regarded as addictive • EVPs meet consumers smoking-ritual needs • Growing evidence that EVPs support smoking cessation No toxicity concern • No toxicity concern with nicotine in the small doses in an EVP Long term health risks? • USSG: Science is inadequate to conclude either way on nicotine and cancer • Any long term risks are unknown • Further long term research is required 20 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Answers to the 4 Big Science Questions 1 2 What impact do EVPs have on consumers? What impact do EVPs have on bystanders? 3 4 Do EVPs re-normalise or act as a gateway to tobacco? What is the addictiveness and health impact of nicotine? 21 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Consumer perception and behaviour assessment Post-market surveillance Quality Growth – Our Strategy in E-vapour Arthur Van Benthem, CEO, Fontem Ventures blu Strategy Global Invest Build Profitability • blu • Brand • Product range • Innovation • Lean and scalable operating model •Global 4 markets •• IP blulicensing • Digital 23 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 • product range blu is the Best Brand • The consumer preferred e-vapour brand • Enjoy your moment, your truth, and make it matter! 24 | Quality Growth • Market • Conversion • Growth momentum • Best product, best brand • Consumer loyalty 25 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Source: Nielsen retail audit blu Creates Value Daily gross margin earned with cigarettes and blu from an average consumer in the USA Cigarettes £0.50 26 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 blu G2 £0.58 blu G3 £0.67 Sources Mainly from Lower Tar and Menthol 27 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Four Levers to Drive Quality Profit Growth Pricing 28 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Trade margin Economies of scale Online Roadmap to a ‘Better than a Cigarette’ Consumer Experience Draw Vaping Flavour Hit Vape Design Accessories Kick 29 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Convince Yourself… Responsive Choice G3 works like a cigarette Style Familiarity Simplicity 30 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 Quality, Agility, Discipline E-vapour • Best brand in blu • Pursuing best experience through technology 31 | Imperial Brands Investor Day | June 2016 • Lean and scalable operating model • Build presence in 4 key markets then scale • Science and regulation will shape category • Licensing 1st generation technology