Catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol with functionalized carbon
Transcription
Catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol with functionalized carbon
3 Volume 26 Number 8 2014 www.jesc.ac.cn 1557 Spatial and vertical variations of perfluoroalkyl substances in sediments of the Haihe River, China Xiuli Zhao, Xinghui Xia, Shangwei Zhang, Qiong Wu, and Xuejun Wang 1567 Dissolved organic matter removal using magnetic anion exchange resin treatment on biological effluent of textile dyeing wastewater Jun Fan, Haibo Li, Chendong Shuang, Wentao Li, and Aimin Li 1597 Application of fish index of biological integrity (FIBI) in the Sanmenxia Wetland with water quality implications Hong Zhang, Baoqing Shan, and Liang Ao 1605 Analysis of the bacterial community composition in acidic well water used for drinking in GuineaBissau, West Africa Ana Machado, and Adriano A. Bordalo 1615 Performance and role of N-acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL)-based quorum sensing (QS) in aerobic granules Yaochen Li, Junping Lv, Chen Zhong, Wen Hao, Yaqin Wang, and Jianrong Zhu 1623 Adsorption behavior of sulfamethazine in an activated sludge process treating swine wastewater Weiwei Ben, Zhimin Qiang, Xiaowei Yin, Jiuhui Qu, and Xun Pan 1631 Scenario analysis of energy-based low-carbon development in China Yun Zhou, Fanghua Hao, Wei Meng, and Jiafeng Fu 1641 Chemical characteristics of size-resolved aerosols in winter in Beijing Kang Sun, Yu Qu, Qiong Wu, Tingting Han, Jianwei Gu, Jingjing Zhao, Yele Sun, Qi Jiang, Ziqi Gao, Min Hu, Yuanhang Zhang, Keding Lu, Stephan Nordmann Yafang Cheng, Li Hou, Hui Ge, Masami Furuuchi, Mitsuhiko Hata, and Xingang Liu 1651 On-board measurement of emissions from liquefied petroleum gas, gasoline and diesel powered passenger cars in Algeria Saâdane Chikhi, Ménouèr Boughedaoui, Rabah Kerbachi, and Robert Joumard 1661 Evaluation of soil washing process with carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin and carboxymethyl chitosan for recovery of PAHs/heavy metals/fluorine from metallurgic plant site Mao Ye, Mingming Sun, Fredrick Orori Kengara, Jingting Wang, Ni Ni, Li Wang, Yang Song, Xinglun Yang, Huixin Li, Feng Hu, and Xin Jiang 1673 Application of sewage sludge and intermittent aeration strategy to the bioremediation of DDT- and HCH-contaminated soil Qi Liang, Mei Lei, Tongbin Chen, Jun Yang, Xiaoming Wan, and Sucai Yang 1681 Acute and chronic toxic effects of Pb2 + on polychaete Perinereis aibuhitensis: Morphological changes and responses of the antioxidant system Yulu Tian, Hongjun Liu, Qixiang Wang, Jian Zhou, and Xuexi Tang 1689 Effect of temperature switchover on the degradation of antibiotic chloramphenicol by biocathode bioelectrochemical system Deyong Kong, Bin Liang, Duu-Jong Lee, Aijie Wang and Nanqi Ren 2014 Distribution and spectral characteristics of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in a coastal bay in northern China Guiju Li, Jing Liu, Yulan Ma, Ruihua Zhao, Suzheng Hu, Yijie Li, Hao Wei, and Huixiang Xie Pages 1557–1758 1585 NUMBER 8 Reduction and characterization of bioaerosols in a wastewater treatment station via ventilation Xuesong Guo, Pianpian Wu, Wenjie Ding, Weiyi Zhang, and Lin Li VOLUME 26 1575 JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Sciences 01 August 2014 Volume 26 Number 8 ELSEVIER CONTENTS Editorial Board of Journal of Environmental Sciences Editor-in-Chief Hongxiao Tang 1699 Submerged vegetation removal promotes shift of dominant phytoplankton functional groups in a eutrophic lake Jing Dong, Kai Yang, Shuangshuang Li, Genbao Li, and Lirong Song 1709 Universally improving effect of mixed electron donors on the CO2 fixing efficiency of nonphotosynthetic microbial communities from marine environments Jiajun Hu, Lei Wang, Shiping Zhang, Yuanqing Wang, Fangming Jin, Xiaohua Fu, and Huirong Li 1717 Community structure and elevational diversity patterns of soil Acidobacteria Yuguang Zhang, Jing Cong, Hui Lu, Guangliang Li, Yuanyuan Qu, Xiujiang Su, Jizhong Zhou, and Diqiang Li 1725 Extraction and characterization of bound extracellular polymeric substances from cultured pure cyanobacterium (Microcystis wesenbergii) Lizhen Liu, Boqiang Qin, Yunlin Zhang, Guangwei Zhu, Guang Gao, Qi Huang, and Xin Yao 1733 Electrochemical oxidation of 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) on DSA electrode: Operating parameters and mechanism Qiongfang Zhuo, Xiang Li, Feng Yan, Bo Yang, Shubo Deng, Jun Huang, and Gang Yu 1741 Catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol with functionalized carbon materials as catalysts: Reaction mechanism and pathway Jianbing Wang, Wantao Fu, Xuwen He, Shaoxia Yang, and Wanpeng Zhu 1751 Graphene-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron: Removal of phosphorus from aqueous solution and mechanistic study Fenglin Liu, JingHe Yang, Jiane Zuo, Ding Ma, Lili Gan, Bangmi Xie, Pei Wang, and Bo Yang 1763 Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances in the biofilms of typical bacteria by the sulfur K-edge XANES spectroscopy Huirong Lin, Chengsong Ye, Lu Lv, Clark Renjun Zheng, Shenghua Zhang, Lei Zheng, Yidong Zhao, and Xin Yu Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, E-mail: [email protected] Associate Editors-in-Chief Nigel Bell Shu Tao Jiuhui Qu P.K. Wong Imperial College London, UK, E-mail: [email protected] Peking University, China, E-mail: [email protected] Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, E-mail: [email protected] The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, E-mail: [email protected] Editorial Board Aquatic environment Baoyu Gao Shandong University, China Maohong Fan University of Wyoming, USA Chihpin Huang National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan, China Ng Wun Jern Nanyang Environment & Water Research Institute, Singapore Clark C. K. Liu University of Hawaii at Manoa, USA, Hokyong Shon University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, Zijian Wang Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Zhiwu Wang The Ohio State University, USA Yuxiang Wang Queen’s University, Canada, Min Yang Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Zhifeng Yang Beijing Normal University, China, Han-Qing Yu University of Science & Technology of China Terrestrial environment Christopher Anderson Massey University, New Zealand Zucong Cai Nanjing Normal University, China Xinbin Feng Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Hongqing Hu Huazhong Agricultural University, China Kin-Che Lam The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Erwin Klumpp Research Centre Juelich, Agrosphere Institute, Germany Peijun Li Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Michael Schloter German Research Center for Environmental Health Germany Xuejun Wang Peking University, China, Lizhong Zhu Zhejiang University, China Atomospheric environment Jianmin Chen Fudan University, China Abdelwahid Mellouki Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France Yujing Mu Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Min Shao Peking University, China James Jay Schauer University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA Yuesi Wang Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Xin Yang University of Cambridge, UK Environmental biology Yong Cai Florida International University, USA Henner Hollert RWTH Aachen University, Germany Jae-Seong Lee Hanyang University, South Korea Christopher Rensing University of Copenhagen, Denmark Bojan Sedmak National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia Lirong Song Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Chunxia Wang National Natural Science Foundation of China Gehong Wei Northwest A & F University, China Daqiang Yin Tongji University, China Zhongtang Yu The Ohio State University, USA Environmental toxicology and health Jingwen Chen Dalian University of Technology, China Jianying Hu Peking University, China Guibin Jiang Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Sijin Liu Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Tsuyoshi Nakanishi Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Japan Willie Peijnenburg University of Leiden, The Netherlands Bingsheng Zhou Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Environmental catalysis and materials Hong He Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Junhua Li Tsinghua University, China Wenfeng Shangguan Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China Yasutake Teraoka Kyushu University, Japan Ralph T. Yang University of Michigan, USA Environmental analysis and method Zongwei Cai Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China Jiping Chen Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Minghui Zheng Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Municipal solid waste and green chemistry Pinjing He Tongji University, China Environmental ecology Rusong Wang Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Editorial office staff Managing editor Editors English editor Qingcai Feng Zixuan Wang Suqin Liu Catherine Rice (USA) Zhengang Mao Aims and scope The Journal of Environmental Sciences, an international monthly journal established since 1989 and sponsored by the Research Center for Eco-Environmental sciences, the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Journal of Environmental Sciences is devoted to publish original, peer-reviewed research papers and reviews on main aspects of environmental sciences, such as environmental chemistry, soil chemistry, atmosphere chemistry, environmental biology, ecotoxicology, geosciences. The aim of the journal is to provide a platform for the latest research advancement. Copyright © 2014, The Research Centre for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. JO U R N A L OF EN V I RO N M EN T A L S CI E NC ES 2 6 ( 20 1 4 ) 1 7 4 1–1 7 4 9 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect www.elsevier.com/locate/jes Catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol with functionalized carbon materials as catalysts: Reaction mechanism and pathway Jianbing Wang1,⁎, Wantao Fu1 , Xuwen He1 , Shaoxia Yang2 , Wanpeng Zhu2 1. School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Beijing Campus, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China. E-mail: [email protected] 2. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China AR TIC LE I N FO ABS TR ACT Article history: The development of highly active carbon material catalysts in catalytic wet air oxidation (CWAO) Received 5 September 2013 has attracted a great deal of attention. In this study different carbon material catalysts Revised 22 December 2013 (multi-walled carbon nanotubes, carbon fibers and graphite) were developed to enhance the Accepted 28 January 2014 CWAO of phenol in aqueous solution. The functionalized carbon materials exhibited excellent Available online 23 June 2014 catalytic activity in the CWAO of phenol. After 60 min reaction, the removal of phenol was nearly 100% over the functionalized multi-walled carbon, while it was only 14% over the purified Keywords: multi-walled carbon under the same reaction conditions. Carboxylic acid groups introduced on Catalytic wet air oxidation the surface of the functionalized carbon materials play an important role in the catalytic activity Phenol in CWAO. They can promote the production of free radicals, which act as strong oxidants in Carbon materials CWAO. Based on the analysis of the intermediates produced in the CWAO reactions, a new Radical reaction pathway for the CWAO of phenol was proposed in this study. There are some Reaction pathway differences between the proposed reaction pathway and that reported in the literature. First, maleic acid is transformed directly into malonic acid. Second, acetic acid is oxidized into an unknown intermediate, which is then oxidized into CO2 and H2O. Finally, formic acid and oxalic acid can mutually interconvert when conditions are favorable. © 2014 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. Introduction Wet air oxidation (WAO) is one of the most effective technologies for degrading hazardous, toxic and highly concentrated organic contaminants in aqueous solutions. In WAO, organic compounds can be ultimately oxidized to CO2 and H2O and some other innocuous end products without the emission of HCl, NOx, and SOx, dioxins and fly ash (Luck, 1999; Yang et al., 2005). Although WAO is a promising technology, its application in industrial wastewater treatment is limited because it is usually performed at high temperature (125–320°C) and pressure (0.5– 20 MPa). Catalytic wet air oxidation (CWAO) is more promising than WAO because it can be performed under much milder conditions. In recent years many noble metal catalysts and transition metal oxide catalysts have been proposed for CWAO (Yang et al., 2007a, 2010; Li et al., 2007; Fortuny et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2006). Although these catalysts have presented high activity in CWAO, the deactivation of catalytic activity usually occurs during the reaction. The catalytic activity deactivation mainly results from the leaching of active components from the catalysts under the severe operating conditions (Fortuny et al., 1999; Kim et al., 2007). Therefore, we sought to develop effective catalytic systems using readily available and stable materials. Since carbon materials including graphite, activated carbon (AC), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and nanofibers are stable under both acidic and basic reaction conditions, the use .ac .cn ⁎ Corresponding author. je sc http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.015 1001-0742/© 2014 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. J O U R NA L OF EN V I RO N M EN T A L S CI EN C ES 2 6 ( 20 1 4 ) 1 7 41–1 7 4 9 5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA). A stock solution of DMPO (100 mmol/L) was prepared and stored in the dark at −20°C. Commercial graphite and CFs were obtained from Tianjing Chemical Reagent Company in China (Tianjing, China). MWCNTs from Tsinghua Nafine Nano-powder Commercialization Engineering Centre (Beijing, China) were prepared by a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method (Yang et al., 2007b). The other reagents were purchased from Beijing Chemical Company in China (Beijing, China) and used without further purification. 1.2. Catalyst preparation Before use, the graphite and CFs were immersed in a HNO3 solution (5%) for 24 hr while the MWCNTs were immersed in an HCl solution (37%) for 30 min. Then each sample was divided into two parts. One part was washed several times with deionized water, dried at 80°C in air overnight and then crushed. The resulting samples were referred to as purified carbon materials. The other part was functionalized by wet-chemical treatment with strong acids (HNO3–H2SO4) to introduce surface functional groups onto the surface of the carbon materials as follows: (1) The graphite was impregnated The surface areas and pore structure of the carbon materials were determined by N2 adsorption at 77 K in an automated gas sorption system (Autosorb, Quantachrome, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Before each measurement, the samples were outgassed at 573 K for 3 hr. SEM measurement was carried out on a scanning electron microscope (HITACHI S-4500, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The FT-IR analysis was carried out on a spectrophotometer (Magna-IR 750, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany). A spectrum was recorded in the range of 500–4000 cm−1 (100 scans) at a resolution of 4 cm−1. Boehm titration was conducted to determine the number of oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface of carbon materials according to the procedures described by Boehm (2002). One gram of carbon sample was added into 50 mL of NaHCO3 solution (0.05 mol/L) and stirred at room temperature for 24 hr. The resultant slurry was then filtered and titrated with HCl to determine the number of carboxylic acid groups. 1.4. Catalytic test and analysis CWAO of phenol was carried out in a 1-L autoclave reactor, which was specifically described in our previous study (Zhu et al., 2002). First 500 mL of 2000 mg/L phenol solution and 0.4 g of carbon materials (if necessary) were introduced to the reactor. The reactor was then sealed. After purging with nitrogen gas for 10 min, the reactor was heated to the reaction temperature of 160°C. As soon as the temperature was reached, pure oxygen was introduced into the reactor until the total pressure was equal to 2.5 MPa. This time was set as “zero” reaction time. Afterwards, the reaction was performed for 120 min. During the reaction, water samples were periodically taken from the reactor. The used carbon materials were washed with deionized water, dried about 80°C overnight, and then analyzed to characterize their structure. In order to determine the adsorption capacity of the carbon materials for phenol, adsorption experiments were conducted with the carbon materials at room temperature for 24 hr. The dosage of the carbon materials and initial phenol concentration were the same as in the experiments for the CWAO of phenol. The experiments for the CWAO of carboxylic acids were conducted according to the procedures mentioned above. The tested carboxylic acids included maleic acid, acrylic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid. The used catalyst was the functionalized MWCNTs. The catalytic activity of the carbon materials in CWAO was assessed by the removal of phenol. The concentration of phenol was determined using an HPLC method with an ODS-3 column and a UV detector (LC-10AD, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The mobile phase was a mixture of methanol/water (0.1% acetic .cn 1.1. Reagents and materials 1.3. Characterization .ac 1. Materials and methods in a mixture of 67% HNO3 and 98% H2SO4 (1:3, in volume), sonicated for 20 min and kept overnight at room temperature; (2) The CFs were refluxed at 85°C for 2 hr in a mixture of 67% HNO3 and 98% H2SO4 (1:3, in volume); and (3) The MWCNTs were sonicated for 20 min in a mixed solution of 67% HNO3 and 98% H2SO4 (1:3, in volume), and then refluxed at 50°C for 4 hr (Yang et al., 2007b). sc of them as catalyst supports arouses great interest (Serp et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2008; Gallezot et al., 1997; Huang et al., 2009. Carbon materials can be also used as catalysts directly (Serp et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2011, 2013; Pyun, 2011). AC with high surface area was investigated first as a catalyst in CWAO and there have been many studies on its activity and stability (Stuber et al., 2005; Suarez-Ojeda et al., 2005, 2007; Santiago et al., 2005; Morales-Torres et al., 2010). Later the use of MWCNTs and commercial nanofibers (CNFs) as catalysts was also studied in CWAO (Serp et al., 2003; Yang et al., 2007b, 2008; Soria-Sánchez et al., 2011). Soria-Sánchez et al. (2011) studied the CWAO of phenol over CNFs, CNTs and graphite. They thought that the surface functional groups on the materials might be favorable for the activity of the catalysts. In our previous work, we also found that the surface functional groups on MWCNTs have a great effect on catalyst activity (Yang et al., 2007b, 2008). However, the mechanism whereby the surface functional groups influence catalytic activity remains unclear (Barbier et al., 1998; Rivas et al., 1998). Moreover, which types of surface functional groups play a main role in catalyst activity is also unknown. Finally, the reported reaction pathway for the CWAO of phenol over carbon materials includes many assumptions, and deserves more study. In this study, we developed carbon material catalysts, including MWCNTs, carbon fibers (CFs) and graphite, with different chemical treatment methods. The catalysts were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). In addition, we studied the effect of surface functional groups on the catalyst activity of the carbon materials in the CWAO of phenol, detected the free radicals produced in the reaction with electron paramagnetic spin resonance (ESR), and analyzed the intermediates produced in the oxidation of various compounds. Based on the results from these experiments we investigated the mechanism through which surface functional groups influence the catalyst activity of carbon materials and explored the reaction pathway for the CWAO of phenols over the carbon materials. je 1742 1743 JO U R N A L OF EN V I RO N M EN T A L S CI E NC ES 2 6 ( 20 1 4 ) 1 7 4 1–1 7 4 9 300 μm 1 μm a 5 μm b c Fig. 1 – SEM images of the functionalized MWCNTs (a), CFs (b), and graphite (c). acid was added) with a ratio of 60/40 (V/V). The detection wavelength was 254 nm. The TOC (total organic carbon) of the water samples was analyzed with a TOC analyzer (TOC-Vwp, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). To identify the intermediates produced in the various CWAO experiments, water samples were also analyzed with the same HPLC system. The mobile phase was a mixture of methanol/water (0.1% phosphoric acid was added) with a ratio of 10/90 (V/V). The detection wavelength was 210 nm. ESR spectra were recorded on an EPR 300E spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany). DMPO was used as a trap. The liquid samples in the reactor were sprayed into a vessel containing the DMPO solution (100 mmol/L), which was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen to avoid the quenching of radicals. The irradiation source (λ = 532 nm) was a Quanta-Ray Nd:YAG pulsed laser (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany). The measurement was performed under the following conditions: center field, 3470.00 G; sweep width, 100.0 G; microwave frequency, 9.77 GHz; power, 5.05 mW; time constant, 20 ms; and scan time, 200 sec. 2. Results and discussion 2.1. Characterization of carbon materials Fig. 1 shows the SEM images of the functionalized carbon materials. The functionalized MWCNTs appear as interlacing a b 1672 1029 1553 1258 1452 Graphite CFs 1727 MWCNTs 1107 1156 1568 1033 802 Graphite 724 1727 1727 CFs tortuous filaments with diameters in the range of 10–15 nm and lengths up to several tens of micrometers (Fig. 1a). The functionalized CFs show a rod-type structure with diameters in the range of 5–30 μm and lengths up to 400 μm (Fig. 1b). The functionalized graphite shows a regular lamellar structure at the micrometer scale, with diameters in the range of 3–10 mm and stacking thickness of sheets greater than 1 mm (Fig. 1c). The FT-IR analysis was conducted to obtain detailed information on the functional groups on the surface of the carbon materials. The recorded spectra are shown in Fig. 2. No significant band was observed in the range of 2000–4000 cm−1 in our study. The bands at ca. 1580 and 1160 cm−1, observed for all samples, are attributed to the aromatic C_C stretching vibrations involving sp2- and sp3-hybridized carbons, respectively (Dandekar et al., 1998; Kim et al., 2005; Kouklin et al., 2004). The bands in the 1000–1450 cm−1 range, which are also detected for all carbon materials, are commonly assigned to the C-O vibrations originating from different surface species (Dandekar et al., 1998; Kim et al., 2005). The functionalized carbon materials have a band at ca. 1720 cm− 1, which is assigned to the C_O stretching vibrations in carboxylic acid groups (Dandekar et al., 1998; Kim et al., 2005), while the purified carbon materials do not have this band (Fig. 2a, b). The observation clearly indicates that the functionalization treatments effectively introduce oxygen-containing functional groups, such as carboxylic acid groups, on the surface of the functionalized MWCNT, graphite and CFs. The content of c 1002 1157 1568 1246 1520 Graphite 1582 1160 1038 1571 1746 1027 CFs 1563 1142 1734 1458 1542 1180 1137 1458 1087 1038 MWCNTs 1714 1176 1554 1026 1458 MWCNTs 1558 1742 2500 2000 1500 1000 Wavenumber (cm-1) 500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 Wavenumber (cm-1) 500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 Wavenumber (cm-1) 500 .ac 3000 .cn 1394 je sc Fig. 2 – FT-IR spectra of the fresh purified (a) and functionalized ( b) carbon materials and the used functionalized carbon materials (c). 1744 J O U R NA L OF EN V I RO N M EN T A L S CI EN C ES 2 6 ( 20 1 4 ) 1 7 41–1 7 4 9 Table 1 – Main characteristic of the functionalized carbon materials. Samples Surface area (m2/g) Fresh Used MWCNTs CFs Graphite 195 19 21 Adsorption capacity a (mgphenl/gcat) Content of carboxylic acid groups (mmol/g) 83 13 51 1.45 0.79 0.21 183 19 18 a Derived from the difference between the initial phenol concentration and final phenol concentration. WAO MWCNTs CFs Graphite 15 10 5 0 0 30 60 90 Reaction time (min) 120 Fig. 3 – Phenol removal in the CWAO of phenol over the purified carbon materials. carboxylic acid groups on the surface of the different functionalized carbon materials ranks as follows: MWCNTs > CFs > graphite (Table 1). 2.2. CWAO of phenol over carbon materials In the WAO of phenol (without catalyst), the removal of phenol was only 10% after 120 min reaction (Fig. 3). In the CWAO of phenol with the purified carbon materials, the removals of 80 a b 70 MWNTs CFs Graphite 60 80 60 WAO MWCNTs CFs Graphite 40 20 50 40 30 20 0 20 40 60 80 Reaction time (min) 100 120 0 0 20 40 60 80 Reaction time (min) 100 120 sc Fig. 4 – Phenol (a) and TOC ( b) removals in the CWAO of phenol over the functionalized carbon materials. .ac 0 .cn 10 je Phenol conversion (%) 100 TOC removal (%) Phenol conversion (%) 20 phenol were no more than 25% after 120 min reaction (Fig. 3). If the contributions of WAO and adsorption were deducted from the overall phenol removal, the remaining phenol removals attributable to catalytic oxidation with the purified carbon would be less than 10%. Thus the purified carbon materials do not show excellent activity in the CWAO of phenol. The functionalized carbon materials significantly improved the removal of phenol in the CWAO of phenol, and the removals of phenol over them were almost 100% after 120 min reaction (Fig. 4). It should be pointed out that the removal rates of phenol in the presence of the functionalized carbon materials were much higher than those in the presence of the purified carbon materials. For example, the nearly complete removal of phenol was achieved after 60 min reaction over the functionalized MWNTs (Fig. 4a), while the removal of phenol was only 14% over the purified MWNTs under the same operating conditions (Fig. 3). The adsorption capacities of the functionalized carbon materials for phenol are shown in Table 1. The functionalized MWNTs, with the highest surface area, displayed the highest adsorption capacity for phenol. The adsorption capacities of the functionalized carbon materials suggest that the adsorption of phenol on the functionalized carbon materials resulted in low phenol removal (less than 15%) in CWAO of phenol. Most of the phenol removals can be attributed to catalytic oxidation. Thus the functionalized carbon materials show excellent activity in the CWAO of phenol. The order of the catalytic activity of the functionalized carbon materials is as follows: MWCNTs > CFs > graphite (Fig. 4). Usually in catalytic oxidation a catalyst with larger surface area exhibits higher activity. However, this was not observed in our study. The phenol removal rate in the reaction with the functionalized CFs is faster than that with the functionalized graphite, while the surface area of the functionalized CFs is lower than that of the functionalized graphite (Table 1). This indicates that the surface area was not the determining factor for the catalytic activity of the functionalized carbon materials in the CWAO of phenol. It should be noticed that the order of the activity for the functionalized carbon materials is in good agreement with that of the content of carboxylic acid groups on the surface of these materials. Namely, the higher the content of surface 1745 JO U R N A L OF EN V I RO N M EN T A L S CI E NC ES 2 6 ( 20 1 4 ) 1 7 4 1–1 7 4 9 2.3. Active species produced in the CWAO of phenol b a 3420 3440 3460 3480 Magnetic field (G) 3500 3520 Fig. 5 – ESR spectra of DMPO-added phenol aqueous solution in the WAO (a) and CWAO with the functionalized MWCNTs ( b). carboxylic acid groups the carbon materials have, the higher the activity they display in the CWAO of phenol. SoriaSánchez et al. (2011) have drawn the similar conclusion through XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) analysis of CNFs, CNTs and graphite. In our previous study we also found that MWCNTs with higher content of surface functional groups exhibit higher activity (Yang et al., 2007a, 2007b; Yang et al., 2008). As both the XPS and FI-IR analysis show this correlation between catalyst activity and the content of the surface functional groups for the carbon materials, we conclude that carboxylic acid groups on the surface of the carbon materials play an important role in their activities in the CWAO of phenol. After the CWAO of phenol, the carbon materials were taken from the reactor and studied to obtain information about any possible structural changes. There was little difference in surface area between the fresh and used carbon materials. Fig. 2 shows that the bands for carboxylic acid surface groups (ca. 1720 cm−1) appearing on the fresh carbon materials slightly shift to ca. 1735 cm− 1 for the used samples. This can be attributed to the adsorption of organic compounds on the surface of the carbon materials during the reaction (Yang et al., 2008). This shows that these carbon materials have good chemical stability in the CWAO reaction. It has been commonly accepted that the mechanism of the CWAO of organic compounds involves radical chain reactions U with active species such as OU− 2 , OOH, OH and OR. These reactive species greatly enhance the oxidation of organic compounds. In our study the ESR spin-trapping technique was used to determine whether radicals were produced in the reactions. In the absence of catalysts, no observable ESR signal was detected (Fig. 5 line a), indicating that no radicals or very low concentration of radicals are formed in the WAO experiments. However, clear ESR signals were detected when the functionalized MWCNTs were added into the reaction system. These signals could be characteristic of the 4-oxo-TEMPOL adduct according to the literature (Yamakoshi et al., 2003; Xu et al., 2012). The signals of DMPO-OOH and DMPO-OOH were not observed, perhaps due to the presence of 4-oxo-TEMPOL. According to the ESR results, we propose that U OOH/OU− 2 species could be formed in the CWAO of phenol. Thus the functionalized carbon materials can effectively promote the production of the active radicals which enhanced the CWAO of phenol. 2.4. Reaction pathway for the CWAO of phenol In this study complete mineralization of organic compounds was not achieved after 120 min reaction in the CWAO of phenol (Fig. 4), indicating that some refractory intermediates were formed during the reaction. In order to investigate the reaction pathway for the CWAO of phenol, we used the HPLC method to analyze the reaction solutions withdrawn from the reactor. The identification of the peaks was carried out by direct comparison of retention times with the corresponding standards. It should be pointed out that there was no 100% correspondence between real peaks and injected standards because of the complexity of the intermediates. In this study the selected standards and identified intermediates are listed in Table 2. Though Santos et al. (2002) reported that phenol oxidation starts by hydroxylation of the molecule leading to hydroquinone or catechol, catechol was not detected in the reaction solutions in our study. This might be due to the difference of the catalyst used between the two studies. Maleic acid is the main intermediate in the CWAO of phenol according to references (Santos et al., 2002). We also Table 2 – Selected standards and identified intermediates for the analysis of reaction pathway. Malonic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid Acetic acid and formic acid Formic acid Unknown compound Oxalic acid Malonic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid .cn Malonic acid Oxalic acid Acetic acid Formic acid Acrylic acid Hydroquinone, p-benzoquinone, maleic acid, fumaric acid, cis butenedioic anhydride, malonic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid .ac Maleic acid Hydroquinone, catechol, p-benzoquinone, maleic acid, fumaric acid, cis butenedioic anhydride, butyric acid, succinic acid, propionic acid, acrylic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid Butyric acid, succinic acid, propionic acid, acrylic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid Oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid Acetic acid, formic acid Oxalic acid, formic acid Oxalic acid and acetic acid Malonic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid Identified intermediates sc Phenol Selected standards je Test compound 1746 J O U R NA L OF EN V I RO N M EN T A L S CI EN C ES 2 6 ( 20 1 4 ) 1 7 41–1 7 4 9 detected it in the reaction solutions. Moreover, we detected fumaric acid (the structural isomer of maleic acid) and cis butenedioic anhydride (the acid anhydride of maleic acid) in the reaction solutions with very low concentration. No studies have reported that these intermediates were observed in the CWAO of phenol. In order to further elucidate the oxidation pathway of phenol, we conducted the CWAO experiments with maleic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid. The reaction solutions were also analyzed with the HPLC method to investigate the organic compounds produced in the reactions. The selected standards and identified intermediates are shown in Table 2. The evolution of the concentrations of the parent compounds and intermediates is shown in Fig. 6. In the experiments for the CWAO of maleic acid, the identified intermediates include malonic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid (Fig. 6a). Acetic acid was not measured in the first 30 min of reaction. As acetic acid is 2000 Maleic acid Gormic acid Oxalic acid Malonic acid Acetic acid a Concentration (mg/L) 1600 400 200 700 b 600 Concentration (mg/L) 1800 500 400 Formic acid Malonic acid Acetci acid 300 200 100 1.0 20 60 80 Time (min) 100 0 0 120 c 0.8 0.4 Unknown 0.2 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 25000 20 40 60 80 100 120 Acetic acid Concentration (mg/L) 0.6 0.0 0 2100 2080 2060 2040 2020 2000 0 20 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 2000 60 80 Time (min) 100 120 d Oxalic acid 20 40 60 80 100 120 Formic acid 1500 1000 500 20 40 60 80 Time (min) 100 0 0 120 20 40 60 80 Time (min) 100 120 1000 e 900 Formic acid Oxalic acid Malonic acid Acetic acid Acrylic acid f 800 Formic acid 20 40 60 80 100 120 Oxalic acid 2000 1500 700 600 500 400 300 1000 200 500 100 0 0 20 40 60 80 Time (min) 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 Time (min) 100 120 .cn 0 40 .ac Concentration (mg/L) 40 Concentration (mg/L) Concentration (mg/L) Normalized concentration (C/C ) max 0 0 je sc Fig. 6 – Evolution of the concentration of parent compound and the intermediates in the CWAO of (a) maleic acid, ( b) malonic acid, (c) acetic acid, (d) formic acid, (e) oxalic acid, and (f ) acrylic acid. 1747 JO U R N A L OF EN V I RO N M EN T A L S CI E NC ES 2 6 ( 20 1 4 ) 1 7 4 1–1 7 4 9 1400 Calculated TOC Measured TOC TOC (mg/L) 1200 1000 800 600 400 0 20 40 60 80 Time (min) 100 120 Fig. 7 – Variation of the measured and calculated TOC in the CWAO of phenol. OH O O O O OH OH O OH HO O HOOCCH 2COOH CH 3COOH O HCOOH O O2 HOOCCOOH CO 2+H 2O CH 2O 2 Fig. 8 – Proposed reaction pathway for the CWAO of phenol. .cn O .ac OH sc OH intermediate for the oxidation of acetic acid, although the detection of dioxirane was not reported in their study. This unknown peak might be attributed to dioxirane. However, as we were not able to obtain dioxirane with high enough purity as a standard, it is hard for us to determine whether the peak is attributable to dioxirane. Oxalic acid was identified as an intermediate of the oxidation of formic acid (Fig. 6d). Oxalic acid formation from the oxidation of formic acid can be explained as a termination path in free-radical oxidation of formic acid. In this process a hydroxyl radical attacks the aliphatic compound to remove a hydrogen atom bonded to a carbon atom, and the free-radicals (UCOOH) thus form oxalic acid. It is surprising that formic acid was also identified as the intermediate for the oxidation of oxalic acid (Fig. 6e). The explanation for this is that oxalic acid is thermally decomposed into formic acid under the conditions of CWAO. The concentrations of the intermediates produced in the oxidation of oxalic acid and formic acid were no more than 100 mg/L. This suggests that most of the oxalic acid and formic acid were oxidized directly into carbon dioxide and water. In the CWAO of oxalic acid, the concentration of formic acid still increased after the concentration of oxalic acid decreased to zero. This indicates that there are other intermediates that were not identified in the CWAO of oxalic acid. Santos et al. (2002) reported that acrylic acid is an intermediate in the oxidation of phenol. They also reported that acrylic acid comes from the oxidation of maleic acid and will be oxidized into malonic acid in the CWAO of phenol. However, acrylic acid was not identified in the reaction solutions from the CWAO of phenol and maleic acid in our study. As acrylic acid is relatively stable compared to oxalic acid and formic acid (Fig. 6f), we conclude that acrylic acid is not an intermediate in the CWAO of phenol with the functionalized MWCNTs. We also did not identify butyric acid, succinic acid or propionic acid as intermediates in the CWAO of phenol with the functionalized MWCNTs. The theoretical TOC can be calculated from the concentrations of intermediates. Fig. 7 shows the variation of the measured TOC determined from the carbon analyzer and the theoretical TOC calculated from the concentration of the intermediates. As observed, there is little difference between je relatively stable in CWAO (Barbier et al., 1998), we conclude that acetic acid is not the intermediate directly produced from the oxidation of maleic acid. It might be produced from the oxidation of malonic acid and oxalic acid. In the CWAO of malonic acid, its concentration decreased quickly (Fig. 6b), and both acetic acid and formic acid were soon detected in the reaction solutions. This indicates that acetic acid and formic acid are intermediates in the direct oxidation of malonic acid. In our study, there are two peaks in the HPLC spectrum of the reaction solutions from the CWAO of acetic acid (Fig. 6c). One is attributed to acetic acid, and the other is unknown. Most references reported that acetic acid is directly oxidized into carbon dioxide and water (Luck, 1999; Barbier et al., 1998; Santos et al., 2002). Duprez et al. (1996) proposed a mechanism for the CWAO of acetic acid, in which dioxirane is an J O U R NA L OF EN V I RO N M EN T A L S CI EN C ES 2 6 ( 20 1 4 ) 1 7 41–1 7 4 9 Acknowledgments This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51078143) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China. REFERENCES Barbier Jr., J., Delanoë, F., Jabouille, F., Duprez, D., Blanchard, G., Isnard, P., 1998. Total oxidation of acetic acid in aqueous solution over noble metal catalysts. J. Catal. 177 (2), 378–385. Boehm, H.P., 2002. Surface oxides on carbon and their analysis: a critical assessment. Carbon 40 (2), 145–149. Dandekar, A., Baker, R.T.K., Vannice, M.A., 1998. Characterization of activated carbon, graphitized carbon fibers and synthetic diamond powder using TPD and DRIFTS. Carbon 36 (12), 1821–1831. Duprez, D., Delanoe, F., Barbier Jr., J., Isnard, P., Blanchard, G., 1996. Catalytic oxidation of organic compounds in aqueous media. Catal. Today 29 (1–4), 317–322. Fortuny, A., Bengoa, C., Font, J., Fabregat, A., 1999. Bimetallic catalysts for continuous catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol. J. Hazard. Mater. 64 (2), 181–193. Gallezot, P., Chaumet, S., Perrard, A., Isnard, P., 1997. Catalytic wet air oxidation of acetic acid on carbon-supported ruthenium catalysts. Catal. Today 168 (1), 104–109. Huang, S.Y., Zhang, C.B., He, H., 2009. In situ adsorption-catalysis system for the removal of o-xylene over an activated carbon supported Pd catalyst. J. Environ. Sci. 21 (7), 985–990. Kim, U.J., Furtado, C.A., Liu, X.M., Chen, G.G., Eklund, P.C., 2005. Raman and IR spectroscopy of chemically processed single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (44), 15437–15445. Kim, S.K., Kim, K.H., Ihm, S.K., 2007. The characteristics of wet air oxidation of phenol over CuOx/Al2O3 catalysts: effect of copper loading. Chemosphere 68 (2), 287–292. .cn The functionalized carbon materials MWCNTs, CFs and graphite exhibit good performance in the CWAO of phenol. Carboxylic acid groups on the surface of these materials play an important role in their good catalytic performance and promote the production of active radical species in the CWAO of phenol. In the CWAO over MWCNTs, phenol is first oxidized into hydroquinone and then p-benzoquinone. After the ring is broken, carboxylic acids are produced. Most of the carboxylic acids can be oxidized directly into carbon dioxide and water. .ac 3. Conclusions Kouklin, N., Tzolov, M., Straus, D., Yin, A., Xu, J.M., 2004. Infrared absorption properties of carbon nanotubes synthesized by chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 (19), 4463–4465. Li, N., Descorme, C., Besson, M., 2007. Catalytic wet air oxidation of 2-chlorophenol over Ru loaded CexZr1 − xO2 solid solutions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 76 (1–2), 92–100. Liu, Y., Sun, D.Z., Cheng, L., Li, Y.P., 2006. Preparation and characterization of Fe2O3–CeO2–TiO2/γ-A12O3 catalyst for degradation dye wastewater. J. Environ. Sci. 18 (6), 1189–1192. Liu, Z.Q., Ma, J., Cui, Y.H., 2008. Carbon nanotube supported platinum catalysts for the ozonation of oxalic acid in aqueous solutions. Carbon 46 (6), 890–897. Liu, Z.Q., Ma, J., Cui, Y.H., Zhao, L., Zhang, B.P., 2011. Factors affecting the catalytic activity of multi-walled carbon nanotube for ozonation of oxalic acid. Sep. Purif. Technol. 78 (2), 147–153. Liu, X.T., Wang, M.S., Zhang, S.J., Pan, B.C., 2013. Application potential of carbon nanotubes in water treatment: a review. J. Environ. Sci. 25 (7), 1263–1280. Luck, F., 1999. Wet air oxidation: past, present and future. Catal. Today 53 (1), 81–91. Morales-Torres, S., Silva, A.M.T., Pérez-Cadenas, A.F., Faria, J.L., Maldonado-Hódar, F.J., Figueiredo, J.L., et al., 2010. Wet air oxidation of trinitrophenol with activated carbon catalysts: effect of textural properties on the mechanism of degradation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 100 (1–2), 310–317. Pyun, J., 2011. Graphene oxide as catalyst: application of carbon materials beyond nanotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (1), 46–48. Rivas, F.J., Kolaczkowski, S.T., Beltrán, F.J., McLurgh, D.B., 1998. Development of a model for the wet air oxidation of phenol based on a free radical mechanism. Chem. Eng. Sci. 53 (14), 2575–2586. Santiago, M., Stüber, F., Fortuny, A., Fabregat, A., Font, J., 2005. Modified activated carbons for catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol. Carbon 43 (10), 2134–2145. Santos, A., Yustos, P., Quintanilla, A., Rodriguez, S., Garcia-Ochoa, F., 2002. Route of the catalytic oxidation of phenol in aqueous phase. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 39 (2), 97–113. Serp, P., Corrias, M., Kalck, P., 2003. Carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in catalysis. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 253 (2), 337–358. Soria-Sánchez, M., Maroto-Valiente, A., Álvarez-Rodríguez, J., Muñoz-Andrés, V., Rodríguez-Ramos, I., Guerrero-Ruíz, A., 2011. Carbon nanostructured materials as direct catalysts for phenol oxidation in aqueous phase. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 104 (1–2), 101–109. Stuber, F., Font, J., Fortuny, A., Bengoa, C., Eftaxias, A., Fabregat, A., 2005. Carbon materials and catalytic wet air oxidation of organic pollutants in wastewater. Top. Catal. 45 (1–4), 3–50. Suarez-Ojeda, M.E., Stüber, F., Fortuny, A., Fabregat, A., Carrera, J., Font, J., 2005. Catalytic wet air oxidation of substituted phenols using activated carbon as catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 58 (1–2), 105–114. Suarez-Ojeda, M.E., Fabregat, A., Stüber, F., Fortuny, A., Carrera, J., Font, J., 2007. Catalytic wet air oxidation of substituted phenols: temperature and pressure effect on the pollutant removal, the catalyst preservation and the biodegradability enhancement. Chem. Eng. J. 132 (1–3), 105–115. Xu, Y., Li, X.Y., Cheng, X., Sun, D.Z., Wang, X.Y., 2012. Degradation of cationic red GTL by catalytic wet air oxidation over Mo–Zn–Al–O catalyst under room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (5), 2856–2863. Yamakoshi, Y., Umezawa, N., Rui, A., Arakane, K., Miyakta, N., Goda, Y., et al., 2003. Active oxygen species generated from photoexcited fullerene (C60) as potential medicines: O−U 2 versus O2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (42), 12803–12809. sc them, confirming that the main intermediates have been identified. According to these results, we propose a new reaction pathway for the CWAO of phenol (Fig. 8). In this pathway phenol is first oxidized into hydroquinone and then p-benzoquinone. After the ring is broken, maleic acid is produced as a main product. Maleic acid can be oxidized into malonic acid, oxalic acid and formic acid. Malonic acid can be oxidized into acetic acid. Formic acid and oxalic acid can change into each other. Most of the carboxylic acids can also be oxidized directly into carbon dioxide and water. je 1748 1749 JO U R N A L OF EN V I RO N M EN T A L S CI E NC ES 2 6 ( 20 1 4 ) 1 7 4 1–1 7 4 9 sc .ac .cn carbon nanotubes in the wet air oxidation of phenol. Carbon 46 (3), 445–452. Yang, S.X., Besson, M., Descorme, C., 2010. Catalytic wet air oxidation of formic acid over Pt/CexZr1 − xO2 catalysts at low temperature and atmospheric pressure. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 100 (1–2), 282–288. Zhu, W.P., Bin, Y.J., Li, Z.H., Jiang, Z.P., Yin, T., 2002. Application of catalytic wet air oxidation for the treatment of H-acid manufacturing process wastewater. Water Res. 36 (8), 1947–1954. je Yang, S.X., Feng, Y.J., Wan, J.F., Lin, Q.Y., Zhu, W.P., Jiang, Z.P., 2005. Pretreatment of apramycin wastewater by catalytic wet air oxidation. J. Environ. Sci. 17 (4), 623–626. Yang, M., Xu, A.H., Du, H.Z., Sun, C.L., Li, C., 2007a. Removal of salicylic acid on perovskite-type oxide LaFeO3 catalyst in catalytic wet air oxidation process. J. Hazard. Mater. 139 (1), 86–92. Yang, S.X., Zhu, W.P., Li, X., Wang, J.B., Zhou, Y.R., 2007b. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) as an efficient catalyst for catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol. Catal. Commun. 8 (12), 2059–2063. Yang, S.X., Li, X., Zhu, W.P., Wang, J.B., Descorme, C., 2008. Catalytic activity, stability and structure of multi-walled JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 环境科学学报(英文版) (http://www.jesc.ac.cn) Aims and scope Journal of Environmental Sciences is an international academic journal supervised by Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The journal publishes original, peer-reviewed innovative research and valuable findings in environmental sciences. The types of articles published are research article, critical review, rapid communications, and special issues. The scope of the journal embraces the treatment processes for natural groundwater, municipal, agricultural and industrial water and wastewaters; physical and chemical methods for limitation of pollutants emission into the atmospheric environment; chemical and biological and phytoremediation of contaminated soil; fate and transport of pollutants in environments; toxicological effects of terrorist chemical release on the natural environment and human health; development of environmental catalysts and materials. For subscription to electronic edition Elsevier is responsible for subscription of the journal. Please subscribe to the journal via http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jes. For subscription to print edition China: Please contact the customer service, Science Press, 16 Donghuangchenggen North Street, Beijing 100717, China. Tel: +86-10-64017032; E-mail: [email protected], or the local post office throughout China (domestic postcode: 2-580). Outside China: Please order the journal from the Elsevier Customer Service Department at the Regional Sales Office nearest you. Submission declaration Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The submission should be approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out. If the manuscript accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder. Submission declaration Submission of the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The publication should be approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out. If the manuscript accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder. Editorial Authors should submit manuscript online at http://www.jesc.ac.cn. In case of queries, please contact editorial office, Tel: +86-10-62920553, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]. Instruction to authors is available at http://www.jesc.ac.cn. Journal of Environmental Sciences (Established in 1989) Vol. 26 No. 8 2014 Supervised by Chinese Academy of Sciences Sponsored by Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences Edited by Editorial Office of Journal of Published by Elsevier Limited, The Netherlands Distributed by Domestic North Street, Beijing 100717, China P. O. Box 2871, Beijing 100085, China Local Post Offices through China Foreign E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] CN 11-2629/X Science Press, 16 Donghuangchenggen Environmental Sciences Tel: 86-10-62920553; http://www.jesc.ac.cn Editor-in-chief Science Press, Beijing, China Hongxiao Tang Domestic postcode: 2-580 Elsevier Limited http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jes Printed by Beijing Beilin Printing House, 100083, China Domestic price per issue RMB ¥ 110.00 Editorial Board of Journal of Environmental Sciences Editor-in-Chief Hongxiao Tang Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Associate Editors-in-Chief Jiuhui Qu Shu Tao Nigel Bell Po-Keung Wong Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Peking University, China Imperial College London, United Kingdom The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Editorial Board Aquatic environment Baoyu Gao Shandong University, China Maohong Fan University of Wyoming, USA Chihpin Huang National Chiao Tung University Taiwan, China Ng Wun Jern Nanyang Environment & Water Research Institute, Singapore Clark C. K. Liu University of Hawaii at Manoa, USA Hokyong Shon University of Technology, Sydney, Australia Zijian Wang Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Zhiwu Wang The Ohio State University, USA Yuxiang Wang Queen’s University, Canada Min Yang Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Zhifeng Yang Beijing Normal University, China Han-Qing Yu University of Science & Technology of China Terrestrial environment Christopher Anderson Massey University, New Zealand Zucong Cai Nanjing Normal University, China Xinbin Feng Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Hongqing Hu Huazhong Agricultural University, China Kin-Che Lam The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Erwin Klumpp Research Centre Juelich, Agrosphere Institute Germany Peijun Li Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Michael Schloter German Research Center for Environmental Health Germany Xuejun Wang Peking University, China Lizhong Zhu Zhejiang University, China Atomospheric environment Jianmin Chen Fudan University, China Abdelwahid Mellouki Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique France Yujing Mu Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Min Shao Peking University, China James Jay Schauer University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA Yuesi Wang Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Xin Yang University of Cambridge, UK Environmental biology Yong Cai Florida International University, USA Henner Hollert RWTH Aachen University, Germany Jae-Seong Lee Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea Christopher Rensing University of Copenhagen, Denmark Bojan Sedmak National Institute of Biology, Slovenia Lirong Song Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Chunxia Wang National Natural Science Foundation of China Gehong Wei Northwest A & F University, China Daqiang Yin Tongji University, China Zhongtang Yu The Ohio State University, USA Environmental toxicology and health Jingwen Chen Dalian University of Technology, China Jianying Hu Peking University, China Guibin Jiang Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Sijin Liu Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Tsuyoshi Nakanishi Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Japan Willie Peijnenburg University of Leiden, The Netherlands Bingsheng Zhou Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Environmental catalysis and materials Hong He Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Junhua Li Tsinghua University, China Wenfeng Shangguan Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China Yasutake Teraoka Kyushu University, Japan Ralph T. Yang University of Michigan, USA Environmental analysis and method Zongwei Cai Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China Jiping Chen Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Minghui Zheng Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Municipal solid waste and green chemistry Pinjing He Tongji University, China Environmental ecology Rusong Wang Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Editorial office staff Managing editor Editors English editor Qingcai Feng Zixuan Wang Suqin Liu Catherine Rice (USA) Zhengang Mao Copyright© Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.