Freight Village Land Use Plan

Transcription

Freight Village Land Use Plan
2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
Technical Report 6:
Freight Urban Village Land Use Plan and
Strategies
Prepared by:
Leftwich Consulting Engineers, Inc.
12151 Science Drive, Suite 101
Orlando, Florida 32826
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. ii
LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................................... ii
1.0
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 1
2.0
METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 2
3.0
GENERAL LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED FREIGHT VILLAGE AREAS...................................... 3
4.0
TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES ........................................................... 20
4.1 The Proposed Horizon West Towncenter Freight Village .......................................... 20
4.2 The Proposed Hermit Smith-Hogshead Road Freight Village ..................................... 20
4.3 The Proposed Landstreet-Vineland Freight Village .................................................... 21
4.4 The Proposed L.B. McLeod Freight Village................................................................ 21
4.5 The Proposed Oakland Freight Village ...................................................................... 21
4.6 The Proposed Ocoee Freight Village ......................................................................... 21
4.7 The Proposed Silver Star Road Freight Village ........................................................... 22
4.8 The Proposed Zellwood Freight Village .................................................................... 22
4.9 The Proposed State Road 417 Southern Extension Freight Village ............................. 22
4.10 The Proposed Kissimmee Gateway Airport Freight Village ........................................ 22
4.11 The Proposed Poinciana Boulevard Freight Village ................................................... 23
4.12 The Proposed Harmony Research Park Freight Village .............................................. 23
4.13 The Proposed Yeehaw Junction Freight Village ......................................................... 23
4.14 The Proposed Orlando Sanford Intl Airport/E. Lake Mary Boulevard Freight Village .. 23
4.15 The Proposed Port of Sanford Freight Village ............................................................ 23
5.0
LAND USE POLICY STRATEGIES ..................................................................................... 24
5.1 Land Use Policy Strategies by Jurisdiction and Agency .............................................. 24
5.1.1 Florida Department of Transportation......................................................... 24
5.1.2 Cities and Counties .................................................................................... 24
5.2 Common Roles for All Jurisdictions and Agencies ..................................................... 25
5.2.1 Review Existing Roadway Network ............................................................ 25
5.2.2 Plan in an Integrated Manner ..................................................................... 25
5.2.3 Design Standards In and Around Urban Freight Villages............................. 25
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont’d)
5.2.4 Private Sector Planning .............................................................................. 26
6.0
SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... 27
LIST OF TABLES
1.
Proposed Freight Village Locations ........................................................................................ 3
2.
Proposed Freight Village by County ..................................................................................... 27
LIST OF FIGURES
1.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Regional Locations……………………………………….......4
2.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Horizon West Towncenter ........................................... 5
3.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Hermit Smith-Hogshead Road ...................................... 6
4.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Landstreet-Vineland...................................................... 7
5.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – L.B. McLeod Road ........................................................ 8
6.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Oakland ....................................................................... 9
7.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Ocoee ........................................................................ 10
8.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Silver Star Road .......................................................... 11
9.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Zellwood ................................................................... 12
10.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – SR 417 Southern Extension ......................................... 13
11.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Kissimmee Gateway Airport ....................................... 14
12.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Poinciana Boulevard .................................................. 15
13.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Harmony Research Park ............................................. 16
14.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Yeehaw Junction ........................................................ 17
15.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Orlando Sanford International Airport/East Lake Mary
Boulevard............................................................................................................................ 18
16.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Port of Sanford ........................................................... 19
17.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Orange County Locations ........................................... 29
18.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Osceola County Locations .......................................... 30
19.
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Seminole County Locations ........................................ 31
ii
1.0
INTRODUCTION
METROPLAN ORLANDO, as part of the Year 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) update,
is developing an Urban Freight Village Land Use Plan/Strategy. Under a supplemental contract, the
Urban Freight Village Land Use Plan/Strategy will be developed and coordinated with the 2030
LRTP.
This technical report, titled Freight Urban Village Land Use Plan and Strategies, provides a
summary of the development of an Urban Freight Village Land Use Plan and Strategy with
proposed freight village locations.
An urban freight village is an intermodal or freight staging facility where access is provided to rails,
trucks, ports, and/or airports.
These facilities with warehousing and distribution enhance the
integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people
and freight as well as encourage large scale manufacturing. They also help to better manage the
flow of commodities in and around the different areas within the study area. From an economic
standpoint, they act as facilitators to attract manufacturing businesses that wish to relocate to lower
logistics costs; they also create secondary jobs in warehouses, distribution centers, manufacturing,
packaging plants, and other value added businesses.
This section (Section 1.0) provides the general introduction for this Technical Report 6: Freight
Urban Village Land Use Plan and Strategies. Section 2.0 offers a brief methodology of the tasks
outlined in the scope. Section 3.0 identifies the general location of the proposed urban freight
village areas. Section 4.0 details the purpose and role of the various transportation infrastructure
facilities. Section 5.0 presents specific land use policy strategies in supporting the growth and
development of the freight urban villages. Finally, Section 6.0 includes a summary of the proposed
freight village locations and the land use policy strategies detailed in this report.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
1
Technical Report 6
2.0
METHODOLOGY
This task was sub-divided into four (4) parts. With the first part, the Leftwich Consulting Engineers,
Inc. (LCE) Team identified locations within the study area for the development of urban freight
village land use plans, policies, and strategies. Previous studies commissioned by local agencies
were referenced in order to identify locations that were ideal for this type of approach. Also,
county staff was contacted for initial identification of the potential freight village sites.
Field
reviews were conducted at all locations. The LCE Team then met with county staff from Orange,
Osceola, and Seminole Counties to finalize the locations.
Section 3.0 details the locations
identified.
For the second part, LCE developed a GIS map and database with the general locations of the
proposed urban freight village areas identified. The data included roadway, rail, air and other
freight infrastructures in and around the freight urban villages. The GIS maps are described and can
be found in Section 3.0 of this report.
The third part defines the purpose and role of various transportation infrastructure facilities. More
specifically, the network roles are defined for the key roadways within the urban freight villages, as
well as those connecting them to the broader system and network. GIS maps of the connecting
transportation infrastructure facilities are provided and detailed as a part of Section 4.0.
Finally, the fourth part of this task provides specific land use policy strategies to be utilized by the
various local jurisdictions in supporting the growth and development of the urban freight villages.
Current policies regarding freight villages and goods movement within the study area were
researched and reviewed. Those policies relevant to the proposed freight villages contained within
this report are mentioned in Section 5.0.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
2
Technical Report 6
3.0
GENERAL LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED FREIGHT VILLAGE AREAS
As mentioned in Section 2.0, the LCE Team identified locations within the study area for the
development of urban freight villages upon consultation with county staff and field reviews. Table
1, Proposed Freight Village Locations, lists the finalized sites, the county upon which they lie, and
the general location.
TABLE 1
PROPOSED FREIGHT VILLAGE LOCATIONS
Name
Boggy Creek Road
Horizon West Towncenter
Landstreet-Vineland
Oakland
Ocoee
Hermit Smith-Hogshead
Road
Taft
Zellwood
SR 417 Southern Extension
Kissimmee Gateway
Airport
Poinciana Boulevard
Harmony Research Park
Yeehaw Junction
Orlando Sanford Int’l2
Airport
Port of Sanford
County
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
Orange
General Location
Southwest of OIA1 (Boggy Creek Rd at Ringhaver Dr)
SR 429 at New Independence Pkwy Interchange
US 441 (S. OBT) at Turnpike
West Colonial Dr (SR 50) at Turnpike
West Colonial Dr (SR 50) at SR 429
Orange
Hermit Smith at Hogshead Road (South of US 441)
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Orange Ave (SR 527) at Landstreet Rd
US 441 (N. OBT) at Laughlin Rd
Turnpike south of Deer Run Rd (Green Island DRI2)
Osceola
West of the Kissimmee Gateway Airport
Osceola
Osceola
Osceola
Poinciana Boulevard at US 17-92
US 192 (east of Hickory Tree Road)
SR 60 at Turnpike
Seminole Southeast of Sanford Int’l Airport (East Lake Mary Blvd)
Seminole East of Interstate 4 between SR 46 and US 17-92
Notes: (1) OIA – Orlando International Airport
(2) Int’l – International
A GIS map was developed by the LCE Team with general locations of the proposed freight villages.
Figure 1, Proposed Freight Village Locations – Regional Locations, is a map of all the proposed
freight villages within the study area. Figures 2-16 provide a detailed map of each individual
proposed freight village and their general location.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
3
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 1
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Regional Locations
Page needs to be deleted
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
4
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 2
Proposed Freight Village
Locations – Horizon West Towncenter
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
5
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 3
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Hermit Smith-Hogshead Road
Page needs to be deleted
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
6
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 4
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Landstreet-Vineland
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
7
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 5
Proposed Freight Village Locations – L.B. McLeod Road
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
8
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 6
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Oakland
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
9
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 7
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Ocoee
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
10
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 8
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Silver Star Road
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
11
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 9
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Zellwood
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
12
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 10
Proposed Freight Village Locations – SR 417 Southern Extension
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
13
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 11
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Kissimmee Gateway Airport
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
14
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 12
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Poinciana Boulevard
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
15
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 13
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Harmony Research Park
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
16
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 14
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Yeehaw Junction
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
17
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 15
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Orlando Sanford International Airport/East Lake Mary
Boulevard
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
18
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 16
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Port of Sanford
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
19
Technical Report 6
4.0
TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES
The transportation infrastructure facilities that provide for the mobility of freight, goods, and
services in and around Central Florida include Interstate 4, Florida’s Turnpike, State Road 50
(Colonial Drive), and State Road 528 (the Beachline). More specifically, Interstate 4 connects
Interstate 75 (Tampa) through Orlando, the heart of Central Florida, and to Interstate 95 (Daytona
Beach). Florida’s Turnpike also connects Interstate 75 (Ocala) through Orlando to Interstate 95
(Miami). Both Intestate 75 and Interstate 95 start from South Florida and run northward out of the
state on the west and east side of Florida, respectively. State Road 528 is a major arterial that joins
Interstate 4 in Orlando to Port Canaveral, Florida’s number two cruise port of annual passenger
volumes.
As mentioned in Section 3.0, GIS maps were developed by the LCE Team with general locations of
the proposed freight villages. These maps also include designated truck routes for the region as
well as within the general location of each proposed freight village. Figures 1-16 provide detailed
maps of the individual proposed freight village, their general location, and the truck routes in and
around the proposed site. The following sections describe each proposed freight village and their
connectivity to the region’s transportation infrastructure facilities.
4.1
The Proposed Horizon West Towncenter Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 2, this proposed freight village is situated northeast of the State Road 429
interchange at New Independence Parkway. New Independence Parkway gives access to State
Road 429 and State Road 545, both designated truck routes.
4.2
The Proposed Hermit Smith-Hogshead road Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 3, this proposed freight village is situated at the intersection of Hermit Smith
Road and Hogshead Road which is just south of US 441 (N. OBT). US 441, a designated truck
route, connects directly with State Road 429 and State Road 436. This site is also within close
proximity to the Florida Central railroad.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
20
Technical Report 6
4.3
The Proposed Landstreet-Vineland Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 4, this proposed freight village is situated east and west of South Orange
Blossom Trail (S. OBT), south of State Road 528 and north of Wetherbee Road.
This site is
proposed near the general area of the CSX Intermodal Property. Access at S. OBT, a designated
truck route, offers a multitude of connections to other truck routes. S. OBT connects with directly
with the City of Kissimmee in Osceola County, Florida’s Turnpike (north to Ocala or South to
Miami), SR 528 (east Port Canaveral or west to Interstate 4), and State Road 417 (south to Interstate
4 towards Celebration or north to Interstate 4 towards Sanford). Not only is this proposed freight
village location very well tied into the transportation infrastructure facilities, it is also within close
proximity to the CSXT railroad and OIA (via Boggy Creek Road).
4.4
The Proposed L.B. McLeod Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 5, this proposed freight village is situated south of L.B. McLeod Road and in
the area of Mission Road and Vineland Road, west of Interstate 4. Access to L.B. McLeod Road
and/or Conroy Road allows for a direct connection to Interstate 4, within close proximity other
highways.
They include Florida’s Turnpike State Road 528, State Road 408 and many other
designated truck routes.
4.5
The Proposed Oakland Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 6, this proposed freight village is situated south of State Road 50, north of
Florida’s Turnpike, and east of the Florida’s Turnpike interchange at State Road 50. Access at State
Road 50, a designated truck route, offers connections to Florida’s Turnpike, State Road 429, and
State Road 408. This site is within close proximity to the Florida Central railroad.
4.6
The Proposed Ocoee Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 7, this proposed freight village is situated in the northeast corner of the
interchange at State Road 429 and State Road 50. Access at State Road 50, a designated truck
route, offers connections to Florida’s Turnpike, State Road 429, and State Road 408. This site is
also within close proximity to the Florida Central railroad.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
21
Technical Report 6
4.7
The Proposed Silver Star Road Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 8, this proposed freight village is situated west of US 441 (N. OBT) and the
CSX Railroad, near the intersection of Silver Star Road and State Road 423 (John Young Parkway).
Access to US 441, a designated truck route, offers connections to State Road 50, State Road 408,
and Interstate 4. This area is home to existing intermodal activities which makes a proposed freight
village highly desirable here.
4.8
The Proposed Zellwood Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 9, this proposed freight village is situated just west of US 441 (N. OBT) near
Willow Street. US 441, a designated truck route, connects directly with State Road 429 and State
Road 436. This site is also within close proximity to the Florida Central railroad.
4.9
The Proposed State Road 417 Southern Extension Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 10, this proposed freight village is situated around Florida’s Turnpike
southeast of Lake Tohopekaliga. This site is within very close proximity to the Proposed Green
Island Development of Regional Impact and proposed interchange at the Turnpike.
More
specifically, this site is located roughly halfway between the Kissimmee Park Road interchange and
the Canoe Creek Service Plaza on the Turnpike. Access to Florida’s Turnpike, a designated truck
route, allows direct connectivity with State Road 417, State Road 528, and Interstate 4 to the north
and south to Miami.
4.10
The Proposed Kissimmee Gateway Airport Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 11, this proposed freight village is situated adjacent to the Kissimmee
Gateway Airport on the west side. Additionally, the site is south of US 192, north of Old Tampa
Highway, and west of Pleasant Hill Road. Access to designated truck routes may include US 192
and US 17-92. US 192 offers a direct connection to State Road 535, Interstate 4, Boggy Creek
Road, and Florida’s Turnpike. US 17-92 connects to Haines City in the south as well as with State
Road 417 and State Road 528 (via State Road 423) to the north. Not only is this proposed freight
village location very well tied into the transportation infrastructure facilities, it is also within close
proximity to the CSXT railroad.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
22
Technical Report 6
4.11
The Proposed Poinciana Boulevard Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 12, this proposed freight village is situated near the intersection of US 17-92
and Poinciana Boulevard. US 17-92, a designated truck route, connects to Haines City in the south
as well as with State Road 417 and State Road 528 (via State Road 423) to the north. This proposed
freight village location is also within close proximity to the CSXT railroad and the Kissimmee
Gateway Airport.
4.12
The Proposed Harmony Research Park Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 13, this proposed freight village is situated off US 192, east of East Hickory
Tree Road in the Community of Harmony and within the proposed Research Park. Access to US
192, a designated truck route, connects with State Road 15 and Florida’s Turnpike to the west. To
the east, US 192 connects with the City of Melbourne.
4.13
The Proposed Yeehaw Junction Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 14, this proposed freight village is situated just north of the Florida’s Turnpike
interchange at State Road 60 and east of US 441. With access to Florida’s Turnpike, a designated
truck route, direct connections are offered to Orlando to the north and Miami to the south.
4.14
The Proposed Orlando Sanford International Airport/East Lake Mary Boulevard Freight
Village
As depicted in Figure 15, this proposed freight village is situated to the west of and adjacent to the
Orlando Sanford International Airport. It is generally located off Airport Boulevard and north of
East Lake Mary Boulevard. This site is also within close proximity to the CSXT railroad. Nearby
truck routes include State Road 417 and US 17-92. These facilities tie into Interstate 4, State Road
419, and State Road 434.
4.15
The Proposed Port of Sanford Freight Village
As depicted in Figure 16, this proposed freight village is situated along the Interstate 4 corridor
between the State Road 46 and US 17-92 interchanges and includes the Port of Sanford. This site
has access to designated truck routes Interstate 4, State Road 417, and US 17-92. Interstate 4
connects west to Orlando and Tampa and east to Daytona Beach. This proposed freight village
location is also within close proximity to the CSXT railroad.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
23
Technical Report 6
5.0
Land Use Policy Strategies
As mentioned in Section 1.0, an urban freight village is an intermodal or freight staging facility
where access is provided to rails, trucks, ports, and/or airports. These facilities with warehousing
and distribution enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and
between modes, for people and freight as well as encourage large scale manufacturing.
The
following describes land use policy strategies that may be utilized in order to promote the growth
of urban freight villages and facilitate in the movement of goods between these freight villages.
5.1
Land Use Policy Strategies by Jurisdiction and Agency
A diverse group of jurisdictions and agencies represent the tri-county study area. As these agencies
address the needs specific its jurisdiction, the following land use policy strategies give details for
specific agencies as well as details common to all agencies.
5.1.1
Florida Department of Transportation
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as having authority over State Roadways and
Interstates and connect many jurisdictions governed by various local agencies, should work with
these agencies in preserving the specific existing and future roles corridors and arterials within the
region. Monitoring existing roadway conditions, identifying transportation impacts of new or redevelopments and future design implementations with greater freight mobility will encourage the
growth and sustainability of freight villages.
The Department should assist local agencies in
identifying sources of funding for greater freight prospects.
5.1.2
Cities and Counties
Cities and Counties, with focus on comprehensive planning zoning designations, should direct the
development of warehousing and distribution in and around the proposed freight villages herein.
The requirement of buffers and/or transitional zones between incompatible land uses shall also be
implemented. The Cities and Counties should also protect undeveloped land adjacent to freight
villages for future freight expansion or by preventing encroachment of incompatible land uses
through zoning, easements and/or purchase.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
24
Technical Report 6
5.2
Common Roles for All Jurisdictions and Agencies
Although the region is governed by multiple jurisdictions and agencies, all have some common
roles they may play is supporting and augmenting the proposed urban freight villages.
The
following details these commonalities.
5.2.1
Review Existing Roadway Network
All agencies should review existing roadways in the network and examine the interactions among
land uses to ensure the sustainability of freight villages. Only allowing supporting developments of
like land uses around transportation infrastructure facilities with available or improved capacity also
aids in the success of these villages. This requires coordination of freight and non-freight land uses
to be separated in order to preserve freight mobility as the region continues to grow.
5.2.2
Plan in an Integrated Manner
All agencies should involve freight operators, shipper, and receivers in local and regional planning.
This includes comprehensive planning as well as long range planning. Again, requiring a buffer
and/or transitional zone between mixed matched land uses is essential in planning. This should be
implemented by protecting undeveloped land neighboring freight villages for future freight
development or by averting the advancement of incompatible land uses through zoning,
easements, and/or acquisition.
5.2.3
Design Standards In and Around Urban Freight Villages
All agencies should enhance the long range planning, local comprehensive planning, and zoning
processes to address freight related issues. This may include limiting land use intensities to what
the surrounding transportation infrastructure and intersection may support.
Guidelines for
developers and planners may include requiring transportation infrastructure, intersection design,
signage, and signalization to encourage truck traffic. Also, require deliver/access needs to be built
into site design and review process. Site layout and building design guidelines and templates for
freight support should also be implemented as well as adequate access for deliveries. Goods
movement and logistics needs should be built into land development and site design.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
25
Technical Report 6
5.2.4
Private Sector Planning
The private sector should be involved in the planning process through advisory committees and
technical planning processes.
METROPLAN ORLANDO’s Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)
should continue providing general direction and guidance to the planning process of freight
villages. Although the former Freight Mobility Working Group (FMWG), an advisory committee,
and its Steering Committee, which consisted of private and public sector stakeholders, no longer
exists, the private sector may participate by becoming involved with the CAC.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
26
Technical Report 6
6.0
SUMMARY
This technical report provided an outline of the development of an Urban Freight Village Land Use
Plan/Strategy which is coordinated with the 2030 LRTP and includes proposed freight village
locations. Presented in this technical report is the definition of an urban freight village and the
need for them in the region. Also presented are the proposed locations and the land use policy
strategies that will promote the growth of these villages. Figures 17-19 map out the Proposed
Urban Freight Villages by County.
In summary, a total of fifteen (15) Urban Freight Villages are proposed for the METROPLAN
ORLANDO study area. Table 2, Proposed Freight Villages by County, lists the proposed freight
villages by county.
TABLE 2
PROPOSED FREIGHT VILLAGE BY COUNTY
County
Orange
Osceola
Seminole
Name
Boggy Creek Road
Horizon West Towncenter
Landstreet-Vineland
Oakland
Ocoee
Hermit Smith-Hogshead Road
Taft
Zellwood
SR 417 Southern Extension
Kissimmee Gateway Airport
Poinciana Boulevard
Harmony Research Park
Yeehaw Junction
Orlando Sanford International Airport
Port of Sanford
The land use policy strategies presented included agency specific roles as well as roles common for
all agencies. Agency roles pertained more particularly to the FDOT, as well as Cities and Counties.
Common roles incorporated a review of the existing roadway network, planning in an integrated
manner, design standards in and around Urban Freight Villages, and private sector planning.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
27
Technical Report 6
With the Proposed Urban Freight Villages and the land use policy strategies summarized herein,
these facilities with warehousing and distribution will enhance the integration and connectivity of
the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight as well as encourage
large scale manufacturing.
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
28
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 17
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Orange County Locations
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
29
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 18
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Osceola County Locations
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
30
Technical Report 6
FIGURE 19
Proposed Freight Village Locations – Seminole County Locations
Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
31
Technical Report 6
METROPLAN ORLANDO
One Landmark Center
315 E. Robinson Street, Suite 355
Orlando, Florida 32801
(407) 481-5672
www.metroplanorlando.com