International Buyers - Joseph R. Schortz, CPA, PLLC
Transcription
International Buyers - Joseph R. Schortz, CPA, PLLC
Presenter: Joseph R. Schortz, CPA June 22nd, 2012 Introduction Speaker: Licensing Professional organizations Boards Experience What we will not cover today: FIRPTA Property held jointly between a USA Citizen and a nonresident alien Gift tax responsibilities of nonresident aliens Expected estate tax changes as of 01/01/13 Advanced planning for nonresident aliens USA expatriates What we will cover today: Actual 2011 case example The differences between income and estate taxation of nonresident aliens Alternative methods of owning USA realty by a nonresident alien References: The Internal Revenue Code and U.S. Treasury Regulations U.S. Treasury Regulations U.S. Tax Court Cases Publications and periodicals Facts: 1. A married Austrian citizen purchased a home in Punta Gorda in the mid 1990's. 2. The home was purchased solely in the name of the wife. 3. The home cost $280,000 in 1996. 4. The home was purchased outright [no mortgage]. 5. The Austrian woman died in 2011. 6. At the date of her death the home was valued, by an independent appraisal, at $290,000. 7. The will of the decedent bequeathed the home to her husband. Analysis: 1. The Austrian woman was a nonresident alien for USA estate tax purposes. 2. For 2011 a USA person was allowed a $5,000,000 unified gift and estate tax exemption. 3. For 2011 a USA person was allowed an unlimited marital deduction for transfers to a USA spouse. 4. For 2011 a nonresident alien was allowed a $60,000 estate tax exemption. 5. For 2011, in absence of a qualified domestic trust [QDOT], a nonresident alien was allowed no marital deduction for transfers to a nonresident alien spouse. 6. A nonresident alien is allowed the same annual gift tax exclusion as a USA person [$13,000 in 2011]. 7. Separate from the annual gift tax exclusion, a nonresident alien is allowed a gift tax deduction for gifts to a nonresident alien spouse [$136,000 in 2011]. A compulsory financial contribution imposed by a government to raise revenues, levied on: income of persons property of persons income of organizations property of organizations production costs of goods or services sales of goods or services, or use of property Income - annual on persons on organizations Property tangible personal property tax - annual tax on the value of property used by businesses realty transfer tax - a transactional tax on the sale, transfer or exchange of real property real estate tax - annual tax on the value of property owned by persons and non-tax exempt organizations death taxes - a transactional tax on the value of assets owned by persons at their demise - now called estate, transfer or inheritance taxes gift tax - a transactional tax coupled and coordinated with estate tax Sales – transactional state sales tax - on the sales price of goods and services, including rentals local sales tax - on the sales price of goods and services, including rentals municipal - tax on short term realty rentals Social – annual on persons and organizations - to fund social programs, e.g., Medicare, social security, unemployment Income Tax of Noncitizens [Internal Revenue Code Section {IRC Sec.} 7701(b)] A noncitizen of the United States of America {USA} will be treated as a resident for income tax purposes in any calendar year in which the individual is: a. admitted as a lawful permanent resident: Typical Scenario: you hold a Green Card OR b. substantially present in the USA. Typical Scenario: you meet the "Substantial Presence Test” To meet this test you must be physically present in the USA on at least: 1. 31 days during the current year AND 2. 183 days during the 3 year period that includes the current and two preceding years. The 183 days are counted/calculated as follows: a. all of days you were physically present during the current year, plus; b. 1/3 of the days you were physically present during the preceding year, plus; c. 1/6 of the days you were physically present during the second preceding year. There are certain exceptions, such as the "closer connection" exception, and technical variations, such as those for certain students, trainees, etc., to the 183 day rule. Definition of resident alien and nonresident alien. (1) In general. For purposes of this title (other than subtitle B)— (A) Resident alien. An alien individual shall be treated as a resident of the United States with respect to any calendar year if (and only if) such individual meets the requirements of clause (i), (ii), or (iii): (i) Lawfully admitted for permanent residence. Such individual is a lawful permanent resident of the United States at any time during such calendar year. (ii) Substantial presence test. Such individual meets the substantial presence test of paragraph (3). (iii) First year election. Such individual makes the election provided in paragraph (4). (B) Nonresident alien. An individual is a nonresident alien if such individual is neither a citizen of the United States nor a resident of the United States (within the meaning of subparagraph (A). Estates of Nonresidents Not Citizens Tax [Internal Revenue Code Sections {IRC Sec.} 2101 to 2108] For USA estate and gift tax purposes, "resident" means an individual who has his or her "domicile" [United States Treasury Regulation {Reg.} 20.1-1(b)] in the USA. A "nonresident" decedent is a person whose domicile was outside of the USA at the time of death. The domicile of a person is the place he or she voluntarily selected as his or her permanent principal home, with no definite present intention of leaving. Domicile requires two elements, both of which are essential: 1. actual residence AND 2. an intent to remain indefinitely An individual cannot abandon an old domicile and acquire a new one unless both elements are present. The intent to change domicile will not establish a new domicile without an actual change in residence. Moving to a new place will not establish a new domicile unless the move is coupled with an intent to remain there indefinitely. Pursuant to IRC Sec. 2101, the value of the gross estate of every decedent nonresident not a citizen of the USA is that part of the decedent's gross estate [determined pursuant to IRC Sec. 2031] which at the time of his death is situated in the USA [commonly referred to as "USA situs property"]. The Internal Revenue Code [IRC] does not provide a clear definition of USA situs property. USA real property, tangible personal property [e.g., art, jewelry, furniture, etc.] and stock in a USA domestic corporation are examples of USA situs property. Debt obligations of a USA person, or of the USA, a state, or any political subdivision are subject to USA estate tax as are certain bank deposits. Note: if a decedent's real property is encumbered [mortgaged] and the debt is recourse [meaning it is the personal obligation of the decedent], the full value of the real property, unreduced by the mortgage, is subject to USA estate tax. An Interest in U.S. Real Property [USRPI] A. Investor, a nonresident alien individual [NRA), owns the USRPI directly in his own name. B. Investor, a foreign corporation [FC], owned by a NRA, owns the USRPI directly in its own name. C. Investor, a FC owned by a NRA, creates a U.S. Domestic Corporation [USCO] that owns the USRPI. D. Investor, a USCO owned by a NRA, owns the USRPI. E. Investor, a U.S. Domestic Limited Liability Company [LLC] owned by a NRA, owns the USRPI. F. Investor, a NRA, creates a U.S. Domestic Partnership [USP] or a Foreign Partnership [FP] that owns the USRPI. G. Investor, a NRA, creates a U.S. Domestic Trust [UST] or a Foreign Trust [FT] that owns the USRPI. Generally, stock in a Florida corporation that is owned by a nonresident alien who is not domiciled in the USA is, pursuant to IRC Sec. 2104(a), included in the value of the gross estate of a nonresident alien and subject to USA estate tax. Alternative C above is often employed to avoid this conclusion, however, in some instances there are treaties in place with foreign countries that eliminate the need for this alternative. An example of such a treaty is the Estates, Inheritances, Gifts and Generation-Skipping Transfers Convention between the United States of America and Austria. This treaty, which was signed by then President Regan on June 21, 1982, became effective as of July 1, 1983. This type of agreement is known as a "domicile treaty." A domicile treaty typically overrides provisions of a statute as to taxation. Article 7(1) of this treaty provides that stock in a USA domestic corporation held by an Austrian resident citizen is not subject to USA estate taxes and is subject to Austrian estate taxes, if any. This treaty also provides, under Article 5(2), that a U.S. real property interest held directly by an Austrian resident citizen is taxed based on the location of the real property. Therefore, corporate ownership of the U.S. real property interest avoids USA estate tax but direct ownership does not. To avoid the consequence of Article 5(2) if a corporation is used, it is necessary for the corporation to continue to be active and to maintain corporate formalities, such as annual minutes of shareholder and board of director meetings, etc. Germany, as an example, has a treaty with the USA that mirrors the Austrian treaty discussed above. Treaties must be reviewed on a case by case basis. Other countries with which the USA had Estate and Gift Tax Treaties in 2011 include Australia, Canada [through the income tax treaty], Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. These treaties would need to be reviewed individually to determine specific applicability and benefits. Using Trusts – G By creating and implementing an irrevocable U.S. domestic trust a nonresident alien may be able to exclude a USA situs real property interest from his USA estate, as well as be taxed at favorable capital gains rates on a gain from disposition of the real property interest [assuming the real property interest is held more than one year]. The key to this planning opportunity is that the nonresident alien creator may not retain any interest in the trust. If any interest is deemed to be maintained than the real property interest would be included in the USA estate of the nonresident alien. If the creator reserves the power to alter, amend, revoke or terminate the trust, under IRC Sec. 2038, he has "retained an interest" in the trust and therefore the real property interest is includable in his USA estate. The use of this technique demands that the nonresident alien be willing to part with control of the trust property. This is often a reason that this technique is not used. If the nonresident alien has already acquired a U.S. real property interest and desires to implement this strategy an issue arises in conjunction with USA gift tax. When the U.S. real property interest is deposited to the trust a gift to the trust beneficiaries is made. Since the nonresident alien is subject to the USA gift tax rules, if the amount of the gift exceeds the annual exclusion amount, the nonresident alien would need to file a USA gift tax return, which could result in a reduced USA estate tax exclusion amount or the payment of gift tax. Alternatively, by contributing cash [preferably from a non USA bank account] to the trust and then having the trust acquire the U.S. real property interest, the nonresident alien will not be subject to USA gift taxation on the cash contribution. This technique will avoid probate and the associated costs (often 4% of the value of the probated assets) of probate upon the demise of the creator of the trust. If the U.S. real property interest is the ownership of a house and the nonresident alien or others wish to use the house, the use must be on an arm's length basis. Rent would need to be paid to the trust, at market rates, and the trust would need to use the rental income to pay the expenses and costs of owning and maintaining the rental property and keeping the trust in good standing. Trust formalities would need to be maintained. Additional income tax consequences result from whether the rental is determined to be effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business or fixed or determinable periodic income [FDAPI]. Using Corporations – C Shares of stock issued by a U.S. domestic corporation, regardless of the location in which the certificates are held, are USA situs property subject to USA estate tax. Shares of stock issued by a foreign corporation, regardless of the location in which the certificates are held, are not USA situs property and are not subject to USA estate tax. This may constitute a planning opportunity. The foreign corporation will be respected and avoid its assets being subject to USA estate tax as long as it engages in legitimate business activities and operates in an arm's length fashion. The foreign corporation would own the shares of the USA domestic corporation. The U.S. domestic corporation would own the U.S. real property interest. This structure is USA estate tax efficient in that it avoids the USA estate tax entirely, but it is not income tax efficient in that if there is a gain on the disposition of the U.S. real property interest, the gain will not be subject to favorable capital gains rates and is subject to state income tax in Florida. Although IRC Sec. 351 contains tax free incorporation provisions, if the nonresident alien already owns the U.S. real property interest in his individual name, this provision would only apply if he transferred the U.S. real property interest to a U.S. domestic corporation and immediately after the transfer or exchange he was in control of the corporation pursuant to the provisions of IRC Sec. 368(c). Ultimately he would have to transfer his ownership interest to the foreign corporation. This technique avoids FIRPTA withholding and probate while providing limited liability and anonymity. On the other hand it is an expensive structure to maintain. If the U.S. real property interest is the ownership of a house and the nonresident alien or others wish to use the house, the use must be on an arm's length basis. Rent would need to be paid to the corporation, at market rates, and the corporation would need to use the rental income to pay the expenses and costs of owning and maintaining the rental property and keeping the corporation in good standing. Corporate formalities would need to be kept current, including minutes of shareholder and board of director meetings, etc. Additional income tax consequences result from whether the rental is determined to be effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business or fixed or determinable periodic income [FDAPI]. Using Partnerships – F Neither the Internal Revenue Code nor the U.S. Treasury Regulations specifically address the situs of partnership interests for USA estate tax or gift tax purposes. Case law and rulings in this area are not conclusive. The issue appears to be focused on the two alternative pass-through entity/partnership theories: the aggregate theory, and; the entity theory. Under the aggregate theory the partnership is seen as a transparent aggregate of its underlying assets causing the partners to be deemed to own a share of the partnership assets. Under the aggregate theory, the share of partnership assets would be deemed USA situs property. Under the entity theory, the partners are deemed to own an intangible asset which at least one court case found to avoid USA estate tax. Since a partnership is a pass-through entity, favorable capital gains rates are applicable. If the partnership form was a limited partnership, then limited legal liability would apply to all but the general partner(s). Since the issue of USA situs property is not legislatively or judicially settled, some practitioners believe that assuming it cannot be USA situs property is overly aggressive planning. However, other practitioners believe that if the Internal Revenue Service [IRS] took the position that a partnership interest is USA situs property, such a position would not be a sustainable interpretation. These latter practitioners are comfortable, taking the position that if IRS challenges it, the law supports exclusion from the USA estate tax gross estate. If the U.S. real property interest is the ownership of a house and the nonresident alien or others wish to use the house, the use must be on an arm's length basis. Rent would need to be paid to the partnership, at market rates, and the partnership would need to use the rental income to pay the expenses and costs of owning and maintaining the rental property and keeping the partnership in good standing. Partnership formalities would need to maintained. Additional income tax consequences result from whether the rental is determined to be effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business or fixed or determinable periodic income [FDAPI]. IRC Sec. 721, et seq., contains provisions for tax-free contributions of capital, including appreciated assets, to a partnership. Nonresident Alien Investor Owns Realty in his own Individual Name – A Many practitioners believe this is the best way to hold a U.S. real property interest. They address the negative of the inclusion for USA estate tax by using a valid analogy. If a USA citizen expects a significant estate tax bill upon their demise, the planning often includes life insurance. If life insurance is owned by a nonresident alien at their non-USA domicile, the life insurance proceeds will not be included as a USA situs property and, as such, will not be taxable in the USA gross estate. Many foreign countries have entities which appear to be corporate forms but which do not fit the definition of corporation in the USA for tax purposes. A Swiss stiftungen [foundation] is an example. Should an investor choose the corporation planning alternative, qualifying the foreign corporation for USA tax purposes is essential. Transfer to corporation controlled by transferor. (a) General rule. No gain or loss shall be recognized if property is transferred to a corporation by one or more persons solely in exchange for stock in such corporation and immediately after the exchange such person or persons are in control of the corporation. Page 2,047 of the January 2008 IRC Non-recognition of gain or loss on contribution. (a) General Rule. No gain or loss shall be recognized to a partnership or to any of its partners in the case of a contribution of property to the partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership. (b) Special Rule. Subsection (a) shall not apply to gain realized on a transfer of property to a partnership which would be treated as an investment company (within the meaning of section 351) if the partnership were incorporated. Page 3,064-3,065 of the January 2008 IRC Basis of contributing partner’s interest. The basis of an interest in a partnership acquired by a contribution of property, including money, to the partnership shall be the amount of such money and the adjusted basis of such property to the contributing partner at the time of the contribution increased by the amount (if any) of gain recognized under section 721(b) to the contributing partner at such time. Page 3,065 of the January 2008 IRC Basis of property contributed to partnership. The basis of property contributed to a partnership by a partner shall be the adjusted basis of such property to the contributing partner at the time of the contribution increased by the amount (if any) of gain recognized under section 721(b) to the contributing partner at such time. Page 3,065 of the January 2008 IRC Explanation of Abbreviations BLITBranch Level Interest Tax GIGross Income BPTBranch Profits Tax N/ANot Applicable ECIEffectively Connected Income NRANon-resident Alien ETBEngaged in a U.S Trade or Business P.E.Permanent Establishment R.E.Real Estate RRRevenue Ruling TYTaxable Year US-United States USSI-United States Source Income FCForeign Corporation FDAPIFixed or Determinable Annual or Periodical Gains, Profits and Income FSIForeign Source Income (A) • INV (NRA) USRPI Advantages: Possibly lowest income tax rate (15% capital gain or 35% maximum ordinary income) if an individual and, less likely, trust or estate; in event, only 1 income tax. Least complex structure Can pay out U.S. tax-free foreign source interest on U.S. business. Related debt and obtain deduction where business assets secure such debt or where debt is “booked” to a U.S. trade or business, subject to a percentage limitation. No BPT or BLIT Disadvantages: No anonymity Individual tax return filing §1445 FIRPTA withholding on sale Unlimited legal liability U.S. estate and gift tax Disadvantages: BPT or BLIT and possible regulatory elimination of the BPT complete termination exception. Possibly more income tax than individual ownership, and no favorable capital gains rate. §1445 FIRPTA withholding on sale Expense of FC §163(j) interest-stripping limitation and the related foreign person guarantee rule BPT/BLIT/Passive investment problems as to: (i)sale using §453; (ii)reinvestments of any earning in passive property. Limitations on PIE benefits when using BPT/§453 rule. Advantages: 34/35% income tax rate + state income tax, but only one tax if BPT termination rules are followed No U.S. estate or gift tax Limited legal liability Some anonymity Limited application of §1441/1442 where no E&P (B) INV (FC) USRPI Advantages: 34/35% income tax rate plus state income tax, but only one tax No U.S. estate or gift tax Limited legal liability Extra level of anonymity No BPT or BLIT No §1445 FIRPTA withholding on sale USCO may not be subject to the accumulated earnings tax (C) INV (FC) Disadvantages: Occasional proposals, in enacted, could result in more than 56% federal double taxation Income tax rate may be USCO greater than individual rate Expensive structure §163(j) interest-stripping limitation and the related foreign person guarantee rule Application of §1441/1442 USRPI even where no current/accumulated E&P (D) INV (USCO) USRPI Disadvantages: U.S. estate tax 34/35% income tax Income tax rate may be rate + state income greater than individual tax, but only one tax rate No U.S. gift tax Occasional proposals, if enacted, could result in Limited legal liability more than 56% federal No BPT or BLIT double taxation Some anonymity §163(j) interest-stripping limitation and the related No §1445 FIRPTA foreign person guarantee withholding on sale rule Application of §1441/1442 even where no current accumulated E&P Advantages: Disadvantages: Probably U.S. estate tax §1445 withholding (with no adjustment for NOL carryovers) as LLC may be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes Possibly U.S. gift tax Advantages: 35% maximum ordinary pass-through individual federal tax rate (15% capital gains rate) if classified as partnership or disregarded as an entity for federal tax purposes and only one tax Limited legal liability Arguably, no U.S. gift tax, but not clear a real risk No BPT or BLIT Some anonymity possible if management via a manager or managers in lieu of by the members (E) INV (LLC) USRPI Advantages: Pass-through income tax rate and 1 tax Possibility for favorable 15% long-term capital gains rate If limited partnership and a limited partner, limited legal liability No BPT or BLIT considerations Arguably, no U.S. gift tax, but not clear, and maybe same if a foreign partnership (F) INV (NRA) USP or FP USRPI Disadvantages: Trade or business status, or permanent establishment of partnership causes such status at NRA partner level No real anonymity No limited legal liability if a general partner unless provided by a specific state law Difficult to avoid U.S. estate tax, if at all §1446 withholding on ECTI of any foreign partner (with no adjustment for NOL carryovers) Possibly U.S. gift tax (G) INV (NRA) UST or FT USRPI Advantages: Pass-through income tax rate and 1 tax Possibility for favorable 15% long-term capital gains rate No BPT/BLIT considerations Arguably, no U.S. gift tax, but not clear a real risk If a FT, can pay out U.S. taxfree foreign source interest on U.S. business related debt and obtain deduction where such business assets secure such debt or where debt is “booked” to a U.S. trade or business subject to a percentage limitation. Disadvantages: Trade or business status or permanent establishment of trust causes such status at NRA beneficiary level No real anonymity No limited liability If irrevocable and no tainted rights, powers, benefits, interests etc. are retained, can likely avoid U.S. estate tax (otherwise U.S. estate tax and possibly gift tax) Undistributed ECTI may be subject to 35% tax rate at a relatively low level of taxable income Joseph R. Schortz, CPA (FL & NJ) Office Location: 201 West Marion Avenue, Suite 1204 Sunloft Center Punta Gorda, Florida 33950 Email: [email protected]