The Glen to Glen Trail Feasibility Study

Transcription

Prepared for:
Stroud Region Open Space and
Recreation Commission
Monroe County,
Pennsylvania
November, 2013
This study is funded in part by a grant from the
Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
Bureau of Recreation and Conservation
and the Monroe County Open Space Program
through its Financial Assistance Program II
Prepared by:
1. Introduction
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 — Executive Summary & Introduction
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
Purpose
Study Area
Planning Process
Public Participation
Findings
Recommendations for Action
Implementation Strategies
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Chapter 2 — Inventory / Analysis
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
Previous Related Studies
Physiographic Analysis
Political Features
Demographics
Field Reconnaissance
Mapping
Description of Trail Segments
Estimates of Probable Costs for Trail Development
3
4
5
7
7
8
9
18
Chapter 3— Feasibility of Alternatives
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
Physical Feasibility
Usage Feasibility
Legal Feasibility
Financial Feasibility
21
26
27
28
Chapter 4— Recommendations for Action
4.1
4.2
4.3
Phased Implementation Actions
Action Schedule
Funding Strategies
33
34
34
Chapter 5 — Public Participation
5.1
5.2
5.3
Study Committee Meetings
Public Meetings
Key Person Interviews
Appendices
39
40
40
45
1. Introduction
ii
1. Introduction
Executive Summary
Purpose
The Glen to Glen Trail Feasibility Study was initiated by the
Stroud Region Open Space and Recreation Commission
(SROSRC) to determine whether a “through” trail alignment is
feasible between the Glenbrook Country Club in Stroud
Township and Glen Park in the Borough of Stroudsburg.
Study Area
The study corridor follows the general east-west alignment of
Godfrey Ridge, a prominent geological feature, and McMichael
Creek that meanders through the valley at the northern foot of
Godfrey Ridge. The topography of this corridor will require a
significant elevation change for any alternative route.
Planning Process
The Glen to Glen Trail study was prepared by consultant
Simone Collins Landscape Architecture to assess multiple
aspects of “trail feasibility” including: physical suitability;
regional context; legal issues; potential usage; operation/
maintenance/security considerations; potential partners; and
costs/funding options.
The public involvement process included four (4) study
committee meetings; two (2) public meetings; and eight (8)
“key person” interviews.
Findings
The study resulted in a determination that a single type of
“through-trail” facility was not possible, and that any through
trail system within this corridor will be comprised of different
types of pedestrian/biking facilities — provided that several
conditions can be achieved by SROSRC and partners, including
easement acquisitions. This project will require multiple phases
to complete, due to multiple easement acquisition needs.
Recommendations for Action (details in Section 4)
• Negotiate missing rights-of-ways with private owners
• Develop “trail” segments as funding is secured
• Develop a master plan for Godfrey Ridge parcels
• Plan for trail system maintenance
Implementation Strategies
• Adoption of the Glen to Glen strategy as an element of the
SROSRC Greenway Plan, and municipal comprehensive
plans
• Partner with DCNR, NEPA Alliance , PennDOT and
municipalities.
• Apply for funding through DCNR and Monroe County.
1
2. Inventory and Analysis
2
Inventory & Analysis
This section is intended to supplement but not repeat data
collected and presented in previous related studies.
2.1 Previous Related Studies
Previous recreation and trails plans that are related to the Glen
to Glen study area include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Monroe County Comprehensive Plan, 1999
Brodhead Greenway Feasibility Study, 2000 (Section of
Godfrey Ridge Greenway)
Pennsylvania Greenways: An Action Plan for Creating
Connections, 2001
Stroud Region Multi-Municipal Open Space and
Recreation Plan, 2002
Brodhead Watershed Conservation Plan (Adopted 2002)
The Brodhead, McMichael and Pocono Creeks
Greenway Study, 2002
Pocono Creek Pilot Study - Goal-Based Watershed
Management, 2000-2004
Stroud Region Levee Loop Trail Master Plan, 2005
Terra Greens and Glen Brook Regional Parks Master Site
Plan, 2008
Stroud Area Trail Bridge Location Feasibility Analysis,
2012
Pennsylvania Outdoor Recreation, 2009-2013
A cursory search of historic documents at the Monroe
County Historical Society was initiated during a key person
interview. Several documents were identified that can
contribute to an eventual interpretive/signage system for a
Stroud area greenway system.
•
•
•
•
Historic Trolley Trails, Delaware Water Gap, Appalachian
Trail, and The Dummy (that was a separate steampropelled engine that pulled the old horse-drawn cars
before the self-propelled Trolley between 1892-1902
The Mountain View Trolley (1905-1928) route map
Toot Toot Here They Come – The Mountain View Trolley
(1905-1928) – history booklet
Article “…Rails Abandoned in 1227….
3
2.2 Physiographic Analysis
2.2.1 Geology and Soils
The soils in the study corridor are described by four basic types. At the higher
elevations and along the ridge a well-drained Benson-Rock outcrop complex is
found. Lower down the slopes along terraces and floodplains a moderately well
drained silt loam is present. These silt loams also exist under the urban fabric of
Stroudsburg as well as under Glenbrook municipal golf course to the west. Between
these two areas, along lower terraces and floodplains are areas defined by
excessively drained gravely loam.
Disturbed soils are present along the southern border of Brodhead Creek including at
Glen Park where significant cut and fill has taken place. A small percentage of the
study corridor consists of areas of poorly drained soil that intersect with potential
trail alignments in approximately four minor locations.
2.2.2 Steep Slopes (Greater than 15%)
Proposed trail segments 14-15, 23-24, and 37-38 exceed slopes of 10-15%. Segments
9-10 and 26-29 traverse terrain that exceed 20% slopes. In general, switchback
alignments will need to be created and maintained for trail segments where slopes
are greater then 15%.
2.2.3 Streams, Waterways & Wetlands
The study corridor follows a general east-west alignment that parallels the prominent
geological feature called Godfrey Ridge and the McMichael Creek that meanders
through the valley at the northern foot of Godfrey Ridge.
Most trail alignments alternatives do not encroach on sensitive wetland/riparian
areas, except for one spur alignment (4-7) that is identified as a priority trail
improvement and can be created as an ADA-accessible route between the Glenbrook
trailhead and the forested banks of the McMichael.
2.2.4 Ecosystem Analysis
Monroe County receives an average of 38 inches of rainfall annually and is within
Plant Hardiness Zone 6a. The annual extreme minimum temperature reaches 0 to -5
degrees Fahrenheit. The EPA identifies the Kittatinny Ridge (of which Godfrey Ridge
is a spur) as part of the Northern Glaciated Limestone Ridges, Valleys, and Terraces
within the eastern temperate forests of the United States.
At present, the area along Godfrey Ridge remains generally undeveloped and still
functions as an important wildlife corridor, including black bear habitat. Prior to 2008,
economic pressures threatened several large parcels on Godfrey Ridge with
development of single family housing sites. Since that time, the construction sector
has languished and a new residential road that was planned and actually rough4
graded across Godfrey Ridge has begun to re-vegetate.
Conservation of the Godfrey Ridge top environment requires preservation and/or
stringent “conservation by design” development practices to remain ecologically
viable for wildlife. For the purposes of this study, “conservation development” means
employing best management practices to developing open space for mixed uses.
These techniques may include: cluster development, increasing unit density to
maximize conserved lands, common infrastructure (driveways) etc.
Godfrey Ridge, in general—from Stroudsmoor Road to the Delaware Water Gap—
requires its own conservation-based master plan. The master plan should be
conducted from a conservation development perspective that identifies options to
create a major conservation development strategy that addresses sustainable mixed
uses and public access for this major ecological system. Trails are likely compatible
activities along the ridge top environment to share the ecosystem with viable wildlife
habitat. Additional new construction along the ridge should be re-visioned by
Stroud Township and its conservation partners.
2.3 Political Features
2.3.1 Municipalities
The study area traverses two municipalities – Stroud Township to the west and
Stroudsburg Borough to the east.
2.3.2 Land Uses
Both termini within study corridor are publicly owned. Glenbrook is owned and
operated by Stroud Township as a municipal golf course. Glen Park is owned by the
Borough of Stroudsburg and operated by SROSRC as a regional park.
The parking area for the driving range at Glenbrook municipal golf course is currently
used as a popular “trailhead” access location to this corridor for local hiking, dog
walking and mountain biking along the north side of Godfrey Ridge. The historic
railroad grade that was graded into the side of the ridge is used as a “cultural trail” by
the general public to access and for fishing and bird-watching locations along
McMichael Creek.
Glen Park In Stroudsburg Borough is developed with a parking area, a baseball field
and public access to the Brodhead Creek. The public parking is also used by
mountain bikers who access the publically-owned property known as the “Maze” - a
dry valley with dramatic topography and rock outcrops that serve as natural “vert”
obstacles for enthusiasts.
Glen Park can serve as a future trailhead for a hiking, mountain-biking network that
currently climbs westward up the ridge in a series of informal trails, as well as a major
access point for the former railroad grade that extends eastward from the site toward
an eventual linkage with the Borough of Delaware Water Gap.
5
Residential areas surround both public recreations sites.
2.3.3 Zoning
According to Monroe County data, the study corridor within Stroud Township is
zoned almost entirely residential, with commercial and recreation nearby. This
includes lands owned by Labar Village Community Association, VFG Labar Village LLC
and First National Community Bank. The study corridor within Stroudsburg Borough
is almost entirely residential with a mix of commercial and conservation zones.
According to Monroe County data, the study corridor within Stroud Township is
zoned almost entirely residential, with industrial, commercial, recreation and
conservation zones nearby. This includes lands owned by Labar Village Community
Association, VFG Labar Village LLC and First National Community Bank. The study
corridor within Stroudsburg Borough is a mix of industrial, special use, residential
and commercial zones.
6
Note: full scale map
in Appendix.
2.3.4 Highways
The study corridor is intercepted by two state highways, Route 611 (aka Foxtown Hill
Road) and Route 191 (aka Godfrey Ridge Road.) Glen Brook and Glen Park are both
accessible by municipal roads. Storm Street (off of Collins Street) is the access to Glen
Park. Glenbrook Road is the roadway access to the driving range / trailhead parking
area.
2.3.5 Utility Analysis
The study corridor intersects with overhead utility corridor at three locations
between Points 21 and 26. Others utilities such as electric, gas and sewer are present
where the trail traverses roads and sidewalks. There are no apparent physical
conflicts with existing utilities along any section of the Glen to Glen study
alignments. “Cultural” trails are well worn along or across the existing utility
corridors, indicating that the trails have been well used by the public without official
sanction.
2.4 Demographics
2.4.1 Population within walking distances from both Glens
Local census data indicates that approximately 3,400 persons live within a typical
walking distance of ½ mile from both Glenbrook and Glen Parks. These existing
residents are the immediate client base for a Glen to Glen Trail system.
Less quantifiable, but guaranteed visitors to the Glen to Glen Trail system will be the
hiking and outdoor clubs who have long supported developing this trail as a public
resource.
The Glen to Glen Trail system may become a “spur” attraction for out-of-region
visitors—if future linkages are eventually created to the existing Appalachian Trail
and the Minisink Trail near Delaware Water Gap. A potential future connection is also
possible through Stroudsburg to Lackawanna County—if the existing WB&E RR
corridor is developed as a rail to trail through Monroe.
2.5 Field Reconnaissance
Site reconnaissance was performed on 5/23/12 and 6/19/12 with members of the
study committee and Monroe County Planning Department. General conditions
were observed and specific locations were recorded using GPS technology. The
captured data was added to the existing Monroe County GIS database and used as
the base mapping for this project.
7
2.6 Mapping
Mapping for this study was developed using base information from Monroe County
Planning Commission, aerial photos, USGS surveys, and US Census sources to create
displays that identify alignment alternatives; property boundaries; locations where
issues must be resolved; destinations; and potential local user populations.
2.6.1 Mapping System / Methodology
The mapping used for the Glen to Glen trail study is referred to as a “point and
segment” system. Each location of significance is assigned a “point” number.
Various “segments” between two points are described by the two point numbers
(eg: Segment 3-4.) Because trail “spur” alignments and trail “loops” were assessed,
segment names are not necessarily described by consecutive point numbers (eg:
Segment 21-24).
The final GIS-based database was used to calculate quantities for various potential
trail improvements. A database linked to the GIS mapping enables the calculating
capability of the software. The GIS program calculates the length of the segments
and allows unit cost values to be assigned by specific improvement “type” to enable
the database to calculate costs of trail development—by individual segment or by
entire trail sections.
8
Note: full scale map
in Appendix.
This GIS mapping—data base system is updateable to enable alignments to be
modified and unit costs to be changed over time. These functions enable users to
analyze alternative development scenarios to find the optimum deployment of
available funding.
Three primary maps were created for the project:
• Preferred Trail Routes
• Alignment Alternatives
• Census Block Population Map
2.7 Description of Trail Segments
2.7.1 General
This section includes general descriptions of the alternative trail points and
segments. “Cultural” trails are considered those existing trails that have been
historically used by the general public despite segments that may cross private
properties. Segment lengths, suggested specifications, and estimated costs are
included in the Cost Matrix (this section.)
Point 1 Glenbrook driving range parking area
Approximately 16 parking spaces exist at this
location.
1-2
2-3
Segment 1-2 Parking area to base of ridge
A nondescript, relatively flat, drive that extends
south across a public field from the Glenbrook
Driving range parking lot to where the historic
floodplain meets the base of the Godfrey Ridge.
The gradient of this segment is generally ADAcomplaint. The existing surface is gravel,
approximately 6 feet wide. The final southern
stretch of this segment is through successional
forest before reaching the base of the ridge. The
trail program for this segment will be determined
during final design whether the trail surface
should be designed to serve maintenance and
emergency vehicles and/or whether the parking
area needs to be expanded in the future.
Segment 2-3 Switchback access from field to
former railroad grade
This segment is depicted as a “switchback” trail
segment that will traverse the grade change from
the historic floodplain “field” level to the higher
“bench” that was originally created as a railroad
alignment in the side of the ridge. This segment
will need to be graded to be ADA-compliant and
9
should probably be wide enough to allow access by a pickup truck and rubber wheel
construction machines. EMS vehicle access to the grade trail at this location should
be analyzed during the design phase when topographic survey is available.
Segment 3-4 Railroad grade to McMichael
creekside trail spur
This segment runs entirely along the former
railroad grade from the access switchback to the
point where a cultural trail forks down from the
grade toward the McMichael Creek. There are
several locations along the stretch of remaining
railroad grade where hillside drainage collects
and has eroded the trail surface across the
grade. The original practice for railroad
construction included uphill swales to collect
water and periodic culverts under the grade to
release the water down the slope. Larger
culverts were also created to serve existing
hillside drainage ways. These types of structures were not visible. The general
consensus of the project committee was to generally take a minimal approach to
trail development along the entire corridor alignment. Using this approach the
initial development of Segments 3-4, 4-7,and 7-8 could be as simple dredging
sections of swale as collectors and installing periodic corrugated pipe culverts under
the trail with riprap dissipaters downhill in several key locations. If not immediately,
the drainage issues along the railroad grade sections of the trail will need to be
addressed sooner than later as a civil engineering necessity to prevent larger scale
erosion in the future. The committee consensus was to live with the existing trail
surface in this area as long as possible before a future volume of use increases to the
point where surface improvement decisions need to be made. Compacted stone
dust is a logical surface upgrade for the railroad grade segments—provided the
drainage issues are solved.
10
Segment 4-5 Railroad grade trail to
McMichael Creek access at Point 4
This segment begins at the elevation of the
former railroad grade and forks down to the
north toward the McMichael Creek. The slope
of a trail from the RR grade down to the flood
plain elevation will need to be graded as a new
sloped “bench” into the existing slope to
formalize it as an ADA-accessible route. A
topographic survey of the area (at minimum
between Point 2 and 3, and from point 4 to
floodplain) will be needed to ensure that the
new trail “ramp” gradients comply with ADA
standards. The committee envisions this
segment of trail to be minimal width (suggested 6-feet wide for the grade change to
allow for a machine to construct it.) Drainage design will need to be included for
this trail grade. The trail within the flood plain can be informal alignment and be
routed around natural features. ADA standards should apply for “passing areas”
periodically along the trail. Otherwise, the trail width can be a woodland footpath as
narrow as 3-4 feet wide. The intent of this path is to provide ADA access to the edge
3-4
4
of the McMichael Creek in at least two significant locations (points 5 and 6) for
fishing and nature observation. The trail surface for Points 4 to 7 can be stone dust
to create an ADA-accessible surface, but these segments of the trail will always be
subject to flooding and high water erosion of the stone fine material. Trail stewards
should plan on restoring these segments of washed out trail periodically. If the trail
section from Point 4 to the floodplain is not created to accommodate a rubber
wheel loader, then these lowland sections will always need to maintained by hand.
Segment 5-6 Floodplain trail
This segment is similar to segment 4-5, except it is closer to the creek. The trail is on
the lee side of the bend, but it appears that during high water the entire bend is
under water. Trail issues for this segment are the
same as segment 4-5. Point 6 was considered a
highly attractive scenic and fishing location. Point
6 may be a cul-de-sac location, depending on the
final stewardship decisions about segment 6-7.
Segments 1 to 6 are located on publicly-owned
land.
6-7
4-7
7-8
Segment 6-7 Floodplain to RR grade
This segment may not need or perhaps should
not be constructed due to the slope that needs to
be traversed to change grade between floodplain
and former RR grade. Hikers and ambulatory
anglers will be able to bushwack this slope, but
the grading required to create an new ADAaccessible trail facility here is not recommended
as a priority. The steep slope should be
monitored for rouge trails and erosion. The
chances that this happening are probably not
high, since most anglers and handicapped users
will embark on the trail from Point 1 and will not
need to traverse a segment between Points 6 and
7.
Segment 4-7 Railroad Grade
This segment is a continuation of the former RR
grade. Improvements will be needed similar to
segment 4-4. The southern portion of this
segment is located on publicly-owned land. The
northern portion appears to enter into privatelyowned land and if confirmed will require an
easement agreement to formalize what is now a
“cultural use” of this segment of the “trail” by the
public.
Segment 7-8 Railroad Grade
This segment traverses another stretch of the
former RR grade where the gradient increases
upward toward the northeast to a point where
the former grade is lost (perhaps never
11
completed ?) at Point 8. This entire segment is located on private property (Two
parcels) and will require easement agreement(s). Point 8 is considered a general
location to make a spur trail connection to the Labar Village residential community, if
residents wish to access the trail in the future. Point 8 is also the last point that
should be considered capable of being developed as ADA-accessible from Point 1.
Segment 8-9 Overland Grade
At Point 8, the character of the trail alignment
changes from the graded “bench” of the former RR
grade to a narrow, winding hiking path. This
segment winds through a wooded area on a series
of cultural paths across the Godfrey Ridge northern
slope as it grades upward to the east. This entire
segment is located on private property and will
require easement agreement(s).
Segment 9-10 Steep Slope
This segment of trail is not well-defined where a
prong of the Godfrey Ridge extends to the west
and a steep slope must be traversed to reach the
elevation of Stroudsmoor Road. This area suffered a severe “blowdown” prior to the
site reconnaissance and alternative trail alignments to climb to Stroudsmoor Road
are likely to be possible with selective clearing of downed trees. This segment is
entirely on private property and will require an easement agreement. The ultimate
alignment design of this segment should attempt to
create an alignment with the least gradient possible
within the narrow corner of the property boundary.
This strategy may include using switchbacks.
Segment 10-11 Connection to Stroudsmoor
Road.
This segment is located on private property with a
“flag lot” boundary neck that directly abuts
Stroudsmoor Road. This neck is generally along a
ridge or saddle of topography and enables the
possibility to create a vehicular access entry from
Stroudsmoor Road. This option needs to be studied
carefully during the easement agreement process
and final design—to retain all possible options by
the trail steward.
Segment 11-12 Stroudsmoor Road
This segment changes character from a woodland
hiking trail (Segments 8 through 11) to a “share the
road” type of pedestrian route. This segment may
be one of the most technically complex for the trail
steward to negotiate a safe route. The 2-lane road
is very narrow without and slopes down on either
side. Local residents walk Stroudsmoor Road
regularly, and are familiar with the conditions. If
the route between Glen to Glen is to be formalized
for use by non-residents, there will need to be clear
12
8-9
10-11
11
signage at Points 1, 11 and 13, with maps and descriptions of the conditions to be
encountered by the general public.
Segment 12-13 Mountain Road Crossing
This segment is a short, on-road section of the “trail
route” that needs to be designed along Route 191
to crossing the state highway. The intersection of
Stroudsmoor Road with Route 191 (Point 12) is at
the summit of the Godfrey Ridge and the highway
curves horizontally through this intersection as it
runs downhill in both directions. The challenges to
creating a safe “trail” crossing in this location are
significant. An existing driveway on the east side
of Route 191 approximately 200 feet south of
Stroudsmoor Road is the only existing access for
13
automobiles or a future trail into a large privatelyowned property that covers 2.3 acres across
Godfrey Ridge. This segment (and other potential highway segments will require a
traffic engineering analysis to determine how trail facilities and highway crossings
can be designed to meet PennDOT standards. Issues include: horizontal and vertical
curves in the roadway that reduce sight distances, as well as issues caused by slowing
traffic on uphill grades from both directions. The optimum geometry for this
highway crossing may be to create a new “cross roads” intersection where the
driveway access (to the southeast) is rerouted to directly opposite from Stroudsmoor
Road. This solution will require significant grading of the embankment on the
eastern side of Route 191, but if the property is to be acquired from the current bank
owner for future conservation development, these improvements may be considered
by Stroud Township as one of the development requirements. A center turning lane
may be required in both directions on Route 191. As a typical “TIP” (Transportation
Improvement Program) this intersection improvement may initially be considered as
a lower priority within the larger Monroe County transportation needs. However, if
the (FNCB-owned) Godfrey Ridge property is acquired as a “conservation
development” project that includes major open space preservation and trail
improvements, then the intersection project can be advanced as a “Transportation
Alternatives” priority project for Monroe County within the regional funding
negotiations at NEPA. In the interim, public access to the Godfrey Ridge “cultural
trails” (east of Route 191) require an easement to officially sanction public access to
and through these parcels. Decisions regarding interim crossing of Route 191
without understanding the conservation development potential and the terms of
public access to the Godfrey Ridge property are premature. Conservation partners
considering any type of acquisition for public access to this property should include
provisions for creating what will ultimately becomes an important “summit trail
crossing” of Route 191 at Stroudsmoor Road. Precedents for these types of crossing
exist throughout Pennsylvania, including Appalachian Trail, Laurel Highlands Trail,
etc. Trail crossings located downhill from the Godfrey Ridge summit in either
directions on Route 191 are not recommended, due to their mid-grade locations,
limited sight distances, and the need to use of a narrow highway shoulder for twodirectional ped/bike travel without a barrier separation from vehicular travel lanes.
Segment 13-14 Private Driveway (Potential New Segment 12-15)
This driveway is privately-owned and serves several single family homes that have
13
been built on the south side of the Godfrey Ridge. The unimproved gravel surface is
a narrow “two-lane” width. Current property owners actively restrict trespassers. An
embankment to the north and the highway curve to the south limit sight distance
where the driveway meets Route 191. The topography of the driveway is rolling and
it connects to a rough-graded, unimproved “road” at a “switchback” intersection (at
Point 14) with a steep gradient to the north. The maintenance of the existing
driveway is an issue for the homeowners who are “in-holders” within the larger
property currently owned by FNCB. If new conservation development were to
happen on the south side of this ridgetop property, the existing driveway would
require improvements, especially if were to share new “trail” traffic. One alternative is
to relocate a new driveway from Point 12 to Point 15 to allow a new drive/road—with
trail—to share a common crossing near the summit of Route 191 . This strategy
would require the new driveway /trail to be graded on a new alignment between
Point 12 and Point 15. In this scenario the old driveway entrance (Segment 13-14)
would be closed completely.
Segment 14-15 Steep Graded Roadway
This segment of graded road is steep and would be accessible to hikers and
mountain bikers. The surface of this trail segment could be gravel, provided drainage
improvements were made to limit the potential for erosion.
Segment 15-16 Existing Roadway “Cut”
This segment of “trail” was graded along the ridge
to serves a future residential development, and
cuts through bedrock topography. The alignment
is a residential scale street width, including roughgraded drainage swales on both sides. The
original reasons this alignment was cut through
bedrock does not make immediate sense for
typical subdivision purposes. Segments 15
through 17 are clearly preferred alignment for a
future trail through this Godfrey Ridge property.
Specific recommendations for how to develop
these segments of trail will depend heavily on
what other improvements are recommended and
negotiated to happen under any a future conservation development plan for the
property. Under some scenarios these segments might function as a road with trail.
A “master plan” for the larger Godfrey Ridge” is recommended for the between Route
191 and Route 611 in the Delaware Water Gap. This plan would propose specific trail
alignments in context with a comprehensive for future mixed uses.
Segment 16-17 Graded Road
This segment is similar to Segment 15-16, except that the area of “cut” is less and
places along the trail may be more suited to a trailhead area with parking that could
be accessed from Godfrey’s Gate Road. If the Godfrey Ridge property is negotiated
to become a conservation development property, there is a unique opportunity to
create a system of hiking trails that connect to and through trail “spine” created
between Points 15 and 17. This hiking trail system could access the glacial lake on
the south side of the ridge.
14
Segment 17-18 Graded Road
This segment is similar to Segment 16-17, and is graded as a typical residential
subdivision entry at the intersection with Godfrey’s Gate Road, including the “entry”
15-16
pylon/walls for the envisioned neighborhood. Segments 15-18 have the potential to
be created as a multi-use type of trail, as opposed to the types of “hiking” trail or “onroad” segments that are the only alternatives on either end of the Godfrey Ridge
property. The relatively flat gradient of this half-mile alignment could make this a
destination for families with small children and seniors to recreate on an “off-road”
trail, that might also provide access to adjacent nature hiking trails.
18
Segment 18-19 Godfrey’s Gate Road
This residential sub-development road currently
serves two homes near Route 191 intersection and
one home located at the end of the cul-de-sac. If
additional homes were to be built along this road
as part of a future conservation development plan,
a trail segment and/or sidewalks should be
included as a minimum improvement along the
north side of the road and specifically along this
segment. A trail crossing with signage should be
created at Point 18 to explain the change in trail
‘types” at this location.
Segment 19-20 Stormwater Detention Basin
Utility ROW
This alignment from the Godfrey’s Gate Road cul-de-sac skirts the northern rim of an
existing detention basin and then grades down and to the north within an existing
utility corridor/service road to Route 611. A master plan for Godfrey Ridge would
determine what easement(s) will be required for this segment. This segment could
be developed as a minor walkway, since the segments on either ends have road
crossings and do not warrant any higher trail development in this short segment.
Segment 20-21 On-road Route 611 shoulder
This segment would need to run for approximately
400 feet from where the utility easement intersects
with Route 611 (at Point 21) along a shoulder to
the intersection of Route 611 with Godfrey Ridge
Road. Neither southbound nor northbound
shoulder are acceptable to route a public walkway.
Keeping a walkway on the southbound (uphill)
shoulder would be the first choice for this route,
except the hillside is a massive rock outcrop that
would defy widening the shoulder to create a
crossing at Godfrey Ridge Road intersection. The
20-21
alternate scheme to create this segment would be
to create a Route 611 crossing near the intersection
at Point 21 and enlarge the northbound (downhill) shoulder in front of an existing
house to reach Godfrey Ridge Road. A crossing at Point 21 is where the horizontal
curve of Route 611 meets a short tangent segment that extends to Godfrey Ridge
Road. The sight distances to the north (downhill) are currently limited, but this could
be improved with clearing, grading, and signage.
Segment 22-23 Godfrey Ridge Road (Route 611 to Utility ROW)
15
Godfrey Ridge Road is not suitable to widen one or both shoulders for the short
distance needed to “route” segment between Route 611 and the overhead power
line right of way. The alternative is to have hikers and mountain bikers share the
cartway on Godfrey Ridge Road.
Segment 21-24 Alternate Route 611 to Power line link
This alternative segment would create a new of Route 611 at Point 21 and create a
new trail segment within the existing overhead power line that crosses Route 611 in
this location. Clearing, grading, trail surfacing, and a small trail bridge to cross the
existing drainage way would be needed to make this physical connection. An
easement agreement would need to be negotiated with the utility company and
possibly other property “owners.” This crossing location is not optimum because it
right on the tangent of the Route 611 curve, as opposed to the existing “T”
intersection on a short straightaway section of Route 611at Godfrey Ridge Road. A
new trail segment 21-24 needs to be analyzed to include civil engineering aspects of
the new trail Segment 21-24 in addition to the traffic and highway geometry analyses
to determine the required improvements.
Segment 23-24 Powerline ROW
This segment is a spur right of way that begins as Godfrey Ridge Road and meets the
larger same powerline right of way that crosses Route 611—just below its
intersection with Godfrey Ridge Road. This segment appears to be on the edge of
County-owned property, follows parallel to drainage course from Godfrey Ridge Road
down the hillside. A field survey should be performed for this segment to verify who
owns the actual access Road.
This segment is an overland access road along the overhead utility right of way. The
existing surface is earth and stone gravel and will probably never be improved
beyond the existing conditions. The segments of utility rights of way between Point
12 and Point 29 will not be ADA-accessible, and will require a an easement from the
utility to create an official public hiking trail along the right of way corridor.
Same as Segment 24-25. This location is where
two overhead power lines cross.
Same as Segment 24-25. Point 26 is where the
unimproved grade of a street named East
Claremont Avenue climbs the ridge and
terminates at the intersection with the overhead
power lines.
Same as Segment 24-25. This segment begins a
steep decent toward the Brodhead Creek. A lattice of rogue mountain bike trails
generally follow the utility corridor alignment down the hillside.
Segment 28-29 Utility corridor intersects former RR ROW
Same as Segment 24-25. This segment begins a steep decent toward the Brodhead
Creek. A lattice of rogue mountain bike trails generally follow the utility corridor
16
25-26
alignment down the hillside.
Segment 29-30 Former Railroad Grade
This segment parallels the edge of the Brodhead
Creek within public property and extends to the
edge of Glen Park at Point 30. The trail surface is
the eroded historic RR grade, but should be
considered more of a hiking trail than a potential
rail-trail type of facility. This bench continues to
the east and is expected by many to be an ultimate
hiking trail connection between Glenbrook Park
and Delaware Water Gap.
Segment 30-31 Glen Park / Future Brodhead
Trail Bridge
This segment runs on an unimproved road
alignment between the former railroad grade and where Storm Street enters Glen
Park. This road way enables hiking access to the ridge and fishing access
downstream to the Brodhead Creek. Point 31 is the general preferred location for an
important future pedestrian bridge over the Broadhead that will connect the densely
populated East Stroudsburg with Glen Park and the future extended Glen to Glen
Trail network. The pedestrian bridge needs its own feasibility study to physically
connect the park to and through the municipal sewer authority property. Elements of
that study should include: location, subsurface testing (geo-tech and soils.) historic
records (this was a former landfill area,) property ownership, structural and approach
alignment alternatives, utility issues, projected preconstruction and construction
costs, and funding alternatives. This project has the potential to gain support from
two municipalities, county, state, and regional businesses concerned with
community affairs, recreation, and health—such ESSA and Pocono Medical.
29-30
Segment 31-32 Storm Street—Glen Park entry
drive
Storm Street does not meet standards as a twodirectional park entry road. Two alignments (and
two culverts exist) along this alignment—which
might be utilized together to create two one-way
lanes in and out of the Park.
31
17
Collins Street and potential Borough street
segments (East of Broad Street)
Segment 32-33 Collins Street—Share the
Road
Segment 33-34 Huston Avenue—Share the
Road
Segment 34-35 Huston Avenue—Share the
Road
Segment 35-36 Clemont Avenue—Share the
Road
Segment 36-37 Broad Street—Sidewalk
Segment 36-39-40-41 Broad Street—Sidewalk
35-36
Neighborhood Streets (West of Broad Street)
Segment 34-39
Segment 39-42
Segment 42-43
Segment 43-44
Sidewalk
Bryant Street—Sidewalk
Bryant Street—Sidewalk
Park Avenue—Sidewalk
Park Avenue Bridge—
36-37
2.8 Concept-level Estimates of
Probable Costs for Trail
Development
Concept-level costs to develop all trail segments
are estimated to exceed $300,000. A matrix of
costs by segment is included in the study
appendix.
40-41
18
19
3. Feasibility of Alternatives
20
Feasibility of Alternatives
3.1 Physical Feasibility
3.1.1 General Description of the Study Corridor
The Glen to Glen corridor is collection of existing and potential
“trail” routes that generally parallel the Godfrey ridge from the
Glenbrook Country Club to Glen Park. There is no single trail
type feasible—such as a rail-trail or a continuous hiking trail.
Due to the existing property ownership; the topography;
waterways; the alignment of highways; and patterns of human
development, the Glen to Glen “Trail” will need to be created
as a system of interconnected trail segments of different
types—including potential on-road segments.
Due to the complexity of the physical conditions, a preferred
alignment will not likely be accomplished immediately—a
reality that will require creative management over time, such
as alternative connector routes or discrete segments being
developed that can be used without having an immediate
“through trail.”
3.1.2 Specific Issues to be Addressed
Former Railroad Grade near Stroudsmoor
A former railroad bench that was cut into the Godfrey Ridge
hillside still exists as a walkable trail grade from Glenbrook
Country Club—running along the northern property line of the
Stroudsmoor resort, before ending within other privatelyowned properties to the east.
This segment of railroad grade that lies within publicly-owned
properties is a segment that is feasible to be developed as a
discrete segment that can provide “independent utility.” This
segment of the corridor can be developed as a first phase with
the potential to create ADA-accessible improvements from
Glenbrook to popular access points along the McMichael
Creek.
The Labar Village Area
A feasible trail alignment was identified across private
properties that abut the southern boundaries of Labar Village.
21
Easements or acquisition will be required to develop this segment of trail from the
terminus of public property to the west to an intersection with Stroudsmoor Road. If
this section is negotiated and constructed, there is a potential to create a future trail
spur to link to Labar Village, if that is desired by the residents.
It is important to note that several parcels contain the name “Labar” in the legal title,
however the owners of several parcels are different. This ownership configuration ,
combined with the local topography and waterway makes it difficult to identify
another alternative route for this segment.
Labar Village
During the study, Labar Village Association representatives indicated that the
retirement community did not seek a local walkway connection from their properties
to a future Glen to Glen trail system. If this primary trail segment is created to the
south of Labar Village, a connection can always be established at a future date, if the
demographics and preferences of the Labar residents change.
The Labar Village Association did indicate a willingness to divest of a property
located across the McMichaels Creek from the residential units. This parcel may be
considered potentially valuable to Stroud Township as a means to create direct
access to the creek for residents on the opposite side.
Stroudsmoor Road and Crossing Route 191
Due to existing topography and the lack of existing shoulders along Stroudsmoor
Road, any walkway-trail along this segment of roadway will need to be a “share the
road” condition. Local residents currently walk this road, but formalizing a public
route along this segment will require clear signage at minimum to alert pedestrians
and drivers.
A new “trail” crossing at the intersection of Stroudsmoor Road and Route 191 will
require a formal traffic study to determine the best possible location and safety
features. Creating a safe and useable trail crossing at this location on Route 191
depends heavily on the future disposition and plans for the Godfrey Ridge property
located east of Route 191 (and currently owned by FNCB.)
Route 191 On-road Segment
This segment of state highway has a wide shoulder to the west side, where a public
walking route would be most feasible to connect Stroudsmoor Road with Route 611.
Development of this feature would also require a traffic study—which could
potentially be coupled with the traffic study needed to create a crossing at the
Stroudmoor-Route 191 intersection. The intersection of Routes 191 and 611 should
also be considered for crosswalk / safety upgrades that link to the Borough sidewalk
network on the north side.
22
Godfrey Ridge Property
A preferred ‘trail” route was identified through this large private property that utilizes
existing driveways, streets, and grades that were cut for streets that were never
developed. The preferred route through the entire property is physically feasible for
hikers and mountain bikers, and sections of this segment are potentially feasible for
development of off-road multi-use trails that are at grades that could be paved with
asphalt and serve families with small children and rollerbladers.
The preferred alignment also includes the need to cross the residential Godfrey Gate
Road—a low traffic volume cul-de-sac. This can be accomplished with signage and
painted crosswalks.
The greatest physical challenges to creating a trail through this property is creating a
safe trail access into it from both ends at Routes 191 and 611. The need for traffic
studies in these locations are described in this study.
Route 611 On-road Segment and Crossing
Crossing Route 611 is a necessity to create a “through-trail” eastward that reaches
Glen Park and future trail segments to Delaware Water Gap. A trail crossing appears
to be feasible at mid-grade up Route 611 that can connect a future trail alignment via
utility rights of ways that run on both sides of the highway. A traffic study will be
required for this crossing and sight lines may need to be improved for traffic
southbound by grading back the hillside shoulder for a distance to be determined.
Utility Rights of Way
Easements will be required to officially sanction/improve public access within the
existing rights of way located east of Route 611 that can provide physical access to
Glen park from Godfrey Ridge above. The overhead utility corridors include
maintenance access drives that can serve as hiking and mountain biking trails.
Stroudsburg Borough Sidewalks
Collins Street and many of its local cross streets do not currently have sidewalks and
area residents who want to walk to Glen Park need to share the local roads with
motor vehicles on these low traffic volume streets. Most Borough streets west of
Broad Street on the south side of the McMichael Creek have sidewalks of varying
conditions. These sidewalks are important pedestrian routes that serve as collectors
to the Broad Street and Park Avenue Bridges.
Broad Street and Park Avenue Bridges
These bridges both have pedestrian facilities and serve as critical links between the
two halves of the Borough.
23
3.1.3 Potential Linkages
Potential connections to local parks include:
• Glen Park,
• Glen Brook Golf Club,
• Hickory Valley Park,
• Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area,
• Cherry Valley Wildlife Refuge,
• Kovarick Park Lands,
• Norton Farms
• Pocono Creek Greenway
Potential future connections to trails include:
Minisink Trail,
Levee Loop,
Historic Trolley Trails,
Appalachian Trail,
Delaware River Water Trail
•
•
•
•
•
Potential connections to districts/ neighborhoods include:
Historic Downtown Stroudsburg District,
East Stroudsburg Borough
South Stroudsburg Neighborhoods,
Labar Village,
GPU property,
Peeney property,
•
•
•
•
•
•
Potential access to streams and creeks:
Pedestrian access to Broadhead Creek,
access to McMichaels Creek for fishing,
Delaware National Scenic River
•
•
•
3.1.4 Future Trail Linkages
Important trail linkages are potentially possible to extend the Glen to Glen Trail
alignment upstream along the McMichael Creek, and to extend in both directions
along the Brodhead Creek as part of a larger regional trail network. These future
linkages are outside the scope of this study, but are identified to describe how a Glen
to Glen trail may fit within the context of the Monroe County as well as a regional
recreation trail network. If Monroe County and partners pursue a feasibility study for
a WB&E rail-trail, it should include a description of how that trail could connect to the
Glen to Glen Trail
Ultimately the Glen to Glen Trail can extend downstream along the Brodhead Creek
and Godfrey Ridge to the Delaware Water Gap, where linkages have been identified
in several previous plans that could enable connections for national recreation trail
users, including – hikers on the Appalachian Trail, and hikers and bikers on the
McDade Trail traversing the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area.
24
When these connections are ultimately formalized, they will enable and encourage
local Monroe County residents to travel greater distances on foot and by bike to
recreate without using motor vehicle transportation.
Other local populations that could be served by segments of the Glen to Glen trail in
the future may specifically include: the resident senior population at Labar Village
who can elect to create their own controlled-access trail link directly to an ADAaccessible trail segment—to create a 1-mile walk to Glenbrook Golf Course and
restaurant.
SROSRC has also identified a future trail bridge from Glen Park across the Brodhead
Creek to link to the Borough of East Stroudsburg as high-priority in this and previous
studies. This pedestrian bridge over the Brodhead is a priority to provide a direct
walkable route between Glen Park and East Stroudsburg for residents of both
Boroughs.
3.1.5 Development
This study corridor features dramatic geography, geology and cultural development
on most parcels where these constraints were not extreme enough to prevent some
type of past construction. These factors combine to present significant physical
challenges to establishing any new thru-trail route.
The Glen to Glen trail segment within the greater Godfrey Ridge corridor is suitable
for “recreation” development. A hiking and mountain biking route for the entire
length between the “Glen” parks is feasible to serve the physically able segment of
the population as a continuous through-trail, if specific easements are acquired.
Only small sections of the entire corridor are suitable to develop as a the type of
multi-use trail that typically serves as both a transportation and recreation route, at
gradients less than 5%. McMichael Creek presents recreational opportunities with
relatively minor physical challenges if a trail loop segment is created from Glenbrook
Country Club on the western end of the study area.
At least one specific segment – beginning at
Glenbrook, can be developed entirely on
existing public lands to create an ADAaccessible route to reach McMichaels Creek for
nature observation and fishing opportunities
with facilities that will serve all populations and
user types. This segment is a feasible, “early
implementation” opportunity to develop an
immediate trail improvement that will also
serve as a key section of an ultimate thru-trail
for hiking from Glen to Glen, as missing
easements are acquired.
Historic uses of the north side of Godfrey Ridge
McMichaels Creek
25
reveal remnants of two “rail” corridors and multiple forest roads and “cultural” paths
that run parallel to the creek and traverse back up to the ridge summit. Many are
simply footpaths that have been used for centuries and continue to be used
informally by local people with little overt abuse and minimal restrictions enforced
by owners across the private properties.
The remaining segments of the historic railroad and trolley grades can be seen in
areas “benched” into portions of the Godfrey Ridge mountainside and are capable of
providing sections of fairly level “rail-trail” type of service. Unfortunately, these
historic alignments which usually make superior trails are no longer physically
continuous through several segments of the Glen to Glen corridor.
3.2 Usage Feasibility
The “facility” type that is a feasible “common denominator” for the entire corridor is a
single-file hiking path. General consensus within the project committee was to
include mountain biking as an acceptable use on the corridor route. These two uses
will need to be carefully negotiated and described during design to prevent user
conflicts and the creation of rogue trails. The Glen To Glen segment of a larger
Godfrey Ridge Greenway/Trail system can be an important local recreation resource
for Monroe County citizens – especially those residents living within walking distance
of Glenbrook or Glen Park.
Given the location and general alignment proposed for a Glen to Glen Trail system,
the most frequent users will be residents of the three SROSRC municipalities: Stroud
Township, Stroudsburg Borough, and East Stroudsburg Borough. Both “Glen” parks
are accessible by motor vehicle and have formalized parking areas. Both parks are
accessible by foot from local neighborhoods, although the routes to the parks
currently require walkers to use the shoulders of local roads.
A fully-developed hiking / mountain biking trail system between the “Glen” parks will
be used primarily by Monroe County residents who can walk from their homes, or
those who will drive short distances to access the corridor from either park or from
several local access points along the route. The Glen to Glen trail is envisioned as a
primary local recreation asset for an active and energized community dedicated to
conservation of the natural environment and to providing healthy green
infrastructure available for public uses.
Estimates of potential users for a Glen to Glen Trail corridor—given the existing
access locations is estimated to be approximately 3,400 people, assuming a
pedestrian bridge connection is built across Broadhead Creek.
Ultimately, as larger regional connections are created, there may be visitors who
discover a Glen to Glen trail corridor as a spur to the larger national trails to the
south. A significant population is not anticipated who seek the Glen to Glen segment
as a regular destination – given its relatively short distance and proposed trail
restrictions.
26
As the Glen to Glen project enters the next phases of planning, design and
development, negotiations between partners will need to be formalized regarding
permitted uses and responsibilities. For instance, a reasonable mixed-use strategy is
to open the new trail system to allow mountain biking along the designated trail
alignment, but restrict the use of off-track mountain bike “obstacles” between Glen
to Glen. This compromise allows mountain bikers to use the trail for travel
experiences and to reach other local “obstacle” locations for more extreme mountain
biking experiences.
Usership could increase greatly for the Godfrey Ridge section (currently owned by
FNCB) if the proposed master plan for the property recommends other recreation
uses for the property in addition to the through trail segment, and if other
compatible mixed are developed on the site.
3.3 Legal Feasibility
To complete entire preferred “through trail,” formal easements will be required from:
•
•
•
•
Stroudsmoor
VFG Labar Village LLC
FNCB
PP&L
Easements terms should allow provisions to cross, improve and maintain “trail”
alignments and associated improvements (such as stormwater facilities) on private
properties.
Approximately ten privately-owned parcels by four separate owners have been
identified where the preferred alternative trail alignment will need legal easements.
These details will be finalized in later phases of the project, but contacts have been
initiated as “key person” interviews with most of the potentially-affected property
owners, as part of this feasibility study.
Easements will not be executed during the feasibility phase, but will require a
committed effort by SROSRC and its partners to secure the necessary agreements
one by one to ultimately develop the through-trail incrementally. None of the legal
issues appear to be insurmountable, and all are similar to issues solved by trail
advocacy partners across the nation.
To complete the on-road improvements within the state highway rights of way, the
project will require one or more Highway Occupancy Permits (HOP) from PennDOT
District 5. Locations identified include:
•
•
•
•
Route 191—shoulder walkway from Stroudsmoor Road to Route 611
Route 611—crossing at Route 191 intersection
Route 191—crossing at Stroudsmoor Road
Route 611—crossing north of Godfrey Ridge Road
Liability will likely become the responsibility of SROSRC, to be handled in the same
way as SROSRC administers all its other recreation facilities.
27
3.4 Financial Feasibility
3.4.1 Acquisition / Easement Costs
Acquisition and easement costs can vary greatly—depending upon the terms of the
agreement and the timing of the market. The variables to consider for acquiring one
or more easements or parcels needed to construct the Glen to Glen Trail, make the
strategy highly conceptual at the feasibility stage. A general strategy is proposed as
one way to approach acquisitions, in general priority order:
1. Godfrey Ridge property
• Decide which partner will lead negotiations and which assume ultimate control
• Negotiate a right of first refusal to purchase the property fee simple or
easments
• Consider partnership with FNCB to conduct a conservation master plan for the
site
2. Parcels west of Stroudsmoor Road
• Decide which partner will lead negotiations and which assume ultimate control
• Have the property boundaries surveyed in the field
• Begin negotiation with owners, including Stroudsmoor, if needed
• Consider government intervention if current owners cannot solve legal
disputes
3. Utility Easement
• Begin negotiations with PP&L to formalize public use and maintenance of ROW
access drives as soon as practical
Budget estimates for acquisition should be help as proprietary. Municipal and
SROSRC conservancy partners with such expertise should be included in the
acquisition/easement negotiation process.
3.4.2 Trail Development
Feasibility-level estimates of probable costs for “trail” development were created in a
“menu” to enable SROSRC to use the cost projections as a planning tool to elect
various components as priorities that meet the user needs, funding agency priorities.
and available budgets.
The estimates of probable costs were prepared within an excel spreadsheet format
that corresponds to the GIS project mapping that can be used to calculate distances
and quantities. SROSRC can periodically update the development unit costs for
various materials to keep the cost estimate tool useful over the various future
development phases.
The Estimate of Probable Costs is included in the study appendix.
28
3.4.3 Operation / Maintenance / Security
Operations, Maintenance and Security (OMS) are responsibilities and annual costs of
the trail “owner” and/or its committed partners. SROSRC has assumed the role of
regional trail developer and responds to its three member municipalities to meet
public expectations for recreation services.
The costs of operating the Glen to Glen Trail as one part of the SROSRC trail system
will need to be included in the SROSRC annual budget with revenue coming from
sources other than specific trail users.
SROSRC can project future costs for anticipated trail segments as they come on line
by applying similar unit costs for other SROSRC facilities—such as grass cutting, trail
grooming or swale cleaning.
Even with the best maintenance, beloved trails can become the victims of their own
success – a result of the sheer volume of users. SROSRC will need to rely on partners
to help closely monitor trail conditions. With clear agreements at the start, SROSRC
can expect biking and hiking club partners to help educate and “police” their own as
vital partners in protecting the hometown trail resource. Other communities have
demonstrated similar successes where the projects have engaged all parties from the
start – like SROSRC has begun with Glen to Glen.
The trail segments to create ADA-accessible routes to the water’s edge of the
McMichael Creek for fishing and nature observation will need to be designed and
constructed with occasional flooding as a reality. Budget projections will need to
acknowledge this inevitable periodic contingency.
A future master plan for the Godfrey Ridge can identify physically vulnerable areas
along the preferred trail alignment where future repairs are likely to be needed.
Security and emergency services for a Glen to Glen Trail will need to be provided by
the Stroud Area Regional Police, and the Stroud Township, East Stroudsburg and
Stroudsburg Volunteer Fire Departments—like for other public recreation facilities. It
is important for SROSRC and its partners to engage these agencies in future planning
and design of the trail system, so that they understand the trail program scope and
details, as well as contribute valuable safety recommendations during the project
development.
3.4.4 Potential Revenue Generation
For SROSRC, a portion of its annual operations budget is covered by revenuegenerating activities – such as swimming pool user fees, concessions, and fee
programs.
Development of a viable user activity fee to operate and maintain a Glen to Glen Trail
is unlikely – considering the low impact trail development strategy and the open
public access that is anticipated. The Glen to Glen trail will not contribute income to
SROSRC.
29
3.45 Potential Partners
Between the two parks are multiple properties that are currently under public and
private ownership. To establish a “thru” trail that will connect the two parks, a
combination of acquisitions and/or easements will need to be created by SROSRC or
another cooperating trail partner.
SROSRC is uniquely developed among the regional recreation commissions of
Monroe County to continue to serve as project leader for the Glen To Glen trail
development. SROSRC member agencies can continue to contribute essential
support, especially in terms of local knowledge, assistance with easement acquisition
negotiations, and political support for funding initiatives. Associated conservancy
partners can assist with the negotiation and possibly the stewardship of acquired
properties and easements.
3.4.6 Funding Opportunities
SROSRC has a great reputation in Monroe County and in Pennsylvania as a multimunicipal regional recreation commission that has successfully partnered with
Monroe County and DCNR for funding to plan, design and build trails and parks.
DCNR funding appears likely to continue in future years. Monroe County
Commissioners will consider their options to hold a referendum for another
recreation and open space bond, now that the funds created by the first bond
program have been fully invested.
The federal Map21 Transportation Alternatives funds are eligible for use on elements
of the Glen to Glen Trail—if they are considered “transportation-related”
improvements.
A matrix of potential funding sources is included in the study Appendix.
30
31
4. Recommendations For Action
32
4 Recommendations
For Action
4.1 Phased Implementation Actions
Recommended actions are listed by five (5) categories and in
general priority orders. Implementation schedules for various
elements will depend on multiple factors.
Administration
• Adopt the Glen to Glen strategy as a component of the
SROSRC Greenway Plan.
• Seek adoption of the Glen to Glen strategy by Stroud
Township and Stroudsburg Borough.
• Maintain active contacts with Monroe County, DCNR,
NEPA, and PennDOT.
• Apply for project funding through DCNR, Monroe County
and PennDOT (NEPA).
• Seek private partner funding
Acquisition
• Negotiate preferred easements, rights-of-ways, and/or fee
simple purchases for alignments through private
properties and other agreements required for public
properties. Priorities include:
▪ Godfrey Ridge (FNCB)
▪ VGF Labar LLC (both parcels)
▪ Stroudsmoor (easement)
▪ Utility rights of way
▪ PennDOT Highway Occupancy
▪ Route 191
▪ Route 611
▪ The Glen (recreation/maintenance easement)
Planning
• Master Plan for Godfrey Ridge ( Route 191 to DWG)
• Feasibility Study for Brodhead Trail Bridge at Glen Park to
East Stroudsburg Borough (Reference previous completed
Brodhead Trail Bridge Study that funding was secured from
both DCNR and PennDOT)
Development
1. Glenbrook to McMichael Creek (Points 1 through 6)
2. Other segments first require easement negotiations
3. Brodhead Bridge
Maintenance
• Spine Trail
• Spur Trails
• Bridges
33
4.2 Action Schedule
This schedule generalizes an approach for SROSRC and partners for the five task
categories and the elements within each. Priorities are suggested, but not
prescribed, due to the flexibility needed to negotiate easements, partnerships, and
funding.
Action Schedule: See Appendix
4.3 Funding Strategies
4.3.1 Potential Funding Partners
This list includes applicable programs, listed by partners.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
34
Municipalities (SROSRC constituent organizations)
Monroe County
▪ Open Space Funds (if renewed)
▪ Hotel Tax (if negotiated)
PA DCNR
▪ Pennsylvania Community Recreation and Conservation Program
▪ Peer to Peer Program
▪ Conservation Landscape Initiative (Pocono Forest & Waters)
PA DCED Act 13 Marcellus Legacy Fund Program
▪ Greenways, Trails and Recreation
▪ Watershed Restoration Protection
PA DCED Monroe County LSA (Gaming funds)
PennDOT
▪ Agility program (road shoulder improvements)
▪ Transportation Alternatives Program
The Commonweath Financing Authority (Act 13 Marcellus Legacy Fund)
▪ Greenways
▪
•
•
Trails and Recreation
National Park Service (DEWA)
Powerline Impact Mitigation fees
Corporate / Non-profit / Foundation (banking, educational, medical, etc)
4.3.2 General Funding Targets
Different elements of the Glen to Glen “trail” plan will be more applicable to specific
funding program requirements than others. This section recommends a general
approach to securing funding for specific elements of the overall plan.
Planning—Planning projects for recreation and trails projects (like this study) are
typically funded in part by PA DCNR with a equal matching amount from non-DCNR
sources—such as counties, municipalities, and on-profits.
Examples of Glen to Glen planning projects that should be considered eligible for
DCNR funding include:
•
•
A Master Plan for Godfrey Ridge and
A Feasibility Study for the new trail bridge over the Brodhead Creek at Glen Park.
Design/Construction—PA DCNR typically funds recreation and trail
“development” (design-construction) projects in partnership with local partners.
DCNR funds discrete projects that can be designed and constructed in one phase.
DCNR usually limits project design / engineering fees to 15% of that specific project
total. DCNR funds have been used effectively for over two decades to match FHWA
“Enhancements” (now “Alternatives”) funding for trails and other eligible
“transportation” projects. In these cases DCNR funds can effectively leverage the
federal “TA” funding at least 5:1. DCNR funds are typically used to pay “preconstruction” costs and TA funds are used to pay for project construction, including
inspection.
Specific projects that are eligible for DCNR “development” funding include:
• Recreation—Trail development Glenbrook to McMichael Creek (Points 1-7)
• Recreation—Development of other trail segments when acquired
• Transportation—Match to FHWA funds for trail crossings (Rtes 191 and 611)
• Transportation—Match to FHWA for Brodhead trail bridge (at Glen Park)
Other partner programs that should be eligible to match either recreation or
transportation projects funded by DCNR include: local, county, DCED LSA, DCED
Marcellus Shale, and private sources.
35
Acquisition—DCNR funds partnership acquisitions of priority open space, trails and
recreation properties for public use. DCNR funds typically up to 50% of the
negotiated market value of properties. Priority acquisition projects (easements,
rights of way, and/or fee simple agreements) to enable a “through trail” system for
the Glen to Glen project include:
•
•
•
Godfrey Ridge property
VFG Labar LLC properties
Stroudsmoor (formal easement to sanction existing public uses)
Other partner programs that may be available to match DCNR acquisition funds include:
local, county, DCED LSA, DCED Marcellus Shale, NPS/DEWA powerline mitigation funds
and private sources.
Model Trail Easement Agreement and Commentary document prepared by Pennsylvania
Land Trust Association can be found at: http://conservationtools.org/libraries/1/files/745
Maintenance—Operations, maintenance and security costs are usually funded by
the owner and user partners. A dedicated, perpetual source of funding is the goal for
all trail stewards. In the case of Glen to Glen, if the trail system is considered a priority
asset by Monroe County, the hotel tax legislation is broad enough to interpret how
a percentage of that income being used to stream dedicated funding to trail
promotion activities and maintenance needs.
36
37
5. Public Participation
38
The public participation process for the Glen to Glen study
included four (4) study committee meetings; two (2) public
meetings, and eight () key person interviews.
5.1 Study Committee Meetings
Committee Meeting #1 – (5/23/12)
The type of and character of the trail was discussed, with the
committee initially leaning toward a a multi use trail type. An
ADA-accessible segment(s) of the trail was considered
important—especially regarding an SROSRC policy on the use
of powered wheelchairs and other power driven mobility
devices (OPDMDs), as per the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA.) Concern if the trail should be used for hunting, fishing
ATV use, equestrian and bicycling was expressed, as well as if
the local tennis group (SARTA) could develop the Glenbrook
Golf Course driving range area into a tennis court complex.
The project schedule and feasibility was discussed with a
power point presentation. Acquisition of easements was
considered a priority before the land surrounding the
proposed trail becomes developed. Property easements will
need to be determined based on the preferred alternative
alignments
Alignment alternatives were discussed as well as users. The
committee considered mountain biking as an acceptable use
for this corridor. Specific key person interviews were discussed
regarding trail support and acquisition issues.
A draft preferred alignment was presented for comment by the
committee. Committee comments were incorporated into the
final draft alignment and plan narrative.
39
5.2 Public Meetings
Public Meeting #1 – (6/19/12)
Significant support was received during the public meeting for allowing mountain
biking along the future Glen to Glen alignment. There was recognition that
mountain bike organizations are usually conservation advocates and actively
participate as trail maintenance partners.
Of greatest concern environmentally are public respect for the eco-systems and proactive maintenance of trail alignments, especially where they traverse steep slopes.
There was consensus for the need to control rogue trail cutting by hikers or bikers.
Educational signage, guidance, and monitoring by partner organizations are the first,
pre-emptive step recommended in this process. The need for major easement
acquisition was acknowledged.
Public Meeting #2 – (1/7/13)
The draft alignment was presented to the public for comment. There was a general
consensus in favor of the alignment and the strategy presented to move the project
forward, including support for a funding application to DCNR to develop an ADAaccessible trail loop from Glenbrook to the McMichael Creek—as a pilot
development project.
5.3 Key Person Interviews
Key person interviews were conducted by William Collins of Simone Collins with
eight people during the course of the study to seek input from a broad cross-section
of stakeholders and interested parties.
General issues discussed included:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
40
This is a feasibility level study to determine potentially suitable trail development
scenarios.
Various alignments are studied to determine if a preferred alignment can be
achieved.
Some of the potential alignments will be on public lands and some may require
private easements.
Users will sometimes vary greatly for different sections of trail – based on location
and type of trails
Safety and security are important factors to address for each specific trail
segment.
At present, it is envisioned that SROSRC will manage operation and maintenance
of any future trail.
A Glen to Glen Trail would likely be developed in segments over time.
The trail design will seek to serve a wide variety of user groups
William Kerrigan - FNC Bank land manager
Mr. Kerrigan currently manages the 200 Acre “Godfrey Ridge” property for FNC Bank,
where he is actively seeking to sell the property for development where three
residences have been constructed. Mr. Kerrigan indicated that FNCB was open to
discussing any reasonable partnership offers such as the concept where open space/
trail partners might be interested in acquiring a trail corridor with an expanded
conservation buffer – and leverage state and Monroe County Open Space program
funds to acquire preserved acreage within the FNCB parcel for conservation and a
trail.
Mr. Collins discussed that he would be talking about these ideas subsequently with
Stroud Supervisors Ed Cramer and Daryl Eppley, and with Andrew Forte, a
neighboring business owner on Godfrey Ridge. Mr. Kerrigan said that he was
speaking to a private party regarding interest in acquisition of at least a portion of
the property.
Labar Village - Private land owner
The private land owner Labar Village Association was contacted about an interview
with SROSRC. Mr. Collins wrote a capsule project description to help explain the
interview request. The request was declined according to a Labar Village reply that a
trail connection through the property was not in the member’s interest. The Labar
Village did offer to sell land that the association owns on the opposite side of the
McMichael Creek.
Gary S. Olson - ESSA Bank Trust President & CEO
Mr. Olson lives at the top of Godfrey Ridge, and identified his home location near the
intersection of Godfrey Ridge Road (Route 191) and Stroudsmoor Road. Mr. Collins
met with Mr. Olson to provide an overview of the project area, using a preliminary
GIS map prepared by SC to show the potential trail alignments that had already been
walked in the field, and the major property owners identified within the study
corridor.
Mr. Collins explained the concepts for acquiring an official trail alignment across the
FNCB property on Godfrey Ridge, both acknowledged the current real estate
marketability issues faced by FNCB. Mr. Olson said that the FNCB property is located
nearby to his home and he had walked it many times, including once with Andrew
Forte.
Mr. Olson then explained the history of ESSA Bank in support of SROSRC trail
planning and access initiatives. Mr. Olson was in general support for a public trail – if
it was feasible through this corridor, and asked to be kept informed.
Ed Cramer - Stroud Township Board of Supervisors (Monroe County OSAB Chair)
Daryl Eppley - Chairman of Monroe County OS Advisory Board
Mr. Collins met with Stroud Township supervisors Ed Cramer and Daryl Eppley to
provide an overview of the project area – using a preliminary GIS map prepared by
SC to show the potential trail alignments that had already been walked in the field
and identify major property owners who might be potentially affected within the
41
study corridor.
Mr. Collins recounted his interview with Mr. Kerrigan (representing FNCB) and Mr.
Cramer and Mr. Eppley both expressed concern that any of the former development
plans for the Godfrey Ridge site could be moved into construction in their current
forms.
It was generally acknowledged that a spine trail link through the FNCB property
would offer multiple assets to a local trail “network.” It was understood that FNCB is
open to reasonable proposals that include trail development with one or more
partners. Mr. Collins suggested that this parcel might attract PA DCNR funding on
the basis of its potential to become a trail that could complement economic
development opportunities—such as “conservation development” with compatible
mixed uses.
Note: In a subsequent conversation with Mr Kerrigan about the viability of the plans,
Mr. Kerrigan said that he would contact Mr. Cramer directly. Mr. Collins also spoke
about the Labar Village properties and the feasibility of finding a suitable alternative
around or through those parcels. Mr. Collins relayed the response from the Labar
Village Association of its interest in divesting of a parcel located across the McMichael
Creek from the main Labar Village campus. Mr. Cramer and Mr. Eppley
acknowledged the potential to acquire the creekside parcel for Township open space
and took the subject under advisement. Mr. Collins suggested the Township may
wish to request a meeting with Labar Village leadership to discuss these issues.
Carl Wilgus, E.D. -
Pocono Mountains Visitors Bureau (PMVB)
Mr. Collins met with Mr. Wilgus to inform him about the intent and status of study,
using the draft map that was developed to display alternative alignments and blocks
of property ownership in the study corridor.
Mr. Wilgus understood that the nature of this study corridor is very beautiful, but that
its location, length and multiple characters would serve primarily local residents and
would not be a major regional attraction for Pocono Mountains visitors.
Mr. Wilgus explained that the Monroe County Hotel tax is targeted for promotional
activities and cannot be used to develop the actual regional recreation facilities such
as trails.
Amy Leiser - Monroe County Historical Association
Ms. Leiser met with Mr. Collins to learn about the Glen to Glen study and to offer
assistance with historic research that might be relevant to the project. Mr. Collins
identified several potential alignment alternatives that included portions of the rights
of way for the former trolley service and railroad alignments in the Glen to Glen study
area. Ms. Leiser made available multiple documents to review briefly and offered to
assist SROSRC allies with their historic interpretation efforts in later phases.
Andrew Forte - Stroudsmoor Country Inn & Spa
Andrew Forte has served on the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Task Force; on
the MC Chamber of Commerce; and is a Director on the PMVB Board. Mr. Collins met
with Mr. Forte at Stroudsmoor to discuss the concept for the Glen to Glen Trail and to
42
inquire about concerns that Stroudsmoor might have about a trail sanctioned to
traverse a former railroad grade along the base of Godfrey Ridge – that would almost
certainly be located inside the Stroudsmoor property line.
Mr. Forte asked, in general, why are more trails being proposed – and if there were
not sufficient public trails in the region ? Mr. Collins explained about some of the
different characters that trails can take, and described diverse user groups that
different types of trails can serve. Mr. Collins suggested that a Glen to Glen “Trail”
would be a most likely become a system of mixed types of pedestrian / hiking routes
that would be both off and on roads – if it were possible to establish a “through
connection” between Glenbrook Country Club and Glen Park. This reality of multiple
walkway types, plus its alignment, public access locations and relatively short length
(2+ miles) would guarantee that a Glen to Glen trail “link” would serve primarily local
residents and would not widely attract visitors from outside the region.
Mr. Forte explained that some guests do use the internal trail network at Stroudmoor
and that this use would need to continue. Mr. Forte also mentioned the need to
establish legal easements, as well as clearly-delineated partnership responsibilities
for trail maintenance, security and signage, if Stroudsmoor were to enter into an
agreement with SROSRC to operate a public trail through Stroudsmoor property.
Mr. Forte concluded the interview by saying that he supported the trail concept in
principle and would continue to work with SROSRC to advance the plan.
43

The Glen to Glen Trail Feasibility Study

Transcription

Similar documents

5K Trail Blazer - Waasegiizhig Nanaandawe`Iyewigamig Health

Trail of Tears (Robert Lindneux in 1942)

Ribbon Cutting Ceremony - Great Rivers United Way

SSTF - TUHAYE.mxd - South Summit Trails Foundation

Rannel`s Kettle Run Nature Preserve

Slotomania Big Win - Bingo Card Game For Ipad

Photo Trail

Trail Map - Lakes Region Snowmobile Club

Halloween Town poster 2015

Pooh Trail Brochure - Barrington Conservation Commission