“Nothing for me, without me”
Transcription
“Nothing for me, without me”
Winning Conditions for Patient and Family Engagement Disclosure • I have no conflict of interest to declare With Me PERSON-CENTRED PERSPECTIVE ESTHER GREEN DIRECTOR, PERSON -CENTRED PERSPECTIVE PRESENTATION OBJECTIVES • • • Outline the importance of engaging individuals and family in health system and cancer control system planning Discuss promising practices to accelerate a person-centred cancer control system. Share lessons in shifting culture WHAT IS PERSON-CENTRED CARE? The individual needs to be at the centre of their care The provision of care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient/family preferences, needs and values I AM RESPECTED, I AM HEARD, I UNDERSTAND, I AM INVOLVED The core ideas in person-centred care are dignity, respect, communication, information sharing, collaboration, participation and shared-decision-making WHAT IS PERSON-CENTRED CARE? It means working with individuals rather than doing things to or for the person. In essence, person-centred care implies the sentiment, “Nothing about me, without me” and evokes the picture of seeing the situation through the eyes of the other person. Moving from a provider focus to a focus on the patient/person requires a shift in culture in health care. “I firmly believe understanding the lived experiences of patients and families are vital to creating a system that puts the patient first” Rhonel Biddy Patient and Family Advisor, Data Development Committee, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer PILLARS OF PERSON-CENTRED CARE Responsible, responsive and accountable services and institutions 2 Culture and communications 1 3 5 Leaders with clarity of vision Supportive health care environments 4 Resources available to enable person-centred approaches “I started my career as a nurse and I’ve witnessed the fundamental way personal experiences and perspectives can shape the conversation and influence the health system. I’m proud of the Partnership’s approach and commitment to embedding the person-centred perspective in all that we do and to ensuring patients are equal partners at the table – the CEOs of their own health care.” Chris Power Chair, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE SUCCESS OF BUILDING PERSON-CENTRED CAPACITY Involvement of individuals which includes patients, families, caregivers Leadership support for the initiative Strategic (shared) vision Care for the caregivers through a supportive healthcare environment Systematic measurement and feedback Quality of the healthcare environment Supportive technology TO EMBED THE PERSON-CENTRED PERSPECTIVE INTO ALL ASPECTS OF CARE MEANS: Improvement in the processes and outcomes of health care A requirement of attention at various levels: CLINICAL ENCOUNTER PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT/IMPLEMENTATION INSTITUTION/ SYSTEM-WIDE POLICY LEVEL Patient Engagement Frameworks 13 Engagement Framework 14 Continuum of engagement Involvement Partnership and shared leadership Levels of engagement Consultation Direct Care Patients receive information about a diagnosis Patients are asked about their preferences in treatment plan Treatment decisions are made based on patients’ preferences, medical evidence, and clinical judgement Organizational design and governance Organization surveys patients about their care experiences Hospital involves patients as advisers or advisory council members Patients co-lead hospital safety and quality improvement committees Policy making Public agency conducts focus groups with patients to ask opinions about health care issues Patients’ recommendations about research priorities are used by public agency to make funding decisions Patients have equal representation on agency committee that makes decisions about how to allocate resources to health programs Source: Kristin L.Carman, Pam Dardess, Maureen Maurer, Shoshanna Sofaer, Karen Adams, Christine Bechtel, and Jennifer Sweeney, “Patient and Family Engagement: A Framework for Understanding the Elements and Developing Interventions and Policies,”Health Affairs 32, no. 2 (2013): 223-31. National Framework for Consumer Involvement in Cancer Control Government of Prepare patients and families to partner with researchers in designing and conducting research studies Strategy for Patient-Oriented Reseach: Patient Engagement Framework Shifting Culture: Lessons 19 PATIENT AND FAMILY PREPARATION CARE AND SYSTEM REDESIGN MEASUREMENT AND RESEARCH CLINICIAN AND LEADERSHIP PREPARATION TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ORGANIZATIONAL PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP IN PUBLIC POLICY Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer ME, Workman T, Ganachari D, Pathak-Sen E. (2014). A Roadmap for Patient and Family Engagement in Healthcare Practice and Research PATIENT AND FAMILY ADVISORS ENGAGEMENT AT CPAC Embedding a person centered perspective across the cancer continuum. By using targeted approaches to improve Cancer Control, we engage Canadians through: o Advisory Groups o National Networks o Patient Panels o Reviewing and Contribute to Reports o Strategic planning o Research o Resources for Professionals for Improved Practices: www.cancerview.ca o System Reports o Partnering with Healthcare Professionals, Cancer Care Organizations and communities Survey Results over 44 Network/Committees/Projects with patient/family advisors Orientation ISSUES: FROM STAFF FROM ADVISORS • • • • • • • • • • Need for best practices Recruitment Engagement Culturally safe environment Demographic representation Accommodation Preparation Engagement Role clarity Feedback opportunity 22 GROUND RULES FOR DIALOGUE Express disagreement with ideas not personalities We are all equal. Leave rank at the door Share airtime Listen respectfully especially when you disagree. Acknowledge you have heard the others Stay on topic- connect to what others have said Look for common ground Understand & learn from each other Identify & test assumptions Adapted from The Change Foundation www.changefoundation.ca Lessons learned • Clarity of purpose and scope • Choose the best engagement format and timeframe to ensure meaningful input • Expect the unexpected… • Give participants the tools they need • Be prepared for lulls and how to navigate them • Recognition and reporting back • Build staff capacity • Identify dedicated champions Promising Practices 25 PERSON-CENTRED ENGAGEMENT IN THEIR CARE Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) move beyond basic symptom screening and empower patients to be active partners in their care • • • T0 accelerate PRO implementation across the country, short videos have been created to increase awareness and uptake of screening for distress With one geared towards the patients and the other towards clinicians, two-minute animated videos, presented in English and French, will promote the use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-R) by highlighting the benefits for both patients and clinicians There are currently eight provinces across Canada engaging in efforts to promote the use of the ESAS-R tool. Patient Reported Outcomes Videos: Empowering patients to be active partners in their care Symptom and Distress Screening Assessment, Intervention and Follow-up 27 Examples of Screening Tools: Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r) and Canadian Problem Checklist 28 Example of a patient summary report, reviewed by clinician, following the completion of the questionnaire…. 29 Organizational Partnership • Partnering with patients and families in the design of processes, policies, and facilities ensures that healthcare organizations and systems are structured to better reflect the patient and family perspective and needs, provide specific opportunities for patient and family engagement, ensure better outcomes, and provide better experiences for patients, families, and clinicians. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer ME, Workman T, Ganachari D, Pathak-Sen E. (2014). A Roadmap for Patient and Family Engagement in Healthcare Practice and Research. CANCER • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Examples of Success: CCO Public Participation in Cancer Screening Enhancing Communication through Synoptic Reporting Patients as Partners in Managing Treatment-Related Toxicity Symptom Management Summit Making Wait Times Information More Meaningful Patient Engagement in Funding Reform Over 3,000 Participants in Patient Education Survey Enhancing Person-Centred Systemic Treatment Patient and Family Advisors Help Co-Design Shared-Care Focal Tumour Ablation Report Released Measuring Patient Experience at the End of Life 8 Cancer Patient Symptom Management Guides Developed Ontario Cancer Plan IV Patients Co-Create Educational Materials to Support Shared Decision-Making Co-design is a way of improving healthcare services with patients Engage Change Plan Co-design elements Explore Decide Develop Waitemata District Health Board, NZ, 2010 Revised Accreditation Canada Cancer Care Standards • Revised and evaluated throughout 2015 – Partnership with CPAC – Close work with the CPQR to add content for radiotherapy – Focus on collaboration across cancer care and integrating services – Now 1 set of standards – Cancer Care • Released January 2016 on-site surveys starting January 2016 34 Standards Working Group • • • • 16 Representatives from across Canada Experts in cancer care and radiotherapy National bodies, clients, stakeholders Radiation oncologists, oncology nurses, medical physicists, etc. • Accreditation Canada surveyors • Patient representation 35 Standards Content – 10,000 Feet • Focus on the continuum of care • Building a service the meets the needs of clients • Bringing together a collaborative team that is prepared, supported, and engaged • Partnering with clients and families • Partnering with local, provincial, and national bodies • Safe systemic therapy – from the pharmacy to the home • Safe radiotherapy – from equipment acquisition to treatment • A focus on care and client outcomes in quality improvement 36 What gets in the way? • We need to hire more staff and we can’t afford it • This is really about being nice to people and we already do that • This doesn’t relate to me because patient engagement is someone else’s job • We are patient-centred already; our satisfaction scores are good…isn’t that enough? Fooks et al. 2015 Final words • Sir Robert Francis, Chair of a health service public inquiry in England said: Individual patients and their treatments are what really matters. Statistics, benchmarks and action plans are tools. They should not come before patients and their experiences. Francis, 2013 Discussion Questions: References • • • • • • • • • Carman, K., P. Dardess, M. Maurer, S. Sofaer, K. Adams and C. Bechtel. 2013. “A multidimensional framework for patient and family engagement in health and health care.” Health Affairs 32(2):223-31. Cancer Care Ontario. 2015. Building a Culture of Person-Centred Care in Ontario. https://www.cancercare.on.ca/pcs/person_centred_care/engagementreport/pccreport/ https://www.cancercare.on.ca/pcs/person_centred_care/engagementreport/pccreportwww.cancercare.o The Health Policy Partnership. 2014. “The state of play in person-centred care: A pragmatic review of how person-centred care is defined, applied and measured.” http://www.healthpolicypartnership.com/person-centred-care/ Kaitemata District Health Board. 2010. Health Service Co-Design. http://www.healthcodesign.org.nz/about.html. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2014. “Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research: Putting Patients First. Government of Canada. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer ME, Workman T, Ganachari D, Pathak-Sen E. A Roadmap for Patient and Family Engagement in Healthcare Practice andResearch. (Prepared by the American Institutes for Research under a grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Dominick Frosch, Project Officer and Fellow; Susan Baade, Program Officer.) Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation: Palo Alto, CA; September 2014. www.patientfamilyengagement.org. Cancer Australia and Cancer Voices Australia, 2011. National Framework for Consumer Involvement in Cancer Control. Cancer Australia, Canberra, ACT. Fooks, C., G. Obarski, L. Hale, and S. Hylmar. 2015. “The patient experience in Ontario in 2020: What is possible?”. Healthcare Papers 14(4): 8-18. Francis, R. 2013. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. www.midstaffordshirepublicinquiry.com. http://www.healthpolicypartnership.com/person-centred-care/ ttps://www.cancercare.on.ca/pcs/person_centred_care/engagementreport/pccreport.https://www.cancercare.on.ca/pcs/person_centred_ca re/engagementreport/pccreport Read more about Person-Centred Perspective on cancerview.ca