Frida Kahlo`s Mexican Body: History, Identity, and Artistic Aspiration
Transcription
Frida Kahlo`s Mexican Body: History, Identity, and Artistic Aspiration
Woman's Art Inc. Frida Kahlo's Mexican Body: History, Identity, and Artistic Aspiration Author(s): Sharyn R. Udall Reviewed work(s): Source: Woman's Art Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Autumn, 2003 - Winter, 2004), pp. 10-14 Published by: Woman's Art Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1358781 . Accessed: 05/06/2012 18:34 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Woman's Art Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Woman's Art Journal. http://www.jstor.org FRIDA KAHLO S MEXICAN BODY History,Identity, and ArtisticAspiration By Sharyn R. Udall rida Kahlo(1907-54),whose body and biographywere her chief subjects, mythologized them into a revealing life epic. Her paintingstell stories-intimate, engaging,terriand tragicones. Togetherwith her writings,they explorethe fying, toughness and vulnerability of the human body. When Kahlo looked into death's dark mirror, she saw herself. In the act of paintingand in the resultingcanvases,she documentedher own attemptsto survivepain, to make sense of it, to act out through images layeredwith fantasy,irony,and allegory.Her work is searingly candid,overlaidwith the unrealityof an endless nightmare. When she abandonedhope in her dailylife, Kahloembedded her despairwithin paintings,which, by virtue of their very existence, act as the artist'senvoysin searchof salvation,or somethinglike it. At times archaizingand romantic,at times brutallyimmediate, Kahlo'ssubjectsimpose stasison history,freezingtogetherthe ancient past with livingmemories.When she used time as a referent, it was with ambivalence;she refused time'slinearityand its arbitrarydivisions."Heute ist immer noch"(Todaystill goes on), she wrotebeneathher signatureon the backof SelfPortraitwith a Velvet Dress (1926; P1. 5).1 In that revealing statement the artist demonstratedearlyon that in her mind the present is living,continuouswith a past of historyand of art. By followingKahlo'slead, by thinkingabouttime as a threadconnectingthe episodicwith the eternal,we canbeginto understandherworkin new andtellingways. This earlywork echoes severalart-historicalprecedents:Kahlo admiredBronzino'sfamousmanneristportraits,especiallyA Young Womanand her LittleBoy (c. 1540), and praisedthe refinedgrace of Botticelli,whom she mentioned several times in letters. After she gave the self-portraitto AlejandroG6mez Arias,her firstlove, painterand portraitbecame one in her mind. She wrote Alejandro that "your[Botticelli]...remembersyou always."2It is here, perhaps,thatKahlo'sabilityto transcendboth time and inheritedidentity begins; in many future paintings she exchanges and merges personaewith painted selves, with animals,plants,and mythicbeings. It is a practiceas much shamanicas artistic,one relatedto the conceptof Aztec dualityand addressedin othertermsas well. Timeand specificallythe oppositionof the modem and antimodem in her work figure prominentlyin her next self-portrait,Time Flies (1929; P1.6). Painted the year of Kahlo'smarriageto Diego Rivera,this severelyfrontal,well-litportraitappearsfarless mysterious and romanticthan the one she made for Alejandro.The clock and airplaneground it in the modem era. Yet the paintingis far more complex,far less direct than it first appears.Beneathits surface franknesslie multipletemporalclues,pullingthe here and now into a web of art-historical, narrative,and allegoricalreferents. Spanish painting, particularlythat of Velazquez, has always been a powerfulpresence in Mexicanart.As OrianaBaddeleyand ValerieFraserhavewritten,"Velazquezis centralto anyconsideration of the impact of the European artistic heritage on that of Latin America."3YoungFrida Kahlo, enamored of Renaissance, Mannerist,and later Europeanpainting,certainlyknew the work of Spain'sgreatest Baroque master.Velazquez'sQueen Mariana F 0 (1652) belongs to a traditionof courtpaintingthat reachesbackto Titianand forwardto Goya. Queen Marianamemorializesa royal dynasty,the Spanish Hapsburgs,who represent (besides much else) a significant part of Mexico's own colonial past. In many forms, the ruling dynasty provided an enduring fascination for generations of Mexican artists, among them the 20th-century painter Alberto Gironella, who borrowed elements from Las Meninasand other worksby Velazquez.More specifically,Queen Mariana is a remembered prototype and a key to the multiple meaningswithinTimesFlies. Two immediate similaritiesto the Velazquezpainting are the queen'sformalized,staticpose and the massive,tie-backdraperies. The more criticalformaland symbolicelement in both paintingsis a clock, an unmistakableallusionto the concept of time. In each case the clock is located to the sitter'sleft and behind her. The Velazquezgold clock, as Baddeleyand Fraserpoint out, is a "rare, expensiveand ornate"object.4It would have been a statussymbol in 17th-centurySpain, or perhaps an updated, secularizedreference to the transienceof life formerlysuggestedby an hourglassin moralizingvanitaspaintings.In any case, the hour is not visible; seemingly,Velazquezused the clock to make an oblique reference to his own modernity,to timelinessin a paintingwhose immobility places it otherwiseentirely outside time. Kahlo'suse of the clock seems to place TimeFlies specificallywithintime. Hers is a cheap, modernalarmclock, strictlyutilitarian,with large blackhands and numeralsdeclaringthat it is 2:52, perhapsan oblique referenceto the date of the Velazquezpainting,1652. There are several ironies involved in Kahlo's invocation of Velazquez. She appropriateselements from an Old World, Old Masterpaintingin the New World;she is neither old, nor (being female) a "master,"nor is she clear at this point in her life about her own artisticheritage.She is tryingon identities,both personal and artistic:from the melancholyaristocratof her first self-portrait, she seems to be testing an image that speaks of her own mixedEuro-Americanand Indianheritage. Other aspects of Kahlo'sclock compel notice:placed exactlyat Kahlo's eye level, the wide oblique angle of the hands on the clock'sface forms a shape that mimicsher own dense eyebrowsjoined like dark bird wings above her nose. The clock face thus rhymeswith her own; and like it, she becomes an instrumentthat measurestime-that mediates between past and present. It also forecasts the way Kahlo would paint other faces to mimic her own-on coconuts,her pet monkeys,and on a varietyof other objects, animateand inanimate.For example,in Tearsof the Coconut (WeepingCoconuts,CoconutTears)(c. 1950) a hairycoconut is given prominenteyes fromwhich tears drop onto the surrounding fruit in a still-life arrangement.Kahlo also used clocks in a number of other drawingsand even as a design in the rock-encrusted ceiling of her home.5The little alarmclock, or a similar one, remainstodayon a bedside table at her home in Coyoacan. In TimeFlies the clockrestson a carvedwooden column,whose spiralshaft rises exactlythe length of Kahlo'sown spinalcolumn, WOMAN'S ARTJOURNAL furtherreinforcingthe interpretationof the clock and its pedestal which Rivera and Kahlo as some kind of mechanicalalter-ego, looking over her shoulder lived in the Morrows'home and markingtime. But it has an ancientresonanceas well. We are while the Americanswere in reminded in the visual pairing of "columns"of the ways preEurope. While Rivera was Columbianpeoples in Mexicoanthropomorphized painting the saga of the objects,such as the Zapotecterracottapolychromedvase in the form of a vertebral Spanishconquest,Kahlohad column, from Monte Alban, Oaxaca(Fig. 1). Kahlo, whose own time to thinkaboutthe proxshatteredspinalcolumnsuppliedonly fragilesupport,could relyon imity of past and present in these other columnsfor metaphoricalsupport.In her famous1944 Cuernavaca, where Cortes self-portraitThe Broken Column(P1.7), she invokedstill another had spenthis lastyears. kind of column-a Greek fluted one-as interiorsupport.It is a Wingedflight,symbolized crackedIonic column,the "I"and its traditionalassociationwith feby Lindbergh, seemed to male proportionsperhapsa punningreferenceto herself. hold endless promisefor the Anothertime reference in TimeFlies is the necklaceshe wears future,thoughit held signifiof heavy,hand-carvedjade beads, relics of Mexico'spre-Cortesian cant dangersaswell. In 1928, a a young Mexican aviator, f .^ . . past. The center stone is inscribedwith the Aztec glyph for movement, with connotations of "beginnings" or "nowness." Such Emilio Carranza, made a _cmr meaningwould not have been lost on Kahlo,whose sophisticated flight to the United States to . ... ...... knowledgeof the pre-Columbianpast fueled her art and her own reciprocateLindbergh'sMexeventualmythification.6 It is also an appropriatesymbolfor a perico visit the previous year. Fig. 1. Vase in the Formof a Vertebral sonalbeginning:her marriageto Riverathatyear.7 Column(200 B.C.-200A.D.), Forgottentodayin the UnitTime and history rise along Kahlo'sbody, from the ancient ed States, but well remempolychromedterracotta,h. 161/2". necklaceto the jeweled colonialearringsto the penetratingnow of bered in Mexico, is the tragic FromMonte Alban, Oaxaca. her gaze. Above that gaze, pushing Kahlo'squestionsof time still journey: ending to Carranza's further,hovers a plane, an element clearly announcingthe 20th Upon takeofffroma Long Islandairfieldfor his returnhome, lightcentury.At the same time, like the clock, it poses multiplemythic ning struckthe plane,plungingthe pilotto a violentdeath.'2 The plane in Kahlo'sTime Flies, as well as its title, seems on possibilities:not those of Velazquez'sSpanishBaroque,but of even older allegoriesof flight,of striving,and of artitself. one level a clear reference to Lindbergh'scelebratedaccomplishKahlo was certainly aware of Charles Lindbergh's1927 solo ment or to Carranza'stragic flight. On the other hand, knowing the kind of symbolicand allegoricalplay Kahlo enjoyed, another flight over the Atlantic.Hurtlingeastwardthrough multiple time level of meaningfor the plane can be consideredas well. For exzones, his legendaryflight turned considerationsof time and distance upside down. He joined other pioneering aviatorssuch as ample, a closer look at the fuselage of the plane, small but insisthe Frenchflyer Louis Bleriot,whose 1909 crossingof the English tently painted, reveals,beneath its whirlingpropeller,a red shape, channelhad been memorializedby the painter Robert Delaunay.8 curvedlike an aviator'shelmet, framinglines that describe a crude Like Bleriot,Lindberghbecame a moder hero, inscribedforever face. Seen this way, the plane becomes more than a machine;it into popularhistory.His daring earned him millions of admirers takes on the vaguelyliving characterof an inhabitantof the skies. on both sides of the Atlantic,but he gained special acclaim as a Is it human, celestial, insect, bird-or some combination?Half hero for the Americas.9Mexicanswere amongthose swept into the plane, half wingedtalisman,it rises above Kahlo'shead into mythic mass adulation, and the American ambassadorin Mexico City, or allegoricalstatus. However,tryingto decipherpreciselywho or what the plane representscan only end, as it begins, with speculaDwight Morrow,saw a way to build on Lindbergh'sheroicsto create good will for the United States among its southernneighbors. tion. With greaterconfidencewe can think of the plane merely as A few months after the Atlantic crossing, Morrowinvited Lindan emblem of the artist'sinterest in flight. And with that demonbergh to pilot his single-enginecraftto MexicoCity.In a delirious strable fact as starting point, we can look at other examples of winged flightin Kahlo'slife and work. reception, more than 100,000 Mexicans, including President Calles, welcomed the aviator-heroupon his arrivalon December Even as a child, Frida had been fascinated by the notion of 14, 1927. Lindberghstayedtwo weeks in the Mexicancapital,durflight. Not long after she developed, at age six, the polio that would atrophyher rightleg, she askedher parentsfor a model airing which he made many public appearancesand met his future wife, the ambassador's plane. Instead,they gave her a pairof strawwings and dressedher daughterAnne. in a white robe like an angel.'3The useless wings must have reinThen, and during a subsequent visit in 1929, Lindberghflew over unexcavated ruins in Guatemala and the Yucatan,making forced the frustrationsof a child whose mobilitywas alreadyhampered. The memory of that childhood disappointment,coupled photographsfrom the air. This effort (initiated by Lindberghin New Mexicoin 1927) was hailed as the first successfulapplication with her sufferingmultiple foot surgeriesin the 1930s, is a likely of aerialphotographyfor archaeologicalpurposes.'?It demonstrat- source of Kahlo's1938 painting(now lost) TheyAskfor Planesand ed to the worldnew ways of using technologyto link past and preAre Given Straw Wings (Fig. 2). In it a child, whose Tehuana sent; for many,it was an Americancounterpartof HeinrichSchliedress and hair ribbonidentifyher as a miniatureFrida,holds the mann'srediscoveryof Troydecades earlier,a feat Freud declared model plane she did not receive. Tethered to the earth, yet suswas like bringingfortha mythicpast into moder reality." pended by the strawwings from above, the child longs to fly but Kahlowas very much aware of Lindberghand may well have cannot.On a personallevel,thisis a paintingof frustratedaspirations. met the aviator;she certainly knew the Morrowfamily. Late in But, typical of the artist who universalizesher own experience, Kahlo invites a broaderinterpretation:in 1938 the SpanishCivil 1929, the year of Lindbergh'smarriageto Anne Morrow(as well as Kahlo and Rivera's), the Morrows commissioned Rivera to paint a War aroused the artist'sgrave concern for its refugees and vicseries of murals on the wall of the old Cortes Palace in Cueravatims."4Newspapersin Mexicowere filled with accountsof the desca, outside Mexico City. The project took nearly a year, during olation.To press their struggle,the SpanishRepublicanArmyreFALL2003 / WINTER2004 0 Av vkA vS I,c fct,:. 7 i~ O&;k; in her workboth more personaland more profound thanhe knew. The butterfly was of vital interest to the peo- -/:: IB ~ |S ||{>P; i X :?:! ples of ancient Mexico, for whom duality and transformationwere foundingtropes. As Peter and RobertaMarkmanwrite, "Throughoutthe developmentof Mesoamericanart,the imageof the butterfly recurs."2'Janet Berlo explainsin greaterdetail: The butterfly is a natural choice for a transformational symbol. During its life it changes from caterpillar to pupa wrapped in hard chrysalis, to butterfly: a process of birth, apparent death, and resurrection as an elegant airborne creature. To the Teotihuacano,the butterfly surely was an emblem of the soul as it was for the later Aztecs.2 !" 'g >lRE~'; ~~r-Y?8.- Fig. 2. FridaKahlo, TheyAsk for Planes and Are Given Straw Wings (1938). .. Fig. 3. FridaKahlo,Alas Rotcs, diarypage 124. FridaKahloMuseum. quested planes, but did not receive them. Kahlo'sThey Askfor Planes and Are Given Straw Wings could allude to that tragic disappointment as well.'5 Her preoccupation with the war in Spain may well have prompted still another painting that year. Kahlo biographer Hayden Herrera suggests that The Airplane Crash (1938), in which bloodied corpses litter the ground, may echo the kind of searing war protest Picasso expressed in Guernica.'6 Throughout the 1930s Kahlo referred to wings and flight in her painting and writing. In an era when most people traveled long distances by train or ship, she and Rivera flew as early as 1931, returning by plane from San Francisco to Mexico. In a metaphorical sense as well, Kahlo continued to think of herself as a winged being; in 1934 she wrote to friends of her disappointment in learning they would not visit Mexico soon: "My wings fell down to the ground, since you do not know what I would give to have you guys here.""7Planes and wings, then, are metaphors of time travel in Kahlo's work. But they demand to be seen as much more; as symbolic vehicles, they are keys to Kahlo's development of a private, object-based language. And they raise personal events and present-day happenings to the level of allegory.'8Kahlo knew this, and so did many of the people who admired her work. Andre Breton, for example, visited Mexico in 1938, the year Kahlo painted They Ask for Planes and Are Given Straw Wings. But it was in another of her paintings that Breton caught the sensation of flight. Of Kahlo's self-portrait painted for Leon Trotsky (1937), Breton wrote: "She has painted herself dressed in a robe of wings gilded with butterflies."'9 Breton wanted to make Kahlo's imagery surrealist, an appellation Kahlo resisted. A few months later she protested, somewhat disingenuously, "I didn't know I was a Surrealist till Andre Breton came to Mexico and told me I was."20 Breton, though soon a collector of pre-Columbian art, knew little about the ancient sources of Kahlo's imagery. She, however, was intimately familiar with the Mexican past and cloaked herself in its conventions, as intermediary between past and present, myth and reality. Whatever the level of Breton's understanding of Kahlo's "robe of wings gilded with butterflies,"he had touched upon imagery 0 For Kahlo, the butterflywas clearlya kind of emblem as well; she kept them near herphotographs show a collection framed under glass and mounted under the canopythat surmounted her bed. Their brilliant colors and transformative symbolism distracted and sus- tained her duringher long bedriddenhours. In butterflies as with other symbolic life forms, Kahlo relished the escalating possibilities of meaning-from winged insect to transcendentsoul-riding on the wings of a butterfly. Kahlomust have imaginedherself,in one of her winged avatars, as a butterfly,so often did she use it in her self-portraits.Delicate yet resilient, the butterfly mirrorsher own life. In Self-Portrait (1940;P1.8) a pairof them, reproducedin colonialsilver,nestles in her hair,while winged blossoms,the sexualorgansof plants,hover above, carryingthe reproductivepromise of their species. Kahlo paintedherselfwithina naturalworldthatis farfromnatural.Death and transfiguration, disguisedas plants and animals,populate this mysteriousEden, with an iconic Kahloat its center.CarlosFuentes saw this timeless,tragicelement in the artist'slife, likeningher to a "fragile,sensitive,crushedbutterflywho foreverrepeatedthe cycle fromlarvato chrysalisto obsidianfairy,spreadingher brilliantwings onlyto be pinneddown,over and over,astoundinglyresistantto her pain,untilthe name of both the sufferingand the end of the suffering becomesdeath."23 If pain and release inhabitKahlo'sself-portraits,they often arrive via the winged creaturesshe includes. Birdsare also frequent companions.In the 1940 self-portraita dead hummingbirdhangs suspended from her menacingnecklace of thorns. The tiny, panhemispherichummingbirdheld many meanings.In folk tradition it was a love charm.As she paintedthis self-portraitin the months followingher painfuldivorcefrom Diego, perhapsFridaincluded it as a talismanto restorelost love. Beyond the personal, Kahlo also would have cherished the wider pre-Columbianassociations.Linkedsymbolhummingbird's ically with the great god Huitzilopochtli, and with the rain god Tlaloc,the hummingbirdis a multivalentimage of courage,oracle, and magic. The Aztecs believed it to hang lifeless from a tree in winter, then to renew its youth as summer approached.Because Kahlopainted the hummingbirdso insistently,with a wing shape that replicates her own dark brows, we must consider it as a metaphorof self. Like the hummingbird,who also does not walk well, Kahlo's oft-impaired mobility made her aspire to flight. And because she tied the tiny creature so conspicuously (and literally) WOMAN'S ART JOURNAL page (92) a winged woman floats among the repeated word Sueno-sleep. Wingsin suchimagessuggestescape,apotheosis. Even more poignant, and considerably more complex, are Kahlo'simageryand text on diarypages 140 and 141, which layer personalhistoryand myth.To be understood,they must be taken together with page 142, which reads, "Se equivoco la paloma;se equivocaba..."(The dove made mistakes.It made mistakes.Instead of going Northit went South/Itmade mistakes/Itthoughtthe wheat was water/Itmade mistakes.)By themselves,the lines are mysterious, but when connected with the clues given on page 140, the meaningbecomes clearer.There she muses on the greatnessof HieronymusBosch and Pieter Breugelthe Elder,whom she calls"the magnificent"and "mi amado"(my loved one). Breugel,the 16thcenturyFlemish painterof moralisticallegories,providesthe context for Kahlo'swordsandthe wingedcreaturedrawnon page 141. Famous among Breugel's allegories is that of the flight of Icarus,a mythologicaltrope of aspirationand failure.Breugelused Ovid's Metamorphosesas the source for his The Fall of Icarus (c. 1558). Ovid's account describes the attempted escape of Daedalus and his son Icarus from their exile in Crete. Daedalus fashioned wax wings for both of them, instructinghis son to fly north on a middle course, not too close to either sky or sea. But the son, questing for the heights, soared too near the sun; his wings melted and he plunged to his death. The Icarus myth has long pointed to the ironyat the heartof the artist'squest:the more one aspiresto the ideal, the more certainis her doom.27 Kahlo'sreferences to flying south instead of north and mistaking wheat for waternow read as clearreferencesto Icarus.So does the drawingitself: upon her marriageto the massive Diego, her True to its shamanic base, Mesoamerican spiritual thought sees man parentslikenedthe union to that between an elephantand a dove. In the diarydrawingthe dove nests atop the headless shouldersof as spirit temporarily and tenuously housed in a material body. "Soul the winged female creature,whose cracked spinal column is unloss" is a constant possibility, and curersfrom pre-Columbian times to the present have been called on to reunite body and spirit. That mistakablyKahlo'sown, as seen in The BrokenColumn.She labels her two legs "SupportNumber 1" and "SupportNumber 2." The spirit/matter dichotomy is represented metaphorically throughout the history of Mesoamerica and for most indigenous groups today by latter,stiff and columnar,is encircledwith a spiralingline, suggestthe belief that each person has a companion animal who somehow ing a cast or an umbilicalcord from an earlierlithograph,but also reminiscentof the carved spiralclock pedestal in TimeFlies and "shares"his soul.25 the column supportingFrida in an earlier diarypage, captioned "Yosoy la desintegracion."28 Ultimately,such soul-sharingbetween the person and her nahual In that earlierdiaryentry(fromthe 1940s),as in the Icaruspage in one of "a different kind the add Markmans, uncovers, reality, which the spirit and the man, the magicianand the disguise be(July1953), Kahloshows herself with only one functioningleg. In Such is the came strangelyunified and, finally,interchangeable."26 both, curiously,it is the right one, the one crippledby her childhood polio and the one amputatedin the summerof 1953 to halt case, we can argue,with Kahlo'suse of the winged creatures-the her her the the and nahuals, advancing gangrene. In its absence she longs for wings, those hummingbird, butterfly-all parrot, totemic links to other realities.These links she frequentlyundermetaphoricaldefiersof gravity,disease,and time itself. On another scoredwith ribbonsthattie her,literally,to her companionanimals. diarypage dated 1953 (page 134), she drew her severed feet and The diaryKahlokept duringthe last decade of her life was pubcaptionedit "Feetwhatdo I need them for/IfI havewingsto fly." Kahlo'swings, like her art, were mythicallypowerful. Unlike lished in 1995. Though fragmented,with long interruptionsbetween some entries,this intimatejournalprovidesglimpsesinto her pedestals, spinal columns, and feet, which could not be relied upon, her imagined bird-butterfly-Icarus-artistwings could lift thoughtprocesses,emotionallife, and physicaldecline. The images her above the pain of the physicalworld into a realm where difshe drew and painted on its pages occasionallyrelate to finished with ferences of time and reality collapsed. Even without the severed a visual most are but narrative,captioned separate paintings, words and phrases-occasionally in Nahuatl,Sanskrit,or Russian. leg, she had appendages to spare: "I have many wings," she Fantasticwinged creatures,some of a mythicor semidivinenature, wrote in another defiant diary entry from 1953. "Cut them off and to hell with it!!"29 populate the pages. These include an Egyptianbird, a griffin, a In these multipleexamplesKahloshiftedtime into spatialstrucwith references to and several unmistakable bird-woman, pregnant Alherself.Diarypage 124 (Fig. 3) is captioned."Tevas?No. Alas Rotures;she refusedlinearityand traditionalnotionsof "progress." tas." (Are you leaving? No. Broken wings.) Here Kahlo stands, ways,she drewher storyinto history.To her assertionthat "I never painted dreams, I painted my own reality,"one can reply that wingsunfurledbehindher shoulderswhile her body,surroundedby a mass of foliage, is being consumed by flames below. Always, dream,reality,andhistorywere for her interchangeable. Frida Kahlowanted her paintingsto be timely-that is, modKahlomirroredher thoughtswith overt or concealedself-portraits; here brokenwings seems a probablelament for her own physical erm,original,without precedent. But she also wanted them to be and emotionalimmobilityat that stage of her life. On anotherdiary timeless, existingoutside time, like some ancient, essential truth. to the thorn necklace, dead center along her verticalaxis,we are reminded again (as in Time Flies) of the vertical ascent of time along the columnaraxis of her own body. Once more, to understand Kahlo'scomplexlanguageof symbolsis to recognize,always, its encodingwithinher biologicalself. Still anotherbird must be consideredwithinthe iconographyof Kahlo'sself-portraits.The parrotappearseven more often than the hummingbird,particularlyin the early 1940s. The artistkept parrots and posed with them seated on her shoulderor nestled, like children, against her breast. She drew too upon pre-Columbian lore, in which the parrot was prized for its gift of speech and looked upon as a supernaturalbeing. Kahlo used fantasyin her paintingsto allow such ancient beliefs to co-exist as living memories with moder ones. As her friend Anita Brenner wrote, the parrot'sAztec name, nahual,means a being that takesmanyforms: "InculturedAztec circles nahual gave nahualli,wise man and poet, and nahuatato,speakerof manytongues."4In modernMexican folklore,adds Brenner,the birdremainsa symbolof sorcery.Kahlo, who thought of herself as something of a sorceress-she called herself"lagranoccultadora,"the greatconcealer-recognized her own veiledidentities,multiplelike the veryhistoryof Mexicoitself. The concept of the nahual was of central and abidingimportance in Aztec thought, a key to the pervasiveconcept of duality. Variouslydefined as an opposition of values, a cleavage in the Aztec soul, the ancient dualities were managed by means of shamanicpractice,the abilityto traversethe realmsof matterand spirit.Peter and RobertaMarkmanhave describedthe role of the nahual,or companionanimal: FALL2003 / WINTER2004 0 To achieve that duality she incorporated elements from her nation's ancient past, as well as those, like the airplane, that unequivocally announced the 20th century. While Kahlo's 1929 self-portrait Time Flies at first seems to condense or telescope time along the vertical axis of her own body, what it does ultimately is to condense other realities-historic, nationalistic, mythic, and symbolic-into its own. In this way art finally becomes its own reality. ? NOTES Permission to reproduceall FridaKahloimageshas been receivedfromtheir Nacionalde BellasArtesand Bancode owners,as wellas fromthe Instituto Mexico Mexico, City. 1. Picassosharedhisconvictionthatartformsone continuous livingpresent."Tome,"he wrote,"thereis no pastor futurein art.Ifa workof artcannotlivealwaysin the present,it mustnotbe consideredat all.Theartof the Greeks,of the Egyptians,of thegreatpainterswho livedin othertimes,is not an artof thepast;perhapsit is morealivetodaythaniteverwas";quotedin AlfredBarr,Picasso:FiftyYearsof hisArt(New York: Museumof ModernArt,1946),270-71. 2. Kahloto Arias,March29, 1927, quotedin HaydenHerrera,Frida Kahlo:ThePaintings(New York:HarperPerennial, 1993), 45. 3. OrianaBaddeleyand ValerieFraser,DrawingtheLine:Artand Latin America(London: in Contemporary Cultural Verso,1989), 48. Identity 4. Ibid.,55. 5. InherdrawingFantasy(1944), forexample,a weepingeye has a clockat itscenter,and in jOjoAvisor!(All-SeeingEye, 1934) she placesa These clockwithinan eye filledwithotherobjectsand landscapefragments. The Kahlo: in Frida are Paintings,128, 108. drawings reproduced Herrera, in the 6. See, forexample,JaniceHelland,"Culture, Politics,and Identity D. The in Broude and Frida Norma of eds., Garrard, Kahlo," Mary Paintings andArtHistory(New York:HarperCollins, ExpandingDiscourse:Feminism 1992), 397-408. 7. Inthatconnection,theclockmayalso pay homageto hernew husworkfromhis band,who had painteda verysimilarobjectin a Cubist-style Parisyears, TheAlarmClock(1914).Thisworkbelonged,in fact,to Kahlo. 8. Delaunaypainteda seriesof workscelebratingmachineflight,circular in his Homageto Bleriot(1914).Atthe rhythms, lightand space, culminating in theirpoetmadeairplaneimageryimportant sametime,the ItalianFuturists historicflight.By ryand painting,beginningin 1909, theyear of Bleriot's 1912, an "airplanemania"was at itsheightin France.TheLivredes Indepenof modernflight:Icarus, dantsthatyear containedhomagesto the precursors and Bleriot.Diego Rivera,who was in FrancedurLeonardo,Santos-Dumont, ing thedecade of the 1910s, was influencedby Delaunayin hisCubistexplorations.He wouldhavebeen awareof the maniaforflightand the 1912 IndeRivera's own avid inSuchactivitymayhave stimulated pendantspublication. in partby a phototerestin planesand the historyof flight,as demonstrated graphtakenin hisstudio,wherea modelplane(ofthevintageof Lindbergh's fromtheceiling.See Adrianna is suspendedprominently "Spiritof St. Louis") of Texas,1994), 102. On the Williams,Covarrubias (Austin: University D. Wolfe,TheFabulousLifeof connection,see Bertram Rivera-Delaunay Mich.: Rivera (Chelsea, ScarboroughHouse,1963), 78, 87. On DeDiego the Futurists and mania,"see SherryA. Buckberrough, "airplane launay, RobertDelaunay:TheDiscoveryof Simultaneity (AnnArbor:UMI,1982), 226-31. Americanhero, 9. Lindbergh rapidlycame to representthequintessential of theAmericanvaluesof daring,exploration,and a modernreincarnation a metaphoracrossgendersand occupations,AlfredStieglitz risk;stretching of declaredin 1928 of hisprot6egeGeorgiaO'Keeffe,"Sheis the Lindbergh art.LikeLindbergh, MissO'KeeffetypifiesthealertAmericanspiritof going afterwhatyou wantand gettingit";quotedin B.VladimirBerman,"ShePaintedthe Lilyand Got $25,000 and FameforDoing it!"New YorkEveningGraphic,May 12, 1928, 3M. 0 10. Fora fulleraccountof thisactivity,see HelenDelpar,TheEnormous RelationsbetweentheUnitedStatesand Vogueof ThingsMexican:Cultural of Alabama,1992), 110;and 1920-1935 Mexico, (Tuscaloosa: University of CharlesA. Lindbergh, Values Brace, (NewYork:Harcourt, Autobiography Jovanovich,1978), 85-88. American 11. SuzanneCassirerBernfeld,"Freudand Archeology," Imago8(1951), 111. 12. See Delpar,TheEnormous Vogue,64. D. Wolfe,"Riseof AnotherRivera,"Vogue(October/ 13. Bertram November,1938), 131. 14. Demonstrating theirconcernaboutthiswar, Kahloand Riverahelped severalSpanishrefugeesupontheirarrivalin Mexico.See Herrera,Frida Kahlo:ThePaintings,26. of LuchaMaria(1942), is an im15. Anotherof Kahlo'spaintings,Portrait a a of seated girlholding toy airplane.Inthe backgroundis a divided age skycontaininga sunand moon,each positionedabove the pyramidsof the at Teotihuac6n. sunand moon,respectively, 16. Herrera,FridaKahlo:ThePaintings,26. Thelocationis notknown. 17. Kahlo,letterto EllaWolfe,July11, 1934, in MarthaZamora,comp., TheLetters of FridaKahlo:CartasApasionadas(SanFrancisco: Chronicle, 55. 1995), 18. Womenpaintersand writershaveoftenexpressedelationor frustration in termsof flight.O'Keeffe,duringherfirstexhilarating summerin New Mexico, wrotethatthesightof Taosmountainloomingabove vastexpansesof fieldsmadeherfeel likeflying.HeleneCixoushas concludedthat"Flyingis a of women'sflightas deliberatelydisruptive woman'sgesture."Herdescription of thesocietalstatusquo (thoughnotwrittenspecificallyaboutKahlo),paraltheorderof space...disorilels manyof Kahlo'ssubversivegestures:"jumbling entingit,dislocatingthingsand values,breakingthemall up...andturning of theMedusa,"in Elizaproprietyupsidedown";see HeleneCixous,"Laugh bethAbeland EmilyK.Abel,eds., TheSignsReader:Women,Genderand of Chicago, 1983), 291. Scholarship (Chicago:University 19. Andr6Breton,Surrealism and Painting,SimonWatson,trans. (London: TaylorMacDonald,1972), 35. 64. 20. Quotedin Wolfe,"Riseof AnotherRivera," 21. PeterT.Markmanand RobertaH. Markman, Masksof theSpirit:Image of California,1989), and MetaphorinMesoamerica(Berkeley: University 148. TheCeramicIn22. JanetC. Berlo,"Artistic Specializationat Teotihuac6n: ArtHistory:Selectin AlanaCordy-Collins, cense Burner," ed., Pre-Columbian ed Readings(PaloAlto,Calif.:PeekPublications, 1977), 99. 23. CarlosFuentes,intro.,in SarahM. Lowe,ed., TheDiaryof FridaKahlo: An Intimate Self-Portrait (NewYork:Abrams,1995), 10. Forreproductions and reviewby SalomonGrimberg,see WAJ(F97/W98), 42-43. 24. AnitaBrenner, IdolsBehindAltars(New York:Payson&Clarke,1929), 38. Brenner's maytakelibertieswiththe parrot'snamein the interpretation withnagual,or "guardian Aztec(Nahuatl)language,usingit interchangeably beast." 25. Markman and Markman, Masksof theSpirit,144. 26. Ibid. 27. Amongthecountlesspoetsand painterswho have usedthe Icaruslegend in theirworkare HendrikGoltzius,Baudelaire,and, morerecently,Henri Matisse,W. H. Auden,and WilliamCarlosWilliams.Mythanksto BillGarrison fordirectingme to thosereferences. 28. Kahlo's1932 lithographFridaand theMiscarriage(reproduced in Herrera,FridaKahlo:ThePaintings,77) showsan umbilicalcordwrapped aroundherrightleg connectinga foetusinsideherbodywitha largerfoetus outsideherbody. 29. Diarypage 139, July1953. Sharyn Udall, author of Carr, O'Keeffe, Kahlo: Places of Their Own (2000), is an art historian and independent curator. WOMAN'S ARTJOURNAL -~ PI. 5. FridaKahlo, Self-Portraitwith VelvetDress (1926), oil on canvas, 31" x 23". PrivateCollection. la, , I ~~~~~~~~~~ " ' .... ..u. P1.7. FridaKahlo, TheBrokenColumn(1944), oil on canvas mountedon masonite, 153/4"x 12". Museo Dolores Olmedo Patino,Mexico City. PI.6. FridaKahlo, Self-Portrait [TimeFlies] (1929), oil on masonite, 313/4"x 271/2". PrivateCollection. If t I \1 U PI.8. FridaKahlo, Self-Portrait(1940), oil on canvas, 24'/2" x 181/4". IconographyCollection, HarryRansomHumanitiesResearchCenter, Universityof Texas, Austin. Photo:CourtesySalomon Grimberg.
Similar documents
Frida Kahlo`s Spiritual World: The Influence of Mexican
to crucify Jesus; wheat ("Then he took a piece of bread, gave thanks to God, broke it, and gave it to them, saying, This is my body, which is given for you: do this in remembrance of me," Luke, 22:...
More information