Jun 8, 2016 - City of Highwood
Transcription
Jun 8, 2016 - City of Highwood
AGENDA MEETING OF THE HIGHWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Wednesday, June 8, 2016 6:30 p.m. Meeting Meeting will be held at Highwood City Hall 17 Highwood Avenue - Highwood, Illinois I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES i. February 24, 2016 IV. SCHEDULED BUSINESS i. 440 Green Bay Road – Planned Unit Development ii. 546 Green Bay Road – Planned Unit Development V. ADJOURNMENT City of Highwood Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission February 24, 2016 The Meeting was called to order by Chairman Ferguson Mills at 6:30 pm. Committee members Roman Beluch, Peter Biagi, Anthony Bilotti, Frank Campareale, Sonja Feddermann, Chris Meyer and Ferguson Mills were also present. Paul Fabbri and Paul Martinez was absent. Also present was City Manager Scott Coren. Approval of Minutes Commissioner Feddermann made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 11, 2016 meeting with a second from Roman Beluch. The vote was 7-0 in favor. 502 Sheridan Road The Public Hearing was opened at 6:32 PM. Tang Wong, the petitioner, explained the business of Vape312, a shop that sells electronic cigarettes and e-liquids. The main purpose is to allow smokers to switch or quit. He said they currently have 10,000 customers and many of those customers are from this area with limited competition in this area. The petitioner said they would bring many customers and revenue to Highwood. Roman Beluch mentioned that these types of uses do not typically bring in a significant amount of revenue to the community. Sonja Feddermann asked if this space was the normal size of one of their stores, as it was very large. The petitioner answered that this would be their headquarters as well as store, and there would be inventory and offices in back. Peter Biaggi asked about the cost of the products, and the petitioner said the average sale was between $40 - $50. Chairman Mills asked if there would be a ventilation system in the building. The petitioner said the vape dissipates quickly and that only ceiling fans were needed, with nothing required. The petitioner said they have a license in Chicago to smoke indoors. This is the only place with those requirements. There are no other requirements in Highwood, which has not evaluated different standards for allowing Vape shops. Roman Beluch asked if having two vape shops in the community was too extensive and if both shops could survive. The petitioner said this is not a very competitive environment and many of these types of businesses work together. Peter Biaggi asked about the number of parking spots necessary. The petitioner said the majority of customers were finished with their purchases in fifteen minutes. He said parking was often sufficient in the time they were busy, often during the day. Roman Beluch made a motion to close the public hearing, Sonja Feddermann seconded. The public hearing was closed. The Chairman asked for comments from the public, but none were present. Commissioner Beluch made a motion to approve the special use; Commissioner Biagi seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0. Commissioner Feddermann made a motion to approve the parking variance; Commissioner Meyers seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0. Adjournment There being no further business Commissioner Meyer made a motion to adjourn, with a second by Feddermann. The motion carried at 7:11 pm. CITY OF HIGHWOOD PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Public Hearing Wednesday, June 8, 2016 6:30 PM Request: Property in Question 440 Green Bay Road 16-15-213-012 16-15-213-013 16-15-213-014 Owner: City of Highwood Applicant: 440 GBR, LLC Zoning District B-1 Retail Business District Petition for a Planned Unit Development Summary: The Petitioner, 440 GBR, LLC has submitted a petition for a planned unit development. The development is a five story mixed-use development consisting of 2,812 square feet of commercial space and 52 total residential units. The residential units break down into 16 two bedroom units, 8 one bedroom units with a den, and 28 one bedroom units. The site plan demonstrates the development utilizing 82 onsite parking spaces entirely within the building. Staff Review and Comment: In the Downtown Projects Guidebook recently approved by the City of Highwood, these parcels fall within the Green Bay Road District. This district states that “Well established and successful existing businesses should remain, but other uses, such as office and residential buildings, should be considered.” Further in the report, mixed use buildings are recommended for heights of four to seven stories to generate viable development economics. The larger buildings are recommended to be designed in a certain fashion to insure these developments do not overwhelm adjacent properties. The design of the building has been reviewed by a consultant in a separate report. This development assists with multiple goals in the business district, including investment in a vacant lot, adding commercial or office space and providing additional residential density in the downtown core. The added density of 83 units per acre may serve to create additional support to fill these vacancies and increase the feasibility of other sites closer to the train station and downtown core. The greatest challenge with this particular development is the configuration of the existing lot and the current utilities. ComEd has constructed utility poles on the property and the City and developer are working on a plan with them to have them removed or relocated. The site has a unique shape. The lot itself features 200 feet of frontage on Green Bay Road that is attractive for a commercial or office tenant. The lot depth is minimally 132.42 feet on the North and is 181.06 feet deep on the South end, which is sufficient to include 82 parking spaces within the building. The City wants to encourage the developer to maximize parking on the site because of the difficulty of parking in the surrounding area, which requires them to use the entire lot. The consultant hired by the City has recommended that the developer review the possibility of creating an access off the frontage of the property for parking, looking at adding setbacks or reducing parking. Staff believes maximizing parking within the structure is more important than these items. 1 The neighboring Recreation Center already has overflow parking on the property currently and Staff has requested the developer review the possibility of dedicating fifteen parking spaces for the users of the Recreation Center to offset this loss of parking. Alternatively, Staff and the developer have discussed the possibility of allowing an easement on the five foot setback of the property to allow the parking for the Recreation Center to move North, potentially allowing for additional parking near the face of the Recreation Center building. Public Comments Received: No written comments have been received regarding this petition. If the Planning & Zoning Commission considers recommending the granting of a variance the following minimum conditions would be recommended: Conditions: 1. The utility poles must be removed from the property. 2. Engineering plans must be reviewed and approved by the City’s engineer to appropriately address any stormwater concerns on the property. 3. This project must be reviewed by the Appearance Review Committee to ensure compliance with the Appearance Review Code. 4. That the Petitioner shall comply with such other or appropriate requirements imposed by the City for the proposed improvements including but not limited to recommendations of the Appearance Review Committee, City Engineer, City Planner, City Building Consultant and/or City Staff for the construction and maintenance of the proposed improvements on the premises. 5. That the Petitioner pays all costs incurred by the City of Highwood for the zoning proceedings and any costs incurred by the City of Highwood related to the processing, review and enforcement of this proposal. Submitted by Scott Coren, City Manager 2 440 Green Bay Road PETITION for PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 04 / 26 / 2016 440 GBR, LLC index 1 PLAT OF SURVEY 2 SITE PHOTOS 3 SITE PLAN 4 GROUND FLOOR PLAN 5 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 6 THIRD TO FIFTH FLOOR PLAN 7 EAST & SOUTH ELEVATIONS 8 WEST & NORTH ELEVATIONS 9 RENDERINGS PLAT OF SURVEY 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 SITE PHOTOS 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 FIVE-STORY MULTI-FAMILY 5' 0 5' 10' 20' 35' (IN FEET) 70' SITE PLAN 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 PROJECT SUMMARY UNIT BREAKDOWN No. of Bedroom Per Floor Total Units 1 Bed 7 Units 28 Units 1 Bed / 1 Den 2 Units 8 Units 2 Bed 4 Units 16 Units total 52 Units COMMERCIAL SPACE 2,812 SQ. FT. No. of PARKING SPACES 82 Total incld'g 4 Handicap 5' 0 5' 10' 20' 35' (IN FEET) GROUND FLOOR PLAN 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 UNIT DATA F UNIT NUMBER OF BEDROOMS UNIT AREA A 2 BED 1244 SQ. FT. B 1 BED/1 DEN 1020 SQ. FT. C 1 BED/1 DEN 1028 SQ. FT. D 1 BED 799 SQ. FT. E 1 BED 697 SQ. FT. F 1 BED 707 SQ. FT. G1 2 BED 987 SQ. FT. H 1 BED 698 SQ. FT. I 1 BED 799 SQ. FT. J 1 BED 799 SQ. FT. K 1 BED 828 SQ. FT. L 2 BED 1035 SQ. FT. M 2 BED 1079 SQ. FT. G1 E H I D J C K B A M L 5' 0 5' 10' 20' 35' (IN FEET) SECOND FLOOR PLAN 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 UNIT DATA F UNIT NUMBER OF BEDROOMS UNIT AREA A 2 BED 1244 SQ. FT. B 1 BED/1 DEN 1020 SQ. FT. C 1 BED/1 DEN 1028 SQ. FT. D 1 BED 799 SQ. FT. E 1 BED 697 SQ. FT. F 1 BED 707 SQ. FT. G 2 BED 1148 SQ. FT. H 1 BED 698 SQ. FT. I 1 BED 799 SQ. FT. J 1 BED 799 SQ. FT. K 1 BED 828 SQ. FT. L 2 BED 1035 SQ. FT. M 2 BED 1079 SQ. FT. G E H I D J C K B A M L 5' 0 5' 10' 20' 35' (IN FEET) THIRD TO FIFTH FLOOR PLAN 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 EAST ELEVATION 5' 0 5' 10' 20' (IN FEET) SOUTH ELEVATION 35' ELEVATIONS 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 WEST ELEVATION 5' 0 5' 10' 20' (IN FEET) NORTH ELEVATION 35' ELEVATIONS 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 440 Green Bay Road Highwood, Illinois Date: April 26, 2016 May 15, 2016 Scott Coren City Manager Highwood, Illinois delivery: [email protected] RE: Project Review - 440 Green Bay Road Dear Scott, Attached please find a project review for the above named project, reviewed first based upon the existing code, then reviewed based upon the current draft regulations for the downtown district. In terms of meeting the EXISTING CODE regulations, I found that, in general, the existing regulations do not support this type of development, except under the umbrella of the more general "Findings of Fact" (section 11-10-14). The development is, however, fairly consistent with the general statements regarding downtown development in the comprehensive plan. Based upon the existing code, the main concerns for the project are as follows: 1. Compatibility. The uses are compatible with the surroundings; however, the location of the uses on the site are less compatible with adjacent lots. First, the proposed development includes no rear setback at all, adjacent to the single and 4 unit buildings behind the parcel. The parking structure would be constructed right at the rear lot line. Second, the scale of the ground story is quite tall, and is not compatible iwth the surrounding scale of Green Bay Road commercial and residnetial buildings. Note the adjacent building to the north shown in the rendering on page 11 of the PUD application PDF document. 2. Density, Lot Coverage. The current code does not specifically allow for such significant increases in density and lot coverage, except to state in the findings of fact for a PUD to allow developments consistent with the general statements of the comprehensive plan. 3. Building Design. Many aspects of the building design, while consistent with the draft downtown code under development, are not required specifically by the existing code. The applicant has included many design details that increase the compatibility, quality of design, pedestrian orientation, and appearance of the building. The only element that impedes pedestrian orientation of the building is the location of the garage entrance. The current code does not define the location of access, though it does address ingress and egress from the property generally. An alternative solution (side or rear access) to the location of the garage entrance would help to enhance the pedestrian comfort and safety in this location so close to the station. See review based upon the draft code regulations below. www.codametrics.com This is an excellent project, meeting many of the current DRAFT CODE regulations. The main items for discussion include the following: 1. General Building Type. I reviewed this project as if the regulating map were correct, meaning the district would be RX 1, requiring mainly residential uses and not permitting many retail uses. 2. Rear Setback. This design does not utilize any rear setback. Given that there are single family residences behind and that this project's parking garage extends up to the lot line, I would recommend some level of setback. 3. Garage Entrance. Ideally, the entrance to the garage would not be off Green Bay Road, but off a newly developed alley through the block. This alley could serve other redevelopment projects along the block as well as creating a buffer with the rear properties. 4. Parking Requirements. The relocation of the garage and the rear setback would directly impact the amount of parking the garage could provide. If the applicant were to utilize the current code (assuming the working group and council agrees), they could reduce the number of spaces and provide a bit more space for the devleopment onsite. 5. Impervious Cover. The project as drawn is very close to 100% impervious with the exception of the 5' side yards. For a residential building, I think it makes sense to provide a bit more landscape area, even in a more urban situation. The dog park could provide the semi-pervous coverage amount, if expanded. Thank you for the opportunity to review the projects. I look forward to our discussions. Leslie Oberholtzer, AICP, RLA, LEED AP Principal w w w . c o d a m e t r i c s . c o m EXISTING CODE REVIEW Business (B-1) District & PUD Zoning The site is currently designated for B-1 zoning and the applicant is requesting a Planned Unit Development designation. Uses: The uses are consistent with the B-1 zoning, including multifamily uses on the upper floors, and business uses on the ground floor. Lot Area: The minimum lot area for multifamily uses in B-1 is 10,000 sf. For PUD zoning, the minimum required area is double that, 20,000 sf (11-10-2). The lot is 27,278 sf. Building Height: The maximum height of a B-1 building is 35 feet and no more than 3 stories. The height of the proposed development is 5 stories, not consistent with the base district. Though not specifically stated, the PUD may be utilized for increased height, in the form of density. Lot Coverage & Density: The density of the development is approximately 83 units/acre (52 units on .63 acres). There is no base density for the B-1 district, but a limit is placed on multiplefamily uses. The limit requires the development not to exceed a floor area ratio of 100% of the lot area (this project is close to 400%), lot coverage of 33.3 % (this project is close to 100%), and impervious surface of 60% (this project is close to 96%). Setbacks: The PUD standards say the yards shall be at least equal in width or depth to that of the adjacent zoning district. The zoning districts to either side of the parcel are B-1, which has no setback requirements; for hotels, motels, and multiple-family uses, however, a front setback of 30 feet and a side setback of 5' is required. The project includes 5' side setbacks per the multiplefamily requirements, but a zero front yard setback. The PUD standards also state that buildings over Project Review City of Highwood 24 feet in height are required to set the building back from any property line equal to the height of the building. With the zero rear and front lot line setback of this proposal and the 5' side yard setbacks, this project does not meet those requirements. [Note: These requirements are inappropriate for a mixed use downtown and more in line with a larger scale development of multiple buildings on several acres.] Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: Currently, the comprehensive plan map designates this parcel as public/semi-public. However, the comprehensive plan states that new higher density development can "complement the built form, scale, and character of existing commercial, while respecting the surrounding residnetial neighborhoods." Consistent with the comprehensive plan, this proposed development uses brick and stone and includes a level of ground story detail, consistent with many existing Green Bay Road buildings. The scale of the ground story is somewhat higher than existing floor to floor heights in the downtown. The overall height, while inconsistent with existing buildings, is consistent with the goal of providing higher density residential in the downtown, supporting transit, and increasing the vibrancy of the downtown. Compatibility with Surrounding Sites: The uses of this development are consistent with the surrounding sites (residential and ground floor commercial). Need: No need has been stated in the application; however, the project would provide a significant number of residential units in close proximity to both the train station and the heart of the downtown. Further, the structured parking provided frees up other parking in the area to serve existing businesses and commuters. 3 Project Review: 440 Green Bay Road PROJECT REVIEW: 440 GREEN BAY ROAD Purpose & Intent of the Planned Unit Development: This development provides a development type that fulfills a key recommendation of the comprehensive plan for the downtown: higher density, pedestrian oriented development, utlizing existing infrastructure and providing significant parking. Parking The B-1 off-street parking required for the number of units and the commercial space would be 140 spaces, while the proposal includes a total of 82 spaces, all in an internal structured garage screened from the street, one story partially below grade. The provision of fewer spaces is consistent with the transit-oriented development recommendation of 1.2 spaces per unit, especially in terms of the currently required 2.5 spaces per residential unit. Appearance Review Parkways and Public Ways: The application does not include information related to installation of street trees as required in 10-3-7-5. Trash Enclosures: Trash dumpsters are located within the parking structure, just inside the garage door. The elevation shows the garage door closed, screening the dumpsters from the sidewalk and street view, except when open. PROPOSED CODE REVIEW This review follows the current draft requirements of the downtown districts, dated April 28, 2016. At the time of this project review, the working committee for the code has just begun review of the code. Staff has reviewed a preliminary version. REGULATING PLAN District The regulating plan currently denotes the 440 Green Bay lot as RX 1: Residential Mix, the highest intensity multi-unit residential district. Uses: The district would allow 5 story residential uses. The use of the ground story for the fitness center and lobby is desirable, creating a public face for the ground story, and would be permitted. Commercial Uses: The portions of the ground story noted "commercial" would be limited to a day care facility, library, museum, or community room, as written. Neighborhood service uses, such as a barber/beauty shop, eating & drinking place, gym, or spa, could be permitted with a special use permit, as currently drafted. Neighborhood uses are limited to less than 5000 sf. Residential or livework units (allowing home occupation uses) would be permitted by right. The goal of limiting commercial in this area is to consolidate retail and service uses in the downtown to create distinct and more vibrant nodes or areas of activity. Currently, the B-1 zoning in the downtown covers a very large area and the vacancy rates are relatively high. With somewhat less business zoning, those areas of existing storefronts could fill up and increase activity. New residential and potentially offices in the surrounding areas would provide customers for those areas. Primary Street The regulating plan designates Green Bay Road as a primary street for this lot. Primary frontage designation requires certain build-to requirements w w w . c o d a m e t r i c s . c o m 4 Project Review City of Highwood The current draft would not allow a drive entrance off a primary facade, but would require it to be located on the side facade. This would limit the coverage of this lot further (see building type notes for coverage below). Ideally, with anticipated redevelopment of several parcels along this block face (and others), an overall access plan to implement alleys would be ideal. Additionally, an alley would provide additional buffer to residential parcels behind the property. BUILDING TYPE Assuming this lot is zoned RX 1, the permitted building types are the General Building, the Row Building, and the Civic Building. The height and use distribution is most similar to the General Building; therefore, this review will use the General building type requirements. Building Siting Following the requirements of the building type regulation tables in the draft document, this building is generally sited with some exceptions. Minimum Primary Frontage Coverage: The building meets the minimum 80% required primary frontage coverage, extending fully between the two 5' side yards. Build-to Zone: The build-to zone of the building type is set to be between 12 and 25 feet to give a mainly residential building a small front yard or landscape area. This building appears to be designed to be built close to the property line with an estimated variability between 0 and 15 feet. The conflict here is that the building is really designed as a mixed use storefront building type, not permitted in this district. Further, the sidewalk area between the right-of-way and curb appears to be less than 10 feet, so an additional couple of feet will be required to provide an enhanced streetscape Project Review City of Highwood Side & Rear Setbacks: Additionally, the minimum side setbacks are not met for the general building, required to be a minimum 10 feet and 5 feet is provided. Rear yard with no alley for the general building is set to be 30 feet adjacent to single family uses (Funston uses appear to be two single family and one multi-unit building). If all multi-unit, the setback would be 10 feet with the current draft code. This plan shows no rear setback. A rear setback would be desirable, considering the properties on the other side of the rear lot line. This would potentially reduce the footprint of the parking structure; however, with the proposed reduction in required parking, the number of spaces provide may be more than necessary. Site Coverage: The total coverage permitted with the current draft code is 85% of the lot, though 25% of that coverage would be required to be semi-pervious. The semi-pervious cover could be handled through the dog park noted for the garage roof deck or additional green roof. The required setbacks, if met, could also provide additional semi-pervious and/or pervious areas. Parking: Parking for this building is located fully within the building. See below. The location of the dumpster would not meet the requirements of being located in the rear of the building, though with the garage door closed it would not be visible. Additionally, see requirements for occupied building space below. Building Height The building appears to meet the requirements of building height, currently set to be a minimum of 2 stories and a maximum of 5.5 stories (6 stories is also being considered). Floor to floor heights for the upper residential stories are 12 feet, within the range of the current draft (9' to 14'). The ground story commercial height is 17 feet, which would not be permitted by this building height. Again, this buillding is utilizing the storefront building requirements which would allow a taller storefront space on the ground story 5 Project Review: 440 Green Bay Road for the building types and limits drive and garage access. (though this is taller than the neighborhood Mixed Use district would currently allow. Use within the Building Overall uses were discussed above under the District section. The parking located within the building is ideal, with the exception of the entrance location already noted. The parking is located in the rear of the lot, screened fully by the building. Parking is not visible from the street, located behind generally occupied space. The occupied space regulation requires 20 feet depth of space along the primary frontage for all stories that must be regularly occupied by people. The would apply to all primary frontage. The utilities area adjacent to the garage entrance on Green Bay would not qualify as occupied space. These uses in this location provide further dead space along the garage. The electrical room may be located beyond the 20 foot requirement. Facade & Cap Requirements The building appears to meet the facade requirements, including a minimum of 15% tranparency for all stories (the storefronts would not be required for the general building type) and the number of entrances along the ground story. Entrance configurations and elevations are currently designed for storefronts, but would meet the stoop requirements. Blank Wall Limitations: The blank facades associated with the utility areas adjacent to the garage entrance, as well as the garage entrance would not meet the blank wall requirements, appearing to extend more than 15 feet and possibly occupying 30 percent of the facade. Expression Lines: The facade design would meet the requirements for horizontal expression line at the ground story, but does not include the required line at the bottom of the 5th story. Vertical divisions between the storefront windows meets that requirement. Cap Type: The cap type requirements are not met for this building. The building permits a parapet, pitched or flat roof. The design illustrated appears to use a parapet, but does not meet the expression line requirements associated with this roof type, especially on the composite rainscreen facades. A consistent complaint during image preference survey discussions is that contemporary buildings are not capped, the facade material just ends. Survey participants state that the buildings look boxy and unfinished. The cap types defined are intended to finish off the building, providing either a pitched roof, a parapet defined with expression and shadow lines, and a visibly flat roof with a substantial overhanging eave. MATERIALS & COLOR Major Materials: The building uses brick. a rainscreen of composite panels, and some limestone veneer as the major facade finish materials. The brick is defined as a permitted major material. Composite siding is typically a less expensive type of architectural metal panel system, currently permitted. No prohibited materials are utilized. Simplicity of Major Materials: The code currently requires one material to be used for 60 percent of the facade. This is meant to reduce the complexity of facade designs seen in many contemporary buildings. This building may not meet this requirement, with each major material occupying what looks like 50 percent of the facade. Limited Use Major Material: Concrete block used on side and rear facades is permitted in the draft as a limited facade material. The elevation states that the block is painted, while the code draft requires the block to be burnished, glazed, or honed. Minor Materials. No minor materials are called out on this submittal with the exception of the limestone veneer and cap on the rear parking deck, which is an acceptable major or minor w w w . c o d a m e t r i c s . c o m 6 Project Review City of Highwood LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS Roof Materials: Roof materials include metal standing seam as called out for the principal entrance bay. Frontage buffers and interior parking lot landscape is not required for this design, as no exterior parking or loading areas are provided. BUILDING FACADE ELEMENTS STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS Windows: The windows on all facades appear to be vertically oriented, operable, clear, and recessed, though additional information is required in terms of glass specifications, operability, and depth of window detail. The general building would qualify as a nonstorefront development, with the minimum 12 front landscape area planted with planting beds. Additionally, non-storefront developments are required to install a landscape parkway and street trees. Lintels: The only window requirement that is not met is a requirement for delineation of window lintels. Similar to the capping of the building, the visibility of lintels over windows provides a sense of structure for the window opening as well as a level of detail around the windows, often lacking on contemporary facades. The working group will discuss this requirement. Awnings: Awnings appear to meet the requirements of the draft code. Balconies: The balconies on the submittal appear to meet all of the requirements of the draft code. The balconies are integrated with the design of the facade (and not tacked on), and do not share supports among multiple balconies. The size of the balconies may be shallower than the required minimum 4 feet, but appear to meet the minimum 5 foot width. Further, the balconies do not appear to cover more than 40 percent of the primary facade, but further measuring would be required. Principal Entryway: The principal entry, in this case the entrance into the lobby, is defined by a separate material, sidelights and transom, and separate building bay with a pitched cap. This design utilized four of the outlined design options, while only two are required. OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS With 52 units, the minimum number of spaces required by the draft code would be 63 spaces, not including spaces for the commercial use. Commercial uses would be required to meet the existing code. With the exception of restaurants, generally the space would require an additional 10 spaces. Further, however, the total number of spaces could be reduced due to proximity to the station (15%), on-street spaces, public parking associated with the station area (?), provision of long-term bicycle parking, and motorcycle parking. 73 spaces required - 11 spaces for transit credit - 3 on-street spaces across the street - 6 spaces for potential motorcycle/scooter parking - 8 spaces if a long-term bicycle space is provided for each unit Total of 45 spaces required. The applicant may choose to provide additional spaces. OTHER DESIGN ELEMENTS None of the other design requirements are applicable: rear parking facade treatment, parking structure, fuel stations, and drive-throughs. Project Review City of Highwood 7 Project Review: 440 Green Bay Road material. CITY OF HIGHWOOD PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Public Hearing Wednesday, June 8, 2016 6:30 PM Request: Property in Question 546 Green Bay Road 16-15-207-027 16-15-207-011 Owner: Wintrust Financial Corporation Applicant: Highwood Property Investors LLC/FIDES Capital Partners LLC Zoning District B-1 Retail Business District R-3 Residential Duplex Dwelling Petition for a Planned Unit Development Summary: The Petitioner, Highwood Property Investors LLC/FIDES Capital Partners LLC has submitted a petition for a planned unit development. The development is a four story residential development of 28 total units consisting of 16 two bedroom units and 12 one bedroom units. The site plan demonstrates the development utilizing 24 onsite parking spaces in addition to 13 existing onstreet spaces along Washington Avenue adjacent to the development. Staff Review and Comment: In the Downtown Projects Guidebook recently approved by the City of Highwood, these parcels fall within the Green Bay Road District. This district states that “Well established and successful existing businesses should remain, but other uses, such as office and residential buildings, should be considered.” Further in the report, stand-alone apartment buildings are recommended for heights up to four stories, which match the existing properties on Lake View Avenue, with heights of four to seven stories recommended for mixed-use buildings to generate viable development economics. While the Green Bay parcel is currently in the B-1 district, adding additional commercial or office space may not be justified due to existing vacancies. The added density of 62.2 units per acre may serve to create additional support to fill these vacancies and increase the feasibility of other sites closer to the train station and downtown core. The greatest challenge with this particular development is providing sufficient parking for tenants and guests. The Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council recently approved another development on Webster & Clay with parking sufficient for 1.2 spaces per unit. These reduced parking requirements were recommended in the Downtown Projects Guidebook for certain sites and it is common for municipalities to have reduced parking requirements for Transit Oriented Developments with accessibility to public transportation. This calculation would require 34 spaces on the property, of which 24 are onsite and 13 are on Washington Avenue. Staff has been informed the 13 spots on Washington Avenue were previously dedicated to Scornavacco’s, the former business located on site. Additionally, Staff would recommend modifying the parking restrictions on the East side of Green Bay Road adjacent to the railroad tracks. Along Lakeview Avenue and Clay Avenue, near development of a similar scale, the City allows for overnight permitted parking at a rate of $90 per quarter. This project is not anticipated to generate the need for these additional spots but this would offer an additional alternative for tenants of this building or other nearby residents while filling underutilized spaces. 1 Public Comments Received: No written comments have been received regarding this petition. If the Planning & Zoning Commission considers recommending the granting of a variance the following minimum conditions would be recommended: Conditions: 1. Engineering plans must be reviewed and approved by the City’s engineer to appropriately address any stormwater concerns on the property. 2. This project must be reviewed by the Appearance Review Committee to ensure compliance with the Appearance Review Code. 3. That the Petitioner shall comply with such other or appropriate requirements imposed by the City for the proposed improvements including but not limited to recommendations of the Appearance Review Committee, City Engineer, City Planner, City Building Consultant and/or City Staff for the construction and maintenance of the proposed improvements on the premises. 4. That the Petitioner pays all costs incurred by the City of Highwood for the zoning proceedings and any costs incurred by the City of Highwood related to the processing, review and enforcement of this proposal. Submitted by Scott Coren, City Manager 2 Planning Department PETITION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 17 Highwood Avenue, Highwood, IL 60040 (Phone) 847.432.1924 (Fax) 847.432.0735 City of Highwood SECTION I: DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION 1. INDEX INFORMATION: (To be completed by City Staff) Application Number: __________________________________________________ Title: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ Date of Submission: ___________________________________________________ 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (All correspondence will be sent to the petitioner) a. Petitioner: Address: City: _Highwood Property Investors LLC / FIDES Capital Partners LLC_ _225 E. Deerpath Road, Suite 134 Lake Forest Telephone: Fax Number: Email Address: State: _IL Zip: 60045 847-274-3544 _ ______________________________________________________ [email protected]____________ _ b. Relationship of Petitioner to Property: Future owner & developer of 542-546 Greenbay Road (parcel under contract) c. Current Owner of Property: FCBT Holdings, LLC, Series 546 Green Bay __ Address: Wintrust Financial Corporation 9700 West Higgins Road, Suite 650 City: _Rosemont State: IL Zip: 60018__ _ Telephone: Fax Number: ___Chris Swieca 847-939-9083______________________________ ______________________________________________________ 3. APPROVALS REQUESTED _ Site Plan Approval _ Rezoning (1) Parcel A: ____ acres from ____ to _____________ (2) Parcel B: __ __acres from _____________to_______________ _____Special Use _____Variation(s) _ X Other: 4. ___PUD___________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF REQUESTED ACTIONS: ______Height variation and inclusion of 13 public street parking spaces as part of the parking space per unit requirement. __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ 5. PROJECT STAFF: Developer: _Gregg Handrich (FIDES) Engineer: ___Pat Bleck___________ Architect: ___Bob Bleck___ Landscape Architect: 6. Phone: Phone: _847-274-3544_ ____________ Phone: ____________ Phone: _ _847-247-0303_ __________________ DESCRITION OF SITE: a. Location (address): 542-546 Greenbay Road, Highwood, IL 60018_ b. Comprehensive Plan Designation: c. Existing Zoning: d. Existing Land Use: Vacant Land e. Existing Structures: None _______________________ f. Significant natural amenities (slope, vegetation, water bodies, rock outcropping, etc.) ___________ _ _______________B-1____ _ _ None g. Flood plains and other development restrictions: _ None _ _ 7. CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA: Zoning/Jurisdiction Land Use North R-3 Residential South B-1 Residential East B-2 Commercial West R-3 Residential 8. PUD INFORMATION: Land Use breakdown: Residential Commercial Industrial No. of acres Percentage of total Parking/Landscaped Institutional Other Area Total .17 .28 .45 38% 62% 100% Residential Density: Number of Units Net Acres Net Density Gross Acres Gross Density Single-family Townhome Condominium Apartments 28 .45 62.2 .45 62.2 Total 28 .45 62.2 .45 62.2 Type of Unit Net acres = land development for that land use type not including right-of-way Net density = number of units/net acres Gross acres = land designated for that land use type including right-of-way Gross density = number of units/gross acres 9. VARIATIONS: List and justify any requested variation(s) from the (a) Zoning Ordinance and (b) Subdivision Control Ordinance (attach additional pages if necessary): ________________________________________________________________________ 10. LIST OF REQUIRED EXHIBITS FOR CITY DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW A. Plat of Survey ____ B. Location Map ____ C. Existing Conditions Exhibit ____ ! Existing topography ! Significant environmental features (wetlands, floodplain, streams/creeks, lakes/ponds, drainage ways, trees and vegetation) ! Existing structures ! Location of existing public and private utilities (overhead or underground) D. Site Plan, including data table listing the following: ____ ! Site Area ! Building Area ! Open Space ! Parking (# of spaces, including accessible spaces) ! Units of Proposed Uses (e.g., # of residential units; # of sq ft of retail or office) E. Engineering Plans ____ ! Grading Plan ! Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (can be combined with Grading Plan) ! Stormwater Drainage and Detention Plan ! Utilities Plan ! Wetland Protection Plan, if applicable ! Floodplain Development and Protection Plan, if applicable F. Architectural Plans ____ ! Building Elevations ! Floor Plans ! Color 3D Architectural Renderings (street level views) ! Materials list and samples G. Landscape Plan ____ H. Lighting Plan ____ I. Traffic Impact Study ____ J. Market Study ____ K. Fiscal Impact Analysis (impacts on City, schools, taxes, and other taxing districts) ____ L. Schedule (Phasing Plan) ____ M. Covenants, if applicable ____ N. Findings of Fact for PUD and Zoning Variations ____ O. All of the above files shall be provided in 2 full-sized hard copy sets and in PDF format on a CD or flash drive ____ In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this site plan Petitioner: Highwood Property Investors LLC / FIDES Capital Partners LLC ______________. (Print or type name) _ _ (Petitioner’s Signature) Date: _______4/21/16___________________________________________________________ Current Owner of Property: ________________________________________________________________ (Print or type name) ___________________________________________________________________ (Property Owner’s Signature) Date: ___________________________________________________________________ Bleck & Bleck Architects Illinois Registration Number: 184-001815 200 E. Church Street LibertyviHe, Illinois 60048 Office Fax Email [HJ IRIIIRIIIRII~ B ILJLJ IIRIIRIIRI ~~ ODIi ,~,~ B SIi) ID [email protected] ,~,DI ______E;,_ IIRIIRIIFII ~~ 11~~ 84 7 · 24 7 · 0303 847 · 247 · 1737 Apartment Building for: BIi LJDD IDD_~gQIBgia}l:iill a• ~~~~~-V'/v>)<vX~ loB~DID LJ <>'<' ~Bl I II I I I Green Bay Rd I Highvvood, Bhnois DD D _II For Preliminary Heview Date: April 19, 2016 Revisions: SOUTt-1 ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 5CALE: I/Ii&" = 1'-IZ>" 5CALE, I/Ii&" = 1'-IZ>" .-: Hl~I <!l' -~ A / ' . .,~.. /',. A / ' ...~•.. /·, A /' • ,--------------1 ,------- Ill .."' ·~ ' (!l '"' ·v' ',/ ·v- ·v· '•/ ',/ ·v- ·v· '•/ ' / V 11111 11111 ---------.1------, II 11 ,--------, I ~· Ir= ,,~111~,,~,f'=jl-== 1111 Ill Ill ,---------, I ,--------------.-,--------, II 1111 Ill ·~ ~· 11===1 l~ll~I 'f'=Jl~!t==-1 l~IILdl Ill =~ I~ J 1~n1n1n~m:i10 01o~~n1n~m:Jo~~n1n~101 /\ ,,.,.--,, r. -·- 11""'"\II\. r 1,11~ B B B B Bl IBI B B 8 8 [ I B llil LJD II D D D 128'-5" NORTt-1 ELEVATION 5CALE: I/Ii&" • 1'-IZ>" WEST ELEVATION 5CALE: I/Ii&" = 1'-IZ>" Sheet: of: Project Ko. 1 3904 Bleck & Bleck Architects Illinois Registration Number: 184-001815 "' "'"' 200 E. Church Street LibertyviHe, Illinois 60048 2S TOT AL LNITS 16 2 3R UNITS 12 I BR Ui',ITS "'' ' 24 0'-1 SITE PARKINS SPACES 13 DEDICATED STREET PARK '-IG SPACES 1.32 PARKINS SPACES I LNIT l1~d11 ~ Q co SITE A~EA BUILDING COVERAGE PERi"'EA6LE S TC:: COVERAGE ~. .. m· ~ En ~ 0 oo 1:a& 1·1 11 111 66 -0 1 Email 84 7 · 24 7 · 0303 84 7 · 24 7 · 1737 [email protected] (P 24 PARKING SPACES i;;;Ei) Office Fax 1'3,b23SF 14 ':, l2J SF 3 B .0 '.7o 1':, ':,12Jl2JSF 1 '3.12J'.7c Apartment Building for: Green Bay Rd Highvvood, Bhnois 1 Q I~ 24'-0 11 01. 6:2''-:2)' 01 ,, B'-:2' 11 ,o r' " Q ' For Preliminary Heview Date: April 19, 2016 Revisions: 13 dPACIES @ ~~r~1"~2~,;AN 128 l svv SF (_)aa_ [] [ J0 II I I I D - - D - LJ ;::, r' - c:::; N I D n = -=i - - - ~ ?~_))l, - / ' ~t; \ Q le:-) ' C,~ 0O c:-J ~ Q IREF. II - J C:r I C ::, - c:; :::, I Q Q Q ;/: Or D ~ = C::::::;: ~ I ' 188 JIREF D D - -;::, I m:pwl D 188 IR=F.11 (:-; //// -n~ LJ o:) DX X D '' I I II ~ 2' :,; I !', ' ~:-) C:-)1 Q IIREF I 188 c:-;, (:-)I Q 4'-0" ~ ~ Q ., I ' Q "''-3, •I ro'•' r -!) - .,0_)/ <;-i / / / I!) ill ~ O IC) \ ill \ II ~ \ " ·, \ \ ,,_,,"' I .'-... I ' - 'II '3' -2 II N ' (P D [] ;,., :-. u\ - '' D 0 DX 0 C CJ 0 I rn:pwl - ' I DD 111~~111 1-·10 --- u !::, Co~ = D :_=) D LJ n n =D D ~ rn1 .~o --o :=) D - DD ( - 11 I l:Pwl F D X I CJD CJ 0 (") (") 0 11'6Et I 881 ( " '1 1 - lpw:rn I 0 C. -- (") 0 ll '6Et I 681 88lt•nll C) A "' ' C:-) c_)aa D1 - G812J SF I I - l:pum I D u I ':':8? oF IC)B[B I 0 -=i ~ ~ II D~ - c::; II (_)rf9rF9l D - '335 SF 'II ~ - D - I!::, n ~ ~ [] D - n ' ·~I '· 02 :0, SF II @ ~J~e~irE>"~~-;;OR - 11102s s= 1 FLAN II 800 SF I Sheet: of: Project Ko. 1 3904 I~ 11 1-----G_RE_E_NB_A_Y _RO _A_D_&_w_AS_H_IN_G_TO _N_ s_m_ E_ET _ _ _ _- I , , . . q: / Man ha r m < -< C ::D en m r- -t -t zC )1,, r- ~ en > > (') - -t > r- l.! 1 ::,1 -,,.; \ I I . .A.VENUE WASHWGTON llll'J~tiOUS . PA\01ENT ' l c1 ';1 CONC;:'(TE 'I/AU< !i'1 ·• I I I J:i' \ I~ ~ •..: ... I I I \ c.. FE\ ~...E ""OST I~ O. -l.£ ~-4 k C !·.r- 'II. S-X.1H C:. ,~, C F~~ !f i.t) _iE l't O.:i. S.. PARCEL 1 LOT 1 $;;1[ilgh?B~O~l•£ ,:JJF llltl;i~:~ o{'; It~~ J.§:. :I'l1.;ii;C~~I!£ fCJ3:JB'¥'1~1~26 rn[,~1,-'i:1,'<'.'~t: ..,,~: ~ ~fil~l;.,i·~ ~r:J~~r,o~ton1l ·:. ". "'·'·-,-1.:'<lH U} E : F L:iT 2 LOT 2 ,_. ... 0o --~ " C ,j 0 :. ,:;,!ElE ::e::- TE>'t CF :'.'.1£".•,duT t, r,; : ,r ,... - .... R:', FE>iCE E~hI 1:;..: J €'<' ._E ~ 1Sc;;~ R I F£N::E mo 'J.6 s./ Bll\J>Jl'l0-t5 "'<,',E\<E";T ••/ Vi ~ ,:,· t-1 I rn,l,Z IS O.S " ·~ . TE:"> CF r-c·11E"i ti.£, IS 0. I.,.'·<;/ I I ,,.n .'Vi UNr: a ., ._ \ " s l>&l!B>EM LOT 2 . w£!' F' INCUS ~T • 1/; ~-:,:; f :., ;..,( •:::~J~·,t S' PL b'LIC .>,LLEY l!..J'i' ~ ~~;~]~t'fO~O,C:Jf ~IF E:l!.~CIT{ ~ Of<l .,,;.~ :~:;~~t.EIXEIUL~ ~JJi®l'.;flli-10@1©:t~; C~tl1~r1~~ ffe:.3"i[G> if~J.fi't'~ ~:,;J~!GB'iti'l~D~~) .~5-'2 ~"1 L_ I l. ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY 542-546 GREENBAY ROAD, HIGHWOOD, ILLINOIS ,_ _ _ _ _ GR_E_EN_BA _ Y_R_ OA_D_& _WA_S_HIN _ G_To _N_ST _R_EE_T _ _ _ _ , If ~~ . i ja ~ I i !I ~;:'!., :,,'1,, • • ~ ·rrr § ~ I n !I 'i - B - CO N S U LT I N C Manha r ...,.• ~ ! j a I ~~ :fI ! I ,1 ! ~ 1i . ~ s~ ;iii! 1 f i rI ;lll~u if! ~ f!f m :I-. --HI I I -iJ --.- Pe .I . I<; !_ ~ E=~~~.:.=~=S - ~ in .... , 1 l~i .i~ i .:.~ ~ 5~ : !ll t; I l ,_ _ t:.. ~ ::i ~ m < -< C :rJ en m =i r- -f ~ r> ~ z ~ C ~ > > 0 en - > r- -f May 10, 2016 CODAMETRICS Scott Coren City Manager Highwood, Illinois delivery: [email protected] RE: Project Review - 546 Green Bay Road Dear Scott, Attached please find a project review for the above named project, reviewed first based upon the existing code, then reviewed based upon the current draft regulations for the downtown district. In terms of meeting the EXISTING CODE regulations, the two main concerns for the project are as follows: 1. Parking Design. The main concern of the development is the side yard parking lot, which is not permitted per the existing parking regulations. The surface lot occupies about a third of the Washington frontage, adjacent to the single family home to the west, and extends into the front yard adjacent to the sidewalk. There is no location for screening and cars would be visible from all vantage points down Washington, east and west. Further, the development does not include any structured parking, per the existing code. 2. Quality of the Project. While not specifically stated in the code, the PUD standards allude to a higher quality of design. In my opinion, the materials, floor-to-floor heights, the at-grade, first story (while not required in the proposed code), and the lack of recessed windows will result in a building that feels lower in quality. In terms of meeting the PROPOSED CODE, the main items for discussion include the following: 1. Parking Lot on Primary Frontage. Similar to the existing code review, the parking lot in the side yard is the biggest issue. The lot should be located in the rear, screened from the street by the building. 2. Transparency. The other shortcoming is the level of transparency (windows) on the two end facades. The facade on the parking lot is highly visible from the street, being setback from the side lot line 66 feet. 3. Facade Material. Additional information is needed (wood, vinyl, hardieboard?), but siding is not currently included in the major facade materials. If vinyl, the material is prohibited in the draft. 4. Recessed Window. Recessing windows a minimum of 2 inches from the facade is one of the best ways to achieve a higher quality facade. The recess adds a layer of depth www.codametrics.com and three-dimensions to the facade, even when the facade of a lower quality material. Thank you for the opportunity to review the projects. I look forward to our discussions. Leslie Oberholtzer, AICP, RLA, LEED AP Principal w w w . c o d a m e t r i c s . c o m EXISTING CODE REVIEW Business (B-1) District & PUD Zoning The site is currently designated for B-1 zoning and the applicant is requesting a Planned Unit Development designation. Uses: The residential uses permitted are consistent with the B-1 zoning in the upper floors; however, B-1 specifically prohibits residential uses on the ground floor on this section of Green Bay Road. Lot Area: The minimum lot area for multifamily uses in B-1 is 10,000 sf. For PUD zoning, the minimum required area is double that, 20,000 sf (11-10-2). The lot is less than 20,000 sf per the submittal information. Building Height: The maximum height of a B-1 building is 35 feet and no more than 3 stories. The height of the proposed development is 4 stories, not consistent with the base district. Though not specifically stated, the PUD may be utilized for increased height, in the form of density. Lot Coverage & Density: The density of the development is approximately 62 units/acre (28 units on .45 acres). There is no base density for the B-1 district, but a limit is placed on multiplefamily uses. The limit requires the development not to exceed a floor area ratio of 100% of the lot area (this project is close to 150%), lot coverage of 33.3 % (this project is 38% per the submittal), and impervious surface of 60% (this project is 62% per the submittal). Setbacks: The PUD standards say the yards shall be at least equal in width or depth to that of the adjacent zoning district. The zoning districts adjacent to the parcel are B-1 and R-3. B-1 has no setback requirements; for hotels, motels, and multiple-family uses (and R-3 districts), however, a front setback of 30 feet and a side setback of 5' Project Review City of Highwood is required. R-3 requires a minimum 20' rear yard. The project includes a 17' front setback, 66' side setback, and 5' rear setback. The PUD standards also state that buildings over 24 feet in height are required to set the building back from any property line equal to the height of the building. This project does not meet those requirements. [Note: These requirements are inappropriate for a mixed use downtown and more in line with a larger scale development of multiple buildings on several acres.] Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: Currently, the comprehensive plan map designates this parcel as Mixed Use/Downtown Core. Further, the comprehensive plan states that new higher density development can "complement the built form, scale, and character of existing commercial, while respecting the surrounding residnetial neighborhoods." This development is more consistent with the comprehensive plan language than the existing code requirements. The surface parking lot in the side yard and extending into the front yard is not consistent with the language of the comprehensive plan, which promotes well-designed, higher density, pedestrian-oriented development. Compatibility with Surrounding Sites: The uses of this development are consistent with the surrounding sites (residential). Need: No need has been stated in the application; however, the project would provide a significant number of residential units in close proximity to both the train station and the heart of the downtown. Purpose & Intent of the Planned Unit Development: This development provides a development type that fulfills a key recommendation of the comprehensive plan 3 Project Review: 546 Green Bay Road PROJECT REVIEW: 546 GREEN BAY ROAD for the downtown: higher density development utlizing existing infrastructure. Parking The off-street parking required for the number of units and the commercial space would be 70 spaces, while the proposal includes a total of 24 on-site spaces plus 13 adjacent head-in, on-street spaces for a total of 37 spaces. The provision of fewer spaces is consistent with transit-oriented development recommendation of 1.2 spaces per residential unit previously approved by the City. However, the code also requires that half of all multifamily parking spaces must be provided under or within the principal building. And, further, that no parking shall be permitted in any required front or side yard setback. This proposal conflicts with all of these requirements: the surface lot is located in the side yard and extends into the front yard beyond the building face. Appearance Review Parkways and Public Ways: The application does not include information related to installation of street trees as required in 10-3-7-5. Trash Enclosures: Trash dumpsters are located would also likely be located in the side yard parking, visible from the street. Fencing and screening would help, but the opening would likely face the street. Additionally, a trash enclosure in the parking area would be adjacent to the single family home next door. PROPOSED CODE REVIEW This review follows the current draft requirements of the downtown districts, dated April 28, 2016. At the time of this project review, the working committee for the code has just begun review of the code. Staff has reviewed a preliminary version. REGULATING PLAN District The regulating plan currently denotes the 542-546 Green Bay series of lots as RX 1: Residential Mix, the highest intensity multi-unit residential district. Uses: The district would allow a 4 story building with only residential uses. Primary Street The regulating plan designates Green Bay Road as a primary street for this lot, though it also contemplates whether Washington should be considered primary. Because the entrance door into the building appears to be on the Washington facade, this review assumes Washington as the primary frontage. Primary frontage designation requires certain build-to requirements for the building types and limits parking frontage and drive access. BUILDING TYPE The permitted building types for RX 1 are the General Building, the Row Building, and the Civic Building. The height and use distribution is most similar to the General Building; therefore, this review will use the General building type requirements. Building Siting Following the requirements of the building type regulation tables in the draft document, this building is generally sited with some exceptions. Minimum Primary Frontage Coverage: Estimating the lot length along Washington as 166', deducting the required side yard of 25' (see w w w . c o d a m e t r i c s . c o m 4 Project Review City of Highwood Build-to Zone: The build-to zone of the building type is set to be between 12 and 25 feet for the primary frontage and 12 and 25' for the nonprimary frontage. This building would meet the requirements of the primary street frontage (Washington) as it is proposed to be built between 17 and 24 feet, but would not meet the nonprimary build-to zone, being proposed between 5 and 12 feet from the lot line. Additional sidewalk area would also likely be required along Green Bay to accommodate a 10 foot streetscape, increasing the build-to area a couple of feet. Side & Rear Setbacks: Side setbacks for the general building are defined as 10', with a minimum of 25' adjacent to a single family house. Rear is set at 10, with 5' at an alley and a minimum of 30' abutting a single family house. In this case, the single family house to the west would trigger a 25' side yard setback and the rear yard setback would be 10' except 5' adjacent to the alley. Also note that the parking lot would not be permitted within the 25 foot side yard setback. [working group to consider reducing it to 15 feet]. Site Coverage: The total coverage permitted with the current draft code is 85% of the lot, though 25% of that coverage would be required to be semi-pervious. The approximate combination of building and parking lot on this lot appears to be around 88% coverage, so some portion of the parking lot would need to be semi-pervious or a portion of the roof green. Parking: Parking for this building type is required to be located fully in the rear yard only. Parking for this building is partially located in a side yard lot. The dumpster would also likely be located within this lot, visible from the street. Trash is required to be located in the rear yard. Project Review City of Highwood Building Height The building appears to meet the requirements of building height, currently set to be a minimum of 2 stories and a maximum of 5.5 stories (6 stories is also being considered). Floor to floor heights for the upper residential stories appear to be about 9.5 feet, within the range of the current draft (9' to 14'), though on the lower end. Use within the Building The proposed building appears to meet the requirements of this section: residential uses with no parking within the building. All facades have occupied spaces located adjacent to them. Facade & Cap Requirements The building appears to generally meet the facade requirements with a few exceptions. Entrance: The current draft requires an entrance for every 90 feet of primary frontage facade. Assuming Washington is the primary frontage, at least 2 entrances would be required. The configuration and elevation would meet the requirements. Minimum Transparency: A minimum of 15% tranparency is required for all street facade stories as well as facades "visible from the street". The Green Bay Road (east) elevation has less than 5 percent coverage and the west elevation facing the parking lot (considered visible from the street) has only 3 percent transparency. The Washington elevation appears to just meet the minimum transparency at 16 percent per story. Blank Wall Limitations: Further, the east and west elevations would not likely meet the blank wall limitations. Blank wall limitations limit blank walls without windows to any overlaid rectangle of no more than 30% of the story and no 15’ length of the story without windows. In the draft, this is explained in 11-6-14.D.2. Expression Lines: The facade design would meet the requirements for horizontal expression line at the ground story on Green Bay, but does not 5 Project Review: 546 Green Bay Road below) and the non-primary minimum frontage of 12 feet, a 102 foot building (estimated) would provide a 77 percent coverage, short of the required 80 percent. include it on the Washington facade. The recessed bays would fulfill the vertical division requirement. Cap Type: The cap type requirements do not appear to be met for this building. The building type permits a parapet, pitched or flat roof. The design illustrated appears to use a parapet, but does not meet the expression line requirements associated with this roof type and does not appear to meet the minimum height for a parapet. A consistent complaint during image preference survey discussions is that contemporary buildings are not capped, the facade material just ends. Survey participants state that the buildings look boxy and unfinished. The cap types defined are intended to finish off the building, providing either a pitched roof, a parapet defined with expression and shadow lines, and a visibly flat roof with a substantial overhanging eave. be vertically oriented, operable, and clear, though additional information is required in terms of glass specifications and operability. The depth of the window detail is not apparent, though is suspected to be very shallow, especially on the facades where siding is specified. Window depth from facade to glass is required to be 2 inches in the current draft. Lintels: Lintels are not expressed on any of the windows,. Balconies: There are no balconies currently shown. [The working group may consider requiring balconies for some portion of the units.] Principal Entryway: The principal entry is defined by a separate material (tile) and separate building bay with a taller component. This design utilized two of the outlined design options. OTHER DESIGN ELEMENTS MATERIALS & COLOR Major Materials: The building uses brick and two sides of "siding". As currently written, no type of siding is permitted on the general building as a major material and vinyl siding is prohibited. More information would be required. Simplicity of Major Materials: The draft code also currently requires one major material to be used for 60 percent of the facade. This is meant to reduce the complexity of facade designs seen in many contemporary buildings. This building may not meet this requirement, with the proportions of brick to siding shown. Minor Materials. The tile called for on the entrance bay is not currently listed as a major or minor material, but could be considered as an "other" material for special use approval as currently written.. BUILDING FACADE ELEMENTS Windows: The windows on all facades appear to None of the other design requirements are applicable: rear parking facade treatment, parking structure, fuel stations, and drive-throughs. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS The side yard parking lot, though not permitted, would also require a frontage buffer and interior parking lot landscape. STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS The general building would qualify as a nonstorefront development, with the minimum 12 front landscape area planted with planting beds. Additionally, non-storefront developments are required to install a landscape parkway and street trees. The on-street parking spaces that currently exist should be incorporated into the streetscape design, though the code does not outline requirements as such. OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS With 28 units, the minimum number of spaces required by the draft code would be 34 spaces, utilizing the previously approved TOD w w w . c o d a m e t r i c s . c o m 6 Project Review City of Highwood Project Review: 546 Green Bay Road recommendation of 1.2 spaces per unit. The total number of spaces could be reduced further due to proximity to the station (15% -- site is just barely within 1/4 mile), on-street spaces, and potential provision of long-term bicycle parking and/or motorcycle/scooter parking. 34 spaces required - 5 spaces for transit credit - 22 potential on-street spaces on Washington and Green Bay (though 2 hour limit on Green Bay spaces) - 3 spaces for potential motorcycle/scooter parking - 4 spaces if a long-term bicycle space is provided for each unit The applicant would likely not choose to utilize all of these credits, but very few spaces would be required on site. Project Review City of Highwood 7 53 W. Jackson Boulevard Suite 1326 Chicago, Illinois 60604 www.reci.biz MARKET FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS: PROPOSED 28-UNIT APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT on a 0.46 Acre Parcel at the Southwest Quadrant of Washington Avenue and Green Bay Road, Highwood, IL 60040 Prepared for: Mr. Gregg Handrich Principal Fides Capital Partners, LLC 225 E. Deerpath Road Suite 134 Lake Forest, IL 60045 April 29, 2016 53 W. Jackson Boulevard Suite 1326 Chicago, Illinois 60604 www.reci.biz Mr. Gregg Handrich Principal Fides Capital Partners, LLC 225 E. Deerpath Road Suite 134 Lake Forest, IL 60045 Re: April 29, 2016 Market Feasibility Analysis of a Proposed 28-unit Apartment Development on a 0.45 Acre parcel at the Southwest Quadrant of Washington Avenue and Green Bay Road, Highwood, IL 60040 Dear Mr. Handrich: At your request, we prepared a market feasibility analysis regarding the feasibility of a proposed 28 unit apartment development to be constructed adjacent to downtown Highwood, located at the southwest quadrant of Washington Avenue and Green Bay Road, Highwood, Illinois. In summary, first, we observed the subject property site, neighborhood and urban environs. Second, we performed an analysis of the economy of Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area economy and Lake County/Kenosha County Metropolitan Division, Illinois/Wisconsin economy. Third, we researched national apartment demand/supply trends, particularly recent changes in renter demand in the United States. Fourth, we prepared an analysis of the demand/supply dynamics of the southeast Lake County apartment submarket. Fifth, we performed a detailed survey of Class A and Class B/C apartment communities located in southeast Lake County, Illinois and other nearby submarkets; and a survey of rental condominium units in nearby Highland Park, Illinois and other North Shore communities. Sixth, we reviewed the unit mix and unit sizes of recently developed apartments as well as properties currently under construction. Seventh, we forecast absorption, established rental rates for each of the subject property’s units for the Primary Market Area and quantified demand through a capture rate analysis of rental units in the Primary and Secondary Market Area, as a whole. Our conclusions are based on the presented facts and rationale, and are subject to the limiting conditions and assumptions contained in this report. Our conclusions and recommendations appear in Section VIII of this report. Respectfully submitted, Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Thomas J. Amato, CRE RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Mary Claire Sparrow 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Executive Summary Section I THE ASSIGNMENT Scope of Work Objective Client Intended Use Intended Users Property Identification Limiting Conditions and Assumptions Hypothetical Conditions and Extraordinary Assumptions Professional Competency 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 Section II THE GEOGRAPHIC ENVIRONMENT Location The Highwood Community Roadways and Access Highwood Community Amenities Downtown Highwood /Surrounding Land Uses 4 4 4 6 7 11 Section III THE PROPERTY Site Redevelopment TIF District And Subject Site Redevelopment 19 19 21 Section IV THE MARKET ENVIRONMENT Regional Overview United States Economy Chicago MSA Economy Lake County Economy/Employment Trends 23 23 23 24 30 Section V DRIVERS OF APARTMENT DEMAND Introduction The Rentership Rate Increase The Nation’s Apartment Market Renters by Age Group Lake County, IL Population and Employment Lake County, IL Migration and Commuting Patterns Major Employment Centers in Lake County, IL 37 37 37 41 43 44 45 46 Section VI MARKET AREA DEMAND/SUPPLY Overview of Metro Chicago Apartment Market Apartment Market Area Definition Lake County and Market Area Apartment Deliveries 52 52 53 56 Section VII MARKET AREA APARTMENT DEMAND Market Area Demographics Market Area Housing Primary/Secondary Market Area Renter Demand Geodemographic Analysis of Market Area Households Competitive Alignment and Rental Survey Primary Market Area Demand Outlook/Absorption Unit Mix and Rental Rates 60 60 61 63 66 68 74 77 Section VIII FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS Findings/Conclusions Summary 82 82 RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2 ADDENDA Subject Property/Neighborhood Photos Potential Renter Household Targets Competitive Survey Limiting Conditions and Assumptions Certification Qualifications RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Assignment As determined by the consultant, with input from the client, the assignment was to prepare a market feasibility analysis for a 28 unit apartment development located on a site in downtown Highwood, Illinois. Property Location The subject development is planned for a 0.45 acre parcel located at the southwest quadrant of Washington Avenue and Green Bay Road in Highwood, Illinois. The property is presently vacant after a fire in 2009 destroyed the Victoria of Highwood banquet hall in 2009. According to the developer, the recognized address for the property is 544-546 Green Bay Road, Highwood, Illinois 60040 and is located in the Lake County/Kenosha County Metropolitan Division. Summary of Findings Even before the U.S. economy fell into recession a watershed change was emerging with respect to demand for rental housing in the United States. The nation's homeownership rate actually began declining in 2005. The conditions brought about by the Great Recession and post-recession period prompted a renewed appreciation for the benefits of renting. Nationally, households of all but the oldest age groups have joined in the shift toward renting. Chicago MSA employment is projected to continue to exhibit gains throughout the forecast period, though growth is forecast to lag somewhat behind the national average. Meanwhile, Lake County job growth has been fueling the demand for renter housing for some time. Over the last four decades, Lake County was transformed into a major employment center of the region, with most of the development occurring in the southeast portion of the county. Migration and commuting patterns are also contributing to the demand for rental housing in the county. The tightest apartment market conditions in eastern Lake County’s recent history have been exhibited in recent years. The defined Primary Market Area has a total inventory of 2,297 apartment units (and 3,939 total rental units). At the end of the 1st quarter 2016, the vacancy rate in the Primary Market Area was only 3.5%. The average monthly effective rent was $1,724 or $1.90 per square foot in the 1st quarter. For nearly the past 10 years, there were very few apartment units delivered in this market area until recently. The high apartment occupancy rates and recent strong growth in rents in the Primary and Secondary Market Areas indicate apartment demand continues to exceed supply and suggests that rental unit demand is presently not being met. This view is supported by: (1) the capture rate analysis that suggests that the subject property needs to capture only about 7% to 13% of qualified renter demand to be leased–up; and (2) a demand/supply forecast that suggests the delivery of as many as 363 apartment units (total of all apartment projects that are under construction or proposed in the Primary and Secondary Market Areas) will be able to be absorbed after an initial spike in the vacancy rate in the Primary Market Area. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 4 RECI forecasts that the vacancy rate will rise to between 4% and 6% as a result of the delivery of units under construction or proposed as of March 2016. If additional units are developed in the Primary Market Area through 2018, the vacancy rate could rise above 6%. Over the last four years (1st quarter 2012 to 1st quarter 2016), the average effective rent has increased by nearly 11% in the Primary Market Area, despite the delivery of two large apartment developments built just outside the Primary Market Area boundaries. Unit absorption at two of the largest properties (Woodview Apartments and Amli Deerfield Apartments), have been strong. Three potential sources of demand for apartments in downtown Highwood include: (1) renter households that work in downtown Highwood, downtown Lake Forest, Downtown Highland Park or other downtowns along the Metra line in Cook County; (2) renter households presently residing in older rented condos or apartments in the Highwood, Highland Park and Lake Forest communities that that may be more suited to newly constructed apartments; and (3) renter households residing in northern Cook County who work north of the Northbrook/Deerfield area, who presently commute by commuter train or vehicle. Using the PRIZM geodemographic database, we have identified a rather diverse mix of household types for apartments in downtown Highwood. In fact, the Primary Market Area contains a very diverse mix of household types. We have identified 10 household types or market segments that we believe contain a significant number of households that are either renters or given the opportunity, would become renters at a future stage in their lives. The household types include singles and couples, mostly without children. Potential target households may include 25-35 year olds, singles and couples in their late 30s and 40s, as well as older folks, including empty nesters. These households span a range of affluence that may include some considered to be Lower-Middle income, but mostly Midscale, Upper Middle, Upscale and some households that may be considered Wealthy. In view of the targeted demand segments, we believe that one bedroom and two-bedroom units should represent roughly 40% to 50% and 50% to 60% of total units, respectively. Based on the data that we have available to us, we have concluded a monthly absorption rate range for the subject property to be six to nine units per month. This absorption rate range implies that a 28 unit apartment project would be leased to 95% (i.e., 27 units) between three and four months. We have concluded that the target weighted average per square foot rental rate range for the 28 apartment units developed on the subject property should be in the range of $1,693 to $1,814 in today’s dollars. This equates to an average monthly rental rate of $1.88 to $2.02 per square foot. Observation Date: March 22, 2016, April 6, 2015 and April 12, 2016. Report Date: April 29, 2016 RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 5 SECTION I - THE ASSIGNMENT SCOPE OF WORK In preparing this report, we completed the following scope of work plan: identified the objective of the assignment; identified assignment elements, including the client, the subject property, its relevant characteristics, the intended users and the intended use of our opinions and conclusions; identified the specific assignment conditions, including any special assumptions, extraordinary assumptions, hypothetical conditions, supplemental standards, jurisdictional exceptions, and any other conditions that affect the scope of work; identified the property by addresses and described its location and neighborhood; observed the subject property and surrounding neighborhood on March 22, 2016, April 6, 2015 and April 12, 2016; analyzed the economy and employment base of the Lake County, IL/Kenosha County, WI Metropolitan Division and the Chicago; identified centers of employment in Lake County using employment statistics available from the Illinois Department of Employment Security and concentrations of office, industrial and retail space; evaluated retail, office and residential development trends in eastern Lake County, Illinois; evaluated metro Chicago apartment market statistics, especially those associated with southeastern Lake County, Illinois, including vacancy, absorption, deliveries and change in market average rent; delineated an apartment market area (i.e., a Primary and a Secondary Market Area); representing the geographic area that contains the apartment units and broader residential inventory that will most directly compete with the apartment units developed at the subject property; and the employment centers that will generate demand for new apartments developed at the subject property; reviewed demographic and housing trends for the city of Highwood, Lake County and the Primary and Secondary Market Areas; evaluated demand/supply dynamics for apartments in the Chicago MSA and the Primary and Secondary Market Areas; surveyed 17 apartment/rental properties located in and around the Primary and Secondary Market Areas, including five Class B/C properties, eight Class A apartment communities and four Class A condo/townhome rental properties; . RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 6 established the “market” rents for the subject property’s three unit types based on the rents, location and characteristics of the property’s surveyed; reviewed the unit mix and unit sizes of recently developed apartments as well as properties currently under construction; evaluated average monthly absorption rates of other urban/infill apartment properties and forecast an absorption rate for the subject property; forecast absorption and vacancy the Primary Market Area; and quantified rental housing unit demand through a capture rate analysis of rental units in the Primary and Secondary Market Areas. Market research of national, regional and local economic and market conditions was prepared from our analysis of public and private data sources. These sources include demographic and housing data from the U.S. Census, Neilsen, ERSI, S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index; employment data from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, Moody’s Analytics and the Illinois Department of Employment Security; apartment market statistics available from CoStar and other sources. Comparable rental information was gathered from both public and private sources and local property managers/operators. OBJECTIVE As determined by the consultant, with input from the client, the assignment was to prepare a market feasibility analysis for a 28 unit apartment development located on a site adjacent to downtown Highwood, Illinois. The subject property is planned for a 0.46 acre parcel located at the southwest quadrant of Washington Avenue and Green Bay Road in Highwood, Illinois. The recognized address for the property is 544-546 Washington Avenue, Highwood, 60040 and is located in the Lake County/Kenosha County Metropolitan Division. CLIENT Fides Capital Partners INTENDED USE This report is for use by the client and other specified users to establish rental apartment absorption and market rent parameters for the subject property as part of an evaluation of rental apartment demand. This report is not intended for any other use. The “readdressing” (transfer) of this report, or the consultant’s opinions and conclusions, to any party, other than the named client and its intended users, is prohibited. The consultant is not responsible for the unauthorized use of this report. INTENDED USERS Fides Capital Partners, LLC, the City of Highwood and prospective lender, as determined by the client. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION The recognized address for the property is 544-546 Washington Avenue, Highwood, 60040. The Subject Property is designated for tax purposes with the following Property Identification Numbers (PIN): 15-16-207-027 and 1516-207-011. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 7 LIMITING CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS AND EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCY This report is subject to the general limiting conditions and the specific assumptions stated in this report. Please see the list of limiting conditions and assumptions contained in the Addenda, as they represent an integral part of the research process and conclusion. A hypothetical condition is a condition, which is contrary to what exists, but is supposed for the purpose of analysis, and an extraordinary assumption is an assumption, directly related to the assignment, which, if found to be false, could alter the consultant’s opinions or conclusions. In this instance, we make three extraordinary assumptions. First, we assume that the United States economy and the Lake County, Illinois/Kenosha County, Wisconsin. Metropolitan Division continue their recovery from the Great Recession and overall economic growth mirror’s the economic forecasts as prepared by Moody’s Analytics in March 2016. Second, we assume that the unit absorption rates calculated at other similar urban/infill properties located in the Chicago market are reasonable indicators of the potential lease-up rate associated with the subject property’s 28 apartment units. Third, we assume that the number of units presently forecast for delivery in the Primary and Secondary Markets will not deviate materially for our current estimates. Our knowledge and previous experience in evaluating this property type qualifies us to competently complete this assignment. Please see the consultant’s professional qualifications in the Addenda for additional information. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 8 SECTION II-THE GEOGRAPHIC ENVIRONMENT LOCATION The city Highwood is located approximately 28 miles north of downtown Chicago in Lake County, Illinois. Incorporated as a city in 1868, Highwood is part of the Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI MSA. The metropolitan area contained approximately 9.6 million persons in 2015 and had an employment base of just over 4.6 million workers in the 4th quarter 2015. As shown in Figure 1, Highwood is positioned roughly in the middle of the Lake County portion of the “North Shore”, the suburban communities which extend northward along Lake Michigan from the city of Chicago. FIGURE 1: LOCATION OF CITY OF HIGHWOOD, IL Source: DeLorme Street Atlas USA THE HIGHWOOD COMMUNITY Highwood sits at a one of the highest elevation points between Chicago and Milwaukee, and was named for this high elevation and towering trees. Highwood is a small city, covering less than one square mile of land. Highwood was incorporated at the same time as the former Fort Sheridan Army Post, which was situated just east of Highwood, along the shores of Lake Michigan. Highwood’s identity as a hub for entertainment and dining pre-dates the establishment of Fort Sheridan, but its proximity to this military installation served to solidify this local function, as the presence of the USO in Highwood during World War II brought thousands of servicemen to the community. The image of the community as a focal point for entertainment and dining continues today, due to its geographical position at the center of the North Shore’s most affluent communities. While Fort Sheridan’s function as Highwood’s closest neighbor changed drastically when the main fort was officially closed in the early 1990’s, a small military presence remains, as approximately 90 acres of the southern portion of the site was retained by the military. Military functions remain through the current Sheridan Reserve Center complex, and new construction is ongoing with attractive office structures replacing antiquated, obsolete remnants of the base. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 9 Open lands and forest preserves took other portions of the Fort Sheridan land, while historically and architecturally significant barracks and residences were renovated, redeveloped and now serve as condominium, townhome and single-family residences owned or rented by civilians. Since the closing of Fort Sheridan Army Post, annexation agreements between the military and the neighboring cities of Highwood, Highland Park and Lake Forest increased the municipal boundaries of Highwood and Highland Park. Highland Park now almost completely surrounds Highwood, bordering the city on the north, south and west, and most portions of its eastern city limits as well. The affluent suburb of Lake Forest is situated nearby to the north, and other neighboring communities include Bannockburn, Deerfield and Northbrook. Highwood’s municipal boundaries are shown in Figure 2. FIGURE 2: CITY OF HIGHWOOD MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES Source: Google maps In addition to its identity as an entertainment and dining hub, Highwood grew as a working class suburb, chosen by waves of first Italian and later Hispanic immigrants seeking affordable residential choices within the affluent north shore enclave. In part due to the annexation of portions of Fort Sheridan, wherein residents with higher incomes moved into the new residences created when the area was redeveloped, Highwood now displays what real estate developers and commercial enterprises consider as “strong demographics.” Highwood’s 2015 average household income, at $98,577, while lower than that of its elite suburban neighbors, is over 25% higher than the state average, and 32% higher than the national average household income. Population density is high, at 5,680 persons per square mile. As Figure 3 below shows, Highwood’s population density is well above that of its neighbors or any other north shore community. Aside from the blighted community of North Chicago, Highwood also has the highest percentage of renter-occupied units, at 60.2%. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 10 In addition to the older one and two- story single-family residences which dominate Highwood’s residential neighborhoods, there are also many areas developed with two-to four-unit multi-family dwellings, mostly dating to the 1960’s through 1980’s, as well as one large garden apartment property, known as Fort Sheridan Place, which is located just northeast of the subject property, along Sheridan Road. FIGURE 3: DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS AND CRIME STATISTICS FOR NORTH SHORE COMMUNITIES Area Highwood Highland Park Lake Forest 2015 Population 5,680 29,880 19,505 2015 2015 - 2020 2015 Percentage Annual Average of RenterPopulation Household Occupied Change Income Units 0.59% $98,577 60.2% 0.09% $174,019 19.3% 0.20% $219,068 14.7% 2015 Population Per Square Mile 5,680 2,490 1,135 2013/2014 Average Crime Rate Per 100,000 918 1,174 807 North Chicago 30,503 -0.18% $59,376 64.4% 3,861 2,194 Lake Bluff 5,746 0.04% $202,550 12.6% 1,419 833 Knollwood 1,580 -0.38% $90,796 34.7% 2,376 N/A Green Oaks 3,873 0.09% $173,361 4.9% 963 N/A Libertyville 20,446 0.21% $146,183 22.2% 2,321 1,256 Vernon Hills 25,858 0.04% $127,109 27.9% 3,354 1,999 Deerfield 18,271 0.07% $191,691 12.8% 3,274 698 Northbrook 33,431 0.21% $162,407 14.0% 2,535 1,273 Glencoe 8,746 0.09% $267,952 8.9% 2,351 953 Winnetka 12,270 0.18% $262,449 12.2% 3,220 964 Kenilworth 2,567 0.35% $306,327 7.0% 4,208 1,273 Total North Shore 428,850 0.25% $145,594 24.5% -N/A State of Illinois 12,917,613 0.21% $78,861 34.9% 223 N/A United States 318,536,439 0.75% $74,699 37.0% 32 N/A Source: ESRI, 2015 Illinois Uniform Crime Report and Real Estate Counselors, International Note: Communities shown are part of the North Shore as defined by the MLS. Not all North Shore communities are included. Anticipated growth in population is slightly higher in Highwood than surrounding communities. Highwood’s population is projected to grow at 0.59% annually between 2015 and 2020. This projected annual growth rate is more typical of the United States as a whole, which is projected to grow 0.75% annually through 2020, than the North Shore, which is projected to grow 0.25% annually over the same time period, approximately one-half Highwood’s projection. ROADWAYS AND ACCESS Highwood is bisected by the Metra’s North Line railroad, as well as by both Sheridan Road and Green Bay Road. The presence of the Metra North Line, which provides direct access to downtown Chicago, is viewed as a significant benefit to residents seeking transit-oriented residential options. Sheridan Road and Green Bay Road are significant north-south thoroughfares throughout the North Shore, but in Highwood, they form the framework of commercial development, and define the downtown area. U.S. Route 41 is located just over a mile west of downtown Highwood, and Interstate 94 is accessible just over four miles west, via Half Day Road, which is known as Prairie Avenue throughout most of Highwood. This arterial is located in the southern portion of the city, and provides convenient access to U.S Route 41. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 11 Despite Highwood’s identity as an entertainment and restaurant destination, traffic and congestion are fairly limited within the area. Figure 4 below shows traffic volumes in Highwood and the surrounding communities. FIGURE 4: HIGHWOOD ACCESSIBILITY AND TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS Source: IDOT and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. The lack of traffic congestion contributes to Highwood’s appeal for residential uses, and to its continued choice as a location for restaurant and entertainment venues. Parking is generally adequate, although at peak demand periods, can be lacking, and city officials are addressing this deficit as part of their on-going planning efforts. Just as importantly, the lack of congestion and high traffic volumes, but also owing to its compact built environment, allow for and encourage easy pedestrian access. Two Metra stops, one located in the center of the downtown district, enhance the pedestrian access, as well as overall access to the community for both residents and patrons of the dining and entertainment opportunities. HIGHWOOD COMMUNITY AMENITIES Analysis of the community amenities located in and around Highwood confirms the city’s standing as a resource for the North Shore for dining and entertainment options. Figure 5 below lists by category the local offerings of community amenities. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 12 FIGURE 5: COMMUNITY AMENITIES Map # Category and Name Location Recreation, Dining and Entertainment Miramar Bistro Froggy's French Café 210 Restaurant Del Rio Restaurant Wooden Nickel Teddy O'Brian's Cellar Gate Wine Market & Bistro The Art of Beer Curry Hut Alex's Washington Gardens Longitud315 Isaac & Moishe Restaurant & Grocery La Casa De Isaac Nieto's Nite N' Gale Mean Wiener Clucker's Charcoal Chicken Tacos El Norte Buffo's Jay Lovell's Barrel Crossing Tap & Grill Improv Playhouse Ravinia Festival Highwood Bocce Courts School of Rock Highwood Recreation Center Highwood Public Library Everts Park Exmoor Country Club Highland Park Country Club Sanctuary Yoga Fort Sheridan Forest Preserve 301 Waukegan Avenue 306 Green Bay Road 210 Green Bay Road 228 Green Bay Road 444 Lakeview Avenue 432 Sheridan Road 524 Sheridan Road 552 Sheridan Road 410 Sheridan Road 256 Green Bay Road 315 Waukegan Avenue 311 Waukegan Avenue 413 Temple Avenue 429 Temple Avenue 346 Sheridan Road 532 Sheridan Road 760 Sheridan Road 110 Washington Avenue 431 Sheridan Road 766 Sheridan Road 260 Green Bay Road 1991 Sheridan Road 418 Sheridan Road 440 Bank Lane 9 Prairie Avenue 428 Green Bay Road 102 Highwood Avenue 111 North Avenue 700 Vine Avenue 1201 Park Avenue West 502 Sheridan Road Old Elm & Simmonds Way Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highland Park Highland Park Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highland Park Highland Park Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highland Park Highland Park Highwood Fort Sheridan 240 Prairie Avenue 720 Elder Lane 945 North Avenue 433 Vine Avenue 432 Green Bay Road 878 Lyster Road 523 Bank Lane 760 E. Westleigh Road 1500 West Kennedy Road 555 N. Sheridan Road Highwood Deerfield Highland Park Highland Park Highwood Highwood Highwood Lake Forest Lake Forest Lake Forest 1025 W. Everett Road 777 Park Avenue West 50 Pleasant Avenue 660 N. Westmoreland Road Lake Forest Highland Park Highwood Lake Forest 520 Green Bay Road 485 Sheridan Road 320 Waukegan Avenue 2503 Waukegan Road 1812 Green Bay Road 4 Deerfield Road 25901 Riverwoods Road 445 Sheridan Road 531 Bank Lane 43 Highwood Avenue 259 Waukegan Avenue 9 Highwood Avenue 433 Waukegan Avenue Highwood Highwood Highwood Bannockburn Highland Park Highland Park Lake Forest Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood Highwood NEC Green Bay & North Avenue 461 W. Old Elm Road Highwood Highwood Education Oak Terrace Elementary School Holy Cross School Northwood Junior High School Highland Park High School The Performer's School Midwest Young Artists (MYA) Vitrychenko Academy Woodland Academy of the Sacred Heart Lake Forest Academy Lake Forest College Health Care Lake Forest Acute Care Highland Park Hospital Aperion Care Highwood Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital Shopping and Services Poeta's Food Market La Union Supermarket Walgreens Heinen's Sunset Foods Jewel‐Osco Costco The Viti Companies Anna's Mostly Mahogany Gallery KL Consignments, Etc The Find Bent Fork Bankery Transportation Metra ‐ North Line Highwood Station Metra ‐ North Line Fort Sheridan Station North Shore Bike Path Sources: Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Field Survey, April 2016 RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 13 The amenity mix includes a substantial number of restaurants and entertainment options, a testament to the prominence Highwood has continued to serve as a dining and entertainment draw from neighboring suburbs and beyond. Figure 6, below, shows the tight clustering of the recreation and entertainment offerings in Highwood’s downtown district. FIGURE 6: COMMUNITY AMENITIES Source: Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 14 Restaurants and venues continue to open in the city, either re-purposing existing structures, or demolishing them and building new from the ground up. A new music venue has just broken ground at the former Bertucci’s restaurant site, at 246 Green Bay Road, which will feature musical entertainment, as well as secondary events like live band karaoke or sportsviewing events. The former bowling alley at 210 Green Bay Road is being redeveloped as a restaurant and comedy club. These new venues add to the draw already spurred by the School of Rock, on the south side of Prairie Avenue, just west of Green Bay Road, as well as Highwood’s myriad local outdoor festivals. Highwood’s Evening Markets are unique on the North Shore, drawing residents from neighboring communities every Wednesday evening throughout the summer months for dinner, cocktails, and live music. Highwood’s complement of grocery and other neighborhood service offerings is fairly limited. Large format retail shopping areas are situated at positions outside of Highwood, in the neighboring communities of Highland Park and Deerfield, although their distance is not as substantial as to serve as a deterrent to residential development in Highwood. A new grocery amenity is expected to open with the completion of the Hotel Moraine redevelopment. The new project will include 104 independent living units and is expected to be completed in the fall of 2016. DOWNTOWN HIGHWOOD AND SURROUNDING LAND USES Highwood’s core of downtown commercial development is centered between Sheridan Road on the east and Green Bay Road on the west, a one block wide sliver of property which extends approximately six blocks long, from Washington Avenue on the north, to Prairie Avenue on the south. Development is marked by mostly two and three-story brick buildings, some historic, with store-front retail offerings on the first floor, and office and apartments above. Downtown parking is located primarily at the rear of the retail storefronts, with alleyways facilitating access. Figure 7 below shows the outlines of structures in light gray, with parking highlighted in darker gray, and the boundaries of the subject property outlined in yellow. The Metra station is located three blocks south. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 15 FIGURE 7: DOWNTOWN HIGHWOOD Source: Lake County GIS Maps and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. The subject property is currently vacant land, situated at the southwest corner of Green Bay Road and Washington Avenue, and as such is situated just outside the core downtown district. The site was previously improved with a restaurant known as Scornavacco’s which was destroyed by fire and subsequently demolished. This area, while located in proximate to downtown Highwood, is more residential in nature than the core downtown district and is largely developed by a mixture of single-family and multi-family homes. These are mostly mid-century construction. Along Green Bay Road, some service uses are situated in a mixture of commercial and residential properties. Further to the east, a variety of commercial and restaurant uses are situated in a small strip center and older two-story structures. The Fort Sheridan Place apartments, a mid-rise apartment complex, is located caty corner to the northeast, from the subject property, but is accessible from Sheridan Road, approximately one block north. A variety of older one and two story buildings line the opposite, eastern side of the Metra rail line, and while this area has been the subject of redevelopment efforts, these efforts were recently thwarted, due to the difficulty of assembling all necessary parcels. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 16 The subject property, situated as it is along Green Bay Road, one of Highwood’s main thoroughfares, has good local access. Green Bay Road a two-lane road which flows north and south, and has parallel street parking on both sides of the street beginning approximately two blocks south of the subject property. Due to the previous use of the subject property as a restaurant site, approximately 20 angled parking spaces have been demised on a paved area between Green Bay Road and the Metra line. Green Bay Road is curbed, with a sidewalk along the western side of the road. Green Bay Road terminates three blocks north of the subject property, which serves to limit traffic volumes in this area, and contributes to the desirability of the location for residential use. The subject property also borders on Washington Avenue, a two-lane, eastwest curbed thoroughfare, which becomes known as Old Trail Road as it extends into Highland Park, approximately three blocks west of the subject property. Old Trail Road terminates another six blocks beyond this to the west, where it would run into the Old Elm Country Club, a male-only private golf club, located in Lake Forest. This further serves to limit traffic volumes, as travel along this east west route does not permit access to Highway 41 or any other major thoroughfares. Visibility of the site is favorable from both Green Bay Road and Washington Avenue, owing in part to a slightly higher elevation at this intersection, than the immediately surrounding area. However, Washington Avenue does provide crossing over the Metra Line, just across the street from the subject property, and this is only one of two crossings in Highwood. Opportunity for Growth in Downtown Highwood According to CoStar, the city of Highwood contains an inventory of approximately 425,000 square feet of retail, office and industrial buildings. The vast majority of this space (estimated at about 80%) is accounted for by retail/eating and drinking establishments. The city has historically been a draw for dining and entertainment on the North Shore and is located along a heavily traveled Metra line, though the housing inventory, especially the inventory of rental units has not kept pace with trends exhibited in many suburban downtowns in the metro Chicago area. Since the 1990s, many suburban municipalities in the metro area have created incentives for developers to build retail/eating and drinking establishments facilities and residential units (i.e., mostly residential condominium units in the 1990s through 2008, and only recently rental apartments.) The objectives of most of these redevelopment initiatives have typically centered around transit oriented development and creation of 24/7 neighborhoods. Over the last 30 years, RECI has consulted on such initiatives with municipal officials in many suburban downtowns, including St. Charles, Oak Park, Wilmette, and Joliet. Our experience has been that the most challenging element of the desired mix of residential and retail/eating and drinking establishments has been the latter. The city of Highwood already has a critical mass of these businesses, which will be enhanced with new residential development. Judging from the experience of many municipalities in the metro area, eventually an increase in the number of residents living in downtown housing supports the expansion of the retail/restaurant base. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 17 The city of Highwood contained 1,097 occupied rental units in 2015 according to ESRI. Costar Group, Inc. reports on approximately 322 of the total rental units, as indicated in Figure 8. Clearly this table does not represent the lion’s share of rental units in the city. However, the properties listed in the table suggest that the rental units in Highwood are older and smaller in size than institutionally-owned (i.e., owned by REITs, pension funds and insurance companies) in Lake County. Data from the 2010-2014 American Community Survey for the city of Highwood tells us that the majority of rental units fall into the size category of two unit buildings to 19 unit buildings. FIGURE 8: REPRESENTATIVE RENTAL PROPERTIES IN HIGHWOOD # B ui l d i ng A d d re s s 1 6 3 4 Sherid an Rd (Fo rt Sherid an Place) 2 13 1 Pleas ant Ave C o S t ar B ui l d i ng C l a s s R a t i ng N umb e r O f U ni t s 19 70 B 2 52 NA B 12 Y e a r B ui l t 3 54 8 -552 Sherid an Rd NA C 12 4 17-2 1 Web s t er Ave 19 55 C 12 5 74 0 Sherid an Rd NA C 9 6 13 -15 Web s t er Ave 19 54 C 9 7 11 Walker Ave 19 4 7 C 7 8 2 0 Web s t er Ave 19 2 3 C 5 9 8 Walker Ave 19 10 C To t a l 4 322 So even though the city of Highwood has approximately 60% of its occupied units classified as rental units, this inventory is void of any significant number of modern dwelling units that represent a true complement to both the cluster of commercial activity and the Metra commuter line. In summary, downtown Highwood represents a “frontier” of sorts, a commercial district that is ripe for new rental residential units. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 18 SECTION III - THE PROPERTY SITE REDEVELOPMENT The subject property is currently vacant land, situated at the southwest corner of Green Bay Road and Washington Avenue, as shown in the map below, and is being considered for redevelopment into multi-family residential apartment use with 28 dwelling units. Figure 9 below shows the location of the redevelopment site. FIGURE 9: LOCATION OF REDEVELOPMENT SITE Source: Lake County and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. The site is currently zoned B-1, Retail Business, by the city of Highwood, as shown in Figure 10. This zoning classification allows for a wide variety of retail and other business uses. According to the existing zoning code, residential use would not permitted on the first floor of structures located within a business district along Green Bay Road from Burtis Avenue to Washington Avenue, which includes the subject property. However, according to the City Manager, Scott Coren, the subject property, like other sites within the Highwood TIF Area 1, would be considered for a PUD that would allow for development of a multi-family project. In September, 2014, the Highwood City Council adopted The Highwood Downtown Projects Guidebook as an addendum to the 2012 Official Comprehensive Plan of the City of Highwood. The Guidebook included a Land Use Framework plan for central portions of Highwood. Three main districts were delineated in this plan, and are outlined on the map on the next page, in Figure 11. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 19 FIGURE 10: ZONING NEIGHBORHOOD CLASSIFICATIONS IN SUBJECT PROPERTY Subject Property Sources: City of Highwood Zoning Map and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. FIGURE 11: LAND USE FRAMEWORK PLAN – DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS Sources: City of Highwood Downtown Projects Guidebook and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 20 The overarching theme of this plan was to leverage Highwood’s identity as an entertainment and dining destination, and make it a desirable residential choice, especially for younger people, and thereby strengthen Highwood’s image, and improve its neighborhoods. The subject property is situated within the Green Bay Road District. This area, situated on the western edge of Highwood’s downtown area, provides a supporting role to the core commercial function of downtown Highwood. The Land Use Framework Plan called for the addition of office and residential buildings to this district. Mixed use buildings, with apartments above ground floor office or retail, are suggested by the Guidebook, for uses along Sheridan Road and Green Bay Road, with heights to vary from three to four stories. Three stories are suggested for Green Bay Road sites. TIF DISTRICT AND SUBJECT SITE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN The subject property is situated within the boundaries of Highwood’s Tax Increment Finance Area 1, or TIF district. The boundaries of the TIF district are shown in Figure 12 below. FIGURE 12: HIGHWOOD TAX INCREMENT FINANCE AREA 1 Source: Lake County The Highwood TIF district was established in 2002 and is set to expire in 2025, although an extension of this time frame may be allowed through legislation. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 21 Typically, during the life of the TIF district, property values are frozen for the purposes of distributing tax dollars to schools and other governments. Several properties have been constructed within the Highwood TIF district since its establishment, including the Walgreens and neighboring U.S. Bank building, located at the northwest corner of Highwood Avenue and Sheridan Road, as well as the two-story Viti Insurance Building, located at the northwest corner of Webster Avenue and Sheridan Road. Developers seeking TIF monies must prove that if not for the TIF assistance, the development would not be financially feasible. According the Scott Coren, a 52-unit apartment building was recently approved in Highwood for 440 Green Bay Road, and this site would fall within the TIF District. A major mixed-use development on land situated south of Washington Avenue between the Metra line and Sheridan Road was proposed to include about 200 units. However, according to Scott Coren, the project, which was to be part of the TIF District, has been scrapped, a result of the developer’s inability to assemble all of the necessary parcels. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 22 SECTION IV - THE MARKET ENVIRONMENT REGIONAL OVERVIEW The subject property is located in the city Highwood, Lake County, Illinois in the Lake County, Illinois/Kenosha County, Wisconsin Metropolitan Division, which is part of the Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA),contained nearly 9.6 million persons in 2015, and makes it the third largest metropolitan economy in the United States. The Chicago MSA consists of Cook, DeKalb, DuPage, Grundy, Kane, Kendall, Lake, McHenry and Will counties in Illinois; Jasper, Lake, Porter and Newton counties in Indiana; and Kenosha County in Wisconsin. The Lake County, Illinois and Kenosha County, Wisconsin Metropolitan Division, contained over 703,000 persons and 419,000 jobs in 2015 and consists of Lake County, IL and Kenosha, WI. UNITED STATES ECONOMY The Great Recession ended in June 2009 and this past July 2015, was the 6th anniversary of the beginning of the U.S. economic expansion. Moody's Analytics points out that this national expansion is already longer than the average expansion since World War II. They contend that prospects are good that this will be one of the longer expansions in the nation's history. GDP is forecast to increase to have increased at 2.4% in 2015, 2.3% in 2016 and 3.1% in 2017. FIGURE 13: HISTORICAL AND FORECAST QUARTERLY CHANGE IN UNITED STATES GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT 8.0% GDP Annualized Percentage Change 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% ‐2.0% ‐4.0% ‐6.0% ‐8.0% ‐10.0% Year/Quarter Sources: United States Bureau of Economic Analysis, Moody’s Analytics and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 23 According to the U.S. Bureau of labor Statistics, the U.S. economy created over 2.7 million jobs in 2015. The private sector has consistently added to payrolls for nearly six years, the longest string of consecutive gains on record. According to Moody's Analytics, if the recent pace of growth is sustained, the economy will be back to full employment by mid-2016. Moody's Analytics believes that even after wage growth revives, it will be some time before this translates into a significant increase in inflation. The remaining slack in the labor market is already quickly being absorbed, as the economy continues to grow. The estimated underemployment gap - the percent of the labor force that is underemployed - has fallen below 1%. Wage gains are finally accelerating, consistent with the fast-tightening job market. Both average hourly earnings and wages as measured by the employment cost index have accelerated noticeably over the past year or more. The wage pickup is especially strong in industries and regions of the country that have already returned to full employment. Full employment and stronger wage growth will induce an increase in household formations. Household formations slowed sharply during the Great Recession. According to Moody's, between mid-2007 and mid-2012, formations were running near 500,000 per year. They forecast that in a typical year given the growth in the population and the population's age and ethnic distribution, formations should be closer to 1.15 million per annum. The stronger U.S. dollar, which, according to Moody's, is up about 15% on real broad trade-weighted basis over the past year, is indeed a drag on growth. Acknowledging that the nation's manufacturing base is taking the brunt of the weaker trade balance, industrial production continues to increase and manufacturing employment continues to remain stable. According to Moody's, record vehicle sales and production and stronger construction-related manufacturing have offset the negative fallout of the stronger dollar on manufacturing and the broader economy. Finally, despite the dollar's strength, it remains close to its average value since the collapse of the Bretton Woods agreement and the broad adoption of flexible exchange rates in the early 1970s. CHICAGO MSA ECONOMY Chicago is fueling the state economy as strong growth in service industries (e.g., Professional & Business Services) compensates for sluggishness in the goods-producing arena. Faster job growth in Chicago’s urban core is encouraging. In addition to many established large employers, Chicago’s cluster of high-tech startups continues to expand. Most venture capital funding in Illinois gets funneled into Chicago, and the value of investments is the highest since the dot-com bust. The total amount of downtown office space occupied by tech companies is growing rapidly. According to Moody’s Analytics, even though growth in Chicago will keep the state economy moving in the right direction, the city’s financial woes threaten to curtail the Chicago metro division’s momentum. Chicago has done more than the state to get its fiscal house in order, but significant challenges remain. Driven by rising pension costs and declining state aid, Chicago’s fiscal problems are among the most severe nationally. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 24 The City Council approved Mayor Rahm Emanuel's 2016 budget that will hit Chicagoans with more than $755 million in tax and fee increases to plug the budget shortfall. However, without some help from leaders in Springfield, Chicago officials will be unable to make much headway toward a long-term solution, particularly regarding its unfunded pension liabilities. The state of Illinois longer-term outlook is tarnished primarily by its budget woes and weak population trends, not its high costs relative to nearby states. According to Moody’s Analytics, business costs in the state are slightly lower than they are nationally. Costs are lower than those in Wisconsin and Michigan but higher than those in neighboring Missouri and Indiana. Firms in Illinois tend to pay less in taxes and their utility costs are below average, but labor is somewhat expensive. The Chicago MSA contains approximately 4.6 million payroll jobs. The area has a well-educated workforce that garners high per capita incomes. Chicago has dominated North American transportation and distribution since the 1850s. Over the past 20 years, it has become the major crossroads of America's burgeoning global trade. The Chicago metro area is a world-class business center and the primary business center of the Midwest region of the United States. Chicago's office market is the third largest office market in the nation, eclipsed only by the total inventory of office space in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan region and the Washington, D.C. region. Long recognized for being a transportation hub, Chicago has also evolved as one of the nation's primary distribution centers and is the largest industrial space market in the nation. Chicago is located at the center of one of the largest trading areas in the world - the east-west nexus joining the markets of Europe and Asia and the north-south nexus of NAFTA. Metro Chicago has two ports capable of handling ocean-going ships/barges, and is linked to the Atlantic via the St. Lawrence Seaway and to the Gulf of Mexico via the Mississippi River. However, in the short-term, weaker foreign demand, associated with the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, will slow the rate of growth in transportation warehousing. Moody's Analytics reports that cargo traffic through Midway and O'Hare Airports softened at the end of 2014. Chicago remains one of the top cities for both conventions and domestic/foreign tourism, but the strengthening dollar will also put some of the growth in tourism at risk since it will be more expensive for foreigners to visit the city. Primary drivers of the economy within the Chicago metro area include most office-using industries, which are typically comprised of the professional/business services firms. This sector is comprised of firms such as computer systems design, management/scientific consulting and other financial services-related industries. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 25 Employment in both Financial Services and Professional and Business Services sector is concentrated in the Central Business District (CBD) of the city of Chicago, though much of the metro area's employment is concentrated in the manufacturing, retail and broader services sector dispersed throughout the region. The bulk of new jobs being created in Chicago are business and professional services jobs. There has been a rapid increase in tech-related hiring in Chicago's urban core which has been enticing workers to move downtown. In 2014, over $1.0 billion in venture capital was invested in tech related firms in downtown Chicago, the most since the dot.com bust, according to Moody's Analytics. This capital infusion will result in startups being able to more aggressively hire, and this hiring will support the downtown apartment market. Developers have completed construction on 2,042 apartment units in the CBD and 3,795 units in the city of Chicago in 2015, as a whole, according to data available from CoStar. The other major employment centers are located in the O'Hare Airport area, northwest Cook County, central DuPage County (East/West Corridor) and eastern Lake County, Illinois. As shown in Figure 15, the metro area's largest employers include the U.S. Government, Chicago Public Schools, the City of Chicago, Cook County Government, Advocate Health Care, University of Chicago, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., State of Illinois, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, and United Continental Holdings, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 26 Figure 14: CHICAGO METRO AREA MAJOR EMPLOYERS # Largest Employers Number of Employees 1 U.S. Government 42,887 2 Chicago Public Schools 37,406 3 City of Chicago 30,276 4 Cook County 21,795 5 Advocate Health Care 18,308 6 University of Chicago 16,197 7 Northwestern Memorial Healthcare 15,317 8 State of Illinois 15,136 9 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. 14,158 10 United Continental Holdings Inc. 14,000 11 Walgreen Co. 13,006 12 Health Care Service Corp. 13,006 13 Presence Health 10,500 14 Abbott Laboratories 10,000 15 Northwestern University 9,708 16 Jewel-Osco 9,660 17 Chicago Transit Authority 9,510 18 University of Illinois at Chicago 9,212 19 American Airlines 0 8,900 20 Rush University Medical Center 8,273 21 AT&T 8,000 22 Wal-Mart Stores Inc. 6,981 23 Employco USA Inc. 7,409 24 AON PLC 7,335 25 Archdiocese of Chicago 2,283 Source: Crains Chicago Business, December 2015 RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 27 Chicago MSA Employment Trends As shown in Figure 15, the metro area exhibited positive job growth in all 12 quarters of 2012, 2013 and 2014, with growth continuing this upward trend throughout most of 2015. Employment is forecast to attain pre-recession levels by the end of the 1st quarter of 2016. MSA employment is projected to continue to exhibit gains throughout the forecast period, though the rate of growth is forecast to lag somewhat behind the national average. The recent poor performance of the metro area's very large Manufacturing and Financial Activities sectors is anticipated to be a drag on overall job growth. As shown in Figure 16, the Chicago metro area's unemployment rate was 5.4% in November 2015, on par with pre-recession rates of the early to mid2000s, and significantly below the peak unemployment rates of 10.4%, 9.6% and 9.1% in 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, in the midst of, or just after the Great Recession. The unemployment rates for the United States and Illinois were 4.8% and 5.8%, respectively, in November 2015, while Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties exhibited unemployment rates ranging from 4.3% (DuPage County) to 6.1% (Kane County) for the same time period. Moody's forecast models suggest that job growth in metro Chicago is unlikely to return to its pre-recession trend in the near term. Some sectors of the economy, such as housing and banking, are still struggling with the residual effects of the downturn, and others, such as transportation and distribution, face a more difficult outlook because of slower global expansion. Downstream industries to manufacturing, which have been prominent growth drivers during the recovery, will now face slowing foreign demand and lower shipping volumes. Meanwhile, financial services have suffered a setback as banks struggle to overcome various challenges. Notwithstanding, there are several positive trends that indicate growth in Chicago will accelerate in 2016, according to Moody's Analytics. First, deleveraging seems to have run its course, and delinquency rates are at a sixyear low and not far from the national average. Second, households are also enjoying a significant gain in wealth. Although still half the national average, home equity per household has doubled from its low in metro Chicago. Third, weaker inventory building will hurt manufacturing and the auto industry, but slowing will be quicker to subside given that factories export a below average share of what they produce. Fourth, a revival in the downtown real estate market will also aid growth. A better job market and drop in housing affordability will help extend the apartment boom, and the first wave of new office development since the crash should give way to a second as vacancies fall to multi-year lows and rents move higher. Over the long-term, the Chicago MSA will benefit from: (1) major business, distribution, transportation and financial center; (2) a huge talent pool and a strong roster of well-respected educational institutions; and (3) a budding high tech center in the River North area, located north of the Chicago CBD. Moody's is forecasting manufacturing job growth to accelerate through 2016. The Construction and Professional and Business Services sectors are projected to continue to exhibit strong growth through 2016. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 28 FIGURE 15: QUARTERLY CHANGE IN JOBS FOR THE CHICAGO MSA AND THE UNITED STATES: 1990-2017 6% 5% 4% Annualized Quarterly % Change 3% 2% 1% 0% ‐1% ‐2% ‐3% ‐4% ‐5% ‐6% ‐7% ‐8% 1990Q1 1992Q1 1994Q1 1996Q1 1998Q1 2000Q1 2002Q1 2004Q1 2006Q1 2008Q1 2010Q1 2012Q1 2014Q1 2016Q1 Year/Quarter United States Chicago‐Naperville‐Elgin, IL‐IN‐WI Metropolitan Statistical Area Sources: United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, Moody’s Analytics, and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. FIGURE 16: HISTORICAL NOVEMBER UNEMPLOYMENT RATES FOR THE UNITED STATES, THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, THE CHICAGO MSA, COOK, DUPAGE, KANE, LAKE, MCHENRY, AND WILL COUNTIES 12.0% 11.0% 10.0% Unemployment Rate 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 U.S. State of Illinois Chicago MSA Cook County Kane County Lake County McHenry County Will County 2013 2014 2015 Dupage County Sources: Illinois Department of Employment Security and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Note: These are non-seasonally unadjusted unemployment rates and are by place of residence. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 29 Lake County, IL/ Kenosha County, WI Metro Division Economy and Employment Trends The Lake County, Illinois/Kenosha County Metropolitan Division contains approximately 417,000 payroll jobs. Although employment growth in the Lake County, IL/Kenosha County, WI Metropolitan Division has been slow so far this year, stronger rates of employment growth are forecast to return in 2016. The employment recovery since 2010 has been uneven and has not been on par with the United States nor the Chicago MSA, as a whole. Nevetheless, Moody's Analytics is predicting that the metro division will replace all the jobs lost during the Great Recession by early 2016. Relative to the nation, four industries in this metro division - Wholesale Trade, Manufacturing, and Professional & Business Services and Retail Trade - exhibit higher than average shares of total payroll employment. Of these sectors, Moody's is forecasting significant growth in the first three. For some time, weak U.S. export demand associated with the rising value of the U.S. dollar has been forcing manufacturing firms to downsize, which has pushed employment growth well below the state and national average growth rates. In addition, the drop in oil production in the U.S. and Canada has reduced demand for heavy machinery which, in concert with the higher U.S. dollar, has adversely impacted exports to Canada. The uneven recovery of the Lake County, IL/Kenosha County, WI Metropolitan Division is shown in Figure 17. Annualized Quarterly % Change FIGURE 17: RECENT RECESSION AND RECOVERY IMPACT ON JOB GROWTH FOR THE CHICAGO MSA, THE LAKE COUNTY, IL/KENOSHA COUNTY, WI METRO DIVISION AND THE UNITED STATES: 1Q2008- 4Q2016 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% ‐1% ‐2% ‐3% ‐4% ‐5% ‐6% ‐7% ‐8% ‐9% ‐10% ‐11% ‐12% Year/Quarter United States Lake County‐Kenosha County, IL‐WI Metropolitan Division Sources: United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, Moody’s Analytics, and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 30 LAKE COUNTY, IL/ ECONOMY AND EMPLOYMENT TRENDS Lake County, Illinois was estimated to contain a total of 280,000 private sector jobs in early 2015. Relative to the Chicago metro area, as a whole, four private sector industries in the county – Manufacturing, Wholesale Trade, Retail Trade and Utilities - exhibit higher than average shares of total private sector employment. These sectors each exhibit high “Location Quotients” in the county’s employment base. The most dominant manufacturing industries include textiles, leather & allied products, chemical (pharmaceuticals), plastics & rubber products, fabricated metal products and computer & electronics. With a location Quotient of 1.75, the Lake County manufacturing sector is 75% more concentrated than the manufacturing sector in the broader Chicago metro area. This usually results in county jobs being hit fairly hard during national recessions. The Great Recession was no exception. As shown in Figure 18, between 2008 and 2010, five employment sectors lost the largest number of jobs in Lake County – Construction, Manufacturing, Retail Trade, Finance & Insurance and Business & Professional Services. Nevertheless, since 2010 and as the U.S. and regional economies recovered, some of these Lake County sectors have exhibited strong growth. The sectors that have exhibited the greatest increase in jobs since 2010 (i.e., the bottom of recessionary trends in metro Chicago) include Construction, Manufacturing, Retail Trade, Business & Professional Services and Accommodations & Food Services. FIGURE 18: RECENT JOB GROWTH TRENDS FOR THE LAKE COUNTY ECONOMY EMPLOYMENT SECTORS: 2008 TO 2015 UNCLASSIFIED (99) OTHER SERVICES (except PUBLIC ADMIN.) (81) ACCOMMODATIONS & FOOD SERVICES (72) ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT & RECREATION (71) HEALTH CARE & SOCIAL ASSISTANCE (62) EDUCATIONAL SERVICES (61) ADMIN. & SUP. & WASTE MGMT. & REMED. SVCS. (56) MNGMT. OF COMPANIES & ENTERPRISES (55) PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC & TECH. SVCS. (54) REAL ESTATE & RENTAL & LEASING (53) FINANCE & INSURANCE (52) INFORMATION (51) TRANSPORTATION & WAREHOUSING (48‐49) RETAIL TRADE (44‐45) WHOLESALE TRADE (42) MANUFACTURING (31‐33) CONSTRUCTION (23) UTILITIES (22) MINING, QUARRYING, & OIL AND GAS EXTRACTION (21) AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, FISHING, & HUNTING (11) ‐8,000 ‐6,000 ‐4,000 ‐2,000 0 Recovery: Change 2010‐2015 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 Recession: Change 2008‐2010 Sources: Illinois Department of Employment Security and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 31 12,000 In 2015, Lake County, Illinois jobs remain slightly behind the pre-recession peak (2008) number of total private sector jobs. However, by mid-2016, we expect total jobs to equal or exceed the number of jobs reported in 2008 for the county. As shown in Figure 19, the longer-term trend of job growth in Lake County has been stronger than the rate of growth in the six Illinois counties that makeup the Chicago MSA. By the late 1990s and early 2000s, Lake County was exhibiting job decentralization and growth characteristic of Du Page County in the 1970s and 1980s. Job growth merely flattened out in Lake County during the 2001 recession. However, as shown, because the Great Recession was much deeper and broader than the early 2000s recession, Lake County jobs exhibited a sharp decline between 2008 and 2010. Figure 20 shows that the recovery in Lake County following the Great Recession has been slightly weaker than the recovery in the broader Chicago MSA. This is, in part, a result of the concentration of manufacturing employment in Lake County. FIGURE 19: LONGER-TERM JOB GROWTH TRENDS FOR LAKE COUNTY AND CHICAGO MSA: 1996 TO 2015 130.0 128.0 126.0 124.0 122.0 Employment Growth Index (1996 = 100.0) 120.0 118.0 116.0 114.0 112.0 110.0 108.0 106.0 104.0 102.0 100.0 98.0 96.0 94.0 92.0 90.0 Lake County Illinois Portion of Chicago MSA Sources: Illinois Department of Employment Security and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 32 FIGURE 20: RECESSION IMPACT AND RECOVERY IMPACT ON LAKE COUNTY AND CHICAGO MSA JOBS: 2008 TO 2015 101.0 Employment Growth Index (2008 = 100.0) 100.0 99.0 98.0 97.0 96.0 95.0 94.0 93.0 92.0 91.0 90.0 2008 2009 2010 Lake County 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015p Illinois Portion of Chicago MSA Sources: Illinois Department of Employment Security and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Chicago MSA Housing Market Conditions During most economic recoveries since the Great Depression, an improving housing market has led recovery of the broader economy. Not so during the early part of this recovery. In fact, as recent as 2012, the nation's housing market continued to place downward pressure on the recovery from the Great Recession. According to Moody's Analytics, the decline in home prices has impeded recovery by slowing home sales, reducing gross metropolitan product and inhibiting labor mobility. They believe that declines in home equity will affect critical aspects of the economy from education to entrepreneurship and may remain a drag on U.S. growth over the next decade. Throughout the early to mid-2000s, annual home sales increased across the United States at a rapid pace. According to the National Association of Realtors, total U.S. annual volume of sales peaked in 2005 at over 7.0 million transactions of existing homes. Existing home sales fell to 6.5 million in 2006, then to 5.0 million in 2007, continued declining in 2008 to 4.1 million. Though total sales increased slightly in 2009 to approximately 4.3 million, home sales decreased again in 2010 to 4.2 million and 2011 existing sales equaled 2009 sales of approximately 4.3 million. The National Association of Realtors reported 4.7 million existing home sales in 2012, 5.09 million in 2013, 4.94 million in 2014 and 5.25 million in 2015. The home price trends shown below in Figures 10 and 11 are based upon movement in the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price data series. The S&P/CaseShiller Home Price Indices are designed to measure the growth in value of residential real estate in various regions across the United States. This index family includes 21 indices - 20 metropolitan regional indices, and one composite index (the 20 metro areas). RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 33 The index, based on initial research undertaken in the 1980s by Karl E. Case and Robert J. Shiller, uses a repeat sales pricing technique, still considered the most accurate way to measure prices of residential real estate. As shown in Figure 21, home prices in many metropolitan areas began escalating at an especially rapid pace during the 2003 to 2006 period and prices across the composite cities peaked in July 2006. Home prices began falling in the various cities as early as November 2005 (in Boston) through October 2007 (in Charlotte) and plummeted in 2009. Recovery began as early as 2009 - in March 2009 in Denver, in May 2009, in Washington, DC and Boston, and in June 2009 in Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco. However, price declines continued for many cities through early 2012, with recovery beginning in February 2012 in Charlotte and Las Vegas, in March 2012 in Cleveland, in April 2012 in Atlanta, New York and Cleveland, and in May 2012 in Chicago. In all cities, home prices have risen since 2012 with two cities, Denver and Dallas, exceeding pre-recession peaks as of May 2013. FIGURE 21: SINGLE FAMILY HOME PRICE INDEX FOR THE CHICAGO MSA AND OTHER SELECTED METRO AREAS: DECEMBER 2000 TO DECEMBER 2015 Home Price Index (January 2000 = 100.0) 295.0 280.0 265.0 250.0 235.0 220.0 205.0 190.0 175.0 160.0 145.0 130.0 115.0 100.0 85.0 70.0 55.0 AZ‐Phoenix CA‐San Francisco FL‐Miami IL‐Chicago MN‐Minneapolis NY‐New York TX‐Dallas CA‐Los Angeles CO‐Denver FL‐Tampa MA‐Boston NC‐Charlotte OH‐Cleveland WA‐Seattle CA‐San Diego DC‐Washington GA‐Atlanta MI‐Detroit NV‐Las Vegas OR‐Portland Metro Area Composite Sources: S&P/Case Shiller Home Price Indices and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 34 Figure 22: SINGLE FAMILY HOME PRICE INDEX FOR THE CHICAGO MSA AND OTHER SELECTED METRO AREAS: DECEMBER 2014 TO DECEMBER 2015 9.6% 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.1% Percent Change in Home Price: December 2014 to December 2015 7.1% 7.0% 6.3% 6.1% 6.0% 5.7% 5.5% 5.8% 5.5% 4.7% 5.0% 4.5% 4.0% 3.1% 3.0% 2.0% 2.3% 1.7% 1.0% 0.0% Sources: S&P/Case Shriller Home Price Indices and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. As shown in Figure 22, from December 2014 to December 2015, home prices in Chicago increased 2.3%, on par with Washington, DC, and New York, but well below the 5.7% rate of gain exhibited across the composite index of 20 metro areas. Though the period from 2009 to 2012 will be considered part of one of the worst housing construction cycles in 40 years, the authors of "The State of The Nation's Housing 2013" point to the fact that minorities and seniors will drive demand fundamentals for housing demand over the next decade. But while the overall pace may be similar to the past, the composition of household growth is changing - and with it, the direction of housing demand. Over the next decade, the number of households aged 65 and over is projected to increase by 9.8 million. Most of these households will opt to age in place and may therefore need to modify their homes to accommodate their changing needs. But a large number will look for different housing opportunities, creating demand for new types of units in communities where they currently live as well as in areas that traditionally attract retirees. Minorities - and particularly younger adults - will also contribute significantly to household growth from 2013 to 2023, accounting for seven out of ten net new households. An important implication of this trend is that minorities will make up an ever-larger share of potential first-time home buyers. But these households have relatively few resources to draw on to make down payments. Proposed limits on low down payment mortgages would thus pose a substantial obstacle for many of tomorrow's potential home buyers. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 35 Despite the slow economic recovery, the rental apartment market, both nationally and across the Chicago MSA, exhibited a strong recovery each year from 2010 through the 4th quarter 2015. The 4th quarter 2015 apartment vacancy in metro Chicago was 4.1%, despite the delivery of 5,659 units in 2013, 5,920 units in 2014 and 5,853 units in 2015. While economic conditions drive household growth in the short run, the size and age structure of the adult population are more important factors in the long run. Based on the Census Bureau's latest population projections and recent estimates of headship rates, demographic drivers support household growth of approximately 1.2 million a year over the remainder of the decade - similar to the rates in the 1990s as well as in the years preceding the Great Recession. Although the overall pace may be similar to the past, the composition of household growth is changing - and with it, the direction of housing demand. Over the next decade, the number of households for those aged 65 and over is projected to increase by 9.8 million. Most of these households will opt to age in place and may therefore need to modify their homes to accommodate their changing needs. But a large number will look for different housing opportunities, creating demand for new types of units in communities where they currently live as well as in areas that traditionally attract retirees. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 36 SECTION V – DRIVERS OF APARTMENT DEMAND INTRODUCTION In this section of the report we address seven fundamental factors that we believe are driving apartment demand in Lake County, Illinois: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. THE RENTERSHIP RATE INCREASE A watershed change in how Americans are making housing decisions, fueled by the shifting view of owner-occupied housing and the perceived economic safety of rental housing. Renter-occupied housing units in Lake County among all age groups, make up a smaller share than these age groups, nationally and therefore there is greater potential that rental units are underrepresented in the county. Since the 1980s Lake County’s growth in office, industrial, retail and other business establishments has been strong, fueling job growth. Lake County and north suburban Cook County contained approximately 466,000 jobs in 2015, representing about 12% of Chicago MSA private sector jobs. The I-94 and Route 41 corridors in eastern Lake County are proximate to major concentrations of corporate office and industrial space and healthcare facilities; commuting patterns imply that major centers of employment in eastern Lake County and northern Cook County generate significant demand for housing, including rental housing. Although though DuPage County job growth produced over 59,500 jobs between 2010 and 2015, Lake County and northern Cook County produced 34,000 jobs during this same period. Lake County employment growth over the last 40 years has exceeded the rate of population growth in the county. Even before the U.S. economy fell into recession, a watershed change was emerging. The nation’s homeownership rate began to decline in 2005. Both the number and share of U.S. households paying more than 30% of income for housing were on the rise, as home values and mortgage debt was on the rise. Certainly the enormous wave of foreclosures that swept the nation after 2008 played a role in this trend, displacing millions of homeowners. More broadly, the Great Recession brought high rates of sustained unemployment that strained household budgets which prevented would-be buyers from purchasing homes. Meanwhile, the experience of 2008 to 2012 highlighted the many risks of homeownership, including the potential loss of wealth from falling home values, the high costs of relocating, and the financial and the personal havoc caused by foreclosure. The conditions brought about by the Great Recession and post-recession period prompted a renewed appreciation for the benefits of renting, including the greater ease of moving, the ability to choose housing that better fits the family budget, the lack of unnecessary exposure to market volatility and the freedom that this brings. According to a report from the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University sometime after the recovery began: The housing market crash and Great Recession took a toll on rental markets, pushing up vacancy rates and pushing down rents and property values in many areas. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 37 While many measures indicate that rental markets remain under stress, other evidence points to the beginnings of a turnaround. Vacancy rates have retreated as the troubled homeowner market has spurred strong growth in renter households. And with limited new supply in the pipeline, the ingredients may be in place for rents to rise quickly when the economic recovery strengthens. The dramatic decline in home prices across the nation and in the metro Chicago market between 2006 and 2011, coupled with steep job losses, had underscored the true financial risks of homeownership. Of course, renters face the risk of rent inflation and the loss of their security deposits. However, rental housing does provide a safe haven during times of falling and/or stagnant home prices or job insecurity as detailed below: (1) moving to and from rental housing involves much lower transaction costs than homeownership. (i.e., the last month’s rent plus a security deposit are smaller than the fees associated with buying and selling homes); (2) renting transfers primary responsibility for upkeep and maintenance to a landlord; and (3) renting does not tie up funds in the form of a down payment, nor does it expose households to the risk of loss of that investment. Since the single family housing market recovered in 2012, there have been other factors at work that have fueled the decline in home ownership and the growth of apartment demand. The increase in the nation’s rentership rate between 2005 and 2014 is shown in Figure 23, below. FIGURE 23: RENTERSHIP RATES FOR UNITED STATES: 1995 TO 2014 36.0% 35.5% 35.0% 34.5% 34.0% % of All U.S. Households 33.5% 33.0% 32.5% 32.0% 31.5% 31.0% 30.5% 30.0% 29.5% 29.0% 28.5% 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Sources: US Census Bureau, Housing Vacancy Survey. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 38 While economic conditions drove household growth in the short run, the size and age structure of the adult population are more important factors in the long run. The Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University in their 2015 publication, “State of the Nation’s Housing” explained the decline in homeownership in this way: The downtrend (in homeownership) continued in early 2015 with a firstquarter reading of just 63.7 percent—the lowest quarterly rate since early 1993. The 233,000 drop in homeowner households last year brought the total decline since the 2006 peak to 1.7 million. The weakness in homeownership extends across all regions of the country and nearly all metropolitan areas, including inner cities, suburbs, and non-metro areas. And while recent estimates suggest that homeownership rates may be firming in some areas, there is no evidence so far of a significant rebound. With the exception of Detroit, major metros with the largest declines in homeownership are all within the Sunbelt states, where high foreclosure rates amplified the impacts of the Great Recession. At the top of the list are Las Vegas and New Orleans (both with an 8.5 percentage-point drop in homeownership), and Bakersfield (with an 8.3 percentage-point drop). The worst hit markets generally experienced a much sharper cycle in home prices and incomes than metros that were more sheltered from the housing boom and bust from responsibility for home maintenance. Households of all but the oldest age groups have joined in the shift toward renting. The largest share increase is among households in their 30s, up by at least 900 basis points over an eight-year span. But shares of households across all five-year age groups between 25 and 54 also rose by at least 600 basis points. According to the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, with these widespread increases in rentership rates, the 2000s marked the strongest decade of growth in renter households over the past half-century, as shown in Figure 24. FIGURE 24: INCREASE IN APARTMENT RENTING AGE COHORTS Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics and CoStar Portfolio Strategy RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 39 As shown, after a modest rise early in the decade, the number of renter households soared after 2005, boosting average annual growth to more than 500,000 households. Again, according to the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, future demand for apartments will be favorably influenced by demographic trends of the next 10 years: Over the next decade, two broad demographic trends—the aging of the population and the increasing importance of minorities for household growth—will drive significant changes in rental demand. Assuming current rentership rates, the aging of the baby-boom generation will lift the number of renters over age 65 by 2.2 million in the ten years to 2023, generating roughly half of overall renter growth. The older profile of renters means much of the increase will be among single persons and married couples without children, each group accounting for about 30 percent of growth. Many of these older households are already renters, but will be aging into the next phase of life. This trend suggests growing demand for smaller rentals, with good access to transportation and located near communities where households in their 50s and 60s are currently living. A future increase in renters is also implied by the uncoupling of 20 to 34 year old householders. The recent historical average household size for this age cohort (i.e., primary renter-age group) has ranged between 2.40 and 2.45. Between 2008 and 2014 (i.e., recession and post-recession period), the average household size increased to between 2.55 and 2.60 persons per household, a result of the doubling-up of households within this age cohort. According to CoStar Portfolio Strategy and as indicated in Figure 25, a return to the recent average household size for this age cohort of 2.40 to 2.45 equates to 1.9 million more households, with the vast majority of these adding to the pool of renter households. FIGURE 25: POTENTIAL RETURN TO RECENT HISTORICAL AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE FOR APARTMENT RENTING AGE COHORT Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics and CoStar Portfolio Strategy RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 40 As shown in Figure 26, the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University is forecasting growth in most of the young adult age cohorts (i.e., 30 to 34, 35 to 39 and 40 to 44) between 2010 and 2030 that have a high propensity to rent. This is in contrast to the growth in older, middle-age cohorts that was exhibited between 1990 and 2010. FIGURE 26: FORECAST GROWTH IN HOUSEHOLDS BY AGE COHORT FOR THE UNITED STATES Sources: U.S. Census Bureau and Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University THE NATION’S APARTMENT MARKET According to data available from Costar, demand for apartments remains strong nearly six years after the recovery of the apartment market began, even as construction activity has accelerated, as indicated in Figure 27. Nationally CoStar reports that the apartment vacancy rate ended the year at 3.9%. According to the Costar data, vacancy rates have been fluctuating somewhat over the last two years – declining when deliveries fall and increasing slightly as deliveries accelerate in any particular quarter. Actually, U.S. apartment rents posted one of the weakest 4th quarters since the end of the most recent recession. In the first six months of 2015, U.S. apartment rents grew at an annualized rate of 9.4%, according to CoStar’s same-store analysis of more than 50 million rent observations. The growth rate slowed to just 2.7% in the second half of 2015, and turned negative over the final three months of the year. Taken together, U.S. apartment rents grew by an average of 6% in 2015. Construction of a large number of apartments continued in 2015, with 214,000 new units added across the 54 largest U.S. markets, reflecting an 8% increase in new supply over the previous year, which was also a record. Absorption held steady for the year at around 210,000 units rented, and the average vacancy rate ended the year at a cyclical low of 3.9%, virtually unchanged from the end of 2014. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 41 FIGURE 27: UNITED STATES APARTMENT DEMAND/SUPPLY: 2000-2015 Source: CoStar Group, Inc. New apartment construction is causing vacancy among Class A apartments (i.e., CoStar’s designation of 4 & 5 Star properties) to increase, as shown in Figure 28. FIGURE 28: UNITED STATES APARTMENT VACANCY BY CLASS 2007-2015 Source: CoStar Group, Inc. Note: For all intents and purposes 4 & 5 Star properties are Class A properties. Nationally, CoStar is forecasting rent growth to slow in 2016 to 3% to 4% range, rather than 6% as was exhibited in 2015. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 42 RENTERS BY AGE GROUP Who are renters? According to the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, nationally, single persons (i.e., those households with more limited incomes and need for less living space) make up nearly two out of every five renters. The balance of the renter population is divided among married couples with and without children, single-parent households, and other related and unrelated groups of people. Though younger age groups are much more likely to rent, more heads of renter households are 35 to 64 years old, than under 35. Elderly households account for the remaining renter households. In fact, the United States’ share of households that are renters varies according to the age of householder. As households are formed in the late teen years through the mid-20s, the vast majority of these households are renters. Renting is a common choice for young adults since they face frequent moves as family, work, school, and living arrangements change; not to mention wealth and income constraints that prevent them from becoming homeowners. As wealth is accumulated by the mid-30s, an increasing share of households choose to purchase homes or condos. Figure 29 shows the percentage of householders that were renters in 2000 for the United States and Lake County, Illinois. As shown, Lake County, Illinois exhibits a considerably lower share of households from each age group that are renters and therefore there is greater potential that rental units are underrepresented in the county, overall. Other factors that can impact these shares within individual counties or overall metro areas include local area commuting patterns, local land use regulations (especially those which favor single family detached residential units versus multifamily), housing market and investment market conditions. FIGURE 29: PERCENT OF RENTERS AMONG HOUSEHOLDER AGE COHORTS IN THE UNITED STATES AND LAKE COUNTY: 2010 90.0% 83.9% 81.7% 80.0% % of Age Cohort That Are Renters 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 58.0% 47.6% 37.7% 28.5% 30.0% 24.0% 20.0% 22.7% 22.5% 17.6% 16.6% 13.6% 22.1% 19.8% 18.5% 13.0% 10.0% 0.0% Householder 15 Householder 25 Householder 35 Householder 45 Householder 55 Householder 65 Householder 75 Householder 85 to 24 years to 34 years to 44 years to 54 years to 64 years to 74 years to 84 years years and over United States Lake County, IL Sources: U.S. Census and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 43 LAKE COUNTY, IL POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT Prior to 1970, Lake County was primarily a bedroom community within the metro Chicago region. Since the 1970s, employment growth in Lake County has exceeded population growth in county. In 1970, Lake County, Illinois had a total population of 382,638 persons and total employment of only 89,665. As shown in Figure 30, in 2010, according to the 2010 U.S. Census, the total population had increased to 703,462 persons and total jobs had increased to 324,805 jobs. FIGURE 30: EMPLOYMENT AND POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS 380.0 360.0 Growth Index (1970 = 100.0) 340.0 320.0 300.0 280.0 260.0 240.0 220.0 200.0 180.0 160.0 140.0 120.0 100.0 1970 1980 1990 Population 2000 2010 Employment Sources: Lake County, U.S. Census County Business Patterns and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. As shown, Lake County population increased by 15% during the 1970s, though employment increased by about 51%; during the 1980s, population increased by about 17%, though total jobs increased by about 53%; and during the 1990s, population increased by about 25%, though total jobs increased by about 49%. Though employment growth was strong prior to the 2008 recession, between 2000 and 2010, job growth grew only slightly faster than population growth. The growth in the number of jobs in Lake County is directly related to the surge in commercial real estate development during the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. Over these four decades, Lake County was transformed into a major employment center of the region, with most of the development occurring in the southeast portion of the county. From the CoStar office building database, we estimate that approximately 18 million square feet of office, retail and industrial space was built in Lake County during the 1970s; more than 26 million square feet was built in the 1980s; more than 32 million square feet was built in the 1990s and nearly 24 million square feet was built between 2000 and 2009. Only approximately 3.1 million square feet was built since 2010, as construction came to a virtual halt during and immediately after the Great Recession. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 44 More rapid growth in employment compared to population often suggests that housing construction may lag commercial/industrial development in a particular market. In the next section we consider the implications of commuting patterns on Lake County apartment demand. LAKE COUNTY, IL MIGRATION AND COMMUTING PATTERNS Our analysis of 2009-2013 migration data available from the U.S. Census Bureau indicates there are large numbers of in-migrants to Lake County from nearby counties, including Cook County, Kenosha County, McHenry County, Kane County, DuPage County and Will County. By far the county that produces the greatest number of in-migrants is Cook County, as shown in Figure 31. FIGURE 31: ORIGIN OF MIGRANTS TO LAKE COUNTY, IL: 2009-2013 10,000 9,251 9,000 8,000 Number of Migrants 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,162 1,124 1,000 716 648 409 0 Cook County Kenosha County McHenry County Kane County DuPage County Will County Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 5-year American Community Survey There are other metropolitan regions of the U.S. that produce measurable numbers of migrants to Lake County, IL. These areas include Champaign, IL, Phoenix, AZ, Southern California, Northern California, Hawaii, Detroit, MI and Minneapolis, MN. Another dynamic that we researched was commuting patterns among residents of Lake County and Cook County. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey provide a good picture of commuting patterns among residents/workers of Lake County and surrounding counties. The relationship is strongest between Lake County and Cook County residents/workers. The data indicate that 64,036 residents of Lake County work in Cook County and 78,045 residents of Cook County work in Lake County. Since Northern Cook County (Interstate 94/294 corridor) and Northwest Cook County (Interstate 90 corridor) contain both major employment centers in addition to large and fairly dense residential communities, it is no surprise that Lake County commuting patterns are dominated by both commuters to Lake County from Cook County as well as commuters to Cook County from Lake County. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 45 As shown in Figure 32, the origin of Lake County workers includes those living in Lake County (66%), those that commute from other Illinois counties (27%), workers that commute from the State of Wisconsin (6%) and from other states (1%). As alluded to above and shown in the figure below, Figure 32, the commuting data show that 78,045 workers commute from a residence in Cook County to a job in Lake County. Not only does this trend favor residential demand in Lake County, but the estimated 64,036 workers that commute from Lake County to jobs in Cook County also illustrates that Lake County housing (especially a location in eastern Lake County) is accessible to workers in Cook County. FIGURE 32: ORIGIN OF LAKE COUNTY WORKERS: RESIDENTS OF ILLINOIS COUNTIES AND WISCONSIN COUNTIES FOR 2009-2013 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 5-year American Community Survey MAJOR EMPLOYMENT CENTERS IN LAKE COUNTY, IL Proximity of apartments to major centers of employment is an important factor associated with the location decisions of most renters. The subject property is located in eastern Lake County, roughly in the middle of the communities considered to be the North Shore. Using data available from the Illinois Department of Employment Security, we estimate that there are approximately 174,000 private sector jobs located within a 15-20 minute drive-time from downtown Highwood. Somewhat less than 50,000 of these jobs are manufacturing, wholesale trade and transportation/warehousing (i.e., industrial) jobs. Approximately 35,000 jobs are traditionally officeusing jobs; just over 20,000 jobs are in the retail sector and nearly 14,000 jobs are in the healthcare sector. As shown in Figure 33, office development, in particular, has followed the path of primary high speed access highways (i.e., interstate highways) in Lake County, north Cook County and northwest Cook County. These three areas contain nearly 138.0 million square feet of office space and over 300.0 million square feet of industrial space. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 46 The city of Highwood is located immediately east of the Interstate 94 corridor and is easily accessible to the Interstate 94/294 corridor in Lake County and northern Cook County. This corridor contains a total of 55.0 million square feet of office space and 90.0 million square feet of industrial space, as shown in Figure 33. FIGURE 33: LAKE COUNTY, NORTH COOK COUNTY AND NORTHWEST COOK COUNTY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS: 2015 Sources: Costar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. As shown in Figures 34 and 35, the county’s largest employers include AbbVie/Abbott, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Medline Industries Inc., Aon Corp, Baxter Healthcare Corp, Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co, Six Flags, Discover Financial Services, Hospira Inc., Naval Station Great Lakes and several others. Many of the county’s largest companies are located within 10 miles or a 15 to 20 minute drive-time of downtown Highwood. The Veterans Administration Medical Center-North Chicago (Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center), Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital, Advocate Good Shepard Hospital, Vista Health System and Vista Medical Center East represent the primary healthcare employers in Lake County. Healthcare employment in Lake County includes the hospital campuses as well as the rapidly growing number of outpatient healthcare facilities being developed across the county. Lake County had approximately 30,000 private sector healthcare jobs in early 2015. This represents a slight increase in healthcare jobs since 2008. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 47 FIGURE 34: LARGEST EMPLOYERS LOCATED IN LAKE COUNTY E s t im a t e d num be r o f e m p lo ye e s C o m pa ny N a m e P a rt ia l A d d re s s C it y Abbo tt La bo ra to rie s /AbbVie * Abbo tt P a rk R d No rth C hic a go /M e tta wa Wa lgre e ns B o o ts Allia nc e Inc Wilm o t R d De e rfie ld 6,100 M e dline Indus trie s Inc M e dline P l M unde le in 5,000 Abbo tt La bo ra to rie s /AbbVie * S he rida n R d No rth C hic a go 4,000 Ao n C o rp Ove rlo o k P t Linc o lns hire 4,000 B a xte r Inte rna tio na l Inc B a xte r P kwy De e rfie ld 4,000 Da yto n Ele c tric M fg C o W Il R o ute 60 La ke F o re s t 3,000 S ix F la gs Gre a t Am e ric a n P kwy C a pta in J a m e s A. Lo ve ll F e de ra l He a lth C a re C e nte r Gre e n B a y R d Gurne e 3,000 No rth C hic a go 3,000 Dis c o ve r F ina nc ia l S vc R ive rwo o ds 3,000 La ke C o o k R d 12,000 Ho s pira Inc N F ie ld Dr La ke F o re s t 3,000 Na va l S ta tio n Gre a t La ke s P a ul J o ne s S t # 1-A Gre a t La ke s 2,500 No rthwe s te rn La ke F o re s t Ho s p N We s tm o re la nd R d La ke F o re s t 1,800 C dvo DW cCaoterpGo o d S e pa d Hoke s pita Ta da lP ha rm a c e utic a ls US A Inc N M ilwa uke e Ave Ve rno n Hills 1,800 W Il R o ute 22 B a rringto n 1,710 Ta ke da P kwy De e rfie ld 1,700 Trus tm a rk Ins ura nc e C o N F ie ld Dr La ke F o re s t 1,700 La c o s ta Inc W B o nne r R d Wa uc o nda 1,600 La ke F o re s t C o lle ge N S he rida n R d La ke F o re s t 1,400 R e xa m Inc C o rpo ra te Gro ve Dr B uffa lo Gro ve 1,400 S ie m e ns Indus try Inc De e rfie ld P kwy B uffa lo Gro ve 1,300 M o nde le z Inte rna tio na l Inc P a rkwa y N # 300 De e rfie ld 1,200 B lic k Art M a te ria ls Gre e n B a y R d Highla nd P a rk 1,001 Vis ta He a lth S ys te m Wa s hingto n S t Wa uke ga n 1,000 Am e ric a n Ta xi & De live ry N Il R o ute 59 La ke Villa 1,000 Vis ta M e dic a l C tr Ea s t N S he rida n R d Wa uke ga n 1,000 Kle in To o ls Inc B o nd S t Linc o lns hire 1,000 La ke C o unty Ta xi Gra nd Ave F o x La ke 1,000 We s tm o re la nd N We s tm o re la nd R d La ke F o re s t 1,000 Quill C o rp S c he lte r R d Linc o lns hire 1,000 B a nne r Da y C a m p R ive rwo o ds R d La ke F o re s t 1,000 1,000 P a c ka ging C o rp o f Am e ric a W F ie ld C t La ke F o re s t Intre n S Il R o ute 83 Gra ys la ke 937 La ke C o unty He a lth De pt Gra nd Ave Wa uke ga n 900 F re s e nius Ka bi US A LLC C o rpo ra te Dr # 300 La ke Zuric h 800 Am e ric a n Ho te l R e gis te r C o S M ilwa uke e Ave # 100 Ve rno n Hills 800 M idwe s te rn M e dic a l C tr Elis ha Ave Zio n 800 C a nc e r Tre a tm e nt C tr o f Am e r S he rida n R d Zio n 800 C a rdina l He a lth S Wa uke ga n R d Wa uke ga n 750 Ze bra Te c hno lo gie s C o rp Ove rlo o k P t Linc o lns hire 740 Wo lte rs Kluwe r Ta x & Ac c tg La ke C o o k R d R ive rwo o ds 700 EC HO Inc Oa kwo o d R d La ke Zuric h 700 Ea s t We s t Dis tributing C o Wilm o t R d De e rfie ld 700 Es s e nda nt Inc P a rkwa y N # 100 De e rfie ld 600 Aldridge Ele c tric Inc E R o c kla nd R d Libe rtyville 600 R o s a lind F ra nklin Unive rs ity Gre e n B a y R d No rth C hic a go 600 Sources: Illinois Department of Employment Security and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. *Note: Employment at Abbott/AbbVie may not reflect current totals. The spin-off of AbbVie from Abbott and relocation of some employees to Mettawa may result in current totals that deviate from the totals that were reported to us. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 48 FIGURE 35: LAKE COUNTY MAJOR EMPLOYERS: 2015 Sources: Illinois Department of Employment Security and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Downtown Chicago, containing nearly 560,000 jobs, is the single largest employment center of the region and is approximately an hour commute (approximately 25 miles) on the Union Pacific North Metra commuter train from Highwood. Commuter Rail Road Trends and Employment Data from the U.S. Census tells us that approximately 70% of Highwood residents commute less than 30 minutes to their place of work. This is in contrast to Highland Park residents which have longer commute times, in part, due to residents commuting to downtown Chicago. Only about 56% of Highland Park residents have commute times less than 30 minutes. The commute time from the Highwood station to downtown Chicago is a little over one hour. As shown in Figure 36, the average number of passengers boarding inbound (southbound) trains during morning peak hours at the Highwood stations totaled 99 in 2014. A slightly larger number of commuters (165) board inbound morning trains at the Fort Sheridan station, located approximately one and one-half miles to the north. The number of commuters boarding morning inbound trains in Highwood is slightly less than one-fifth of the number of passengers boarding inbound trains in Highland Park and well below the number of passengers boarding southbound trains in Lake Forest (281), Wilmette (806) or Evanston (2,625). Our experience in researching Metra ridership trends in metro Chicago suggests that ridership of passengers commuting to downtown Chicago declines as one moves further out from downtown Chicago. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 49 For example, Wilmette, in northern Cook County is only a 35 minute commute to downtown Chicago (about one-half of the commute time from Highwood to downtown Chicago) and the number of morning inbound passengers is more than eight times the number of inbound passengers boarding in Highwood. FIGURE 36: PASSENGERS GETTING ON METRA MORNING PEAK INBOUND TRAINS 1,400 1,290 Number of Morning Peak Inbound ON Passengers 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,041 969 1,000 863 900 806 793 800 700 600 492 500 478 400 300 265 252 237 165 200 123 178 151 132 99 86 63 100 322 295 281 157 141 31 0 0 Sources: Metra and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. The number of morning outbound passengers getting off the trains at the Fort Sheridan and Highwood stations is also relatively small, as shown in Figure 37. Number of Morning Peak Outbound OFF Passengers FIGURE 37: PASSENGERS GETTING OFF METRA MORNING PEAK OUTBOUND TRAINS 520 500 480 460 440 420 400 380 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 492 342 270 194 177 146 96 133 82 79 68 61 47 2 15 30 43 26 18 19 9 14 26 36 23 0 Sources: Metra and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 50 Although there is currently not a significant trend of commuters boarding trains in Highwood for a downtown Chicago commute, the potential is there for Highwood to become a more dominant point of origin and destination. Not only is downtown Chicago accessible by commuter train, so are other employment centers along the North Shore, such as downtown Lake Forest, downtown Highland Park, downtown Wilmette and downtown Evanston. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 51 SECTION VI – MARKET AREA DEMAND/SUPPLY OVERVIEW OF METRO CHICAGO APARTMENT MARKET The Chicago MSA market contains a total inventory of approximately 543,000 apartment units, according to CoStar. At the end of the 1st quarter 2016, the vacancy rate in the metro area was 4.4%. The average monthly effective rent was $1,195 or $1.48 per square foot at that time. In the 3rd quarter 2010, the vacancy rate was much higher – at 8.2%. By the 2nd quarter 2012, the vacancy rate had fallen to about 4%, fluctuating between 4% and 5% over the previous three years. Between the 4th quarter 2010 and the 2nd quarter 2012, there were very few apartment units delivered, as shown in Figure 38. However, beginning in the 3rd quarter 2012, deliveries accelerated as the vacancy rate fell below 5% and rent growth spiked. Between the 3rd quarter 2012 and the end of the 1st quarter of 2016, just over 19,000 units were delivered. Over this same time period total net absorption approximated about 15,000 units. Evidence suggested the same factors which were discussed in the previous section of this report that fueled apartment market demand nationally were fueling demand in the Chicago MSA apartment market. 12.00% 11.00% 10.00% 9.00% 8.00% 7.00% 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% ‐1.00% ‐2.00% ‐3.00% ‐4.00% ‐5.00% ‐6.00% ‐7.00% ‐8.00% ‐9.00% ‐10.00% ‐11.00% ‐12.00% Units (Absorption and Deliveries) 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 ‐500 ‐1,000 ‐1,500 ‐2,000 ‐2,500 ‐3,000 ‐3,500 ‐4,000 ‐4,500 ‐5,000 Deliveries Net Absorption Vacancy Percent Effective Rent Growth/Yr Sources: CoStar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 52 Percent (Vacancy Rate and Annualized Average Rent Change) FIGURE 38: CHICAGO MSA APARTMENT MARKET DELIVERIES, ABSORPTION, VACANCY AND RENT CHANGE: Q1 2006 to Q3 2015 APARTMENT MARKET AREA DEFINITION The subject property is located in the southeastern portion of Lake County, Illinois. RECI delineated a market area based on several factors. In fact, seven factors were utilized to delineate a market area for upscale apartments developed at the subject site in southeast/central Lake County. These factors included: 1. Location and accessibility of major roads/highways. 2. Historical cross-sectional analyses of apartment residents’ distances 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Primary Market Area to places of work in Chicago and other metropolitan markets. Distances and drive times to major concentrations of employment. Demographic/geodemographic profiles of Lake County neighborhoods. Distance and drive times to competitive apartment developments located in Lake County and the broader Chicago metropolitan market. Physical and perceptional barriers such as dramatic changes in land use, freeways and the like. Regional residential and commercial development patterns. The Primary Market Area is shown in Figure 39. The approximate boundaries include Lake Michigan on the east, State Route 21 (Milwaukee Avenue) on the west, the city of Deerfield Road on the south and State Route 60 (Town Line Road) on the north. The northern boundary extends approximately 10-15 minutes to the north, the western boundaries of the Primary Market Area extend 15-20 minutes from downtown Highwood. The southern boundary extends only 5-10 minutes to the south due largely to the strong north-south access. The Primary Market Area contains 40.8 square miles and has a total inventory of 4,944 rental units of all types, according to the U.S. Census data. However, the CoStar database reports that there are about 2,300 apartment units (i.e., the larger properties among the total inventory of rental units). FIGURE 39: PRIMARY MARKET AREA Sources: ESRI, CoStar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 53 The apartment properties located in the Primary Market Area exhibited a 1st Quarter 2016 occupancy rate of 96.5%, which is just above the metro area average of 95.3%. The Secondary Market Area exhibited a mid-1st quarter vacancy rate of 95.50%. By themselves, strong growth in rents and an average occupancy above 95% would indicate demand already exceeds supply, suggesting that the market has rental unit demand that is presently not being met. Over the last four years (1st quarter 2012 to 1st quarter 2016), the average asking rent has increased by nearly 11% in the Primary Market Area. The submarket average effective rent has increased despite a surge in apartment unit construction located to south of Primary Market Area boundary. (Note: quarter to quarter changes in the average rent do indicate quarterly declines as well as increases.) A total of 488 apartment units were delivered in 2015 at two properties – Amli Deerfield and Woodview. At the end of the 1st quarter 2016, the vacancy rate in the Primary Market Area was 3.5%, as shown in Figure 40. There are two large properties (Woodview Apartments in Deerfield and Amli Deerfield) that delivered units to market. (Both of these properties are actually located just outside the Primary Market Area.) These two properties are seven to nine miles southwest of the subject property. However, if these two properties are included in the Primary Market Area inventory, the Primary Market Area vacancy rate averages 13.4%. Though the vacancy rate is high, absorption is quite strong, causing a rapid decline in the vacancy rate. The Primary Market Area average monthly effective rent was $1,724 or $1.90 per square foot at the end of the 1st quarter. The average monthly effective rent is 45% above the MSA average effective per unit rent. FIGURE 40: PRIMARY MARKET AREA DELIVERIES, VACANCY AND RENT CHANGE: Q1 2006 to Q1 2016 150 ABSORPTION, 36.00% Units (Absorption and Deliveries) 125 32.00% 28.00% 100 24.00% 20.00% 75 16.00% 50 12.00% 8.00% 25 4.00% 0.00% 0 ‐4.00% ‐25 ‐8.00% ‐12.00% ‐50 ‐16.00% ‐20.00% ‐75 Deliveries Units Net Absorption Units Vacancy Percent Effective Rent Growth/Yr Sources: CoStar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 54 Percent (Vacancy Rate and Annualized Average Rent Change) 40.00% In the 2nd quarter 2010 the vacancy rate had spiked to over 8%. However, by the 4th quarter 2011, the vacancy rate had fallen to less than 4%, fluctuating between 2% and 4% over the past three to four years. For nearly the entire period (Q1 2006 to Q2 2015), there were very few apartment units delivered in this market area, as indicated in Figure 40. There were 240 units delivered between 2006 and 2010. Between the 1st quarter 2010 and the 1st quarter 2015, net absorption was relatively flat (slightly positive or slightly negative) as the vacancy rate had declined to below 3%. In a market like this, when the vacancy rate drops below 4%, rents often spike, even though net absorption is low. Rents had begun to spike in the 3rd quarter 2014. Even as new projects were delivered in 2015 the Primary Market Area average effective rent continued to increase at a strong rate. CoStar reports that concession levels have remained low in the Primary market Area. Secondary Market Area The Secondary Market Area is shown in Figure 41. The Secondary Market Area contains 33.96 square miles and a total inventory of 4,123 rental units according to ESRI and 1,162 apartment units. FIGURE 41: SECONDARY MARKET AREA Sources: ESRI, CoStar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. At the end of the 1st quarter 2016, the vacancy rate in the Secondary Market Area was 2.5%, as shown in Figure 42. The average monthly effective rent was $1,198 or $1.39 per square foot in the 1st quarter. The average monthly effective rent is about 31% below the Primary Market Area average effective rent. In the 3rd quarter 2010 the vacancy rate had spiked to 7.9%. However, by the 4th quarter 2011, the vacancy rate had fallen to 2.9%, fluctuating between 1% and 5% over the past three to four years. For nearly the entire post-construction boom period (i.e., Q1 2008 to Q1 2016), there were no apartment units delivered in this market area, as shown in Figure 42. During this period, quarterly absorption remained relatively flat (slightly positive or slightly negative) and rent growth remained marginal. Strong rent growth has also been exhibited in the Secondary Market Area. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 55 CoStar reports that rent concession levels were substantial during the Great Recession, but only marginal since the 1st quarter 2012. 30 20.00% 18.00% 16.00% 14.00% 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% ‐2.00% ‐4.00% ‐6.00% ‐8.00% ‐10.00% ‐12.00% ‐14.00% ‐16.00% ‐18.00% 25 Units (Absorption and Deliveries) 20 15 10 5 0 ‐5 ‐10 ‐15 ‐20 ‐25 ‐30 Deliveries Net Absorption Vacancy Percent Percent (Vacancy Rate and Annualized Average Rent Change) FIGURE 42: SECONDARY MARKET AREA DELIVERIES, ABSORPTION, VACANCY AND RENT CHANGE: Q4 2008 to Q1 2016 Effective Rent Growth/Yr Sources: CoStar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. LAKE COUNTYMARKET AREA APARTMENT DELIVERIES Lake County Apartment deliveries in Lake County, as shown in Figure 43, were relatively high prior to the Great Recession. Much of the apartment construction came to halt by 2008, though some projects proceeded in late 2009 and 2010. There was a resurgence of deliveries in 2014. FIGURE 43: HISTORICAL APARTMENT DELIVERIES IN LAKE COUNTY: 2005 TO Q 12015 350 328 300 294 280 248 Number of Units Delivered 250 240 200 165 148 150 126 110 106 100 100 100 84 66 75 65 50 14 9 2005 Q1 2005 Q2 2005 Q3 2005 Q4 2006 Q1 2006 Q2 2006 Q3 2006 Q4 2007 Q1 2007 Q2 2007 Q3 2007 Q4 2008 Q1 2008 Q2 2008 Q3 2008 Q4 2009 Q1 2009 Q2 2009 Q3 2009 Q4 2010 Q1 2010 Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2011 Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2012 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2013 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2014 Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2015 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2016 Q1 9 0 Sources: CoStar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 56 The largest apartment developments completed since 2005 include the following: Coventry Glen, Round Lake, IL AMLI at Museum Gardens, Vernon Hills, IL Zion Senior Cottages, Zion, IL 301 Riverwalk Place, Buffalo Grove, IL Cardinal Square - Building A, Mundelein, IL 1199 E. Port Clinton Road Condos, Vernon Hills, IL Thomas Place - Fox Lake, IL The Commons at Town Center, Vernon Hills, IL Village Park, Waukegan, IL Lakefront Residences at Grayslake, Grayslake, IL Thomas Place – Gurnee, Gurnee, IL Zurich Meadows, Lake Zurich, IL The Oaks of Vernon Hills, Vernon Hills, IL Woodview Apartments, Deerfield, IL Amli Deerfield - 280 units 294 units 110 units 90 units 84 units 66 units 100 units 84 units 126 units 70 units 100 units 95 units 328 units 248 units 240 units As shown, two recent developments, Amli Deerfield and Woodview located outside the subject property Primary Market Area - added 240 apartment units in the 4th quarter 2015. According to the CoStar database and other research that we performed, there are nine other apartment developments (other than the subject property units) in Lake County, totaling 429 units that are proposed for delivery in in Lake County in 2016 through 2018. Only 363 units area under construction or proposed for the Primary and Secondary Market Areas. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Primary and Secondary Market Areas The Oaks Phase II, Vernon Hills, IL 833 Laurel, Highland Park Manchester Square, Libertyville, IL McGovern Flats, Highland Park, IL Roger Williams, Highland Park, IL 440 Green Bay Road, Highwood, Fides/Downtown Lake Bluff Focus Dev. Site Lake Forest, IL Fides/Downtown Highwood, IL 32 units (2016) 30 units (2016) 34 units (2016/2017) 73 units (2017) 30 units (2017) 52 units (2017) 40 units (2017) 110 units (2017) 28 units (2018) Much of the apartment development of the last 10 years in Lake County took place in the central and western parts of Lake County. We estimate that approximately 52% of the 2,327 units that were delivered in the county over the past 10 years were built in the Primary and Secondary Market Areas, as referenced in Exhibit 44. As part of our research of future rental apartment deliveries, we contacted representatives of several communities in the North Shore including Lake Bluff, Lake Forest, Libertyville, Mettawa, Vernon Hills, Lincolnshire, Riverwoods, Buffalo Grove, Highwood and Highland Park. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 57 FIGURE 44: HISTORICAL AND FORECAST APARTMENT DELIVERIES IN THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MARKETS 2005 TO Q2 2018 350 300 294 280 248 Number of Units Delivered 250 240 200 165 150 148 150 126 110 106 100 100 100 84 66 75 65 66 73 52 50 30 30 9 14 28 9 0 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Sources: CoStar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Note: Proposed developments are also shown in this chart. Delivery dates represent approximations only. The subject property’s 28 units are also represented. As shown in Figure 45, we forecast deliveries, absorption and vacancy for the Primary Market Area. After reflecting the apartment deliveries that have been proposed for the Primary Market Area (delivery dates have been estimated) and forecasting absorption based, in part, on historical trends in this market, we forecast the vacancy rate through 2018. As units are delivered (as the have been in the 2015 and early 2016), we forecast positive absorption which is typical of trends in this market between 2007 and 2011 (i.e., before and after the Great Recession), as shown above in Figure 44. As shown in Figure 45, after new units were delivered in 2015 (AmliDeerfield and Woodview), submarket absorption spiked. Our experience in urban and suburban submarkets that have been subject to no or minimal apartment construction over decades, especially those markets proximate to major employment centers, has been that newly constructed rental units are absorbed fairly rapidly as existing apartment renters and other households capitalize on the availability of new and/or “higher quality” rental units. Initially, in this case, vacancy may spike somewhat, rent growth may slow, but over time vacancy levels off, especially if there is, as we believe, pent-up demand for rental housing in the Primary Market Area. As shown in Figure 46, for the period 2016 to 2018, we show two vacancy rate forecasts – a Base Case and a Pessimistic Case. RECI forecasts that the vacancy rate will rise to between 4% and 6% as a result of the delivery of units under construction or proposed. If additional units are developed in the Primary Market Area through 2018, the vacancy rate could rise above 6%. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 58 FIGURE 45: PRIMARY MARKET AREA DEMAND/SUPPLY FORECASTS: DELIVERIES, ABSORPTION AND VACANCY 225 45.00% 200 40.00% 175 35.00% 150 30.00% 125 25.00% 100 20.00% 75 15.00% 50 10.00% 25 5.00% 0 0.00% ‐25 ‐5.00% ‐50 ‐10.00% Deliveries Units Net Absorption Units Vacancy Percent ‐ Optimistic Vacancy Percent ‐ Pessimistic Percent (Vacancy Rate and Annualized Average Rent Change) Units (Absorption and Deliveries) 250 Sources: CoStar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Note: Delivery dates represent approximations only. The subject property’s 28 units are also represented. Even though we have not developed a rent forecast, we anticipate continued increases in the Primary Market Area’s average rent along with positive net absorption and a reduction in vacancy. Again, this assumes that all of the units that have been proposed in the Primary Market Area are built in 2016, 2017 and 2018. In the next section of this report, we perform an additional demand analysis which reflects pent-up demand for rental apartments. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 59 SECTION VII – MARKET AREA DEMAND MARKET AREA DEMOGRAPHICS In order to support the demand/supply forecasts presented at the end of the last section of this report, we perform an additional analysis aimed at quantifying total rental unit demand. Here we are concerned with the subject property’s capture rate within the Total Market Area (Primary Market Area and Secondary Market Area, combined). If the capture rate necessary to absorb the subject property’s 28 units is relatively high, the analysis suggests that proposed new construction may cause a demand/supply imbalance. But first, we review the demographics of these two geographic areas. As shown in Figure 46, the Primary Market Area contains 59,640 persons and 21,852 households in contrast to the Secondary Market Area which contains 40,264 persons and 12,924 households. FIGURE 46: PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MARKET AREA DEMOGRAPHICS Primary Market Secondary Market Demographics Area Area 2 0 10 S u m m a ry P o pula tio n Ho us e ho lds F a m ilie s Ave ra ge Ho us e ho ld S ize Owne r Oc c upie d Ho us ing Units R e nte r Oc c upie d Ho us ing Units M e dia n Age M e dia n Ho us e ho ld Inc o m e 2 0 15 S u m m a ry P o pula tio n Ho us e ho lds F a m ilie s Ave ra ge Ho us e ho ld S ize Owne r Oc c upie d Ho us ing Units R e nte r Oc c upie d Ho us ing Units M e dia n Age M e dia n Ho us e ho ld Inc o m e Ave ra ge Ho us e ho ld Inc o m e H is t o ric a l T re n d s : 2 0 10 - 2 0 15 C o m p o u n d e d A n n u a l A v e ra g e C h a n g e P o pula tio n Ho us e ho lds F a m ilie s Owne r Ho us e ho lds R e nte r Ho us e ho lds M e dia n Age M e dia n Ho us e ho ld Inc o m e 2 0 2 0 S u m m a ry P o pula tio n Ho us e ho lds F a m ilie s Ave ra ge Ho us e ho ld S ize Owne r Oc c upie d Ho us ing Units R e nte r Oc c upie d Ho us ing Units M e dia n Age M e dia n Ho us e ho ld Inc o m e Ave ra ge Ho us e ho ld Inc o m e F o re c a s t T re n d s : 2 0 15 - 2 0 2 0 C o m p o u n d e d A n n u a l A v e ra g e C h a n g e P o pula tio n Ho us e ho lds F a m ilie s Owne r Ho us e ho lds R e nte r Ho us e ho lds M e dia n Age M e dia n Ho us e ho ld Inc o m e 59,640 21,852 16,556 2.67 17,484 4,368 43.8 N/A 40,264 12,924 8,741 2.51 9,165 3,759 31.9 N/A 60,318 22,359 16,775 2.64 17,415 4,944 45.2 $ 123,334 $ 184,762 39,886 13,188 8,836 2.50 9,065 4,123 33.0 $ 93,605 $ 146,783 0.23% 0.46% 0.26% -0.08% 2.51% 0.63% --- -0.19% 0.41% 0.22% -0.22% 1.87% 0.68% --- 60,895 22,691 16,917 2.63 17,575 5,116 46.4 $ 141,102 $ 209,077 40,255 13,357 8,897 2.50 9,128 4,229 34.5 $ 106,436 $ 168,332 0.19% 0.30% 0.17% 0.18% 0.69% 0.53% 2.73% 0.18% 0.25% 0.14% 0.14% 0.51% 0.89% 2.60% Sources: U.S. Census and ESRI RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 60 The median household income in the Primary Market Area ($123,334) is above the median income in the Secondary Market Area ($93,605). This may in part be a result of the slightly older median age in the Primary Market Area (45.2 years) in contrast to that of the Secondary Market Area (33.0 years). It is also noteworthy to point out that between 2010 and 2015, the number of owner occupied households declined as the number of renter households increased in both the Primary and Secondary Market Areas. The population and number of households in the Secondary Market Area increased at a more rapid rate than the population and households in the Primary Market Area. This trend is forecast to continue between 2015 and 2020, also as shown in Figure 46. MARKET AREA HOUSING A profile of the housing stock of both the Primary and Secondary Market Areas is presented in Figure 47. The Primary Market Area is estimated to contain a total of 23,321 housing units and the Secondary Market Area is estimated to contain 32,863 housing units in 2015. Approximately 15% of total units in the Primary Market Area were built since 2000 with a slightly lower percentage, 12.0%, built since 2000 in the Secondary Market Area. Nevertheless, roughly 17% of total housing units in both the Primary Market Area and the Secondary Market Area were built before 1950. The Primary Market Area is estimated to contain a total 3,939 renteroccupied housing units and the Secondary Market Area is estimated to contain 3,571 renter-occupied housing units. Of total housing units, the percentage of units that are owner-occupied is 82% in the Primary Market Area and slightly higher or 72% in the Secondary Market Area. Of total housing units, 71% of the units in the Primary Market Area are single-unit detached in contrast to a slightly lower share, 65%, in the Secondary Market Area. Nearly 36% of renter households moved into their unit since 2010 in the Primary Market Area in contrast to 42% of renter households in the Secondary Market Area. Among owner-occupied households 72% of households moved into their unit between 1990 and 2000 in the Primary Market Area in contrast to 76% in the Secondary Market Area. The percentage of owner-occupied units (homes) without a mortgage in the Primary Market Area is estimated 32% in contrast to the Secondary market Area, which is 30%. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 61 FIGURE 47: PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MARKET AREA HOUSING Primary Market Area 2 0 15 T O T A LS To ta l P o pula tio n To ta l Ho us e ho lds To ta l Ho us ing Units O WN E R - O C C UP IE D H O US IN G UN IT S B Y M O R T G A G E S T A T US To ta l Ho us ing units with a m o rtga ge /c o ntra c t to purc ha s e /s im ila r de bt S e c o nd m o rtga ge o nly Ho m e e quity lo a n o nly B o th s e c o nd m o rtga ge a nd ho m e e quity lo a n No s e c o nd m o rtga ge a nd no ho m e e quity lo a n Ho us ing units witho ut a m o rtga ge % 58,418 21,538 23,321 Secondary Market Area % 36,133 12,639 13,843 17 ,6 0 0 12,006 333 3,554 150 7,969 5,593 100.0% 68.2% 1.9% 20.2% 0.9% 45.3% 31.8% 9 ,0 6 8 6,389 144 1,874 50 4,322 2,679 100.0% 70.5% 1.6% 20.7% 0.6% 47.7% 29.5% 2 3 ,3 2 1 16,541 1,917 518 627 582 616 1,281 1,213 27 0 100.0% 70.9% 8.2% 2.2% 2.7% 2.5% 2.6% 5.5% 5.2% 0.1% 0.0% 13 ,8 4 3 9,043 1,516 209 397 379 572 711 885 130 0 100.0% 65.3% 11.0% 1.5% 2.9% 2.7% 4.1% 5.1% 6.4% 0.9% 0.0% 2 3 ,3 2 1 60 3,506 2,511 2,904 2,518 4,430 3,359 870 3,162 1970 10 0 .0 % 0.3% 15.0% 10.8% 12.5% 10.8% 19.0% 14.4% 3.7% 13.6% 13 ,8 4 3 14 1,651 2,234 2,015 2,152 1,884 1,588 533 1,772 1975 10 0 .0 % 0.1% 11.9% 16.1% 14.6% 15.5% 13.6% 11.5% 3.9% 12.8% 2 1,5 3 9 17 ,6 0 0 1,180 7,178 3,951 2,716 1,358 1,217 3 ,9 3 9 1,431 2,132 255 64 42 15 2001 10 0 .0 % 12 ,6 3 9 9 ,0 6 8 420 4,021 2,409 1,087 710 421 3 ,5 7 1 1,481 1,736 246 72 36 0 2002 10 0 .0 % H O US IN G UN IT S B Y UN IT S IN S T R UC T UR E To ta l 1, de ta c he d 1, a tta c he d 2 3 or4 5 to 9 10 to 19 20 to 49 50 o r m o re M o bile ho m e B o a t, R V, va n, e tc . H O US IN G UN IT S B Y YE A R S T R UC T UR E B UILT To ta l B uilt 2010 o r la te r B uilt 2000 to 2009 B uilt 1990 to 1999 B uilt 1980 to 1989 B uilt 1970 to 1979 B uilt 1960 to 1969 B uilt 1950 to 1959 B uilt 1940 to 1949 B uilt 1939 o r e a rlie r M e dia n Ye a r S truc ture B uilt O C C UP IE D H O US IN G UN IT S B Y YE A R H O US E H O LD E R M O VE D IN T O UN IT To ta l O wn e r o c c u p ie d M o ve d in 2010 o r la te r M o ve d in 2000 to 2009 M o ve d in 1990 to 1999 M o ve d in 1980 to 1989 M o ve d in 1970 to 1979 M o ve d in 1969 o r e a rlie r R e n t e r o c c u p ie d M o ve d in 2010 o r la te r M o ve d in 2000 to 2009 M o ve d in 1990 to 1999 M o ve d in 1980 to 1989 M o ve d in 1970 to 1979 M o ve d in 1969 o r e a rlie r M e dia n Ye a r Ho us e ho lde r M o ve d Into Unit 69.9% 6.7% 40.8% 22.4% 15.4% 7.7% 6.9% 36.3% 54.1% 6.5% 1.6% 1.1% 0.4% 2000 75.5% 4.6% 44.3% 26.6% 12.0% 7.8% 4.6% 41.5% 48.6% 6.9% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey and ESRI RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 62 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MARKET AREA RENTER DEMAND In order to support the demand/supply forecasts presented in the previous section of this report, we perform an additional analysis aimed at quantifying rental housing demand and calculating the subject property’s capture rate within the Total Market Area (both the Primary Market Area and the Secondary Market Area, combined). FIGURE 48: SUBJECT PROPERTY MARKET AREA Sources: U.S. Census, ESRI, Neilsen PRIZM, and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. The capture rate represents the percentage of likely consumers that would need to be attracted to the planned development to reach stabilized occupancy (i.e., 95% occupancy). Typically, the capture rate for any single apartment development should not be considerably higher than 5% - 10% of total rental demand, according to industry standards/benchmarks, though this can vary from market to market based upon market size, density, recent new supply, etc. In order to perform this analysis, we obtained housing data from the 2010 U.S. Census, the 2007-2011 American Community Survey, the 2009-2013 American Community Survey and ESRI. The exact methodology and source data is outlined in detail in Figure 50. Below, we offer a synopsis of the several steps. The first step is to calculate total renter-occupied housing units’ share of total occupied housing units for two recent periods – 2010 and 2014. The second step is to establish the target rental housing share for the Total Market Area (Primary and Secondary Market Areas, combined) which because of both a moderately low share (around 26%) and lack of multifamily rental housing construction over at least the past 15 years, is forecast by RECI to range between 27% to 28%. (Note: For comparison purposes, the average share for the entire North Shore is 24.5%. The average share for a diverse mix of 14 suburban municipalities located in north Cook County and northwest Cook County is 26%). RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 63 Third, we apply the 27% and 28% share against Total Market Area households and then make adjustments for: (a) a 5% vacancy rate; (b) replacement demand; and (c) competitive apartment units under construction or proposed for the Primary and Secondary Market Areas. The resultant total rental unit demand range for the Primary and Secondary Market Areas after these adjustments equals 400 to 773 units. Hence the proposed 28 units represents a capture rate of 3.6% to 7.0% of demand for total rental units. Fourth, based upon our research of the income distribution associated with Primary and Secondary Market Area renter households, we conclude that only a portion of all renters have household incomes sufficiently high to support monthly rents as proposed for the subject property. Based on the data available from the 2007-2011 American Community Survey, we estimate, of total Market Area Renter Households, only 53% have income levels high enough to support the proposed rent structure for the subject property. Applying this share to “qualified” (or high income renters) rental demand, referenced above, indicates qualified new demand of 212 to 410 apartment units. Also, as shown in Figure 49, the proposed 28 units represent a capture rate of 6.8% to 13.2% of total demand for units of the subject type among renter households with income levels above $50,000. Therefore, we conclude that the market should be able to support the addition of 363 other apartment units that are under construction or proposed (and accounted for in for calculations) for the Primary and Secondary Market Areas. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 64 Row A Calculation FIGURE 49: DEMAND/CAPTURE RATE ANALYSIS FOR 28 APARTMENT UNITS IN HIGHWOOD, IL. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MARKET AREA DEMAND/SUPPLY FORECAST RANGE Note High Low 2 0 10 Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area Ho us eho ld s (1) 3 7,776 3 7,776 8 ,12 7 B 2 0 10 Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area Rent er-Occup ied Unit s / Ho us eho ld s (2 ) 8 ,12 7 C 2 0 10 Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area Rent er Ho us eho ld Share (3 ) 2 1.5% 2 1.5% D 2 0 15 Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area Ho us eho ld s (4 ) 3 5,54 7 3 5,54 7 E Es t imat ed 2 0 15 Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area Rent er-Occup ied Unit s (5) 9 ,3 4 5 9 ,3 4 5 F Es t imat ed 2 0 15 Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area Rent er Share (6 ) 2 6 .3 % 2 6 .3 % G Ta rg e t R e nt a l Ho us i ng S ha re (7) 2 7% 28% H 2 0 15 Targ et Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area Rent al Unit s (8 ) 9 ,59 8 9 ,9 53 I Difference b et ween Es t imat ed 2 0 15 unit s and 2 0 15 Targ et Rent al Unit s (9 ) 2 53 608 J Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area Rep lacement Demand (10 ) 30 30 K Sub ject Pro p ert y Rep lacement Demand (11) 0 0 L Plus : 5% Vacancy Rat e (12 ) 480 498 M Les s : Unit s Und er Co ns t ruct io n o r Pro p o s ed in t he Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Areas (13 ) 363 363 N To t a l D e ma nd f o r N e w P ri ma ry a nd S e c o nd a ry M a rke t A re a R e nt a l U ni t s (14 ) 400 773 O Share o f Demand fo r Unit s wit h Gro s s Rent mo re t han $1,3 0 0 (15) 53 % 53 % P Demand fo r Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area Rent al Unit s wit h Rent s o ver $1,3 0 0 (16 ) 2 12 4 10 Q Sub ject Pro p ert y M AXIM UM Numb er o f Planned Unit s (17) R Cap t ure Rat e o f Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area Rent er HHs (18 ) 0 .3 0 % 28 0 .3 0 % 28 S C a p t ure R a t e o f To t a l N e w R e nt a l D e ma nd (19 ) 7.0 % 3 .6 % P Cap t ure Rat e o f Demand fo r Rent al Unit s wit h Rent s o ver $1,3 0 0 (2 0 ) 13 .2 % 6 .8 % N O TES : (1) Ob t ained fro m t he 2 0 10 U.S. Decennial Cens us . (2 ) Ob t ained fro m t he 2 0 10 U.S. Decennial Cens us . (3 ) Rent er Unit s (Ro w B) d ivid ed b y To t al Unit s (Ro w A) . (4 ) (5) Ob t ained fro m t he es t imat es availab le fro m ESRI. (6 ) Rent er Unit s (Ro w E) d ivid ed b y To t al Unit s (Ro w D). (7) (8 ) Ob t ained fro m t he es t imat es availab le fro m ESRI. Fo recas t cap t ure rat e b as ed o n rent er s hare fro m U.S. Cens us Bureau, 2 0 0 9 -2 0 13 5-Year American Co mmunit y Survey fo r M o raine To wns hip , Lake Co unt y, IL (2 3 %) and M ain To wns hip , Co o k Co unt y, IL. (2 4 %). Targ et Share (Ro w G) t imes To t al Unit s (Ro w D). (9 ) Difference b et ween 2 0 10 t arg et unit s (Ro w I) minus (Ro w E). (10 ) Annual rep lacement d emand eq ual t o 1% o f unit s b uilt p rio r t o 19 70 (3 0 .1% o f all rent al unit s in Primary and Seco nd ay M arket Areas ). (11) (12 ) (13 ) No rent al unit s will b e d emo lis hed b efo re co ns t ruct io n will co mmence o n 3 6 unit b uild ing . 5% as s umed s t ab ilized vacancy rat e t imes Targ et Rent er Unit s (Ro w H). The s um o f all ap art ment unit s t hat are und er co ns t ruct io n o r p ro p o s ed in t he Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Area. Increas e in Demand (Ro w I) p lus Rep alcement Demand fo r all unit s includ ing s ub ject p ro p ert y (Ro w J and Ro w K), p lus vacant rent er unit s (Ro w L) minus rent er unit s und er co ns t ruct io n/ p ro p o s ed (Ro w M ). The s hare o f rent er ho us eho ld s wit h inco mes o ver $50 ,0 0 0 annual inco me o b t ained fro m U.S. Cens us Bureau, 2 0 0 9 -2 0 13 5-Year American Co mmunit y Survey fo r Primary and Seco nd ary M arket Areas . (14 ) (15) (16 ) Up p er inco me rent ers s hare (Ro w N) t imes To t al Demand (Ro w O). (17) (18 ) Numb er o f Unit s p lanned fo r t he Lake Bluff s it e (Sup ject Pro p ert y). (19 ) Numb er o f Sub ject Pro p ert y Unit s (Ro w Q) d ivid ed b y To t al Rent er Unit s (Ro w E). Numb er o f Sub ject Pro p ert y Unit s (Ro w Q) d ivid ed b y To t al Unit Demand (Ro w N). (2 0 ) Numb er o f Sub ject Pro p ert y Unit s (Ro w Q) d ivid ed b y Unit Demand fo r Up p er Inco mr Rent ers (Ro w P). Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007-2011 American Community Survey, 2009-2013 5-Year American Community Survey, ESRI and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 65 GEODEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY MARKET AREA HOUSEHOLDS In addition to analyzing the demographics of the Primary Market Area, we also researched the geodemographics (also known as psychographics) of the Primary Market Area by applying a specialized database –Nielsen’s PRIZM database. This database is a market segmentation system which defines all U.S. household in terms of 66 demographically and behaviorally distinct types, or "segments," to help marketers discern those consumers’ likes, dislikes, lifestyles and purchase behaviors. Not only do we use these classifications to supplement our analysis of market area demographics, but this database can be useful in marketing to the targeted households. The corresponding value/number to the left of the segment name refers to the socioeconomic rank of the household type or segment. The segments with the lowest numbers are the most affluent. It is no surprise that the North Shore is characterized by the most affluent household types or “segments” as they are known. The segments that are the brightest red in Figure 50 are the most affluent. As shown on the map, these segments are also denoted by the rankings “1”, “2” and “3” primarily. (the lower the rank; the higher the income level). These three household types or segments are known as “Upper Crust” (1), “Blue Blood Estates” (2) and “Movers and Shakers” (3). Also, noteworthy on the map below are the households located in and around Highwood that are more diverse. FIGURE 50: DOMINANT HOUSEHOLD TYPES (PRIZM PSYCHOGRAPHIC SEGMENTS) FOR SOUTHEAST LAKE COUNTY Sources: ESRI, Nielsen and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Note: Although these neighborhoods (actually U.S. Census Block Groups) contain a range of household, the PRIZM data presented in the map identifies the predominant household type. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 66 Through our extensive research of apartment markets across the country, we have found the traditional segments or household types residing in apartments in large metropolitan areas typically include: “Young Digerati”, “Bohemian Mix”, “Executive Suites”, “Urban Achievers” and “Young Influentials”. These households typically reside proximate to downtown employment centers and/or trendy urban neighborhoods. In the Primary Market Area the numbers of households that fall within the household types referenced above are nonexistent or relatively small. Hence this is not an apartment market that has the breadth and depth of the downtown of a major city. Notwithstanding, the Primary Market Area contains a very diverse mix of household types. In fact, we have identified 10 household types or segments that we believe contain a significant number of households that are either renters or given the opportunity, would become renters at a future stage in their lives. The household types include singles and couples, mostly without children. Potential target households may include 25-35 year olds, singles and couples in their late 30s and 40s, as well as older folks including empty nesters. These households span a range of affluence that may include some considered to be Lower-Middle income, but mostly Midscale, Upper Middle, Upscale and some considered wealthy. These household types are identified on the right side of the pie chart in Figure 51. FIGURE 51: PROFILE OF PRIZM DATABASE SEGMENTS FOR THE PRIMARY MARKET AREA. GEODEMOGRAPHIC Sources: ESRI, Nielsen and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 67 These ten segments we have identified in the Primary Market Area include, ranked in order of socioeconomic standing: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Movers & Shakers (03) Executive Suites (08) Second City Elite (10) Brite Lites, Li'l City (12) New Empty Nests (14) Gray Power (21) Young Influentials (22) Up-and-Comers (24) Middleburg Managers (27) Boomtown Singles (35) Defining characteristics of these household types are presented in Figure 52, below. FIGURE 52: DEFINING HOUSEHOLD TYPES # S o c io Ec o no mi c R a nk 1 3 P R IZM N E S e g me nt N i c kna me S o c i a l G ro up N a me M o vers & Shakers Elit e Sub urb s Inc o me C la s s if ic a t i on Wealt hy P re d o mi na nt Inc o me where $10 0 k+ > 9 0 % CHARACTERISTICS Ag es 3 5-6 4 Seco nd Cit y Elit e Seco nd Cit y So ciet y Up s cale $75k+ > 9 0 % 4 5+ 2 20 3 8 Execut ive Suit es The Affluent ials Up s cale $75k+ > 9 0 % 2 5-4 4 4 12 Brit e Lit es , Li'l Cit y Seco nd Cit y So ciet y Up s cale $75k+ > 9 0 % 2 5-54 5 14 New Emp t y Nes t s The Affluent ials Up p er M id d le where $50 k+ > 9 0 % 6 5+ P re d o mi na nt HH C o mp o s i t i o n M arried Co up les M arried Co up les / No Child ren Sing les / Co up les / No Child ren OF THE TEN P re d o mi na nt Ed uc a t i o n C l a s s Co lleg e Grad uat e + PRIZM P re d o mi na nt Emp l o y me nt Execut ive, Pro fes s io nal, Whit e Co llar Co lleg e Grad uat e + Pro fes s io nal, Whit e Co llar Co lleg e Grad uat e + Execut ive, Pro fes s io nal, Whit e Co llar M arried Co up les Co lleg e Grad uat e + Pro fes s io nal, Whit e Co llar M arried Co up les / No Child ren Co lleg e Pro fes s io nal, Whit e Co llar Co lleg e Pro fes s io nal, Whit e Co llar Co lleg e Pro fes s io nal, Whit e Co llar Co lleg e Pro fes s io nal, Whit e Co llar 7 22 Yo ung Influent ials M id d leb urb s M id s cale $3 0 k-$75k > ~8 0 % <3 5 8 24 Up -and -Co mers Cit y Cent ers M id s cale $3 0 k-$75k > ~8 0 % <3 5 Sing les / Co up les / No Child ren M o s t ly Sing les / No Child ren Sing les / Co up les 9 27 Cit y Cent ers M id s cale $3 0 k-$75k > ~8 0 % 55+ Sing les / Co up les Co lleg e Pro fes s io nal/ Whit e Co llar 10 35 Lo wer M id d le where 9 0 % < $50 k <3 5 M o s t ly Sing les So me Co lleg e Whit e Co llar/ Service 6 21 Gray Po wer M id d leb urg M anag ers Bo o mt o wn Sing les M id d leb urb s Cit y Cent ers M id s cale $3 0 k-$75k > ~8 0 % 6 5+ Sources: ESRI, Nielsen and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. COMPETITIVE ALIGNMENT AND RENTAL SURVEY According to CoStar, the Primary Market Area contains 2,297 apartment units which were built primarily in the pre-1980 period. The Secondary Market Area contains 1,162 apartment units. CoStar reports that Lake County, as a whole, contains approximately 30,000 apartment units. The complete inventory of apartments in Lake County is shown in Figure 53. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 68 FIGURE 53: LOCATION OF APARTMENTS IN LAKE COUNTY, IL Sources: CoStar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Seventeen apartment/rental properties in the Primary and Secondary Market Areas were surveyed and include five large Class B/C properties, eight Class A and/or newly constructed apartment communities and four condo/townhome rental properties, as depicted in the in Figure 54. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 69 FIGURE 54: MAP OF COMPETITIVE PROPERTIES SURVEYED Sources: Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Field Survey November 2015 The five Class B/C apartment communities (including the nearby Fort Sheridan Place and Braeside Apartments) were built in 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, all but one contain more than 100 units, and are located less than one block up to eight miles from the subject property. We include four of these since they represent some of the larger apartment properties in southeast Lake County. One of the five is small, but appears to be typical of many of the rental units located in east Lake County. However, due to age and neighborhood location we believe that they would not be directly competitive with the subject property, as planned. The eight Class A properties were built since 2000 (actually one – Manchester Square - is still under construction) and each range between 30 units and 328 units. The condo/townhome rentals consist of a mixture of older rented condominium units and three recently developed condominium rentals (15 Clay Avenue Condos, built in 2008, the condo units built at Fort Sheridan in 2002 and The Ravines Condominiums in Highland Park, IL built in 2002.). RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 70 One-bedroom/one-bath units at the five Class B/C apartments generally rent for between $1,000 and $1,800 per month. Two bedroom/two-bath units generally rent for between $1,500 and $2,400 per month. As shown in the oversize exhibit in the Addenda, the Class B/C apartment units that were surveyed include: Fort Sheridan Place, 634 Sheridan Road, Highwood, IL 60040 (252 units), built in 1970 (renovated in 2011). Braeside Apartments, 511 County Line Road, Highland Park, IL 60035 (16 units), built in 1975 (and renovated in 2000). Americana Apartments, 1755 Lake Cook Road, Highland Park, IL 60035 (108 units), built in 1982. Deer Valley Apartments, 30011 Waukegan Avenue, Lake Bluff, IL 60044 (224 units), built in 1991. Forest Pointe/Village Green, 29533 N. Waukegan Road, Lake Bluff, IL 60044 (236 units), built in 1989. Unit amenities at three of these properties include most of the typical amenities found in garden-style apartment developments, central airconditioning, cable ready, ceiling fans, washer and dryer in each unit or in the case of Fort Sheridan Place, on each floor as it is a mid-rise property. At Braeside Apartments only washer/dryer connections are provided. The two garden-style communities also feature vaulted ceilings and fire places in some units. The units at Fort Sheridan Place have been completely renovated since 2009; Deer Valley management has been renovating units upon turnover. These renovated units feature stainless steel, energy-efficient appliances, granite countertops, high-end cabinetry and hardwood-style flooring. Common area amenities at both properties include clubhouses, fitness centers, business centers and swimming pools. Deer Valley and Forest Point/Village Green also feature an outdoor pool and patios/balconies. One-bedroom/one-bath units at the eight Class A/newly constructed apartment developments generally rent for between $1,500 and $2,400 per month. Two bedroom/two-bath units generally rent for between $2,500 and $3,500 per month. The eight Class A apartment properties surveyed include: The Oaks of Vernon Hills, 103 Oak Leaf Lane, Vernon Hills, IL 60061 (328 units), built in 2014. Deerfield Village Centre, 625 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL 60015 (56 units), built in 2000. Woodview Apartments, 15 Parkway North, Deerfield, IL 60015 (248 units), built in 2015. : RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 71 Renaissance Place, 849 Green Bay Road, Highland Park, IL 60035 (30 units), built in 2000. Unit size, monthly and per square foot rental rates: Focus Development Western/Laurel, 1000-1042 N. Western Avenue, Lake Forest, IL 60045 (110 units), planned for development in 2016/2017. : Manchester Square, 601-611 N. Milwaukee Avenue, Libertyville, IL 60048 (34 units), built in 2008; renovated/reconfigured in 2015. Unit size, monthly and per square foot rental rates have not yet been reported by the developer. AMLI at Museum Gardens, 1155 North Museum Blvd., Vernon Hills, IL 60061 (294 units), built in 2005. AMLI Deerfield, 1525 Lake Cook Road, Deerfield, IL 60015 (240 units), built in 2015. These eight Class A/Upscale properties feature a wide range of common area and unit area amenities. Each of these properties are located on heavily trafficked thoroughfares. The Oaks of Vernon Hills, Woodview Apartments, Amli at Museum Gardens and AMLI Deerfield were all built since 2005 and feature extensive common area amenities found at most garden-style properties. However, of these four properties, only the Oaks of Vernon Hills is a garden-style property. The others are low-rise/mid-rise with four to seven stories. Each of these four properties contains more than 200 apartment units. AMLI Deerfield and Woodview Apartments are the two newest and most upscale properties in terms of unit features and amenities. Amli Deerfield features stainless steel appliances, side-by-side refrigerators, under-counter beverage centers, 42" painted white wood shaker-style or espresso wood flat panel kitchen cabinets, task lighting, marble or glass tile backsplashes, gooseneck kitchen faucets and pull-down sprayers, full size washers and dryers, 9-foot ceilings, crown molding, some private yards and balconies. Woodview’s units include an open kitchen design, quartz countertops, upgraded plank flooring, stainless steel appliances, full-size stackable washers and dryers, private balconies and patios, a peninsula/island counter with overhead lighting, and other modern kitchen amenities, including a pulldown gooseneck kitchen faucet. Amli at Museum Gardens was built in 2005 and has very large (i.e., what appear to be too large for this market) units. Unit features include nine-foot ceilings, gourmet kitchens with 42-inch upper cabinets, black or white Whirlpool appliances, full-size built-in microwaves, refrigerators with automatic ice makers, track lighting in kitchens, kitchen pantries and linen closets, designer floors featuring Berber carpet, home offices with wood floors, full-size washers and dryers, walk-in closets, raised cultured marble vanities, double bowl vanities, storage available, private balconies, sunrooms, Individually controlled heat and air conditioning, high-speed internet available and four phone-line capability. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 72 Amli - Deerfield and Woodview were constructed in 2014/2015 and as such, feature the most extensive common area amenities and exhibit the most contemporary finishes. Both of these properties have visibility from Interstate 94/294. Amli-Deerfield was designed to qualify for LEED Silver designation and features a fitness center, swimming pool, resident lounge with fireplace and gourmet kitchen, a business center with coffee bar and lounge area, golf simulator room, garage parking, electric charging stations, and secure bicycle storage and repair shop and a dog wash. Deerfield Village Square, Renaissance Place and Manchester Square are smaller properties with 53, 30 and 34 units, respectively. Each of these three properties are located in North Shore community downtowns, along a major thoroughfare and accessible to Metra trains. Deerfield Village was built in 2000 as part of the redevelopment of downtown Deerfield. It is located adjacent to Deerfield Square. In 1998, a significant portion of the Deerfield downtown area was demolished and replaced with a new outdoor shopping district, Deerfield Square, sometimes called "The Square" or "The Commons" by some Deerfield residents. This downtown area is composed of stores, restaurants and facilities, such as Barnes & Noble, Biaggi's Ristorante Italiano, Footloose, Potbelly Sandwich Shop, CorePower Yoga, Whole Foods Market, and Pure Barre. In addition to retail space, Deerfield Square includes some office space and an outdoor plaza which is used during the summer for free outdoor concerts. The property is also a very short walk to the Deerfield Metra station. This property features the highest per square foot rents of all of the properties that we surveyed. Renaissance Place (downtown Highland Park) and Manchester Square (downtown Libertyville) and are similar developments to Deerfield Village. Renaissance Place an urban-style low-rise residential property which is part of a mixed-use development with high-end retail tenants on the first floor. The property was built in 2000 and contains 30 apartment units. In addition to upscale retailers, trendy restaurants the project contains an upscale movie theater. The property includes heated underground garage parking, a fitness center, security, and elevator access. At Manchester Square, multifamily units that were originally built in 2008 are being reconfigured/redeveloped. This property was purchased in 2013 by Chicago-based Cedar Street Companies, which intends to reconfigure the second and third floor apartment units. The first floor retail has been successful but the original developer's attempt to market the upper floors as residential condominium units and office suites space failed. Plans are for a portion of the units to be offered as "affordable", to those with incomes lower than the metro Chicago average. Parking includes a combination of indoor and outdoor spaces. This property is three stories tall, and the exterior is of high quality materials with brick and limestone-type finish. Gated balconies with sliding glass doors are featured. Asking rental rates and amenities have not yet been determined. There is one large apartment development planned in Lake Forest, 4.5 miles north of the subject property. The developer is Focus development and they plan to build 110 units in 2016/2017. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 73 This property was formerly the site for the municipal services department of Lake Forest, which has been moved to a new facility near I-294 and Hwy 60. The site has been cleared and the developer is awaiting final approvals on various components of development. The apartments are planned to be demised in 3-story brick clad structures with fireplaces in some units. This entire development is also expected to include 12 detached singlefamily homes ranging in size from 3,900 to 4,400 sf and 42 condominiums ranging in size from 1,408 to 2,600 square feet. One-bedroom/one-bath units at the four Condo/Townhome rentals generally rent for between $950 (Lake Forest North Condominiums) and $1,800 (15 Clay Avenue) per month. Two bedroom/two-bath units generally rent for between $1,200 (Lake Forest North Condominiums) and $3,500 (The Ravines Condominiums) per month. The four Condo/Townhome rentals four surveyed include: 15 Clay Avenue Condos, 15 Clay Avenue, Highwood, IL (12 units), built in 2008. The Ravines Condominiums, 3535 Patten Road, Highland Park, IL 60035 (50 units), built in 2002. Bachelor's Officers Quarters/Barracks Lofts Condominiums, 25 Ronin Road, Highwood, IL 60035 (actually, several nearby addresses), built in 1890, renovated in 2002. Lake Forest North Condominiums, 1301 N. Western Avenue, Lake Forest, IL 60045 (120 units), built in 1972. Of these four properties, 15 Clay Avenue Condos, The Ravines Condominiums the Bachelor's Officers Quarters/ Barracks Lofts Condominiums are located within one mile of the subject property. The fourth property, Lake Forest North Condominiums, is older and not competitive with the subject property, but was included to illustrate another core segment of the nearby rental unit inventory – vintage rental condominiums. PRIMARY MARKET AREA APARTMENT DEMAND OUTLOOK AND ABSORPTION The apartment properties located in the Primary Market Area exhibited a 1st Quarter 2016 occupancy rate of 96.5%, which is just above the metro area average of 95.3%. The Secondary Market Area exhibited a mid-1st quarter vacancy rate of 95.50%. By themselves, strong growth in rents and an average occupancy above 95% would indicate demand already exceeds supply, suggesting that the market has rental unit demand that is presently not being met. Over the last four years (1st quarter 2012 to 1st quarter 2016), the average asking rent has increased by nearly 11% in the Primary Market Area. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 74 The submarket average effective rent has increased despite a surge in apartment unit construction located to south of Primary Market Area boundary. (Note: quarter to quarter changes in the average rent do indicate quarterly declines as well as increases.) A total of 488 apartment units were delivered in 2015 at two properties – Amli Deerfield and Woodview. These units are being absorbed at a relatively rapid pace – about 15 units per month. Our experience in urban and suburban submarkets that have been subject to minimal or no new apartment construction in 20 to 30 years, especially in urban submarkets proximate to major employment centers, has been upon the delivery of new rental units, the units are absorbed fairly rapidly as existing apartment renters and other households capitalize on the availability of newer/better quality renter units. Earlier in this section of the report we calculated a capture rate that represents the percentage of likely consumers that would need to be attracted to the planned development to reach stabilized occupancy (i.e., 95% occupancy). We calculated a capture rate of 3.6% to 7.0% of demand for all renter units in the Total Market Area. Refining this analysis to reflect only higher income households (i.e., household income of $50,000+), the capture rate increases to 6.8% to 13.2%. These two measures suggest that there is opportunity for additional rental units. Also, in Section VI, we forecast the potential impact of an additional 363 units in eastern Lake County units on the Primary Market Area vacancy rate. A demand/supply forecast that suggests the delivery of as many as 521 apartment units (total of all apartment projects that are under construction or proposed in the Primary and Secondary Market Area) will be able to be absorbed after an initial spike in the vacancy rate in the Primary Market Areas. The vacancy rate is forecast to ultimately decline to be no higher than 4% to 7%, according to RECI’s forecasts. Three potential sources of demand for apartments in downtown Highwood include: (1) renter households that work in downtown Highwood, downtown Lake Forest, Downtown Highland Park or other downtowns along the Metra line in Cook County; (2) renter households presently residing in older rented condos or apartments in the Highwood, Highland Park and Lake Forest communities that that may be more suited to newly constructed apartments; and (3) renter households residing in northern Cook County who work north of the Northbrook/Deerfield area, who presently commute by commuter train or vehicle. Absorption Forecast In order to develop a forecast of apartment unit absorption, we look to the lease-up rate of recently built apartment developments within or near Lake County, Illinois. Figure 55 below shows average monthly absorption estimates for 15 apartment communities that we have studied since 2009 as part of a broader analysis of Class A apartment developments in Lake County, IL. Our research suggested that each of these properties were properly positioned for their respective submarkets. All but one, for its size (301 Riverwalk Place), achieved a moderate to high rate of lease-up. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 75 This project was built by developer of office/industrial properties (Hamilton Partners) and also had a significant locational disadvantage – set back well off of Milwaukee Avenue. One of the most rapid rates of lease-up was associated with Deerfield Village apartments. We attribute this to its location at the intersection of two major thoroughfares, location adjacent to Deerfield’s redeveloped downtown and the time period (2000) it was delivered. In summary, our research of the last three to four years suggest that an apartment absorption rate of 10 to 20 units per month is typically achievable for larger apartments projects when: (1) the product is properly positioned to penetrate urban/suburban apartment demand; and (2) the property is properly priced (i.e., subject property rents are not considerably above its primary competitors). We would expect smaller apartment developments like the subject property to exhibit an absorption rate closer to one-half the monthly rate of larger properties, say below 10 units per month. For example, the lease-up rate for two smaller properties in 2013 - Emerson Square and Central Station –were estimated at 5 units per month, as shown below. FIGURE 55: CLASS A AND CLASS A/UPSCALE APARTMENT UNIT ABSORPTION RATES g Number of Units Total Leasing Leased/ % of Total City Units Began Units Month # Property Name 1 Deerfield Village Center Deerfield 56 2000 12 21.4% 2 Amli at Museum Gardens Vernon Hills 298 3Q 2004 17 5.7% 3 Madison at Park Butterfield Mundelein 522 2004 22 4.2% 4 Coventry Glen Round Lake 225 2Q 2005 19 8.4% 5 301 Riverwalk Place Buffalo Grove 90 4Q 2006 5 5.6% 6 Port Clinton Vernon Hills 60 2Q 2009 10 16.7% 7 Commons at Town Center Vernon Hills 85 4Q 2009 7 8.2% 8 Emerson Square* Evanston 32 4Q 2013 5 16.7% 9 AMLI Evanston Evanston 195 1Q 2013 10 5.1% 10 1717 Evanston 175 1Q 2013 11 6.3% 11 Central Station Evanston 80 2Q 2013 5 6.3% 12 Oaks of Vernon Hills I Vernon Hills 304 3Q 2014 16 5.3% 13 Woodview Deerfield 248 1Q 2015 14 5.6% 15 Amli - Deerfield Deerfield 240 3Q 2015 14 5.8% 12 8.4% Total/Average 2,848 Sources: Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Field Surveys, 2000-2016 *Note: Features affordable rental units and is considered a Class B property. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 76 Nevertheless, based on the data that we have available to us, we have concluded a monthly absorption rate range for the subject property to be six to nine units per month, as shown in Figure 56. This absorption rate range implies that a 28 unit apartment project would be leased to 95% (i.e., 27 units) between four and nine months. FIGURE 56: CLASS A APARTMENT UNIT ABSORPTION FORECAST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Total Number of Units to be Absorbed to Reach 95%+ Occupancy of 28 Unit Property 27 Units Forecast Range Low Absorption High Absorption Forecas t Range of Monthly Abs orption, in Units 6 Forecas t Range of Monthly Abs orption, in % 23% Forecas t Period to abs orb 28 units , in Months 4 UNIT MIX AND RENTAL RATES Evaluation Of Unit Mix Several of the newer apartments in the Primary and Secondary Market Areas – Amli at Museum Garden, Woodview, Amli –Deerfield and the Oaks of Vernon Hills – are targeting singles/married couples and offer 60% to 80% one bedroom units and/or studio apartments. Renaissance Place and Deerfield Village, located in east Lake County, are 50% to 60% two bedroom units and 40% to 50% one bedroom units. (They do not offer three bedroom units.) Earlier in this section, we summarized the most competitive apartments in located in the Primary and Secondary Market Areas. In addition, we also surveyed key characteristics of 13 recently completed and under construction apartment projects in northern Cook County and Lake County and summarized the unit mix of each and the unit sizes by unit type. These properties reflect the most recent design plans of apartment developers in the region and are shown in Figure 57. A summary of our findings is as follows: RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Studio apartments are primarily found in the in the largest apartment developments, with more than 200 units. Studio apartments are found in seven of the 13 projects. Examples include Woodview, Amli Deerfield, Amli Evanston, E2, Tapestry and The Reserve. Central Station is only 80 units, but featured eight or 10% studios. Among the properties with studio units, they generally account for only 6% to 15% of total units. E2 in downtown Evanston features the largest percentage – at 24%. Three bedroom units are featured in in seven of the 13 developments, but in only four of the largest developments (over 200 units). 77 9 34% 3 Among the properties with three bedroom units, they generally account for only 3% to 18% of total units. Two of the smaller properties – Emerson Square and The Founders exhibit the highest percentage of three bedroom units, at 31% to 33%. Unit sizes for studio, one bedroom, two bedroom and three bedroom units are summarized: o Studio units range in size from 505 square feet to 654 square feet, with an average of 595 square feet. o One bedroom units range in size from 695 square feet to 1,318 square feet, with an average of 834 square feet. o Two bedroom units range in size from 950 square feet to 1,517 square feet, with an average of 1,174 square feet. o Three bedroom units range in size from 1,090 square feet to 1,518 square feet, with an average of 1,351 square feet. For those properties that reported vacancy by unit type (only five of the 13), we did not observe any pattern of high vacancy among any single unit size/type. Regarding the subject property’s amenities kitchens will feature 42” cabinets and granite countertops and an island featuring the sink and dishwasher. All units will have nine foot ceilings. These amenities should be attractive to most residents and a significant upgrade from many of the rental units located in the Primary market Area. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 78 FIGURE 57: RECENTLY COMPLETED AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION APARTMENTS: UNIT MIX AND UNIT SIZES Unit Mix Number # Property Name 1 Woodview 2 Amli Deerfield 3 Emerson Square 4 Midtown Square 5 Central Station 6 E2 7 Amli Evanston 8 The Reserve 9 833 Laurel 10 The Founders 11 Tapestry Glenview 12 Northshore 770 13 Northgate Crossing LOW HIGH AVERAGE City Deerfield Deerfield Evanston Evanston Evanston Evanston Evanston Glenview Highland Park Northbrook Northbrook Northbrook Wheeling Year Built 2015 2015 2013 2014 2013 2015 2013 2015 2016 2015 2014 2016 2016 Studio 24 23 0 0 8 85 6 16 0 0 44 0 0 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 112 104 8 127 90 0 4 18 10 68 70 0 44 24 4 111 108 50 71 98 39 96 96 30 2 10 0 14 14 14 133 113 0 NA NA 0 234 54 0 2 10 0 234 113 50 85 67 12 Sources: CoStar and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. % Unit Mix Total 248 240 32 138 80 354 214 238 12 42 290 0 288 32 354 167 Studio 10% 10% 0% 0% 10% 24% 3% 7% 0% 0% 15% --0% 0% 24% 6% 1 BR 45% 53% 13% 49% 55% 31% 33% 40% 17% 33% 46% --81% 13% 81% 41% 2 BR 42% 38% 56% 51% 30% 31% 46% 40% 83% 33% 39% --19% 19% 83% 42% 79 Unit Size 3 BR Studio 3% 596 0% 536 31% --0% --5% 601 14% 505 18% 654 13% 630 0% --33% --0% 645 ----0% --0% 505 33% 654 10% 595 1 BR 764 830 700 810 837 695 831 821 1,318 750 877 821 787 695 1,318 834 2 BR 1,182 1,218 950 1,162 1,225 1,126 1,260 1,157 1,517 1,000 1,133 1,135 1,197 950 1,517 1,174 3 BR 1,328 --1,090 --1,485 1,443 1,518 1,396 --1,200 ------1,090 1,518 1,351 Unit Type with Highest Vacancy (April, 2016) IBR/2BR IBR/2BR NA NA 1 BR 3BR NONE NA NA NA NA NA NA In view of the targeted demand segments, we believe that the one bedroom and two-bedroom units should represent roughly 40% to 50% and 50% to 60% of total units, respectively. The client’s unit mix falls within these ranges. U ni t D e t a i l # B e d ro o m Ty p e C o unt % o f To t a l U ni t s U ni t S q ua re Feet To t a l S q ua re Fe e t 1 1 Bed ro o m, 1 Bat h 4 14 .3 % 680 2 ,72 0 2 1 Bed ro o m, 1 Bat h, Den 8 2 8 .6 % 800 6 ,4 0 0 3 2 Bed ro o m, 2 Bat h 8 2 8 .6 % 985 7,8 8 0 4 2 Bed ro o m, 2 Bat h 8 2 8 .6 % 1,0 2 5 8 ,2 0 0 28 10 0 . 0 % TO TA L/ A V ER A G E 900 2 5,2 0 0 Our analysis of the unit sizes of recently built and projects under construction indicated: (1) the subject’s planned one bedroom units at 680 square feet is only slightly below the bottom end of the range of 695 square feet to 1,318 and (2) the subject’s larger one bedroom unit, at 800 square feet, is just below the average of the range of sizes of one bedrooms; and (3) the planned two bedroom units, at 985 square feet and 1,025 square feet are above the bottom end of the range, at 950 square feet, but below the average size of one bedrooms units, at 1,174. Establishing Rental Rates For Subject Property In order to establish the “market” rents for the subject property, we evaluated the monthly and per square foot rents of both the surveyed Class A/newly constructed apartments and the rental condos/townhomes, with special emphasis on unit features, location and the subject property’s unit sizes. This analysis also reflected our analysis of household types, income levels and affordability. After considering such factors as property location, unit amenities and common area amenities, we believe the target weighted average per square foot rental rate range of $1,693 to $1,814 in today’s dollars. This equates to an average monthly rental rate of $1.88 to $2.02 per square foot. FIGURE 58: FORECAST MARKET RENTS AND TARGET HOUSEHOLDS FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 80 U ni t D e t a i l # B e d ro o m Ty p e C o unt M o nt hl y R e nt %o f To t a l U ni t s U ni t S q ua re Feet To t a l S q ua re Fe e t Lo w Hi g h M o nt hl y R e nt PS F Lo w 1 1 Bed ro o m, 1 Bat h 4 14 .3 % 680 2 ,72 0 $1,3 50 $1,50 0 $1.9 9 2 1 Bed ro o m, 1 Bat h, Den 8 2 8 .6 % 800 6 ,4 0 0 $1,50 0 $1,70 0 $1.8 8 3 2 Bed ro o m, 2 Bat h 8 2 8 .6 % 985 7,8 8 0 $1,8 0 0 $1,9 0 0 $1.8 3 4 2 Bed ro o m, 2 Bat h 8 2 8 .6 % 1,0 2 5 8 ,2 0 0 $1,9 50 $2 ,0 0 0 $1.9 0 TO TA L/ A V ER A G E 28 10 0 . 0 % 900 2 5,2 0 0 $ 1, 6 9 3 $ 1, 8 14 $ 1. 8 8 P o t e nt i a l Ta rg e t M a rke t Hi g h P R IZM Ho us e ho l d C l a s s i f i c a t i o n a nd S o c i o e c o no mi c R a nk Execut ive Suit es (8 ), Gray Po wer $2 .2 1 (2 1), Up -and -Co mers (2 4 ), M id d leb urg M anag ers (2 7) and $2 .13 Bo o mt o wn Sing les (3 5). $1.9 3 M o vers & Shakers (3 ), Brit e Lit es , Li'l Cit y (12 ), New Emp t y Nes t s (14 ), Seco nd Cit y Elit e (2 0 ), Yo ung $1.9 5 Influent ials (2 2 ) $2 .0 2 Sources: Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. Field Survey, March 2016 RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 81 SECTION VIII – FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS FINDINGS/ CONCLUSIONS SUMMARY We summarize the primary findings/conclusions of our study below: Even before the U.S. economy fell into recession a watershed change was emerging with respect to demand for rental housing in the United States. The nation's homeownership rate actually began declining in 2005. The conditions brought about by the Great Recession and postrecession period prompted a renewed appreciation for the benefits of renting, including the greater ease of moving, the ability to choose housing that better fits the family budget, the lack of unnecessary exposure to market volatility and the freedom that this brings. While economic conditions drove household growth in the short run, the size and age structure of the adult population are more important factors in the long run. Households of all but the oldest age groups have joined in the shift toward renting. The largest share increase is among households in their 30s, up by at least 900 basis points over an eight-year span. But shares of households across all five-year age groups between 25 and 54 also rose by at least 600 basis points. Over the next decade, two broad demographic trends - the aging of the Baby Boom population and the increasing importance of minorities for household growth-will drive significant changes in rental demand. Also, a return to the recent average household size for 20-34 year olds of 2.40 to 2.45 equates to 1.9 million more households, with the vast majority of these adding to the pool of renter households. Chicago MSA employment is projected to continue to exhibit gains throughout the forecast period, though growth is forecast to lag somewhat behind the national average. The recent poor performance of the metro area's very large Manufacturing and Financial Activities sectors is anticipated to be a drag on job overall growth. Lake County job growth, in particular, is forecast by Moody’s Analytics to accelerate in 2016. Lake County job growth has been fueling the demand for renter housing. Since the 1970s, employment growth in Lake County has exceeded population growth in the county. The growth in the number of jobs in Lake County is directly related to the surge in commercial real estate development (and jobs) during the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. Over these four decades, Lake County was transformed into a major employment center of the region, with most of the commercial development occurring in the southeast portion of the county. Migration and commuting patterns are also contributing to the demand for rental housing in the county. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 82 There are approximately 174,000 private sector jobs located within a 15-20 minute drive-time of downtown Highwood. Somewhat less than 50,000 of these jobs are manufacturing, wholesale trade and transportation/warehousing (i.e., industrial) jobs. Approximately 35,000 jobs are traditional office-using jobs; just over 20,000 jobs are in the retail sector and nearly 14,000 jobs are in the healthcare sector. The Interstate 94 corridor contains a total of 55.0 million square feet of office space and 90.0 million square feet of industrial space. The tightest apartment market conditions in eastern Lake County’s recent history have been exhibited in recent years. The Primary Market Area contains approximately 41 square miles and has a total inventory of 2,297 apartment units (and 3,939 total rental units). At the end of the 1st quarter 2015, the apartment vacancy rate in the Primary Market Area was only 3.5%. The average monthly effective rent was $1,724 or $1.90 per square foot in the 1st quarter. For nearly the past 10 years, there were very few apartment units delivered in this market area until recently. The high apartment occupancy rates and recent strong growth in rents in the Primary and Secondary Market Areas indicate demand continues to exceed supply and suggests rental unit demand that is presently not being met. This view is supported by: (1) the capture rate analysis that suggests that the subject property needs to capture only about 7% to 13% of “qualified” renter demand to be leased–up; and (2) a demand/supply forecast that suggests the delivery of as many as 363 apartment units (total of all apartment projects that are under construction or proposed in the Primary and Secondary Market Areas) will be able to be absorbed after an initial spike in the vacancy rate in the Primary Market Area. The vacancy rate is forecast to ultimately decline to be no higher than 4% to 7%, according to RECI’s forecasts. Three potential sources of demand for apartments in downtown Lake Bluff include: (1) renter households that work in downtown Highwood, downtown Lake Forest, Downtown Highland Park or other downtowns along the Metra line in Cook County; (2) renter households presently residing in older rented condos or apartments in the Highwood, Highland Park and Lake Forest communities that that may be more suited to newly constructed apartments; and (3) renter households residing in northern Cook County who work north of the Northbrook/Deerfield area, who presently commute by commuter train or vehicle. Using the PRIZM geodemographic database, we have identified a rather diverse mix of household types for apartments in downtown Highwood. The Primary Market Area contains a very diverse mix of household types. In fact, we have identified 10 household types or segments that we believe contain a significant number of households that are either renters or given the opportunity, would become renters at a future stage in their lives. These household types include singles and couples, mostly without children. Potential target households may include 25-35 year olds, singles and couples in their late 30s and 40s, as well as older folks, including empty nesters. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 83 These households span a range of affluence that may include some considered to be Lower-Middle income, but mostly Midscale, Upper Middle, Upscale and some considered Wealthy. In view of the targeted demand segments, we believe that the one bedroom and two-bedroom units should represent roughly 43% and 57%, respectively, as shown below. We have concluded that the target weighted average per square foot rental rate range for the 28 apartment units developed on the subject property should be in the range of $1,693 to $1,814 in today’s dollars. This equates to an average monthly rental rate of $1.88 to $2.02 per square foot. U ni t D e t a i l # B e d ro o m Ty p e C o unt M o nt hl y R e nt %o f To t a l U ni t s U ni t S q ua re Feet To t a l S q ua re Feet Lo w M o nt hl y R e nt PS F Hi g h Lo w Hi g h 1 1 Bed ro o m, 1 Bat h 4 14 .3 % 680 2 ,72 0 $1,3 50 $1,50 0 $1.9 9 $2 .2 1 2 1 Bed ro o m, 1 Bat h, Den 8 2 8 .6 % 800 6 ,4 0 0 $1,50 0 $1,70 0 $1.8 8 $2 .13 3 2 Bed ro o m, 2 Bat h 8 2 8 .6 % 985 7,8 8 0 $1,8 0 0 $1,9 0 0 $1.8 3 $1.9 3 4 2 Bed ro o m, 2 Bat h 8 2 8 .6 % 1,0 2 5 8 ,2 0 0 $1,9 50 $2 ,0 0 0 $1.9 0 $1.9 5 28 10 0 . 0 % TO TA L/ A V ER A G E 900 2 5,2 0 0 $ 1, 6 9 3 $ 1, 8 14 $ 1. 8 8 Sources: Fides Capital Partners and Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. RECI REAL ESTATE COUNSELORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 84 $2 .0 2 ADDENDA SUBJECT PROPERTY/NEIGHBORHOOD PHOTOS TARGET RENTER HOUSEHOLDS LIMITING CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS LIMITING CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in nature. No investigation has been made of the title to or any liabilities against the properties. It is assumed, unless otherwise noted, that the owner's title claim is valid, all assessments are paid, the property rights are good and marketable, and there are no questions or defects in title, boundaries, encroachments, easements, or liens. No soil analysis or geological studies were made or furnished to the consultant to determine the soil bearing capabilities of the land, nor were any water, oil, gas, coal, or other subsurface mineral and use rights or conditions investigated. To the best of our knowledge, all data set forth in this report are true and accurate. Although gathered from reliable sources, no guarantee is made nor liability assumed for the accuracy of any data, opinions, or estimates identified as being furnished by others. We assume all information provided by the client--including a rent roll and other property data--is accurate. We reserve the right to modify or change our findings and conclusions if these data are later determined to be inaccurate. Substances such as asbestos, urea-formaldehyde foam insulation, atmospheric emissions, PCBs, hazardous chemicals, toxic waste, or other potentially hazardous materials could if present, adversely affect the value of properties. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous substances, which may or may not be present on or in the properties, was not considered by the consultant in the development of conclusions. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions, and the consultant is not qualified to detect such substances. The consultant is not required to give testimony or appear in court or at any governmental hearing by reason of this analysis or report, unless prior arrangements and compensatory fees have been agreed upon. Exhibits, such as the site plan or parcel maps, are presented to assist in visualizing the properties and its surroundings. No liability is assumed for their legal or cartographic accuracy. Parcel sizes (i.e., square footages) reported by CoStar and zoning were verified when possible through on-line public records databases. However, not all zoning classifications were verified which would have required extensive research, but all sales and listing parcel sizes were confirmed. The subject parcel sizes and the zoning classifications were also verified with Volusia County public records. Land areas and legal descriptions used in this analysis were obtained from public records and have not been verified by a licensed surveyor or attorney. The land description is typically included for identification purposes only and should not be used in a conveyance or other legal document without proper verification by legal counsel. No environmental impact study has been ordered or made. Full compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws is assumed unless otherwise stated, defined, and considered in this report. It is also assumed that all required licenses, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private organization either have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use which the report covers. Accordingly, we do not opine on, nor are we responsible for, the structural integrity of the properties including its conformity to specific governmental code requirements, such as fire, building and safety, earthquake, and occupancy, or any physical defects. The date of our forecasts to which the conclusions and opinions expressed apply, is set forth in this report. The sales price ranges are based on the status of the national business economy, the purchasing power of the United States dollar, and financing terms as of that date. One or more signatories of this report is a member or associate of the Counselors of Real Estate. The bylaws and regulations of the Counselors of Real Estate require each member and associate to control the use and distribution of each report signed by them. Possession of this report or any copy thereof does not carry with it the right of publication; nor may this report be used by anyone but the client without the consent of Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. We do not authorize conveyance of all or part of the contents of this report to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without prior written consent. Of particular concern are the forecasts, the identity of the consultants, and any reference to the Counselors of Real Estate or the designation awarded by this organization. COMPETITIVE RENTAL SURVEY APRIL 2016: SURVEY OF SELECTED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES IN LAKE COUNTY AND NORTH COOK COUNTY Building Name & Address Class Year built # of Units 1 st Quarter 2016 Occupancy Rate Distance from Subject Property Unit Type Unit # of Units Distribution Square Feet Monthly Asking Rent Additional Fees Unit Amenities Common Area Amenities Comments CLASS B/C MULTIFAMILY PROPERTIES 1 Fort Sheridan Place 634 Sheridan Road Highwood, IL 60040 C 1970/2011 252 97.2% 1 Block 1 Bed, 1 Bath 72 29% 2 Bed, 1 Bath 144 57% 3 Bed, 2 Bath 36 14% 571 - 630 $1,154 - $1,194 ($1.89/sf - $2.02/sf) 881 - 933 $1,384 - $1,484 ($1.57/sf - $1.59/sf) 1,144 - 1,172 $1,744 - $1,764 ($1.51/sf - $1.52/sf) 2 Braeside Apartments 511 County Line Road Highland Park, IL 60035 C 1975/2000 16 95.0% 5 Miles 2 Bed, 1 Bath 16 100% 1,000 3 Americana Apartments 1755 Lake Cook Road Highland Park, IL 60035 B 1982 108 95.4% 6 Miles 1 Bed, 1 Bath 18 17% 822 2 Bed, 2 Bath 37 34% 2 Bed, 2 Bath + Den 28 26% 3 Bed, 2 Bath 53 49% 1 Bed, 1 Bath 120 54% 725 2 Bed, 2 Bath 104 46% 1,050 1 Bed, 1 Bath 126 56% 672 - 768 2 Bed, 2 Bath 110 49% 1,013 4 5 Deer Valley Apartments 30011 Waukegan Road Lake Bluff, IL 60044 B/C Forest Pointe/Village Green 29533 N. Waukegan Road Lake Bluff, IL 60044 B/C Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. 1991 1989 224 236 96.9% 97.9% 7 Miles 8 Miles Application Fee Security Deposit Administration Fee Pet Deposit Pet Rent Storage $50 $500 to 2 times Monthly Rent $150 $250 $15/pet/mo. Complimentary Central air-conditioning, cable ready, dishwasher, disposal, microwave, walkin closets, window coverings. Units have been completely renovated since 2009. Security Deposit Administration Fee Pet Rent $1,500 $200 $25/pet/mo. Air-condition, ceiling fans, hardwood Storage available in the basement, but flooring, cable-ready, dishwasher. no on-site amenities. Washer/dryer connections are available in the basement but not in the individual units. This is an older 4-building, 2-story apartment complex situated directly across from the Braeside Metra stop, on the north side of Lake Cook Road. It has no amenities, but has been mostly updated with hardwood floors and new kitchens. Application Fee Security Deposit Pet Deposit Additional Garage Space $60 $500 (non-refundable) $500 (non-refundable) $150 Air-conditioning, cable-ready, high-end upgrades in kitchen, including marble/quartz countertops and European-style maple cabinets. Laundry facilities in each unit, as well as gas fireplaces and balconies. Outdoor swimming pool provided, but no exercise facility. One garage space is provided with each unit, and additional are available to rent. Shorter term leases, and furnished apartments are available, owing to the large proportion of snow birds in residence. This property has large units with luxury appointments both in the lobby areas, as well as within the apartments themselves. The exterior appears dated, and has not been updated. This property was originally developed as a condominimum-conversion with a total of four buildings. However, only one has been converted to condominiums and is not included in the unit mix. The population at this property is much older. $1,298 - $1,592 ($1.79/sf - $2.19/sf) $1,371 - $1,670 ($1.31/sf - $1.59/sf) Application Fee Security Deposit Administration Fee Parking Pet Deposit Pet Rent Storage $50/application $300 $200 $125/mo $250 $25/pet/mo. $30 Central air-conditioning, cable ready, Clubhouse, fitness center, garages ceiling fans in all bedrooms, stainless available, on-site management, pet steel, energy-efficient appliances, friendly policies, recycling center, granite countertops, fireplaces in some swimming pool, storage available, wi-fi 2-bedroom homes, granite countertops, available, business center, and high-end cabinetry, hardwood-style picnic/BBQ area available to flooring, valuted ceilings in select residents. homes, private balconies & patios, walkin closets, washer/dryer in each unit, view of wetland preserve. Deer Valley is located directly across the street from AbbVie's executive offices and corporate headquarters in Abbott Park. Concessions are currently being advertised at $750 for the 2bedroom units only. This property has a Lake Bluff mailing address, but is located in unincorporated Lake County, and is associated with the Libertyville school system. Lease terms are offered at six to 15 months, with discounts for longer-term leases. $1,039 - $1,818 ($1.54/sf - $2.64/sf) $1,407 - $2,422 ($1.39/sf - $2.39/sf) Application Fee Security Deposit Administration Fee Garage Parking Garage Deposit Pet Deposit Pet Rent Storage $40 or $10 on-line $400 (non-refundable) $150 $100/mo $50 $275 $30/pet/mo. $30 - $50/mo Central air-conditioning, washer/dryer in units, cable ready with high speed internet access available, above-range microwave, garages available, private balcony or patio available, woodburning fireplaces in some units, vaulted ceilings available. This property was developed by the same developer as the Deer Valley Apartments but is under separate ownership. Forest Pointe is also known as a Village Green property, and is owned by Blackrock. Like Deer Valley, Forest Pointe is located in unincorporated Lake County, and while it has a Lake Bluff mailing address, is part of the Libertyville school system. Short-term leases are available, and discounts are available for employees of Abbott, Motorola, Cardinal, Baxter, and Hewitt Associates. No other concessions are being offered. $1,500 - $1,600 ($1.50/sf - $1.60/sf) $1,625 ($1.98/sf) 1,473 - 1,699 $2,625 ($1.55/sf - $1.78/sf) 1,859 - 2 136 $2,825 ($1.32/sf - $1.52/sf) 1,851 - 1,886 $2,825 ($1.50/sf - $1.53/sf) Fitness centers in each building, washer and dryers on each floor, storage locker and bike storage in basement. Club room, business/conference center, outdoor pool with sundeck, activity center, 24-hour emergency maintenance and 24-hour fitness center. Dog run and dog walking stations. Not all buildings are petfriendly. Fort Sheridan Place was purchased in 2009 with the intent to convert to condominiums, but this effort was scrapped in favor of substantial overhaul and renovation, including roof, siding and interiors. In the process, the rents were substantially increased, and the residential mixed was altered from larger families to more singles and young professionals. Owing to its position across from the remaining functions of Fort Sheridan, the property is also popular with military personnel. This property is situated at the north end of Highwood, and is approximately a 10-minute walk to the Metra station. APRIL 2016: SURVEY OF SELECTED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES IN LAKE COUNTY AND NORTH COOK COUNTY CLASS A/UPSCALE AND NEWLY CONSTRUCTED MULTIFAMILY PROPERTIES 6 7 8 9 Renaissance Place 1849 Green Bay Road Highland Park, IL 60035 A Deerfield Village Centre 625 Deerfield Road Deerfield, IL 60015 A AMLI Deerfield 1525 Lake Cook Road Deerfield, IL 60015 Woodview Apartments 15 Parkway North Deerfield, IL 60015 10 Manchester Square 601-611 N. Milwaukee Avenue Libertyville, IL 60048 Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. A A A 2000 2000 2015 2015 2008/2015 30 93.3% 53 86.8% 240 47.5% 248 83.1% 34 1.7 Miles 5 Miles 8 Miles 7 Miles 12 Miles 1 Bed, 1 Bath 20 67% 960 - 1,273 $2,145 - $2,350 ($1.80/sf - $2.32/sf) 1,330- 1,878 $3,025 - $3,475 ($1.81/sf - $2.33/sf) Security Deposit One month's rent Central air conditioning, cable or satellite available, internet access, extra storage available, patio or balcony in most units, washer/dryer in unit, and units come with window covering. Pets are not allowed. This is an urban-style residential Current concession of free garage parking is property which is part of a mixed-use included with a 6 or 12 month lease. Short-term development with high-end retail on furnished apartments are sometimes available. the first floor. In addition to upscale retailers, excellent restaurants and a upscale movie theater are part of the development. The property includes heated underground garage parking, a fitness center, security, and elevator access. 2 Bed, 2 Bath 10 33% 1 Bed, 1 Bath 25 47% 760 - 995 Application Fee Security Deposit Parking Pet Deposit Pet Rent Storage $50/application $500 $50/mo - Single; $75/mo - Tandem $400 - 1 pet; $600 - 2 pets $20/pet/mo. $0 (1st come/1st serve) Furnished, central air conditioning, high speed internet available, dishwasher, washer/dryer, small bedrooms, large terraces, upgrading to nickel finished fixtures, storage available at no charge. Each unit has unique layout. On-site management, on-site maintenance, storage space(s), concierge, garage parking, housesitting service, small free fitness center, residents lounge, package receiving, business center, elevator, trash chutes, recycling center. 1 Bed+ Den, 2 Bath 1 2% 2 Bed, 2 Bath 27 51% Studio 23 10% 527 - 631 Application Fee Security Deposit Administration Fee Parking Pet Deposit Additional Pet Deposit $65 $250 (refundable) $180 $125/mo for garage pkg $250 (refundable) $350 (non-refundable) Stainless steel appliances, side-by-side This property was designed to qualify refrigerators, under-counter beverage for LEED Silver designation. It is a centers, 42" painted white wood shaker- smoke-free community with fitness center, swimming pool, resident style or espresso wood flat panel kitchen cabinets, task lighting, marble lounge with fireplace and gourmet or glass tile backsplashes, gooseneck kitchen, a business center with coffee kitchen faucets and pull-down sprayers, bar and lounge area, golf simulator room, garage parking, electric full size washers and dryers, 9-foot ceilings, crown molding, some private charging stations, and secure bicycle storage and repair shop. It is pet yards and balconies. friendly, with a dog wash. This is a new property which was completed in the 3rd quarter of 2015. It has high rental rates, but is offering concessions on some units. Concessions include 3 months free parking or one month's rent free. It also offers short-term furnished apartments from $105/day, with a minimum stay of 90 days. 1 Bed, 1 Bath 121 50% 1 Bed, 1 Bath with Office 6 3% 2 Bed, 2 Bath 76 32% 2 Bed, 2 Bath with Office 14 6% Convertible, 1 Bath 204 82.3% 586 - 605 Application Fee Administrative Fee Security Deposit Parking Pet Deposit Pet Rent Storage $50 $400 1 month's rent $75 - $125 $250 (non-refundable) $20/pet/mo. $25 - $100/mo 1 Bed, 1 Bath 22 8.9% 675 - 859 Units include quartz countertops, upgraded plank flooring, stainless steel appliances, private balconies and patios, a peninsula/island counter with overhead lighting, and other modern kitchen amenities, including a pull-down gooseneck kitchen faucet. Outdoor pool with cabanas and hot tub, fitness center with yoga studio, outdoor kitchens and fire pits, "iLounge" with coffee bar, clubroom, business center, multimedia, gaming and theatre room, private lounge with shuffle board and pool table, pet wash with turbo pet dryers. A dog park is under construction. This is a new property still in lease-up, offering various concessions, including 1 month free on a 13-month lease. The $400 administrative fee can be applied toward the first months' rent if a lease is signed within 24 hours of a tour. 2 Bed, 2 Bath 21 8.5% 958- 1,319 3 Bed, 2 Bath 1 0.4% 1,328 Studio 1 Bed, 1 Bath 2 Bed, 2 Bath 3 Bed, 2 Bath 4 8 12 10 12% 24% 35% 29% 710 880 1,430 1,980 The units are being reconfigured. Parking includes a combination of indoor and outdoor spaces, and redevelopment plans have been stalled due to the limited number of units. This property is 3 stories high, and the exterior is of high quality with brick and limestone-type finish. Gated balconies with sliding glass doors are featured. Amenities have not yet been determined. This property was purchased in 2013 by Chicagobased Cedar Street Companies, who intend to reconfigure the second and third floor apartment units. The first floor retail has been successful but the original developer's attempt to market the upper floors as condominium units and office space failed. Plans are for a portion of the units to be offered as "affordable", to those with incomes lower than the Chicago average. $1,820 - $2,240 ($2.25/sf - $2.35/sf) 1,088 $2,650 ($2.44/sf) 1,040 - 1,400 $2340 - $3,150 ($2.25/sf) $1,403 - $1,730 ($2.24/sf - $2.79/sf) 722 - 858 $1,657 - $1,918 ($2.18/sf - $2.30/sf) 966 $2,137 - $2,167 ($2.21/sf - $2.24/sf) 1,147 - 1,303 $2,451 - $2,717 ($2.09/sf - $2.18/sf) 1260 - 1340 $2,853 - $3,117 ($2.25/sf - $2.33/sf) $1,500 - $1,575 ($2.48/sf - $2.65/sf) $1,678 - $2,103 ($2.30/sf - $2.49/sf) $2,208 - $3,052 ($2.13/sf - $2.39/sf) $3,437 ($2.46/sf) APRIL 2016: SURVEY OF SELECTED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES IN LAKE COUNTY AND NORTH COOK COUNTY 11 Focus Western/Laurel 1000-1042 N. Western Avenue Lake Forest, IL 60045 12 The Oaks of Vernon Hills 103 Oak Leaf Lane Vernon Hills, IL 60061 13 AMLI at Museum Gardens 1155 North Museum Blvd. Vernon Hills, IL 60061 A A A 2007 2014 2005 110 302 N/A 4.5 Miles 97.7% 294 96.3% 9 Miles 1 Bed, 1 Bath 32 29% 750 2 Bed, 2 Bath 54 49% 1,100 - 1,600 3 Bed, 3 Bath 24 22% 1612 - 1811 1 Bed, 1 Bath 132 1 Bed, 1 Bath + Den 44 2 Bed, 2 Bath 94 2 Bed, 2.5 Bath + Den Row Home 3 Bed, 2.5 Bath + Den Row Home 25 1 Bed, 1 Bath 36 1 Bed, 1 Bath + Office 126 1 Bed, 1.5 Bath 30 2 Bed, 2 Bath 72 3 Bed, 2 Bath 30 1 Bed, 1.5 Bath 2 2 Bed, 2 Bath 10 2 Bed, 2.5 Bath 3 Bed, 3 Bath 7 $1,900 $2.53/sf) N/A $3,900 ($2.15/sf - $2.41/sf) 696 - 889 $1,495 - $2,076 ($1.84/sf - $2.77/sf) 893 $1,753 - $2,275 ($1.96/sf - $2.55/sf) 1,197 - 1,249 $2,096 - $2,754 ($1.65/sf - $2.20/sf) 1,447 $2,820 - $3,856 ($1.95/sf - $2.66/sf) 1,800 $3,362 - $4,437 ($1.87/sf - $2.47/sf) 1,001 $1,638 - $1,816 ($1.64/sf - $1.81/sf) 1,045 $1,516 - $1,678 ($1.45/sf - $1.61/sf) 1,064 $1,749 ($1.64/sf) 1,203 - 1,216 $1,710 - $2,178 ($1.42/sf - $1.71/sf) 1,402 $2,190 ($1.56/sf) This development is also expected to The apartments are planned to be demised in 3-story brick clad structures include 12 detached single-family homes ranging in size from 3,900 to with fireplaces in some units. 4,400 sf and 42 condominiums ranging in size from 1,408 to 2,600 sf. This property was formerly the site for municipal services in Lake Forest, which have been moved to a new facility near I-294 and Hwy 60. The site has been cleared and the developer is awaiting final approvals on various components of development. Application Fee Security Deposit Administration Fee Parking Pet Deposit Additional Pet Deposit Pet Rent $50 $250 (refundable) $200 $150 - $180/mo for garage pkg $300 (refundable) $300 (non-refundable) $10/mo Private garages open directly into apartment buildings, while rowhomes have an attached, two-car garage. Units have granite countertops, stainless stell appliances, contemporary flooring and advanced technology. One- and two-bedroom apartments are situated in elevator buildings. Units are equipped with washers and dryers, and balconies. Property is LEED certified, Silver. Outdoor swimming pool with sundeck, nature trails, a community room with business center, pool table and theater room, fitness center, dog park, bicycle storage, individual resident storage spaces and secure telephone entry system, as well as on-site management and maintenance staff. This is the newest property in the market, and has leased up very quickly. Only the one bedroom units have any significant availability. Concessions of 1 month's rent are currently offered on the one bedroom units.The property is a typical garden apartment property, constructed of wood frame and demised in 8 buildings. The property is owned by REVA Developmentment. Another 32 units will be delivered in 2016 in Phase II of this project. Application Fee Security Deposit Administration Fee Parking $65/applicatant $250 (refundable) $180 $150/mo for underground garage $100/mo for detached garages $250 (refundable) $350 (non-refundable) $15 - $30/mo Nine-foot ceilings, gourmet kitchens with 42-inch upper cabinets, black or white Whirlpool appliances, full-size built-in microwaves, refrigerators with automatic ice makers, track lighting in kitchens, kitchen pantries and linen closets, designer floors featuring Berber carpet, home offices with wood floors, full-size washers and dryers, walk-in closets, raised cultured marble vanities, double bowl vanities, storage available, private balconies, sunrooms, Individually controlled heat and air conditioning, high-speed internet 7-story buildings with elevators and telephone entry system, controlled access gates, heated enclosed reserved parking, crystal-chandeliered great room, 24-hour fitness club, resort style pool with sundeck, clubhouse, gardens with fountains and seating areas, walking/jogging path that connects to Gregg`s Landing trails, media room with 72-inch rearprojection television and state-of-theart audio and video equipment, library and conference room with a fireplace, business center with computers, AMLI at Museum Gardens is located in Gregg’s Landing, a master-planned residential community. The community is located adjacent to Westfield Shoppingtown Hawthorn Mall. The Tri-State Tollway (I-94) is located 2.25 miles to the east and the Libertyville Metra commuter train station (Milwaukee North Line) is located nearly 3.5 miles to the north. The property is located proximate to the I-94 employment corridor. The property is situated in a neighborhood that is primarily made up of commercial land uses. $50/application Owing to new construction, the units have high-end finishes, hardwood floors, granite countertops with open kitchen and stainless appliances. In unit laundry, private balcony, indoor garage. There are no amenities, owing to the small size of the property. This new construction faces the remaining, newly constructed army reserve functions at Fort Sheridan. The exterior is brick, and the building has an elevator. Units have been listed for between $299,000 and $385,000, although none of the units have sold, since the property was developed in 2008. Rental growth for the units since they were constructed has been substantial, generally in the range of $100/month when the units rolled. Pet Deposit Additional Pet Deposit Storage RENTAL CONDOS/TOWNHOMES 14 15 Clay Avenue Condos 15 Clay Avenue Highwood, IL B 15 The Ravines Condominiums 3535 Patten Road Highland Park, IL 60035 A Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. 2008 2002 12 100.0% 50 N/A .3 Mile 1 Mile 1,318 $1,600 - $1,800 ($1.22/sf - $1.37/sf) 1517 - 1587 $1,950 - $2,000 ($1.26/sf - $1.29/sf) Application Fee Pet Fee Security Deposit 30 2,006 - 2,400 Varies 20 2,800 $2,400 - $3,500 ($1.20/sf - $1.46/sf) $2,800 - $3,200 ($1.00/sf - $1.14/sf) One Month's rent These are luxury condominium units This 9-story condo building has an with high-end finish. Gourmet kitchens outdoor heated pool and exercise with stainloess appliances, granite facility. Pets allowed with weight limit. countertops, cherry cabinets, glass tile This building was originally intended to include two condo towers, but only one was constructed. The units are generally owned by empty nesters and snowbirds, and very few are available for rent. APRIL 2016: SURVEY OF SELECTED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES IN LAKE COUNTY AND NORTH COOK COUNTY 15 Bachelor's Officers Quarters Barracks Lofts Condominiums 25 Ronin Road, Highwood, IL A 16 Lake Forest North Condominiums 1301 N. Western Avenue Lake Forest, IL 60045 B Real Estate Counselors International, Inc. 1890/2002 1972 150 120 N/A N/A 1 Mile 4.5 Miles 2 Bed, 2.5 Bath N/A 3 Bed, 3 Bath N/A 1 Bed, 1.5 Bath 60 2 Bed, 2 Bath 60 1,400 - 2,100 $2,500 - $2,700 ($1.29/sf - $1.71/sf) 1,750 - 3,000 $3,000 - $3,250 ($1.00/sf - $1.86/sf) Varies These luxury condominiums have a wide range of finishes, but largely respect the historic architecture of Fort Sheridan, and typically offer lofts, wide balconies, and garage spaces. Interior appointments are high end, with European kitchens, hard wood floors, exposed beams and other unique finishes. 838 - 1,040 Varies These are condominium units, so each The property is distinguished by its unit has different finish. There are no lack of covered or garage parking and washer/dryers in any of the units, and its dated design. some of the units have very antiquated furnace/air conditioner units. $950 - $1,200 ($1.13/sf - $1.15/sf) 1,170 - 1,400 $1,200 - $1,400 ($1.00/sf - $1.03/sf) While the buildings do not offer garden apartment style amenities, the position of these buildings on the bluff overlooking Lake Michigan offers substantial open space and outstanding views. In addition to the historic buildings renovated and gutted as part of the Fort Sheridan redevelopment project, some newer buildings were also built, which typically include townhomes. Rents for these units can extend from $3,450 to over $4,000 per month. This is a condominium development which has many units owned by investors for rent only. The condominium rules were changed over a decade ago to limit this ability, however, so not all units are rental units. Sales prices on these units are remarkably low, sometimes reaching below $120,000. CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned certify, except as may be otherwise noted in this report, that: To the best of our knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are the personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions of the undersigned. Neither the undersigned, Real Estate Counselors International, Inc., nor any of its officers, have any present or prospective interest in the properties that are the subject of this report, or have any personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. Thomas J. Amato and Mary Claire Sparrow made a personal observation of the subject property site. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Code of Ethics of the Counselors of Real Estate and the Standards of Professional Practice and Bylaws of The Counselors. No one provided significant professional assistance to the persons signing this report. The assignment was not based on a requested minimum pricing range or specified result. Thomas J. Amato, CRE Mary Claire Sparrow QUALIFICATIONS PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS - THOMAS J. AMATO, CRE Professional Experience Mr. Amato is Director of Due Diligence/Market Research at RECI. In this capacity, he has counseled developers, retailers, lenders, institutional investors and TIC Sponsors with regard to acquisition due diligence, disposition strategies and market feasibility of apartments, retail, office, industrial, medical office, student housing, senior housing, self storage facilities and manufactured housing. He has over 30 years of experience in real estate investment and market research and more than six years of experience in commercial real estate appraisal. Mr. Amato has held senior research positions in two of the largest real estate investment firms active in the United States during the 1980s and 1990s - The Balcor Company and Equity Group Investments, LLC. Mr. Amato also has considerable experience as a real estate consultant to equity/debt investors and other entities, providing market feasibility services to some of the largest retailers and retail developers of the 1970s and 1980s, and most recently, to institutional clients in matters of real estate development, acquisition, and disposition as President of Delta Associates - Midwest. In 1990, Mr. Amato joined Equity Group Investments, LLC and created the real estate/corporate market research division serving Samuel Zell's investment subsidiaries. These included Equity Residential Properties Trust, Equity Office Properties, Manufactured Home Communities, Equity Group - Corporate Investments, American Classic Voyages Company, Capital Trust, and other investment subsidiaries. Mr. Amato led a team of consultants in a wide range of research and consulting engagements that included real estate due diligence, corporate M & A due diligence, marketing research, consumer segmentation research, and regional extensive economic research. Education Professional Designations and Affiliations University of Illinois Masters Degree Dominican University Bachelors Degree Counselors of Real Estate Designation: CRE National Association of Realtors Lambda Alpha International Invitations and Acknowledgments University of Illinois Guest Lecturer PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS – MARY CLAIRE SPARROW Professional Experience Mary Claire Sparrow has been active in the commercial real estate industry for over 17 years. Her experience has involved the appraisal and consulting of industrial, multi-family, office, hotel and retail properties. Most recently, between 2010 and 2013, Mrs. Sparrow appraised commercial properties in the Midwest for NPV Advisors, a national real estate appraisal concern. The majority of her clients were pension funds and major banks. Between 2005 and 2009, she re-valued the commercial portfolio of property for Shields Township, Illinois. These properties represented the full range of commercial real estate, from very small to large, institutional grade properties. Mrs. Sparrow previously worked in the Cushman & Wakefield Appraisal Division, where she concentrated appraisal and consulting work on retail, office and hotel properties and portfolios, and prior to that provided general real estate consulting services for Landauer Associates, with emphasis on computerized real estate analysis, valuation and feasibility studies. Mrs. Sparrow also worked as an Investment Manager for Rubloff Capital Investments, acquiring retail properties for this Japanese-funded arm of Rubloff. She began her career as a Real Estate Analyst for VMS Realty, where she performed due diligence and deal structuring for this early leader in the syndications industry. Education University of Wisconsin - Madison BBA- Real Estate and Urban Land Economics and Finance, Investment and Banking Professional Designation Appraisal Institute Practicing Affiliate