Challenges of the Agbami Project (Nigeria)
Transcription
Challenges of the Agbami Project (Nigeria)
People and Partnerships Delivering a World‐Scale Field Development Richard H. Strauss Chevron Energy Technology Company June 25, 2009 Agbami Field Overview Benin Lagos Nigeria N Escravos 100 km Warri Gulf of Guinea Port Harcourt OML 127 OML 128 Bonny Island 20 0 km Brass ~ • 965+ MM bbl reserves • 47° API (sweet crude) Agbami • +/- 4,800-ft water depth 10 Years from Discovery to Production f 1993 OPL 216 license award f 1998 Agbami #1 discovery well f 1999 – 2004 Appraisal drilling Front‐end engineering f 2004 – December First Nigeria Deepwater Unit agreement FPSO contract award f 2007 – October FPSO sailaway f 2008 – July First oil production f 2008 – October Gas injection f 2009 + Development drilling continues Concessionaires Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Famfa Oil Limited Agbami Unit Operator Star Deep Water Petroleum Limited (an affiliate of Chevron Corporation) Other Funding Participants Statoil Nigeria Limited Petróleo Brasileiro Nigeria Limited Texaco Nigeria Outer Shelf Inc. (an affiliate of Chevron Corporation) Field Development Plan • Floating production storage and offloading vessel (FPSO) • Flexible risers • 38 subsea wells • Crestal gas injection and peripheral water injection • Offloading buoy with U-shaped pipeline AGBAMI FIELD Agbami Field Size (If in Houston) No r t h L o o p F wy WUL1 A GB03 PVM 1 AGB -07 (PDL1) PA L7 WM A WFL7 AGB04 WGL7 WM B1 WM B WM B WOL2 PQL2 GEL1 PM D PCM 1 GM D AGB -13 GA M 1 (GGL2) GHL6 AGB-15 (GDL4) GBM 6 GM G AGBAGB-12 02 (PGL4) PDL6 PFL5 PM C PM F PBM 2 PNL2 AGB 06 PLL3 A GB-08 WM L3 AGB-11 (PJL3) PAM 3 WDL6 WM C WEL5 WM D PM E PPL4 AGB -10 (PIL4) WNL3 AGB -14 (PHL4) AGB-05 (WAL4) AGB09 WJL3 So u t h L o o p F wy 5 Agbami Contractor Locations KOS SS Controls Eng'g & Manuf. KONGSBERG Kvaerner Dynamic Umbilical Design & Manuf. MOSS Umbilicals Design & Manuf. DUCO Acergy Offloading Lines Engineering FlexiFrance Risers & Flowlines Design & Manuf. PM & Engineering Kvaerner Risers, Flowlines and Umbilicals LE TRAIT PARIS NEWCASTLE SBM Suction Pile Design MONACO KBR FPSO Topside Engineering SBM FPSO Mooring Engineering FMC SS Engineering & Tree Fabrication SBM OSC Project Mgmt & Buoy Eng'g. Hull Engineering Hull Construction Topside Fabrication Hull/Topside Integration DSME OKPO HOUSTON UAE Lamprell Buoy Turntable BRAZIL FMC Flowline Swivels Grinaker SS Manifolds and Piles Manufacture DSME FPSO FMC Operations Support Base SBM / Acergy Offloading System NETCO FPSO Topsides Detailed Eng'g TEF Fowlines/Umbilicals Manifold Installation DNL FPSO Modules and Flare Fab'n FMC Installation and HUC Support MODU Drilling/Completion & Tree Installation AGBAMI FIELD NIGERIA Nigerdock FPSO Modules and Piles Fab'n Installation Site Shore Facilities Nigerdock Offloading Buoy and Piles Fab'n 6 Critical Success Factors • Establishing a worldwide Incident‐ and Injury‐Free® culture • Achieving schedule benchmarks • Setting new standards in Nigerian content • Maintaining high production reliability • Managing a challenging cost environment Creating an Incident‐ and Injury‐Free Culture • Agbami was delivered safely; however, every injury was clearly preventable: Five days away from work (DAFW) injuries in 18 million work‐hours • Commitment and belief in working injury‐ and incident‐free across the global Agbami team • Creative approaches to safety procedures and practices Delivering a New Standard in Nigerian Content • Strategic objective embraced by all project participants • 10,000 tons fabricated in Nigeria • 3 million work‐hours with zero DAFW injuries • 300,000 FPSO Nigerian engineering work‐hours 1,700-ton Flare Module Daewoo Nigeria Ltd., Warri • 100+ Nigerian engineers trained worldwide Nigerian Content Successfully Delivered First Fabrication of Subsea Manifolds in Nigeria GrLTA, Port Harcourt Offloading Buoy, Suction Piles, Two FPSO Modules, Nigerdock, Lagos Drilling Program: Decades of Commitment WPO-Well Perf. Optm. Well level Drilling = ~ 50% of total project investment Typical Agbami IWC… ¾Field level: 2 separation trains, complex network of 8 sub-sea manifolds & risers (prod/inj) ¾At the reservoir level, multiple lobes within the same reservoir ¾At the well level, 2 valves for zonal control plus a number of measurement devices- (6) P,T,Q •Stage 1 – 22 wells to reach plateau production Reservoir level •Stages 2 & 3 17D ZONAL / WELL SURVEILLANCE & MONITORING – 16 wells to extend plateau and increase water and gas injection 17E 17F © Chevron 2005 DOC ID Intelligent well completions to maximize oil recovery 17 Agbami Subsea System Subsea Highlights •One of the largest flexible subsea systems •Design conditions pushing technology limits •Interface design challenges led to construction success •Marine vessel breakdowns required creative contingency planning Agbami FPSO AGBAMI Production Capacity Total Liquids (B/D) Oil Rate (BOPD) Produced Gas (MMscf/D) Injection Gas (MMscf/D) Gas Lift (MMscf/D) Produced Water (BWPD) Water Injection (BWPD) FPSO Particulars New build construction 20-year life in field 2.15 MM bbl storage capacity Offloading 45,000 bbl/hr 1.0 MM bbl approximately every four days Dimensions 317 m ¯ 58 m ¯ 32 m Displacement 404,811 t Accommodations 153 POB 450,000 250,000 450 415 50 250,000 450,000 Offshore Hookup and Commissioning Offshore Highlights •Offshore work‐hours greater than planned •Interface management success •No major technical problems Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPs) Left to Right: Accommodation Vessels, FPSO, Diving Support Vessel, Riser Installation Vessel Startup Reliability Higher Than Forecast Forecast vs. Actual Production Efficiency Production Efficiency • Excellent teamwork between commissioning and operations Actual 100% Forecast 80% • Phased startup of nearly 100 systems: January 2008 – FPSO Arrival July 2008 – First Oil 60% October 2008 – Gas Injection 40% February 2009 – Water Injection 20% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Month 7 8 9 10 12 • Production rampup continues through 2009 Subsea Design, Installation and Lessons Learned 16 Base Case Concept Infield Umbilicals Water Injection System (Blue) T T T T M Main Umbilical T M T T T Piggy-Back Drill Center T T T T M Drill Center M Gas Injection System (Green) Production System (Red) T T T T Piggy-Back Production System (Red) 17 Subsea Equipment – SEV Scope 5x2 – 10 ksi Horizontal Trees (17 Production, 9 Water Injection & 6 Gas Injection) 4 Slot Manifolds (Suction Pile Mounted) • MUX Controls (Top Sides & Subsea) • Flowline & Jumper Connectors • Electrical & Hydraulic Flying Leads • IWOCS & Tooling 18 Loading Trees onto Installation Vessel – Onne Port Tree Being Lowered into Water, Drilling Rig in Background Tree On Wellhead 5 Subsea Lessons Learned spanning a wide range of topics 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 22 Retrievable Flowmeter Issues Flexible Flowline & Jumper Kits Flow Assurance & Insulation Cathodic Protection of Trees Tree Installation Lesson #1: Retrievable Flowmeter issues Flowmeter with ROV retrievable instrumentation – Issue: Unexpectedly complex, expensive, long‐ lead ROV tooling. 23 Lesson #1: Retrievable Flowmeter issues Flowmeter with ROV retrievable instrumentation – Issue: Unexpectedly complex, expensive, long‐ lead ROV tooling. Ensure all parties understand scope of Company-required items prior to award. 24 Lesson #2: Interface Definition in FEED Direct Connect Flowlines – Cross‐Contract Situation: • FMC to provide Flowline & Jumper end Kits • Installation contractor to provide Flexible flowlines / Jumpers and installation responsibility – Issue: Installation engineering details arriving late in fabrication program – Analysis: • 2nd End Flexible Flowline Connectors have integral padeyes resulting in one‐piece elbow/padeye forging • Swivels required for all Jumpers and Flowlines 2nd end connections. 25 Lesson #2: Interface Definition in FEED Direct Connect Flowlines – Cross‐Contract Situation: • FMC to provide Flowline & Jumper end Kits • SIC to provide Flexible flowlines / Jumpers and installation responsibility – Issue: Installation engineering details arriving late in fabrication program – Analysis: • 2nd End Flexible Flowline & Jumpers have integral padeyes resulting in one‐piece elbow/padeye forging • Additional swivels required for all Jumpers and Flowlines Early, continuing communication between contractors to identify and avoid costly and time consuming interface clashes. 26 Lesson #3: Flow assurance and Insulation • Ten Hour target cool‐down period specified, 2” thick insulation calculated for trees. – Issue: More conservative assumptions were introduced late. – Result: Insulation thickness increased to 3” and less aggressive cool‐down period of 7 hrs agreed. 27 Lesson #3: Flow assurance and Insulation • Ten Hour target cool‐down period specified, normally require 2” thick insulation for trees. – Issue: More conservative assumptions were introduced late. – Result: Insulation thickness increased to 3” and less aggressive cool‐down period of 7 hrs agreed. Assumptions for thermal analysis should be agreed in early phase to avoid potential delays and costs. 28 Lesson #4: Cathodic Protection – Trees • Insufficient Cathodic protection on trees – Issue: Calculations for cathodic protection of trees initially did not include for subsea well. – Solution: • Additional anodes added in‐country to several trees already shipped, as well as all trees still in Houston. • FMC determined tree funnel could be removed in‐country, anodes welded to funnel & re‐attached. 29 Lesson #4: Cathodic Protection – Trees • Cathodic risk to sensitive tree sensors – Issue: Initial calculations for cathodic protection of trees initially did not include for subsea well. – Solution: • Additional anodes added in‐country to several trees already shipped, as well as all trees still in Houston. • FMC determined tree funnel could be removed in‐country, anodes welded to funnel & re‐attached. Assumptions for cathodic protection analysis agreed in early project phase to avoid potential delays and costs. 30 Lesson #5: Tree Installation • Planned Tree deployment from A‐frame from edge of drilling rig. – Issue: Concerns raised as to safety on rig and offshore transfer of trees to rig. – Better solution: Trees loaded out onto surface support vessel and installed from same vessel offshore from wire rope. 31 Lesson #5: Tree Installation • Planned Tree deployment from A‐frame from edge of drilling rig. – Issue: Concerns raised as to safety on rig and offshore transfer of trees to rig. – Better solution: Trees loaded out onto surface support vessel and installed from same vessel offshore from wire rope. Careful consideration of safety issues in conjunction with alternatives can save costs as well as lowering risks! 32 Thank You!