analysis of michigan department of environmental quality high
Transcription
analysis of michigan department of environmental quality high
ANALYSIS OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY HIGH VOLUME HYDRAULICALLY FRACTURED WELL COMPLETIONS AND APPLICATIONS FARWatershed.com respectmyplanet.org March 28, 2014 Clockwise from top left: Pioneer 1-3HD1, Excelsior 1-25HD1, Garfield 1-25HD1, Beaver Creek 1-23HD1. Table of Contents GENERAL HF INFORMATION ................................................................................................................. 3 Drilling and Completion ........................................................................................................................... 3 Drilling .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Completion............................................................................................................................................ 4 Formation Characteristics ......................................................................................................................... 4 Conventional & Unconventional .......................................................................................................... 4 Permeability & Porosity ........................................................................................................................ 5 Interstitial Gas & Adsorbed Gas ........................................................................................................... 5 Natural Fractures ................................................................................................................................... 5 Formation Pressures .............................................................................................................................. 5 Induced Pressure ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Water ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 High Volume & Large Volume ............................................................................................................ 6 Consumptive Use of Water ................................................................................................................... 7 Chemicals.................................................................................................................................................. 7 Proppants .................................................................................................................................................. 7 WELLS ON THE HVHF CHART ............................................................................................................... 8 Large Volume Wells ................................................................................................................................. 8 Utica/Collingwood ................................................................................................................................ 8 A-1 Carbonate ....................................................................................................................................... 9 High Volume Wells ............................................................................................................................... 10 Antrim ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Dundee ................................................................................................................................................ 11 Niagaran .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Black River (VanWert) ....................................................................................................................... 12 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................ 13 ANALYSIS OF MDEQ HIGH VOLUME HYDRAULICALLY FRACTURED WELL COMPLETIONS AND APPLICATIONS This paper addresses the list of high volume hydraulically fractured wells published by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Oil, Gas and Minerals, (MDEQOOGM) on its website dated March 18, 20141, attached as Appendix A. When you look at the list of 58 HVHF wells on the MDEQ list, you may assume that all of them involve the use of millions of gallons of water and toxic chemicals at extremely high pressure to complete. This is not the case, and the differences are significant enough to warrant better understanding. An overall comparison of the factors discussed in this paper as they pertain to the wells on the MDEQ chart is contained in Appendix D, and you can skip right to it if you want to know the “what” of the differences between the wells—but if you want to know the “why” for the differences, we have attempted to give some basic descriptions of the contributing factors. The source papers linked to the paper afford in depth education on many of these for anyone seeking deeper understanding. GENERAL HF INFORMATION Drilling and Completion To start with the basics, hydraulic fracturing (HF) is not a drilling technique. It is a completion technique. It is defined by the MDEQ as a well completion operation that involves pumping fluid and proppant into a target formation to create or propagate artificial fractures, or enhance natural fractures, for the purpose of improving the deliverability and production of hydrocarbons.2 Each well has two phases: the drilling of the well (which does not involve fracturing but does involve the use of water and/or other fluids), and the completion of the well (which may involve fracturing, and the use of water and/or other fluids, and may include additional chemicals). Drilling Drilling fluid or “mud” is a very important component of the drilling process. The main functions of drilling fluids include providing hydrostatic pressure to prevent formation fluids from entering into the well bore, keeping the drill bit cool and clean during drilling, carrying out drill cuttings, and suspending the drill cuttings while drilling is paused and when the drilling assembly is brought in and out of the hole. The drilling fluid used for a particular job is selected to avoid formation damage and to limit corrosion.3 The wells on the MDEQ chart will not all be drilled using the same kind of drilling fluid. The components of the fluid can sometimes be found in the well summary contained in the MDEQ well file (Page 60 of the Kohler-Kendall well file is a good example4), or may be available through a Freedom of Information Act request to the MDEQ. 1 http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/High_Volume_Hydraulic_Fracturing_Activity_DATA_TABLE_423436_7.pdf 2 http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/Supervisor_of_Wells_Insruction_1-2011_428260_7.pdf 3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drilling_fluid#Dispersed_systems ; http://www.aesfluids.com/ ; https://www.rigzone.com/training/insight.asp?insight_id=291&c_id=24 4 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/031/60170_WF.pdf Completion The completion phase of an HF well is the stage when the hydraulic fracturing occurs. Completion sometimes involves perforating the horizontal section of the pipe and the cement casing installed in a well with explosive charges contained in a perforating gun, then injecting fluid and proppant under pressure into the formation through the openings (perforations), to create fractures in the rock or enhance naturally occurring fractures already present. The amount of pressure necessary to create or enhance fractures and the type of fluid used varies greatly, depending on the characteristics of the formation being accessed. Some HF wells have horizontal sections which are “open hole” and do not involve creating perforations. The key differences between the completion techniques used on the listed wells discussed here are Induced pressure Composition and amount of chemicals Amount of proppant Volume of water All of these factors vary, depending on the formation characteristics. Formation Characteristics Geologic formation characteristics and the way gas and oil are deposited within them dictate completion techniques.5 For this reason, we group the wells and applications according to the targeted geological formation. To get a sense of how deep the target formation is, see the Stratigraphic Map attached as Appendix B. The way hydrocarbons have been deposited in the formation, the physical structure of the formation rock, and the depth of the formation all affect the method of completion indicated to extract the hydrocarbon. Conventional & Unconventional The term “conventional” or “unconventional” describes the way gas or oil is situated in the formation. It does not describe the method of removing it. Conventional natural gas is generally held as a pocket of gas beneath a rock layer with low permeability and flows freely to the surface once the well is drilled. By contrast, unconventional natural gas is more difficult to extract because it is trapped in rock with very low permeability. Unconventional natural gas does not flow freely to the surface once the well is drilled. Three common types of unconventional gas include: (1) coalbed methane, which is sourced from within a coal seam or in the surrounding rock; (2) tight natural gas, which is found in low- porosity sandstones and carbonate reservoirs; and (3) shale gas, which is trapped in the pore space of shale rocks.6 Of the formations for the wells on the MDEQ chart, the Utica, Collingwood, Antrim, and A-1 Carbonate formations are 5 6 http://web2.geo.msu.edu/geogmich/Oil&gas.html http://www.pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2013/02/full_report35.pdf termed unconventional: the Black River (Van Wert), Niagaran and Dundee are termed conventional. 7,8,9 Permeability & Porosity Permeability is a measurement of how easily fluid flows through rock. Fluid flow is much easier in rock with higher permeability. The values of high, moderate, and low permeability assigned to a rock formation are defined on the basis of both the formation permeability and the reservoir fluid viscosity.10 When you see the terms “low permeability” it generally means it will be more difficult to remove the hydrocarbon from the rock than in formations defined as “high permeability”. Porosity of a rock is a measurement of its ability to hold a fluid. Mathematically, porosity is the open space in a rock divided by the total rock volume (solid + space or holes). Porosity is normally expressed as a percentage of the total rock which is taken up by pore space. For example, a sandstone may have 8% porosity. This means 92 percent is solid rock and 8 percent is open space containing oil, gas, or water.11 Interstitial Gas & Adsorbed Gas Interstitial gas refers to gas stored in the pore spaces of the rock: sometimes referred to as “free gas”. Adsorbed gas has adhered to organic particles present in the rock. Completion techniques will vary depending on whether gas is interstitial or adsorbed. Natural Fractures Fractures may be referred to as “natural fractures” to distinguish them from induced fractures-as the name implies, natural fractures are already present in the rock. In some reservoirs, natural fractures improve production. In other cases, natural fractures can complicate reservoir stimulation. The Antrim is naturally fractured and its fractures can be enhanced with relatively low pressure. While some natural fractures exist in the Utica, no natural fractures are observed in the core samples from the Collingwood.12,13 Formation Pressures Generally speaking the deeper the formation, the greater the pressure encountered. The term “bottom hole pressure” means either the pressure present at the bottom of the well, or at the top of the perforated interval. As fluid is released from the formation, pressure will change. Formation pressure affects both drilling and completion. 7 http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MTMzMjM5fENoaWxkSUQ9LTF8VHlwZT0z&t=1 http://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga95/prov63/text/prov63.pdf ; http://bradfordgordon.com/pdf/USGSMichiganCore8_22.pdf 9 https://www.ugcenter.com/US-Shales/Unconventional-Action-Pops-Southeastern-Michigan_86565: request article from [email protected] 10 http://petrowiki.org/Fracturing_high-permeability_formations 11 http://www.geomore.com/porosity-and-permeability-2/ 12 http://msue.anr.msu.edu/uploads/235/29659/OilGasnews_June_2013.pdf, Encana Oil and Gas Outlines Utica Collingwood Play 13 http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1311&context=etds 8 All of the characteristics discussed above will affect the level of pressure, amount and type of fluid, and the amount of proppant used to hydraulically fracture a formation and complete a well. Induced Pressure The pressure at which fluid is pumped into the well during completion varies, depending on all of the formation characteristics discussed above. For the wells in the formations we concern ourselves with here, the greatest pressure is utilized for wells into the Utica Collingwood. Sustained pressure of 9200 psi, and peaks at over 10,000 psi, were used to complete Encana's State Beaver Creek 1-23 HD1 well in May of 2013.14 Nine days were needed to fracture 33 stages.15 In comparison, the Antrim Shale has very different formation characteristics than the Collingwood. As a result, the pressure used during completion is much lower. Completion pressures between 800 and 1800 psi, depending on depth and location, are used in typical Antrim wells. Antrim wells can be completed in one day and typically require 2-5 stages.16 There is only one Antrim well on the MDEQ’s HVHF chart because typical Antrim wells are not high volume. Why such a pressure disparity between the Antrim and the Collingwood? The Collingwood has low permeability and has little or no natural fracturing. The Antrim on the other hand, is considered a naturally, un-conventional shale due to an extensive natural fracture network. Simply put, less pressure is needed to expand the Antrim's natural fractures than is needed to create new cracks in the Collingwood. Formation depth also plays a role in pressure. Total measured depth (TMD17) of wells that exceed 20,000 feet, will require much more pressure during hydraulic fracturing than a 1500 ft. vertical well simply because more friction must be overcome. Water High Volume & Large Volume MDEQ-OOGM states that hydraulic fracturing has been occurring in Michigan for about 50 years18. It does not say that high volume or large volume hydraulic fracturing has been occurring in Michigan for 50 years, and this is an important distinction. “High Volume” is defined by MDEQ as a well that is completed using over 100,000 of any liquid: water, brine, foam, acid, or gels. “Large Volume”, on the other hand, means using more than 100,000 gallons of water per day over a consecutive 30 day period (100,000 gallons of water over 30 days=3,000,000 gallons) to complete a well. Only operators intending to use a large volume water withdrawal for well 14 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/BeaverCreek.Completion_Program_.pdf http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/CompletionReport.BeaverCreek_.pdf 16 http://www.geo.mtu.edu/svl/LINGO/reports/42931_LINGO_Antrim_Play_Handbook.pdf 17 Total Measured Depth=Vertical + Horizontal length of wellbore 18 http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/deq-FINAL-frack-QA_384089_7.pdf 15 completion are required to utilize the Water Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WWAT) in accordance with Supervisor of Wells Instruction 1-201119. Also note that there is no reporting requirement for the amount of fresh water withdrawn for drilling the well: only completing the well. Wells going into deep formations, or with long lateral wellbores, may use from 300,000 to more than 1,000,000 gallons20 of fresh water to drill the well which should be included in water withdrawal analysis. Consumptive Use of Water The water used for gas and oil extraction is 100% consumptive,21 meaning none of it is returned to the hydrological cycle. There is no requirement in Michigan to recycle the water used for gas and oil extraction. Chemicals What is in completion fluids? The answer varies greatly, depending on what formation a well is being completed in. In the Antrim formation, many hundreds of wells have been completed with nitrogen foam. In the A-1 Carbonate, acid stimulation is common. In the Utica / Collingwood, fresh water mixed with an array of chemical constituents is used. Some of these chemicals are highly toxic, and may also be classified as endocrine disruptors or carcinogens.22 Encana has posted the chemical constituents utilized in six of the wells completed to date on the FracFocus website23, and MDEQ has Material Safety Data Sheets posted for some of those. Some of the chemicals are listed as “proprietary” and their names are not disclosed.24 Slickwater or slick water fracturing is a method or system of hydraulic fracturing which involves adding chemicals to water to increase the fluid flow. Fluid can be pumped down the wellbore as fast as 100 bbl25/min. to fracture the shale. Without using slickwater the top speed of pumping is around 60 bbl/min.26 Proppants A proppant is a solid material designed to keep an induced hydraulic fracture open, during or following a fracturing treatment. All of the wells considered in this paper utilized sand as a proppant. The size of the sand particles are described in terms of mesh size, and the size range of the proppant is very important. Typical proppant sizes are generally between 8 and 140 mesh (106 µm - 2.36 mm), for example 16-30 mesh (600 µm – 1180 µm), 20-40 mesh (420 µm - 840 µm), 30-50 mesh (300 µm – 600 µm), 40-70 mesh (212 µm - 420 µm) or 70-140 mesh (106 µm 212 µm). When describing frac sand, the product is frequently referred to as simply the sieve cut, i.e. 20/40 sand.27 Crystalline silica, in the form of sand (“frac sand”), plays a major role in the hydraulic fracturing process."Frac sand" is a high-purity quartz sand with very durable and very 19 http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/Supervisor_of_Wells_Insruction_1-2011_428260_7.pdf http://www.shalegaswiki.com/index.php/Amount_of_Water_Used 21 http://nrconservation.msu.edu/uploads/files/105/MSUE_BulletinWQ62_WaterWithdrawalsandWaterUseinMichigan.pdf 22 http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Hydraulic-Fracturing-Chemicals-2011-4-18.pdf 23 http://www.fracfocusdata.org/DisclosureSearch/ 24 http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,4561,7-135-3311_4111_4231-262172--,00.html 25 Bbl=barrel. One barrel = 42 gallons 26 http://www.waytogoto.com/wiki/index.php/Slickwater 27 http://www.horiba.com/scientific/products/particle-characterization/applications/frac-sand/ 20 round grains.28 In the United States there are two preferred types of frac sand - Ottawa (white) and Brady (brown), the former found mostly in the St. Peter sandstone formations spanning north-to-south from Minnesota to Missouri and east-to-west from Illinois into Nebraska and South Dakota. This quartz silica sand is the highest quality available.29 Not all of the completion records filed with the MDEQ for the wells discussed here contain proppant information. The Encana Beaver Creek 1-23 HD1 well used an unprecedented 18,707,700 pounds of sand to complete.30 This is the largest reported use of proppant by any well on the HVHF list. WELLS ON THE HVHF CHART Large Volume Wells Utica/Collingwood 34 out of the 58 wells listed on the MDEQ HVHF chart target either the Utica or the Collingwood formations, or both, and Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. (Encana) is the operator on 29 out of the 34. The Utica is a shale formation lying just above the Collingwood, which is sometimes classified as a carbonate formation. Both formations are often permitted together as a target formation by MDEQ-OOGM. All of the permits listed for this formation are located in Cheboygan, Missaukee, Kalkaska, Crawford and Roscommon counties. The first production from the Utica/Collingwood was in 2011, from the Excelsior 1-13 HD1 well in Kalkaska County. Although the Encana Pioneer and Kohler Kendall wells were completed earlier, neither well has a pipeline installed to the well and both are temporarily abandoned. Since November of 2011, the six Encana wells producing from this formation have not yielded stellar results in comparison with other plays in North America31, but it’s too soon to tell what the overall production curve will look like. Production figures are available for these wells at respectmyplanet.org.32 Encana has used, and proposes to use, significantly larger amounts of water to complete its Utica/Collingwood wells than any other producer in any other formation to date (For a list of the Encana wells and water use See Appendix C). All of the Encana wells completed or proposed on the MDEQ chart in this formation are Large Volume and have used, or propose to use, more than 3,000,000 gallons of water. The latest applications filed by Encana for its BRCA wells in Kalkaska County estimate using 35,280,000 gallons of water per well33. 28 http://geology.com/articles/frac-sand/ http://fracdallas.org/docs/sand.html 30 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/CompletionReport.BeaverCreek_.pdf 31 http://www.eia.gov/oil_gas/natural_gas/data_publications/eia914/eia914.html 32 Go to respectmyplanet.org, click on a well from the map or the legend, click on homepage, click on production. 33 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/A130152.pdf 29 Only 5 wells listed on the chart for the Utica/Collingwood were not drilled by Encana: Well Name Lucas 1-13 HD1 State Norwich 1-6 HD1 State Richfield 1-34 HD1 Yonkman 1-29 HD1 State Garfield/Tiger 1-14 Completion Drilled but not hydraulically fractured. Litigation is pending over alleged faulty pipe couplings.34 Drilled, not completed. Dry Hole.35. Drilled and completed with 4,811,940 gals. slickwater. Failed to produce. Plugged.36 Drilled. Not Completed. Plugged. 37 Drilled and completed using 210,000 gals. slickwater. The well did not produce and is temporarily abandoned.38 A-1 Carbonate Carbonate formations tend to be extremely heterogeneous, with complex porosity and permeability variations, barriers, and irregular flow paths.39 There have been incidents of “kicks”, i.e. high pressure gas pockets, encountered in the formation40, as well as hydrogen sulfide (sour gas) in the A-1. The formation has not been widely explored. There appear to be two primary ways to complete Michigan A-1 Carbonate wells: matrix acid stimulation and acid fracturing.39 The amount of water and specific chemicals being used vary greatly from well to well. Of the 12 wells listed in the MDEQ chart for the A-1, only two are Large Volume wells: Well Name Sherwood 1-22 HD1 Merten 1-24 HD1 34 Completion Drilled. Not completed. Est. 3 million gallons water41 Drilled and completed. No completion data available to date. Est. 3 million gallons water.42 Atlas Resources LLC v McJunkin Red Man Corp., U.S. District Court, Western District, 1:12-cv-00041-JTN http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/113/60161_WF.pdf 36 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/143/60560_WF.pdf 37 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/113/60617_WF.pdf 38 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/079/60363_WF.pdf http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/079/54696_WF.pdf 39 https://www.slb.com/~/media/Files/resources/mearr/num8/51_63.pdf 40 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/011/41728_WF.pdf; 41 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/093/60811_WF.pdf 42 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/127/60788_WF.pdf 35 High Volume Wells A-1 Carbonate The remaining 10 wells listed in A-1 are high volume wells (or may have been if they were completed). Well Name Schultz 1-36 HD1 Schick 1-7 HD1 David’s Acres 1-19 HD1 Cronk1-24 HD1 Wiley 1-18 HD1 St. Orange &Christenson 1-21 HD1 Riley 1-22 HD1 Walker 11-25 HD1 State Wheatland & Reinelt Swanson Trust 1-1 HD1 Rich et al. 11-33 HD1 Completion Drilled and Completed w/acid and 154,600 gals. Water. Shut In since May 2012.43 Drilled. Not completed. Plugged44. Partially drilled. Not completed. Plugged45 Drilled and Completed w/ 231,450 gals gel & 44,000 gals. 15% HCL. Plugged.46 Drilled and Completed.1.42 million gallons water w/acid & gel. Plugged.47 Drilled and Completed. Used 645,834 water with BTEX constituents. Plugged.48 Drilled and Completed w/ 10,487,650 scf Nitrogen & 93,198 gals. HCI.49 Application to plug well filed 2/3/2014. Drilled and Completed.50 2,600,270 gallons water used to complete51 Drilled. Est. water withdrawal: 1 million gallons52 Not drilled. Est. water withdrawal 2.1 million gallons53 Not drilled. Est water withdrawal 2.75 million gallons54 It can be seen that the completion techniques employed in the A-1 Carbonate do not approach the volume and scale of the water withdrawal and/or fluid utilized in the Utica Collingwood. 43 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/151/59112_WF.pdf http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/035/60526_WF.pdf 45 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/129/60582_WF.pdf 46 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/051/60380_WF.pdf 47 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/051/60452_WF.pdf 48 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/067/60615_WF.pdf 49 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/Riley_Completion_Report.pdf 50 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/151/60809_WF.pdf 51 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/21-151-60808-01-00-2182014_115914_AM-373Whiting_Petroleum.pdf 52 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/151/60826_WF.pdf 53 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/121/60755_WF.pdf 54 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/Whiting.RichA140014_.pdf 44 However, producers continue to experiment with HF fluid ingredients ( including BTEX constituents), and water withdrawal volumes continue to increase for A-1 completion. Antrim The Antrim formation, located throughout Michigan, is presently only commercially productive in the northern part of the State, and predominantly produces natural gas. To date, Antrim exploration and production has centered on Otsego, Montmorency, Alpena, Alcona, Oscoda, Antrim and Manistee Counties. The Antrim shale was one of the first shale gas productions in the United States, coming online in 1926.55 Significant development occurred in the Antrim in the 1980’s56. The majority of the “12,000 wells” the MDEQ states have been hydraulically fractured in Michigan are in the Antrim shale. A particular characteristic of this formation is that a considerable amount of formation water is produced initially with the gas.57 You will note from the Stratigraphic Map (Appendix B) this formation is significantly shallower than either the Utica/Collingwood or the A1 Carbonate58 (500 to 2000 feet ). In 2011, respectmyplanet.org undertook an examination of well file records for Antrim wells. To date, 1,670 files have been reviewed. Of these, 59.4% (992) used water, and 40.6% (678) used nitrogen or nitrogen foam to complete. Of the wells that used water, the average consumption was 11,457 gallons59. The MDEQ chart lists one high volume well completed in the Antrim: the Soper 1-25 HD1, completed by Cimarex Energy Co. in 2008. This well used 1.8 million gallons of water, failed to produce, and was plugged.60 From the records reviewed in the respectmyplanet.org Antrim Well Project, this well is an exception to common completion techniques employed in the Antrim. MDEQ lists pending HV applications for two additional wells into the Antrim by O.I.L. Energy Corp. Both wells estimate +/-185,000 of water to be used for completion in the application files.61 Dundee The Dundee is a rather shallow formation throughout the basin and ranges from surface outcrops to 4300 feet deep.62, exhibiting high permeability and high porosity.63 It is the most prolific oil producing unit in the Michigan Basin, with more than 375 million barrels of oil produced to date64. It is also gas bearing in the northern part of the Lower Peninsula. It is the target formation for many brine disposal wells.65 The Dundee is also a current target for geological sequestration of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). 62 55 http://repository.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-12-7481/AGRAWAL-THESIS.pdf http://www.mogpef.org/Exploration/GeologicalFormationsinMichigan.aspx 57 http://custom.cengage.com/regional_geology/data/Geo_Michigan_Watermarked.pdf 58 Stratigraphic Map, Appendix B 59 Request a copy of the Antrim Well Report at [email protected] 60 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/133/59173_WF.pdf 61 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/OIL.Antrim_AppA130164_.pdf http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/OILAntrimAppA130165.pdf 62 http://www.mrcsp.org/userdata/Articles/eg09007.pdf 63 http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/GIMDL-OFR866_302614_7.pdf 64 http://aapgbull.geoscienceworld.org/content/90/11/1787.abstract 65 http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1327&context=etds 56 Completion of Dundee wells is not typically high volume. The single HVHF well listed by the MDEQ in the Dundee is for Jordan Development’s State Jerome and Starnes 15-8 HD1 in Midland County.66 The lateral portion of the well is about 3500’ and will also use open hole completion. The well has been drilled but no completion records have been filed so it is undetermined whether this well is actually high volume or not. No other completed wells or pending applications on the MDEQ High Volume chart are targeting the Dundee. Niagaran Development in Kalkaska, Grand Traverse and Otsego counties in this formation began in earnest in 1970. The decade of the 1970s produced around 225 million barrels of oil and almost 874 billion cubic feet of gas in Michigan, and most of this production was from the Niagaran reefs.67 The first horizontal well in Michigan was drilled into this formation in 1984.68 MDEQ lists one high volume well in the Niagaran formation completed in 2010 by Merit Energy Company: the Hubbel 2-22 HD1. MDEQ records indicate that this well was completed using a combination of water, hydrochloric acid and nitrogen foam. Total fluid is noted at 216,968 gallons.69 The well was open hole for the lateral portion of 2,143 feet. No other completed wells or pending applications on the MDEQ High Volume chart are targeting the Niagaran. Black River (Van Wert) The Black River formation is below the Utica/Collingwood. This formation produces both oil and gas. Gas produced from the Black River Group is predominantly “dry”. The formation has low permeability and low porosity. Development in this formation is focused in south central Michigan.70 Six wells listed on the MDEQ HVHF list target the Black River formation. One is plugged, two are producing and three have yet to be drilled or completed: Well Name Kelly et al. 1-26 HD1 McNair 1-26 HD1 Arno 1-25 HD1 Arno/Timmons 1-24 HD1 66 Completion Well completed with 228,291 gals. gelled water. Producing.71 Well completed with 17,405 NE Acid72 & 350448 PPG gel.73 Producing.74 Well not drilled as of August 201375 Well not drilled as of August 201376 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/Jordan.Dundee60718_.pdf http://custom.cengage.com/regional_geology/data/Geo_Michigan_Watermarked.pdf 68 http://bradfordgordon.com/pdf/USGSMichiganCore8_22.pdf 69 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/60041_wf_with_water_summary.pdf 70 http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/GIMDL-GGTBR_302379_7.pdf 71 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/059/60212_WF.pdf 72 http://www.weatherford.com/Products/EngineeredChemistry/AcidAdditives/Surfactants/ 73 http://www.chemeor.com/downloads/PB_Cerogel%20PPG_906-p1.pdf 74 http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/059/60537_WF.pdf 75 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/Arno.File_.pdf 67 Stiverson & French 1-25 HD1 Burns A1-23 HD1 Well Plugged. Drilled in September 2013. Dry Hole77 Well not drilled as of December 201378 SUMMARY Of the 58 wells listed on the MDEQ chart, 23 have been drilled and completed, 9 have been drilled but not completed, and the rest have not been drilled or completed as of this date. Of the 23 that have been drilled and completed, 8 are currently producing. The wells completed and proposed by Encana Oil & Gas (USA), Inc. into the Utica/Collingwood formation are the longest (TMD now approaching 4 miles), and are using the largest volume of fresh water, as well as the most varied and toxic array and volume of chemicals in Michigan to date. Wells targeting the A-1 Carbonate formation are utilizing ever increasing volumes of water as well as many of the same chemicals associated with Utica/Collingwood completions. Wells currently being completed in other formations do not approach those numbers, as can be seen from the comparisons contained in this report (Appendix D). We hope you’ve found this paper helpful in differentiating between the formations being accessed and the corresponding completion techniques being employed in the wells listed on the MDEQ’s HVHF chart. Please contact us with any questions or feedback you may have via email to [email protected] or [email protected] . 76 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/Continental.Arno2_.pdf http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/GeoWebface/GeoWebface/WF/059/60662_WF.pdf 78 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/60674.Muzyl2_.pdf 77 HIGH VOLUME HYDRAULICALLY FRACTURED WELL COMPLETION ACTIVE PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS (AS OF 3/18/2014) HIGH VOLUME (>100,000 gallons) HYDRAULIC FRACTURING SINCE 2008 - ACTIVE PERMITS # Company Name BEACON EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION CO LLC CIMAREX ENERGY CO ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC MERIT ENERGY COMPANY ATLAS RESOURCES LLC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC ATLAS RESOURCES LLC COUNTRYMARK RESOURCES INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC TIGER DEVELOPMENT LLC DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY LP ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY LP DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY LP CONTINENTAL RESOURCES INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY LP ALTA ENERGY OPERATING LLC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY LP COUNTRYMARK ENERGY RESOURCES LLC COUNTRYMARK ENERGY RESOURCES LLC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC Well Name SCHULTZ SOPER PIONEER HUBBEL STATE NORWICH STATE KOEHLER & KENDALL LUCAS KELLY ET AL STATE EXCELSIOR STATE GARFIELD & TIGER CRONK STATE EXCELSIOR WILEY SCHICK MCNAIR ET AL STATE EXCELSIOR STATE EXCELSIOR STATE RICHFIELD RILEY STATE GARFIELD DAVID'S ACRES, LLC ARNO ARNO & TIMMONS WESTERMAN Well No 1--36 1-25 HD1 1-3 HD1 2-22 HD1 1-6 HD1 1-27 HD1 1-13 HD1 1-26 HD1 1-13 HD1 1-14 1-24 HD1 1-25 HD1 1-18 HD1 1-7HD1 1-26 HD1 2-25 HD1 3-25 HD1 1-34 HD1 1-22 HD1 1-25 HD1 1-19 HD1 1-25 HD1 1-24 HD1 1-32 HD1 County SANILAC OSCEOLA MISSAUKEE MONTMORENCY MISSAUKEE CHEBOYGAN KALKASKA HILLSDALE KALKASKA KALKASKA GLADWIN KALKASKA GLADWIN CLARE HILLSDALE KALKASKA KALKASKA ROSCOMMON OCEANA KALKASKA OGEMAW HILLSDALE HILLSDALE KALKASKA Pilot Boring NA ACOW 59919 NA NA 60133 60138 NA 60357 NA 60379 NA 60451 60525 60536 NA NA 60559 60574 NA 60581 NA NA 60600 Comments well completed Feb. 2012 well completed Aug. 2008 well completed Feb 2010 well completed June. 2010 well not hydraulically fractured to date. well completed Oct 2010 well not hydraulically fractured to date. well completed Sept. 2011 well completed Nov 2011 Well completed Oct. 2013 well completed April/May 2012 well completed Nov 2011 well completed May/June 2012 well not hydraulically fractured well completed August 2012 well completed Oct 2012 well completed Oct 2012 well completed Nov 2012 Well completed Dec. 2012/May 2013 Well completed Dec. 2012 well not hydraulically fractured permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well No completion records on file Target formation A1 Carbonate Antrim Utica-Collingwood Niagaran Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood Black River (Van Wert) Utica-Collingwood Collingwood A1 Carbonate Utica-Collingwood A1 Carbonate A1 Carbonate Black River (Van Wert) Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood Collingwood A1 Carbonate Utica-Collingwood A1 Carbonate Black River (Van Wert) Black River (Van Wert) Utica-Collingwood 25 60606 ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC 26 27 28 29 30 31 ROSETTA RESOURCES OPERATING LP DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY LP ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC COUNTRYMARK ENERGY RESOURCES LLC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC MUZYL OIL CORPORATION STATE MENTOR 1-17 HD1 CHEBOYGAN STATE ORANGE & CHRISTENSEN YOUNKMAN STATE BEAVER CREEK STIVERSON & FRENCH STATE ROSCOMMON BURNS 1-21 HD1 1-29 HD1 1-23 HD1 1-25 HD1 1-7 HD1 A1-23 HD1 IONIA MISSAUKEE CRAWFORD HILLSDALE ROSCOMMON HILLSDALE 34N 3W 17 NA permit for horizontal well (60562) 6N 6W 21 21N 8W 29 25N 4W 11 6S 2W 24 21N 4W 17 6S 2W 23 60614 00581 60620 NA 60670 NA Well completed June 2013 well not hydraulically fractured well completed May 2013 well not hydraulically fractured permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well 32 60686 33 60718 ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC STATE GARFIELD 1-23 HD1 JORDAN DEVELOPMENT CO. LLC 15-8 HD1 ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC STATE JEROME & STARNES STATE EXCELSIOR KALKASKA 25N 6W 26 60685 1-14 HD1 MIDLAND KALKASKA 8N 1W 8 27N 6W 24 60717 NA 34 60746 35 60747 ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC 36 60748 ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC STATE EXCELSIOR 1-12 HD1 KALKASKA 27N 6W 24 STATE EXCELSIOR 1-11 HD1 KALKASKA 27N 6W 24 37 60749 ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC STATE EXCELSIOR 2-14 HD1 KALKASKA 38 60750 ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC STATE EXCELSIOR 2-12 HD1 39 60755 ROSETTA RESOURCES OPERATING LP 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC SWANSON TRUST STATE EXCELSIOR STATE EXCELSIOR STATE EXCELSIOR MERTEN WALKER SHERWOOD STATE OLIVER STATE EXCELSIOR STATE OLIVER STATE OLIVER STATE EXCELSIOR STATE WHEATLAND & REINELT STATE PIONEER STATE NORWICH BLACK RIVER CONSERVATION ASSN. STATE CUSTER AND MUNN RICH ET AL 1-1 HD1 3-12 HD1 4-12 HD1 5-12 HD1 1-24 HD1 11-25 HD1 1-22 HD1 3-13 HD1 4-25 HD1 2-13 HD1 1-13 HD1 5-25 HD1 11-7 HD1 3-4 HD1 3-12 HD1 1-9 HD1 D2-6 11-33 HD1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Permit # 59112 59173 59979 60041 60161 60170 60198 60212 60360 54696 60380 60389 60452 60526 60537 60545 60546 60560 60575 60579 60582 60587 60588 60601 60615 60617 60621 60662 60672 60674 60765 60766 60767 60788 60809 60811 60818 60819 60820 60821 60822 60826 60848 53 60891 54 60892 55 60922 56 60930 UNION GAS OPERATING COMPANY WHITING OIL AND GAS CORPORATION GEOSOUTHERN OPERATING LLC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC WHITING OIL AND GAS CORPORATION ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC O I L ENERGY CORP. WHITING OIL AND GAS CORPORATION Well Type Oil Gas Gas Oil Dry Hole Oil Not available Oil Gas Gas Dry Hole Gas Gas Other Oil Gas Gas Gas Oil Gas Other Location Location Location Well Status Shut-in Plugging complete Temporarily abandoned Producing Temporarily abandoned Temporarily abandoned Temporarily abandoned Producing Producing Temporarily abandoned Plugging complete Producing Plugging complete Plugging complete Producing Producing Producing Plugging complete Well complete Well Complete Plugging complete Permitted Well Permitted Well Drilling complete Utica-Collingwood Location Permitted Well YES A1 Carbonate Utica Utica-Collingwood Black River (Van Wert) Utica-Collingwood Black River (Van Wert) Dry Hole NA Gas Dry Hole Location location Well complete Plugging complete Well Complete Plugging complete Permitted Well Permitted Well NO NO NO NO YES NO permit for horizontal well Utica-Collingwood Location Permitted Well YES No completion records on file Dundee Location Drilling complete NO permit for horizontal well Utica-Collingwood Location Permitted Well YES NA permit for horizontal well Utica-Collingwood Location Permitted Well YES NA permit for horizontal well Utica-Collingwood Location Permitted Well YES 27N 6W 24 NA permit for horizontal well Utica-Collingwood Location Permitted Well YES KALKASKA 27N 6W 24 NA permit for horizontal well Utica-Collingwood Location Permitted Well YES MUSKEGON KALKASKA KALKASKA KALKASKA 9N 14W 1 27N 6W 24 27N 6W 24 27N 6W 24 15N 17W 24 12N 15E 25 4N 3E 23 26N 6W 1 26N 6W 1 26N 6W 1 26N 6W 1 26N 6W 1 13N 14E 7 24N 7W 3 25N 6W 36 27N 5W 28 29N 7W 6 12N 15E 4 60754 NA NA NA 60787 60808 60804 NA NA NA NA NA 60825 NA NA NA NA 60927 permit for horizontal well A1-Carbonate Location Permitted Well YES permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood A1-Carbonate A1-Carbonate A-1 Carbonate Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well YES YES YES NO NO YES YES YES YES YES YES Location Location Location Location Location Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well Permitted Well OCEANA SANILAC LIVINGSTON KALKASKA KALKASKA KALKASKA KALKASKA KALKASKA SANILAC MISSAUKEE KALKASKA KALKASKA ANTRIM SANILAC Wellhead T R S 12N 15E 36 17N 10W 25 24N 7W 3 29N 1E 22 24N 6W 6 35N 2W 33 26N 8W 13 6S 2W 26 27N 6W 24 25N 6W 14 19N 1W 24 26N 6W 1 18N 2W 18 19N 3W 7 6S 2W 26 26N 6W 1 26N 6W 1 22N 1W 27 15N 18W 22 25N 6W 36 22N 4E 19 6S 2W 25 6S 2W 24 28N 8W 29 permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for horizontal well permit for directional well permit for horizontal well A1 Carbonate Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood Utica-Collingwood Antrim A-1 Carbonate HIGH VOLUME (>100,000 gallons) HYDRAULIC FRACTURING PROPOSALS - ACTIVE APPLICATIONS # App # 1 A130152 2 A130164 Company Name ENCANA OIL AND GAS USA INC O I L ENERGY CORP. Well Name BLACK RIVER CONSERVATION ASSN. STATE CUSTER AND BGC Well No 6-9 HD1 C3-31 County KALKASKA ANTRIM Wellhead T R S 27N 5W 28 29N 7W 6 Pilot Boring NA NA target formation Utica-Collingwood Antrim comments application for horizontal well application for a directional well Confidential NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES YES YES YES NO YES STRATIGRAPHIC SUCCESSION IN LOWER PENINSULA OF MICHIGAN DOMINANT LITHOLOGY Basin Center u .~ Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift '" u <II Mesozoic Jurassic ~ ?Kimmeridgian? ~ Conemaugh :< ------- - ---Pennsylvanian ~ ro ?Pottsville? w * ...J Mississippian Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Geological Survey DIvision Harold Fitch, State Geologist and Grand River Formation ~~ Saginaw Formation E~~~~::::~~~=~=~l __~arma Sand2~o~,~ ___ _ ________ ____ _ Bayport Limestone Grand Rapids Group Meramecian Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Dr. Paul A . Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman 1-+_____ Osagian ~ f - - - - - - I::=::::::::;~~;l:'i:~ Kinderho okian .'!! ~ Marshall Sandstone Principa l Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Dr. Dave BWestjohn Mark S. Wollensak Coldwater Shale Sunbury Shale Berea Sandstone Bedford Shale Antrim Shale Chautauquan '" ...J Senecan 2000 Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale ~ '0 Dundee Limestone ~f------ Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Sylvania Sandstone BOi s Blanc Formation Ulsterian Garden Island Formation Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Cayugan Glacial Salina F Unit Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Salina C Shale Salina 8 Unit { Niagaran Salina Group (Gray Niagaran) Lockport (While Niagaran) Dolomite Manistique Limestone Burnt Bluff Formation Cabot Head Shale Alexandrian Till/Gravel limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Salina A-2 Evaporite RuH Formation (Salina A-I Carbonate) Guelph Dolomite (Salina A-I Evaporite) . . (Brown Niagaran! Cain Formation Salina A-O Carbonate) Silurian Clay or Silt Sandy Limestone Shaley Limestone Limestone Bedded Dolomite Sandy Dolomite Niagara Group Cataract Group Manitoulin Dolomite Shaley Dolomite Sandstone-Coarse Sandstone-Fine Sandstone-Cross Bedded Queenston Shale Sandstone-Bedded Richmond Group Cincinnatian Calcareous Sandstone Utica Shale Shaley Sandstone Collingwocd Shale Shale <D Ordovician ~ ~ Trenton Formation Arenaceous Shale Mohawkian Black River Forma tion Fosler Formation Canadian Dolomitic Shale Anhydrite Basement Rocl<s Tre mpealeau Formation Coal Bed Franconia Formation Franconian !B Galesville Sandstone '" ...J Dresbach ian Prairie du Chien Group Gypsum Trempealeaun Cambrian Calcareous Shale Glenwood Formation Bruggers Sandstone/St. Peler Sandstone Chazyan ,--------- --- .... _- ... _---- .. Munising Group -~-- Chert .. .. Glauconite GG Mt. Simon Sandstone Pre-Mt. Simon Clastics Middle Proterozoic Eon Breccia Eau Claire Formation Bentonite Fossils ~---. -----~.--~-~.~--~----- Precambrian Crystalline Basement Unconformity X X X X f f f f Appendix C Large Volume Water Withdrawal for Hydraulic Fracturing in Deep Shale Formations by Encana Oil & Gas (USA), Inc. (as of March 20, 2014) Kalkaska, Crawford, Missaukee, Cheyboygan & Roscommon Counties, Michigan Proposed and Actual Water Removal in Gallons Actual water removal reported for completed wells: 60170 59979 60360 60389 60545 60546 60579 60621 60601 Koehler-Kendall Pioneer 1-3 Excelsior 1-13 Excelsior 1-25 Excelsior 2-25 Excelsior 3-25 Garfield 1-25 Beaver Creek 1-23 Westerman 1-32 3,256,596 6,720,000 5,840,000 8,481,635 12,592,096 21,112,194 12,539,639 15,810,735 12,636,294* 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 Wells permitted but not yet drilled: 60606 60748 60747 60750 60746 60749 60765 60766 60767 60819 60822 60821 60820 60818 60672 60686 60891 60892 60848 Mentor 1-17 Excelsior 1-11 Excelsior 1-12 Excelsior 2-12 Excelsior 1-14 Excelsior 2-14 Excelsior 3-12 Excelsior 4-12 Excelsior 5-12 Excelsior 4-25 Excelsior 5-25 Oliver 1-13 Oliver 2-13 Oliver 3-13 Roscommon 1-7 Garfield 1-23 Norwich 3-12 BRCA 1-9 Pioneer 3-4 est. 4, 200,000 est 23,100,000 est 23,100,000 est 23,100,000 est 23,100,000 est 23,100,000 est 23,100,000 est 23,100,000 est 23,100,000 est 18,900,000 est 18,900,000 est 31,500,000 est 31,500,000 est 31,500,000 est 16,800,000 est 10,600,000 est 25,200,000 est 35,280,000 est 25,200,000 Wells applied for, permits pending: A130152 BRCA 6-9 TOTAL: est 35,280,000 568,649,189 GALLONS *2,130,576 from Kalkaska and Mancelona Municipal Water as per Bill Duley, MDEQ Geologist 11/7/2013 Appendix D Summary of Completion Factors for MDEQ Chart of HVHF Wells in Michigan as of January 23, 2014 Utica Collingwood Wells Permit # 60560 54696/ 60170 Well Name Richfield 1-34 HD1 Garfield & Tiger 1-14 Koehler-Kendall Completion Fluid 4,811,940 gals slickwater 210,000 gals slickwater 3,256,596 gals slickwater Chemicals See below1 See below2 Not Reported 59979 60360 60389 60545 60546 60579 60621 60601 Pioneer 1-3 Excelsior 1-13 Excelsior 1-25 Excelsior 2-25 Excelsior 3-25 Garfield 1-25 Beaver Creek 1-23 Westerman 6,720,000 gals slickwater 5,840,000 gals slickwater 8,481,635 gals slickwater 12,592,096 gals slickwater 21,112,194 gals slickwater 12,539,639 gals slickwater 15,810,735 gals slickwater 12,636,294 gals slickwater Not reported See below3 See below3 See below4 See below4 See below5 Not Reported See below6 Proppant 3,875,300 lbs silica Not reported 2,840,000 #20/40 mesh; 241,810 # 30/50 mesh 423,277 40/70 mesh 1,300,000 100 mesh; 2,580,000 40/70 mesh 1,100,000 40/70 mesh;2,580,000 20/40 mesh 1,870,000# 40/70 mesh; 3,440,000# 20/40 mesh 988,164# Ottawa sand 8,827,623# Ottawa sand 9,668,100# Ottawa sand 18,707,700# Premium White 10,333,000# silica7 The remaining wells on the MDEQ list permitted to target the Utica Collingwood formations have not been completed to date. 1 Hydrochloric acid, Hexamethylenetetramine, Phenol / formaldehyde resin, Trimethylbenzene, Ethanol , Heavy aromatic petroleum naphtha, Naphthalene, Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-(4nonylphenyl)-omega-hydroxy-, branched, Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride, Ammonium salt, Ammonium chloride, Hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, Paraffinic solvent, Methanol, Ethoxylated nonylphenol, Sodium perborate tetrahydrate http://www.fracfocusdata.org/DisclosureSearch/SearchResults.aspx 2 Hydrochloric acid 7.5%, Hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride, Ammonium chloride, Ammonium salt. 9-Octadecenanide alcohols, Isopropanol, http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/Permit_54696_MSDS_439389_7.pdf 3 Hydrogen chloride, Ethoxylated Nonylphenol, Glycol Ethers, Isopropyl Alcohol, Propargyl Alcohol, Tar bases, quinoline derivs, benzyl chloride-quaternized, 2,2-dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide, Ammonium Sulfate, Ammonium Chloride, Ethoxylated alcohol blend, Ethoxylated oleylamine, Hydrotreated light distillates Hydrotreated light distillates, Polyacrylamide, Propylene glycol, 2Butoxyethanol, 2-Ethylhexanol, Cocamidopropyl Dimethylamine, Coconut oil, Dodecylbenzenesulfonate sopropanolamine, Epichlorohydrin, Methanol, Isopropyl Alcohol, Monoethanolamine, Dimethyl-1,3-Propanediamine, Cocoamidopropyl-N,N-dimethyl-N-2-h ydroxypropylsulfobetainE, Naphthalene, Phosphoric Acid, Poly(Oxy-1,2-Ethanediyl)Alpha.-Hydro-.Omega.-Hydroxy-, MonoC8-10-Alkyl Ethers, Phosphates, Polyethylene glycol trimethylnonyl ether, Sodium Metabisulfite, Solvent Naptha (Petroleum), Sulfamic Acid, Aluminum,Titanium and Iron oxides, 2 undisclosed proprietary elements http://www.fracfocusdata.org/DisclosureSearch/StandardSearch.aspx 4 Hydrochloric acid, Hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride, Ammonium chloride, Trimethylbenzene, Ethanol, Heavy aromatic petroleum naphtha, Naphthalene, Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-(4-nonylphenyl)-omega-hydroxy-, branched, Methanol, Propargyl Alcohol, http://www.fracfocusdata.org/DisclosureSearch/StandardSearch.aspx 5 Hydrochloric acid, Hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride, Ammonium chloride, Trimethylbenzene, Ethanol, Heavy aromatic petroleum naphtha, Naphthalene, Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-(4-nonylphenyl)-omega-hydroxy-, branched, Methanol, Propargyl Alcohol, Guar Gum, Sodium Persulfate http://www.fracfocusdata.org/DisclosureSearch/StandardSearch.aspx 6 15% FE Acid, Heavy aromatic petroleum naphtha, Trimethylbenzene, Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride, Hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, Guar Gum, Methanol, Propargyl Alcohol, Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-(4-nonylphenyl)-omega-hydroxy-, branched, Sodium persulfate, Ammonium chloride, Naphthalene, FracTracers http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/60601_Westerman_1-32_MSDS_426422_7.pdf ; http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/Encana_-_Westerman_1-32HD1_Chemical_Disclosure_%281%29.pdf 7 http://www.respectmyplanet.org/public_html/documents/Westerman_01-32_HD-1_-_Chemical_Additive_Usage.pdf A-1 Carbonate Wells Permit # 59112 60380 60452 60615 60575 60809 60788 Well Name Schultz 1-36 Cronk 1-24 HD1 Wiley 1-18 HD1 Christenson 1-21 HD1 Riley 1-22 HD1 Walker 11-25 HD1 Merten 1-24 HD1 Completion Fluid 154,600 gals water 231,450 Linear gel & 44,000 gals 15% HCI 1,420,939 gals water 645,834 gals water 93,198 gals. HCI 2,600,270 gals water Not Reported to Date Chemicals Proppant 26,000 gals 10% HCI 175,000 sand See below8 See below9 See below10 See below11 See below12 Not reported to date 593,400# unspecified proppant 1,308,602# unspecified proppant Amount not specified on completion report No proppant noted on completion report Silica sand. Amount not specified. Not Reported to date The remaining wells permitted to target the A-1 Carbonate formation have not been completed to date. Antrim Well Permit # 59173 Well Name Soper 1-25 HD1 Completion Fluid 1,800,000 slickwater Chemicals Proppant No MSDS on file at MDEQ None noted on completion report Dundee Well The single well on the HVHF list for this formation, the Jerome & Starnes 15-8 HD1, has been drilled and completed but no completion record is available. 8 Hydrochloric Acid, Guar Gum, Resin, Petroleum Distillates,Methanol, Parafinic Petroleum Distillates, Poly (Oxyethylene) Nonylphenol Ether, Citric Acid, Acrylic Polymers, 1-Butoxy-2-Propanol, 2-Butoxyethanol, Enzyme solution, Boric Acid (H3BO3), Methyl Borate, Ethylene Glycol, Potassium Carbonate, Isopropanol, Glutaraldehyde, Sodium Carbonate, Polyoxyalkylenes, Didecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Chloride, Hemicellulase Enzyme , Calcium Chloride, Ethanol, Quaternary Ammonium Compound, Fatty Acids, Ammonium Persulfate, Olefin, Propargyl Alcohol, Potassium Hydroxide , http://www.fracfocusdata.org/DisclosureSearch/SearchResults.aspx 9 Hydrochloric Acid, Guar Gum, Hexamethylenetetramine, Phenol / formaldehyde resin, Ethylene glycol, Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride, Hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, Monoethanolamine borate, Acetic Acid, Methanol, Sodium persulfate, Sodium perborate tetrahydrate, Alcohols, C12-16, ethoxylated, Ammonium chloride, Sodium chloride, Sodium Sulfate, & three proprietary ingredients, http://www.fracfocusdata.org/DisclosureSearch/SearchResults.aspx 10 Xylene, Ethel Benzene, Toluene, Monoethanolamine borate, Ethylene glycol, Monobutyl ethel, Isopropanol, Crotonaldehyde, Acetaldehyde, Methanol, Hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, Aldol,Ethanol, Heavy aromatic petroleum naphtha, Naphthalene, Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-(4-nonylphenyl)-omega-hydroxy-, branched, 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene, Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride, Sodium persulfate & 6 confidential ingredients, , http://www.fracfocusdata.org/DisclosureSearch/SearchResults.aspx 11 Hydrochloric acid , Dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid, Isopropynol, Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride, Ammonium salt, Carbohydrates, Hemicellulase enzyme, Methanol, Propargyl alcohol, Inner salt of alkyl amines, Sodium chloride, Paraffinic solvent Paraffinic solvent, Ethanol, Heavy aromatic petroleum naphtha, Naphthalene, Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-(4-nonylphenyl)-omegahydroxy-, branched, Isopropanol, Nitrogen http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/60575_Riley_HD1_MSDS_420613_7.pdf 12 Hydrochloric Acid, Guar Gum, Acetic anhydride, Methyl Borate, Dipropylene glycol monomethylether, Ethanol, Heavy aromatic petroleum naphtha, Naphthalene, Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha(4-nonylphenyl)-omega-hydroxy-, branched, Ethylene glycol, 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene, Ammonium salt, Citric Acid, Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride, Propylene glycol, Sodium chloride, Methanol, & 11 confidential ingredients. http://www.fracfocusdata.org/DisclosureSearch/SearchResults.aspx Niagaran Well Permit # 60041 Well Name Hubbel 2-22 HD1 Completion Fluid Chemicals 216,000 water; 968 additives See below13 Proppant 177,000# 20/40 premium white Black River Wells Permit # 60212 60537 Well Name Kelly et al, 1-26 HD1 McNair 1-26 HD 1 Completion Fluid 228,291 gals. gelled water 17,405 NE Acid & 350,448 gals PPG gel. Chemicals See below14 See below15 Proppant None noted in completion report None noted in completion report The remaining wells on the MDEQ list permitted to target the Black River formation have not been completed to date. 13 Monoethanolamine borate, Ethylene glycol, 2-Monobromo-3-nitrilopropionamide, 2,2 Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide, 2-Bromo-2-nitro-1,3- propanediol, Acetic acid, Carbohydrates, Hemicellulase enzyme, Methanol, Propargyl alcohol, Ethanol, Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), alpha-(4-nonylphenyl)-omega-hydroxy-,branched Naphthalene 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene , Heavy aromatic petroleum naphtha, Heavy aromatic petroleum naphtha, Isopropanol. Guar Gum & 1 proprietary ingredient, http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,4561,7-135-3311_4111_4231-262172--,00.html 14 Ethylene glycol, Ammonium Persulfate, 2,2 Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide, Polyethylene Glycol Mixture, Isopropyl Alcohol, Glycol Ethers, & 2 proprietary ingredients, http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/KELLEY_MSDS2011_11_02_367756_7.pdf 15 Glycol Ethers, Isopropyl Alcohol, Isopropynol, Hydrocarbons, Hydrochloric Acid, Cupric Sulfate, Copper, Methanol, Ethylene Glycol, & 2 proprietary ingredients http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/McNair_ET_AL_1-26_HD1_MSDS_401458_7.pdf