Dan Pennick - Town of Mount Pleasant

Transcription

Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Beth Ryan <[email protected]>
Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:51 AM
Christine Barrett; Planning
Request for increased density in Dunes West
Hello,
I am a resident of Park West and would like you to deny this request to increase density in Dunes West. As you
know, the infrastructure in our community is already over burdened with traffic and overcrowded schools. We
have heard many people discuss and complain about the traffic, but the more urgent issue is the overcrowding
in the schools. The school district has restructured the zoning to help alleviate this overcrowding, yet we still
find hundreds of kids being taught in trailers, many of which are set up in parking lots. With all that is
happening in the world these days I for one do not see these trailers as a safe place to be teaching our
children. We need to decrease density not increase it. Please help us get our kids out of the parking lots. I urge
you to deny this request tonight.
Beth Ryan
3186 John Bartram Place
Mount Pleasant, SC 29466
843.214.5063
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Stephanie Williamson <[email protected]>
Planning
proposed changes to dunes west
I would like to state my opposition to the proposed zoning changes for Dunes West. It is sad to think that as our
neighborhood is somewhat near completion, John Wieland Homes seems to be disregarding everything we were told as
potential buyers in favor of making more profit. It appears that as they run out of space, they plan to change and put
MORE homes in that was previously planned. It seems the developers profit is put above the citizens who call this city
home. As they move out, we are left to deal with traffic, safety, reduced home values and overcrowded schools.
Besides the increased density, this proposed change will allow NO buffer between Ayers Plantation Road and homes, NO
where else in the neighborhood is that occurring. It has the potential to greatly impact the beauty of our neighborhood as
well as the value of our homes.
I thank the commission for this opportunity to keep these parcels low density.
Stephanie Williamson
2993 Sturbridge Road
Mt. Pleasant
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Jan Hillis <[email protected]>
Planning
747 People are writing you regarding Dunes West Zoning Changes
DWPetitionSignatures111815.pdf; DWPetitionComments111815.pdf
Dear Planning Commission Members,
Please find attached a petition opposing the JW Home's change requests on your agenda for tonight. Also
attached in a separate document are the comments. Since I printed it, we are now at 747 people who have taken
the time and had the courage to publicly oppose tonight's proposed changes.
Please consider the comments, many, many people really thought about what this means to them and their
community. Then they made the effort to communicate that to you. Some folks are emotional about this issue.
All will certainly appreciate your votes to oppose any increases in density for Dunes West.
Thank you, sincerely, for allowing us the opportunity to keep these parcels low density.
Jan Hillis
2772 Oak Manor Dr.
Mt. Pleasant, SC 29466
270-313-2090
1
Signatures
Name
Location
Date
Virginia Hillis
Mount Pleasant, SC, United States
2015-11-12
Lonnie Davis
2015-11-12
Ryan Gunselman
2015-11-12
Mark Davis
2015-11-12
Monica Mutter
2015-11-12
Jane Fitzsimmons
Charleston, SC, United States
2015-11-12
Paul MacDonald
2015-11-12
Susan Pace
2015-11-12
Linda Duane
2015-11-12
Pamela Bell
2015-11-12
Sharon Hall
2015-11-12
Ann Hart
Mt. Pleasant, SC, United States
2015-11-12
James Hart
2015-11-12
Steven Livell
2015-11-12
Emma Hillis
2015-11-12
Erin Varela
2015-11-12
Kristen Pierce
2015-11-12
Mindy Logan
2015-11-12
Leanne Sherry
2015-11-12
Christopher Fisher
2015-11-12
Margaret Morse
2015-11-12
JESSICA SMALYGA
2015-11-12
Howard Gambino
2015-11-12
Michael Smalyga
2015-11-12
Christopher Logan
2015-11-12
Bethany Young
2015-11-12
Philip Leffel
2015-11-12
Marilyn Smith
2015-11-12
Thomas Smith
2015-11-12
Michele Lewis
2015-11-12
Name
Location
Date
Caitlin Esto
2015-11-12
Steve Solari
2015-11-12
James Feeley
2015-11-12
Matthew Pinkel
McLean, VA, United States
2015-11-12
Lars Runquist
2015-11-12
Scott Ellington
2015-11-12
Kelley Shaw
Mt Pleasant, SC, United States
2015-11-12
Carolyn Runquist
2015-11-12
Danielle Faust
2015-11-12
Denise Bromer
2015-11-12
Melanie Jurga
2015-11-12
Margaret Graham
2015-11-12
Kara Semo
2015-11-12
Stephen Pierce
2015-11-12
Joan Dehne
2015-11-12
Christina Owens
2015-11-12
Erik Ripple
Monroe, NC, United States
2015-11-12
David Graham
Alcoa, TN, United States
2015-11-12
Dennis Bradford
2015-11-12
Patti Comire
2015-11-12
Brent Reeves
2015-11-12
Valerie Cobb
2015-11-12
Natalia Reeves
2015-11-12
Brett Barnes
2015-11-12
Scott Hurley
2015-11-12
Jeff Beck
2015-11-12
Heather Cook
2015-11-12
Thomas Dickinson
2015-11-12
Shelley Savage
2015-11-12
Jeana Phillips
2015-11-12
doug buchan
2015-11-12
Don Lewis
2015-11-12
Name
Location
Date
Vivian Wohlford
2015-11-12
Brooke Beasley
2015-11-12
Brian Burgess
2015-11-12
James Paladino
2015-11-12
Toni Peterson
2015-11-12
C.T. Starkey, Jr.
2015-11-12
Renee Popovich
2015-11-12
Marcia Rosenberg
2015-11-12
Trish Austin
2015-11-12
Lisa Signori
2015-11-12
Angela Duclos
Windham, NH, United States
2015-11-12
Allen &Marion Usdan
Wallace, NC, United States
2015-11-12
Megan Ogden
2015-11-12
Michael Dye
2015-11-12
Max Immelman
2015-11-12
Julie Buchan
2015-11-12
Sara Duclos
Windham, NH, United States
2015-11-12
Paula Dickinson
2015-11-12
Maria Starkey
2015-11-12
Kazem Memari
2015-11-12
Kermitt J Hill
2015-11-12
Kelly Garrison
2015-11-12
Robert Wheaton
2015-11-12
Peggy Horner
2015-11-12
Patricia Broghamer
2015-11-12
Jim Lewis
2015-11-12
Amanda Hill
2015-11-12
Claudia Interrante
2015-11-12
Susan Norman
2015-11-12
Jeff Hoffman
2015-11-12
Amy Hux
2015-11-12
Kathy Wall
2015-11-12
Name
Location
Date
Josephine Frye
2015-11-12
Katharine Kirven
2015-11-12
John and Lorraine Merryman
2015-11-12
Lori Hills
2015-11-12
Eric Browder
2015-11-12
Kelly Lyons
2015-11-12
Peter Cuneo
2015-11-12
Robin White
2015-11-12
Chris Moore
2015-11-12
Jo Lee Deem
2015-11-12
Meredith Shuler
2015-11-12
Heather DiSandro
2015-11-12
Bill Anderson
2015-11-12
Deborah Everidge
2015-11-12
Dawn Limberg
2015-11-12
Anne Moore
2015-11-12
Megan Graham
2015-11-12
William Failor
2015-11-12
Tracy Murphy
2015-11-12
Donna ONeal
2015-11-12
Renee O'Connor
2015-11-12
William and Jane Bowers
2015-11-12
Julie Wood
2015-11-12
Andria Moceri
2015-11-12
James Everidge
2015-11-12
Kathy Dye
2015-11-12
Paige Wall
2015-11-12
Patrick Huber
2015-11-12
Jennifer Ciccone
2015-11-12
Deborah Brown
2015-11-12
Alex Sherry
2015-11-12
Wendy Damron
2015-11-12
Name
Location
Date
Jess Smith
2015-11-12
Charles E. Montgomery, Jr.
2015-11-12
Sharon Hawkes
2015-11-12
Sharon King
2015-11-12
Ashley Armour
2015-11-12
Kathleen Busher
2015-11-12
Mark Fish
2015-11-12
Deborah Stossel
Leesburg, VA, United States
2015-11-12
Janet Fish
2015-11-12
cherrie Knight
2015-11-12
Sandi Jacobs
2015-11-12
Scott Chrismer
2015-11-12
Karen Lantz
2015-11-12
Michelle Porcaro
2015-11-12
Ryan Angell
2015-11-12
Victoria Halas
2015-11-12
Paul Donato
2015-11-12
Andrew Fish
2015-11-12
Jo Anne Sheahan
2015-11-12
Andrea West
2015-11-12
Ty Quinn
2015-11-12
Leanne Holroyd
2015-11-12
Allison Nock
2015-11-12
Jill Cragg
2015-11-12
Jennie smith
2015-11-12
Amber johnson
2015-11-12
Christopher Ryan
2015-11-12
PAMELA BELL
mount pleasant, SC, United States
2015-11-12
Patricia Barkley
2015-11-12
Allison Jennigs
2015-11-12
Carlos Gonzalez
2015-11-12
Kaitlyn Cotov
2015-11-12
Name
Location
Date
Daria Justyn
2015-11-12
Alicia Schuster
2015-11-12
Lesley Robbins
2015-11-12
Max McGee
2015-11-12
Emily Allenspach
2015-11-12
Bill Woodall
Fayetteville, NC, United States
2015-11-12
Natasha DeWitte
2015-11-12
John DeWitte
2015-11-12
Rachael Skelley
2015-11-12
Tina Kerdock
2015-11-12
Elizabeth Warren
2015-11-12
Everette Davis
2015-11-12
Richard Artale
2015-11-12
Stephanie Sams
2015-11-12
Janice Artidiello
2015-11-12
Mary Nickerson
2015-11-12
Nathan J Sterner
2015-11-12
James Wright
2015-11-12
Leisa Yeager
2015-11-12
Bill Jacques
2015-11-12
Patricia Tykal
2015-11-12
Rosemary Montesi
2015-11-12
Mark Brandt
2015-11-12
Kristina Shatz
2015-11-13
Bob Long
2015-11-13
Glyn Cowden
2015-11-13
Jan Marvin
2015-11-13
Susan Ballard
2015-11-13
Katie Hoffman
2015-11-13
Steve Potter
2015-11-13
Anne Owens
2015-11-13
Kim Asbill
2015-11-13
Name
Location
Date
Ken Carter
2015-11-13
John Sonnendecker
2015-11-13
Nan Fetters
2015-11-13
Josh Merryman
2015-11-13
Kim Shellnutt
2015-11-13
Linda Fowler
2015-11-13
Clara Lombana
2015-11-13
JENNIFER RICHARDS
MT PLEASANT, SC, United States
2015-11-13
Josephine O'Brien
2015-11-13
Elizabeth Leffel
2015-11-13
Monique Isaacks
2015-11-13
Chris ODonnell
Jacksonville, FL, United States
2015-11-13
Ronald Fowler
2015-11-13
Aimee OKeefe
2015-11-13
Rob McDaniels
2015-11-13
Allisom Benning
2015-11-13
Joey bushey
2015-11-13
Paul Lombardino
2015-11-13
Tammy Trenholm
Canton, GA, United States
2015-11-13
Linda baker
2015-11-13
Maria Remley
2015-11-13
Jen Storm
2015-11-13
Michelle Valenta
2015-11-13
Sydney Causey
Mt. Pleasant, SC, SC, United States
2015-11-13
Chris Davis
2015-11-13
JC Owens
2015-11-13
Kim Firilas
2015-11-13
Elaine Lombardino
2015-11-13
Michael West
2015-11-13
Karen Rose
2015-11-13
Christa Norman
2015-11-13
Jay Norman
2015-11-13
Name
Location
Date
Edward Jones III
2015-11-13
shannon gonzaga
2015-11-13
Lisa Ledbetter
2015-11-13
Julie Nocida
2015-11-13
Bill Young
2015-11-13
Annette Kellner
2015-11-13
Jenny Phillips
2015-11-13
Allen Gonzaga
2015-11-13
Patti Crothers
2015-11-13
Megan Hauer
2015-11-13
Mark Uyak
2015-11-13
Julie Fowler
2015-11-13
Mike Foster
phoenixville, PA, United States
2015-11-13
Kathy King
2015-11-13
Wendy Arnsdorff
2015-11-13
James Lipke
2015-11-13
Ruth Hurley
2015-11-13
Ellen Artale
2015-11-13
Charles Maglio
2015-11-13
Eric Silberman
2015-11-13
Eric Young
2015-11-13
Pam Durante
2015-11-13
Gary Durante
2015-11-13
Thomas Malphrus
2015-11-13
Cynthia Messenger
2015-11-13
Tina Barrett
2015-11-13
Nancy Fairless
Mt Pleasant SC, SC, United States
2015-11-13
Heather Dolan
2015-11-13
Jane Bride
2015-11-13
Elizabeth Deaton
2015-11-13
Jason Phillips
2015-11-13
John & Kim Rankin
2015-11-13
Name
Location
Date
Rebecca Wynn Amerson
2015-11-13
Jim Robertson
2015-11-13
Theresa Horan
2015-11-13
Mary Himes
2015-11-13
Catherine Hagberg
2015-11-13
Mindy Robertson
2015-11-13
Kerry Gholson
2015-11-13
Laura Fletcher
2015-11-13
Amelia Sizemore
2015-11-13
Angela McCay
2015-11-13
Julie Van de Meulebroecke
2015-11-13
Emily Watson
2015-11-13
Allen Goss
2015-11-13
Todd Boccabella
2015-11-13
William Thompson
Round Rock, TX, United States
2015-11-13
Ron Romagnoli
2015-11-13
Catherine Barnard
2015-11-13
Ann marie Byrne
2015-11-13
Martha Roper
2015-11-13
stephen sumner
2015-11-13
Elizabeth Thompson
2015-11-13
Elizabeth Fisher
2015-11-13
Lucie Wheeler
2015-11-13
Yulia Levin
2015-11-13
Sue Romagnoli
2015-11-13
John Palumbo
2015-11-13
jericha mcgee
2015-11-13
Jennifer Vail
2015-11-13
Justine Trotta
2015-11-13
Jaime O'Donnell
2015-11-13
Richard Sizemore
2015-11-13
Susan Johnson
2015-11-13
Name
Location
Date
Patty Craven
2015-11-13
Alyson Gray
2015-11-13
Robyn Vestmcclellan
Mt pleasant, SC, United States
2015-11-13
Larry Haskell
2015-11-13
Linda Williams
2015-11-13
Kevin Doyle
2015-11-13
Leigh Crescenzo
2015-11-13
Roxann Lewis
2015-11-13
Ada Nybo
2015-11-13
John Mutter
2015-11-13
jamie davis
2015-11-13
Irene Palasek
2015-11-13
James Moses
2015-11-13
Maureen Richardson
2015-11-13
John Sanders
2015-11-13
Scott McCleary
2015-11-13
Jamie Meek
2015-11-13
Anna Carter
2015-11-13
Philip Anstead
2015-11-13
John Byrnes
2015-11-13
Lawrence Cuppy
2015-11-13
Gary Banks III
2015-11-13
George Forni
2015-11-13
kerri forni
2015-11-13
Kenneth Wilson
2015-11-13
Paul Rodenberg
2015-11-13
Barbara Forni
2015-11-13
Brian Womble
2015-11-13
Sandra Quinque
2015-11-13
Carol Yeager
2015-11-13
Pamela Allen
2015-11-13
Anna Allen
2015-11-13
Name
Location
Date
Rob Broekhuizen
2015-11-13
George Thiebaud
2015-11-13
Karen Thompson
2015-11-13
Ryan Ogden
2015-11-13
Dominic DiSandro
2015-11-13
Karl Interrante
2015-11-13
Cathy Valerio
2015-11-13
Michael Ankney
2015-11-13
Patrick Trenholm
2015-11-13
Bruce Thompson
2015-11-13
Ronald Partilla
2015-11-13
Catharine Holland
2015-11-13
Courtney Pinkel
2015-11-13
carmen bills
2015-11-13
Bill Walters
2015-11-13
Sarah Schwartz
2015-11-13
Julie Fanelli
2015-11-13
Scott Kavanagh
2015-11-13
michelle snyder
2015-11-13
Carolyn Olmo
2015-11-13
Kay Steinkamp
2015-11-13
Emily Gilbert
2015-11-13
Donna Burke
2015-11-13
Jeff Cavanaugh
2015-11-13
David Sowers
2015-11-13
Jo Gafford
2015-11-13
Joan G Rubinstein
2015-11-13
Mike Wright
2015-11-13
Mark Rogers
2015-11-13
Patricia Cavender
2015-11-13
Jo A Lavender
2015-11-13
George Smith
2015-11-13
Name
Location
Date
Beth Marshall
2015-11-13
Madison Cevallos
2015-11-13
Mary beth Doyle
2015-11-13
Kathryn Ellington
2015-11-13
Paige Hall
2015-11-13
Richard Gafford
My Pleasant, SC, United States
2015-11-13
Amber McElhaney
2015-11-13
Anita Tankersley
2015-11-13
Annette Merrifield
2015-11-13
Alan Vail
2015-11-13
John Shuck
2015-11-13
Kathleen Eovino
2015-11-13
Debbie Orvin
2015-11-13
Edward Castiller
2015-11-13
Brian Davies
2015-11-13
Stefanie McCarron
2015-11-13
Philippa Suaifan
2015-11-13
Lisa Gair
2015-11-13
Henry and Katherine Coombs
2015-11-13
John Devaney
2015-11-13
John Gair
Glenview, IL, United States
2015-11-13
Shannon Pinson
2015-11-13
Dan Tetrault
2015-11-13
Alan Cusick
2015-11-13
Candace Roberts
2015-11-13
Kathryn Ripple
2015-11-13
Andrea Pereira
Awendaw, SC, United States
2015-11-13
Jenn Devaney
2015-11-13
Nora Howard
2015-11-13
Maria Lansink
2015-11-13
Jamie Zazella
Isle of Palms, SC, United States
2015-11-13
Linda Leiker
2015-11-13
Name
Location
Date
Ashley Hance
2015-11-13
Kathleen Edwards
2015-11-14
jason bonavito
2015-11-14
Boisseau J. Sanford Boisseau
2015-11-14
Jake Leiker
2015-11-14
Jennifer Felton
2015-11-14
Shannon Wessinger
2015-11-14
Roger Hawkes
2015-11-14
Charlisa Pugh
2015-11-14
Cristina Garrett
2015-11-14
Lisa Foss
2015-11-14
David Ahatz
2015-11-14
Robert Tykal
2015-11-14
John Maize
2015-11-14
Greg Flanagan
2015-11-14
Lori Winkler
2015-11-14
Richard Iriart
2015-11-14
Brigitte McElroy
2015-11-14
Stacie Gregory
2015-11-14
Pierre & Ruth Rizk
2015-11-14
Erika Colbrunn
2015-11-14
Nia Haas
2015-11-14
Beth clark
2015-11-14
Shirley Mulholland
2015-11-14
Dianne Schuler
2015-11-14
Frank Badolato
2015-11-14
James OBrien
2015-11-14
Ann Gambino
2015-11-14
jill mcclure
2015-11-14
Edward Conway
2015-11-14
Robert Hickok
2015-11-14
Catherine Davis
2015-11-14
Name
Location
Date
Lance Brooks
2015-11-14
Beau inabinet
2015-11-14
Shaharra Brooks
2015-11-14
Ann Mitchell
2015-11-14
Nanette Miner
2015-11-14
Laurie Brown
2015-11-14
Meagan McCleary
2015-11-14
Tuesday Lee
2015-11-14
gail hasson
2015-11-14
Del Allen
2015-11-14
Mary Glasser
2015-11-14
Jennifer Belcher
2015-11-14
Barbara Karinshak
2015-11-14
Margaret Adams
2015-11-14
Laurie Langford
2015-11-14
terre goss
2015-11-14
John Carey
2015-11-14
Falyn Langford
2015-11-14
Barbara Brown
2015-11-14
Judy Adams
2015-11-14
Karen Super
2015-11-14
Sybil Hill
2015-11-14
Williamson Stephanie
2015-11-14
Buckley McCall
2015-11-14
Yvette Book
2015-11-14
Cynthia DeZearn
2015-11-15
Bert Holem
My Pleasant, SC, United States
2015-11-15
Darin Reynolds
2015-11-15
Meleah Reynolds
2015-11-15
Marvin Rosenberg
2015-11-15
Matt Boland
2015-11-15
Chris Whitaker
2015-11-15
Name
Location
Date
Michael Hornblas
2015-11-15
Justin Lichty
2015-11-15
Jay Bauer
2015-11-15
Julie Bogart
2015-11-15
Chris Ford
2015-11-15
Eugene Carrick
2015-11-15
Leslie Jones
2015-11-15
Ross Curnett
2015-11-15
Kellis Dawson
2015-11-15
Mona Mancy Mancy
2015-11-15
John McCrosson
2015-11-15
Harold Bell
2015-11-15
Evan Jones
2015-11-15
Kathleen Dubois
2015-11-15
Claudia Pillot
2015-11-15
Cori Jeddrey
2015-11-15
Doug Borgmann
2015-11-15
Becky Jones
2015-11-15
Jamie Curnett
2015-11-15
Tamara Weis
2015-11-15
Kelsie Davis
2015-11-15
Christian Davis
2015-11-15
Jason Lungarini
2015-11-15
Melissa Giuliano
2015-11-15
Theresa Lungarini
2015-11-15
John Williams
2015-11-15
Kathy Sanders
2015-11-15
Jane Abbott
2015-11-15
Alethea Setser
2015-11-15
Leigh Ann Lichty
2015-11-15
Raymond Setser
2015-11-15
Michael Pace
2015-11-15
Name
Location
Date
Cristine Ribes
2015-11-15
Beth Crunelle
2015-11-15
Hugh Myrick
2015-11-15
Daniel Dickerson
2015-11-15
Joan Greeson
2015-11-15
Bob Phillips
Youngstown, FL, United States
2015-11-15
Donna Sanders
2015-11-15
patricia potter
mt. pleasant, SC, United States
2015-11-15
jacki Bennis
2015-11-15
Shanna Flanagan
2015-11-15
Joan Bauer
2015-11-15
Tim Bennis
2015-11-15
Gene Parker
Walterboro, SC, United States
2015-11-15
kathleen king
2015-11-15
Laura Smith
2015-11-15
Shannon McAlister
2015-11-15
christine farrell
2015-11-15
Elizabeth Azari
2015-11-15
Susan Higerd
2015-11-15
Karen Yeates
2015-11-15
Jessica Warden
2015-11-15
Karin Frangipani
2015-11-15
Devon Angell
2015-11-15
Susan Haigh
2015-11-15
Terrence Abbott
2015-11-15
Julie Wescott
MT PLEASANT, SC, United States
2015-11-15
Jennifer Thomas
2015-11-15
Pete Solomon
2015-11-15
Donna Waln
2015-11-15
Marcia Russo
2015-11-15
Elaine Peery
2015-11-15
Stacey Shoecraft
2015-11-15
Name
Location
Date
Kylene Bogart
Blacksburg, VA, United States
2015-11-15
Carrie Johnson
2015-11-15
Peter Vandemeulebroecke
2015-11-15
Vicki Robertson
2015-11-15
Mark Pinson
2015-11-15
Dawn Sparks
2015-11-15
sophie messenger
2015-11-15
Gary Dubois
2015-11-15
Mark Langston
2015-11-15
Jim Moreland
2015-11-15
Frederick Shinners
2015-11-15
Tom Epperson
Raleigh, NC, United States
2015-11-15
Kimberly Epperson
2015-11-15
Kevin Knight
2015-11-15
Solange Townsend
2015-11-15
Andrew Weis
2015-11-15
Phyllis Leventis
2015-11-15
Katherine Banks
2015-11-15
Debbie Knight
Charlotte, NC, United States
2015-11-16
Nancy Chadwick
2015-11-16
Burnetta Schrecker
2015-11-16
Tanya Hodges
2015-11-16
Elliott Savage
2015-11-16
judith Barber
2015-11-16
Paige Phipps
2015-11-16
George Leventis
2015-11-16
Quinn McDaniels
2015-11-16
jessica leiker
2015-11-16
David Ryan
2015-11-16
Joe Marchant
2015-11-16
Susie Schill
2015-11-16
Julie Lutz
2015-11-16
Name
Location
Date
Kelsey Chapman
2015-11-16
ELIZABETH MAYER
MOUNT PLEASANT, SC, United States
2015-11-16
Christine Cirelli
2015-11-16
Scott Theriault
2015-11-16
Stacey Williams
2015-11-16
C Harvey King
2015-11-16
Richard Isaac
2015-11-16
Elizabeth W. Ross
2015-11-16
Pamela Otto
Awendaw, SC, United States
2015-11-16
Jen Pulsifer
2015-11-16
Jeff Taylor
2015-11-16
Paige Hoagland
2015-11-16
Tina Gorman
2015-11-16
Julie Teiken
2015-11-16
Ron D'Alessandro
2015-11-16
Mark Lindsey
2015-11-16
THOMAS SAVAGE
2015-11-16
Emily Linville
2015-11-16
William Henesy
2015-11-16
Aimee Schmidt
2015-11-16
Joseph Davies
2015-11-16
Joseph Hall
2015-11-16
Melanie Theriault
2015-11-16
Laurie Clark
2015-11-16
Darren Williams
2015-11-16
Carolyn Wysong
2015-11-16
Kathleen Cornely
2015-11-16
Andrrw Smith
2015-11-16
Deborah Chute
2015-11-16
Jennifer Hartley
2015-11-16
Roy Flanagan
2015-11-16
Sally Byrnes
2015-11-16
Name
Location
Date
Mark Estebo
2015-11-16
Will Lutz
2015-11-16
Tom Hawkins
2015-11-16
Andrea McCollam
2015-11-16
Joe Zinaich
2015-11-16
Bruce Lodge
2015-11-16
Cynthia Gardner
2015-11-16
Kathy Ward
2015-11-16
Jim LIEBENTRITT
2015-11-16
David Underkofler
2015-11-16
george kellner
2015-11-16
Doug Lauer
2015-11-16
Lee Orvin
2015-11-16
Jennifer Smith
2015-11-16
Joann Elkin
2015-11-16
Sandra Connell
2015-11-16
Karen Orcutt
2015-11-16
Laura Clark
2015-11-16
Amy King
2015-11-16
Paul DeSantis
2015-11-16
Geoff Schuler
2015-11-16
Thomas Cottingham
Arlington, VA, United States
2015-11-16
Robert Messenger
2015-11-16
Cynthia Nirenblatt
2015-11-16
Laurie Gamliel
2015-11-16
Megan Hrenya
2015-11-16
Jeffrey Stanton
2015-11-16
Paul McClintock
2015-11-16
mcclintock mcclintock
2015-11-16
Jeff Bobby
2015-11-16
Peter Nastro
Asheboro, NC, United States
2015-11-16
Regan Miller
2015-11-16
Name
Location
Date
Jessica Emili-Jonnet
2015-11-16
Mandy Bulwinkle
2015-11-16
Coleman Owens, III
2015-11-16
Cracraft Scott
2015-11-16
Ofet Gamliel
2015-11-16
Glen Garrett
2015-11-16
George Hernandez
2015-11-16
Pat Weis
2015-11-16
Marnie Browder
2015-11-16
Dana Sisk
2015-11-16
Paige Hall
2015-11-16
eric gustafson
Sarasota, FL, United States
2015-11-16
Andy Infante
2015-11-16
Karen Woodside
2015-11-16
Sebastian Hauer
2015-11-16
Mary Ann Heidenreich
2015-11-16
Malani Jones
2015-11-16
William Finan
2015-11-16
Zoe Shapiro
2015-11-16
David Sirles
2015-11-16
david corso
2015-11-16
Christine Bobby
2015-11-16
Linda Stanton
2015-11-16
Gregory Hrenya
2015-11-16
Jane Siman
2015-11-16
David Jones
2015-11-16
Carlos Jensen
2015-11-16
Mary Bryan
2015-11-16
William Burgwald
2015-11-16
Norman Jones
2015-11-16
John Ledbetter
2015-11-16
John Sams
2015-11-16
Name
Location
Date
Emily Arthur
2015-11-16
Mary Carter
2015-11-16
Susan Gonzales
2015-11-16
Jeff Cook
2015-11-16
Michael Popovich
2015-11-16
Richard Gonzales
2015-11-16
Steven Morse
2015-11-16
George Matthews
2015-11-16
Paul Nybo
2015-11-16
Jeff Beitel
2015-11-16
Jason Stoklosa
2015-11-16
Bruce Thompson
2015-11-16
Bruce Belvin
2015-11-16
Anne Underkofler
2015-11-16
Susan Garren
2015-11-16
Joe Cosentino
2015-11-17
William SHANAMAN
2015-11-17
Craig Henke
2015-11-17
Diane Ellison
2015-11-17
Marisol Ferdinand
2015-11-17
George Clayton
2015-11-17
Anita Clark
2015-11-17
William (Bill ) Godwin
2015-11-17
Terry Giordano
2015-11-17
Nancy Brown
2015-11-17
Martha Gibson
2015-11-17
Meredith Floyd
2015-11-17
Chris Hills
2015-11-17
William Landrus
2015-11-17
Mary Ryan
2015-11-17
Lisette Glennon
2015-11-17
Jennifer Daly
2015-11-17
Name
Location
Date
Deborah Manke
2015-11-17
Selma Oster
2015-11-17
Deedie Harrington
2015-11-17
Russell Miller
2015-11-17
Gerald Harrington
2015-11-17
Andrew White
2015-11-17
James Seney
2015-11-17
Stephen Chadwick
2015-11-17
Joanna Whitaker
2015-11-17
Theresa Ponessa
2015-11-17
Edward Langford
2015-11-17
Michael Giordano
2015-11-17
Mary Horres
2015-11-17
albert montillo
2015-11-17
william Behrens
2015-11-17
Kristina yates
2015-11-17
Kristy Lewis
2015-11-17
Jeff Eulau
2015-11-17
Roland Richard
2015-11-17
John Whittle
2015-11-17
Lorraine De Muccio
2015-11-17
Chris Murphy
2015-11-17
Elizabeth Lundy
2015-11-17
Quincy Anderson
mt. pleasant, SC, United States
2015-11-17
Jonathan Fulton
2015-11-17
Carol Scott
2015-11-17
Barbara Christianson
2015-11-17
Jane Schloss
2015-11-17
Jennifer Bodily
2015-11-17
gRETCHEN rHODES
2015-11-17
Andrew Tabor
2015-11-17
Robert Horan
2015-11-17
Name
Location
Date
Arlette Geffert
2015-11-17
Jim Snow
2015-11-17
Emily Hertwig
2015-11-17
Ronald Miedema
2015-11-17
Rachelle Larue
2015-11-17
Brian Tallmadge
2015-11-17
Ed Fleuren
2015-11-17
Peyton Brown
2015-11-17
Lisa Bower
2015-11-17
Jonathan Cotov
2015-11-17
John Barber
2015-11-17
jennifer perrelli
2015-11-17
Nancy Swift
2015-11-17
Christos Maltezos
2015-11-18
Ashley Owens
2015-11-18
Jim Walker
2015-11-18
N Creed
2015-11-18
KEVIN STRALO
2015-11-18
Ann Thompson
2015-11-18
brittany Quisenberrry
2015-11-18
Art DeGiovine
2015-11-18
Mary Hamilton
2015-11-18
Karen Caldeira
2015-11-18
Nancy Lindsey
2015-11-18
Jeff Doss
2015-11-18
Patty Evans
2015-11-18
Neda Smith
2015-11-18
Cheri Cosentino
2015-11-18
Cassandra Bobby
2015-11-18
Laura Badolato
2015-11-18
Steve Clark
2015-11-18
Rick Arthur
2015-11-18
Name
Location
Date
Randy Wilson
2015-11-18
Kathy Shannon
2015-11-18
theresa stanton
2015-11-18
Tom Winkler
2015-11-18
Comments
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Lonnie Davis
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
This change in zoning cannot happen. The proposed change in zoning does
not match the current surrounding neighborhoods in Dunes West. Changing
the zoning would impact traffic, safety, public education, our neighborhoods
quality of life. Lets please make sure our council members understand the
importance of not allowing this zoning to happen. There is a reason why the
last council members where voted out this past election because they allow our
town to become a mess with all this over building. To the new council member
voted in please stop this onslaught of developer greed. The developer
purchased these lots under the original current zoning just like all of us in the
Richmond Cove and Rush Haven neighborhoods did. The home owners of
these neighborhoods do not have a choice in picking up our homes and moving
them to another neighborhood. The developer should not be able to change
the zoning.
Monica Mutter
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
When we purchased our home we made the decision to spend more to
purchase a property in a DWR-1 neighborhood as opposed to a DWR-3. We
paid the premium to do so. Moving from DWR-1 to DWR - 3 at this point
would unfairly financially penalize those in Richmond Cove 1 since what we
were baited with would have been switched.
Paul MacDonald
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I am vehemently opposed to density being increased in Dunes West. This
would not only hurt the Dunes West community but also would severely impact
traffic, safety, and quality of life.
Pamela Bell
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
This proposed change to the zoning in Dunes West would have a negative
impact on traffic, safety, our schools and the market comps for our properties.
We bought our property in Richmond Cove over 10 years ago with the
understanding that future development in the follow-on phases in and around
our neighborhood would be low density and that our property value would be
supported by that development. The developer has already received
concessions near the back gate with the placement of town homes on the right
and the proposed Fishing Village on the left - please say no to allowing him to
continue to saturate our existing neighborhoods to increase his profits.
Steven Livell
Chatham, NJ
2015-11-12
The zoning laws should not be changed to financially benefit a developer.
There will be a huge impact on surrounding neighbor hoods in terms of traffic,
school budgets, and the appearance of the surrounding communities long after
the developer leaves.
Erin Varela
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
My husband commutes to and from MUSC daily and it routinely takes more
than an hour each way mostly because of traffic on Hwy 41. If we allow high
density homes to be built it will only increase the traffic that is already
unbearable. We love our neighborhood but often feel trapped here during peak
hours as all the routes to head into town are ridiculously jammed. We will be
moving to another area if this problem gets worse. It is irresponsible to rezone
in DW and I cannot think of one positive impact that this will have on our
community.
Margaret Morse
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Overdevelopment, overcrowding, traffic congestion, lack of green space which
Weiland and Sales has center used to justify high HOA, POA, and house
prices. We bought here for the open space, pristine setting and single family
concept. Townhomes--please will drive quality of life and home values down as
more investors will rent out the town homes. Just look at the difference
between Dunes West Town homes and duplexes outside the gate.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
michael smalyga
mt pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I'm tired of the "growth simply for profit" that is occurring in East
Cooper...officials, it quality of life! get it !
Marilyn Smith
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I oppose the Dunes West increase in building more homes/ duplexes. We can't
get in the gates now b/c of construction trucks. Too much traffic on getting in
and out of the neighborhood plus you are destroying the beauty by knocking
down 98% of the trees. This isn't NY city!! Save the foliage !!!
Thomas Smith
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Please stop building in Dunes West. We are becoming a mini city. Too many
homes, to many cars, to mank construction truck and to few trees. You have
destroyed the beauty of what madeDunes West so desirable . If I didn't love my
custom build home I would move!!!
Michele Lewis
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
It is crowded enough in Dunes West!
Matthew Pinkel
McLean, VA
2015-11-12
I oppose increasing the density of Dunes West.
Lars Runquist
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I oppose this change in zoning from DWR-1 to DWR-3.
kelley shaw
mt pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Our neighborhood and schools are overcrowded. There are too many cars on
the road and the infrastructure does not meet the growth.
Joan Dehne
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
we already have too many people living in this area
David Graham
Alcoa, TN
2015-11-12
Lowers the value of our homes along with the over use of roads etc
Patti Comire
Keller, TX
2015-11-12
We are concerned about the increased traffic on neighborhood narrow roads
as well as on Hwy 41. Also the increased population in neighborhood
amenities.
Jeff Beck
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
We need to make sure the traffic and school impact is considered when
analyzing this request. The school traffic along Dunes West/Park West Blvd. is
already incredibly congested.
Thomas Dickinson
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I oppose the density increase as the Infrastructure in roads is not in place nor is
there a definitive plan in place. Fund the increase in HWY 41 first then let's talk
about density increases.
Shelley Savage
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I am against the rezoning because the overall quality of life in our
neighborhood would be impacted by increased traffic and value of our homes
not to mention the impact it would have on the wildlife.
Don Lewis
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I agree with your statement and conclusions.
C.T. Starkey, Jr.
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
My wife, Maria, and I purchased the lot in Richmond Cove and built our home
there solely because of the larger lot size and lower density of housing in the
neighborhood. The designation of the impacted areas as higher density would
be completely out of line with the surrounding home density. The increased
density would put increased pressure on Dunes West streets and Hwy 41 that
would lead to even more traffic congestion in an already congested area. We
respectfully request that the commission deny the request for a zoning change.
Lisa Signori
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
There is already too much traffic on 41 and 17. The routes are saturated and
cannot handle more traffic! Increased housing means increased traffic!
Angela Duclos
Windham, NH
2015-11-12
We are planning on moving to Dunes West to be with family in 2 years. High
density housing and more traffic is not an incentive for anyone!
Allen &Marion Usdan
Wallace, NC
2015-11-12
Against density increase in my neighborhood
Paula DICKINSON
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
There is way too much traffic in this area now. It would add to the dangerous
situation. I don't feel safe driving in this area.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Maria Starkey
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Mount Pleasant is already bursting at the seams and there isn't any way that it
can support the growth as far as schools, roads and other infrastructure. It is
also very disconcerting that this builder (JW Weiland) would ask to rezone
property that originally was R-1. Our home was completed just one year ago
and backs up to parcel #15. Rezoning of this parcel would affect not only our
quality of life, but the value of our home. In our research of the zoning of this
parcel of land, we found it to be R-1 and that is the reason we chose to go
ahead and buy the property, and build. We strongly object to the rezoning.
Kermitt J Hill
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
This action would hurt the value of the. Existing real estate
Kelly Garrison
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Building is out of control-it's time to say enough is enough!
Robert Wheaton
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
THERE WILL BE TO MUCH TRAFFIC.
Peggy Horner
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I oppose medium to high density homes in area that is already unbearably
crowded!!
Patricia Broghamer
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
This planning change will greatly alter the quality of life in Dunes West with
beautiful single family homes. As a Realtor, a Duplex typically bring in renters
and unlike homeownership there is no pride with renters in maintaining a
home's exterior and typically they sell for less, also reducing the value of the
nearby homes. Thank you.
Kathy Wall
Charleston, SC
2015-11-12
Do not want double density so close to my home in Dunes West.
Patricia Broghamer
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I live in Park West. As a Realtor I feel it is important to stay consistent with
Single Family homes vs. duplex's. Duplex's typically bring investors as
buyers/owners and they will rent the property out and renters do not display the
same pride in homeownership that an owner typically displays. The Duplex's
will sell for less and have a slower appreciation, as they have been in The
Gates in PW. Please keep it Single Family homes. Thank you.
Kathy Wall
Charleston, SC
2015-11-12
Our schools are already over crowded and traffic is a nightmare for am and
afternoon commute to get out onto 41.
Kelly lyons
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I strongly feel that growth in Mt Pleasant is out of control. I feel like there has
been uncontrolled growth without any thought to existing infrastructure. Our
main roads (17, 41 and those running through Parkwest and Dunes West) are
already overwhelmed with traffic. I don't see how the town can continue to
approve building when our traffic is already such an issue. When we moved to
Parkwest it was to a town with a small town feel. Now it is a constant
frustration trying to get anywhere in town. What should take five minutes to
drive to our child's school has, at times, taken up to 45 minutes. The schools in
our neighbourhoods are already at mass capacity and cramming a bunch of
new homes in PW and DW is obviously going to worsen that issue. When is
enough going to be enough? There will be a point when people will no longer
want to move here because it will have lost all the charm it once had.
Peter Cuneo
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
JW Homes does not need any denser development. They need to be happy
with what they got and move on out.
Chris Moore
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
We do not need increased desities within the dunes west/park west
developments.
Bill Anderson
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
John weiland could care less about the people in this community. He continues
to try to destroy the community. He only care about how many homes he can fit
into every square foot of land. Unfortunately the town council seems to be the
same.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
William Failor
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
At the present time HWY41 lacks the capacity to handle the traffic. This does
not include planned growth in Park West and the approved zoning in Dunes
West. Morning and evening volume on 41 is a backup from 17 to the light at
Dunes West.
Donna ONeal
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Please hold developers to the R1 zoning in Dunes West. I live in Park West
and have tremendous problems getting out of my neighborhood due to school
traffic coming through from Dunes West in the morning. This increased density
will cause more overcrowding in the schools as well as more traffic in Park
West and Hwy 41, which as we all know is awful. We have got to start holding
the line on density. Also anyone this far out in the north end of town has to
commute the length of hwy 17 to get to work and back. The widening we
recently underwent in Hwy 17 is already congested. Please say no to increased
density.
Renee O'Connor
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Stop packing people in like ants. It's not why we bought into the community!
You're killing our habitat for a nice living.
James Everidge
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Until infrastructure is addressed, there should be no more density increase
allowed.
Paige Wall
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Dunes West used to be a sought after community, we don't need additional
housing
Jennifer Ciccone
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I do not agree with a higher density area in the Harbor of DW!
Wendy Damron
Plymouty, MI
2015-11-12
I live in Dunes West. Both 41 and Park West Blvd are already extremely slow at
morning & afternoon rush hour. Gate traffic is also backed up, sometimes even
into the road on Dunes West Blvd. People pay extra to be in this neighborhood
because it is more exclusive, lets keep it that way.
Sharon Hawkes
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Please hold developers to the R1 zoning in Dunes West.
Sharon King
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
This area does not need any more multi family housing. The roads are crowded
the schools are crowded- leave it as single family with large lots and we need
more parks and playgrounds, soccer fields and water access!!!
Deborah Stossel
Leesburg, VA
2015-11-12
It well over due!
Janet Fish
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I'm opposed to the density increases in Dunes West.
Scott Chrismer
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I live in Dunes West and we bought because of the large lots, this is going to
reduce property value.
Michelle Porcaro
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I'm signing this because there are already too many homes in dunes west.
Jo Anne Sheahan
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I oppose the change to high density zoning, not only to benefit the developer
but remember it also benefits the Town of Mt Pleasant (increased tax revenues
with higher density). My message is: town council knows traffic in this area is
already congested & schools are overcrowded; if you vote for rezoning we will
vote you out!!!
Ty Quinn
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Enough is enough! Let's stop the greed that is destroying the little character
that our town has left.
Jill Cragg
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Highway 41 needs to be widened first before any more homes are built. We
don't have the infrastructure in place.
Amber Johnson
Brookfield, WI
2015-11-12
Oppose - no relief in traffic on 41!! It's awful driving g into Chsrleston daily!!!!!
Patricia Barkley
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I am opposed to the rezoning to increase the building density in Dunes West.
Daria Justyn
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Growth is good but not when it's exploding!
John DeWitte
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Area is already too dense, traffic is horrific!
Name
Location
Date
Comment
elizabeth warren
MOUNT PLEASANT, SC
2015-11-12
Too many homes I this area!!!
Hwy 41 can't handle it!!!!
Dick Artale
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
I oppose the zoning changes requested to increase densities in Dunes West.
Our town should place consideration for the welfare and property values of
residents above the welfare of the developer. An increase in density is totally
out of character with the low density, single family, homes already existing in
the areas involved in these requested changes.
James Wright
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
It is wrong! Destroying beautiful pathways, wildlife for more traffic and noise
and taxes.
Leisa Yeager
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-12
Enough is enough traffic is gotten out of hand
Susan Ballard
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
This would change the neighborhood that I thought I was buying into, in a very
negative way.
Ken Carter
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Increasing the density in the areas described would hurt an entire community
that has lived in and supported Mt. Pleasant for many years. This onerous
request by a developer should be denied without exception!
John Sonnendecker
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Welcome to Los Angeles, South Carolina! Four years ago, I moved to Mount
Pleasant to escape traffic, urban sprawl and developers. I moved to Dunes
West because it was a beautiful, wooded community with large lots and not
densely populated. I was told by John Weiland homes, that this would not
change. Greed has obviously overtaken. There is way too much development
and no attention has been paid to infrastructure. Wooded areas have been
slashed and burned. Traffic is horrible! Too many people are being packed
into such a small area, for no reason! I oppose any more housing in Dunes
West and Mount Pleasant.
Joshua Merryman
Charleston, SC
2015-11-13
These developers need to be reigned in
Kim Shellnutt
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
We cannot handle anymore traffic - we are drowning on Hwy 41!
Linda Fowler
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I want the neighborhood to be built as planned and approved.
Clara Lombana
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Stop the density for our neighborhoods.. No infrastructure for more density!
Josephine O'Brien
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
we need additional entrance and exit roads here before additional homes can
be added. The value of our homes will be damaged by adding multiple
resident homes.
Ronald Fowler
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
The requested density far exceeds the original approved development plan and
therefor the towns services and infrastruture will not support the resulting
growth without a tax increase.
Joey bushey
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
overcrowding already a problem
Paul Lombardino
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I'm signing this in opposition to the proposal to increase the density of building
in the Dunes West Sub-Division. There is no reason to increase the housing
density except to line the pockets of the developers with more money while
destroying the property values of current home owners of this community. We
all purchased homes here based on the plans that were in place at that time, to
change the rules now would be a total disregard for the will of the people The
developers were granted permits based on their original plans and that's what
they should be building!
Tammy Trenholm
Canton, GA
2015-11-13
I am a home owner in Richmond Cove and do not agree with the proposed
density changes.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Maria Remley
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I live in Dunes West in area 6 of the attached map. My biggest concerns are
traffic, already overcrowded schools, and home values being affected when the
substance of the neighborhood is changed. We are all concerned about 41,
but has anyone addressed the URGENT need for JW Homes to widen the
"back gate" entrance from 41to Harpers Ferry Road. At certain times of the
day it can take 5 minutes to get through that gate. Please consider residents'
quality of life over corporate greed.
Chris Davis
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
No new homes until current infrastructure is expanded.
JC Owens
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
High density and disproportionate development should not take place in our
town, I will continue to fight on behalf of the townspeople wherever the two are
proposed!
Kim Firilas
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I am opposed to density increases for Dunes West!
Elaine Lombardino
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I am signing because it is essential that we consider how the development
patterns will affect the overall quality of the environment and the quality of life
for the residents of Dunes West. Residents who purchased homes in Dunes
West did so based on a Master Plan that was approved and those residents
were satisfied that the development would remain low density housing areas.
The infrastructure in Mt. Pleasant is insufficient to handle this additional
increase as well as all the other housing developments being approved. The
original planning took into account roads, traffic, drainage, facilities, etc. for low
density plans and not for the higher densities which John Weiland is now
proposing.
The aesthetic quality of Ayers Plantwtion Way will definitely be changed due to
this reasoning which impacts infrastructure, safety, and the environment. The
ramifications of this reasoning will not only be felt by the Dunes West
Community but by the entire town of Mt. Pleasant as well. Our recent elections
have demonstrated that the people of Mt. Pleasant want leaders who will.isten
to their concerns. I believe this responding will greatly impact on the value of
everyone's property within the Dunes West community.
Michael West
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
We need less density not more
Jay Norman
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I oppose the density increase in dunes west. Preserve the neighborhood
Julie Nocida
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Enough with all of these rezoning requests to create denser communities and
to essentially toss out the vision and promise of the type of community many of
us bought into when we moved to Dunes West/Park West. These developers
will make plenty of money with the zoning as it is. Town Council is under no
obligation to help them make more at the expense of the quality of life of the
residents who live here and pay taxes.
Annette Kellner
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I object to continued density in an area that is already overdeveloped!! Quality
of life has change dramatically for the worse in the past few years.
Annette Kellner
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Quality of life has changed dramatically in the last few years because of
overdevelopment in this area. We are often faced with miles of bumper to
bumper traffic to get to and from home. Zoning changes affect the quality of life
for those of us who have to live with your decisions. Please vote "no" for
higher density zoning changes in Dunes West!
Julie fowler
Cleveland, TN
2015-11-13
I am against the building of yet more in the area. 41 is a nightmare as it is
Ellen Artale
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I don't believe that a varience for higher density should be granted as it would
have a negative effect on property values for those who border these areas. It
would also serve to add to the problem of congestion on Rte 41.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Eric Young
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I'm very concerned with the rapid growth and traffic increases I've seen. We've
only been here 2.5 years and the changes are shocking. We need to see a
comprehensive plan to address the existing traffic and congestion issues
before we continuing to increase the density in the area. Even given the
existing approved developments, traffic and general overcrowding will be a
nightmare very soon!
Nancy Fairless
Mt Pleasant SC, SC
2015-11-13
I believe the residents of Dunes West had , andd were sold a vision. It shouldn't
change.
Heather Dolan
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
While I do not live in the 41 area, every resident of mount Pleasant is feeling
the impacts of unrestrained growth in that area. 526 backs up at Longpoint now
with the influx of traffic from 17 and from Longpoint. More importantly, the
schools are bursting at the seams and ccsd is incapable of keeping up with the
level of growth. With all the task of building a new high school, old Wando is
still standing and constriction progress appears nonexistent. Every time I go to
park west it seems like a new high density neighborhood has been built. It town
and county services cannot keep up with the pace.
Jane Bride
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
We need an comprehensive infrastructure plan for North Mt Pleasant to include
roads, schools etc to accommodate continued residential growth.
Rebecca Wynn Amerson
Decatur, GA
2015-11-13
People purchased homes in this area on a promised plan. If they wanted to
move into a high density area, they would have purchased somewhere else. To
change the density rules after they have purchased a home - the largest
investment - is a bait and switch tactic. Our infrastructure is not prepared for
greater density in the Dunes West/Park West area. 41 is only 2 lanes. In case
of an emergency, how can our infrastructure safely evacuate people? They
can't move through the neighborhoods when they take their children to school.
The quality of life here will be greatly impacted by changing the density.
Laura Fletcher
Huntington Beach, CA
2015-11-13
High Density doesn't belong in Dunes West. The neighborhood roads and
infrastructure is not set up for humdreds of additional cars. We are new to
Dunes West and love the quality of life that we have here. Keep Dunes West
the way it was meant to be.
Amelia Sizemore
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I'm signing because I would like privacy as I live on the outside on the circle
near district 15.
Angela McCay
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I live in Dunes West and this greatly affects an already VERY congested area!
Todd Boccabella
Sleepy Hollow, NY
2015-11-13
I am signing because our roads are already overcrowded and schools as well.
William Thompson
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
We do not need to increase the density of our neighborhood. We moved into
Dunes West and Mt Pleasant to enjoy retirement in a non contested, over
crowded community.
Ron Romagnoli
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Higher density means more traffic on a 2 lane highway 41 that is already
overloaded during the day. Also, schools are already overloaded and require
"temporary " trailers. Seems like road and schools should be dealt with before
increasing density.
Lucie Wheeler
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Traffic is overwelming danger for emergency ;(
Sue Romagnoli
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Higher density will result in more traffic on 41 and more overcrowding of the
already overcrowded schools.
Jennifer Vail
Cape Vincent, NY
2015-11-13
We are totally opposed to more density in this area. It is inconceivable that this
could take place. We will be out of town for the meeting or we would be
attending
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Richard Sizemore
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Previously unplanned multi-family developments in Dunes West will greatly
further stress the local public schools which are already far above capacity and
will add much more traffic to Park West Boulevard and Highway 41 - roads
which can't handle more traffic. It is irresponsible to rezone these communities
- as it will be detrimental to the quality of life in this area of Mount Pleasant.
This is not reasonable growth - this is maximum profits for the developer at the
expense of the community.
Patty Craven
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
The traffic in this area is too heavy already to support the additional density.
Robyn Vestmcclellan
Mt pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I'm signing because 41 and Clements Ferry are all ready too busy!
Larry Haskell
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Roads are already overcrowded and this change would depart from what we
were promised when we bought into the community.
Linda Williams
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I want Dunes West to retain its open and green look, and I want to protect our
natural landscape.
Kevin Doyle
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
No more developement in Dunes West
jamie davis
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
oppose density increase
Irene Palasek
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Too much traffic already on 41!!!
James Moses
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
The recent town council election should indeed indicate that the residents of
Mt.Pleasant will no longer submit to greedy and over zealous developers, as
well as those elected officials who support over development. The residents of
Dunes West do not support increased densities, bonus densities, and over
development as infrastructure can no longer support such. Traffic is out of
control, public education facilities can no longer support rapid population
growth, and resident safety, culture and quality of life, as well as property
values and marketability are being permanently damaged.
John Sanders
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
The commute either way on 41 in the morning or afternoon is already a
nightmare. Studies have shown the road is beyond capacity. How can any
sane person in the local government support additional multi-unit housing
without first addressing the road issue. It is unconscionable.
And now the widening of Clements Ferry is delayed 5 years. Just say NO! Any
government official that supports this is in the pockets of the developers.
Philip Anstead
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Quality of life
John Byrnes
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
There is plenty of space opportunity moving up 17 towards Awendaw. Also,
41 can't support any additional traffic until the road is widened considerably.
Lawrence Cuppy
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
This is responsible growth by the developer or the town. The roads and
schools need to be ready for growth before it happens and this area is
prepared for this growth.
Gary Banks III
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Too much density with amount of infrastructure
George Forni
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
increased traffic, congestion on AP Rd; Safety, devaluation of neighborhoods,
Hwy 41 traffic, etc...
kerri forni
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
my husband made me
Kenneth Wilson
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I see no positive benefit to the community to allowing this; and many negatives.
Anna Allen
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I live in Dunes West and my children attend Pickney & Laurel Hill. I also sell
real estate in Dunes West. We want to protect the quality of life we enjoy here
as home owners & do not welcome increased traffic, over crowded schools,
and dangerous commutes. We want to maintain the few green spaces we still
have and keep our community beautiful and appealing.
Rob Broekhuizen
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Density, quality of life. Like it the way it is, would hurt property values.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Karen Thompson
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
This will negatively impact our Neighborhood. More traffic, lower home prices,
overcrowd schools.
stephen sumner
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
LOOK! Those of you involved with this decision know the right thing to do! If the
developers are pressuring all of you to build something, let them help pay for
road infrastructure to be built! At this point, there is NOT ONE THING that
could be built here in Mt.Pleasant that would benefit its residents. DO THE
RIGHT THING GUYS & GALS!! JUST SAY NO!!
Dominic DiSandro
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
the amenities can not handle additional homes that were not included in initial
plan
Cathy Valerio
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I am opposed to increased density in Mt. Pleasant. We voters are aware that
"smart growth" is not really effective controlled growth. We want and pray that
our Mt. Pleasant businesses should thrive and prosper; however, not at the
continued expense of our quality of life here in Mt. Pleasant. "Smart Growth"ers,.....smarten up.
Cathy Valerio
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I am opposed to increased density in Mt. Pleasant. Mt. Pleasant voters are
becoming more and more aware that "smart growth" is not really effective
controlled growth. While we want and pray that our Mt. Pleasant businesses
should prosper and thrive, it should not be at the continued expense of our
prized quality of life, which is now diminished. Smart Growth-ers, Smarten Up!
Catharine Holland
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Dunes West has become overgrown and the traffic in the morning is horrible
Courtney Pinkel
Charleston, SC
2015-11-13
Doing this would ruin the neighborhood. This isn't what we signed up for.
David Sowers
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Increased density in this area would severely overwhelm current, as well as
planned, infrastructure. Homes and property were sold to residents based on
existing zoning and rezoning it at this stage amounts to no more than 'bait and
switch'. Developers may be known for this, but we would hope that the Town of
Mount Pleasant would be more concerned with citizen welfare.
Jo Gafford
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I'm signing because I live in Dunes West and deal with the congestion and
traffic daily. I leave my home every weekday morning at 6:30 to try to beat
traffic to get to work before 8am in N Charleston. Bessemer is a nightmare
during rush hour, it takes a hour to drive home at night creeping at 15 mph
down Clements Ferry, and Hwy 17 North to turn onto 41 backs up to Town
Centre. We can't take anymore traffic until roads are widened and more/better
traffic light control.
joan rubinstein
mt pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Changes in density MUST STOP. And that begins with not accommodating
developers who are sole interested in lining their pocket at our expense. Please
reject and changes.
Mike Wright
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
PW Blvd, 41, 17, and Clements Ferry are overloaded as is! The people that
develop here, do not deal with the traffic like we do. The roads and traffic need
to be dealt with before any further development... Or maybe we do not have to
build on every bit of open land, and keep some of the charm and beauty of our
area.
Mark Rogers
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Our neighborhood, town, infrastructure, schools, and county cannot afford this
unbridled growth. Quality of life has already taken a hit due to overcrowding
and increased density Surely is not the answer to the problem.....IT IS THE
PROBLEM!!!
Patricia Cavender
Charleston, SC
2015-11-13
There is too much traffic on Hwy 17 and Hwy 41 now. There have been no
improvements or talk of improving traffic diversion to assist with the current
traffic that we have. This is a bad bad idea.
Beth doyle
Charleston, SC
2015-11-13
I do not want any more developement in dunes west! The traffic on rt 41 is
aweful !! Please !!
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Kathryn Ellington
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
This was not what was speed to be built on this property when we invested in a
home in this neighborhood. It WILL bring property values down at REAL cost to
the existing homeowners here. We will consider moving if this is passed
through. The expansion of the back part of Dunes West , with homes on tiny
lots, has already caused a significant increase in traffic and hurt property
values of homes that were on larger lots. Again, this is real money to existing
homeowners.
Anita Tankersley
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
There HAS to be SOME Point in Growth/Development of the Mount Pleasant
area when someone will just simply say, "ENOUGH. We MUST Slow Down
the over~development, increased densities, and population explosion going
on Here.
John Shuck
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Route 41 would be even worse than it currently is.
Debbie Orvin
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
We need to widen Hwy 41 first! Traffic out here is already over congested.
brian Davies
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Besides the detrimental effect on neigborhoods, it is very sobering to watch
emergency vehicles fighting their way up 17 and 41 at busy times when every
second counts.
John Devaney
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
I do not want the increased housing overpopulating Dunes West
John Gair
Glenview, IL
2015-11-13
It is absurd and one-sided to go from DWR-1 to DWR-3. My selection and
home investment in Dunes West was based on certain facts and criteria.
Changes such as this are a clear win for the developer but not for the
community. It is simply not appropriate and goes against the originally
approved design and zoning.
Dan Tetrault
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
Senseless development needs to stop!!
Kathryn Ripple
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-13
It already takes me 35 min to get out of my neighborhood some days and the
freshman class last year was 1050 and this year's freshman class is 1400 and
there is no more room in the school. Why keep permitting growth when the
infrastructure is not in place?
Kathleen Edwards
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
Our roads can't handle more growth off of hwy 41. Better planning needs to be
in place before additional homes and business are allowed.
Boisseau J. Sanford
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
Boisseau
Because the increase density, the "typical finished product" will be (square
footage) smaller and will therefore have an inferior "quality of construction" to
attract a buyer in this price range. Also, it will have an negative effect on our
already crowded roads, have an adverse effect on the neighborhood
(homogeneity) aesthetics and subsequently have a negative effect on property
values. In other words, it will not have ANY positive effect on the Dunes West
neighborhood and the only benefit will go to one of the country's largest
(provides residence in 12 states) builder's "bottom line".
Jake Leiker
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
What is the reason for approving this change of zoning? How does this help
increase the property value of surrounding areas?
Nan Fetters
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
Why have zoning if it can be changed at a developers whim? I bought my
home thinking the zoning would be enforced.
Roger Hawkes
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
We were promised low density housing when we built & higher density will
dimenish my property value. In addition the neighborhood has already been
rezoned for higher density in area's of low density without additional
improvement to the neighborhood. To increase the density would be a slap to
the residents and increase a hostile zone.
David shat
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
Is there not enough gridlock without more frickin building?
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Robert Tykal
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
There is no benefit to the community or the residents by cramming more
people into Dunes West. I bought in this area due to the green space and the
current density which is appropriate for the home prices. The current
infrastructure is not capable of handling the increased volume. It already takes
up to 30 minutes to get from Dunes West to Hwy 17 at certain times in the
morning and late afternoon.
Robert Tykal
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
There is no benefit to the community or the residents by cramming more
people into Dunes West. I bought in this area due to the green space and the
current density which is appropriate for the home prices. The current
infrastructure is not capable of handling the increased volume. It already takes
up to 30 minutes to get from Dunes West to Hwy 17 at certain times in the
morning and late afternoon.
Greg Flanagan
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
As a real estate broker I present homes in this area as single family detached
homes. That is what the PUD was granted at its inception. To change that now
is to benefit only the developer and builder. This is unfair to the homeowners of
the neighborhood. These are not and were not meant to be high density areas.
If allowed, the character of the neighborhood changes and may adversely
values of all homes. This zoning change should not be granted
Lori Winkler
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
I'm signing because I am a resident of Dunes West.
Richard Iriart
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
N Mt Pleasant is already becoming too crowded and experiencing ridiculous
traffic with the numerous town home and multi-family developments that have
been built up in recent years. Definitely do not need Dunes West to become
MORE dense and bring MORE traffic, and MORE demand on schools.
Nan Fetters
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
The zoning was there when we bought our homes in Park West and Dunes
West. We trusted our neighborhoods would be protected by the zoning. We
expect our elected officials to protect our investments. Please deny this
change.
Karl Interrante
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
It is amazing that they keep pushing their same agenda in our face. I oppose
this new zoning application.
Shirley Mulholland
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
I do not want more density on the Harbour side of Dunes West
Robert Hickok
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
An increase in density would be extremely detrimental to the Dunes West
community. The infrastructure is not sufficient to support it, and it would lead to
a substantial deterioration in the quality of life for residents.
Catherine Davis
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
The density does not need to be increased in this area. There is no
infrastructure improvements that will support this change and this change will
damage our neighborhood quality.
Laurie Brown
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
We are new residents to SC and Dunes West and our home backs up to parcel
#15 and will be directly impacted with reduction in our property value. We
relocated from South Florida where irresponsible rezoning for the financial gain
of big development is rampant. The results are serious and cannot be
reversed. This community and surrounding area is not properly able to handle
the volume it currently has - additional stress on the community roads, schools
and infrastructure will only magnify those problems exponentially and will
certainly cause significant decline in the quality of life for the residents that call
Dunes West home.
Mary Glasser
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
Please stop over populating and over developing our beautiful home
Jennifer Belcher
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
I live in the Harbour
Barbara Karinshak
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
As a resident of Dunes West I am opposed to changing the DW zoning.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
John Carey
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
There is no upside to this for residents with nothing but negative impacts to
traffic. Changing the "plan" now benefits only the developer who has no long
term interest.
Karen Super
mount pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
Dunes west is large enough and this is not what we wanted when we moved
there
Sybil Hill
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
Stop please!
Yvette Book
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-14
Traffic is already horrific trying to get to and from work.
Cynthia DeZearn
mount pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
This type of proposal distracts from the community appeal we were attracted to
when we bought into the initial Dunes West development. The effect on
property values would most likely be negative. Increased Traffic has already
paralyzed many homeowners. The developers will build and leave.
Darin Reynolds
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I purchased a lot on Rush Haven in 2004 based on John Weiland stating that
everything in The Harbour (behind brick sign) would be custom homes. I sold
my custom built home in 2014 because of my fear of what type homes would
be built behind my house (the proposed area). I sold in fear of more homes
similar to that now built in the back of The Harbour. I feel these homes lower
the value of my custom home. We moved to the golf course side of Dunes
West and greatly oppose the density increase.
Matt Boland
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
Overdevelopment and lack of infrastructure.
Angela McCay
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
We live in Dunes West and will most certainly sell if this happens. It can take
me 20 minutes to get out of Dunes West before I even get to 41. With Carolina
Park being built as well, the traffic is already obscene!
Michael Hornblas
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
There is too much traffic, especially school hours.
Julie Bogart
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I agree with the petition.
Chris Ford
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
We recently moved from Northern Virginia (just outside of DC) to remove my
family from an overcrowded community. In our last subdivision (and
surrounding area) we experienced what is proposed in Dunes West. After all
the single family sites were developed, builders filled every remaining space
with townhomes, condos and apartments. These changes accelerated density
problems including traffic congestion, crime, school overcrowding and
excessive wear on infrastructure such as roads, emergency services, etc. MP:
don't make these same mistakes. You cannot reverse them or their impacts.
Eugene Carrick
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
Dunes West is already crowded with traffic getting worse. Adding townhouses
would make it less safe and over crowded.
Leslie Jones
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
Increased densities would mean decreased quality of life for all in this area.
Ross Curnett
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
There are more than enough homes already in this neighborhood available and
for sale. One of the reasons we purchased back here was some of the
guaranteed green space which John wieland homes is trying to take over. I
strongly oppose this
Kellie Dawson
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I am signing because I live in Dunes West. Traffic has become overwhelming. I
also teach in the neighborhood. My classes are packed. With more houses, it
will have a negative impact.
Mona Mancy Mancy
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
The roads cannot handle all this traffic and our schools are already
overcrowded
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Harold Bell
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
These requests to change the current zoning in DW is about greed and not
consequences to the town and exiting residence. Wieland homes knew what
they were buying many years ago and now that housing is at a premium in MP
the wish to capilize at any cost. The current infrasructure in MP to include
facilities, schools, and roads cannot support the increased demand associated
with these zoning changes. Who will bear the burden? The taxpayer, long after
Wieland Homes has pocketed there profits.
Kathleen Dubois
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
Mt. Pleasant has become a traffic nightmare. Adding more housing to Dunes
West is not going to help with traffic or property values.
Jamie Curnett
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I'm opposed to John Weiland building more homes/town homes in our
neighborhood. We have enough!
Jason Lungarini
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
Gates, roads and amenities are inadequate for increased density.
Jane Abbott
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
The increased density would have a severe impact on our neighborhood,
schools and infrastructure. This has already been seen with the impact of
large homes on smaller lots on Ayers Plantation and all the new streets beyond
River Vista and Yachtsman.
Alethea Setser
mount pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I'm signing because these roads can't handle the traffic that is on them now. It
makes no sense to add more. The schools can't handle it either! We already
have TWO buses just for our section of Dunes West - just for Elementary kids.
The bus company & schools & road can't handle more! Terrible idea to add
even more homes here.
Cristine Ribes
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
This town has limited roads and only one high school. The traffic and
congestion is awful!
Beth Crunelle
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I'm against changing zones to accommodate develooers without first
accommodating the community with sufficient infrastructure. Growth is good,
unmanaged overgrowth is irresponsible.
Hugh Myrick
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
No more growth until developers share their profits to increase infrastructure
which includes roads and schools. It would be interesting to know how many of
the entities who are increasing housing do not even reside in the area and
therefore are nothing more than profit-minded. Our politicians who represent
us should be ashamed.
Jacki Bennis
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
This is important because it shouldn't take my son 40 minutes to get to school
when we live 15 minutes away. It's important because 1300++ students in a
three grade school is not productive. It's important because parents chose to
drop off their students rather than allow them to ride buses so the number of
vehicles on the road increases safety and environmental issues. It's important
because our children should know what green areas are. If this area keeps
building there will be no beautiful green areas like there once was. Money isn't
the only thing that should be important here!
Joan Bauer
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
We have enough crowded roads in Dunes West. You are taking away from the
gated community landscape by taking away our trees and grassy areas and
adding condos!
Laura Smith
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I teach at Laurel Hill. I live off of 41. It takes me 20 minutes to go 4.5 miles
and that is ridiculous!
Shannon MCALISTER
Chapin, SC
2015-11-15
The area cannot handle the growth Q
Karin Frangipani
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I think MP is becoming too dense
Jennifer Thomas
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
Our schools & roads are already way too overcrowded this will only contribute
to the problem and quality of life
Donna Waln
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I live there and don't want more congestion.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Marcia Russo
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I worked in the schools for this area. So overcrowded!
Stacey Shoecraft
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I am a teacher and the school is packed! I live 2 subdivisions away from school
and traffic has gotten out if intros when it used to be a 4 minute commute. We
don't need to build more and tear down every tree, you are taking away the
beauty of this area.
Mark Langston
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
Highway 41 traffic is already terrible
Fred Shinners
SC, SC
2015-11-15
We do not need any more medium to hidensity neighborhoods. The
infrastructure can not handle it
Tom Epperson
Raleigh, NC
2015-11-15
No more town homes please
Kevin Knight
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
This change would directly impact the value of many homes in Dunes West
and further crowd our already overcrowded roads and schools.
Solange Townsend
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
Too much traffic already in dunes west....I dread taking my kids to school. I live
5 minuets from the school and it takes almost 30 to get there in the
mornings.....we don't need anymore homes to add to the traffic to go to our
already over crowded schools!
Phyllis Leventis
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-15
I oppose any density changes
Nancy Chadwick
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
This is a low-density neighborhood. That was the master plan and that's how it
should stay. Particularly, with the higher density, over-crowding in schools, no
infrastructure etc etc.
Tanya Hodges
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Dunes West is already built up so much here on the Harbor side of the
neighborhood! There is already too much traffic here in the neighborhood, not
to mention Hwy. 41 which is always beyond crowded!! The building madness
has to stop to protect our neighborhood and quality of life of those who live
here!
George Leventis
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Compliance with existing density only!
Quinn McDaniels
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Changing the zoning would negatively impact the residents of Dunes West and
the surrounding communities.
jessica leiker
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I think it is ridiculous to have more houses built back here. It will loose what is
special about this neighborhood. Who wants to see into someone else's dining
room everyday instead of the pretty trees and ponds? certainly not me.
David Ryan
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I am adamantly opposed to any changes to zoning that would allow the
developer to build "higher density" housing in Dunes West. There are already
sections within Dunes West that have townhomes/duplexes. More of those will
only increase traffic and negatively impact property values. Traffic in the
neighborhoods continues to increase with the existing construction. It will get
progressively worse even with the planned R-1 density building. Increasing the
density beyond what currently is planned will only worsen the situation and
should not be permitted.
Joe Marchant
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I am signing because I oppose the re-zoning and agree with the statement
listed in this petition.
George Leventis
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I'm against any increase in density between Dunes West/HWY 41 and HWY 17
until all infrastructure has been elevated to meet the communities needs!
ELIZABETH MAYER
MOUNT PLEASANT, SC
2015-11-16
I'm tired of the traffic!
Name
Location
Date
Comment
C Harvey King
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
The current infrastructure of Dunes West can't support the added residential
development. Currently we are dealing with the lack of cell service due to over
utilization because of the added population. As well as flooding in the
established residence yards due to the poor planning of adequate drainage
that's forcing the wet lands to spill over in our yards during heavy rains. These
are just two examples of the negative affect the over building is having on the
community currently. In addition, the increase of traffic is a major concern that
will continue to overwhelm Hwy 41 and Dunes West/Park West Blvd.
Jen Pulsifer
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Town Council, please consider driving around this area from 7-8:15am, and
again from 5-6pm. It's a nightmare, and that's every single day. The density in
our neighborhoods is critically impacting our quality of life.
Tina Gorman
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Our roads and infrastructure in this part of town is already at it's breaking point.
Our quality of life in Mt. Pleasant is in jeopardy every time we allow unrestricted
multi-family development to continue. Don't allow our town council who seems
to have little regard for this part of town to dictate our quality of life!
Melanie Theriault
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Our community cannot handle any more growth. Our traffic is horrendous,
schools are overcrowded, & quality of life is declining with each new home that
is built. The lifestyle and beauty that Mount Pleasant once offered is becoming
a thing of the past. Enough is enough!
Carolyn Wysong
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I do not want an increase in traffic. There is already enough new high density
housing. Do we have to build on every scrap of green space?
Kathleen Cornely
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I am sick of sitting in traffic on hwy 41- this is getting ridiculous!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Deborah Chute
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I am signing because we DO NOT need more growth...we need better traffic
flow/4 lane 41....
Jennifer Hartley
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I'm signing because our town is being totally screwed up. Pull up a picture from
a decade ago and see! If I see one more turquoise townhouse where a tree
once stood I'm going to lose my mind! Greed...plain and simple.
Mark Estebo
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Enough stuffing every inch
Andrea McCollam
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I live in Dunes West. The traffic is already too much.
Joe Zinaich
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Density IN DW, Rivertowne and Park est already to great and adding Carolina
Park will make it even worse. Infrastructure can't take more density
Cynthia Gardner
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I live near Dunes West and am already concerned with all of the construction of
multi family units in Park West. Hwy 41 cannot support all of this new traffic.
Logic over greed!
Sandra Connell
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Traffic is horrible I feel like we now live in Mt unpleasant please stop the
building of homes until you expand the roads. This is dangerous and there is
no way we could escape for a hurricane! We are beyond capacity already.
Karen Orcutt
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Carolina Park is an example of over development and it won't stop! Adding
even more and ruining the appeal of Dunes West and further crowding an
overtaxed infrastructure is just stupid. It is greed and this part of Mt Pleasant
cannot handle the huge surge ... already cannot handle it. I am starting to hate
this part of town. I definitely hate the greed of developers and others that allow
our area to become overcrowded and claustrophobic.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Karen Orcutt
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
So tired of the greed and overcrowding. I did not move here and live here the
past 12 years to live with so many people in such close proximity. The growth
rate in Carolina Park and Tupelo is quite enough but yet they keep growing and
growing. Now someone wants to take the greenspace in Dunes West that
makes Dunes West so nice too. The infrastructure cannot handle Carolina
Park as it is! Developers and town officials please stop being so greedy ... find
another part of this world to ruin, leave our already overpopulated becoming
unpleasant neighborhoods alone!
Jeffrey Stanton
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I live in the area effected. I do not believe developers are appropriately sharing
in the cost of infrastructure impacts. I do not believe there is an adequate town
plan to deal with any additional North Mount Pleasant development nor the
impact from the Clements Ferry Road development. These projects are
directly impacting motorist safety, traffic gridlock, and quality of life on the
Highway 41 corridor.
Paul McClintock
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I am opposed to the rezoning of Dunes West for the density increase. This
increase is wanted by who? The developers and their pocket books. It will
decrease the value of our community and our resale values.
mcclintock mcclintock
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I am opposed to the increased density for Dunes West. This will decrease the
value of our property and our quality of life in this neighborhood.
Jeff Bobby
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
We live in Richmond Cove and invested in our home. We did this with the
understanding that our property value was protected by having Low Density
Homes of equal value around us. Changing the zoning will hurt us in many
ways. The value of our homes is decreased and the safety of our children is
decreased as an increase of traffic occurs. Our roads are not sized to handle
an increase of traffic. Besides the original plan called for a clubhouse and pool
in this area labeled 16. It is my responibility as a parent to protect my children
and I see this change as creating danger to them. Please say no to the rezoning request!! Thank you!
Regan Miller
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Traffic is already outrageous. We don't need more residents off 41. The roads
need to be expanded.
Cracraft Scott
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
We do not need more density. The traffic will only get worse of we allow this to
happen.
Marnie Browder
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
We don't need more traffic.
Dana Sisk
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
The roads in MT Pleasant and 526 cannot support anymore traffic. Our roads
are turning into parking lots. Stop the building
Paige Hall
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
41 and clements ferry road can't handle existing traffic. It is also difficult to get
out of dunes west because of construction and the traffic.
David Sirles
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I want the growth stopped. There has already been to much of it.
Christine Bobby
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I do not believe in high density neighborhood, decreases my home value,
increase the amount of children in our schools, the high volume of traffic, and
the high volume of traffic is unsafe for my children.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Linda Stanton
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
The current infrastructure cannot effectively handle the amount of traffic
traveling thru the area on a daily basis. The schools we moved to the area for
are at or above max. capacity. These are only 2 considerations when zoning for
additional growth in an already very dense area. What about the negative
effect on quality of life or the devalued residential properties due to future
buyers deciding the quality of life we all moved to the area for, is no longer. I
am all for health growth but it seems we our putting the cart before the
horse...meaning lets address the infrastructure,schools, etc. and how to pay for
them before allowing any new development. Maybe the development
companies should fund improved infrastructure, schools, etc. in areas they
want to develop...
Emily Arthur
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Our schools and buses are already overcrowded, and the traffic in the
neighborhood is already bad during peak hours. Highway 41 traffic is terrible,
and increasing the housing density will only make things worse. Many
improvements are needed at the current density level. Please don't cause more
problems by allowing increased density in Dunes West.
Mary Carter
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
I oppose any future developments that reduce forest and animal habitats. I also
oppose greater density due to greater issues with traffic and increases in
congestion passing through both gates. Lastly I oppose due to increases traffic
on Hwy. 41, which our evacuation route.
Kim Firilas
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Opposed to density increase in our neighborhoid
Susan Gonzales
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
My husband and I are living in our third home in Dunes West, so obviously we
like this community. It is the premier community in Mount Pleasant, gated or
otherwise. Part of that is due to the beautiful landscaping, parkways and
greenspace. Please do not crowd it with increased density and more multi
family homes.
Dante Torhan
Ambridge, PA
2015-11-16
Traffic and schools.
Michael Popovich
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
My name is Mike Popovich and I live at 2810 Oak Manor Drive in the Richmond
Cove sub-division. I’ve been a home owner in Richmond Cove since 2004. My
wife and I built our home with the understanding that someday the second
phase of Richmond Cove (behind our home) would be developed. We were
told by the sales representative of John Wieland Homes that it would be
developed using the same zoning guidelines as our existing neighborhood (e.g.
low density homes). I would like to make it clear - we are NOT in favor of
having the property behind our home rezoned to increase the density of homes
on that land. As you may know, most developers are in the business of
maximizing their profits without the considering the impact to the overall
community plan, adjacent neighborhoods, schools, traffic conditions and public
safety support. The request to rezone Richmond Cove Phase-2 is just another
example of a developer trying to maximize their profits at the expense of
existing families and home owners. It is your responsibility as elected officials
to reject this rezoning request on behalf of the existing home owners in Dunes
West.
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Michael Popovich
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
My name is Mike Popovich and I live at 2810 Oak Manor Drive in the Richmond
Cove sub-division. I’ve been a home owner in Richmond Cove since 2004. My
wife and I built our home with the understanding that someday the second
phase of Richmond Cove (behind our home) would be developed. We were
told by the sales representative of John Wieland Homes that it would be
developed using the same zoning guidelines as our existing neighborhood (e.g.
low density homes). I would like to make it clear - we are NOT in favor of
having the property behind our home rezoned to increase the density of homes
on that land. As you may know, most developers are in the business of
maximizing their profits without the considering the impact to the overall
community plan, adjacent neighborhoods, schools, traffic conditions and public
safety support. The request to rezone Richmond Cove Phase-2 is just another
example of a developer trying to maximize their profits at the expense of
existing families and home owners. It is your responsibility as elected officials
to reject this rezoning request on behalf of the existing home owners in Dunes
West.
Richard Gonzales
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
When we bought in 2005 Dunes West specificaly noted all the dedicated
conservation space they've built into the subdivision. Now they want to take it
away. Our community is not John Weiland's ATM!
George Matthews
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
Infrastructure is overloaded as it is
Bruce Belvin
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
There is too much density already. Infrastructure is not in place to support
additional residential growth.
Anne Underkofler
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-16
We love this neighborhood as it is! We would like to keep it as a low-density.
Adding more housing would increase the traffic which is already at maximum
capacity! We are definitly against this density increase!!
Susan Garren
Charleston, SC
2015-11-16
The road infrastructure in this area is over capacity with the existing traffic. It
certainly won't be able to absorb what will happen when 70 acres is developed
at low density and especially not at high density.
Diane Ellison
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
I do not want higher density housing in my neighborhood. It will adversely
affect the value of the homes in the community.
William (Bill ) Godwin
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
I agree not to rezone......
Larry Haskell
Mt Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
I oppose high density development in my neighborhood. Traffic is already bad
enough and this is contrary to the expectations when I was sold my property.
William Landrus
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
Impact on traffic and public education is unacceptable. Density laws should not
be changed to satisfy a developer.
Mary Ryan
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
I want to see LESS density in Dunes West to retain property value.
Lisette Glennon
Mt. Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
Traffic is already a nightmare every morning and every evening getting in and
out of Dunes West and Park West. The schools are still overcrowded even
with the new districting. Enough building, fix our road system or lack of road
system in this area of town before anymore building continues.
Russell Miller
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
Expand the roads to handle existing traffic and future growth at current
densities first. Rezoning before that work is complete is irresponsible and not in
the best interests of current or future residents.
Theresa Ponessa
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
I would like to see the imposition of a infrastructure tax levied on builders or
developers to fund the necessary improvements to sustain their plan
developments
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Michael Giordano
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
I am not opposed to growth but we need time to plan and invest in
infrastructure... developers need to help accountable to previous agreements
on density and help pay for the roads, parks "open spaces" and services that
come along with growth.
william Behrens
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
High density in DW not good for any home owner, only benefits developer!
Kristina yates
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
we don't need any more high density housing developments on an already
congested 41! We also can't afford what this would mean for our already over
packed park west schools!
Roland Richard
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
Bought a home in Rivertowne in 2006. The change in traffic is awful. Route 41
often full from 17N to Rivertowne. Ni more desity until 41 is fixed. Not safe,
John Whittle
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
I am strongly opposed to the increased densities. It will hurt the quality of life in
our neighborhood and will lower the value of the homes. I purchased in this
neighborhood only because of the low density. The developer appears to have
no interest in protecting the integrity of the neighborhood.
Lorraine De Muccio
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
Mt. Pleasant North, South, East and West would be hurt by increased densities
in Dunes West and Park West as well. The requested changes would impact
traffic, safety, public education, public recreation, mobility, culture and quality of
life. Please, consider the impact on property values and the marketability of
existing homes in No. Mt. Pleasant.
Carol Scott
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
These new neighborhoods will have kids attending Wanda high school and for
the past few years it takes me 30 minutes to travel 7 miles to work bease of the
scool traffic. I might add that when I am finally able to cross through traffic to
get out of my neighborhood, the traffic is back up from the schools at the front
of Park West all the way back to Hwy 41. It might be different if any of the
officials of Mt Pleasant had to sit in their neighborhood each morning and wait
minute after minute for a good Samaritan to let you out of your neighborhood. I
SAY NO TO ANY NEW GROWTH UNTIL YOU CAN FIX THE CURRENT
TRAFFIC SITUATION.
Jane Schloss
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
No change in density
Arlette Geffert
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
I am signing because it is already a burden to get out of Dunes West with the
existing traffic. Besides, John Wieland is still building in the Harbor area farther
in that these 4 marked areas would make it impossible to get out of here.
Emily Hertwig
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
Our traffic issues are only getting worse especially on Hwy 41 and Clements
Ferry Road. Our schools are at capacity. we need to stop building more homes
until we fix the infrastructure.
Rachelle Larue
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
Neighborhood is too busy already and especially with only 1 main road into the
Harbour.
Rachelle Larue
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
I do not support rezoning in DW.
Traffic into and out of both gates is already out of control.
Adding to the existing line of resident, visitor,employee, and contractor vehicles
sitting in traffic out on Hway 41 is both irresponsible and a pulic safety issue.
Jennifer Perrelli
Chester, MD
2015-11-17
Increased volume, beyond what was planned for when I purchased property
here, will negatively impact both my life & the life of my family. The increased
amount of traffic, increased volume in the schools, increased strain on the
resources, both man-made and natural,will all detract from the community that I
bought in to.
Nancy Swift
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-17
Don't need more traffic in Dunes west or 41!!!! Schools are already over
crowded!!!!! No way does Dunes West need this!!!!
Name
Location
Date
Comment
Christos Maltezos
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-18
I completely oppose this density increase. The infrastructure currently in the
area is already dense and this proposal is purely for monetary gains. I again
oppose these zoning requests in the neighborhood.
Art DeGiovine
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-18
Traffic is unbearable
Cheri Cosentino
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-18
The student buses are already full.
Often children do not have a seat on the bus. Hwy 41 needs to be improved
first! The traffic is already dangerous enough at rush hour. We do not need
more housing. We need road improvements and infrastructure before any
additional housing! Stop the development.
Cassandra Bobby
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-18
I live in Richmond Cove and we, along with the rest Dunes West do not need
this.
Laura Badolato
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-18
Additional homes should not be built anywhere along Highway 41 until the city
spends the money to improve the infrastructure. In an emergency it would be
almost impossible to evacuate quickly when travel on Highway 42 or Clements
Ferry is required.
Steve Clark
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-18
Weiland maneuvering to change the zoning on their remaining phases should
come as no surprise, Since they already have the club portion on the market.
They are preparing their exit strategy. The most cost efficient way to quickly
close out their remaining parcels is the high density many of process model.
Weiland intentionally misled the vast majority of us during the buying process.
This new zoning request is simple, soon they will have no stake in our
community and nor do they care whose property values they are going to
crush. Infrastructure is a huge concern as well. Our schools, roads, and public
works are already overly burdened.
Shameful behavior Weiland.
Randy Wilson
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-18
I'm signing this petition because rezoning to higher density will destroy quality
of life. The residents of Dunes West paid a premium for this quality of life only
to watch the developer (JWHOMES) slowly take it away. Our current amenities
are insufficient for the current residents (you can hardly find a spot at the pool,
the fitness center is too small, one playground, tennis courts typically have long
wait times to get on the court, poorly lite multi-media paths so runners are
running in the road early in the morning). Rezoning these plats to higher
density will compound these issues. Rezoning these plate will increase traffic
on already overcrowded roadways. Rezoning will add more students to our
already overcrowded schools. I am signing this petition because I am against
rezoning. The developer has no legitimate reason for this change.
Michael Bradley
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-18
Very concerned about the uncontrolled growth in this area.
Michael Bradley
Mount Pleasant, SC
2015-11-18
Very concerned about the uncontrolled growth in this area...
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Wyndy Amerson <[email protected]>
Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:14 PM
Planning
Developer's request to increase Density Increase for Dunes West - Mt. Pleasant
Good Afternoon,
We have learned the developer wishes to increase the set density of section of Dunes West and we
would request that you do not allow it. Our infrastructure in the Dunes West / Park West area is
stretched as it is with roads (Hwy 41 / Park West Blvd / Hwy 17) crowded from 7 AM till 7 PM. The
schools are over-crowded.
We invested our life savings in our homes. We did our research to learn about our neighborhoods,
the schools and had our homes inspected as part of our investment decision making process. The
Developer knew what type of density he had when he bought into the investment potential of Dunes
West. We didn't purchase into an area that would have every acre maxed out and our quality of living
diminished to increase the bank account of a developer.
Please deny his request to increase the density of Dunes West development.
Thank you.
Take Care,
Rebecca Wynn (
Wyndy
) Amerson
1501 Huxley Drive, Mt. Pleasant, SC 29466
678-595-6180
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dick Artale <[email protected]>
Tuesday, November 17, 2015 1:37 PM
Planning
Kelly Cousino
Dunes West Rezoning Request
In reviewing the request by JWH to rezone Parcel 6 on Harpers Ferry Way and Parcels 9, 15 and 16
on Ayers Plantation Way I would request that these zoning changes be denied. Changing these
parcels to a higher density would be detrimental to the current homeowners who purchased their
property in a low density area. Also, I believe it would add to the already difficult situation with Rte.41
congestion.
The developer knew the zoning when the land was purchased. Clearly they will make a reasonable
profit from the property as it is currently zoned. They should be held to the original agreement and not
allowed to make changes that will be to the detriment of the residents of Dunes West. Please show
us that you are working for the residents of Mount Pleasant by denying the requests by JWH.
Thank you
Richard Artale
2736 Fountainhead Way
1
843.202.7200
Fax: 843.202.7218
Lonnie Hamilton III Public Services Building
4045 Bridge View Drive
North Charleston, SC 29405
Joel H. Evans, PLA, AICP
Zoning/Planning Director
November 16, 2015
Christiane Farrell, Director
Town of Mount Pleasant Planning and Development Dept.
100 Ann Edwards Lane
Re: Proposed Zoning of TMS Numbers 615-00-00-047, -050, -124, and -125
Christiane:
This letter is in regard to the proposed zoning of TMS Numbers 615-00-00-047, -050, -124, and -125,
located on U.S. Highway 17 North, between Darrell Creek Trail and Tupelo Forest Drive, which will be
considered by the Town’s Planning Commission on November 18. The Charleston County
Comprehensive Plan recommends these properties for Rural Residential future land uses, which carries
a density range of 1 dwelling unit per 3 acres to 1 dwelling unit per acre. The Comprehensive Plan states
that the intent of the Rural Residential future land use designation “is to accommodate modest population
growth to reduce demand for public services and facilities while retaining rural community character.”
The Charleston County Zoning and Land Development Regulations Ordinance (ZLDR) implements the
recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan by placing these properties in the Rural Residential (RR-3)
Zoning District, which has a maximum density of 1 dwelling unit per 3 acres, with allowances to increase
the density to a maximum of 1 dwelling unit per acre when the Conservation Subdivision requirements
are met. The density (3 dwelling units per acre) and character of the proposed development are
inconsistent with the County Comprehensive Plan recommendations, the current zoning of the properties,
and the development existing on surrounding unincorporated properties.
Please contact me with any questions.
Sincerely,
Joel H. Evans, PLA, AICP, Director
Charleston County Zoning & Planning Department
cc:
Town of Mount Pleasant Planning Commission Members
Jennifer Miller, Deputy Administrator for Human Services
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Pat Allan <[email protected]>
Monday, November 16, 2015 9:39 PM
Christine Barrett; Kelly Cousino
[email protected]
Hway 41 Impact from DW zoning proposed changes
Dear Mayor Page, Planning Commission members, and Town Council Members: I urge you to vote against allowing higher entities on the three Dunes West lots coming before you this week. Higher home densities, with the expected increase in autos exiting onto 41 at the DW back gate, must not be approved at this time. What happens in Dunes West will directly affect all the homeowners south along 41, with increased traffic and a deleterious effect on our home values. I remind you that in the face of a devastating traffic impact study, the Mill Creek Market was approved, even when the protesting residents, appearing before both Commission and Town Council, requested the TC zoning was devastating to area neighborhoods. The residents suggested that approximately 50 town houses or patio homes be built on the existing parcel instead, to allow less traffic on 41. That request was not considered to be executable, however (while I did not write down the comments made in sympathy to the resident's pleas), it was explained by Councilman Gawrych that the increase in auto traffic caused by homes instead of the shopping center was to be expressly avoided, as it would add to the problem of State Road 41's inability to carry more traffic. To paraphrase his comments ......(paraphrase) to add any more homes to the North end of an Un‐widened 41, would be unacceptable to those who you have elected to make the decision for you. We have no choice but to accept that this commercial center (Mill Creek) would allow far fewer daily trips on an unacceptably over‐capacity 41, and to allow more housing at this time would be the wrong decision for us to make for the residents. While we feel sorry for the taxpayers on North 41, who will have no relief from traffic grid‐lock for many years, you elected us to make the best decision for the town, and we must keep more autos off 41........ Therefore, the proposed increase in density in the parcels behind the DW back gate, is even more shocking in light of Gawrych's words, and certainly would seem to be double‐standard thinking by the Council. Why would more traffic be acceptable now? Increased density in these DW parcels, and the expected increase in the number of autos exiting DW onto 41, would certainly seem to represent a change in commitment to keep more autos off 41, and to grossly undermine the effectiveness of the proposed 41 widening from Joe Rouse to 17. It seems incredibly ill‐advised to sabotage the costly "solution" the Council decided on to ease traffic moving toward 17, while making things worse on the north end of the same highway. We are even still waiting to see how a five lane Berkeley County bridge will transition to a two lane 41, less than a mile from the back gate of Dunes West. Where is the benefit in granting increased densities on these three parcels to any existing Dunes West taxpayers? The benefit to the developer is obvious, but surely the Council has a greater obligation to the current DW residents, (as well as the hundreds of neighboring taxpayers south on 41) to weigh the impact of deliberately increasing traffic on the north end of 41, while spending big monies to ease traffic on the south end of the same road! It seems Ill‐advised and wasteful of scarce funds to those of us watching the decision being made. Some developers are approaching their "build out and exit" stages, and their requests for any changes call for increased sensitivity and mature judgement on the part of each member of Council. No member can be unaware of the devastating effect on all existing property owners of making the traffic on 41 any worse, and should be aware that the affected DW neighboring tax payers are counting on you to do no more harm to those of us condemned to suffer daily 1
grid‐lock on a road the Town neither owns, nor can fix. All of our property values are being threatened, whether inside the DW gates, or not, by this decision, and we ask you to weigh that fact carefully as you face your vote. The increased densities must not be granted on the Dunes West parcels. A decision to approve the request in DW, and it's ripple effect on hundreds of fed up North 41 constituents who must commute daily on 41, is unthinkable. I hope the Council members understand how critical their denial of these density changes are to the quality of life of all North 41 citizens, and our trust in their judgement to make the correct decision in this case. I am sincerely respectful of your willingness to serve the Town of Mt Pleasant, and hopeful the decision you make supports your constituents best interests. Regards, Pat Allan Patricia Allan 2705 Wild Dogwood Way Mt Pleasant, SC 29466 Cell: (919) 607‐0044 Sent from my IPhone 2
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Byron and Sara Andrade <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Dunes West Zoning
My husband and I are against changing the zoning in Dunes West from low density to medium density.
Traffic and congestion is already terrible.
Our roads cannot sustain the growth that has been taking place in North Mt Pleasant.
It makes us so sad that Mt Pleasant is no longer why it always has been! We are losing our community's
character and charm.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sara and Byron Andrade
Sara Andrade
Young Living Executive #1422675
Scent2Heal.com
tinyurl.com/Scent2Heal
Facebook.com/Scent2Heal
Disclaimer:
Information contained herein is not meant to diagnose or treat any condition. I am not a health care
professional. I am a mama who wants to help equip you to seek out the best options for you and your family. I
pray that The Holy Spirit will guide you as you minister to your family. Please continue to consult the health
care provider of your choice.
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
sharon hawkes <[email protected]>
Planning
Dunes West rezoning
Dear Planning Commission,
We are writing to you to express our concern with proposed changes to the zoning within our neighborhood, Dunes West. We
were promised low density housing when we built, higher density will impact our property value and the marketability of our
home. In addition the neighborhood has already been rezoned for higher density in area
’s of low density, without additional improvement to the neighborhood.
These changes will impact traffic, wear on our private roads, safety, and public education.
Please do the right thing by denying the rezoning request. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Roger & Sharon Hawkes
1909 Mooring Line Drive
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
G Harper <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Kris Harper
Rezoning Proposal in Dunes West
Planning Commission
100 Ann Edwards Lane
Mt Pleasant, South Carolina
Thank you for the opportunity to address the proposal to rezone real estate parcels in
Dunes West, specifically Parcel 6 Harpers Ferry Way; Parcels 15 & 16 Ayers Plantation,
and Parcel 9 Ayers Plantation, from low density to medium density.
As homeowners in the area, we have the following concerns about approving this
proposal:
1. Rezoning will likely reduce the value of neighboring homes, which were bought
under the premise that the area is and would remain zoned as low density.
2. Rezoning would have a negative impact on the quality of life of residents in Dunes
West. The recreational infrastructure of Dunes West (recreational areas, swimming
pools, tennis courts, etc.) were designed to handle low density housing. Increasing
the density of the neighborhoods would result in over-crowding or require
investment to expand these facilities. Is the developer willing to fund the
expansion?
3. Rezoning would increase the wear and tear on sidewalks and roads which were
designed for low density. This will result in greater traffic congestion and expense
for maintenance and repair, especially during the construction phase.
4. Rezoning will increase the traffic through the back gate to Dunes West off Route 41,
which is on occasion already backed up onto Route 41. Increasing the housing
density would increase the traffic on this gate, resulting in further congestion and
delay or costly construction to make the access road two lanes.
Kris & Gil Harper
2728 Rush Haven Drive
Mt Pleasant SC 29466
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
KERRY/MARIA REMLEY <[email protected]>
Monday, November 16, 2015 11:09 AM
Planning
Dunes West back gate
Good morning. I am one of the very many residents concerned about John Wieland's request for increased densities in Dunes West. However, at this time I would like some more information about the "back gate" (the one at Harpers Ferry Road and Route 41) that is under JW Home's control. There is a desperate need for the road coming into that gate to be widened. At certain times of the day, especially peak times when contractors are entering the visitor lane, residents are blocked from reaching the residents' gate and often have to wait 5 to 10 minutes to get through. This problem will only get worse as more homes are being built and more visitors (both commercial and personal) line up to get checked in. Another issue related to that gate is the safety issue of having contractor trucks lined up on 41 at peak times as they wait to get in. It is already difficult to make a left turn from Harper's Ferry Road onto Route 41, but at those peak times when the trucks are lined up on 41, it is extra difficult to see. Our neighbor's 2 daughters were involved in a serious car accident there about 18 months ago at one of those peak times. I do not know whose responsibility it is to improve the approach to Harpers Ferry Road from Route 41, but that needs to be looked at. In the meantime it is imperative that before John Wieland builds another home in Dunes West that they make major improvements to the gate on Harpers Ferry Road so that residents and potentially emergency vehicles have clear access. Please let me know if these issues have been discussed and what the status of the situation is. Sincerely, Maria Remley 1687 Heather Grove Lane Mount Pleasant, SC 29466 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Daniel Cruz <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Jason Munday; Anna S Lewis
Wakendaw Place
Kelly,
As I previously mentioned to you over the phone, it is our intent to request deferral for Wakendaw Place. I will be present
at this Wednesday's PC meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions.
-Daniel
Daniel Cruz, EIT
Civil Engineering Project Coordinator I
(843) 884-1667
[email protected]
www.seamonwhiteside.com
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
E. M. Seabrook III <[email protected]>
Kevin Mitchell
Kelly Cousino; [email protected]; Hillary Repik
Wakendaw Place - November 18 Planning Commission Agenda Item 4. l.
November 13 001.jpg; November 13 002.jpg; November 13 003.jpg; Mathis Ferry Rd
November 14 003.JPG; Mathis Ferry Rd November 14 005.JPG
Dear Mr. Mitchell,
Thank you for speaking with me Friday regarding my concerns for existing poor drainage conditions
along Mathis Ferry Road in the vicinity of Point Pleasant, Parish Place and Wakendaw Lakes
subdivisions. After routine rainfall events, the intersection of Mathis Ferry Road and Wakendaw
Boulevard is often flooded with water standing on pavement and in adjoining yards, along shoulders
and within ditches for some time afterward.
On Friday, November 13 and Saturday, November 14 I shot the attached photographs showing
standing water within the ditches on both sides of Mathis Ferry Road near its intersection with
O’Sullivan Road. The most recent rainfall recorded at the Custom House occurred on Monday,
November 9.
I understand the proposed stormwater management solution for Wakendaw Place is discharge into
the Mathis Ferry Road system. I strongly desire and request that the Planning Commission require
the developer, the Town’s Stormwater Utility and SCDOT to implement a solution to the stormwater
conditions on Mathis Ferry Road that adversely affect the property and the safety of residents of
Point Pleasant, Parish Place and Wakendaw Lakes as well as every traveler along Mathis Ferry
Road. Please note I do not oppose the subdivision of the property. However, the plan should not
impose additional burden to the existing failing Mathis Ferry Road stormwater system.
Please submit my concerns to the Planning Commission for consideration and action. Thank you.
E. M. Seabrook III
732 Chatter Road
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Christiane Farrell
Kelly Cousino; Lynnette Lynes
FW: Rezoning in Dunes West
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Linda Fowler [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:41 PM To: Christiane Farrell <[email protected]> Subject: Rezoning in Dunes West As a resident of Dunes West I am very disturbed to hear of the recent rezoning requests by John Weiland Company. When we bought our lot and had a custom home built, we had no idea that John Weiland was about to clear cut the entire back section of The Harbour, which is behind us. Smaller lots were redrawn from the original plans and houses have been stacked almost on top of each other, with the same 4 or 5 house plans built over and over. Now JW wants to lower the density of the remaining undeveloped wooded lots thereby changing the original neighborhood plan that we all thought we would be living in. This is resulting in lower value in our homes, crowded amenities, over burdened streets, schools, and other infrastructures. Not to mention when all the trees are cut down (after removing the mud and bringing in dirt, the saved trees will end up dying) and a few trees of smaller size and quality are planted, our neighborhood is never going to look the same. At some time the city of Mt. Pleasant is going to realize that these huge, beautiful old trees can never be replaced. If you don't believe this is happening, just ride around the newest section of the Harbour. It is a shame. I have pictures of the way the wooded lots looked before JW started building in there. Please deny the request to increase the density of Dunes West. There is more to quality of life than just making money. JW is going to built as much as they possibly can and then pull out, leaving us a neighborhood that was once a beautiful place to live. Linda Fowler 2929 Yachtsman Drive Mt. Pleasant, SC Sent from my iPad 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Christiane Farrell
Kelly Cousino; Lynnette Lynes
FW: JWH Rezoning Request for Dunes West
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Elaine Lombardino [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 2:06 PM To: Christiane Farrell <[email protected]> Subject: JWH Rezoning Request for Dunes West To the Planning Commissioner: I am writing to you because I am concerned with the fact that JWH is applying to rezone areas of Dunes West from its original approved Master Plan. I guess the overriding question is, "Why does JWH NEED to rezone to medium density housing?" It is important for the town's leaders to consider how development patterns affect the overall quality of the environment and the quality of life of the residents of Dunes West and Mount Pleasant overall. When the Master Plan was approved, a low density development was proposed and infrastructure, traffic, drainage, facilities, schools, etc. were based on that plan, not on one of higher density. We have been told that in the requested rezoning area "because of wetlands, grand design tress (which cannot come down) it will be difficult to get more homes than are permitted in R1" anyway. In the Harbour section we have watched the environment be dessimated by JWH as his company built houses on "postage stamp" lots, only to put up fences and more fences in place of trees and shrubs. How do we know that will not occur in the rezoned area? Do we take JW's word about that? Those of us who have lived here have then had to deal with the drainage issues that resulted in the natural environment being so disturbed. You only have to be aware of the "Possible flooding ahead" sign at the front and back entrance gates to realize that we already have drainage issues in and around the complex as it is. The aesthetic quality of Ayers Plantation Way will definitely be changed due to the rezoning, not to mention the safety issue of having that as the only exit road to Highway 41 from the Harbour. How much more traffic can Highway 41 handle especially with the Fishing Village being built at the entrance of 41 and Harper's Ferry Way and the massive Cainhoy development planned a few miles away off Highway 41? I can't even imagine that the widening of Highway 41 will be able to handle the kind of traffic that these major developments will create. Issues of fairness remain. Is it fair to the residents of Dunes West who purchased or built homes based on the Master Plan of a lovely park like community only to have this taken away and changed? I can only see this increased density having a negative impact on property values as well. Some of us who are older and retired had hoped to stay in our homes because of the quality of life this area afforded us which may now be jeopardized. November election results spoke volumes in regard to elected officials not listening to the public's concerns. I ask that the members of the Planning Commission consider the overall Impact of your decisions on the future of Dunes West and the lovely town of Mount Pleasant and deny the current JWH rezoning request. It boils down to Vision, Vision, Vision on the part of the town's planning board! Best regards, Elaine Lombardino 1
2925 Yachtsman Drive Mount Pleasant, SC 843‐606‐2211 Sent from my iPad 2
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
THOMAS F SAVAGE <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Savage Deborah
Proposed Zoning Changes to Zoning with in Dunes West
The people of Mt Pleasant spoke load and clear in the last election. They voted AGAINST MORE HIGH DENSITY HOUSING IN MT PLEASANT. We all bought our homes in Dunes West with the knowledge of the original zoning and plan design. This was part of the appeal of Dunes West. To allow a developer to change this for their financial gain while it will reduce the property values of all the home owners in Dunes West, will be to do a disservice to your constituents. The roads and infrastructure within Dunes West are not sufficient to handle this increase in density. This is to say nothing of the traffic problems on Rt 41, Clements Ferry and Rt 17. These were also major issues in the elections a few weeks ago. The people also spoke clearly about these traffic issues. Please vote as the people of Mt Pleasant clearly would want you to and reject the requests to change the zoning within Dunes West Tom and Debbie Savage 2444 Darts Cove Mt Pleasant 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
william khouri <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Rezoning in Dunes West
We are emailing to record our opposition to the rezoning of any of the parcels in Dunes West to allow multi‐family residential units and specifically the rezoning of Parcel 6 Harpers Ferry Way, Parcels 15 & 16 Ayers Plantation and Parcel 9 Ayers Plantation. DW is congested enough without this further development. As residents we often have to wait for long periods at the entry gate and getting onto 41 is difficult at times. More residents will also put a strain on the existing recreational facilities. The units will also encourage renters rather than more stable and caring homeowners in the development. Therefore altering the zoning might also impact our property values. Thank you for recording our opposition to this plan. William & Corinne Khouri 1225 Darts Cove Landing Mount Pleasant , SC 29466 USA +1 843 216 7173 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Home <[email protected]>
Planning
Re-zoning in Dunes West
Dear Town Council, I am a concerned town resident living in Park West of a proposal to re‐zone parcels in Dunes West for multi‐family development. Since most of you do not live out here, let me inform you that this proposal should not be allowed as our current infrastructure and road system can not support numerous developments like this and retain our quality of life here. We love Mt Pleasant and you are taking it away from us piece by piece every time you allow developers and possible city income to cloud your decisions to allow these developments. The part of town most of you live in has little to no areas of development, whereas ours out here near and past 41 does. It feels like we have a target on our backs and our way of life here is not being represented or considered AT ALL!!! Come sit in our daily traffic jams or attend one of our crowded school rooms and understand why we are pleading with you to slow down and consider what your votes do to those of us who already call Mt. Pleasant our homes. Some growth is necessary and acceptable, but cramming as many places into a small area just for revenue possibilities for our town is disgraceful. And allowing is to continue with little improvement to the road system and supporting infrastructure is irresponsible. I urge you to please think about each and every project that comes across your desk and understand how critical your decisions and signatures are to a beautiful town we all love to call home. Respectfully yours, Tina Gorman Wellesley subdivision Mt Pleasant, SC Sent from my iPad 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rita Conley <[email protected]>
Sunday, November 15, 2015 4:35 PM
Kelly Cousino
Deny Re-Zoning petition for pockets within Dunes West/11.18.15
Dear Ms. Cousino As concerned citizens living off Rt 41, we DO NOT support the rezoning of the following parcels from their
current Low Density Residential District to anything that increases a more intense designation of land use.
This is not a petition whose purpose is to prevent people from coming into Mt. Pleasant; it is a desperate plea to
our Town Council, BoZa, and Planning Committee to help us keep all our neighborhoods along the 41 Corridor
safe from ultimate destruction, which is the inevitable, should increased densities be allowed.
Please pass along our email to those who will be making a decision regarding the rezoning of the following:
1) Parcel 6 Harpers Ferry Way
Request to amend the Dunes West PD, Planned Development District, ordinance by changing the Master Land Use
Plan designation from DWR-1, Dunes West Low Density ResidentialDistrict, to DWRTH, Dunes West Townhouse
Residential District. 17.69 acres
2) Parcel 15 & 16 Ayers Plantation
Plan designation from DWR-1, Dunes West Low Density ResidentialDistrict, to DWR-3, Dunes West Medium
Density Residential District. 34.33 acres
3) Parcel 9 Ayers Plantation
Plan designation from DWR-1, Dunes West Low Density Residential District, to DWMF, Dunes West Multi-family
Residential District, but limiting uses to only those permitted in the DWR-3, Dunes West Medium Density Residential
District (i.e., multi-family residential uses are expressly prohibited). 27.63 acres
Regards, Rita
& Curt
Pitts
1908 Bristle Pine Court
(843) 822-1939
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Waln, Donna L <[email protected]>
Planning
Opposed to Dunes West Zoning Change Requests
Adding my voice to the opposition of the Dunes West Zoning Change Requests. In Marsh Cove, we are already overrun with new homes and townhomes. Please don’t add even more density to our neighborhood. Donna
Donna L. Waln
Liaison Engineering Deputy/LE Skill Team Leader, BSC Production Engineering
Senior Manager
787 Final Assembly Liaison Engineering
Boeing South Carolina
(cell) 843-513-8018 Stability/Standard Work Instructions/Process Discipline!
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
McClintock, Paul <[email protected]>
Planning
Dunes west Re-zoning
There seems to be no logical or ethical reason or justification for this request. Every homeowner purchased their homes in Dunes West with basic understandings of the zoning of remaining home sites. Allowing this change will lower the value of our properties and the quality of life in our sub‐division. How about our already overcrowded facilities, property values etc…?? These will turn into rental properties. How can this request be fair or even reasonable??? Regards,
The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it was addressed
and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee of this e-mail you should not copy, forward, disclose or
otherwise use it or any part of it in any form whatsoever. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
us by telephone or e-mail the sender by replying to this message, and then delete this e-mail and other copies of
it from your computer system. We reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through our network.
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Suzan Heiber <[email protected]>
Saturday, November 14, 2015 2:17 PM
Planning
Zone changing
My husband and I are relatively new residents here in mount pleasant. We found a perfect home for us in park west. One of the things that attracted us to this area was that it was beautiful, well kept homes, and much to offer in the sense of places to eat, shop, go for entertainment...etc. and all this with not a lot of traffic back ups. By what I understand with changing the zoning laws, that this will create many issues, but I think what most people are concerned about are the ways this will change our ability to get around with out going through severe traffic back ups. Please take this into consideration during your meetings and final vote. Most sincerely, Suzan heiber Sent from my iPad 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
CHERRIE KNIGHT <[email protected]>
Saturday, November 14, 2015 11:56 AM
Planning
Zoning change in Mt. Pleasant, Dunes West
Planning Commission:
I understand there is a move by JWH to change the zoning in the Dunes West development,
specifically the Harbor Side. If this re-zoning is allowed by your committee it will be setting a
precident for other developers in the future. Where will this all end for the town of Mt. Pleasant?
Developers changing zoning laws to suit their own needs regardless of what the consequences for
the residents may be? You all were placed on this commission to protect the citizens of Mt.
Pleasant; not to comply with the whims and desires of the developers and builders in our town as
they attempt to overturn existing ordinances that were created to protect property values and quality
of life in our Planned Developments.
This past election should have given your committee pause for thought. The voters of this town
expect that you will do the right thing.
Regards,
Cherrie Knight
3511 Hartford Village Way
Mt. Pleasant, SC
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Deb Stossel <[email protected]>
Planning
CHERRIE KNIGHT
Re: Zoning change in Mt. Pleasant, Dunes West
I concur with Cherrie Knight. The voters have spoken and have yet to be heard.
Everyone needs to get out and vote again on Tuesday, November 17th.
Do not grow Mount Pleasant at the expense of the residents! Developers are only in for the money and will
move on after the last nail is driven.
Deborah Stossel
On Nov 14, 2015, at 11:55 AM, CHERRIE KNIGHT <[email protected]> wrote:
Planning Commission:
I understand there is a move by JWH to change the zoning in the Dunes West
development, specifically the Harbor Side. If this re-zoning is allowed by your
committee it will be setting a precident for other developers in the future. Where will
this all end for the town of Mt. Pleasant? Developers changing zoning laws to suit
their own needs regardless of what the consequences for the residents may be? You all
were placed on this commission to protect the citizens of Mt. Pleasant; not to comply
with the whims and desires of the developers and builders in our town as they attempt
to overturn existing ordinances that were created to protect property values and
quality of life in our Planned Developments.
This past election should have given your committee pause for thought. The voters of
this town expect that you will do the right thing.
Regards,
Cherrie Knight
3511 Hartford Village Way
Mt. Pleasant, SC
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Michael McDermott <[email protected]>
Planning
Rezoning Request for Dunes West by JW Homes
15 year residents of Dunes West, we are writing to advise of our objection to the subject
request. Increasing the density of our community is a VERY bad idea. What this area of
Mount Pleasant does NOT need is more residents attempting to exit onto Route 41. An
already dangerous situation will be even more so ...... not to mention the destruction of
the aesthetics of our beautiful community.
We all bought into the original plan ("MLUP") and it seems that in the recent election,
the voters of Mount Pleasant have signaled their desire to put a halt to the dramatic
expansion of our community. Increasing the density of the Harbor area of Dunes West
is just such an expansion.
We hereby add our names to the petition opposed to the rezoning request by JW Homes.
Michael F McDermott
Cynthia C McDermott
2744 Fountain Head Way
MT Pleasant, SC 29466
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mag Rab <[email protected]>
Friday, November 13, 2015 12:02 PM
Planning
Planning Meeting 11-18-15 - Agenda Item re South Morgan Point Road & Hwy 17 Oakland Plantation
I am unable to attend the meeting on November 18th but want to voice my opposition to granting any variances
to accommodate the businesses that want to build on that site. I have sent the following letter to the Planning
Commission.
Please do not allow any variances regarding the property involved in the above Request. The Planning Commission spent
many hours and money to come up with a growth plan and zoning requirements, and I would like to see those requirements
remain intact with no variations allowed for this Request.
Residents of Charleston National have been living off South Morgan Point Road for 20 years. Allowing traffic
for a big box store and other commercial enterprises will create huge traffic problems and noise for residents in Charleston
National, particularly along Heathland Way. The construction noises alone will be an intrusion into our peace and
quiet. Construction hours need to be limited – not early in the morning and not late into the evening. Deliveries for the
businesses to be located there must also be restricted to not before 7:00 am and not after 9:00 pm.
The height restrictions should remain without change. Tree buffers and set back lines should also remain without
change. If a company wants to build on the tract as is, fine, but nothing should be changed to allow larger buildings requiring
removal of trees and shrubs and creating more noise and traffic along South Morgan Point Road.
High sound-absorbing fences must be built all along South Morgan Point Road – by the businesses that want to
construct on the site (not by my tax dollars), and the tree line buffer along the rear of the properties on Heathland and South
Morgan Point must remain as is, if not enlarged. All of the sound-absorbing devices must be in place prior to the opening
of the businesses. The sound-absorbing fences should be built along the property line of the commercial enterprises, not
the rear lines of Heathland Way property owners.
Please be respectful and mindful of us residents who simply want some peace and quiet in our own homes and
neighborhoods and trust in our public officials to keep the zoning and variances intact.
Thank you.
Esther Lapin
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Panamsam747 <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Dunes West rezoning
Please do NOT allow ANY rezoning to occur on any parcel in Dunes West. I have lived in Dunes West for over 12 years and the impact higher density rezoning would have on Ayers Plantation Way would be extremely negative. Also, the higher density housing proposed for Harper's Ferry Way would highly impact the way in and out of Dunes West to access Hwy 41. Thank you for your attention. Shirley Mulholland Sent from my iPad 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Christopher Logan <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Dunes West Rezone
Ms Cousino, I am writing to you to express my concern with proposed changes to the zoning within my neighborhood, Dunes West. I am hopeful that you can relay my concerns to the Planning Commission. As I'm sure you are aware, the builders of Dunes West are requesting that over 78 acres within the property be changed from low‐density housing to medium‐density. I believe that the net affect will be deleterious to the surrounding community, resulting in overcrowding and imposing on an already overburdened infrastructure. First, I am concerned about the traffic, and the impact on highway 41, Clements Ferry, and highway 17 N. I believe that for the increased traffic alone, an in‐depth traffic analysis must occur, and a moratorium on additional building should be imposed until it is accomplished‐‐and maintained until after the widening of highway 41. Additionally, I am concerned about the additional traffic on secondary roads, such as Dunes West Boulevard and Park West Boulevard, which will surely be impacted, and are already strained during peak travel periods. Secondly, having served on the School Improvement Council for Charles Pinckney Elementary School (CCSD), 2013‐2015, I am deeply aware of the overcrowding already occurring. The school was built to house over 700 students, but currently serves approximately 1300, despite recent re‐zoning. Many classes are already held in trailers‐‐hardly a hallmark of a "Blue Ribbon" school. Increasing the housing density in Dunes West (or Park West/surrounding neighborhoods) at this time would only serve to increase overcrowding and reduce the educational outcomes for our students. I am asking that building in North Mount Pleasant be suspended until concerns about school overcrowding, traffic and infrastructure are adequately addressed by Town leadership. For a longer‐term solution, I would like to see the imposition of an infrastructure tax, levied on builders/developers to fund the necessary improvements to sustain their planned developments; numerous other municipalities use this to ensure their citizens are not unfairly burdened by unrestrained growth, and that infrastructure keeps pace with development. Thank you for your careful consideration. Respectfully, Chris Christopher G. Logan, Lt Col (ret), USAF 2312 Darts Cove Way Mt Pleasant SC, 29466 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kellner, George W - MOUNT PLEA SC <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
rezoning
I noticed that a rezoning request is coming up shortly on Harpers Ferry Way & Ayers Plantation. Low Density was how it was planned for & how it was purchased. It should remain that way. In addition, traffic in the 7:00 A.M. hour can take anywhere from 5 to 15 minutes to get out of the gate. I don’t see how this would improve the situation. I would urge you to deny the request. George Kellner
Vice President, Financial Advisor
Merrill Lynch Wealth Management
941 Houston Northcutt Blvd. Ste 100
Mt. Pleasant, S.C. 29464
[email protected]
Phone: 800-356-8784
Fax: 843-628-6711
View my webpage at:
http://fa.ml.com/George_Kellner
NMLS Number: 578592
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at
http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this
message.
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
[email protected]
Sunday, November 08, 2015 10:15 AM
Kelly Cousino
Rezoning
Parcels 15 and 16 Ayers Plantation Way Zoning was created to protect property values. All the owners in Richmond Cove of Dunes West built/bought their homes with the understanding that Richmond Cove was zoned DWR1. We were required to have houses with a minimum of 2400 sq. ft and to have garage doors on the side, not facing the street. We paid a premium for our lots and homes. It would be unethical and grossly unfair to change the rules in the middle of the game so to speak. Changing Richmond Cove's Phase 2 zoning to R3 will hurt our property values. It will allow greater density and create an area inconsistent with the character of our existing neighborhood. Parcels. 15, 16, 9 Ayers Plantation Way Next, think about the traffic. Greater density means more cars ‐ likely two per household. This means 200+ cars will likely be added to Ayers Plantation Way everyday and this will be in addition to the 1200+ cars that the undeveloped lots in the Harbour will add. Parcel 6 Harper's Ferry, which I understand has already been approved, will contribute more cars, more congestion at the back gate as well. Extra traffic entering at the back gate at rush hour could cause a traffic backup on Rt 41 past the turn lanes effectively blocking Rt 41 in both directions. In an emergency, exiting the back gate would be made even more difficult. Please vote against the rezoning. It makes no sense and benefits no one except the developer who has no stake in the well being of Dunes West or Mt Pleasant for that matter. Rosemary and Tom Montesi 2813 Oak Manor Drive Mt Pleasant, SC Sent from my iPad 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Earl Richter <[email protected]>
Saturday, November 07, 2015 12:14 PM
Planning
New Lowes on Morgan Point Road
Be prepared to add another light at the main entrance to Charleston National. The road across from Park West by the Blue Water station is already too busy. A left turn signal is already needed there. Who ever designed the drainage system where the new storage units are being built she be fired. There has been water over the road several times already. Will the sidewalks that were built in front of the new storage units be extended to National Drive so they can be used? Morgan Point Road is already a night mare! Please check out all these points before giving final approval! Thank you! Sent from my iPhone 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Josh Camp <[email protected]>
Planning; Christine Barrett
No to Lowes
Enough! We don’t need another Box store in North MP! We have a garden center, home improvement and overall great store in that exact area called Sweetgrass Hardware. Between Sweetgrass, the existing Lowes, and other stores we have more than adequate sources of home improvement/design improvement/garden nursery services at our disposal. The addition of another such store is will continue to ruin the small, local store which is one of the foundations for this great community. Fast growth is not smart growth. http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20151106/PC05/151109514/1505/second‐lowe‐x2019‐s‐home‐improvement‐
store‐planned‐for‐mount‐pleasant Josh Camp 1029 Black Rush Circle 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Meredith Shuler <[email protected]>
Friday, November 06, 2015 3:58 PM
Kelly Cousino
Concerns
Kelly,
The re-zoning of Dunes West is a huge concern. We do not have the right infrastructure to have more people
and houses in the neighborhood. Traffic is already absurd, schools are already crowded and this is just going to
add to it.
Thanks,
Meredith Shuler
Product Manager
843-746-8646 (T) 843-860-0170 (M)
Right-click here to
download pictures. To
help protect y ou r priv acy ,
Outlo ok prev ented
auto matic downlo ad o f
this pictu re from the
In ternet.
5255 Virginia Ave
North Charleston, SC 29406
www.ingevity.com
This electronic message contains information from WestRock Company (www.westrock.com) or its subsidiaries, which
may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be disclosed to and
used by only the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, then your review, use, disclosure, printing,
copying, or distribution of this message or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify WestRock immediately at [email protected], and delete the message from your system. Unless
previously authorized in writing, this message does not constitute an offer, acceptance, or agreement of any kind. Sender
is not liable for damage, errors or omissions related to or caused by transmission of this message. © WestRock
Company.
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
David <[email protected]>
Friday, November 06, 2015 8:54 AM
Kelly Cousino
Rezoning in Dunes West. Public Hearing Items 5, 6 and 7
I am strongly opposed to rezoning any areas of Dunes West from low density residential to medium density. David Connell 2106 Sewee Indian Ct. Mt. Pleasant, SC 29466 Dunes West Sub‐division 843‐442‐7463 Subj: Rezoning in Dunes West
Subject: Rezoning in Dunes West
1) Parcel 6 Harpers Ferry Way
Request to amend the Dunes West PD, Planned Development District, ordinance by
changing the Master Land Use Plan designation from DWR-1, Dunes West Low
Density Residential District, to DWRTH, Dunes West Townhouse Residential District.
17.69 acres
2) Parcel 15 & 16 Ayers Plantation
Density Residential District, to DWR-3, Dunes West Medium Density Residential
District. 34.33 acres
3) Parcel 9 Ayers Plantation
Density Residential District, to DWMF, Dunes West Multi-family Residential District,
but limiting uses to only those permitted in the DWR-3, Dunes West Medium Density
Residential District (i.e., multi-family residential uses are expressly prohibited). 27.63
acres
http://www.tompsc.com/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/4017
Planning Commission (843)884-1229
E-mail: [email protected]
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Nan Fetters <[email protected]>
Thursday, November 05, 2015 8:42 PM
Kelly Cousino
Dunes West rezoning request
Please deny the request to rezone the 4 parcels in Dunes West from low density to medium density a change from the approved plan for this community. This would only increase the burden on Hwy. 41 and impact our schools, parks and other infrastructure. Please know that I would be at your 5:00 meeting if I did not have to work. Thank you for your attention to this problem, Nan Fetters 3077 Queensgate Way Sent from my iPad 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Shari Gordon <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Rezoning of Dunes West
To Whom It May : As a Dunes West property owner, we want to voice our objection to allowing the Ayers Plantation corridors in question to go to a medium density town home site. Please leave this as low density area to preserve the beauty & wildlife left after all of the construction. We cannot make the meeting on Nov. 18, but strongly oppose this unwanted congestion of squeezing extra homes into this zone. Thank you‐ Doug & Shari Gordon 2804 River Vista Way Sent from my iPhone 1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Barry Blake <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Dunes West Rezoning
I live in Dunes West and am opposed to the re-zoning of three parcels in Dunes West for the following reasons:
1. Our Mayor has stated that we are already converting too much land into residential use.
2. The traffic on Hwy. 41 simply cannot take more high density development, even with the widening in 5
years.
3. The anticipated greater density development will attract families that are a net burden to the tax basis in the
town, using more services than they can pay for with their taxes.
We simply cannot afford more high density development in Mt. Pleasant, nor do we need it. There is more than
adequate housing available in the new developments under construction in Carolina Park, the Beazer
development off of Rifle Range and elsewhere. Our city services are already over burdened.
Respectfully,
Barry T. Blake
1849 Shell Ring Circle
cell: 843-860-3938\fax: 843-856-2707
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Erik Ripple <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Rezoning Parcel 6, 15, 16 and 9 Harpers Ferry and Ayers Plantation
To whom ever it may concern,
As a resident of Dunes West in Mt. Pleasant, I am apposed to the rezoning of Parcel 6 (Harpers Ferry
Road), Parcel 15 & 16, and Parcel 9 on Ayers Plantation to Low Density Housing. The road Ayers
Planation and Harpers Ferry are already busy with the current growth occurring in the Harbour of
Dunes West. It is very difficult to turn on to Hwy 41 because of the excessive amount of growth. Low
density housing just magnifies the traffic issues more than in can currently handle.
Erik and Kathy Ripple
3093 Yachtsman Dr.
Mt. Pleasant,SC 29466
1
Kelly Cousino
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kenneth Wilson <[email protected]>
Kelly Cousino
Please vote down the rezoning on Ayers Plantation
Hello, Kelly,
Please reject the proposed rezoning on Ayers Plantation.
I live in the Harbour neighborhood and I am firmly against this, because:
- As you're well aware, traffic out here has become ridiculous
- Townhouses and high-density homes are in conflict with the neighborhood
- It's morally wrong for the developer to sell us homes with one plan, and then bait-and-switch us by changing
the plan significantly.
Thank you for your consideration.
-Kenneth N. Wilson
[email protected]
1

Dan Pennick - Town of Mount Pleasant

Transcription

Similar documents

Open living room

Mount Pleasant Community Brochure

Farmers Market

Moultrie News article on Monday`s Social and Practice Ride

Join us for a in the garden

Jenester Whitaker

MPCDC News: February 2011

PRINT the Sell Sheet PDF

Welcome To The 26th Annual - BECKLEYREGISTER

NextEra Energy Solutions launches $7.5M MPISD renovation project