Natural Resource Areas Management Plan

Transcription

Willamalane Park and Recreation District
Natural Resource Areas
Management Plan
July 2012
Acknowledgements
Willamalane Board of Directors
• Anne Ballew
• Denise Bean
• Lee Beyer
• Gregory James
• Gary Ross
Willamalane Planning Team
• Bob Keefer, Superintendent
• Jason Genck, Deputy Superintendent
• Greg Hyde, NRAMP Project Manager
• Nicole Ankeney, Landscape Architect
• Laura Carter, Community Recreation Supervisor
• Damon Crume, Horticulture Program Manager
• Joel Miller, Park Services Division Director
• Sean O’Brien, Park Specialist
Technical Advisory Team
• Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board
• Elise Ferrarese, Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Council
• Mark Metzger, City of Springfield – Planning
• Todd Miller, City of Springfield – Environmental Services
• Eve Montanaro, Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Council
• John Moriarty, Lane County Public Works
• Bruce Newhouse, Salix Associates
• Jason Nuckols, The Nature Conservancy
• Ryan Ruggiero, McKenzie River Trust
• Larry Six, McKenzie Watershed Council
• Trevor Taylor, City of Eugene Parks and Open Space Division
• Jeff Ziller, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Prepared By
Jeff Krueger, Landscape Architect
Lane Council of Governments
859 Willamette Street, Suite 500
Eugene, Oregon 97401
www.lcog.org
Cover photo: Dorris Ranch Living History Farm (Brett Cole)
Natural Resource Areas
Management Plan
250 South 32nd Street
Springfield, Oregon 97478
541-736-4544
www.willamalane.org
July 2012
Table of Contents
1.0 Background and Purpose.............................................................................................................. 1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Background.........................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Planning Assumptions................................................................................................1 Willamalane Park & Recreation Comprehensive Plan Guidance................................................. 2 1.3.1 Core Values Related to Natural Resources...........................................................................2 1.3.2 Key Goals Related to Natural Resources...............................................................................2
1.3.3 Key Strategies and Actions Related to Natural Areas......................................................... 2
Related Plans, Studies, and Initiatives.............................................................................................4
Key Terms and Definitions....................................................................................................... 4
2.0 Ecological Setting and Regional Context........................................................................................ 6
2.1 Willamette Valley Ecoregion Context..............................................................................................6
2.1.1 Historic Conditions of Willamette Valley Ecoregion............................................................ 6
2.1.2 Willamette Valley Ecoregion Change Over Time............................................................ 6
2.1.3 Rare Habitats................................................................................................................. 7
2.2 Habitat Types........................................................................................................................... 9
2.3 Willamalane Natural Resource Areas Regional Context........................................................ 10
2.3.1 Rivers to Ridges Vision and Partnership...................................................................... 10
2.3.2 Proximity to Other Protected Natural Resource Areas................................................ 10
3.0 Natural Resource Areas Function and Value Assessments........................................................... 14
3.1 Assessment Methodology Overview..................................................................................... 14
3.2 Natural Resource Areas Descriptions and Assessment Scores.............................................. 15
Bob Artz Park......................................................................................................................... 15
Clearwater Park..................................................................................................................... 16
Dorris Ranch Living History Farm........................................................................................... 17
Eastgate Woodlands.............................................................................................................. 18
Georgia-Pacific Property........................................................................................................ 19
Gray Property........................................................................................................................ 20
Guy Lee Park.......................................................................................................................... 21
Harvest Landing Natural Area................................................................................................ 22
Island Park............................................................................................................................. 23
Jasper Meadows Park and Jasper Meadows South............................................................... 24
Kelly Butte Park...................................................................................................................... 25
Lively Park.............................................................................................................................. 26
Middle Fork Path................................................................................................................... 27
Moe Property........................................................................................................................ 28
Mountain Park....................................................................................................................... 29
Rob Adams Park..................................................................................................................... 30
Ruff Park................................................................................................................................ 31
Volunteer Park....................................................................................................................... 32
West D Street Greenway....................................................................................................... 33
Willamette Heights Park........................................................................................................ 34
3.3 Comparison of Assessment Scores ....................................................................................... 35
Continued next page
4.0 Goals, Objectives, and Recommended Actions and Strategies..................................................... 36
Goal 1: Habitat Preservation, Restoration, and Enhancement....................................................... 36
Goal 2: Ongoing Natural Resource Area Management . ................................................................ 38
Goal 3: Ecosystem Services............................................................................................................. 41
Goal 4: Public Access and Nature-Based Recreation...................................................................... 42
Goal 5: Education, Stewardship, and Research.............................................................................. 44
Goal 6: Natural Resource Area Planning......................................................................................... 46
Goal 7: Monitoring and Mapping................................................................................................... 46
Goal 8: Future Habitat Preservation, Land Acquisition, and Easements........................................ 48
Goal 9: Partnerships and Collaboration.......................................................................................... 49
5.0 Management Planning Guidelines............................................................................................... 50
5.1 Purpose of Management Plans............................................................................................. 50
5.2 Management Planning Process............................................................................................. 50
5.3 Recommended Management Plan Content.......................................................................... 51
5.4 Process for Addressing Unanticipated Issues and Conflicts................................................... 53
6.0 Prioritization of Actions..............................................................................................................54
6.1 High Priority Natural Resource Areas (based on assessment scores)....................................54
6.2 Prioritization of Restoration and Maintenance Actions.........................................................54
7.0 Guidance for Future Natural Resource Areas Acquisition.............................................................56
7.1 Criteria for Acquisition...........................................................................................................56
7.2 Utilizing Natural Resource Areas Function and Values Assessment Methodology................56
7.3 Comp Plan Guidance on Future Acquisition..........................................................................57
7.4 District Policy on Acceptance of Land for District Use...........................................................57
7.5 District Policy on Planning, Park Development, and Acquisition...........................................57
7.6 Willamette Basin Synthesis Project.......................................................................................58
Maps
Willamette Valley Ecoregion Strategy Habitats Map (Oregon Conservation Strategy).....................8
Natural Resource Areas Management Plan Context Map .............................................................11
Natural Resource Area Site Maps............................................................................................. 15-34
Willamette Valley Synthesis Conservation Opportunities Areas Map............................................59
Appendices A Related Plans, Studies, and initiatives
B Natural Resource Areas Function and Value Assessment Methodology
C Comp Plan Natural Opportunity Areas Map
D District Policy on Acceptance of Land for District Use
E
Acronyms Used in the Natural Resource Areas Management Plan
1.0 Background and Purpose
1.1 Background
The Willamalane Park and Recreation District manages approximately 783 acres of land in 37
parks, 4 facilities, and 3 undeveloped properties in and around Springfield1. The District
provides a variety of recreational facilities and a wide range of services including aquatics,
community athletics, specialized recreation, outdoor education, and adult and senior programs.
Natural resource areas, which are lands that are managed for natural resource values and
related public uses, make up a significant percentage of District’s land base. There are currently
18 District-owned or -managed parks containing significant amounts of natural resource area,
covering a total of 494 acres. Two additional natural area acquisitions are currently pending
(Moe Property and Mountain Park), which would bring that total up to 564 acres when
completed (see Table 3-2). In addition to providing an important habitat, visual, and ecosystem
service function, many of these natural areas are utilized by the District to provide sites for
nature-based recreation, education, and research.
Input received during development of the 2004 Willamalane Park and Recreation
Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan), and during the Comp Plan update currently underway,
demonstrates that Willamalane residents value opportunities for nature-based recreation
within their local park system. Accordingly, one of the Comp Plan’s goals is to “provide parks
and open spaces that offer close-to-home access to recreational opportunities, while preserving
important natural resources.” Strategy A.37 of the 2004 Comp Plan calls for development of
“natural resource management plans … as a basis for making acquisition, development, and
restoration decisions.” One of the Board’s Strategic Tasks is to “Develop and implement a clear,
concise Natural Resource Management Plan that identifies goals, objectives, [and] preferred
prescription methods for priority natural resource areas within the District.” The adopted fiveyear Capital Improvements Program calls for development of a District-wide Natural Resource
Areas Management Plan in fiscal year 2012.
1.2 Purpose and Planning Assumptions
The purpose of the Natural Resource Areas Management Plan (NRAMP) is to define a clear and
achievable approach for long-term management of the natural resources and specific ecological
communities contained within Willamalane Park and Recreation District-owned properties. The
NRAMP is intended to provide context for District-owned natural areas in relationship to the
larger regional open space system; define and assess the quality and potential of existing
natural resource areas; provide achievable District-wide goals and objectives for managing
these resources; and devise a framework for site-specific management planning to be
implemented over time. The following planning assumptions have been developed to frame the
content of the NRAMP:
Valuable natural resource areas currently exist within District-owned properties.
These natural resources provide important ecological, social, and recreational functions.
Ongoing management actions will be needed to protect and improve these natural
resources over time.
1
The acres and number of parks shown include an 11-acre parcel called the Moe Property, which the District is in
the process of acquiring.
Natural Resource Areas Management Plan - July 2012
Page 1
The District has limited resources for management of natural resources and the NRAMP
will provide a framework for prioritizing activities.
In some cases, natural resource objectives may overlap with other District priorities and
the NRAMP will need to identify and address these.
Natural resource management requires an adaptive approach, capable of responding to
emerging issues.
1.3 Willamalane Comprehensive Plan Guidance
Adopted in March 2004, the Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan)
provides a specific, community-supported plan for the future of the District's parks and open
spaces. The plan provides guidance on recreational facilities, programs, services, and natural
resource area use and management. An update to the Comp Plan is currently underway, with
an estimated completion date of fall 2012. The natural resource related guidance contained
within an early draft of this update is consistent with the adopted 2004 plan, but the updated
plan should be consulted once adopted. The Comp Plan is an important policy document and
key elements from the plan related to natural resource area management and use are listed
below:
1.3.1 Core Values Related to Natural Areas (from 2004 Comp Plan)
We Value the Environment: Our community looks to us to be the stewards of our present and future
natural resources. We are committed to providing leadership in conserving those resources, and looking
for new and better ways to be environmentally responsible.
1.3.2 Key Goals Related to Natural Areas (from 2004 Comp Plan)
Provide opportunities to enjoy nature: Willamalane's parks, programs, and facilities offer
unique opportunities to enjoy nature, view wildlife, and develop a sense of well-being that
grows from a deep relationship with nature and a connection to the natural world.
Preserve the natural environment: Willamalane will provide parks and open spaces that
offer close-to-home access to recreational opportunities, while preserving important
natural resources.
Parks and Open Space: Provide parks, open spaces, river access, and pathways, while
respecting private property rights.
Rehabilitation: Upgrade and revitalize existing parks and recreation facilities to provide
recreation opportunities, protect recreation resources, improve the environment, enhance
user safety, and improve accessibility for people with disabilities.
Park and Facility Operations: Manage park, open space, and community facilities to
promote recreation, user safety, and sustainable environmental practices; and to protect
public investment.
1.3.3 Key Strategies and Actions Related to Natural Areas (from 2004 Comp Plan)
Natural-Area Parks:
A35. Consider unique and significant natural areas for acquisition and development, as
appropriate.
Page 2
A36. Acquire and develop a system of natural-area parks that protects, conserves, and
enhances elements of the natural and historic landscape that give the region its unique
sense of place.
A37. Develop comprehensive natural resource management plans for natural areas as a basis
for making acquisition, development, and restoration decisions.
A38. Provide opportunities for nature-based recreation, such as wildlife viewing, fishing, hiking,
bicycling, etc.
A39. Protect and enhance a variety of habitat types within Willamalane’s park and open space
system, including upland and wildlife communities such as oak savanna, wetlands, upland
prairie, and riparian forest.
A40. Work with others, as appropriate, to acquire significant natural areas. Priorities include:
Large parcels;
Sites that provide uninterrupted corridors that link parks, schools, habitats, and
natural-resource areas;
Sites with high outdoor recreation potential;
Sites that serve as greenbelts or urban buffers; and
Sites that provide significant views.
A41. Work with other agencies and providers to support conservation and acquisition of
nearby key regional natural resource areas.
A42. Coordinate with other agencies and providers to protect riparian areas and floodplains
along creeks and rivers within Willamalane’s park and open space system.
A43. Explore the feasibility of a wetland mitigation banking program at District park sites.
A44. Work with other agencies and providers to encourage the development of appropriate
recreation amenities in nearby regional natural areas where appropriate.
A45. Orient riverfront parks to the rivers and their natural resource values; support waterrelated recreation activities where appropriate.
A46. Develop and manage parks and facilities to protect and enhance wetlands, waterways,
and water quality, and to take advantage of their natural amenities and recreation values.
A47. Incorporate natural resource enhancement into plans for park and facility development
where appropriate.
A48. Use environmentally-sustainable park development and management practices.
A49. Work with the City and developers to coordinate park and open space planning with
planning for stormwater, wetlands mitigation/protection, multipurpose trails, and
natural-resource conservation, as appropriate.
A50. Continue to participate in the TEAM Springfield-sponsored Mill Race Ecosystem
Restoration Project, representing public recreation and education interests.
Park and Facility Operations:
D2. Implement maintenance and operations programs that maintain and enhance natural
resources and minimize disturbance to natural vegetation and critical wildlife habitats.
D3. Use sustainable environmental practices.
D4. Manage natural-area parks, and natural areas in other parks, both for natural-resource
values and passive recreation.
D6. Increase natural-resource management expertise through partnerships, hiring, and staff
development.
Page 3
D7. Manage natural areas to protect unique environments, including the removal of invasive,
exotic vegetation.
D8. Retain, replace, and introduce native plants wherever appropriate.
D9. Manage vegetation in scenic areas and at overlooks to preserve and maintain important
views and scenic qualities.
D10. Emphasize safe pest-management techniques that use sound environmental practices.
D16. Coordinate with the City to successfully implement stormwater Best Management
Practices to assist in meeting State and Federal water-quality standards and Endangered
Species Act requirements.
Recreation Programs and Services:
E15. Expand outdoor recreation activities and programs that foster environmental awareness
and stewardship.
1.4 Related Plans, Studies, and Initiatives
A significant number of statewide, regional, and local plans, studies, and initiatives provide
relevant background for the development of the NRAMP and guidance for ongoing
management of natural resource areas, important habitat types, emerging threats, and future
acquisition targets. These include statewide initiatives and studies such as the Oregon
Conservation Strategy (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), 2006), which provide
high level guidance for habitat management and protection; local and regional plans such as
the Rivers to Ridges Open Space Vision (2003) and the Willamalane Comp Plan (2004), which
provide a long-range vision and policy guidance; and park specific management and master
plans such as the Dorris Ranch Master Plan (2008) and the Clearwater Park Management Plan
(2010), which provide site specific guidance.
A listing of relevant plans, studies, and initiatives has been compiled in table format and
includes a brief summary of content, a list of key elements related to the NRAMP, and a web
link to the report if available. This table is included as Appendix A.
1.5 Key Terms and Definitions
Adaptive Management: Adaptive management is a systematic process for continually improving
management policies and practices by learning from outcomes of previous actions.
Management actions are documented and monitored over a period of time and the results and
observations are then used to modify and improve management practices and to identify
unforeseen problems that need to be addressed.
Ecosystem Services: The services that an ecosystem or natural resource area provides to a
human population such as drinking water protection, stormwater filtration, and floodwater
conveyance.
Explorers Club: The Explorers Club is a District-run family program that investigates the natural
world, meeting monthly at local parks to explore and learn about the park’s natural resources.
A staff member guides participants in opportunities to learn with hands-on activities,
community service projects, and hiking the natural areas.”
Page 4
Natural Area Park: A Willamalane Comp Plan designation for a park type that is managed for
both recreational use and natural values that provides opportunities for nature-based
recreation, such as wildlife viewing, hiking, jogging, bicycling, and nature play. The two District
parks with this designation are Eastgate Woodlands and Harvest Landing. Note: Natural
resource areas exist in numerous District parks having other park designations such as
neighborhood parks, linear parks, special-use parks, and undeveloped parkland.
Natural Resource Area: An area of land that is managed for natural resource values including
wildlife habitat, water quality function, and visual quality and that provides opportunities for
nature-based recreation, education, and research.
Nature-Based Recreation: Includes recreational activities that benefit from proximity to nature
and are compatible with natural resource values. Examples of nature-based recreation include
wildlife viewing, nature study, walking for pleasure, jogging, bicycling, fishing, nature play, and
picnicking.
Nature Play: This term is used to describe the unstructured play that occurs in natural settings
in which children have the opportunity to engage in creative activities with natural elements in
a natural setting. The nature play concept has evolved nationwide as a response to the
realization that many children today are lacking unstructured access to nature.
Page 5
2.0 Ecological Setting and Regional Context
2.1 Willamette Valley Ecoregion Context
The Willamalane Park and Recreation District-owned and -managed natural resource areas
contain a variety of habitat types which are typical of the broader Willamette Valley Ecoregion.
This ecoregion encompasses 5,308 square miles and includes the relatively flat alluvial plain
associated with the Willamette River and its tributaries and scattered groups of low basalt hills.
Elevations on the valley floor range from about 500 feet at the southeastern end near
Springfield, dropping gently to near sea-level at Portland. Foothills and buttes within the
ecoregion are generally less than 2,500 feet in elevation with the highest elevation Willamalane
natural areas being the future Mountain Park at approximately 1,240 feet, Willamette Heights
at approximately 760 feet, and Kelly Butte at 645 feet.
2.1.1 Historic Condition of Willamette Valley Ecoregion
Historical accounts indicate that, prior to European settlement, much of the Willamette Valley
was covered by native grasses and forbs with widely scattered trees on the hill slopes and
riparian forest along the rivers. The native Kalapuyan people regularly set fires to improve
hunting and travel and these fires helped maintain the valley’s mosaic of grasslands, oak
savannas, wet prairies and other open habitats (Oregon Conservation Strategy, ODFW, 2006).
For thousands of years, the Willamette River and its tributaries have meandered through the
flat valley bottom, changing course on a frequent basis. Regular floods inundated large areas of
the valley bottom including much of what is today Springfield. These floods shaped the
landscape and deposited thick layers of rich agricultural soils and gravels. This dynamic river
system also created abundant aquatic habitat by continuously carving new side channels,
building sheltered alcoves, creating pools, toppling trees, and pushing sediment downstream.
Countless generations of Native Americans lived in this fertile valley, but sadly, by the mid1800s, the population had been so decimated by disease that their once thriving culture had
collapsed and seasonal burning practices ended.
The best record of the pre-settlement vegetation pattern for the Willamette Valley is derived
from the Government Land Office (GLO) survey notes that were recorded in the 1850s. These
detailed survey notes, which documented vegetation types and location of major features such
as rivers, sloughs, and hills, were translated to map form in the 1990s (Christy et al.) and are a
useful resource for interpreting historic condition and documenting change over time. The GLO
surveys indicate that much of what is today the Springfield area was covered primarily with a
mix of upland and wetland prairie, with broad riparian forests lining the Willamette and
McKenzie rivers. Oak woodland and savanna were noted on the area hill slopes including
Quarry Butte, Moe Mountain, and the south slopes of the Thurston Hills. Upland forest was
very limited, but noted on the north slopes of the Thurston Hills and Potato Hill (Mountain
Park).
2.1.2 Willamette Valley Ecoregion Change Over Time
Since the 1850’s, much of the Willamette Valley ecoregion, including the Springfield area, has
been significantly altered by agricultural practices and urban development, particularly
affecting oak woodlands, oak savanna, grassland, riverine, and wetland habitats. The
Willamette River system that had historically flooded vast areas and migrated on a regular basis
Page 6
has been significantly tamed since the 1850s. This river system was modified through
channelization, removal of woody debris, elimination of river side channels, and eventually with
the installation of flood control reservoirs upstream, which have greatly reduced large scale
flooding.
In the absence of regular fires, the remaining prairie and savanna habitats that hadn’t been
converted to agricultural or urban uses declined rapidly as forest and woodland began moving
into these areas through the process of natural succession. Riparian forests also declined
dramatically due to agricultural clearing and reduction of seasonal flooding. This valley-wide
trend also occurred in the Springfield area, with prairie, savanna, and riparian habitats greatly
reduced, while coniferous forests and woodland areas expanded.
2.1.3 Rare Habitats
The Oregon Conservation Strategy (ODFW, 2006) has designated a list of Strategy Habitats for
each ecoregion within the state. Strategy Habitats include those habitat types that have
declined significantly within the ecoregion since European settlement began in the 1850s or
that have been badly degraded. The Willamette Valley ecoregion Strategy Habitats include:
oak woodlands,
upland prairie/grasslands (including oak savanna),
wetlands (including wet prairie and forested wetland),
riparian,
aquatic, and
herbaceous balds and bluffs.
These habitat types have been integrated into the Willamalane Natural Resource Function and
Value Assessment (see Section 3.1) as a way of indicating the presence of rare habitat types
within a natural area. All of these Strategy Habitats are represented within District-owned and
managed properties with the exception of herbaceous balds and bluffs. A description of these,
and other locally present habitat types, is included in Section 2.2. The historic and current
extent of these strategy habitats within the Willamette Valley ecoregion are shown on the
following page.
Page 7
Page 8
2.2 Habitat Types
The habitat types listed below were derived from a number of sources including: The Nature
Conservancy’s Willamette Valley-Puget Trough-Georgia Basin Ecoregional Assessment (TNC, 2004), the
Oregon Conservation Strategy (ODFW, 2006), and the South Ridgeline Habitat Study (Salix Associates,
2007) and are representative of likely habitat conditions within the southern Willamette Valley.
Table 2-1: Habitat Types
Habitat Type
Conifer Forest
71-100%
Canopy
Mixed Forest
71-100%
Hardwood
Forest
71-100%
Conifer
Woodland
31-70%
Mixed
Woodland
Oak Woodland
31-70%
Riparian
0-100%
Savanna
6-30%
31-70%
Wetland
Forest/
Woodland
31-100%
Wetland
Prairie/
Vernal Pool
0-5%
Upland
Prairie/
Grassland
0-5%
Herbaceous
Balds and
Bluffs
0-5%
Aquatic
0-5%
Description
Forested areas associated with dry sites, with a minimum of 60% tree cover of coniferous
species such as Douglas-fir. The understory typically consists of shade tolerant shrubs, ferns,
and forbs.
Forested areas associated with dry sites, with a mix of coniferous and deciduous trees (less than
60% of either type) and a shade tolerant understory.
Forested areas associated with dry sites, with a minimum of at least 60% tree cover of
deciduous species such as maple or oak. The understory typically consists of shade tolerant
shrubs, ferns, and forbs.
Woodland area dominated by coniferous species such as Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine, with
some openings in the canopy. The understory typically consists of a mix of shade and sun
tolerant shrubs, ferns, grasses, and forbs.
Woodland area with a mix of conifers and deciduous trees (less than 60% of either type) and a
mix of shade and sun tolerant understory species.
Woodland area dominated by white or black oak with Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine, madrone,
and maple often present. The understory typically consists of a mix of shade and sun tolerant
shrubs, ferns, grasses, and forbs.
Riparian habitats are those adjacent to rivers and streams or occurring on nearby floodplains.
Riparian habitats are shaped and maintained through seasonal flooding, scour, and soil
deposition and vary from sparsely vegetated areas to cottonwood gallery forests due to flood
dynamics. Typical vegetation includes willow, Douglas-fir, alder, maple, cottonwood, snowberry,
dogwood, spiraea, rushes, sedges, forbs and grasses.
Savannas are associated with dry sites and/or frequent pre-settlement fires, with widely
scattered trees. Typical tree species include white and black oak, ponderosa pine, and Douglasfir with understory similar to prairie or grassland, with some shrubs present. Succession in the
absence of fire or mowing tends to favor increased shrub and tree dominance over time.
Wetland areas with tree cover present with a hydric soil tolerant understory of shrubs, grasses,
forbs, sedges, and rushes. Oregon ash is the typical dominant tree species in these areas with
Douglas-fir and willow often present. This category differs from riparian in that it is generally
found on perched seasonal water tables and is less prone to disturbance due to flooding.
Wet prairies and vernal pools historically covered large areas of the Willamette Valley and were
maintained by a combination of wetland soil hydrology and frequent burning. Wetland prairies
are dominated primarily by bunch grasses, rushes, and forbs and largely free of trees and
shrubs. Vernal pools are characterized by freshwater inundation for much of the winter and
spring, followed by dramatic lowering of the water table at the approach of summer. They are
found in isolated small depressions with no inflow or outflow and typically dominated by annual
forbs.
Upland prairie/grassland occurs on well-drained soils and was maintained historically by
frequent burning. Dominant native vegetation is perennial bunchgrasses with abundant and
diverse forbs. Much of this habitat has been lost in the Willamette Valley and most remaining
habitats have lost native diversity and are often dominated by non-native grasses.
Herbaceous balds and bluffs occur in the driest environmental settings within the Willamette
Valley: generally south- to west-facing slopes on shallow or sandy/gravelly soils. They typically
occur as isolated sites within a forest matrix, on steep slopes, rocky areas, or cliff faces.
Vegetation is dominated by perennial bunchgrasses, forbs, ferns, lichens, and mosses. Scattered
trees and shrubs may be present.
Freshwater aquatic habitats including rivers, streams, ponds, and marshes with water typically
present throughout the year with aquatic and wetland vegetation present.
Page 9
Natural Resource Areas Management Plan - Context Map
BLM
Legend
Willamalane Park Ownership
Harvest
Landing
Beltline Rd.
Scale
eer P
Other Protected Park or Open Space
kwy.
Royal Delle
Park
Centennial Blvd
ath
EWEB P
Oxbow
(Sprigfield)
Moe
Property
MRT
Berggren
(MRT)
MRT
Hwy. 126
Blv
d.
ha
wk
Willamalane
Park
ral
14th St.
Natu
MWMC
Area
28th St.
mu
eƩe
Willam
S. 2nd St.
Sprin
Willamalane
Center
gfiel
d
6
Street
Mountain
Park
BLM
Jesse Maine
Park
ce
Ra
Middle
Fork Path
Willame e
Heights Park
ub Park
Willame e Confluence
(The Nature Conservancy)
way
dle
Mid
OPRD
BLM
Bob Stra
Clearwater
Park
TNC
Gray
Property
G-P
Property
Moon Mnt.
(Eugene)
LC
er
Hwy. 12
ill
Dorris
Ranch
Hendricks
Park
(Eugene)
Riv
Bob Artz
Park
M
r
Rive
Island
Park
MRT
Rob Adams
Park
Main
Volunteer
Park
ie
z
Ken
58th St.
Alton Baker
Park
t
Meadow
Park
Vickery
Park
(LC)
Mc
Creek
42nd St.
ila
Ruﬀ
Park
Mo
W. D Street
treet
Greenway
Wh
Lively
Park
r
da
Ce
Kelly Bu e
Park
Eastgate
Woodland
June
2012
19th St.
Guy Lee
Park
Map produced by LCOG; Aerial Photo: 2009
Willamalane Natural Resource Areas
r
Pion
II-5
zie
McKen
Rive
Gateway St
.
Willamalane Planning Area
Menlo
Park
1/2 Mile
1/4
0
Jasper Meadows
Park and JM South
For
k
BLM
Coast
TNC
30th Ave
.
Lane
Community
College
Fork
I-5
Buford Recrea on Area
(Lane County)
TNC
OP
RD
Arlie Park
Page 11
2.3 Willamalane Natural Resource Areas Regional Context
2.3.1 Rivers to Ridges Vision and Partnership
The Rivers to Ridges Metropolitan Regional Parks and Open Space Vision was completed in
2003, with the intent of providing the framework for future park and open space planning in
the region. Willamalane was an active participant in this region wide visioning process, and the
vision was unanimously endorsed by local elected officials, including the Willamalane Board,
Lane County Board of Commissioners, and both the Eugene and Springfield City Councils. Key
concepts from this vision included connectivity of existing and future open spaces (utilizing
rivers and ridgelines), protection and restoration of key habitats, preservation of scenic quality,
and recreational and educational use of natural areas. These basic concepts were later refined
and incorporated into the 2004 Willamalane Comp Plan. A key strategy of the Rivers to Ridges
vision was the reliance on regional partnerships to implement the vision. The Rivers to Ridges
(R2R) partnership was formalized in 2010, with members committing to participation through
signature of a Statement of Partnership. In 2011, Willamalane formally joined this partnership,
which now includes a total of 14 member organizations:
City of Eugene
Friends of Buford Park and Mount Pisgah (2011)
Lane County Public Works Department (2011)
Long Tom Watershed Council
McKenzie River Trust
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (2011)
Oregon Parks and Recreation Department (OPRD) (2011)
Oregon Youth Conservation Corps
The Nature Conservancy
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Bureau of Land Management
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Willamalane Park and Recreation District (2011)
Willamette Resources and Educational Network
Combined, these organizations own and manage several thousand acres of open space within
the Eugene-Springfield region and meet on a regular basis to coordinate and collaborate on
acquisition planning, habitat management, and trail connectivity.
2.3.2 Proximity to Other Protected Natural Areas
The Willamalane-owned and -managed natural resource areas, which total nearly 500 acres,
are an important component of the broader network of permanently protected open spaces
and habitats in the region. Rivers to Ridges partner lands and conservation easements form
large contiguous blocks of natural area spanning a range of important habitat types. Contiguity
of protected open spaces is beneficial in that it can improve overall habitat viability and provide
opportunities for connectivity for trails and paths. From the perspective of the broader regional
open space system, the District-owned natural resource areas can be grouped into the
following general zones:
Page 10
Middle Fork Willamette River: The natural areas located along the Middle Fork Path and in
Dorris Ranch, the Georgia-Pacific Property, and Clearwater Park are a component of a much
larger contiguous area of permanently protected open space totaling over 4,300 acres situated
along both sides of the Middle Fork Willamette River. Contiguous open space areas include the
Howard Buford Recreation Area (Lane County), the Willamette Confluence Project (TNC), Glass
Bar Island (OPRD), and several smaller properties. This area includes significant amounts of high
quality riparian, aquatic, and savanna habitats and has very high potential for enhancement of
floodplain function.
Willamette River Main Stem: The natural areas located in Island Park, West D Street Greenway,
and Eastgate Woodlands are situated along the north bank of the Willamette River, adjacent to
the Eugene portion of the Whilamut Natural Area of Alton Baker Park. These natural areas
combined form a nearly contiguous block of nearly 300 acres of habitat within the heart of the
metro area.
McKenzie River: The one Willamalane-owned natural area located along the McKenzie River
corridor is the 22-acre Harvest Landing. Although not immediately adjacent to another
protected natural area, it is one of a growing number of preserved habitats along the
Springfield side of the river corridor. These include several McKenzie River Trust properties
(Berggren Conservation Area, McKenzie Oxbow Property, and Big Island conservation
easement), the City-owned Oxbow site, and the Lane County-owned Armitage and KeppelVickery parks. Although dispersed, these properties combined total nearly 350 acres.
Other Dispersed Natural Areas: Willamalane owns and manages a number of dispersed natural
areas that don’t fall into the zones described above. Although these areas are not currently part
of larger blocks of permanently protected habitat, they are significant from a regional
standpoint in that many contain rare habitat types (ODFW Strategy Habitats) such as savanna,
oak woodland, aquatic, and wetland and upland prairie and several have potential for improved
connectivity in the future.
Page 13
3.0 Natural Resource Areas Function and Value Assessments
3.1 Assessment Methodology Overview
In order to gain a better understanding of the relative value and potential of each Willamalaneowned and -managed natural resource area, a Natural Resource Areas Function and Value
Assessment Methodology was developed for this planning effort. The assessment methodology
was designed to specifically reflect Willamalane Park and Recreation District priorities and is
intended to help answer the question: What makes this natural resource area valuable from
the Willamalane perspective? Assessment topics include Habitat Value; Public Use and
Visibility; Ecosystem Services; and Potential for Improvement of Natural Resource Area
Function (see the full assessment methodology in Appendix B). Sub-totals have been tallied
separately for each topic so that the data can be utilized in various combinations. This data will
be used to help rank natural areas in terms of overall value, guide future management
decisions, and inform future land acquisition decisions.
Table 3-1: Natural Resource Areas Function and Value Assessment Categories
I. Habitat Values
a. Size of natural area
b. Native vegetation cover
c. Habitat diversity (one point/type)
d. Rare habitats
e. Rare plant or animal species present
f. Contiguity with other natural areas (based on size of adj. area)
Possible Points
0-3
0-3
0+
0 or 2
0 or 2
0-4
II. Public Use and Visibility
a. Nature-based recreation (passive)
b. Educational use
c. Visibility and scenic value
d. Access and presence of trails
e. User experience
Possible Points
0-3
0-3
0-3
0-3
0-3
III. Ecosystem Services
a. Presence and permanence of water on site
b. Surface water quality function
c. Drinking water protection
d. Floodplain function
Possible Points
0-3
0-3
0-4
0-4
IV. Potential for Improvement of Natural Resource Area Function
a. Potential for habitat restoration or enhancement activities
b. Potential for recreation, education, or trails improvements
c. Potential for water quality related improvements
Possible Points
0-4
0-3
0-3
Page 14
3.2 Natural Resource Area Descriptions and Assessment Scores
The following section includes a brief overview of each of the twenty Willamalane natural
resource areas and assessment scores (see Table 3-2 for composite scores).
Bob Artz Park (7807 Thurston Road)
This natural area includes a portion of Gray Creek and associated riparian vegetation along the south edge of the
park, immediately adjacent to softball fields.
Natural Resource Function and Value Assessment Scores
I. Habitat Values
g. Size of natural area
h. Native vegetation cover
i.
Habitat diversity (one point/type)
j.
Rare habitats
k. Rare plant or animal species
l.
Contiguity
Points
0
1
2
2
2
1
Notes
0.8 acres
Low
Riparian and aquatic
Chinook Salmon habitat - Gray Creek (OBIC)
None, but adjacent to undeveloped SD19 property and wetland
mitigation area
f. Nature-based recreation (passive)
g. Educational use
h. Visibility and scenic value
i.
Access and presence of trails
j.
User experience
Points
1
1
1
0
1
Notes
Wildlife viewing
Birding trail site
Backdrop to developed park area
None
Small size and developed park on edge, rural feel, views
e. Presence /permanence of water
f. Surface water quality function
g. Drinking water protection
h. Floodplain function
Points
3
1
0
0
Notes
Gray Creek (perennial)
Riparian vegetation present
Outside 99-year time of travel
Outside mapped 100-year floodplain
IV. Potential
d. Habitat restoration or enhancement
e. Increased public use and enjoyment
Points
2
1
Notes
Potential for invasive species control and riparian planting
Possible trail along Gray Creek (proposed in Corps of Engineers
Metro Waterways Study)
Riparian vegetation for shading of Gray Creek
f.
Water quality
2
Page 15
Clearwater Park (south end of Clearwater Lane)
This natural area contains outstanding riparian and aquatic habitats and is situated along the Middle Fork
Willamette River and the Springfield Mill Race. Access through the park has been greatly improved with the
construction of the Middle Fork Path and parking facility. A Park Master Plan is under development.
I. Habitat Values
Points
2
2
c.
d.
e.
Habitat diversity (one point/type)
Rare habitats
Rare plant or animal species
2
2
2
f.
Contiguity
3
b.
c.
d.
e.
Educational use
Visibility and scenic value
User experience
Points
3
2
2
3
3
Notes
43.7 acres
Dominant native vegetation with some invasive species such as
blackberry present
Riparian, aquatic (ponds)
Aquatic and riparian habitats
Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout (OBIC); Oregon Chub have been
noted in Mill Race; Western Pond Turtle likely present
GP property (west) and TNC Confluence property south
Notes
Bicycling, wildlife viewing, walking, fishing, jogging/running,
picnicking, nature play, swimming
Signage, birding trail site, Explorer’s Club site
Visible to park users and from the river
Middle fork path, trails, parking, boat ramp
Outstanding
a. Presence /permanence of water
Points
3
3
3
3
Notes
Mill Race, Middle Fork, ponds
Significant riparian forest along river, pond, and Mill Race
Between 2 and 5 year TOT
Approximately 28.3 acres of nat. res. area in 100-year floodplain
IV. Potential
a. Habitat restoration or enhancement
b. Increased public use and enjoyment
c. Water quality
Points
2
3
1
Notes
Invasive species control, pond enhancement
Master Plan specifies trails, nature center, fishing pier
Limited potential for improvement over existing
Related Plans, Studies, and Recent Enhancements: Clearwater Park Management Plan (2010); Clearwater Park
Master Plan (under development); Mill Race Restoration Project (2011); Weed Board-funded false brome removal
project 2008-2009.
Page 16
Dorris Ranch Living History Farm (205 Dorris Street)
The natural area contains the most diverse range of habitats within the Willamalane system. The natural areas are
easily accessed through a series of trails and the planned extension of the Middle Fork Path.
I. Habitat Values
d.
e.
f.
Points
3
2
6
Rare habitats
Rare plant or animal species
Contiguity
2
2
3
Points
3
Notes
173.0 acres
High native cover in riparian and forest, low in prairie
Riparian, conifer forest, mixed forest, prairie/savanna, wetland
prairie, oak woodland
Riparian, oak woodland, upland prairie
Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout (Middle Fork)
OPRD and TNC confluence properties to the south
b.
Educational use
3
c.
d.
e.
Visibility and scenic value
User experience
3
2
3
Notes
Nature study, walking, jogging/running, fishing, picnicking, nature
play, wildlife viewing, swimming
Outdoor classroom, events, signage, Explorer’s Club site, birding
trail site
Park use is high (exceeds 100 users per day)
Soft-surfaced trails
Outstanding
a. Floodplain function
Points
3
3
0
4
Notes
Middle Fork Willamette and seasonal creek, pond
Mature riparian forest and aquatic vegetation
Not within 99 year Time of Travel (TOT) to wellhead
Approximately 57 acres of nat. res. area within 100-year floodplain
IV. Potential
Points
2
3
Notes
Significant opportunities: oak woodland, prairie, and savanna
Middle Fork Path (2012/13), improvements to existing trails,
additional trails, and possible interpretive center
Some water quality improvements possible, including at pond and
along the historic diversion channel.
c.
Water quality
1
Related Plans, Studies, and Recent Enhancements: Dorris Ranch Management Plan (2005); Dorris Ranch Living History Farm
Master Plan (2008); Dorris Ranch Living History Farm Natural Resource Assessment (2008); Weed Board-funded false
brome removal project 2008-2009.
Page 17
Eastgate Woodlands (512 Aspen Street)
Eastgate Woodlands is the Springfield portion of the broader 237-acre Whilamut Natural Area, which extends into
Eugene. The natural area contains mature riparian vegetation and aquatic habitats associated with the Willamette
River and Canoe Canal, with excellent public access available via paths, trails, and boat.
I. Habitat Values
d. Rare habitats
e. Rare plant or animal species
f. Contiguity
Points
2
2
3
2
2
3
Notes
39.8 acres
Native vegetation is dominant; invasive species present
Riparian, upland prairie/grassland (pasture), aquatic
Riparian, aquatic, upland prairie/grassland
Chinook salmon, bull trout (OBIC)
Adjacent to West D. Street Greenway and the Eugene portion of the
Whilamut Natural Area
Points
3
Notes
Wildlife viewing, nature study, walking, jogging/running, bicycling,
fishing, picnicking
Active volunteer group (regular work parties), signage, talking
stones, Explorer’s Club site, birding trail site
Visible from I-5 , paths, trails, and the river
Paved paths, bark trails, bridge
Dense vegetation, outstanding views to river/canal
b. Educational use
2
e. User experience
3
3
3
Points
3
3
0
3
Notes
Willamette River and Canoe Canal
Mature riparian vegetation along river and Canoe Canal
Not within 99-year TOT to wellhead
22.2 acres within mapped 100-year floodplain
IV. Potential
c. Water quality
Points
2
2
1
Notes
Riparian planting, invasive species control, prairie enhancement
Various improvements in the EABPP (trails/boat access)
Supplemental tree/shrub planting for shading
Related Plans , Studies or Recent Enhancements: East Alton Baker Park Plan (1996) Restoration and Monitoring Plan – Eastgate Woodlands of
the Whilamut Natural Area (Willamalane, 2005); Riparian plantings associated with I-5 bridge project; numerous invasive plant removal and
habitat restoration projects, 2008-2012.
Page 18
Georgia-Pacific Property (along the north side of the Middle Fork of the Willamette River)
The GP Property, which is primarily accessed by the public from the Middle Fork Path or the river, contains high
quality riparian and aquatic habitats. The property is bordered by protected natural area on three sides.
I. Habitat Values
Points
3
2
d. Rare habitats
2
2
2
f. Contiguity
3
b. Educational use
e. User experience
Points
3
1
2
3
3
Notes
119.7 acres
Native vegetation dominant, but significant patches of non-native
vegetation is present
Riparian and aquatic (pond and Mill Race)
Chinook Salmon, Western Pond Turtle, Bull Trout (OBIC); Oregon
Chub noted in the Mill Race.
Clearwater Park to east, Confluence property (TNC) to south
Notes
Bicycling, walking, jogging/running, nature study, fishing, nature
play
Currently only passive educational uses
Middle Fork Path facilitates consistent use
Middle Fork Path
Solitude, views to river and adjoining natural areas
Points
3
3
4
4
Notes
Middle Fork Willamette River, Springfield Mill Race, pond
Mature riparian forest along majority of waterways
Within 1 year TOT from wellhead
Approximately 68 acres within mapped 100-year floodplain
IV. Potential
Points
2
2
c. Water quality
1
Notes
Riparian restoration and enhancement opportunities including
riparian planting and invasive species control
Potential for additional trails, interpretive signage, mountain bike
skills park, and accessible fishing area on pond
Riparian planting opportunities in some areas along edge of pond,
Middle Fork, and Mill Race
Page 19
Gray Property (Main Street in east Springfield)
This small natural area surrounds the historic homestead. Future acquisition could expand the size of this Districtowned property, with trail connections into the Thurston Hills possible.
I. Habitat Values
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
Points
1
1
1
2
0
0
Notes
2.6 acres
Limited native cover with significant non-native vegetation
Upland prairie/grassland
Upland prairie/grassland (savanna like habitat on southern edge of
property)
None present
No adjacent protected natural areas, but possible future
Willamalane acquisition could expand size.
b. Educational use
e. User experience
Points
0
0
2
0
0
Notes
None currently
None currently
Somewhat visible from Highway 126
None currently
Adjacent to busy roadway
Points
0
0
0
0
Notes
No significant standing or flow water present
No waterways, ponds, or wetlands present
Not within a 99-year TOT to wellhead
Not within mapped 100-year floodplain
IV. Potential
Points
3
2
Notes
Savanna/prairie restoration potential over most of nat. res. area
Has high potential for trail connection to Thurston Hills with future
acquisition.
No wetlands, ponds, or waterways present
c. Water quality
Page 20
0
Guy Lee Park (890 Darlene Street)
This small natural area, which lies adjacent to a similar habitat patch owned by Springfield Public Schools, consists
of a mix of wetland prairie and woodland, with a seasonal waterway flowing through the area. Due to the close
proximity to the school, ball fields, and residential neighborhood, this area is a popular destination for kids.
I. Habitat Values
Points
0
1.5
Notes
1.7 acres (two areas bisected by SD19 property)
Native cover dominant in forest/woodland, non-native cover
dominant in prairie/grassland
Wetland forest/woodland, upland prairie/grassland
Wetlands
None noted
Bisected by SD19 undeveloped natural area
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
2
2
0
0
b. Educational use
e. User experience
Points
1
2
2
2
1
Notes
Nature study, wildlife viewing, nature play
Birding trail site, proximity to school, popular with kids
Within high use park
Gravel trail and footbridge
Close proximity to residential neighborhood and ball fields
Points
2
1
1
1
Notes
Seasonal waterway and wetlands
Some riparian vegetation along waterway
Within 99-year TOT of wellhead
0.4 acres within 100-year floodplain
IV. Potential
Points
2
2
Notes
Invasive species control, riparian planting, prairie enhancement
Proximity to active park and school (potential interpretive signage,
outdoor classroom, improved path connections)
Potential to enhance riparian area for shading
c. Water quality
1
Page 21
Harvest Landing Natural Area (north end of Harvest Lane)
This natural area lies within the 100-year floodplain of the McKenzie River and contains a mixture of mature
riparian and side channel habitat. Public use is currently limited.
I. Habitat Values
Points
2
2
Notes
22.4 acres
Dominated by native cover, with patches of invasive species such as
blackberry and reed canarygrass present
Riparian and aquatic (side channel)
Chinook Salmon, Oregon Chub, Bull Trout (McKenzie River)
No adjacent protected natural areas
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
2
2
2
0
b. Educational use
e. User experience
Points
2
1
2
1
2
Notes
Wildlife viewing, nature study, fishing, nature play, walking
Birding trail site
Visible to park visitors and McKenzie River boaters
Boat ramp to river on adjacent ODFW property
Views to river and solitude along river
Points
3
3
4
3
Notes
McKenzie River and side channel
Outstanding with mature riparian vegetation
Within 1-year TOT of wellhead
Entire area within mapped floodway and 100-year floodplain
IV. Potential
c. Water quality
Points
1
1
0
Notes
Invasive species control
River study potential, signage by boat ramp
Existing condition is excellent
Page 22
Island Park (along Willamette River west of downtown Springfield)
This natural area, which consists of riparian and side channel habitats, is adjacent to the more developed portion
of Island Park, the Adult Activity Center, and downtown Springfield and is easily accessed by paths and trails.
I. Habitat Values
Points
1
2
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
2
2
2
3
Points
3
b. Educational use
2
e. User experience
3
3
2
Notes
5.8 acres
Native vegetation is dominant, but invasives present in large
quantities including blackberry and reed canarygrass
Riparian, Wetland forest/woodland
Riparian, Wetland forest/woodland
Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout in Willamette River
Up-river from West D Greenway and Whilamut Natural Area and at
outfall of Springfield Mill Race
Notes
fishing, picnicking, nature play, swimming
Explorer’s Club site, summer fair activities, outdoor classes (fly
fishing, birding), birding trail site
Heavy use park and visible from river and Springfield Bridge
Paved paths, gravel trails, boat ramp
Views to river
Points
3
2
0
3
Notes
Willamette River and side channel
Mature riparian vegetation, with some gaps along river
Nearly entire area with 100-year floodplain (12 acres)
IV. Potential
Points
2
2
c. Water quality
1
Notes
Riparian planting along river, invasive species control, habitat
features along river/side channel/Beaver Creek
Master Plan calls for accessible fishing pier, river overlook, and
other improvements. Adjacent to Adult Activity Center
Additional riparian planting along river for shading
Related Plans or Studies: Island Park Master Plan (1997)
Page 23
Jasper Meadows Park and Jasper Meadows South (South 57th Street at Mount Veron Road)
This natural area includes a mix of aquatic and wetland habitats (some recently restored) and is located within a
newer residential neighborhood. Jasper Meadows Park (north end) includes walking paths and a playground.
I. Habitat Values
Points
1
3
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
2
2
0
0
b. Educational use
Points
2
2
2
e. User experience
2
1
Points
2
1
0
0
IV. Potential
Points
2
3
c. Water quality
2
Page 24
Notes
13.1 acres (JMP: 4.9 acres; JMS: 8.2 acres)
Good native cover in wetland mitigation areas, patches of nonnative species present in forested areas
Wetland prairie, aquatic, wetland forest/woodland
Wetlands, aquatic
None noted
Not contiguous to other protected natural area
Notes
Wildlife viewing, nature study, nature play, walking, running
Explorer’s club site, playground program site (lots of kids), birding
trail site
Backdrop to residential neighborhood, visible from nearby roads
and developed neighborhood park area
Sidewalks adjacent to natural area
Able to escape some influences of built environment
Notes
Waterway and seasonal wetlands
Some shading vegetation present along waterway. Grasses and
forbs provide filtration in wetland areas.
Notes
Riparian planting, invasive species control, diversity plantings in wet
prairie areas
Potential for addition of interpretive signage, planned boardwalk
trail system in FY 13-17 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Riparian planting along waterway for shading
Kelly Butte Park (937 Summit Blvd.)
This natural area consists of mixed forest on the slope of Kelly Butte with public access limited primarily to the
overlook on the south side of the park which offers excellent views of the city and nearby rivers and hills.
I. Habitat Values
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
Points
1
2
1
0
0
0
Notes
4.2 acres
Mostly native tree cover, invasive species present
Mixed forest
None
None noted
Not adjacent to other protected natural area
b. Educational use
e. User experience
Points
1
1
3
1
2
Notes
Wildlife viewing, picnicking, photography
Birding trail site, Explorer’s Club site
Highly visible from west Springfield
No trails, but viewing area present
Outstanding views to nearby natural areas
Points
0
0
1
0
Notes
None present
N/A
Within 99-year TOT to wellhead
IV. Potential
c. Water quality
Points
2
1
0
Notes
Invasive species control
Interpretive signage, Limited potential for trails (slope)
N/A
Page 25
Lively Park
The Lively Park natural area includes a diverse mix of habitat types within a relatively small area including a portion
of Cedar Creek and is in close proximity to the heavily used Splash! facility and Thurston Middle School.
I. Habitat Values
Points
1
2
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
4
2
2
0
b. Educational use
Points
2
2
e. User experience
2
2
2
Notes
8.7 acres
Mostly native canopy. Patches of invasive vegetation: blackberry,
reed canarygrass. Grassland mostly non-native.
Mixed woodland, conifer forest, riparian, upland prairie/grassland
Upland prairie/grassland, riparian
Chinook Salmon (Cedar Creek)
Notes
Wildlife viewing, nature study, walking for pleasure, picnicking
Birding trail site, close proximity to recreational facility, Explorer’s
Club site, volunteer work parties
Visible to park users
Soft-surface trail and footbridge
Views to Cedar Creek, relatively quiet area
Points
3
2
4
1
Notes
Cedar Creek (perennial waterway)
Riparian vegetation present along most of creek edge
0.2 acres within mapped 100-year floodplain (Cedar Creek)
IV. Potential
Points
2
3
Notes
Invasive species control, habitat features in creek
Close proximity to recreational facility and school, proposed trail
along Cedar Creek (Metro Waterways Study), Nature trail
improvements in Master Plan and Fiscal Year 13-17 CIP
Expanding riparian vegetation along creek
c. Water quality
1
Related Plans, Studies, and Recent Enhancements: Jack B. Lively Memorial Park Master Plan (2005); Lively Park Restoration Plan (Claire Porter,
AmeriCorps, 2006); OWEB-funded invasive plant removal projects 2010-2012.
Page 26
Middle Fork Path (north bank of the Middle Fork Willamette River)
This lineal natural area is limited to the fringe area along either edge of the path, but passes through extensive
areas of riparian and aquatic habitat, much of which is in City of Springfield and Springfield Utility Board
ownership.
Natural Resource Function and Value Assessment Scores*
I. Habitat Values
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
Points
2
2
1
2
2
3
Notes
15.3 acres
Dominated by native cover, patches of invasive species
Riparian (immediately adjacent to aquatic habitats)
Riparian
Western Pond Turtle, Chinook Salmon, Bull Trout (OBIC)
Contiguous to Lively Park (east), Dorris Ranch (west), and TNC
Confluence property (south)
Points
3
1
3
3
3
Notes
Wildlife viewing, nature study, walking for pleasure,
jogging/running, bicycling, fishing, picnicking
Only occasional use due to location, no signage
Visible from river and Middle Fork Path users
Middle Fork Path
Outstanding views to river and adjacent natural area
Points
3
3
4
3
Notes
Middle Fork Willamette River and side channels
Dense riparian vegetation in most of the natural area
Within 1-2 year TOT to wellhead
12.0 acres within mapped 100-year floodplain
IV. Potential
c. Water quality
Points
1
1
0
Notes
Invasive species control and riparian planting
Interpretive signage
Limited due to size/configuration
b. Educational use
e. User experience
Related Plans or Studies: Clearwater Park Management Plan (2010), includes recommendation for MF Path
*The assessment applies only to the areas immediately adjacent to the path (owned or managed by Willamalane)
Page 27
Moe Property (north of Marcola Road on slope of Vitus Butte)
This future Willamalane Park includes a diverse range of habitat types that extend down the southwest facing
slopes of Vitus Butte. A planned multi-use path will provide excellent public access in the future and great
opportunities for enhancement of rare habitat types exists.
I. Habitat Values
Points
1
2
Notes
11.1 acres
Mostly native overstory, invasive species present including English,
blackberry, and non-native grasses.
Aquatic, oak woodland, prairie/grasslands mixed woodland
Oak woodland, aquatic, upland prairie/grasslands
None noted
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
4
2
0
0
b. Educational use
e. User experience
Points
0
0
3
0
2
Notes
None currently
None currently
Visible from neighborhood and transportation corridors
Graveled surface in place, but not yet a public trail
Views and varied habitats
Points
3
2
1
0
Notes
Irving Slough (perennial)
Shading vegetation along much of waterway
IV. Potential
c. Water quality
Points
2
3
1
Notes
Oak release, invasive species control, habitat features
Proposed path (RTP funding request) – gravel in place; signage
Enhanced riparian shading
Page 28
Mountain Park (Forest Ridge Drive)
This future Willamalane Park includes a diverse range of habitat types including oak savanna, mature conifer
forest, and upland prairie. An extensive trail network is planned for the future, with outstanding views available.
I. Habitat Values
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
Points
3
2
4
2
0
0
Notes
59.4 acres
Native canopy dominant, mixed understory
Conifer forest, mixed woodland, savanna, upland prairie/grassland
Savanna, upland prairie
None noted
Not contiguous to protected natural area, although in close
proximity to Rob Adams Park
b. Educational use
Points
0
0
3
Notes
No access currently permitted
No access currently permitted
Highly visible from much of east Springfield, views from open
slopes, backdrop to residential neighborhood
No public trails
Large area allows for solitude, outstanding views, varied habitats
e. User experience
0
3
Points
0
0
0
0
Notes
Standing or flowing water not present
N/A
Not within 99 TOT to wellhead
IV. Potential
Points
2
c. Water quality
3
0
Notes
Habitat enhancements related to invasive species control, oak
release in savanna and woodland areas, woody vegetation control
in prairie areas
Trail system planned and in FY 13-17 CIP
Standing or flowing water not present
Related Plans or Studies: Concept plan for trail network has been developed
Page 29
Rob Adams Park (890 Mountaingate Drive)
This natural area is dominated by mixed forest on west facing slopes, with a small patch of forested wetland on the
north end, and a grassy hill-slope on the south (reclaimed quarry planted in grass).
I. Habitat Values
Points
2
2
3
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
2
0
1
b. Educational use
e. User experience
Points
1
1
2
2
1
Notes
25.5 acres
Invasive species prominent on south end of park near quarry, native
vegetation in forested areas is dominant
Mixed forest, wetland forest (0.8 acres on northern edge), and
upland prairie/grassland (~5.0 acres on southern edge). Small pond
on southern end, but below 0.5 acre threshold.
0.8 acres forested wetland (plus low quality grassland)
None noted
No adjacent protected natural areas (close proximity to Mountain
Park); Adjacent to permanent stormwater facility
Notes
Nature play, wildlife viewing, walking
Explorer’s Club site
Backdrop to neighborhood, visible from Bob Straub Parkway and
other nearby roadways
Soft surface trail
Close proximity to residential area
Points
1
2
0
0
Notes
Seasonal wetland at northern edge
Forested wetland
IV. Potential
c. Water quality
Points
1
1
0
Notes
Savanna/prairie restoration potential on southern 5 acres
Potential trail enhancements, signage
Existing wetland condition is already good
Page 30
Ruff Park (1161 North 66th Street)
This natural area includes segments of both the North Branch and South Branch of Cedar Creek and associated
riparian vegetation. The park has an active group of neighborhood volunteers.
I. Habitat Values
Points
1
2
d. Rare habitats
2
2
2
f. Contiguity
0
Notes
3.3 acres
Trees/shrubs along creek mostly native, invasive species such as
reed canarygrass and blackberry common along creek, low native
cover in north triangle area.
Riparian and aquatic (Cedar Creek branches)
Chinook Salmon, Western Pond Turtle (North and South Branch
Cedar Creek)
No adjacent protected natural area
b. Educational use
e. User experience
Points
2
2
2
2
2
Notes
Nature study, wildlife viewing, walking, nature play
Birding trail site, Explorer’s Club site, active volunteer group
Not visible from travel corridor, viewed by park users
Loop trail along riparian edge (all-season surface)
Views, quiet setting
Points
3
3
4
2
Notes
North and South Branch Cedar Creek (both perennial)
Mature riparian vegetation lines most of the creek banks
Within the 1-2 year TOT
3.3 acres within 100-year floodplain (100% of natural area)
IV. Potential
Points
2
c. Water quality
2
1
Notes
Invasive species control along creeks, “native plant restoration”
proposed for northern portion of park in Master Plan
Creek overlook and picnic sites proposed in Master Plan; signage
Some riparian planting opportunities
Related Plans or Studies: Ruff Park Master Plan (2006)
Page 31
Volunteer Park (4350 Mount Vernon Road)
This natural area includes a constructed wetland that was incorporated into the park design to take advantage of
wet conditions at the north end of the park.
I. Habitat Values
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
Points
0
2
1
2
0
0
Notes
0.9 acres
Native vegetation (by design); invasive species present
Emergent wetland/wetland prairie
Constructed wet prairie
None noted
Not contiguous with other protected natural area
b. Educational use
Points
2
2
Notes
Wildlife viewing, nature study, walking, picnicking
Immediately adjacent to school and playground, Explorer’s Club
site, birding trail site
Backdrop for park users
Soft-surface trail, bridge, walkways
e. User experience
2
2
1
Points
2
1
1
0
Notes
Seasonal wetland
Limited shading on wetland
IV. Potential
c. Water quality
Points
0
1
1
Notes
Limited potential for improvement
Possible integration with school curriculum, signage
Shading vegetation along wetland edge
Page 32
West D Street Greenway
This natural area, which consists of riparian, aquatic habitats, and mixed woodland habitats, receives heavy
recreational use by runners and walkers and is a popular spot for water play along the river’s edge during the
summer months.
I. Habitat Values
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
Points
3
2
2
2
2
3
Notes
10.0 acres
Native vegetation is dominant; invasive species present
Riparian, mixed woodland, aquatic (river)
Riparian, aquatic
Chinook salmon, bull trout (OBIC)
Adjacent to Island Park, Eastgate Woodlands, Whilamut Natural
Area
Points
3
Notes
fishing, picnicking, swimming
Birding trail site, heavy use, but limited educational use
Visible from West D Street , river, and paths and running through
park
Paved path, bark trails, walkways
Interesting geology along river, outstanding views
b. Educational use
1
3
e. User experience
3
3
Points
3
2
0
2
Notes
Willamette River and side channels
Mature riparian vegetation, but some exposed soil
3.3 acres within mapped 100 year floodplain
IV. Potential
c. Water quality
Points
1
1
0
Notes
Invasive species control, native understory planting
Some potential, no specific plans or proposals
Limited ability to shade river from north bank
Page 33
Willamette Heights Park (508 Valley View Avenue)
This natural area, which contains a mix of open and forested habitats, receives relatively low visitation, but offers
excellent views to the south and west.
I. Habitat Values
d. Rare habitats
f. Contiguity
Points
1
2
2
2
0
0
Notes
3.1 acres
Mostly native tree composition
Prairie/savanna and mixed forest
Prairie/savanna (~0.5 acre patch on south side of park)
None noted
No adjacent protected natural areas
b. Educational use
e. User experience
Points
1
1
1
0
2
Notes
Picnicking, nature study
Birding trail site
Relatively low use
No formal paths
Outstanding views
Points
0
0
0
0
Notes
None
None
Not within floodplain
IV. Potential
Points
2
1
Notes
Invasive species control, prairie/savanna enhancement
Potential improvements to the existing informal trail along the west
and north slopes
N/A
c. Water quality
Page 34
0
3.3 Overview of Assessment Scores
The following table includes the comparative scores for each of the twenty natural resource
areas. See table 6-1 to review the results in ranked order.
Table 3-2: Natural Resource Areas Function and Value Assessment Scores
Page 35
4.0 Goals, Objectives, and Recommended Actions and Strategies
4.1 Purpose
The purpose of this section is to provide detailed policy direction for the protection and
management of District-owned and -managed natural resource areas and to document
potential actions and strategies that the District could utilize to implement these policies over
time. The goals and objectives listed below have been crafted to support policy direction given
in the 2004 Willamalane Comp Plan and 2012 Comp Plan update (draft) along with other
related plans, studies, and initiatives (see Appendix A). Input and review was also provided by
the NRAMP Planning Team and Technical Advisory Team.
4.2 Organization
The following section is organized under nine overarching goal topics related to the District’s
Natural Resource Areas, each with a series of more detailed supporting objectives. A set of
recommended actions and strategies have been developed to describe specific steps that could
be taken to help implement each objective and are included in a bulleted list following the
objective.
Goals (1-9)
o Objectives (1a, 1b, 1c…)
 Recommended Actions and Strategies
NRAMP Goal Topics:
Goal 1: Habitat Preservation, Restoration, and Enhancement
Goal 2: Ongoing Natural Resource Area Management
Goal 3: Ecosystem Services
Goal 4: Public Access and Nature-Based Recreation
Goal 5: Education, Stewardship, and Research
Goal 6: Natural Resource Area Planning
Goal 7: Monitoring and Mapping
Goal 8: Future Habitat Preservation, Land Acquisition, and Easements
Goal 9: Partnerships and Collaboration
4.3 Goals, Objectives, and Recommended Actions and Strategies
Goal 1: Habitat Preservation, Restoration, and Enhancement
Preserve, restore, and enhance native habitats found within District-owned and managed
natural resource areas, recognizing that natural areas are dynamic and will change over time.
Objective 1a. Recognize and foster the important function that District-owned natural areas
play in providing habitat for native species, nature-based recreational and educational
opportunities, and ecosystem services and work to preserve those attributes over time.
Preserve a variety of habitat types within the District’s park and open space system,
with a special emphasis on Oregon Conservation Strategy (ODFW, 2006) habitats such as
oak woodlands, savanna, prairie/grasslands, wetlands, aquatic, and riparian.
Page 36
Preserve natural resource areas in proximity to the urbanized portions of Springfield in
order to provide easy access to residents for nature-based recreation and education and
to provide a scenic backdrop for the community.
Consider creating a special designation of key high quality natural resource areas to
ensure a long-term focus on preservation and enhancement of natural resource
function. Types of facilities and level of access in these areas would be determined
during the management planning process for individual sites.
Evaluate potential for expanding existing District-owned natural resource areas and
preserving other nearby high quality natural areas as feasible to improve overall system
quality, provide increased nature-based recreational opportunities, and protect
ecosystem services (see Goal 8 below).
Invite participation from the Native American community to assist with planning and
management of natural resource areas.
Objective 1b. Identify opportunities to restore and enhance habitats within existing natural
resource areas where they are currently degraded and secure funding for implementation of
restoration and enhancement projects.
Inventory existing natural resources and identify opportunities for major enhancement
and restoration projects within natural resource areas through management or master
planning efforts for individual parks or groupings of parks. Preparing restoration and
enhancement concept plans and cost estimates for those opportunity areas will prepare
the District to take advantage of funding opportunities as they arise.
Implement habitat restoration and enhancement projects as funding becomes available.
Projects could include riparian planting, enhancement of prairie and savanna habitats,
reconnection of river side channels, oak release, and placement of habitat features such
as large woody debris in waterways for fish habitat, basking logs for turtles, and rock
piles for reptiles.
Introduce native nectar producing forbs and shrubs into natural resource areas to
improve habitat for native pollinators and butterflies.
Leverage state, federal, and foundation grant funding for significant enhancement or
restoration activities or pursue partnerships with other local entities such as watershed
councils to assist with implementation of projects.
Objective 1c. Utilize an adaptive management approach to guide the management of Districtowned natural areas over time. Adaptive management is a systematic process for continually
improving management policies and practices by learning from outcomes (see diagram below).
Carefully record techniques, timing, and geographic extent of major management,
enhancement, and restoration activities as they occur (see monitoring goal and
objectives below).
Document and evaluate the success of the management, enhancement, or restoration
actions over time (see Goal 7: Monitoring and Mapping).
Adjust management, enhancement, and restoration actions for the site and other
similar natural areas accordingly to improve future success.
Revisit Management Plans (see Goal 6 and Section 5.0) on a regular basis and adjust as
needed based on adaptive management approach. Management plans should be
updated every 5-10 years as feasible.
Page 37
Adaptive Management Diagram
Goal 2: Ongoing Natural Resource Area Management
Actively manage District natural resource areas to help sustain their integrity and long-term
viability and to protect the District’s investments in property and completed restoration and
enhancement projects.
Objective 2a. Actively manage natural resource areas to sustain their integrity and long-term
viability, with a priority on protecting the highest quality natural resource areas.
Actively manage oak woodlands, savanna, and prairie habitats to minimize
encroachment of conifers and other woody vegetation, which over time will degrade
these rare habitats.
Help prevent establishment of invasive species through public and staff training and
education.
Control invasive vegetation, focusing on highly invasive non-native species such as
Armenian blackberry, Scotch broom, Japanese knotweed, shining geranium, false
brome, English ivy, butterfly bush, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other emerging threats.
Coordinate with the Oregon State Weed Board, Upper Willamette Cooperative Weed
Board, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), Oregon Department of
Agriculture, Western Invasives Network, and the Native Plant Society of Oregon –
Emerald Chapter. Priority should be given to control or even eradication of newly
colonizing invasive species before they become widely established. Some widely
established species populations may be beyond control or eradication efforts. The Early
Detection and Rapid Response (EDRR) process for plants and insects could be a useful
tool for District staff and provides excellent materials such as invasive species
identification keys and photos. Useful web resources include:
www.fs.fed.us/invasivespecies/earlydetection.shtml and
http://www.westerninvasivesnetwork.org/pages/cwmapage.php?region=upperwillamette)
Page 38
Give special management attention to areas containing known rare native plant and
animal populations to control newly colonizing species and research and implement
best management practices for those individual species. Where threatened or
endangered species are present, confer with the appropriate agencies to ensure state
and federal regulations are met and that proposed management actions are appropriate
for those species.
Monitor for the presence of feral animals such as cats, domestic geese, and pigs (an
emerging threat in Oregon) that negatively impact native wildlife species and take
appropriate actions for control. Coordinate with the Springfield office of the Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Assess impacts of ongoing and proposed recreational use on sensitive resource areas
and develop strategies for changing use patterns if issues are occurring. Impacts could
include formation of undesignated trails, construction of unauthorized free-riding
courses, and placement of geocaches. Geocaches are often placed in parks without
significant resource impacts, but are occasionally unknowingly placed in sensitive areas.
Locations of all existing geocaches can easily be monitored on www.geocaching.com.
Objective 2b. Ensure that ongoing management and maintenance activities of natural resource
areas follow best management practices for protection and improvement of native habitats.
Work to minimize the impacts of routine management and maintenance activities that
occur within natural resource areas to the extent possible.
Evaluate the timing, frequency, and methods used for various ongoing management
activities such as mowing, invasive species control, and trail work to minimize negative
impacts to native wildlife species. For example, mowing and brush removal should be
scheduled, where possible, to avoid the period between May and July to minimize
impacts to nesting birds.
Use environmentally-sustainable park development and management practices. Utilize
the District-wide Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program to guide decision making
for appropriate use of management prescriptions such as herbicide and pesticide
application. Evaluate the existing IPM program to ensure that it is adequate to guide
natural resource area management, and revise as needed. Explore utilization of the City
of Eugene’s IPM appendix related to natural area management.
Leave downed trees and snags in place as habitat features where they do not pose a
public safety threat or block trails or paths. Consider reducing snag height as an
alternative to complete removal.
Develop a standard protocol for preventing transport of weed seed between sites
during maintenance activities including shoe cleaning stations and cleaning of
maintenance equipment.
Objective 2c. Maintain and improve existing and future designated trails to clarify routes,
improve user safety, and to accommodate all-season use, while limiting impacts to sensitive
natural areas.
Develop a set of District-wide trail standards and maintenance guidelines.
Maintain all natural area trails in a way that keeps users on a single designated track and
eliminates trail braids, cut switchbacks, desire lines, and other unofficial trails. This will
be achieved through improvements to the designated trail, placement of logs and brush,
Page 39
signage, vegetation, and temporary fencing to block unwanted trails. Any fencing
material will be selected to minimized visual impact (wood or natural colors).
Develop a consistent system of signage to be used to indicate closed trails, wayfinding,
and park boundaries.
Objective 2d. Work to ensure that District-staff who regularly manage and maintain natural
resource areas are well trained on techniques and best management practices for management
of native habitats found within District-owned natural resource areas.
Participate in regular identification and training sessions and conferences offered by
organizations such as the Society for Ecological Restoration, Oregon Recreation and
Parks Association (natural resource section), and the Rivers to Ridges Field Operations
Group.
Consider cross-training with natural resource staff from other local partners such as the
City of Eugene Parks and Open Space Division, watershed councils, Friends of Buford
Park, McKenzie River Trust, and The Nature Conservancy, all of whom have built staff
expertise in management of local habitats.
Cross-train District staff who regularly manage nature-based recreational programming.
Objective 2e. Improve the District’s ability to more accurately project costs for ongoing
management and potential restoration or enhancement actions.
Record costs of standard management and maintenance activities that occur on a
regular basis as a way to help develop rule-of-thumb costs for estimating fiscal impacts
of acquiring new properties and expanding/reducing management practices on existing
properties.
Research unit costs for standard restoration and enhancement activities such as riparian
planting or oak release, so that accurate cost estimates can be made for budgeting and
grant applications.
Utilize cost information during the management planning process for individual sites to
ensure that proposed actions are achievable with available funding.
Objective 2f. Identify funding in the District’s annual budgeting process for operations and
maintenance to adequately maintain natural resource areas.
Develop up-to-date cost estimates and task lists for routine management of natural
resource areas and incorporate funding into the District’s yearly work plan.
As natural resource area properties are acquired in the future, attempt to incorporate
basic site improvements as a condition of purchase. This approach could greatly reduce
up-front site management costs of newly acquired properties and could include
activities such as site grading, disposal of slash piles, road removal, and upgrades to
infrastructure.
Look for opportunities to partner with Team Springfield agencies and other
organizations on funding enhancement and management activities with overlapping
benefits. For example, Springfield Utility Board (SUB) could assist with drinking water
protection related projects, the School District could help fund educational programs,
and City stormwater funds could be utilized for water quality related efforts.
Consider establishing stewardship endowments where feasible as a technique to ensure
long-term site management funding.
Page 40
Expand opportunities for volunteers and adoption groups to perform natural resource
area management activities such as invasive species survey and control, planting, trail
maintenance, litter collection, and monitoring.
Develop partnerships with organizations and corporations that share a similar mission
for outdoor stewardship and recreation and could potentially provide funding or
volunteers, or provide low-cost services. Examples would be Cabelas, REI, Disciples of
Dirt, Obsidians, University of Oregon, and Lane Community College.
Goal 3: Ecosystem Services
Work to ensure that District-owned natural resource areas are managed in a way that is
compatible with the preservation of ecosystem services such as drinking water protection,
stormwater treatment, and floodplain function and look for opportunities to further protect
these services over time.
Objective 3a. Manage natural resource areas in a way that is compatible with the protection of
drinking water resources in the Springfield area and collaborate with regional partners to
protect other key properties.
Work with the Springfield Utility Board and Rainbow Water District to develop drinking
water protection best management practices for natural resource areas within
Springfield’s wellhead protection area. This could include practices such as reduced use
of herbicide and pesticides or vegetation enhancements within these areas. Use an
integrated pest management approach to determine alternative management
techniques in these areas where feasible.
Consider partnering with SUB to implement a Groundwater Guardian Green Sites
program in one or more Willamalane parks or natural areas. Through this program,
groundwater-friendly practices would be adopted and water quality progress measured
over time. In addition to helping protect groundwater resources, these parks could be a
focal point for demonstrating water quality friendly practices to the public. For more
information on Groundwater Guardian Green Sites program go to
http://www.groundwater.org/gg/greensites.html.
Collaborate with other regional partners to identify and protect key properties that are
within a short groundwater time-of-travel to existing municipal wellheads.
Objective 3b. Work to preserve and enhance floodplain function of local rivers and creeks.
Collaborate with other regional partners to acquire conservation easements or purchase
land of willing sellers over key floodplain properties to accommodate flooding and allow
for natural river migration.
Look for opportunities within District-owned natural resource areas to improve
floodplain function by re-connecting side channels and widening urban waterways to
add floodwater capacity and off-channel habitat.
Objective 3c. Improve water quality function of District-owned natural resource areas and
modify management approaches near waterways.
Increase native component of riparian vegetation along rivers and streams where it is
degraded to increase shading and filtration, and increase diverse native habitat for
Page 41
terrestrial invertebrates or aquatic invertebrates with a terrestrial need in their life
cycle.
Minimize use of herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers near waterways, wetlands, and
other aquatic habitats.
Coordinate with the City to successfully implement stormwater best management
practices to assist in meeting State and Federal water-quality standards and Endangered
Species Act requirements. Review the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit and assess how it specifically relates to District-owned
properties.
Goal 4: Public Access and Nature-Based Recreation
Provide close-to-home opportunities for the public to access and enjoy natural areas and
provide outstanding sites for nature-based recreational activities.
Objective 4a. Construct a network of carefully sited and designed trails and paths that will
enable the public to easily access and enjoy District-owned natural resource areas, while
limiting impacts to sensitive habitats.
Continue to expand the system of multi-use paths that provide connections through and
between District-owned natural areas, nearby open space areas (non-District owned),
and to the regional path network. These long-distance connections are critical for
providing opportunities for non-motorized access to natural resource areas for nature
based recreational activities.
Where feasible, provide direct trail and path connections to natural resource areas from
adjacent neighborhoods, schools, and parks. These connector trails are intended to
provide localized access and therefore will not require significant facilities such as
parking lots or rest rooms. Trailheads should include signage to clarify that they are
public trails and assist with route finding.
Work to minimize impacts of trails and paths on sensitive habitats. Prior to construction
of new trails and paths, carefully assess the natural resource area for the presence of
sensitive vegetation, rare plant species, and critical wildlife habitats so that it can be
sited to avoid impacting those areas.
Avoid over building trail networks, especially within the more sensitive natural resource
areas. Where feasible, limit formal public access to large blocks of habitat, in order to
provide refuge to wildlife.
Develop a network of soft-surfaced trails to provide access to points of interest within
natural areas such as viewpoints, highly scenic areas, and unique habitats, being careful
to design and site trails to limit impacts to sensitive habitats. Trails should be sited in a
way that avoids direct visual access to nearby roadways, homes, and other urban
features where possible to help maximize visual experience and provide a sense of
solitude for trail users. Trail and path networks should be planned so they provide loops
of various lengths and connect into the broader regional network if possible.
Objective 4b. Provide opportunities and related facilities to accommodate nature-based
recreational activities such as wildlife viewing, photography, nature study, walking for pleasure,
jogging, running, bicycling, nature play, fishing, swimming, and picnicking.
Page 42
Use public surveys, Comp Plan recommendations, and other sources to determine
public preferences for nature based recreational opportunities and work to integrate
facilities within District-owned natural areas.
Coordinate with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife on locating a family friendly
and accessible fishing area including an accessible fishing pier (Comp Plan
recommendation).
Develop a strategy to improve opportunities for recreational access to water for
activities such as wading and water-play. Consider the feasibility of designating access
points as a way to help reduce impacts of dispersed use and to direct users to safe
areas.
Objective 4c. Provide and maintain publicly accessible views and vista points and improve visual
quality to, from, and within District-owned natural areas.
Manage vegetation to preserve or improve important views and vistas of nearby natural
features such as rivers and hills, varied habitats, and the surrounding landscape.
Vegetation management should be done in a way that limits natural resource impacts
and maintains a pleasing and/or interesting view.
Provide viewpoints that are accessible to individuals with limited mobility, either by
short, fully accessible trails or from designated parking areas similar to Kelly Butte.
Work to preserve and improve the visual quality of District-owned natural resource
areas. This could include enhancement of native vegetation to enhance interest and
beauty (including flowering forbs and shrubs), planting of screening vegetation to block
undesirable views, and working with adjacent property owners on visual enhancements.
Objective 4d. Provide an outstanding user experience for visitors to District-owned natural
resource areas.
Identify key views, vistas, and features of interest and provide access to those areas,
where feasible, while avoiding impacts to sensitive habitats or natural resource values.
Provide basic user amenities within natural resource areas where appropriate including
features such as benches and signage. Care should be taken to ensure that added user
amenities do not detract from the visual quality of the natural resource area.
Strive to keep the District-owned natural areas trash free through regular maintenance
schedule and utilization of volunteers and adoption groups.
Encourage dog owners to obey leash laws and remove pet waste. Pet waste is a major
source of water pollution in urban areas. Off-leash pets can disrupt user experience and
impact native habitat and wildlife.
Objective 4e. Address public safety issues through a combined approach of environmental
design, natural surveillance, enforcement of park rules, community involvement, vegetation
management, and clear signage (to help direct emergency response).
Manage natural areas to eliminate hiding places that tend to attract illegal activities and
camping, focusing on areas of documented problems. This could include limbing and
pruning of lower branches on trees and shrubs to create sight lines and clearing thick
sight-obscuring vegetation. Managing vegetation for public safety can be done in a way
that is consistent with habitat management goals including removal of exotic species
such as ivy, holly, Japanese knotweed, and blackberry.
Page 43
Clearly delineate park boundaries with signage or low wildlife friendly fencing to
eliminate unintentional trespass onto adjacent private properties.
Design hard surfaced paths to accommodate emergency response and patrol vehicles.
Consider emergency response logistics when siting new soft-surfaced trails.
Organize park watch programs where nearby citizens and volunteers could be enlisted
to monitor and report illegal activities and other problems occurring in natural areas
and nearby paths and trails. Trained volunteer docents could also perform this public
safety function while interfacing with visitors in some of the more popular natural areas.
Seek partnerships with appropriate law enforcement and emergency response agencies
and organizations to ensure that District parks and natural resource areas have
adequate coverage.
Lighting is generally discouraged in natural areas due to wildlife considerations, but
where it is necessary for public safety reasons, it should be designed for a consistent
level of low light and avoid light pollution and light trespass into the natural area and
nearby residences. Extreme light levels can be counterproductive because they can
accentuate pockets of shadow along path edges. Lighting should be designed with
vandalism and theft resistance in mind with solar wireless power considered where
feasible to avoid wire theft.
Post District phone contact information in key locations to enable park users to easily
call to report issues.
Goal 5: Education, Stewardship, and Research
Utilize the District-owned natural areas as an educational resource for children and adults.
Objective 5a. Develop a comprehensive approach to guide formal outdoor education within
District-owned natural resource areas along with support facilities.
Develop a comprehensive outdoor education plan to help define community need, key
educational themes, and partnership opportunities. This plan could also include
identification of a series of outdoor classrooms at key locations and proposals for
improvement of those areas for educational use.
Expand on successful District-run outdoor educational programs that are already in
place such as the Explorer’s Club and Living History Program.
Work with area educational organizations such as Springfield Public Schools, University
of Oregon, Oregon State University, Lane Community College, SUB, Willamette
Resources & Education Network (WREN), and the City of Springfield to utilize Districtowned natural resource areas as an educational resource and work cooperatively on
developing related curriculum and support facilities.
Support the development of interpretive facilities within the District that will serve as
centers for learning about nature and to provide facilities that can be used to host
District sponsored outdoor educational programs.
Utilize existing educational materials that have been produced by the McKenzie and
Middle Fork Willamette watershed councils related to those rivers and associated
watershed features.
Page 44
Objective 5b. Provide informal learning opportunities throughout the District’s system of
natural resource areas, taking advantage of unique habitat features, viewpoints, and proximity
to trails and paths.
Identify suitable locations for designated “nature play” areas within a District-owned
natural resource area. A nature play area is a designated site where unstructured play is
encouraged in a natural setting and where children have the opportunity to engage in
creative activities with natural elements in a natural setting. This can be implemented
on a trial basis and then expanded to other natural areas if successful. Nature play areas
should be monitored on a regular basis to identify and remove potential hazards such as
poison oak, yellow jacket nests, and materials that could be hazardous such as boards
with nails or broken glass. Signage to encourage use, define the boundary, and provide
guidelines for use is critical. The Clearwater Park Master Plan (draft, 2012) proposes a
nature play demonstration project.
Develop a District-wide Interpretive Plan (in conjunction with the Education Plan
mentioned above), which would define key themes and direct the installation of
interpretive signage and related art (similar to the Talking Stones in the Whilamut
Natural Area) at key points within natural resource areas and possibly development of
self-guided tour materials. Topics could include geology, Native American and recent
cultural history, ecology, wildlife, and ongoing management efforts.
Incorporate green architecture and site features such as roof gardens, pervious
pavement, bio-swales, and native plantings into District facilities in close proximity to
natural resource areas to serve as demonstration projects and provide learning
opportunities.
Collaborate with ongoing water quality related outreach programs such as the
Springfield Utility Board’s Groundwater Guardian program and the City’s Adopt-aWaterway program.
Objective 5c. Provide research opportunities for natural resource agencies, educational
institutions, and their students, particularly activities that assist with monitoring, restoration
and adaptive management of District-owned natural resource areas.
Maintain communication and seek research opportunities with academic staff and
students at the University of Oregon, Oregon State University, Lane Community College,
and other regional colleges who are conducting research relevant to natural processes,
wildlife, and fish populations.
Work with local non-profit organizations such as the Native Plant Society of Oregon –
Emerald Chapter, Lane County Audubon Society, the North American Butterfly
Association, and the McKenzie and Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Councils to
conduct research and inventories that will assist the District with natural resource area
monitoring and management. Encourage these groups to maintain records and
inventories using a consistent protocol that will help the District achieve its monitoring
objectives.
Seek funding partnerships that would assist relevant research opportunities.
Page 45
Goal 6: Natural Resource Area Planning
Develop comprehensive natural resource area management plans for District-owned natural
areas as a basis for making acquisition, development, and restoration decisions.
Objective 6a. Prioritize District-owned sites for development of site-specific natural resource
area management plans.
Utilize the results of the Natural Resource Areas Function and Value Assessments (see
Section 3.0) to prioritize sites for management planning, scheduling higher quality
natural resource areas first.
Consider developing consolidated management plans that combine numerous smaller
sites that contain similar habitats as a way to reduce management planning costs and
prioritize actions across multiple sites.
Consult natural resource area management plans, if they exist, prior to implementing
major management activities, maintenance actions, or construction of new facilities
such as trails to ensure compatibility.
Periodically revisit and update (if necessary) Natural Resource Area Management Plans
to allow for the effective use of the adaptive management approach. A typical cycle for
updating would be five to ten years.
Objective 6b. Develop site-specific Natural Resource Area Management Plans using a
consistent format to allow for efficiency of plan development, comparison of sites, and ease of
implementation (Section 6.0 for template).
Encourage regional, state, and federal partners and Native American tribes to
participate in management planning processes to encourage sharing of ideas and
collaboration through established partnerships such as Rivers to Ridges. The Rivers to
Ridges Field Operations Group (FOG) is a multi-jurisdictional team that typically meets
once monthly to coordinate on-the-ground natural resource activities and share
technical information and experience. This group, or a sub-set, could be a valuable
resource for the District’s future management planning process.
Incorporate recommendations from natural resource area Management Plans into park
Master Plans for park and facility development where appropriate.
Schedule tasks and seek additional funding as needed to implement the Management
Plan recommendations. The Park Services Division will be responsible for plan
implementation and coordination with other divisions as needed.
Goal 7: Monitoring and Mapping
Provide adequate monitoring data on vegetation, wildlife, and hydrology for all District-owned
and -managed natural areas to inform management decisions, track change over time, and
allow for adaptive management.
Objective 7a. Develop and implement a cost effective and achievable District-wide monitoring
program that could be used to document baseline conditions and track changes to vegetation
communities, fish and wildlife, and hydrology over time.
Develop a set of vegetation and wildlife monitoring goals and protocols for a Districtwide monitoring program that is cost effective and achievable and that can be applied
consistently across all District-managed natural areas.
Page 46
Record and map locations of known rare or unique species populations and other
species of interest using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology.
Record and map populations of highly invasive species that have potential to rapidly
spread across District-managed and other natural areas if established. This would
include concentrations of emerging high threat plant species such as shining geranium,
false brome, knot weed, and butterfly bush, and wildlife species such as Eastern Gray
Squirrel and Red-eared Slider (turtle).
Record and map large concentrations of more widespread invasive species such as
Armenian blackberry, Scotch broom and American Bullfrog as feasible.
Classify habitat types across all District-owned natural resource areas over time, using a
consistent classification system and create associated Geographic Information System
(GIS) data. Habitat classification could be done incrementally over time during the
management planning process for individual natural resource areas.
Develop an approach that would allow the use of volunteers or adoption groups to
perform basic vegetation and wildlife monitoring. For example, smart phone
applications and web based platforms (such as wiki, social networking sites, or blogs)
are currently available to help facilitate the collection and sharing of monitoring data.
Objective 7b. Develop and implement a cost effective monitoring protocol for use with major
restoration and enhancement projects as a way of documenting pre- and post-project
conditions.
Develop specific vegetation and wildlife monitoring goals for individual restoration and
enhancement projects prior to implementation.
Collect baseline data prior to project implementation using an approach that is cost
effective, while providing adequate information to allow managers to gauge project
success and inform the adaptive management approach. Approaches could range from
detailed plant surveys to photo monitoring.
Conduct post-project monitoring for several years following project implementation to
document change and inform the adaptive management approach.
Objective 7c. Compile and utilize existing monitoring data related to District-owned natural
resource areas or nearby properties.
Coordinate with the McKenzie and Middle Fork Willamette watershed councils,
Springfield Utility Board, City of Springfield and other local partners to compile and
utilize existing relevant data.
Utilize consistent data collection protocols with other local partner organizations when
possible to allow for ease of data collection.
Work with regional partners to create a shared library of resources including data,
photographs, oblique aerial photos (such as the Raptor Views collection), and historic
aerial photos.
Page 47
Goal 8: Future Habitat Preservation, Land Acquisition, and Easements
Acquire and manage a system of natural-area parks that protects, conserves, and enhances
elements of the natural and historic landscape that give the region its unique sense of place.
Strategically expand the network of natural areas over time to protect at-risk habitats, improve
system connectivity, preserve visual quality, and provide expanded opportunities for naturebased recreation and education for a growing population (see Section 7.0 for Acquisition
Guidelines).
Objective 8a. Work to preserve regionally important habitat areas, especially those with
imperiled plant, fish, or wildlife species.
Collaborate with regional partners, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and U.S.
Fish and Wildlife, and others to identify key habitats within proximity to the District’s
boundary.
Collaborate on fee title acquisition or purchase of conservation easements with regional
partners and funders to protect key habitats.
Review Comp Plan recommendations for future acquisition and pursue funding and
partnerships to achieve protection of those areas.
Objectives 8b. Work to acquire properties that provide key connections between existing
District-owned natural areas and to other nearby protected natural areas and open spaces.
Collaborate with regional partners to identify gaps in habitat connectivity and
collaborate on future acquisition of key properties.
Collaborate with regional partners to identify potential path and trail connections and
collaborate on future acquisition to accommodate future facilities.
Objective 8c. Work to identify visually important properties in and around Springfield and
collaborate with regional partners on long-term preservation of visual quality.
Collaborate with regional partners on fee title acquisition or purchase of conservation
easements on key properties for protection of the visual resources such as highly visible
hill slopes and river corridors.
Work with property owners and land managers of highly visible forested lands around
Springfield in areas such as the Coburg Hills, Thurston Hills, and Camp Creek Ridge to
design timber harvests in a way that considers potential visual impacts. Utilize GIS
software to determine locations of the most highly visible hill slopes.
Objective 8d. Work to identify properties that provide key ecosystem services and collaborate
with Team Springfield and other partners to preserve those properties through acquisition or
purchase of conservation easements.
Develop intergovernmental agreements with regulating or permitting bodies such as the
City, the County, and other agencies to waive or reduce fees in exchange for
Willamalane purchases of key properties that preserve ecosystem services such as
stormwater conveyance, floodplain function, and drinking water protection. This could
be done using a credit system and could apply to both existing and future natural
resource areas.
Page 48
Goal 9: Partnerships and Collaboration
Pursue and maintain partnerships with local, state, federal, and non-profit organizations as a
way of collaborating on natural resource acquisition, restoration, management, education,
recreation, and funding.
Objective 9a. Collaborate and coordinate with Team Springfield organizations including the
Springfield Utility Board, City of Springfield, and Springfield Public Schools.
Coordinate with SUB on planning, funding, and implementing of water resource
protection efforts within District-owned natural resource areas.
Collaborate with Springfield Public Schools on development of curriculum and sharing of
facilities and resources.
Support City efforts related to path and trail construction and waterway restoration
efforts such as the Springfield Mill Race Ecosystem Restoration Project.
Work with the City and the development community to coordinate park and open space
planning with planning for stormwater, wetlands mitigation/protection, multi-purpose
trails, and natural resource conservation.
Objective 9b. Coordinate with other regional entities and organizations within the southern
Willamette Valley to collaborate on natural resource protection and restoration and
development of recreational amenities.
Actively participate in the Rivers to Ridges partnership and work toward support of
conservation, management, and acquisition of key natural resource areas, consistent
with the Rivers to Ridges Metropolitan Regional Parks and Open Space Study. The name
Rivers to Ridges emanates from a regional open space vision document developed by
Lane Council of Governments (LCOG) in 2003, which was endorsed by many
organizations and elected officials in the greater Eugene-Springfield including the
Willamalane Board. Willamalane formally joined this partnership in 2011 through
signature of a Statement of Partnership, joining 13 other member organizations.
Coordinate with the McKenzie and Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Councils, WREN,
Nearby Nature, and other potential partners on educational programs, property owner
outreach, and habitat restoration efforts within or near the District’s service area.
Coordinate with other regional partners to explore opportunities for more efficient
management of natural resource areas through land trades or transfers and
management agreements.
Page 49
5.0 Management Planning Guidelines
5.1 Purpose of Management Plans
The purpose of a Management Plan is to document historic and existing site conditions,
describe a vision for the desired future condition, and provide detailed direction for short- and
long-term management and restoration of a site’s habitats and facilities. Management Plans
often include related information on vegetation and wildlife monitoring and implementation
priorities to help direct allocation of resources. In addition to providing District staff, the Board,
and the public detailed information about how the site will be managed and improved over
time, these plans are useful for supporting future applications for restoration and enhancement
funding. They are also an important way to document existing condition and change over time
in support of the District’s adaptive management approach.
5.2 Management Planning Process
To be most effective, the management planning process should be collaborative and include
involvement by a range of District staff, local experts, and those involved in previous planning
or research on the site if feasible. At a staff level, it is important to include Park Specialists and
maintenance workers who are likely to have on-the-ground knowledge of the natural resource
area along with other specialized staff with expertise in education, recreation, habitat
restoration, or biology/botany. Local experts who have management or restoration experience
with similar sites in the area should be invited to provide input as well, which can often been
done effectively through a single site visit and possible follow-up questions. The Rivers to
Ridges Field Operations Group (FOG), which includes many local experts, would be a good
starting point for seeking input on the management planning process. Limiting the time
commitment, especially of non-District staff, is important for ensuring participation.
Typically, a lead staff person or designated consultant will coordinate the planning effort and
include other participants at key junctures of the process as needed. The project lead would
initially conduct site analysis, prepare historic and existing conditions maps, and collect related
background material. A kick-off meeting (typically a site visit) would be scheduled with the
purpose of providing an overview of the site, identifying issues and opportunities, and
discussing site goals. The project lead would take that input and develop a preliminary draft of
the Management Plan and schedule a second meeting (often a second site visit) to discuss
proposed site goals and management actions. Based on the input received at this meeting, a
revised management plan draft will be prepared and sent out to the team for final review.
Management Plans are typically internal guidance documents and do not generally require
Board approval or extensive citizen involvement. In some cases, the District may choose to
conduct some level of citizen involvement, especially for those natural areas that have active
adoption groups or a high level of public or neighbor interest. It is recommended that
Management Plans are reviewed and updated if needed on a 5-10 year cycle in order to
support use of the adaptive management approach. The District’s Park Services Division will
take the lead in implementing all Management Plans once completed.
Page 50
5.3 Recommended Management Plan Content
Management Plan content will vary from one site to the next based on special site conditions,
but using a consistent format is recommended since it promotes efficiency and allows for easier
comparison of natural areas. The following outline includes elements typically included within a
Management Plan:
Introduction and Background
o Introduction
o Purpose and Need
o District Operating Assumptions
o Comp Plan and Policy Direction
o Related Studies and Plans
Site History and Existing Conditions
o Site Description
o Site History (including historic vegetation and Native American Management)
o Recent Management Activities
o Topography and Hydrology
o Geology and Soils
o Existing Vegetation Communities (use NRAMP categories)
o Rare Plant and Wildlife Species (including target species for specific habitats)
o Invasive, Exotic Species
o Threats to Native Communities and Special Needs
o Existing Facilities and Programs
o Adjacent Land Uses
o Site Access
Issues and Opportunities
o Habitat and Species Ecology
o Hydrology and Flooding
o Access
o Recreation and Education
o Management and Maintenance
Desired Future Condition
Management Goals, Objectives, and Actions
o Habitat Management Goals, Objectives, and Actions
o Monitoring and Mapping Goals, Objectives, and Actions
o Public Access, Education, and Recreation Goals, Objectives, and Actions
o Neighborhood Interface Goals, Objectives, and Actions
o Public Safety Goals, Objectives, and Actions
o Access and Maintenance Goals, Objectives, and Actions
Page 51
o Adaptive Management Goals, Objectives, and Actions
o Other Goals Applicable to Site Conditions, Objectives, and Actions
Hierarchy: Each goal would include a series of more detailed objectives describing how to
achieve the goal, followed by a set of recommended actions and strategies. In some cases
the recommended actions and strategies could be replaced with indicators, which are
more quantitative and indicate specific targets (such as acreage or percent cover).
Prioritization of Management Actions
Classifies each objective by priority based on need and available resources (short range,
medium range, long range, and regular maintenance activity). See example below taken
from another management plan.
Example of Prioritization of Management Actions:
Page 52
Maps and Aerial Photos
Context Map
Historic Aerial Photos (as available)
Aerial Photo (most recent available with park boundary)
Soils and/or Hydrology Map (if applicable)
Existing Vegetation Map (use habitat classifications from NRAMP)
Existing Conditions and Recent Enhancements Map (over aerial photo)
Action Plan Map (site improvements and access)
Habitat Management Plan Map (vegetation related)
Appendices
Plant and Wildlife Inventories (if available)
Regional Open Space Vision Maps (if applicable)
Conservation Easement (if applicable)
5.4 Process for Addressing Unanticipated Issues and Conflicts
Although the management planning process for individual natural resource areas will provide
much greater clarity than currently exists, there is still the likelihood that unanticipated issues
and conflict will arise over time that are not clearly addressed in the plan. This could include
conflicts between natural resource management objectives and recreational use, public safety,
adjacent property owner concerns, or other special circumstances. Similar issues will likely arise
for sites that do not yet have a management plans in place or even during the management
planning process. Where these conflicts arise, the District will rely on a Natural Resources
Management Committee to make decisions.
Natural Resources Management Committee: Issues and conflicts that are not easily resolved
will be brought to a standing Natural Resources Management Committee for discussion and
formulation of a recommended resolution. The committee’s recommended resolution will then
be forwarded to the Superintendent for a final decision. The committee will consist of between
3-5 District staff appointed by the District Superintendent, with the possible addition of one or
more representatives from outside of the District. In addition to resolving issues and conflicts,
the Natural Resources Management Committee will also play a key role in reviewing
Management Plans as they are developed and making recommendations to the Superintendent
regarding plan approval. The committee would meet on an as-needed basis.
Page 53
6.0 Prioritization of Natural Areas and Ongoing Management Actions
6.1 High Priority Natural Resource Areas
The scoring results of the Natural Resource Areas Function and Value Assessment (see Section
3) provides useful information related to the relative value of each natural resource area based
on the combined factors of habitat, public use and visibility, and ecosystem services. The
District will base prioritization of restoration, enhancement, and management activities on a
variety of considerations including intent of funding sources (e.g. a fish habitat grant would be
focused on river sites), Board direction, or public priorities. However, the protection and
improvement of the highest value natural resource areas is one of the most important factors
the District will use for guiding allocation of limited resources. The following table shows the
relative ranking of each natural resource area, based on the assessment of existing conditions:
Table 6-1: Relative Ranking of Natural Resource Areas
Rank* Natural Resource Area
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Dorris Ranch Living History Farm
Georgia-Pacific Property
Clearwater Park
Eastgate Woodlands
Middle Fork Path
Island Park
Lively Park
West D Street Greenway
Ruff Park
Harvest Landing Natural Area
Jasper Meadows Park/JM South
Moe Property
Guy Lee Park
Rob Adams Park
Mountain Park
Bob Artz Park
Volunteer Park
Kelly Butte Park
Willamette Heights Park
Gray Property
Existing
Score
Potential
Score
Combined
Score
(of 56 points)
(of 10 points)
(of 66 points)
42
40
38
37
38
33
31
34
31
31
20
20
18.5
20
17
16
18
13
12
7
6
5
6
4
2
5
6
2
5
3
7
6
5
2
5
5
2
3
3
5
48
45
44
41
40
38
37
36
36
33
27
26
23.5
22
22
21
20
16
15
12
*Rank is based on combined score
6.2 Prioritization of Regular Management and Maintenance Actions
District staff must develop a work program to guide management and maintenance activities in
natural resource areas on an annual basis. Desired actions typically exceed available resources,
so the following evaluation tool has been developed to help guide the decision making process
for allocation of limited funds. Each management action would be reviewed based on a variety
of factors including public safety, regulatory compliance, natural area value, protection of
Page 54
previous investments, public support, emerging threats, and habitat enhancement value. This
methodology can be applied either on an individual site basis or on all District natural resource
areas as desired. The following flow diagram depicts the steps of the decision making process
and could easily be converted to a more quantitative ranking system if desired that would give
a score to each task. Once ranked, the tasks would be given priority for implementation starting
with the higher ranked task. It should be noted that in some cases, funding sources are
obligated to a specific park, project, or type of management action, so prioritization would take
these factors into consideration.
Management and Maintenance Decision Making Process Diagram
Page 55
7.0 Guidance for Future Natural Area Acquisition
Based on Comp Plan policy, the District will undoubtedly look for opportunities to expand its
ownership in the future to serve a growing population and meet public priorities including
acquisition of additional natural resource areas. Goal 8 and related objectives of this NRAMP
(see Section 4.0) provides general direction on future habitat preservation, land acquisition,
and easements. The sections below include recommended criteria for acquisition of natural
resource areas, Comp plan guidance, the District’s policies on land acquisition, and Willamette
Valley conservation priorities. The District will continue to rely on regional partnerships and
supplemental funding through grants and donations to help stretch limited available funding
for land acquisition.
7.1 Criteria for Acquisition
The following criteria should be used to help evaluate potential of future District land
acquisitions:
Proximity: site is adjacent to another permanently protected open space or other high
quality natural area.
Connectivity: site provides connectivity between two or more existing permanently
preserved natural areas or open spaces (District-owned or other) or other high quality
natural area.
Recreational and educational value: site possesses high value for compatible naturebased recreational uses, such as wildlife viewing, photography, nature study, walking for
pleasure, jogging, running, bicycling, nature play, fishing, swimming, and picnicking or
could provide learning opportunities.
Habitat value: site possesses high habitat value or contains unique or imperiled habitat
type(s) or species.
Willing seller: site owner is willing to sell the property at fair market value.
Cost effectiveness: site provides high recreation and/or habitat values relative to its
purchase price. For example, lands with high habitat value that lie outside the urban
growth boundary.
Land use compatibility: use of site as habitat or open space does not significantly
conflict with other planned land uses or significantly affect the local buildable land
inventory.
Comp Plan guidance: site is consistent with Comp Plan, Comp Plan Natural
Opportunities Areas Map (see Appendix D), and supportive of the Comp Plan
Community Needs Survey results (March 2011).
Available funding: outside funding sources are potentially available to offset acquisition
costs to the District (see section 7.5 for Willamette Valley priority areas).
Presence of hazards: site does not have unacceptable levels or amounts of
contamination or debris such as abandoned vehicles, tires, or garbage.
7.2 Utilizing Natural Resource Areas Function and Values Assessment Methodology
Anther useful tool for assessing the value of a potential site for acquisition is the Natural
Resource Function and Values Assessment Methodology, which was developed for use in the
NRAMP (see Section 3.0 and Appendix B). Using this methodology, potential sites can be
assessed for values including habitat, public use and visibility, and ecosystem services and easily
Page 56
compared to the assessment scores of other potential sites and existing District-owned natural
resource areas.
7.3 Comp Plan Guidance on Future Acquisition
The Comp Plan (2004) and Comp Plan update (underway), provide useful direction on potential
future natural resource area acquisition areas and public preferences related to nature-based
recreational activities. The Comp Plan includes a Natural Opportunities Areas Map, which
provides general guidance on where key natural areas are located in and around Springfield
including wetlands, floodplain, riparian corridor, and upland wildlife areas (see Appendix C to
view map).
During the 2011-2012 Comp Plan update process, the public was asked to provide input on
recreational activities through a series of surveys and workshops. Natural resource areas
support recreation activities that are among survey respondents’ top 20 favorite recreation
activities, including: walking (1), bicycling (4), dog walking (10), hiking (12), wildlife watching
(13), picnicking (15), fishing (16), and running (17). The Comp Plan update and related materials
can be viewed at www.willamalane.org.
7.4 District Policy on Acceptance of Land for District Use
The District’s administrative policies on Acceptance of Land for District Use and Planning and
Park Development provide general parameters and guidance for District acceptance/acquisition
of land. These policies are incorporated into the Administrative Policy and Procedures Manual
(updated, October 2011). The adopted policies are included as Appendix D.
7.5 District Policy on Planning, Park Development, and Acquisition
On June 6, 2001, the Board adopted a set of administrative polices related to planning, park
development, and acquisition. These policies are incorporated into the Administrative Policy
and Procedures Manual (updated, October 2011) as listed below:
The Willamalane Park and Recreation District will update its park and recreation comprehensive
plan (comprehensive plan) every five years and prepare a comprehensive update of the
comprehensive plan every ten years. The comprehensive plan will comply with Statewide
Planning Goals One (Citizen Involvement), Five (Open Spaces), Eight (Recreational Needs),
Twelve (Transportation), and Fifteen (Willamette River Greenway).
The District will cooperate with the City of Springfield in updating, amending, and implementing
the comprehensive plan per intergovernmental agreement as outlined in ORS 195.
The District will annually prepare a five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for capital
development and park and open space acquisition based on the comprehensive plan, the
Rehabilitation Plan, and other current planning documents such as a land acquisition plan, an
annexation plan, etc.
The District will acquire suitable parkland in accordance with the CIP, the comprehensive plan,
and other current planning documents such as a land acquisition plan, etc. Such land will meet
Page 57
the suitability criteria set forth in the District’s adopted Policy/Procedure for Acceptance of Land
for District Use.
The District may acquire parkland in advance of need when deemed to be in the best interest of
the public. The District will determine the timing of development of such parkland based upon
need, availability of funding, and other factors as may be applicable.
Procedure: The District will implement its Capital Improvements Program by means of a CIP
Management Team, members of which shall be appointed by the Superintendent.
7.6 Willamette Basin Synthesis Project
Much of the available State and Federal habitat conservation funding in the coming years will
likely be directed toward high priority conservations sites that have been identified in the
Willamette Basin Synthesis Project. This Synthesis Project is a collaborative approach to
conservation planning that has led to the delineation of priority sites within the Willamette
Valley where investment in conservation or restoration would best contribute to the health of
historically significant and functional habitats. Partners in this effort include Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife, The Nature Conservancy, The Wetlands Conservancy, the
Willamette Partnership, Oregon Parks & Recreation Department, The Defenders of Wildlife,
Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality,
Oregon Biodiversity Project, and Metro.
In 2005, the Synthesis Project combined a total of six existing major Willamette Valley
conservation assessments into a single Union Portfolio, which depicts the mapped locations of
those key habitats. These assessments included:
The Nature Conservancy’s Willamette Valley Ecoregional Assessment
The Pacific Northwest Ecosystem Research Consortium’s Willamette River Basins
Alterative Futures Project
ODFW’s Comprehensive Conservation Strategy
Critical Habitat Designations and Recovery Plans for Willamette Valley Fish and
Endemics
The Wetlands Conservancy Priority Wetlands
Oregon Biodiversity Project.
The Synthesis Project opportunities area map can be viewed on the following page or in more
detail at http://maps.tnc.org/wv_synthesis_coas/. In proximity to Springfield, the map
identified significant riparian and aquatic areas along the Middle Fork Willamette River,
McKenzie River, Cedar Creek, and Springfield Mill Race as portfolio sites.
Page 58
Willamette Valley Synthesis Conservation Opportunity Areas Map
Page 59

Natural Resource Areas Management Plan

Transcription

Similar documents

The truth about… The truth about… habitats

Brochure - Habitat for Zoomanity A Life Science Webquest

2016 Hollywood Build Fact Sheet

Uchee Creek

Colleen Farrow - All Occasions Management

District Department of the Environment Backyard Wildlife Workshop

cultural heritage ecology

Chamise Chaparral - Nature Bytes Video

The Habitats and Birds Directives Ciaran O`Keeffe