Cigarettes and Fires
Transcription
Cigarettes and Fires
FLASH POINT T HE O FFI C I AL PUB L I CAT I O N OF T H E SA N LUI S O B I SP O F IR E T H E O F F I C I A L P U BT LHI EC AOT FI FO I NC I OA FL TP HU EB LS I AC NA IT LNI UOV INES S OTO IFBGITASHTPEI OO SNFA I NSR TELR UI KI SE OT EB AI SMP O F I I NV E ST I G AT I O N ST R IK E T EA M I N V ESTI GATION STR I K E TE AM ! fire origins: cigarettes and fires Volume 2, Number 1 // December 2015 slo f is t. or g ! about SLOFIST ! ! ! ! SLOFIST Executive Staff John Madden, President/Chief Executive Officer Barb Kessel, Chief Financial Officer Dr. Elayne Pope, Vice President - Training and Education Bob Adams, Vice President - Operations/Field Operations Stuart MacDonald, Vice President - Administration Dr. Robert Kimsey, Secretary - Forensic Sciences Director Inside this Issue of Flash Point This issue kicks off a new look to the newsletter, which was pulled out of the box, dusted off and revitalized — for the purpose of keeping issues central to fire and death investigation current and interesting. This issue looks at fire origins starting with cigarettes and moving on to intentional and natural fires and the consequences. ! ! President’s Message....................Page 1 Scott Hall, Vice President - Safety ! ! Cover Story ...................................Page 2 SLOFIST Directors Brian Parker, Classroom Instruction Nancy Acebo, Locating the Dead Instructor e-Cigarette Explosions................Page 4 Kevin McBride, Hotel Liaison Dennis Byrnes, Logistical Operations Mike Whitney, Videography and Medical Education CEUs Training..........................................Page 11 Jamie Novak, Photographic Documentation Russ Auker, Vehicle Fire Course Headlines & News .......................Page 12 Jeremy Davis, Marketing/Thermocouple Data Collection Eric Emmanuele, Marketing/Live X-Ray Data Collection Jeff Nichols, SLO Sheriff’s Department, Coroner Division Book Reviews ...............................Page 16 Dr. Lynn Kimsey, Staff Photographer ! ! ! ! ! SLOFIST is a 501(c)(3) Non-profit organization Box 1041, Atascadero, California 93423 www.slofist.org [email protected] ! Copyright 2016, SLOFIST New Technology ..........................Page 18 N R L E U I I S O A NPL U the I S S B OI S O B I S P O IRE E IS N VTE SI T G IGA ON N FV AT IT I S OT R NI K E ST ETA M R I K E T President’s Message As 2016 takes off, we are making a few changes — all of which are for the better. With any change, there will be adjustments and new hurdles, so hang in there with us. As you are likely familiar, we have been blessed with the use of property at Camp San Luis Obispo for the last several years. However, due to contractual issues and agreements between state and local agencies, we are no longer able to use this property in the same manner. As a result, we are relocating, but not too far away. We will be in the same general area, but on CalFire property to the north behind Cuesta College. In addition, the following changes are on the horizon: • The classes we have offered have blossomed from the core Forensic Fire Death Investigation Course we started with eight years back. This year, we will be offering a new CSI component to the training curriculum. Stay tuned for more information to follow on this. president’s ! message • Time and resources are necessary for this new CSI component, which will also open up a wonderful new ability for more entomological studies with Dr. Bob Kimsey and his talented team of assistants. • We continue to offer the Forensic Vehicle Fire Investigation Course separate from FFDIC. The basics explained in this course are fundamental to understanding the nuances of fires associated with vehicles. • Since you are reading this, you are undoubtedly aware that we have decided to support a regular newsletter. We started out with one in 2011, but put it into hibernation until now. We have decided to give it a go again this year along with several other new changes. I am excited about this possibility and make an open invitation to individuals interested in writing an article or advertising their product. If you are interested in either of these, please contact the newsletter editor at [email protected] or me for further discussion. ! In closing, I welcome the changes and new direction we have for 2016 and beyond. Thank you for allowing us to get to where we are as well as being a part of our exciting future. John Madden SLOFIST President and Chief Executive Officer HISTORY AND MISSION: ! The San Luis Obispo Fire Investigation Strike Team (SLOFIST) was formed in 1994 filling the need of providing qualified public safety personnel with an expertise in fire-related investigations to San Luis Obispo County’s local jurisdictions. SLOFIST Task Force members are working public investigators who conduct investigations of fire scenes for determination of fire origin and cause, explosions for determination of cause and identification, preservation and collection of evidence related to explosions, hazardous materials incident and any other investigations. In 2008, SLOFIST Inc. was created as a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. The corporation is the training arm of the task force for all outside training. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 1 C o ve r St o r y : C igarettes are causing few er w ildfires, but w h y ? by Sarah Farmer, Science Delivery / January 13, 2015 / srs.fs.usda.gov The number of wildfires caused by cigarettes has fallen drastically. “Since 1980, smoking-caused wildfires fell by 90 percent,” says U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station (SRS) scientist Jeffrey Prestemon. “Until recently, little has been known about why, and other causes of wildfire have not experienced this level of decline.” ! Prestemon, project leader of the SRS Forest Economics and Policy unit, recently coauthored a modeling study on smoking-caused wildfires. The study was led by David Butry, an economist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and published in the International Journal of Wildland Fire. The scientists evaluated three possible reasons for the decline in smoking-caused wildfires: national requirements for less fire-prone cigarettes, better methods of identifying the causes of wildfires, and a decline in the number of smokers. ! “We found that 10 percent of the decline – a small but meaningful factor – is because fewer people smoke,” says Prestemon. Since the 1980s, the number of adults who smoke cigarettes has fallen from 33 percent to 19 percent, and teen smoking rates have fallen as well. Starting in 2004, states began requiring cigarettes to be self-extinguishing, so less prone to cause fires. The advent of self-extinguishing cigarettes led to a 23 percent decrease in the number of cigarette-caused wildfires. “The size of this effect was surprising,” says Butry. “Less fire-prone cigarettes were designed to reduce smoking fatalities in homes, but clearly they have had other, unexpected benefits.” ! Billions of cigarettes are discarded outdoors each year, and before the widespread use of less fire-prone cigarettes, they were more likely to smolder, sometimes igniting nearby vegetation. Under laboratory conditions, less fire-prone cigarettes self-extinguish over 75 percent of the time. When discarded by roadsides or outdoors, they usually do not continue to burn, although scientists are not sure how many discarded cigarettes self-extinguish. Nevertheless, the likelihood of a discarded cigarette starting a wildfire has always been small compared to other causes of wildfire. ! The most significant reason for the decline is that investigators now have better ways to tell how a wildfire began. “As many as half of wildfires once considered smoking-caused were actually started by something else,” says Prestemon. And while understanding the causes of wildfire ignition does not reduce the actual number of fires, there are other benefits. “Better investigations and fire classification mean that wildfire prevention specialists can better target their messages at the causes most likely to yield the biggest gains in preventing unwanted fires on our public and private lands,” says Prestemon. ! The cumulative impacts from reduced smoking, less fire-prone cigarettes, and improved fire investigation methods include economic benefits. Across national forests and grasslands of the 12 states studied (which included Kentucky, Oklahoma, and Texas), $3.5 million in fire-fighting and rebuilding costs were avoided due to the decline in smoking-caused wildfires. “We contend that these benefits are accruing nationwide, not just in the public lands of states analyzed in our study,” says Prestemon. Click here to: Read the full text of the article. For more information, email Jeffrey Prestemon at [email protected]. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 2 Cigarettes and Fires — Getting the Word Out, Close to Home Fire safety outreach materials: Smoking PSAs - Do they work? ! As a member of the fire service, you know all too well the dangers of unattended or improperly discarded smoking materials. These free resources are yours to use when educating smokers about the importance of practicing fire safety. For more resources, go to https://www.usfa.fema.gov/prevention/outreach/ FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 3 S F A I R N E L U I S I N V E S T O I B I S P G A T I O O N S T R I K E T E A M S E by Scott MacFarlane // NBCWashington.com // November 11, 2015 Fire officials are warning e-cigarette users against modifying or altering the devices following a report about fires and explosions. E L E C T R O N I C C I G A R E T T E F I Fire Officials Warn Against Altering E-Cigarettes After Explosions R In the News—Electronic Cigarette Fires and Explosions ! ! Federal investigators documented at least 25 incidents of fires or explosions triggered by misused or malfunctioning electronic cigarettes. The U.S. Fire Administration, which issued a report detailing some of those incidents, specifies many of the fires or explosions were triggered while users were charging the devices. ! An I-Team review of Maryland State Police reports revealed a recent explosion incident in Garrett County. Gina Kisner and her husband called the state fire marshal after an e-cigarette exploded while charging in a home computer. The incident triggered a fire inside their Oakland home and nearly spread to an oxygen tank her husband was using for breathing. ! “(My husband) was using this device to stop smoking,” Kisner said. “It just shot across the room. It was a big bang right beneath his bed. The carpet caught fire.” ! The U.S. Fire Administration’s review of fire incidents said fires are rare, but nevertheless dangerous. According to the agency’s report, “Most of the incidents resulted in ignition of nearby contents, such as carpets, drapes, bedding, couches or vehicle seats. Fortunately, users were generally nearby when the incident occurred.” ! The Office of the Maryland State Fire Marshal said most fires or explosions involving e-cigarettes occur because users attempt to manipulate or alter the device. In some cases, the fires are ignited by the use of improper charging cords, some of which are much too powerful to be used for e-cigarettes. ! In other recent incidents, electronic cigarettes exploded in the faces of users. One Florida man was put into a coma by the force of the explosion. In another Florida case, which was detailed by the U.S. Fire Administration report, a user lost teeth and part of his or her tongue when a device exploded during usage. ! Sean Robinson, owner of the District Vapes shop in Northeast D.C., said novice e-cigarette users are sometimes tempted to doctor the devices. “They usually want more sensation,” Robinson said. “They want more flavor. So instead of buying a better device, they try to modify the one they have.” ! continued FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 4 Fire Officials Warn Against Altering E-Cigarettes After Explosions (continued) Robinson said he warns customers against doing so and offers to make any needed adjustments to devices free of charge for his customers. ! The Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association, an industry group representing electronic cigarette manufacturers, issued a statement to the News4 I-Team about fire risks: ! ! “As with other rechargeable electrical equipment, consumer goods such as laptops and cellphones, we recognize that there have been reported instances of lithium ion batteries malfunctioning, in this case with the use of modified vaporizers. While these incidents are taken very seriously, millions of former smokers across the United States and overseas continue to use these products as intended and have found vaping to be a significant alternative to combustible cigarettes.” A spokesman for the Virginia Department of Fire Programs said, “Always use the charging device that comes with the appliance and to follow the manufacturer’s instructions on the use of the charger and the e-cigarette appliance.” ! The e-cigarette industry is operating free of government regulations. Though some rules are reportedly under consideration, a spokesman for the United States Food and Drug Administration told the I-Team, “Currently, these products are not regulated by anyone.” ! “We understand the manufacturers of the e-cigarettes are aggressively addressing the issues related to these products and some of the incidents that have occurred involved improper charging devices or modifications by the end user to the e-cigarette itself,” Maryland State Fire Marshal Brian S. Geraci said. “Although incidents in Maryland have been exceedingly rare, the potential still exists for an accidental fire related incident to occur. We recommend, as with any electrical appliance, to please read and follow manufacturers’ guidelines when choosing to purchase and use the products.” ________________________________________________ The US Fire Administration has an excellent resource on e-cigarettes and explosions located here e_cig_explosions FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 5 Electronic Cigarette Explosions Making Headlines E-cigarette explosions prompt three lawsuits in California Hailey Brnson-Potts / latimes.com / November 15, 2015 the suits allege the e-cigarettes and their components, including lithium ion batteries and chargers, were unsafe and that the businesses in the supply chains failed to properly warn of the defects. Employees at Luxor Cafe & Vape Lounge and Vape Fame said they were unaware of Garza’s lawsuit. Other defendants in his and the other suits could not be reached for comment. ! Vicente Garza was getting ready for bed in his Bakersfield home when he decided to use an electronic cigarette. He lifted the device to his mouth, pushed the vapor button and started to inhale. Then it exploded near his face, badly burning his mouth and dominant left hand, which was holding the device. Doctors amputated Garza’s left index finger, and he had to undergo immediate surgery on his tongue after the Oct. 16 incident. He still can barely eat. ! Garza’s attorney, Gregory L. Bentley, said Thursday that he had filed a product liability lawsuit against the e-cigarette’s manufacturer and designer, Flawless Vapes & Supplies, LLC; the Bakersfield store where Garza bought the battery and device, Luxor Cafe & Vape Lounge; and the Bakersfield store where he bought his e-cigarette charger, Vape Fame. “I never in my life thought that something like this would happen,” Garza, 23, said at a Glendale news conference Thursday. ! Garza’s is one of three e-cigarette explosion lawsuits filed by Bentley this week in Kern and Orange counties. “E-cigarette explosions are becoming all too common as this industry is taking off,” Bentley said. “Consumers have the right to expect that products have been properly designed, manufactured tested for safety before they are put into “it exploded near his face, badly burning his mouth and dominant left hand, which was holding the device” E-cigarettes constitute a multibillion-dollar industry, with millions of users, according to a 2014 report on e-cigarette fires and explosions by the U.S. Fire Administration. The report said e-cigarettes use lithium ion batteries that include flammable liquid electrolytes that can explode when they overheat, such as when they receive too much voltage while charging. ! Despite huge sales, the fledgling industry is largely unregulated, with few safeguards for consumer protection, Bentley said. ! In September, a Riverside County Superior Court jury awarded a client of Bentley's, Jennifer Ries, nearly $1.9 million after she sued the distributor, wholesaler and store where she FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 6 Electronic Cigarette Explosions Making Headlines bought the gaping devices that exploded. She was badly burned after a charging e-cigarette battery caught fire in her car. Bentley said that was the first e-cigarette explosion lawsuit to be tried in the country and that his phone has since been ringing nonstop with similar cases. ! Bentley this week filed a suit in Kern County on behalf of Bakersfield resident Gregory Phillips, Jr., whose leg was burned in September when an e-cigarette battery exploded in his pocket. He required skin grafts. Phillips is suing the device’s seller, Bakersfield store Cigarette World 4. ! Bentley also filed suit this week in Orange County Superior Court on behalf of retired former Los Angeles Galaxy soccer player Daniel Califf. In February, Califf was using an e-cigarette when it exploded near his face, blasting a large hole in his cheek. It gave him a concussion and set the room on fire, the suit alleges. Califf is suing the distributor of one of the device’s components, Washington-based UVAPER Inc., and the seller, Newport Beach-based 32nd Street Vapors, which closed but is now doing business as R&D Creations, according to the attorney. E-cigarettes banned from checked bags on planes Hugo Martin / latimes.com / November 1, 2015 Add something to the list of things you can't pack in your checked bag before a flight: electronic cigarettes. ! The U.S. Department of Transportation issued a final rule last week prohibiting any battery-powered portable electronic smoking devices from being packed in a checked bag. In addition, the federal agency has prohibited passengers and crew members from charging the devices or their batteries in the plane. ! Why? E-cigarettes have been known to catch fire. A federal study by the U.S. Fire Administration reported 25 incidents of fires or explosions caused by e-cigarettes from 2009 to 2014. ! A checked bag that arrived late at Los Angeles International Airport in January and missed its connecting flight caught fire in the luggage area because of an overheated e-cigarette packed inside. Passengers can still tote ecigarettes in their carry-on bags or pockets but they can't smoke them in the plane. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 7 Electronic Cigarette Explosions Making Headlines E-cigarette explodes in California teen's pocket January 5, 2016 / cbsnews.com ! An Orange County, California, teen is recovering from burns after an e-cigarette exploded in his pocket. CBS Los Angeles reports that the 19-year-old was at work at an Albertsons supermarket in Ladera Ranch Monday evening when one of the two e-cigarette batteries in his pocket blew up after coming into contact with his keys, according to Capt. Steve Concialdi of the Orange County Fire Authority. The exploded unit blew about 15 feet down an aisle at the grocery store, Concialdi said. ! "The batteries exploded and it burned his leg pretty bad. It shot off almost like a bottle rocket," Albertsons employee Jeremy Fleming said. ! "The battery heated up and just blew out of his pocket, and one of my coworkers said it shot right at him," said another employee, Mitch Landingham. ! The victim was taken to Mission Hospital where he was treated for first and second-degree burns on his thigh and then released. Landingham described his coworker's injuries: "There was just like a huge black circle and almost like a rocket mark on his leg," he said. And it's not the first report of e-cigarettes malfunctioning and injuring people. ! Last February, a 17-year-old boy was injured while smoking an e-cigarette in Anaheim, California. In March, CBS Los Angeles reports a Santa Ana man was injured after his e-cigarette blew up in his hands. The explosion sent half of the electronic smoking device into the ceiling and started a fire at his apartment. ! And a Colorado Springs man was seriously injured in November when an e-cigarette exploded in his face, leaving him hospitalized with a broken neck, facial fractures and burns. Fire officials are warning e-cigarette users to keep batteries away from copper or metal, steer clear of discount batteries and carry e-cigarettes separately from the body. ! Because of the potential fire hazard, the federal government recently banned e-cigarettes from checked luggage on aircraft. The Department of Transportation said it had reports of least 26 incidents since 2009 in which e-cigarettes had caused explosions or fires. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 8 Electronic Cigarette Explosions Making Headlines Man seriously injured by e-cigarette explosion November 24, 2015 / cbsnews.com ! A man is hospitalized in Colorado Springs with serious injuries after an electronic cigarette exploded in his face, his family says. 29-year-old Cordero Caples suffered a broken neck, facial fractures, burns to his mouth and shattered teeth in the explosion. According to an account posted by his sister on the fundraising site GoFundMe, Caples was using an e-cigarette made by Kangertech when it exploded on Friday. Kangertech has not yet responded to a request for comment by CBS News.Caples' sister, Colessia Porter, described the situation as "heartbreaking." "Any sudden move can cause him to be in a paralyzed state, and that is something we don't want," Porter told WMC-TV in Caples' hometown of Memphis. "He's going to need 24-hour care for a while and constant monitoring from family and friends and loved ones." She said he underwent spinal surgery on Sunday, the first of a number of operations he's expected to require. ! According to the Colorado Springs Fire Department, emergency crews responded to the medical call at his job, and the incident is still under investigation, the station reported. ! Although safety officials say fires or explosions caused by e - c i g a re t t e s a re r a re , t h e F e d e r a l E m e rg e n c y Management Agency (FEMA) said it was aware of at least 25 such incidents between 2009 and 2014. Nine people were injured, including two who suffered serious burns. ! "The shape and construction of e-cigarettes can make them more likely than other products with lithium-ion batteries to behave like 'flaming rockets' when a battery fails," FEMA warned in a 2014 report. ! CBS Los Angeles reports a similar accident last month injured 23-year-old Vicente Garza in Bakersfield, California. Garza suffered damage to his mouth and doctors were forced to amputate part of his left index finger. "It exploded in my face," Garza told the station. "I never thought something like this could happen.” Last week, he joined two other California men in a lawsuit against companies that manufacture and sell the products. ! "It's unconscionable that these products are out there, and they are randomly exploding all across the country," said Garza's attorney, Greg Bentley. Bentley and his firm also represent former LA Galaxy soccer player Danny Califf, who was hurt in February when an e-cigarette exploded next to his face, and Greg Phillips of Bakersfield, who suffered leg burns when an e-cigarette battery exploded in his pocket in September. ! "This is an unregulated industry, that is causing tremendous harm across the country," Bentley added. In October, federal transportation officials imposed a new rule banning e-cigarettes from checked baggage on airlines to protect against the risk of in-flight fires. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 9 Fire Deaths Making National Headlines 5 die in house fire in Virginia; 5 survive flames January 17, 2016 / Alexa Welch Edlund / Richmond Times-Dispatch /AP ! CHESTERFIELD, Va. — Emergency response officials say five people were killed in an early morning fire in suburban Richmond. Chesterfield County fire and emergency medical services said they responded shortly after 3 a.m. Sunday to reports of a house fire. When firefighters arrived, they found flames coming from an attached garage. ! Five occupants were able to escape, but five others died. Four died at the scene, while the fifth was pronounced dead at VCU Medical Center in Richmond. One firefighter was treated for minor burns. ! The cause of the fire is being investigated. ! ________________________________________________________________ ! 4 Adults Found Dead in New York Home After Late-Night Fire January 11, 2016 / Associated Press / Rochester, NY ! Authorities say four adults have been found dead inside a Rochester, New York, home after a late-night fire that is being considered suspicious. Fire officials say they were called to the three-story, two-family home on Sunday just before midnight. Officials say firefighters found the bodies of two men and two women while battling the blaze. ! The Democrat and Chronicle of Rochester reports several homicide investigators and Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley were at the scene Monday. The fire has been deemed suspicious. Officials haven't released any details on what may have caused the blaze or on what killed the four victims. They haven't been identified. ! ________________________________________________________________ ! Man found dead after Andover house fire January 16, 2016 / Will Ashenmacher / pioneerpress.com / St. Paul, MN ! A 39-year-old Andover man was found dead after authorities were called to investigate a burning home Friday night. The man's body was found in the garage, and it doesn't appear he died in the fire, the Anoka County sheriff's office said in a news release. The victim's identity has not yet been released. Just after 8 p.m. Friday, a neighbor called 911 to report a home in the 13900 block of Nightingale Street Northwest in Andover was on fire. When authorities arrived, they found the home in flames. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 10 Forensic Fire Death Investigation Course (FFDIC) San Luis Obispo, Embassy Suites Hotel / Rural San Luis Obispo June 20, 2016 (0800 hours) — June 24, 2016 (1700 hours) ! Seasoned investigators and detectives from fire, law enforcement, and coroner agencies will gain the knowledge and skills to thoroughly and professionally investigate any fire death situation. Separate registration for Fire Service, Law Enforcement, and Coroner personnel is required to ensure a multidisciplinary mixture for course diversity and interaction. See website for availability and registration details. This course is POST certified. Field Operations Course (FOC) San Luis Obispo, Rural San Luis Obispo ! June 20, 2016 (0800 hours) D— June 22, 2016 (0500 hours) N FFDIC E Past graduates of the will be observers in the field O operations as set Pup by SLOFIST personnel. This new course gives T attendees the ability to witness Sthe actual burning of human remains in a manner you were not able to observe in theOFFIDC. Separate registration for Fire Service, Law Enforcement, P and Coroner personnel is required to ensure a multidisciplinary mixture for course diversity and interaction. See website for availability and registration details. Prerequisite: Previous completion of entire FFDIC course. This course is POST certified. Forensic Vehicle Fire Investigation Course (FVFIC) La Quinta Inn, Paso Robles October 24, 2016 (0800) — October 28, 2016 (1700) ! Fire service, law enforcement, and private investigator personnel will participate in this 40-hour course for live vehicle burns to analyze vehicle burn times, patterns, and temperatures using the scientific method and the systematic approach for investigating vehicle fires through first-hand observations of vehicle burns. This course is pending POST certification. Training Announcements can be made in FLASH POINT after approval through SLOFIST administration. If you are interested in advertising your training, please contact the SLOFIST Board of Directors for additional information. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 11 ra isi ng c h u r ch SLOFIST 2016 Training Schedule Headlines and News: Wildfire Fatality Trends January 17, 2016 / Bill Gabbert / wildfiretoday.com ! Last week, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack reported that 13 wildland firefighters lost their lives in the line of duty in 2015. That was an increase from 2014, when there were 10 fatalities, and was about a third of the 34 that were killed in 2013 — that year included the deaths of 19 members of the Granite Mountain Hotshots near Yarnell, Arizona. The National Interagency Fire Center has statistics about line-of-duty deaths going back to 1910. During that time, according to their numbers, 1,099 firefighters died. ! In looking at the 105 years of NIFC data there appears to be an increasing trend. The figures below are the average number of fatalities each year for the indicated time periods: ! 1910-2015: 10.5 1910-1959: 6.9 1960-1989: 10.2 1990-2015: 17.0 ! One likely explanation for the apparent increase is that 80 to 105 years ago probably not all fatalities were reported or ended up in a centralized data base, especially those that occurred on state or locally protected lands. Even if we only look at the figures since 1960, as in the chart above, it still shows a steep increase over those 55 years. It is possible in the last 25 years the reporting of fatalities and the collection of the data has been somewhat more consistent and complete. The chart on the next page covers that period, from 1990 through 2015, and has a slight downward trend, which would be even more obvious if not for the 19-person crew that passed away in 2013 on the Yarnell Hill Fire. ! I can’t prove that there was under-reporting of wildland firefighter fatalities during most of the 20th century, but if a firefighter was killed on a vegetation fire in Missouri in 1921, I can see how that statistic may not have made it into the data base that is now maintained at NIFC. ! So what does all this mean? Individuals can look at the same batch of statistics and develop vastly different interpretations. However, it would not be prudent to assume that the fatality rate almost tripled from the first part of the 105-year period to the last 25 years. There are several ways to analyze data like this. The least complex is to look at the trend of the raw numbers of fatalities year to year. A more complex and meaningful method would be to determine the fatality rate. For example, the fatalities per million hours spent traveling to and working on fires. That would be impossible to ferret out during most of the last 105 years. But the firefighting agencies should be able to find a way to begin collecting this information, if they don’t have it already. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 12 ! If the fatality and serious injury rates were calculated over a multi-year period, it should illustrate the effectiveness of a risk management program. Otherwise, the simple number of deaths each year might be affected to an unknown degree by the number of acres burned. Other factors could also affect the numbers, such as fire intensity influenced by fuel treatment programs, fire history, drought, climate change, or arson. ! Should firefighting agencies have specific goals about serious injuries and fatalities? Is there an acceptable number? Is five a year too many? Is 15 too many? Is it stupid to have a goal of zero fatalities—or any number? ! The chart below superimposes the number of fatalities over the acres burned in the United States from 1990 through 2015, but it does not include Alaska since many fires there are not suppressed, or they are only suppressed in areas where they threaten structures or people. In 2015, more acres burned in Alaska than all of the other states combined. ! One of our loyal readers, Bean, has been thinking about this issue and figured that since the amount of firefighters’ exposure to risk is necessary in order to calculate trends, perhaps parameters other than acres burned could be correlated with the number of fatalities. Data that is publicly available as far back as 1990 or 1994 includes mobilizations of incident management teams, crews, overhead, helicopters, air tankers, air attack ships, infrared aircraft, MAFFS air tankers, caterers, military firefighters, and shower units. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 13 F I R E I N V E S T I S A N G A T I O L N U I S S T R I O K B E I S T E P A O M I considered all of those and concluded that the number of crews mobilized would come the closest to serving as a proxy for accurate data of how many hours all firefighters spent traveling to and working on fires. ! Data for crew mobilizations is available from 1990 through 2014. I divided the number of crews mobilized by the number of fatalities for each year and called this the Fatality/Crews Mobilized Index (below). ! Like the earlier chart comparing fatalities to acres burned, this analysis also shows a decreasing trend in the last 25 years. In a comment posted January 17, Kevin9 said the earlier acres/fatalities analysis is “spiky”. This newer crews mobilized/fatalities data also has spikes (especially in 1997 and 2009) but not quite to the degree the earlier chart had. During the 25-year period, 1997 had the least number of acres burned and crews mobilized, but still had 10 fatalities. The second lowest number of crews mobilized occurred in 2009 and there were 15 fatalities that year. ! As an experiment, knowing that there were mass casualty events in 1994 and 2013 (14 and 19 fatalities respectively), just to see what the effects were, I changed the data in those two years to the average for the last 25 years, which is 17, and there was no major change in the trend line, except it was a little lower across the entire range. THINKING AS A TEAM… CROSSING THE DISCIPLINE LINES… As a side note, law enforcement line-of-duty deaths are detailed by year and cause of death at the Officer Down Memorial Page, located at www.odmp.org and a national initiative titled Below 100 (www.below100.com)aims at keeping law enforcement deaths below 100 per year. Check them out. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 14 Report Summary: NFPA’s Lightning Fires and Lightning Strikes Marty Ahrens / June 2013 / nfpa.org ! This analysis of lightning fires and lightning strikes includes information on incident type and when and where the incidents occurred. It also includes selected published incident descriptions. ! During 2007-2011, U.S. local fire departments responded to an estimated average of 22,600 fires per year that were started by lightning. These fires caused an average of nine civilian deaths, 53 civilian injuries, and $451 million in direct property damage per year. Most of these fires occurred outdoors, but most associated deaths, injuries, and property damage were associated with home fires. Fires started by lightning peak in the summer months and in the later afternoon and early evening. The January 2006 West Virginia coal mine explosion that claimed 12 lives was the deadliest U.S. fire started by lightning in recent years. Nine firefighters were killed in an August 2008 helicopter crash as they were being evacuated from a California wildland fire started by lightning. ! Lightning-related fires are more common in June through August and in the late afternoon and evening. Peak seasons for lightning-related fires vary by region, as do weather patterns in general. In addition to the fires reported to local fire departments, federal and state wildland firefighting agencies reported an average of 9,000 wildland fires started by lightning to the National Interagency Fire Center per year in 2008-2012. These fires tended to be larger than fires started by human causes. The average lightning-caused fire burned 402 acres, nine times the average of 45 acres seen in human-caused wildland fires. ! Over the 10 years from 2003-2012, 42 U.S. firefighters were killed as a result of lightning-caused fires. These deaths include fatalities during fireground activities, as well as responding or returning to fires. Four of these deaths occurred at structure fires, and the remaining 38 were killed as the result of wildland fires. Eleven of these deaths occurred in helicopter crashes. ! In addition to causing fires, lightning is dangerous on its own. Data from the National Weather Service show that in 2008-2012, an average of 29 people per year died as a result of lightning strikes. The most common location for these deaths was outside or in an open area. The average number of lightning flashes per square mile varies considerably by state, as does the death rate from lightning incidents. See http://www.lightningsafety.noaa.gov for more information. ! In 2003, the last year for which data about fire department responses to non-fire incidents is currently available, 10,200 non-fire lightning strikes were reported to local fire departments. The majority of these, 62%, occurred at home properties. Go to http://www.nfpa.org/research/reports-and-statistics/ fire-causes/lightning-fires-and-lightning-strikes for additional information and resources. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 15 e x p a n d y o u r l i d y o u r l i b Related Reading — Automotive Fire Analysis b r a r a r r y y In the new Automotive Fire Analysis: An Engineering Approach, Third Edition, experienced field engineer Gregory Barnett points out common problems with the way automotive fires are investigated. Mr. Barnett has compiled the research undertaken to date by manufacturers, standards organizations and private institutions into one compact guide. Mr. Barnett guides you through the proper techniques of vehicle fire analysis and investigation, typical vehicle fires and burn patterns, and indicators of arson in auto fires. He teaches you how to tell the difference between flameresistant and flammable materials, the flammable liquids contained in cars, auto electrical systems and related fires, and more. This expanded third edition contains brand new sections on alternative fuel vehicles and the types of fires associated with them, including lithium-ion batteries, supplemental restraint systems, and golf cart fires. He covers the current safety standards for autos in the United States, in a clear and easy to follow manner. He gives you important information on functioning as a witness in court on auto fire cases. —Lawyers & Judges Publishing, 2013 ! ! ! ! ! ! Related Reading — Electrical Fire Analysis This updated and expanded third edition continues the theme of the second edition of providing extensive research findings in all types of electrical fires. This book describes in a practical and easy-to-understand manner the patterns of electrical fires which make it easier to determine where an electrical fire started. Specific topics include: (1) the general background and essential elements of fire initiation; (2) codes and standards, testing laboratories approval, non-electrical fires, arc mapping and V-patterns; (3) disassembly of equipment, nameplates, equipment misuse, abuse, and repair; (4) the gathering, preserving, and shipping of evidence, keeping records; (5) common clues, melting points, and insulation degradation; (6) common components, moveable contacts, switches and relays, circuit breakers and panels, conduit joints, heating elements; (7) appliances, wall outlets and switches, light bulbs, reversed polarity; (8) arson, telephones and answering machines, igniters, debris inspection; (9) reports, depositions and trials, report purpose and appearances; (10) fire initiation and spread, space heaters, wires, and other heat-producing mechanisms; (11) fire characteristics and general precautions; (12) electrical systems and grounds, general wiring; (13) photography and camera features; (14) electrical circuits and waves; and (15) electrical power equipment, transformers, generators, rectifiers, and motors. This book is an excellent resource not only for arson investigators but for attorneys, the insurance industry, and manufacturers who are concerned with electronic reliability. ! —Charles C. Charles Publishing, Ltd. 2010 ! (Reviews & photos: amazon.com) FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 16 S F A I R N E L U I S I N V E S T O I B I S P G A T I O O N S T R I K E T E A M ADVERTISE WITH SLOFIST v i e w i n g c l i e n t s Your ad will reach hundreds of current and prior SLOFIST FFDIC attendees, their families, acquaintances, and business partners via e-mail. Also, as FLASH POINT is posted on the SLOFIST website, anyone viewing the website can view the newsletter and your advertisement(s). Advertisers supply their own copy along with this form and a check payable to “SLOFIST” with the amount selected below. Electronic submissions to “FLASH POINT Editor” at [email protected] in jpg, gif, png or pdf. Ad copies and payments submitted to the Treasurer and Editor by the due dates listed below. SLOFIST reviews product for professional subject matter. E-mail the Editor with any questions regarding your ad. y o u r a d v e r t i s e m e n t Company Name: Mailing Address: City: Phone Number: Contact Person: Fax Number: E Zip Code: State: X P e-mail address: A J U S T N D G O T I N G Y O E A S I E R U R B U S I N E S S anyone can view your advertisement get the most out of your advertising with SLOFIST today CHOOSE YOUR AD SIZE & NUMBER OF ISSUES 1 Issue Size Business Card $25 Quarter Page $50 Half Page $75 Full Page $100 CHOOSE YOUR START ISSUE 4 Issues Issue Ad and Payment Due Date $60 March February 1 $160 June May 1 $260 September August 1 $360 December November 1 First issue for ad appearance: Special Notes: Make checks payable to “SLOFIST” and mail with this completed form to “SLOFIST Treasurer,” PO BOX 1041, Atascadero, CA 93423, Re: Newsletter Ad. Additionally, e-mail ad copy to the newsletter editor at [email protected] C O M Date check received: P L E T E D B Check/PO Number: Y S L O F I S T Amount: 1/2016 NEW TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS U AV- B a s e d C r i m e S c e n e I n v e s t i g a t i o n ! !! Technique applicable for large-scale scenes or investigations lidarnews.com / November 19, 2015 This experimental project was organized by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and Pix4D to investigate a proposed UAV-based protocol for accident and crime scene investigations. Comparing results with traditional methods (measuring tape, laser scanner) would show the accuracy and reliability of the achieved reconstruction results so that they can eventually be used as admitted evidence in court. ! Two data sets of a made-up crime scene were acquired with quadcopters from Aeryon Labs (225 images) and Draganfly (212 images). The ground sampling distance was less than 1 cm in order not to miss any details. The full flight took less than thirty minutes including the pre-flight preparation. Eight yellow evidence markers were placed around the collision scene, indicating the location where all evidence was found. (The densified 3D point cloud is shown embedded above from the Pointscene.com platform.) ! In order to improve the global accuracy of the final results, several points were measured with kinetic GPS and total station. These points were picked from corners of the vehicles, the feature objects, and the evidence markers. They were imported into the software and used either as ground control points, manual tie points or check points. In addition, a terrestrial laser scanner was set up in several locations to scan over the entire scene to be used for quality assessment of the UAV results. Pix4Dmapper’s total processing time was approximately 2 hours on a laptop with a core i7 and 8GB RAM. A densified point cloud, digital surface model (DSM) and orthomosaic were generated. ! The reconstructed results either exactly match or are within one centimeter accuracy when compared with traditional methods. Detailed comparisons of results can be found in the White Paper (http://pix4d.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2013/04/Pix4D-White-Paper_UAV-based-CSI.pdf) The project results show that UAV-based solutions not only save the field measuring work but also provide LiDAR-like accuracies with more visible details which can be admitted as evidence in court. http://blog.pix4d.com/post/103641424926/uav-based-accident-and-crime-scene-investigation FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 18 S F A I R N E L U I S I N V E S T O I B I S P G A T I O O N S T R I K E T E A M U AV- B a s e d C r i m e S c e n e I n v e s t i g a t i o n FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 19 multidisciplinary focus: law enforcement spotlight Using Drones for Scene Reconstruction and Analysis G re g G r a v e s e n i s a n experienced traffic accident reconstruction specialist. H e re h e explains how employing a fixed-wing mapping drone has revolutionized his work. _____________________ Hi Greg, why don’t you start by telling us a little about your background and experience? ! ! ! Hi. I’ve been a law enforcement officer for 25 years. During the past 22 years, I have developed a specialty in the area of crash reconstruction. In addition, through my position as a Sergeant with the St. Paul Police Department’s Forensic Services Unit, I have had extensive experience in the area of crime scene documentation and illustrations. ! How has the technology you use in this work changed over that time? Early on in my career, I used tape measures to document my crash scenes. As technology developed and the costs got lower, I eventually upgraded to a laser scanning system. The past 15 years, I have incorporated terrestrial surveying instruments such as a Trimble robotic total station and a FARO scanner to document both crash and crime scenes. I am also involved in teaching this technology. Earlier this past year, I purchased the senseFly eBee drone, which has become my primary methodology of scene documentation. This system allows me to collect information for very large scenes very quickly. ! How do you use the geospatial data you collect? The senseFly mapping system allows me to create the orthomosaic image, a 3D point cloud, and a 3D mesh of my crash and outdoor crime scenes. This output can be used in a number of ways, from a pure graphical perspective and also during the analysis. ! The eBee produces a high-resolution image that normally does not contain moving vehicles. In other words, if a moving vehicle is contained in one image, that cell of the mosaic can be replaced by another image. This results in a stunning image that can be a trial exhibit. This image can be used in several ways. One of the most common applications is to use this image to create highly detailed and accurate scale diagrams. In addition, the orthomosaic may also serve as the background for two-dimensional simulations and animations. The resulting graphic is very visually appealing. This approach to scene data collection is not only applicable for large-scale scenes or investigations, but has minimal impact on the actual scene. This could be a breakthrough in scene management. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 20 Using Drones for Scene Reconstruction and Analysis ! From a graphical perspective, I create a number of animations using the 3D point cloud data that I collect, for example with the laser scanner or more recently with the eBee. The most common type of animations involves a virtual “fly-through” of the scene. This allows the viewer to get a unique perspective of a scene that simply can’t be accomplished through traditional technologies such as photography. Using the eBee system these “fly-throughs” are easy and quick to create. In addition, I create more photorealistic animations where I insert scaled models of objects, pedestrians, etc. into the 3D point cloud. The 3D point clouds can also be used as a “blueprint” to create virtual models and environments using software such as Autodesk’s 3D Studio Max. The video [link: https://youtu.be/vwQFPRc7YYQ, screenshot below] is a point cloud fly-through animation that depicts a scene over a mile long, which involved two vehicles drag racing. This animation allows the viewer to get a unique perspective of the entire crash scene. It would have taken days to use a terrestrial scanner to complete this project. This type of exhibit is really effective evidence. It gives juries and clients a unique perspective that traditional methods, such as photography, just cannot compete with. Another application of the drone’s output involves the use of computer simulation software, a powerful tool used in traffic accident reconstruction. This software predicts things such as vehicle positions, trajectories, acceleration, collision forces etc., which are based on Newton’s Laws of Motion. Specifically, I use Engineering Dynamic Corporation’s HVE and PC-Crash software packages. Both packages require an environment be created and later displayed in the simulated results. The orthomosaic image and the 3D point cloud created by the eBee are easily imported into this software and help produce a high quality, accurate output. ! Why did you choose the eBee drone specifically? What made this system stand out? I researched the eBee and was really impressed with it. However, I never really saw its full potential until I went out and bought one. It is an extremely versatile system that produces accurate results, quickly. Whether I am using the high-resolution orthomosaic image to create diagrams, the 3D point cloud to create a simulation environment, or creating fly-though animations, this work is done much quicker and safer than using other methodologies. FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 21 Using Drones for Scene Reconstruction and Analysis For example, for large scenes when I would previously have used terrestrial scanners these would have taken one to two days to document (not including computer processing time). These take literally less than 30 minutes to fly and about three hours to process on the computer. Initially, the drone simply sounded too good to be true. However, I was amazed when I experienced it firsthand. ! and built-in safeguards. One of the other things I really like about the eBee system is its reliability ! What do you feel the acceptance of drone technology has been like in the crash and crime scene analysis world up to now? Interestingly, rotary systems are becoming common, but some people think that fixed wing UAS have no place in forensics. I disagree completely. Often times, especially from the standpoint as a private consultant, my involvement is long after the date of the crash and I don’t have the luxury of shutting down a road. A product like the eBee excels here because I am able to capture highly accurate information about the scene both quickly and safely. I am able to obtain 3D data in a fraction of the time it takes with other terrestrial surveying instruments. And best of all, I do not have to enter the roadway or shoulders to obtain it. ! The resolution of the eBee’s imagery means I can actually identify the paint marks that law enforcement made on the ground, tire evidence, ruts in ditches, and other important evidence. Another strength of the eBee system is the ability to document very large scenes. For example, I recently documented a crash scene that resulted from two vehicles racing. The incident occurred over a one mile section of roadway. I was able to document this scene with one 24-minute flight. I am not aware of a rotary system that could cover that extensive a scene in one flight. The multi-rotor systems I am familiar with do not have the battery life that permits them to have the kind of range seen with the eBee system. ! You’re working on a comprehensive study about your use of drone technology in crash reconstruction. Could you tell us a little more about what that will contain? That’s right. I have already done some validation testing prior to using the eBee system for case work. I am now planning on conducting a more extensive study that will scientifically evaluate drone technology in the content of scene analysis work. This testing will involve evaluating and comparing technologies such as the eBee, total stations and terrestrial laser scanners, and using a tape measure, in terms of their accuracy and efficiency. This type of research is useful to validate tools like the eBee and defend them with Daubert challenges in court. We hope to publish these results in a peer-reviewed journal. Based on my experience so far, the drone will prove to be the fastest, most comprehensive data gathering tool. Its speed and accuracy, from what I’ve seen so far, are just incredible. ! _________________________________________ Greg Gravesen has been an ACTAR-accredited traffic accident reconstruction specialist since 1994. He is the president of the private consulting company Northwest Crash Analysis, LLC and currently works as a Sergeant in the St. Paul Police Department, Minnesota, assigned to the Forensic Services Unit. He is also an adjunct instructor with IPTM. waypoint.sensefly.com/setting-the-scene-using-drones-for-crash-reconstruction-and-analysis / 9/22/2015 FLASH POINT — DECEMBER 2015 — PAGE 22 t h e l a s t e m b e r ! Old, new, scratched up, or forgotten under the desk, these “toys” continue to do their part in safety management and training. What other tool allows you to ! easily demonstrate and explain apparatus placement with ease and portability? (Yes, you have permission to admit you still play with toys you’ve had since you were five. It’s…for work.) SLOFIST San Luis Obispo Fire Investigation Strike Team (SLOFIST) // PO Box 1041 // Atascadero, California // 93423 w w w . S L O F I S T . o r g