Twin Lakes WRAPS – 9 Element Watershed Plan
Transcription
Twin Lakes WRAPS – 9 Element Watershed Plan
Twin Lakes WRAPS – 9 Element Watershed Plan SummaryFlint Hills RC&D • Impairments to be addressed Directly addressing: Council Grove Lake – Eutrophication Neosho River - Bacteria • Positively Effecting: Council Grove Lake - Siltation Munkers Creek near Council Grove – DO Cropland Targeted areas were identified after reviewing the Council Grove Watershed STEPL and gaining local knowledge, the Twin Lakes SLT choose three priority areas for Cropland and BMP Implementation Livestock Targeted areas were identified after reviewing KDHE monitoring data and the Twin Lakes 303 d-listed waters. Then after reviewing a Twin Lakes watershed CAFO map three subwatersheds were identified. Neosho River near Parkerville – TP Prioritized Critical Areas for Targeting BMPs Best Management Practices and Load Reduction Goals Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address phosphorus and sediment in the watershed where chosen by the SLT based on local acceptance/adoptability and the amount of load reduction gained per dollar spent. Phosphorus Reducing Cropland BMPs Targeting Considerations: • • • • • • • Vegetative Buffers Grassed Waterway No-Till Terraces Nutrient Management Plan Permanent Vegetation Grade Stabilization Structures Phosphorus Reducing Livestock BMPs • • • • • Vegetative Filter Strip Relocate Feeding Pens Relocate Pasture Feeding Sites Alternative (Off-Stream) Watering System Rotational Grazing Twin Lakes WRAPS – 9 Element Watershed Plan SummaryFlint Hills RC&D Load reduction needed • • The focus of the Twin Lakes 9 element plan will be the phosphorus load reduction. Implementing BMP’s directed at the phosphorus load reduction should also reduce nitrogen loads entering Council Grove Reservior. Based on the KWO bathymetric Council Grove is filling (sediment) in at a designed rate. The SLT’s goal is to maintain the siltation rate entering the reservior. TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN OUR WORLD, OUR WATER, OUR RESPONSIBILITY 2012 116 Fox Street 620-767-5111 Angela Beavers: [email protected] Angela Anderson: [email protected] Input for this plan was provided by the Twin Lakes WRAPS Stakeholder Leadership Team , KDHE and Kansas State University. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment has provided financial assistance for this project through an EPA Section 319 Non-Point Source Pollution Control Grant. Page 1 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This plan was completed with extensive assistance from Kansas State University. Many thanks must be given to the following people: K-State Research and Extension Project (KSRE) Staff Robert Wilson, Watershed Planner, Office of Local Government Josh Roe, Watershed Economist, Department of Agricultural Economics Susan Brown, Kansas Center for Agricultural Resources and the Environment Aleksey Sheshukov, Watershed Modeler, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Twin Lakes Watershed Stakeholder Leadership Team Watershed Representatives: Angela Beavers, Joe Hecht, Laura Marks, Chris McAfee, Katie Miller, Cindy Mullen, Angelina Zimmerman, Billy Colvin, Leland Parker Agency Members Morris County: JoBea Titus-Hutchinson, Conservation District Manager; Joe Hecht, NRCS; Laura Marks, KSRE Kansas Department of Health and Environment Project Officer: Ann D’Alfonso, Watershed Management Section Additional Technical Assistance Provided by: Rich Basore, Kansas Department of Health and Environment; Bobbi Wendt, Kansas Water Office; Chris GNau, Kansas Water Office Flint Hills RC&D: Angela Beavers, WRAPS Coordinator; Angela Anderson, WRAPS Coordinator Kansas Rural Center: Lyle Kohlmeier, Field Organizer Page 2 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….………2 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..........6 1.1 History……………………………………………………………………….........6 1.2 Development of the WRAPS Project……………………………………………..8 1.3 Preface……………………………………………………………………….........8 2.0 Watershed Characteristics…………………………………………………………………9 2.1 Drainage Area……………………………………………………………………..9 2.2 Watershed Review…………………………………………………….………….10 3.0 Land Use…………………………………………………………………………..……..12 3.1 Rangeland………………………………………………………………………..12 3.2 Cropland………………………………………………………………………….12 3.3 Developed Land………………………………………………………………….13 3.4 Public Water Supplies……………………………………………………………13 3.5 NPDES and CAFO Facilities……………………………………………………13 3.5.1 Confined Livestock…………………………………………………..14 3.5.2 Unconfined Concentrated Animal Areas…………………………….14 4.0 Designated Uses for Council Grove Reservoir…………………………………………..16 5.0 Water Quality Data…..…………………………………………………………………..18 5.1 Total Daily Maximum Loads…………………………………………………….18 5.2 Eutrophication……………………………………………………………………21 5.3 Current Conditions………………………………………………………….........21 5.3.1 Eutrophication ……………………………………………………….21 5.3.2 Phosphorus………………………………………………………….21 5.3.3 Sediment..……………………………………………………….........21 5.3.4 Bacteria..……………………………………………………………...21 5.4 Assessment Data…..……………………………………………………………..23 5.4.1 Step L Model…………………………………………………………23 5.4.2 Cropland and Livestock Targeted Areas……………………………..24 6.0 Cropland and Livestock Best Management Practices…………………………………….26 6.1 Cropland Best Management Practices……………………………………..…….26 6.1.1 Vegetative Buffer……….………………………………….…………26 6.1.2 Grassed Waterway………………………………………….…..…….27 6.1.3 No-Till………………………………………………………….…….27 6.1.4 Terraces…………………………………………………….….……..27 6.1.5 Permanent Vegetation………………………………………….…….27 6.1.6 Nutrient Management Plan………………………………….……….27 6.2 Livestock Best Management Practices…………………………………………..27 6.2.1 Vegetative Filter Strip………………………………………………..27 6.2.2 Relocate Feeding Sites………………………………………………..28 6.2.3 Alternative (Off Stream) Watering Systems………………………….28 6.2.4 Rotational Grazing……………………………………………………28 6.3 Cropland and Livestock “Needs” ……………………………………….…….....28 7.0 Contaminant Sources…...…………………………………………………………….…..28 8.0 TMDL Load Allocations………………………………………………………………….33 9.0 Best Management Practices, Costs and Efficiencies……………………………..…...36-90 10.0 Information and Education…………………………………………………..……….....91 11.0 Twin Lakes Water Quality Milestones to Determine Improvement……………..……..97 11.1 Water Quality Milestones for Council Grove Lake………………………….....97 Page 3 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 11.2 Water Quality Milestones for Munkers Creek, Lairds Creek & Neosho River……..99 11.3 Water Quality Milestones for Bacteria……………………………………………100 11.4 Additional Water Quality Indicators………………………………………………103 11.5 Monitoring and Water Quality Progress…………………………………………..103 11.6 Evaluation of Monitoring Data……………………………………………….103-104 12.0 Glossary of Terms…………………………………………………………………………119 13.0 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………120 LIST OF FIGURES 1 Photos of a Flooded Street and the Neosho River Bridge in Council Grove, 1951…….……………6 2 DEM& Location of Water Quality Sampling Sites of C.G. Lake Watershed………...........................9 3 Neosho Basin, SLT Areas, 2011………………………………………………………................….10 4 Twin Lakes WRAPS Watershed, July 2011……………………………………………...............…11 5 Land Cover Map of the Twin Lakes Watershed………………………………………...............…..12 6 T.L. Confined Animal Feeding Operations, March 2011……………………………...............……15 7 Impaired Water Bodies……………………………………………………………...............………18 8 Impaired Waters to Be Addressed…………..……………………………………...............………20 9 Neosho Headwaters Bacteria Index…….………………………………………...............…………22 10 Total Phosphorus Load………………………………………………………...............………….24 11 Priority HUC 12 Watersheds……………………………………………………...............…….....25 12 Monitoring Sites in the Twin Lakes Watershed…………………………………...............……….26 13 Possible BMPs for Phosphorus.……………………………………………… ...............………...29 14 Possible BMPs for Sediment……………………………………………………...............………..30 15 Possible BMPs for Bacteria………..……………………………………………...............………..31 16 Possible BMPs for Nitrogen………………………………………………………..............………32 17 Total Phosphorus Load Reduction…………………………………………………...............……34 18 Total Nitrogen Load Reduction……………………………………………………...............……..35 19 Neosho Headwaters Bacteria Index…………………………………………………...............…..101 20 SC637 Neosho River 2007 and 2011 Intensive Sampling Events…………………...............……102 LIST OF TABLES 1 USGS Data from the 1951 Flood………………………………..…………………...............………7 2 Lake & Stream Designation…………………………………………..……………...............……..17 3 2009 TMDLs in the Watershed…………………………………………..………...............……….19 4 2010 303d Listed Impaired Waters in Twin Lakes Watershed………………..…...............……….19 5 TMDL Review Schedule for the Neosho Basin………………………………….................………20 6 Watershed Runoff Loads and Ranking……………………………………………...............…..…..23 7 Twin Lakes BMP Adoption Rates and Gully Erosion……………………………...............………36 8 Cropland BMPs, Costs & Reduction Efficiencies…………………………………...............………36 9 Annual Adoption (treated acres) Cropland BMPs…………………………………...............………37 10 Annual Soil Erosion Reduction, Cropland BMPs…………………………………...............……..38 11 Annual Phosphorus Reduction, Cropland BMPs…………………………………...............………39 12 Annual Nitrogen Reduction………………………………………………………...………………40 13 Cropland BMP Implementation Milestones…………………………………..................…………41 14 Annual Cost Before Cost Share BMPs…………………………………………..................………42 15 Annual Cost Before Cost Share Cropland BMPs………………………………..................………43 16 Annual Livestock BMP Adoption……………………………………………………….................44 17 Livestock BMP Adoption Milestones…………………………………………………...................45 18 Annual Cost Before Cost Share of Implemented Livestock BMPs……………………..................46 19 Annual Cost After Cost Share of Implemented Livestock BMPs………………………................47 20 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions………………………………………………….................48 21 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions……………………………………………………...................49 Page 4 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 22 Combined Soil Erosion Reduction of Cropland and Livestock BMPS…….………….....................50 23 Combination of Cropland and Livestock BMP to Meet the Council Grove Lake Phosphorus TMDL…….……………………………………………………………....................................................51 24 Combined Nitrogen Reduction of Cropland and Livestock BMPs….…………………...................52 25 Total Annual Cost After Cost Share by BMP Category……………………………..…....................53 26 Phosphorus TMDL Summary…………………………………………………………....................54 27 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Adoption Cropland BMPs……………………………......................55 28 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Adoption Cropland BMPs……………………………......................56 29 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Adoption Cropland BMPs……………………………......................57 30 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Soil Erosion Reduction Cropland BMPs………………....................58 31 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Soil Erosion Reduction Cropland BMPs………………....................59 32 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Soil Erosion Reduction Cropland BMPs………………....................60 33 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Phosphorus Reduction Cropland BMPs………………...................61 34 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Phosphorus Reduction Cropland BMPs………………...................62 35 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Phosphorus Reduction Cropland BMPs………………...................63 36 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Nitrogen Reduction Cropland BMPs………………….....................64 37 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Nitrogen Reduction Cropland BMPs………………….....................65 38 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Nitrogen Reduction Cropland BMPs………………….....................66 39 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Adoption Cropland BMPs…………………………….....................67 40 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Adoption Cropland BMPs……………..………………...................68 41 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Adoption Cropland BMPs……………………………......................69 42 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost Before Cost Share Cropland BMPs………………...................70 43 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost Before Cost Share Cropland BMPs………………...................71 44 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost Before Cost Share Cropland BMPs………………...................72 45 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost After Cost-Share Cropland BMPs……………..…...................73 46 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost After Cost-Share Cropland BMPs……………….....................74 47 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost After Cost-Share Cropland BMPs……………….....................75 48 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Livestock BMP Adoption……………………………......................76 49 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Livestock BMP Adoption……………………………......................77 50 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Livestock BMP Adoption…………………………….......................78 51 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost Before Cost Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs………..79 52 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost Before Cost Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs………..80 53 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost Before Cost Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs………..81 54 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost After Cost Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs………….82 55 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost After Cost Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs………….83 56 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost After Cost Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs…………84 57 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions…………………................................85 58 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions……………........................................86 59 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions…………............................................87 60 Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions………………..........................................88 61 Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions…………..................................................89 62 Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions………………..........................................90 63 Cropland BMP Implementation Information and Education……………………….....................92-93 64 Livestock BMP Implementation Information and Education………………………....................94-96 65 Water Quality Milestones for Council Grove Lake………………....................................................98 66 Water Quality Milestones for KDHE Stream Stations in the Twin Lakes Watershed…………….99 67 TMDL Review Schedule for the Neosho Basin…………………………………............................104 68 Watershed Wide Information and Education……………………………………....................105-107 69 Technical Assistance Needed to Implement BMPs………………………………...................108-109 70 Total Annual Cost for I&E if All Events are Implemented…………………………..................…109 71 Organization’s Contact Information………………………………………………..................110-118 Page 5 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 HISTORY Twin Lakes is the name used to describe the two reservoirs that lie in the headwater of the Neosho River. The two impoundments that are located in the watershed are the Council Grove City Lake and the Council Grove Lake. The City Reservoir was constructed in 1942 as the primary water supply for the city of Council Grove. In the City Reservoir good water quality had been maintained and protection efforts for that body of water are discussed in the attached Source Water Protection Plan compiled by Katie Miller of the Kansas Rural Water Association. Eastern Kansas suffered through a series of droughts in the late 1940s and the early 1950s. By 1951, farmers and ranchers in the area were praying for spring rains to save their crops and water the grass of the expansive Flint Hills needed to graze their livestock. Their earnest requests were answered and a series of much needed rains arrived in March and April. The problem was, the downpours never stopped. By May, some of the rivers in the western part of the state were reaching flood stage. On May 22, a flash flood west of Hays rushed down Big Creek and swallowed most of the southern part of the town, killing six people, three of whom were teenagers returning from a night out at a dance in nearby Ellis. Cloud bursts and flash floods moved eastward and by early July, the Kansas, Arkansas, Neosho, Marais des Cygnes and the Verdigris rivers all left their banks causing tremendous amounts of property damage and human suffering. The worst flooding occurred after the rains of July 9th when five to seventeen inches fell over a 72 hour period in eastern Kansas. The rivers crested in a few days, but the flood waters did not fully recede for weeks. Figure 1: Photos of a flooded street and the Neosho River Bridge in Council Grove, KS July 1951. Page 6 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 1: USGS data from the 1951 flood. Neosho River City Emporia Neosho Rapids Leroy Burlington River crest 33.4 ft. Height above flood Date of stage measurement 13.4 ft. July 11, 1951 34.3 ft. 12.3 ft. July 11, 1951 34.48 ft. 41.53 ft. 11.48 ft. 14.53 ft. July 12, 1951 July 12, 1951 On July 13, a total of 1,074,000 acres (4346 km²) in Kansas were flooded. After seeing the devastation that the floods left in their wake, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was able to rally increased support for a system of levees and reservoirs in eastern Kansas. Proposals for such a system of structures had been around since the 1930s, but local opposition had successfully blocked construction of all but a few. In the aftermath of the 1951 floods, the support for the federal flood control system overcame the dissenters and site selection began. Construction began on the Council Grove Reservoir, in 1962 to help with flood control in the region. Although its beginnings were as a flood control project, the Council Grove Reservoir has become much more during the now nearly 50 years since its completion. A portion of the storage in the lake is held in reserve as a water source for Council Grove, Emporia and Iola which can be obtained for use through releases to the Neosho River. It is a very popular recreation spot for visitors from all over the country. The Reservoir and its surrounding public and private lands have become important aquatic and terrestrial wildlife habitat. Thus, protecting and restoring this important water body is important both ecologically and economically. Restoration of the water quality in the Council Grove Reservoir will be the focus of this document. The Twin Lakes WRAPS Stakeholder Leadership Team, SLT, has worked with Josh Roe of Kansas State University and with staff from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment to put together this Plan. Over the next 30 years, the actions outlined in this document will help to maintain and improve the water quality in the Reservoir. Page 7 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 1.2 Development of the WRAPS project The Twin Lakes Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy project began in 2005 at the urging of the Morris County Conservation District. The Flint Hills Resource Conservation and Development, RC&D, Council was contacted and agreed to serve as the project sponsor. A project manager, Katie Miller, was hired and a stakeholder leadership team made up of local landowners and agency personnel was recruited. During the intervening years, the make-up of the SLT and the project manager have changed, but the goal of the group has always been to compile a 9-Element Plan that could set forth concrete actions that would lead to the improvement and protection of the water quality in the Council Grove Reservoir. Also assisting in the implementation of this plan will be the Morris County Conservation District Board of Supervisors and staff members that will serve as the Project Management Team, PMT. The goals that the Twin Lakes SLT has adopted are as follows; 1. Reduce the amount of total phosphorus flowing into the reservoir as detected by the KDHE monitoring stations located up in the watershed. 2. Reduce the amount of sediment entering the reservoir. 3. Reduce the amount of E.Coli bacteria entering the surface waters of the watershed as measured by the Bacteria Index used by KDHE. Accomplishment of these goals will involve both an educational component as well as the implementation of Best Management Practices on both public and private lands within the entire watershed. Efforts will be focused on the Target Watersheds discussed later in this plan. These efforts will also aide in the reduction of other non-point source pollutants such as nitrogen that enter the Reservoir and degrade its water quality. 1.3 Preface The purpose of this Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) report for the Twin Lakes Watershed is to outline a plan of restoration and protection goals and actions for the surface waters of the watershed. Watershed goals are characterized as “restoration” or “protection”. Watershed restoration is for surface waters that do not meet Kansas water quality standards, and for areas of the watershed that need improvement in habitat, land management or other attributes. Watershed protection is needed for surface waters that currently meet water quality standards, but are in need of protection from future degradation. This report is intended to serve as an overall strategy to guide watershed restoration and protection efforts by individuals, local, state and federal agencies and organizations. At the end of the WRAPS process, the Stakeholder Leadership Team (SLT) will have the capability, capacity and confidence to make decisions that will restore and protect the water quality and watershed conditions of the Twin Lakes Watershed. Page 8 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS 2.1 Drainage Area A watershed is an area of land that catches precipitation and funnels it to a particular creek, stream and river and so on, until the water drains into an ocean. A watershed has distinct elevation boundaries that do not follow political “lines” such as county, state and international borders. Watersheds come in all shapes and sizes, with some covering an area of a few acres while others are thousands of square miles across. Below is a map of the Council Grove watershed. Figure 2: DEM and location of water quality sampling sites of Council Grove Lake Watershed. Page 9 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 2.2 Watershed Review There are twelve river basins located in Kansas. The scope of this WRAPS project is a portion of the Neosho Basin. The entire basin drains the Neosho River and its tributaries into Oklahoma and eventually empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Figure 3: Neosho Basin, SLT Areas, KDHE, July 2011. Page 10 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 The entire Neosho Basin is covered by WRAPS projects. The scope of this plan will focus on the Council Grove (Twin Lakes) watershed located in the northern point of the Neosho Basin. A HUC is an acronym for Hydrologic Unit Code. HUCs are an identification system for watersheds. Each watershed has a unique HUC in addition to a common name. As watersheds become smaller in geographic size, the HUC number will become larger. For example, the Neosho Basin is one of twelve basins in the state of Kansas. Within the Neosho Basin there are seven HUC 8 classifications. HUC 8’s can further be split into smaller watersheds that are given HUC 10 numbers and HUC 10 watersheds can be further divided into smaller HUC 12’s. The HUC 8 number for the Neosho Headwaters watershed is 11070201. The HUC 10 for the Twin Lakes watershed is 1107020101. The HUC 12 numbers for the subwatersheds are listed below. Figure 4. Twin Lakes WRAPS Watershed, KDHE, July 2011. The Council Grove Reservoir watershed covers 259 square miles, 165,760 acres, and is located at the headwaters of the Neosho River in the Flint Hills Eco region. The lake itself covers 2589 acres with a maximum depth of 36’. The Reservoir is managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers out of the Tulsa District. Page 11 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950, the project was designed and built by the Tulsa District, Corps of Engineers, at a cost of $11.5 million. Construction began in 1962, and the project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1964. The project is one of seven reservoirs authorized for full development of the Neosho River Basin in Kansas and Oklahoma. The four In Kansas are Council Grove and John Redmond on the Neosho River and Marion and Cedar Point on the Cottonwood River, a tributary of the Neosho. The three in Oklahoma are Fort Gibson, Markham Ferry, and Pensacola. Cedar Point Dam has been de-authorized by the US Congress and will not be constructed. 3.0 LAND USE 3.1 Rangeland Due to its location in the Flint Hills, 67% of the land use in the watershed is native tallgrass prairie. These lush grasslands are used primarily to graze cattle for three to six months of the year. 3.2 Cropland Another 21% of the land use is for crop production. Common crops produced in the area include wheat, corn, soybeans, alfalfa or other forage crop which are mainly grown in some type of rotation. As indicated on the map below, the cropland is widely distributed throughout the watershed with more concentration in the valley along the main stem of the Neosho River. Figure 5: Land Cover Map of the Twin Lakes Watershed. Page 12 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 3.3 Developed Land There are three communities located partially or totally within the watershed, White City, Dwight and Alta Vista. A developed area is also located on the western edge on the grounds of the Herington Municipal Airport. The airfield was built as a bomber staging area during World War II and now the runways are home to the largest Confined Animal Feeding Operation in the watershed, the Tiffany Cattle Company. These developed areas account for less than 1% of the total land use in the watershed. 3.4 Public Water Supplies Each of the three communities, White City, Dwight and Alta Vista use groundwater sources for their public water supply. At least part of the wells in each of the cities is located within the Twin Lakes watershed. The largest public water supply is the Council Grove City Reservoir which provides water for the City of Council Grove. The Council Grove Federal Reservoir is a backup water supply for the cities of Council Grove, Emporia and Iola. The communities would most likely access the water supply through releases from the Lake into the Neosho River. Most of the population in the watershed obtains their water through private groundwater wells. White City and Dwight have both recently updated their water supply and waste water systems with grant funds obtained through State and Federal sources. 3.5 NPDES and CAFO Facilities There are three permitted NPDES facilities in the Twin Lakes Watershed. Dwight MWTP seldom discharges effluent into Munkers Creek while Alta Vista and White City MWTPs consistently discharge below their design flow. The construction of a three-cell lagoon was considered to remove wastewater from the septic systems around the Council Grove City Reservoir by the City of Council Grove. Ultimately, this wastewater treatment system was not constructed due to insufficient financial support. In compliance with their NPDES permits, White City samples for biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, pH, and ammonia, but nitrogen and phosphorus data are not available for either of the waste treatment plants. For typical lagoon systems in Kansas, average effluent TN and TP concentrations are 7 mg/L and 2 mg/L, respectively. Watershed. NPDES Permit Facility KS-0096733 Alta Vista KS-0051675 Dwight KS-0096873 White City Name MWTP MWTP MWTP Type Design Flow Four-Cell Lagoon 0.054 MGD Three-Cell Lagoon 0.070 MGD Three-Cell Lagoon 0.094 MGD Reach Munkers Creek Lairds Creek Neosho River Permit Expires 4/30/2013 6/30/2013 4/30/2013 Page 13 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 3.5.1 Confined Livestock Any livestock facility with an animal unit capacity of 300 or more or a facility with a daily discharge regardless of size must register with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE). Any facility, no matter what animal capacity, is required to register if KDHE’s investigates them due to a complaint and the facility is found to pose a significant pollution potential. Facilities which register with KDHE will be site inspected for significant pollution potential, if deemed not a significant pollution potential by KDHE, they can be certified if they follow BMPs as recommended by the technical service provider and approved by KDHE. These include but are not limited to: regular cleaning of stalls, managing manure storage areas, etc. Facilities with 300 animal units up to 999 (known as Confined Feeding Facilities (CFFs) identified to have a significant pollution potential must obtain a State of Kansas Livestock Waste Management Permit. Facilities 1,000 or more must obtain an NPDES Livestock Waste Management Permit (Federal) known as Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs). Operations with a daily discharge, such as a dairy operation that generates an outflow from the milking barn on a daily basis, are required to have a permit. (See www.kdheks.gov/feedlots) for more information. 3.5.2 Unconfined Concentrated Animal Areas Unconfined areas of animal concentration – e.g. watering areas, loafing areas or feeding areas can also pose a pollution potential if not managed properly. These are potential sources of nutrients, sediment, bacteria and aquatic impacts from manure and leftover feed. Best Management Practices for these areas can include proper manure application from a cleaning of these areas. This would be especially important when addressing cropland target areas. Other practices such as alternative water supplies, rotational grazing are for grazing type of activities, alternative watering or loafing areas, mineral and feed location rotation etc. will not likely address any type of “regulated” livestock pollution control need. There are 10 registered confined animal feedlot operations (CAFOs) that are either certified (8) or permitted (2), which are primarily located in the central portion of the watershed. One of two permitted facilities is of sufficient size (beef, 15,500 animal units) to warrant NPDES permitting (KS0117218 or ANEMR- C001). All the permitted and certified livestock facilities (2 dairy, 5 beef, and 3 swine) have waste management systems designed to minimize runoff entering their operation or detaining runoff emanating from their facilities. In addition, they are designed to retain a 25- year, 24-hr rainfall/runoff event as well as an anticipated two weeks of normal wastewater from their operations. Typically, this rainfall event coincides with stream flow that is occurs than 1-5% of the time. Though the total potential number of animals is 18,088 head in the watershed, the actual number of animals at the feedlot operations is typically less than the allowable number. Page 14 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Figure 6. Twin Lakes Confined Animal Feeding Operations. March 2011. The sediment and nutrient loads found in the watershed streams and in the Council Grove reservoir are derived from many non-point sources in the watershed. The previously discussed NPDES and permitted CAFOs are some of the obvious potential sources as are the many unpermitted small animal feeding operations located throughout the area. No manufacturing or industrial sites are located in the Twin Lakes watershed. Therefore, livestock and crop production areas are the main contributors to the pollutant loads in the watershed. Streambank erosion, mainly along the main stem of the Neosho River is a major contributor to the sediment load and also will contribute to the nutrients found in the stream as well. Page 15 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 4.0 DESIGNATED USES FOR COUNCIL GROVE RESERVOIR Surface waters in this watershed are generally used for aquatic life support (fish), human health purposes, domestic water supply, recreation (fishing, boating, and swimming), groundwater recharge, industrial water supply, irrigation and livestock watering. These are commonly referred to as “designated uses” as stated in the Kansas Surface Water Register, 2004, issued by KDHE. Surface waters are given certain “designated uses” based on what the waters will be used for. For example, waters that will come into contact with human skin should be of higher quality than waters used for watering livestock. Therefore, each “designated use” category has a different water quality standard associated with it. When water does not meet its “designated use” water quality standard then that water is considered impaired. Page 16 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 2. Lake & stream designation. CLASS AL CR DS FP GR IW IR LW 1107020127 110702019023 GP GP E E C b X X O X X X X X X X X X 1107020132 GP E C X O X X X X 1107020135 GP E b X X X X X X 1107020129 GP E C X X X X X X Lairds Creek 1107020130 Neosho River, West Fork 1107020128 Lanos Creek 1107020121 Munkers Creek, East Branch 1107020131 Munkers Creek 1107020118 Neosho River 1107020123 Council Grove Lake N/A Council Grove City Lake N/A CUSEGA = channel unit segment GP GP GP GP GP GP GP GP E E E E E E E E b b b C C C A A X X X X X X X X O X O X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Lake/Stream Name Parkers Creek Level Creek Munkers Creek, Middle Branch Crooked Creek Haun Creek CUSEGA CLASS = anti-degradation category GP = general purpose waters AL = designated for aquatic life use E = expected aquatic life use water CR = A = C = b = designated for contact recreational use Primary contact recreation stream segment/lake that is a public swimming area/has a posted public swimming area Primary contact recreation stream segment/lake that is not open to and accessible by the public under Kansas law Secondary contact recreation stream segment/lake that is not open to and accessible by the public under Kansas law FP = designated for food procurement use DS = designated for domestic water supply GR = designated for ground water recharge IW = designated for industrial water supply use IR = designated for irrigation use LW = designated for livestock watering use X = O = blank = referenced stream segment/lake is assigned the indicated designated use referenced stream segment/lake does not support the indicated designated use capacity of the referenced stream segment/lake to support the indicated designated use has not been determined by use attainability analysis Page 17 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 5.0 WATER QUALITY DATA 5.1 Total Daily Maximum Loads (TMDL) Based on the Clean Water Act, a water body that does not meet water quality standards is considered “impaired”. The Clean Water Act requires States to develop a clean-up plan for impairments. The cleanup plan and the process used to develop it is the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). A TMDL designation sets the maximum amount of pollutant that a specific body of water can receive without violating the surface water-quality standards, resulting in failure to support their designated uses. Figure 7. Impaired Water Bodies. KDHE. Pollutants are assigned “categories” depending on stage of TMDL development: Category 5 – Waters needing TMDL(s) Category 4a – Waters that have a TMDL(s) developed for them and remain impaired Category 3 – Waters that are indeterminate and need more data or information Page 18 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 TMDLs in the Watershed The TMDLs that are highlighted in blue will be directly targeted by this WRAPS plan. Table 3. 2009 TMDLs in the Watershed. Category 4a - Has TMDL and remains impaired 4a - Has TMDL and remains impaired 4a - Has TMDL and remains impaired 4a - Has TMDL and remains impaired 2009 TMDLs in the Watershed Water Segment TMDL Pollutant Priority Sampling Station Council Grove Lake Eutrophication High LM022001 Council Grove Lake Siltation High LM022001 Neosho River Fecal Coliform Bacteria Medium SC637 Neosho River (Parkerville) Copper Low SC637 Table 4. 2010 303d listed impaired waters in the Twin Lakes watershed. 303d Listed Waters in the Watershed 5 – Waters needing TMDL 2010 303d listed impaired Waters in the Twin Lakes Watershed Water Segment TMDL Pollutant Priority Sampling Station * Munkers Creek Near Council Grove Dissolved Oxygen Low SC631 Four Mile Creek Near Council Grove Zinc Low SC630 5 - Waters needing TMDL Lairds Creek near Kelso 5 - Waters needing TMDL 3- Waters with insufficient data for listing decision * Neosho River near Parkerville Four Mile Creek near Council Grove 3 - Waters with insufficient data for listing decision Munkers Creek Near Council Grove Category 5 - Waters needing TMDL Zinc Low SC632 Total Phosphorus Low SC637 Atrazine SC630 Copper SC631 * TMDLs highlighted in blue will be directly targeted by this plan. Waters highlighted in orange will be positively impacted by BMP implementation from this plan. Page 19 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 5. TMDL Review Schedule for the Neosho Basin. TMDL Review Schedule for the Neosho Basin Year Ending in September 2013 Implementation Period 2014-2023 Possible TMDL to Revise 2002, 2004, 2005 TMDL to Evaluate 2002, 2004, 2005 2018 2019-2028 2000, 2004, 2005, 2008 2000, 2004, 2005, 2008 Figure 8. Impaired Waters to be Addressed. KDHE. Page 20 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 5.3 Current Conditions 5.3.1 Eutrophication The Council Grove Reservoir has been on the TMDL 303d list since 1998. The impairment listed for the lake is eutrophication. Eutrophication is the super-saturation of the water with nutrients, mainly nitrogen and phosphorus. Further classified as argillotrophic, this water could support growth of potentially harmful blue-green algae if conducive environmental conditions are present. The impairments in this watershed mainly stem from non-point pollution sources (NPS). This means that there is not one specific outlet where the contaminants are entering the water course, but rather multiple sites contributing to the overall pollutant loads. 5.3.2 Phosphorus Water quality data collected from 2000 to 2007 reveals that Council Grove Reservoir ranks third for total phosphorus (TP) concentration of 24 federal reservoirs in the state. The average concentration is 198 μg/L (ppb), which is 10 times greater than the reference value (19 μg/L) suggested for the Flint Hills region and nearly twice that of the national average (100 μg/L) as indicated within the EPA’s Survey of Nation’s Lake in recent years. 5.3.3 Sedimentation Similar to TP, the total suspended solids (TSS) concentration, indicative of turbid condition, is high and averages about 21 mg/L (ppm). Based on the 2008 bathymetric survey of Council Grove Reservoir conducted by the Kansas Biological Survey and funded by the Kansas Water Office, Council Grove is silting in at a rate of 194 ac-ft./yr. This rate of siltation is below the designed sedimentation rate of 206 ac-ft./yr. Therefore in communication with the Kansas Water Office it was agreed that high priority TMDL for Siltation was less of a priority than the high priority TMDL for Eutrophication. 5.3.4 Bacteria Bacteria Load reductions should result in less frequent exceedance of the nominal E. Coli Bacteria (ECB) criterion (427 Colony Forming Units (cfu/100mL) for the KDHE sampling site SC637 near Parkerville, KS. In order to assess the impact of BMPs addressing bacteria impairments the relative frequency and magnitude of bacteria concentrations seen in the receiving streams monitored by KDHE on a routine or rotational basis, must be measured to determine if water quality improvements are being achieved. The bacteria index is utilized by KDHE to assess the relative frequency and magnitude of the bacteria concentrations at KDHE monitoring sites. Page 21 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 The calculated bacteria index for the Neosho River sampling station SC637 is the natural logarithm of each sample value taken during the April-October Primary Recreation season, divided by the natural logarithm of the bacteria criteria for Primary Recreation Class C [ln(427)]. Index = ln(ECB Count)/ln(427) The indicator will be the Upper Decile of those index values; with the target being that the index is below 1.0 at the upper decile (90th percentile). KDHE sampling station SC637 on the Neosho River was sampled in accordance with the water quality standard for three different intensive sampling events in 2007 and one intensive sampling event in 2011. Each intensive sampling event consisted of five ECB samples collected in a 30day period. The calculated geometric mean of the five samples for each event was under the recreational use criterion of 427 cfu/100mL for all of the sampling events. Neosho Headwaters -- Bacteria Index Primary Contact Recreation 'C' Index 1.8 1.6 1.4 Index 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 Target is for the Neosho River Index to be below 1 at 90% 0.4 0.2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentile Neosho River SC637 Figure 9. Neosho Headwaters Bacteria Index. Primary Contact Recreation ‘C’ Index. KDHE. Page 22 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 5.4 Assessment Data 5.4.1 STEPL Model STEPL is a simple watershed model that provides both agricultural and urban annual average sediment and nutrient simulations as well as implementation evaluation of various best management practices. The STEPL model calculates nutrient loading based on the runoff volume and the pollutant concentrations in the runoff water as it is influenced by factors such as the land use distribution and management practices. The results of STEPL for the Council Grove Reservoir watershed as included within the table below. Table 6. Watershed runoff loads and ranking. STEPL Simulated annual average watershed and sub watershed runoff nutrient loads Sub watershed (HUC 12) Area (ac) TN (ton) TP (ton) Basin 110702010101 27,931 118.06 22.61 Basin 110702010102 27521 83.58 15.41 Basin 110702010103 19555 83.55 15.64 Basin 110702010104 36,578 158.22 25.72 Basin 110702010105 19,348 61.21 11.02 Basin 110702010106 30,834 89.89 14.89 Total 161,767 594.51 105.29 Watershed ranking of annual runoff TN and TP loads per unit of area Ranking TN (lbs./ac) Ranking TP (lbs./ac) Basin 110702010104 8.65 Basin 11070201010010 1.62 Basin 110702010103 8.54 Basin 11070201010030 1.6 Basin 110702010101 8.45 Basin 11070201010040 1.41 Basin 110702010105 6.33 Basin 11070201010050 1.14 Basin 110702010102 6.07 Basin 11070201010020 1.12 Basin 110702010106 5.83 Basin 11070201010060 0.97 Page 23 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Total Phosphorus Load (lbs./ac/yr.). Figure 10. Total Phosphorus Load 5.4.2 Cropland & Livestock Targeted areas After reviewing the STEPL modeling data and comparing that data with where the impaired waters are located in the watershed/ monitoring data, the SLT chose three HUC 12’s to target cropland & livestock BMP’s. These three HUC 12s were broken down into two different priority levels, Tier 1 & Tier 2. BMP implementation for the first 10 years will be focused in Tier 1 targeted areas, HUC 110702010101 and 110702010102. After ten years of BMP implementation, the Twin Lakes WRAPS will then include HUC 110702010104 in the BMP targeted areas. The watershed modeling shows that sub-watersheds #0103, #0105, #0106, have the potential to contribute a significant amount of total phosphorus to this system. However, after discussion with the representatives from Kansas State University and KDHE, the SLT decided to focus the Page 24 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 WRAPS efforts on sub watershed # 0104. This decision was made based on the fact that #0104 has more acres of cropland and those acres are mainly adjacent to the Munker’s creek. Thus, the SLT felt that in all actuality, they would be contributing the greater load of P. Cropland & Livestock Targeted Areas: Tier 1 HUC 110702010101 HUC 110702010102 Tier 2 HUC 110702010104 Figure 11. Priority HUC 12 Watersheds. KDHE. Page 25 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Figure 12. Monitoring Sites in Twin Lakes Watershed. The SLT would like to implement one additional KDHE monitoring site: below the #0102 watershed. In 2010, KDHE funded an additional water quality monitoring sites (SC637) below #0101 that would collect four routine water chemistry samples between March and October and one additional high follow event. This monitoring would continue for a period that would not exceed five years. KDHE will update the Twin Lakes SLT on the monitoring results. This data will help the SLT gage water quality success and assist in more detailed targeting of BMPs 6.0 CROPLAND AND LIVESTOCK BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Listed below are the cropland & livestock BMP’s that the Twin Lakes SLT chose based on adoptability within the targeted areas. 6.1 Cropland Best Management Practices 6.1.1 Vegetative Buffer -Area of field maintained in permanent vegetation to help reduce nutrient and sediment loss from agricultural fields, improve runoff water quality, and provide habitat for wildlife. -On average for Kansas fields, 1 acre buffer treats 15 acres of cropland. Page 26 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 -50% erosion reduction efficiency, 50% phosphorus reduction efficiency -Approx. $1,000/acre, 90% cost-share available from NRCS. 6.1.2 Grassed Waterway -Grassed strip used as an outlet to prevent silt and gully formation. -Can also be used as outlets for water from terraces. -On average for Kansas fields, 1 acre waterway will treat 10 acres of cropland. -40% erosion reduction efficiency, 40% phosphorus reduction efficiency. -$1,600 an acre, 50% cost-share available from NRCS. 6.1.3 No-Till -A management system in which chemicals may be used for weed control and seedbed preparation. -The soil surface is never disturbed except for planting or drilling operations in a 100% no-till system. -75% erosion reduction efficiency, 40% phosphorus reduction efficiency. -WRAPS groups and KSU Ag Economists have decided $10 an acre for 10 years is an adequate payment to entice producers to convert, 50% cost-share available from NRCS. 6.1.4 Terraces -Earth embankment and/or channel constructed across the slope to intercept runoff water and trap soil. -One of the oldest/most common BMPs -30% Erosion Reduction Efficiency, 30% phosphorus reduction efficiency -$1.02 per linear foot, 50% cost-share available from NRCS 6.1.5 Permanent Vegetation -Planting a portion of or an entire field to grass. -95% erosion reduction efficiency, 95% phosphorus reduction efficiency. -$150 an acre, 50% cost-share available from NRCS. 6.1.6 Nutrient Management Plan -Managing the amount, source, placement, form and timing of the application of nutrients and soil amendments. -Intensive soil testing -25% erosion and 25% P reduction efficiency. -WRAPS groups and KSU Ag Economists have decided $7.30 an acre for 10 years is an adequate payment to entice producers to convert, 50% cost-share is available from NRCS. 6.2 Livestock Best Management Practices 6.2.1 Vegetative Filter Strip -A vegetated area that receives runoff during rainfall from an animal feeding operation. -Often require a land area equal to or greater than the drainage area (needs to be as large as the feedlot). -10 year lifespan, requires periodic mowing or haying, average P reduction: 50%. Page 27 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 -$714 an acre 6.2.2 Relocate Feeding Sites -Feeding Pens- Move feedlot or pens away from a stream, waterway, or body of water to increase filtration and waste removal of manure. Highly variable in price, average of $6,600 per unit. -Pasture- Move feeding site that is in a pasture away from a stream, waterway, or body of water to increase the filtration and waste removal (e.g. move bale feeders away from stream). Highly variable in price, average of $2,203 per unit. -Average P reduction: 30-80% 6.2.3 Alternative (Off-Stream) Watering System -Watering system so that livestock do not enter stream or body of water. -Studies show cattle will drink from tank over a stream or pond 80% of the time. -10-25 year lifespan, average P reduction: 30-98% with greater efficiencies for limited stream access. -$3,795 installed for solar system, including present value of maintenance costs. 6.2.4 Rotational Grazing -Rotating livestock within a pasture to spread manure more uniformly and allow grass to regenerate. -May involve significant cross fencing and additional watering sites. -50-75% P Reduction. -Approximately $7,000 with complex systems significantly more expensive. 6.3 Cropland & Livestock ”Needs” Once the SLT decided on where to target cropland BMP implementation and what BMP would be implemented, the next step was to make sure there was a “need” in the watershed for these types and quantities of BMPs within the targeted area. KDHE surveyed the county conservation districts for land treatment “needs” in 2005. KDHE, K-State and the watershed coordinators did a follow-up, “ground-truthing” in 2012. The districts completed a spreadsheet indicating the number of acres for each land use type that were in need of structural and/or nonstructural land treatment. Please view the data developed in chapter 9 on page 37 of the plan. 7.0 CONTAMINANT SOURCES The tables on the following three pages illustrate some of the sources of these contaminants. As demonstrated, the relationship between the pollutants and their sources is very complex and often times each source contributes more than one pollutant to the watershed. This is one of the factors that make NPS contaminants very difficult to manage. Page 28 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Pollutant Source 2011 Possible Best Management Practices Alternate watering source Ponds Spring Development Animal feeding/watering facilities Replace or repair system Tanks On-site waste water systems Native Grass Buffers or conversion to permanent vegetation Riparian Forest Gully erosion Feeding Site Relocation Phosphorus Diversions Terraces Cropland Rangeland Structural Practices Grade Stabilization Waterways No-Till Soil Testing Grazing Management Plans & Practices Nutrient Management Planning Figure 13. Possible BMPs for Phosphorus. Page 29 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Pollutant Source 2011 Possible Best Management Practices Alternate watering source Ponds Spring Development Animal feeding/watering facilities Plug well Tanks Native Grass Abandoned wells Buffers Riparian Forest Streambank erosion Feeding Site Relocation Sediment Diversions Terraces Cropland Rangeland Structural Practices Streambank Stabilization Waterways No-Till Soil Testing Brush Control and Pasture Burning Figure 14. Possible BMPs for Sediment. Page 30 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Pollutant Source 2011 Possible Best Management Practices Alternate watering source Ponds Spring Development Animal feeding/watering facilities Repair or replace system, Plug well Tanks Native Grass Onsite waste water systems, Abandoned wells Buffers Riparian Forest Bacteria Feeding Site Relocation Streambank erosion Diversions Rangeland Streambank Stabilization Brush Control and Pasture Burning Figure 15. Possible BMPs for bacteria. Page 31 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Pollutant Source Gully Erosion 2012 Possible Best Management Practices Buffers or Conversion to Permanent Vegetation Native Grass Riparian Forest Feeding Site Relocation or Alternate watering sources Diversions Cropland Terraces Structural Practices Nitrogen Waterways Grade Stabilization Rangeland No-Till Grazing Management plans and practices Soil Testing Nutrient Management Planning Figure 16. Possible BMPs for Nitrogen. Page 32 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2011 8.0 TMDL LOAD ALLOCATIONS TMDL loading is based on several factors. A total load is derived from the TMDL. Part of this total load is waste load allocation. This portion comes from point sources in the watershed: NPDES facilities, CAFOs or other regulated sites. Some TMDLs will have a natural or background load allocation, which might be atmospheric deposition or natural mineral content in the water. After removing all the point source and natural contributions, the amount of load left is the TMDL Load Allocation that originates from nonpoint sources (pollutants originating from diffuse areas, such as agricultural or urban areas that have no specific point of discharge) and is the amount that this WRAPS project is directed to address. All BMPs derived by the SLT will be directed at this Load Allocation to address nonpoint sources pollution within the WRAPS project area. The focus of the Council Grove 9 element plan will be a nonpoint source total phosphorus load reduction of 68,767 lbs./year. In communication with the KDHE TMDL Section, it was agreed that implementation of BMP’s to address the TP load reduction goal should also reduce nitrogen loads entering Council Grove Reservoir. When the TMDLs for the Neosho Basin have been reviewed in 2013, KDHE will update the Council Grove SLT on current monitoring data for the purpose of evaluating implementation progress and the need for any plan revisions. According to the KWO bathymetric, the Reservoir is filling in at a designed rate. Therefore, there is no TSS load reduction. The SLT goal is to maintain the siltation rate entering the reservoir. In the Twin Lakes watershed, there is a TMDL in sub-watershed #0102 for bacteria which is more than likely related to the various livestock operations located in the area. In working with KDHE, the SLT has decided to make the main focus of this plan the eutrophication TMDL for the Council Grove Reservoir and not the bacteria levels. Bacteria loads are difficult to quantify and there are no load reductions available for this contaminant. It is anticipated that the livestock BMPs that will be installed through this plan to reduce P and N will also have a positive effect on the bacteria loads as well. Page 33 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Figure 17. Total Phosphorus load reduction. Page 34 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Figure 18. Total Nitrogen load reduction. Page 35 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 9.0 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, COSTS AND EFFICIENCIES The following tables were developed by Josh Roe of Kansas State University based off of a spring 2012 “ground-truthing session” where it was determined the BMPs most needed with significant efficiency included grassed waterways, terraces and gully erosion. In consultation with the Twin Lakes SLT, the SLT agreed to the list of BMPs which they also felt would be the most readily adopted by landowners and which would be the most efficient at reducing sediment and nutrient loads in the watershed. In order to achieve the load reduction goals, this plan is based on a 30 year implementation schedule. The focus of the first ten years will be on the nutrient (mainly phosphorus) component and at that point, bacteria loads will be addressed. Table 7. Twin Lakes BMP Adoption Rates and Gully Erosion Sub Watershed 0101 0102 0104 Overall Twin Lakes BMP Adoption Rates and Gully Erosion Grassed No- Perm Contour Grade Gully Waterway Terraces Till Veg Buffer Farmed Stab Erosion 44% 32% 9% 0% 0% 0% 0% 44% 36% 82% 27% 0% 0% 0% 0% 73% 47% 68% 68% 0% 5% 0% 0% 53% 44% 52% 30% 0% 2% 0% 0% 52% Table 8. Twin Lakes Cropland BMPs, Costs and Reduction Efficiencies Twin Lakes WRAPS Cropland BMPs, Costs, and Reduction Efficiencies Best Management Practice Permanent Vegetation No-Till Terraces Waterways Vegetative Buffers Nutrient Management Plan Grade Stabilization/Sediment Basin Cost per Acre Available CostShare Erosion Phosphorus Nitrogen Reduction Reduction Reduction Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency $150 $78 $102 $160 $100 $57 50% 39% 50% 50% 90% 50% 95% 75% 30% 40% 50% 25% 95% 40% 30% 40% 50% 25% 95% 25% 30% 40% 25% 25% $300 50% 50% 50% 25% Page 36 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 9. Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs. Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total Permanent Vegetation Nutrient Grade Vegetative Management Stabilization Total No-Till Terraces Waterways Buffers Plan Structures Adoption 36 144 36 144 36 144 36 144 36 144 36 144 36 144 36 144 36 144 36 144 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 1,101 4,405 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 2,203 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 3,304 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 2,203 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 2,203 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 3,304 612 612 612 612 612 612 612 612 612 612 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 18,721 Page 37 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 10. Annual Soil Erosion Reduction (tons), Cropland BMPs. Annual Soil Erosion Reduction (tons), Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation No-Till Terraces Waterways 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 36 71 107 142 178 213 249 285 320 356 389 422 455 488 521 554 587 620 653 686 719 752 785 818 851 884 917 950 983 1,016 112 225 337 449 562 674 787 899 1,011 1,124 1,228 1,332 1,436 1,541 1,645 1,749 1,853 1,957 2,062 2,166 2,270 2,374 2,478 2,583 2,687 2,791 2,895 2,999 3,104 3,208 22 45 67 90 112 135 157 180 202 225 246 266 287 308 329 350 371 391 412 433 454 475 496 517 537 558 579 600 621 642 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360 405 449 491 533 575 616 658 700 741 783 825 866 908 950 991 1,033 1,075 1,116 1,158 1,200 1,241 1,283 Vegetative Buffers 37 75 112 150 187 225 262 300 337 375 409 444 479 514 548 583 618 652 687 722 757 791 826 861 896 930 965 1,000 1,035 1,069 Nutrient Management Plan 19 37 56 75 94 112 131 150 169 187 205 222 239 257 274 291 309 326 344 361 378 396 413 430 448 465 483 500 517 535 Grade Total Stabilization Load Structures Reduction 56 112 169 225 281 337 393 449 506 562 614 666 718 770 822 874 927 979 1,031 1,083 1,135 1,187 1,239 1,291 1,343 1,396 1,448 1,500 1,552 1,604 328 655 983 1,311 1,639 1,966 2,294 2,622 2,950 3,277 3,581 3,885 4,189 4,493 4,797 5,101 5,405 5,709 6,013 6,317 6,621 6,925 7,229 7,533 7,837 8,141 8,445 8,749 9,052 9,356 Page 38 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 11. Annual Phosphorus Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs. Annual Phosphorus Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Permanent Vegetative Year Vegetation No-Till Terraces Waterways Buffers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 92 184 277 369 461 553 645 738 830 922 1,008 1,094 1,181 1,267 1,353 1,439 1,526 1,612 1,698 1,784 1,871 1,957 2,043 2,129 2,216 2,302 2,388 2,475 2,561 2,647 155 311 466 621 776 932 1,087 1,242 1,397 1,553 1,698 1,843 1,988 2,134 2,279 2,424 2,570 2,715 2,860 3,005 3,151 3,296 3,441 3,587 3,732 3,877 4,022 4,168 4,313 4,458 58 116 175 233 291 349 408 466 524 582 637 691 746 800 855 909 964 1,018 1,073 1,127 1,182 1,236 1,290 1,345 1,399 1,454 1,508 1,563 1,617 1,672 116 233 349 466 582 699 815 932 1,048 1,164 1,273 1,382 1,491 1,600 1,709 1,818 1,927 2,036 2,145 2,254 2,363 2,472 2,581 2,690 2,799 2,908 3,017 3,126 3,235 3,344 97 194 291 388 485 582 679 776 873 970 1,061 1,152 1,243 1,334 1,424 1,515 1,606 1,697 1,788 1,878 1,969 2,060 2,151 2,242 2,332 2,423 2,514 2,605 2,696 2,786 Nutrient Management Plan 49 97 146 194 243 291 340 388 437 485 531 576 621 667 712 758 803 848 894 939 985 1,030 1,075 1,121 1,166 1,212 1,257 1,302 1,348 1,393 Grade Total Stabilization Load Structures Reduction 146 291 437 582 728 873 1,019 1,164 1,310 1,456 1,592 1,728 1,864 2,000 2,137 2,273 2,409 2,545 2,681 2,818 2,954 3,090 3,226 3,362 3,499 3,635 3,771 3,907 4,043 4,180 713 1,427 2,140 2,853 3,566 4,280 4,993 5,706 6,419 7,133 7,800 8,467 9,135 9,802 10,469 11,137 11,804 12,471 13,139 13,806 14,473 15,141 15,808 16,476 17,143 17,810 18,478 19,145 19,812 20,480 Page 39 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 12. Annual Nitrogen Reduction (lbs.) Cropland BMPs. Annual Nitrogen Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Nutrient Grade Permanent Vegetative Total Load Management Stabilization Vegetation No-Till Terraces Waterways Buffers Plan Structures Reduction 389 410 246 492 205 205 307 2,254 778 819 492 983 410 410 615 4,507 1,168 1,229 738 1,475 615 615 922 6,761 1,557 1,639 983 1,967 819 819 1,229 9,014 1,946 2,049 1,229 2,458 1,024 1,024 1,537 11,268 2,335 2,458 1,475 2,950 1,229 1,229 1,844 13,521 2,725 2,868 1,721 3,442 1,434 1,434 2,151 15,775 3,114 3,278 1,967 3,933 1,639 1,639 2,458 18,028 3,503 3,688 2,213 4,425 1,844 1,844 2,766 20,282 3,892 4,097 2,458 4,917 2,049 2,049 3,073 22,535 4,280 4,505 2,703 5,406 2,253 2,253 3,379 24,779 4,667 4,913 2,948 5,896 2,457 2,457 3,685 27,022 5,055 5,321 3,193 6,385 2,661 2,661 3,991 29,266 5,443 5,729 3,437 6,875 2,864 2,864 4,297 31,509 5,830 6,137 3,682 7,364 3,068 3,068 4,603 33,753 6,218 6,545 3,927 7,854 3,272 3,272 4,909 35,996 6,605 6,953 4,172 8,343 3,476 3,476 5,215 38,240 6,993 7,361 4,416 8,833 3,680 3,680 5,520 40,483 7,380 7,768 4,661 9,322 3,884 3,884 5,826 42,727 7,768 8,176 4,906 9,812 4,088 4,088 6,132 44,970 8,155 8,584 5,151 10,301 4,292 4,292 6,438 47,214 8,543 8,992 5,395 10,791 4,496 4,496 6,744 49,457 8,930 9,400 5,640 11,280 4,700 4,700 7,050 51,701 9,318 9,808 5,885 11,770 4,904 4,904 7,356 53,944 9,705 10,216 6,130 12,259 5,108 5,108 7,662 56,188 10,093 10,624 6,374 12,749 5,312 5,312 7,968 58,431 10,480 11,032 6,619 13,238 5,516 5,516 8,274 60,675 10,868 11,440 6,864 13,728 5,720 5,720 8,580 62,918 11,255 11,848 7,109 14,217 5,924 5,924 8,886 65,162 11,643 12,255 7,353 14,707 6,128 6,128 9,192 67,405 Page 40 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 13. Cropland BMP Implementation Milestones Cropland BMP Implementation Milestones Permanent Vegetation Long-Term MediumTerm Short-Term Year NoTill 1 2 3 4 5 36 36 36 36 36 Total 6 7 8 9 10 Terraces 144 144 144 144 144 72 72 72 72 72 180 720 36 36 36 36 36 144 144 144 144 144 Total 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total Waterways Vegetative Buffers Nutrient Management Plan Grade Stabilization Structures 108 108 108 108 108 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 360 540 360 72 72 72 72 72 108 108 108 108 108 72 72 72 72 72 360 1,440 720 1,080 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 37 148 1,101 4,405 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 2,203 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 3,304 Total Adoption 108 108 108 108 108 612 612 612 612 612 360 540 3,060 72 72 72 72 72 108 108 108 108 108 612 612 612 612 612 720 720 1,080 6,120 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 2,203 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 2,203 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 3,304 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 630 18,721 Page 41 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 14. Annual Cost Before Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs. Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation No-Till 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 $5,400 $5,562 $5,729 $5,901 $6,078 $6,261 $6,448 $6,642 $6,841 $7,046 $4,951 $7,695 $7,926 $8,164 $8,409 $8,661 $8,921 $9,188 $9,464 $9,748 $10,041 $10,342 $10,652 $10,972 $11,301 $11,640 $11,989 $12,349 $12,719 $13,101 $11,188 $11,524 $11,869 $12,226 $12,592 $12,970 $13,359 $13,760 $14,173 $14,598 $10,258 $15,942 $16,421 $16,913 $17,421 $17,943 $18,482 $19,036 $19,607 $20,195 $20,801 $21,425 $22,068 $22,730 $23,412 $24,114 $24,838 $25,583 $26,350 $27,141 Nutrient Grade Vegetative Management Stabilization Terraces Waterways Buffers Plan Structures Total Cost $7,345 $7,565 $7,792 $8,026 $8,266 $8,514 $8,770 $9,033 $9,304 $9,583 $6,734 $10,465 $10,779 $11,103 $11,436 $11,779 $12,132 $12,496 $12,871 $13,257 $13,655 $14,065 $14,487 $14,921 $15,369 $15,830 $16,305 $16,794 $17,298 $17,817 $84,900 $87,447 $90,071 $92,773 $95,556 $98,423 $101,375 $104,417 $107,549 $110,776 $77,839 $120,978 $124,607 $128,346 $132,196 $136,162 $140,247 $144,454 $148,788 $153,251 $157,849 $162,584 $167,462 $172,486 $177,660 $182,990 $188,480 $194,134 $199,958 $205,957 $17,281 $17,800 $18,334 $18,884 $19,450 $20,034 $20,635 $21,254 $21,891 $22,548 $15,844 $24,625 $25,363 $26,124 $26,908 $27,715 $28,547 $29,403 $30,285 $31,194 $32,130 $33,094 $34,086 $35,109 $36,162 $37,247 $38,364 $39,515 $40,701 $41,922 $7,201 $7,417 $7,639 $7,868 $8,104 $8,347 $8,598 $8,856 $9,121 $9,395 $6,602 $10,260 $10,568 $10,885 $11,212 $11,548 $11,894 $12,251 $12,619 $12,997 $13,387 $13,789 $14,203 $14,629 $15,068 $15,520 $15,985 $16,465 $16,959 $17,467 $4,083 $4,206 $4,332 $4,462 $4,596 $4,734 $4,876 $5,022 $5,173 $5,328 $3,744 $5,819 $5,993 $6,173 $6,358 $6,549 $6,745 $6,948 $7,156 $7,371 $7,592 $7,820 $8,054 $8,296 $8,545 $8,801 $9,065 $9,337 $9,617 $9,906 $32,402 $33,374 $34,376 $35,407 $36,469 $37,563 $38,690 $39,851 $41,046 $42,278 $29,707 $46,171 $47,556 $48,983 $50,453 $51,966 $53,525 $55,131 $56,785 $58,488 $60,243 $62,050 $63,912 $65,829 $67,804 $69,838 $71,933 $74,091 $76,314 $78,604 *3% Inflation Page 42 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 15. Annual Cost Before Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs. Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 $2,700 $2,781 $2,865 $2,951 $3,039 $3,130 $3,224 $3,321 $3,421 $3,523 $2,476 $3,848 $3,963 $4,082 $4,204 $4,331 $4,460 $4,594 $4,732 $4,874 $5,020 $5,171 $5,326 $5,486 $5,650 $5,820 $5,994 $6,174 $6,360 $6,550 No-Till $6,825 $7,030 $7,240 $7,458 $7,681 $7,912 $8,149 $8,394 $8,645 $8,905 $6,257 $9,725 $10,017 $10,317 $10,627 $10,945 $11,274 $11,612 $11,960 $12,319 $12,689 $13,069 $13,462 $13,865 $14,281 $14,710 $15,151 $15,606 $16,074 $16,556 Vegetative Terraces Waterways Buffers $3,672 $3,782 $3,896 $4,013 $4,133 $4,257 $4,385 $4,516 $4,652 $4,791 $3,367 $5,233 $5,390 $5,551 $5,718 $5,890 $6,066 $6,248 $6,436 $6,629 $6,828 $7,032 $7,243 $7,461 $7,684 $7,915 $8,152 $8,397 $8,649 $8,908 $8,641 $8,900 $9,167 $9,442 $9,725 $10,017 $10,317 $10,627 $10,946 $11,274 $7,922 $12,312 $12,682 $13,062 $13,454 $13,858 $14,273 $14,702 $15,143 $15,597 $16,065 $16,547 $17,043 $17,554 $18,081 $18,624 $19,182 $19,758 $20,350 $20,961 $720 $742 $764 $787 $810 $835 $860 $886 $912 $940 $660 $1,026 $1,057 $1,089 $1,121 $1,155 $1,189 $1,225 $1,262 $1,300 $1,339 $1,379 $1,420 $1,463 $1,507 $1,552 $1,599 $1,646 $1,696 $1,747 Grade Nutrient Stabilization Management Plan Structures $2,042 $2,103 $2,166 $2,231 $2,298 $2,367 $2,438 $2,511 $2,586 $2,664 $1,872 $2,909 $2,997 $3,086 $3,179 $3,274 $3,373 $3,474 $3,578 $3,685 $3,796 $3,910 $4,027 $4,148 $4,272 $4,401 $4,533 $4,669 $4,809 $4,953 $16,201 $16,687 $17,188 $17,703 $18,235 $18,782 $19,345 $19,925 $20,523 $21,139 $14,854 $23,086 $23,778 $24,492 $25,226 $25,983 $26,763 $27,565 $28,392 $29,244 $30,122 $31,025 $31,956 $32,915 $33,902 $34,919 $35,967 $37,046 $38,157 $39,302 *3% Inflation Page 43 Total Cost $40,801 $42,025 $43,285 $44,584 $45,922 $47,299 $48,718 $50,180 $51,685 $53,236 $37,407 $58,139 $59,883 $61,679 $63,530 $65,435 $67,399 $69,420 $71,503 $73,648 $75,858 $78,133 $80,477 $82,892 $85,378 $87,940 $90,578 $93,295 $96,094 $98,977 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 16. Annual Livestock BMP Adoption. Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total Annual Livestock BMP Adoption Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Strip Pens Site System Grazing 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 30 15 30 90 15 Page 44 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Short-Term Table 17. Livestock BMP Adoption Milestones Year 1 2 3 4 5 MediumTerm Total 6 7 8 9 10 Long-Term Total Total 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Livestock BMP Adoption Milestones Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Strip Pens Site System Grazing 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 5 3 5 15 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 10 5 10 30 5 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 30 15 30 90 15 Page 45 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 18. Annual Cost Before Cost-Share, of Implementing Livestock BMPs. Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Annual Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing Cost 1 $714 $6,621 $2,203 $11,385 $0 $20,923 2 $735 $0 $2,269 $11,727 $7,210 $21,941 3 $757 $7,024 $2,337 $12,078 $0 $22,197 4 $780 $0 $2,407 $12,441 $7,649 $23,277 5 $804 $7,452 $2,479 $12,814 $0 $23,549 6 $828 $0 $2,554 $13,198 $8,115 $24,695 7 $853 $7,906 $2,630 $13,594 $0 $24,983 8 $878 $0 $2,709 $14,002 $8,609 $26,199 9 $904 $8,387 $2,791 $14,422 $0 $26,505 10 $932 $0 $2,874 $14,855 $9,133 $27,794 11 $960 $8,898 $2,961 $15,300 $0 $28,119 12 $988 $0 $3,049 $15,760 $9,690 $29,487 13 $1,018 $9,440 $3,141 $16,232 $0 $29,831 14 $1,049 $0 $3,235 $16,719 $10,280 $31,283 15 $1,080 $10,015 $3,332 $17,221 $0 $31,648 16 $1,112 $0 $3,432 $17,737 $10,906 $33,188 17 $1,146 $10,625 $3,535 $18,270 $0 $33,575 18 $1,180 $0 $3,641 $18,818 $11,570 $35,209 19 $1,216 $11,272 $3,750 $19,382 $0 $35,620 20 $1,252 $0 $3,863 $19,964 $12,275 $37,353 21 $1,290 $11,958 $3,979 $20,563 $0 $37,789 22 $1,328 $0 $4,098 $21,179 $13,022 $39,628 23 $1,368 $12,687 $4,221 $21,815 $0 $40,091 24 $1,409 $0 $4,348 $22,469 $13,815 $42,041 25 $1,451 $13,459 $4,478 $23,143 $0 $42,532 26 $1,495 $0 $4,613 $23,838 $14,656 $44,602 27 $1,540 $14,279 $4,751 $24,553 $0 $45,122 28 $1,586 $0 $4,893 $25,289 $15,549 $47,318 29 $1,634 $15,148 $5,040 $26,048 $0 $47,870 30 $1,683 $0 $5,192 $26,829 $16,496 $50,200 3% Annual Cost Inflation Page 46 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 19. Annual Cost After Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs. Annual Cost* After Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing 1 $357 $3,311 $1,102 $5,693 $0 2 $368 $0 $1,135 $5,863 $3,605 3 $379 $3,512 $1,169 $6,039 $0 4 $390 $0 $1,204 $6,220 $3,825 5 $402 $3,726 $1,240 $6,407 $0 6 $414 $0 $1,277 $6,599 $4,057 7 $426 $3,953 $1,315 $6,797 $0 8 $439 $0 $1,355 $7,001 $4,305 9 $452 $4,194 $1,395 $7,211 $0 10 $466 $0 $1,437 $7,427 $4,567 11 $480 $4,449 $1,480 $7,650 $0 12 $494 $0 $1,525 $7,880 $4,845 13 $509 $4,720 $1,570 $8,116 $0 14 $524 $0 $1,618 $8,360 $5,140 15 $540 $5,007 $1,666 $8,610 $0 16 $556 $0 $1,716 $8,869 $5,453 17 $573 $5,312 $1,768 $9,135 $0 18 $590 $0 $1,821 $9,409 $5,785 19 $608 $5,636 $1,875 $9,691 $0 20 $626 $0 $1,931 $9,982 $6,137 21 $645 $5,979 $1,989 $10,281 $0 22 $664 $0 $2,049 $10,590 $6,511 23 $684 $6,343 $2,111 $10,907 $0 24 $705 $0 $2,174 $11,235 $6,908 25 $726 $6,730 $2,239 $11,572 $0 26 $747 $0 $2,306 $11,919 $7,328 27 $770 $7,139 $2,375 $12,276 $0 28 $793 $0 $2,447 $12,645 $7,775 29 $817 $7,574 $2,520 $13,024 $0 30 $841 $0 $2,596 $13,415 $8,248 3% Annual Cost Inflation Annual Cost $10,462 $10,971 $11,099 $11,639 $11,775 $12,347 $12,492 $13,099 $13,252 $13,897 $14,059 $14,743 $14,916 $15,641 $15,824 $16,594 $16,788 $17,604 $17,810 $18,677 $18,895 $19,814 $20,045 $21,021 $21,266 $22,301 $22,561 $23,659 $23,935 $25,100 Page 47 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 20. Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions (lbs.) Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions (lbs.) Relocate Off Vegetative Relocate Pasture Stream Annual Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Load Strip Pens Site System Grazing Reduction 797 1,196 63 189 0 2,246 1,595 1,196 126 378 63 3,358 2,392 2,392 189 568 63 5,604 3,189 2,392 252 757 126 6,716 3,987 3,588 315 946 126 8,962 4,784 3,588 378 1,135 189 10,075 5,581 4,784 441 1,324 189 12,320 6,379 4,784 504 1,513 252 13,433 7,176 5,980 568 1,703 252 15,679 7,973 5,980 631 1,892 315 16,791 8,771 7,176 694 2,081 315 19,037 9,568 7,176 757 2,270 378 20,149 10,365 8,372 820 2,459 378 22,395 11,163 8,372 883 2,649 441 23,508 11,960 9,568 946 2,838 441 25,753 12,758 9,568 1,009 3,027 504 26,866 13,555 10,764 1,072 3,216 504 29,112 14,352 10,764 1,135 3,405 568 30,224 15,150 11,960 1,198 3,594 568 32,470 15,947 11,960 1,261 3,784 631 33,582 16,744 13,156 1,324 3,973 631 35,828 17,542 13,156 1,387 4,162 694 36,941 18,339 14,352 1,450 4,351 694 39,186 19,136 14,352 1,513 4,540 757 40,299 19,934 15,548 1,577 4,730 757 42,545 20,731 15,548 1,640 4,919 820 43,657 21,528 16,744 1,703 5,108 820 45,903 22,326 16,744 1,766 5,297 883 47,015 23,123 17,940 1,829 5,486 883 49,261 23,920 17,940 1,892 5,675 946 50,374 Page 48 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 21. Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions (lbs.) Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions (lbs.) Relocate Off Vegetative Relocate Pasture Stream Annual Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Load Strip Pens Site System Grazing Reduction 1,502 2,253 119 356 0 4,230 3,004 2,253 238 713 119 6,325 4,505 4,505 356 1,069 119 10,555 6,007 4,505 475 1,425 238 12,651 7,509 6,758 594 1,782 238 16,880 9,011 6,758 713 2,138 356 18,976 10,513 9,011 831 2,494 356 23,205 12,014 9,011 950 2,851 475 25,301 13,516 11,263 1,069 3,207 475 29,531 15,018 11,263 1,188 3,563 594 31,626 16,520 13,516 1,307 3,920 594 35,856 18,022 13,516 1,425 4,276 713 37,952 19,523 15,769 1,544 4,632 713 42,181 21,025 15,769 1,663 4,989 831 44,277 22,527 18,022 1,782 5,345 831 48,506 24,029 18,022 1,900 5,701 950 50,602 25,531 20,274 2,019 6,058 950 54,832 27,032 20,274 2,138 6,414 1,069 56,927 28,534 22,527 2,257 6,770 1,069 61,157 30,036 22,527 2,375 7,126 1,188 63,253 31,538 24,780 2,494 7,483 1,188 67,482 33,040 24,780 2,613 7,839 1,307 69,578 34,541 27,032 2,732 8,195 1,307 73,807 36,043 27,032 2,851 8,552 1,425 75,903 37,545 29,285 2,969 8,908 1,425 80,133 39,047 29,285 3,088 9,264 1,544 82,228 40,549 31,538 3,207 9,621 1,544 86,458 42,050 31,538 3,326 9,977 1,663 88,554 43,552 33,790 3,444 10,333 1,663 92,783 45,054 33,790 3,563 10,690 1,782 94,879 Page 49 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 22. Combined Soil Erosion Reduction of Cropland and Livestock BMPs. Sediment Combined Soil Erosion Reduction of Cropland and Livestock BMPs Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Livestock Cropland Total Reduction Reduction Reduction (tons/yr.) (tons/yr.) (tons/yr.) 759 328 1,087 1,518 655 2,173 2,277 983 3,260 3,036 1,311 4,347 3,795 1,639 5,434 4,554 1,966 6,520 5,313 2,294 7,607 6,072 2,622 8,694 6,831 2,950 9,781 7,590 3,277 10,867 8,349 3,581 11,930 9,108 3,885 12,993 9,867 4,189 14,056 10,626 4,493 15,119 11,385 4,797 16,182 12,144 5,101 17,245 12,903 5,405 18,308 13,662 5,709 19,371 14,421 6,013 20,434 15,180 6,317 21,497 15,939 6,621 22,560 16,698 6,925 23,623 17,457 7,229 24,686 18,216 7,533 25,749 18,975 7,837 26,812 19,734 8,141 27,875 20,493 8,445 28,938 21,252 8,749 30,001 22,011 9,052 31,063 22,770 9,356 32,126 Page 50 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 23. Combination of Cropland and Livestock BMPs to Meet the Council Grove Lake Phosphorus TMDL Phosphorus Combination of Cropland and Livestock BMPs to Meet the Council Grove Lake Phosphorus TMDL Cropland Livestock Total Reduction Reduction Reduction % of Year (lbs./yr.) (lbs./yr.) (lbs./yr.) TMDL 1 713 2,246 2,959 4.3% 2 1,427 3,358 4,785 7.0% 3 2,140 5,604 7,744 11.3% 4 2,853 6,716 9,570 13.9% 5 3,566 8,962 12,528 18.2% 6 4,280 10,075 14,354 20.9% 7 4,993 12,320 17,313 25.2% 8 5,706 13,433 19,139 27.8% 9 6,419 15,679 22,098 32.1% 10 7,133 16,791 23,924 34.8% 11 7,800 19,037 26,837 39.0% 12 8,467 20,149 28,617 41.6% 13 9,135 22,395 31,530 45.9% 14 9,802 23,508 33,310 48.4% 15 10,469 25,753 36,223 52.7% 16 11,137 26,866 38,003 55.3% 17 11,804 29,112 40,916 59.5% 18 12,471 30,224 42,696 62.1% 19 13,139 32,470 45,609 66.3% 20 13,806 33,582 47,389 68.9% 21 14,473 35,828 50,302 73.1% 22 15,141 36,941 52,082 75.7% 23 15,808 39,186 54,995 80.0% 24 16,476 40,299 56,775 82.6% 25 17,143 42,545 59,688 86.8% 26 17,810 43,657 61,468 89.4% 27 18,478 45,903 64,380 93.6% 28 19,145 47,015 66,160 96.2% 29 19,812 49,261 69,073 100.4% 30 20,480 50,374 70,853 103.0% TMDL for Phosphorus Met Council Grove Lake Phosphorus TMDL: 68,767 Pounds Reduced per Year Page 51 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 24. Combined Nitrogen Reduction of Cropland and Livestock BMPs Nitrogen Combined Nitrogen Reduction of Cropland and Livestock BMPs Cropland Livestock Total Reduction Reduction Reduction Year (lbs./yr.) (lbs./yr.) (lbs./yr.) 1 2,254 3,478 5,731 2 4,507 5,216 9,723 3 6,761 8,693 15,454 4 9,014 10,432 19,446 5 11,268 13,909 25,177 6 13,521 15,647 29,169 7 15,775 19,125 34,900 8 18,028 20,863 38,892 9 20,282 24,341 44,623 10 22,535 26,079 48,615 11 24,779 29,557 54,336 12 27,022 31,295 58,317 13 29,266 34,773 64,038 14 31,509 36,511 68,020 15 33,753 39,988 73,741 16 35,996 41,727 77,723 17 38,240 45,204 83,444 18 40,483 46,942 87,426 19 42,727 50,420 93,147 20 44,970 52,158 97,129 21 47,214 55,636 102,850 22 49,457 57,374 106,831 23 51,701 60,852 112,552 24 53,944 62,590 116,534 25 56,188 66,067 122,255 26 58,431 67,806 126,237 27 60,675 71,283 131,958 28 62,918 73,022 135,940 29 65,162 76,499 141,661 30 67,405 78,237 145,642 Page 52 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 25. Total Annual Cost after CostShare by BMP Category Total Annual Cost after Cost-Share by BMP Category Total Year Cropland Livestock Cost 1 $40,801 $10,462 $51,262 2 $42,025 $10,971 $52,995 3 $43,285 $11,099 $54,384 4 $44,584 $11,639 $56,223 5 $45,922 $11,775 $57,696 6 $47,299 $12,347 $59,647 7 $48,718 $12,492 $61,210 8 $50,180 $13,099 $63,279 9 $51,685 $13,252 $64,937 10 $53,236 $13,897 $67,133 11 $37,407 $14,059 $51,467 12 $58,139 $14,743 $72,882 13 $59,883 $14,916 $74,798 14 $61,679 $15,641 $77,321 15 $63,530 $15,824 $79,354 16 $65,435 $16,594 $82,029 17 $67,399 $16,788 $84,186 18 $69,420 $17,604 $87,025 19 $71,503 $17,810 $89,313 20 $73,648 $18,677 $92,325 21 $75,858 $18,895 $94,752 22 $78,133 $19,814 $97,947 23 $80,477 $20,045 $100,523 24 $82,892 $21,021 $103,912 25 $85,378 $21,266 $106,645 26 $87,940 $22,301 $110,241 27 $90,578 $22,561 $113,139 28 $93,295 $23,659 $116,954 29 $96,094 $23,935 $120,029 30 $98,977 $25,100 $124,077 Page 53 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 26. Phosphorus TMDL Summary Phosphorus TMDL Summary Best Total Management Load % of Practice Reduction Phosphorus Category (pounds) TMDL Cropland 20,480 29.8% Livestock 50,374 73.3% Total 70,853 103.0% Page 54 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 27. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Nutrient Grade Permanent NoVegetative Management Stabilization Total Year Vegetation Till Terraces Waterways Buffers Plan Structures Adoption 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 389 389 389 389 389 389 389 389 389 389 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 Page 55 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 28. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Nutrient Grade Permanent NoVegetative Management Stabilization Total Year Vegetation Till Terraces Waterways Buffers Plan Structures Adoption 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 223 223 223 223 223 223 223 223 223 223 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 Page 56 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 29. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Nutrient Grade Permanent NoVegetative Management Stabilization Total Year Vegetation Till Terraces Waterways Buffers Plan Structures Adoption 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 Page 57 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 30. Sub-Watershed #010 Annual Soil Erosion Reduction (tons), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Soil Erosion Reduction (tons), Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 19 38 57 77 96 115 134 153 172 191 201 210 220 230 239 249 258 268 277 287 297 306 316 325 335 344 354 363 373 383 No-Till Terraces 60 121 181 242 302 362 423 483 544 604 634 665 695 725 755 785 816 846 876 906 936 967 997 1,027 1,057 1,087 1,118 1,148 1,178 1,208 12 24 36 48 60 72 85 97 109 121 127 133 139 145 151 157 163 169 175 181 187 193 199 205 211 217 224 230 236 242 Waterways 24 48 72 97 121 145 169 193 217 242 254 266 278 290 302 314 326 338 350 362 375 387 399 411 423 435 447 459 471 483 Vegetative Buffers 20 40 60 81 101 121 141 161 181 201 211 222 232 242 252 262 272 282 292 302 312 322 332 342 352 362 373 383 393 403 Nutrient Management Plan 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 81 91 101 106 111 116 121 126 131 136 141 146 151 156 161 166 171 176 181 186 191 196 201 Grade Stabilization Structures Total Load Reduction 30 60 91 121 151 181 211 242 272 302 317 332 347 362 378 393 408 423 438 453 468 483 498 513 529 544 559 574 589 604 Page 58 176 352 529 705 881 1,057 1,233 1,410 1,586 1,762 1,850 1,938 2,026 2,114 2,202 2,291 2,379 2,467 2,555 2,643 2,731 2,819 2,907 2,995 3,083 3,172 3,260 3,348 3,436 3,524 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 31. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Soil Erosion Reduction (tons), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Soil Erosion Reduction (tons), Cropland BMPs Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Permanent Vegetation 16 33 49 66 82 99 115 132 148 165 173 181 189 197 206 214 222 230 239 247 255 263 271 280 288 296 304 313 321 329 No-Till Terraces 52 104 156 208 260 312 364 416 468 520 546 572 597 623 649 675 701 727 753 779 805 831 857 883 909 935 961 987 1,013 1,039 10 21 31 42 52 62 73 83 94 104 109 114 119 125 130 135 140 145 151 156 161 166 171 177 182 187 192 197 203 208 Waterways 21 42 62 83 104 125 145 166 187 208 218 229 239 249 260 270 281 291 301 312 322 333 343 353 364 374 384 395 405 416 Vegetative Buffers 17 35 52 69 87 104 121 139 156 173 182 191 199 208 216 225 234 242 251 260 268 277 286 294 303 312 320 329 338 346 Nutrient Management Plan 9 17 26 35 43 52 61 69 78 87 91 95 100 104 108 113 117 121 126 130 134 139 143 147 152 156 160 165 169 173 Grade Stabilization Structures Total Load Reduction 26 52 78 104 130 156 182 208 234 260 273 286 299 312 325 338 351 364 377 390 403 416 429 442 455 468 481 494 507 520 Page 59 152 303 455 606 758 909 1,061 1,212 1,364 1,515 1,591 1,667 1,743 1,818 1,894 1,970 2,046 2,122 2,197 2,273 2,349 2,425 2,500 2,576 2,652 2,728 2,803 2,879 2,955 3,031 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 32. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Soil Erosion Reduction (tons), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Soil Erosion Reduction (tons), Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 30 46 61 76 91 106 122 137 152 167 183 198 213 228 243 259 274 289 304 No-Till Terraces 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 96 144 192 240 288 336 384 432 480 528 576 624 672 720 768 817 865 913 961 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 19 29 38 48 58 67 77 86 96 106 115 125 134 144 154 163 173 183 192 Waterways 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 38 58 77 96 115 134 154 173 192 211 231 250 269 288 307 327 346 365 384 Vegetative Buffers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160 176 192 208 224 240 256 272 288 304 320 Nutrient Management Plan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96 104 112 120 128 136 144 152 160 Grade Stabilization Structures Total Load Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 264 288 312 336 360 384 408 432 456 480 Page 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 280 420 560 700 841 981 1,121 1,261 1,401 1,541 1,681 1,821 1,961 2,101 2,241 2,382 2,522 2,662 2,802 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 33. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Phosphorus Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Phosphorus Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Year Permanent Vegetation NoTill Terraces Waterways Vegetative Buffers Nutrient Management Plan Grade Stabilization Structures Total Load Reduction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 50 101 151 201 252 302 353 403 453 504 529 554 579 85 170 255 339 424 509 594 679 764 848 891 933 976 32 64 95 127 159 191 223 255 286 318 334 350 366 64 127 191 255 318 382 445 509 573 636 668 700 732 53 106 159 212 265 318 371 424 477 530 557 583 610 27 53 80 106 133 159 186 212 239 265 278 292 305 80 159 239 318 398 477 557 636 716 795 835 875 915 390 779 1,169 1,559 1,949 2,338 2,728 3,118 3,507 3,897 4,092 4,287 4,482 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 604 630 655 680 705 730 756 781 806 831 856 882 907 932 957 982 1,007 1,018 1,060 1,103 1,145 1,188 1,230 1,273 1,315 1,357 1,400 1,442 1,485 1,527 1,569 1,612 1,654 1,697 382 398 414 429 445 461 477 493 509 525 541 557 573 589 604 620 636 764 795 827 859 891 923 954 986 1,018 1,050 1,082 1,113 1,145 1,177 1,209 1,241 1,273 636 663 689 716 742 769 795 822 848 875 901 928 954 981 1,007 1,034 1,060 318 331 345 358 371 384 398 411 424 437 451 464 477 490 504 517 530 954 994 1,034 1,074 1,113 1,153 1,193 1,233 1,273 1,312 1,352 1,392 1,432 1,471 1,511 1,551 1,591 4,677 4,871 5,066 5,261 5,456 5,651 5,846 6,041 6,235 6,430 6,625 6,820 7,015 7,210 7,405 7,600 7,794 Page 61 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 34. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Phosphorus Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Phosphorus Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Year Permanent Vegetation NoTill Terraces Waterways Vegetative Buffers Nutrient Management Plan Grade Stabilization Structures Total Load Reduction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 42 84 125 167 209 251 293 335 376 418 439 460 481 502 523 544 565 585 70 141 211 282 352 423 493 563 634 704 740 775 810 845 880 916 951 986 26 53 79 106 132 158 185 211 238 264 277 291 304 317 330 343 357 370 53 106 158 211 264 317 370 423 475 528 555 581 607 634 660 687 713 740 44 88 132 176 220 264 308 352 396 440 462 484 506 528 550 572 594 616 22 44 66 88 110 132 154 176 198 220 231 242 253 264 275 286 297 308 66 132 198 264 330 396 462 528 594 660 693 726 759 792 825 858 891 924 324 647 971 1,294 1,618 1,941 2,265 2,588 2,912 3,235 3,397 3,559 3,721 3,882 4,044 4,206 4,368 4,530 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 606 627 648 669 690 711 732 753 774 795 815 836 1,021 1,056 1,092 1,127 1,162 1,197 1,233 1,268 1,303 1,338 1,373 1,409 383 396 409 423 436 449 462 475 489 502 515 528 766 792 819 845 872 898 924 951 977 1,004 1,030 1,056 638 660 682 704 726 748 770 792 814 836 858 880 319 330 341 352 363 374 385 396 407 418 429 440 957 990 1,023 1,056 1,089 1,122 1,155 1,189 1,222 1,255 1,288 1,321 4,691 4,853 5,015 5,177 5,338 5,500 5,662 5,824 5,985 6,147 6,309 6,471 Page 62 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 35. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Phosphorus Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Phosphorus Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Permanent Vegetation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 80 120 161 201 241 281 321 361 402 442 482 522 562 602 643 683 723 763 803 NoTill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 135 203 271 338 406 473 541 609 676 744 812 879 947 1,015 1,082 1,150 1,218 1,285 1,353 Terraces 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 51 76 101 127 152 178 203 228 254 279 304 330 355 380 406 431 457 482 507 Waterways 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 101 152 203 254 304 355 406 457 507 558 609 660 710 761 812 862 913 964 1,015 Vegetative Buffers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 85 127 169 211 254 296 338 380 423 465 507 550 592 634 676 719 761 803 846 Nutrient Management Plan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 42 63 85 106 127 148 169 190 211 233 254 275 296 317 338 359 380 402 423 Grade Stabilization Structures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 127 190 254 317 380 444 507 571 634 698 761 824 888 951 1,015 1,078 1,141 1,205 1,268 Page 63 Total Load Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 311 621 932 1,243 1,554 1,864 2,175 2,486 2,797 3,107 3,418 3,729 4,039 4,350 4,661 4,972 5,282 5,593 5,904 6,215 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 36. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Nitrogen Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Nitrogen Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 230 460 691 921 1,151 1,381 1,612 1,842 2,072 2,302 2,418 2,533 2,648 2,763 2,878 2,993 3,108 3,223 3,339 3,454 3,569 3,684 3,799 3,914 4,029 4,144 4,260 4,375 4,490 4,605 No-Till Terraces Waterways 242 485 727 969 1,212 1,454 1,697 1,939 2,181 2,424 2,545 2,666 2,787 2,908 3,030 3,151 3,272 3,393 3,514 3,635 3,757 3,878 3,999 4,120 4,241 4,363 4,484 4,605 4,726 4,847 145 291 436 582 727 873 1,018 1,163 1,309 1,454 1,527 1,600 1,672 1,745 1,818 1,890 1,963 2,036 2,109 2,181 2,254 2,327 2,399 2,472 2,545 2,618 2,690 2,763 2,836 2,908 291 582 873 1,163 1,454 1,745 2,036 2,327 2,618 2,908 3,054 3,199 3,345 3,490 3,635 3,781 3,926 4,072 4,217 4,363 4,508 4,653 4,799 4,944 5,090 5,235 5,381 5,526 5,671 5,817 Vegetative Buffers 121 242 364 485 606 727 848 969 1,091 1,212 1,272 1,333 1,394 1,454 1,515 1,575 1,636 1,697 1,757 1,818 1,878 1,939 2,000 2,060 2,121 2,181 2,242 2,302 2,363 2,424 Nutrient Management Plan 121 242 364 485 606 727 848 969 1,091 1,212 1,272 1,333 1,394 1,454 1,515 1,575 1,636 1,697 1,757 1,818 1,878 1,939 2,000 2,060 2,121 2,181 2,242 2,302 2,363 2,424 Grade Stabilization Total Load Structures Reduction 182 364 545 727 909 1,091 1,272 1,454 1,636 1,818 1,909 2,000 2,090 2,181 2,272 2,363 2,454 2,545 2,636 2,727 2,818 2,908 2,999 3,090 3,181 3,272 3,363 3,454 3,545 3,635 1,333 2,666 3,999 5,332 6,665 7,998 9,331 10,664 11,997 13,330 13,997 14,663 15,330 15,996 16,663 17,329 17,996 18,662 19,329 19,995 20,662 21,328 21,995 22,661 23,328 23,994 24,661 25,327 25,994 26,660 Page 64 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 37. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Nitrogen Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Nitrogen Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 159 318 477 636 795 954 1,113 1,272 1,431 1,590 1,670 1,749 1,829 1,908 1,988 2,067 2,147 2,226 2,306 2,385 2,465 2,544 2,624 2,703 2,783 2,862 2,942 3,021 3,101 3,180 No-Till Terraces Waterways 167 335 502 669 837 1,004 1,172 1,339 1,506 1,674 1,757 1,841 1,925 2,008 2,092 2,176 2,259 2,343 2,427 2,511 2,594 2,678 2,762 2,845 2,929 3,013 3,096 3,180 3,264 3,347 100 201 301 402 502 603 703 803 904 1,004 1,054 1,105 1,155 1,205 1,255 1,305 1,356 1,406 1,456 1,506 1,557 1,607 1,657 1,707 1,757 1,808 1,858 1,908 1,958 2,008 201 402 603 803 1,004 1,205 1,406 1,607 1,808 2,008 2,109 2,209 2,310 2,410 2,511 2,611 2,711 2,812 2,912 3,013 3,113 3,213 3,314 3,414 3,515 3,615 3,716 3,816 3,916 4,017 Vegetative Buffers 84 167 251 335 418 502 586 669 753 837 879 921 962 1,004 1,046 1,088 1,130 1,172 1,213 1,255 1,297 1,339 1,381 1,423 1,464 1,506 1,548 1,590 1,632 1,674 Nutrient Management Plan 84 167 251 335 418 502 586 669 753 837 879 921 962 1,004 1,046 1,088 1,130 1,172 1,213 1,255 1,297 1,339 1,381 1,423 1,464 1,506 1,548 1,590 1,632 1,674 Grade Stabilization Total Load Structures Reduction 126 251 377 502 628 753 879 1,004 1,130 1,255 1,318 1,381 1,444 1,506 1,569 1,632 1,695 1,757 1,820 1,883 1,946 2,008 2,071 2,134 2,197 2,259 2,322 2,385 2,448 2,511 921 1,841 2,762 3,682 4,603 5,523 6,444 7,364 8,285 9,205 9,666 10,126 10,586 11,046 11,507 11,967 12,427 12,887 13,348 13,808 14,268 14,728 15,189 15,649 16,109 16,569 17,030 17,490 17,950 18,411 Page 65 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 38. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Nitrogen Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPS Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Nitrogen Reduction (lbs.), Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 193 386 579 772 964 1,157 1,350 1,543 1,736 1,929 2,122 2,315 2,508 2,700 2,893 3,086 3,279 3,472 3,665 3,858 No-Till Terraces Waterways 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 203 406 609 812 1,015 1,218 1,421 1,624 1,827 2,030 2,233 2,436 2,640 2,843 3,046 3,249 3,452 3,655 3,858 4,061 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 244 365 487 609 731 853 975 1,096 1,218 1,340 1,462 1,584 1,706 1,827 1,949 2,071 2,193 2,315 2,436 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 244 487 731 975 1,218 1,462 1,706 1,949 2,193 2,436 2,680 2,924 3,167 3,411 3,655 3,898 4,142 4,386 4,629 4,873 Vegetative Buffers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 203 305 406 508 609 711 812 914 1,015 1,117 1,218 1,320 1,421 1,523 1,624 1,726 1,827 1,929 2,030 Nutrient Management Plan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 203 305 406 508 609 711 812 914 1,015 1,117 1,218 1,320 1,421 1,523 1,624 1,726 1,827 1,929 2,030 Grade Stabilization Total Load Structures Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 305 457 609 761 914 1,066 1,218 1,371 1,523 1,675 1,827 1,980 2,132 2,284 2,436 2,589 2,741 2,893 3,046 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,117 2,233 3,350 4,467 5,584 6,700 7,817 8,934 10,050 11,167 12,284 13,401 14,517 15,634 16,751 17,867 18,984 20,101 21,218 22,334 Page 66 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 39. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Long-Term MediumTerm Short-Term Permanent Year Vegetation No-Till Terraces Nutrient Grade Vegetative Management Stabilization Total Waterways Buffers Plan Structures Adoption 1 2 3 4 5 23 23 23 23 23 92 92 92 92 92 46 46 46 46 46 69 69 69 69 69 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 69 69 69 69 69 389 389 389 389 389 Total 114 458 229 343 229 229 343 1,945 6 7 8 9 10 23 23 23 23 23 92 92 92 92 92 46 46 46 46 46 69 69 69 69 69 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 69 69 69 69 69 389 389 389 389 389 Total 229 915 458 686 458 458 686 3,890 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 458 1,831 915 1,373 915 915 1,373 7,780 Total Page 67 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 40. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Adoption (treated Acres), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs MediumTerm Short-Term Nutrient Grade Permanent Vegetative Management Stabilization Total Year Vegetation No-Till Terraces Waterways Buffers Plan Structures Adoption 1 2 3 4 5 13 13 13 13 13 52 52 52 52 52 26 26 26 26 26 39 39 39 39 39 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 39 39 39 39 39 223 223 223 223 223 Total 66 262 131 197 131 131 197 1,115 13 52 13 52 13 52 13 52 13 52 131 525 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 7 26 262 1,050 26 26 26 26 26 262 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 525 39 39 39 39 39 394 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 787 26 26 26 26 26 262 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 525 26 26 26 26 26 262 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 525 39 39 39 39 39 394 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 787 223 223 223 223 223 2,230 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 4,461 6 7 8 9 10 Long-Term Total 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total Page 68 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 41. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Adoption (treated acres), Cropland BMPs Short-Term Nutrient Grade Permanent Vegetative Management Stabilization Total Year Vegetation No-Till Terraces Waterways Buffers Plan Structures Adoption 1 2 3 4 5 MediumTerm Total 6 7 8 9 10 Long-Term Total 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 19 76 381 1,525 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 762 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 1,144 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 762 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 762 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 1,144 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 324 6,480 Page 69 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 42. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share, Cropland BMPS Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 $3,432 $3,535 $3,641 $3,751 $3,863 $3,979 $4,098 $4,221 $4,348 $4,478 $2,306 $2,376 $2,447 $2,520 $2,596 $2,674 $2,754 $2,837 $2,922 $3,009 $3,100 $3,193 $3,288 $3,387 $3,489 $3,593 $3,701 $3,812 $3,927 $4,044 Vegetative No-Till Terraces Waterways Buffers $7,111 $7,324 $7,544 $7,770 $8,003 $8,244 $8,491 $8,746 $9,008 $9,278 $4,778 $4,922 $5,069 $5,221 $5,378 $5,539 $5,706 $5,877 $6,053 $6,235 $6,422 $6,614 $6,813 $7,017 $7,228 $7,444 $7,668 $7,898 $8,135 $8,379 $4,668 $4,808 $4,952 $5,101 $5,254 $5,412 $5,574 $5,741 $5,913 $6,091 $3,137 $3,231 $3,328 $3,428 $3,530 $3,636 $3,745 $3,858 $3,974 $4,093 $4,215 $4,342 $4,472 $4,606 $4,745 $4,887 $5,034 $5,185 $5,340 $5,500 $10,984 $11,313 $11,653 $12,002 $12,362 $12,733 $13,115 $13,508 $13,914 $14,331 $7,381 $7,602 $7,830 $8,065 $8,307 $8,556 $8,813 $9,077 $9,349 $9,630 $9,919 $10,216 $10,523 $10,839 $11,164 $11,499 $11,844 $12,199 $12,565 $12,942 $4,577 $4,714 $4,855 $5,001 $5,151 $5,305 $5,465 $5,629 $5,797 $5,971 $3,075 $3,167 $3,262 $3,360 $3,461 $3,565 $3,672 $3,782 $3,896 $4,012 $4,133 $4,257 $4,385 $4,516 $4,652 $4,791 $4,935 $5,083 $5,235 $5,392 Nutrient Grade Stabilization Total Management Plan Structures Cost $2,595 $2,673 $2,753 $2,836 $2,921 $3,009 $3,099 $3,192 $3,288 $3,386 $1,744 $1,796 $1,850 $1,906 $1,963 $2,022 $2,082 $2,145 $2,209 $2,275 $2,344 $2,414 $2,486 $2,561 $2,638 $2,717 $2,799 $2,882 $2,969 $3,058 $20,594 $21,212 $21,848 $22,504 $23,179 $23,874 $24,591 $25,328 $26,088 $26,871 $13,838 $14,254 $14,681 $15,122 $15,575 $16,043 $16,524 $17,020 $17,530 $18,056 $18,598 $19,156 $19,730 $20,322 $20,932 $21,560 $22,207 $22,873 $23,559 $24,266 *3% Inflation Page 70 $53,961 $55,580 $57,247 $58,965 $60,734 $62,556 $64,432 $66,365 $68,356 $70,407 $36,260 $37,347 $38,468 $39,622 $40,810 $42,035 $43,296 $44,595 $45,933 $47,311 $48,730 $50,192 $51,697 $53,248 $54,846 $56,491 $58,186 $59,932 $61,729 $63,581 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 43. Sub-Watershed #0102Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 $1,968 $2,027 $2,088 $2,150 $2,215 $2,281 $2,350 $2,420 $2,493 $2,568 $2,645 $1,362 $1,403 $1,445 $1,488 $1,533 $1,579 $1,626 $1,675 $1,725 $1,777 $1,831 $1,885 $1,942 $2,000 $2,060 $2,122 $2,186 $2,251 $2,319 Vegetative No-Till Terraces Waterways Buffers $4,077 $4,199 $4,325 $4,455 $4,589 $4,727 $4,868 $5,014 $5,165 $5,320 $5,479 $2,822 $2,907 $2,994 $3,084 $3,176 $3,271 $3,369 $3,471 $3,575 $3,682 $3,792 $3,906 $4,023 $4,144 $4,268 $4,396 $4,528 $4,664 $4,804 $2,676 $2,757 $2,839 $2,925 $3,012 $3,103 $3,196 $3,292 $3,390 $3,492 $3,597 $1,852 $1,908 $1,965 $2,024 $2,085 $2,147 $2,212 $2,278 $2,347 $2,417 $2,490 $2,564 $2,641 $2,720 $2,802 $2,886 $2,973 $3,062 $3,154 $6,298 $6,487 $6,681 $6,882 $7,088 $7,301 $7,520 $7,745 $7,978 $8,217 $8,463 $4,359 $4,489 $4,624 $4,763 $4,906 $5,053 $5,204 $5,361 $5,521 $5,687 $5,858 $6,033 $6,214 $6,401 $6,593 $6,791 $6,994 $7,204 $7,420 $2,624 $2,703 $2,784 $2,867 $2,953 $3,042 $3,133 $3,227 $3,324 $3,424 $3,526 $1,816 $1,871 $1,927 $1,985 $2,044 $2,105 $2,169 $2,234 $2,301 $2,370 $2,441 $2,514 $2,589 $2,667 $2,747 $2,829 $2,914 $3,002 $3,092 Nutrient Grade Stabilization Total Management Plan Structures Cost $1,488 $1,533 $1,579 $1,626 $1,675 $1,725 $1,777 $1,830 $1,885 $1,942 $2,000 $1,030 $1,061 $1,093 $1,125 $1,159 $1,194 $1,230 $1,267 $1,305 $1,344 $1,384 $1,426 $1,468 $1,512 $1,558 $1,605 $1,653 $1,702 $1,753 $11,808 $12,162 $12,527 $12,903 $13,290 $13,689 $14,099 $14,522 $14,958 $15,407 $15,869 $8,173 $8,418 $8,670 $8,930 $9,198 $9,474 $9,758 $10,051 $10,353 $10,663 $10,983 $11,313 $11,652 $12,002 $12,362 $12,733 $13,114 $13,508 $13,913 *3% Inflation Page 71 $30,939 $31,868 $32,824 $33,808 $34,822 $35,867 $36,943 $38,051 $39,193 $40,369 $41,580 $21,414 $22,056 $22,718 $23,399 $24,101 $24,824 $25,569 $26,336 $27,126 $27,940 $28,778 $29,641 $30,531 $31,447 $32,390 $33,362 $34,363 $35,393 $36,455 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 44. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share, Cropland BMPS Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Permanent Year Vegetation 1 $0 2 $0 3 $0 4 $0 5 $0 6 $0 7 $0 8 $0 9 $0 10 $0 11 $0 12 $3,958 13 $4,076 14 $4,199 15 $4,324 16 $4,454 17 $4,588 18 $4,725 19 $4,867 20 $5,013 21 $5,164 22 $5,319 23 $5,478 24 $5,642 25 $5,812 26 $5,986 27 $6,166 28 $6,351 29 $6,541 30 $6,737 No-Till Terraces $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,199 $5,382 $8,445 $5,544 $8,698 $5,710 $8,959 $5,881 $9,228 $6,058 $9,505 $6,239 $9,790 $6,427 $10,084 $6,619 $10,386 $6,818 $10,698 $7,023 $11,019 $7,233 $11,349 $7,450 $11,690 $7,674 $12,040 $7,904 $12,402 $8,141 $12,774 $8,385 $13,157 $8,637 $13,552 $8,896 $13,958 $9,163 Grade Vegetative Nutrient Stabilization Waterways Buffers Management Plan Structures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,664 $5,277 $2,992 $23,745 $13,044 $5,435 $3,082 $24,458 $13,435 $5,598 $3,175 $25,191 $13,838 $5,766 $3,270 $25,947 $14,254 $5,939 $3,368 $26,725 $14,681 $6,117 $3,469 $27,527 $15,122 $6,301 $3,573 $28,353 $15,575 $6,490 $3,680 $29,204 $16,042 $6,684 $3,791 $30,080 $16,524 $6,885 $3,904 $30,982 $17,019 $7,091 $4,022 $31,911 $17,530 $7,304 $4,142 $32,869 $18,056 $7,523 $4,266 $33,855 $18,598 $7,749 $4,394 $34,871 $19,156 $7,981 $4,526 $35,917 $19,730 $8,221 $4,662 $36,994 $20,322 $8,468 $4,802 $38,104 $20,932 $8,722 $4,946 $39,247 $21,560 $8,983 $5,094 $40,425 *3% Inflation Page 72 Total Cost $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,217 $64,084 $66,006 $67,986 $70,026 $72,127 $74,290 $76,519 $78,815 $81,179 $83,614 $86,123 $88,707 $91,368 $94,109 $96,932 $99,840 $102,835 $105,920 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 45. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Permanent Vegetation $1,716 $1,768 $1,821 $1,875 $1,932 $1,990 $2,049 $2,111 $2,174 $2,239 $1,153 $1,188 $1,223 $1,260 $1,298 $1,337 $1,377 $1,418 $1,461 $1,505 $1,550 $1,596 $1,644 $1,694 $1,744 $1,797 $1,851 $1,906 $1,963 $2,022 No-Till $4,338 $4,468 $4,602 $4,740 $4,882 $5,029 $5,179 $5,335 $5,495 $5,660 $2,915 $3,002 $3,092 $3,185 $3,281 $3,379 $3,480 $3,585 $3,692 $3,803 $3,917 $4,035 $4,156 $4,280 $4,409 $4,541 $4,677 $4,818 $4,962 $5,111 Terrace $2,334 $2,404 $2,476 $2,550 $2,627 $2,706 $2,787 $2,871 $2,957 $3,045 $1,568 $1,615 $1,664 $1,714 $1,765 $1,818 $1,873 $1,929 $1,987 $2,046 $2,108 $2,171 $2,236 $2,303 $2,372 $2,443 $2,517 $2,592 $2,670 $2,750 Waterway $5,492 $5,657 $5,826 $6,001 $6,181 $6,367 $6,557 $6,754 $6,957 $7,166 $3,690 $3,801 $3,915 $4,032 $4,153 $4,278 $4,406 $4,539 $4,675 $4,815 $4,959 $5,108 $5,261 $5,419 $5,582 $5,749 $5,922 $6,099 $6,282 $6,471 Vegetative Buffers $458 $471 $486 $500 $515 $531 $546 $563 $580 $597 $308 $317 $326 $336 $346 $357 $367 $378 $390 $401 $413 $426 $438 $452 $465 $479 $493 $508 $524 $539 Nutrient Management Plan $1,298 $1,337 $1,377 $1,418 $1,461 $1,504 $1,549 $1,596 $1,644 $1,693 $872 $898 $925 $953 $981 $1,011 $1,041 $1,072 $1,105 $1,138 $1,172 $1,207 $1,243 $1,281 $1,319 $1,359 $1,399 $1,441 $1,484 $1,529 Grade Stabilization Structures $10,297 $10,606 $10,924 $11,252 $11,590 $11,937 $12,295 $12,664 $13,044 $13,435 $6,919 $7,127 $7,341 $7,561 $7,788 $8,021 $8,262 $8,510 $8,765 $9,028 $9,299 $9,578 $9,865 $10,161 $10,466 $10,780 $11,103 $11,436 $11,780 $12,133 *3% Inflation Page 73 Total Cost $25,932 $26,710 $27,511 $28,337 $29,187 $30,062 $30,964 $31,893 $32,850 $33,836 $17,425 $17,948 $18,487 $19,041 $19,612 $20,201 $20,807 $21,431 $22,074 $22,736 $23,418 $24,121 $24,844 $25,590 $26,357 $27,148 $27,963 $28,801 $29,665 $30,555 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 46. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Permanent Vegetation $984 $1,014 $1,044 $1,075 $1,108 $1,141 $1,175 $1,210 $1,247 $1,284 $1,322 $681 $701 $723 $744 $767 $790 $813 $838 $863 $889 $915 $943 $971 $1,000 $1,030 $1,061 $1,093 $1,126 $1,159 No-Till $2,487 $2,562 $2,639 $2,718 $2,799 $2,883 $2,970 $3,059 $3,151 $3,245 $3,342 $1,721 $1,773 $1,826 $1,881 $1,937 $1,996 $2,055 $2,117 $2,181 $2,246 $2,313 $2,383 $2,454 $2,528 $2,604 $2,682 $2,762 $2,845 $2,930 Terraces $1,338 $1,378 $1,420 $1,462 $1,506 $1,551 $1,598 $1,646 $1,695 $1,746 $1,798 $926 $954 $983 $1,012 $1,042 $1,074 $1,106 $1,139 $1,173 $1,209 $1,245 $1,282 $1,321 $1,360 $1,401 $1,443 $1,486 $1,531 $1,577 Waterways $3,149 $3,243 $3,341 $3,441 $3,544 $3,650 $3,760 $3,873 $3,989 $4,108 $4,232 $2,179 $2,245 $2,312 $2,381 $2,453 $2,526 $2,602 $2,680 $2,761 $2,844 $2,929 $3,017 $3,107 $3,200 $3,296 $3,395 $3,497 $3,602 $3,710 Nutrient Vegetative Management Buffers Plan $262 $744 $270 $766 $278 $789 $287 $813 $295 $837 $304 $863 $313 $888 $323 $915 $332 $943 $342 $971 $353 $1,000 $182 $515 $187 $530 $193 $546 $198 $563 $204 $580 $211 $597 $217 $615 $223 $633 $230 $652 $237 $672 $244 $692 $251 $713 $259 $734 $267 $756 $275 $779 $283 $802 $291 $826 $300 $851 $309 $877 Grade Stabilization Structures $5,904 $6,081 $6,264 $6,451 $6,645 $6,844 $7,050 $7,261 $7,479 $7,703 $7,934 $4,086 $4,209 $4,335 $4,465 $4,599 $4,737 $4,879 $5,026 $5,176 $5,332 $5,492 $5,656 $5,826 $6,001 $6,181 $6,366 $6,557 $6,754 $6,957 *3% Inflation Page 74 Total Cost $14,869 $15,315 $15,774 $16,247 $16,735 $17,237 $17,754 $18,286 $18,835 $19,400 $19,982 $10,291 $10,599 $10,917 $11,245 $11,582 $11,930 $12,288 $12,656 $13,036 $13,427 $13,830 $14,245 $14,672 $15,112 $15,566 $16,033 $16,514 $17,009 $17,519 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 47. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share, Cropland BMPs Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Permanent Vegetation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,979 $2,038 $2,099 $2,162 $2,227 $2,294 $2,363 $2,434 $2,507 $2,582 $2,659 $2,739 $2,821 $2,906 $2,993 $3,083 $3,175 $3,271 $3,369 No-Till $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,001 $5,151 $5,306 $5,465 $5,629 $5,798 $5,972 $6,151 $6,336 $6,526 $6,721 $6,923 $7,131 $7,345 $7,565 $7,792 $8,026 $8,266 $8,514 Terraces $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,691 $2,772 $2,855 $2,941 $3,029 $3,120 $3,213 $3,310 $3,409 $3,511 $3,617 $3,725 $3,837 $3,952 $4,071 $4,193 $4,318 $4,448 $4,581 Waterways $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,332 $6,522 $6,718 $6,919 $7,127 $7,341 $7,561 $7,788 $8,021 $8,262 $8,510 $8,765 $9,028 $9,299 $9,578 $9,865 $10,161 $10,466 $10,780 *3% Inflation Vegetative Buffers $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $528 $544 $560 $577 $594 $612 $630 $649 $668 $688 $709 $730 $752 $775 $798 $822 $847 $872 $898 Nutrient Management Plan $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,496 $1,541 $1,587 $1,635 $1,684 $1,735 $1,787 $1,840 $1,895 $1,952 $2,011 $2,071 $2,133 $2,197 $2,263 $2,331 $2,401 $2,473 $2,547 Grade Stabilization Structures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,873 $12,229 $12,596 $12,973 $13,363 $13,764 $14,176 $14,602 $15,040 $15,491 $15,956 $16,434 $16,927 $17,435 $17,958 $18,497 $19,052 $19,624 $20,212 Page 75 Total Cost $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,900 $30,797 $31,721 $32,672 $33,652 $34,662 $35,702 $36,773 $37,876 $39,012 $40,183 $41,388 $42,630 $43,909 $45,226 $46,583 $47,980 $49,420 $50,902 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 48. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Livestock BMP Adoption Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total Sub Watershed #0101 Annual Livestock BMP Adoption Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Strip Pens Site System Grazing 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 10 5 10 30 5 Page 76 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 49. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Livestock BMP Adoption Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total Sub Watershed #0102 Annual Livestock BMP Adoption Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Strip Pens Site System Grazing 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 10 5 10 30 5 Page 77 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 50. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Livestock BMP Adoption Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total Sub Watershed #0104 Annual Livestock BMP Adoption Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Strip Pens Site System Grazing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 5 10 30 5 Page 78 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 51. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Annual Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing Cost 1 $714 $6,621 $0 $7,590 $0 $14,925 2 $0 $0 $2,269 $3,909 $0 $6,178 3 $757 $0 $0 $8,052 $7,426 $16,236 4 $0 $0 $2,407 $4,147 $0 $6,554 5 $804 $7,452 $0 $8,543 $0 $16,798 6 $0 $0 $2,554 $4,399 $0 $6,953 7 $853 $0 $0 $9,063 $8,358 $18,274 8 $0 $0 $2,709 $4,667 $0 $7,377 9 $904 $8,387 $0 $9,615 $0 $18,907 10 $0 $0 $2,874 $4,952 $0 $7,826 11 $0 $0 $0 $5,100 $0 $5,100 12 $988 $0 $0 $5,253 $0 $6,242 13 $0 $9,440 $0 $5,411 $0 $14,851 14 $0 $0 $3,235 $5,573 $0 $8,808 15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 16 $1,112 $0 $0 $5,912 $0 $7,025 17 $0 $0 $0 $6,090 $11,233 $17,323 18 $0 $0 $3,641 $6,273 $0 $9,914 19 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 20 $1,252 $0 $0 $6,655 $0 $7,907 21 $0 $11,958 $0 $6,854 $0 $18,812 22 $0 $0 $4,098 $7,060 $0 $11,158 23 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 24 $1,409 $0 $0 $7,490 $0 $8,899 25 $0 $0 $0 $7,714 $14,230 $21,944 26 $0 $0 $4,613 $7,946 $0 $12,558 27 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 28 $1,586 $0 $0 $8,430 $0 $10,016 29 $0 $0 $0 $8,683 $16,015 $24,698 30 $0 $0 $5,192 $0 $0 $5,192 3% Annual Cost Inflation Page 79 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 52. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Annual Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing Cost 1 $0 $0 $2,203 $3,795 $7,000 $12,998 2 $735 $0 $0 $7,818 $0 $8,553 3 $0 $7,024 $2,337 $4,026 $0 $13,387 4 $780 $0 $0 $8,294 $0 $9,074 5 $0 $0 $2,479 $4,271 $7,879 $14,629 6 $828 $0 $0 $8,799 $0 $9,627 7 $0 $7,906 $2,630 $4,531 $0 $15,068 8 $878 $0 $0 $9,335 $0 $10,213 9 $0 $0 $2,791 $4,807 $8,867 $16,465 10 $932 $0 $0 $9,903 $0 $10,835 11 $0 $0 $0 $5,100 $0 $5,100 12 $0 $0 $3,049 $5,253 $0 $8,303 13 $0 $0 $0 $5,411 $9,980 $15,391 14 $1,049 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,049 15 $0 $0 $0 $5,740 $0 $5,740 16 $0 $0 $3,432 $5,912 $0 $9,345 17 $0 $10,625 $0 $6,090 $0 $16,715 18 $1,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,180 19 $0 $0 $0 $6,461 $0 $6,461 20 $0 $0 $3,863 $6,655 $0 $10,518 21 $0 $0 $0 $6,854 $12,643 $19,497 22 $1,328 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,328 23 $0 $0 $0 $7,272 $0 $7,272 24 $0 $0 $4,348 $7,490 $0 $11,838 25 $0 $13,459 $0 $7,714 $0 $21,174 26 $1,495 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,495 27 $0 $0 $0 $8,184 $0 $8,184 28 $0 $0 $4,893 $8,430 $0 $13,323 29 $0 $15,148 $0 $0 $0 $15,148 30 $1,683 $0 $0 $8,943 $0 $10,626 3% Annual Cost Inflation Page 80 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 53. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost* Before Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Annual Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing Cost 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 4 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 7 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 11 $960 $8,898 $2,961 $10,200 $9,407 $32,426 12 $0 $0 $0 $5,253 $0 $5,253 13 $1,018 $0 $3,141 $10,822 $0 $14,980 14 $0 $0 $0 $5,573 $0 $5,573 15 $1,080 $10,015 $3,332 $11,481 $10,588 $36,496 16 $0 $0 $0 $5,912 $0 $5,912 17 $1,146 $0 $3,535 $12,180 $0 $16,861 18 $0 $0 $0 $6,273 $0 $6,273 19 $1,216 $11,272 $3,750 $12,921 $11,917 $41,076 20 $0 $0 $0 $6,655 $0 $6,655 21 $1,290 $0 $3,979 $13,708 $0 $18,977 22 $0 $0 $0 $7,060 $0 $7,060 23 $1,368 $12,687 $4,221 $14,543 $13,413 $46,232 24 $0 $0 $0 $7,490 $0 $7,490 25 $1,451 $0 $4,478 $15,429 $0 $21,359 26 $0 $0 $0 $7,946 $0 $7,946 27 $1,540 $14,279 $4,751 $16,369 $15,096 $52,034 28 $0 $0 $0 $8,430 $0 $8,430 29 $1,634 $0 $5,040 $17,365 $0 $24,039 30 $0 $0 $0 $8,943 $0 $8,943 3% Annual Cost Inflation Page 81 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 54. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Annual Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing Cost 1 $357 $3,311 $0 $3,795 $0 $7,463 2 $0 $0 $1,135 $1,954 $0 $3,089 3 $379 $0 $0 $4,026 $3,713 $8,118 4 $0 $0 $1,204 $2,073 $0 $3,277 5 $402 $3,726 $0 $4,271 $0 $8,399 6 $0 $0 $1,277 $2,200 $0 $3,477 7 $426 $0 $0 $4,531 $4,179 $9,137 8 $0 $0 $1,355 $2,334 $0 $3,688 9 $452 $4,194 $0 $4,807 $0 $9,453 10 $0 $0 $1,437 $2,476 $0 $3,913 11 $0 $0 $0 $2,550 $0 $2,550 12 $494 $0 $0 $2,627 $0 $3,121 13 $0 $4,720 $0 $2,705 $0 $7,425 14 $0 $0 $1,618 $2,787 $0 $4,404 15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 16 $556 $0 $0 $2,956 $0 $3,512 17 $0 $0 $0 $3,045 $5,616 $8,661 18 $0 $0 $1,821 $3,136 $0 $4,957 19 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 20 $626 $0 $0 $3,327 $0 $3,953 21 $0 $5,979 $0 $3,427 $0 $9,406 22 $0 $0 $2,049 $3,530 $0 $5,579 23 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 24 $705 $0 $0 $3,745 $0 $4,449 25 $0 $0 $0 $3,857 $7,115 $10,972 26 $0 $0 $2,306 $3,973 $0 $6,279 27 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 28 $793 $0 $0 $4,215 $0 $5,008 29 $0 $0 $0 $4,341 $8,008 $12,349 30 $0 $0 $2,596 $0 $0 $2,596 3% Annual Cost Inflation Page 82 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 55. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Annual Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing Cost 1 $0 $0 $1,102 $1,898 $3,500 $6,499 2 $368 $0 $0 $3,909 $0 $4,277 3 $0 $3,512 $1,169 $2,013 $0 $6,694 4 $390 $0 $0 $4,147 $0 $4,537 5 $0 $0 $1,240 $2,136 $3,939 $7,315 6 $414 $0 $0 $4,399 $0 $4,813 7 $0 $3,953 $1,315 $2,266 $0 $7,534 8 $439 $0 $0 $4,667 $0 $5,106 9 $0 $0 $1,395 $2,404 $4,434 $8,233 10 $466 $0 $0 $4,952 $0 $5,417 11 $0 $0 $0 $2,550 $0 $2,550 12 $0 $0 $1,525 $2,627 $0 $4,151 13 $0 $0 $0 $2,705 $4,990 $7,696 14 $524 $0 $0 $0 $0 $524 15 $0 $0 $0 $2,870 $0 $2,870 16 $0 $0 $1,716 $2,956 $0 $4,672 17 $0 $5,312 $0 $3,045 $0 $8,357 18 $590 $0 $0 $0 $0 $590 19 $0 $0 $0 $3,230 $0 $3,230 20 $0 $0 $1,931 $3,327 $0 $5,259 21 $0 $0 $0 $3,427 $6,321 $9,748 22 $664 $0 $0 $0 $0 $664 23 $0 $0 $0 $3,636 $0 $3,636 24 $0 $0 $2,174 $3,745 $0 $5,919 25 $0 $6,730 $0 $3,857 $0 $10,587 26 $747 $0 $0 $0 $0 $747 27 $0 $0 $0 $4,092 $0 $4,092 28 $0 $0 $2,447 $4,215 $0 $6,662 29 $0 $7,574 $0 $0 $0 $7,574 30 $841 $0 $0 $4,472 $0 $5,313 3% Annual Cost Inflation Page 83 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 56. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPS. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Cost* After Cost-Share of Implementing Livestock BMPs Relocate Vegetative Relocate Pasture Off Stream Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Annual Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing Cost 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 4 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 7 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 11 $480 $4,449 $1,480 $5,100 $4,704 $16,213 12 $0 $0 $0 $2,627 $0 $2,627 13 $509 $0 $1,570 $5,411 $0 $7,490 14 $0 $0 $0 $2,787 $0 $2,787 15 $540 $5,007 $1,666 $5,740 $5,294 $18,248 16 $0 $0 $0 $2,956 $0 $2,956 17 $573 $0 $1,768 $6,090 $0 $8,430 18 $0 $0 $0 $3,136 $0 $3,136 19 $608 $5,636 $1,875 $6,461 $5,959 $20,538 20 $0 $0 $0 $3,327 $0 $3,327 21 $645 $0 $1,989 $6,854 $0 $9,488 22 $0 $0 $0 $3,530 $0 $3,530 23 $684 $6,343 $2,111 $7,272 $6,706 $23,116 24 $0 $0 $0 $3,745 $0 $3,745 25 $726 $0 $2,239 $7,714 $0 $10,679 26 $0 $0 $0 $3,973 $0 $3,973 27 $770 $7,139 $2,375 $8,184 $7,548 $26,017 28 $0 $0 $0 $4,215 $0 $4,215 29 $817 $0 $2,520 $8,683 $0 $12,020 30 $0 $0 $0 $4,472 $0 $4,472 3% Annual Cost Inflation Page 84 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 57. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions (lbs.) Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions (lbs.) Relocate Off Vegetative Relocate Pasture Stream Annual Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Load Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing Reduction 1 797 1,196 0 126 0 2,119 2 797 1,196 63 189 0 2,246 3 1,595 1,196 63 315 63 3,232 4 1,595 1,196 126 378 63 3,358 5 2,392 2,392 126 504 63 5,478 6 2,392 2,392 189 568 63 5,604 7 3,189 2,392 189 694 126 6,590 8 3,189 2,392 252 757 126 6,716 9 3,987 3,588 252 883 126 8,836 10 3,987 3,588 315 946 126 8,962 11 3,987 3,588 315 1,009 126 9,025 12 4,784 3,588 315 1,072 126 9,885 13 4,784 4,784 315 1,135 126 11,145 14 4,784 4,784 378 1,198 126 11,271 15 4,784 4,784 378 1,198 126 11,271 16 5,581 4,784 378 1,261 126 12,131 17 5,581 4,784 378 1,324 189 12,257 18 5,581 4,784 441 1,387 189 12,383 19 5,581 4,784 441 1,387 189 12,383 20 6,379 4,784 441 1,450 189 13,244 21 6,379 5,980 441 1,513 189 14,503 22 6,379 5,980 504 1,577 189 14,629 23 6,379 5,980 504 1,577 189 14,629 24 7,176 5,980 504 1,640 189 15,489 25 7,176 5,980 504 1,703 252 15,615 26 7,176 5,980 568 1,766 252 15,741 27 7,176 5,980 568 1,766 252 15,741 28 7,973 5,980 568 1,829 252 16,602 29 7,973 5,980 568 1,892 315 16,728 30 7,973 5,980 631 1,892 315 16,791 Page 85 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 58. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions (lbs.) Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions (lbs.) Relocate Off Vegetative Relocate Pasture Stream Annual Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Load Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing Reduction 1 0 0 63 63 63 189 2 797 0 63 189 63 1,113 3 797 1,196 126 252 63 2,435 4 1,595 1,196 126 378 63 3,358 5 1,595 1,196 189 441 126 3,547 6 2,392 1,196 189 568 126 4,471 7 2,392 2,392 252 631 126 5,793 8 3,189 2,392 252 757 126 6,716 9 3,189 2,392 315 820 189 6,905 10 3,987 2,392 315 946 189 7,829 11 3,987 2,392 315 1,009 189 7,892 12 3,987 2,392 378 1,072 189 8,018 13 3,987 2,392 378 1,135 252 8,144 14 4,784 2,392 378 1,135 252 8,942 15 4,784 2,392 378 1,198 252 9,005 16 4,784 2,392 441 1,261 252 9,131 17 4,784 3,588 441 1,324 252 10,390 18 5,581 3,588 441 1,324 252 11,187 19 5,581 3,588 441 1,387 252 11,250 20 5,581 3,588 504 1,450 252 11,376 21 5,581 3,588 504 1,513 315 11,502 22 6,379 3,588 504 1,513 315 12,300 23 6,379 3,588 504 1,577 315 12,363 24 6,379 3,588 568 1,640 315 12,489 25 6,379 4,784 568 1,703 315 13,748 26 7,176 4,784 568 1,703 315 14,545 27 7,176 4,784 568 1,766 315 14,608 28 7,176 4,784 631 1,829 315 14,735 29 7,176 5,980 631 1,829 315 15,931 30 7,973 5,980 631 1,892 315 16,791 Page 86 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 59. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions (lbs.) Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Phosphorus Load Reductions (lbs.) Relocate Off Vegetative Relocate Pasture Stream Annual Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Load Year Strip Pens Site System Grazing Reduction 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 797 1,196 63 126 63 2,246 12 797 1,196 63 189 63 2,309 13 1,595 1,196 126 315 63 3,295 14 1,595 1,196 126 378 63 3,358 15 2,392 2,392 189 504 126 5,604 16 2,392 2,392 189 568 126 5,667 17 3,189 2,392 252 694 126 6,653 18 3,189 2,392 252 757 126 6,716 19 3,987 3,588 315 883 189 8,962 20 3,987 3,588 315 946 189 9,025 21 4,784 3,588 378 1,072 189 10,012 22 4,784 3,588 378 1,135 189 10,075 23 5,581 4,784 441 1,261 252 12,320 24 5,581 4,784 441 1,324 252 12,383 25 6,379 4,784 504 1,450 252 13,370 26 6,379 4,784 504 1,513 252 13,433 27 7,176 5,980 568 1,640 315 15,678 28 7,176 5,980 568 1,703 315 15,741 29 7,973 5,980 631 1,829 315 16,728 30 7,973 5,980 631 1,892 315 16,791 Page 87 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 60. Sub-Watershed #0101 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions (lbs.) Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sub Watershed #0101 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions (lbs.) Relocate Off Vegetative Relocate Pasture Stream Annual Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Load Strip Pens Site System Grazing Reduction 1,502 2,253 0 238 0 3,992 1,502 2,253 119 356 0 4,230 3,004 2,253 119 594 119 6,088 3,004 2,253 238 713 119 6,325 4,505 4,505 238 950 119 10,317 4,505 4,505 356 1,069 119 10,555 6,007 4,505 356 1,307 237 12,413 6,007 4,505 475 1,425 237 12,650 7,509 6,758 475 1,663 237 16,642 7,509 6,758 594 1,782 237 16,880 7,509 6,758 594 1,900 237 16,999 9,011 6,758 594 2,019 237 18,619 9,011 9,011 594 2,138 237 20,991 9,011 9,011 713 2,257 237 21,228 9,011 9,011 713 2,257 237 21,228 10,513 9,011 713 2,375 237 22,849 10,513 9,011 713 2,494 356 23,086 10,513 9,011 831 2,613 356 23,324 10,513 9,011 831 2,613 356 23,324 12,014 9,011 831 2,732 356 24,944 12,014 11,263 831 2,851 356 27,316 12,014 11,263 950 2,969 356 27,553 12,014 11,263 950 2,969 356 27,553 13,516 11,263 950 3,088 356 29,174 13,516 11,263 950 3,207 475 29,411 13,516 11,263 1,069 3,326 475 29,649 13,516 11,263 1,069 3,326 475 29,649 15,018 11,263 1,069 3,444 475 31,270 15,018 11,263 1,069 3,563 593 31,507 15,018 11,263 1,188 3,563 593 31,626 Page 88 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 61. Sub-Watershed #0102 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions (lbs.) Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sub Watershed #0102 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions (lbs.) Relocate Off Vegetative Relocate Pasture Stream Annual Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Load Strip Pens Site System Grazing Reduction 0 0 119 119 119 356 1,502 0 119 356 119 2,096 1,502 2,253 238 475 119 4,586 3,004 2,253 238 713 119 6,325 3,004 2,253 356 831 237 6,681 4,505 2,253 356 1,069 237 8,421 4,505 4,505 475 1,188 237 10,911 6,007 4,505 475 1,425 237 12,650 6,007 4,505 594 1,544 356 13,007 7,509 4,505 594 1,782 356 14,746 7,509 4,505 594 1,900 356 14,865 7,509 4,505 713 2,019 356 15,102 7,509 4,505 713 2,138 475 15,340 9,011 4,505 713 2,138 475 16,841 9,011 4,505 713 2,257 475 16,960 9,011 4,505 831 2,375 475 17,198 9,011 6,758 831 2,494 475 19,569 10,513 6,758 831 2,494 475 21,071 10,513 6,758 831 2,613 475 21,190 10,513 6,758 950 2,732 475 21,427 10,513 6,758 950 2,851 593 21,665 12,014 6,758 950 2,851 593 23,167 12,014 6,758 950 2,969 593 23,285 12,014 6,758 1,069 3,088 593 23,523 12,014 9,011 1,069 3,207 593 25,894 13,516 9,011 1,069 3,207 593 27,396 13,516 9,011 1,069 3,326 593 27,515 13,516 9,011 1,188 3,444 593 27,752 13,516 11,263 1,188 3,444 593 30,005 15,018 11,263 1,188 3,563 593 31,626 Page 89 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 62. Sub-Watershed #0104 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions (lbs.). Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sub Watershed #0104 Annual Nitrogen Load Reductions (lbs.) Relocate Off Vegetative Relocate Pasture Stream Annual Filter Feeding Feeding Watering Rotational Load Strip Pens Site System Grazing Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,502 2,253 119 238 119 4,229 1,502 2,253 119 356 119 4,348 3,004 2,253 238 594 119 6,206 3,004 2,253 238 713 119 6,325 4,505 4,505 356 950 237 10,555 4,505 4,505 356 1,069 237 10,673 6,007 4,505 475 1,307 237 12,532 6,007 4,505 475 1,425 237 12,650 7,509 6,758 594 1,663 356 16,880 7,509 6,758 594 1,782 356 16,999 9,011 6,758 713 2,019 356 18,857 9,011 6,758 713 2,138 356 18,975 10,513 9,011 831 2,375 475 23,205 10,513 9,011 831 2,494 475 23,324 12,014 9,011 950 2,732 475 25,182 12,014 9,011 950 2,851 475 25,301 13,516 11,263 1,069 3,088 593 29,530 13,516 11,263 1,069 3,207 593 29,649 15,018 11,263 1,188 3,444 593 31,507 15,018 11,263 1,188 3,563 593 31,626 Page 90 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 10.0 INFORMATION AND EDUCATION A major component of this project is the dissemination of information about the causes of the watershed surface water impairments and the education of both rural and urban landowners as to the actions that they can undertake to reduce their water impacts. The Twin Lakes project is one of eight WRAPS that are sponsored by the Flint Hills RC&D and the Information and Education plans have been developed for all eight projects as a whole. Some of the projects will be targeted when a specific problem is identified in one of the watershed and some of the information will be disseminated on more of a regional basis. Efforts will be made to provide educational opportunities for all segments of the population in the watersheds. Some activities will be geared more toward adult education and some more toward youth. Some will be focused on the agricultural population and some more toward the more urban landowners. The following tables demonstrate the timing of each of the activities, the population it will focus on, the technical services provides that will be asked to work with the WRAPS and the cost of each of the programs. Page 91 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Table 63. Cropland BMP Implementation I&E. BMP Target Audience 2011 Information/Education Time Frame Activity/Event Cropland BMP Implementation Estimated Costs Demonstration Project Annual $5,000 per demonstration project Tour/Field Day to Highlight Buffers Annual $500 per tour or field day Newspaper Articles Annual – Ongoing No Charge Newsletter Article Quarterly $500 One on One Meetings with Producers Annual – Ongoing $2,500 Soil Testing Ongoing $500 Buffers GrassWaterways New Terraces Landowners and Farmers Permanent Vegetation Sponsor/Responsible Agency Kansas Rural Center Buffer Coordinator NRCS Kansas Forest Service Flint Hills RC&D Buffer Coordinator Conservation District NRCS Kansas Forest Service Conservation Districts NRCS Flint Hills RC&D Conservation Districts Kansas Research and Extension NRCS Flint Hills RC&D Conservation Districts, Kansas Research and Extension and Buffer Coordinators NRCS Kansas Forest Service Kansas Research and Extension Page 92 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN No-Till Workshop Newsletter Article No-till/Cover Crop Annual $1,000 per meeting $500 Farmers and Rental Operators Flint Hills RC&D Conservation Districts Kansas Research and Extension No-Till on the Plains Flint Hills RC&D Conservation District Kansas State Research and Extension NRCS No-Till on the Plains One on One Meetings with Producers Annual Ongoing $2,500 Scholarships for producers to attend NoTill Winter Conference Annual – Winter $150 per person No-till on the Plains DOC $500 Conservation District and Kansas State Research and Extension NRCS Cost Share for Soil Tests Nutrient Management Annual - Spring Flint Hills RC&D Conservation Districts 2012 Kansas State Research and Extension NRCS No-Till on the Plains Annual Ongoing Newsletter Article Annual $500 One on One Meetings with Producers Annual Ongoing $10,000 Farmers Flint Hills RC&D Conservation Districts Kansas Research and Extension Flint Hills RC&D NRCS Conservation District Kansas State Research and Extension Watershed Specialist Kansas Rural Center Page 93 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 64. Livestock BMP Implementation. I&E BMP Vegetative Filter Strips Target Audience Information/Education Time Frame Activity/Event Livestock BMP Implementation Estimated Costs Demonstration Project Annual $2,500 per project Tour/Field Day Annual $1,000 per tour Workshop/Tour Annual $500 per workshop Annual $300 per demonstration or tour Landowners and Ranchers Livestock Filter Strip and Feedlot Relocation Demonstration/Tour Sponsor/Responsible Agency Flint Hills RC&D Kansas Rural Center Buffer Coordinator Kansas State Research and Extension Flint Hills RC&D Kansas Rural Center Buffer Coordinator Kansas State Research and Extension Flint Hills RC&D Kansas Rural Center Buffer Coordinator Kansas State Research and Extension Conservation Districts NCRS Page 94 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Relocated Feedlot Relocate Pasture Feeding Site Landowners and Small Feedlot Operators 2012 Demonstration Project Annual $5,000 per demonstration project Tour/Field Day Annual $500 per tour or field day Cost-Share Program Promotion Annual No Charge Demonstration Project Annual – Spring $5,000 per demonstration project Tour/Field Day Annual Summer $1,000 per tour or field day Grazing Informational Meeting Annual - Fall $250 per meeting Ranchers Flint Hills RC&D Kansas Rural Center Buffer Coordinator Kansas State Research and Extension Flint Hills RC&D Kansas Rural Center Buffer Coordinator Kansas State Research and Extension Flint Hills RC&D Kansas Rural Center Buffer Coordinator Kansas State Research and Extension Kansas Rural Center NRCS DOC Kansas State Watershed Specialist Kansas Rural Center NRCS DOC Kansas State Watershed Specialist Conservation Districts Kansas Rural Center Page 95 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Grazing and Rangeland Management Alternative Watering System 2012 Demonstration Project Annual – Ongoing $1,000 per event Tour/Field Day Annual Ongoing $1,000 per event Demonstration Project Annual – Spring $5,000 per demonstration project Tour/Field Day Annual Summer $1000 per tour or field day Grazing Informational Meeting Annual - Fall Combined with relocating pasture feeding site meeting Demonstration project for pond construction and spring developments Annual - Fall $10,000 per project Ranchers Ranchers Kansas Rural Center NRCS DOC Kansas State Watershed Specialist Kansas Rural Center NRCS DOC Kansas State Watershed Specialist Kansas Rural Center NRCS DOC Kansas State Watershed Specialist Kansas Rural Center NRCS DOC Kansas State Watershed Specialist Kansas Rural Center NRCS DOC Kansas State Watershed Specialist Kansas Rural Center NRCS DOC Kansas State Watershed Specialist Page 96 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 11.0 TWIN LAKES WATER QUALITY MILESTONES TO DETERMINE IMPROVEMENT The goal of the Twin Lakes WRAPS plan is to restore water quality for uses supportive of aquatic life, domestic water supply, and recreation for Council Grove Lake and the Neosho River. The plan specifically addresses the high priority Eutrophication TMDL for Council Grove Lake along with the medium priority Bacteria TMDL for the Neosho River at KDHE sampling station SC637. The restoration plan includes separate BMP implementation scheduled for the two water bodies, which spans over 30 years for Council Grove Lake and 30 years for the Neosho River. Water quality milestones are established to enable KDHE and the Twin Lakes WRAPS to measure water quality improvements within the watershed of their WRAPS area. Separate water quality milestones have been developed for both Council Grove Lake and the Neosho River, along with additional indicators of water quality. Water quality improvements associated with the BMP implementation schedules contained in this plan will be measured against the established milestones and indicators. 11.1 Water Quality Milestones for Council Grove Lake This plan estimates that it will take 30 years to implement the planned BMPs necessary to meet the load reduction goals for the impairments being addressed in the Twin Lakes watershed. The table below includes 10-year and long term water quality goals for Council Grove Lake. Page 97 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 65. Water Quality Milestones for Council Grove Lake. KDHE. Water Quality Milestones for Council Grove Lake Sampling Site Council Grove Lake LM022001 10-Year Goal Long Term Goal 10-Year Goal Long Term Goal Current Current Improved Condition Improved Condition* Improved Condition Improved (1996Condition Total Total Total Total (1990 Condition (2011 – Condition (2012 – Reduction Reduction 2011) Reduction Reduction 2011) Average 2021) Average Needed Needed Average Needed Needed 2021) Average TP TP Average TN TN Average TP TN Total Phosphorus (average of data collected Total Nitrogen (average of data collected during indicated period), ppb during indicated period), ppm 191 151 40 100 91 1.01 0.87 0.14 0.8 0.21 10-Year Goal Long Term Goal 10-Year Goal Long Term Goal Current Current Improved Condition* Condition Condition (1990 – (1990 - Improved Condition Total (2012 Improved Condition Improved Condition 2011) 2011) Reduction (2011 - 2021) 2021) Chlorophyll a Secchi (Avg.) Chlorophyll Secchi Needed Secchi (Avg.) Chlorophyll a (Avg.) a Sampling Chlorophyll a (average of data collected Secchi (average of data collected Site during indicated period), ppb during indicated period), m Council Maintain Average Maintain Secchi Grove Lake 6.6 6 0.43 0.6 Secchi depth >0.7 Chlorophyll a ≤ 10 depth > 1.0 LM022001 Page 98 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 11.2 Water Quality Milestones for Munkers Creek, Lairds Creek and Neosho River While the primary focus is on achieving improvements in the lake, there will be water quality improvements resulting from BMP implementation within the watershed at the three KDHE stream chemistry sampling sites located on Munkers Creek near Council Grove (SC631) and the Neosho River near Parkerville (SC637). The following table details the 10-year and long term water quality goals for Total Phosphorus (TP) and Total Nitrogen (TN) at these sampling locations. Table 66. Water Quality Milestones for KDHE Stream Stations in the Twin Lakes Watershed. KDHE. Water Quality Milestones for KDHE Stream Stations in the Twin Lakes Watershed 10-Year Goal Long Term Goal 10-Year Goal Long Term Goal Current Current Improved Improved Condition* Condition Condition Improved Condition Total Improved Total (1992 (2000Total Total (2012 – Condition (2011 – Reduction Condition Reduction 2008) Reduction Reduction 2008) 2021) Average 2021) Needed Average Needed Average Needed Needed Average Average TP Average (7%) TN (19%) TP TN TP TN Sampling Total Phosphorus (average of data collected Total Nitrogen (average of data collected Site during indicated period), ppb during indicated period), ppm Munkers Cr SC631 141 113 28 96 45 1.06 0.98 0.08 0.86 0.2 Neosho River SC637 269 200 69 100 169 1.21 1.12 0.09 0.98 0.23 Page 99 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 11.3 Water Quality Milestones for Bacteria The plan is addressing the bacteria TMDL for the Neosho River within the Twin Lakes watershed above KDHE station SC637. The water quality goal associated with the bacteria impairment can be tied to the E.Coli Bacteria (ECB) Index values. Bacteria Load reductions should result in less frequent exceedance of the nominal E. Coli Bacteria (ECB) criterion (427 Colony Forming Units (cfu/100mL) for the KDHE sampling site SC637 near Parkerville, KS. In order to assess the impact of BMPs addressing bacteria impairments the relative frequency and magnitude of bacteria concentrations seen in the receiving streams monitored by KDHE on a routine or rotational basis, must be measured to determine if water quality improvements are being achieved. The bacteria index is utilized by KDHE to assess the relative frequency and magnitude of the bacteria concentrations at KDHE monitoring sites. The calculated bacteria index for the Neosho River sampling station SC637 is the natural logarithm of each sample value taken during the April-October Primary Recreation season, divided by the natural logarithm of the bacteria criteria for Primary Recreation Class C [ln(427)]. Index = ln(ECB Count)/ln(427) The indicator will be the Upper Decile of those index values; with the target being that the index is below 1.0 at the upper decile (90th percentile). KDHE sampling station SC637 on the Neosho River was sampled in accordance with the water quality standard for three different intensive sampling events in 2007 and one intensive sampling event in 2011. Each intensive sampling event consisted of five ECB samples collected in a 30-day period. The calculated geometric mean of the five samples for each event was under the recreational use criterion of 427 cfu/100mL for all of the sampling events. KDHE has stated that the water quality goal for the bacteria impairments in the Neosho River at SC637 is for at least 90% of the samples taken during the April through October period to be below the water quality criterion of 427 cfus/100ml, which corresponds to 90% of the samples being below the index value of one. Page 100 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Neosho Headwaters -- Bacteria Index Primary Contact Recreation 'C' Index 1.8 1.6 1.4 Index 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 Target is for the Neosho River Index to be below 1 at 90% 0.4 0.2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentile Neosho River SC637 Figure 19. Neosho Headwaters – Bacteria Index; Primary Contact Recreation ‘C’ Index. KDHE. Page 101 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 SC637 -- Neosho River 2007 & 2011 Intensive Sampling Events 10000 ECB (cfu/100mL) Event 1 Samples 1 thru 5 Geomean = 331 Event 2 Samples 6 thru 10 Geomean = 171 Event 4 Samples 16 thru 20 Geomean = 136 100 Event 3 Samples 11 thru 15 Geomean = 67.9 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Sample 4/10/07 to 4/24/07 6/20/07 to 7/10/07 8/14/07 to 9/4/07 4/6/11 to 5/4/11 Primary 'C' (427 cfu/100mL) Figure 20. SC637, Neosho River 2007 & 2011 Intensive Sampling Events. KDHE. Page 102 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 11.4 Additional Water Quality Indicators In addition to the monitoring data, other water quality indicators can be utilized by KDHE and the SLT. Such indicators may include anecdotal information from the SLT and other citizen groups within the watershed (skin rash outbreaks, fish kills, nuisance odors), which can be used to assess short-term deviations from water quality standards. These additional indicators can act as trigger-points that might initiate further revisions or modifications to the WRAPS plan by KDHE and the SLT. • • • • • • • Taste and odor issues in public water supply from Council Grove Lake Occurrence of algal blooms in Council Grove Lake Visitor traffic to Council Grove Lake Boating traffic in Council Grove Lake Trends of quantity and quality of fishing in Council Grove Lake Beach closings at Council Grove Lake No fish kills on streams within the Council Grove Lake watershed 11.5 Monitoring and Water Quality Progress KDHE continues to monitor water quality in the Twin Lakes watershed by maintaining three stream chemistry stations and one lake monitoring station. The three KDHE stream chemistry stations (SC631, SC632, and SC637) in the watershed will continue to be sampled on a rotational basis every four years. These stations are sampled on a quarterly basis during the year they are sampled and the next scheduled sampling year for these stations is in 2012. The KDHE lake monitoring station at Council Grove Lake, LM022001, will be sampled by KDHE every three years with the next sampling year scheduled for 2014. 11.6 Evaluation of Monitoring Data Monitoring data in the Twin Lakes watershed will be used to determine water quality progress, track water quality milestones, and to determine the effectiveness of the BMP implementation outlined in the plan. The schedule of review for the monitoring data will be tied to the water quality milestones that have been developed for each sub watershed, as well as the frequency of the sampling data. The BMP implementation schedule and water quality milestones for the Twin Lakes watershed extend through a 30 year period from 2012-2042. Throughout that period, KDHE will continue to analyze and evaluate the monitoring data collected. After the first ten Page 103 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 year of monitoring and BMP implementation, KDHE will evaluate the available water quality data to determine whether the water quality milestones have been achieved. KDHE and the SLT can address any necessary modifications or revisions to the plan based on the data analysis. In 2042, at the end of the plan, a determination can be made as to whether the water quality standards have been attained. In addition to the planned review of the monitoring data and water quality milestones, KDHE and the SLT may revisit the plan in shorter increments. This would allow KDHE and the SLT to evaluate newer available information, incorporate any revisions to applicable TMDLs, or address any potential water quality indicators that might trigger an immediate review. Table 67. TMDL Review Schedule for the Neosho Basin. TMDL Review Schedule for the Neosho Basin Year Ending in September 2013 Implementation Period 2014-2023 2018 2019-2028 Possible TMDL TMDL to to Revise Evaluate 2002, 2004, 2005 2002, 2004, 2005 2000, 2004, 2000, 2004, 2005, 2008 2005, 2008 Page 104 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 68. Watershed Wide Information and Education. BMP Target Audience Information/Education Time Frame Estimated Costs Activity/Event Watershed Wide Information and Education Day on the Farm Education of Youth Educators, K-12 Students Poster, essay and speech contests Envirothon Curriculum workshop for K-12 educators Envirofest/Water Festival Sponsor/Responsible Agency Annual – Spring $500 per event Conservation Districts Kansas Farm Bureaus Kansas FFA Kansas State Research and Extension Annual – Spring $200 Conservation Districts Annual - Spring Annual – Summer $250 $2,000 per workshop Conservation Districts Annual – Fall $700 KACEE Conservation Districts NRCS Kansas State Research and Extension Flinthills RC & D Page 105 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Newsletter Presentation at annual meeting Education of Adults Educators, Adult Education River Friendly Farms producer notebook Media campaign to promote healthy watersheds (brochures, news releases, TV, radio, web-based) Educational campaign about leaking/failing septic systems 2012 Quarterly $2,000 per quarter Flint Hills RC&D Annual – Winter No charge Annual – Ongoing $250 per notebook Conservation District Flint Hills RC&D Kansas State Research and Extension Flint Hills RC&D Kansas Rural Center Ongoing $1,000 per year Flint Hills RC&D Ongoing $1,500 per year Local Environmental Protection Programs Page 106 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Watershed Wide Information and Education 2012 Meeting with Soil and Grassland Awards Annual – Ongoing No charge Conservation Districts Media campaign to promote healthy watersheds (brochures, news releases, TV, radio, web-based) Ongoing $1,000 per year Flint Hills RC&D Media campaign to address urban nutrient runoff (flyers or handouts addressing phosphate and nitrate pollution from urban areas) Annual – Ongoing $500 per campaign Local Environmental Protection Program Watershed display for area events Annual – Ongoing $1,000 per event Flint Hills RC&D Conservation Districts Kansas State Research and Extension Page 107 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 69. Technical Assistance needed to Implement BMP. Technical Assistance Needed to Implement BMPs. BMP No-till CROPLAND Min-till Terrace Waterway Buffer Personnel Needed to Implement BMP Technical Assistance WRAPS Coordinator DOC Buffer Technician KRC River Friendly Farms Technician Watershed Specialist NRCS WRAPS Coordinator SCC Buffer Technician KRC River Friendly Farms Technician Watershed Specialist NRCS WRAPS Coordinator SCC Buffer Technician KRC River Friendly Farms Technician Watershed Specialist NRCS WRAPS Coordinator SCC Buffer Technician KRC River Friendly Farms Technician Watershed Specialist NRCS WRAPS Coordinator SCC Buffer Technician KRC River Friendly Farms Technician Watershed Specialist NRCS Projected Annual Cost NRCS District Conservationist No Charge Conservation District Soil Technician No Charge DOC Buffer Technician No Charge WRAPS Coordinator $36,000 Watershed Specialist $4,000 KRC River Friendly Farms Technician $9,000 Page 108 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Personnel Needed to Implement BMP BMP Permanent Cover Strategic fencing LIVESTOCK 2012 Alternative Water Relocate Feed Area Vegetative Filter Strip Technical Assistance WRAPS Coordinator SCC Buffer Technician KRC River Friendly Farms Technician NRCS WRAPS Coordinator KRC River Friendly Farms Technician Watershed Specialist WRAPS Coordinator KRC River Friendly Farms Technician Watershed Specialist WRAPS Coordinator KRC River Friendly Farms Technician Watershed Specialist WRAPS Coordinator SCC Buffer Technician KRC River Friendly Farms Technician Watershed Specialist Projected Annual Cost Kansas State Forester No charge Table 70. Total annual cost for information and education if all events are implemented. Total annual cost for Information and Education if all events are implemented Total $49,000 Page 109 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Table 71. Organizations Contact Information Organization Programs Purpose Technical or Financial Assistance Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program Provides low cost loans to communities for water pollution control activities. Watershed Protection To conduct holistic strategies for restoring and protecting aquatic resources based on hydrology rather than political boundaries. Flint Hills RC&D Natural resource development and protection Plan and Implement projects and programs that improve environmental quality of life. Kansas Alliance for Wetlands and Streams Streambank Stabilization The Kansas Alliance for Wetlands and Streams (KAWS) organized in 1996 to promote the protection, enhancement, restoration and establishment wetlands and streams in Kansas. Technical Available for watershed districts and multipurpose small lakes development. Technical and Financial Environment al Protection Agency Wetland Restoration Cost share programs Kansas Dept. of Agriculture Watershed structures permitting. Phone 913-551-7003 Website address www.epa.gov Financial 913-551-7003 www.flinthillsrcd.com Technical 620-340-0113 ext. 9 785-463-5804 www.kaws.org NE Chapter 785-296-2933 www.ksda.gov Page 110 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Organization Kansas Dept. of Health and Environment Programs and Technical Assistance Purpose Nonpoint Source Pollution Program Provide funds for projects that will reduce nonpoint source pollution. 2012 Technical or Financial Assistance Phone 785-296-5500 Website address www.kdheks.gov Municipal and livestock waste Compliance monitoring. Livestock waste Municipal waste State Revolving Loan Fund Makes low interest loans for projects to improve and protect water quality. Technical and Financial Page 111 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Land and Water Conservation Funds Conservation Easements for Riparian and Wetland Areas Provides funds to preserve develop and assure access to outdoor recreation. 620-672-5911 To provide easements to secure and enhance quality areas in the state. 785-296-2780 To provide limited assistance for development of wildlife habitat. North American Waterfowl Conservation Act To provide up to 50 percent cost share for the purchase and/or development of wetlands and wildlife habitat. MARSH program in coordination with Ducks Unlimited May provide up to 100 percent of funding for small wetland projects. Walk In Hunting Program F.I.S.H. Program www.kdwp.state.ks.us 620-672-5911 Wildlife Habitat Improvement Program Chickadee Checkoff 2012 620-342-0658 Technical and Financial 620-672-5911 Projects help with eagles, songbirds, threatened and endangered species, turtles, lizards, butterflies and stream darters. Funding is an optional donation line item on the KS Income Tax form. Landowners receive a payment incentive to allow public hunting on their property. Landowners receive a payment incentive to allow public fishing access to their ponds and streams. Page 112 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Organization Programs and Technical Assistance Kansas Forest Service Conservation Tree Planting Program Provides low cost trees and shrubs for conservation plantings. Riparian and Wetland Protection Program Work closely with other agencies to promote and assist with establishment of riparian forestland and manage existing stands. Kansas Rural Center The Heartland Network Clean Water FarmsRiver Friendly Farms Purpose The Center is committed to economically viable, environmentally sound and socially sustainable rural culture. Sustainable Food Systems Project 2012 Technical or Financial Assistance Phone Website address 785-532-3312 www.kansasforests.org Technical 785-532-3310 785-873-3431 http://www.kansasrural center.org 785-336-3760 http://www.krwa.net Technical and Financial Cost share programs Kansas Rural Water Association Technical assistance for Water Systems with Source Water Protection Planning. Provide education, technical assistance and leadership to public water and wastewater utilities to enhance the public health and to sustain Kansas’ communities Technical Page 113 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Kansas State Research and Extension Water Quality Programs, Waste Management Programs Kansas Center for Agricultural Resources and Environment (KCARE) Provide programs, expertise and educational materials that relate to minimizing the impact of rural and urban activities on water quality. Kansas Environmental Leadership Program (KELP) 2012 785-532-7108 www.kcare.ksu.edu Educational program to develop leadership for improved water quality. 785-532-5813 www.ksre.ksu.edu/kelp Kansas Local Government Water Quality Planning and Management Provide guidance to local governments on water protection programs. 785-532-2643 www.ksre.ksu.edu/olg Rangeland and Natural Area Services (RNAS) Reduce non-point source pollution emanating from Kansas grasslands. 785-532-0416 WaterLINK Service-learning projects available to college and university faculty and community watersheds in Kansas. 785-532-2732 www.kstate.edu/waterlink/ 785-532-3039 http://www.kansaspridepr ogram.ksu.edu/pride/ 785-532-1443 www.ksre.ksu.edu/kswat er/ Technical Kansas Pride: Healthy Ecosystems/Healthy Communities Citizen Science Help citizens appraise their local natural resources and develop short and long term plans and activities to protect, sustain and restore their resources for the future. Education combined with volunteer soil and water testing for enhanced natural resource stewardship. Page 114 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Organization Programs and Technical Assistance 2012 Purpose Technical or Financial Assistance Technical and Financial Kansas Water Office Public Information and Education Provide information and education to the public on Kansas Water Resources No-Till on the Plains Field days, seasonal meetings, tours and technical consulting. Provide information and assistance concerning continuous no-till farming practices. Phone Website address 785-296-3185 www.kwo.org 888-330-5142 www.notill.org Technical Page 115 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Organization NRCS, FSA, State Conservation Commission, and Conservation Districts Programs and Technical Assistance Water Resources Cost Share Purpose 2012 Technical or Financial Assistance Phone Website address Geary Provide cost share assistance to landowners for establishment of water conservation practices. Morris www.nrcs.usda.gov Lyon Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Fund Riparian and Wetland Protection Program Stream Rehabilitation Program Kansas Water Quality Buffer Initiative Watershed district and multipurpose lakes Chase Provides financial assistance for nonpoint pollution control projects which help restore water quality. Marion Osage http://www.kacdnet.org/ Coffey Funds to assist with wetland and riparian development and enhancement. Assist with streams that have been adversely altered by channel modifications. www.scc.ks.gov Greenwood www.fsa.usda.gov McPherson Technical and Financial Wabaunsee Butler Compliments Conservation Reserve Program by offering additional financial incentives for grass filters and riparian forest buffers. Programs are available for watershed district and multipurpose small lakes. Page 116 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN Organization US Army Corps of Engineers US Fish and Wildlife Service Programs and Technical Assistance Planning Assistance to States Purpose Assistance in development of plans for development, utilization and conservation of water and related land resources of drainage Environmental Restoration Funding assistance for aquatic ecosystem restoration. Fish and Wildlife Enhancement Program Supports field operations which include technical assistance on wetland design. Private Lands Program Contracts to restore, enhance, or create wetlands. 2012 Technical or Financial Assistance Phone 816-983-3157 Website address www.usace.army.mil Technical 816-983-3157 785-539-3474 www.fws.gov Technical 785-539-3474 Page 117 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN USDANatural Resources Conservation Service and Farm Service Agency Conservation Compliance Conservation Operations Watershed Planning and Operations Wetland Reserve Program Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program Grassland Reserve Program, EQIP, and Conservation Reserve Program 2012 Clay Co 785632-3550 Primarily for the technical assistance to develop conservation plans on cropland. Marshall Co 785-562-5343 To provide technical assistance on private land for development and application of Resource Management Plans. Primarily focused on high priority areas where agricultural improvements will meet water quality objectives. Cost share and easements to restore wetlands. Nemaha Co 785-336-2164 Pottawatomie Co 785-4573661 Technical and Financial Riley Co 785776-7582 Washington Co 785-3252253 Cost share to establish wildlife habitat which includes wetlands and riparian areas. Improve and protect rangeland resources with cost-sharing practices, rental agreements, and easement purchases. Page 118 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2011 12.0 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Best Management Practices (BMP): Environmental protection practices used to control pollutants, such as sediment or nutrients, from common agricultural or urban land use activities. Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD): Measure of the amount of oxygen removed from aquatic environments by aerobic microorganisms for their metabolic requirements. Biota: Plant and animal life of a particular region. Chlorophyll a: Common pigment found in algae and other aquatic plants that is used in photosynthesis Dissolved Oxygen (DO): The amount of oxygen dissolved in water. E. coli bacteria: Bacteria normally found in gastrointestinal tracts of animals. Some strains cause diarrheal diseases. Eutrophication (E): Excess of mineral and organic nutrients that promote a proliferation of plant life in lakes and ponds. Fecal coliform bacteria (FCB): Bacteria that originate in the intestines of all warm-blooded animals. Municipal Water System: Water system that serves at least 25 people or has more than 15 service connections. NPDES Permit: Required by Federal law for all point source discharges into waters. Nitrates: Final product of ammonia’s biochemical oxidation. It is the primary source of nitrogen for plants and is contained in manure and fertilizers. Nitrogen(N or TN): Element that is essential for plants and animals. TN or total nitrogen is a chemical measurement of all nitrogen forms in a water sample. Nutrients: Nitrogen and phosphorus in water source. Phosphorus (P or TP): Element in water that, in excess, can lead to increased biological activity. Riparian Zone: Margin of vegetation within approximately 100 feet of waterway. Sedimentation: Deposition of slit, clay or sand in slow moving waters. Secchi Disk: Circular plate 10-12” in diameter with alternating black and white quarters used to measure water clarity by measuring the depth at which it can be seen. Stakeholder Leadership Team (SLT): Organization of watershed residents, landowners, farmers, ranchers, agency personnel and all persons with an interest in water quality. Total Suspended Solids (TSS): Measure of the suspended organic and inorganic solids in water. Used as an indicator of sediment or silt. Page 119 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 13.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; www.corpslakes.usace.army.mil/visitors/projects.cfm?Id=M504100 2. Council Grove City Lake Association; cgclakeassoc.org 3. EPA’s Neosho River Basin Total Maximum Daily Load. Water Body: Council Grove Lake Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication www.epa.gov/Region7/water/pdf/council_grove_lake_ks_tmdl_200909.pdf 4. KDHE’s Neosho River Basin Total Maximum Daily Load Council Grove Lake Water Quality Impairment of Eutrophication; www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/ne/CouncilGroveTMDL.pdf 5. Kansas City InfoZine. www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/42104 6. KDHE’s Neosho River Basin Total Maximum Daily Load Water Body: Council Grove Lake Water Quality Impairment: Siltation; www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/ne/CouncilGroveSILT.pdf 7. Council Grove Lake: Water Quality Status, Trends and Management; http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/download/eval_assessment/Council_Grove_Fact_Sheet.pdf 8. Letter from the United States Environmental Protection Agency; http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/download/EPA_approval_9_30_09.pdf 9. KDHE’s Neosho River Basin Total Maximum Daily Load. Water Body: John Redmond Reservoir; Water Quality Impairment: Siltation. http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/ne/RedmondSILT.pdf 10. KDHE’s Neosho River Basin Total Maximum Daily Load. Water Body: Neosho River Headwaters; Water Quality: Fecal Coliform Bacteria. http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/ne/NeoshoRHdwtrs_FCB.pdf 11. KDHE’s Neosho River Basin Total Maximum Daily Load. Water Body: John Redmond Reservoir; Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication. http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/ne/RedmondE.pdf 12. KDHE’s Neosho River Basin Total Maximum Daily Load. Water Body: Neosho River Parkerville; Water Quality Impairment: Copper. http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/ne/NeoshoRvParkerville_Cu.pdf 13. EPA letter responding to the submissions by Kansas to the submissions by Kansas of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLS) for water bodies located in the Walnut River Basin, the Verdigris River Basin, and the Neosho River Basin. http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/download/EPAapprov_NVW.pdf 14. A Watershed Conditions Report for the State of Kansas HUC 11070204 (Upper Neosho) Watershed http://www.kdheks.gov/nps/wc_reports/11070204.pdf 15. Bathymetric and Sediment Survey of Council Grove City Lake, Morris County, Kansas. http://astra.ku.edu/documents/reports/Council_Grove_City_Lake_final_report.pdf Page 120 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Page 121 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Page 122 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Page 123 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Page 124 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Page 125 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Page 126 TWIN LAKES WRAPS 9-ELEMENT PLAN 2012 Page 127
Similar documents
Kirwin WRAPS 9 Element Watershed Plan w
Larry Meili, Phillips County District Conservationist, NRCS James Molzahn, Rooks County District Conservationist, NRCS George Carter, Norton County District Conservationist, NRCS Brian Schulze, Gra...
More information