Site Characterization Report for the Former Ithaca Gun Factory

Transcription

Site Characterization Report
REMEDIATION
SOLUTIONS
for the
Former Ithaca Gun Factory - Offsite
121-125 Lake Street
Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTING
DRILLING
APPLICATIONS
NYSDEC Site No. C755019A
NYSDEC Callout No. 121885
February 3, 2014
Prepared for:
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Environmental Remediation
Region 7
5 McCrea Hill Road
Ballston Spa, NY 12020
p 518.885.5383
f 518.885.5385
aztechtech.com
121-125 Lake Street, Ithaca, New York
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………… 1
1.1 Site Background……….………………………………………………………………………………………………….1
2.0 INITIAL OFFSITE CHARACTERIZATION ………….………………………………..……………………………………2
2.1 Soil Boring Advancement……………………………………. ………………………………………………………2
2.1.1 Geology of Samples……………………………………………………….. …....……………………………3
2.2 Temporary Well Installations ………………………………………………………………………………………3
2.2.1 Groundwater Sampling Results………………………………….. ………………………………………3
2.3 Temporary Vapor Point Installations……………….. ……………….……………………………………….4
2.3.1 Soil Vapor Point Sampling and Analytical Results ……………………...……………………….5
3.0 SUPPLEMENTAL SOIL BORINGS AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION …………………………...6
3.1 Offsite Survey……………………………............... …………………………………………………………………7
3.2 Monitoring Well Gauging and Sampling……………………..……. …………………………………………7
4.0 DATA USABILITY SUMMARY REPORT…………………………………..…………………. ……………………………8
List of Figures
Site Map – Offsite Area
Soil Boring Location Map
Groundwater VOC Distribution Map – August, 2013
Soil Vapor VOC Distribution Map – August, 2013
Monitoring well Location Map
Groundwater Contour Map – November, 2013
Groundwater Distribution Map – November, 2013
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
List of Tables
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results – July 31 to August 1, 2013
Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Results – July 30 to August 1, 2013
T.G. Miller Survey Data
Groundwater Elevation Data – November 4, 2013
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results – November 4 to November 6, 2013
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
Attachment D
Attachment E
List of Attachments
Soil Boring and Well Completion Logs
Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Report – July 31 to August 1, 2013
Soil Vapor Laboratory Analytical Report – July 30 to August 1, 2013
Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Report – November 4 to November 6, 2013
Data Usability Summary Reports
Aztech Technologies, Inc.
Page i
1.0
INTRODUCTION
On June 24, 2013, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)
issued a call out (Callout No. 121885) to Aztech Technologies, Inc. (Aztech) for conducting a
subsurface investigation and site characterization of the Former Ithaca Gun Factory – Offsite.
This site encompasses an area to the west of the Brownfield Cleanup Program (BCP) site
identified as the Former Ithaca Gun Factory (Site No.: C755019) located at 121-125 Lake Street
in the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Figure 1 - Offsite Area). The main focus of
the offsite site characterization was to determine if volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
including chlorinated solvents, associated with the former gun manufacturing operation had
migrated to offsite groundwater and/or soil vapor. The area of the offsite study is
predominantly composed of residential zones with a mix of commercial properties. The offsite
area investigation activities were performed generally in the area from Lake Street to North
Aurora Street and East Falls Street to King Street (Figure 1).
The initial investigation was conducted in July 2013 and included collection of groundwater and
soil vapor samples using direct push technology from the area defined above. Following an
initial review of results from the July 2013 investigation, NYSDEC Callout No. 121885 was
amended on September 21, 2013 to include the installation of permanent groundwater
monitoring wells, a professional survey, and a groundwater monitoring event. The second
phase of the investigation effort which included the well installations and professional survey
was conducted in October 2013. The groundwater monitoring event was conducted in
November 2013 and included groundwater gauging, well development and sample collection.
1.1
SITE BACKGROUND
The Ithaca Gun Company operated from approximately 1885 through 1986 at a property
located to the east and uphill from this off-site neighborhood area. The main operations
included manufacture of firearms and munitions. Supporting manufacturing activities and site
uses included spray pointing, drying gun stocks in ovens, firing ranges, metal plating, machine
shop, and forging. Prior uses by the Ithaca Gun Company appear to have led to contamination
of both on-site and near off-site areas.
From 1995 to 1998, following discovery of lead shot in the Fall Creek gorge area, soil sampling
was conducted in on-site and off-site areas. In 2000, leaking transformers and associated PCBcontaminated soils were removed from the site. From 2000 to 2002, the USEPA conducted a
removal assessment, limited building demolition, and soil removal activities mostly on adjacent
off-site areas; however, some portions of the former Ithaca Gun Factory property were
included. In 2001, an Environmental Site Assessment and a Site Investigation were completed
for and funded by the owner at that time. In 2002, the former Ithaca Gun Factory property
entered the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP), with the site identification of V00511. The
original factory property has since been divided and is identified a two separate sites; the Ithaca
Falls Overlook, Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) site owned by the City of Ithaca, and
the Former Ithaca Gun Factory, BCP site owned by IFR Development, LLC.
Page 1
Groundwater sampling conducted in 2012 through investigations for the ERP site, show
presence of tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene, and vinyl chloride at
monitoring wells hydraulically downgradient from the BCP site at concentrations exceeding
respective groundwater standards.
In July 2013 the NYSDEC contracted Aztech to conduct a subsurface investigation and site
characterization of an offsite area located topographically downgradient from the site. Details
of all offsite work conducted by Aztech is documented in the following sections.
2.0
INITIAL OFFSITE CHARACTERIZATION
The initial scope of work for the site characterization was defined by the NYSDEC in the callout
document to include: the advancement of ten (10) offsite soil borings into groundwater;
collection of ten (10) groundwater samples; and, the collection of 12 soil vapor samples. The
scope was also modified during the course of conducting the site characterization to the include
installation of eight (8) permanent groundwater monitoring wells. Site characterization field
activities were conducted between July, 2012 and November, 2013. Details are provided in the
following sections.
2.1 SOIL BORING ADVANCEMENT
Between July 29 and August 1, 2013 Aztech, on behalf of NYSDEC advanced ten (10) soil borings
(SB-1 through SB-10) offsite from the Former Ithaca Gun Factory property (Figure 2). All soil
borings were installed within the green spaces (i.e., tree lawns) between the sidewalk and
street curb and were located within City of Ithaca public property. Boring locations were
selected by NYSDEC based on spatial distribution and proximity to on-site or off-site features,
and the anticipated direction of groundwater flow and contaminant migration. The soil boring
locations are presented on Figure 2.
A track mounted geoprobe® drill rig, equipped with direct push technology was utilized during
the soil boring advancement, temporary vapor point and monitoring well installation and soil
sampling activities. Each soil boring was advanced from the surface to approximately five (5) to
nine (9) feet into the observed groundwater table. The terminal depths of each boring varied
between 20 and 40 feet below grounds surface (bgs). During these activities, depth discrete
soil samples were collected utilizing 5-foot macro-core acetate sleeves, two-inches in diameter.
An Aztech geologist characterized the soil samples in the field for color, grain size, moisture
content, and presence of petroleum or solvent impacts.
After the soil samples were characterized they were placed in re-sealable, airtight plastic bags
and allowed to volatilize. The headspaces of samples were then screened for VOCs using a
Minirae 2000 photoionization detector (PID) equipped with a 10.6 eV bulb and calibrated to a
gasoline standard using 100 parts per million (ppm) isobutylene gas. No soil samples collected
during the boring advancements exhibited elevated PID readings (i.e. >5.0 ppm). Due to the
Page 2
lack of positive PID response, visual or olfactory evidence of impact in all soil samples
recovered, soil samples were not submitted for laboratory analysis during the study. Details for
each soil boring are presented in the soil boring and well completion logs (Attachment A).
2.1.1 GEOLOGY OF SOIL SAMPLES
Soil encountered during the boring program typically consisted of brown to gray fine to
medium sand and fine gravel overlying gray highly fractured and weathered siltstone bedrock.
Fragments of weathered siltstone intermixed in the overburden were commonly encountered
and a thin layer of ash material (less than one (1)-inch) was observed just beneath the ground
surface throughout a large portion of the study area. Some silt and clay was observed in
layered bands within the sand and gravel overburden material. A layer of alluvial deposits
consisting of rounded fine gravel were typically encountered just above the highly weathered
bedrock material. Within this layer groundwater was commonly observed at depths ranging
from 13.5 to 32 feet bgs. Boring refusal was not encountered during the boring program.
2.2
TEMPORARY WELL INSTALLATIONS
Following advancement of each soil boring (SB-1 through SB-10), a temporary monitoring well
was inserted into the borehole to allow collection of groundwater samples. Each temporary
monitoring well was constructed of an appropriate length of 1-inch inner diameter (ID)
schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic 10-slot well screen and solid riser. The annular
space between the monitoring well screen and borehole wall was filled with number 0 sand.
Following the collection of groundwater samples, each temporary well was removed and the
borehole was backfilled with number 0 sand and subsequently sealed with bentonite.
Construction specifications for each temporary monitoring well are included in the soil boring
and well completion logs (Attachment A).
2.2 .1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND RESULTS
Between July 31 and August 1, 2013 a groundwater sample was collected from each of the
temporary monitoring wells. To ensure the collection of representative samples, each
temporary monitoring well was developed (purged of approximately ten well volumes of
groundwater) using a disposable dedicated bailer. Following development, the monitoring
wells were allowed to recharge prior to sample collection. Groundwater samples were then
retrieved using a dedicated, disposable bailer and decanted into pre-preserved, laboratorysupplied sampling vials containing dilute hydrochloric acid. The groundwater samples were
placed on ice and shipped under a chain of custody to Test America in Amherst, NY. The
samples were analyzed for the NYSDEC full list of VOCs, including MtBE, using USEPA Method
8260B category B deliverables.
The groundwater laboratory analytical results for this sampling event are summarized in Table
1. A VOC distribution map of groundwater is presented as Figure 3. A copy of the groundwater
laboratory analytical report is included in Attachment B.
Page 3
The analytical results for the July 31 and August 1, 2013 groundwater sampling event are as
follows:
•
In general the analyte compounds detected in groundwater across the study area are
chlorinated solvent derived (i.e. trichloroethene, chloroform). No petroleum range
compounds including Methyl tertiary-Butyl Ether (MtBE) were detected in any of the
groundwater samples submitted for laboratory analysis. A summary of detected
compounds is presented below;
•
Trichloroethene (TCE) was detected in seven (7) of the ten (10) groundwater samples
collected (SB-1, SB-4, SB-5, SB-7, SB-8, SB-9, and SB-10). However, no detections were
reported above the NYSDEC groundwater standard of 5.0 micrograms per liter (µg/l) as
per NYSDEC Technical and Operational Guidance Series (TOGS) Memorandum 1.1.1,
June 1998;
•
Chloroform was detected in nine (9) groundwater samples collected (SB-1, SB-2, SB-4,
SB-5, SB-6, SB-7, SB-8, SB-9, and SB-10). However, no detections were reported above
the NYSDEC groundwater standard of 7.0 µg/l as per TOGS Memorandum 1.1.1, June
1998;
•
Carbon Disulfide was detected in eight (8) groundwater samples collected (SB-1, SB-2,
SB-3, SB-4, SB-5, SB-6, SB-7, and SB-10). No detections were reported above the
NYSDEC groundwater standard of 50 µg/l as per TOGS Memorandum 1.1.1, June 1998;
•
2-Butanone was detected in six (6) groundwater samples collected (SB-1, SB-2, SB-3, SB4, SB-5, SB6). However, no detections were detected above the NYSDEC groundwater
standard of 50 µg/l as per TOGS Memorandum 1.1.1, June 1998;
•
Acetone was detected below the NYSDEC groundwater standard of 50 µg/l in all
groundwater samples collected. The consistent acetone detection may be attributed as
laboratory artifact which may be a product of laboratory hygiene.
2.3
TEMPORARY VAPOR POINT INSTALLATIONS
A temporary soil vapor point was installed within three (3) feet of each soil boring advanced. A
total of 12 temporary soil vapor points (VP-1 through VP-12) were installed between July 29
and August 1, 2013. Vapor points VP-1 through VP-10 corresponded directly to soil borings SB1 through SB-10. Additional temporary soil vapor points VP-11 and VP-12 were installed within
three (3) feet of existing monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-6, respectively. The location of each
vapor point is presented on Figure 2.
Each temporary soil vapor sampling point was installed within a 2.0-inch diameter borehole
advanced via direct push tooling. Soil vapor sampling points were constructed of a 6.0-inch
length of ¼-inch diameter stainless steel wire mesh screen attached to ¼-inch diameter teflonlined silicone tubing. The screened portion was vertically centered within approximately 12inches of glass beads. The sampling point was placed to sample the soil vapor from the
Page 4
subsurface within approximately 3.0-feet of the water table (as observed during the drilling
program). The glass beads were sealed with hydrated bentonite to within 2.5-feet of grade.
The annular space above the bentonite seal was backfilled with compacted native soil and
number 0 sand. Upon completion of soil vapor sample collection each vapor point location was
covered with native soil and an 8-inch nail was buried with the teflon tubing in-order to assist in
finding the vapor point in the future with a metal detector. The construction specifications for
the temporary soil vapor points are included in the soil boring and well completion logs
(Attachment A).
2.3.1 SOIL VAPOR POINT SAMPLING AND RESULTS
Between July 30 and August 1, 2013 a total of twelve soil vapor samples were collected. To
ensure ambient air from the surface was not drawn into the soil vapor probe the bentonite seal
was tested at each vapor point location prior to sample collection. Testing of the seal was
conducted by extending an appropriate length of teflon tubing from the vapor point through a
tracer gas enclosure. The tubing was sealed to the tracer gas enclosure and the atmosphere
within the enclosure was enriched with helium gas. Once the tracer gas enclosure was enriched
with helium, the vapor point was purged of approximately three volumes at a flow rate of less
than 0.2 liters per minute (lpm) using a purge pump. After purging was completed, a tedlar bag
was filled with sub-slab vapor and the contents field screened with a PID for total VOC
concentration and, percent helium in order to test the integrity of the seal between the soil
vapor sampling point and the surface. Once the seal was confirmed via helium testing,
sampling of the sub-slab vapor point commenced.
Soil vapor samples were collected using laboratory-supplied summa canisters and flow
regulators at each location. Each flow regulator was laboratory-calibrated to obtain the soil
vapor sample over a 1.0-hour duration. After collection, soil vapor samples were submitted via
overnight courier to the Test Americas’ Knoxville, Tennessee laboratory where they were
analyzed via analytical method TO-15 for the full list of VOCs.
The soil vapor laboratory analytical results for this sampling event are summarized in Table 2. A
VOC distribution map of soil vapor is presented as Figure 4. A copy of the soil vapor laboratory
analytical report is included as Attachment C.
New York State currently does not have any standards, criteria or guidance values for
concentrations of compounds in soil vapor per the New York State Department of Health
(NYSDOH) Guidance for Evaluating Soil Vapor Intrusion in the State of New York – October,
2006. The following discussion presents a comparison of the soil vapor data collected between
July 30 and August 1, 2013 using United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
guidance values for target indoor air and shallow soil gas concentrations per Table 2A – OSWER
Draft Guidance for Evaluating Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils
(OSWER) – November, 2002;
•
In general when reviewing the soil vapor laboratory analytical data, detected analytes
appear to be derived of both chlorinated solvent and petroleum range compounds.
•
The analyte carbon tetrachloride was detected above the OSWER guidance value of 16
microgram per cubic meter (µg/m3) in seven (7) soil vapor samples collected
Page 5
•
Elevated concentrations of chloroform were detect in soil vapor sample VP-1, VP-4, VP5, VP-7, VP-8, VP-9, VP-10, VP-11 and VP-12;
•
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) was detected in concentrations above 100 µg/m3 in four (4)
soil vapor samples collected (VP-1, VP-8, VP-11, and VP-12).
•
Trichloroethene (TCE) was above the concentration of 5 µg/m3 in eight (8) of the soil
vapor samples collected (VP-1, VP-4, VP-5, VP-7, VP-8, VP-9, VP-10, and VP-11).
•
Petroleum range compounds 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene were
detected above OSWER guidance values in soil vapor samples VP-1, VP-10, VP-11, and
VP-12.
3.0
SUPPLEMENTAL SOIL BORINGS AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATIONS
The supplementary investigation was expanded slightly to the south and west. During this
phase of the investigation between October 14 and October 16, 2013, Aztech advanced three
(3) additional soil borings (SB-11 to SB-13) which were completed as permanent monitoring
wells AZMW-1, AZMW-2, and AZMW-3, respectively. The soil borings and were installed by the
same means and methods as described in the previous sections. Five (5) monitoring wells
(AZMW-4 to AZMW-8) were installed within the vicinity of previously drilled boring locations
during this time. Soil sampling was not conducted during the installation of monitoring wells
AZMW-4 to AZMW-8. The location of all soil borings and monitoring wells are presented on
Figure 5.
Soil borings SB-11 to SB-13 were advanced approximately five (5) feet into the observed water
table. During the boring advancements soil samples were retrieved using macro-core sampling
techniques and field screened with a PID as described in the previous sections. No elevated PID
readings were observed in any of the field screened soils and subsequently no soil samples
were submitted for laboratory analysis. The geology of soil borings SB-11 to SB-13 was
consistent with the geology described in soil borings SB-1 to SB-10 and no major changes were
observed. Details for each soil boring are presented in the soil boring and well completion logs
(Attachment A).
Soil boring SB-11 was completed as monitoring well AZMW-1 and was constructed of an
appropriate length of 1-inch ID schedule 40 PVC plastic 10-slot well screen and solid riser. The
well screen was placed so that the upper portion of the screen extended approximately 3.0-feet
above the water table (as observed in the borehole during drilling). The annular space around
the well screen was backfilled with number 0 filter pack sand to extend above the screened
interval. The sand filter pack was subsequently sealed with bentonite chips that were hydrated
before completing the monitoring well installation. AZMW-1 was installed differently than all
other wells installed (described below) due to refusal of the 3-inch diameter drill casing
required to install the originally scoped 1.5-inch pre-packed wells.
Page 6
Monitoring wells AZMW-2 to AZMW-8 were installed by advancing 3-inch diameter drilling
casing equipped with a stainless steel disposable point to an appropriate depth. Each well was
constructed of an appropriate length of 1.5-inch ID schedule 40 PVC plastic 10-slot pre-packed
well screen and solid riser. The pre-packed well screen was placed fully submerged within the
water table. The pre-packed well screen was backfilled with additional number 0 filter pack
sand approximately two (2) feet above the screened interval. The sand filter pack was
subsequently sealed with bentonite chips that were hydrated before completing the monitoring
well installation. The drill casing was extracted and each monitoring well was finished flush to
grade with a steel, bolt-down road box set in a concrete pad. Construction specifications for
each temporary monitoring well are included in the soil boring completion logs (Attachment A).
3.1
OFFSITE SURVEY
On October 24, 2013 the location, ground elevation, and top of casing (TOC) elevation of
monitoring wells AZMW-1 to AZMW-8 were surveyed by a professional surveyor licensed in the
state of New York. The surveying activities were conducted by T.G Miller, P.C (Miller) of Ithaca,
New York. Miller surveyed the elevations in mean sea level (MSL) and the locations using the
North American Datum (NAD) of 1983. The location coordinates; ground and TOC elevation
data is presented on Table 3.
3.2
MONITORING WELL GAUGING AND SAMPLING
Between November 4 and November 6, 2013 Aztech completed a groundwater gauging and
sampling event at the eight (8) newly installed monitoring wells (AZMW-1 to AZMW-8) and two
(2) existing monitoring wells MW-6 and MW-7.
Depth to groundwater measurements were collected using an electronic water level meter
graduated in 0.01 feet intervals. All measurements were taken from the top of groundwater
monitoring well casings. The water level meter was decontaminated between locations using
acceptable industry practices and in accordance with the manufacturer.
The groundwater elevation data collected are presented on Table 4. The groundwater flow
varied from flowing toward the northwest, nearest Fall Creek (MW-6 and AZMW-7) to the westsouthwest over the residential area. This is consistent with the transition in geology from the
exposed siltstone bedrock located on the actual site of the Former Ithaca Gun Factory to the
alluvial deposits seen in the overburden material located offsite. However, the overall
groundwater flow direction in the overburden beneath the study area was generally to the
west-southwest based on the November 4, 2013 gauging data (Figure 6). The hydraulic
gradient varied across the subject area particularly where the greatest change in topography
occurs (between the natural area and Lake Street). In this general area the hydraulic gradient
was 0.04 ft/ft on November 4, 2013. Between Lake street and North Aurora Street the
hydraulic gradient was 0.001 ft/ft and is considerably level.
Following the groundwater gauging event, each newly installed well (AZMW-1 to AZMW-8) was
developed by removing approximately ten well volumes of water using a peristaltic pump and
dedicated polyethylene tubing. Groundwater samples from ten (10) wells (AZMW-1 to AZMW8, MW-6 and MW-7) were retrieved using low flow sampling techniques. Groundwater samples
were decanted into laboratory supplied glassware preserved with dilute hydrochloric acid,
Page 7
placed on ice in a cooler, and transported under proper chain of custody to Test America in
Amherst, NY. The samples were analyzed for the NYSDEC full list of VOCs, including MtBE, using
USEPA Method 8260B category B deliverables.
The groundwater laboratory analytical results for this sampling event are summarized in Table
5. A VOC distribution map in groundwater is presented as Figure 7. A copy of the groundwater
laboratory analytical report is included as Attachment D.
The analytical results for the November 4 to November 6, 2013 groundwater sampling event
are summarized below:
•
TCE was detected in five (5) of the ten (10) groundwater samples collected (AZMW-3,
AZMW-4, AZMW-6, AZMW-7 and MW-7). However, no detections were reported above
the NYSDEC groundwater standard of 5.0 µg/l as per TOGS Memorandum 1.1.1, June
1998;
•
Chloroform also detected in seven (7) groundwater samples collected (AZMW-1, AZMW3, AZMW-4, AZMW-5, AZMW-6, AZMW-8, and MW-7). However, no detections were
reported above the NYSDEC groundwater standard of 7.0 µg/l as per TOGS
Memorandum 1.1.1, June 1998;
•
Carbon Disulfide as detected in AZMW-6 at a concentration of 0.3 µg/l on November 4,
2913. This was below the NYSDEC groundwater standard of 50 µg/l as per TOGS
Memorandum 1.1.1, June 1998;
4.0
DATA USABILITY SUMMARY REPORT
A third party data usability summary report (DUSR) was completed after each groundwater and
soil vapor sampling event conducted during the investigation between July 29 and November 6,
2013. Each DUSR was conducted by EnviroAnalytics of Utica, New York. The purpose of the
DUSR is to ensure validation in the quality of data received from the groundwater sampling
event. The DUSR executive summary indicates that the volatile organic analyses were
determined to be usable for qualitative and quantitative purposes with minor qualification.
Sample results for several compounds were qualified based on deviations from blank analysis,
continuing calibration, field duplicate and matrix spike criteria. The DUSR for each sampling
event is included in Attachment E.
Page 8
FIGURES
TABLES
TABLE 1
LABORATORY GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS - 7/31/2013 to 8/1/2013
Volatile Organic Compounds
Former Ithaca Gun Factory - (Offsite)
Ithaca, New York
DEC Site No. C755019A
COMPOUNDS LIST
TOGS
Guidance/Standard
Sample ID
Date Sampled
8260 Full LIST
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Hexanone
2-Butanone (MEK)
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Dibromochloromethane
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Cyclohexane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
Methyl acetate
MtBE
Methylcyclohexane
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes, Total
GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
SB-1
31-Jul-13
SB-2
31-Jul-13
SB-3
31-Jul-13
SB-4
31-Jul-13
ppb - (µg/L)
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
4.7
5
5
5
4.7
50
50
50
50
1.0
50
50
5
50
5
5
50
5
7
50
5
5
50
5
5
5
50
10
50
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.4 J
ND
12 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.4 JB
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.1 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.8 J
ND
10 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.7 J
ND
14 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.98 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.55 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.1 J
ND
17 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.88 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.7 J
ND
ND
ND
-
ND
19
ND
15
ND
20
ND
24
BTEX
*TOTAL VOCs
SB-5
31-Jul-13
SB-6
31-Jul-13
SB-7
1-Aug-13
SB-8
1-Aug-13
SB-9
1-Aug-13
SB-10
1-Aug-13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.7 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.2 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.6 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.8 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.4 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.3
ND
1.1 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.1 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.9 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.1 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.3
ND
14
ND
12
ND
14
VOC Analytical Results (ppb)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.1 J
ND
20 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.75 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.4 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.5 J
ND
13 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.65 JB
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.78 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS (ppb)
ND
ND
29
17
Notes:
MtBE: Methyl tertiary-Butyl Ether
BOLD values indicate exceedance of applicable NYSDEC guidance values
ND: Not Detected Above Applicable Laboratory Detection Limits
TOGS: Technical and Operational Guidance Series
TOGS Standards and Guidance are determined by the NYSDEC Ambient Water Quality Standards and Guidance Values and Groundwater Effluent Limitiations, Technical and Operational Guidance Series, June 1998
All values are reported in parts per billion (ppb or µg/L)
J - Laboratory Qualifier (Result is less than the reporting limit, but greater than the method detection limit and the concentration is an approximate value)
B - Laboratory Qualifier (Compound was found in the blank and sample)
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 2
LABORATORY SOIL VAPOR ANALYTICAL RESULTS - 7/30/2013 to 8/1/2013
Ithaca, New York
COMPOUNDS LIST
USEPA/OSWER Vapor
Intrusion Guidance
NYSDOH Air Guidance
Sample ID
Date Sampled
8260 Full LIST
Benzene
Benzyl Chloride
Bromoform
Bromomethane
2-Butanone (MEK)
Tert-butyl alchohol
Chlorobenzne
Chloromethane
Chloroform
Cyclohexane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetraflouroethane
1,4-Dioxane
Ethanol
Ethylbenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
n-Hexane
Methylene chloride
Methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE)
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
Vinyl Chloride
m,p-Xylene
o-Xylene
*TOTAL VOCs
SOIL VAPOR SAMPLES
VP-1
30-Jul-13
VP-2
31-Jul-13
VP-3
31-Jul-13
VP-4
31-Jul-13
VP-5
31-Jul-13
(ug/m3)
31
5
14
220
*
1,000
*
16
60
10
90
11
*
20
200
110
800
200
500
9
35
70
200
4
*
*
*
*
*
220
11
200
60+
80
3,000
1,000
4.2
100+
400
200
2,200
150
5+
700
30,000
6
6
*
28
7,000
7,000
5.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
83
ND
ND
ND
520
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
21
ND
13
ND
ND
ND
14
ND
420
55
ND
150
ND
910
ND
ND
42
10
ND
ND
72
30
3.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.4
ND
3.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
16
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.2
0.95
ND
27
ND
13
ND
ND
ND
1.9
7.4
ND
8.1
1.4
ND
ND
1.4
1.8
1.0
ND
ND
4.7
1.7
2.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.1
ND
1.9
ND
ND
ND
1.7
9.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.36
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.0
1.0
7.7
2.3
4.7
ND
ND
ND
0.57
6.2
ND
4.6
ND
1.7
0.94
0.80
2.6
1.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
120
ND
ND
ND
99
6.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
45
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
ND
ND
11
ND
3.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.2
ND
170
ND
57
6.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.4
ND
6.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.2
ND
37
ND
ND
ND
12
7.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
27
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
3.7
ND
ND
0.75
37
ND
2.2
ND
6.7
11
ND
56
ND
5.2
19
2.1
6.8
2.2
ND
ND
11
4.3
-
2,355
106
60
538
275
VP-6
31-Jul-13
VP-7
1-Aug-13
VP-8
1-Aug-13
VP-9
1-Aug-13
VP-10
1-Aug-13
VP-11
30-Jul-13
VP-12
30-Jul-13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
47
ND
ND
ND
500
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
150
ND
ND
110
ND
1,400
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.9
ND
ND
ND
320
12
ND
ND
ND
ND
43
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
25
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.3
ND
42
ND
320
19
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.2
ND
2.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.7
ND
2.5
ND
ND
1.3
12
4.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.4
0.94
ND
6.4
ND
2.9
ND
ND
ND
16
4.8
ND
8.2
ND
120
1.3
ND
8.2
ND
ND
ND
3.4
1.2
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.5
ND
75
ND
ND
ND
430
22
ND
ND
ND
ND
260
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
56
26
ND
29
ND
9.7
ND
15
ND
500
72
ND
210
ND
130
28
ND
32
11
ND
ND
84
34
7.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.8
ND
ND
ND
33
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
28
25
ND
14
ND
ND
ND
17
ND
490
64
ND
17
ND
3.6
ND
ND
55
14
ND
ND
86
35
2,207
807
210
2,043
901
VOC Analytical Results (ug/m3)
2.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
13
ND
38
ND
ND
ND
0.84
16
ND
ND
ND
ND
22
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.0
2.2
ND
36
1.1
6.2
ND
0.55
ND
1.3
14
ND
47
ND
ND
40
1.5
3.5
1.6
1.0
ND
10
3.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
96
ND
ND
ND
310
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
34
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
21
ND
ND
200
ND
730
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS (ug/m3)
265
1,421
Notes:
USEPA Vapor Intrusion Guidance = Target Indoor Air and Target Shallow Soil Gas concentrations per Table 2A - OSWER Draft Guidance for Evaluating Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) – November, 2002.
+ indicates NYSDOH Air Guideline Value; Guidance for Evaluating Soil Vapor Intrusion in the State of New York (October, 2006).
* Indicates no Vapor Intrusion Guidance Value.
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 3
T.G MILLER SURVEY DATA - October 24, 2013
Ithaca, New York
MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
TOC ELEV.
GROUND
ELEV.
NORTHING
EASTING
AZMW-1
408.54'
408.29'
892983.22
844028.41
AZMW-2
394.60'
394.38'
892872.65
843690.65
AZMW-3
395.51'
395.28'
893425.07
843498.09
AZMW-4
402.67'
402.32'
893444.95
843914.37
AZMW-5
406.26'
406.06'
893179.09
843936.90
AZMW-6
396.88'
396.63'
893298.71
843666.73
AZMW-7
404.42'
403.95'
893711.85
844018.80
AZMW-8
398.32'
398.08'
893700.33
843759.36
Notes:
TOC Elev = Top of Well Casing
All elevation data is presented in Mean Sea Level (MSL)
TOC data from T. G. Miller survey conducted 10/24/2013
TABLE 4
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
Ithaca, New York
MONITORING WELL
DESIGNATION
TOP OF CASING
AZMW-1
AZMW-2
AZMW-3
AZMW-4
AZMW-5
AZMW-6
AZMW-7
AZMW-8
MW-6
MW-7
408.29
394.38
395.28
402.32
406.06
396.63
403.95
398.08
423.69
432.38
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
Date
11/4/2013
DTW
25.15
11.81
12.18
19.21
23.30
13.91
20.58
15.01
30.69
37.91
GW Elev
383.14
382.57
383.10
383.11
382.76
382.72
383.37
383.07
393.00
394.47
Notes:
GW Elev = Groundwater Elevation (ft.)
DTW = Depth to water (ft.)
TOC data from T. G. Miller survey conducted 10/24/2013
TABLE 5
LABORATORY GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS - 11/4/2013 TO 11/6/2013
Ithaca, New York
COMPOUNDS LIST
TOGS
Guidance/Standard
Sample ID
Date Sampled
8260 Full LIST
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Hexanone
2-Butanone (MEK)
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Cyclohexane
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
Methyl acetate
MtBE
Methylcyclohexane
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes, Total
BTEX
TOTAL VOCs
GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
AZMW-1
6-Nov-13
AZMW-2
5-Nov-13
AZMW-3
5-Nov-13
AZMW-4
5-Nov-13
ppb - (µg/L)
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
4.7
5
5
5
4.7
50
50
50
50
1.0
50
50
5
50
5
5
50
5
7
50
5
5
50
5
5
5
50
10
50
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.98 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.8
ND
ND
ND
-
ND
4.8
ND
ND
ND
6.2
ND
2.8
AZMW-5
5-Nov-13
AZMW-6
5-Nov-13
AZMW-7
5-Nov-13
AZMW-8
5-Nov-13
MW-6
4-Nov-13
MW-7
4-Nov-13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.82 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.30 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.82
ND
4.3
ND
0.30
ND
4.2
VOC Analytical Results (ppb)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.1
ND
ND
ND
TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS (ppb)
ND
ND
4.1
6.9
Notes:
MtBE: Methyl tertiary-Butyl Ether
BOLD values indicate exceedance of applicable NYSDEC guidance values
TOGS: Technical and Operational Guidance Series
TOGS Standards and Guidance are determined by the NYSDEC Ambient Water Quality Standards and Guidance Values and Groundwater Effluent Limitiations, Technical and Operational Guidance Series, June 1998
All values are reported in parts per billion (ppb or µg/L)
J - Laboratory Qualifier (Result is less than the reporting limit, but greater than the method detection limit and the concentration is an approximate value)
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT A
SOIL BORING AND WELL COMPLETION LOGS
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Ballston Spa, New York 12020
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Boring Log: SB-1/VP-1
Client: NYSDEC
Street Address: East Falls Street
Drilling Method: Geoprobe(Direct Push)
City / State: Ithaca, New York
Drilled Borehole Dia: 2.25"
Drilling Co.: Aztech Technologies, Inc.
Total Drilled Depth: 30'
1
3
3
4
4
(5' - 6') Similar Soil
(6' - 7.5') Brown fine to medium SAND and SILT, loose, moist to wet, no
odor.
7
5
6
7
8
8
9
9
10 MC-3 (10' - 15') 0.0 40/60"
(10' - 12') Similar soil
11
10
11
12
(12' - 12.5') Weathered shale fragments, moist, no odor.
13
12
13
(12.5 - 14') Gray to dark gray fine SAND and SILT, fine to medium
angular Gravel, moist, no odor.
14
15 MC-3 (15' - 20') 0.0 50/60"
(15' - 16.5') Similar Soil.
16
14
15
16
(16.5' - 19') Gray highly fractured SILTSTONE and weathered rock, little
fine to medium brown Sand and Silt, moist, no odor.
17
17
18
18
19
19
20 MC-4 (20' - 25') 0.0 35/60"
(20' - 23') Similar Soil. Saturated @ 21.5' fbg.
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25 MC-5 (25' - 30') 0.0 40/60"
(25' - 28.3') Highly Fractured rock (siltstone), Saturated.
26
25
26
Boring Terminated @ 30' fbg.
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
Notes:
NA - Not Available
fbg - feet below grade
Native Fill
0.0 37/60"
PID - Photoionization Detector
ppm - parts per million
Geologist: Thomas Giamichael
Bentonite
MC-2 (5' - 10')
6
Stainless Steel Vapor Point
Glass Beads
5
1/4" teflon lined poly tubing
2
1" Dia. Sch 40 PVC Riser
(0.5' - 1.5') Brownish gray fine to medium SAND and fine GRAVEL,
angular, little Silt and weathered rock(shale) fragments, moist, no odor.
2
Vapor Point Diagram
(0' - 0.5') Grass and Topsoil, trace ash.
Native Fill
0.0 28/60"
1
Well
Diagram
Notes:
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
Depth to water: 20.5'
1: Dia. 0.010"-slot Sch 40 PVC Screen
MC-1 (0' - 5')
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Finish date and time: 7/29/2013
Sample ID
Start date and time: 7/29/2013
Driller: Ray Hammond
Depth (Feet)
Address: 5 McCrea Hill Road, Ballston Spa, New York Ground Elevation: NA
Lithology
Project: Former Ithaca Ithaca Gun - Offsite
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Client: NYSDEC
MC-1 (0' - 5')
0.0 48/60"
Vapor Point Diagram
(0' - 0.5') Grass and Topsoil.
0.0 40/60"
6
(5' - 6') Gray fine SAND and SILT, little fine to medium rounded to subrounded Gravel, trace ash, moist to wet, no odor.
(6' - 8.3') Gray highly horizontal fractured SILTSTONE, some fine Sand
and SIlt, moist, no odor.
7
5
6
7
8
8
9
9
10 MC-3 (10' - 15') 0.0 49/60"
(10' - 12.5') Similar Soil, moist, no odor.
11
10
11
12
12
(12.5 - 14') Gray horizontally fractured SILTSTONE, thinly bedded
CLAY, some fine Sand, moist to wet, no odor.
13
14
13
14
15 MC-3 (15' - 20') 0.0 25/60"
16
(15' - 17') Gray weathered SILTSTONE, saturated, no odor.
Water Table Observed @ 15' fbg.
15
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20 MC-4 (20' - 25') 0.0 30/60"
(20' - 22.5') Similar Soil.
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
26
Notes:
NA - Not Available
25
26
MC-2 (5' - 10')
4
Native Fill
4
3
Bentonite
(2' - 4') Gray WEATHERED ROCK (SHALE) with SAND and SILT,
moist, no odor.
Glass Beads
3
2
2
1
(0.5' - 2') Dark brown to black fine SAND and SILT, some sub-angular
fine Gravel, little Brick and Ash fragments, trace clay, moist.
Native Fill
1
5
Well
Diagram
Notes:
Description
Depth (feet)
Depth to water: 15 fbg
Recovery
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Lithology
Project: Former Ithaca Gun Factory - Offsite
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Client: NYSDEC
4
5
0.0 40/60"
6
(5' - 5.2') Gray to brown fine SAND and fine to medium GRAVEL, subangular, little Silt, trace clay, moist, no odor.
(5.2' - 8.5') Dark brown SILT and fine SAND, little weathered Shale
fragments, moist to wet, no odor.
7
5
6
7
8
8
9
9
10 MC-3 (10' - 15') 0.0 39/60"
(10' - 11.8') Similar soil, moist, no odor.
11
10
11
12
(11.8' - 13.5') Dark gray fine SAND and SILT, some highly horixzontally
fractured weathered Siltstone, wet, no odor
13
12
13
Water Table Observed @ 13.5' fbg.
14
14
15 MC-3 (15' - 20') 0.0 52/60"
(15 - 15.6') Similar soil, saturated, no odor.
(15.6' - 19.6') Dark gray SILT and CLAY, some fine angular Gravel and
weathered Siltstone, little fine sand, soft, saturated, no odor.
16
15
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
Broing Terminated @ 20' fbg.
20
20
21
21
22
22
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Vapor Point Diagram
3
4
MC-2 (5' - 10')
3
2
Native Fill
(1' - 2.2') Similar soil with a 3" layer of pulverized brick fragments, little
fine Gravel, moist, no odor.
Bentonite
2
1
Glass Beads
(0.5' - 1') Dark gray to black fine SAND and SILT, some fine subrounded to sub-angular Gravel, trace clay and ash, moist. no odor.
1
(0' - 0.5') Grass and Topsoil.
Native Fill
0.0 26/60"
Well
Diagram
Notes:
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
Depth to water: 13.5 fbg
MC-1 (0' - 5')
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Lithology
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Client: NYSDEC
0.0 36/60"
7
(5' - 8') Dark brown to gray fine to coarse SAND and fine to medium
sub-rounded to angular GRAVEL, little Silt, trace brick debris, moist, no
odor.
4
5
6
7
8
8
9
9
10 MC-3 (10' - 15') 0.0 38/60"
11
12
(10' - 12') Dark brown to gray fine to coarse SAND and fine to medium
sub-rounded to angular GRAVEL, little Silt, moist, no odor.
(12' - 13.5') Brown to gray SILT and CLAY, soft, little fine to medium
Gravel, moist, no odor.
13
10
11
12
13
14
15 MC-3 (15' - 20') 0.0 36/60"
16
(15 - 15.3') Similar soil.
(15.3' - 18') Gray highly horizontally fractured SILTSTONE, some fine to
medium Sand, little Silt, moist, no odor.
17
15
16
17
18
18
19
19
20 MC-4 (20' - 25') 0.0 40/60"
21
(20' - 23.5') Gray highly horizontally fractured SILTSTONE, some fine to
medium Sand, little silt, moist to wet, no odor.
22
Water table Observed @ 23.5' fbg.
20
21
22
23
23
24
24
25 MC-5 (25' - 30') 0.0 37/60"
26
(20' - 28') Gray highly horizontally fractured SILTSTONE and fine to
medium rounded GRAVEL, little fine Sand, saturated, no odor.
25
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
31
30
31
Bentonite
14
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Vapor Point Diagram
3
Glass Beads
MC-2 (5' - 10')
6
(1' - 1.5') Black to brown fine to medium SAND and BRICK fragments,
some sub-angular Gravel, moist, no odor.
4
2
Native Fill
3
1
(0.3' - 1') Black fine to medium SAND, some Silt and Ash, little fine
gravel, moist, no odor.
2
5
(0' - 0.3') Concrete and crushed stone
Native Fill
0.0 18/60"
1
Well
Diagram
Notes:
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
MC-1 (0' - 5')
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Lithology
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Client: NYSDEC
MC-1 (0' - 5')
0.0 24/60"
1
(0' - 0.3') TOPSOIL and GRAVEL
(0.3' - 2') Dark brown to gray SILT and fine SAND, some fine to mediu,
Gravel, little Ash and Brick debris, trace clay, moist, no odor.
2
Vapor Point Diagram
2
5
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10 MC-3 (10' - 15') 0.0 42/60"
11
(10' -13.8') Gray brown fine to coarse SAND, some sub-angular Gravel
and horizontal fractured Siltstone fragments, little Silt, moist, no odor. .
10
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15 MC-3 (15' - 20') 0.0 48/60"
16
17
(15' - 17') Brown fine to medium SAND, some fine to medium subangular Siltstone fragments, trace silt, moist, no odor.
(17' - 19') Brown SILT and CLAY, soft, litte fine Sand and rounded
Gravel, moist to wet, no odor.
18
16
17
18
19
20 MC-4 (20' - 25') 0.0 50/60"
(20 - 23.5') Similar soil, very moist, no odor.
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
25 MC-5 (25' - 30') 0.0 40/60"
26
27
(23.5' - 24.2') Brown SILT and CLAY, varved, soft, some fine angular
Gravel, moist to wet, no odor.
24
(25' - 28.5') Similar soil, highly horizontally fractured SILTSTONE @
24.5', very moist, no odor.
26
28
29
0.0 36/60"
31
(30' - 33') Brown to gray fine to medium SAND and fine to medium subrounded GRAVEL, some fractured Siltstone, wet, no odor.
32
30
31
32
Water Table Observed @ 32.0' fbg
33
34
33
34
35 MC-7 (35' - 40') 0.0 55/60"
36
37
38
(35' - 36') Similar soil, wet, no odor.
(36' - 39.5') Brown SILT and fine SAND and Gray fine to medium
rounded to sub-angular GRAVEL, some highly fractured Siltstone, loose,
wet, no odor.
39
35
36
37
38
39
40
40
41
42
Notes:
NA - Not Available
27
28
29
30 MC-6 (30 - 35')
25
41
42
1" Dia. 0.010"-slot Sch 40 PVC Screen
19
15
Native Fill
(5' - 8') Gray to brown fine to coarse SAND, some sub-angular Gravel,
little Silt, loose, moist, no odor.
Bentonite
6
Glass Beads
0.0 38/60"
4
MC-2 (5' - 10')
3
4
5
1
Native Fill
3
Well
Diagram
Notes:
Description
Depth (feet)
Recovery
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Lithology
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Client: NYSDEC
0.0 32/60"
1
1
2
3
4
4
0.0 40/60"
(5' - 8.5') Similar soil, little Organics, moist, no odor.
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10 MC-3 (10' - 15') 0.0 42/60"
11
(10' -13') Brown to gray fine to coarse SAND and fine to medium
GRAVEL, little Silt, moist, no odor.
11
(13' - 13.5') Gray Horizontally fractured SILTSTONE, moist, no odor.
14
13
14
15 MC-3 (15' - 20') 0.0 50/60"
16
(15' - 17.3') Brown fine to coarse SAND and fine to medium GRAVEL,
moist, no odor.
15
16
17
18
19
19
20 MC-4 (20' - 25') 0.0 50/60"
20
21
21
22
23
24
(21.5' - 23') Gray SILT and fine SAND, little Clay, soft, very moist to
wet, no odor..
22
(23' - 24.1') Dark brown CLAY, some Silt, firm, little fractured
Siltstone,moist, no odor.
24
25 MC-5 (25' - 30') 0.0 48/60"
26
(25' - 29') Brown to gray fine to medium SAND and fine to medium
GRAVEL and weathered Siltstone, some Silt, very moist, no odor.
27
28
27
28
29
29
0.0 45/60"
31
32
(30' - 32') Dark brown to gray fine to medium sub-rounded to angular
GRAVEL, some Silt, trace clay, wet, no odor.
33
(32' - 34') Gray highly horizontallt fractured SILTSTONE, some fine to
medium Sand, wet, no odor.
34
35
30
31
32
33
34
35
Boring Termintated @ 35' fbg.
36
Notes:
NA - Not Available
23
25
26
30 MC-6 (30 - 35')
Bentonite
(17.3 - 21.5') Dark gray SILT, little Sand and fine Gravel, firm, moist, no
odor..
18
36
Glass Beads
17
Native Fill
12
13
Native Fill
12
10
MC-2 (5' - 10')
3
5
Vapor Point Diagram
(0.4' - 2.9') Dark brown to gray fine to coarse SAND and fine to medium
sub-rounded to angular GRAVEL, trace silt, loose, moist, no odor.
2
Well
Diagram
Notes:
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
MC-1 (0' - 5')
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Lithology
Project: Former Ithaca Gun Factory - Offisite
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Client: NYSDEC
2
3
3
4
4
0.0 45/60"
5
6
6
(6.2' - 7.8') Brown fine to coarse SAND, some fine to medium subangular Gravel, loose, moist, no odor..
7
8
(7.8' -8.5') Brown SILT and fine SAND, little Clay and fine sub-rounded
to sub-anngular Gravel, trace organics, firm, moist, no odor.
8
9
10 MC-3 (10' - 15') 0.0 42/60"
11
(10' - 16') Brown SILT and fine SAND, some Gravel and fractured
Siltstone, little Clay, firm, moist, no odor.
10
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15 MC-3 (15' - 20') 0.0 30/60"
15
16
(16' - 16.4') Gray highly fractured SILTSTONE, trace fine to medium
sand, moist, no odor.
17
18
(16.4 - 17.5') Gray SILT and fractured SILTSTONE, some fine to
medium Sand, moist, no odor.
19
20 MC-4 (20' - 25') 0.0 20/60"
21
(20' - 21.7') Gray highly horizontally fractured SILTSTONE with thin
layers of fine sub-rounded GRAVEL, wet, no odor.
22
Water Table Observed @ 20' fbg..
23
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Bentonite
9
7
Glass Beads
MC-2 (5' - 10')
Native Fill
5
1
Native Fill
2
Vapor Point Diagram
(0.4' - 6.2') Brown to gray fine to coarse SAND and fine to medium subrounded GRAVEL, some Silt, trace organics, moist, no odor.
.
1
0.0 31/60"
Well
Diagram
Notes:
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
Depth to water: 20'
MC-1 (0' - 5')
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Lithology
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Client: NYSDEC
5
4
MC-2 (5' - 10')
0.0 40/60"
(5.0' -7.0') Brown SILT and fine SAND, some Organics, little Clay and
fine Gravel. moist, no odor.
6
5
6
7
(7.0' - 8.5') Brown to gray fine to medium SAND, some Silt and fine to
medium sub-angular Gravel, trace clay, moist, no odor.
7
8
8
9
9
10 MC-3 (10' - 15') 0.0 45/60"
(10' - 12.2') Dark gray CLAY, some Silt, firm, very moist, no odor.
11
10
11
12
12
(12.2 - 14') Brown to gray fine to medium SAND and fine to medium
GRAVEL, some Silt and weathered Siltstone, very moist to wet, no
odor.
13
14
15 MC-3 (15' - 20') 0.0 24/60"
(15' - 17') Gray highly fractured SILTSTONE and thin layers of fine to
medium sub-rounded GRAVEL, wet, no odor.
13
14
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
Boring Termintated @ 20' fbg.
20
21
Notes:
NA - Not Available
20
21
4
3
Bentonite
Native Fill
(1.0' - 2.0') Brown to gray SILT and SILTSTONE fragments, some fine
to medium Sand and Clay, firm, moist, no odor.
3
2
Glass Beads
2
1
(0.7' - 1.0') ASH and BRICK and SLAG fragments, some fine to coarse
Sand, loose, moist, no odor..
.
1
Vapor Point Diagram
(0' - 0.7') TOPSOIL and GRAVEL. some Gravel, moist, no odor.
Native Fill
0.0 24/60"
Well
Diagram
Notes:
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
MC-1 (0' - 5')
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Lithology
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Client: NYSDEC
1
3
4
4
0.0 30/60"
5
6
(6.2' - 6.4') Gray highly fractured SILTSTONE.
7
(6.4' - 10.8') Brown to gray fine to medium SAND and fine to medium
sub-round to angular GRAVEL, little Silt and Organics, loose, moist, no
odor
8
9
10 MC-3 (10' - 15') 0.0 48/60"
11
(12' - 16.8') Dark gray SILT, little Clay, trace fine sub-round gravel,
soft, moist, no odor.
13
8
9
10
(10.8' - 12') Brown fine to coarse SAND, some fine to medium subrounded to angular Gravel, trace silt, loose, moist, no odor.
12
7
11
12
13
14
14
15 MC-3 (15' - 20') 0.0 48/60"
15
16
16
17
18
19
(16.8 - 23.1') Dark gray SILT and SILTSTONE fragments, little Clay,
trace fine sub-round gravel, soft, very moist to wet, no odor.
17
19
18
20 MC-4 (20' - 25') 0.0 46/60"
20
21
21
22
22
23
(23.1' - 24) Gray highly fractured SILTSTONE, some fine to medium
Sand, wet, no odor.
24
25 MC-5 (25' - 30') 0.0 48/60"
26
(25' - 29') Gray highly fractured SILTSTONE, some interbedded layers
of fine to medium rounded Gravel, little fine Sand, wet, no odor.
23
24
25
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
31
Notes:
NA - Not Available
30
31
Bentonite
MC-2 (5' - 10')
6
Glass Beads
5
Native Fill
3
2
(0.6' - 6.2') Brown to gray fine to medium SAND and fine to medium
sub-rounded to angular GRAVEL, little Silt and Organics, loose, moist,
no odor.
2
Vapor Point Diagram
(0' - 0.6') TOPSOIL and GRAVEL.
Native Fill
0.0 24/60"
1
Well
Diagram
Notes:
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
MC-1 (0' - 5')
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Lithology
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Client: NYSDEC
(0.5' - 3.0') Dark gray to brown SILT and CLAY, some fine sub-round
Gravel and Organics, little fine Sand, moist, no odor.
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
0.0 52/60"
(5.0' - 7.3') Dark gray SILT and CLAY, trace fine gravel, moist, no odor.
6
5
7
7
(7.3' - 9.0') Brown SILT, some varved Clay, trace gravel, moist, no
odor.
8
9
8
9
10 MC-3 (10' - 15') 0.0 48/60"
(10' - 16.5') Dark brown SILT and CLAY, little fine Sand, trace fine
rounded gravel, moist to wet.
11
10
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15 MC-3 (15' - 20') 0.0 55/60"
15
16
16
(16.5' - 17.5') Gray fractured SILTSTONE and fine to medium subrounded to rounded GRAVEL, some fine Sand, wet, no odor.
17
18
(17.5 - 19') Dark gray SILT and CLAY, some fine to medium angular
Gravel, wet, no odor.
19
17
18
19
20
21
20
21
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Vapor Point Diagram
6
Bentonite
MC-2 (5' - 10')
Glass Beads
5
Native Fill
(0' - 0.5') TOPSOIL and GRAVEL, some Ash @ 0.4 fbg.
0.0 36/60"
Well
Diagram
Notes:
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
Native Fill
MC-1 (0' - 5')
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Lithology
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Boring Log: SB-11/AZMW-1
Drill Fluid: NA
60/60"
(0' - 0.5') TOPSOIL and GRASS.
(0.5' - 6.0') Dark gray fine to medium SAND and SILT, some medium
to coarse rounded Gravel, little bCobbles with miscellaneous fill, moist,
no odor.
2
3
4
MC-2
(5' - 10')
0.0
(6.0' - 7.0') Dark brown fine to medium SAND, some fractured angular
Siltstone, little Silt, moist, no odor.
8
7
9
MC-3
(10' - 15')
0.0
36/60"
(10' - 11.5') Simliar soil, moist, no odor.
11
10
11
(11.5' - 13') Brown fine to medium SAND, little fine rounded Gravel,
loose, dry, no odor.
12
13
14
12
13
14
MC-3
(15' - 20')
0.0
48/60"
16
15
16
17
17
(17.5 - 19') Brown fine to medium SAND, some coarse rounded Gravel,
trace silt, moist, no odor.
18
19
MC-4
(20' - 25')
0.0
50/60"
18
19
20
22
23
(22.8' - 24') Brown fine to medium SAND, trace fine gravel, moist, no
odor.
24
MW-5
(25' - 30')
0.0
30/60"
(25 - 27.5) Similar soil, very moist, no odor.
23
24
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
30
29
MC-6
(30' - 35')
0.0
31
30/60"
(30' - 31') Brown fine to medium SAND, some gray horizontally
fractured Siltstone, trace silt and clay, wet, no odor
32
30
31
32
33
34
33
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Benonite Seal
21
22
#0 Filter Sand
21
25
6
8
9
20
3
5
24/60"
7
15
2
4
6
10
1
5
Well Diagram
Native Fill 1" Dia. Sch 40 PVC Riser
0.0
1
Depth (feet)
(0' - 5')
Description
Recovery
MC-1
Depth to water: 31'
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Well Notes:
Lithology
Client: NYSDEC
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Boring Log:
SB-12/AZMW-2
Client: NYSDEC
Drill Fluid: NA
2
3
3
4
4
MC-2
(5' - 10')
1.1
24/60"
6
(5.0' - 6.5') Brown fine to coarse SAND and fine sub-rounded GRAVEL,
little Silt, moist, no odor.
(6.5' - 7.0') Light brown fine to medium SAND and SILT, little fine
rounded Gravel, trace fracted siltstone, moist, no odor.
7
5
6
7
8
8
9
9
MC-3
(10' - 15')
0.0
24/60"
11
12
(11.5' - 12') Gray medium to coarse rouned GRAVEL, little Silt and fine
Sand, trace siltstone, wet, no odor.
12
13
13
14
15
#0 Sand
11
10
14
MC-3
(15' - 20')
0.0
16
48/60"
(15' - 19') Gray highly fractured SILTSTONE and fine to medium
SAND, some fine rouned Gravel, little silt, trace clay, wet, no odor.
15
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
Notes:
NA - Not Available
#0 pre-packed Filter Sand
10
#0 Sand
2
1.5" Dia. Sch 40 PVC Riser
1
Benonite Seal
(0.5' - 2.0') Dark brown to gray fine to coarse SAND and fine to
medium rounded GRAVEL, little Silt, dry, no odor.
Steel Roadbox
24/60"
1
5
Well Diagram
1.5" Dia. pre-packed 0.010"-slot Sch 40 PVC Screen
0.0
Depth (feet)
(0' - 5')
Description
Recovery
MC-1
Depth to water: 12'
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Lithology
Well Notes:
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Boring Log:
SB-13/AZMW-3
Drill Fluid: NA
2
2
3
3
4
4
MC-2
(5' - 10')
0.0
12/60"
6
(5.0' - 6.0') Dark gray fine SAND and SILT, some fine to medium
angular Gravel, moist, no odor.
5
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
MC-3
(10' - 15')
0.0
36/60"
11
(10' - 11.2') Gray to brown SAND and SILT, some fine angular Gravel,
little Slag and Ash, moist, no odor.
10
11
12
(11.2' - 12') Brown fine to medium SAND and SILT, some fine to
medium angular Gravel, moist, no odor.
12
13
(12' - 13') Gray fine rounded to sub-angular GRAVEL and fine SAND,
trace silt, wet, no odor..
13
14
14
15
MC-3
(15' - 20')
0.0
16
30/60"
(15' - 20') Gray fine rounded GRAVEL and fine SAND, some Silt, little
clay, wet, no odor..
15
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Benonite Seal
5
#0 Sand
1
#0 Sand
(0.5' - 2.0') Dark gray fine SAND and SILT, some fine to medium
angular Gravel, litte Ash and Organics, soft, moist, no odor.
1
Steel Roadbox
(0' - 0.5') TOPSOIL and GRASS.
1.5" Dia. pre-packed 0.010"-slot Sch 40 PVC 1.5"
Screen
Dia. Sch 40 PVC Riser
15/60"
Well Diagram
0.0
Depth (feet)
(0' - 5')
Description
Recovery
MC-1
Depth to water: 13'
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Well Notes:
Lithology
Client: NYSDEC
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Boring Log:
AZMW-4
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Well Notes:
Steel Roadbox
(0.0' - 25') Borehole advanced with 3-inch casing to set well. No soil
was sampled during the boring advancement.
1
Well Diagram
#0 Sand
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
Depth to water: 20'
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Benonite Seal
Drilled Borehole Dia: 3"
#0 Sand
Drill Fluid: NA
Lithology
Client: NYSDEC
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Boring Log:
AZMW-5
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Well Notes:
Steel Roadbox
1
Well Diagram
#0 Sand
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
Depth to water: 24'
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Benonite Seal
#0 Sand
Drill Fluid: NA
Lithology
Client: NYSDEC
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Boring Log:
AZMW-6
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Well Notes:
Steel Roadbox
Well Diagram
#0 Sand
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
Depth to water: 14'
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Benonite Seal
#0 Sand
Drill Fluid: NA
Lithology
Client: NYSDEC
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Boring Log:
AZMW-7
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Well Notes:
Steel Roadbox
1
Well Diagram
#0 Sand
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
Depth to water: 21'
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Benonite Seal
#0 Sand
Drill Fluid: NA
Lithology
Client: NYSDEC
5 McCrea Hill Rd.
Phone: (518) 885-5383 Fax: (518) 885-5385
Boring Log:
AZMW-8
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
Notes:
NA - Not Available
Well Notes:
Steel Roadbox
Well Diagram
#0 Sand
Recovery
Description
Depth (feet)
Depth to water: 15'
Headspace PID
Sample
Interval (feet)
Sample ID
Depth (Feet)
Benonite Seal
#0 Sand
Drill Fluid: NA
Lithology
Client: NYSDEC
ATTACHMENT B
GROUNDWATER LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT JULY 31 TO AUGUST 1, 2013
1
2
3
4
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Buffalo
10 Hazelwood Drive
Amherst, NY 14228-2298
Tel: (716)691-2600
TestAmerica Job ID: 480-43132-1
Client Project/Site: Former Ithaca Gun Factory #C755019A
For:
New York State D.E.C.
615 Erie Blvd., West
Syracuse, New York 13204
Attn: Gary Priscott
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Authorized for release by:
8/12/2013 4:09:03 PM
Joe Giacomazza, Project Administrator
[email protected]
Designee for
Sally Hoffman, Project Manager II
[email protected]
The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited
parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full,
and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager
at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is
intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
Client: New York State D.E.C.
Project/Site: Former Ithaca Gun Factory #C755019A
1
2
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically
and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed within the body of this report. Release of the data
contained in this sample data package and in the electronic data deliverable has been authorized by the
Laboratory Manager or his/her designee, as verified by the following signature.
3
4
5
6
7
Joe Giacomazza
Project Administrator
8/12/2013 4:09:03 PM
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 2 of 40
8/12/2013
2
Table of Contents
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
3
1
3
4
5
6
8
23
24
31
32
34
35
36
37
39
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 3 of 40
TestAmerica Buffalo
8/12/2013
Definitions/Glossary
1
2
3
Qualifiers
GC/MS VOA
4
Qualifier
Qualifier Description
J
Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
B
Compound was found in the blank and sample.
F
MS or MSD exceeds the control limits
5
6
GC/MS VOA TICs
Qualifier
J
Indicates an Estimated Value for TICs
N
Presumptive evidence of material.
T
Result is a tentatively identified compound (TIC) and an estimated value.
J
7
8
9
Glossary
10
Abbreviation
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤
Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
%R
Percent Recovery
CNF
Contains no Free Liquid
DER
Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)
11
12
DL, RA, RE, IN
Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC
Decision level concentration
MDA
Minimum detectable activity
EDL
Estimated Detection Limit
MDC
Minimum detectable concentration
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ML
Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC
Not Calculated
ND
Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
QC
Quality Control
RER
Relative error ratio
RL
Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD
Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF
Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ
Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
13
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 4 of 40
8/12/2013
Case Narrative
1
2
3
Job ID: 480-43132-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Buffalo
4
Narrative
5
Job Narrative
480-43132-1
6
Receipt
The samples were received on 8/3/2013 2:00 AM and 8/3/2013 9:00 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and,
where required, on ice. The temperatures of the 2 coolers at receipt time were 2.0º C and 4.2º C.
7
8
GC/MS VOA
Method(s) 8260B: The matrix spike / matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries for batch 132713 were outside control limits. The
associated laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery met acceptance criteria.
9
10
Method(s) 8260B: The method blank for batch 132854 contained Carbon disulfide above the method detection limit. This target analyte
concentration was less than the reporting limit (RL); therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis of samples was not performed.
11
No other analytical or quality issues were noted.
12
13
14
15
Page 5 of 40
TestAmerica Buffalo
8/12/2013
Detection Summary
2
Client Sample ID: SB-7
Analyte
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1
Lab Sample ID: 480-43132-1
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
5.7 J
10
3.0 ug/L
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260B
Prep Type
Total/NA
0.26 J
1.0
0.19 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Chloroform
1.1
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Trichloroethene
2.2
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
Dil Fac D Method
Prep Type
Acetone
4.6 J
10
3.0 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Chloroform
4.4
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Trichloroethene
4.8
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Acetone
Result Qualifier
7.4 J
10
3.0 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Chloroform
1.3
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
1.1
1.0
0.81 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Trichloroethene
2.1
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Analyte
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Dil Fac D Method
Prep Type
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
7.9 J
10
3.0 ug/L
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260B
Prep Type
Total/NA
0.26 J
1.0
0.19 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Chloroform
2.7
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Trichloroethene
3.1
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
2-Butanone (MEK)
2.4 J
10
1.3 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Acetone
12
10
3.0 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
1.0
0.19 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Carbon disulfide
Result Qualifier
0.40 J B
Dil Fac D Method
Prep Type
Chloroform
1.4
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Trichloroethene
3.1
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
2-Butanone (MEK)
Result Qualifier
1.8 J
10
1.3 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Acetone
10
10
3.0 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Carbon disulfide
1.5
1.0
0.19 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Chloroform
2.1
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Analyte
Dil Fac D Method
Prep Type
RL
MDL Unit
2-Butanone (MEK)
Result Qualifier
4.7 J
10
1.3 ug/L
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260B
Prep Type
Total/NA
Acetone
14
10
3.0 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 6 of 40
8/12/2013
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Detection Summary
2
Client Sample ID: SB-3 (Continued)
Analyte
1
RL
MDL Unit
Carbon disulfide
Result Qualifier
0.98 J
1.0
0.19 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Methylene Chloride
0.55 J
1.0
0.44 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Analyte
Dil Fac D Method
Prep Type
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
Dil Fac D Method
Prep Type
2-Butanone (MEK)
3.1 J
10
1.3 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Acetone
17
10
3.0 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
0.88 J
Carbon disulfide
1.0
0.19 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Chloroform
1.0
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Trichloroethene
1.7
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Analyte
2-Butanone (MEK)
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Result Qualifier
4.1 J
RL
MDL Unit
10
1.3 ug/L
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260B
Prep Type
Total/NA
20
10
3.0 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
0.75 J
1.0
0.19 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Chloroform
3.0
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Trichloroethene
1.4
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Analyte
2-Butanone (MEK)
Acetone
Result Qualifier
2.5 J
13
RL
MDL Unit
10
1.3 ug/L
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260B
Prep Type
Total/NA
10
3.0 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Carbon disulfide
0.65 J B
1.0
0.19 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Chloroform
0.78 J
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: SB-XX DUP
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
2-Butanone (MEK)
Result Qualifier
4.7 J
10
1.3 ug/L
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260B
Prep Type
Total/NA
Acetone
25
10
3.0 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Carbon disulfide
0.66 J B
1.0
0.19 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Chloroform
0.84 J
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: TB
Analyte
Acetone
Methylene Chloride
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
4.2 J
10
3.0 ug/L
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260B
Prep Type
Total/NA
0.96 J
1.0
0.44 ug/L
1
8260B
Total/NA
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 7 of 40
8/12/2013
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
1
2
Date Collected: 08/01/13 08:10
Date Received: 08/03/13 02:00
Matrix: Water
4
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Acetone
5.7 J
10
3.0 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Chloroform
1.1
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Methyl tert-butyl ether
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Trichloroethene
2.2
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/08/13 09:00
1
Carbon disulfide
3
0.26 J
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 8 of 40
8/12/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Tentatively Identified Compound
Surrogate
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
Matrix: Water
4
Est. Result Qualifier
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
5
Dil Fac
6
08/08/13 09:00
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
113
66 - 137
08/08/13 09:00
1
93
71 - 126
08/08/13 09:00
1
101
73 - 120
08/08/13 09:00
1
Matrix: Water
Result Qualifier
7
8
9
10
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Acetone
4.6 J
10
3.0 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Chloroform
4.4
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 9 of 40
8/12/2013
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Trichloroethene
4.8
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/08/13 09:24
1
Surrogate
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Result Qualifier
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
D
CAS No.
Prepared
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
08/08/13 09:24
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
66 - 137
08/08/13 09:24
1
93
71 - 126
08/08/13 09:24
1
102
73 - 120
08/08/13 09:24
1
Matrix: Water
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Acetone
7.4 J
10
3.0 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Dil Fac
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 10 of 40
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
111
Analyte
3
8/12/2013
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Chloroform
1.3
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
1.1
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Trichloroethene
2.1
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/08/13 09:49
1
Surrogate
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Result Qualifier
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
D
CAS No.
Prepared
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
08/08/13 09:49
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
114
66 - 137
08/08/13 09:49
1
92
71 - 126
08/08/13 09:49
1
102
73 - 120
08/08/13 09:49
1
Matrix: Water
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
08/08/13 10:14
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 11 of 40
8/12/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Acetone
7.9 J
10
3.0 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Carbon disulfide
Result Qualifier
0.26 J
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Chloroform
2.7
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Trichloroethene
3.1
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/08/13 10:14
1
Surrogate
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
3
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Limits
Analyzed
Dil Fac
08/08/13 10:14
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
115
66 - 137
08/08/13 10:14
1
94
71 - 126
08/08/13 10:14
1
103
73 - 120
08/08/13 10:14
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 12 of 40
8/12/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
2.4 J
10
1.3 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Acetone
12
10
3.0 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Chloroform
1.4
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Trichloroethene
3.1
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/08/13 03:37
1
Carbon disulfide
3
0.40 J B
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 13 of 40
8/12/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
RT
CAS No.
Propene
3.1 T J N
ug/L
4.37
115-7-1
08/08/13 03:37
1
Silanol, trimethyl-
5.6 T J N
ug/L
8.22
1066-40-6
08/08/13 03:37
1
Tetrahydrofuran
1.7 J
ug/L
8.74
109-99-9
08/08/13 03:37
1
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
Limits
Prepared
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
109
66 - 137
08/08/13 03:37
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
95
71 - 126
08/08/13 03:37
1
94
73 - 120
08/08/13 03:37
1
Matrix: Water
Result Qualifier
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
1.8 J
10
1.3 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Acetone
10
10
3.0 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Carbon disulfide
1.5
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Chloroform
2.1
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 14 of 40
8/12/2013
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
3
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/07/13 19:08
1
11
Dil Fac
12
Surrogate
Result Qualifier
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
D
CAS No.
Prepared
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
5
RL
Methyl acetate
08/07/13 19:08
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
110
66 - 137
08/07/13 19:08
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
96
71 - 126
08/07/13 19:08
1
96
73 - 120
08/07/13 19:08
1
Matrix: Water
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
08/07/13 19:33
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
4.7 J
10
1.3 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Acetone
14
10
3.0 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 15 of 40
8/12/2013
6
7
8
9
10
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
Carbon disulfide
Result Qualifier
0.98 J
RL
MDL Unit
1.0
0.19 ug/L
D
Prepared
08/07/13 19:33
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/07/13 19:33
1
Methylene Chloride
0.55 J
RT
CAS No.
Silanol, trimethyl-
4.2 T J N
ug/L
8.22
1066-40-6
08/07/13 19:33
1
Tetrahydrofuran
4.3 J
ug/L
8.73
109-99-9
08/07/13 19:33
1
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
Limits
Prepared
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
111
66 - 137
08/07/13 19:33
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
97
71 - 126
08/07/13 19:33
1
96
73 - 120
08/07/13 19:33
1
Matrix: Water
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
08/07/13 19:58
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 16 of 40
8/12/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
2-Butanone (MEK)
3.1 J
10
1.3 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Acetone
17
10
3.0 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Chloroform
1.0
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Trichloroethene
1.7
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/07/13 19:58
1
Carbon disulfide
0.88 J
RT
CAS No.
Silanol, trimethyl-
3.1 T J N
ug/L
8.22
1066-40-6
08/07/13 19:58
1
Tetrahydrofuran
2.2 J
ug/L
8.74
109-99-9
08/07/13 19:58
1
Surrogate
3
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
Limits
Prepared
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
106
66 - 137
08/07/13 19:58
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
92
71 - 126
08/07/13 19:58
1
92
73 - 120
08/07/13 19:58
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 17 of 40
8/12/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
4.1 J
10
1.3 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Acetone
20
10
3.0 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Chloroform
3.0
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Trichloroethene
1.4
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/07/13 20:24
1
Carbon disulfide
3
0.75 J
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 18 of 40
8/12/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
RT
CAS No.
Propene
5.2 T J N
ug/L
4.38
115-7-1
08/07/13 20:24
1
Silanol, trimethyl-
2.9 T J N
ug/L
8.22
1066-40-6
08/07/13 20:24
1
Tetrahydrofuran
2.5 J
ug/L
8.73
109-99-9
08/07/13 20:24
1
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
Limits
Prepared
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
111
66 - 137
08/07/13 20:24
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
96
71 - 126
08/07/13 20:24
1
96
73 - 120
08/07/13 20:24
1
Matrix: Water
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
2.5 J
10
1.3 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Acetone
13
10
3.0 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Carbon disulfide
0.65 J B
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Chloroform
0.78 J
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Analyte
3
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 19 of 40
8/12/2013
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
3
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/08/13 04:02
1
11
Dil Fac
12
Propene
Surrogate
Result Qualifier
5.8 T J N
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
ug/L
D
RT
CAS No.
4.37
115-7-1
Limits
Prepared
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
5
RL
Methyl acetate
08/08/13 04:02
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
107
66 - 137
08/08/13 04:02
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
95
71 - 126
08/08/13 04:02
1
94
73 - 120
08/08/13 04:02
1
Matrix: Water
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
08/08/13 04:27
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
4.7 J
10
1.3 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Acetone
25
10
3.0 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 20 of 40
8/12/2013
6
7
8
9
10
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
Carbon disulfide
Result Qualifier
0.66 J B
RL
MDL Unit
1.0
0.19 ug/L
D
Prepared
08/08/13 04:27
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/08/13 04:27
1
Chloroform
0.84 J
RT
CAS No.
Propene
7.5 T J N
ug/L
4.38
115-7-1
08/08/13 04:27
1
tert-Butyldimethylsilanol
5.4 T J N
ug/L
8.22
18173-64-3
08/08/13 04:27
1
Tetrahydrofuran
2.2 J
ug/L
8.74
109-99-9
08/08/13 04:27
1
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
Limits
Prepared
Prepared
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
109
66 - 137
08/08/13 04:27
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
97
71 - 126
08/08/13 04:27
1
97
73 - 120
08/08/13 04:27
1
Matrix: Water
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
08/08/13 04:52
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 21 of 40
8/12/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Acetone
4.2 J
10
3.0 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Methylene Chloride
Result Qualifier
0.96 J
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/08/13 04:52
1
Surrogate
3
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Limits
Analyzed
Dil Fac
08/08/13 04:52
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
108
66 - 137
08/08/13 04:52
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
95
71 - 126
08/08/13 04:52
1
96
73 - 120
08/08/13 04:52
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 22 of 40
8/12/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Surrogate Summary
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
4
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
12DCE
TOL
BFB
(66-137)
(71-126)
(73-120)
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
480-43132-1
SB-7
113
93
101
480-43132-2
SB-8
111
93
102
480-43132-3
SB-9
114
92
102
480-43132-4
SB-10
115
94
103
480-43159-1
SB-1
109
95
94
480-43159-2
SB-2
110
96
96
480-43159-3
SB-3
111
97
96
480-43159-4
SB-4
106
92
92
480-43159-5
SB-5
111
96
96
480-43159-5 MS
SB-5
105
98
97
480-43159-5 MSD
SB-5
103
94
95
480-43159-6
SB-6
107
95
94
480-43159-7
SB-XX DUP
109
97
97
480-43159-8
TB
108
95
96
LCS 480-132713/5
Lab Control Sample
102
97
96
LCS 480-132852/4
Lab Control Sample
95
96
104
LCS 480-132854/4
Lab Control Sample
104
98
100
LCSD 480-132852/5
Lab Control Sample Dup
98
97
104
MB 480-132713/8
Method Blank
107
98
96
MB 480-132852/6
Method Blank
98
97
101
MB 480-132854/28
Method Blank
112
99
98
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 23 of 40
8/12/2013
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Lab Sample ID: MB 480-132713/8
Matrix: Water
Analysis Batch: 132713
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Prep Type: Total/NA
5
MB MB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
4
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
08/07/13 12:54
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/07/13 12:54
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 24 of 40
8/12/2013
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
5
MB MB
None
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
08/07/13 12:54
1
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
107
66 - 137
08/07/13 12:54
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
98
71 - 126
08/07/13 12:54
1
96
73 - 120
08/07/13 12:54
1
Lab Sample ID: LCS 480-132713/5
Matrix: Water
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample
Prep Type: Total/NA
Spike
Analyte
Added
LCS LCS
Result Qualifier
D
%Rec
Limits
25.0
28.1
ug/L
113
71 - 129
1,1-Dichloroethene
25.0
27.9
ug/L
112
58 - 121
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
25.0
24.6
ug/L
98
80 - 124
1,2-Dichloroethane
25.0
26.4
ug/L
106
75 - 127
Benzene
25.0
28.8
ug/L
115
71 - 124
Chlorobenzene
25.0
25.9
ug/L
104
72 - 120
25.0
28.1
ug/L
113
74 - 124
Ethylbenzene
25.0
25.8
ug/L
103
77 - 123
25.0
26.4
ug/L
106
64 - 127
Tetrachloroethene
25.0
24.7
ug/L
99
74 - 122
Toluene
25.0
25.6
ug/L
102
80 - 122
25.0
28.6
ug/L
115
73 - 127
Trichloroethene
25.0
27.6
ug/L
110
74 - 123
66 - 137
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
97
71 - 126
96
73 - 120
Lab Sample ID: 480-43159-5 MS
Matrix: Water
14
15
Prep Type: Total/NA
Sample Sample
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Spike
Added
MS MS
Result Qualifier
%Rec.
Unit
D
%Rec
Limits
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
25.0
30.8
ug/L
123
71 - 129
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
25.0
31.4 F
ug/L
126
58 - 121
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
25.0
24.9
ug/L
99
80 - 124
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
25.0
27.7
ug/L
111
75 - 127
Benzene
ND
25.0
31.3 F
ug/L
125
71 - 124
Chlorobenzene
ND
25.0
27.6
ug/L
110
72 - 120
ND
25.0
29.6
ug/L
118
74 - 124
Ethylbenzene
ND
25.0
26.8
ug/L
107
77 - 123
ND
25.0
27.1
ug/L
108
64 - 127
Tetrachloroethene
ND
25.0
26.6
ug/L
106
74 - 122
Toluene
ND
25.0
27.0
ug/L
108
80 - 122
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 25 of 40
10
13
Limits
102
9
12
LCS LCS
%Recovery Qualifier
8
11
%Rec.
Unit
1,1-Dichloroethane
Surrogate
6
7
MB MB
Surrogate
4
8/12/2013
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
Sample Sample
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Spike
MS MS
Added
Result Qualifier
5
%Rec.
Unit
D
%Rec
Limits
ND
25.0
31.2
ug/L
125
73 - 127
Trichloroethene
1.4
25.0
30.8
ug/L
118
74 - 123
6
7
MS MS
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
105
66 - 137
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
98
71 - 126
97
73 - 120
8
9
Lab Sample ID: 480-43159-5 MSD
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
Sample Sample
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Spike
MSD MSD
Added
Result Qualifier
%Rec.
Unit
D
%Rec
RPD
RPD
Limit
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
25.0
31.9
ug/L
128
71 - 129
4
20
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
25.0
32.7 F
ug/L
131
58 - 121
4
16
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
25.0
26.4
ug/L
106
80 - 124
6
20
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
25.0
28.5
ug/L
114
75 - 127
3
20
Benzene
ND
25.0
32.2 F
ug/L
129
71 - 124
3
13
Chlorobenzene
ND
25.0
28.5
ug/L
114
72 - 120
3
25
ND
25.0
31.3 F
ug/L
125
74 - 124
5
15
Ethylbenzene
ND
25.0
28.5
ug/L
114
77 - 123
6
15
ND
25.0
28.7
ug/L
115
64 - 127
6
37
Tetrachloroethene
ND
25.0
27.6
ug/L
111
74 - 122
4
20
Toluene
ND
25.0
28.2
ug/L
113
80 - 122
4
15
ND
25.0
32.4 F
ug/L
129
73 - 127
4
20
Trichloroethene
1.4
25.0
32.3 F
ug/L
124
74 - 123
5
16
Limits
MSD MSD
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
103
66 - 137
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
94
71 - 126
95
73 - 120
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
MB MB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
4
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
08/08/13 00:33
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 26 of 40
8/12/2013
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
5
MB MB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/08/13 00:33
1
MB MB
None
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
08/08/13 00:33
1
MB MB
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
98
66 - 137
08/08/13 00:33
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
97
71 - 126
08/08/13 00:33
1
101
73 - 120
08/08/13 00:33
1
4
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 27 of 40
8/12/2013
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
Spike
Analyte
Added
LCS LCS
Result Qualifier
5
%Rec.
Unit
D
%Rec
Limits
1,1-Dichloroethane
25.0
26.1
ug/L
104
71 - 129
1,1-Dichloroethene
25.0
22.7
ug/L
91
58 - 121
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
25.0
24.4
ug/L
98
80 - 124
1,2-Dichloroethane
25.0
25.1
ug/L
100
75 - 127
Benzene
25.0
27.3
ug/L
109
71 - 124
Chlorobenzene
25.0
26.5
ug/L
106
72 - 120
25.0
26.9
ug/L
108
74 - 124
Ethylbenzene
25.0
26.6
ug/L
106
77 - 123
25.0
25.4
ug/L
102
64 - 127
Tetrachloroethene
25.0
26.6
ug/L
106
74 - 122
Toluene
25.0
26.1
ug/L
104
80 - 122
25.0
27.7
ug/L
111
73 - 127
Trichloroethene
25.0
26.3
ug/L
105
74 - 123
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
LCS LCS
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
13
Limits
95
66 - 137
96
71 - 126
104
73 - 120
14
Lab Sample ID: LCSD 480-132852/5
Matrix: Water
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup
Prep Type: Total/NA
Spike
Analyte
Added
LCSD LCSD
Result Qualifier
%Rec.
Unit
D
%Rec
Limits
RPD
RPD
Limit
1,1-Dichloroethane
25.0
25.9
ug/L
104
71 - 129
1
20
1,1-Dichloroethene
25.0
22.3
ug/L
89
58 - 121
2
16
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
25.0
24.3
ug/L
97
80 - 124
1
20
1,2-Dichloroethane
25.0
25.1
ug/L
101
75 - 127
0
20
Benzene
25.0
26.8
ug/L
107
71 - 124
2
13
Chlorobenzene
25.0
26.0
ug/L
104
72 - 120
2
25
25.0
26.7
ug/L
107
74 - 124
1
15
Ethylbenzene
25.0
26.0
ug/L
104
77 - 123
2
15
25.0
25.5
ug/L
102
64 - 127
0
37
Tetrachloroethene
25.0
26.1
ug/L
104
74 - 122
2
20
Toluene
25.0
25.6
ug/L
102
80 - 122
2
15
25.0
27.4
ug/L
110
73 - 127
1
20
Trichloroethene
25.0
25.8
ug/L
103
74 - 123
2
16
LCSD LCSD
Surrogate
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
98
66 - 137
97
71 - 126
104
73 - 120
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 28 of 40
8/12/2013
15
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
5
MB MB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
4
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
08/08/13 00:24
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Carbon disulfide
0.519 J
1.0
0.19 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
08/08/13 00:24
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 29 of 40
8/12/2013
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
5
MB MB
None
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
08/08/13 00:24
1
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
112
66 - 137
08/08/13 00:24
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
99
71 - 126
08/08/13 00:24
1
98
73 - 120
08/08/13 00:24
1
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
Spike
Analyte
Added
LCS LCS
Result Qualifier
D
%Rec
Limits
25.0
28.6
ug/L
114
71 - 129
1,1-Dichloroethene
25.0
27.3
ug/L
109
58 - 121
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
25.0
24.6
ug/L
99
80 - 124
1,2-Dichloroethane
25.0
26.5
ug/L
106
75 - 127
Benzene
25.0
28.8
ug/L
115
71 - 124
Chlorobenzene
25.0
26.1
ug/L
104
72 - 120
25.0
27.5
ug/L
110
74 - 124
Ethylbenzene
25.0
25.6
ug/L
102
77 - 123
25.0
26.9
ug/L
108
64 - 127
Tetrachloroethene
25.0
24.0
ug/L
96
74 - 122
Toluene
25.0
25.3
ug/L
101
80 - 122
25.0
27.9
ug/L
112
73 - 127
Trichloroethene
25.0
27.0
ug/L
108
74 - 123
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
66 - 137
98
71 - 126
100
73 - 120
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 30 of 40
10
13
Limits
104
9
12
LCS LCS
%Recovery Qualifier
8
11
%Rec.
Unit
1,1-Dichloroethane
Surrogate
6
7
MB MB
Surrogate
4
8/12/2013
QC Association Summary
1
2
3
GC/MS VOA
4
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
480-43159-2
SB-2
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43159-3
SB-3
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43159-4
SB-4
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43159-5
SB-5
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43159-5 MS
SB-5
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43159-5 MSD
SB-5
Total/NA
Water
8260B
LCS 480-132713/5
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Water
8260B
MB 480-132713/8
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
8260B
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
480-43132-1
SB-7
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43132-2
SB-8
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43132-3
SB-9
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43132-4
SB-10
Total/NA
Water
8260B
LCS 480-132852/4
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Water
8260B
LCSD 480-132852/5
Lab Control Sample Dup
Total/NA
Water
8260B
MB 480-132852/6
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
8260B
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
480-43159-1
SB-1
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43159-6
SB-6
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43159-7
SB-XX DUP
Total/NA
Water
8260B
480-43159-8
TB
Total/NA
Water
8260B
LCS 480-132854/4
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Water
8260B
MB 480-132854/28
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
8260B
Prep Batch
5
6
7
8
9
Prep Batch
11
12
13
Prep Batch
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 31 of 40
10
8/12/2013
Lab Chronicle
1
2
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132852
08/08/13 09:00
Analyst
Lab
PJQ
TAL BUF
4
5
6
3
Matrix: Water
7
8
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132852
08/08/13 09:24
Analyst
Lab
PJQ
TAL BUF
9
10
Matrix: Water
11
12
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132852
08/08/13 09:49
Analyst
Lab
PJQ
TAL BUF
13
14
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132852
08/08/13 10:14
Analyst
Lab
PJQ
TAL BUF
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132854
08/08/13 03:37
Analyst
Lab
NQN
TAL BUF
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132713
08/07/13 19:08
Analyst
Lab
RAL
TAL BUF
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 32 of 40
8/12/2013
15
Lab Chronicle
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
4
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132713
08/07/13 19:33
Analyst
Lab
RAL
TAL BUF
5
6
Matrix: Water
7
8
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132713
08/07/13 19:58
Analyst
Lab
RAL
TAL BUF
9
10
Batch
Matrix: Water
11
12
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
1
132713
08/07/13 20:24
Analyst
Lab
RAL
TAL BUF
13
14
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132854
08/08/13 04:02
Analyst
Lab
NQN
TAL BUF
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132854
08/08/13 04:27
Analyst
Lab
NQN
TAL BUF
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260B
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
132854
08/08/13 04:52
Analyst
Lab
NQN
TAL BUF
Laboratory References:
TAL BUF = TestAmerica Buffalo, 10 Hazelwood Drive, Amherst, NY 14228-2298, TEL (716)691-2600
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 33 of 40
8/12/2013
15
Certification Summary
1
2
3
All certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority
Program
EPA Region
Certification ID
Expiration Date
Arkansas DEQ
State Program
6
88-0686
07-06-13 *
California
NELAP
9
1169CA
09-30-13
Connecticut
State Program
1
PH-0568
09-30-14
Florida
NELAP
4
E87672
06-30-14
Georgia
State Program
4
N/A
03-31-14
Georgia
State Program
4
956
03-31-14
Illinois
NELAP
5
200003
09-30-13
Iowa
State Program
7
374
03-15-15
Kansas
NELAP
7
E-10187
01-31-14
Kentucky
State Program
4
90029
12-31-13
Kentucky (UST)
State Program
4
30
04-01-14
Louisiana
NELAP
6
02031
06-30-14
Maine
State Program
1
NY00044
12-04-13
Maryland
State Program
3
294
03-31-14
Massachusetts
State Program
1
M-NY044
06-30-14
Michigan
State Program
5
9937
04-01-14
Minnesota
NELAP
5
036-999-337
12-31-13
New Hampshire
NELAP
1
2973
09-11-13
New Hampshire
NELAP
1
2337
11-17-13
New Jersey
NELAP
2
NY455
06-30-14
New York
NELAP
2
10026
04-01-14
North Dakota
State Program
8
R-176
03-31-14
Oklahoma
State Program
6
9421
08-31-13 *
Oregon
NELAP
10
NY200003
06-09-14
Pennsylvania
NELAP
3
68-00281
07-31-14
Rhode Island
State Program
1
LAO00328
12-31-13
Tennessee
State Program
4
TN02970
04-01-14
Texas
NELAP
6
T104704412-11-2
07-31-14
USDA
Federal
P330-11-00386
11-22-14
Virginia
NELAP
3
460185
09-14-13
Washington
State Program
10
C784
02-10-14
West Virginia DEP
State Program
3
252
09-30-13
Wisconsin
State Program
5
998310390
08-31-13 *
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
* Expired certification is currently pending renewal and is considered valid.
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 34 of 40
8/12/2013
Method Summary
1
2
Method
Method Description
Protocol
Laboratory
8260B
Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
SW846
TAL BUF
Protocol References:
3
4
5
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 35 of 40
8/12/2013
Sample Summary
1
2
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Matrix
Collected
Received
480-43132-1
SB-7
Water
08/01/13 08:10
08/03/13 02:00
480-43132-2
SB-8
Water
08/01/13 09:25
08/03/13 02:00
480-43132-3
SB-9
Water
08/01/13 11:00
08/03/13 02:00
480-43132-4
SB-10
Water
08/01/13 12:39
08/03/13 02:00
480-43159-1
SB-1
Water
07/31/13 07:55
08/03/13 09:00
480-43159-2
SB-2
Water
07/31/13 08:25
08/03/13 09:00
480-43159-3
SB-3
Water
07/31/13 09:18
08/03/13 09:00
480-43159-4
SB-4
Water
07/31/13 11:00
08/03/13 09:00
480-43159-5
SB-5
Water
07/31/13 13:10
08/03/13 09:00
480-43159-6
SB-6
Water
07/31/13 13:35
08/03/13 09:00
480-43159-7
SB-XX DUP
Water
07/31/13 00:00
08/03/13 09:00
480-43159-8
TB
Water
07/31/13 00:00
08/03/13 09:00
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 36 of 40
8/12/2013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 37 of 40
8/12/2013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 38 of 40
8/12/2013
1
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
2
Job Number: 480-43132-1
Login Number: 43132
List Source: TestAmerica Buffalo
List Number: 1
3
4
5
Creator: Janish, Carl M
6
Question
Answer
Comment
Radioactivity either was not measured or, if measured, is at or below
background
True
The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
tampered with.
True
8
Samples were received on ice.
True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
True
9
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
True
COC is present.
True
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
True
There are no discrepancies between the sample IDs on the containers and
the COC.
True
Samples are received within Holding Time.
True
Sample containers have legible labels.
True
Containers are not broken or leaking.
True
Sample collection date/times are provided.
True
Appropriate sample containers are used.
True
Sample bottles are completely filled.
True
Sample Preservation Verified
True
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
MS/MSDs
True
VOA sample vials do not have headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4") in
diameter.
True
If necessary, staff have been informed of any short hold time or quick TAT
needs
True
Multiphasic samples are not present.
True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
True
Sampling Company provided.
True
Samples received within 48 hours of sampling.
True
Samples requiring field filtration have been filtered in the field.
N/A
Chlorine Residual checked.
N/A
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
aztech
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 39 of 40
8/12/2013
1
2
Job Number: 480-43132-1
Login Number: 43159
List Number: 1
3
4
5
Creator: Stau, Brandon M
6
Question
Answer
Comment
background
True
True
tampered with.
True
8
True
True
9
True
COC is present.
True
True
True
True
the COC.
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
MS/MSDs
True
diameter.
True
needs
True
True
True
True
False
N/A
N/A
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
AZTECH
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 40 of 40
8/12/2013
ATTACHMENT C
SOIL VAPOR LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT –
JULY 30 TO AUGUST 1, 2013
H3H020401 Analytical Report ..............................................
1
Sample Receipt Documentation ..........................................
25
Total Number of Pages .........................................................
29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
H3H060408 Analytical Report ..............................................
1
Sample Receipt Documentation ..........................................
23
Total Number of Pages .........................................................
26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ATTACHMENT D
GROUNDWATER LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT NOVEMBER 4 TO NOVEMBER 6, 2013
1
2
3
4
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Buffalo
10 Hazelwood Drive
Amherst, NY 14228-2298
Tel: (716)691-2600
Client Project/Site: Former Ithaca Gun Factory #C755019A
For:
New York State D.E.C.
615 Erie Blvd., West
Syracuse, New York 13204
Attn: Gary Priscott
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Authorized for release by:
11/21/2013 12:12:38 PM
Joe Giacomazza, Project Management Assistant II
[email protected]
Designee for
Judy Stone, Senior Project Manager
(610)337-0992
[email protected]
The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited
parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full,
and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager
at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is
intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
1
2
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically
and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed within the body of this report. Release of the data
contained in this sample data package and in the electronic data deliverable has been authorized by the
Laboratory Manager or his/her designee, as verified by the following signature.
3
4
5
6
7
Joe Giacomazza
Project Management Assistant II
11/21/2013 12:12:38 PM
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 2 of 38
11/21/2013
2
Table of Contents
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
3
1
3
4
5
6
8
25
26
29
30
33
34
35
36
38
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 3 of 38
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/21/2013
Definitions/Glossary
1
2
3
Qualifiers
GC/MS VOA
4
Qualifier
J
F
MS/MSD Recovery and/or RPD exceeds the control limits
5
6
Glossary
Abbreviation
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤
Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
%R
Percent Recovery
CNF
Contains no Free Liquid
DER
Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac
Dilution Factor
7
8
9
DL, RA, RE, IN
Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC
Decision level concentration
MDA
Minimum detectable activity
EDL
Estimated Detection Limit
MDC
Minimum detectable concentration
MDL
Method Detection Limit
ML
Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC
Not Calculated
ND
Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
QC
Quality Control
RER
Relative error ratio
RL
Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD
Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF
Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ
Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
10
11
12
13
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 4 of 38
11/21/2013
Case Narrative
1
2
3
Job ID: 480-49553-1
4
Narrative
5
Job Narrative
480-49553-1
6
Receipt
The samples were received on 11/7/2013 2:00 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 2.2º C.
7
8
GC/MS VOA
Method(s) 8260C: The large number of analytes included in the continuing calibration verification (CCV) in batch 151859 gives a high
probability that one or more analytes will be outside acceptance criteria. As indicated in the reference method, analysis may proceed as
long as no more than 20% of the analytes are outside the method-defined %D criteria.
9
10
Method(s) 8260C: The matrix spike duplicate (MSD) recoveries for batch 151859 were outside control limits. The associated laboratory
control sample (LCS) recovery met acceptance criteria.
11
No other analytical or quality issues were noted.
12
13
14
15
Page 5 of 38
TestAmerica Buffalo
11/21/2013
Detection Summary
2
Client Sample ID: MW-6
Analyte
Carbon disulfide
Result Qualifier
0.30 J
RL
MDL Unit
1.0
0.19 ug/L
Analyte
1
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260C
Prep Type
Total/NA
RL
MDL Unit
Chloroform
Result Qualifier
1.8
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260C
Total/NA
Trichloroethene
2.4
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260C
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: AZMW-7
Analyte
Trichloroethene
Prep Type
Result Qualifier
0.82 J
RL
MDL Unit
1.0
0.46 ug/L
Analyte
Dil Fac D Method
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260C
Prep Type
RL
MDL Unit
Dil Fac D Method
Prep Type
Chloroform
2.8
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260C
Total/NA
Trichloroethene
4.1
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260C
Total/NA
Analyte
Result Qualifier
RL
MDL Unit
Chloroform
3.6
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260C
Total/NA
Trichloroethene
2.6
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260C
Total/NA
Analyte
Chloroform
Chloroform
Trichloroethene
Prep Type
Result Qualifier
4.3
RL
MDL Unit
1.0
0.34 ug/L
Analyte
Dil Fac D Method
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260C
Prep Type
Total/NA
Result Qualifier
0.98 J
1.8
RL
MDL Unit
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260C
Total/NA
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260C
Total/NA
Dil Fac D Method
Prep Type
No Detections.
Analyte
Chloroform
Result Qualifier
4.1
RL
MDL Unit
1.0
0.34 ug/L
Analyte
Chloroform
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260C
Prep Type
Total/NA
Result Qualifier
4.8
RL
MDL Unit
1.0
0.34 ug/L
Dil Fac D Method
1
8260C
Prep Type
Total/NA
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 6 of 38
4
5
6
7
8
9
Total/NA
Result Qualifier
3
11/21/2013
10
11
12
13
14
15
Detection Summary
2
Client Sample ID: MW-X DUP1
Analyte
Chloroform
Trichloroethene
1
Result Qualifier
0.90 J
1.7
RL
MDL Unit
1.0
0.34 ug/L
1
8260C
Total/NA
1.0
0.46 ug/L
1
8260C
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: MW-X2 DUP2
Dil Fac D Method
Prep Type
3
4
5
6
No Detections.
7
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
No Detections.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 7 of 38
11/21/2013
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 02:55
1
Carbon disulfide
3
0.30 J
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 8 of 38
11/21/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Surrogate
Matrix: Water
4
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
5
Dil Fac
6
11/14/13 02:55
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
97
66 - 137
11/14/13 02:55
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
96
71 - 126
11/14/13 02:55
1
98
73 - 120
11/14/13 02:55
1
Matrix: Water
Result Qualifier
7
8
9
10
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Chloroform
1.8
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 9 of 38
11/21/2013
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS (Continued)
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Trichloroethene
2.4
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 03:18
1
Surrogate
Result Qualifier
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
D
CAS No.
Prepared
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
11/14/13 03:18
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
98
66 - 137
11/14/13 03:18
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
96
71 - 126
11/14/13 03:18
1
97
73 - 120
11/14/13 03:18
1
Matrix: Water
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Dil Fac
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 10 of 38
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
Analyte
3
11/21/2013
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 03:42
1
Trichloroethene
Surrogate
0.82 J
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
11/14/13 03:42
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
95
66 - 137
11/14/13 03:42
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
94
71 - 126
11/14/13 03:42
1
99
73 - 120
11/14/13 03:42
1
Matrix: Water
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
11/14/13 04:07
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 11 of 38
11/21/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Chloroform
2.8
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Trichloroethene
4.1
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 04:07
1
Surrogate
3
Result Qualifier
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
D
CAS No.
Prepared
Prepared
ug/L
Limits
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
11/14/13 04:07
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
97
66 - 137
11/14/13 04:07
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
95
71 - 126
11/14/13 04:07
1
96
73 - 120
11/14/13 04:07
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 12 of 38
11/21/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
11/14/13 04:31
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Chloroform
3.6
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Trichloroethene
2.6
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 04:31
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 13 of 38
11/21/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Surrogate
Matrix: Water
4
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
5
Dil Fac
6
11/14/13 04:31
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
96
66 - 137
11/14/13 04:31
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
96
71 - 126
11/14/13 04:31
1
98
73 - 120
11/14/13 04:31
1
Matrix: Water
Result Qualifier
7
8
9
10
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Chloroform
4.3
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 14 of 38
11/21/2013
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 04:55
1
Surrogate
Result Qualifier
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
D
CAS No.
Prepared
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
11/14/13 04:55
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
98
66 - 137
11/14/13 04:55
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
96
71 - 126
11/14/13 04:55
1
96
73 - 120
11/14/13 04:55
1
Matrix: Water
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Dil Fac
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 15 of 38
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
Analyte
3
11/21/2013
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Trichloroethene
1.8
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 05:19
1
Chloroform
Surrogate
0.98 J
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
11/14/13 05:19
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
97
66 - 137
11/14/13 05:19
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
94
71 - 126
11/14/13 05:19
1
97
73 - 120
11/14/13 05:19
1
Matrix: Water
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
11/14/13 05:43
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 16 of 38
11/21/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 05:43
1
Surrogate
3
Result Qualifier
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
D
CAS No.
Prepared
Prepared
ug/L
Limits
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
11/14/13 05:43
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
98
66 - 137
11/14/13 05:43
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
95
71 - 126
11/14/13 05:43
1
97
73 - 120
11/14/13 05:43
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 17 of 38
11/21/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
11/14/13 06:08
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Chloroform
4.1
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 06:08
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 18 of 38
11/21/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Surrogate
Matrix: Water
4
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
5
Dil Fac
6
11/14/13 06:08
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
97
66 - 137
11/14/13 06:08
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
97
71 - 126
11/14/13 06:08
1
97
73 - 120
11/14/13 06:08
1
Matrix: Water
Result Qualifier
7
8
9
10
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Chloroform
4.8
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 19 of 38
11/21/2013
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 06:31
1
Surrogate
Result Qualifier
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
D
CAS No.
Prepared
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
11/14/13 06:31
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
98
66 - 137
11/14/13 06:31
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
96
71 - 126
11/14/13 06:31
1
97
73 - 120
11/14/13 06:31
1
Matrix: Water
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Dil Fac
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 20 of 38
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
Analyte
3
11/21/2013
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Result Qualifier
D
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Trichloroethene
1.7
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 06:56
1
Chloroform
Surrogate
0.90 J
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
11/14/13 06:56
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
97
66 - 137
11/14/13 06:56
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
95
71 - 126
11/14/13 06:56
1
99
73 - 120
11/14/13 06:56
1
Matrix: Water
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
11/14/13 07:20
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 21 of 38
11/21/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
RL
MDL Unit
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 07:20
1
Surrogate
3
Result Qualifier
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
D
CAS No.
Prepared
Prepared
ug/L
Limits
Analyzed
Analyzed
Dil Fac
Dil Fac
11/14/13 07:20
Prepared
Analyzed
1
Dil Fac
97
66 - 137
11/14/13 07:20
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
94
71 - 126
11/14/13 07:20
1
96
73 - 120
11/14/13 07:20
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 22 of 38
11/21/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Matrix: Water
4
Analyte
3
RL
MDL Unit
Result Qualifier
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
11/14/13 07:44
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/14/13 07:44
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 23 of 38
11/21/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
Surrogate
Matrix: Water
3
4
None
%Recovery Qualifier
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Limits
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
5
Dil Fac
6
11/14/13 07:44
Prepared
Analyzed
97
66 - 137
11/14/13 07:44
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
94
71 - 126
11/14/13 07:44
1
98
73 - 120
11/14/13 07:44
1
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 24 of 38
11/21/2013
Surrogate Summary
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
4
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
12DCE
TOL
BFB
(66-137)
(71-126)
(73-120)
MW-6
97
96
98
MW-7
98
96
97
480-49553-3
AZMW-7
95
94
99
480-49553-4
AZMW-6
97
95
96
480-49553-5
AZMW-3
96
96
98
480-49553-6
AZMW-8
98
96
96
480-49553-6 MS
AZMW-8
98
94
98
480-49553-6 MSD
AZMW-8
98
95
99
480-49553-7
AZMW-4
97
94
97
480-49553-8
AZMW-2
98
95
97
480-49553-9
AZMW-5
97
97
97
480-49553-10
AZMW-1
98
96
97
480-49553-11
MW-X DUP1
97
95
99
480-49553-12
MW-X2 DUP2
97
94
96
480-49553-13
Trip Blank
97
94
98
LCS 480-151859/4
Lab Control Sample
95
97
103
MB 480-151859/7
Method Blank
97
96
98
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
480-49553-1
480-49553-2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Surrogate Legend
12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
15
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 25 of 38
11/21/2013
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
5
MB MB
Analyte
Result Qualifier
4
RL
MDL Unit
ND
1.0
0.82 ug/L
D
Prepared
11/13/13 23:30
Analyzed
Dil Fac
1
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.23 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.31 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.38 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.29 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1.0
0.21 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1.0
0.72 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.78 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.84 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
2-Hexanone
ND
5.0
1.2 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
10
1.3 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
5.0
2.1 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Acetone
ND
10
3.0 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Benzene
ND
1.0
0.41 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.39 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Bromoform
ND
1.0
0.26 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Bromomethane
ND
1.0
0.69 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Carbon disulfide
ND
1.0
0.19 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.27 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
1.0
0.75 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
0.32 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Chloroform
ND
1.0
0.34 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Chloromethane
ND
1.0
0.35 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.81 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Cyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.18 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.68 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Ethylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.74 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Isopropylbenzene
ND
1.0
0.79 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Methyl acetate
ND
1.0
0.50 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Methylcyclohexane
ND
1.0
0.16 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Methylene Chloride
ND
1.0
0.44 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Styrene
ND
1.0
0.73 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1.0
0.36 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Toluene
ND
1.0
0.51 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.37 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Trichloroethene
ND
1.0
0.46 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
ND
1.0
0.88 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Vinyl chloride
ND
1.0
0.90 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
Xylenes, Total
ND
2.0
0.66 ug/L
11/13/13 23:30
1
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 26 of 38
11/21/2013
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
5
MB MB
None
Unit
D
RT
CAS No.
Prepared
ug/L
Analyzed
Dil Fac
11/13/13 23:30
1
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
Prepared
Analyzed
Dil Fac
97
66 - 137
11/13/13 23:30
1
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
96
71 - 126
11/13/13 23:30
1
98
73 - 120
11/13/13 23:30
1
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
Spike
Analyte
Added
LCS LCS
Result Qualifier
D
%Rec
Limits
25.0
23.6
ug/L
94
71 - 129
1,1-Dichloroethene
25.0
22.8
ug/L
91
58 - 121
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
25.0
25.2
ug/L
101
80 - 124
1,2-Dichloroethane
25.0
24.7
ug/L
99
75 - 127
Benzene
25.0
23.7
ug/L
95
71 - 124
Chlorobenzene
25.0
26.0
ug/L
104
72 - 120
25.0
24.6
ug/L
98
74 - 124
Ethylbenzene
25.0
24.8
ug/L
99
77 - 123
25.0
23.5
ug/L
94
64 - 127
Tetrachloroethene
25.0
29.5
ug/L
118
74 - 122
Toluene
25.0
24.2
ug/L
97
80 - 122
25.0
24.2
ug/L
97
73 - 127
Trichloroethene
25.0
26.4
ug/L
105
74 - 123
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
66 - 137
97
71 - 126
103
73 - 120
Matrix: Water
14
15
Prep Type: Total/NA
Sample Sample
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Spike
Added
MS MS
Result Qualifier
%Rec.
Unit
D
%Rec
Limits
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
25.0
26.8
ug/L
107
71 - 129
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
25.0
26.7
ug/L
107
58 - 121
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
25.0
26.5
ug/L
106
80 - 124
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
25.0
26.9
ug/L
108
75 - 127
Benzene
ND
25.0
26.7
ug/L
107
71 - 124
Chlorobenzene
ND
25.0
27.5
ug/L
110
72 - 120
ND
25.0
27.2
ug/L
109
74 - 124
Ethylbenzene
ND
25.0
26.9
ug/L
108
77 - 123
ND
25.0
25.1
ug/L
100
64 - 127
Tetrachloroethene
ND
25.0
30.0
ug/L
120
74 - 122
Toluene
ND
25.0
25.8
ug/L
103
80 - 122
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 27 of 38
10
13
Limits
95
9
12
LCS LCS
%Recovery Qualifier
8
11
%Rec.
Unit
1,1-Dichloroethane
Surrogate
6
7
MB MB
Surrogate
4
11/21/2013
QC Sample Results
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
Sample Sample
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Spike
Added
MS MS
Result Qualifier
5
%Rec.
Unit
D
%Rec
Limits
ND
25.0
27.0
ug/L
108
73 - 127
Trichloroethene
ND
25.0
28.9
ug/L
116
74 - 123
6
7
MS MS
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
Limits
98
66 - 137
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
94
71 - 126
98
73 - 120
8
9
Lab Sample ID: 480-49553-6 MSD
Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
Sample Sample
Analyte
Result Qualifier
Spike
Added
MSD MSD
Result Qualifier
%Rec.
Unit
D
%Rec
Limits
RPD
RPD
Limit
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
25.0
27.9
ug/L
112
71 - 129
4
20
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
25.0
28.5
ug/L
114
58 - 121
6
16
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
25.0
27.2
ug/L
109
80 - 124
3
20
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
25.0
28.2
ug/L
113
75 - 127
5
20
Benzene
ND
25.0
27.6
ug/L
111
71 - 124
4
13
Chlorobenzene
ND
25.0
29.2
ug/L
117
72 - 120
6
25
ND
25.0
28.8
ug/L
115
74 - 124
6
15
Ethylbenzene
ND
25.0
27.6
ug/L
111
77 - 123
3
15
ND
25.0
26.1
ug/L
105
64 - 127
4
37
Tetrachloroethene
ND
25.0
31.5 F
ug/L
126
74 - 122
5
20
Toluene
ND
25.0
27.3
ug/L
109
80 - 122
6
15
ND
25.0
29.0
ug/L
116
73 - 127
7
20
Trichloroethene
ND
25.0
29.9
ug/L
120
74 - 123
3
16
MSD MSD
Surrogate
%Recovery Qualifier
4
Limits
98
66 - 137
Toluene-d8 (Surr)
95
71 - 126
99
73 - 120
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 28 of 38
11/21/2013
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Association Summary
1
2
3
GC/MS VOA
4
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Prep Type
Matrix
Method
480-49553-1
MW-6
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-2
MW-7
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-3
AZMW-7
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-4
AZMW-6
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-5
AZMW-3
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-6
AZMW-8
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-6 MS
AZMW-8
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-6 MSD
AZMW-8
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-7
AZMW-4
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-8
AZMW-2
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-9
AZMW-5
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-10
AZMW-1
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-11
MW-X DUP1
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-12
MW-X2 DUP2
Total/NA
Water
8260C
480-49553-13
Trip Blank
Total/NA
Water
8260C
LCS 480-151859/4
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Water
8260C
MB 480-151859/7
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
8260C
Prep Batch
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 29 of 38
11/21/2013
Lab Chronicle
1
2
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 02:55
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
4
5
6
3
Matrix: Water
7
8
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 03:18
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
9
10
Matrix: Water
11
12
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 03:42
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
13
14
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 04:07
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 04:31
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 04:55
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 30 of 38
11/21/2013
15
Lab Chronicle
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
4
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 05:19
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
5
6
Matrix: Water
7
8
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 05:43
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
9
10
Batch
Matrix: Water
11
12
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Prepared
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
1
151859
11/14/13 06:08
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
13
14
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 06:31
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 06:56
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
Matrix: Water
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 07:20
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 31 of 38
11/21/2013
15
Lab Chronicle
1
2
3
Matrix: Water
4
Batch
Batch
Prep Type
Type
Method
Total/NA
Analysis
8260C
Run
Dilution
Batch
Factor
Number
or Analyzed
Prepared
1
151859
11/14/13 07:44
Analyst
Lab
LCH
TAL BUF
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 32 of 38
11/21/2013
Certification Summary
1
2
3
All certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority
Program
EPA Region
Certification ID
Expiration Date
Arkansas DEQ
State Program
6
88-0686
07-06-14
California
NELAP
9
1169CA
09-30-14
Connecticut
State Program
1
PH-0568
09-30-14
Florida
NELAP
4
E87672
06-30-14
Georgia
State Program
4
N/A
03-31-14
Illinois
NELAP
5
200003
09-30-14
Iowa
State Program
7
374
03-01-15
Kansas
NELAP
7
E-10187
01-31-14
Kentucky
State Program
4
90029
12-31-13 *
Kentucky (UST)
State Program
4
30
04-01-14
Louisiana
NELAP
6
02031
06-30-14
Maine
State Program
1
NY00044
12-04-14
Maryland
State Program
3
294
03-31-14
Massachusetts
State Program
1
M-NY044
06-30-14
Michigan
State Program
5
9937
04-01-14
Minnesota
NELAP
5
036-999-337
12-31-13 *
New Hampshire
NELAP
1
2973
09-11-14
New Jersey
NELAP
2
NY455
06-30-14
New York
NELAP
2
10026
04-01-14
North Dakota
State Program
8
R-176
03-31-14
Oklahoma
State Program
6
9421
08-31-14
Oregon
NELAP
10
NY200003
06-09-14
Pennsylvania
NELAP
3
68-00281
07-31-14
Rhode Island
State Program
1
LAO00328
12-31-13
Tennessee
State Program
4
TN02970
04-01-14
Texas
NELAP
6
T104704412-11-2
07-31-14
USDA
Federal
P330-11-00386
11-22-14
Virginia
NELAP
3
460185
09-14-14
Washington
State Program
10
C784
02-10-14
West Virginia DEP
State Program
3
252
12-31-13
Wisconsin
State Program
5
998310390
08-31-14
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
* Expired certification is currently pending renewal and is considered valid.
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 33 of 38
11/21/2013
Method Summary
1
2
Method
Method Description
Protocol
Laboratory
8260C
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
SW846
TAL BUF
Protocol References:
3
4
5
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 34 of 38
11/21/2013
Sample Summary
1
2
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Matrix
Collected
Received
480-49553-1
MW-6
Water
11/04/13 12:55
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-2
MW-7
Water
11/04/13 15:00
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-3
AZMW-7
Water
11/05/13 11:30
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-4
AZMW-6
Water
11/05/13 12:50
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-5
AZMW-3
Water
11/05/13 14:40
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-6
AZMW-8
Water
11/05/13 10:25
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-7
AZMW-4
Water
11/05/13 11:30
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-8
AZMW-2
Water
11/05/13 13:05
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-9
AZMW-5
Water
11/05/13 14:45
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-10
AZMW-1
Water
11/06/13 08:15
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-11
MW-X DUP1
Water
11/05/13 00:00
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-12
MW-X2 DUP2
Water
11/05/13 00:00
11/07/13 02:00
480-49553-13
Trip Blank
Water
11/05/13 00:00
11/07/13 02:00
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 35 of 38
11/21/2013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 36 of 38
11/21/2013
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 37 of 38
11/21/2013
1
2
Job Number: 480-49553-1
Login Number: 49553
List Number: 1
3
4
5
Creator: Wienke, Robert K
6
Question
Answer
Comment
background
True
True
tampered with.
True
8
True
9
True
True
COC is present.
True
True
True
True
the COC.
True
True
True
True
True
True
True
N/A
MS/MSDs
True
diameter.
True
needs
True
True
True
True
True
N/A
N/A
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
Aztech
TestAmerica Buffalo
Page 38 of 38
11/21/2013
ATTACHMENT E
DATA USABILITY SUMMARY REPORTS
Data Usability Summary Report
Former Ithaca Gun Factory Site #C755019A
Ithaca, New York
Groundwater Samples
Collected July and August 2013
September 2013
2638 Sunset Avenue
Utica, New York 13502
Groundwater Samples
Collected July and August 2013
Ithaca, New York
Prepared By:
EnviroAnalytics
Data Management and Validation Service
2638 Sunset Avenue
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report addresses data quality for groundwater samples collected at the Former Ithaca Gun Factory
Site #C755019A located in Ithaca, New York. The samples were analyzed for volatile organics (VOCs)
following New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Analytical Services
Protocol (ASP) methodologies. Sample collection was performed by Aztech Technologies, Inc. located
in Ballston Spa, New York. Analytical services were provided by TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. located
in Amherst, New York.
The volatile organic analyses data were determined to be usable for qualitative and quantitative purposes
with minor qualification. Sample results for several compounds were qualified based on deviations from
blank analysis, continuing calibration, field duplicate, and matrix spike criteria.
ii
TABLE of CONTENTS
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................1
1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Analytical Methods ............................................................................................................................................1
1.3 Validation Protocols ..........................................................................................................................................1
1.3.1 Organic Parameters ....................................................................................................................................2
1.4 Data Qualifiers ...................................................................................................................................................2
SECTION 2 - DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY ...................................................................................................4
2.1 Volatiles Organics Analysis...............................................................................................................................4
SECTION 3 - DATA USABILITY and PARCC EVALUATION ...........................................................................7
3.1 Data Usability .....................................................................................................................................................7
3.2 PARCC Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................7
3.2.1 Precision ......................................................................................................................................................7
3.2.2 Accuracy ......................................................................................................................................................7
3.2.3 Representativeness ......................................................................................................................................7
3.2.4 Comparability .............................................................................................................................................8
3.2.5 Completeness ...............................................................................................................................................8
Appendices
Appendix A - Data Validation Checklists
iii
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
This report addresses data quality for groundwater samples collected at the Former Ithaca Gun
Factory Site #C755019A located in Ithaca, New York. The samples were analyzed for volatile
organics (VOCs) following New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC) Analytical Services Protocol (ASP) methodologies. Sample collection was
performed by Aztech Technologies, Inc. located in Ballston Spa, New York. Analytical services
were provided by TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. located in Amherst, New York. The quantity
and types of samples submitted for data validation are tabulated below.
Table 1: Introduction - Sample Summary Table
Sample Identification
SDG#
Date Collected
Sample Matrix
480-43159-1
07/31/2013
Water
480-43132-1
08/01/2013
Water
Client ID
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
SB-6
SB-XX DUP
TB
SB-7
SB-8
SB-9
SB-10
Laboratory ID
480-43159-1
480-43159-2
480-43159-3
480-43159-4
480-43159-5
480-43159-6
480-43159-7
480-43159-8
480-43132-1
480-43132-2
480-43132-3
480-43132-4
1.2 Analytical Methods
The samples were analyzed for volatile organics (VOCs) following New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Analytical Services Protocol (ASP) methodologies
(2005 update). Laboratory analyses were provided by TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. located in
Amherst, New York.
1.3 Validation Protocols
Data validation is a process that involves the evaluation of analytical data against prescribed
quality control criteria to determine the usefulness of the data. The analytical data addressed in
this report were evaluated utilizing the quality control criteria presented in the following
documents:

USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for
Superfund Organic Methods Data Review, EPA-540-R-08-01, June 2008.

CLP Organics Data Review and Preliminary Review, SOP No. HW-6 Revision
#14, USEPA Region II, September 2006.
1

Validating Volatile Organic Compounds By Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry SW-846 Method 8260B, SOP No. HW-24 Revision #2, USEPA
Hazardous Waste Support Branch, October 2006.

Exhibit E of New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Analytical Services Protocol (NYSDEC ASP), NYSDEC June 2005.
1.3.1 Organic Parameters
The validation of organic parameters for this project followed the requirements presented
in the analytical methodology and the data validation guidelines presented above. The
following QA/QC parameters were evaluated:
Volatile Organics Analysis
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Holding Times
GC/MS Instrument Tuning Criteria
Calibration
a.
Initial Calibration
b.
Continuing Calibration
Blank Analysis
Surrogate Recovery
Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate Analysis
Reference Standard Analysis
Internal Standards Recovery
Compound Identification and Quantification
Field Duplicate Analysis
System Performance
Documentation Completeness
Overall Data Assessment
1.4 Data Qualifiers
The following qualifiers as specified in the guidance documents presented in Section 1.3 of this
report have been used for this data validation.
U
Indicates that the compound was analyzed for, but was not detected. The sample
quantification limit is presented and adjusted for dilution. This qualifier is also
used to signify that the detection limit of an analyte was raised due to blank
contamination.
J
Indicates that the result should be considered approximate. This qualifier is used
when the data validation procedure identifies a deficiency in the data generation
process.
UJ
Indicates that the detection limit for the analyte in this sample should be
considered approximate. This qualifier is used when the data validation process
identifies a deficiency in the data generation process.
2
R
Indicates that the previously reported detection limit or sample result has been
rejected due to a major deficiency in the data generation procedure. The data are
considered to be unusable for both qualitative and quantitative purposes.
The following sections of this document present a summary of the data validation process.
Section 2 discusses data compliance with established QA/QC criteria and qualifications
performed on the sample data. A discussion of the Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness,
Comparability, and Completeness (PARCC) of the data and data usability are discussed in
Section 3. The USEPA Region II Data Validation Checklist is presented in Appendix A.
3
SECTION 2 - DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY
This section presents a discussion of QA/QC parameter compliance with established criteria and
the qualification of data performed when QA/QC parameter deviations were identified. When
several deviations from established QA/QC criteria were observed, the final qualifier assigned to
the data was based on the cumulative effect of the deviations.
2.1 Volatile Organics Analysis
Data validation was performed for eleven groundwater samples and one trip blank sample. The
QA/QC parameters presented in Section 1.3.1 of this report were found to be within specified
limits with the exception of the following:
Blank Analysis
The method blanks contained detectable concentrations of several target compounds. Blank
action levels were calculated at ten times the blank concentrations for the common laboratory
contaminants and five times for other target compounds. Detected sample results, which
were less than the blank action levels were qualified with a "U" in the associated samples.
Results that were detected below the contract required detection limit (CRDL) were raised to
the CRDL and qualified with a "U" qualifier. The "U" qualifier indicates that the volatile
organic was analyzed for but was not detected above the CRDL. Samples qualified for blank
contamination are tabulated below.
Table 2: Volatile Organics Analysis - Blank Analysis Deviations
Blank
Matrix
Date
Analyzed
Compound
Water
08/08/2013
Carbon Disulfide
Blank
Action
Level
2.6 µg/L
Associated
Samples
Qualified
Sample Result
SB-1
SB-6
SB-XX DUP
1.0 U µg/L
1.0 U µg/L
1.0 U µg/L
The continuing calibration percent difference (%D) limit, which requires the %D to be
less than 25 percent, was exceeded for several compounds. Sample qualification
included the approximation (J, UJ) of results when %D criteria were exceeded, but were
less than 90 percent. Samples requiring qualification due to these deviations are
tabulated below.
4
Table 3: Volatile Organics Analysis - Continuing Calibration Deviations
Date Analyzed
08/07/2013
(22:41)
HP5973P
Compound
%D
26.1 %
Qualifier
UJ
Affected Samples
SB-7
SB-8
SB-9
SB-10
Matrix Spike Recovery
Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recovery criteria requiring compound
recoveries to be within laboratory generated control limits were exceeded for several
compounds. Qualification of sample results included the approximation of results when
spike recoveries were greater than the upper limit, but less than 200 percent or less than
the lower limit, but greater than 10 percent. Samples qualified due to MS/MSD recovery
deviations are tabulated below.
Table 4: Volatile Organics Analysis - MS/MSD Analysis Deviations
Control
Limits
Qualifier
Affected Samples
Percent
Recovery
(MS/MSD)
118 %/125 %
74 % to 124 %
J
SB-9
Trichloroethene
118 %/124 %
74 % to 123 $
J
SB-1
SB-4
SB-5
SB-7
SB-8
SB-9
SB-10
MS/MSD
Sample ID
Compound
SB-5
SB-5
Field duplicate criterion requires the relative percent difference (RPD) between duplicate
analyses to be less than 50 percent. Qualification of sample results included the
approximation of data for compounds with RPD values greater than 50 percent. Samples
qualified due to laboratory duplicate analysis deviations are tabulated below.
5
Table 5: Volatile Organics Analysis - Field Duplicate Deviations
Duplicate
Sample ID
SB-XX DUP
Original
Sample ID
SB-6
Compound
RPD
Qualifier
Affected Samples
Acetone
63.2 %
J
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
SB-8
SB-9
SB-10
SB-XX DUP
Overall, the laboratory performed volatile organic analyses in accordance with the
requirements specified in the methods listed in Section 1.2. These data were determined
to be usable for qualitative and quantitative purposes with minor qualification. Sample
results for several compounds were qualified based on deviations from blank analysis,
continuing calibration, field duplicate, and matrix spike criteria.
6
SECTION 3 - DATA USABILITY and PARCC EVALUATION
3.1 Data Usability
This section presents a summary of the usability of the analytical data and an evaluation of the
PARCC parameters. Data usability was calculated as the percentage of data that was not
qualified as rejected based on a significant deviation from established QA/QC criteria. Data
usability which was calculated separately for each type of analysis is tabulated below.
Table 6: Data Usability and PARCC Evaluation - Data Usability
Parameter
Volatile Organics
Usability
100 %
Deviations
None resulting in the rejection of data.
3.2 PARCC Evaluation
The following sections provide an evaluation of the analytical data with respect to the precision,
accuracy, representativeness, comparability, and completeness (PARCC) parameters.
3.2.1 Precision
Precision is measured through field duplicate samples, split samples, and laboratory
duplicate samples. For this sampling program, none of the data were qualified for
laboratory duplicate criteria deviations and 1.91 percent of the data were qualified for
field duplicate criteria deviations.
3.2.2 Accuracy
Matrix spike sample, surrogate recovery, internal standard recovery, laboratory control
samples, and calibration criteria indicate the accuracy of the data. For this sampling
program, 1.39 percent of the analytical data were qualified for deviations from matrix
spike recovery criteria; none of the data were qualified for surrogate recovery criteria
deviations; none of the data were qualified for internal standard recovery criteria
deviations; none of the data were qualified for laboratory control sample deviations; and
0.69 percent of the data were qualified for calibration criteria deviations.
3.2.3 Representativeness
Holding times, sample preservation, and blank analysis are indicators of the
representativeness of the analytical data. For this investigation, none of the analytical
data required qualification for holding time deviations and 0.52 percent of the analytical
data required qualification for blank analysis deviations.
7
3.2.4 Comparability
Comparability is not compromised provided that the analytical methods did not change
over time. A major component of comparability is the use of standard reference
materials for calibration and QC. These standards are compared to other unknowns to
verify their concentrations. Since standard analytical methods and reporting procedures
were consistently used by the laboratory, the comparability criteria for the analytical data
were met.
3.2.5 Completeness
The percent usability or completeness of the data was determined to be 100 percent.
8
APPENDIX A
DATA VALIDATION CHECKLISTS
Table of Contents
Page
I.
Part A: SW-846 Method 8260B VOA Analysis
1
2
Data Validation Checklist - Part A: SW-846 Method 8260B VOA Analysis
No:
Parameter
YES
1.0
Traffic Reports and Laboratory Narrative
1.1
Are the traffic Report Forms present for all samples?
1.2
Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sample receipt,
condition of samples, analytical problems or special circumstances affecting the quality
of the data?
2.0
Holding Times
2.1
Have any VOA technical holding times, determined from date of collection to date of
analysis, been exceeded?
3.0
System Monitoring Compound (SMC) Recovery (Form II)
3.1
Are the VOA SMC Recovery Summaries (FORM II) present for each of the following
matrices:
a. Low Water
3.2
NO
N/A
X
X
X
X
b. Low Soil
X
c. Air
X
Are all the VOA samples listed on the appropriate System Monitoring Compound
Recovery Summary for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water
X
b. Low Soil
X
c. Air
X
3.3
Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk?
X
3.4
Was one or more VOA system monitoring compound recovery outside of contract
specifications for any sample or method blank?
If yes, were samples re-analyzed?
X
Were method blanks re-analyzed?
X
3.5
Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw data and Form II?
4.0
Matrix Spikes (Form III)
4.1
Is the Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Form (Form III) present?
4.2
Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency for each of the following
matrices?
a. Low Water
4.3
X
X
X
b. Low Soil
X
c. Air
X
How many VOA spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water
4.4
X
2
out of 48
Soils
0
out of 48
How many RPD’s for matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries are outside
QC limits?
Water
0
out of 48
Soils
0
out of 48
2
No:
Parameter
5.0
Blanks (Form IV)
5.1
Is the Method Blank Summary (Form IV) present?
X
5.2
Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of VOA TCL compounds, has a
reagent/method blank been analyzed for each SDG or every 20 samples of similar
matrix (low water, low soil, medium soil), whichever is more frequent?
X
5.3
Has a VOA method/instrument blank been analyzed at least once every twelve hours
for each concentration level and GC/MS system used?
X
5.4
Is the chromatographic performance (baseline stability) for each instrument acceptable
for VOAs?
X
6.0
Contamination
6.1
Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results (TCL and/or TIC) for
VOAs?
X
6.2
Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive VOA results (TCL and/or TIC)?
X
6.3
Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every sample?
X
7.0
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check (Form V)
7.1
Are the GC/MS Instrument Performance Check Forms (Form V) present for
Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)?
X
7.2
Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge (m/z) listing for the BFB
provided for each twelve hour shift?
X
7.3
Has an instrument performance compound been analyzed for every twelve hours of
sample analysis per instrument?
X
7.4
Have the ion abundances been normalized to m/z 95?
X
7.5
Have the ion abundance criteria been met for each instrument used?
X
7.6
Are there any transcription/calculation errors between mass lists and Form V’s?
7.7
Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two) been reported?
X
7.8
Are the spectra of the mass calibration compound acceptable?
X
8.0
Target Compound List (TCL) Analytes
8.1
Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I VOA) present with required header
information on each page, for each of the following:
8.2
8.3
YES
X
a. Sample and/or fractions as appropriate?
X
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates?
X
c. Blanks?
X
Are the VOA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the mass spectra for the identified
compounds, and the data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in the sample
package for each of the following?
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate?
X
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates (Mass spectra not required)?
X
c. Blanks?
X
Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report?
X
3
NO
N/A
No:
Parameter
YES
8.4
Is the chromatographic performance acceptable with respect to:
Baseline stability?
X
Resolution?
X
Peak shape?
X
Full-scale graph (attenuation)?
X
NO
Other:
X
8.5
Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the identified VOA compounds present
for each sample?
X
8.6
Is the RRT of each reported compound within 0.06 RRT units of the standard RRT in
the continuing calibration?
X
8.7
Are all ions in the standard mass spectrum at a relative intensity greater than 10% also
present in the sample mass spectrum?
X
8.8
Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%?
X
9.0
Tentatively Identified Compounds (TIC)
9.1
Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I Part B) present; and do listed
TICs include scan number or retention time, estimated concentration and “JN”
qualifier?
9.2
N/A
X
Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified compounds and associated “best
match” spectra included in the sample package for each of the following:
X
b. Blanks?
X
9.3
Are any TCL compounds (from any fraction) listed as TIC compounds?
X
9.4
Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a relative intensity greater than
10% also present in the sample mass spectrum?
X
9.5
Do TIC and “best match” standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%?
X
10.0
Compound Quantitation and Reported Detection Limits
10.1
Are there any transcription/calculation errors in Form I results?
10.2
Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions and, for soils, sample moisture?
11.0
Standards Data (GC/MS)
11.1
Are the Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, and data system printouts present for initial
and continuing calibration?
12.0
GC/MS Initial Calibration (Form VI)
12.1
Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present and complete for the volatile
fraction at concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 ug/L? Are there separate calibrations
for low/med soils and low soil samples?
X
X
X
X
12.2
Were all low level soil standards, blanks, and samples analyzed by heated purge?
12.3
Are the response factors stable for VOA’s over the concentration range of the
calibration (%Relative Standard Deviation (%RSD) <30%)
X
12.4
Are the RRFs above 0.01?
X
12.5
Are there any transcription/calculation errors in the reporting of average response
factors (RRF) or %RSD?
4
X
X
No:
Parameter
YES
13.0
GC/MS Continuing Calibration (Form VII)
13.1
Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Form VII) present and complete for the volatile
fraction?
X
13.2
Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed for every twelve hours of sample
analysis per instrument?
X
13.3
Do any volatile compounds have a %Difference (%D) between the initial and
continuing RRF which exceeds the +/- 25% criteria?
X
13.4
Do any volatile compounds have a RRF <0.01?
X
13.5
factor (RRF) or %difference (%D) between initial and continuing RRFs?
X
14.0
Internal Standard (Form VIII)
14.1
Are the internal standard areas (Form VIII) of every sample and blank within the upper
and lower limits (-50% to +100%) for each continuing calibration?
X
14.2
Are the retention times of the internal standards within 30 seconds of the associated
calibration standard?
X
15.0
Field Duplicates
15.1
Were any field duplicates submitted for VOA analysis?
5
X
NO
N/A
Former Ithaca Gun Factory
Ithaca, New York
Soil Vapor Samples
Lot # H3H020401
Lot # H3H060408
September 2013
2638 Sunset Avenue
Soil Vapor Samples
Lot # H3H020401
Lot # H3H060408
Former Ithaca Gun Factory
Ithaca, New York
Prepared By:
EnviroAnalytics
2638 Sunset Avenue
ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report addresses data quality for air samples collected at the former Ithaca Gun Factory located in
Ithaca, New York. The samples were analyzed for TO-15 volatile organics (VOCs) following New York
State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Analytical Services Protocol (ASP)
methodologies. Sample collection was performed by Aztech Technologies, Inc. located in Ballston Spa,
New York. Analytical services were provided by TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. located in Knoxville,
Tennessee.
The TO-15 volatile organic analyses data were determined to be usable for qualitative and quantitative
purposes as presented by the laboratory.
iii
TABLE of CONTENTS
1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................1
1.4 Data Qualifiers ...................................................................................................................................................2
3.1 Data Usability .....................................................................................................................................................5
3.2.1 Precision ......................................................................................................................................................5
3.2.2 Accuracy ......................................................................................................................................................5
3.2.4 Comparability .............................................................................................................................................5
3.2.5 Completeness ...............................................................................................................................................6
Appendices
iv
1.1 Introduction
This report addresses data quality for air samples collected at the former Ithaca Gun Factory located
in Ithaca, New York. The samples were analyzed for TO-15 volatile organics (VOCs) following
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Analytical Services
Protocol (ASP) methodologies. Sample collection was performed by Aztech Technologies, Inc.
located in Ballston Spa, New York. Analytical services were provided by TestAmerica
Laboratories, Inc. located in Knoxville, Tennessee. The quantity and type of samples submitted
for data validation are tabulated below.
SDG#
Date Collected
Sample
Matrix
H3H020401
07/30/2013 – 07/31/2013
Soil Vapor
H3H060408
07/31/2013 – 08/01/2013
Soil Vapor
Client ID
VP-11
VP-12
VP-1
VP-2
VP-3
VP-4
VP-5
VP-6
VP-7
VP-8
VP-9
VP-10
VP-XX DUP
Laboratory ID
M1H7R
M1H7T
M1H7V
M1H7W
M1H7X
M1H70
M1H71
M1J68
M1J7D
M1J7E
M1J7F
M1J7G
M1J7H
The samples were analyzed for TO-15 volatile organics (VOCs) following New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Analytical Services Protocol (ASP)
methodologies (2005 update). Laboratory analyses were provided by TestAmerica Laboratories,
Inc. located in Knoxville, Tennessee.
Data validation is a process that involves the evaluation of analytical data against prescribed quality
control criteria to determine the usefulness of the data. The analytical data addressed in this report
were evaluated utilizing the quality control criteria presented in the following documents:



1

Validating Air Samples Volatile Organic Analysis of Ambient Air in Canister by
Method TO-15, SOP No. HW-31 Revision #4, USEPA Hazardous Waste Support
Branch, October 2006.

TO-15 Volatile Organics Analyses
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Holding Times
Calibration
a.
Initial Calibration
b.
Blank Analysis
Surrogate Recovery
System Performance
1.4 Data Qualifiers
U
contamination.
J
process.
UJ
Indicates that the detection limit for the analyte in this sample should be considered
approximate. This qualifier is used when the data validation process identifies a
deficiency in the data generation process.
2
R
The following sections of this document present a summary of the data validation process. Section
2 discusses data compliance with established QA/QC criteria and qualifications performed on the
sample data. A discussion of the Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Comparability, and
Completeness (PARCC) of the data and data usability are discussed in Section 3. The USEPA
Region II Data Validation Checklist is presented in Appendix A.
3
Data validation was performed for thirteen soil vapor samples. The QA/QC parameters presented
in Section 1.3.1 of this report were found to be within specified limits. The overall data assessment
is presented below.
Overall, the laboratory performed TO-15 volatile organic analyses in accordance with the
to be usable for qualitative and quantitative purposes as presented by the laboratory.
4
3.1 Data Usability
PARCC parameters. Data usability was calculated as the percentage of data that was not qualified
as rejected based on a significant deviation from established QA/QC criteria. Data usability which
was calculated separately for each type of analysis is tabulated below.
Parameter
TO-15 Volatile Organics
Usability
100 %
Deviations
None resulting in the rejection of data.
3.2.1 Precision
laboratory duplicate criteria deviations and none of the data were qualified for field
duplicate criteria deviations.
3.2.2 Accuracy
program, none of the analytical data were qualified for deviations from matrix spike
recovery criteria; none of the data were qualified for surrogate recovery criteria deviations;
none of the data were qualified for internal standard recovery criteria deviations; none of
the data were qualified for laboratory control sample deviations; and none of the data were
qualified for calibration criteria deviations.
representativeness of the analytical data. For this investigation, none of the analytical data
required qualification for holding time deviations and none of the analytical data required
qualification for blank analysis deviations.
3.2.4 Comparability
over time. A major component of comparability is the use of standard reference materials
for calibration and QC. These standards are compared to other unknowns to verify their
5
concentrations. Since standard analytical methods and reporting procedures were
consistently used by the laboratory, the comparability criteria for the analytical data were
met.
3.2.5 Completeness
6
APPENDIX A
Table of Contents
Page
I.
Part A: TO-15 VOA Analyses
2
Data Validation Checklist - Part A: TO-15 VOA Analyses
No:
Parameter
YES
1.0
Data Completeness and Deliverables
1.1
Have any missing deliverables been received and added to the data package?
2.0
Cover Letter, Narrative, and Data Reporting Forms
2.1
Is the Lab. Narrative and Cover Page Present?
X
2.2
Is Case Number contained in the Narrative?
X
2.3
Are the following Data Reporting Forms present?
X
Tentatively Identified Compounds [Form I-TIC]
X
Blank Summary [Form IV/Equivalent]
X
Laboratory Control Sample Data Sheet [Form III/Equivalent]
X
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check and Mass Calibration [Form V/Equivalent]
X
Initial Calibration [Form VI/Equivalent]
X
Continuing Calibration [Form VII/Equivalent]
X
Internal Standard Area and RT Summary [Form VIII/Equivalent]
X
Canister Certification [Form IX/Equivalent]
X
Canister Receipt/Log-in Sheet
3.1
Do all info items agree with each sample?
4.0
4.1
Are the Traffic Report Forms present for all samples?
5.0
Holding Times
5.1
Have any VOA technical holding times of 30 days, determined from the date of sample
collection to the date of analysis, been exceeded?
6.0
Leak Test Evaluation
6.1
Did the pressure test not vary by more than  13.8 kPa ( 2 psi) over the 24 hours
period?
7.0
Canister Certification Form IX/Equivalent
7.1
Blank Analysis
7.2
X
Analysis Data Sheet [Form I/Equivalent]
3.0
NO
X
X
X
X
Were the target analytes < the required detection limits specified in the task order?
X
Is the canister certification form provided, and the associated canister sample
identification included? When contamination, included contamination detected (all raw
data), analyte and reference mass spectra.
X
2
N/A
No:
Parameter
YES
8.0
Laboratory Control Samples
8.1
Is an LCS Data Sheet [Form III/Equivalent] present and complete for each LCS?
X
8.2
Was an LCS prepared (10 ppbv total scan, 0.1 ppbv SIM) and analyzed at the required
frequency (once per 24 hour analytical sequence, and concurrently with the samples in
the SDG)?
X
NO
N/A
8.3
Are there any transcription/calculation errors between the raw data and Form
III/Equivalent?
8.4
Is the % recovery within 70 – 130 % for each LCS target compound reported on Form
III/Equivalent?
X
8.5
Is the RT of each reported LCS compound within the windows established during the
most recent valid calibration?
X
8.6
Do the Internal Standards meet the requirements specified in Sections 18.1 and 18.2?
X
9.0
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check
9.1
Are the GC/MS Instrument Performance Check Forms [Form V/Equivalent] present for
X
9.2
Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge (m/z) listing for the 50 ng BFB
provided for each twenty-four hour shift?
X
9.3
Has the instrument performance compound been analyzed for every twenty-four hours
of sample analysis per instrument?
X
9.4
X
9.5
X
9.6
Are there any transcription/calculation errors between mass lists and Form Vs?
9.7
X
9.8
X
10.0
Performance Evaluation Sample (Optional)
10.1
Was a PE sample submitted from the Agency with each SDG?
X
10.2
Do the Internal Standards meet the requirements specified in Section 18.1 and 18.2?
X
11.0
Laboratory Method Blanks
11.1
Is an Analysis Data Sheet [Form IV/Equivalent] present and complete for each method
blank?
11.2
Frequency of Analysis:
X
X
X
Has a method blank analysis been reported per instrument for each 24-hour analytical
sequence?
X
Has a method blank been analyzed after the initial calibration or a valid calibration
check standard, and before the LCS, prior to sample analysis?
X
11.3
Is the chromatographic performance (baseline stability) for each instrument acceptable?
X
11.4
Was the area response of each Internal Standard (IS) in the blank within  40 % of the
mean area response of the IS of the most recent valid calibration?
X
3
No:
Parameter
11.5
Were the RTs of each IS within  0.33 min (20 sec.) between blanks and most recent
valid calibration?
12.0
Blank Contamination
12.1
Do any method blanks have positive target and non-target VOA results?
13.0
Target Compound Analytes
13.1
Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets [Form I/Equivalent], VOA chromatograms, and
data system printouts present and complete with required header information for each
of the following:
13.2
YES
NO
N/A
X
X
a. Samples?
X
b. Method blanks?
X
c. Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)?
X
d. Performance Evaluation Sample (PES)?
X
a. Baseline stability?
X
b. Resolution?
X
c. Peak shape?
X
d. Full-scale graph (attenuation)?
X
e. Other?
X
13.3
Were any electropositive displacement (negative peaks) or unusual peaks seen?
13.4
Is the sample component relative retention time (RRT) within  0.06 RRT units of the
RRT of the standard component from the most recent continuing calibration?
13.5
Was Nafion dryer used?
14.0
14.1
Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms [Form I-TIC] present and are retention
time, estimated concentration and “JN” qualifier listed corresponding to each TIC?
14.2
match” spectra included in the sample package for each of the following?
X
X
X
X
a. Samples
X
b. Blanks
X
14.3
10 % also present in the sample mass spectrum?
X
14.4
Do TIC and “best match” standard relative ion intensities agree within 20 %?
X
15.0
Initial Calibration and System Performance [Form VI/Equivalent]
15.1
Were each GC/MS system calibrated at 5 concentrations that span the monitoring range
of the interest in an initial calibration sequence to determine the sensitivity and the
linearity of the GC/MS response for the target compounds?
X
Was the same volume introduced into the trap consistently for all field and QC-sample
analyses?
X
15.2
4
No:
Parameter
15.3
Was the area response (Y) at each calibration level within  40 % of the mean area
response (mean Y) over the initial calibration range for each Internal Standard?
X
Did the laboratory tabulate the area response (Y) of the primary ions and the
corresponding concentration for each compound and Internal Standard?
X
Are the relative retention times (RRTs) for each of the target compounds at each
calibration level within  0.06 RRT units of the mean relative retention time for the
compound?
X
15.5
Are all individual RRF and average RRFs  0.050?
X
15.6
Are the response factors (RF) stable i.e., % Relative Standard Deviation (%RSD) 
40.0 %?
X
15.4
YES
15.7
factors (RRFs) or %RSDs?
15.8
Are the RT shift for each Internal Standard (IS) at each calibration level within 20
seconds of the mean RT over the initial calibration range of each IS?
X
Daily Calibration (Form VII/Equivalent)
16.1
Are the daily Calibration Forms [Form VII/Equivalent] present and complete for the
volatile fraction?
X
Has the daily calibration standard (20 ppbv total scan, 0.1 ppbv SIM) been analyzed for
every twenty-four hours of sample analysis per instrument after the BFB tuning
analysis?
X
16.3
Do any volatile compounds have a % Difference (%D) between the initial and daily
RRFs which exceed the  30 % criteria?
X
16.4
Are there any transcription/calculation errors in the reporting of the average response
factors (RRF) or % difference (%D) between initial and daily RRFs?
X
17.0
17.1
Are there any transcription/calculations errors in Form I results?
17.2
Are the reported detection limits adjusted to reflect sample dilutions?
17.3
Have any target compound concentrations exceeded the calibration range of the GC?
X
17.4
Was more than one method of quantitation used to calculate sample results within a
batch or 24-hour analytical sequence?
X
17.5
Did the lab report the target compounds below CRQLs with the suffix “J”?
18.0
Internal Standards (Form VIII/Equivalent)
18.1
Are the 3 internal standard areas [Form VIII] of every sample, LCS, PE, and blank
within the upper and lower limits (+ 40 % to – 40 %) for each continuing calibration or
10 ppbv level of initial calibration?
X
Are the internal standard retention times in each sample, LCS, PE, and blank within 20
seconds of the corresponding retention times in the associated calibration standard?
X
18.2
19.0
Mass Spectral Interpretation/Identification
19.1
Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets present with required header information on each
page, for each of the following:
X
X
X
X
5
N/A
X
16.0
16.2
NO
No:
19.2
19.3
Parameter
YES
b. Laboratory Control Samples?
X
c. Blanks?
X
NO
N/A
compounds, and the data system printouts (quant reports) included in the sample
package for each of the following:
X
b. Laboratory Control Samples?
X
c. Blanks?
X
Is chromatographic performance acceptable with respect to:
a. Baseline stability?
X
b. Resolution?
X
c. Peak shape?
X
d. Full-scale graph (attenuation)?
X
e. Other:
X
19.4
Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the identified compounds present for
each sample?
X
19.5
X
19.6
Are all ions present in the reference standard mass spectrum at a relative intensity
greater than 10 % also present in the sample mass spectrum?
X
19.7
Do sample and reference standard relative ion intensities agree within  20 %?
X
20.0
Field Duplicates
15.1
6
X
Ithaca, New York
Groundwater Samples
Collected November 2013
February 2014
2638 Sunset Avenue
Groundwater Samples
Collected November 2013
Ithaca, New York
Prepared By:
EnviroAnalytics
2638 Sunset Avenue
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report addresses data quality for groundwater samples collected at the Former Ithaca Gun Factory
Site #C755019A located in Ithaca, New York. The samples were analyzed for volatile organics (VOCs)
following New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Analytical Services
Protocol (ASP) methodologies. Sample collection was performed by Aztech Technologies, Inc. located
in Ballston Spa, New York. Analytical services were provided by TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. located
in Amherst, New York.
The volatile organic analyses data were determined to be usable for qualitative and quantitative purposes
as reported by the laboratory.
ii
TABLE of CONTENTS
1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................1
1.4 Data Qualifiers ...................................................................................................................................................2
3.1 Data Usability .....................................................................................................................................................5
3.2.1 Precision ......................................................................................................................................................5
3.2.2 Accuracy ......................................................................................................................................................5
3.2.4 Comparability .............................................................................................................................................5
3.2.5 Completeness ...............................................................................................................................................6
Appendices
iii
1.1 Introduction
This report addresses data quality for groundwater samples collected at the Former Ithaca Gun
Factory Site #C755019A located in Ithaca, New York. The samples were analyzed for volatile
organics (VOCs) following New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC) Analytical Services Protocol (ASP) methodologies. Sample collection was
performed by Aztech Technologies, Inc. located in Ballston Spa, New York. Analytical services
were provided by TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. located in Amherst, New York. The quantity
and types of samples submitted for data validation are tabulated below.
SDG#
Date
Collected
Sample
Matrix
480-49553-1
11/4/2013
Water
11/5/2013
Water
11/6/2013
Water
Client ID
MW-6
MW-7
AZMW-7
AZMW-6
AZMW-3
AZMW-8
AZMW-4
AZMW-2
AZMW-5
MW-X DUP1
MW-X2 DUP2
Trip Blank
AZMW-1
Laboratory ID
480-49553-1
480-49553-2
480-49553-3
480-49553-4
480-49553-5
480-49553-6
480-49553-7
480-49553-8
480-49553-9
480-49553-11
480-49553-12
480-49553-13TB
480-49553-10
The samples were analyzed for volatile organics (VOCs) following New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Analytical Services Protocol (ASP) methodologies
(2005 update). Laboratory analyses were provided by TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. located in
Amherst, New York.
Data validation is a process that involves the evaluation of analytical data against prescribed
quality control criteria to determine the usefulness of the data. The analytical data addressed in
this report were evaluated utilizing the quality control criteria presented in the following
documents:


1


Volatile Organics Analysis
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Holding Times
Calibration
a.
Initial Calibration
b.
Blank Analysis
Surrogate Recovery
System Performance
1.4 Data Qualifiers
U
contamination.
J
process.
UJ
Indicates that the detection limit for the analyte in this sample should be
considered approximate. This qualifier is used when the data validation process
identifies a deficiency in the data generation process.
2
R
The following sections of this document present a summary of the data validation process.
Section 2 discusses data compliance with established QA/QC criteria and qualifications
performed on the sample data. A discussion of the Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness,
Comparability, and Completeness (PARCC) of the data and data usability are discussed in
Section 3. The USEPA Region II Data Validation Checklist is presented in Appendix A.
3
Data validation was performed for twelve groundwater samples and one trip blank sample. The
QA/QC parameters presented in Section 1.3.1 of this report were found to be within specified
limits without exception. The overall data assessment is summarized below.
Overall, the laboratory performed volatile organic analyses in accordance with the
to be usable for qualitative and quantitative purposes as reported by the laboratory.
4
3.1 Data Usability
PARCC parameters. Data usability was calculated as the percentage of data that was not
qualified as rejected based on a significant deviation from established QA/QC criteria. Data
usability which was calculated separately for each type of analysis is tabulated below.
Parameter
Volatile Organics
Usability
100 %
Deviations
None resulting in the qualification of data
3.2.1 Precision
laboratory duplicate criteria deviations and none of the data were qualified for field
duplicate criteria deviations.
3.2.2 Accuracy
program, none of the analytical data were qualified for deviations from matrix spike
recovery criteria; none of the data were qualified for surrogate recovery criteria
deviations; none of the data were qualified for internal standard recovery criteria
deviations; none of the data were qualified for laboratory control sample deviations; and
none of the data were qualified for calibration criteria deviations.
representativeness of the analytical data. For this investigation, none of the analytical
data required qualification for holding time deviations and none of the analytical data
required qualification for blank analysis deviations.
3.2.4 Comparability
over time. A major component of comparability is the use of standard reference
materials for calibration and QC. These standards are compared to other unknowns to
verify their concentrations. Since standard analytical methods and reporting procedures
5
were consistently used by the laboratory, the comparability criteria for the analytical data
were met.
3.2.5 Completeness
6
APPENDIX A
Table of Contents
Page
I.
Part A: SW-846 Method 8260B VOA Analyses
1
2
No:
Parameter
YES
1.0
1.1
Are the traffic Report Forms present for all samples?
1.2
Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any problems with sample receipt,
condition of samples, analytical problems or special circumstances affecting the quality
of the data?
2.0
Holding Times
2.1
Have any VOA technical holding times, determined from date of collection to date of
analysis, been exceeded?
3.0
System Monitoring Compound (SMC) Recovery (Form II)
3.1
Are the VOA SMC Recovery Summaries (FORM II) present for each of the following
matrices:
a. Low Water
3.2
NO
N/A
X
X
X
X
b. Low Soil
X
c. Air
X
Are all the VOA samples listed on the appropriate System Monitoring Compound
Recovery Summary for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water
X
b. Low Soil
X
c. Air
X
3.3
Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk?
X
3.4
Was one or more VOA system monitoring compound recovery outside of contract
specifications for any sample or method blank?
If yes, were samples re-analyzed?
X
Were method blanks re-analyzed?
X
3.5
Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw data and Form II?
4.0
Matrix Spikes (Form III)
4.1
Is the Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Form (Form III) present?
4.2
Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency for each of the following
matrices?
a. Low Water
4.3
X
X
X
b. Low Soil
X
c. Air
X
How many VOA spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water
4.4
X
0
out of 26
Soils
0
out of 0
How many RPD’s for matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries are outside
QC limits?
2
No:
Parameter
Water
0
YES
out of 13
Soils
0
NO
out of 0
5.0
Blanks (Form IV)
5.1
Is the Method Blank Summary (Form IV) present?
X
5.2
Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of VOA TCL compounds, has a
reagent/method blank been analyzed for each SDG or every 20 samples of similar
matrix (low water, low soil, medium soil), whichever is more frequent?
X
5.3
Has a VOA method/instrument blank been analyzed at least once every twelve hours
for each concentration level and GC/MS system used?
X
5.4
Is the chromatographic performance (baseline stability) for each instrument acceptable
for VOAs?
X
6.0
Contamination
6.1
Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive results (TCL and/or TIC) for
VOAs?
X
6.2
Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive VOA results (TCL and/or TIC)?
X
6.3
Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every sample?
X
7.0
GC/MS Instrument Performance Check (Form V)
7.1
Are the GC/MS Instrument Performance Check Forms (Form V) present for
X
7.2
Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge (m/z) listing for the BFB
provided for each twelve hour shift?
X
7.3
Has an instrument performance compound been analyzed for every twelve hours of
sample analysis per instrument?
X
7.4
X
7.5
X
7.6
Are there any transcription/calculation errors between mass lists and Form V’s?
7.7
X
7.8
X
8.0
Target Compound List (TCL) Analytes
8.1
Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I VOA) present with required header
information on each page, for each of the following:
a. Sample and/or fractions as appropriate?
X
X
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates?
X
c. Blanks?
8.2
N/A
X
compounds, and the data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in the sample
package for each of the following?
X
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates (Mass spectra not required)?
c. Blanks?
X
X
3
No:
Parameter
YES
8.3
Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report?
8.4
NO
N/A
X
Baseline stability?
X
Resolution?
X
Peak shape?
X
Full-scale graph (attenuation)?
X
Other:
8.5
Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the identified VOA compounds present
for each sample?
X
8.6
X
8.7
Are all ions in the standard mass spectrum at a relative intensity greater than 10% also
present in the sample mass spectrum?
X
8.8
Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%?
X
9.0
9.1
Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I Part B) present; and do listed
TICs include scan number or retention time, estimated concentration and “JN”
qualifier?
9.2
X
match” spectra included in the sample package for each of the following:
X
b. Blanks?
X
9.3
Are any TCL compounds (from any fraction) listed as TIC compounds?
X
9.4
10% also present in the sample mass spectrum?
X
9.5
Do TIC and “best match” standard relative ion intensities agree within 20%?
X
10.0
10.1
Are there any transcription/calculation errors in Form I results?
10.2
Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions and, for soils, sample moisture?
11.0
Standards Data (GC/MS)
11.1
Are the Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, and data system printouts present for initial
and continuing calibration?
12.0
GC/MS Initial Calibration (Form VI)
12.1
Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present and complete for the volatile
fraction at concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 ug/L? Are there separate calibrations
for low/med soils and low soil samples?
12.2
Were all low level soil standards, blanks, and samples analyzed by heated purge?
12.3
Are the response factors stable for VOA’s over the concentration range of the
calibration (%Relative Standard Deviation (%RSD) <30%)
4
X
X
X
X
X
X
No:
Parameter
YES
NO
12.4
Are the RRFs above 0.01?
12.5
factors (RRF) or %RSD?
13.0
GC/MS Continuing Calibration (Form VII)
13.1
Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Form VII) present and complete for the volatile
fraction?
X
13.2
Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed for every twelve hours of sample
analysis per instrument?
X
13.3
Do any volatile compounds have a %Difference (%D) between the initial and
continuing RRF which exceeds the +/- 25% criteria?
X
13.4
Do any volatile compounds have a RRF <0.01?
X
13.5
factor (RRF) or %difference (%D) between initial and continuing RRFs?
X
14.0
Internal Standard (Form VIII)
14.1
Are the internal standard areas (Form VIII) of every sample and blank within the upper
and lower limits (-50% to +100%) for each continuing calibration?
X
14.2
Are the retention times of the internal standards within 30 seconds of the associated
calibration standard?
X
15.0
Field Duplicates
15.1
X
5
X
X
N/A

Site Characterization Report for the Former Ithaca Gun Factory

Transcription

Similar documents

Former Paragon Terminal/Apollo Street Creek Parcels 2011 Annual

Remedial Action Plan

Dental Chairs - US Dental Depot