October 2014 Technical Report
Transcription
October 2014 Technical Report
NI 43-101 REPORT ON THE INITIAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE SAN LUIS DEL CORDERO PROJECT DURANGO STATE, MEXICO LOCATION CENTERED NEAR NAD27 MEXICO UTM ZONE 13 567524 E 2812900 N Lat: 25°25’58”N Long: 104°17’20”W PREPARED FOR PROSPERO SILVER CORP. 900 - 900 West Howe Street Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6Z 2M4 PREPARED BY TERENCE WESLEY HODSON, P.GEO. HODSON GEOLOGICAL LTD. 12426 23rd Avenue Surrey, B.C. V4A 2C4 Effective Date: October 1, 2014 1 1.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................................................8 1.2 Budget ...........................................................................................................................................8 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE ..................................................................... 8 2.1 Terms of Reference and Purpose ...................................................................................................9 2.2 Source of Information and Data.................................................................................................... 9 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER PROFESSONALS……………….......................................................... 9 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ………………………......................................10 4.1 Property Area...............................................................................................................................10 4.2 Property Location........................................................................................................................11 4.3 Description of Claims……………............................................................................................. 12 4.4 Claim Title and Agreements………........................................................................................... 13 4.5 Legal Survey ............................................................................................................................... 13 4.7 Environmental Liabilities and Surface Access ............................................................................13 4.8 Work Permits…………. ............................................................................................................ 14 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, LOCAL RESOURCES, CLIMATE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ....................14 5.1 Topography, Elevation and Vegetation ..................................................................................... 14 5.2 Access to the Property and Proximity to Population Center(s) ................................................. 14 5.3 Relevant Climate and Length of Operating Season ...................................................................14 5.4 Availability of Surface Rights, Power, Water and Mining Personnel .......................................15 5.5 Potential Areas for Tailings Disposal, Heap Leach Pads and Plant Sites ..................................15 6.0 HISTORY …..................................................................................................................................15 6.1 Previous Ownership ...................................................................................................................15 6.2 Previous Exploration...................................................................................................................16 6.3 Historic Production and Resource Estimates .............................................................................17 7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ............................................................................................................ 24 7.1 Regional Geological Setting ...................................................................................................... 24 7.2 Property Geology……………………………………………………………………………….25 7.3 Mineralized Zones……………………...................................................................................... 26 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES……………...................................................................................................... 28 8.1 Mineral Deposit Type…………………………………………………………………………...28 8.2 Geological Concepts Used For Exploration of the Property …...................................................29 8.3 Mineralization …………………….. ..........................................................................................29 9.0 EXPLORATION …………………...............................................................................................31 9.1 Geochemical Sampling ...............................................................................................................31 9.2 Induced Polarization Geophysical Program..……………………………...................................31 9.2 Discussion of Induced Polarization Results ............................................................................... 33 10.0 DRILLING .................................................................................................................................. 33 9.1 Drillhole Orientation…................................................................................................................40 11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY.................................................... 40 11.1 Sample Preparation and Analytical Procedures……………………………………………….40 11.2 Review of Quality Assurance/Quality Control..........................................................................41 11.2.1 Standards………………………………………………………………………………….41 11.2.2 Duplicates…………………………………………………………………………………44 11.2.3Blanks……………………………………………………………………………………...46 11.3 Core Storage Facility……………….........................................................................................47 11.4 Discussion..……………………………………………………………………………………48 2 12.0 DATA VERIFICATION ..............................................................................................................48 12.1 Quality Control and Data Verification ......................................................................................48 12.2 Verification of Sampling and Analytical Data...........................................................................48 12.3 Discussion..……………………………………………………………………………………49 13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ............................................50 14.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES .......................................................................................50 14.1 Drillhole Database……………………………….....................................................................50 14.2 Project Parameters……………………………….....................................................................50 14.3 Specific Gravity………………………………….....................................................................51 14.4 Compositing………………………………..…….....................................................................51 14.5 Geological Interpretation….......................................................................................................51 14.6 Block Model Validation………………………….....................................................................52 14.7 Resource Classification………………......................................................................................53 14.8 Mineral Resource Statement…………………..........................................................................54 15.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES .........................................................................................................57 15.1 Relevant Data on Adjacent & Nearby Properties......................................................................57 16.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION ................................................................57 17.0 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................57 18.0 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS …............................................................................................58 19.0 REFERENCES …………………………………………….........................................................60 20.0 DATE AND CERTIFICATE…....................................................................................................62 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Mineral Resource Statement, San Luis del Cordero Project.…………………….…………...7 Table 1.2 Budget…………………………………………………………………………….………..…8 Table 4.1 Pertinent Claim (Mining Concession) Data for San Luis Project…………………………...12 Table 4.2 Prospero Shares Issuable to Altiplano Under Option Agreement…………………………...13 Table 10.1 Drillhole Collars……………………………………………………………………………33 Table 10.2 Assay Intervals Used in the Resource Estimation…………………………….…………...34 Table 12.1 Drill Core Check Samples from the San Luis Property…………………………………....48 Table 12.2 Drill Hole Collar Checks from the San Luis Property……………………………………..49 Table 14.1 SRLC Block Model Setup………………………………………………………………….50 Table 14.2 3D Wireframe Statistics……………………………………………………………………52 Table 14.3 Interpolation Parameters…………………………………………………………………...52 Table 14.4 Global Model Comparisons………………………………………………………………..53 Table 14.5 Block Model vs Composites……………………………………………………………….53 Table 14.6 Mineral Resource Statement, San Luis del Cordero Project……………………………….54 Table 18.1 Budget for Recommended Drill Programs......……………………………………………..59 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4.1 Location Plan for San Luis Del Cordero Project, Durango State, Mexico…………………10 Figure 4.2 General Location of SLDC Project, Mexico……………………………………………….11 Figure 4.3 Location of SLDC Project Mining Concessions Durango State, Mexico………………….12 Figure 6.1 Geology of the SLDC………………………………………………………………………18 Figure 6.2 SW-NE Section in the Plane of Apex Drill Holes SL-0-1 & 2…………………….………19 Figure 6.3 NE-SW Section in the Plane of Apex Drill Holes SL-0-3…………………………………20 Figure 6.4 NE-SW Section in the Plane of Prospero Drill Holes PSLC-11-14, PSLC-11-16, and Silver Standard Hole SSLC-13-20……………………………………………………21 Figure 6.5 N Section in the Plane of Prospero Drill Holes PSLC-10-1 and PSLC-10-12………….….22 Figure 6.6 N Section in the Plane of Silver Standard Drill Holes SSLC-13-21 and SSLC-14-32….…23 Figure 6.7 NW-SE Section Showing Santa Rosa Mine Workings and Altiplano Sampling Above Water Table…………………………………………………………………………24 Figure 7.1 Generalized Geology of SLDC, Durango State, Mexico…………………………………..27 Figure 7.2 Stratigraphic Section for the SLDC Project Area………………………………………….28 Figure 8.1 Outcrop map showing General geology of the project……………………………………..30 Figure 9.1 Location Plan for Surveyed IP Grid………………………………………………………..32 Figure 11.1 Standard CDN-FCM-5……………………………………………………………………42 Figure 11.2 Standard STD-15………………………………………………………………………….43 Figure 11.3 Ag-Cu-Zn Duplicates…….………………………………….…………………………….45 4 Figure 11.3 Ag-Cu-Zn Blanks………...………………………………….…………………………….46 Figure 14.2 Santa Rosa Vein and Santa Rosa East Skarn Resource Classification……………………55 Figure 14.2 Santa Rosa Vein and Santa Rosa East Skarn AgEq Grade Distribution………………….56 5 1.0 SUMMARY Prospero Silver Corp. (“Prospero” or “The Company”) through its Mexican subsidiary Minera Fumarola, S.A. De C.V. (“Fumarola”) holds an option to earn 100% in the San Luis Del Cordero Project (“SLDC” or “Cordero”). The property is located immediately north of the town of San Luis del Cordero, Durango State, Mexico and consists of six (6) mineral concessions totaling 2825 hectares. On August 29, 2008 P rospero signed a letter of agreement with Exploraciones Del Altiplano, S.A. Del C.V. (“Altiplano”) providing an option for Prospero to earn a 100% interest in Altiplano’s San Luis del Cordero project. Subsequently on May 14, 2009 a nd July 10, 2009 t he agreement was amended. The final terms of the Option Agreement and amendments provide Prospero the ability to earn a 100% interest in the San Luis del Cordero property. Prospero will issue 50,000 shares on or before September 13, 2014; 100,000 shares on or before March 13, 2015; 100,000 shares on or before September 13, 2015; and 600,000 shares on or before March 13, 2016 a s outlined in Table 6.2. The Mexican partner (Altiplano) will receive 2% NSR which can be bought down to 1.5% by paying US$500,000 within 3 years of the decision to exercise the option. The SLDC area is underlain by a basement of Jurassic age La Casita Formation overlaid by limestone and shales of the Cretaceous Aurora/Cuesta del Cura, Indidura and Caracol Formations. SLDC covers a contact zone between granodioritic, dioritic, quartz porphyry, feldspar porphyry and quartz-feldspar porphyry intrusive rocks and siltstone, limestone and shale. The property hosts both vein type and skarn copper-silver-zinc mineralization. Prospero’s mapping has shown that large areas close to the intrusive contact zone have been recrystallized to hornfels and skarnified and that more distal jasperoids have formed along structures and replaced limy sedimentary rocks. The principle mineralized structures, Santa Rosa Vein and Santa Rosa East Skarn have been traced for over a kilometer with trends varying up to 30° from the main east-west trend. These structures have close association with the north border of the main complex stock. Multiple veins and skarn occur in each structure varying in width from one to several 10’s of meters. The Santa Rosa East Skarn and additional known skarn style mineralized zones, La Puerta and El Canal, envelope the intrusive complex along its northern, eastern and southern borders, for a total length in the order of 5 kilometers and is referred to as the “Skarn Rim Zone”. A number of silver bearing replacement and skarn bodies occur in similar settings in other deposits near the eastern edge of the Sierra Madre (Figure 4.1) The San Luis Del Cordero Project area has a number of historical old shafts and old mine workings that exploited tetrahedrite and base metal bearing vein structures. The first formal operation on the SLDC took place in the Santa Rosa Mine and targeted the near surface extent of the Santa Rosa Vein. Mining was carried out by Torreon-based Compañia Minera del Carmen, SA de CV with records suggesting extraction in the order of 70,000 tons during the 1950’s and 1960’s with three hundred 270 t onne lots), shipped directly to the now inactive Industrial Minera Mexico SA (IMMSA) smelter at San Luis Potosi, yielding 600-700 g/t Ag and 2% to 2.5% copper. 6 Since 2000 four separate exploration programs have been carried out. In overburden covered areas surface sampling, Induced Polarization (IP), air borne magnetic and electrical magnetic geophysics surveys were conducted to trace vein and skarn structures. Four drill programs totaling 11,436.42 meters in 43 drill holes have been completed. Drilling has been focused on the known or extensions of the Santa Rosa vein and Santa Rosa Skarn mineralized structures. The SLDC deposits are classified under the categories of Indicated and Inferred in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Definition Standards. Table 1 lists the estimated resources for both mineralized zones as of October 1, 2014. Resources were calculated using Inverse Distance cubed (ID3). Resources are reported at a silver-equivalent (AgEq) cut-off grade of 85 g/ t using the following metal prices: silver= $19/oz, copper= $3.00/lb, zinc=$0.90/lb. The known mineralized zones have not been fully delineated by the current drilling and remain open in several directions. Additionally the property has potential for new mineralized zones such as the El Canal and La Puerta targets. Table 1.1 Resource Statement, San Luis del Cordero Project, October 1, 2014 AgEq3 Ag g/t g/t Class Zone TONNES Cu % Zn Ag AgEq4 % ozs Ozs Sta. Rosa vein Indicated 31,500 1022.6 827.8 1.21 1.98 838,366 1,035,663 Sta. Rosa East skarn Indicated 631,125 200.8 86.1 0.76 1.02 1,747,094 4,075,335 Total Indicated 662,625 239.9 121.4 0.78 1.06 2,585,460 5,110,998 Sta. Rosa vein Inferred 218,437 955.4 716.4 1.12 3.62 5,031,291 6,710,075 Sta. Rosa East skarn Total Inferred 2,566,875 214.9 95.7 0.72 1.26 7,897,950 17,734.488 Inferred 2,785,312 273.0 144.4 0.75 1.45 12,929,241 24,444,562 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves as there are insufficient studies to demonstrate economic viability. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Resource will be upgraded to an Indicated or Measured Resource as a result of continued exploration. Resources are reported at a silver-equivalent cut-off grade of 85 g/t. AgEq = Ag + [Cu% x 22.046 x Cu price x 31.103/Ag price + Zn% x 22.046xZn price x 31.103/Ag price]. Metal prices used in the formula: silver = US$19/oz, copper = US$3.00/lb, Zn = US$0.90/lb. AgEq ozs = AgEq grams/31.103 7 1.1Conclusions and Recommendations The Santa Rosa Vein, located at depth and along strike from the old Santa Rosa Mine workings, is a structurally controlled narrow vein zone hosting highly anomalous silver grades with associated copper and zinc mineralization. The Santa Rosa East Skarn deposit is located east of the Santa Rosa Mine workings along the contacts between quartz feldspar porphyry and granodioritic bodies with limy Mesozoic sedimentary units hosting silver-copper-zinc mineralization. Both deposits remain open along strike and to depth. Previous drill results and the success of the exploration programs justify further drilling of the SLDC as follows in priority order. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Extension to depth and to the west in the Santa Rosa Vein mineralized zone. Upgrading the Santa Rosa Vein deposit to Measured and Indicated categories. Extents and definition of the Santa Rosa East Skarn. Extension at depth, east and west of drill hole PSLC-17 in the El Canal target. The extension at depth of La Puerta skarn. The blind skarn adjacent to and in the HW of the Santa Rosa Vein. 1.2 Budget Preliminary budget for the recommended work outlined above is shown in Table 1.2. Costs shown are all inclusive and cover associated costs required to support the recommended 12,500 meter drilling and sampling program. All costs are in US dollars. Table 1.2 Budget for Recommended Drill Programs Type Phase 1 Description Santa Rosa Vein extension and definition drilling Phase 2 Santa Rosa East Skarn extensions, 10,000 meters definition and exploration targets Total Drilling Total Length 2,500 meters 12,500 meters Estimated Cost US $500,000 US $2,000,000 US $2,500,000 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE This T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t was prepared for Minera Fumarola SA de CV the wholly owned Mexican subsidiary of Prospero Silver Corp. (“Prospero” or “The Company”). Prospero is listed under the symbol PSL on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) Venture Exchange. 8 Prospero’s head office is located at Suite 900 900 Howe St., Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6Z 2M4. 2.1 Terms of Reference and Purpose Hodson Geological Ltd. was retained by Fumarola to produce an initial resource estimate on the San Luis del Cordero property. The report has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and is for supporting documentation to be filed with the relevant securities commissions and the TSX Venture Exchange. Terence Wesley Hodson, P.Geo. is the qualified person for this report. The writer personally examined the geological setting of the SLDC area on August 15, 2014 and reviewed the geological setting with Prospero’s exploration manager, geological engineer Martin Soto Moran. In addition, the writer examined and sampled core at Prospero’s secured core splitting and storage facility in San Luis Del Cordero. The writer has examined a number of properties in Sonora, Coahuila, Baja California Sur and Michoacán, Mexico for other TSX and TSX venture companies, but has no previous experience on the SLDC prior to his August 15, 2014 property examination. 2.2 Source of Information and Data All reports and documents used for this report were provided by Fumarola (Prospero) in the form of digital files. Other supporting documents are listed under the References and Sources of Information section of this report. Data was collected primarily by geological and geophysical contractors and employees of Prospero and Silver Standard, previous operators and Consejo de Recursos Minerales (CRM) personnel. The writer’s review of mapping, drill sites and core handling and storage indicated that previous operators u sed competent personnel for fieldwork and sampling and Hochschild, Prospero Silver, and Silver Standard used certified laboratories for analytical work. The Induced Polarization geophysical program conducted by SJ Geophysics Ltd. for Prospero is outlined in a report entitled “Logistical Report for Prospero Silver Corp. Induced Polarization Survey on the San Luis Del Cordero Project” (Dobrescu and Ko, 2008) and interpreted in a draft report entitled, “3D Induced Polarization on the San Luis del Cordero Project” (Rastad and Dobrescu, 2008). 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER PROFESSIONALS The writer is required by NI 43-101 to include description of the property title and terms of legal agreements that are presented in the following sections. The writer has relied entirely on property agreements and title documents provided by Prospero in order to provide summaries of title and ownership. Property agreements and title documents are legal matters and should be reviewed by Prospero’s legal counsel. In Mexico, claim locations are established by a registered Mexican mineral claim surveyor and such plans are equivalent to a legal survey of the claim area. 9 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 4.1 Property Area The SLDC, consisting of 6 exploration concessions covering 2825.0 hectares Table 4.1; Figures 4.1, 4.2 & 4.3) is situated in Durango State and centered near NAD27 MEXICO UTM ZONE 13 coordinates 567524E and 2812900N and geographic coordinates 25o 25’ 58” N latitude and 104 o 17’ 20” W longitude. Figure 4.1 Location Plan for San Luis Del Cordero Project, Durango State, Mexico. (Prepared by Prospero, 2008) 10 4.2 Property Location The SLDC Project is located about 150 kilometers NNE of Durango City, Durango State, Mexico and about 85 kilometers west of Torreon, Coahuila State, Mexico. The project area can be reached from Durango City or Torreon via Federal highways 40 (Durango-Torreon) and then westerly on Highway 34 (also Highway 39 on Durango map) to Nazas and northerly for 23km on a secondary paved road that passes through the town of San Luis del Cordero, Durango Mexico. Alternately, Highway 45 north from Durango for about 160km to Hidalgo del Parral and east on Highway 34 to Nazas, avoids the toll road. The San Luis Del Cordero municipality is a small town with a population of 2,000 people, all services (manpower, electrical, water, general goods) are available. The town also offers cell phone service and low speed internet. Figure 4.2 General Location of SLDC Project, Mexico. 11 4.3 Description of Claims The SLDC, consisting of 6 claims or mining concessions covers about 2,825.0 ha in the Municipality of San Luis del Cordero, State of Durango, Mexico was optioned by Prospero in 2008 (Table 4.1) . Table 4.1 Pertinent Claim (Mining Concession) Data for San Luis Project. CLAIM ISSUED EXPIRY Claim Taxes 2º half 2014 (pesos) Claim Taxes 1º half 2015 (pesos) TITLE HECTARES TECOLOTES 194984 25.00 30 Jul. 1992 29 Jul. 2042 3,231 3,231 CORDERO II 218972 175.00 28 Jan. 2003 27 jan.2053 22,617 22,617 CORDERO III 223678 129.00 2 Feb. 2005 01 Feb. 2055 9,474 16,672 CORDERO 222485 320.00 16 Jul. 2004 15 jul. 2054 23,501 41,357 CORDERO III 221970 129.00 22 Apr. 2004 21 Ap. 2054 16,672 16,672 CORDERO IV 228447 2047.00 22 Nov. 2006 21 Nov. 2056 150,332 150,332 225,827 250,881 2,825.00 Figure 4.3 Location of SLDC Project Mining Concessions Durango State, Mexico. (Prepared by Prospero, 2008) 12 The 2005 Mexican Mining Regulations, effective in January 2006, provide for all concessions to be valid for a period or 50 years. Annual taxes, due in January and June of each year, vary from about US$0.45 in the first year to US$9.88 per hectare in year eleven of exploration. Property holding costs for June to December 2014 are about US$17,265.00 and will increase to about US$27,913.00 as titles mature. 4.4 Claim Title and Agreements The SLDC property consists of 6 claims in Durango State, Mexico. On August 29, 2008, Prospero, through a Mexican subsidiary Minera Fumarola and Exploraciones Del Altiplano, S.A. Del C.V. (“Altiplano”) entered into an exploration and option agreement, as amended May 14, 2009 and July 10, 2009 (the “Cordero Option Agreement”), providing an option for the Company to earn a 100% interest in the Cordero Property, subject only to a 2.0% net smelter royalty interest on commercial production payable to Altiplano. After exercise of option Prospero may, within 3 years, purchase 0.5% of the NSR for a payment of US$500,000. In order to maintain the Cordero Option Agreement in good standing and exercise such option, Fumarola must issue shares of Prospero (Table 4.2) to Altiplano. Table 4.2 Prospero Shares Issuable to Altiplano Under Option Agreement. ISSUE DATE September 13, 2014 (issued) March 13, 2015 September 13, 2015 March 13, 2016 NUMBER OF SHARES 50,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 4.5 Legal Survey Mexican mining law requires a mineral claim be established by a registered Mexican Mineral Claim Surveyor. Prospero compiled a plan of the SLDC property concessions (Figure 4.3) from the registered surveyor’s plots. Monuments were observed in the field establish the location of the property as shown on Figure 4.3 claim locations but no attempt was made to evaluate the legal title to claims shown on Figure 4.3. 4.7 Environmental Liabilities and Surface Access The writer is not aware of any environmental liabilities or social issues related to the San Luis Project area. The area is used for grazing by local ranchers and care must be taken to insure safety of livestock. The SLDC property is mainly situated on privately held land and permission must be obtained 13 to access the land. Altiplano and previous exploration companies obtained permission to access the claim area for mapping and sampling at no cost, the permission for access the properties for drilling purposes was obtained at a cost of $3,000.00 Mexican pesos per each drill hole. Prospero management believes that access permission will not be a problem. Some land purchase may eventually be required for mill and disposal sites. 4.8 Work Permits All exploration activities carried out on the property are in compliance with relevant environmental permitting requirements. 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, LOCAL RESOURCES, CLIMATE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY 5.1 Topography, Elevation and Vegetation The SLDC project is located in the Eastern Sierra Madre Occidental Physiographic subprovince near the eastern edge of the Mesa Central Province (Central Plateau Province) near the boundary with the Sierra Madre Oriental. In the SLDC area jasperoid alteration and dioritic and granodioritic bodies form resistant areas which result in modest relief of about 200 meters with elevations ranging from about 1500 meters and 1700 meters with old workings mainly between 1500m and 1600m. San Luis is situated in an area with various bushes, shrubs and cactus. Natural grass meadows are used to graze cattle and other livestock. Wild fauna is not abundant but wild turkeys and several other varieties of birds, rabbits, coyote, lizards, white tail deer, and rattlesnakes are seen. 5.2 Access to the Property and Proximity to Population Centers The project area can be reached from Durango City via Federal highways 40 (DurangoTorreon) and then westerly about 50km on highway 39 to Nazas and then northerly for 23km on a good secondary road to San Luis del Cordero (Figure 4.2). Access to the project area requires twowheel drive but local trails and tracks require four wheel drive truck or ATV. Permission for local access may be obtained from local ranchers that are kept informed of exploration activity. 5.3 Relevant Climate and Length of Operating Season The climate in the region is characterized by elevated temperatures during the summer months with cooler temperatures in the winter months producing some freezing from December through February. The area is semi-arid with maximum temperatures over 30ºC during the summer season. The rainy season extends from June through October with occasional rain during December 14 and January. The average annual precipitation is about 50mm but during wet years rainfall reaches 250 mm. 5.4 Availability of Surface Rights, Power, Water and Mining Personnel The SLDC is not part of an environmental reserve or protected area and Estudio de Impacto Ambiental and Cambio de Uso de Suelo (Environmental Impact and Soil Use Change) permits are not required for early stage exploration and drilling. Surface rights are controlled by local ranchers and farmers and they should be kept informed of planned exploration. Roads should be planned to assist locals with access and gated and/or cattle guarded as necessary. Water and power are available in San Luis Cordero. Drilling companies and mining contractors are available in Durango, Zacatecas and Fresnillo and other areas of Mexico and San Luis del Cordero provides a local labor pool. Mining personnel are available and they have been trained to work at local mines in Zacatecas and Durango States. 5.5 Potential Areas for Tailings Disposal, Heap Leach Pads and Plant Sites The property covers a number of flat meadow or basin areas which would be suitable for tailings disposal and plant sites. Land is relatively inexpensive and sufficient areas could be purchased for all mining needs. 6.0 HISTORY Systematic mining in the Altiplano of Mexico started in pre-colonial times with mines in the Velardeña mining district and in the Mapimi mining district located or re-located by Spanish prospectors late in the 16th century. The presence of mineralization near San Luis del Cordero was probably also known to the early Spanish prospectors. The mineralization at the SLDC would have generated minimal interest because it was not amenable to silver recovery by simple amalgamation. The first formal operation on the SLDC took place in the Santa Rosa Mine and was carried out by Torreon-based Compañia Minera del Carmen, SA de CV with records suggesting extraction in the order of 70,000 tons during the 1950’s and 1960’s with 300 ton lots, shipped directly to the now inactive Industrial Minera Mexico SA (IMMSA) smelter at San Luis Potosi, yielding 600700 g/t Ag and 2% to 2.5% copper. 6.1 Previous Ownership Compañia Minera del Carmen controlled the property in the 1960’s and 1970’s and following completion of mining in the Santa Rosa Mine, the concessions were relinquished. The Tecolotes concession, covering the Santa Rosa Mine has been held since July 1992 and Exploraciones del 15 Altiplano, SA de CV initially filed claims in the district in 1996 and the “Tecolotes” claim was optioned in 1999 and purchased in 2002. Altiplano finalized consolidation of all ground in the district by claiming of the Cordero IV concession in November 2006. On May 12, 2006 Minera Hochschild Mexico, SA de CV (“HC”) and Altiplano signed an exploration option agreement allowing HC to obtain rights to the project by spending US$2,700,000 in four years. After completing sampling of workings, geological assessment, and 6 diamond drill holes totaling 1,477.40m, the property was returned to Altiplano in 2007. In August 2008 Exploraciones del Altiplano and Prospero Silver through its subsidiary Minera Fumarola signed an option agreement to acquire 100% of the SLDC concession for cash payments, share payments and US$1,650,000.00 work commitments. I n 2013 the Project was subject to Join Venture Agreement with three parties, Exploraciones del Altiplano, Prospero Silver and Silver Standard. In March 2014 Silver Standard returned the option to Prospero. The original contract between Prospero and Altiplano has been amended to require Prospero to issue to Altiplano 100,000 shares on or before March 13, 2015; 100,000 shares on or before September 13, 2015; and 600,000 shares or before March 13, 2016 for 100% of the concession. 6.2 Previous Exploration During the year 2000 Apex Silver Mines Ltd. completed diamond drill holes SL-001, SL-002, SL-003 under the Sta. Rosa mine (Figures 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3), and commissioned detailed mapping of the central and western portion of the district. During 2007 Minera Hochschild Mexico, SA de CV (“HC”) carried out a 6 hole diamond drill program at the Sta. Rosa mine area (2 holes), the India Bonita target zone (3 holes) and NE Veta structure (1 hole) (Figures 6.1, 7.1, 8.1). Altiplano conducted underground sampling of the Santa Rosa workings above the water table at about 40m shaft depth. Pierce points for historic drill holes below the Santa Rosa workings are shown in Figure 6.7 a longitudinal section along with the location and results of channel samples results. Altiplano’s sampling showed the Santa Rosa vein to be a generally narrow vein with swells to 2.0m containing strong to high-grade values in silver, copper and zinc plus elevated but commercially non-significant values in Pb and Mo. In August 2008 P rospero Silver through his subsidiary Minera Fumarola cmpleted detailed surface geologic mapping and sampling and an IP geophysical survey. In 2010 a nd 2011 P rospero completed two diamond drill hole programs. The drilling program delineated a high grade silver ore shoot with modest width in Santa Rosa Vein and in following up of HC’s skarn intercept in drill hole HCSL-1 outlined a p olymetalic (Ag-Cu-Zn) mineralized skarn deposit in Santa Rosa East skarn structure. Hole PSLC-11-17 intersected a polymetalic mineralized structure in the Canal Target Zone. In 2013 Silver Standard reviewed the previous information, carried out rock sampling in the jasperoid zone, completed a ground IP geophysical survey and executed a 15 diamond drill hole program. Three drill holes intersected the Santa Rosa Vein, all three intersected high grade silver values (Figure 6.4 SSLC-13-14, SSLC-13-16). Drillhole SSLC-13-20 intersected a strong 70 m wide unmineralized blind skarn body located in the hangingwall of the Santa Rosa Vein. Five drill holes drilled along the eastern extension of Santa Rosa East skarn extended the mineralized skarn an additional 250 meters in that direction. Five holes drilled to intersect IP anomalies in the west zone of the property below the jasperoid zone and along the India Bonita trend at the NE sector of the property, failed to find significant mineralization. Two drill holes (SSLC-13-28 and SSLC-13-30) located to the east of the Santa Rosa E skarn trend intersected a zone of quartz porphyry dikes with an associated low temperature style mineralization in quartz veins, which represent possible peripheral 16 mineralization of the La Puerta skarn target. 6.3 Historic Production and Resource Estimates Altiplano used production records to estimate historic production of about 70,000 tonnes yielding 650 g/t Ag and 2.5% Cu. (The records are no longer available to Prospero and the vendor’s historic production figures, presented as property information, have not been verified by the writer or Prospero and should not be relied upon). Workings and dumps present at the Santa Rosa Mine and India Bonita Mines suggest that the 70,000 tons is a reasonable estimate of material removed from the property and it is reasonable to expect that higher grade material was removed, resulting in lower grades for material left in the Santa Rosa Mine dump (Figure 6.7). The writer is unaware of any previous resource estimates having been carried out on the Santa Rosa Vein or Santa Rosa East Skarn mineralized structures. 17 Figure 6.1 Geology of the SLDC showing locations of veins and Apex, HC, Prospero and Silver Standard drill holes. A number of adits and shafts were used to exploit the Santa Rosa and India Bonita structures (Prepared by Prospero, 2014). 18 Figure 6.2. SW-NE Section in the Plane of Apex Drill Holes SL-0-1 & 2. (Section Looking NW; Prepared by Prospero, 2014) 19 Figure 6.3. NE-SW Section in the Plane of Apex Drill Holes SL-0-3. (Section Looking NW; Prepared by Prospero, 2014) 20 Figure 6.4. NE-SW Section in the Plane of Prospero Drill Holes PSLC-11-14, PSLC-11-16, and Silver Standard Hole SSLC-13-20, Testing Santa Rosa vein. (Section Looking NW; Prepared by Prospero, 2014) 21 Figure 6.5. N Section in the Plane of Prospero Drill Holes PSLC-10-1 and PSLC10-12, Testing Santa Rosa East Skarn. (Section Looking N; Prepared by Prospero, 2014) 22 Figure 6.6. N Section in the Plane of Silver Standard Drill Holes SSLC-13-21 and SSLC-14-32, Testing the Santa Rosa East Skarn. (Section Looking N; Prepared by Prospero, 2014) 23 Figure 6.7 NW-SE Section Showing Santa Rosa Mine Workings and Altiplano Sampling Above Water Table. (Prepared by Prospero, 2008) 7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING 7.1 Regional Geological Setting The geology of Durango State, Mexico is dominated by extensive volcanic fields that form one of the world’s largest deposits of rhyolitic ignimbrite and tuff. The volcanic field has been divided into an early, Lower Volcanic Group (LVG) consisting mainly of intermediate composition volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks and a later (Oligocene), Upper Volcanic Group (UVG) consisting of acid volcanic rocks. 24 Early Tertiary to Mesozoic age, sedimentary rocks occur in the eastern part of Durango State and as windows in the extensive Tertiary volcanic fields. Locally younger intrusive bodies, quartz feldspar porphyry, dioritic or granodioritic units, intrude limy sedimentary rocks and result in areas of skarn development as seen on the SLDC property. 7.2 Property Geology The SLDC property is located in the Sierras y Valles Province (Basin and Range) of Durango with the property geology described as part of a regional mapping project by the CRM (Consejo de Recursos Minerales). The local geology has been mapped by Apex, Altiplano, Hochschild and Prospero and field checked by Prospero and the writer. A plan of the SLDC property geology compiled by Prospero is presented as Figure 7.1. This outcrop geological map shows areas of silicification, jasperoid alteration and skarnification (the “Skarn Rim Zone). A stratigraphic section for the SLDC is presented as Figure 7.2. The SLDC is underlain by Mesozoic and Tertiary clastic sedimentary rocks and limestone covered by large areas of recent alluvium. The oldest sedimentary rocks consist of interbedded shale, sandstone and limestone of the Jurassic La Casita Formation. These Jurassic sedimentary rocks occupy the core of a recumbent anticline that passes through the central part of the SLCD property and are the primary host rocks for the Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa East and the India Bonita vein structures. These sedimentary rocks are hornfelsed near intrusive contacts and vein structures. Cretaceous Aurora/Cuesta formation massive limestone and thick bedded dolomite with minor interbedded shale overlie the Jurassic sedimentary rocks. Tertiary Ahuichila Formation conglomerate is found locally. The Tertiary conglomerate is overlain by rhyolitic tuff of the Cerro Prieto Formation in western areas of the SLDC property. Quaternary Basalt overlies the rhyolites east of the main access road. Recent alluvial cover is the most extensive unit on the SLDC. The geological picture is further complicated by a recumbent fold with a northerly trending axis centered on the SLDC. Thrust fault, normal faults and fracture zones complicate the distribution of units and cause segmenting of the geophysical response. The granodiorite is equigranular, composed of plagioclase, biotite, quartz and variable amounts of K-feldspar. The quartz porphyry dikes consist of angular and small quartz crystals in a fine grained felsitic groundmass. Quartz-feldspar porphyry consists of large quartz and plagioclase crystals in a felsic matrix. The feldspar porphyry consists of large euhedral plagioclase crystals in felsic matrix. A diorite intrusive, composed of medium grained plagioclase and mafic minerals in a fine grained pyritic groundmass, is found mainly in the NE sector of the project area (Figure 7.1). Surface mapping indicates the granodiorite is the oldest intrusive and the porphyry dikes and diorites are younger. An early prograde skarn is primarily structurally controlled, and affects all the intrusive phases. Retrograde polymetalic and precious metals mineralization occurred mainly after skarn formation and occurs in veins and stockwork zones hosted in hornfels close to the intrusive contact as well as in zones of skarnification. 25 7.3 Mineralized Zones Mineralization is related to skarnified and replacement zones associated with the contact zone of Cretaceous limy sediments and a h ighly differentiated intrusive complex which includes a granodioritic stock cut by quartz porphyry, feldspar porphyry, quartz-feldspar porphyry and diorite dikes of Tertiary age. Four mineralized structural vein and skarn zones, the Santa Rosa Vein, Santa Rosa East Skarn, India Bonita vein and Veta NE, have been explored with workings and/or drilling. Modest exploitation has occurred from the Santa Rosa Mine workings and minor exploitation is indicated by the smaller workings at the India Bonita Mine. The primary exploration target had been extensions of the Santa Rosa Vein structure until 2007 w hen Hochschild hole HCSR-2 intersected skarn style mineralization while looking for the east extension of the Santa Rosa Vein structure. In the Santa Rosa Mine area silicification or jasperoid alteration occurs along a WNW trend. Drilling has shown that quartz and carbonate veins with chalcopyrite, pyrite, sphalerite, tetrahedrite and galena fill several sub-parallel structures in the Santa Rosa Vein. The vein dips 60-80 degrees south with widths up to two (2) meters true width. Drilling has traced strike and dip extensions of this structure beneath the old workings for 300 m eters along strike and 200 meters down dip. This mineralized structure remains open along strike and down dip. The old workings extend along strike for 170m and down dip from surface to the 1450 elevation. Water table is approximately at the 1500m elevation leaving only the uppermost portion of the old workings accessible. Historic production from the Santa Rosa Vein was an estimated 70,000 tonnes of direct shipping ore. Santa Rosa East Skarn occurs along an east-west trending zone located at or near the contact of the Tertiary intrusive units with Cretaceous limestone or limy sediments. Multiple mineralization skarnified zones typically occur over widths of 30m to 100m (Figures 6.1 to 6.6) along east-west trending zones with 60-80°southerly dips. Chalcopyrite, pyrite, sphalerite, tetrahedrite and trace galena mineralization are found in zones up t o 25 meters true width. Mapping and drilling have traced the main Santa Rosa East Skarn zone for over 900 meters along the east-west trend and 200 meters down dip. Two drill holes (SSLC-13-28 & 30) located 650 meters along strike to the east of the Santa Rosa East Skarn also intersected skarn style mineralization (Figure 8.1). The India Bonita outcrops in the northern portion of the project, trending SW to NE and dipping 55-60o to the SE. It is a narrow banded to brecciated quartz-calcite vein hosted by altered sandstone-siltstone-limestone units. Best result returned was from SSLC-13-25 with 110 g/ t Ag, 0.105% Zn over 1.50 meters (Figures 7.1 & 8.1). Veta NE vein, located NE of the Bonita Vein, is a quartz-calcite skarn structure trending SW to NE and dipping 75o to the SE. One drill hole tested the structure and returned minor disseminated chalcopyrite. 26 Figure 7.1 Generalized Geology of SLDC, Durango State, Mexico. (Prepared by Prospero, 2014) 27 Figure 7.2 Stratigraphic Section for the SLDC Project Area. (Prepared by Prospero, 2014) 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES 8.1 Mineral Deposit Types The SLDC property contains a number of workings in skarnified and hornfelsed areas of Mesozoic limy sediments associated with the contact of granodioritic and porphyritic intrusive bodies. The setting is favourable for skarn type and replacement deposits similar to Velardeña, Naica, and San Martín deposits held by others in Durango and Chihuahua States (Figure 4.1). Exploration has been primarily directed at mineralization associated with veined shear zones (Santa Rosa Vein, India Bonita Vein) and mineralized skarn zones (Santa Rosa East Skarn) (Figure 8.1). 28 8.2 Geological Concepts Used For Exploration of the Property General exploration concept for skarn and contact metamorphic deposits in the Sierra Madre is to locate geophysical anomalies associated with conductive sulfide bodies or magnetism associated with bodies enriched in pyrite, magnetite or pyrrhotite. Induced polarization surveys have been successfully used to identify sulfide concentrations buried below post-mineral or recent alluvial or soil cover. The quality of the geophysical interpretation is enhanced by the availability of detailed geological and alteration mapping. The evaluation of vein type deposits can be enhanced if mineralization is associated with conductive sulfides and if resistivity signatures are characteristic of well mineralized lodes. Drilling results showed the known ore bodies, Santa Rosa Vein and Santa Rosa E Skarn, have subtle or null chargeability response and in the localities with interesting IP anomalies the drill holes intersected hornfels with disseminated pyrrhotite. To date the better exploration methods on the SLDC property are geologic targets produced by detailed geologic mapping and soil sampling at the border of the intrusive stock complex. 8.3 Mineralization Mineralization associated with the Santa Rosa Vein consists of coarse crystalline quartz+ pyrite+chalcopyrite+sphalerite+tetrahedrite-tennantite. Sphalerite is light-medium brown with chalcopyrite replacement textures (also known as exsolution textures). Tetrahedrite is the more abundant sulfosalt, tennantite is less common. Galena is rare in the Santa Rosa vein. Both prograde and retrograde skarn type mineralization are associated with the Santa Rosa East Skarn. Retrograde minerals seen are similar to those found in Santa Rosa Vein and include quartz, pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and tetrahedrite-tennantite. Prograde skarn mineralization is usually simple: garnets (andradite and grossularite) crystalline quartz+chalcopyrite+pyrite. At the India Bonita vein quartz+calcite+pyrite+sphalerite+galena are found. 29 Figure 8.1 Outcrop map showing General geology of the project. (Prepared by Prospero, 2008) 30 9.0 EXPLORATION 9.1 Geochemical Sampling Prospero’s geochemical sampling consisted of rock samples from surface outcrops, underground workings, soil samples and core samples. All samples were analyzed by ICP multielement Au + 41 package at the ALS-Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia. The elements Au, Ag, Cu, Pb, and Zn were considered of economic interest or as possible pathfinders for silver-base metal mineralization. Prospero found that molybdenum and to a lesser degree beryllium and tungsten were also anomalous in the India Bonita structure. Geochemical sampling verified the presence of significant silver in the India Bonita structure and suggests that molybdenum and possibly the lithophile elements tungsten, beryllium and tin may be of interest in skarn and replacement type deposits or wider areas of vein or stockwork mineralization. Soil geochemistry developed in the East sector of Santa Rosa East Skarn shows interesting anomalous zone at the border of the intrusive in Cu, Zn, Ag and Mo with spikes at La Puerta and El Canal zones. La India Bonita shows spikes in Pb, Zn and Ag. Soil anomalies have been used to confirm drill targets in zones where the geology is partially or totally alluvium covered. 9.2 Induced Polarization Geophysical Program A time domain 3D Induced Polarization (“IP”) survey was conducted for Prospero from June 05, 2008 to June 25, 2008 on 17 north-south lines spaced at 100m intervals (1W to 17W) by SJ Geophysics (“SJ”) of Canada (Dobrescu and Ko, 2008; Rastad and Dobrescu, 2008). A total of 23 line-kms were surveyed (Figure 9.1). A dipole array consisted of a modified pole-dipole configuration with a combination of 8 or 12 dipoles, for a total array length of 800m. The acquired data was inverted to provide a subsurface distribution of resistivity and chargeability. The 23 line-km IP survey produced a number of resistivity and chargeability anomalies as interpreted in a report by Rastad and Dobrescu (2008). SJ’s survey shows that chargeability anomalies appear to correlate with resistivity features and mapped geology. Silver Standard completed an additional 19.2 line-kms of ground IP and CSMAT (Controlled source Audio-frequency Magnetotelluric survey) in the eastern sector of the project. 31 Figure 9.1 Location Plan for Surveyed IP Grid. (from Rastad and Dobrescu, 2008) 32 9.2 Discussion of Induced Polarization Results Drill programs completed by Prospero and Silver Standard indicated that known mineralized deposits have a subtle chargeability response. In contrast, the more peripheral zones within the intrusive metamorphic halo host pyrrhotite and pyrite and produce significant IP anomalies, but lack polymetalic mineralization of significance. Confirmation of this is seen in drill core from holes SSLC-13-27 and SSLC-13-29 suggesting chargeability anomalies are in response to disseminated pyrite within hornfels and silicified Jurassic sediments. 10.0 DRILLING Previous drilling campaigns on the SLDC property include Apex Silver Mines Ltd. (Apex) in 2000 drilled three (3) diamond drill holes under the Sta. Rosa mine (659.37m); in 2007 Minera Hochschild Mexico, SA de CV (HC) carried out a six (6) hole diamond drill program (1477.40m) both at the Sta. Rosa mine area (2 holes), the India Bonita target zone (3 holes) and NE Veta structure (1 hole); Prospero in 2010-11 completed 19 drillholes primarily targeted at extensions of the Santa Rosa Vein and Santa Rosa East Skarn structures (3779.30m); and in 2013-14 Silver Standard carried out a 15 h ole program (5520.35) also mainly targeted at extensions of the known vein and skarn mineralization but also drilled exploration targets. In total 43 drill holes were completed for 11,436.42 meters. Drill holes were collared using HQ and reduced to NQ as required. Coordinate system used is WGS 84 (equivalent to ITRF 92) and the topography relief lines are taken from INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática) maps. Table 10.1 Drill Hole Collars. Drill Hole SL-00-1 SL-00-2 SL-00-3 HCIB-1 HCIB-2 HCIB-3 HCNE-1 HCSR-1 HCSR-2 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-3 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-5 PSLC-10-6 PSLC-10-7 Easting 571533 571533 571603 572911 572916 572774 574711 571376 572042 571996 572095 571946 572145 571672 572907 572048 Northing 2812946 2812945 2812887 2814070 2813898 2813812 2815397 2813058 2812909 2812874 2812875 2812873 2812855 2812900 2813791 2812820 Elevation 1530 1529 1529 1566 1562 1575 1572 1530 1510 1507 1508 1511 1507 1524 1562 1504 Dip -53 -68 -65 -48 -65 -60 -50 -45 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -65 -50 Azimuth 30 30 30 0 0 325 315 30 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 Length 195.07 231.65 232.65 184.40 299.40 396.30 195.65 199.35 202.30 126.60 87.60 138.80 146.40 158.80 185.00 189.10 33 PSLC-10-8 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-10 PSLC-10-11 PSLC-11-12 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-14 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-16 PSLC-11-17 PSLC-11-18 PSLC-11-19 SSLC-13-20 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-22 SSLC-13-23 SSLC-13-24 SSLC-13-25 SSLC-13-26 SSLC-13-27 SSLC-13-28 SSLC-13-29 SSLC-13-30 SSLC-13-31 SSLC-14-32 SSLC-14-33 SSLC-14-34 572043 572196 570793 572146 572000 571839 571453 571884 571352 572459 571787 572361 571347 572318 572463 571334 570859 572280 572570 570512 573100 570506 573097 571290 572318 572318 572407 2812848 2812855 2813196 2812807 2812759 2812834 2812972 2812790 2812907 2811826 2813187 2811948 2812911 2812841 2813120 2813080 2813299 2813485 2813724 2813486 2813035 2813487 2813027 2813020 2812841 2812842 2812845 1505 1508 1568 1504 1503 1520 1526 1514 1522 1497 1541 1490 1520 1503 1531 1528 1566 1527 1603 1612 1520 1610 1520 1526 1503 1497 1519 -50 -50 -70 -50 -50 -51 -49 -51 -50 -50 -51 -50 -73 -50 -60 -65 -60 -45 -50 -45 -60 -65 -60 -73 -70 -60 -50 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 2 30 320 173 140 30 0 180 30 30 340 315 30 10 30 150 30 0 320 0 85.40 173.85 125.05 228.75 303.75 218.40 228.45 273.50 320.25 143.05 491.00 155.55 398.65 366.45 439.75 298.70 389.20 406.75 423.70 452.60 523.70 213.75 409.50 314.75 412.10 270.10 200.65 Table 10.2. Assay intervals used in the resource estimation. Dhid From(m) HCSR-2 18.50 HCSR-2 18.80 HCSR-2 19.50 HCSR-2 20.20 HCSR-2 21.00 HCSR-2 21.50 HCSR-2 22.45 HCSR-2 22.85 HCSR-2 24.10 HCSR-2 24.90 HCSR-2 25.15 To(m) 18.80 19.50 20.20 21.00 21.50 22.45 22.85 24.10 24.90 25.15 25.45 Length(m) 0.30 0.70 0.70 0.80 0.50 0.95 0.40 1.25 0.80 0.25 0.30 Ag g/t 39.6 40.7 53.9 14.1 5.6 4.0 12.4 42.9 68.9 850.0 38.5 Cu% 0.49 0.61 0.63 0.35 0.08 0.08 0.14 0.48 0.54 2.46 0.08 Zn% 0.29 0.35 0.25 0.16 0.50 0.08 0.43 0.67 1.15 1.84 2.02 MinZone Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn 34 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 HCSR-2 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 25.45 25.65 25.80 26.00 26.45 27.55 28.80 28.95 29.50 30.55 31.00 31.40 18.50 80.32 81.37 82.10 82.80 84.08 85.35 86.03 86.82 87.20 88.18 88.50 89.67 90.13 90.57 90.97 92.47 93.94 95.25 96.10 97.45 98.70 99.62 100.02 100.80 101.30 102.20 103.05 103.76 104.64 105.60 106.35 107.03 25.65 25.80 26.00 26.45 27.55 28.80 28.95 29.50 30.55 31.00 31.40 31.80 31.80 81.37 82.10 82.80 84.08 85.35 86.03 86.82 87.20 88.18 88.50 89.67 90.13 90.57 90.97 92.47 93.94 95.25 96.10 97.45 98.70 99.62 100.02 100.80 101.30 102.20 103.05 103.76 104.64 105.60 106.35 107.03 107.48 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.45 1.10 1.25 0.15 0.55 1.05 0.45 0.40 0.40 13.30 1.05 0.73 0.70 1.28 1.27 0.68 0.79 0.38 0.98 0.32 1.17 0.46 0.44 0.40 1.50 1.47 1.31 0.85 1.35 1.25 0.92 0.40 0.78 0.50 0.90 0.85 0.71 0.88 0.96 0.75 0.68 0.45 741.0 19.3 19.5 30.8 3.6 22.5 101.0 35.3 3.7 326.0 4.4 51.3 63.3 76.4 81.2 474.0 16.3 13.2 3.5 157.0 133.0 36.4 89.6 142.0 25.0 17.6 26.6 7.8 4.1 2.3 4.5 21.3 2.2 189.0 839.0 48.2 322.0 440.0 30.0 135.0 80.9 27.6 16.6 24.8 45.5 6.18 0.14 0.11 0.18 0.02 0.26 2.25 0.52 0.06 1.90 0.03 1.14 0.52 0.65 0.74 3.60 0.10 0.07 0.02 1.61 0.48 0.53 1.73 1.84 0.10 0.04 0.35 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.08 0.09 0.03 0.35 5.62 0.34 1.31 1.45 0.07 0.33 0.60 0.21 0.31 0.42 1.00 3.00 3.92 1.63 1.17 1.37 2.22 10.45 2.00 0.36 1.78 0.26 0.35 1.08 0.19 0.39 0.56 0.11 0.17 0.09 0.19 0.24 0.30 0.43 1.30 0.94 0.58 3.45 0.55 0.29 0.18 0.29 0.21 0.13 0.27 0.23 0.98 3.70 1.47 0.32 0.23 1.25 0.09 0.12 0.76 4.32 Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn 35 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-1 PSLC-10-11 PSLC-10-11 PSLC-10-11 PSLC-10-11 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-2 PSLC-10-3 PSLC-10-3 107.48 108.51 109.61 110.61 80.32 168.29 168.64 169.97 168.29 51.40 52.65 53.90 54.95 56.45 57.28 57.95 58.85 59.00 59.50 60.15 60.35 61.53 62.13 62.55 63.65 64.45 65.23 66.10 66.74 67.65 68.20 68.55 70.00 70.05 70.35 70.65 70.90 71.20 71.85 73.40 74.45 75.00 51.40 94.55 95.37 108.51 109.61 110.61 110.91 110.91 168.64 169.97 170.48 170.48 52.65 52.90 54.95 56.45 57.28 57.95 58.85 59.00 59.50 60.15 60.35 61.53 62.13 62.55 63.65 64.45 65.23 66.10 66.74 67.65 68.20 68.55 70.00 70.05 70.35 70.65 70.90 71.20 71.85 73.40 74.45 75.00 75.60 75.60 95.37 96.06 1.03 1.10 1.00 0.30 30.59 0.35 1.33 0.51 2.19 1.25 0.25 1.05 1.50 0.83 0.67 0.90 0.15 0.50 0.65 0.20 1.18 0.60 0.42 1.10 0.80 0.78 0.87 0.64 0.91 0.55 0.35 1.45 0.05 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.65 1.55 1.05 0.55 0.60 24.20 0.82 0.69 23.7 29.4 302.0 223.0 91.6 25.1 115.0 99.0 96.9 83.5 0.9 98.0 84.8 687.0 77.3 65.1 70.0 14.7 397.0 74.1 4.3 6.5 25.4 4.9 3.5 2.1 14.8 217.0 129.0 23.2 128.0 26.5 26.5 13.7 18.9 0.8 758.0 27.3 2.1 23.6 2.4 72.6 84.0 11.8 56.8 0.70 0.89 8.41 6.26 0.70 1.53 0.65 0.92 0.67 1.12 0.3 0.71 0.48 0.54 0.70 0.80 0.11 0.04 1.24 1.31 0.13 0.04 0.73 0.13 0.09 0.00 0.24 3.62 4.00 0.94 0.74 0.65 0.65 0.43 0.43 0.02 3.74 0.22 0.01 0.49 0.04 1.67 0.72 0.18 0.60 0.69 0.47 2.99 3.47 0.92 0.36 0.47 3.07 1.24 0.14 0.23 0.37 0.24 0.53 0.58 0.63 0.24 0.14 0.59 0.74 0.18 0.13 0.73 0.22 0.19 0.05 0.09 6.40 0.96 0.11 4.24 0.50 0.50 0.10 2.37 0.41 0.77 0.05 0.06 0.48 0.45 0.97 0.58 1.72 3.53 Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn 36 PSLC-10-3 PSLC-10-3 PSLC-10-3 PSLC-10-3 PSLC-10-3 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-4 PSLC-10-5 PSLC-10-5 PSLC-10-5 PSLC-10-5 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 PSLC-10-7 97.20 97.80 98.44 99.31 94.55 85.40 86.90 88.73 89.53 90.75 92.20 93.60 95.00 96.30 97.70 97.90 98.90 99.90 100.65 102.17 85.40 132.50 132.85 134.20 132.50 141.50 142.15 143.69 144.38 145.00 145.50 146.05 147.35 148.13 148.87 149.95 150.83 151.31 151.76 152.80 154.14 155.50 157.00 157.78 141.50 97.80 98.44 99.31 99.86 99.86 86.90 87.90 89.53 90.75 92.20 93.60 95.00 96.30 97.70 97.90 98.90 99.90 100.65 102.17 103.70 103.70 132.85 134.20 135.52 135.52 142.15 142.84 144.38 145.00 145.50 146.05 147.35 148.13 148.87 149.95 150.83 151.31 151.76 152.80 154.14 155.50 157.00 157.78 158.55 158.55 0.60 0.64 0.87 0.55 5.31 1.50 1.00 0.80 1.22 1.45 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.40 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.52 1.53 18.30 0.35 1.35 1.32 3.02 0.65 0.69 0.69 0.62 0.50 0.55 1.30 0.78 0.74 1.08 0.88 0.48 0.45 1.04 1.34 1.36 1.50 0.78 0.77 17.05 964.0 9.3 15.2 14.5 125.7 59.1 89.7 17.2 191.0 11.5 2.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 250.0 155.0 262.0 177.0 68.8 54.4 68.1 1.4 26.2 58.7 37.5 92.8 76.2 75.0 208.0 52.6 183.0 5.6 3.1 35.1 12.4 48.7 88.9 13.4 3.2 3.7 3.6 4.6 35.0 425.0 61.5 1.62 0.21 0.60 0.54 0.52 1.12 0.12 0.13 0.43 0.17 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 2.86 5.43 4.17 1.64 0.99 1.04 0.13 0.03 0.74 0.35 1.02 0.26 0.25 0.72 0.14 0.85 0.14 0.02 0.23 0.07 0.42 0.10 0.03 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.13 1.55 1.28 0.36 1.67 0.92 1.23 0.61 1.74 0.42 0.10 0.18 0.45 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.21 0.24 0.06 0.54 0.19 0.08 0.16 4.21 0.19 0.28 0.70 3.05 2.91 0.97 3.74 0.22 1.61 0.69 0.18 0.82 0.70 6.22 1.89 0.72 0.19 0.41 0.41 0.34 0.22 0.35 1.48 Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval 37 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-9 PLSC-11-12 PLSC-11-12 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-13 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 132.24 133.39 134.10 135.53 136.75 137.94 138.72 140.03 140.72 141.72 142.85 143.50 143.64 144.82 132.24 250.10 250.10 173.78 174.34 175.07 175.22 175.50 176.40 177.45 178.25 178.95 179.90 173.78 201.55 202.32 203.81 204.22 205.52 206.40 207.55 208.43 209.12 210.30 211.45 211.72 212.35 212.75 213.12 213.43 214.17 133.39 134.10 135.53 136.75 137.94 138.72 140.03 140.72 141.72 142.85 143.50 143.64 144.82 145.46 145.46 251.10 251.10 174.34 175.07 175.22 175.50 176.40 177.45 178.25 178.95 179.90 180.78 180.78 202.32 203.25 204.22 205.52 206.40 207.55 208.43 209.12 210.30 211.45 211.72 212.35 212.75 213.12 213.43 214.17 214.85 1.15 0.71 1.43 1.22 1.19 0.78 1.31 0.69 1.00 1.13 0.65 0.14 1.18 0.64 13.22 1.00 1.00 0.56 0.73 0.15 0.28 0.90 1.05 0.80 0.70 0.95 0.88 7.00 0.77 0.93 0.41 1.30 0.88 1.15 0.88 0.69 1.18 1.15 0.27 0.63 0.40 0.37 0.31 0.74 0.68 74.8 67.6 0.9 1.2 1.9 6.1 17.4 73.9 3.7 4.7 14.9 30.6 20.8 237.0 31.8 57.7 57.7 131.0 14.5 96.0 5.1 23.5 21.1 106.0 56.5 120.0 34.9 58.9 121.0 72.2 86.5 32.8 32.0 337.0 10.8 7.9 15.6 9.4 46.5 9.2 33.2 5.4 23.6 7.1 26.4 2.56 1.05 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.11 0.62 1.81 0.05 0.06 0.13 0.52 0.41 0.94 0.55 0.51 0.51 0.38 0.11 2.80 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.64 0.68 0.99 0.21 0.43 0.59 0.21 0.41 0.20 0.25 1.91 0.21 0.11 0.36 0.07 2.29 0.23 0.53 0.08 0.51 0.13 0.86 2.99 2.16 0.04 0.13 0.23 0.03 0.10 0.08 0.17 0.09 0.03 4.32 0.11 0.22 0.52 0.33 0.33 0.85 0.50 6.67 0.19 0.37 0.19 3.03 4.44 9.91 2.60 2.81 0.62 0.32 1.58 0.62 0.42 0.31 0.32 0.51 0.25 0.52 0.20 0.32 0.26 0.45 0.86 0.62 1.49 Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn 38 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 PSLC-11-15 SL-00-2 SL-00-2 SL-00-2 SL-00-2 SL-00-2 SL-00-3 SL-00-3 SL-00-3 SL-00-3 SL-00-3 SL-00-3 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-13-21 SSLC-14-33 SSLC-14-33 SSLC-14-33 SSLC-14-33 SSLC-14-34 SSLC-14-34 SSLC-14-34 SSLC-14-34 PSLC-11-14 PSLC-11-14 PSLC-11-14 PSLC-11-14 214.85 216.25 216.70 217.23 217.75 201.55 195.07 195.62 196.46 197.56 195.07 212.98 213.36 214.56 215.14 215.98 212.98 137.45 139.10 140.05 141.00 142.50 144.05 144.95 146.45 148.00 149.50 150.00 151.05 152.55 154.10 155.60 137.45 197.05 197.65 198.45 197.05 137.30 137.85 138.90 137.30 163.73 164.61 165.13 163.73 216.25 216.70 217.23 217.75 218.10 218.10 195.62 195.98 197.56 197.70 197.70 213.36 214.56 215.14 215.98 216.93 216.93 139.10 140.05 141.00 142.50 144.05 144.95 146.45 148.00 149.50 150.00 151.05 152.55 154.10 155.60 157.15 157.15 197.65 198.45 200.00 200.00 137.85 138.90 139.70 139.70 164.61 165.13 166.07 166.07 1.40 0.45 0.53 0.52 0.35 16.55 0.55 0.36 1.10 0.14 2.63 0.38 1.20 0.58 0.84 0.95 3.95 1.65 0.95 0.95 1.50 1.55 0.90 1.50 1.55 1.50 0.50 1.05 1.50 1.55 1.50 1.55 19.70 0.60 0.80 1.55 2.95 0.55 1.05 0.80 2.40 0.88 0.52 0.94 2.34 2.1 28.6 65.5 171.0 274.0 62.5 0.3 173.0 0.0 15.9 28.8 17.6 1.9 87.0 6.4 13.8 19.7 98.0 64.3 39.8 382.0 390.0 98.1 218.0 37.4 49.0 95.0 95.0 48.5 121.0 11.0 256.0 142.4 843.0 14.3 7.4 179.2 1020.0 103.0 34.3 290.3 1915.0 534.0 62.0 863.7 0.05 0.69 2.52 0.89 4.94 0.69 0.01 6.20 0.00 0.08 0.95 0.25 0.02 0.46 0.33 0.12 0.20 0.40 0.42 0.18 0.46 0.61 0.29 1.38 0.56 0.26 1.98 1.98 0.79 0.61 0.14 1.08 0.69 4.16 0.22 0.04 0.93 6.59 0.39 1.24 2.09 2.16 1.49 0.18 1.22 0.43 2.17 3.41 1.64 1.62 0.85 0.01 0.12 0.00 1.06 0.08 5.85 0.30 2.40 9.20 8.15 4.92 0.02 1.91 0.74 1.69 1.12 1.41 0.69 2.26 1.24 1.79 1.79 0.60 0.72 0.39 0.19 1.02 1.52 1.38 0.02 0.69 0.23 2.87 1.54 1.82 1.36 1.40 0.21 0.91 Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Interval Santa Rosa Vein Santa Rosa Vein Santa Rosa Vein Interval 39 PSLC-11-16 PSLC-11-16 PSLC-11-16 PSLC-11-16 PSLC-11-16 SL-00-1 SL-00-1 SL-00-1 SL-00-1 SL-00-1 SSLC-13-23 SSLC-13-23 SSLC-13-23 260.84 261.68 261.86 262.36 260.84 173.94 174.56 174.99 175.53 173.94 138.90 139.90 138.90 261.68 261.86 262.36 263.46 263.46 174.56 174.99 175.53 176.05 176.05 139.90 141.00 141.00 0.84 0.18 0.50 1.10 2.62 0.62 0.43 0.54 0.52 2.11 1.00 1.10 2.10 60.4 801.0 2430.0 575.0 779.6 837.6 156.0 370.2 971.0 612.0 226.0 834.0 544.5 0.26 2.94 3.17 0.72 1.19 1.58 0.26 0.58 1.56 1.05 0.24 1.74 1.03 0.21 30.00 8.27 0.88 4.08 5.80 0.30 0.98 0.89 2.24 2.31 10.45 6.57 Santa Rosa Vein Santa Rosa Vein Santa Rosa Vein Santa Rosa Vein Interval Santa Rosa Vein Santa Rosa Vein Santa Rosa Vein Santa Rosa Vein Interval Santa Rosa Vein Santa Rosa Vein Interval 10.1 Drill Hole Orientation The Santa Rosa Vein strikes at approximately 130o and dips southeast at 70-80o. The Santa Rosa East Skarn strikes east-west and dips southerly at 70-80o. Therefore the majority of drill holes were drilled in a northerly direction at dips ranging from 45 to 70 degrees (Table 10.1). All collars were positioned using GPS instrumentation. Downhole surveys were taken with a Reflex survey tool for all Prospero and Silver Standard holes. True width is on average about 75% of drillhole intercept. No cutting factors were applied to the assay data base. While there are some exploration holes located to test geological structures, geochemical anomalies, and/or IP anomalies, the primarily method to locate drill holes has been to target projected extensions of the Santa Rosa Vein, Bonita Vein and Santa Rosa East Skarn structures. 11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY 11.1 Sample Preparation and Analytical Procedures During the drill programs the following QA/QC protocol has been established by Prospero (company memorandum dated July 2008) and Silver Standard as follows: 1. Drilling Supervisión. Supervision of the drill program, sampling of the core, and collection of the metallurgical sample is under the supervision of the project geologist. 2. Transport of the core to the core shack. Once the drill hole is completed the core boxes are loaded into a pick up and tied together with a rope to avoid any core falling out during transport to the secured core shack, a rented warehouse located in the town of San Luis del Cordero. 40 3. Calculation of core recovery and RQD (Rock Quality Data). With the core placed in decending order, the number of core pieces greater than 10 centimeters in length is determined in order to calculate the RQD. Measurement of the length of recovered core. 4. Logging procedures and sample selection. The core is described according to intervals of equal lithology, according to formations and members, paying special attention to subdivisions in the mineralized zones. Sample selection is carried out in the mineralized intervals with a black marker pen indicating where each sample initiates and ends and showing arrows that indicate the interval to be sampled. The length of the samples varies depending on the type of material being sampled. The maximum length for individual samples does not exceed 1.5 meters. 6. Numbering of samples. Within the interval that is to be sampled a sample number is marked with a black marker pen that identifies the sample. The numbering sequence used for sampling is continuous and ascending with respect to depth in a specific diamond drill hole. Numbering control is carried out in a field notebook. 7. Duplicates-Blanks-Standards. • duplicate pulp samples are inserted 3 for every 100 s amples. Placing of the duplicate pulps is done by the laboratory once all the pulps are produced. • 2 blanks are inserted every 100 samples, • standards are inserted one per 20 assay samples, 8. Sampling of the Core. Splitting of the core is carried out with a diamond saw that cuts the core in half. A half is placed in a plastic bag and is tagged by labeling a piece of flag tape with an indelible marker pen and inserting the numbered flag and/or an assay tag. The same number is also placed on the outside of the plastic bag. The remaining half core is ordered and returned the core box for reference and later use. Sample selection and splitting of the core is carried out by trained geological technicians with experience in core splitting and under the supervision of the geologist. 9. Storage of core boxes and transport of samples to the Assay Laboratory. The core boxes are placed inside secured rooms. The keys, permitting access, are controlled by two company representatives. The samples for assaying are placed into 30 kilogram sacks, loaded onto a company vehicle and driven by a company employee to a courier service for shipment to a sample preparation laboratory of ALS Chemex in Zacatecas, Hermosillo, Sonora or in Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. 10. Pulp Transport. ALS Chemex shops the pulps from its preparation laboratory in Zacatecas or Guadalajara to ALS Chemex in North Vancouver for assaying. ALS Chemex is an ISO 9001:2008 certified facility and operates in compliance with ISO/IES 17025. 11. Assay Methods. The assay methods currently used by ALS Chemex are ME- ICP61m or ME-ICP41m for the metals and Au ICP21 for gold. The Code OG62 is for silver overruns of 100 ppm. 11.2 Review of Quality Assurance/Quality Control Hochschild, Silver Standard and Prospero used a series of Standard Reference Materials (SRMs), blank references (Blanks) and duplicates as part of their QA/QC program. Apex Silver relied on laboratory controls. 11.2.1 Standards One standard was inserted for every 20 assay samples Hochschild, Silver Standard and 41 Prospero drill programs. Not all results have been graphically displayed, but a r eview of the assay results for the Prospero standards show reasonable correlation to the standards certified assay results. Figures 11.1 and 11.2 show Silver Standard results. Figure 11.1. Standard CDN-FCM-5 CDN-FCM-5 [Ag] 34 32 Ag_ppm 30 Mean-Ag +2SD-Ag 28 -2SD-Ag +3SD-Ag 26 -3SD-Ag 24 Ag 22 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 NumberOfSamples CDN-FCM-5 [Cu] 4700 4600 4500 Cu_ppm 4400 Mean-Cu 4300 +2SD-Cu 4200 -2SD-Cu +3SD-Cu 4100 -3SD-Cu 4000 Cu 3900 3800 3700 0 10 20 30 40 50 NumberOfSamples 60 70 80 42 CDN-FCM-5 [Zn] 7400 7200 7000 Zn_ppm 6800 Mean-Zn +2SD-Zn 6600 -2SD-Zn 6400 +3SD-Zn 6200 -3SD-Zn 6000 Zn 5800 5600 5400 0 10 NumberOfSamples 30 40 50 20 60 70 80 Figure 11.2. Standard STD-15 STD-15 [Ag] 165 160 155 Ag_ppm 150 Mean-Ag 145 +2SD-Ag 140 -2SD-Ag +3SD-Ag 135 -3SD-Ag 130 ICP61-Ag 125 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 NumberOfSamples 43 11.2.2 Duplicates Duplicate pulp samples were introduced 3 for every 100 assay samples. Placing of the duplicate pulps was done by the laboratory once all the pulps are produced. There were 176 duplicate samples analyzed (Figure 11.3). The Ag, Cu and Zn duplicates all report 70% within 30% relative difference. These numbers are affected by the number of duplicates for low grade assays which tend to return a higher relative difference. 44 Figure 11.3 Ag Cu Zn Duplicates Ag Duplicates 50 ICP61-Ag D U P 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Cu Duplicates 2500 ICP61-Cu y = 0.9611x - 8.4757 2000 D U P 1500 1000 500 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 -500 45 Zn Duplicates 6000 ICP61-Zn y = 0.9842x + 1.4692 D U P 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 11.2.3 Blanks Blank samples were introduced 2 for every 100 assay samples. The graphs below show the results for Ag, Cu and Zn for 179 blanks (Figure 11.4). The blank results are within established limits except for the blanks used for the Prospero drill program. The material Propero used for blanks is not uniform and needs to be replaced in any future drill program. Care needs to be taken to ensure all standard materials are of high quality. Figure 11.4 Ag Cu Zn Blanks Blank [Ag] 6 5 Ag_ppm 4 3 Ag LLD Ag 10LLD 2 ICP61-Ag 1 0 -20 30 80 NumberOfSamples 130 180 46 Blank [Cu] 400 350 Zn_ppm 300 250 Cu LLD 200 Cu 10LLD 150 ICP61-Cu 100 50 0 -20 30 NumberOfSamples 80 130 180 Blank [Zn] 600 500 Zn_ppm 400 Zn LLD 300 Zn 10LLD 200 ICP61-Zn 100 0 -20 30 NumberOfSamples 80 130 180 11.3 Core Storage Facility Prospero established a secure core storage facility at a warehouse in San Luis Cordero. The facility has ample room for core logging, core sampling and core, reject and pulp storage. All drill core, rejects and pulps are stored at the warehouse. 47 11.4 Discussion The writer believes that QA/QC procedures carried out by the operators through the 2000 to 2014 programs at SLDC follow industry guidelines and the drillhole database is sufficient for resource estimation. 12.0 DATA VERIFICATION 12.1 Quality Control and Data Verification The writer carried out a-field examination of the SLDC on August 15, 2014. The field examinations included examination of old workings, skarnified limy sedimentary rocks near the quartz feldspar porphyry or granodiorite contact and review of drill core securely stored in Prospero’s core logging and storage building in San Luis del Cordero. The writer verified drill coordinates of drill holes in the field and re-sampled several drill hole core intervals at the core storage facility. 12.2 Verification of Sampling and Analytical Data The writer toured the SLDC property with Prospero’s exploration manager Martin Soto Moran on August 15, 2014 and collected 5 samples from core holes. The writer’s samples support the presence of significant silver, zinc and copper grades obtained by Apex, HC, Altiplano, Prospero and Silver Standard. The writer’s collar checks and samples are summarized in Tables 12.1 and 12.2. The writer’s samples were submitted to ALS Chemex Lab in Vancouver for preparation and assay for gold and silver by fire assay start with an atomic absorption finish (“FA-AA”) on a 30 gram split from the prepared sample. Copper, lead and zinc were determined by digestion of a 1.0 gram split in aqua regia and analysis by AA. Seven point two percent (7.2%) of the assay database was compared to the original assay certificates as received from the ALS Chemex lab. No errors were found. Table 12.1 Drill Hole Collar Checks from the SLDC Property. DDH SSLC-13-23 SSLC-11-14 SL-00-1 SL-00-3 SSLC-13-20 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-2 Data Base Coordinates Easting 571334 571453 571533 571603 571347 572196 572095 Northing 2813080 2812972 2812946 2812887 2812911 2812855 2812875 Elevation 1528 1526 1530 1529 1520 1508 1508 DDH PSLC-11-23 SSLC-11-14 SL-00-1 SL-00-3 SSLC-13-20 PSLC-10-9 PSLC-10-2 GPS Check Coordinates Easting 571335 571451 571537 571602 571345 572193 572092 Northing 2813079 2812972 2812926 2812888 2812910 2812856 2812878 Elevation 1533 1528 1525 1513 1523 1506 1507 48 Seven drill hole collars were checked in the field during the site visit with a handheld Garmin GPS 60CSx. Accuracy with this instrument is stated to be ±3 meters for easting and northing with elevation readings often less accurate. Accuracy of the collar coordinates were generally confirmed within the level of GPS accuracy. The northing for SL-00-1 is outside of the error limit and should be verified by Prospero staff during the next available property visit. Drillhole collars are well marked in the field with permanent cement markers. Table 12.2 Drill Core Check Samples from the SLDC Property. Original Sample 72068 74103 74106 255978 441659 Ag ppm 89.6 534.0 17.2 1020.0 98.1 Cu % 1.73 1.49 0.15 6.59 0.29 Zn % 0.43 1.40 0.48 0.23 1.41 Fe % 3.93 3.01 2.54 8.20 2.61 S % 0.60 0.01 2.32 10.00 1.59 Pb ppm 137 3050 44 968 588 Re-Sample Ag ppm 94.6 567.0 6.0 921.0 83.9 Cu % 2.23 1.14 0.08 6.26 0.22 Zn % 0.59 1.80 0.68 0.11 1.52 Fe % 4.50 3.89 1.33 8.29 2.35 S % 0.71 0.25 0.98 9.42 1.38 Pb ppm 166 4610 25 657 501 72068 74103 74106 255978 441659 The writer collected five samples, one each from five separate drill holes during the visit to the core storage facility. Every effort was made to match the sample interval from the original sample. There was no core saw available and sampling was carried out with a core splitter. Results of the duplicate samples compare reasonably well with the original sample and confirmed the presence of anomalous mineralization on the SLDC property. 12.3 Discussion The writer believes that the database is sufficient to support resource estimation. 49 13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING Prospero has not conducted any metallurgical testing on the mineralization nor is there and metallurgical data available on the processing of the direct shipping ore mined from the Santa Rosa Vein deposit. The property has sufficient areas for any potential tailings pond and plant facilities. 14.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES The mineral resource was calculated using MinesightTM MS3D software. The effective date of the resource is October 1, 2014. 14.1 Drillhole Database In the period 2000 to 2014 the SLDC property has been subject to 4 separate drill campaigns by Apex Silver Mines Ltd., Minera Hochschild Mexico, SA de CV, Prospero and Silver Standard totaling 11,436.42 meters in 43 drill holes (Tables 10.1). The database contains all required drill hole information required to construct a 3D model and resource estimate including location, orientation, downhole surveys, assays, logged geology and alteration. The drillhole database was compiled by Prospero, reviewed and verified by the writer and was determined to be acceptable for use in resource estimation. Topographic data is from hand held GPS units or taken from INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática) maps. 14.2 Project Parameters The project was modeled for silver, copper and zinc. Block sized used is 25 meters east-west by 25 meters north-south with a 10 meters bench height and was based on the nominal drill spacing of 50 to 100 meters. Block model origin in UTM coordinates is 570200 East, 2811400 North and 1050 Elevation. Table 14.1 contains the block model limits. Table 14.1 SRLC Block Model Setup Minimum(m) Maximum(m) Easting 570200 574800 Northing 2811400 2815500 Elevation 1050 1650 Cell Size 25 25 10 Number 184 164 60 50 14.3 Specific Gravity After discussions with Prospero geologists, review of assay results, visual inspection of drill core and data search of other similar operations SGs a specific gravity of 3.00 g/t3 was selected for use in the resource estimate. The writer recommends Prospero carry out a detailed program of specific gravity measurements from the existing core and to continue this program with future drill programs. 14.4 Compositing A compositing length of 1.0 meters was selected for the Santa Rosa Vein and Santa Rosa East Skarn mineralized zones based on the average assay length for these zones, 0.84m and 0.71m respectively. Composite values for intervals less than or equal to 0.4m in length were combined with the preceding composite. Composites honoured the geologic code used to define the separate mineralized zones. 14.5 Geological Interpretation Separate three dimensional (3D) wireframe solids were developed for the Santa Rosa Vein and the Santa Rosa East Skarn. The wireframe models were constructed from drill holes using the basis of a minimum value of $50 US over a minimum true thickness of 1.50 meters. Prices used for value calculation were Ag = $19/oz; Cu = $3.00/lb; Zn = $0.90/lb. The cost of $50/tonne used to tag the assays and construct the 3D solids was provided by Prospero and is based on data from seven Mexican silver and/or base metal operations. The average production cost for these seven Mexican operations is $42.50 per tonne. Cost data for these operations was obtained from 2013 annual reports, company’s 2014 guidance or conversations with company personnel. Production rates vary from 1300 to 3200 tonnes per day. Deposit types include veins, skarns and carbonate replacement deposits. When an average recovery of 85% is applied to the $42.50 per tonne cost it raises the value to the $50 used. The $50 value is approximately equal to 85 grams silver (or silver equivalent (AgEq)) and is the cut-off grade used to report the resource estimate Table 14-6. Sectional interpretations were built using Minesight software. These 2D interpretations were then verified and altered if necessary to maintain consistency of strike and dip of the mineralized structures. Sections developed for the Santa Rosa Vein and Santa Rosa East Skarn deposits were then linked to form 3D solids. The solids were projected a maximum of 50m along strike from the last drill hole. Wireframes were trimmed to honour old mine workings and the estimated base of overburden. Solids were validated using Minesight software with no errors found (Table 14-2). Due to sheer size of the wireframes and interpolation parameters used, grades were not estimated into the full volume of the wireframe models. 51 Table 14.2 3D Wireframe Statistics Zone Santa Rosa Vein Min Easting 571545 Max Easting 572460 Min Elev 1291 Max Elev 1506 Min Thk 1.53 Max Thk 23.05 Volume(m3) 90,608 Santa Rosa East Skarn 571314 571619 1269 1485 1.40 2.35 1,089,863 The wireframe solids were then used to tag the block model with Santa Rosa Vein and East Skarn identifier codes and volume percent of the 3D wireframe solid contained within each model block. Grade interpolations into the model blocks were completed using the Inverse Distance cubed (ID3) estimation method. Grade interpolation was limited to the wireframe models by employing composite and model code matching. Estimation was designed in three passes with the maximum interpolation distance decreasing and minimum and maximum number of data points required to interpolate a block increasing with each pass. Table 14.3 summarizes interpolation criteria used. Table 14.3 Interpolation Parameters Interpolation distance (m) Number of composites Pass 1 Min Max 100 1 15 Pass 2 Min Max 75 2 15 Pass 3 Min Max 50 4 15 14.6 Block Model Validation Visual Validation The visual comparisons of interpolated block grades, resource classification, 3D wireframe outlines and drill hole composite intersections for each of the zones were verified on screen for plan and section. No significant discrepancies were apparent from the sections reviewed, yet grade smoothing is apparent in some regions due to the distance between drill samples being broader. Global Comparison The block model ID3 estimate was verified for global bias by comparing it to the average grades of a sectional model. Table 14.4 shows the comparison of the global estimates for the two models. In general, there is good agreement between the models. Larger discrepancies reflect a lower 52 drill density in some portions of the model. Table 14.5 contains statistical comparison of composite and model grades. Table 14.4 Global Model Comparisons Model Type ID3 Sectional Ag g/t 140 151 Cu% 0.76 0.80 Zn% 1.37 1.40 Table 14.5 Block Model vs Composites BM Item Average Std.dev Minimum Maximum c.v. BM Item Average Std.dev Minimum Maximum c.v. Skarn Ag g/t 94 84.1 20 368 0.83 Vein Ag g/t 732 153.0 508 1104 0.22 Skarn Cu% 0.73 0.56 0.19 2.52 0.71 Vein Cu% 1.13 0.11 0.94 1.45 0.1 Skarn Zn% 1.23 1.18 0.10 6.21 0.81 Vein Zn% 3.41 1.93 0.95 6.84 0.53 Comps Item Average Std.dev Minimum Maximum c.v. Comps Item Average Std.dev Minimum Maximum c.v. Skarn Ag g/t 84 109.3 1.0 607 1.31 Vein Ag g/t 722 563.7 179 1749 0.78 Skarn Cu% 0.73 1.02 0.0 7.32 1.40 Vein Cu% 1.13 0.66 0.24 2.08 0.59 Skarn Zn% 1.00 1.34 0.0 8.98 1.34 Vein Zn% 3.37 3.19 0.57 10.45 0.95 14.7 Resource Classification The resources are classified under the categories Indicated Resources and Inferred Resources in accordance with CIM Definition Standards. Classification reflects confidence of drill hole spacing, grade continuity, historic mine workings, the number of samples required to estimate a block and the author’s experience with shear hosted, CRD and skarn deposits. The resource model blocks were classified into Indicated and Inferred Resource categories. The basis for the classification varied. If the distance to the nearest composite was less than 50 meters and composites from a minimum of 2 drillholes were used the block was classified as Indicated. If the distance to the nearest composite was 50 to 90 meters the block was classified as Inferred. No environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing or other relevant issues are known to the author that may affect the estimate of mineral resources. Mineral reserves can only be estimated on the basis of an economic evaluation that is used in a preliminary feasibility study 53 or a feasibility study of a mineral project; thus, no reserves have been estimated. As per NI 43-101, mineral resources, which are not mineral reserves, do not have to demonstrate economic viability. 14.8 Mineral Resource Statement The mineral resource for the San Luis del Cordero project as of October 1, 2014 comprises Indicated Resources and Inferred Resources (Table 14.7). All classes of resources are reported at an AgEq 85 g/t cut-off. Table 14.6 Mineral Resource Statement, San Luis del Cordero Project 1 Indicated Tonnes AgEq g/t3,4 Ag g/t Cu% Zn% Santa Rosa Vein 31,500 1022.6 827.8 1.21 1.98 631,125 200.8 86.1 0.76 1.02 Total Indicated 631,125 251.9 127.4 0.82 1.11 Inferred2 Tonnes AgEq g/t Ag g/t Cu% Zn% Santa Rosa Vein 218,437 955.4 716.4 1.12 3.62 2,566,875 214.9 95.7 0.72 1.26 2,566,875 296.2 156.7 0.82 1.57 Santa Rosa East Skarn Santa Rosa East Skarn Total Inferred 1. 2. 3. 4. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves because there are insufficient studies to demonstrate economic viability. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Resource will be upgraded to an Indicated or Measured Resource as a result of continued exploration. Resources are reported at a silver-equivalent cut-off grade of 85 g/t. AgEq = Ag + [Cu x 22.046 x Cu price/Ag price * 31.013 + Zn x 22.046 x Zn price/Ag price x 31.103]. Metal prices used in the formula: silver = US$19/oz, copper = US$3.00/lb, Zn = US$0.90/lb. The resource estimate is constrained within the wireframe models. The 85 g/t AgEq cut-off is based on similar Mexican deposits. Grade distribution and resource classification are shown in Figures 54 14.1 and 14.2) Figure 14.1 Santa Rosa Vein and Santa Rosa East Skarn Resource 55 Classification Figure 14.2 Santa Rosa Vein and Santa Rosa East Skarn AgEq Grade Distribution 56 15.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES 15.1 Relevant Data on Adjacent & Nearby Properties The SLDC contains an intrusive contact type environment with potential for replacement or skarn type precious metal base metal deposits and structurally controlled vein mineralization. A number of other base metal skarn and replacement deposits occur in similar geological settings in eastern Durango State. The Velardeña mining district, about 70km southeast of SLDC property, has been mining from skarn-replacement, limestone replacement and epithermal veins since Spanish times. The Ojuela-Mapimi District, about 60km northeast of SLDC, was discovered by Spanish prospectors in 1598 and the district had strong production by Compania Minera Penoles, S.A. (“Penoles”) from 1894 till 1932 with production reported by Consejo de Recursos Minerales (“CRM”) of 3,732,589 tonnes yielding 470 g/t Ag, 3.73 g/t Au and 15.8% lead with total district production estimated at over 5,000,000 tonnes (Cardenas Vargas et al., 1993). The historic production is from Mexican government publications and has not been verified by either Prospero or the writer. The Ojela-Mapimi District is about 60km from the SLDC. 16.0 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION The writer is not aware of any data not included in this report that would make the report misleading or would influence the writer’s opinion that the property warrants further exploration. 17.0 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS The SLDC property is situated in a geological and tectonic environment that hosts numerous precious and base metal bearing skarn, replacement and base metal vein deposits. Previous work on the SLDC property included a shaft and several levels of development on the Santa Rosa Vein, minor development on the India Bonita vein and exploration drill programs. Drill programs carried out by Apex Silver, Hochschild, Prospero Silver and Silver Standard outlined two mineralized deposits, the Santa Rosa Vein and Santa Rosa East Skarn. The Santa Rosa Vein, located at depth and along strike from the old Santa Rosa Mine workings, is a structurally controlled narrow vein zone hosting highly anomalous silver grades with associated copper and zinc mineralization. Due to its high silver grades, the Santa Rosa Vein has the 57 potential to impact future exploration and potential development of this property. The Santa Rosa East Skarn deposit is located east of the Santa Rosa Mine workings along the contacts between quartz feldspar porphyry and granodioritic bodies with limy Mesozoic sedimentary units hosting silvercopper-zinc mineralization. Both deposits remain open along strike and to depth. The drill hole database and geological understanding are sufficiently reliable to support the resource calculation for the Santa Rosa Vein and the Santa Rosa East Skarn deposits. The specific gravity of 3.00 t/m3 used is reasonable for the drill data seen and deposit types, but a detailed program of density measurements should be carried out to provide a definitive specific gravity for each deposit. The SLDC Property covers additional prospective contacts between quartz feldspar porphyry and granodioritic bodies with limy Mesozoic sedimentary rocks). The favorable contact zone is mainly covered by soil and alluvial deposits that require indirect geophysical and geochemical methods to guide drilling and detect covered or buried mineralization. Exploration programs consisting of soil and rock sampling and induced polarization conducted by Prospero and Silver Standard have identified prospective areas for replacement or skarn deposits (La Puerta and El Canal showings) and have outlined projected extensions of the Santa Rosa Vein, Santa Rosa East Skarn and India Bonita Vein systems. Previous drill results and the success of the exploration programs justify further drilling of the SLDC as follows in priority order: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Extension to depth and to the west in the Santa Rosa Vein mineralized zone, Upgrading the Santa Rosa Vein deposit to Measured and Indicated categories. Extension at depth and to the East and definition of the Santa Rosa East Skarn, Extension at depth, east and west of drill hole PSLC-17 in the El Canal target, The extension at depth of La Puerta skarn. The blind skarn adjacent to and in the HW of the Santa Rosa Vein. 18.0 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS The primary focus of future drill programs should initially be the Santa Rosa Vein deposit structure and its projected extensions. A detailed understanding of the size, grade and extents of the Santa Rosa Vein could have a significant impact on any future exploration programs and potential development of this property. A 2 Phased program of 12,500 meters of HQ diamond drilling is recommended (Table 18.1). Phase 1 would consist of a 2,500 meter drill program targeting extensions and definition of the Santa Rosa Vein. 58 Depending on Phase 1 results, a 10,000 meter Phase 2 drill program targeting extensions and infill of the Santa Rosa East Skarn deposit and other advanced exploration targets is warranted. Initial focus of Phase 2 should be on the Santa Rosa East Skarn extents. In-fill definition drilling would then target thicker and/or higher grading areas of this skarn. Table 18.1 Budget for Recommended Drill Programs Type Description Phase 1 Santa Rosa Vein extension and definition drilling Total Length 2,500 meters Phase 2 Santa Rosa East Skarn extensions, 10,000 meters definition and exploration targets Total Drilling 12,500 meters Estimated Cost US$500,000 US$2,000,000 US$2,500,000 59 19.0 REFERENCES AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION Addison, R., López, L., 2011. Summary Report on the Parrilla Silver Mine, Tate of Durango, Mexico. Prepared for First Majestic Silver Corp. dated September 8, 2011. Alegria, L., Diaz, C., Martinez, R., 2014. Exploration Activities at San Luis De Cordero Project, Durango, Mexico. For Silver Standard Resources Inc., March, 2014. Camprubi, A., Ferrari, L., Cosca, M.A., Cardellachi, E., and Canals, A., 2003. Age of Epithermal Deposits in Mexico: Regional Significance and Links with the Evolution of Tertiary Volcanism. Econ. Geol., Vol. 98, pp. 1029-1037. Cardenas Vargas, J., Paraga Perez, J. de J., Merida Montiel, R., Macedo Palencia, R., and Rodriguez Salinas, J. de J., 1992. Geological-Mining Monograph of the State of Zacatecas for Consejo de Recursos Minerales, Publication M-2e. Christopher, P.A., 2008. Technical Report on the San Luis Del Cordero Project, Durango State, Mexico for Prospero Silver Corp., August 22, 2008. Dobrescu, J. and Ko, K., 2008. Logistical Report for Prosper Silver Corp. Induced Polarization Survey on the San Luis Del Cordero Project. Survey conducted by SJ Geophysics Ltd., dated July 2008. Hulse, D.E., Black, Z., Gurr, K.D., Mohorta, D., 2013. NI 43-101 Technical Report Bolivar Mine, Chihuahua State, Mexico for Sierra Metals Ltd. date May 31, 2013. Montenegro, H., 2014. Determinacion Densidad Bulk for Silver Standard Resources. February 4, 2014. Neff, D.H., Drielick, P.E., Orbock III, E.J.C., Hertal, M., Guajes and El Limon Open Pit Deposits Updated Mineral Resource statement Form 43-101F1 Technical Report Guerro, Mexico for Torex Gold Resources Inc. date June 18, 2012. Perez Corona, J.L., 2007. Reporte de barrenacion con diamate primera etapa-Projecto San Luis del Cordero, Durango: Internal Report Minera Hochschild Mexico, SA de CV, Julio 2007. Polk, A., Trueman, A., Fox, J., Technical Report on Tejamen Silver Property, Durango State, Mexico. For Oromex Resources Ltd. date October 3, 2006. 60 Prospero Silver Corp., 2008a. Procedure for sample collection, security, and data verification of Mine Assay Samples. Memorandum Dated July 2008. Prospero Silver Corp., 2008b. Procedure for sample collection and security of diamond drill hole core samples for assaying. Memorandum Dated July 2008. Rastad, S. and Dobrescu, J., 2008. Geophysical Report for Prospero Silver Corporation, 3D Induced Polarization on the San Luis del Cordero Project. Draft report prepared by S.J.V. Consultants Ltd., dated July 2008. 61 20.0 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON I Terence W, Hodson, B.Sc., P,GEO. I, Terence W. Hodson, with business address at 12426 23 Avenue, Surrey, British Columbia, do hereby certify that: • I am a Professional Geologist registered (#109491) with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia since 1992. • I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia ( B.Sc. Honours, 1980). 5. This certificate applies to the technical report entitled NI 43-101 Report On the Initial Resource Estimate for the San Luis Del Cordero Project, Durango State, Mexico dated October 1, 2014. 6. I have practiced my profession in geology for 34 years with experience in exploration, operations, project evaluation and resource estimation. I am a “Qualified Person” for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 (the “Instrument”). 7. My personal inspection of the Property was on August 15, 2014, • I am responsible for Sections 1.0 to 20.0 of the Technical Report. • I am independent of Prospero Silver Corp. as defined by Section 1.5 of the Instrument. • I have no prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of the Technical Report. • I have read the Instrument and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with the Instrument. • As of the date of this certificate, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading. . Signed and dated this 18th day of November, 2014 at Vancouver, British Columbia. Original document signed and sealed by Terence Wesley Hodson, P.Geo. Terence Wesley Hodson, P.Geo. 62