“A tidy laboratory means a lazy chemist” Jöns Jacob Berzelius
Transcription
“A tidy laboratory means a lazy chemist” Jöns Jacob Berzelius
“A tidy laboratory means a lazy chemist” Jöns Jacob Berzelius (Swedish chemist,1779-1848) 6. SEC-Jahrestreffen, 18. - 20. Mai 2016 in Münster (GER) Vernachlässigt, vergessen oder unwichtig? Inaktivmaterialien für Lithium-Ionen Batterien B. Streipert, E. Krämer, L. Terborg, V. Kraft, J. Menzel, D. Gallus, I. Cekic-Laskovic, S. Nowak, T. Placke und M. Winter MEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Univ. of Muenster, GER, [email protected] & Helmholtz Institute Muenster; Ionics in Energy Storage, IEK-12 of Forschungszentrum Juelich [email protected] Acknowledgements (General) Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi) Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation & Nuclear Safety (BMU) Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) North-Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) University of Muenster (WWU) Helmholtz Association (HGF) and Forschungszentrum Jülich Acknowledgements (Specific) German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the project “Elektrolytlabor 4E” Cabot Corporation Acknowledgements None of us is as smart as all of us Lithium Ion Battery (LIB): Active and Inactive Materials Have Functions Active Anode and Cathode Materials: Determine capacity and voltage ⇒ energy Inactive Materials: Additional mass + volume ⇒ decrease energy Electrolyte: “inside” ion conduction, interfaces Separator: safety, electrode separation Inactive cell and electrode components: Can/Pouch, Headers, Terminals, Vents, etc. Current collector: electron conduction, connection to the “outside” Conductive additive: porosity, “inside” electron current distribution Binder: The “glue”, that holds everything together Processing solvents (often disregarded) From the Beginning: Inactive Materials Determine Performance: Volta-Pile (1791); Zn/Cu; NaClaq as Electrolyte Volta-Cell (open to O2 from air) O2 reacts with Cu forming CuO at the surface. (Volta-Pile is a kind of Zinc/Air Battery) Salt water electrolyte @ 1.1 V: (Anode) (Cathode) Zn Zn2+ + 2 eCuO + 2H+ + 2e- Cu + H2O Cu reacts with O2, regen. CuO Closed Cell @ 0.76V (Anode) (Cathode) Zn Zn2+ + 2e2 H+ + 2e- H2 on inert Cu Failure mechanism of the Volta-Pile: Drying out, because of H2O evaporation Technology progress: Pile ⇒ Electrolyte reservoirs or “crown of cups” Lithium Ion Battery Name given by Mr. Keizaburo TOZAWA, Chief Executive Officer, Sony Energytec, Inc. Based on intercalation research in Europe/US.# Realized by Sony, 1990/1991*: I. Use coating technique: audio/video tapes II. Assemble cell in the discharge state and then do “formation“ III. “Right“ electrolyte IV. LiPF6 as HF-Generator for Al passivation# V. Microporous PE-separator# Impresses by an “infinite” variety of materials, designs and applications ⇒ The established “Allrounder” #Personal discussions with pioneering scientists *T. Nagaura, Progress in Batteries & Solar Cells, 10, 218 (1991) Active and Inactive Materials in LIB Parallel electron & lithium ion movement Active Materials: Host electrodes (i) Graphite at the negative electrode (ii) LiMO2 or LiMPO4 (M = Co, Ni, Mn, Fe, etc.) at the positive electrode = Li+-packaging materials Per Li+: Two electrode sites are needed (= double electrode packaging per charge) * *Winter, M.; Besenhard, J. O. Chemie in unserer Zeit 1999, 33, 320-332 Inactive Materials necessary for cell reaction: electrolyte, separator and electrode formulation: additives, binders, collectors Inactive materials: Packaging, vents, etc. 18650: The Standard Cylindrical Cell: Notebook Computers and Power Tools + Depending on chemistry and technology: 30 to >50 grams Case typically: stainless steel, Al 65 mm 18.0 mm 617 mm Anode 60 mm Cathode 57 mm Separator 2 x 600 mm = 1200 mm 57 mm - Mass Distribution in an 18650 cell: 5 Main Groups of Components Anode Total 45.0 12.25 37.5 g / 30.0 t h gi e 22.5 W Electrolyte 18.46 Separator Case, Vents, etc. 15.0 2.20 2.00 7.5 10.09 0.0 Cathode Total 18650 cell: 45g; based on graphite anode and lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) cathode Mass Distribution in an 18650 cell: Component Details Current Collector (Cu) 45.0 37.5 g / 30.0 t h gi e 22.5 W 15.0 18650 cell: 45g; based on graphite anode and lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) cathode 3.200.45 0.45 8.15 2.30 0.81 1.13 14.22 Binder (Anode) Conductive Agent (Anode) Graphite Current Collector (Al) Binder (Cathode) Conductive Agent (Cathode) 2.20 2.00 LiFePO4 Electrolyte 7.5 0.0 10.09 Separator Case, Vents, etc. Mass Distribution in an 18650 cell: Summary: Active vs. Inactive Materials 49.71 wt.% Active Mat. 45.0 14.22 37.5 g / 30.0 t h gi e 22.5 W 15.0 7.5 0.0 Cathode Act. Mat. Anode Act. Mat. 8.15 Inactive 22.63 50.29 wt.% Inactive 18650 cell: 45g; based on graphite anode and lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) cathode Mass Distribution in an 18650 cell: Lithium Ion Battery is Sham ♦Li Active: ♦Li Inactive: ♦Rest: 0.52g (= 1.16 wt.%): mobile Li from Cathode Material 0.21g (= 0.27 wt.%): Li Loss from Cathode Material + Li in Electrolyte 44.37g (= 98.57 wt.%) 18650 cell: 45g; based on graphite anode and lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) cathode 4.5 Ah 20700 Cylindrical Cell: Material Costs* Material costs on cell level: Active: 61.8% Inactive: 38.2% *Source: Total Battery Consulting, 2015 42 Ah Pouch EV Cell Material Costs* Material costs on cell level: Active: 55.2% Inactive: 44.8% *Source: Total Battery Consulting, 2015 34 Ah Metal can EV Cell Material Costs* Material costs on cell level: Active: 46.9% Inactive: 53.1% *Source: Total Battery Consulting, 2015 5 Ah HEV Cell, 200k Packs per Year Material Costs* 216 MWh Plant 5-Ah, 500-W HEV Cell NMC/graphite, Metal Can, 12 Million HEV Cells / year Units Amount $/unit $/cell Cathode Active Materials kg 0.039 30 1.18 Anode Active Materials kg 0.022 18 0.40 Electrolyte kg 0.025 20 0.51 Separator m 2 0.563 1.8 1.01 Copper Foil kg 0.020 17 0.33 Can, Headers & Terminals cell 1 1.75 1.75 Other cell 1 1.0 1.00 Total Materials 6.18 Per kWh 339 Per kW 12.4 Material costs on cell level: Active: 25.6% Inactive: 74.4 % *Source: Total Battery Consulting An Example for an “Inactive”, but not “Passive” Material: The Electrolyte Salt LiPF6: Unwanted, but Indispensable • Typical range of LiPF6 in non-aqu. electrolyte is 0.8 to 1.2 molar (10 - 15% by weight) • 80 – 90 wt. %: organic carbonate solvents + eventual electrolyte additives • Electrolyte contributes ca. 5 to 10 % to the overall lithium ion battery material costs. With a mass fraction of <15%, the LiPF6 costs are up to 90% of the electrolyte costs. • Pros: Instability ⇒ SEI passivation film forming agent ⇒ Al current collector protection (!!!) • Cons: Instability ⇒ Thermal and chemical (hydrolysis) HF and other toxic compounds (fluorophosphates and organophosphates) HF promotes cathode dissolution • LiPF6 is the worst electrolyte salt you can imagine, … • ...except for all the others. Current Collectors: Requirements for LIB* Excellent electronic conductivity: Ag, Cu, Au, Al,… Low cost: Ag, X Cu, Au, X Al Electrochemically stable within the electrode operation potentials: Metals that alloy with Li He Al alloys with Li at carbon anode potentials Cu is oxidized at >∼3.5V vs. Li/Li+ B C N O F Ne Al Si P S Cl Ar Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se a Ru Rh Pd Ag Cd In Sn Sb Te Br Kr I Xe Os At Rn Fe Co Ir Ni Pt Au Hg Tl Pb Bi Po (= cathode potentials), surface impurities ⇒ Cu → anode, Al (!) → cathode (LiPF6 necessary!) Processing to thin foils (in the 10-20 µm range) possible √ Rel. light weight √ Chemically and thermally stable/inert √ *Considerations are valid for lithium ion cells with carbonaceous anode and 4-V cathode! Al: Anodic Oxidation Dissolution Mechanisms in the Presence of LiPF6 vs. LiTFSI* Al Al2O3 AlzOyFz PF6- PF5 Solvated PF6- HF 1 µm after 1,000 cycles Oxidation Al Al2O3 Al3+ TFSI- TFSI- = N(SO2CF3)2- Solvated TFSI200 µm Oxidation after 3 cycles *E. Krämer, MW, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160 (2), A356-A360; E. Krämer, MW, et al., ECS Lett., 2012, 1(5), C1 - C3; “High Voltage” LIB “High Voltage” is Relative Lightning: Several 10.000.000 Volts High voltage grid: Several 100.000 Volts Static electricity: Several 10,000 Volts Humans: Up to 30.000 Volts Sr/Sr+ Li/Li+ SHE F2/HF OF2 -4.1 -3.040 0.0 3.070* 3.294* E / V vs. SHE *(in acidic solution) Batteries: Possible: <8V Practical: <5 V Typical: 1.2 – 4V Towards High Energy Density LIB with High Voltage (HV) Cathodes E=C·V 5V Potential vs. Li/Li+ 4V ? HV Cathodes NMC at HV NMC Cathode Cathode • The use of high voltage cathodes materials presents a major challenge to the oxidation stability of the electrolyte e.g., organic carbonate solvents: > 4.2 - 4.3 V 3V 2V 1V Graphite 0V • Energy density can be elevated by: higher specific capacity and higher cell voltage (via cathode potential increase) Anode LiNi0.33Mn0.33Co0.33O2 (“1/3-NMC”) at HV: Enhanced Potential and Capacity • NMC can be charged to different upper cut-off potentials • Higher cut-off potential ⇒ HV application ⇒ higher specific energy B. Xu, D. Qian, Z. Wang, Y.S. Meng, Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2012, 73, 51-65 48% Li+ 68% Li+ High Voltage Application of NMC Use of LiPF6 in Electrolyte at HV Metal Dissolution (Promoted by HF) 180 -1 WE: NMC, CE, RE: Li LiPF6 160 1000 140 120 Upper cut-off potential vs. Li/Li 4.2 V 4.4 V 4.6 V 100 80 1500 Concentration / µg L Specific capacity / mAh g -1 2000 0 10 20 30 + 500 Ni Co Mn NMC storage in electrolyte for 28 days 0 40 50 3.0 Cycle number 3.5 4.0 4.5 + Electrode potential vs. Li/Li / V • Enhanced average discharge potential • Electrolyte: 1M LiPF6 in EC/DMC (1:1) • Higher specific capacity • Ni, Co, and Mn dissolution • Lower Coulombic Efficiency • Large dissolution at 4.6 V vs. Li/Li+ • Insufficient cycle life D.R. Gallus, MW, et al., Electrochimica Acta, 134 (2014) 393-398. New HF (and H2O) Scavenging Electrolyte Additives: TMS (Trimethylsilyl-) Based • Patent Claim by Saidi et al.*: TMS diethylamine can reduce HF induced transition metal dissolution* • Proposal of mechanism by Zhang** • Diethylamine = Leaving group (LG) • However: Not stable at high cathode potentials 1600 1200 800 NMC storage at 4.6V vs. Li/Li+ for 28 days** 1/ 10 0 400 0 1M LiPF6 in EC/DMC + 1wt% TMS diethylamine Current density / mA cm Mn concentration / µg L -1 -2 **Mechanism S.S. Zhang, J Power Sources, 162 (2006) 13791394 1 M LiPF6 in EC/DMC (1/1) 0.6 + 1 wt% TMS diethylamine 0.4 0.2 WE: LMO; CE, RE: Li Scan rate: 0.1 mV s-1 0.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 + Potential vs. Li/Li / V *M.Y. Saidi, F. Gao, J. Barker, C. Scordilis-Kelley, U.S. Patent 5,846,673 (1998) 6.0 Effect of TMS Additives on NMC Cycling at HV* 1 05 WE: NMC; CE, RE: Li; 3.0-4.6V vs. Li 1st -3rd cycle: 0.2C; 4th-50th cycle: 1C 2 00 Coulombic efficiency / % Specific capacity / mAh g -1 2 40 1 00 1 60 1 20 80 1M LiPF6 in EC/DMC (1/1) + 1wt-% TMS diethylamine + 1wt-% TMS trifluoroacetate 40 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 95 90 1M LiPF6 in EC/DMC (1/1) 85 80 Cycle number + 1wt-% TMS diethylamine + 1wt-% TMS trifluoroacetate 0 10 20 30 40 Cycle number TMS diethyl amine: TMS trifluoro acetate: • • Better capacity retention Better capacity retention •Low Coulombic efficiency •Higher Coulombic efficiency •Oxid. decomposition during cycling •Enables HV application *D. Gallus, MW, et al., Electrochimica Acta, 2015, 184, 410-416 50 Al Passivation in TMS Electrolyte in the Presence of Smaller HF Amounts • Sufficient amounts of HF in the electrolyte are beneficial in order to passivate the Al current collector* Al : Constant voltage @ 4.6 V vs. Li/Li+, 24 h • TMS reduces amount of HF in the electrolyte a b c SEM of Al foils after polarization to 4.6 V vs. Li/Li+ for 24 h a.) 1M LiPF6 in EC/DMC, b.) + 1 wt.-% TMS trifluoro acetate, c.) 1M LiTFSI in EC/DMC *E. Krämer, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160 (2), A356-A360 E. Krämer, et al., ECS Lett., 2012, 1(5), C1 - C3. The Ancestor of Li+ Ion Transfer Cells: The HSO4- Ion Transfer Cell* ) - negative electrode C 2n X + electrolyte discharge positive electrode C 2n X charge Cn C nX *W. Rüdorff, U. Hofmann, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 238 (1938) 1. Page 29 Carbon Black: Small Amount, but Influential Spherical paracrystalline carbon (10~100 nm) with concentrically oriented graphitic domains. [*] Carbon black: High contact surface area High electronic conductivity High thermal conductivity Thermal Treatment to Remove Surface Groups CB-N: non-treated CB-SG: 1500 °C in Ar (slightly graphitized) CB-HG: 2000 °C in Ar (highly graphitized) *R.D. Heidenreich, W.M. Hess, L.L. Ban, J. Appl. Cryst. 1968, 1, 1-19. CB Graphitization Degree: Anion intercalation into CB WE: 80 wt.% CB, 20 wt.% PVdF binder; CE/RE: Li Electrolyte: 1M LiPF6 in EC/DMC (1:1) 1. Constant current cycling Specific current 10 mA g-1 2. Cyclic voltammetry Potential range: 2.5-5.2 V vs. Li/Li+ Scan rate: 20 mV s-1 Anion Intercalation into Carbon Black Leads to Extra Capacity [1] • • • Balancing of cathode and anode capacity is crucial for safety and life “Extra” capacity at the cathode has to be considered when balancing the anode capacity Anion intercalation may damage the electrolyte and the conductive additive [1] X. Qi, B. Blizanac, A. DuPasquier, P. Meister, T. Placke, M. Oljaca, J. Li, M. Winter, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 25306. Dual-Ion Cell Example: Metallic Li-Electrode Metallic Lithium CHARGE DISCHARGE Li+ X- X- Li+ Lithium metal Li+ X- eLi+ X- XLi+ XLi+ Negative Electrode Graphite Li+ X- Electrolyte Positive Electrode Placke, T.; Bieker, P.; Lux, S.F.; Fromm, O.; Meyer, H.-W.; Passerini, S.; Winter, M.; Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, 2012, 226, 391-407 Long-Term Cycling Stability: Effect of Temperature* met. Li vs. KS6 graphite; Cut-off: 5.0 V discharge capacity / mAh g -1 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 °C 40 °C 60 °C 20 Li vs. KS6; CMC Pyr14TFSI, 0.3M LiTFSI Cut-off: 3.4V – 5.0V Current: 50mA/g 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 cycle number *Placke, T.; Fromm, O.; Lux, S.F.; Bieker, P.; Rothermel, S.; Meyer, H.-W.; Passerini, S.; Winter, M. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 159, 2012, A1755-A1765.* Summary LiPF6 is a “good” inactive material, as the reaction products with water and protons (H+) allow to combine an Al collector with org. carbonate solvents. Alternative electrolyte salts such as LiTFSI (= LiN(SO2CF3)2) Al dissolution. LiPF6 is an essential electrolyte component. LiPF6 is a “bad” inactive material, as the reaction products with water and protons (H+) induce the formation of (hopefully not ?) highly toxic compounds. In any case, reducing the amount of inactive materials will reduce the amount of dead mass and dead volume of the cell. The wish: A cell chemistry without any inactive materials. Slide 35 Inactive Materials: Even Small Amounts Make a Big Difference Current Collector (Cu) 45.0 37.5 g / 30.0 t h gi e 22.5 W 15.0 3.20 0.45 0.45 8.15 2.30 0.81 1.13 14.22 Binder (Anode) Conductive Agent (Anode) Total cost per 18650 cell: 1.4 - 1.8 € Total amount of CB: 1.58 g Costs of CB/cell: 0.0158 € (10 € kg-1) Graphite Current Collector (Al) Binder (Cathode) Conductive Agent (Cathode) 2.20 2.00 LiFePO4 Electrolyte 7.5 0.0 10.09 Separator Case, Vents, etc. 18650 cell: 45g; graphite anode and lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) cathode 85 wt.% LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4; 10 wt.% CB; 5 wt.% PVdF “An investment in knowledge pays the best interest.“ ---Benjamin Franklin (American Publisher, Inventor and Scientist, 1706-1790)