Swiss Gynaecologic Ultrasound Guideline
Transcription
Swiss Gynaecologic Ultrasound Guideline
ed ffered &O d Swiss Gynaecologic Ultrasound Guideline Swiss Society for Ultrasound in Medicine Gynaecology and Obstetrics Section GG .c h Prod uc un so tra l U or e n y f in iet edic ctio c So in M B Se s O is N/ Sw GY By ww w. S G U M Swiss Gynaecologic Ultrasound Guideline 2nd Version Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin Swiss Society for Ultrasound in Medicine Sektion Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (SGUMGG) Gynaecology and Obstetrics Section We are grateful to the following companies for their support in compiling this manual: FUJIFILM (Switzerland) AG Mindray Ultraschall-Diagnosesysteme Siemens (Schweiz) AG GE Medical Systems Hitachi - Aloka Medical Systems Bayer (Schweiz) AG Hygis AG Swiss Gynaecologic Ultrasound Guideline Publisher: Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin (SGUM) Swiss Society for Ultrasound in Medicine Sektion Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (SGUMGG) Gynaecology and Obstetrics Section Chairman: Dr. René Carlo Müller, Winterthur www.sgumgg.ch Manuscript and diagrams: PD Dr. Michael Bajka, Zürich, Editor PD Dr. Gilles Berclaz, Bern Dr. René Carlo Müller, Winterthur Professor Dr. Gabriel Schär, Aarau Professor Dr. Sevgi Tercanli, Basel Contents 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3 The principles of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Gynaecology......................... 1 Legal basis ............................................................................................. 1 The objectives of diagnostic ultrasound procedures .............................. 1 Potential benefits ................................................................................... 1 Potential injuries.................................................................................... 2 Practitioners’ qualifications ................................................................... 2 Equipment requirements........................................................................ 3 Equipping the workplace ....................................................................... 3 Hygiene ................................................................................................. 4 Examination procedure.......................................................................... 4 Findings ................................................................................................. 5 Documentation ...................................................................................... 7 References ............................................................................................. 8 The internal Genitalia .................................................................................. 9 Examination techniques ........................................................................ 9 Anatomy, biometry and physiological changes ................................... 13 Diseases of the internal genitalia ......................................................... 23 Early pregnancy................................................................................... 40 Anticonception .................................................................................... 43 Extragenital diseases ........................................................................... 46 The most common differential diagnoses... ......................................... 46 General recommendations and consequences...................................... 48 References ........................................................................................... 48 Urogynaecological sonography ................................................................... 52 3.1 The objectives of urogynaecological sonography .............................................. 52 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 Advantages .......................................................................................... 52 The quality of urogynaecological sonography..................................... 52 Examination procedure........................................................................ 53 Documentation .................................................................................... 54 Evaluation ........................................................................................... 55 Examples with interpretation ............................................................... 57 Further options and future developments ............................................ 62 References ........................................................................................... 63 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 5 Mammasonography ..................................................................................... 64 Indications for mammasonography ..................................................... 64 Examination technique and documentation ......................................... 64 Normal anatomy of the breast glands and axilla.................................. 65 Disease ................................................................................................ 65 BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) .................... 67 Recommendations and consequences .................................................. 68 References ........................................................................................... 68 Report sheets (PDF @ www.sgumgg.ch) .................................................... 69 1 The principles of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Gynaecology Michael Bajka, René Müller 1.1 Legal basis According to the KVG (Swiss compulsory health care system), ultrasound scanning is to be carried out appropriately and economically in terms of the indication, preparation, implementation and conclusions to be drawn from the examination. There are no clear-cut conditions governing gynaecological ultrasound scans unlike the requirements stipulated in Article 13 of the Krankenpflege-Leistungsverordnung (KLV) (Health Care Benefits Ordinance) for ultrasound screening during pregnancy. According to Art. 20 of the Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV) (Ordinance on Medical Devices), health care professionals who use medical devices are responsible for organising the servicing and testing of the equipment as directed. Maintenance must be carried out in accordance with Quality Assurance principles and should be planned, organised and documented efficiently in-house. 1.2 The objectives of diagnostic ultrasound procedures • To shed light on symptoms and (unclear) clinical findings • To record findings as comprehensively as possible with minimal stress to the patient ("ALARA" principle, "as low as reasonably achievable") and with the emphasis on evaluation and the procedure. • To ensure process differentiation by… • Organ identification • Allocation to the relevant pathological spectrum (functional, inflammatory, neoplastic, degenerative, pregnancy-related, etc.) • Type of diagnosis (benign/malignant, chronic/acute, etc.) • Corroborating the clinical evaluation • Supporting an appropriate procedure (expectative, conservative treatment, puncture, endoscopic therapy, open procedure, etc.) • Guidance with invasive procedures (puncture, biopsy, endoscopy, etc.) 1.3 • • • • 1 Potential benefits Avoidance of unnecessary check-ups Avoidance of unnecessary procedures Alleviating anxiety and uncertainty Early recognition of changes and thus the opportunity to intervene from the outset • Cutting costs. Since ultrasound scanning is primarily a diagnostic function, a benefit can only be anticipated if the right consequences are actually drawn on the basis of the medical finding. 1.4 1.4.1 Potential injuries Technical safety aspects When performing an ultrasound scan of the internal genitalia in particular, the examination should only be carried out in women of child-bearing age in accordance with the safety parameters for ultrasound scanning during pregnancy, i.e. the sound power should be limited to a maximum of 100 mW/cm2. It should be noted that sound power can increase to a maximum of 720 mW/cm2 when the Doppler technique is used. The thermal and mechanical effect of the sound power currently used is indicated via the thermal index (TI) or the mechanical index (MI). If possible, the index should be < 11. This will preclude any short- or long-term harmful effects on the patient or the pregnancy. The ALARA principle is basically followed. 1.4.2 Psychological consequences Possible psychological consequences can include: • Anxiety due to an assumed change (abnormality) • Anxiety because of an actual change (true positive) • Anger and disappointment because of a change that has been overlooked (false negative) • Anger and disappointment because of an incorrectly diagnosed change (false positive) Ultrasound scanning must be aimed at preventing negative effects as much as possible. Good communication is extremely important. Anxiety can be alleviated during the examination by pointing out the key anatomical structures (bladder, ovaries, uterus). 1.5 Practitioners’ qualifications The quality of the ultrasound scan essentially depends on the skill of the practitioner. In Switzerland, basic training in gynaecological ultrasound scanning is a key component of continuous professional training in gynaecology and obstetrics. Anyone who has not undergone specialist gynaecological training must take a basic course and a final course in gynaecological ultrasonography. In addition, a certain number of ultrasound examinations must be carried out under supervision, preferably in a gynaecological clinic as part of a regular training programme. Current information on the number of ultrasound examinations to be performed under supervision can be found in the proficiency programme offered by the 2 Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin (www.sgum.ch) (Swiss Society for Ultrasound in Medicine), under the Gynaecology module. Gynaecological-obstetric ultrasound scans should only be carried out in practices that perform at least 50 examinations themselves each year (sonographic fitness). Regular attendance at continuing training events focusing on gynaecologicalobstetric ultrasound techniques is a pre-requisite. Examining practitioners must acknowledge the fact that gynaecological-obstetric diseases that slip through the net lead to increasingly complex rights of recourse confirmed by a court of Final Appeal. 1.6 Equipment requirements A vaginal probe (≥ 5 MHz) and an abdominal probe (≥ 3.5 MHz) must be permanently attached to the ultrasound device in order to perform a differentiated examination of the urogenital system. The transvaginal probe or transducer should have an angle of at least 1200 and a frequency exceeding 5 MHz. Special highfrequency probes (≥ 7.5 MHz) are required for mammasonography. Preference is given to linear ultrasonic probes. Ultrasound devices that allow three or more probes to be connected at the same time are extremely useful if all three probes are used frequently. The devices must comply with IEC standard 1157 especially if they are used concomitantly in obstetric diagnostics: The sound speed must be 1540 m/s, distance (B-mode) or time (M-mode) errors must not exceed 3%; for measuring distances < 17 mm, an absolute error of 1.0 mm is permissible. The device should be able to display at least 256 grey scales. It should also be possible to record appropriate imaging documentation with every device. Obtain these conditions in writing from the manufacturer prior to purchase. Make sure that the manufacturer provides you with the essential servicing documents for the device, explaining how the equipment is to be serviced. 1.7 Equipping the workplace Gynaecological ultrasound scans can be performed in any room fitted with a dimmer switch and equipped for gynaecological examinations. Several studies stress the fact that an optimal examination technique is extremely important for patients. The relevant precautions should be taken with regard to the structural and processing quality of the examination. Ideally, the ultrasound practitioner should outline the procedure to the patient beforehand, emphasising that, in principle, the examination is carried out via the vagina, like a gynaecological examination (transvaginal sonography – TVS) and possibly via the abdominal wall (transabdominal sonography – TAS). 3 In an ideal situation, a second monitor should be installed so that the patient can follow the examination on screen. Alternatively, the monitor can be turned towards the ultrasound device. It is advisable to have available standard references on gynaecological sonography. 1.8 Hygiene Particular attention should be paid to hygiene when carrying out TVS. The ultrasound practitioner should wear gloves. The TVS probe is covered with a uniform gel-filled rubber sleeve. A sterile lubricant is applied to the outside (N.B.: allergies to rubber components, e.g. latex allergy and lubricants). Condoms are preferably used since they are more resistant than standard ultrasound sleeves. In terms of infection, the vaginal mucosa can be likened to abraded skin and is thus prone to an increased risk of infection. Thorough decontamination after every examination is essential to prevent infection via bacterial spores, mycobacteria and fungi. The most effective procedure is to wash the probe with soap and water, rinse with water and dry2,3,4. 99% of bacterial colonisation is already eliminated by using soap. In addition, the probe should be immersed in glutaraldehyde for 20 minutes and subsequently rinsed and dried. This is recommended because 2 % of condoms are not leak-proof. In 66 % of cases, the non-leak-proof area is in the region of the probe tip and can easily be identified by wiping with a dry paper towel. The TAS probe and the mammary probe should always be disinfected after use. In 17.5 % of cases, bacterial contamination persists if the probe is just wiped. If a disinfectant is used, a 2 % level of contamination persists5. Ultrasound gel is another source of contamination. Gel should only be used with small bottles that are changed/disinfected daily. 1.9 Examination procedure An ultrasound examination, especially of the internal genitalia, should only be initiated after obtaining a certain amount of background knowledge. It is also advisable to record this information in the ultrasound documentation. It should include at least the menopause status, day of the cycle, the intake of hormonal active substances, procedures carried out to date, symptoms and/or clinical findings together with a clearly formulated statement. The last two points are crucial quality factors, especially when the ultrasound scan is carried out as a separate service, independently of the clinical examination or patient treatment. Diagnostic evaluation of the internal genitalia and perineal sonography should be carried out with the patient lying in the supine position on a gynaecological examination couch with leg rests. Alternatively a high cushion placed beneath the buttocks will suffice. The mammasonography should ideally be carried out on a narrow couch, again in the supine position, and possibly with the patient’s arms elevated. 4 The examination should be structured in such a way so as to ensure that the atmosphere is relaxed for practitioner and patient alike6. An easy to operate room dimmer switch should also be close at hand. Right-handed practitioners generally prefer to guide the probe with their dominant right hand, using the left hand to operate the device. The equipment is thus positioned on the patient’s right side. All practitioners should plan the procedure to ensure that they cannot be criticised for inappropriate action. A male practitioner performing a genital examination on an unaccompanied female patient of a different culture or who has difficulty in understanding the local language should ideally ask for another female person to be present in the examination room. The practitioner should personally greet the patient before the examination and outline the examination procedure. Practitioners should have their own examination procedure and consequently work to plan whenever possible, e.g. diagnostic procedures on the internal genitalia can be conducted as follows: initially by examination of the uterus with its myometrium and endometrium followed by the right adnexa with the right ovary, then the left adnexa with the left ovary, the intestine and pouch of Douglas, completing the examination with the urinary bladder and rectum. A TAS can be included if required. This routine approach guarantees that no findings are overlooked and that there is no confusion between right and left. The patient should be able to make out the most important easily recognisable structures on the monitor with the aid of the marker (e.g. uterus, ovaries and urinary bladder). The documentation should be prepared during the examination with images and/or film sequences being stored digitally on the ultrasound device or via the network, or else printed out immediately. The mandatory written examination report is drafted at the end of the procedure. The findings should always be documented with an ultrasound evaluation and possibly also with recommendations especially if the ultrasound scan is carried out by other practitioners who are not treating the patient. To conclude, patients should always be given a brief account of the outcome and the next stage following the examination, even in the case of inconspicuous findings, e.g. "It looks fine", "I didn’t find anything in particular", "We will send your doctor a report. Please make an appointment to see him/her in 1 week’s time". 1.10 Findings 1.10.1 A descriptive account of the findings A purely descriptive account warrants the use of targeted terminology without preempting a pathological or histological diagnosis. It provides an important basis for any objective description of imaging techniques so that the right conclusions can finally be drawn, and the same applies to sonography. 5 The following aspects should be covered in the event of conspicuous findings observed during the ultrasound scan: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Visibility/presentability: good, partial, unsatisfactory, cannot be shown/portrayed Organ identification, at least the assumed organ Size (on at least 2 perpendicular levels: length, breadth, height) Shape (round, oval, oblong, polycyclic) Structure [simple (uniform), complex (non-uniform)] External margins Delineation Deformability Cystic finding or cystic segment: Internal echoes: Position (parietal, central, ubiquitous), size (fine, moderately coarse, coarse), intensity (mild, moderate, strong, extremely strong), distance (loose, moderately tight, tight), distribution (uneven, even) Number of chambers Wall thickness Septum thickness Solid finding or solid segment: Internal echo(es): Detection (empty, parietal, central, ubiquitous), size (fine, moderately coarse, coarse), intensity (mild, moderate, strong, extremely strong), distance (loose, moderately tight, tight), distribution (uneven, even) Percentage of the overall finding Mobility/relocatability in the region of / towards the surrounding organs Attenuation and intensification of sound behind the medical finding Evidence of movement within a medical finding Pain elicited on pressure (“Sonopalpation”). 1.10.2 Interpretation of ultrasound findings When evaluating ultrasound findings, practitioners are aware of the fact that a relatively small number of sonomorphological criteria can be indicative of numerous pathological diagnoses. Unfortunately, these are mostly pathognomonic ultrasound criteria. A single ultrasound criterion seldom points conclusively to one histopathological diagnosis, e.g. heart action in the adnexal region is clearly indicative of extrauterine pregnancy (EUP). Conversely, virtually every histopathological diagnosis can be reflected in more than just one single sonomorphology (typical example of multiplicity: the dermoid). Where possible, it is advisable to interpret and draw conclusions from ultrasound findings only in conjunction with the clinical findings, menstrual cycle, medical history, laboratory test results and, above all, additional imaging techniques. Pathological changes should only be discussed with the patient after the examination with reference to the recorded images. 6 If the ultrasound examination is an isolated procedure where the practitioner is responsible only for the imaging, he/she is strongly urged to provide a purely descriptive account of the images recorded during the ultrasound examination if possible. Consequently, the ultrasound practitioner must and should assess the ultrasound findings from a differential diagnostic perspective and comment on the clinical relevance. 1.11 Documentation There are no legal regulations governing the scope of the documentation in Switzerland. However, the standard requirement to file documentation for at least ten years obviously also applies to medical ultrasound examinations. The current fee schedule in Switzerland used to calculate the cost of medical services (Tarmed) requires mandatory organs/structures and pathological processes to be displayed on two planes and non-essential, optional organs, without the opportunity to charge, to be documented on film / as a hard copy or in an appropriate electronic format. The following procedure can be followed for documenting images in the small pelvis: uterus with myometrium and endometrium, right adnexa with right ovary, left adnexa with left ovary (a total of at least 3 images), followed by the urinary bladder and pouch of Douglas. The urogynaecological examination should comprise a total of at least 4 images recorded at rest, on straining, during coughing and, to conclude, on contraction of the pelvic floor. When examining the breast, the right breast is initially examined (pathology including the axilla) followed by the left breast (pathology including the axilla) with an image of each of the upper external quadrants (a total of at least 2 images). A written examination report (structured evaluation, description, procedure, etc.) is mandatory and a component of the respective examination / position regarding fees. The documentation should always be managed purposefully in order to avoid, where possible, any stressful situations for practitioners in the event of a right to recourse. A report and images of the examined organs should always be filed even if no abnormal findings are observed. Pathological images should, if possible, always be recorded on two planes, including the area surrounding the medical finding, dividing the image into a left half and a right half where possible. There is no ceiling as to the number of images that should be recorded for each case given current storage facilities. The structure of the written documentation should follow the routine examination procedure. The report can be sub-divided into various sections such as medical history, findings, evaluation and recommendations. It can be written on a special form such as one of the SGUMGG reporting forms (see appendix or visit the website at www.sgumgg.ch), or as an entry in the patient’s medical record. Ideally, the documentation should be stored on a PC-based system in the form of text and images with the option of displaying the data graphically in addition to the comprehensive, uniform and structured report. 7 1.12 References 1 2 3 4 5 6 SGUMGG: Empfehlungen zur Ultraschalluntersuchung in der Schwangerschaft, 3. Auflage, 2011. AIUM 2003. Report for cleaning and preparing endocavitary ultrasound transducers between patients, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, AIUM Reporter 1995, 11,7. CDC 2004. Information supplied to ultrasonographers on the safe decontamination and disinfection of ultrasound probes. CDC Operational Circular OP 1891/04. ASUM Transvaginal transducers hygiene – what is the big deal? ASUM Ultrasound Bulletin 2005 May, 8(2). Mullaney PJ, Munthali P, Vlachou P, Jenkins D, Rathod A, Entwisle J: How clean is your probe? Microbiological assessment of ultrasound transducers in routine clinical use, and cost-effective ways to reduce contamination. Clinical Radiology 2007;62:694-698. Jeager KA, Imfeld S. Schädigende Wirkung des Ultraschall – auf den Untersucher. Ultraschall in Med 2006;27:131-133. 8 2 The internal Genitalia Michael Bajka, René Müller 2.1 2.1.1 Examination techniques Preparations Both transabdominal and transvaginal access with the appropriate probe (and, in exceptional cases, also transrectal access with a vaginal probe) can be chosen to highlight the female internal pelvic organs. On numerous occasions, transvaginal examination of the uterus and adnexa has proved superior to the transabdominal procedure in many ways,2,3,4,5. The initial approach usually comprises transvaginal sonography (TVS) but if a process protrudes from the small pelvis (e.g. an adnexal tumour of over 10 cm in size, a large Uterus myomatosus), or other abdominal organs have to be examined, practitioners tend to opt for transabdominal sonography (TAS). TVS should be carried out with an empty urinary bladder and TAS with a full bladder. The challenge is to make the most of this situation or to control it. 2.1.2 Examination aids Occasionally, TVS does not grant sufficient access to the small pelvic organs from the outset. Then greater clarity is often achieved by slowly applying increasingly more pressure in the direction of the structure under examination. The patient should be told in advance to inform the practitioner if she experiences any pain. Obviously, targeted searches for painful processes can also be carried out (sonopalpation). If this does not suffice, the free hand can also be used to exert slight pressure from the abdominal wall in the direction of the small pelvis. If necessary, the patient can do this herself. Regular echodense, ribbon-like reflexes, a few millimetres to centimetres apart, can severely impair the image (so-called reverberation artefacts). This is mostly due to the filling of the urinary bladder, which should be emptied. Ultrasound blurring on sector scanning is often caused by inadequate contact gel application, which should be corrected accordingly. Larger myomas as well as gas-filled intestinal loops often are often highly "soundabsorbent". If these cannot be removed from the field of vision, the procedure is switched to TAS. If the structure to be examined is still not visible, it is more likely that a larger cystic space-occupying lesion can at least be ruled out. 2.1.3 Monitor displays Image displays are shown on the monitor in a number of different ways. This manual focuses on the image displays mainly used in German-speaking countries6,7,8,9. 9 With TVS, the image is generally displayed from the bottom to the top, with the ventral region to the right of the image and the dorsal region to the left in the sagittal section (Fig. 1). The images are structured in such a way as though they were recorded in a woman in the standing position, facing right, with the practitioner examining the internal organs as if the pelvis were transparent. The fundus of the anteflexed uterus lies on the bladder and is always pointing to the right (Fig. 1a) whilst the fundus of the retroflexed uterus is always pointing to the left in the image (Fig. 1c). In transverse sections (Fig. 1b, 1d), the right side of the body is displayed on the left of the image and the left side of the body on the right. It should be noted that the external iliac vessels in this arrangement always run from cranial left to caudal right whereas the internal iliac vessels always run towards the dorsal left (Fig. 16). Lateral sections of the median sagittal plane should be labelled with “left” or “right”, respectively as this information is not evident from the images. Fig. 1 Standard TVS display of the uterus with an empty bladder, image build-up from below cranial ventral dorsal left right caudal a) anteflexed uterus in the median sagittal section (organrelated) b) anteflexed uterus in a transverse section cranial ventral dorsal right left caudal c) Retroflexed uterus distinctly close to the inner surface of the sacrum d) Retroflexed uterus in a transverse section The TVS probe is guided according to the organs and structures to be examined in order to generate optimal image displays. The direction and overview in the small pelvis should never be lost, especially when using rotation symmetrical probes. 10 With TAS, cranial left and caudal right areas are displayed in the sagittal sections (Fig. 2a) with right to left imaging and left to right imaging with transverse sections (Fig. 2b). Fig. 2 TAS: Standard display of the uterus with a full urinary bladder, image build-up from above cranial caudal a) Anteflexed uterus in the median sagittal section 2.1.4 right left b) Anteflexed uterus in a transverse section Hystero Contrast (Agent) Sonography (HyCoSy) HyCoSy is used to scan the uterine cavity and to check tubal patency. Basically, a fine catheter is introduced through the cervical canal under sterile conditions and sealed against backflow (Fig. 3a). To keep discomfort to a minimum, it is advisable to block the balloon catheter, if used, in the cervical canal if technically feasible (Fig. 3b). Prepared hyperechogenic ultrasound contrast agent (e.g. ExEm® Foam) is then inserted into the cavity with minimal pressure. The contrast agent is initially expected to reach one and then the other interstitial portion of the tube (Fig. 4a) and is then tracked distally along the isthmic, meandering path as far as possible (Fig. 4b, 4c), often reaching the end of the fimbria. Eventually, the contrast agent can be seen as a hypoechogenic film around the ovaries (Fig. 4e). The cavity can then be assessed in contrast with 0.9%-NaCl solution (Fig. 4e). Space occupying lesions in the uterus present as a gap per se in the presence of an echogenic contrast agent (Fig. 5), and are mostly displayed as echogenic and clearly delineated in an echo-free NaCl solution (Fig. 6). The use of HyCoSy in the evaluation of tubal patency with over 90% approval for use in chromo-laparoscopy has been documented since the mid-nineties10. HyCoSy carries the same diagnostic significance as a hysterosalpingogram but without exposing the patient to irradiation or anasesthesia11. It is well tolerated with a very low incidence of adverse events12. Promising 3D techniques have recently been tested in order to make the procedure more objective and feasible regardless of ultrasound practitioner experience13. 11 Fig. 3 Starting phase for HyCoSy a) Application catheter in the cervical canal b) Block with balloon catheter in the cervical canal (white dot) b) Block with balloon catheter in the uterine cavity (white dot) Fig. 4 HyCoSy with ExEm® Foam to track passage through the tubes a) Tube exits right and left b) Right isthmic tube path d) Periovariell contrast agent (arrow) Abb. 5 HyCoSy: Negative imprint of a spherical finding protruding in the uterine cavity to the right on the posterior wall c) Left isthmic tube path e) Wash-out phase with NaCl Fig. 6 NaCl hydrosonography with echodense polyp (marked with white crosses) 12 2.2 2.2.1 Anatomy, biometry and physiological changes IETA criteria In a consensus statement, the IETA (International Endometrial Tumour Analysis Group) stipulated terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographical findings in the endometrium and intrauterine lesions14. An overview is given below. B image portrayal: Thickness of the endometrium • … mm • Not measurable Endometrial echogenicity and pattern: • Uniform • 3-layer pattern • Hyper-echoic • Hypo-echoic • Iso-echoic • Non-uniform • Homogeneous • With regular cystic areas • With irregular cystic areas • Heterogeneous • Without cystic areas • With regular cystic areas • With irregular cystic areas Endometrial midline • Linear • Non-linear • Irregular • Not defined “Bright edge“ • No • Yes Endo-myometrial junction • Regular • Irregular • Interrupted • Not defined Synechiae • No • Yes Intracavity fluid • No • Yes • … mm • Echogenicity • Anechoic, low level echogenicity • Ground glass • “Mixed“ echogenicity Colour Doppler assessment: • • 13 Score within the endometrium I. No flow II. Minimal flow III. Moderate flow IV. Abundant flow Vascular pattern • No vessels seen • Single “dominant“ vessel • • • • Single “dominant“ vessel without branching • Single “dominant“ vessel with branching Multiple “dominant“ vessels • Focal origin • Multifocal origin Scattered vessels Circular flow 2.2.2 Uterus and Myometrium The procedure used to measure the size of the uterus (Fig. 7) should take into account the various proportions between the corpus with fundus on the one hand and the cervix on the other hand at different ages in life. The length of the uterus should always be given with the cervix. The pre-puberty uterus is, on average, 41 mm long and 9 mm deep. In women of child-bearing age, the length of the uterus, measured transabdominally, is 76 +/- 7 mm with a depth of 29 +/- 4 mm in the case of nulliparous females15. The uterus of a multiparous woman is 12 mm more in all dimensions, i.e. 89 +/- 9 mm in length with a depth of 38 +/- 6 mm15. Transvaginally, Merz16 recorded significantly smaller values (Tab. 1). During the menstrual cycle, the uterus seems small in size but can nevertheless vary with the largest measurements being recorded on the 27th day of the cycle17. In postmenopausal women, the uterus slowly decreases in size but this can vary considerably (Fig. 8). The late postmenopausal uterus can shrink to a length of 45 mm and a width of 15 mm (Fig. 9). Fig. 7 Standard uterine measurement in the median sagittal section a) Length halved (measurement 1,2), depth (3) and endometrial thickness (4) in the sagittal section b) Maximal cervical width (measurement 1) and fundal width (2), on cross-section Fig. 8 Uterus 10 years after the menopause with hormone therapy Fig. 9 Uterus 20 years after the menopause The thickness of the myometrium compared to the endometrium should not be affected by an oestrogen-based hormone replacement therapy during the 14 postmenopausal stage18. From the vagina, the cervix is clearly displayed and delineated, which is often feasible only with restrictions on TAS. Uterine weight can be estimated from sonographic masses for length, width and depth, based on Becker’s formula: Estimated uterine weight (g) = length (mm) x depth (mm) x width (mm) x 0.00038 + 2419. Tab. 1 Biometry of the uterus (guidelines) 15 16 TAS TVS Max. length (mm) Nulliparous female 90 Multiparous female 100 Nulliparous female 73 Multiparous female 92 Max. depth (mm) 50 60 32 43 Max. width (mm) 60 70 40 51 Max. weight (g) 120 150 2.2.3 Endometrium A normal female cycle averaging 28 days is assumed. Measuring the thickness of the endometrium: In the median (organ-related) sagittal section, the thickest point of the endometrium from the echogenic boundary outwards as far as the opposite echogenic boundary should be measured perpendicular to the endometrial tail. This includes both layers of the endometrium – the “bilayer”. The hypoechoic innermost layer of the myometrium is not included. (Fig. 7a). If intrauterine fluid or a definable polyp is present, these should be removed and described separately (Fig. 10). Maximum permissible endometrial thickness (Tab. 2). Tab. 2 Endometrial thickness, measured as the overall thickness = bilayer (guidelines) 20,21 Max. overall thickness (mm) Regardless of premenopausal cycle Premenopausal 4th – 6th day of the cycle 12 5 Postmenopausal (with hormone replacement therapy) Postmenopausal (without hormone replacement therapy) 8 5 Physiologically, the endometrium appears as a homogeneous, echodense, delineated, continuous caudate, the apex of which begins in the cervix and ending in a concave shape in the fundus. The thin, echodense line that separates the two layers runs through the centre. Deviations from this shape and inner or outer limits, especially changes in calibre, are clear indications of disease (myoma, polyps, adenomyosis, deformities, etc.). 15 Fig. 10 Endometrial measurement in the presence of intrauterine fluid (water) Both layers are measured individually (measurement 1,2) without fluid and added up. a) Premenopausal, transversal b) Postmenopausal, sagittal 2.2.4 Cycle diagnostics and the effect of hormones on the endometrium At the end of menstruation from the 4th – 6th day of the cycle (CD), function is diminished and the endometrium can shrink to a thickness of up to 1 mm (Fig. 11a). It can then appear as a thinner, echogenic line on TVS. During the proliferation phase, the thickness of the endometrium constantly increases. From the 10th day of the cycle, the superficial cells loosen due to oedema. Typical layering is then apparent with an echodense margin, hypoechoic volume and echodense streaking in the central endometrial echo. Prior to ovulation, around the 14th day of the cycle (Fig. 11b), the thickness is between 10 and 12 mm. During the median secretion phase, the endometrium reaches its maximum thickness as a result of secretory transformation on the 20th to 25th day of the cycle, with an overall bilayer thickness of 10 – 15 mm (Fig. 11 c), increasingly transforming itself into echodense streaks. During the late secretion phase (26th to 28th day of the cycle, the thickness of the endometrium perceptibly decreases once more. Shortly before the start of menstruation, hypoechoic areas projected onto the endometrium indicate the onset of desquamation (Fig. 11d). The layering of the endometrium quickly disappears as a result. Fig. 11 Cyclic changes in the endometrium a) 5th day of the cycle. Low endometrium b) 14th day of the cycle Elevated endometrium. Mucous clearly present in the region of the cervical canal (arrow) 16 c) 21st day of the cycle. Maximum build-up of endometrium, increasingly echodense d) 28th day of the cycle. Non-homogeneous endometrium, decreasing thickness, hypoechoic zones Optimum evaluation of the contour of the uterine cavity can be obtained via 2D sonography from the 20th to the 25th day of the cycle, with a well built-up image of the endometrium. This is particularly useful for diagnosing uterine anomalies (Uterus bicornis, subseptus, arcuatus, etc.) (Figs. 19, 20, 21). At the pre-menopausal stage, endometrial thickness of over 12 mm can be indicative of disease (endometrial polyp, submucous myoma, etc.) or of pregnancy. If disease is assumed, a post-menstrual check-up should be performed (around the 6th day of the cycle). From a physiological aspect, a streaky endometrium would be expected. Following administration of atrophying gestagens, the endometrium should present with a uniform atrophic appearance, i.e. with a bilayer thickness of less than 5 mm (Fig. 12). Fig.12 Streaky endometrium (measurement 1) during long-term gestagen administration Postmenopausal without hormone replacement therapy indicates that vaginal bleeding must be clarified histologically. One exception to the rule is an endometrial thickness of < 5 mm measurable on sonography, which, given the extremely negative predictive significance of this value, must be initially viewed as anticipated/expectative, assuming atrophy-induced bleeding21,22 Postmenopausal during hormone-replacement therapy – regular or minor bleeding and an endometrial thickness of > 8 mm initially suggests hormone-related 17 withdrawal bleeding. A histological examination must be carried out if the endometrium does not decrease considerably thereafter. As a general rule, unclear situations regarding the endometrium can be initially clarified by HyCoSy or hydrosonography thus contributing to a minimally invasive procedure regardless of whether or not the patient is bleeding22. 2.2.5 Ovaries Detection of the ovaries does not generally pose any problems in premenopausal patients given the specific morphology of these organs with follicles and their usual position in the ovarian fossa in the vicinity of the external iliac vessels (Fig.16). Follicles can be distinguished from major vessels (e.g. in the case of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome) by manoeuvring the probe through 900, i.e. if the section displayed forms a tube after turning through 900, it is most likely to be a vessel as opposed to a follicle. The explanation can also be given via a positive or negative blood flow on the Doppler colour scan. In the postmenopausal patient, ”postmenopausal sonographic ovary“ refers to a homogeneous, hypoechogenic, ovular structure of myometrium echogenicity, < 20 mm long, with an echogenic margin and no peristalsis23,24. This image is mostly small and atrophied on direct macroscopic examination. Pathological significance is only seldom attributed to this phenomenon on microscopic investigation23,25. The simplified form of the ellipsoidal formula should be used to measure the ovaries26,27. Ovarian volume (ml) = diameter1(mm) x diameter2 (mm) x diameter3 (mm) x 0.000523. Three axes should be displayed that are all perpendicular to each other. The image shown on the monitor is divided up into sections for this purpose and the magnification is selected so as to highlight the left and right ovaries in full (Fig. 13). Markedly divergent data have been published regarding the presentability of the ovaries, ranging from 99 %24 to 85 % for at least one ovary and 60 % for both ovaries in the same patient23. In practice, the ovaries can nearly always be detected in pre- and perimenopausal women and in over 50 % of postmenopausal women based on the criteria outlined above. Fig.13 Calculation of ovarian volume based on length, breadth and depth a) Premenopausal, 12th day of the cycle b) Postmenopausal 18 A clear-cut correlation between uterine and ovarian measurements recorded on sonography and anatomical/pathological examination has been confirmed by various authors in studies with large patient cohorts23,28. Structures with an average diameter not exceeding 30 mm in pre- and perimenopausal women are referred to as ovarian follicles. The pathological term "ovarian cysts" is justified for values over 30 mm. In postmenopausal patients, every round, echo-free structure projecting on to the ovary is classed as a cyst. The maximum ovarian volumes according to age are general a good marker for ruling out a disease (Tab. 3). Another rule used in practice is that one ovary should not be more than twice the size of the other one. Tab. 3 Ovarian volumes, upper limits (guidelines)28 max. Volume (ml) Premenopausal Postmenopausal 2.2.6 18 8 Cyclic diagnostics in the ovary As with the endometrium, an ovarian cycle averaging 28 days is assumed. During the first 5 days of the cycle (corresponding to menstruation), only “antral” follicles can be detected in the ovary under normal conditions (Fig. 14a). These appear as echo-empty, small, < 8 mm round zones in the ovary. Their number correlates with the ovarian reserve in that 15 have an excellent reserve and less than 7 indicate severely limited fertility. From these follicles, one follicle crystallises as the dominant follicle per cycle and grows linearly, averaging 1.5 - 2 mm per day. The other antral follicles become atretic. Prior to ovulation, the dominant follicle grows to approximately 22 mm (Fig. 14b). As the follicle is occasionally clearly oval instead of largely spherical, the average diameter of three internal diameters, perpendicular to each other, is used for folliculometry. The largest possible magnification should be chosen. This mass is particularly significant for assisted reproduction medicine. With mature follicles, the Cumulus oophorus is often (in 40 - 80 % of cases) portrayed as a parietal more echodense structure (Fig. 14c). Immediately after ovulation, the ruptured follicle is generally no longer visible and is replaced by a small, collapsed, cystic structure filled with some fluid. Above all, the persistence of a structure resembling a follicle does not prevent ovulation. Free fluid in the pouch of Douglas and an obviously dilated cervical canal with echo-empty content are indirect, rather uncertain signs that ovulation has taken place. 19 Fig. 14 Cyclic changes in the ovary a) 5th day of the cycle Some antral follicles (under 8 mm) b) 14th day of the cycle Clearly oval predominant follicle c) 14th day of the cycle Predominant follicle with Cumulus oophorus prior to ovulation. d) 16th day of the cycle Typical Corpus rubrum postovulation with marked perifocal blood flow e) 21st day of the cycle Corpus luteum, on 2 perpendicular planes f) Corpus albicans (white arrow) The Corpus rubrum (haemorrhagicum), characterised by fine internal echoes (Fig. 14d) is formed as a result of bleeding in the hatched follicle. The Corpus luteum is then formed by producing vessels (Fig. 14e). Sonographic image quality can vary considerably with this structure. The Corpus luteum either has a predominantly hypoechoic content and an echodense margin or a mainly homogeneous echodense content. The dimensions can also vary. 20 Corpus albicans presents as an echodense, lobed, rounded structure, generally devoid of any direct contact with the cortex (Fig. 14f). Antral follicles are mostly detected under ovulation inhibitors (Fig. 15). Otherwise, reliable contraception is doubtful. Fig. 15 Resting ovaries under ovulation inhibitors 2.2.7 Tubes Normal, unchanged tubes cannot be seen and cannot be separated in the adnexal region. Only a tube filled or surrounded by fluid can be seen. 2.2.8 Major vessels The right and left external iliac A and V are regularly visible lengthwise. If shown transversally, avoidable cystic or double cystic findings can be displayed lengthwise per se or transmitted as pulsating vessels by manoeuvring through 90°. Fig. 16 Image of the external iliac A and V, lengthwise, and the ovarian fossa No distinction can be made between the vessels on the left and right side of the body in this image. right a) Ovarian fossa, right left b) Ovarian fossa, left The division into the common iliac A and the internal and external iliac A is generally visible. This division represents a landmark in ovarian scans because they often lie in the ovarian fossa, which is formed by the vessels (Fig. 16). It should be 21 noted that, when the images are shown as outlined above, the external iliac vessels always run from left and right in the image from the top left to the bottom right as opposed to the vessels on the right side of the body which then run from top right to bottom left. This is consistent with the fact that TVS shows distances without stating whether the section is positioned to the right or left of the median sagittal plane. Many US devices give the option of portraying the image left-right according to the position of the section. However, this is not considered a practical option and is not recommended. The sagittal sections in TVS always appear from the right in the patient. 2.2.9 Muscles The two muscles that are regularly portrayed in the dorsal direction on TVS are the M. obturatorius internus and the M. piriformis. On scanning at depth, they are identified as small, delineating pelvic structures in the dorsal lateral and caudal lateral regions. They are structured like all fasciated muscles, i.e. generally hypoechoic with fine, echodense stripes in one direction (Fig. 17). No further pressure should be applied on contact with this structure. Fig. 17 M. piriformis. Note muscle pinnates (white arrow) 2.2.10 Pouch of Douglas Particular clinical relevance is attached to the pouch of Douglas. In the standing female, it represents the lowest point of the abdominal cavity. All of the fluids that penetrate the unobstructed abdominal cavity and are not encapsulated are expected to reach the pouch of Douglas where they can be aspirated if need be. Physiologically, some free, echo-empty to hypoechoic fluid can very often be seen in the Pouch of Douglas (Fig.18a). This mainly occurs mid-cycle, after ovulation. Finally, when the depth of the free fluid exceeds the depth of the cervix, the free fluid is referred to as abundant. Physiologically, one or both ovaries can be found in "solid" space-occupying lesions in the Pouch of Douglas. Enlarged adnexa are often found in the Pouch of Douglas due to gravity. The most common findings in the Pouch of Douglas are large and small intestinal loops, the walls, calibre and peristalsis of which can be clearly seen an evaluated. 22 Fig. 18 Free fluid in the Pouch of Douglas a) A smaller physiological quantity 2.2.11 b) An abundant quantity, echo-empty Urinary bladder The urinary bladder should be considered during every sonographic procedure. The bladder should, if possible, be empty for TVS scans and full for TAS scans. In this way, every cystic finding in the small pelvis is to be considered suspicious on TVS. It should, however, be noted that the bladder can fill up very quickly, especially in stressful situations. Urine in the bladder is always seen to be devoid of echoes (exceptions: marked haematuria, pyuria). The settings on the device can be adjusted (“calibrated”) for a bladder examination so that the urine appears devoid of echoes. This reference value is often of major importance when assessing the intensity of the internal echoes in the small pelvis. Particular attention should be paid to concrement and bladder tumours. The jet phenomenon with the ejaculation of urine from both ureteral ostia in the urinary bladder can also be detected without any problem. 2.3 2.3.1 Diseases of the internal genitalia Congenital Deformities Uterine deformities affect approximately 0.4 % of all women, 4 % of sterility and infertility patients and up to 40 % of patients with ≥ 2 miscarriages. The development of Müllerian Duct Anomalies (MDA) can be attributed to a narrow period of time in embryonal or foetal development. Uterine hypoplasias or –aplasias, complete (Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster syndrome, etc.) or incomplete, or only onesided (Uterus unicornis, etc.), develop during the 8th – 11th week of pregnancy due to partial or complete underdevelopment of one or more ducts. Partial or complete double systems (Uterus didelphys, bicornis bicollis, bicornis unicollis, etc.) develop in the 12th – 14th week of pregnancy due to incorrect fusion of the ducts (Fig. 19a). Deformities that primarily affect the uterus (Fig. 19b) (Uterus arcuatus, septus, subseptus) originate during the 15th – 19th week of pregnancy due to incomplete resorption of the embryonal section of the wall that connects the ducts. The currently 23 most widely used MDA classification was that developed by the AFS (American Fertility Society) in 198829. Fig. 19a Transverse Uterus bicornis Corpus / fundus very wide and interrupted (MDA!), amniotic sac in early pregnancy in the right horn (Fig. 19b Transverse uterus arcuatus: Fundus is very wide, the endometrium in a narrow, concave manner to the angles of the tubes (sagittal: Fundus is flat on the outside to minimally convex, arched) Fig. 19c Uterus subseptus (3D image see Fig. 20) transversal: the suspect isolated endometrial islets to the angles of the tubes suggest MDA (sagittal: the unchanged elevated position of the thick white dot (fundus) from right to left rules out Uterus bicornis, in the centre, the marked movement of the small white dot (inner fundus) in the caudal direction is indicative of uterus subseptus as arcuatus Transversal: fundus Sagittal: fundus right Fundus in the centre Fundus left Sonographic indications of uterine anomalies are mostly apparent in the fundus with a highly built-up image in the endometrium in the 2nd half of the cycle (Fig. 19c). Firstly the presence of rejuvenated “endometrial islets” in the direction of the fundus as far as the angles of the tubes should firstly be clarified in the transverse sections from the fundus to the cervix and back again. If these are present, they are indicative of MDA. The uterus should be examined from left to right and vice versa in sagittal sections and any infiltrations in the fundus investigated (Fig. 19c, large white dot). Significant infiltration suggests Uterus bicornis. If no infiltration can be detected, the upper inner section of the fundus should be examined to establish whether it clearly deviates in the caudal direction. A slight deviation is indicative of Uterus arcuatus whilst a marked deviation suggests Uterus suptus. 24 Further indicators shown on the image include: • A suspiciously wide neck of uterus • The presence of septa • Missing kidney (suspected Uterus unicornis?). If sonography does not give a conclusive diagnosis, hydrosonography30, HyCoSy or MRI scan can be carried out. 3D sonography (Fig. 20)31 provides an excellent image of the uterine contours under investigation. It provides ultrasound practitioners with considerable potential for the diagnosis of uterine deformities, especially when combined with a gynaecological examination. Fig. 20 a,b) Uterus subseptus in 3D images (Uterus from Fig. 19c), c,d) normally configured Uteri (white dots: Small fundus on the inside, large fundus on the outside) a) Virtual 2D section plane b) 3D surface rendering c) Normal uterus, 1-para d) Normal uterus, 0-para 2.3.2 Diseases originating in the uterus 2.3.2.1 Myoma Myomas are the most common gynaecological tumour. Every third woman of childbearing age is a myoma carrier32. Myomas can also develop postmenopause. Isolated myomas are less common than multiple myomas and more than half are located in the region of the fundus. In addition to localised myomas, there is also diffuse 25 myomatosis (Fig. 21) with a very non-homogeneous myometrium. Submucous myomatosis (Fig. 22) can be indicative of a major fertility problem. Occasionally giant myomas are sufficiently visible as far as the upper abdomen. Myomas with a diameter of more than 10 cm should be examined using TAS. Sonographically, myomas typically have a swirling internal structure with echodense and hypoechoic areas. They are spherical in shape and are generally clearly delineated against the myometrium (Fig. 23). Myomas with a good blood flow have a hypoechoic internal pattern (Fig. 24). Echogenicity also decreases as the degenerative changes increase (Fig. 25). However, calcification leads to extremely echodense, non-homogeneous areas. The acoustic shadows that constantly appear with varying density behind the myomas are interesting to note. Blood flow is regularly detected on Doppler colour scans with the largest vessels appearing on the outer boundary. Fig. 21 Diffuse myomatosis Fig. 22 Submucous myomatosis with at least 7 small myomas directly below the endometrium Fig. 23 TVS on two planes perpendicular to each other, subserous myoma, non-homogeneous, maximum measurement of 53 mm 26 Fig. 24 Subserous, with a broad-based stem, diameter of just 12 mm, small hypoechoic anterior wall myoma, clinically silent Fig. 25 Subserous myoma with severe degenerative changes, liquefied centre, originating from the fundus to the left (DD: malignant adnexal finding) Fig. 26 17 mm submucous myoma, unenhanced 2D on 2 perpendicular planes Fig.27 Intraligamentary myoma, 38 mm, broad base attached to uterus, maximum diameter Rounded foci detected in the myometrium should be described as follows: 1. Position [submucous (Fig. 26), intramural (Fig. 21), subserous (Fig. 23), pedunculated subserous (Fig. 24), intraligamentary (Fig. 27)], 2. Average of the three main diameters, 3. Echogenicity, 4. Homogeneity. The position of the myoma in relation to the uterus / endometrium is highly relevant for clarifying the clinical symptoms and planning surgical treatment. The growth of myomas is clearly oestrogen-dependent and should therefore be monitored at appropriate, i.e. three-monthly intervals in premenopausal women until a stable size is detected. Growth following the menopause is suspicious although malignant degeneration at < 0.3 % is extremely rare and uterine sarcoma appears to be largely independent of myoma formation33. It should be pointed out that measuring the size of the myoma varies considerably from one examination to the next and from one practitioner to the next. This must be taken into account when assessing an overall growth trend. 27 2.3.2.2 Polyps Small polyps in the corpus mucosa are often difficult to diagnose. The first signs include an increased middle echo, an enlarged “undulating” endometrium in one or more areas, a smooth area and a local increase in tail-shaped delineation. The sonographic image with spherical to cone-shaped, non-homogeneous and possibly small cystic space occupying lesions on the macroscopic image are only occasionally reminiscent of polyps (Fig. 28). If fluid is present at the same time, the evaluation of an already unenhanced 2D image is relatively simple (Fig. 29). Artificially produced fluid as part of contrast agent sonography (Fig. 5 HyCoSy, Fig. 6 Hydrosonograpy) can be extremely useful when distinguishing between an accentuated endometrium and a polyp via scans. Corpus polyps can be very long, even extending as far as the cervix. In terms of width, they seldom exceed 10 mm. Polyps of unknown origin, which are clinically displayed in the cervical canal, are known as “cervical canal polyps” until confirmed sonographically. In principle, a cervical polyp can be directly removed whereas the cavum should be clarified by hysteroscopy and curettage in the case of a corpus polyp. Principally, all polyps developing in the postmenopausal phase require histological clarification particularly since polyps are frequently associated with endometrial carcinoma without actually being the cause of the carcinoma. Fig. 28 Echodense corpus polyp, isodense to the endometrium clearly portraying the middle echo and highlighting the endometrium Fig. 29 Polypoidal endometrium with 2 additional polyps (arrows) on 2 planes perpendicular to each other 28 2.3.2.3 Fluid accumulation in the uterine cavity This can be seen regularly during menstruation. “Spontaneous” fluid accumulation regularly occurs in the presence of a stenosed cervix, especially during the postmenopausal phase (Fig. 10). Fluid accumulation in the uterine cavity per se is not indicative of malignancy35. On the contrary, it highlights the mucosal contours against a contrast-enriched background and facilitates a better evaluation. Intracavity fluid should be aspirated on measuring endometrial thickness (bilayer ap). 2.3.2.4 Adenomyosis The endometrium can be detected in the myometrium with uterine adenomyosis. This can only affect the innermost, basal layer (Fig. 30a). The endometrium is only unclearly delineated against the myometrium in the presence of numerous fine, echodense areas. However, the deeper myometrium as far as the serosa can also be affected (Fig. 30b). This is expressed in the form of a non-homogeneous asymmetric to sphere-shaped thickening of the uterus (Fig. 30c), occasionally accompanied by more extensive cyst formation with echodense margins. Fig. 30 Adenomyosis uteri a) Affecting the basal layer b) Broadly positioned in the innermost layer of the myometrium 29 c) Surrounding and infiltrating the myometrium 2.3.2.5 Echodense spots in the region of the uterine cavity Echodense spots projected on to the uterine cavity often appear. They mostly appear after pregnancy and can be evidence of curettage or the expression of small degenerative changes (Fig. 31)36. They are rarely associated with a serious disease. Very rarely, spots highlighted sonographically can mask ossification of the endometrium, which would be evident on histological examination36. Fig. 31 Echodense spots (arrows) projected onto the cavum/endometrium a) 6 weeks post-partum, insignificant (clearer section stigma with triangular expansion in the region of the section scar) b) Multiple, focal spots 1 year after spontaneous delivery 2.3.2.6 Ovula Nabothii Spherical, echo-empty, isolated (e.g. punched-out), often multiple structures are frequently found in the neck of the uterus in premenopausal women. These structures vary in length from a few to several centimetres (Fig. 32) with clear echo amplification behind the finding. They are located only a few millimetres from the head of the probe but do not cause any discomfort. These sonographic findings are pathognomonic for Ovula Nabothii. They can often be confirmed by colposcopy37. Fig. 32 Multiple Ovula Nabothii a) Stroma in cervix, retroflexed uterus b) Internal cervical tissue, anteflexed uterus 30 2.3.2.7 Endometrial carcinoma No histological diagnosis should be made sonographically but the suspicions surrounding an excessively built up endometrium, non-homogeneity and unclear delineation against the myometrium with corresponding clinical findings (especially postmenopausal bleeding) should be expressed. Fig. 33 Endometrial carcinoma, exophytic and infiltrating, myometrium infiltrated by >50% (dots) Fig. 34 Endometrial carcinoma extending to the cervix (internal cervical tissue marked with white dots) If corpus carcinoma is detected histologically, an experienced practitioner will be able to confirm “sonostaging” in terms of depth of invasion38 (Fig. 33) and infiltration in the cervix (Fig. 34). Statements regarding infiltration in the parametria or surrounding organs (tubes, ovaries, bladder, rectum) cannot be assessed as reliably via sonography. The endometrium must be dealt with separately under Tamoxifen (Fig. 35). Since evidence points to the fact that conditions such as proliferating endometrium, hyperplasias, polyps, invasive carcinoma and sarcoma occur in large numbers but only very occasionally in postmenopausal women receiving tamoxifen39, TVS as a fixed element of the routine follow-up procedure is discussed controversially in those patients affected. It is unanimously agreed that a histological explanation must be given for a patient who bleeds whilst taking tamoxifen. This approach should also be adopted for an asymptomatic patient with an overall endometrial thickness of > 8 mm. Tamoxifen-induced changes not only of the endometrium but also of the innermost layers of the myometrium contribute to the sonographically highlighted endometrium in the conventional form with enlarged cystic lesions (“Swiss cheese lesion”) 2.3.2.8 Uterine sarcoma Uterine sarcoma can only be suspected sonographically: spherical space-occupying lesion with non-homogeneous, hyperechoic and hypoechoic areas40 and, above all, rapid growth. The diagnosis is always based on histological examination. Uterine sarcoma seems to develop almost exclusively as de novo cases as well as through degeneration of the existing myoma (estimated proportion < 0.3 %)41. 31 Fig.35 Endometrium under tamoxifen a) “Swiss Cheese Lesion”, sonographic image of endometrium, 22 mm, atrophy evident on hysteroscopy b) Low, non-homogeneous endometrium, amenorrhoea, retroflexed uterus c) Endometrium, 8 mm thick, with cysts, no bleeding, retroflexed uterus 2.3.2.9 Cervical carcinoma Basically, routine sonography is not yet suitable for diagnosing or helping to stage cervical carcinoma42. Even parametrial involvement cannot be assessed primarily via sonography. In the case of status post cervical amputation, the remaining cervix can be assessed lengthwise using sonography (Fig. 36). Fig. 36 Short residual cervix (measurement 2) – status post cervical amputation due to cervical carcinoma stage 1A1 32 2.3.2.10 Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) The FIGO classification system for the potential causes of premenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding43 comprises 9 categories, which are referred to under the acronym “PALM-COEIN”. “PALM” stands for causes that can be highlighted via sonography: Polyps, Adenomyosis, Leiomyoma and Malignancy, which should be thoroughly investigated. Finally, an overall bilayer thickness of over 12 mm is suspicious20. A conservative approach should be considered at the postmenopausal stage with uterine bleeding and a maximum endometrial thickness of < 5 mm confirmed on sonography21,22. Following the random detection of an endometrial thickness of 5 mm and over, a test for hormone-induced withdrawal bleeding should be carried out followed by a check-up at least in the early postmenopausal stage44. 2.3.3 Diseases originating in the adnexal region Clinical practitioners should note that the discovery rate of an adnexal finding during a purely clinical examination without sonography is very low, depending on the extent of the finding, i.e. just a 33% chance with a lesion of 4 – 6 cm and 75 % with lesions of 6 – 8 cm45. Thus a combination of clinical investigation and sonography is vital for a correct diagnosis in the adnexal region. Initial imaging for adnexal investigations should be carried out with the TVS method. This can then be effectively supplemented by TAS especially in the case of small pelvic tumours or when investigating other tumour masses in the central and upper abdomen, ascites, lymph node and liver metastases and evaluating the urinary ducts. Overall sonographical diagnosis with an empty bladder is an exception to the rule since, in principle, every cystic finding warrants clarification. Objective imaging should generally be strived for. Clarification of organ identification is extremely useful. For instance, a solid adnexal tumour can clearly be attributed to a subserous pedunculated myoma (Fig. 37). Hence as a common benign uterus finding, it is to be assessed and treated very differently from a genuine adnexal finding thought to be malignant. Fig. 37 Solid adnexal finding corresponding to subserous myoma, ovary (arrow) evident with skilled probe guidance 33 Any attempt to pre-empt histopathological diagnosis via sonography warrants reservation on the part of the practitioner. Even experts make the correct diagnosis in only 42 % of cases46. A so-called n:m problem arises in that virtually every sonomorphological criterion can be allocated to every histopathological diagnosis and vice-versa. The following criteria of dignity have proved useful in assessing the dignity of an adnexal finding. Tumour size, wall structure, cyst structure, wall thickness, septal thickness, inner surface of the cyst, internal echoes in cystic and solid sections, surface properties and ascites47. The classification of adnexal findings in the following groups can also prove useful for the subsequent procedure48: simple cysts, cystic tumours with internal echoes, cystic-solid tumours and solid tumours. It is anticipated and largely supported in the literature with single-chamber, echo-empty, smooth walled cysts, that malignant neoplasms cannot be detected at the pre- or postmenopausal stage. Bernaschek49 should be consulted in practice since a simpler classification system focusing on three sonographic groups has been devised: Simple cysts, apparently benign findings and seemingly malignant findings, with different treatment recommendations for each group. The SGGG50 recommendation to estimate and deal with adnexal findings is based on a clinical examination followed by TVS with or without an estimate using the Sassone or Mainzer score (Tab. 4) and with or without determination of CA125 (see also51,52). More recent concepts with possibly simpler rules and regulations such as the estimation of adnexal tumours based on IOTA (International Ovarian Tumour Analysis Group) criteria initially advocate testing for benign and malignant lesions using few characteristics. The estimate should directly lead into the procedure both in the pre- and postmenopausal stage: benign findings should be checked sonographically, probably benign findings should be removed laparoscopically, probably malignant findings should initially be clarified by laparoscopy and any evidence of malignancy should be investigated via median laparotomy. 2.3.3.1 Simple adnexal cysts The sonomorphological image of simple adnexal cysts comprises a spherical to ellipsoidal smooth-walled space-occupying lesion (Fig. 38). The finding must be isolated with no evidence of septa or deposits, and, above all, regular, fine internal echoes should be detectable. Simple adnexal cysts include in particular the large group of virtually always self-limiting, functional ovarian cysts (follicular cysts, Corpus luteum cysts (Fig. 39), cysts with superstimulation and PCOS (Fig. 40), etc.). These also include retention cysts [parovarial cysts (originating from embryonal structures of the rete ovarii), pseudoperitoneal cysts, etc.], benign tumours [serous cyst adenoma (Fig. 41), purely cystic mature teratoma, etc.]. 34 Fig. 38 Simple ovarian cyst measuring 73 mm. Note the enormous echo amplification behind the cyst Fig. 39 Corpus luteum measuring 33 mm, with cystic changes Fig. 40 Typically configured, PCOS-like ovaries. These appear to be enlarged with follicles measuring 8 mm and are arranged like strings of pearls under the Tunica albuginea, without displaying a dominant follicle in the cycle. A whole series of studies could not detect any malignancy with simple cystic adnexal findings either at the pre- or postmenopausal stage, e.g. in the on-going Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening Project, 256 simple cysts were detected in 7705 postmenopausal women (3.3 %), 125 (49 %) of which resolved spontaneously within 60 days and 131 (51 %) persisted53. Of the latter, 45 underwent surgery and 86 were followed up. No cancer has been detected in either group to date. On discovering a simple adnexal cyst, the practitioner is responsible for avoiding unnecessary surgery by authorising sonographic check-ups at appropriate intervals. The patient should be informed about the possible complications, namely bleeding, torsion or rupture. All of these events are associated with acute pain. In such a situation, the patient should seek medical treatment immediately and should not travel in remote regions. The OEGGG Guidelines of 199854 offer a suitable algorithim for dealing with a simple adnexal cyst – an approach that is still used today. According to the guidelines, a diameter of 5 cm is the boundary for a surgical procedure. At least once ultrasound check-up must still be performed at the premenopausal stage whilst postmenopausal cases are subject to immediate surgical exploration. This is based above all on clinical experience. 35 Fig. 41 Serous cyst adenoma >10 cm a) Simple cyst with no echoes b) Simple, weak, echogenic cyst (compared to echoempty cyst, minimally filled bladder (arrow) Contradictory statements have been published regarding dignity criteria for septated cystic adnexal findings (e.g.48,55). Since septated cystic adnexal lesions must be closely monitored, practitioners should initially decide against surgery. 2.3.3.2 Benign adnexal findings This group includes all cystic adnexal findings with (a clear) internal structure, which in the densest case, is difficult to distinguish from purely solid tumours. The findings should be investigated on the basis of all dignity criteria and described from a purely sonomorphological perspective (see chapter on „objective image descriptions“) The histology of this sonographical group ranges from blood-filled ovarian cysts (Fig. 42), via endometrial cysts (Fig. 43), retention cysts, serous and mucinous cystic adenoma (Fig. 44), deep teratoma (Fig. 45), fibroma, myoma (Fig. 21-27) and inflammatory processes such as sactosalpinx (Fig. 46), through to critical/malignant ovarian findings. A series of extragenital cystic space occupying lesions in the small pelvis as well as pitfalls can clearly compound differential diagnosis. This group also includes highly typical sonomorphological features of certain histopathological findings. Fig. 42 Typical images of blood-filled ovarian cysts, resorption haematoma 36 Fig. 43 a) Diagram of the sectional planes: Fig. 44 Mucinous cystic adenoma Note the universally evenly distributed, pleomorphic echogenic internal echoes A blood-filled ovarian cyst (Fig. 42) is virtually always accompanied by a hypoechoic, homogeneous internal echo reminiscent of a spider’s web and with a honeycomb structure. Some areas appear devoid of echoes depending on the condition of the images. Similar images can be recorded with endometrial cysts (Fig.43). They tend to display a clumpy or honeycomb internal echogenic pattern, often accompanied by additional fluid levels. Benign dermoid cyst, also referred to as mature teratoma is another common adnexal disease. It is often an entirely echogenic tumour (Fig. 42), even if a purely cystic dermoid is present (Fig. 45). A round, echodense nucleus is often seen comprising either solid parts or a mass of sebum. Very often a streaked echodense pattern is visible, which is probably caused by hair. Typically, the dermoids tend to “float on the surface”, thus moving from the small pelvis in the ventral direction, often submerging into the acoustic shadows of the intestinal loops on TVS. It is interesting to note that the typical findings are also evident in inflammatory adnexal processes, such as the sactosalpinx (Fig. 46). With appropriate probe guidance, the septated cysts are mostly portrayed as a tightly wound hose. This image is also referred to as “meandering” like the tortuous path of an uncorrected river. Depending on the inflammatory stage, vascularisation is mainly seen in the septa to varying degree together with a very low flow index. 37 Fig. 45 Dermoids (mature teratoma) a) Typical echocomplex dermoid with echogenic, spherical nucleus (arrow). The internal echoes are irregular, evenly distributed, loose to dense, weak to strong, fine to coarse b) predominantly cystic dermoid with small echodense nucleus (arrow) In routine daily practice, these four benign adnexal findings together with simple adnexal cysts account for over 60 % of all adnexal lesions, thus providing competent sonographers with an impressive list of criteria on which to accurately assess their findings and decide on a suitable procedure47. It must be assumed that the large group of cystic adenomas can also be correctly recognised and classified in practice, thus increasing the quota of cases routinely encountered. Fig. 46 Sactosalpinx Retroperitoneal tumours originating from the vertebral column, for instance, also belong to the rare extragenital cystic space occupying lesions in the adnexal area. Tarlov cysts (extradural nerve root cysts) develop in around 5% of humans (Abb. 47). Pitfalls such as the clinically unrecognised overflow incontinence seldom occur. 2.3.3.3 Malignant adnexal findings The typical sonomorphological image of this group ranges from purely solid to complex [solid-cystic (Fig. 48), and cystic-solid (Fig. 49), depending on which component predominates]. Once again the findings should be investigated on the 38 basis of all dignity criteria and described from a purely sonomorphological perspective. Prömpeler47 discovered over 60% of malignant neoplasms in purely solid tumours during the pre and postmenopausal stages compared to 20% of malignant cases with complex premenopausal tumours and 60% at postmenopausal level. Timmermann56 was able to show that an estimation of the dignity of an adnexal finding by an experienced ultrasound practitioner clearly exceeded all other methods. Morphological scores (e.g.57,58), Doppler colour scans, logistic regression models and artificial neuronal networks proved less effective on the whole. Experienced practitioners managed to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal findings with a 95% hit quota. In Timmermann’s study and a whole series of other studies, papillary deposits, irregularly limited solid areas, septa and increased vascularisation in Doppler colour scans are viewed as clear indicators of malignancy (malignancy criteria). More recent concepts with possibly simpler rules and regulations such as the estimation of adnexal tumours based on IOTA (International Ovarian Tumour Analysis Group) criteria initially allow testing for benign and malignant tumours using 5 criteria59. If only malignancy criteria are discovered, the finding is obviously malignant. If only benign criteria are discovered, the finding is obviously benign. The 10 rules outlined below could be applied in 75% of cases with a sensitivity of 92 % and specificity of 96 %60. If a finding displays both benign and malignant criteria, it cannot be classified even if no criteria are satisfied61. The final estimation by an expert scored the highest number of hits. The procedure according to IOTA yields similarly correct statements like the complex pattern identification. Tab. 4 Mainzer’s score for the sonomorphological evaluation of adnexal tumours (see also documentation sheet appended). Mainzer-Score: Sonomorphological evaluation of adnexal tumours using TVS (according to Merz) Criteria 1. Overall structure of the 0 Points - 1 simple 2 complex 2. Tumour delineation smooth slightly irregular markedly irregular 3. Wall thickness < 3 mm ≥3 mm, ≤ 5 mm 4. Internal echoes of the cystic none homogeneous non- 5. Septa 6. Shape of the complex or purely solid section 7. Echogenicity of the complex or purely solid section 8. Acoustic shadows none no solid section ≤ 3 mm smooth > 3mm bumpy no solid section homoge non- echo amplification partly acoustic shadows 9. Ascites none a few 10. Liver carcinosis metastases/ Premenopausal: Postmenopausal: 39 peritoneal could not be detected cannot moderate be evaluated presentable max. 20 points Up to 8 points: benign, ≥ 9 points: malignant, 96 sens, 8% spec 81%, 47% ppV, 99.6% npV (Merz Up to 9 points: benign, ≥ 10 points: malignant, 97% sens, 91% spec, 91% ppV, 97% npV (Weber et al. 1999) Tab. 5 IOTA criteria to estimate adnexal tumours60 IOTA Criteria Benign Malignant B1 unilocular M1 Irregular solid tumour B2 solid components <7 mm present M2 Ascites present B3 Acoustic shadows present M3 At least 4 papillary structures B4 smooth-walled multilocular tumour <100 mm M4 irregular, multilocular, solid tumour > 100 mm B5 No blood flow present (Colour score 1) B5 Extremely heavy blood flow present (Colour score 4) Fig. 48 Solid cystic ovarian cancer Fig. 49 Cystic solid ovarian cancer In an impressively comprehensive meta-analysis of 445 publications62, the grey level-coded TVS with a sensitivity of 82 – 91 % and specificity of 68 – 81 % was described as superior to all other current methods. Doppler colour sonography, the tumour marker CA125, CT scanning, magnetic resonance imaging and PositronEmission-Tomography are all less beneficial. 2.4 2.4.1 Early pregnancy Intact early pregnancy An intact, timely developed intrauterine embryo63 characterised by: • Evidence of the amniotic sac measuring from 1.6 mm, no later than 4 + 4 weeks of amenorrhoea • Evidence of the yolk sac no later than 5 + 0 weeks of amenorrhoea • Positive heart action no later than 5 + 5 weeks of amenorrhoea. Thus it should be [possible to diagnose an intrauterine pregnancy up to 5 + 5 weeks of amenorrhoea during TVS with almost 100% accuracy64, at a time when there is still no pain and only occasional minor bleeding (Tab. 6). 40 Tab. 6 Correlation of sonographic signs (thick dots represent the latest appearance of a sign in 95 % of pregnancies, GS amniotic sac, YS yolk sac, HA heart action, CRL- crown-rump length, clinical signs on EUP (pain and bleeding), hCG serum values, cwog completed weeks of gestation) 2.4.2 Diseases with a positive pregnancy test 2.4.2.1 Early miscarriages In principle, any doubt regarding the correct development of a precocious pregnancy should be clarified with at least a second examination at an appropriate time interval. Abortus imminens and incipiens are essentially clinically dictated circumstances during which, in addition to the anticipated on-going pregnancy, hypoechoic haematoma or recent bleeding sites can also be detected behind the foetal membranes. Evidence of heart action is the most important argument for pregnancysupporting measures. Abortus incompletus can lead to differential diagnostic problems if no monitoring has been carried out and only non-homogeneous tissue can be seen in utero without any specific pregnancy-related elements. If in doubt, “extrauterine pregnancy” should also be suspected. This also applies for an assumed complete miscarriage. Depending on the clinical situation, treatment can be dispensed with if the overall thickness of the cavity is below 10 mm. 2.4.2.2 Extrauterine pregnancy In principle, extrauterine pregnancy (EUP) must always be assumed in the event of a positive pregnancy test (urine-hCG, SST) with no proof of pregnancy in the uterine cavity (IUP) as this condition is potentially life-threatening. The sonomorphology of EUP (definition: a pregnancy outside the uterine cavity), mostly in the tubes (96 %), and, more rarely, an interstitial, cervical, ovarian or peritoneal pregnancy, marked by several sonomorphological findings that are not only inconsistent but which vary in terms of intensity. On EUP diagnosis, the TVS displays sensitivity of 73 – 93% depending on the actual gestational age and the experience of the practitioner65. 41 Above all, in precocious pregnancy, with a positive SST, only indirect EUP signs often prevail. These are... • A built-up endometrium without an amniotic sac (“empty uterine cavity”) • Evidence of variable quantities of echogenic, free fluid (blood) in the pouch of Douglas and/or on vesicouterine excavation. Fig. 50 Tubal pregnancies a) Oviduct pregnancy with amniotic sac and embryonal pole (double ring sign, right arrow), with directly adjacent echo-empty Corpus luteum, hGG i.S. 1848 IU/L b) Vital oviduct pregnancy, heart action (arrow), rounded, double ring sign surrounded by haematoma, hCG i.S. 1460 IU/L Direct signs of EUP: In a vast number of suspected cases, a non-homogeneous space occupying lesion can be found near an ovary. This is hypoechoic in the centre, slightly compressible and mostly painful on pressure. The positive predictive value (ppV) for an EUP is 80 - 90%66 with these non-simple cystic adnexal findings66 . If, in addition, an amniotic sac with an echodense margin (ring signs) is apparent, occasionally surrounded by a hypoechoic margin (double ring sign), the ppV increases to 93 %67and to 96% with the additional proof of foetal pole (Fig. 50a). In approximately 7 % of suspect cases with positive heart action in the centre of the image (vital EUP, Fig. 50b), the ppV increases to almost 100 %. In addition to medical history and sonography, the human choriogonadotropin (hCG) assay makes a substantial contribution to the diagnosis of precocious pregnancy. The significance of an individual hCG serum value lies in checking whether the “threshold value” of (1500 to) 3000 IU/L was exceeded, whereby in almost 100 % of cases, an EUP must be detected sonographically (Tab. 6). If this is not the case, an EUP or miscarriage is likely. Repeated hCG assays can shed important light on the status of a precocious pregnancy since 50 % of all EUPs record an hCG increase of less than 53% in 48 hours and 50 % an hCG decrease of up to 35 %. Clinical courses with a higher increase in hCG values indicate an intact IUP whereas those with a substantial hcG decrease suggest spontaneous miscarriaget67. Echogenic free fluid in the small pelvis with suspected EUP should always be interpreted as a sign of intra-abdominal bleeding. If large quantities of fluid are found in the pouch of Douglas and on vesicouterine excavation, a significant intraabdominal blood volume of over 500 ml can be assumed. Even with appropriate 42 clinical care, this generally constitutes an emergency situation that must be surgically corrected. The following must be anticipated in the case of a check-up without any surgical procedure... • In 70 % of cases, the EUP will resolve itself completely • The hCG falls considerably faster as the sonographic findings regress • A perceptible reduction in EUP volume on TVS within 7 days makes spontaneous resolution probable with 84 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity. 2.5 2.5.1 Anticonception Effect of ovulation inhibitors Ovulation inhibitors (OI) suppress follicle growth by almost 100% on account of which every ovary with follicle formation must be viewed as suspicious and in need of clarification DD: dosing errors, medication-induced reduction in OI effect, functional findings, neoplasms and extraovarian cysts). 2.5.2 Intrauterine Devices (IUD), “Spirals” Copper-containing IUDs can be detected directly via the highly echogenic, metalbased shaft, with full dorsal acoustic damping (Figure 51). Non-metal IUDs can be detected indirectly via their dorsal acoustic damping (Figs, 53 and 54). Furthermore, Mirena for example, has an echogenic caudal and cranial shaft end whereby the actual cranial end with the wings moves a further 5 mm in the cranial direction. TVS is currently the method of choice for checking the position of intrauterine pessaries (IUD). Various methods for checking the position of IUDs have been recommended in the past69,70,71,72. We suggest using the “distance rule” to check the position of the IUD (e.g. 73). The distance (x) from the tip of the IUD to the end of the cavity should be determined in a sagittal section (Fig. 52). It should be noted that the ends of the IUD mostly comprise a hypoechoic section, which must be calculated for the IUD. The endometrium also has a certain fundal thickness, which must not be included in the measurement. A distance “x” of < 5 mm is described as normal, 5 mm as the limit value, 6 – 10 mm as the grey zone and > 10 mm as the IUD depth. A check-up should be carried out in 3 months’ time with a 5 mm distance. Individual procedures are required for a distance of 6 – 10 mm. If inserted at depth, the IUD must be removed after a detailed explanation (N.B. pregnancy is already confirmed). Furthermore, IUDs should be scanned via TAS with a full bladder (Fig. 55), whereby the patient holds the ultrasound probe on her abdomen and creates the ultrasound image. Finally, the direct position of the IUD is checked via TVS. In favourable situations, this procedure results in pain-free, completely atraumatic insertion 43 Fig.51 Highly echogenic IUD, containing copper, correct position Fig.52 Checking the position of the IUD, x Distance between the upper pole of the IUD and the end of the cavity x Abb.53 Mirena, correct position a) Note the extremely hypoechoic IUD with marked acoustic shadows and the two echogenic poles b) Transverse section with wings extended in the fundus (left). Drop shadows behind the corporal shaft (right) Fig. 54 TAS, both poles of the Mirena are portrayed as echogenic spots; the shaft precisely triggers a trapezoidal acoustic shadow Fig. 55 TAS via patient-steered Mirena device. Mirena® is successfully positioned in utero. The inserter is withdrawn, evidence of speculum shadows to the right 44 2.5.3 Subcutaneous implants Problems mainly arise with implants to be removed but which are no longer palpable. An important pre-requisite for recognising an implant under the skin is precise knowledge of the implant geometry and the exact insertion site, which is often highlighted by a small scar on the skin. High-frequency linear probes (e.g. mammary probes) should be used to examine from the dermis as far as the muscles, extending centripedally if required. Particular attention should be paid to the end of the object, which can easily be recognised by the way in which the dorsal acoustic pattern falls (Fig. 56, 57). The objects themselves are often echogenic and only a few millimetres thin. This is mostly portrayed as a fine echogenic line or echogenic point, with the acoustic shadows close to the probe. Longitudinal imaging often leads to reverberation artefacts on account of which the position of the implant in relation to its depth is best portrayed in the transverse section. It should also be noted that some linear probes cannot grasp the entire width of one implant in one attempt, and the object must be portrayed in at least two parts. In terms of differential diagnosis, an implant must not be separated from long connective tissue septa, its own reverberation artefacts and occasionally also from nerves and vessels. Major diagnostic problems can also trigger perifocal scarred structures under the skin. Fig. 56 Non-palpable, rod-shaped implant inserted under the skin (white arrow). The ends are marked (black arrow) a) Longitudinal section: proximal end b) Longitudinal section: distal end c) Transverse section Fig. 57 Non-palpable, rod-shaped implant that has penetrated the muscles (white arrow). The ends are marked (black arrow) a) Longitudinal section: proximal end 45 b) Longitudinal section: distal end c) Transverse section 2.6 Extragenital diseases Knowledge of these tumours is relevant from a differential diagnosis perspective for unclear space occupying lesions that can be attributed to the adnexal regions. Essentially extragenital cystic space occupying lesions in the small pelvis are: • Cystic kidneys • Ileus • Peritoneal cysts • Retroperitoneal tumours, e.g. Tarlov cysts • Dilated ureters • Mucoceles of the appendix • Fluid-filled intestinal loops • Crohn’s disease Essentially extragenital solid space occupying lesions in the small pelvis: • Filled intestinal loops as pseudo • Cancer of the bladder tumour, faecolit • Small pelvis metastases • Pelvic kidneys • Retroperitoneal tumours (neurinoma, • Transplanted kidneys schwannoma, lymphoma) • Bladder / intestinal endometriotic • Spleen with splenomegaly foci (haematological diseases, infections). • Perityphlitic abscess • Rectal cancer 2.7 The most common differential diagnoses... The differential diagnoses listed below are based on symptoms or findings. They also include diagnoses that cannot always be confirmed on ultrasound, if at all. The sonomorphology of the diagnoses in question are not listed here in any detail. They have been discussed at length in the individual chapters. 2.7.1 ... of premenopausal genital bleeding • Physiological menstruation • Pathological processes (trauma, inflammations, tumours, atrophy) originating from the vagina, cervix, endometrium, uterus, ovary, bladder and intestine) • Coagulation disorders • Drug-related effects especially on the endometrium (hormone-active preparations, tamoxifen, anticoagulants, etc.) • Pregnancy-related. Sonography is particularly useful for evaluating pathological changes in the cervix, endometrium, myometrium, urinary bladder and pregnancy-induced bleeding. 2.7.2 ... of postmenopausal genital bleeding Apart from induced withdrawal bleeding associated with hormone replacement therapy, postmenopausal bleeding is always pathological It can be triggered by: 46 • Pathological processes (trauma, inflammation, tumours, atrophy) originating in the vagina, cervix, endometrium, uterus, ovary, bladder and intestine • Coagulation disorders • Drug-related effects, especially on the endometrium (hormone-active preparations, tamoxifen, anticoagulants, etc. Malignancies of the endometrium and cervix should be considered in particular when carrying out exploratory ultrasound scans. Ovarian processes trigger genital bleeding only very occasionally at the postmenopausal stage. In such cases, hormone-active, solid adnexal tumours should be considered. 2.7.3 • • • • • • • • • • • ... on acute lower abdominal pain Adnexitis Parametritis Ovarian tube abscess Abscess of the pouch of Douglas Pedunculated ovarian tumour Blood-filled ovarian cysts Endometriosis Ruptured ovarian cells Myoma Haematometra IUD expulsion 2.7.4 • Iatrogenic-related changes such as calcification after curettage • Tamoxifen-induced changes • Haematometra • Cervix-induced changes. ... of the simple cystic adnexal findings without internal echoes • Follicle cysts • Corpus luteum cysts • Retention cysts 47 • Uterine sarcoma • Cervical cancer. ... of the highly built-up endometrium • Polyps of the corpus mucosa • Highly built-up endometrium with hormone replacement • Endometrial hyperplasia • Submucous myoma • Corpus carcinoma 2.7.6 EUP Abortus incipiens Appendicitis Diverticulitis Gastroenteritis Urolithiasis Cystitis Crohn’s disease Ileus Acute porphyria Pelvic venous thrombosis ... of uterine space occupying lesions • Myoma (submucous, intamural, subserous, intraligamentary) • Polyps • Foreign bodies (IUD), pregnancy residues, etc. 2.7.5 • • • • • • • • • • • • Hydrosalpinges • Peritoneal cysts • Parovarial cysts • Serous cystic adenoma • Overflow incontinence 2.7.7 ... of the cystic adnexal findings with internal echoes, cystic solid or solid cystic adnexal findings • • • • • • • • • Corpus luteum cysts Endometriotic cysts Ovarian tube abscesses Pedunculated ovary with bleeding Dermoid Pyosalpinges Serous cyst adenoma Mucinous cystic adenoma Ovarian cancer 2.7.8 Myoma due to degenerative changes EUP Filled intestinal loops Ileus Procedure-related changes such as post-operative haematoma ... of the solid adnexal finding • Ovarian cancer (especially serous) • Gonadal stromal tumours (suspected granulosa cell tumours, theca cell tumours, androblastoma) • Germ cell tumours (especially mature cystic teratoma= dermoid) • Rarer ovarian tumours • Pedunculated sub-serous myoma • Intraligamentary myoma • Endometriotic cysts • Filled intestinal loops 2.8 • • • • • • Pelvic kidneys • Ovarian metastases (especially with breast cancer) • Hyperplastic lymph nodes • Fallopian tube carcinoma • Intestinal tumours • Bladder cancer • Retroperitoneal tumours • Tumour recurrence General recommendations and consequences Appropriate caution must be exercised when deriving recommendations and consequences from sonography findings. In principle, ultrasound scans should only be used in conjunction with clinical findings, medical history, cycle or menopause status, laboratory findings or other imaging techniques, e.g. after a dignity estimate of an adnexal finding or depending on the risk to the patient, e.g. due to an assumed EUP. Sonographic check-ups in addition to other observation parameters, sonographically guided procedures and surgical intervention, either endoscopically or via an openaccess are available. 2.9 1 2 References Merz E: Transvaginale oder transabdominale Ultraschalldiagnostik? Ein Vergleich zweier Methoden in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Ultraschall Klin Prax 2;1987:87-94. Degenhardt F: Atlas der vaginalen Ultraschalldiagnostik. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart 1988. 48 3 4 Bernaschek G, Deutinger J, Kratochwil A: Endosonography in obstetrics and gynecology. Springer, Berlin 1990. Sautter T: Transvaginale Sonographie. Lehrbuch und Lehratlas. Enke, Stuttgart 1990. 5 6 Merz E: Vaginosonographie. Enke, Stuttgart 1992. Bernaschek G, Deutinger J: Endosonography in obstetrics and gynecology: the importance of standardized image display. Obstet Gynecol 74;1989:817-820. Hall D A, McArdle C R: Display of transvaginal and transrectal songraphic images. AJR 151;1988:93. Merz E: Standardisierung der Bilddarstellung bei der transvaginalen Sonographie. Gynäkol Geburtshilfe 1;1991:3738. Becker R, Entezami M, Vollert W, Hese S, Loy V, Weitzel H K: Gynäkologische Sonographie I – Vorschläge zur standardisierten Befunderhebung, -beschreibung and -darstellung. Ultraschall Klin Prax 8;1994:235-240. Dietrich M, Suren A, Hinney B, Osmers R, Kuhn W: Evaluation of tubal patency by hysterocontrast sonography (HyCoSy, Echovist) and its correlation with laparoscopic findings. J Clin Ultrasound. 1996;24:523-7. Lim CP, Hasafa Z, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A: Should a hysterosalpingogram be a first-line investigation to diagnose female tubal subfertility in the modern subfertility workup? Hum Reprod. 2011;26:967-71. Savelli L, Pollastri P, Guerrini M, Villa G, Manuzzi L, Mabrouk M, Rossi S, Seracchioli R. Tolerability, side effects, and complications of hysterosalpingocontrast sonography (HyCoSy). Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1481-6. Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Szabolcs B, Amoroso C, Di Giovanni A, Romanini ME, Arduini D: Automated sonographic tubal patency evaluation with three-dimensional coded contrast imaging (CCI) during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:609-12. Leone FP, Timmerman D, Bourne T, Valentin L, Epstein E, Goldstein SR, Marret H, Parsons AK, Gull B, Istre O, Sepulveda W, Ferrazzi E, Van den Bosch T: Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:103-112. Piirionen O. Studies in diagnostic ultrasound. Size of the nonpregnant uterus in women of child-bearing age and uterine growth and foetal development in the first half of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (Suppl) 46;1975:49. Merz E, Miric-Tesanic D, Bahlmann F, Weber G, Wellek S. Sonographic size of uterus and ovaries in pre- and postmenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7:38-42. Piirionen O, Kaihola HL: Uterine size measured by ultrasound during the menstrual cycle. Acta Obstet Gynec Scand 54;1975:247-250. Zalud I, Conway C, Schulman H, Trinca D: Endometrial and myometrial thickness and uterine blood flow in postmenopausal women, the influence of hormonal replacement therapy and age. J Ultrasound Med 12;1993:737741. Becker R, Entezami M, Hese S, Vollert W, Loy V, Weitzel H K: Gynäkologische Sonographie II – Normalwerte der standardisierten Uterusbiometrie. Ultraschall Klin Prax 8;1994:241-247. SGGG Guideline: Abklärung von perimenopausalen Blutungsstörungen, 2003. SGGG Guideline: Abklärung von postmenopausalen Blutungen, 2002. ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice: The Role of Transvaginal Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Postmenopausal Bleeding. ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 440, August 2009 Fleischer A C, McKee M S, Gordon A N, Page D L, Kepple D M, Worrel J A, Jones III H W, Burnett L S, James Jr A E: Transvaginal sonography of postmenopausal ovaries with pathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 9;1990:639-644. Goswamy K, Campell S, Royston J P, Bhan V, Battersby H, Hall V J, Whitehead M I, Collins W P: Ovarian size in postmenopausal women. BJOG 95;1988:795-801. Rodriguez M H, Platt L D, Medearis A L, Lacarra M, Lobo R A: The use of sonography for evaluation of postmenopausal ovarian size and morphology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159;1987:810-814. Becker R, Entezami M, Hese S, Vollert W, Hese S, Weitzel H K: Gynäkologische Sonographie III – Normalwerte der standardisierten Ovarialbiometrie. Ultraschall Klin Prax 9;1994:32-42. Sample W F, Lippe B M, Geyepes M T,: Gray-scale ultrasonography of the normal female pelvis. Radiology 125;1977:477. Van Nagell J, Higgins R V, Donaldson E S, Gallion H H, Powel D E, Pavlik E J, Woods C H, Thompson E A: Transvaginal sonography as a screening method for ovarian cancer. Cancer 65;1990:573-577. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal obstruction, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 944–955. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 49 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 Bronz L, Suter T, Rusca T: The value of transvaginal sonography with saline instillation in the diagnosis of uterine pathology on pre- and postmenopausal women with abnormal bleeding or suspect sonographic findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9;1997:53-58. Bermejo C, Martinez Ten P, Cantarero R, Diaz D, Perez Pedregosa J, Barro E, Labrador E, Ruiz Lopez L. Threedimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:593–601. Clark-Pearson D L: Benign disease of the uterus: Leiomyomas, adenomyosis, hyperplasia and polyps. In ClarkPearson D L, Dawood M Y: Green’s Gynecologic Essentials of Clinical Practice. Little, Brown, Boston 1990. Wallach EE, Vlahos NF. Uterine Myomas: An Overview of Development, Clinical Features, and Management. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:393-406 Laifer-Narin SL, Ragavendura N, Lu D S, Sayre J, Perrella R R, Grant E G: Transvaginal saline hydrosonography: characteristics distinguishing malignant and various benign conditions. AJR 172(6);1999:1513-1520. Gull B, Karlsson B, Wikland M, Milsom I, Granberg S: Factors influencing the presence of asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Acta Obstet Gynec Scand 77(7);1998:751-757. Fehr P, Diener P A, Benz D, Lorenz U: Ossifikation der Endometriums: Ein ungewöhnlicher Befund bei sekundärer Sterilität. Gynäkol Geburtsh Rundsch 33;1993:31-33. Eppel W, Schurz B, Frigo P, Reinold E: Die vaginosongraphische Darstellung der Ovula Nabothi. Ultraschall in Med 12;1991:143-145. Köchli O R, Bajka M, Schär G, Schmidt D, Haller U: Invasionstiefenmessung des Korpuskarzinoms. Präoperative Transvaginalsonographie und Korrelation zu intraoperativen und histopathologischen Befunden - eine prospektive Studie. Ultraschall in Med 16;1995:8-11. ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice: Tamoxifen and Uterine Cancer. Committee Opinion Number 336, June 2006 Cacciatore B, Lehtovirta P, Wahlstrom T, Ylostalo P: Ultrasound findings on uterine mixed mullerian sarcomas and endometrial stromal sarcomas. Gynecol Oncol 35(3);1989:290-293. Sonohysterography . ACOG Technology Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Number 5, December 2008. AWMF Leitlinie Nr.032/033 Diagnostik und Therapie des Zervixkarzinoms, 01/2008 The FIGO classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(7):2204-8, 2208.e1-3 AWMF Leitlinie Nr. 032/034 Diagnostik und Therapie des Endometriumkarzinoms, 2008 Pinotti JA, de Franzin CM, Marussi EF, Zeferino LC. Evolution of cystic and adnexal tumors identified by echography. Int J Obstet Gyn 1988,25:109-114. Valentin L, Hagen B, Tingulstad S, Eik-Nes S. Comparison of 'pattern recognition' and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18(4):357-365. Prömpeler HJ. Abklärung eines Adnexbefundes. Der Gynäkologie 2007;10:813-832. Prömpeler HJ, Randelzhofer B, Sauerbrei W, Madjar H. Uberprüfung der Diagnose-Formel für Ovarialtumoren. Ultraschall in Med 2000;21: 563. Bernaschek I, Obwegeser R. Sonographische Dignitätsbeurteilung von Ovarialtumoren und therapeutische Konsequenzen. Der Frauenarzt 1993;34(8):853-854. Kommission Qualitätssicherung der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe: Der Adnexbefund. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 2004;85(9):458-468. ACOG Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement: The role of the Obstetrician-Gynecologist in the early detection of epithelial ovarian cancer. Committee Opinion Nr. 477. 2011. Skates S, Troiano R, Knapp RC: Longitudinal CA125 detection of sporadic papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003;13(5):693-6. Bailey CL, Ueland FR, Land GL, DePriest, et al. The malignant potential of small cystic ovarian tumors in women over 50 years of age. Gynecol Oncol 1998;69:3-7. Oesterreichische Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Empfehlungen beim Vorgehen bei „simplen Adnexzysten“, 1998. Saunders BA, Podzielinski I, Ware RA, et al. Risk of malignancy in sonographically confirmed septated cystic ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2010;118(3):278-82. Timmermann D. The use of mathematical models to evaluate pelvic masses; can they beat an expert operator? Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004;18:91-104. Merz E, Weber G, Bahlmann F, Kieslich R: A new sonomorphologic scoring system (Mainz Score) for the assessment of ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasonography – Part I. Ultraschall in Med 19;1998:99-107. 50 58 Weber G, Merz E, Bahlmann F, Leber A M: A new sonomorphologic scoring system (Mainz Score) for the assessment of ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasonography – Part II. Ultraschall in Med 20;1999:2-8. 59 Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I; International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group: Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;16(5):500-5. Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D, Epstein E, Melis GB, Guerriero S, Van Holsbeke C, Savelli L, Fruscio R, Lissoni AA, Testa AC, Veldman J, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Bourne T, Valentin L: Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ 2010;341:c6839.doi:10.1136/bmj.c6839. Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, Paladini D, Van Calster B, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L: Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:681-90. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Management of adnexal mass. Evidence Based Report / Technology Assessment No. 130. AHRQ Publ No. 06-E004, Rockville (MD):AHRQ;2006. 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 51 Wisser J: Vaginalsonographie im ersten Schwangerschaftsdrittel. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1995. Barnhart K, Mennuti MT, Benjamin I, Jacobson S, Goodman D, Coutifaris C. Prompt diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in an emergency department setting. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84(6):1010-5. Barnhart KT. Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2009:23;361:379-87. Brown DL, Doubilet PM. Transvaginal sonography for diagnosing ectopic pregnancy: positivity criteria and performance characteristics J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13(4):259-66. Weigel M, Friese K, Schmitt W, Strittmatter HJ, Melchert F. What is the predictive value of ultrasound diagnosis in suspected extra-uterine pregnancy in routine clinical practice? Zentralbl Gynakol 1993;115(5):228-32. Seeber BE, Barnhart KT.Suspected ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107:399-413. Bernaschek G, Endler M, Beck A. Zur Lagekontrolle von Intrauterinpessaren. Geb Fra 41;1981:566-569. Cochrane WJ. Ultrasonography and the intrauterin device. In Steel WB, Cochrane WJ (eds) Gynecological ultrasound. Livingston, New York, 166-167. Merz E: Beurteilung des Uterus. In Merz E (Hrsg) Vaginosonographie. Bücherei des Frauenarztes, Bd 41. Enke, Stuttgart, S25-35. Granberg S, Bundsen P, Bourne T H, Almén M, Grenthe M, Leandersson R, Tönnberg C: The use of transvaginal ultrasonography compared to routine gynecological examination to check the location of an intrauterine contraceptive device. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4;1994: 316-319. Merki-Feld GS, Schwarz D, Imthurn B, Keller PJ.Partial and complete expulsion of the multiload 375 IUD and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD after correct insertion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 137;2008:92–6. 3 Urogynaecological sonography Gabriel Schär 3.1 The objectives of urogynaecological sonography Fine structural imaging of the urethrovesical and perirectal anatomy Dynamic evaluation of the urethrovesical anatomy Post-operative evaluation following sling and net surgery Quality control and analysis of recurrences or complications Valuable morphological information for study purposes Documentation 3.2 Advantages Urogynaecological sonography supplements the clinical examination by providing fine structural information about the urethra, bladder and anal sphincter. A dynamic anatomical evaluation of images improves the understanding of pathophysiological processes and any underlying disruption in the pelvic floor region. Prior to incontinence or descensus surgery, anatomical and dynamic information can influence treatment decisions. Post-operatively, sonography helps to assess the position of inserted nets and correlates with the surgical outcome. Urogynaecological sonography is thus an indispensable tool for monitoring quality control and, above all, for analysing persistent symptoms or recurrence following incontinence surgery. Standardised urogynaecological sonography can be used as a valuable scientific instrument. Angle and distance measurements, Doppler scans, 3D- and intraluminal sonography are essentially of prime importance in terms of scientific use. Urogynaecological sonography is also beneficial for documenting images of the medical findings. As is generally the case in overall urogynaecological diagnostics, neither a diagnosis nor a therapeutic conclusion can be obtained from sonographic findings alone. Urogynaecological sonography is mostly beneficial when it is used as part of the overall urogynaecological diagnostic procedure. 3.3 The quality of urogynaecological sonography The quality of urogynaecological sonography depends on the following factors: the practitioner, anatomy, ultrasound device, bladder filling and patient co-operation. 1. Experience of the practitioner Urogynaecological sonography warrants a certain acclimatisation period in order to learn how to operate the ultrasound probe during dynamic functional diagnostics. The Interpretation of the findings improves in terms of quality with experience in urogynaecological diagnostics. If the practitioner applies excessive pressure to the ultrasound probe when scanning the perineum, artefacts can appear in the urethra and on the bladder floor1. 52 2. Anatomy The urethra, bladder, symphysis and perianal muscular structures are nearly always visible. In some cases the structures are difficult to detect because of large cystoceles2. 3. Bladder filling Bladder filling mainly affects image quality. If the bladder is not full enough, the evaluation of the bladder floor is not sufficiently reliable whereas the evaluation of the urethra is almost unaffected. If the bladder is over-filled, the extent of the descensus cannot be reliably assessed since the over-full bladder can reduce the descensus1. 4. Patient co-operation As urogynaecological sonography is essentially a functional sonographic method, patient co-operation is required with coughing, on straining and on pelvic floor contractions. 5. Ultrasound device The ultrasound devices used in the specialist fields of gynaecology and obstetrics can also be used for urogynaecological sonography. Sound frequencies of 5 – 7.5 mHz (vaginal probe) and 3.5 – 5 mHz are set for scanning the vaginal orifice and perineal region, respectively. Curved linear probes are an advantage in perineal sonography since they allow better contact with the vaginal orifice than straight probes. For rapid movements such as coughing or straining, autocorrelation is beneficial in order to avoid streaking phenomena. We recommend the Cineloop function to examine the urethrovesical anatomy on coughing. An increasing number of devices offer 3D sonography for pelvic floor examinations. This is particularly beneficial for scientific investigations. 3.4 Examination procedure Urogynaecological sonography is based on the recommendations of the Deutsche Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Urogynäkologie AUG2 (German Association for Urogynaecology) (Tab. 7). Tab. 7 Recommendations from the Deutsche Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Urogynäkologie (German Association for Urogynaecology) for standardised sonographical examination • • • • • Measuring technique: The symphysis forms the reference point. The meatus internus is measured either using a co-ordinate system with x and y axes or by distance and an angle Bladder filling: 300 ml Examination position: Supine position or standing Artefacts: Apply light pressure to the probe Dynamic tests: Valsalva, coughing, contraction. Urogynaecological sonography should be included in overall gynaecological diagnostics. It is either carried out as part of a basic diagnosis with a clinical examination and evaluation of medical history or in conjunction with urodynamic examination. The patient is scanned in the supine position on the gynaecological examination couch. The ultrasound probe is applied to the vaginal orifice using ultrasound gel to generate a sagittal cross-section through the midline of the small pelvis. The cartilage of the symphysis (discus interpubicus) provides an ultrasound window that shows retrosymphseal structures and forms reference planes for the midline (Fig. 58). 53 An overview is initially given in order to subsequently record the resting image and functional images on straining, coughing and pelvic floor contraction. In conjunction with the ventral compartment evaluation, the ultrasound probe is tilted in the dorsal direction to highlight the perirectal structures before being rotated through 90° to assess the anal sphincter structures. Patients generally understand the ultrasound images. Along the lines of a biofeedback instruction, the function of the pelvic floor is highlighted in order to promote understanding of pelvic floor contractions and to ensure that the exercises are performed more reliably. Fig. 58 a) Diagram of the sectional planes: In the sectional plane of the discus interpubicus (1), the ultrasound scan can penetrate cartilage, whereas the section through the paramedian osseous symphyseal structure (2) is associated with shadow formation. b) Ultrasound image through the window of cartilage (1): The entire cartilage section of the discus interpubicus is visible, providing an ideal reference plane. c) Paramedian sectional plane (2) with cranial shadow formation due to osseous symphysis. a) b) c) LA = Arcuate ligament, DI = Discus interpubicus, BB = Bladder floor, B = Bladder, R = Rectum, S = Symphysis, U = Urethra, UT = Uterus, V = Vagina 3.5 Documentation The following organs and their structures can be highlighted by sonography: • Bladder: Bladder lumen and bladder wall (comprising the mucosa and detrusor muscles) • Urethra: Urethral wall (comprising mucosa, adventitia, smooth and fasciated muscles) • Symphysis: Cartilage of the discus interpubicus • Vagina: Comprising mucosa, adventitia, smooth muscles • Rectum: Comprising mucosa, adventitia, anal sphincter (smooth and fasciated muscles) Method-related differences are, however, apparent. In contrast to perineal sonography, an overall view of the symphysis is mostly impossible on ultrasonography of the vaginal orifice. Based on the recommendations of the AUG, imaging is directed as follows: Cranial structures are shown in the upper section of the image and caudal structures in the 54 lower section. The ventral region is shown on the right and the dorsal on the left (Fig. 59). Fig. 59 Direction of the urogynaecological ultrasound image. The caudal pelvic structures are displayed in the lower section and the cranial structures in the upper section. Dorsal pelvic structures are shown on the left and ventral structures on the right (cranial cranial, kaudal caudal, Rektum rectum). 3.6 Evaluation Evaluation of the urogynaecological ultrasound images is based on quantitative and qualitative parameters. These are important for pre- and post-therapeutic comparisons and are thus factors in quality control evaluations and scientific investigations. Only the qualitative parameters are relevant for purely clinical image evaluation. This involves assessing the movements of the bladder floor and the urethra during straining, coughing and pelvic floor contraction and evaluating funnelling and kinking of the urethra during an increase in intra-abdominal pressure. As far back as 1975, Green described typical qualitative changes in the urethrovesical unit on lateral urethrocystography3. They still apply to this day. According to Green, the urethrovesical unit can descend in a rotatory or vertical manner or in the form of a cystocele on increased intra-abdominal pressure. (Fig. 60). Funnelling by the proximal urethra mainly occurs with rotary and vertical descensus whilst kinking of the urethra is mostly observed with cystoceles as well as rotatory descensus. Since this is a purely descriptive evaluation of the images, there are no clear limit values with reference to rotatory descensus or cystoceles. Sonographic findings are therefore significant only when assessed in conjunction with clinical symptoms. 55 Fig. 60 Typical forms of bladder descensus according to Green Normal finding rotatory vertical cystocele Fig. 61 Measuring system to determine the position of the urethral meatus internus and retrovesical ß angle (Blase Bladder, Blasenhals Bladder neck, y Achse y axis , x Achse x axis, Zentrale Symphysenlinie Central line of symphysis, Symphyse symphysis, obere Symphysenkante Upper edge of symphysis, Symphysenunterkannte mit Lig. Arcuatum lower edge of symphysis with arcuate ligament . Retrovesical angle β and the position of the urethral und meatus internus are determined for the quantitative evaluation of the ultrasound images2,4 (Fig. 61). The urethral meatus internus is located in a co-ordinate system. The co-ordinate system is based on a central line of symphysis drawn through the symphysis (X axis) and a vertical line (Y axis) to the X axis on the lower edge of symphysis. DX is the horizontal distance of the cranioventral urethral exit from the bladder and DY the vertical distance of the cranioventral urethral exit from the bladder to the Y axis. Retrovesical angle β is measured such that one leg angle is drawn along the bladder floor and the other along the dorsal border of the urethra. Urogynaecological sonography findings can be recorded on a special report form (see Appendix). 56 3.7 3.7.1 Examples with interpretation Continence, normal finding The images shown in Fig. 62 were recorded in a continent female with normal mobility of the urethra and meatus internus. The physiological mobility of the urethra is highlighted by light dorsocaudal movements on straining as well as cranioventral elevation on pelvic floor contraction. Despite considerable straining, the urethra moves only a few millimetres in the dorsal direction. This reflects the intact suspension structures where excessive dorsal caudal movement is prevented. This normal image highlights 3 facts: The urethrovesical unit is firmly anchored in the small pelvis as the endopelvic fascia and the attachment of the sacrouterine and cardinal ligaments are intact. A certain amount of urethral mobility is a physiological phenomenon and helps to promote flawless micturition. Urethral mobility is mainly shown to advantage on straining since pelvic floor relaxation is associated with straining. The Levator ani muscle also stabilises the bladder and urethra through intact muscle contraction and actively prevents the movement of the urethra in the dorsal-caudal direction. Fig. 62 urogynaecological sonography in a healthy, i.e. continent female: Normal anatomy at rest (a). Slight physiological urethral mobility on straining b), cranioventral movement of the urethra on pelvic floor contraction (c) a) 3.7.2 b) c) Stress incontinence and paravaginal defect Fig. 63 was recorded in a patient with stress incontinence and paravaginal defect. At rest, the urethra and bladder lie in an almost vertical position but display intensified dorsocaudal movement on straining (hypermobile urethra). The urethral meatus internus is located on the same level as the lower edge of the symphysis and the bladder floor descends to the same extent as the urethra in the caudal region. On pelvic floor contraction, the urethra, bladder floor and vagina are forcibly lifted in the cranioventral direction. The image highlighting straining with the hypermobile urethra and bladder floor descensus shows a paravaginal defect whereby the endopelvic fascia is no longer firmly attached to the pelvic wall and the passive attachment mechanism is distorted thus increasing the mobility of the urethra and bladder floor. In such situations, 57 pelvic floor contraction generally no longer guarantees stabilisation of the urethrovesical unit whereby the bladder and urethra deviate in the caudal and dorsal directions, also on coughing. Disrupted pressure transmission can occur in the absence of a passive (endopelvic fascia, ligaments) and active (Levator ani) counteracting force on increased abdominal pressure whereby intravesical pressure exceeds urethral pressure and urine is discharged. Fig. 63 Perineal sonography in a stress incontinent female with paravaginal defect. At rest (a) normal sonographic anatomy with vertical urethra and elevated urethral meatus internus (MI). On straining (b) evidence of a hypermobile, horizontal urethra and urethral meatus interna descending under the lower edge of the symphysis. The urine flowing into the urethra is indicative of incontinence and is visible as a funnelling phenomenon (arrow). On pelvic floor contraction (c) powerful cranioventral elevation of the urethra and visible compression of the rectum, vagina and urethra by the dorsal levator muscle (L) a) 3.7.3 b) c) Stress incontinence and vertical descensus The images shown in Fig. 64 were recorded in a female presenting with vertical descensus and stress incontinence. Whereas the image taken at rest shows no sign of disease compared to a healthy female, straining causes a funnel-like extension of the bladder neck with descensus. Fig. 64 Patient with vertical descensus of the urethrovesicular unit. At rest (a) elevated position of the urethral meatus internus, as in a healthy female. On straining (b) funnel-like expansion of the bladder neck (arrow) and opening of the ß angle. Via pelvic floor contraction (c) prompt elevation of the urethral meatus internus and bladder floor a) b) c) 58 Retrovesical angle β opens in contrast to the resting image. The vertical descensus of the urethra is based on two anatomical aspects; on the one hand, the bladder floor and proximal urethra are inadequately supported by the levator muscle, leading to slight descensus with opening of the β angle, and on the other hand, the urethral muscle cannot prevent the funnel-shaped opening of the bladder neck. 3.7.4 Cystocele Fig. 65 shows the situation in a female presenting with a pure cystocele. The image taken at rest shows the bladder at a normal height whilst the urethra is in an almost vertical position. On straining, the bladder descends further in the caudal direction and forms a large cystocele (hour glass shape of the bladder) whilst the urethral meatus internus also descends thus causing the centre of the urethra to bend. Such forms of cystocele are generally indicative of a central defect in the endopelvic fascia whilst the urethra per se is either adequately fixed or is held in position by the cystocele. Fig. 65 Perineal sonography in a female with a large cystocele and a central defect: At rest (a) vertical urethra and bladder floor in a normal position. On straining (b) the bladder floor descends markedly in the caudal direction. The meatus internus descends slightly (arrow) and the urethra bends in the centre (<U). 65b also shows that substantial cystocele formation can hamper evaluation of the urethrovesical anatomy a) 3.7.5 b) Rectocele and enterocele Rectoceles and enteroceles are highlighted in Fig. 66 and Fig. 67. The probe is tilted in the dorsal direction in order to scan the rectum and rectosigmoidal junction. The perirectal smooth muscle is recognisable as a hypoechogenic structure. Rectoceles can be seen more clearly on straining by eversion of the anterior rectal wall. The width and depth of the rectoceles can be measured. 59 Fig. 66 Rectocele (RC) with stool and air (nonhomogeneous, essentially hyperechogenic content) and the hypoechogenic circular smooth muscles (ventral and dorsal M) on straining. Base (distance marker 1) and depth (distance marker 2) can be measured (Rektum rectum) 3.7.6 Fig. 67 Enterocele (image recorded on straining) Dorsally, evidence of the rectum, ventrally, arching of a large enterocele with the contents of the small intestine in this female with apical descensus (Enterozele enterocele) Perianal structures Exoanal sonography is highlighted in Fig. 68. The probe is tilted in the dorsal direction and rotated through 90° in order to highlight the anal structures. Internally, the mucosa is visible. The hypoechogenic structure corresponds to the M. sphincter ani internus (internal anal sphincter), the circular structure with greater echodensity corresponds to the M. sphincter ani externus (external anal sphincter muscle) and the U-shaped echodense structure is the section of the M. levator ani (anal levator muscle), which is also known as the M. pubovisceralis (pubovisceral muscle). The integrity of the anal structures can be assessed by means of exoanal sonography. Fig. 68 exoanal sonography highlighting perianal structures La M Se Si 3.7.7 = = = = M. levator ani Mucosa M. Sphincter ani externus M. Sphincter ani internus Imaging of slings and pelvic floor nets Fig. 69 to Fig. 71 display post-operative ultrasound images following incontinence and descensus surgery with net material. Polypropylene, a thread material used in the production of incontinence tapes or pelvic floor nets, is portrayed as a 60 hyperechogenic structure on an ultrasound scan5,6. Post-operative imaging of nets and tapes is probably the most beneficial aspect of urogynaecological sonography since it helps to identify whether the incontinence tape is correctly positioned under the distal or middle section of the urethra, or if it has slipped under the bladder floor in the event of recurring incontinence. Similarly, sonography can be carried out to establish the position of the pelvic floor net post-surgery and whether it provides adequate support for the urinary bladder. Sonography of the nets and tapes is extremely useful in analysing surgical successes and failures (quality control). Fig. 69 Image of a tape correctly positioned beneath the central section of the urethra (arrow). Left at rest (a), centre on straining (b) right on coughing (c) When the abdominal pressure is raised, the tape acts as a buffer on which the urethra is compressed and no urine can escape. a) b) c) Fig. 70 incorrectly positioned incontinence tapes: Left (a) intraurethral tape in a patient with recurring stress incontinence and dysuria (tape with arrow and marked as 1, caudal urethra muscle*, cranial urethral muscle**), Centre (b) tape in the urethral muscle (arrow No. 2) in a female with a micturition disorder and dysuria but also with an unattached section of tape in the intravaginal region (arrow No. 3) in the right vaginal wall (probe rotated through 90° - coronal view). Right (c) an intravesical tape in a female with recurring urinary tract infections (arrow No. 4) a) 61 b) c) Fig. 71 Image of nets after prolapse surgery Left (a) correctly positioned net following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The ventral net is placed with the section nearest the caudal region (arrow No. 1) at greater depth than the urethral Meatus internus (MI), thus supporting the entire bladder floor. This can prevent recurrent cystocele. Right (b) incorrectly positioned net to correct a cystocele (anterior Prolift). The net (arrow No. 3) was not stretched enough. The arm of the net was not placed sufficiently close to the Spinae ischiadicae, hence the folded net supports the bladder only over a distance of 10 mm. On the one hand, a cystocele (CC) recurred and, on the other hand, the patient experienced pain and dyspareunia a) b) The filling material injected under the urethral mucosa is highlighted on an ultrasound scan. Fig.72 highlights the situation following intraurethral injection of a bulking agent (Bulkamid®). These bulking agents are injected urethroscopically in order to improve urethral occlusion. Possible indications include: Stress incontinence with urodynamically confirmed hypotonic urethra or recurring incontinence with an immobile urethra. Fig. 72 Ultrasound image following intraurethral injection to eradicate stress incontinence. In this case Bulkamid® was used, which is visible in the bladder neck region as hypoechogenic structures (*). Left (a) at rest – the urethral lumen in the region of the bladder neck is completely surrounded by Bulkamid®. Right (b) on straining, evidence that the urethra is not adequately closed because of the influx of urine (arrow). Clinically, incontinence regressed but the patient did not experience full remission. a) 3.8 b) Further options and future developments 3D and 4D sonography in particular is developing in addition to routine sagittal urogynaecological sonography. 3D imaging and navigating in a tissue block of 62 pelvic floor structures makes 3D sonography particularly interesting for scientific applications such as analysis of post-partum muscle defects in the levator muscle and for highlighting pelvic floor nets7,8. These indications have not yet been incorporated as part and parcel of routine clinical diagnostics and are therefore not discussed in any further detail in this report. 3.9 References 1 Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Haller U. Perineal ultrasound - determination of reliable examination procedures. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol 1996;7:347-52. 2 Tunn R, Schaer G, Peschers U, Bader W, Gauruder A, Hanzal E, et al. Updated recommendations on ultrasonography in urogynecology. Int Urogynecol J 2005;16:236-41. 3 Green TH. Urinary stress incontinence:differential diagnosis, pathophysiology and management. Am J Obstet Gynec 1975;122:368-400. 4 Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U. Perineal ultrasound for evaluating the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:220-4 5 Sarlos D, Kuronen M, Schaer GN. How does tension-free vaginal tape correct stress incontinence? Investigation by perineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 2003;14:395-8. 6 Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Perucchini D, Eberhard J, Geissbuhler V, Hilgers R, Viereck V. Tape functionality: Sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27:485-90. 7 Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasound in incontinence: what's in it for the surgeon? Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:1085-97. 8 Tubaro A, Koelbl H, Laterza R, Khullar V, de Nunzio C. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: where are we going? Neurourology and urodynamics 2011;30:729-34. 63 4 Mammasonography Gilles Berclaz 4.1 Indications for mammasonography Mammasonography has developed to such an extent over the last 15 years that it is nowadays used to investigate any form of breast pain, assumed or palpable breast nodes or unclear findings on mammography and MRI breast scans1. Moreover, in most diseases, sonography can confirm the diagnosis by guiding a punch biopsy. Recognised indications for sonography include: • • • • • • • • • • • Unclear findings on palpation or mammography Mammograms that are difficult to evaluate (dense gland bodies) Evaluation of the chest wall and skin Mastitis and abscesses, breast secretion Checking of implants Carcinoma (size, to preclude multicentricity, axilla) Cancer follow-up Screening of risk patients Women under 35 years of age, pregnancy and lactation To guide biopsies for diagnosis To guide the puncture of cysts or abscesses 4.2 Examination technique and documentation The patient should be lying in the supine position or across a cushion, with her arms elevated. A sufficient quantity of gel should be applied to the skin. The 7.5-15 MHz linear ultrasonic probe should be placed perpendicularly on the skin. An optimal focal range and suitable image size should be selected. We recommend antiradial ultrasonic probe guidance (from the periphery to the nipple). Slight pressure should be constantly applied to the tissue. If there are no suspicious findings, the examination can be documented with an image of the outer/upper quadrants. If a medical finding is recorded, this must be displayed on all axes in order to preclude artefacts. Findings should be documented in writing, quoting a clock position and the distance to the nipple, e.g.: Right breast with a 15-mm, unclearly delineated, hypoechoic finding at 9 o’clock, 4.5 cm from the nipple. There must be a definite correlation between the ultrasound findings and the outcome of the clinical examination and mammogram. 64 4.3 Normal anatomy of the breast glands and axilla A distinction must be made between the following structures: derma, subcutaneous fatty tissue, Cooper’s ligaments, echodense gland bodies and hypoechoic fatty segments, nipples, mammary ducts, retromammary fatty tissue, major and minor pectoral muscles with fascia, ribs with intercostal muscles, axillary vessels and level I to III lymph nodes. Particular attention should be paid to the gland parenchyma, which presents in various ways: individual patient variation depending on location in the breast, age or hormone status (cycle, pregnancy, menopause and hormone replacement). 4.4 Disease In principle, all findings are examined on several planes and documented. The following criteria should be taken into account (Tab. 8). Tab. 8 Criteria of dignity in mammosonography • • • • • • • • • • Shape Axis Contour Marginal echo Echo pattern Compressibility Moveability Exit echo (acoustic shadow or amplification) Lateral marginal shadow Structural deformity Benign lesions are generally characterised by a round or horizontal-oval shape, a horizontal axis, a smooth contour, a clearly delineated marginal echo, a uniform echo pattern, mobility, an amplified exit echo, lateral marginal shadows and no structural deformity. 4.4.1 Cysts Typical sonomorphology: Horizontal-oval or round, smooth contour, narrow margin, echo-free content, good compressibility, homogeneous dorsal acoustic amplification, unchanged surrounding structure (Fig. 73, 74). Differential diagnosis: Debris-containing cysts with an echodense content or carcinomas with virtually echo-free content. A colour Doppler scan can prove useful in these situations. If vessels are present, the structure is solid and must be clarified. 65 Fig. 73 Cysts, echo-free, with smooth walls 4.4.2 Fig. 74 Double cysts Fibroadenoma Typical sonomorphology: horizontal-oval or round, narrow, regular contours, hypoechoic, uniform content, less readily compressible and moveable, uniform slight acoustic amplification in approximately 25% of the region, lateral marginal shadows, surrounding area unaffected (Fig. 75, 76). Differential diagnosis: Carcinoma can look like fibroadenoma, especially in young patients. Fig.75 Fibroadenoma, homogeneous 4.4.3 Fig.76 Fibroadenoma, non-homogeneous Carcinoma Carcinoma is generally characterised by an irregular and extremely oval shape, unclear contours, echodense marginal echoes (hyperechoic cap), non-homogeneous, hypoechoic echo pattern, no compressibility, poor moveability, dampened exit echo, no lateral marginal shadows and structural deformity (Fig. 77). Differential diagnosis: Round, smooth, homogeneous carcinoma (Fig. 78); circumscribed advancing medullary and mucinous carcinoma; sclerosing adenosis that is difficult to distinguish from carcinoma. 66 Fig. 77 Breast cancer, typical finding with “local cancer spread” Fig. 78 Breast cancer with only slightly irregular delineation, rather homogeneous, hypoechoic, with slight dorsal acoustic amplification, differential diagnosis: Atypical fibroadenoma! Fig. 79 Breast cancer, punch biopsy with punctured finding Investigations focus on evidence of multifocal sites or multicentricity in cancer. Infiltration of the muscle or skin can have a crucial impact on subsequent diagnosis or therapy. The axillary lymph nodes must be examined carefully and a histological evaluation carried out if required (Fig. 79). 4.5 BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) As for mammography, the American College of Radiology has developed a system to assess sonography images and confirm procedures: This is known as the BIRADS System2 (Tab. 9). Tab. 9 BI-RADS System BI-RADS Category 0: BI-RADS Category 1: BI-RADS Category 2: BI-RADS Category 3: BI-RADS Category 4: BI-RADS Category 5: BI-RADS Category 6: 67 Incomplete. Other images should be evaluated Negative. Routine check-ups Benign finding: Routine check-ups Probably a benign finding: Short-term follow-up recommended Suspicious finding: Biopsy recommended Cancer diagnosed in > 95% of cases: Biopsy recommended Cancer confirmed Surgery or neoadjuvant therapy recommended 4.6 Recommendations and consequences Sonography complements mammography or MRI in breast diagnostics. Sonography is initially recommended for patients under 30 years of age, pregnant women or nursing mothers. If evaluation of the mammogram is limited (e.g. because of dense gland bodies), the absence of any suspicious findings on sonography can largely rule out diseases and thus avoid unnecessary biopsies. Suspicious findings on mammography must, however, be clarified further even in the absence of sonographic malignancy criteria. Cysts are diagnosed on sonography with virtually 100 % accuracy and do not generally require any histological clarification. They can be dispersed if painful. As a general rule, all solid masses must be clarified. Punch biopsy is currently the method of choice. 4.7 References 1 Khouri NF: Breast Ultrasound. In Diseases of the Breast, Fourth Edition. Chapter 13, pp 131-151. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business, 530 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106 USA. 2 American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BIRADS: ultrasound. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: breast imaging atlas. 4th ed. Reston VA: American College of Radiology, 2003, pp 1-86. 68 5 Report sheets (PDF @ www.sgumgg.ch) The following report forms are available to download in PDF format from www.sgumggg.ch: • Gynaecological sonography • Urogynaecological sonography • Mammasonography 69