ALL-CRAFT—Alliance for Collaborative Research in Alternative
Transcription
ALL-CRAFT—Alliance for Collaborative Research in Alternative
Progress Report July 2005-Present Advisory Panel Meeting Midwest Research Institute, February 27, 2006 http://all-craft.missouri.edu Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. ALL-CRAFT—Alliance for Collaborative Research in Alternative Fuel Technology NSF Program “Partnerships for Innovation” 1/25 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Programmatic Overview Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 2/25 Why alternative fuels? Reduce dependence on foreign oil Harness domestic renewable energy sources Create new opportunities for domestic agriculture Create clean air in cities Reduce transportation costs by improving energy efficiency Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Develop sustainable transportation in U.S. Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. • • • • • • What are alternative fuels? • Ethanol (from corn, wood, …) • Natural gas* (NG; from domestic gas fields, deep-sea methane hydrate fields, landfills) • Biodiesel (from soybeans, vegetable oils, …) • Hydrogen* (from NG, water & electricity) • Electricity (from coal/nuclear/hydroelectric/solar/wind power plants) * ALL-CRAFT Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 3/25 How do alternative fuels work together? Long-term goal: Hydrogen fuel-cell cars Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Next-generation clean vehicles: NG internal combustion engine NG, methane Ready to go: NG from domestic (85%) & Canadian (~rest) fields In progress: Renewable methane from landfills & biomass In 10-20 years: Methane from deep-sea methane hydrate fields Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 4/25 • Develop low-pressure, high-capacity storage technologies for natural gas (NG), based on new adsorbent materials discovered at MU: — nanoporous carbon from waste corn cobs in Missouri (“sponge for NG”) — calixarene (“crystalline vacuum pump”) • Demonstrate low-pressure, flat-panel NG tank for — next-generation clean vehicles (NG internal combustion engines) — hydrogen fuel cell cars (no hydrogen infrastructure needed) — collection of NG from landfills (“pollutant to renewable energy”) — large-scale shipping of NG from Alaska and deep-sea methane hydrate fields (reduction of dependence on foreign oil) • Train undergraduates to become future leaders in alternative energy technology, through research internships at MU and partner institutions • Build outreach programs, statewide and at national level, for alternative energy innovations and transition to a sustainable environment/economy Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 5/25 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. ALL-CRAFT Objectives • MU (lead institution): Physics (Pfeifer, Project Leader), Chemistry (Atwood), Chemical Engineering (Suppes), Civil Engineering (Bowders), Office of Technology and Special Projects (Nixon), Office of Research (Coleman) • Lincoln University, Jefferson City • Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City • DBHORNE, LLC, Atlanta • Renewable Alternatives, LLC, Columbia • Missouri Biotechnology Association (MOBIO), St. Louis • Clean Vehicle Education Foundation, Washington, DC • Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources (Energy Center), Jefferson City • City of Columbia (Municipal Landfill), Columbia • Kansas City Office of Environmental Quality & Central Fleet, Kansas City Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 6/25 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. ALL-CRAFT Partners Current natural-gas vehicles Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. / ozone, smog), NOx, particulate • Low emission of hydrocarbons ( matter. NG stored as compressed natural gas (CNG) in steel or composite cylinders at 250 atm (3600 psi). • Clean Cities Coalitions: – Los Angeles: 1500 CNG buses – Kansas City: 150 CNG public utility vehicles – U.S.: 300,000 CNG vehicles – worldwide: 4 million CNG vehicles Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 7/25 Why are we not already driving NG-fueled cars? CNG cylinders in transit bus: © AGLARG 1997 © AGLARG 1997 • ALL-CRAFT: Develop low-pressure, “flat-panel” tank, comparable to gasoline tank, and safe (pressure: 34 atm, 500 psi). Store NG in nanoporous carbon (pores adsorb NG like a sponge; ANG tank), made from corn cob: Missouri corn can supply raw material for all cars in the U.S. Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 8/25 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. • High-pressure cylindrical/spherical tanks take up passenger or trunk space. Storage of NG from landfills • Landfills are largest human-made source of methane (CH4, NG) in U.S. Landfill gas: ~ 50% CH4, ~ 50% CO2, < 1% non-CH4 organic compounds Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. • CH4: 20 times more potent greenhouse gas than CO2 Capture CH4 at landfill; use as renewable energy source; at small landfills, store in mobile ANG tanks and process elsewhere • Annual CH4 emission from landfills in U.S.: – 60 million tons of carbon equivalent – Powers 4 million homes – Greenhouse equivalent to annual emission from 100 million cars (2/3 of all cars in U.S.) – If captured, equivalent to planting 300,000 km2 forest (2 x area of MO) Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 9/25 • 85% of NG is produced domestically; U.S. has huge amounts of NG • 25% of NG is used to generate electricity; replaceable by other fuels, freeing NG for transportation • Renewable NG in the form of biogas from landfills, sewage, farms, feedlots Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. NGVAmerica, Feb. 8, 2006 (NYT, WSJ), in response to the President’s State of the Union Address, Jan. 31, 2006 • NG produces less air pollution and greenhouse gases than gasoline and diesel • Even at today’s high prices, NG is cheaper than gasoline or diesel at the pump • NGVs are the pathway to hydrogen transportation; much of the hydrogen technology is based on NG technology • Other countries are far ahead of us Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 10/25 ALL-CRAFT team at University of Missouri: • Physics: Peter Pfeifer, Jacob Burress, Lacy Hardcastle, Robert Schott, Demetrius Taylor, Mikael Wood • Chemical Engineering: Galen Suppes, Parag Shah, Mona-Lisa Banks, Sean Crockett, Monty Kemiki, Serean Spellerberg • Chemistry: Jerry Atwood, Praveen Thallapally • Civil & Environmental Engineering: John Bowders, Joshua Bergsten Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. ALL-CRAFT Accomplishments Highlights July 2005 - February 2006 11/25 Carbon production & methane storage capacity • Search for maximum NG storage capacity • Capacity in: – M/V: gram of NG per liter of carbon – V/V: NG, as volume of gas at 25 oC and 1 atm, per volume of carbon – M/M: gram of NG per kilogram of carbon ALL-CRAFT, typical briquette (Sample B-21/k) M / V 73-95 g/liter V / V 112-145 liter/liter M / M 170-220 g/kg ALL-CRAFT, best performance (Sample B’-21/k) 104-107 g/liter 159-163 liter/liter 210-220 g/kg AGLARG, best performance 98 g/liter 150 liter/liter 170 g/kg ANG industry target 118 g/liter 180 liter/liter N/A Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. • Production of ~ 80 different carbons from corn cob, with variable activation procedures 12/25 Methane storage capacity, cont.’d NG storage capacity (g/liter), at 34 atm (500 psi) and 25 oC 180 140 120 91% of industry target 83% of industry target 100 80 60 40 160 140 120 100 80 ALL-CRAFT Sample B-21/k Methane adsorption isotherm 60 40 20 20 0 0.0 0 Best AGLARG carbon ANG industry target CNG, at 250 atm (3600 psi) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Pressure (MPa) Methane Capacity (g/kg) © AGLARG 1997 Best ALL-CRAFT carbon AGLARG sample Methane adsorption isotherm Pressure (psia) Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. 160 Methane Capacity (g/kg) 180 13/25 4.0 Methane storage capacity, cont.’d Methane uptake on B-21/k with different instruments, M / M 221 g/kg (± 2%) 209 g/kg (± 2%) 198 g/kg (± 4%) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Pore-size distribution of B-21/k from methane isotherm 0.2 0.1 0.0 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Pressuredifference measurement of methane uptake on 3.5” carbon briquettes (MRI test fixture): Gravimetric, Chem. Eng. Gravimetric, Physics Pressure difference Pore volume (cm3/g) Gravimetric measurement of methane uptake on small samples: 0.4 - 0.6 - 1.0 - 1.5 - 2.0 - 4.0 - 6.0 - 10 - 15 - 20 - >50 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.0 4.0 6.0 10.0 15 20 50 Pore width range (nm) Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 14/25 What does the pore space look like? — Case Study B-18 dV/dr (cm3/Å/g) 1.0E+00 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm (77 K) for B-18. Surface area: 605 m2/g 1.0E-04 Differential pore volume distribution, from N2 desorption isotherm, for B-18 Vol. in r < 10 Å: 0.13 cm3/g Vol. in r = 10-20 Å: 0.15 cm3/g Vol. in r = 20-1400 Å: 0.10 cm3/g Power law: dV/dr ~ r –1.7 1.0E-05 Pore radius r (Å) 1.0E-06 Pressure (MPa) 0.0 0.5 1.0 Pore volume (cm3/g) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Adsorbed CH4 (g/kg) 1 CH4 adsorption isotherm (300 K) for B-18 1.5 2.0 10 100 1000 10000 0.2 0.1 Pore-size distribution from CH4 isotherm, for B-18 Consistent with distribution from N2 0.1 0.0 2.5 0.4 - 0.6 - 1.0 - 1.5 - 2.0 - 4.0 - 6.0 - 10 - 15 - 20 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.0 4.0 6.0 10.0 15 20 50 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Pore-size distribution from adsorption isotherms (N2: standard; CH4: not widely used) >50 Pore width range (nm) Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 15/25 Case Study B-18, cont.’d 1.E+10 Scattered intensity (cm–1) Experimental data Experimental and calculated intensity 1.E+08 1.E+06 1.E+04 1.E+02 1.E+00 1.E-04 dV/dr ~ r –1.7 from N2 adsorption 2.3-dimensional fractal surface 1.E-03 1.E-02 Scattered wave vector 1.E-01 1.E+00 (Å–1) 1.E-02 Exper. Calculated intensity: surface fractal at large length scales (Ds = 2.3); pore-size distribution from N2 adsorption at small scales: I calc (q) = A Calc. Calc., PSD only FormFactor(r , q) 0 dV dr + BqDs 6 3 dr r Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Small-angle x-ray scattering (Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory) gives spatial arrangement of pores 16/25 Case Study B-18, cont.’d Schematic model of pore space of B-18, from scattering data Model consistent with scanning electron micrographs Uncorrelated pores, radii r = 7-1400 Å (independent scatterers), nonfractal power law dV/dr ~ r –1.7 Snapshots of simulation of oxidative removal of carbon by a chemical agent (gray). Resulting pore space is similar to Sample B-18 Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Fractal surface, Ds = 2.3 17/25 N2 ads./des. Isotherm for S-33/k Surface area: 2540 m2/g Micropore volume: 1.1 cm3/g Superb candidate for H2 storage Differential porevolume distribution, from N2 isotherm, of S-33/k Most pores of width < 10Å Expected pore-space structure: nearly spacefilling pore fractal, similar to results of Pfeifer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 15502 (2002): Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Candidate for high-capacity H2 storage: S-33/k 18/25 Sample S-30 Sample B’-21/k’ N2 ads./des. Isotherm for S-30 Surface area: 783 m2/g Micropore volume: 0.31 cm3/g Pure binder N2 ads./des. Isotherm for B’-21/k’ Surface area: 1890 m2/g Micropore volume: 0.76 cm3/g Highest-density carbon Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Pore-size distribution of other samples 19/25 Prediction of storage capacity and heat release = 2.8 x 10–20 J Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. • McEnaney et al. (GCMC, 1997): Max. CH4 capacity in pores of width 1.1 nm • Nicholson (1998): Van der Waals potential of CH4 in slit pore of width 1.1 nm • Energy lost by adsorption ~ 2 x energy lost by condens. (latent heat at 109 K) Compression vi vf (isobaric) from : = • Energy loss more than enough to compress CH4 into dense fluid; remaining energy heat T c P (P,v) dv P(v f v i ) vi v P vf Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 20/25 Other developments 1 1: 17 g/kg; 17 g/liter 2 2: 22 g/kg; 24 g/liter 2 1 Voids hosting methane Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Methane storage capacity of p-tert-R-calix[4]arenes, at ~34 atm and 25 oC: 21/25 Methane storage capacity of p-tert-butyl-calix[4]arene (TBC4), carbon nanotubes (CNT), and isoreticular metal-organic frameworks (IRMOF-1), at ~1 atm and 25 oC : Hydrogen storage capacity of p-tert-R-calix[4]arenes, at ~34 atm and 25 oC : 1: 0.2 mass% 2: 0.2 mass% 3: 0.1 mass% 1 2 Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 3 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Other developments, cont.’d 22/25 © MRI 2006 © MRI 2005 Ford F-150 pickup for road test in Kansas City (MRI, 4/06 - 9/06) Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. Road test of carbon-based ALL-CRAFT ANG tank— Midwest Research Institute 23/25 Renewable NG from landfills Methane recovery in transportable tanks • 40,000 lb carbon tank, with 17 wt% storage capacity, can store 6,800 lb of methane • Ship full tank on tractor trailer to central processing facility,; discharge methane • Return empty tank to landfill • Example: Columbia landfill Flow rate Operated as “dry 250 cuft/min tomb,” 2005 15,000 lb/day Operated as 980 cuft/min bioreactor, 2020 57,000 lb/day One tank full in 0.45 days 0.12 days • Tanks of interest at small or abandoned landfills Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. • Collect & purify methane at landfill 24/25 Strategic and economic opportunities • NG fueled cars = next-generation clean vehicles/transportation 1. Reduce smog, respiratory disease, cardio-vascular disease, … 2. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 3. Reduce dependence on foreign oil now (not in 2040 as in H2 economy) 4. Harness domestic NG fields (Alaska), deep-sea methane hydrate fields (Oregon), renewable NG from landfills & biomass (Missouri, …) • Recovery of NG from landfills 1. Pollutant to energy 2. Economic growth in rural areas • Duplicate ALL-CRAFT success for hydrogen tanks State level Copyright © 2006 — ALL-CRAFT. All rights reserved. National level • Produce NG/hydrogen tanks, from MO corn cob, for 10 million cars/year: $5 billion/yr • Produce & operate NG tanks, from MO corn cob, for 2,500 landfills: $5 billion/yr • Produce NG tanks, from MO corn cob, for large-scale NG shipping: $3 billion/yr Advisory Panel Meeting — February 27, 2006 25/25