Reference Catalogue Safedock A-VDGS
Transcription
Reference Catalogue Safedock A-VDGS
Docking Guidance Systems Reference List Safedock A-VDGS and SafeControl - Apron Management (GOS) Safedock A-VDGS Safegate Group´s Safedock A-VDGS systems results in safety, efficiency and environmental benefits for airports all over the world. By securing safe operations at the gate, a lot of time and money is won. Safedock ensures that your airport is optimally equipped - today and for the future. When using Safedock systems, all aircraft are quickly and smoothly parked in a correct setup, providing the possibility for tight time schedules to be maintained. When an aircraft is parked faster and the gates are turned more efficiently, a lot of CO2 emissions are prevented. This result is optimal safety, increased efficiency and reduced power and aircraft fuel consumption, which lead to a cleaner environment. Our Safedock systems exists in 3 different models : T1, T2 and T3. All Safedock systems contains scan function, aircraft verification check, parking accuracy of 10cm and docking in severe weather. Safedock T1 is equipped with apron scan, PBB scan, Ramp Information Display System (RIDS) and stop position 2-65 meters. SafeControl – Apron Management Origin Gate Operating System (GOS) The Safegate concept of centralized control and monitoring of stands and aprons is called SafeControl - Apron Management. The origin of this new concept is Safegate‟s Gate Operating System (GOS), built on a new platform to enhance integration and data sharing capabilities. SafeControl is a group of software modules used to automate and improve safety at airports around the world. SafeControl - Apron Management is based on the same platform as used for Air Traffic Management guaranteeing you highest safety and availability. Page 2 of 94 Safedock – SafeControl - Apron Management ..................................................................................... 6 North and South America ......................................................................................................................... 6 Canada – Calgary International Airport ............................................................................................. 6 USA – Charlotte-Douglas International Airport – US Airways ..................................................... 7 USA - Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport - American Airlines.......................................... 8 USA – Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport ................................................................. 9 Europe ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 Switzerland - Geneva Airport ................................................................................................................ 9 Middle East ................................................................................................................................................ 10 KSA – Jeddah Airport ........................................................................................................................... 10 Kuwait - Kuwait International Airport .............................................................................................. 10 Oceania ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 Australia - Perth International Airport.............................................................................................. 11 Safedock – Gate Operating System ...................................................................................................... 12 North and South America ...................................................................................................................... 12 Canada - Toronto Pearson International Airport .......................................................................... 12 Canada - Vancouver International Airport ..................................................................................... 13 Chile - Santiago de Chile Airport ....................................................................................................... 13 Netherlands Antilles - St. Maarten Princess Juliana International Airport ............................. 14 Puerto Rico, San Juan Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport – JetBlue ............................ 14 USA – Boston Logan International Airport – JetBlue Airways ................................................. 15 USA - Chicago O‟Hare International Airport – American Airlines ........................................... 15 USA – Los Angeles International Airport – Tom Bradley Terminal ......................................... 16 USA - Miami International Airport – American Airlines .............................................................. 16 USA - New York JFK International Airport – T4 – JFKIAT........................................................... 17 USA - New York JFK International Airport – T8 – American Airlines ...................................... 17 USA - New York JFK International Airport – T5 – JetBlue Airways ......................................... 18 USA – Orlando International Airport – JetBlue Airways ............................................................ 18 USA - Philadelphia International Airport ......................................................................................... 19 USA - Seattle-Tacoma International Airport ................................................................................... 19 Africa ........................................................................................................................................................... 20 Cameroon - Yaoundé Nsimalen International Airport ................................................................ 20 Egypt - Cairo International Airport, Terminal 3 ............................................................................. 20 Morocco - Casablanca International Airport .................................................................................. 21 Asia .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 China - Beijing Capital International Airport, Terminal 3 ........................................................... 22 China - Hangzhou Airport ................................................................................................................... 23 China - Hong Kong Chep Lak Kok International Airport............................................................ 23 China - Kunming Airport...................................................................................................................... 24 China - Lanzhou Airport ...................................................................................................................... 25 China - Ningbo Airport ......................................................................................................................... 25 China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport, Terminal 2 .................................................... 26 China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport ........................................................................... 27 India – Bangalore Airport .................................................................................................................... 27 India - Kolkata; Mumbai; Cochin; New Delhi; New Hyderabad Airport ................................ 28 Indonesia - Juanda International Airport, Surabaya................................................................... 29 Indonesia - Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport, Makassar ............................................ 30 Japan - Central Japan International Airport .................................................................................. 30 Japan - Narita Airport ........................................................................................................................... 31 Malaysia - Kuching Airport .................................................................................................................. 31 Russia - Anadyr Airport......................................................................................................................... 32 Russia – Moscow Domodedovo Airport ......................................................................................... 32 Russia – Moscow Sheremetyevo Airport ........................................................................................ 33 Russia – Moscow Vnukovo Airport .................................................................................................. 33 Singapore - Changi Airport ................................................................................................................. 34 Sri Lanka - Bandanaike International Airport, Colombo ............................................................. 34 Thailand - Bangkok Don Muang International Airport............................................................... 35 Thailand - New Bangkok International Airport ............................................................................. 36 Vietnam - Noi Bai International Airport, Hanoi ............................................................................. 37 Europe ........................................................................................................................................................ 38 Denmark - Copenhagen Kastrup Airport........................................................................................ 38 France – Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport ........................................................................................ 38 France – Paris Orly Airport .................................................................................................................. 39 Germany - Munich Airport .................................................................................................................. 39 Italy - Cagliari Airport ............................................................................................................................ 40 Italy - Catania Airport ............................................................................................................................ 40 Italy - Genoa, Marco Polo..................................................................................................................... 41 Italy - Milan Airports: Malpensa, Linate and Bergamo ................................................................ 41 Italy - Rome Fiumicino Airport ............................................................................................................ 42 Italy - Trieste Airport .............................................................................................................................. 42 Netherlands - Amsterdam Schiphol Airport ................................................................................... 43 Norway - Oslo Gardermoen Airport ................................................................................................ 43 Poland - Warsaw Airport ..................................................................................................................... 44 Romania - Bucharest Henri Coanda International Airport – Otopeni .................................... 45 Slovenia - Ljubljana Airport ................................................................................................................. 45 Spain - Barcelona Airport ..................................................................................................................... 46 Spain - Bilbao Airport ............................................................................................................................ 46 Spain - Fuerteventura Airport ............................................................................................................. 47 Spain - Las Palmas Airport ................................................................................................................... 47 Spain - Palma de Mallorca Airport ..................................................................................................... 48 Spain - Tenerife South Airport ............................................................................................................ 48 Spain - Valencia Airport........................................................................................................................ 49 Sweden - Stockholm Arlanda Airport .............................................................................................. 49 Turkey - Antalya Airport ....................................................................................................................... 50 United Kingdom - Cardiff Airport ...................................................................................................... 50 United Kingdom - London Heathrow Airport ............................................................................... 51 United Kingdom - Glasgow Airport .................................................................................................. 53 Page 4 of 94 United Kingdom – London Gatwick Airport ................................................................................. 53 United Kingdom – Stansted Airport ................................................................................................. 54 Middle East ................................................................................................................................................ 54 Bahrain International Airport ............................................................................................................. 54 Kuwait International Airport............................................................................................................... 55 United Arab Emirates - Al Maktoum International Airport, Dubai .......................................... 55 United Arab Emirates - Dubai International Airport .................................................................... 56 United Arab Emirates - Sharjah International Airport ................................................................ 60 Oceania ...................................................................................................................................................... 61 Australia - Kingsford Smith International Airport, Sydney ......................................................... 61 Australia - Melbourne International Airport ................................................................................... 62 Australia - Perth Intl; Brisbane Intl; Townsville Intl; Cairns Intl; Darwin Intl ........................... 63 Australia - Perth International Airport.............................................................................................. 65 New Zealand - Auckland International Airport ............................................................................ 66 New Zealand - Christchurch International Airport ..................................................................... 67 Complete Reference List, Docking Guidance Systems ..................................................................... 68 North America ........................................................................................................................................ 68 South America ........................................................................................................................................ 70 Oceania..................................................................................................................................................... 71 Middle East .............................................................................................................................................. 74 Europe....................................................................................................................................................... 77 Africa ......................................................................................................................................................... 86 Asia............................................................................................................................................................. 87 Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 94 Safedock – SafeControl - Apron Management North and South America Canada – Calgary International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24/T1 70 (T2-24) + 4 (T1) = 74 2012-2015 Safegate Group was awarded a contract to install A-VDGS on all gates of YYC‟s existing terminal and future international facility, beginning with 41 Safedock systems installed in early 2013 on existing Airline Terminal Building gates. In late 2013 the gate operating system will be updated to SafeControl – Apron Management. Safedock systems will be installed on all gates of the new international facility before its opening in 2015. This will include 29 Safedock T2-24 systems and 4 T1 systems for gates with challenging layouts Client objective: Improve ramp and gate efficiency, particularly during IROPS. Selection process: RFP process Page 6 of 94 USA – Charlotte-Douglas International Airport – US Airways Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 37+46=83 2012-2013 (upgrade from GOS to SAM) In a combined project with US Airways and the airport, Safegate was selected to provide Safedock T2-24 on all US Airways gates at its major CLT hub. All current and future systems will connect to the GOS gate operating system with an interface to US Airways flight systems for automated docking initiation and data collection. When not docking aircraft the Safedock displays will serve as a ramp information display (RIDS) providing timely information to ground crew. Client objective: Improve ramp and gate efficiency, particularly during IROPS. Selection process: Technical evaluation. USA - Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport - American Airlines Equipment: Quantity: Duration: T3-9, T2-24 92+41(T2-24)+1+11SDK=145 Installations in Safedock 2007/08, 2011 and SafeControl – Apron Management 2012 Scope: In the largest airport/airline cooperative project to date, Safedock systems have been installed at all gates on Terminals A, B, C and D for D/FW Airport and American Airlines. In 2012, the Gate Operating System (GOS) was replaced by Safegate‟s new SafeControl - Apron Management system that interfaces directly to the flight information system providing management of the apron, real-time information and historical data to both D/FW and American Airlines. This was Safegate Group first SafeControl – Apron Management installation. Client objective: The primary objective is to improve ramp and gate efficiency, particularly in times of irregular operations. Selection process: Safegate was the preferred provider selected by the general contractor that won the contract in a competitive RFP process. Page 8 of 94 USA – Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 8 2012 Safegate Group was awarded a contract to install 8 Safedock Docking Guidance Systems on international gates at IAH as part of the airport‟s Terminal D renovation. IAH will use Safedock‟s Ramp Information Display System (RIDS) capability to communicate important arrival and departure information to ground crew and Safedock‟s camera feature to provide a live view of all gate activity to strengthen security surveillance. The contract also includes Safegate‟s newest gate operating software, SafeControl - Apron Management that will integrate with the airport‟s flight information system and feed critical gate utilization information to the Airport Operational Database (AODB). Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates. 2. Provide gate equipment familiar to foreign flag carriers. 3. Accommodate new large and wide body aircraft. Selection process: CMAR bid process. Europe Switzerland - Geneva Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 20 2012 2012 delivery of 20 Safedock systems. The contract also includes Safegate Group newest gate operating system, SafeControl - Apron Management. The customer is using SafeControl – Apron Management since January 2013, but the final reception is not yet validated. Middle East KSA – Jeddah Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: Selection process: 78 x T1, 28 x T3, 120 Gate signs, 78 workstations (IASS) including all hardware accessories such as cabinets. 76 x T1, 28 x T3, 120 Gate signs, 76 workstations (IASS) including all hardware accessories such as cabinets. Began 2013. To be completed late 2014 or early 2015. a) Complete design. Including DGS location, infrastructure such as poles and cabling. Safegate have design liability. IASS design, development, installation and implementation. b) Coordination with other vendors for design and development. c) Complete installation for all equipment and infrastructure. d) FAT and training e) T&C f) Handover Documentation for all systems and equipment provided, including As-Builts Client objective: Issue a design that uses our efficiency when it comes to the T1's (i.e. multiple centrlines and stands making use of one system). Our (IASS) will be the platform for all services related to the stand. Accelerated installation is crucial to the client. Compliant DGS maximising end users‟ needs. Exposing new technology and interfaces for KAIA through IASS. Kuwait - Kuwait International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-15 + T1 7 1988-2008, 2011, 2012 2012 delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-15 systems. The contract also includes Safegate Group newest gate operating system, SafeControl Apron Management. Client objective: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Selection process: The first project in 2002 involving replacement of 15 loop systems with Safedocks and a new GOS was executed within the specified project period. The systems since 2002 have been reliably operational. The DGCA decided to directly place an order to Safegate. The state-of-the-art gate system gives the airport additional features and the possibility for easy upgrades, which goes in line with the airport‟s future plans. Page 10 of 94 Performance, availability and quality Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates Minimise the number of incidents and accidents System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB. Oceania Australia - Perth International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T1 17 The installations of systems will be staggered, commencing in November 2013, and for the contract to be completed by February 2014. The first 2 systems are to be installed and connected to Safecontrol Apron Management by Mid-November. With the expansion of Terminal 1, Safegate Group has entered into a contract for the supply and commissioning of 17 x T1 Systems, and for the installation of Safecontrol Apron Management. The Safecontrol Apron Management installation will also be connected to 5 existing Safedock systems currently installed on site The client is interested in Safecontrol Apron Management for the full automation of monitoring and docking aircraft. Safedock – Gate Operating System North and South America Canada - Toronto Pearson International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 6+12+51+5+16+3+5+1=99 Installations in 1998, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007, 2012 The first delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-9 systems was in 1999. Since then Safegate has been awarded 5 additional contracts for the new Terminal 1 and the Terminal 3 redevelopment project. Features include ID check, digital countdown and interlock to boarding bridges. Systems are being connected to a campuswide Safegate Gate Operating System (GOS). Pearson is Safegate‟s second largest North American customer and one of the largest in the world. Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates. 2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates. 3. Modernize the airport. Selection process: Safegate was initially selected in a competitive process that emphasized the technical evaluation. The subsequent contracts have come both from the airport authority and from prime contractors. Page 12 of 94 Canada - Vancouver International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T3-15 9+9+3+3+3+2=29 Installations in 1999, 2004, 2009, 2011, 2013 In 1999 the wide body international gates were equipped with the Safedock Type 3-15 system. Since then additional Safedock systems have been installed in conjunction with the terminal expansion and at the request of WestJet, Canada‟s largest lowcost airline. The WestJet units are connected to a GOS gate operating system for automation. Other features include ID check, digital countdown, dead-man switches and an interface to the synchronized clock system. 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates. 2. Provide gate equipment familiar to foreign flag carriers. 3. Automate the docking process. Chile - Santiago de Chile Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T3-9 17 Installation during 1999 -2000 Safegate‟s first installation of laser guided system Safedock in Latin America. The installations cover all gates at the new terminal. ICAO Annex 14 compliance Netherlands Antilles - St. Maarten Princess Juliana International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: Selection Process: T2-18 4 2006 Provide modern docking systems for the four gates in the new terminal as part of the boarding bridge package supplied by Thyssen. 1. Utilize modern technology 2. Support common use environment Selected by Thyssen for the boarding bridge package. Puerto Rico, San Juan Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport – JetBlue Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: Selection process: Page 14 of 94 T2-24 7 2012 Safegate Group installed 4 Safedock T2-24 systems on JetBlue gates at SJU. The project includes the Safegate GOS and interface to JetBlue‟s FIS for docking automation. JetBlue has been a Safegate customer since 2007 when they added systems to their gates at JFK International Airport, Terminal 5. Safedock is also in use on JetBlue gates at Boston (BOS) and Orlando (MCO) and will be installed at Ft. Lauderdale (FLL) during 2013. Improved efficiency, especially during irregular operations. Negotiated. USA – Boston Logan International Airport – JetBlue Airways Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 16 2011 Safegate installed 16 Safedock T2-24 systems on JetBlue gates at BOS as part of a frame agreement that also included Safedock installation on JetBlue gates at Orlando (MCO). The project includes the GOS gate operating system and RIDS. JetBlue has been a Safegate customer since 2007 when they added systems to their gates at JFK International Airport, Terminal 5. Client objective: Efficiency and irregular operations. Selection process: Negotiated USA - Chicago O‟Hare International Airport – American Airlines Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 35 2010 ORD is the 4th of American Airlines‟ major hubs to be equipped with the Safedock system. All 35 systems are connected to the GOS gate operating system with an interface to American Airlines‟ FOS for automated docking initiation and data collection of in and out times. When not docking aircraft the Safedock displays serve as a ramp information display (RIDS) providing timely information to ground crews. The GOS is linked to American‟s headquarters via the airline‟s WAN. Client objective: Improve efficiency, especially in times of irregular operations. Selection process: Negotiation USA – Los Angeles International Airport – Tom Bradley Terminal Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 16 2012-2013 Safedock was selected to provide safer, more visible docking for the airlines on the Tom Bradley West Terminal gates. The systems will be connected to a GOS and interfaced to the airport‟s flight information source for automated docking. Safety through improved visibility and situational awareness. Client objective: Selection process: Sub-supplier to the boarding bridge provider. USA - Miami International Airport – American Airlines Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24, T1 9+2+26+6+7+9+1(T1)=60 Installations in 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013 In 2004 American Airlines became the first airline in the world to specify, procure and own Safedock systems. Following a highly successful pilot project with 11 Safedock systems, American Airlines installed 39 more Type 2 systems for its Miami hub. Like the initial installation, these are linked via WAN to the airline‟s FOS through the Safegate GOS. This provides AA with real-time monitoring and control of the Safedock systems as well as ramp information display. The GOS interface to FOS facilitates automatic docking initiation and automatic block time reporting. Client objective: 1. Allow aircraft parking during ramp closures due to thunderstorms. 2. Reduce taxi times and improve on-time performance. 3. Reduce operational costs, including fuel burn. Selection process: Safegate was selected in a competitive proposal process that emphasized experience and technical evaluation. Page 16 of 94 USA - New York JFK International Airport – T4 – JFKIAT Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 16 Installation during 2000-2002 JFKIAT, managed by Schiphol of Amsterdam, became the first U.S. airport to install the Safedock system. After using various types of docking systems in Amsterdam, Safedock was selected for the new 16-gate terminal. Features include ID check and dead-man switch. Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates. 2. Modernize the airport. 3. Provide gate equipment familiar to foreign flag carriers. Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation. USA - New York JFK International Airport – T8 – American Airlines Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 29 2008 Safegate was contracted to supply and install Safedock systems at all mainline gates for larger aircraft at this new terminal. The systems are controlled and monitored by a GOS which is linked to the airline‟s FOS via WAN to American‟s headquarters. When not docking aircraft, the Safedock displays ramp information on departing and arriving flights. Client objective: Based on the success of the Safedock project at Miami, the systems have been installed at JFK to improve ramp efficiency, particularly in times of irregular operations. Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation. USA - New York JFK International Airport – T5 – JetBlue Airways Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 26 2008 JetBlue was the first low-cost carrier to incorporate A-VDGS into their hub operation. In addition to the 26 Type 2 systems, Safegate was contracted to supply a GOS for the control and monitoring of the systems. When not docking aircraft, the Safedock displays ramp information on departing and arriving flights, including information on baggage and fuel to maximize efficiency. Client objective: Maximize efficiency on the ramp for quick turns and high customer satisfaction. Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation. USA – Orlando International Airport – JetBlue Airways Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 7 2012 Safegate installed 7 Safedock T2-24 systems on JetBlue gates at MCO as part of a frame agreement that also included Safedock installation on JetBlue gates at Boston (BOS). The project includes the Safegate GOS and interface to JetBlue‟s FIS for docking automation. JetBlue has been a Safegate customer since 2007 when they added systems to their gates at JFK International Airport, Terminal 5. Client objective: Improved efficiency, especially during irregular operations. Selection process: Negotiated. Page 18 of 94 USA - Philadelphia International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 13 2003 Delivery of 13 Safedock Type 2-18 systems for the new International Terminal A-West as requested by US Airways. Features include ID check and digital countdown. Client objective: Facilitate safe docking, especially for wide body aircraft with close in parking positions. Selection process: US Airways selected Safegate as a sub-supplier to JB/Jetway in a negotiation process. USA - Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-13, T2-24 4+5+2+4(T2-24)+2+3(T2-24) =20 Installations in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2012 The initial installation of the Safedock systems was done in conjunction with the new Terminal A project. Since then additional systems have been installed at the request of various airline operators. The Type 2 systems are fully upgradeable to RIDS and network connectivity to a centralized GOS system. SEATAC was the first U.S. airport to employ Safedock systems for its domestic operations. Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps to maximize capacity. 2. Modernize the facilities. Selection process: Negotiation based on the requirements of the airlines. Africa Cameroon - Yaoundé Nsimalen International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T3-9 4 2009 Installation of Safedock T3-9 on the 4 gates with PBB. The gates were earlier equipped with Safegate inductive loops. The customer wanted to upgrade to the modern Safedock technology. Egypt - Cairo International Airport, Terminal 3 Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T3-15 + T3-9 5+25=30 2001-2006 Supply of 25 Safedock Type 3-9 systems and GOS. 1. Performance, availability and quality 2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, maximise capacity 3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding bridge. Selection process: Cairo Airport Company released a BOT tender that was won by TAV. TAV selected Safegate as we were fully compliant to the tender specifications. 5 nos. systems were already operational at Terminal 2 since 2001. Page 20 of 94 Morocco - Casablanca International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T3-9 28 2007 Supply of 28 Safedock Type 3-9 systems. 6. Performance, availability and quality 7. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, maximise capacity 8. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 9. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding bridge. Asia China - Beijing Capital International Airport, Terminal 3 Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 + GOS 1(T2-24)+99 + 26 =126 2007-2008 Beijing International Airport is one of the world‟s busiest and most rapidly developing airports. Safegate International of Malmo, Sweden, has been entrusted to help assure the safety and efficiency with movement of Beijing‟s more than 60 million air travellers and Olympic Games visitors. Safegate is the global leader in aircraft docking guidance systems and addressable light systems for terminals, taxiways and runways. To handle Beijing‟s rapidly growing air travel volume, the huge international airport is to be expanded with a new terminal, adding more than 100 gates. Each new gate will be equipped with the Safedock® Advanced Visual Docking Guidance System to safely and efficiently guide the aircraft to its parking position. The SafeControl® system helps Pilots with the best, safest and quickest route between runway and terminal. Safegate‟s SafeControl® and ASP systems will all be an integrated part of Beijing Airport‟s Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS). Beijing Airport‟s more than 23,000 airfield lights will be under the direct and dynamic control of Safegate‟s systems. Together, these Safegate systems reduce aircraft turnaround time and enable busy airports such as Beijing‟s to manage increased traffic with improved safety, efficiency and operational awareness, even during extreme weather conditions. Page 22 of 94 China - Hangzhou Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-13 5 2001-2002 The new terminal of Hangzhou airport installed Safedock systems on all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executed from the airport central system and FIS. China - Hong Kong Chep Lak Kok International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24, T1 T2: 89 T1:27 1997, 2012 The old airport in Hong Kong, Kai Tak, was replaced 1997 by Chep Lak Kok. Safegate were asked by BAA and what later became the HKG CAA to quote docking guidance systems for the airport. Together with the pilot organisation a new standard of the pilot display was developed. This became later known as the T2- 24. 1996 Safegate received the order for 79 systems all centrally controlled by our Gate Operating System. Safegate managed the service for the project in more than three years. Safegate did also deliver the single light monitoring system for the airport. During 2012 Safegate installed 8 T1 for Western apron and 18 T1 for Midfiels concourse. China - Kunming Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T2-18 + GOS 68 2009 - 2010 Kunming New Airport is a complete new airport located on the mountain of more than 2100m above sea level. It‟s the fourth biggest airport in China, which is also a hub airport in southwest area of China. Safegate is contracted to supply 68 Safedock systems together with a Safegate GOS system. With Safedock systems installed on all gates of the new terminal building, it will increase the capability of traffic management of such a busy airport by providing a safe and efficient docking procedure. The GOS system will be interfaced to AODB to obtain flight information and active docking procedure. To maximum the capacity of gate resources and to enhance safety of docking. Selection Process: Bid followed by negoniation Page 24 of 94 China - Lanzhou Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 8 2001-2002 The new terminal of Lanzhou airport installed Safedock systems on all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executed from the airport central system and FIS. China - Ningbo Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-13 7 2001-2002 The new terminal of Ningbo airport installed Safedock systems on all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executed from the airport central system and FIS. China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport, Terminal 2 Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 42 2006 - 2007 The airport terminal 2 to be built during the second-phase project, at a cost of 10 billion Yuan (1.2 billion US dollars) is expected to go into operation in 2007. The new terminal at International Airport in Shanghai Pudong selected Safegate for the delivery of docking guidance systems. The laser based guidance systems will be installed at all gates and will be connected to the airport central system AODB via the Gate Operating System (GOS). The GOS will be linked to the FIS via the local LAN network. The selection of the aircraft is made from the local operator‟s panel where the selection is compared and confirmed by FIS before starting the docking procedure. The Central system will be delivered by the company Ultra. The Gate operating system will keep the scheduled flight for 48 Hrs. if for any reason the FIS communication will be down. Safegate will also upgrade the Terminal 1 Gate Operating System to the same standard as Terminal 2. In the future there will be common system for both terminals. Page 26 of 94 China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 28 1998 The new International Airport in Shanghai selected Safegate for the delivery of docking guidance systems. The systems are installed at all gates and are interfaced to the FIS system via a Safegate Gate Operating System. The selection of the aircraft is made from the local operator‟s panel and the selection is compared and confirmed by the interface with the FIS before starting the docking procedure. India – Bangalore Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: SDK T2-24 + GOS, Interface to IBM Information Broker & AXA GPU 17 One Year (Three Phases) Supply, testing and commissioning of SDK, GOS, realize the interface with IBM interface broker, RIDS, interface with GPU to log on time, off time and power consumption. Safe and efficient dockings in all weather conditions, accurate blocks, measurement of power consumption when GPU is used India - Kolkata; Mumbai; Cochin; New Delhi; New Hyderabad Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 1+4, 19+3, 5, 9, 13+12=66 2003-2005 NSCBIA Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 3-9 system. First new generation VDGS commissioned in India. CSIA Mumbai: Delivery of 19 Safedock Type 3-9 systems to replace existing Agnis systems. NSCBIA Project 2: Delivery of 4 Safedock Type 3-9 systems. Cochin International Airport: Delivery of 5 Safedock Type 3-9 systems. IGIA New Delhi: Delivery of 9 Safedock Type 3-9 systems. New Hyderabad Intl‟ Airport: Delivery of 13 Safedock Type 3-9 systems with a Gate Operating System (GOS). The GOS will be interfaced with airport‟s database management system AMS/GAS to obtain flight information. In return the GOS will provide Block On/Off data. The GOS will also be interfaced with SCADA to report status and errors of VDGS. Client objective: 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 2. System capable of meeting all tender requirements. 3. Provide a reliable system capable of docking all existing aircraft types and future aircrafts. 4. System capable of distinguishing the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected aircraft type. Page 28 of 94 Selection process: NSCBI Project 1: AAI-IAD procured the first new generation VDGS to evaluate the performance and reliability by means of public tender. FMT participated in the tender. CSIA Mumbai: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. FMT participated in the tender. NSCBI Project 2: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. Honeywell participated in the tender. Cochin International Airport: CIAL floated a tender. IGIA New Delhi: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. Honeywell participated in the tender. New Hyderabad Intl‟ Airport: HIAL had floated a tender, which was won by China State Engineering & Voltas. Voltas evaluated our submission, as we were fully compliant to the technical specifications, we were the chosen one. Honeywell participated in the tender. Indonesia - Juanda International Airport, Surabaya Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 4 Installed in 2010 Installed at all new VVIP gates for safety, faster operation and prestige. The aim is to improve safety in the apron area and to ensure quick and safe aircraft parking also in dark and at all times of low visibility. Safegate Gate Operating System will be added later when all old DGS have been replaced with Safegate equipment. Indonesia - Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport, Makassar Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 2 Installed in 2010 Sultan Hasanuddin Airport is the newest international airport in East Indonesia - and this was the first DGS system installed in the area. The objective was to have a modern solution, to increase the safety of the people working in the apron area and to park the aircraft quickly and safely even during bad weather and at night. Japan - Central Japan International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Page 30 of 94 T2-27NRT 23 2002-2004 When the new Central Japan airport was to be built the chosen docking guidance system was Safedock, centrally controlled by Safegate Gate Operating System. The airport was taken into operation in 2006. Safegate has delivered the single light monitoring system, as well. Japan - Narita Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-27NRT 6+6+13+27+12+2=66 2000-2006 After more than one year‟s test at the Narita airport, Safegate received the first order for 6 systems in year 2000. Our system was selected after a comparison test with our competitors. The system is specially designed for Narita and was extended with one extra row of LED modules. An additional order was received in 2002 for 6 more, 2004 for 13, 2005 for 27 plus 12 and 2006 another 2 systems. All 66 systems are connected to Safegate‟s Gate Operating System and to the airport central data base through the Airport LAN network. Malaysia - Kuching Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 4+3+9=16 2005-2006 Project 1: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates that will be equipped with new PBB. Project 2: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates that will be equipped with new PBB. Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality 2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, maximise capacity 3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding bridge. Selection process: Project 1: Tianda the PBB manufacturer won the tender for supplying PBB & VDGS. 4 nos. Safedock systems delivered in 1998 were reliably operational at the airport. As the airport authority was happy with Safedocks, Tianda chose Safegate‟s VDGS. Project 2: Tianda received a variation order to supply 9 more additional PBB & VDGS. As they had supplied 3 systems earlier in 2005, they chose to procure Safedock. Russia - Anadyr Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 2 2004 At the coast of Bering sea right across Alaska, Safegate got awarded to deliver 2 Safedock systems to Anadyr airport in 2004. Even if the lakes are used as roads and the ground is covered with snow, Safegate‟s A-VDGS parks aircraft as usual with an accuracy of 10 cm. One of the reasons behind Safedocks successful operational history is the intelligent last echo logic that allows aircraft to park aircraft in heavy snow, rain and fog. Russia – Moscow Domodedovo Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Page 32 of 94 T3-15 10+7+2+8=27 2003-2006 Making a fast decision can sometimes be difficult when the latest information is not available. How do airports know if the gates are free, ready or in maintenance? With connection to Safegate‟s Gate Operating System (GOS) Domodedovo Airport can individually control and monitor the gates from a central position, making decisions a lot easier and improving the operational flexibility and safety. Safegate started its relationship with Domodedovo International Airport back in 2003 with 10 Safedock systems. After one year of operation Domodedovo continued finding trust in Safegate when they employed an additional 9 Safedock systems. Safegate are pleased to continue participating in Domodedovo expansion and are happy to announce that 8 more Safedock systems and Safegate‟s GOS will operate for a safer and more efficient docking procedure. Russia – Moscow Sheremetyevo Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 + T2-18 9+30 2007 Moscow‟s Sheremetyevo International Airport have continued to invest in Safedock® with the addition of 30 more of the advanced visual docking guidance systems (A-VDGS) for the Terminal 3 project. The order includes Safegate‟s Gate Operating System (GOS) enabling them to control and monitor every Safedock unit from a central location. This brings the total number of Safedock systems at Sheremetyevo to 39. Safegate is providing A-VDGS at all three Moscow airports. Par Helmersson, Safegate‟s sales manager for Russia, said “To be part of the airport‟s continued expansion not once but twice, demonstrates the successful working relationships of all involved and their trust in the Safegate Effect”. With an order for nine Safedock advanced visual docking guidance systems (A-VDGS), Sheremetyevo Airport fills out Moscow as the latest of Safegate‟s home markets. Moscow is one of many capital cities where the airports are facing continued traffic growth and require solutions for more and safer movements. Safegate started its relationship in Moscow with the Vnukovo and Domodedovo airports back in 2003. Both airports have continued their investment in Safedock (A-VDGS) during the years, and now with the addition of Sheremetyevo this year Safegate proudly serves all three of the major big airports in Moscow making the city one of the many that Safegate considers to be home markets. Russia – Moscow Vnukovo Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 1+3+2=6 2003-2006 International Moscow Vnukovo Airport in Russia first selected three Safedock® systems in 2003. Three years later Vnukovo continues its investment in safety and efficiency with an order for two additional Safedock® systems. With the Safedock® 3Dimensional measuring technology Safegate can ensure that the five Safedock® systems employed in Vnukovo will provide a safe and efficient docking procedure. Vnukovo Airport processed more than 3,5 million passengers in 2005 and has been in operation for more than 60 years. Singapore - Changi Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 16+21+24+23+9+15=108 1997-2006 First project, which was for 16 Docking Guidance Systems, Safedock, was started in 1997 with the T1 extension project. Following the success of the docking systems there, the rest of T1 was also equipped with Safedock systems during 01-03, bringing the total number of Safedocks at T1 to 37. The latest project is to supply docking systems to the new Terminal 3 project. This project is for 24 systems and Safegate has developed a special 50 key panel for this project. Client objective: 1. Have a fully ICAO compliant docking system that provides reliable and easy to understand guidance in all weather conditions. 2. Have a system that is easy for the operators to use. Selection process: Public tender. We were fully compliant to all the specs and met all the client requirements. Sri Lanka - Bandanaike International Airport, Colombo Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 9 2006 Turn-key supply and installation of 9 Safedock Type 3-9 systems and GOS. Scope also includes design and implementation of a LAN to connect the VDGS with GOS. The project has to be completed in 5 months. Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality 2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, maximise capacity 3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding bridge. Selection process: The Airport Authority released a tender, only Safegate participated in the tender. Safegate‟s proposal was compliant to the tender requirements and within the allocated budget. Page 34 of 94 Thailand - Bangkok Don Muang International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-15 6 2001-2002 Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-15 systems & 1 Gate Operating System (GOS) for the new Pier 5. The VDGS shall be controlled, monitored and maintained from a central location. Client objective: 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates. 3. Have working systems (the system procured from another vendor for previous project never worked). Selection process: Public tender. We were fully compliant to all the specs and met all the client requirements. Thailand - New Bangkok International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 93+66=159 2004-2005 Project 1: Delivery of 93 Safedock Type 2-18 systems & a Gate Operating System for the Second Bangkok Intl' Airport. Features include ID check, digital countdown, stand monitoring and interlock to boarding bridges. The GOS will have redundant servers. The GOS will be interfaced with AIMS to receive flight information. The GOS upon receiving information from AIMS will automatically activate the VDGS. The GOS will forward Blocks On/Off data to the AIMS. Project 2: Delivery of 66 Safedock Type 2-18 systems & upgrading of existing Gate Operating System for the Second Bangkok Intl' Airport. Features include ID check, digital countdown, stand monitoring and interlock to boarding bridges. The systems will be equipped at remote stands and cargo bays. The existing GOS shall be able to accommodate the additional systems. The VDGS at the concourse will be interfaced with GPU (400Hz) & PCA. The GOS will log the time when the GPU & PCA were turned on and off. Up to a maximum of 4 external systems can be interfaced with the existing system. Client objective: 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates. 3. System that is expandable and capable of docking future aircraft types by simple upgrading of software. Selection process: Project 1: Public tender. IOT placed an order to us as we were fully compliant to the specs. FMT also proposed but did not qualify as they were not fully compliant. Project 2: The client procured our system after a thorough evaluation. They wanted to have similar systems all over the airport. A variation order was placed. Page 36 of 94 Vietnam - Noi Bai International Airport, Hanoi Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 2+1=3 2006-2008 Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates that will be equipped with new PBB. Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality 2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, maximise capacity 3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding bridge. Selection process: The NAA released a tender for procuring PBB & VDGS. This tender was won by LO Group, Finland. LO Group chose Safedock as our system was fully compliant with the specs and had been reliably operational at HCMC since 2002. Europe Denmark - Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T2-18 1+6+6+1+7+4+1=26 The first Safegate Docking Guidance System was delivered in 1997. Since then, Safegate has provided 24 Safedocks to Kastrup in 6 installations. The system at Kastrup had a request for confirmation selected versus incoming aircraft and a serial interface to the Passenger Boarding Bridge (PBB), offering efficient pre-positioning of the PBB. The selection of the aircraft is made from the operator‟s panel of the PBB. Identification availability. Serial interface with passenger boarding bridge. ICAO Annex 14 compliance. France – Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: Page 38 of 94 T1 and T2-24 4 2009-2010 Equipment of 4 gates on the Terminal 2, one dedicated to the A380 of Air France. Paris- CDG then became the first European airport equipped with the Safedock T1. ADP and Air France are willing to test the Safedock solutions to assess the benefits in terms of safety and efficiency. France – Paris Orly Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T2-24 1 2010 Equipment of 1 gate at Terminal West. ADP and Air France are willing to test the Safedock solutions to assess the benefits in terms of safety and efficiency. Germany - Munich Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: T2-18 T2: 184 First 63 Safegate DGS were taken into operation at Terminal 1 1991, followed by 64 Safedocks for terminal II year 2001. In the year 2003 Safegate was asked to provide additional 13 units for Ramp III. Another 23 Safedocks were delivered in 2005 to terminal I. Scope: Munich Airport uses Safegate DGS at all gates and remote parking positions. These are all connected to FIS over the airport‟s central computer system but also to the central maintenance station. The latest contracts were won after through tests of different systems. Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality 2. Life Cycle Cost (Wirtschaftlichkeit) Selection process: The decision was based on technical evaluation and experience. Italy - Cagliari Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 8 2001 The new airport installed Safedock laser systems together with the new passenger boarding bridges. Italy - Catania Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Page 40 of 94 T3-9 6+6=12 2005-2006 The new terminal installed Safedock laser systems together with the new passenger boarding bridges. Italy - Genoa, Marco Polo Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9, Inductive loop 5+5=10 1986-1998 When the new terminal in Genoa airport Marco Polo was built in the 1980th Safegate installed 5 inductive loop systems. The systems were replaced by the laser system Safedock 1998. Italy - Milan Airports: Malpensa, Linate and Bergamo Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9, Inductive loop 8+26+10+7+1, 5+5, 2=64 1995-2005 Milan North installed eight Inductive Loop systems in 1995 after the good experience of the 5 systems installed at Milan Linate in 1992. When the new Malpensa terminal was built in 1997, the airport installed 26 new Safedock laser systems. Milan Bergamo installed two systems in 1998. For the expansion of Malpensa, the airport installed another 10 Safedock at poles before the next satellite was built. All systems are connected to a central computer via Safegate GOS. The inductive Loop systems at Linate and Malpensa North were replaced by Safedock laser systems in 2002, 2003 and 2005 respectively. Italy - Rome Fiumicino Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9, Inductive loop 5+4+16+17+11+12+10+4+3+1=83 1986-2006 Safegate made the first installation of docking systems in Italy as early as 1986 with 5 inductive loop systems at Fiumicino airport. This installation was followed by 4 more systems in 1988, 16 more in 1991 and further 17 in 1995. The first Safedock Laser Systems were installed at the new Europe terminal in 1999, when the airport installed the Gate Operating System, covering all the inductive systems as well as the new laser systems. The airport replaced the inductive loop systems with Safedock laser systems in 2003 and 2004, a total of 26 systems. Today there are totally 37 Safedock laser systems and 10 inductive loop systems in operation. Italy - Trieste Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Page 42 of 94 T3-9 3 2003 Trieste When the airport in Trieste upgraded the airport to new standard with passenger boarding bridges the airport selected the laser guided system Safedock from Safegate. Netherlands - Amsterdam Schiphol Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T2-23 1+10+13+8+8+1+15+3+12+2+10+1+4+25+9+1+1+5+1+1+1+6+ 4+4=146 1980-2008 In principle all gates at Schiphol are equipped with a Safegate DGS. Some equipped with a serial interface to the Passenger Boarding Bridge (PBB) offering efficient pre-positioning of the PBB. All DGS are connected to a central maintenance centre. 1. High availability 2. Uniformity at all gates 3. Limited Maintenance Norway - Oslo Gardermoen Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-21 34+1=35 1996-2005 Safegate delivered the first docking systems to Norway for Stavanger and Oslo Fornebu airports in1986-97, followed by Bergen and Bodö airports in 1987-89. Totally 29 Loop systems was delivered. The new airport for Oslo, Gardermoen, was one of the first to install our Safedock laser system. The new airport has installed 34 systems and a Gate Operating System. For the first time the Docking system was interfaced with the ground radar. The position of the aircraft entering and leaving the apron area is exchanged with the radar preventing swapping of radar echo as a part of the airport SMGCS system. Poland - Warsaw Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 31 2006 Warsaw Frederic Chopin Airport in Poland has turned to Safegate‟s solutions for safer and faster movements at the gate. Thirty-one Safedock® advanced visual docking guidance systems will be supplied to the new terminal in Warsaw. Safegate continues to increase airport safety and efficiency on airfields and at gates worldwide and now with more than 2300 Safedocks installed. Safegate has been providing safe and accurate parking guidance of aircraft since 1977. Over 4 million aircraft are parked annually with an accuracy of 10 cm regardless of the aircraft stop position. Selection process: 1. Accurate parking 2. Safer, faster movement 3. Best value Page 44 of 94 Romania - Bucharest Henri Coanda International Airport – Otopeni Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Selection process: T1 9 2010 First installation of 5 pcs T3-9 was made in 1998 with Romairport. With the terminal extension, Otopeni Airport decided to install our new docking system T1 for their 9 new gates. 1. Utilize modern technology 2. Easy to use and to maintain 3. Optimization of the gate usage Slovenia - Ljubljana Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 5 2007 The capital city of Slovenia, Ljubljana will now enjoy the benefits of the “Safegate Effect”, more and safer movements, with their investment into five Safedock advanced visual docking guidance systems (A-VDGS) for their new terminal. Among the many benefits associated with the Safedock system is the positive effect on the environment. Statistics shows that the cost of fuel burn can reach up to 48 Euro per minute, but what is the environmental cost? Ljubljana, and all other airports around the world using the Safedock solution, can cut fuel burn at the airport by eliminating the need to wait for airport personnel to marshal aircraft into the gate. The Safedock solution gives both pilots all information they need to efficiently park all aircraft types, not only preventing unnecessary fuel burn, but increasing overall efficiency at the same time. Spain - Barcelona Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-15 + T2-18 27+55+1=84 1998-2008 The first major installation of our Safedock laser system in Spain was Barcelona Airport. The Safedock type was T3-15, the first installation with 15 LED modules covering the whole display. The total number of systems ordered was 27. The system was programmed for curved centrelines. In 2008 we made an additional delivery of 56 Safedock type T2-18 for the new South Terminal at Barcelona Airport. Another T2-18 to join the existing 27 Safedock T3-15 in the old Terminal. Also a GOS to control and monitor all the systems installed in both Terminals. Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made by AENA. Spain - Bilbao Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Selection process: Page 46 of 94 T3-9 7 2001 The systems are installed at the new terminal designed by famous architect Calatravas. The wall-support on the terminal was designed to match the terminal. The system has a check of incoming aircraft versus selected. Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made by AENA. Spain - Fuerteventura Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 7+12 2000-2009 Installation of 7 nos. T3- 9 systems, one gate with two convergent centrelines. By installing one system for two centrelines the airport could use the seventh system for a remote gate. Customers require well proven environmental protection as the airport is situated on an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The systems have a check of incoming aircraft versus selected. Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made by AENA. Spain - Las Palmas Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 15 2003-2004 The systems are installed on the glass façade. Costumers require well proven environmental protection as the airport is situated on an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The system has a check of incoming aircraft versus selected. Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made by AENA. Spain - Palma de Mallorca Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 22+5+1+11=39 1999-2009, 2010 Summer time one of the busiest airports in Europe with a great demand for fast turnaround time. Safedock laser systems were installed at all new gates of the new Terminal. 22 systems were installed in 1999 and expanded with another 5 systems in 2003. The systems have Aircraft identification possibilities and some of the gates have curved centrelines. More Safedocks were installed in 2009 and 2010. Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made by AENA. Spain - Tenerife South Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 9 2001 Customers require well proven environmental protection as the airport is situated on an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The systems have a check of incoming aircraft versus selected. Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made by AENA. Page 48 of 94 Spain - Valencia Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-15 3 1999 One of the smallest installations of Safedock laser systems. Two type T3-15 installed. Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made by AENA. Sweden - Stockholm Arlanda Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: Inductive loop, T1-21, T2-22, T2-21, T2-24 1+14+20+14+10+4=91 (34 in operation) Stockholm Arlanda installed the first DGS from Safegate already in 1983, followed by the first laser systems in 1995. In total, Safegate has provided 91 DGS to Stockholm Arlanda Airport. Replacement of 10 existing units at Terminal 4. With the new systems, Arlanda Airport now has a DGS capable of performing an ID-Check (Aircraft Safety Check) of approaching aircraft. A very important and safety critical feature, especially when operating fixed Passenger Boarding Bridges as Arlanda does. Technical Performance (Aircraft Safety Check) Turkey - Antalya Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T3-9, T3-15 16+16=32, 4 Safegate delivered the first DGS to Turkey (Istanbul Airport) already in 1983. First delivery to Antalya took place in 1998 to the BOT contractor Bayindir (50% owned by Fraport). Later Safedocks were delivered to the BOT contractor Celebi (handles 50% of all ground operation in Turkey). Another 4 units were installed in the Domestic Terminal in 2010. 16 Safedocks to the new BOT terminal: All Safedocks are connected to FIS for automatic start of docking and all block on/off times to FIS are completely automatic. 1. Performance 2. Availability 3. Experience 4. Limited time for commissioning United Kingdom - Cardiff Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 1 Installed & Commissioned 2013 Safedock Docking Guidance Systems selected to replace existing non -compliant AGNIS unit. Client objective: 1.Provide compliant A-VDGS 2. Provide uniformity of docking operation with proven accuracy Selection process: Safegate selected based on proven experience and technical evaluation. Page 50 of 94 United Kingdom - London Heathrow Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 31+1+4+4(T3-9)+2+1+10+5+3+9+3+2+2+3+2=82 2003-2007 Project1: Heathrow Airport installed 1 Safedock systems type 2-18. Project2: Heathrow Airport installed 2 Safedock systems type 2-18. Project3: Heathrow Airport installed 4 Safedock systems type 2-18. Project4: Heathrow Airport installed 4 Safedock systems type 3-9. To provide an accurate and reliable docking alternative. to the problem encountered with the limited use of parking mirrors on stands serving a rail drive passenger boarding bridge “Safegate International was delighted to be part of aviation history when the world‟s largest passenger jet - the Airbus A380 arrived at Heathrow for the first time on 18 May 2006. Heathrow‟s Managing Director Tony Douglas described the day as “a truly monumental day in aviation history.” Safegate‟s Safedock Advanced Visual Docking Guidance System (A-VDGS) was chosen to park the aircraft at the new pier 6, which has been specifically designed to accommodate the A380 twin-deck airliner. The successful landing and docking, was witnessed by leading dignitaries from the aviation industry, and follows hot on the tail of the A380`s inaugural flight to Dubai. Heathrow‟s Safety Development Manager, John Kirkham, was impressed with the system. “It guided the aircraft right to its exact stopping position on the apron and proved beyond doubt that the Safedock system is right for Heathrow`s future.”Safegate can now boast of participating in the first live tests of the A380 at both Heathrow and Dubai airports and is proud to be recognised as the number one supplier of A-VDGS in the world.” Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, maximise capacity 2. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 3. Uniformity of docking operation Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 34, whereas 31 to T5 and 3 to T2 First test was initiated during 2002 Safedock Docking Guidance Systems for new Terminal 5 at Heathrow Airport. Most stands are MARS stands meaning either used by one wide body aircraft or two narrow body aircraft. Safegate solution provides interlock between the centrelines preventing wrong aircraft to enter the gate. The MARS operation demands a Docking Guidance System able to handle a great variation of stop distances, from below 5 metres to almost 30 metres. BAA has for a long time used Agnis system but an unacceptable high rate of incidents and accidents helped them decide to use modern, active Docking Guidance Systems. First T5 installation was made 2004 at remote stands and the project will be finalised 2008 with a total amount of 31 Safedocks. BAA selected Safegate as supplier after a comprehensive test of all manufacturers. Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, maximise capacity 2. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 3. Uniformity of docking operation Proven accuracy of docking serving a rail drive bridge Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made by BAA and pilots using the different test systems. Safegate selected on successful completion of trial system and technical evaluation. Equipment: Quantity: Duration: T2-18 36, 22 systems for T2B and 14 systems for T2A projects Systems to be installed in 2013 in preparation for the Opening in June 2014 Scope: Safedock Docking Guidance Systems for new Terminal 2: The Queens Terminal at Heathrow Airport Client objective: 1. Provide uniformity to pilots and ground handling personnel 2. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 3. Allow flexibility of use among a wide range of aircraft Selection process: Safegate selected to continue the roll out of full compliant Advanced Docking Guidance Systems throughout the airport Page 52 of 94 United Kingdom - Glasgow Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 3+4+4+8=19 2006-2008 The 3 type 2 units are used in a MAR; s configuration and incorporate the Safedock interlock function which allows the Airport Operators to choose which individual or combination of Centre lines should be selected. Client objective: Uniformity of docking operations and compliance with ICAO Annex 14 Standard & recommended practices for P1 & P2 Selection process: Safegate selected on BAA experience and technical evaluation. United Kingdom – London Gatwick Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-18 32+11+21+30+61=155 2005-2009 Gatwick Airport installed 28+4 Safedock systems type 2-18. The Systems form part of the new Pier 6 stands and are in addition to the 28 Safedock units recently supplied. Client objective: Uniformity of docking operations and compliance with ICAO Annex 14 Standard & recommended practices for P1 & P2 Selection process: Safegate group has been chosen by BAA to supply 28 Safedock® Docking Guidance Systems to London Gatwick Airport, the award demonstrates the growing relationship between the two companies and adds to the 31 systems recently purchased for the prestigious T5 project at London Heathrow Airport. The Safedock® Docking Guidance system will help eliminate the possibility of a collision by an aircraft with a passenger boarding bridge which has been incorrectly positioned. The Safedock® system provides a Safe, Accurate and Reliable parking for all types of aircraft with apron driven or (static) Passenger boarding bridges. United Kingdom – Stansted Airport Equipment: Quantity: T2-18 24 Systems to complete the Phase 2 & 3 projects for Stansted Airport Duration: Systems installed in 2013 to follow completed phase 1 project Scope: Safedock Docking Guidance Systems installed on satellites 2&3 plus Cargo and Zulu stands at Stansted Airport Client objective: 1. Provide uniformity to pilots and ground handling personnel 2. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 3. Allow flexibility of use among a wide range of aircraft Selection process: Safegate selected to complete the third phase of works and provide compliant Advanced Docking Guidance Systems Middle East Bahrain International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 + T2-24 18+7+10=35 2001-2008 Project 1: Delivery of 18 Safedock Type 3-9 systems & a Gate Operating System for Bahrain Intl' Airport. Replacement of existing Agnis systems with new generation systems. Features include ID check, digital countdown and interlock with boarding bridges. The GOS shall be used for central monitoring, control and maintenance. The GOS has been interfaced with FIDS to obtain flight information. In return the GOS provides Blocks On/Off data to FIDS. Project 2: Delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-9 systems & upgrade of the existing Gate Operating System and interface with FIDS. Client objective: 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates. 3. Complete the project in time and within allocated budget. Selection process: Project 1: Public tender. FMT and Honeywell participated in the tender. Safegate chosen after thorough investigation. Project 2: As the first project was completed within the specified time & budget, besides the systems being very reliable the client requested the main contractor to supply Safedock Type 3-9 systems. Page 54 of 94 Kuwait International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Inductive loop + T3-15 + T1 1+9+5+15+1+1+6+3+1=42 1988-2008, 2011 208 delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-15 systems for the new cargo apron. The GOS had to be upgraded to accommodate these 6 new systems. 2011 delivery of Safedock T1 system. Client objective: 6. Performance, availability and quality 7. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates 8. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 9. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 10. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB. Selection process: The first project in 2002 involving replacement of 15 loop systems with Safedocks and a new GOS was executed within the specified project period. The systems since 2002 have been reliably operational. The DGCA decided to directly place an order to Safegate. United Arab Emirates - Al Maktoum International Airport, Dubai Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: T2-24 + T1 + GOS 7+64=71 2007 1. Delivery of 52 Safedock Type 2-24 for the new airport „Dubai World Central‟. The Safedocks include IP-camera for stand monitoring and logging. 2. A GOS in redundant configuration will be supplied. The GOS will be interfaced with AFLCMS, TMS, Ground Radar and FIDS. 3. 2-sided signs to display bay numbers and one-sided sign to display GPS co-ordinates. 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 2. System fully compliant to the tender technical specifications. 3. Systems similar to the 158 systems delivered to Dubai International Airport. 4. Systems capable of checking the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one. 5. GOS that can be upgraded to include additional VDGS in the future. 6. Stand monitoring and logging of docking images. 7. System to be able to operate in high temperatures and meet the Cat 3B visibility conditions. Selection process: Danway, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these systems in this package. Danway chose Safegate as our systems were already approved by DCA for Dubai International Airport projects and our systems were fully compliant to the technical specifications. Our proposed systems were approved by the DWC Airport project team. United Arab Emirates - Dubai International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Page 56 of 94 T3-9 + T2-24 + GOS 27+42+19+3+1+17+10+16+23=158 1998-2007 Project 8: Delivery of 16 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for Concourse 2. The systems will be equipped with digital cameras (IP based) for apron monitoring and logging. The systems will be connected to the existing GOS at Concourse 1. GOS will be interfaced with IASS to exchange flight information and system status information. Project 9: Delivery of 10 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the temporary apron north of Concourse 2. System shall have the capability of displaying alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS. All VDGS on remote stands shall be equipped with internal battery backup with an autonomy of 10 minutes, such that docking process does not abort when main power is lost. The systems will be equipped with digital cameras (IP based) for apron monitoring and logging. Two-sided illuminated gate sign and illuminated signs to display GPS co-ordinates will also be supplied. Project 10: Delivery of 23 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the new cargo apron. System shall have the capability of displaying alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS. All VDGS on remote stands shall be equipped with internal battery backup with an autonomy of 10 minutes, such that docking process does not abort when main power is lost. The systems will be equipped with digital cameras (IP based) for apron monitoring and logging. Two-sided illuminated gate sign and illuminated signs to display GPS coordinates will also be supplied. Client objective: 1. Provide a reliable and safe VDGS. 2. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 3. Modernize the airport. 4. Docking possible by both the pilots. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding bridge. 6. Control and monitoring of all VDGS from Control Tower. Reduce the number of personnel on the apron. 7. The system shall be capable of being interfaced with external systems such as UFIS, Ground Radar, IASS, AFL, etc. 8. Ability to store long logs for every docking and easy access of these logs for analysis. 9. Stand Monitoring and logging of docking images. Selection process: Project 8: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these systems in the package AX324. As 109 systems are already operational at the airport, they selected Safedocks. Project 9: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these systems in the package AX94. Since 125 systems were already supplied to Dubai Airport they decided to choose Safedock. Project 10: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these systems in the package AX94. The client wanted systems similar to those supplied for Project 9. Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: VDGS T1 164 2011-2012 Project 1: Delivery of 164 T1 VDGS to replace VDGS T2 and T3 and to expand up to a total of 168 gates with VDGS. The systems will be equipped with the Apron Scan function to ensure an object and obstacle free apron ready for docking an aircraft. Client objective: 1. Increased efficiency of the “pit stop” process by interfacing of VDGS to the aircraft movement routing and guidance system. Selection process: Project 1: Al Naboodah, a contractor signed by Dubai Airport to assist in construction of new terminals and stands, designed to allow for the aggressive growth targets incorporated in strategic plan SP100, will in different phases install 164 new VDGS T1 from Safegate. Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: Page 58 of 94 T3-9; T2-24; GOS & Illuminated Gate Signs 109 2000-2005 Project 1: Delivery of 27 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the Concourse 1. The airport was procuring the new generation VDGS for the first time as they were using Agnis systems. Project 2: Delivery of Gate Operating System for control and monitoring the VDGS at Concourse 1. The system should also have the capability of performing maintenance. The system shall be modular and capable of being expanded in the future to accommodate more VDGS. The GOS shall have Servers in redundant configuration and 3 workstations installed at various locations. Project 3: Delivery of 42 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the Echo Apron. The airport wanted to equip the remote stands with VDGS. Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS. Project 4: Delivery of 19 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the Tango Apron & Air show Apron. The airport wanted to equip the remote stands with VDGS. Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS. Project 5: Delivery of 4 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for Dubai Air Wing & Bay E43 at Echo Apron. System shall have the capability of displaying alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS. Illuminated Stand Signs to display Bay number and GPS co-ordinates will also be supplied. Project 6: Delivery of 17 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the Cargo (Charlie) Apron. System shall have the capability of displaying alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS. All VDGS on remote stands shall be equipped with internal battery backup with an autonomy of 10 minutes, such that docking process does not abort when main power is lost. Project 7: Upgrade 3 existing systems at Concourse 1 to dock A380. First trial docking of A380 expected in November 2005. The existing GOS will be upgraded to interface with IASS (Integrated Aircraft Stand System); stand monitoring functionality will be provided too. Illuminated Stand Signs to display Bay number and GPS co-ordinates will also be supplied. 1. Provide a reliable and safe VDGS. 2. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 3. Modernize the airport. 4. Docking possible by both the pilots. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding bridge. 6. Control and monitoring of all VDGS from Control Tower. Reduce the number of personnel on the apron. 7. The system shall be capable of being interfaced with external systems such as UFIS, Ground Radar, IASS, AFL, etc. 8. Ability to store long logs for every docking and easy access of these logs for analysis. 9. Stand Monitoring and logging of docking images. Selection process: Project 1: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these systems in the package TD-48. The contractor proposed FMT, the consultant Bechtel rejected the product as the system was not fully compliant to the specs. Our system was proposed and the consultants and the client approved it. Project 2: The client signed the contract with us as we had supplied the VDGS and we met all their current and future requirements. Project 3: Transgulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these systems in the package AX11. FMT also proposed their system. The client and consultant were happy with the system performance at Concourse 1 and decided to place an order to us. Project 4: Transgulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these systems in the package AX92. Since 69 systems were reliably operating, the client chose our system. Project 5: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these systems in the packages AX90 & AX94. Since 88 systems were reliably operating, the client chose our system. Project 6: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these systems in the package AX94. Since 92 systems were reliably operating, the client chose our system. Project 7: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor signed the contract with us as we had supplied the systems at Concourse 1. United Arab Emirates - Sharjah International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T3-9 + T2-24 4+3=7 2003, 2006 Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the terminal expansion project. A Basic GOS to control and monitor the 3 new Safedocks as well as the 4 existing Safedocks (operational since 2003). Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality 2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates 3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB Selection process: The first project in 2003 was completed in time and within the allocated budget. The systems since commissioning have been extremely reliable. Page 60 of 94 Oceania Australia - Kingsford Smith International Airport, Sydney Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: Client objective: Selection process: T2-24 2+3+1+6+2+1+2+4+1+2+1+1+1+1+1=29 2002-2008 KSIA Sydney Project 5: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for A380 bays. The NIGS shall be interfaced with boarding bridge to provide the ROLL value, such that the boarding bridge knows the exact location of the aircraft door(s). Systems will be delivered between 2006 & 2008. KSIA Sydney Project 6: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systems at the Virgin Blue Domestic Terminal. NIGS shall be capable of docking a B737 with the nose of the aircraft 4.8m away from the NIGS location (terminal building). 3 nos. Safedocks were delivered earlier in 2003. KSIA Sydney Project 7: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at Bay 58. 1. Performance, availability and quality 2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, maximise capacity 3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding bridge. 6. Work reliably in Australian climatic conditions. KSIA Sydney Project 5: As the systems have been extremely reliable and safe, they decided to equip the remaining A380 bays with our system. KSIA Sydney Project 6: As the systems have been extremely reliable and safe, they decided to equip some more Virgin Blue bays. KSIA Sydney Project 7: The systems operational at Bays 31 and 33, since 2001/2002 has been extremely reliable. SACL intends equipping all the bays with Safedocks over a period of time. Australia - Melbourne International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 + T1 1+1+2+2+1=7 2003-2008 Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at the International Terminal. First new generation NIGS at Melbourne. Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality 2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates 3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB 6. Work reliably in Australian climatic conditions. Selection process: Melbourne Airport wanted to test our system as they have received positive feedback from other Australian airports using the system. Page 62 of 94 Australia - Perth Intl; Brisbane Intl; Townsville Intl; Cairns Intl; Darwin Intl Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 6+1, 2+2+6, 3+1, 3+1+5+2, 1+1=34 2001-2005 Perth Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system. First new generation NIGS commissioned in Australia. Brisbane Project 1: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the terminal expansion project. KSIA Sydney Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at the International Terminal. First new generation NIGS at Sydney. The NIGS shall be capable to being extremely accurate as the boarding bridge tolerance was 0.2m. Brisbane Project 2: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for existing bays at International Terminal. KSIA Sydney Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at the International Terminal. NIGS shall be capable of docking a B747 with the nose of the aircraft 4.6m away from the NIGS location (terminal building). The NIGS shall be capable to being extremely accurate as the boarding bridge tolerance was 0.2m. Townsville: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems. One NIGS shall be capable of docking aircrafts along two parallel centrelines 7m apart. One centreline was for Jets using the boarding bridge; the second centreline was for turbo props. Cairns Project 1: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the domestic terminal. Systems had to guide aircrafts very accurately as wing clearance was extremely tight when two Code E aircrafts were parked on adjacent bays. KSIA Sydney Project 3: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems at the Virgin Blue Domestic Terminal. NIGS shall be capable of docking a B737 with the nose of the aircraft 4.8m away from the NIGS location (terminal building). Darwin: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system. First new generation NIGS at Darwin. Cairns Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system for the International terminal. KSIA Sydney Project 4: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system for a bay that is being upgraded to dock the A380. The NIGS shall be interfaced with boarding bridge to provide the ROLL value, such that the boarding bridge knows the exact location of the aircraft door(s). A380 to perform a trial docking in November 2005. Cairns Project 3: Delivery of 5 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the International terminal. Perth Project 2: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 2-24 systems, 4 for the International terminal and 2 for the domestic terminal. Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality 2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, maximise capacity 3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding bridge. 6. Work reliably in Australian climatic conditions. Selection process: Perth Project 1: Perth Airport ordered the systems as they wanted to test the new generation NIGS. Brisbane Project 1: The airport decided to select us based on the performance of the test system at Perth. KSIA Sydney Project 1: SACL wanted to test the system based on the performance at Perth. Brisbane Project 2: As the systems delivered in the previous project were extremely reliable and safe, Brisbane Airport Corp. (BAC) placed an order directly to us. KSIA Sydney Project 2: SACL wanted to test the system with extremely short clearance between the aircraft nose and the terminal building. As the test system was extremely reliable and precise they placed an order to us. Townsville: Leighton Contractors placed an order to us after tender evaluation. System also had the ability to dock aircrafts on two different centrelines using only one system but still complying with all ICAO Annex 14 requirements. Cairns Project 1: Cairns Port Authority (CPA) placed an order to us based on system‟s performance at various Australian airports. KSIA Sydney Project 3: Airport Equipment, the boarding bridge supplier placed an order to us, as SACL wanted our equipment. Darwin: The airport wanted a reliable system, based on the performance at various Australian airports the airport decided to procure our system. Cairns Project 2: Airport Equipment, the boarding bridge supplier placed an order to us, as CPA wanted our equipment. KSIA Sydney Project 4: As the systems have been extremely reliable and safe, they decided to equip the A380 bays with our system. This is the first bay project. Cairns Project 3: Cairns Port Authority (CPA) placed an order to us based on system‟s performance at domestic terminal and to standardize the equipment in the airport. Perth Project 2: As the first system commissioned in 2001 is extremely reliable they have decided to place an order to us. Page 64 of 94 Australia - Perth International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T1 1 2011 Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 1 system at the Terminal, supply and installation Client objective: To replace old and obsolete FMT units. To allow use of multiple centrelines for docking of aircraft using the latest available technology Selection process: - Competitive tender - Undertaking to support into the future - Commonality of gates across Australia New Zealand - Auckland International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-13 2+2+3+4+3=14 2005-2006 Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-13 systems at the existing International Terminal and Basic GOS in mid 2006. The GOS will be interfaced with either FIDS or Airport Operational Database System to exchange flight information and Blocks On/Off. 6 Safedock Type 2-9/13 and 2 state-of-the-art Safedock T1 will be delivered in the period 2006-2008. Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality 2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates capacity 3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB Selection process: Auckland Airport released a tender, which was participated by FMT and us. The airport intended equipping VDGS at 8 bays, which had 13 centrelines. FMT require 13 systems however we require only 10 systems. Besides the additional safety features available in our system there was also considerable cost saving. Page 66 of 94 New Zealand - Christchurch International Airport Equipment: Quantity: Duration: Scope: T2-24 7+1+1+1=10 2004-2005 Project 1: Delivery of 7 Safedock Type 2-24 to replace the existing FMT systems and a MOS (GOS used for maintenance purpose only) that supports adjacent bay interlock. The airport had several bay restrictions due to wing tip clearance, the various possibilities were providing to us by the airport authority. This was realized in the MOS to ensure that the operator cannot dock an aircraft type by mistake at a certain bay due to adjacent bay restrictions. Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 and upgrade of MOS. Client objective: 6. Performance, availability and quality 7. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates 8. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 9. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 10. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB. Selection process: Project 1: Christchurch Airport released a tender, which was participated by FMT and us. As our system had more safety features and fully compliant with the specifications, the client chose us. Project 2: The client placed an order to standardize the systems. Complete Reference List, Docking Guidance Systems North America COUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT Canada QTY YEAR REMARKS Calgary International Airport Airport Authority T1 4 2013 YYC Calgary International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 70 2013 YUL Airport Authority T2-24 1 2013 Airport Authority T2-24 1 2012 + GOS Airport Authority T3-9 4 2003 Install 2013/14 + SafeControl – Apron Mangement Install 2013/14 + SafeControl – Apron Mangement DGS YYZ YYZ YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 1 5 3 2012 2007 2005 YYZ YYZ YYZ YYZ YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 16 5 51 12 6 2002 2002 2002 2000 1998 Installed Installed 07 + GOS for 93 Safedocks Installed 03 Installed 03 Installed 04-07 + GOS 2002 Installed YVR YVR YVR YVR YVR YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Vancouver Intl Airport Vancouver Intl Airport Vancouver Intl Airport Vancouver Intl Airport Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-15 T3-15C T3-15C T3-15C T3-15C T3-15C 2 3 3 3 9 9 2013 2011 2009 2009 2004 1999 DGS Installed 2011 Installation 09 Installation 09 Installed 05-06 Installed SXM St Maarten Princess Juliana Intl St Maarten Princess Juliana Intl Airport Authority 1 2013 GOS Airport Authority T2-18 4 2005 Installed 06 BOS Boston Logan Intl Airport JetBlue Airways T2-24 16 2011 Installed 2011 + GOS CLT Charlotte-Douglas Intl Airport Charlotte-Douglas Intl Airport Charlotte-Douglas Intl US Airways 1 2013 SXM USA TYPE YYC Montreal-Trudeau Intl Airport YUL Montreal-Trudeau Intl Airport YOW Ottawa Intl Airport Dutch Antilles OWNER CLT CLT Page 68 of 94 US Airways T2-24 37 2012 upgrade from GOS to SAM Installed 2013 + GOS Airport Authority T2-24 46 2012 Installed 2013 Airport ORD Chicago O‟Hare Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 35 2010 + GOS DFW Dallas Fort Worth Intl Airport Dallas Fort Worth Intl Airport Dallas Fort Worth Intl Airport Dallas Fort Worth Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 11 2013 DGS Airport Authority T3-9 1 2012 Airport Authority T2-24 41 2011 Airport Authority T3-9 92 2007 + SafeControl – Apron Management +SafeControl -Apron Management Installed 08 FLL Ft. Lauderdale Hollywood Int. Airport JetBlue Airways T2-24 8 2013 + GOS IAH Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport Airport Authority T2-24 8 2013 +SafeControl -Apron Management LAS Las Vegas McCarran Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 15 2009 Install 2011 LAX Los Angeles Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-18 16 2012 Installed 2012 + GOS MIA MIA MIA MIA MIA MIA MIA Miami Intl Airport Miami Intl Airport Miami Intl Airport Miami Intl Airport Miami Intl Airport Miami Intl Airport Miami Intl Airport American Airlines American Airlines American Airlines American Airlines American Airlines American Airlines American Airlines T1 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 1 9 6 7 26 2 9 2013 2011 2010 2009 2007 2005 2003 DGS JFK JFK JFK New York/JFK Intl Airport New York/JFK Intl Airport New York/JFK Intl Airport JetBlue(Terminal 5) AA (Terminal 8) JFKIAT (Terminal 4) T2-24 T2-24 T3-9 26 29 16 2008 2008 1998 Installed 08 Installed 08 Installed JetBlue Airways T2-24 7 2011 Installed 2011 + GOS PAE Orlando International Airport Paine Field Boeing T2-24 3 2013 DGS + SAM PHL Philadelphia Intl Airport Philadelphia Dept. T2-18 13 2001 Installed 03 SJU San Juan Luis Muñoz Marín JetBlue Airways T2-24 7 2012 + GOS SEA SEA SEA Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Port of Seattle Port of Seattle Port of Seattle T2-24 T2-13 T2-24 3 2 4 2012 2007 2007 Installed 12 Installed 07 Installed 07 DFW DFW DFW MCO Installed 10 Installed 09 Installed 08 Installed 05 Inst. 04 + GOS SEA SEA SEA Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Port of Seattle Port of Seattle Port of Seattle T2-13 T2-13 T2-13 2 5 4 Number of systems in order or in operation in North America 2006 2005 2004 Installed 06 Installed 05 Installed 04 721 South America COUNTRY Brazil IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKS CNF Belo Horizonte Airport Airport Authority Inductive 11 1983 FOR Fortaleza Airport Airport Authority Inductive 9 1999 + GOS GRU International Airport/ São Paulo Private consortium T1 109 2013 DGS + SAM Chile SCL Santiago de Chile Airport Airport Authority T3-9 17 1999 Installed Peru LIM LIM LIM Jorge Chavez Intl Airport Jorge Chavez Intl Airport Jorge Chavez Intl Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 12 1 6 2008 2004 2004 Installed 08 Installed 04 Installed 04 Number of systems in order or in operation in South America Page 70 of 94 165 Oceania COUNTRY Australia IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT ADL Adelaide, New Intl Terminal BNE BNE BNE BNE BNE BNE Brisbane International Airport Brisbane International Airport Brisbane International Airport Brisbane International Airport Brisbane International Airport Brisbane International Airport CNS CNS CNS CNS OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKS VDGS 1 2004 Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T1 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 1 12 2 6 2 2 2013 2013 2011 2007 2003 2001 Inst. 07 + GOS Installed Installed Cairns International Airport Cairns International Airport Cairns International Airport Cairns International Airport Port Authority Port Authority Port Authority Port Authority T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 2 5 1 3 2008 2005 2005 2004 Installed 08 Installed 05 Installed 05 Installed CBR CBR CBR Canberra International Airport Canberra International Airport Canberra International Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 8 2 1 2013 2010 2008 DGS Installed 10 Installed 08 DRW DRW DRW DRW Darwin International Airport Darwin International Airport Darwin International Airport Darwin International Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 1 1 1 1 2012 2011 2007 2004 Installed 07 Installed 05 MEL Melbourne Intl Airport T2-24 5 2013 MEL MEL MEL MEL MEL MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport T2-24 T2-24 T1 T1 T2-24 T1 1 1 3 2 2 2 2013 2012 2012 2011 2011 2010 DGS MEL MEL MEL MEL MEL MEL MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport Melbourne Intl Airport Australia Pacific Airports Pty Ltd Qantas Airways Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Australia Pacific Airports Pty Ltd Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-24 T1 T2-24 T1 T2-24 T2-24 T2-25 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2009 2009 2008 2008 2006 2006 2003 Installed 09 Installed 09 Installed 08 Installed 08 Installed 06 Installed 06 Installed DGS New Zealand PER PER PER PER PER PER PER PER PER PER Perth International Airport Perth International Airport Perth International Airport Perth International Airport Perth International Airport Perth International Airport Perth International Airport Perth International Airport Perth International Airport Perth International Airport Perth Airport Pty. Ltd Perth Airport Pty. Ltd Perth Airport Pty. Ltd Qantas Airways Perth Airport Pty. Ltd Qantas Airways Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Westralia Airports T1 T2-24 T1 T2-24 T1-24 T1 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 1 6 17 1 1 2 2 2 6 1 2013 2013 2013 2012 2012 2011 2011 2010 2005 2001 DGS DGS DGS, SAM SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport T2-24 4 2013 DGS SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport T1 1 2013 DGS SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport 2013 DGS Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport T1 Split Safedock T2-24 T1 T2-24 T2-24 1 SYD SYD SYD SYD 20 1 12 7 2012 2012 2011 2011 DGS SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Sydney Airport Corp. Ltd. Sydney Airport Corp. Ltd. Sydney Airport Corp. Ltd Qantas Airways Qantas Airways Airport Authority Sydney Airport Corp. Ltd. Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 DGS 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 2 1 2 6 1 3 2 1 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2007 2007 2007 2006 2006 2006 2005 2003 2002 1996 Installed 08 Installed 08 Installed 08 Installed 08 Installed 08 Installed 08 Installed 07 Installed 07 Installed 07 Installed 06 Installed 06 Installed 06 Installed 05 Installed Installed TSV TSV Townsville Airport Townsville Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-24 T2-24 1 3 2007 2003 Installed 07 Installed AKL AKL Auckland International Airport Auckland International Airport AIAL AIAL T2-13 T2-13 3 4 2008 2008 Installed 08 Installed 08 Page 72 of 94 DGS Installed 06 Installed AKL AKL AKL Auckland International Airport Auckland International Airport Auckland International Airport AIAL AIAL AIAL T2-13 T2-13 T2-13 3 2 2 2008 2005 2005 Installed 08 Inst. 06 + GOS Installed 06 CHC CHC CHC CHC CHC Christchurch Intl Airport Christchurch Intl Airport Christchurch Intl Airport Christchurch Intl Airport Christchurch Intl Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 6 1 1 1 7 2012 2008 2007 2005 2004 Installed 08 Installed 07 Installed 05 + GOS 2005 WLG WLG Wellington Airport Wellington Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-13 T2-24 1 1 2009 2007 Installed 09 Installed 07 Number of systems in order or in operation in Oceania 227 Middle East COUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE Bahrain BAH BAH BAH BAH Bahrain Airport Bahrain Airport Bahrain Airport Bahrain Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-24 T2-24 T3-9 T3-9 25 10 7 18 2011 2008 2003 2001 +GOS Installed 08 + GOS + GOS Iran THR Tehran/Immam Khomeini Airport Authority T3-9 14 2000 Inst. 04 + GOS Iraq SDA Bagdad Airport Airport Authority T3-9 18 2012 +GOS Erbil Airport Erbil Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 4 2 2007 2007 Installed 07 Installed 07 Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T1 T3-9 T3-9 4 16 10 2011 2011 1998 + GOS + GOS Jordan KSA Kuwait Qatar AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport QTY YEAR REMARKS JED Jeddah T1 127 2013 MED Medinah T3 45 2013 KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 7 2012 KWI KWI KWI KWI KWI KWI KWI KWI KWI KWI KWI Kuwait International Airport Kuwait International Airport Kuwait International Airport Kuwait International Airport Kuwait International Airport Kuwait International Airport Kuwait International Airport Kuwait International Airport Kuwait International Airport Kuwait International Airport Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T1 T3-9 T3-9 T3-15 T3-15 T3-15 T3-15 T3-15 Inductive Inductive Inductive 1 6 1 3 6 1 1 15 5 9 1 2011 2009 2008 2008 2005 2003 2002 2001 1993 1989 1988 DOH Doha Airport DOH Doha Airport Qatar Airways DIA/Qatar Airways T3-9 T3-9 6 14 2012 2009 DOH Doha Airport DIA/Qatar Airways T3-9 10 2008 Page 74 of 94 +SafeControl – Apron Management Installed 09 Installed 08 Installed 08 Inst. 06 + GOS Installed Installed + GOS Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Installed 2012 DGS+GOS (turnkey) DGS+GOS (turnkey) Saudi Arabia Syria UAE DOH Doha Airport DIA/Qatar Airways T3-9 24 2007 DOH DOH DOH DOH Doha Airport Doha Airport Doha Airport Doha Airport Qatar Airways Qatar Airways Qatar Airways Qatar Airways T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 10 6 7 17 2006 2005 2003 2001 Hamad International Airport HIA/Qatar Airways T1 91 2012 NDIA New Doha Airport Qatar Airways NDIA New Doha Airport NDIA New Doha Airport Qatar Airways Qatar Airways DMM Dammam KFIA Airport DMM Dammam KFIA Airport DMM Dammam KFIA Airport RUH RUH 2012 DGS+GOS (turnkey) Installed 06 Installed 05 Installed 04 + GOS DGS+GOS (turnkey) 30 nos. VDGS poles Installed 08 Inst. 08 + GOS T3-9 T1 14 61 2008 2007 Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 Inductive 1 2 13 2011 2002 1989 Installed 11 Installed Riyadh/King Khaled Airport Riyadh/King Khaled Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 Inductive 34 41 2007 1983 Installed 07 TUU Tabuk Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2009 Installed 09 YNB Yanbu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2007 Installed 07 DAM Damascus Airport DGCA T3-9 5 2002 Installed ALP Nejrab Airport (Aleppo) Airport Authority T3-9 4 2007 Installed 07 AUH AUH AUH AUH AUH AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Abu Dhabi International Airport Abu Dhabi International Airport Abu Dhabi International Airport Abu Dhabi International Airport Abu Dhabi International Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Presidential Flight Presidential Flight Airport Authority Airport Authority T1 T3-9 T1 T1 T3-9 T3-9 1 14 1 1 5 34 2012 2011 2011 2010 2009 2008 Installed 11 Installed 11 Installed 10 Installed 09 Installed 08 JXB JXB JXB Al Maktoum Intl Airport Al Maktoum Intl Airport Al Maktoum Intl Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T1 T1 T2-24 1 64 7 2009 2007 2007 Installed 09 Installed 08 Installed 07 DXB DXB DXB DXB DXB Dubai Airport Dubai Airport Dubai Airport Dubai Airport Dubai Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T1 T1 T1 T2-24 T2-24 134 30 2 23 16 2012 2011 2009 2006 2006 Installed 12-13 Installed 11-12 Installed 09 Inst. 07 + GOS + GOS 2007 DXB DXB DXB DXB DXB DXB DXB Dubai Airport Dubai Airport Dubai Airport Dubai Airport Dubai Airport Dubai Airport Dubai Airport DWC Jebel Ali DWC Jebel Ali SHJ SHJ Sharjah International Airport Sharjah International Airport Number of systems in order or in operation in the Middle East Page 76 of 94 Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T2-24 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 10 17 1 3 19 42 27 2006 2005 2004 2004 2003 2003 1998 + GOS 2007 + GOS 2007 + GOS 2007 + GOS 2007 + GOS 2007 + GOS + GOS 2003 Airport Authority T1 T1 12 1 2013 2009 Installed 09 Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-24 T3-9 3 4 2006 2003 Inst. 06 + GOS + GOS 2006 1192 Europe COUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKS Austria VIE VIE Vienna Airport Vienna Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T1-21 Inductive 42 23 2009 19981996 Installed 09 + GOS Belgium BRU Brussel Airport Airport Authority T2-18 33 2013 + GOS LGG Liege Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2012 Bulgaria SOF Sofia Airport Airport Authority T2-18 7 2004 Installed 05 Cyprus LCA LCA LCA Larnaca Airport Larnaca Airport Larnaca Airport Thyssen Thyssen T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 1 3 22 2013 2008 2008 DGS Installation 09 Inst. 08 + GOS Denmark CPH CPH CPH CPH CPH CPH CPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 1 4 7 1 6 6 1 2005 2004 2000 1999 1998 1997 1997 Installed 05 Installed 04 Installed Installed Installed Installed Installed Estonia TLL TLL TLL Tallinn Airport Tallinn Airport Tallinn Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 4 5 3 2008 2007 1999 Installed 08 Installed 07 Installed Finland HEL HEL HEL HEL Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 Inductive 5 11 3 2 2012 2009 2008 1984 Installed 12 Installed 09 Installed 08 HEL Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Airport Authority T2-18 5 2013 DGS OUL Oulu Airport Finavia T2-18 4 2011 + GOS NCE NCE Nice Airport Nice Airport Airport Authority T3-9/T1 T3-9 1+1 2 2011 1998 Installed CDG CDG CDG Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport T3-9 T3-9 T1, T2-24 16 2 4 2011 2012 2009 Installed France Air France T2-24 1 2010 Installed Airport Authority Airport Authority T1 T2-18 1 29 2012 2012 + GOS Frankfurt Airport Airport Authority T1 26 2013 FRA Frankfurt Airport Airport Authority T1 18 2012 FRA Frankfurt Airport Airport Authority T1 2 2011 Hannover Airport Airport Authority T2-18 20 2011 + GOS Leipzig Airport Airport Authority T2-18 6 2012 MUC MUC MUC MUC MUC MUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Airport Authority Flugh. München Flugh. München Flugh. München Flugh. München Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 Inductive 19 42 1 78 64 63 2007 2005 2004 2003 2001 1991 + GOS + FIS Interface Inst. 07 + GOS Inst. 05 + GOS Installed 04 Installed + GOS 23 replaced laser, + GOS Greece ATH Athens Eleftherios Venizelos International Airport Airport Authority T2-18 1 2009 Installed 09 Hungary BUD BUD BUD BUD Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 Inductive 1 6 9 6 2008 2005 1996 1984 GOS Installed 05 + GOS 1999 Replaced by laser Iceland KEF KEF KEF KEF Keflavik Airport Keflavik Airport Keflavik Airport Keflavik Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 2 2 2 8 2007 2005 2004 2000 Installed 07 Installed 05 Installed 04 Installed Italy GOA Genoa Airport GOA Genoa Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 Inductive 5 5 1998 1986 CAG Cagliari Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2001 Installed Replaced by laser + GOS CTA CTA CTA Catania Airport Catania Airport Catania Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Romagnoli T3-9 T3-9 1 6 6 2008 2006 2005 GOS Installed 06 Installed 06 Germany ORY Paris Orly Airport DUS DUS Düsseldorf Airport Düsseldorf Airport FRA HAJ LEJ Page 78 of 94 + GOS + FIS Interface + GOS + FIS Interface + GOS + FIS Interface FCO FCO FCO FCO FCO FCO FCO FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Rome/Fiumicino Airport Rome/Fiumicino Airport Rome/Fiumicino Airport Rome/Fiumicino Airport Rome/Fiumicino Airport Rome/Fiumicino Airport Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport FCO T1 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 1 1 1 3 4 10 12 11 2011 2004-6 2006 2005 2004 2004 2003 1999 Airport Authority Inductive 17 1995 Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority Inductive 16 1991 FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority Inductive 4 1988 FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority Inductive 5 1986 BGY Milan/Bergamo Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 1998 LIN LIN Milan/Linate Airport Milan/Linate Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 Inductive 5 5 2002 1992 MXP MXP MXP MXP MXP Milan/Malpensa Airport Milan/Malpensa Airport Milan/Malpensa Airport Milan/Malpensa Airport Milan/Malpensa Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 Inductive 1 7 10 26 8 2005 2003 1999 1997 1995 TRS Trieste Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2003 Installed Replaced by laser Installed 05 + GOS + GOS + GOS Replaced by laser Installed 03 Lithuania VNO Vilnius Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2007 Installed 07 Netherlands AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport T2-23 4 2008 Installed 08 AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport T2-23 4 2008 Installed 08 AMS AMS AMS AMS AMS AMS AMS AMS AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Siemens Nederland Siemens Nederland Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-23 T2-24 T2-AMS T2-AMS T2-AMS T2-AMS T2-AMS T2-AMS T2-AMS 6 1 1 1 5 1 1 9 25 2007 2005 2005 2004 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Installed 07 Inst. 05 + GOS Installed 05 Installed 05 Installed 04 Installed Installed Installed Installed GOS Installed 06 Installed 06 Installed 04 Installed 04 Installed + GOS: 40 Safedocks Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Installed Norway Poland AMS AMS AMS AMS AMS AMS AMS AMS AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-AMS T2-AMS T2-AMS T2-AMS T2-AMS K K K Inductive 4 1 10 2 12 3 15 1 8 1999 1999 1999 1999 1998 1996 1995 1994 1991 AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority Inductive 8 1989 AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority Inductive 13 1989 AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority Inductive 10 1987 AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority Inductive 1 1980 BGO Bergen/Flesland Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive 11 1987 BOO BOO BOO Bodö Airport Bodö Airport Bodö Airport Avinor Avinor Luftfartsverket T2-13 T2-13 Inductive 2 1 4 2003 2003 1989 FBU Oslo/Fornebu Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive 5 1987 OSL OSL OSL OSL OSL Oslo Gardermoen Airport Oslo Gardermoen Airport Oslo/Gardermoen Airport Oslo/Gardermoen Airport Oslo/Gardermoen Airport Oslo Airport AS Oslo Airport AS Oslo Lufthavn AS Oslo Lufthavn AS Oslo Lufthavn AS T1 T1 T2-21 T2-21 1 1 6 1 34 2013 2013 2011 2005 1996 SVG Stavanger/Sola Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive 9 1986 TOS Tromsö Airport Luftfartsverket T3-9 5 1997 RZE Rzeszów Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2012 WAW Warsaw Airport Airport Authority T3-9 31 2006 WRO Wroclaw Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2012 Page 80 of 94 Installed Installed Installed Installed Installed Installed Installed Installed Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Installed 04 Installed Replaced by laser Replaced by laser SAM DGS Installed 05 + GOS Replaced by laser Installed Installed 06 Romania OTP OTP OTP OTP Bucharest/Otopeni Airport Bucharest/Otopeni Airport Bucharest/Otopeni Airport Bucharest/Otopeni Airport Airport Authority Romairport s.c.a.r.l. GOS T1 T1 T3-9 1 9 9 5 2012 2011 2010 1998 DME Moscow Domodedovo Airport Airport Authority T3-15 29 2003-6 Pulkovo Airport Airport Authority T2-24 8 2012 SVO Sheremetyevo Airport Airport Authority T2-24 /T3-9 72 200712 AER Sochi Airport Airport Authority T3-15 5 2012 VKO Vnukovo Airport Airport Authority T3-15 6 2003 Slovenia LJU Ljubljana Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2007 Installed 07 Spain ALC Alicante International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 17 2009 Installed 09 BCN BCN BCN BCN BCN Barcelona Airport Barcelona Airport Barcelona Airport Barcelona Airport Barcelona Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T3-15 T3-15 1 1 55 27 27 2011 2008 2008 1998 1998 Installed 09 Installed 08 Installed Installed BIO Bilbao Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 2001 Installed FUE FUE Fuerteventura Airport Fuerteventura Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 12 7 2009 2000 Installation 09 Installed LPA Gran Canary Int. Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2013 IBZ Ibiza Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2012 ACE ACE LPA LPA Lanzarote Airport Lanzarote Airport Las Palma Airport Las Palmas Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 1 5 8 15 2002 2001 2012 2003 MAD MAD MAD MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Madrid/Barajas Airport Madrid/Barajas Airport Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 T1-21 Inductive 4 4 2 3 2013 2011 1995 1989 Russia PIE Installed Installed Installed Installed Installed 04 Installed Replaced by MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority Inductive 9 1984 MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority Inductive 1 1982 AGP Airport Authority T2-24 14 2008 laser Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Installed 08 Airport Authority T3-15 5 2007 Installed 07 Malaga Airport MAH Menorca Airport Sweden PMI PMI PMI PMI Palma de Mallorca Airport Palma de Mallorca Airport Palma de Mallorca Airport Palma de Mallorca Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T2-18 T3-9 T3-9 11 1 5 22 2010 2008 2003 1999 Installed 10 Installed 09 Installed 03 Installed SCQ SCQ Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 10 5 2010 2001 Installed 10 Installed OZP Seville Airport Airport Authority T3-15 5 2007 Installed 07 TFS Tenerife South Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2001 Installed VLC Valencia Airport Airport Authority T3-15 3 1999 Installed VGO Vigo Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2008 Installed 09 GOT Gothenburg/Landvetter Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive 2 1985 GOT Gothenburg/Landvetter Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive 10 1977 Replaced by laser Replaced by laser LLA Luleå/Kallax Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive 3 1984 Replaced by laser MMX Malmoe/Sturup Airport MMX Malmoe/Sturup Airport Airport Authority Luftfartsverket T2-24 Inductive 1 4 2004 1992 MMX Malmoe/Sturup Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive 1 1982 ARN ARN ARN ARN ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Luftfartsverket Luftfartsverket Luftfartsverket T2-24 T2-21 T2-22 T1-21 Inductive 4 10 14 20 14 2007 2004 1996 1995 1983 ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive 1 1982 Installed Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Installed 07 Installed 04 + GOS 1997 + GOS 1997 Replaced by laser Replaced by laser Page 82 of 94 Switzerland Turkey SDL SDL Sundsvall/Midlanda Airport Sundsvall/Midlanda Airport Airport Authority Luftfartsverket T2-18 T1-21 3 3 2004 1996 Installed 04 Installed GVA Geneva International Airport Geneva airport T2-24 20 2012 + SafeControl – Apron Management GVA Geneva International Airport AIG SAM 1 2012 ZHR Zurich/Kloten Airport Airport Authority T2-18 70 2003 ZRH Zürich/Kloten Airport Airport Authority Inductive 26 1985 ZRH Zürich/Kloten Airport Airport Authority Inductive 1 1982 ESB ESB ESB Ankara Airport Ankara Airport Ankara Airport T.A.V T.A.V T.A.V T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 1 1 18 2010 2007 2006 Installed 10 + GOS Installed 06 AYT AYT AYT Antalya Airport Antalya Airport Antalya Airport Airport Authority Celebi (BOT) Airport Authority T3-15 T3-9 T3-9 4 16 16 2009 2004 1998 Installed 09 + GOS Installed DLM DLM Dalaman Mugla Airport Dalaman Mugla Airport Airport Authority Civil Aviation Dept. T3-9 Inductive 9 4 2005 1990 Inst. 06 + GOS Replaced by laser ADB ADB ADB Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 Inductive 9 6 6 2006 2005 1987 + GOS Installed 05 IST IST IST IST IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport Istanbul/Ataturk Airport Istanbul/Ataturk Airport Istanbul/Ataturk Airport Istanbul/Ataturk Airport T.A.V T.A.V T.A.V T.A.V DHMI T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 6 1 9 4 1 2010 2009 2006 2003 2000 IST IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport Istanbul/Ataturk Airport DHMI Airport Authority T3-9 Inductive 18 9 1999 1983 Installed 10 Installed 09 Installed 06 Inst. 04 + GOS Test unit + GOS + GOS Replaced BJV Milas Bodrum Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2011 +GOS T3-9 24 2009 Installed 09 Sabiha Gökcen Inst. 2003 + GOS Replaced by laser, + GOS Replaced by laser Ukraine U.K. DOK DOK Donetsk Airport Donetsk Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-15 3 3 2011 2005 LWO Lvov Airport Airport Authority T3-9 10 2012 ABZ ABZ Aberdeen Airport Aberdeen Airport BAA Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 5 2 2008 2006 BHX BHX BHX BHX BHX Birmingham Intl Airport Birmingham Intl Airport Birmingham Intl Airport Birmingham Intl Airport Birmingham Intl Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 2 12 1 1 7 2011 2009 2008 2003 2001 CWL Cardiff Airport T2-18 1 2013 EDI EDI EDI Edinburgh International Edinburgh International Edinburgh International BAA BAA BAA T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 1 15 9 2011 2009 2008 GLA Glasgow Airport Airport Authority T2-18 6 2011 GLA GLA GLA GLA Glasgow Airport Glasgow Airport Glasgow Airport Glasgow Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 8 8 4 7 2009 2008 2007 2006 LHR London Heathrow Airport T2-18 36 2013 LHR London Heathrow Airport T2-18 50 2011 LHR London Heathrow Airport T2-18 57 2010 LHR London Heathrow Airport T2-18 25 2009 LHR London Heathrow Airport T2-18 14 2008 LHR London Heathrow Airport T2-18 3 2007 LHR London Heathrow Airport T2-18 7 2006 LHR London Heathrow Airport T2-18 3 2005 LHR London Heathrow Airport BAA / Airport Authority BAA / Airport Authority BAA / Airport Authority BAA / Airport Authority BAA / Airport Authority BAA / Airport Authority BAA / Airport Authority BAA / Airport Authority T2-18 34 2004 LGW London Gatwick Airport T2-18 18 2010 LGW London Gatwick Airport BAA / Airport Authority BAA / Airport T2-18 61 2008 Page 84 of 94 Installed 08 Installed 06 LGW London Gatwick Airport LGW London Gatwick Airport LTN London Luton Airport STN London Stansted Airport STN London Stansted Airport STN London Stansted Airport MAN Manchester International Number of systems in order or in operation in Europe BAA / Airport Authority BAA / Airport Authority T2-18 62 2007 T2-18 32 2006 Airport Authority T3-9 2 2005 T2-18 24 2013 BAA T2-18 8 2011 BAA T2-18 20 2008 1 2010 2478 Installed 05 Installation 0809 A380 Stand Africa COUNTRY Cameroon Egypt IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKS NSI NSI NSI Yaoundé Nsimalen Intl Airport Yaoundé Nsimalen Intl Airport Yaoundé Nsimalen Intl Airport 0Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 Inductive 3 4 4 2011 2009 1990 Installed 09 CAI CAI Cairo Airport Cairo Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-15 25 5 2006 2001 + GOS 2007 + GOS Installed 08 Ethiopia ADD Bole International Airport FNC T3-9 4 2008 Mali BKO Bamako Bamako Airport T3-9 4 2012 Mauritius MRU SSR International airport/ Mauritius Island Mauritius airport T2-18 6 2012 Morocco CMN Casablanca Airport Airport Authority T3-9 28 2007 New Dakar airport Airport Authority T3-15 6 2012 Durban International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 14 2009 Installation 09 Enfidha Airport Airport Authority T3-9 14 2009 Installation 09 Senegal South Africa Tunisia DUR Number of systems in order or in operation in Africa Page 86 of 94 117 Installed 07 Asia COUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT Azerbaijan GYD GYD Brunei China OWNER Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Baku) Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Baku) TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKS T1 12 2013 DGS GOS 1 2013 5 5 3 6 2011 2001 1997 1987 Bandar Seri Begawan Airport Bandar Seri Begawan Airport Bandar Seri Begawan Airport Bandar Seri Begawan Airport Dept of Civil Aviation Dept of Civil Aviation Airport Authority T2-24 T2-16 T2-18 Inductive PEK PEK PEK Beijing Airport Beijing Airport Beijing Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 T2-24 26 99 1 2008 2007 2005 + GOS + GOS Installed 05 CSX Changsha Airport Airport Authority T2-18 22 2011 + GOS CKG Chongqing Airport Airport Authority T2-18 12 2010 + GOS FOC Fuzhou Changle Airport Airport Authority T2-18 9 2013 + GOS CAN Guangzho Baiyun International Airport, Airport Authority T2-13 22 2008 Installation 0809 HGH HGH HGH Hangzhou Airport Hangzhou Airport Hangzhou Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 T2-13 36 9 5 HFE Hefei New Airport Airport Authority T2-18 5 2011 Hongqiau Airport Authority T2-18 46 2009 Installation 09 HKG HKG HKG HKG HKG Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Gammon/AAHK PCCW/AAHK PCCW Gammon Airport Authority T1 T1 T1 T1 T2-24 19 8 8 19 10 2013 2013 2012 2012 2008 HKG HKG Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-24 T2-24 10 69 1997 1997 + GOS + GOS + GOS + GOS Installation 0809 + GOS + GOS KMG Kunming New Airport Airport Authority T2-18 68 2010 + GOS LHW Lanzhou/Zhongchuan Airport Airport Authority T2-18 9 2013 + GOS BWN BWM BWN BWN Dept of Civil Aviation Installed Installed Replaced by laser 2011-2012 + GOS 2010 + GOS 2002 + GOS India LHW Lanzhou/Zhongchuan Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2001 + GOS MFM Macau Airport Airport Authority T1 4 2011 +GOS NGB Ningbo Airport Airport Authority T2-13 7 2002 + GOS PDG PDG Shanghai/Pudong Airport Shanghai/Pudong Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-18 T3-9 42 28 2006 1998 + GOS + GOS WUH Wuhan Airport Airport Authority T2-13 20 2007 Installed 07 AMD Ahmedabad Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2008 Installed 08 LUH Amritsar Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 IXU Aurangabad Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 BLR Bangalore International Airport BIAL T2-24 17 2012 GOS int with IB + GPU BPL Bhopal - AAI Non-Metro AAI T3-9 2 2013 DGS BBR Bhubneshwar - AAI NonMetro AAI T3-9 2 2013 DGS CCJ Calicut Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2008 Installed 08 IXC Chandigarh Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2012 Installed 13 MAA Chennai Airport Airport Authority T3-9 14 2012 Installed 13 COK Cochin International Airport Cochin Int‟l Limited T3-9 1 2012 COK Cochin International Airport Cochin Int‟l Limited T3-9 1 2011 Installed 12 COK Cochin International Airport Cochin Int‟l Limited T3-9 5 2004 Installed 05 DIB Dibrugarh Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 GAY GAY Gaya Airport Gaya Airport AAI Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 2 2 2013 2008 DGS Installed 08 GOI Goa Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2012 Installed 13 GAU Guwahati Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 Page 88 of 94 IND Indore - AAI Non-Metro AAI T3-9 2 2013 DGS JAI Jaipur Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 KJR Khajurao - AAI Non-Metro AAI T3-9 2 2013 DGS MDR Madurai- AAI Non-Metro AAI T3-9 2 2013 DGS Mangalore Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 BOM Mumbai CSI Airport BOM Mumbai CSI Airport BOM Mumbai CSI Airport T I (A) & II MIAL Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 65 3 19 2010 2007 2004 Installed 08 Installed 04 NAG Nagpur Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 DEL DEL New Delhi Airport New Delhi Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 81 9 2009 2005 Installed 09 Installed 05 HYD HYD New Hyderabad Intl Airport New Hyderabad Intl Airport Hyderabad Intl Hyderabad Intl T3-9 12 2007 2005 HYD New Hyderabad Intl Airport Hyderabad Intl T3-9 13 2005 Installed 07 GOS 2007: 8 Safedocks Installed 06 CCU CCU CCU NSCBIA Kolkata NSCBIA Kolkata NSCBIA Kolkata Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 26 4 1 2012 2004 2003 Installed 13 Installed 05 Installed PNQ Pune Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 RPR Raipur - AAI Non-Metro AAI T3-9 2 2013 DGS RCH Ranchi - AAI Non-Metro AAI T3-9 2 2013 DGS SXR SXR Srinagar Airport Srinagar Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 2 2 2012 2008 Installed 13 Installed 08 SRT Surat - AAI Non-Metro AAI T3-9 2 2013 DGS Tirupati - AAI Non-Metro AAI T3-9 2 2013 DGS Trichy Airport Airport Authority T3 2 2008 IXE TRP TRZ Indonesia Japan TRV Trivandrum Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2008 Installed 08 UDR Udaipur Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 VDR Vadodra - AAI Non-Metro AAI T3-9 2 2013 DGS VNS Varanasi Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 VTZ VTZ Vizag Airport Vizag Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 1 2 2013 2008 DGS Installed 08 BTH BTH Batam Airport Batam Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 2 2 2002 2002 Installed Installed DPS Bali Denpassar Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2000 Installed BEJ BEJ Berau International Airport Berau International Airport Thorindo T3 T3-9 1 1 2012 2010 KDI Kendari Airport Thorindo T3-9 2 2013 DGS UPG UPG Makassar International Airport Makassar International Airport T3-9 T3-9 3 2 2011 2010 Installed 10 SUB SUB Surabaya International Airport Surabaya International Airport T3 T3-9 7 4 2012 2010 + GOS Installed 10 CJIA Central Japan Intl Airport T2-27NRT 23 2002 Inst. 04 + GOS T2-27 8 2013 VDGS 20 2 2008 2006 2000-5 2005 2005 2004 2002 2000 Airport Authority HND Haneda NRT NRT NRT NRT NRT NRT NRT NRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Tokyo/Narita Airport Tokyo/Narita Airport Tokyo/Narita Airport Tokyo/Narita Airport Tokyo/Narita Airport Tokyo/Narita Airport Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T2-27NRT T2-27NRT 12 27 13 6 6 Kazakhstan ALA Almaty Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2003 Installed Malaysia KBR Kota Bharu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2012 Installed Page 90 of 94 T2-27NRT T2-27NRT T2-27NRT T2-27NRT T2-27NRT Installed 09 Installed 06 GOS Installed 05 Installed 05 Installed 04 Installed Installed BKI BKI BKI Kota Kinabalu Airport Kota Kinabalu Airport Kota Kinabalu Airport Wee Hock Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 1 2 3 2012 2000 1998 Installed SBU Sibu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2010 Installed TGG Kuala Terengganu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2006 Installed 07 KCH KCH KCH Kuching Intl Airport Kuching Airport Kuching Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 9 3 4 2006 2005 1998 Installed 06 Installed 05 Installed LBU Labuan Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2006 Installed 07 MDL Mandalay Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 1999 Installed RGN Yangon International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2005 Installed 06 KHI Karachi Airport (JIAAP) Airport Authority T3 6 2011 VDGS MUX Multan International Airport Airport Authority T1 2 2012 VDGS Philippines MNL Manila International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 1997 Installed Russia DYR Anadyr Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2004 Installed 04 DME Moscow/Domodedovo Airport Moscow/Domodedovo Airport Moscow/Domodedovo Airport Moscow/Domodedovo Airport Airport Authority T3-15 8 2006 + GOS Airport Authority T3-15 2 2004 + GOS 2006 Airport Authority T3-15 7 2004 + GOS 2006 East Line Group T3-15 10 2003 + GOS 2006 Moscow/Sheremetyevo Airport Moscow/Sheremetyevo Airport Airport Authority T2-18 30 2007 + GOS Airport Authority T3-9 9 2007 Installed 07 VKO VKO VKO Moscow/Vnukovo Airport Moscow/Vnukovo Airport Moscow/Vnukovo Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 2 3 1 2006 2003 2003 Installed 06 Installed Installed SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Changi Airport Goup GOS 1 2013 GOS serving up to 100 Myanmar Pakistan DME DME DME SVO SVO Singapore Installed DGS units VDGS Installed 06 Installed 06 Installed 06 Installed 05 Installed Installed SIN SIN SIN SIN SIN SIN SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Singapore/Changi Airport Singapore/Changi Airport Singapore/Changi Airport Singapore/Changi Airport Singapore/Changi Airport Singapore/Changi Airport CAG Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority Airport Authority T1-42 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 87 15 9 23 24 21 16 2013 2006 2006 2006 2004 2001 1997 South Korea SEL SEL Seoul/Kimpo Airport Seoul/Kimpo Airport Airport Authority Airport Authority Inductive Inductive 8 2 1987 1985 Sri Lanka CMB Bandarnaike Intl Airport Col. AASL T3-9 9 2006 + GOS Thailand CNX CNX CNX CNX Chiang Mai Airport Chiang Mai Airport Chiang Mai Airport Chiang Mai Airport Gemini Airport Authority Airport Authority Dan-Thai Equipment T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 T2-18 1 2 2 1 2012 2005 2005 2004 Installed 06 Installed 06 Installed DMK Don Muang Airport Bangkok Airport Authority T3-15 6 2001 + GOS HDY HDY Hat Yai Airport Hat Yai Airport Airport Authority T2 T3 3 4 2012 2012 KKC Khonkaen Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2003 Installed KBV Krabi Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05 BKK BKK New Bangkok Intl Airport New Bangkok Intl Airport Airport Authority Bangkok T2-18 T2-18 66 93 2005 2004 + GOS + GOS HKT HKT HKT HKT Phuket Airport Phuket Airport Phuket Airport Phuket Airport T2 7 2012 Dan-Thai Equipment Airport Authority T2-18 T2-18 1 2 2004 1999 Installed 04 Installed PHS Phitsanulok Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05 URT Surat Thani Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05 UTH Udon Thani Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05 Cam Ranh Airport Authority T3-9 1 2009 Installed 09 T3-9 4 2010 Vietnam DAD Da Nang International Airport Page 92 of 94 SGN SGN SGN Ho Chi Minh City Airport Ho Chi Minh City Airport Ho Chi Minh City Airport SAA SAA SAA T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 8 1 1 2005 2002 2001 Inst. 05 + GOS Installed Installed HAN HAN HAN HAN HAN HAN HAN Noibai International Airport Noibai International Airport Noibai International Airport Noibai International Airport Noibai International Airport Noibai International Airport Noibai International Airport ARINC/ACV VDT VTD ShinMaywa Pte Ltd ShinMaywa Pte Ltd ShinMaywa Pte Ltd Airport Authority T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 T1 T3-9 T3-9 T3-9 18 2 1 4 14 1 2 2013 2013 2012 2012 2012 2008 2006 + GOS Tan Son Nhat Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2006 Installed 06 Number of systems in order or in operation in Asia 1745 + GOS + GOS Installed 08 Installed 06 Summary Number of systems in order or in operation in North America 721 Number of systems in order or in operation in South America 165 Number of systems in order or in operation in Oceania 227 Number of systems in order or in operation in the Middle East 1192 Number of systems in order or in operation in Europe 2478 Number of systems in order or in operation in Africa 117 Number of systems in order or in operation in Asia 1745 Total number of systems in order or in operation 6645 Page 94 of 94 Check in to the future How many aircraft can your airport handle today? Can this number be increased without adverse effects on the airport’s safety level? It is a known fact that traffic volume will rise in the foreseeable future. More movements will demand monitoring of the entire airport. Requirements will be sharpened and the development of an integrated system controlling not only ground movements but also air traffic close to the airport is of the highest interest. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) already describes A-SMGCS, Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System, as the answer to the future modern airport need to control the entire airport space in one superior system. To a larger extent than today’s systems, A-SMGCS will rely on automated processes to give both pilots and traffic controllers exact information about positions and directions. Safegate Group delivers complete A-SMGCS solutions already, as well as all vital parts relating to it. Safegate Group can check your airport into the future – today! India [email protected] +91 11 4106 1545 Singapore [email protected] +65 6289 6893 Finland [email protected] +358 (0)20754 7700 Malaysia [email protected] +60 32 011 3522 Spain [email protected] +34 917 157 598 China [email protected] +8610-85275297 France [email protected] +33 (0)1 42 99 60 40 Qatar [email protected] +974 436 9628 UK [email protected] +44 (0)208 573 0384 Dubai [email protected] +971 4 452 75 75 Germany [email protected] +49 (0)4121 464 303 Russia [email protected] +7 495 917 4614 USA [email protected] +1 763 535 92 99 Safegate Group HQ Djurhagegatan 19 SE-213 76 Malmö, Sweden Phone: +46 (0)40 699 17 00 Fax: +46 (0)40 699 17 30 E-mail: [email protected] Brazil [email protected] +55 11 2137 4405 Australia [email protected] +61 (0)3 9720-3233 Austria [email protected] +43 316 429961 Safegate Group offers solutions for increased safety, efficiency and environmental benefits to airports worldwide. The company was founded in 1973 and has its headquarters in Malmö, Sweden. Safegate Group has more than 70 partners around the globe in order to be close to its customers. Earlier members of Safegate Group include Thorn AFL and Idman, who both have over 40 years of experience in airfield lighting solutions for airports and heliports. The latest member of Safegate Group is Avibit, a leading provider of next generation software applications and integration of efficient air traffic control systems. Safegate Group’s complete range of products and services, a “one-stop shop”, provides solutions to customers and airborne travellers around the globe. www.safegate.com