Clicking Here - Spring Creek Chapter of Trout Unlimited

Transcription

SPRING CREEK
Assessment and Restoration
Prepared by
The study area begins
Milesburg
Military Museum,
Spr
in g
and ends at
Cre
ek
at Boalsburg
Milesburg.
Study area = approx. 20 linear miles.
Total Watershed drainage area = 140
sq. miles.
Boalsburg
Military
Museum
NORTH
GOAL 1: WATERSHED ASSESSMENT
Task 1. Geomorphic Characterization
Task 2. Bankfull Discharge Calibration (3 gauged, 4 non-gauged)
Task 3. Reference Reach Data
GOAL 2: RESTORATION PLANNING
Task 1. Prioritization of Sites
Task 2. Demonstration Site
GOAL 3: PERMIT PREPARATION / AGENCY COORDINATION
Goal
Goal 11
Watershed
Assessment
Task 1. Geomorphic Characterization
Task 2. Bankfull Discharge
Calibration (3 gauged, 4 non-gauged)
Task 3. Reference Reach Data
Watershed Assessment
Task 1
Geomorphic
Characterization
- Geomorphic Characterization
Sinuosity Analysis
Confluence with Bald Eagle Creek
Milesburg
Middle
Watershed
Length= 8.15 Miles
Sinuosity= 2.1
continued
McCoy’s dam site
18’ height
Upper
Watershed
Length= 7.29 Miles
Sinuosity= 1.7
North
From AutoCAD drawings
Sinuosity Analysis
Milesburg
Lower
Watershed
Length= 4.62 Miles
Sinuosity= 1.4
Middle
Watershed
Length= 8.15 Miles
Sinuosity= 2.1
North
From AutoCAD drawings
continued
continued
Slope Analysis
. 2%
Middle
Watershed
. 4%
. 3%
. 2%
. 3%
Rockview
. 4%
Benner springs
. 2%
. 3%
. 4%
. 1%
. 2%
PAU sheep farm
PSU sheep farm site
. 4% . 3%
Spring creek park
Bellefonte reach
Gauge station
. 4%
Slab Cabin Run
. 5%
Upper
Watershed
UAJA facility
. 2%
Ref. Reach
Gauge station
Trout Rd. bridge site
Houserville Rd. Bridge site
. 4%
1. 2% Route 28
. 7%
Lemont site
. 3%
. 9%
Quarry
. 5%
. 4% . 5% Cedar run
. 7%
.
322 bypass . 5% 9%
. 4%
. 6%
Military Museum
Reference Reach
Milesburg
Slope Analysis
. 5%
Lower
Watershed
. 2%
McCoy’s dam site 18’ height
Gauge station
. 1%
National slalom
. 4%
training course
. 6% Bellefonte
site
. 7%
. 4%
Spring creek
Logan branch . 3%Falls @ Tallyrand
nature park
. 3% . 4% park 7’ height
Benzie
site
. 5%
residence site
. 4%. 3% Benner pike
Rt. 550
Seibert Rd.. 5% . 4% Paradise rd.
. 3%
roadbed site
. 4%
. 5% Gauge station
Fisherman’s . 6% . 4%
paradise entry. 6% . 4% Ref. reach
. 6%
site
.
. 4% 4%
MIddle
Watershed
. 2%
. 2% . 3%
. 3% Rockview
. 4%
. 4%
. 3%
. 2% Benner springs
continued
Pebble Counts
Pebble Counts
25
120
20
100
80
15
60
10
40
5
20
0
0
1024 - 4096
512 - 1024
362 - 512
256 - 362
180 - 256
128 - 180
90 - 128
64 - 90
45 - 64
32 - 45
22.6 - 32
16 - 22.6
11.3 - 16
8 - 11.3
5.7 - 8
4 - 5.7
2-4
.025 - 2
Particle Ranges (mm)
Cumulative Percent Finer
%
Number of Particles
Sampled
Pebble Count Chart for Houserville
D50 = 82 mm
Series2
Series1
Pebble Counts
Spring Creek
Riffle Pebble Count @ Milesburg Riffle
3/30/200
Particle
Silt and Sand
Very Fine Gravel
Fine Gravel
Fine Gravel
MEdium Gravel
Medium Gravel
Coarse Gravel
Coarse Gravel
Very Coarse Gravel
Very Coarse Gravel
Small Cobble
Small Cobble
Large Cobble
Large Cobble
Small Boulder
Small Boulder
Medium Boulder
Large/Very Large Boulder
Bedrock
TOTAL
Millimeters Total Cumulative
.025 - 2
2-4
4 - 5.7
5.7 - 8
8 - 11.3
11.3 - 16
16 - 22.6
22.6 - 32
32 - 45
45 - 64
64 - 90
90 - 128
128 - 180
180 - 256
256 - 362
362 - 512
512 - 1024
1024 - 4096
4
4
2
2
6
11
9
4
1
8
18
12
12
6
1
0
0
0
0
100
4
8
10
12
18
29
38
42
43
51
69
81
93
99
100
Pebble Counts
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1024 - 4096
512 - 1024
362 - 512
256 - 362
180 - 256
128 - 180
90 - 128
64 - 90
45 - 64
32 - 45
22.6 - 32
16 - 22.6
11.3 - 16
8 - 11.3
5.7 - 8
4 - 5.7
2-4
.025 - 2
Size Classes (mm)
%
Number of Particles
Sampled
Pebble Count Chart for Milesburg
D50 = 62 mm
Pebble Counts
Spring Creek
Riffle Pebble Count @ Axeman Riffle
3/30/200
Particle
Silt and Sand
Very Fine Gravel
Fine Gravel
Fine Gravel
MEdium Gravel
Medium Gravel
Coarse Gravel
Coarse Gravel
Very Coarse Gravel
Very Coarse Gravel
Small Cobble
Small Cobble
Large Cobble
Large Cobble
Small Boulder
Small Boulder
Medium Boulder
Bedrock
TOTAL
.025 - 2
2-4
4 - 5.7
5.7 - 8
8 - 11.3
11.3 - 16
16 - 22.6
22.6 - 32
32 - 45
45 - 64
64 - 90
90 - 128
128 - 180
180 - 256
256 - 362
362 - 512
512 - 1024
1024 - 4096
8
3
4
7
9
6
1
2
8
4
14
16
15
1
2
0
0
0
0
100
8
11
15
22
31
37
38
40
48
52
66
82
97
98
100
Pebble Counts
Pebble Count Chart for Axeman
D50 = 52mm
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
16
14
Cumulative Percent
Finer %
Number of Particles
Sampled
18
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1024 - 4096
512 - 1024
362 - 512
256 - 362
180 - 256
128 - 180
90 - 128
64 - 90
45 - 64
32 - 45
22.6 - 32
16 - 22.6
11.3 - 16
8 - 11.3
5.7 - 8
4 - 5.7
2-4
.025 - 2
Size Classes (mm)
Pebble Counts
Spring Creek
Riffle Pebble Count @Oak Hall Riffle
4/6/00
Particle
Millimeters
Total
Cumulative
Silt and Sand
Very Fine Gravel
Fine Gravel
.025 - 2
2-4
4 - 5.7
6
2
1
6
8
9
Fine Gravel
MEdium Gravel
Medium Gravel
Coarse Gravel
Coarse Gravel
Very Coarse Gravel
Very Coarse Gravel
Small Cobble
Small Cobble
Large Cobble
Large Cobble
Small Boulder
Small Boulder
Medium Boulder
Bedrock
TOTAL
5.7 - 8
8 - 11.3
11.3 - 16
16 - 22.6
22.6 - 32
32 - 45
45 - 64
64 - 90
90 - 128
128 - 180
180 - 256
256 - 362
362 - 512
512 - 1024
1024 - 4096
5
6
3
6
6
4
10
23
14
7
3
1
3
0
0
0
100
14
20
23
29
35
39
49
72
86
93
96
97
100
Pebble Counts
Number of Particles
Sampled
25
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
20
15
10
5
0
1024 - 4096
512 - 1024
362 - 512
256 - 362
180 - 256
128 - 180
90 - 128
64 - 90
45 - 64
32 - 45
22.6 - 32
16 - 22.6
11.3 - 16
8 - 11.3
5.7 - 8
4 - 5.7
2-4
.025 - 2
Size Classes (mm)
%
Pebble Count Chart for Oak Hall
D50 = 65 mm
Pebble Counts
Spring Creek
Riffle Pebble Count @ Houserville Riffle
3/30/200
Particle
Silt and Sand
Very Fine Gravel
Fine Gravel
Fine Gravel
MEdium Gravel
Medium Gravel
Coarse Gravel
Coarse Gravel
Very Coarse Gravel
Very Coarse Gravel
Small Cobble
Small Cobble
Large Cobble
Large Cobble
Small Boulder
Small Boulder
Medium Boulder
Bedrock
TOTAL
.025 - 2
2-4
4 - 5.7
5.7 - 8
8 - 11.3
11.3 - 16
16 - 22.6
22.6 - 32
32 - 45
45 - 64
64 - 90
90 - 128
128 - 180
180 - 256
256 - 362
362 - 512
512 - 1024
1024 - 4096
11
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
4
11
16
16
22
0
7
0
0
0
0
100
11
13
14
16
18
20
22
24
28
39
55
71
93
93
100
Pebble Counts
25
120
20
100
80
15
60
10
40
5
20
0
0
1024 - 4096
512 - 1024
362 - 512
256 - 362
180 - 256
128 - 180
90 - 128
64 - 90
45 - 64
32 - 45
22.6 - 32
16 - 22.6
11.3 - 16
8 - 11.3
5.7 - 8
4 - 5.7
2-4
.025 - 2
Particle Ranges (mm)
%
Number of Particles
Sampled
Pebble Count Chart for Houserville
D50 = 82 mm
Series2
Series1
Task 2
Bankfull Discharge
Calibration
Location Map of bankfull discharge survey areas
- Bankfull Discharge Calibration
Cedar Run
Refer to location map(s).
Boalsburg War Memorial
Quarry
Houserville Gauge
Houserville Road
Axemann
- Bankfull Discharge
Calibration
Milesburg
Task 3
Reference
Reach
Data
- Reference Reach Data
FISHERMAN’S PARADISE
FISHERMAN’S PARADISE
AXEMANN
Reference Reach photo
looking downstream.
Reference Reach photo
looking upstream.
(Axemann site)
(Axemann site)
HOUSERVILLE ROAD
Goal 2
Restoration
Planning
Task 1. Prioritization of Sites
Task 2. Demonstration Site
Restoration Planning
Task 1
Prioritization
of
Sites
- Prioritization of Sites
Potential Restoration Sites
R-13 CLEARWATER RESTORATION SITE (HARRIS)
R-12 LEMONT RESIDENTIAL RESTORATION
(COLLEGE)
R-11 SPRING CREEK PARK (COLLEGE)
R-10 PENN STATE SHEEP PASTURE (COLLEGE)
R-9 HOUSERVILLE ROAD RESTORATION
(COLLEGE)
R-8 TROUT ROAD STREAM RESTORATION
(COLLEGE)
R-7 ROCK ROAD STREAMBANK EROSION
(BENNER)
R-6 FISHERMAN’S PARADISE FLATWATER
(BENNER)
R-5 FISHERMAN’S PARADISE ENTRY (BENNER)
R-4 PARADISE ROAD STABILIZATION (BENNER)
R-3 RESIDENTIAL STREAM RESTORATION
(SPRING)
R SPRING CREEK NATURE PARK (SPRING)
R-2 NATIONAL KAYAK SLALOM COURSE
(BELLEFONTE)
R-1 MCCOY’S DAM SITE (BOGGS)
Gauge station
Reference
reach
Gauge
station
Cross section
Gauge station
Cross section
Cross section
Not to scale
R-13 CLEARWATER
RESTORATION SITE
(HARRIS TWSP)
R-12 LEMONT
RESIDENTIAL
RESTORATION
(COLLEGE TWSP)
R-11 SPRING CREEK
PARK (COLLEGE TWSP)
R-10 PENN STATE SHEEP
PASTURE (COLLEGE TWSP)
Not to scale
R-12 LEMONT RESIDENTIAL
RESTORATION (COLLEGE TWSP)
Residential bank condition
Residential upstream
Residential downstream
Spring Creek bank condition
R-11 SPRING CREEK PARK (COLLEGE TWSP)
R-11 SPRING CREEK PARK (COLLEGE TWSP)
Spring Creek downstream
Spring Creek upstream
R-10 PENN STATE SHEEP
PASTURE (COLLEGE TWSP)
Downstream
Downstream
Upstream
Upstream
R-9 HOUSERVILLE
ROAD RESTORATION
(COLLEGE TWSP)
R-8 TROUT ROAD
STREAM
RESTORATION
(COLLEGE TWSP)
R-7 ROCK ROAD
STREAMBANK
EROSION (BENNER TWSP)
Not to scale
Bank condition
Downstream at structure
Downstream at structure
Upstream from bridge
Upstream
Upstream at structure
Bank condition upstream
Upstream
R-8 TROUT ROAD STREAM
RESTORATION (COLLEGE TWSP)
Downstream
Bank condition
Upstream
R-7 ROCK ROAD
STREAMBANK EROSION
Downstream
R-6 FISHERMAN’S
PARADISE
FLATWATER
(BENNER TWSP)
R-5 FISHERMAN’S
PARADISE
ENTRY (BENNER TWSP)
R-4 PARADISE
ROAD
STABILIZATION
(BENNER TWSP)
Not to scale
R-6 FISHERMAN’S PARADIS
(BENNER TWSP)
Downstream
Upstream
Downstream
R-5 FISHERMAN’S
PARADISE ENTRY (BENNER TWSP)
R-4 PARADISE ROAD
STABILIZATION (BENNER TWSP)
Downstream
Upstream
R-3 RESIDENTIAL
STREAM
RESTORATION
(SPRING TWSP)
R-2 NATIONAL
KAYAK SLALOM
COURSE
(BELLEFONTE)
R-1 MCCOY’S DAM
SITE (BOGGS TWSP)
Bellefonte PA – 7.5 minute USGS Quadrangle Sheet
1962, Photo-revised 1971
Not to scale
R-3 RESIDENTIAL
STREAM RESTORATION (SPRING TWSP)
Upstream
Downstream
R-2 NATIONAL KAYAK
SLALOM COURSE
(BELLEFONTE)
Downstream
Upstream
R-1 MCCOY’S DAM SITE (BOGGS TWSP)
Upstream
McCoy’s dam structure
Task 2
Demonstration Site
- Demonstration Site
R
SPRING CREEK
NATURE PARK
(SPRING TWSP)
Demonstration Site
Bio-Assessment Prepared by Penn State University
(Dr. Robert Carline and students)
Electro-Fish-Trout Inventory
Fish-Trout Inventory
An Assessment of the Fish Community in Spring Creek, Bellefonte
submitted to
Landstudies, Inc.
141 West High Street
Bellefonte, PA 16823
prepared by
Carline and John Ryder
Pennsylvania Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
Merkle Laboratory
University Park, PA 16802
August 2000
(see continuation) (continuation)
Personnel from the Pennsylvania Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit completed a
mark-recapture estimate of wild trout on June 19 and 21, 2000 in a 427-m reach of Spring Creek
along property owned by Sutton Industries and Spring Township. On June 29, 2000 a 160-m
portion of this reach was sampled to provide an overview of fish species composition.
Methods
On June 19, a marking run was completed using a T&J electrofisher with an output of
250V Direct Current. All trout collected were placed in cages and then processed. Fish were
measured to the nearest millimeter, marked with caudal fin clips and a sub-sample was weighed
to the nearest gram. Fish were immediately returned to the stream. Two days later the stream
reach was electrofished again to determine the ratio of unmarked fish to fin-clipped fish.
To ascertain species composition, a 160- m portion of the reach was electrofished on
June 29 using a Coffelt Mark-10 Backpack electrofisher. Shallow water habitat and near shore
areas were sampled for 80 m along the left stream bank (looking upstream). Sampling continued
across the stream channel at a riffle and proceeded upstream 80 m along the right hand stream
bank.
(see continuation)
(continuation)
Results
A mark-recapture population estimate revealed the presence of a dense population of
wild brown trout (Salmo trutta). A surface area of 0.73 ha resulted in a biomass estimate of 257
kg/ha. Trout smaller than 149 mm were not included in the population estimate. These fish were
hatched this year. A subsample was measured to determine their length distribution.
Sampling for species composition yielded 25 white sucker (Catostomus commersoni),
four cutlips minnow (Exoglossum maxillingua), three longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae),
four tesselated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi), two fantail darter (Etheostoma flabellare), and one
slimy sculpin (Cottus cognatus). Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and blacknose dace
(Rhinichthys atratulus) were not sampled during this particular effort but were observed during
the population estimate.
Discussion
This section of Spring Creek supports an exceptionally dense population of wild brown
trout, 257 kg/ha. In 1988, Unit personnel estimated trout densities in 12 reaches of Spring Creek
between Milesburg and Boalsburg. Trout biomass ranged from 42 to 245 kg/ha and averaged
145 kg/ha. Hence, this section supported a trout population substantially larger than that found
in 1988.
(see continuation)
(continuation)
In July 2000, personnel from our Unit and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission
estimated trout densities in 11 sections of Spring Creek. Results from these surveys are not yet
available, though it is likely that they will be available in late fall 2000. At that time, we will be
able to compare the trout density in this section of the stream with the rest of Spring Creek.
The high density of trout in this section is probably due to the quality of the habitat and
the amount of spawning gravels from which juvenile trout are produced. The habitat consisted of
long pools with depths up to 1.5 m, generally stable banks, ample bank cover, and large riffles.
This quality and diversity of habitat is typical of excellent trout streams.
Unit personnel conducted a redd (trout spawning site) survey of Spring Creek from
Milesburg to Boalsburg in November 1999. For survey purposes, the stream was divided into 16
segments. This section lies within the segment bounded by the lamb Street Bridge and the
Highway 550 bridge. A total of 134 redds were counted in 1999 for a density of 57 redds/km,
the second highest density among the 16 stream segments. Previous studies in Spring Creek have
shown that densities of age-1 and older trout are well correlated with redd densities. Segments
that support few adult trout typically have few redds because the availability of good spawning
substrate is limited. Thus, low redd numbers results in low adult numbers, rather than vice versa.
Demonstration Site
Concrete dam slab
Pebble counts in the field.
Downstream view
Upstream view
Existing –
plan view,
longitudinal profile,
cross sections
Existing –
plan view,
cross sections
Existing –
plan view,
cross sections
Existing –
plan view,
cross sections
Existing –
plan view,
cross sections
Existing –
plan view,
cross sections
Goal
Goal 33
Permit Preparation /
Agency
Coordination
Date:
April 10, 2000
TO: Tim Ziegler, Trout Unlimited
Darlene Weener, Clearwater Conservancy
Tom Pluto, US Army Corps of Engineers
Al Sever, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP)
Gary Byron , PADEP
Fran Koch, PADEP
Bonnie Crosby, United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Ron Tibbot, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PAFBC)
Dave Keller, PAFBC
FROM: Mark Gutshall, LandStudies
RE: Request for Pre-Application Meeting
Spring Creek Watershed - Stream Restoration Permit
A pre-application meeting is being requested for stream restoration activities on Spring
Creek, Centre County. The purpose of the meeting is to present several stream restoration
projects within the Spring Creek Watershed. The stream restoration permit and one of the stream
restoration projects is being funded through a grant administered by PADEP.
The objectives of the meeting are:
(see continuation)
(continuation)
1.Identify proposed restoration project sites.
2.Establish an understanding between the review agency and the applicant of permit
documentation requirements.
3.Present background fluvial geomorphic watershed data including:
•Reference reach data (2 sites)
•USGS gauge datum (3 sites)
•Non-USGS gauge datum (4 sites)
•Regional Curve for bankfull discharge
1.Present conceptual restoration plans for Slaughterhouse Road project
2.Present Watershed Assessment data
3.Tour restoration sites
A tentative date between May 8-11 is being requested. I will follow up to confirm scheduling. I
can be reached at [email protected] or 717-627-4440.
E:\PROJECTS\W-SHED\W-011-99 - Spring Creek\Pre-app coordination.doc
Stream Restoration Permit: Spring Creek Watershed
Pre-application Meeting
Thursday, May 11,2000
9:00 AM-Noon
Clearwater Conservancy
2555 N. Atherton St., State College
1. Introduction (office)
•Objectives of meeting
1.Watershed Assessment Results (office and field)
•Overview of data collection (bankfull calibration at gauges, reference reaches)
•Purpose of data collection
•Interim results of data collection
(see continuation)
(continuation)
3.Restoration Sites (field)
•Identified and prioritized
•Samples of previous stream restoration permit submission and Erosion and Sedimentation Plans
4. Discussions – open throughout meeting
To:
Tim Ziegler, Trout Unlimited
Darlene Weener, Clearwater Conservancy
Tom Pluto, US Army Corps of Engineers
Al Sever, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP)
Gary Bryon, PADEP
Fran Koch, PADEP
Bonnie Crosby, United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Ron Tibbott, Pa Fish & Boat Commission (PAFBC)
Dave Keller, PAFBC
Jeffrey Hartranft, PADEP
Brian Auman, LandStudies, Bellefonte Office
From:
Mark Gutshall, Project Manager
Date:
May 31, 2000
To: Craig Russell
PADEP
309 North Fifth Street, Suite D
Sunbury, PA 17801-2003
From:
Mark Gutshall, LandStudies
RE: Spring Creek
Pre-application meeting
Thank you for participating at the May 11 pre-application meeting regarding stream
restoration projects on Spring Creek, Centre County.
The following is a summary of comments/concerns that were discussed, addressed, or
voiced at this meeting.
(see continuation)
(continuation)
•Minimization of sediment involved in the construction of the project.
•Being sure that Spring Township provides written authorization for the stream restoration
as it relates to flood flows.
•Sediment concerns associated with removal of the “dam” at the SMS property.
•Staging and access of equipment, machinery, and materials.
•Permit format to include one specific restoration site and 12 future stream restoration sites.
Initial submission to handle public notice requirements and required data addendums to
accompany subsequent restoration approvals. Documentation format to be similar to Lititz Run
Watershed permit approved by agencies.
•Use of sod matting for bank stabilization from adjacent wetland and non-wetland areas.
7. Biological (fish and macroinvertebrates) indicators to be monitored pre- and post
construction.
If there are any additional comments please forward them to my attention prior to June 15.
Thank you.
E:\PROJECTS\W-SHED\W-011-99 - Spring Creek\Pre-app comments.doc
Mr. Tim Ziegler
Spring Creek Trout Unlimited
133 W. Blade Drive
Pennsylvania Furnace, PA 16865
814-861-3494
[email protected]
Darlene Weener
Clearwater Conservancy
PO Box 163
State College, PA 16804
814-237-0400
[email protected]
Tom Pluto
US ACOE
3947 South Atherton
Suite A
814-466-7756
Gary Byron
PA DEP
208 W. Third Street, Suite 101
Williamsport, PA 17001-6448
570-321-6532
[email protected]
Fran Koch
Bureau of Watershed Conservation
PO Box 8555
Harrisburg, PA 17105
717-783-2289
[email protected]
Bonnie Crosby
Kevin Abbey
Paul Dembowski
US Fish & Wildlife Service
Abbey Associates
PADEP
Dept of Interior
2310 West Gatesburg Road
208 West Third Street, Suite 101
315 W. Allen Street Suite 322
Warriors Mark, PA 16877
814-234-4090
Andy Otten
Mike Welch
Ron Tibbott
PA Fish & Boat Commission
450 Robinson Lane
Bellefonte, PA 16823-9616
814-359-5145
[email protected]
Francis Al Sever
PADEP
570-327-3700
[email protected]
Dave Keller
PA Fish & Boat Commission
450 Robinson Lane
814-359-5158
Jeffrey L. Hartranft
PA DEP Southcentral Region
909 Elmerton Avenue
Harrisburg, PA 17110-8200
717-705-4807
[email protected]
Andropogan Associates, LTD
PADEP
374 Shurs Lane
Philadelphia, PA 19128
Jim Coslo
Centre County Conservation District
414 Holmes Avenue, Suite 4
Craig Russell
PADEP
309 North Fifth Street, Suite D
Sunbury, PA 17801-2003
Steve Webster
PADEP
CD’s
and
Video
Additional
Deliverables
Prepared by

Clicking Here - Spring Creek Chapter of Trout Unlimited

Transcription

Similar documents