Administration - European Pensions
Transcription
Administration - European Pensions
European Pensions November 2015 Scheme management: Investment: Scheme management: Investment: Administration Commodities Costs Property The need for a balance between automation and human intervention Why some investors are now sitting on the sideline in this space Cost control and efficiency within the European pension fund space Why the asset class is growing in popularity amongst pension schemes A battle ahead the need for Italy to reduce reliance on the first pillar and grow the second Plus: News round-up Case study: Fondenergia www.europeanpensions.net 17 Investment shocks - how funds should react to surprises in the market 44 capItal markets unIon - the impact on pension funds Interview: Irish MEP Brian Hayes Pension board relationships See page 20-21 for Pensioni & Welfare Italia Awards 2015 winners NEW CATEGORIES ANNOUNCED Last chance to enter! Free ente to r The deserving winners will be announced at the Pensions Age Awards Gala Dinner & Ceremony Thursday 25 February 2016 London Marriott Hotel Grosvenor Square ENTER NOW www.pensionsage.com/awards For the latest news and updates follow us @PAPensionAwards #PensionsAgeAwards Overall Sponsor Gold Sponsors Organised by Editorial Comment Editor in chief Francesca Fabrizi +44 20 7562 2409 Editor Laura Blows +44 20 7562 2408 Deputy Editor Adam Cadle +44 20 7562 2410 News Editor Lauren Weymouth +44 20 7562 2437 Senior Reporter Natalie Tuck +44 20 7562 2407 Commercial John Woods +44 20 7562 2421 Sam Ridley +44 20 7562 4386 Alessandra Atria +44 20 7562 2438 Design & Production Matleena Lilja +44 20 7562 2403 Accounts Marilou Tait Circulation [email protected] + 44 1635 588 861 Management John Woods, Managing Director Mark Evans, Publishing Director Subscription rates: £198 or €299 per annum Putting up a fight “ The European Union would not pass its own stress test” was the message of the day delivered by the UK’s former Conservative leader William Hague at the National Association of Pension Funds 2015 conference recently - a message that could easily have suppressed the appetites of many delegates looking forward to their conference lunch. Hague, who stood down as an MP in May this year, told delegates that the threats to the British economy are cyclical and external, rather than policy based, and that if EU financial institutions were subjected to a stress test against the challenges likely to arise over the next few years, they would not survive. The global financial crisis of 2007-2008 certainly tested financial institutions such as pension funds and I would hope that lessons have been learnt as to how to combat future threats of that nature. At a time when newspapers and other media outlets are dominated by talks of external terrorist threats from the likes of ISIL, financial threat coverage often falls into the background and whilst Hague’s message might not fill I BELIEVE EIOPA’S PENSION the individual with a great deal of optimism, it is one which should not STRESS TEST, LAUNCHED be ignored. EARLIER THIS YEAR, IS NOT It is for that reason that I believe EIOPA’s pension stress test, launched NECESSARILY A BAD MOVE earlier this year, is not necessarily a bad move, despite receiving criticism from some sections of the industry. Covering both DB and DC schemes, the aim of the stress test is to assess the resilience of IORPs and their pension schemes to adverse market scenarios and a longevity scenario. It is hoped the stress test will provide insight and raise awareness of the occupational pensions’ sector risks and vulnerabilities. At the time EIOPA chair Gabriel Bernardino said pension funds are experiencing a “challenging environment” with low interest rates and rising life expectancy and that is certainly still the case. Results of the stress test are expected in December this year. The report will certainly be an interesting read as to how prepared IORPs across Europe are, in dealing with the financial stresses set to arise over the next few years. www.europeanpensions.net 6th floor, 3 London Wall Buildings, London, EC2M 5PD ISSN 1753-5859 All rights reserved. The views expressed in this journal are not necessarily those of the publishers. Member of the ABC, the PPA and the NAPF. Adam Cadle, Deputy Editor European Pensions has agreements with several associations to reach their membership. For details contact john. [email protected] www.europeanpensions.net 03 In this issue Contents November 2015 38 23 37 General features 38 Balance of power With heightened funding concerns, tensions could be set to rise across European pension boards as traditional power bases are challenged, finds Marek Handzel 41 Robots versus humans Nick Martindale explores the need for a balance between automation and human intervention within pensions administration 46 A question of cost Edmund Tirbutt assesses levels of cost in the European pension fund space and whether schemes will place greater importance in this area in the near future 04 www.europeanpensions.net Investment features Country spotlight 37 Out of the blue The world’s financial markets were rocked recently by the Volkswagen scandal and the crashing of the Chinese stock market. Peter Carvill explores what funds could and should do in the wake of such events 23 A battle ahead David Adams explores the need for Italy to reduce reliance on the first pillar and grow the second, while navigating the tricky arena of intergenerational fairness 30 A stable footing Andrew Williams analyses the reasons why European pension funds are increasingly turning their attention towards property and what areas within the asset class are being closely examined 26 Case study: Fondenergia David Adams speaks to Fondenergia director Alessandro Stori, an Italian pension fund for workers in the energy sector currently managing €1.8 billion of assets for over 40,000 members In this issue Contents 41 09 Interviews Regulars 36 Solving Europe’s pension puzzle As lead negotiator on the IORP II Directive, Irish MEP Brian Hayes has said Europe faces a “demographic crisis”, which is why it is necessary to update the current directive for future generations. Natalie Tuck speaks to him about his proposals for the new directive 06 News 14 Appointments Regulation 16 Industry column: Europe Economics 28 The meaning of MiFID II Michael Hufton explains just what MiFID II means and why it matters 48 Pension talk 50 Directory 42 www.europeanpensions.net 05 Investment News Pension funds interrogate major car makers on emissions standards EuropEan pEnsion funds form a coalition to invEstigatE car makErs' position on Emissions lEgislation following thE vw scandal written by: lauren weymouth s and disclosure of activities by the European Automobile ome of Europe’s largest pension Manufacturers' Association (ACEA). funds and investors have formed Analysis by InfluenceMap recently found these areas a coalition to probe into the lobbying to be the main issues in which companies do not provide position major car manufacturers sufficient reporting detail, and areas that could be crucial take on emissions legislation. for investors in predicting future crises like the one at VW. According to ShareAction, the InfluenceMap executive director Dylan Tanner said: investors, which include Swedish “When it comes to the engagement underway between National Pension Funds AP2, AP3, a company and the key regulations affecting it, there AP4 and AP7, the Environment are often sparse details available to investors. The Agency Pension Fund and AXA Volkswagen case highlights the need for a much greater Investment Managers, have written disclosure regime, both of the company's specific letters to request detailed information position on key legislation and its involvement in the from Volkswagen, BMW, Honda, policy process.” Daimler, General Motors, Ford, Fiat, The world’s fifth largest pension fund, ABP, has Peugeot and Toyota. subsequently announced it intends to review its investment The letters, which ask for specific portfolio in a bid to follow a new sustainability policy. details on the companies’ positions The Dutch pension fund, which currently invests more on proposed EU CO2 emissions than €30bn in fossil fuels, compared to just about €1bn in standards and US CAFE efficiency renewable energy, has launched its new investment policy, and GHG-related standards, come which would apply to more than 4,000 companies in which in the wake of the recent VW it owns stakes. scandal, which exposed the ABP said it will review its entire portfolio of stock and automobile giant’s use of bonds by 2020 and will divest from any companies software to beat emissions that don’t at least try to meet sustainability criteria. and air quality tests. "The VW case However, in response to the fund's 'green' The latest expose has highlights the need for move, campaigners urged ABP to completely triggered a broader axe all fossil fuel investments, which are scrutiny of the a greater disclosure regime, currently helping to drive the climate crisis. relationship between both of the company's specific “The ABP has now put climate change on automobile companies position on key legislation their agenda but if you want to be sustainable, and regulators, as you cannot continue to invest in the companies legislative standards are and its involvement in that are pushing us into climate chaos,” ABP currently being debated the policy process" co-founder of the Fossil Free campaign Vatan in the EU and US on Hüzeir said. transport emissions. “The majority of fossil fuel reserves cannot be burnt to ShareAction has revealed the avoid catastrophic climate change. Fossil fuel companies are letters also call for further information grossly overvalued and we already see them lose value. ABP about the companies’ interactions with is not transparent in this regard but similar pension funds in the regulatory process on these the UK and USA have lost billions on their fossil fuel standards, their spending on trade holdings last year.” associations, and ask for greater clarity 06 www.europeanpensions.net Ratings News o EU countries voted as having the best pension systems in the world ver half of the top 10 best pension systems in the world are European countries, with Denmark and the Netherlands leading the way in first and second place. new report reveals five out of ten of the world's best Denmark and the Netherlands were pension systems belong to european countries both voted as having the best pension systems in the world by the 2015 written by: lauren weymouth and adam cadle Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index, both becoming the only two countries to have ever scored an ‘A’ grade for their pensions savings culture. The index ranked Denmark as the best system globally, with an overall score of 81.7 out of a possible 100, followed by the Netherlands with 80.5 – 80 being the score needed to earn an ‘A’ grade. This can be compared to the "We know UK, which narrowly missed a ‘C’ grade, by scoring a there is no perfect 65, which is the system that can be applied minimum score required to enter the ‘B’ grading universally, but there are bracket. Sweden, many common features that Switzerland and Finland world to learn from the most adequate and however, obtained more sustainable systems. We know there is no perfect can be shared for better comfortable places within system that can be applied universally, but there outcomes" the top 2-10 pension systems are many common features that can be shared for in the world, scoring 74.2, 74.2 better outcomes," Knox said. and 73 respectively. Earlier in October, the EU's Social Protection Committee’s Denmark's place at the top for the 2015 Pension Adequacy Report revealed Europe’s pension fourth consecutive year was attributed to systems can be expected to deliver adequate pensions to its "well-funded pension system with future generations of retirees, provided member states pursue good coverage, high level of assets and strong policies to enable as many workers as possible to stay contributions, provision of adequate in jobs until they reach the statutory pension age. benefits and a private pension system The report said employment policies should provide more with developed relations". possibilities for older workers to stay longer in the labour The scores produced were dependent market and pension systems must also provide protection for on three different criteria: sustainability, those who are unable to remain in the labour market long integrity and adequacy. Based on these enough to build up sufficient pension entitlements. factors, Denmark scored the highest EU commissioner for employment, social affairs, skills mark for sustainability, Finland for and labour mobility Marianne Thyssen said: “Recent pension integrity and Australia for adequacy. reforms have focused on ensuring pensions for a much larger Mercer senior partner and author of older population without destabilising public finances. the report David Knox said “This can only be achieved if the great majority of people implementing the right reform to are offered enough opportunities to keep on working until improve pension systems and provide they reach the regular retirement age that is set to rise across financial security in retirement “has the EU. Our priority must be to invest enough in people’s never been more critical for both skills and health to enable them to use such opportunities. individuals and societies”. We also need solidarity with those who cannot and may “The MMGPI is an important need to rely on unemployment or invalidity benefits before reference for policy makers around the reaching the retirement age.” www.europeanpensions.net 07 Country News t Irish pension fund levy to end in 2015 he Irish pension fund levy will not continue into 2016, Irish Minister of Finance Michael Noonan has IAPF wArns government to 'work hArd' to restore the announced. dAmAge done to sAvers' conFIdence by the levy In the Budget 2015, Noonan said the pension levy was no longer needed. The written by: natalie tuck levy was introduced in 2011, shortly after Noonan took office, to finance the reduced rate of VAT and other measures in the jobs initiative, which was proposed to kick-start the Irish economy. Noonan had previously said the reduction in VAT for tourism services to 9 per cent could not have been achieved if it were not for the pension levy. “The pension fund levy has done its job and is no longer needed to fund the 9 per cent VAT rate because it is more than made up by increased activity and employment," he said. "I can confirm “So I can confirm that the remaining pension fund the remaining levy of 0.15 per cent pension fund levy of introduced for 2014 the government trying to encourage more people and 2015 will to save for retirement. The government will have 0.15 per cent introduced for end this year and to work hard to restore confidence in pension 2014 and 2015 will end this not apply in 2016. savings to recover some of this damage,” he said. year and not apply The original 0.6 per cent Moriarty’s comments come amid research levy ended in 2014." finding that almost half of the Irish population, in 2016" Initially the levy was set at a 43 per cent, have no pension of their own or rate of 0.6 per cent a year on the spousal pension. value of pension assets. However, this A survey by Friends First revealed that although household was increased to 0.75 per cent in 2014 finances have improved for two in five households, it has and reduced to 0.15 per cent in 2015. not been reflected in the uptake of private pensions. Private It was originally meant to end at the pension ownership remains at 46 per cent of adults. close of 2014 but was extended. Furthermore, 44 per cent of those without a private Irish Pension Fund Association chief pension are planning on living off the state pension alone executive Jerry Moriarty said the IAPF in retirement. welcomes the scrapping of the pensions Despite this, the research showed that almost eight in levy but said the “damage” caused by 10 respondents were not confident of having sufficient it is likely to last for some time. income in retirement. “Over €2.3bn was removed by the Friends First pensions and investments director Simon government from pension savings over Hoffman said the postponement of financial planning for the four years of its existence. It has the future is still a concern. reduced people's savings and in some “We have an ageing population and the number set to cases pensions in payment. This was rely on the state pension as their sole retirement is around at a time when most pension funds the 890,000 mark. are underfunded, with DB schemes “This will put a huge strain on the state in the coming struggling to deal with deficits and years as those without a private pension may struggle DC savings not sufficient to provide financially in their retirement and will be depending for a comfortable retirement. on a pension that is less than the current minimum wage,” “It was also at complete odds with he said. 08 www.europeanpensions.net Country News Draft Greek Budget includes further pension cuts the drAFt budget hAs hInted At cuts to tAxes And exPense cuts For PensIon Funds written by: lauren weymouth t he draft Greek Budget for 2016, which was submitted in parliament on 5 October, includes more cuts to Greek pensions. According to news source Tovima, the Budget includes additional taxes and expense cuts for pension funds, which will subsequently result in further cuts to the pension system for savers. Fiscal targets revised by the Minister of Finances Euclid Tsakalotos now mean the government is aiming for a €418m deficit (0.24 per cent of GDP) for the general government budget in 2015, while in 2016 the draft calls for a €894m primary surplus (0.5 per cent of GDP). The government is now set to focus its intervention on tax policy and social insurance due to a 1.3 per cent chance of recession and 25.8 per cent unemployment rates for 2016. The interventions in social insurance will thus focus on gradually increasing the retirement age and penalties for early retirements. Like most countries in Europe, the Greek government has increased the retirement age for its citizens. It is expected the retirement age will increase from 62 to 67 by 2022, but this increase will not apply to those already receiving a pension by June 2015. In addition, Minister of Labour Georgios Katrougalos announced in July people will no longer be able to take their pensions early, except for those with exemptions relating to unhealthy professions and parents with disabled children. The draft also includes provisions to increase pensioner contributions for healthcare and changes so that lump sum payments are made so the sustainability of each pension fund is maintained. In August, as part of the deal to secure the third bailout pensions were cut by as much as €50 and were backdated to July. Lufthansa cabin crew reject airline's retirement proposals An Agreement Is yet to be reAched between luFthAnsA And unIons rePresentIng Its emPloyees written by: natalie tuck t alks between Lufthansa and UFO, the union representing airline staff, have failed to reach an agreement. The airline has proposed an offer that would allow cabin crew to retire at 55 but with a significantly reduced pension. Employees would need to work until 65 in order to obtain the full pension, Reuters has reported. As part of this cabin crew would receive a one-off payment of €2,000 each and those who have been with the company since at least 2012 would get a pay rise of 1.7 per cent in 2016 and 2017. The company said the low interest rates mean it can no longer afford the pension scheme, which cost it €3.6bn last year and allowed workers to retire at 55. Earlier this year the company reported a pension deficit increase of almost €3bn as a result of pension liabilities rising by 41.2 per cent over the first quarter of 2015. During the first three months to March this year, pension obligations went up after the low interest rate environment forced the airline to cut its discount rate by almost 1 per cent. Liabilities rose by 41.2 per cent, which compares to December when a discount rate of 2.6 per cent was still applied after the rate was cut to 1.7 per cent. However, UFO head Nicoley Baublies, which represents around 19,000 flight attendants, said the offer had “failed completely” and did not include important points on job security. "We will not continue negotiations. Another extension is not going to help," he said in a video response posted on the internet. He said UFO still needed to analyse Lufthansa's offer in detail before deciding how to proceed. www.europeanpensions.net 09 International News News in brief ■ The Japanese government pension investment fund is planning to start buying into high-yielding overseas junk bonds to boost investment performance. according to the Asian Review, the world’s largest public pension fund is set to announce its choice of companies for managing the investment. around 20 financial institutions are expected to make the list. ■ The Indian retirement system has been ranked last in the global pension index, according to mercer. india’s index value fell from 43.5 in 2014 to 40.3 in 2015, primarily because of a recent review conducted by the economic intelligence unit that showed a material reduction in its household savings rates. ■ the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) has opened its first investment office in india. this is the fund’s seventh office abroad. the cppib plans to double india weightage over the next eight years. according to the business standard, india investments are currently 1 per cent of its global assets and over the next seven-eight years it could be doubled to 2 per cent. ■ five New York City union pension systems have announced plans to invest around $150m in affordable housing in the city, the afl-cio housing investment trust has said. according to People’s World, the money is being sent to the hit to create $1bn in total investment in the housing in all five boroughs. union labour is set to build the housing in an economically targeted investment programme. 10 www.europeanpensions.net California pensions to divest from coal public pension funds are forced to divest from fossil fuels Written by: lauren Weymouth c alifornian governor Jerry Brown has signed a new bill forcing two of the largest public pension funds in the US to divest from any company profiting from fossil fuels. The new law will affect the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System, which have $58m and $6.7m respectively. According to The American Interest, California State Assembly assistant leader Kevin de León pitched the measure to push for more secure and environmentally friendly investments. “Coal is a losing bet for California retirees and it’s also incredibly harmful to our health and the health of our environment,” he said in a statement. Following the announcement, 350.org executive director May Boeve said this is a “big win” for the movement, demonstrating the “growing strength” of divestment campaigns around the world. “California’s step today gives us major momentum, and ramps up pressure on state and local leaders in New York, Massachusetts, and across the US to follow suit—and begin pulling their money out of climate destruction too,” she said. The move comes at a time when pension funds are being increasingly pushed to help combat climate change by pulling out of investments that hinder it in anyway. Momentum has been kicking off around the world, notably across Europe. China to allow state pension fund to invest in stocks by 2016 govt confirms it is Working hard to reach 2016 goal Written by: lauren Weymouth c hina’s plans to allow its state pension fund to invest in stocks could happen as early as 2016, government officials have said. According to the Global Times, experts have said the move would lay a solid foundation for the long-term stability of the domestic stock markets. Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security spokesman Li Zhong said these funds are now being held by provinces, cities and counties and it is important they be aggregated at the provincial level before any such investment could be carried out. However, the MOHRSS and the Ministry of Finance are reportedly drawing up a procedure for this process now. “We’ll make the best use of our time and work toward the goal of implementing pension fund investment in 2016,” Li said. Plans to allow pension funds to move into the stock market have been intiated by the Chinese government to help increase share prices after they fell by almost 30 per cent since June. Pension funds were previously only allowed to invest in treasury bonds and bank deposits, but had almost 3.5trn yuan in assets at the end of last year. Pensions Diary Diary dates 2015/16 The latest events occurring across the European pensions space IrIsh pensIon awards 2015 25 November 2015 The Shelbourne Dublin, Ireland pensIons age awards 2016 25 February 2016 London Marriott Hotel Grosvenor Square, London pLsa Investment conference 9-11 March 2016 EICC Edinburgh, Scotland Now in its fourth year, the Irish Pension Awards, in association with European Pensions, aim to give recognition to those pension funds and providers who have proved their excellence, professionalism and dedication to maintaining high standards of Irish pension provision. The event will honour the best serving pension funds, investment firms, consultancies and pension providers. europeanpensions.net/irishawards The Pensions Age Awards, which are now in their third successful year, aim to reward both the pension schemes and the pension providers across the UK that have proved themselves worthy of recognition in these increasingly challenging economic times. The awards will take place at London’s prestigious Marriott Hotel on Grosvenor Square and are free to enter. pensionsage.com/pa/awards Formerly the NAPF Investment Conference, this will explore the UK’s relationship with the rest of Europe, and other issues to bring some clarity and certainty as to how schemes can best manage their short-term pressures whilst also being responsible long-term investors delivering what their scheme members want and need. Over 900 professionals are set to attend. plsa.co.uk Not to miss... Iapf annUaL governance conference 3 December 2015 Dublin Castle, Dublin, Ireland www.iapf.ie/events eUropean pensIons awards 2016 23 June 2016 Grosvenor House Hotel, Park Lane, London www.europeanpensions.net aon 2016 pensIon conference 10 February 2016 London www.aon.com barnett waddIngham Investment conference 27 January 2016 London www.barnett-waddingham.co.uk If you have any European pensions events to promote, please contact [email protected] www.europeanpensions.net 11 Irish Pensions Awards 2015 As a feeling of optimism returns to the Irish pensions market, the Irish Pensions Awards, now in their fourth year, aim to give recognition to those pension funds and providers who have proved their excellence, professionalism and dedication to maintaining high standards of Irish pension provision over the past year. Congratulations to this year’s finalists and best of luck. Join us on 25 November 2015 to see the winners exclusively announced. Irish Pensions Awards 2015 – Shortlist Irish Pension Scheme of the Year • Bank of Ireland • Construction Executive Retirement Savings (CERS) • Oracle Pension Trustee Board of the Year • Capita • Construction Executive Retirement Savings (CERS) Best Use of Risk Management • Bank of Ireland • Construction Workers Pension Scheme (CWPS) Best Communication Strategy • Bank of Ireland • Construction Workers Pension Scheme (CWPS) Pensions Consultancy of the Year • ITC Consulting • LCP Ireland • Opportune Trust Property Manager of the Year • BCP Asset Management • Irish Life Investment Managers Investment Manager of the Year • Ashmore Group • BCP • Goldman Sachs Asset Management • Irish Life Investment Managers • Morgan Stanley Investment Management • Russell Investments • Setanta Asset Management Equities Manager of the Year • AB • Ashmore Group • Irish Life Investment Managers • Kleinwort Benson Investors • MFS • Setanta Asset Management • Vontobel Asset Management Alternatives Investment Manager of the Year • BCP Asset Management • Friends First • Irish Life Investment Managers Law Firm of the Year To be announced on the evening BOOK YOUR TABLE NOW: www.europeanpensions.net/irishawards BOOK YOUR TABLE 4th Annual Irish Pensions Awards 2015 25 NOVEMBER 2015 The 5* Shelbourne, Dublin Fixed Income Manager of the Year • Ashmore Group • Goldman Sachs Asset Management • Irish Life Investment Managers • Morgan Stanley Investment Management • Pioneer Investments Pension Scheme Administrator of the Year • Allied Pensions Trustees • Independent Trustee Company • Irish Life Corporate Business • New Ireland Assurance Corporate Pensions Department Communication Award • Allied Pensions Trustees • Independent Trustee Company • Irish Life Corporate Business • Willis Pensions Innovation Award • Aviva Life and Pensions Ireland • Bank of Ireland • BCP Asset Management • BMO Global Asset Management • Independent Trustee Company • Irish Life Corporate Business • LCP Ireland • New Ireland Assurance • Willis Passive Manager of the Year • Irish Life Investment Managers • Legal & General Investment Management Risk Management Provider of the Year • BMO Global Asset Management • Goldman Sachs Asset Management Infrastructure Manager of the Year • To be announced on the evening Emerging Markets Manager of the Year • To be announced on the evening Pensions Technology Provider of the Year • Exaxe • Independent Trustee Company • Willis Independent Trustee Firm of the Year • Harvest Trustees • Independent Trustee Company Irish Pensions Personality of the Year • Jim Connolly, Head of Pensions, Standard Life • Paul Kenny, The Pensions Ombudsman • Fiona Thornton, Chairman of the Retirement Planning Council of Ireland and Consultant at Eversheds Gold sponsors Independent Retail Pension Broker/ Pensions IFA of the Year • City Life Wealth Advisors • Financial Architects • Harvest Financial Services • Investwise • Opportune Trust Find out more: www.europeanpensions.net/irishawards For the latest news and updates follow us @AwardsIrish #IrishPensionsAwards In association with European Pensions Pensions Appointments People on the move... The latest news and moves from people within the European pensions industry 14 If you have any appointments to announce please contact natalie. [email protected] BrUno montAnAri Omnes Capital has appointed Bruno Montanari as partner within the venture capital team, focusing on the life sciences sector. He began his career in 1999 in investment banking at Deutsche Bank, followed by Merrill Lynch, before moving into venture capital at CDP Capital Technology Ventures and then Atlas Venture. He joined Omnes Capital in 2010 and is currently a board member at several companies, including arGEN-X. Agnès BelAisch Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management has appointed Agnès Belaisch as head of its sovereign debt team. She was previously in charge of economic and market analysis at the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), the eurozone’s bailout fund based in Luxembourg. Before that, she was in charge of emerging market strategy at Threadneedle Asset Management in London. Frédéric JAnBon BNP Paribas has announced the appointment of Frédéric Janbon as CEO of BNP Paribas Investment Partners. He succeeds Phillipe Marchessaux, who will support and advise him during a transition period before taking on, at his request, another project, within the BNP Paribas Group. Janbon also has over 25 years’ experience in financial markets. esther nAss-FetzmAnn Schroders has announced the appointment of Esther Nass-Fetzmann in its multi-asset investments and portfolio solutions (MAPS) business. She will focus on strategy for Europe and joins from BlackRock where she spent the past 10 years in senior positions. She was most recently the director and head of UK iShares ETF sales to asset managers and hedge funds. Furthermore, Nass-Fetzmann will be based in Schroders’ office in London. Frédéric messein SIX Swiss Exchange has announced the appointment of Frédéric Messein as head of SIX corporate bonds. He will be responsible for overseeing the roll-out of the new credit trading platform, and is based in Zurich. Prior to this, Messein was global head of fixed income and foreign exchange product management and content strategy for Thomson Reuters. www.europeanpensions.net Pensions Appointments Angelo nAtAle Hermes Investment Management has announced the appointment of Angelo Natale as director, business development, Italy. In this new role, Natale will be responsible for building a client franchise across institutional and wholesale investors in the Italian market. He will oversee the firm’s regional development and also its asset raising targets. lAUrent chevAllier Gottex Fund Management Holdings, an independent global asset management group, has appointed Laurent Chevallier as a senior member of its portfolio management team. He joins Gottex with more than 16 years of experience in the analysis and management of alternative investment strategies and started trading S&P 500 futures in 1998 for a $1 billion plus hedge fund where he then became director of hedge fund research. Ugo sAnsone Allfunds Bank has appointed Ugo Sansone to head its business in Luxembourg in order to help drive the firm’s international expansion. Sansone is a well-known industry figure within Luxembourg, where he has been an active stakeholder across the investment fund sector. Sansone has spent his entire career at Intesa Sanpaolo Group. hUiB vAessen GeoPhy, a commercial property intelligence company, has announced that Huib Vaessen has joined its management team as chief product officer (CPO) as of 1 October 2015. Furthermore, Vaessen was senior portfolio manager for real estate securities at Kempen Capital Management until starting at GeoPhy, previously having worked as an analyst at the same company. mUstAPhA BoUherAoUA Invesco Asset Management has announced that Mustapha Bouheraoua is joining Invesco’s institutional team as head of institutional sales for France. In his new position, Bouheraoua will be reporting to Colin Fitzgerald, head of institutional business EMEA. Bouheraoua joins from Schroders France where he was head of institutional business for France and North Africa. Bouheraoua had started his financial career at BNP Paribas. hAzel mcneilAge Northern Trust Asset Management has named Hazel McNeilage as managing director for Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA), in line with its continuing focus on building relationships with institutional clients across the region. McNeilage holds responsibility for institutional business development and relationship management across the region. www.europeanpensions.net 15 Industry Column Europe Economics An effective substitute europe economics’ Andrew lilico AnAlyses the benefits of investing in oil- And gAs-relAted stocks when other Assets Are fAlling in vAlue “ A pension fund mAnAger thAt excluded fossil fuel stocks from the fund’s portfolio would hAve to choose between tAking 20 per cent more risk to Achieve the sAme return 16 Don’t put all your eggs into one basket” is one of the most basic principles of balanced portfolio management. By investing in a range of assets, a fund manager can try to make sure that when some assets are falling in value that will be offset by others rising at the same time, reducing the risk of losing money overall through such diversification. To do that, of course, one needs to be able to invest in assets that will tend to do well when others are doing badly. One important set of such ‘counter-cyclical’ investments are oil- and gas-related stocks. When oil prices go up, inflation tends to rise and the non-oil economy tends to grow a bit slower. So if, for example, a fund manager has invested in inflation-sensitive bonds, their value may drop when oil prices go up because inflation is expected to rise. However, when oil prices are rising, oil-related stocks will tend to go up in price. So a fund manager could buy some oil-related stocks to offset the risk rising oil prices would present to investments in inflation-sensitive assets or indeed, just to the economy in general. Excluding oil stocks from a portfolio would mean not being able to offset risks in this way. But can the impact of oil-related stocks be duplicated using other assets? It may seem intuitively likely that it cannot, but it is not absolutely obvious from theory alone. There is a campaign at present for various fund managers to ‘divest’ themselves of fossil fuelrelated assets. Those advocating this claim that doing so will help to combat fossil-fuel-related climate change. My team at Europe Economics estimated the impacts on UK investment risks and returns of eschewing fossil fuel stocks. The theory of efficient diversification was set out in the late 1950s by Harry Markowitz - work which won him the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1990. We used Markowitz’ portfolio theory to construct the set of most risk-return efficient www.europeanpensions.net portfolios from Bloomberg data for the period 2002 on. Someone investing £100,000 in a pension pot tracking the stock market (so, at the average risk and return) in 2002 would have had about £280,000 in 2014. We identified all those stocks, in the list the fossilfreeindexes.com website recommends investors avoid, that are in the London FTSE All-Share Index. We then used Markowitz’s theory to construct the most risk-return efficient set of portfolios that excluded fossil fuels. What we found was that the diversification benefits of fossil fuels cannot be duplicated with other assets. A pension fund manager that excluded fossil fuel stocks from the fund’s portfolio would have to choose between taking 20 per cent more risk to achieve the same return. So, whereas our £100,000 2002 pension fund investment that tracked the stock market would have been worth £280,000 in 2014, if that same investment had avoiding fossil fuels but borne the same risk it would have been worth only £260,000 - a loss of more than 7 per cent over the period. Even at a low 4 per cent rate, the £280,000 pension pot would yield an £11,200 a year pension, against £10,400 for the £260,000 pension pot. If someone had that kind of private pension, they would therefore be losing £800 a year by having divested fossil fuel stocks. As we have said, some investors may believe this cost is worth the objective of contributing to the campaign against climate change (though that would still leave open the question of whether this was the best way to spend that money). But no-one should pretend that pension funds can divest themselves of fossil fuels without a material cost to their beneficiaries. ■ Written by Andrew Lilico, executive director of Europe Economics and lead author of Costs to Investors of Boycotting Fossil Fuels, commissioned by the Independent Petroleum Association of America Investment Shocks investment Out of the blue The world’s financial markets were rocked recently by the Volkswagen scandal and the crashing of the Chinese stock market. Peter Carvill explores what funds should do in the wake of such events WR IT TEN BY P e T e r C ar vill, a fre e lanC e j o ur na l i s T T he Volkswagen scandal emanating from Germany hit hard and fast in September, sending seismic waves around the world. It was discovered by the US Environmental Protection Agency that the German car giant had intentionally been rigging software in its vehicles to bypass emissions regulating, and that actual emissions from the cars had been up to 40 times higher than legally allowed. Shock events The immediate cost—both human and financial—to Volkswagen was quick and severe. Group CEO Martin Winterkorn tried to maintain his position in the company but had to resign in the week after the scandal broke. At the same time, the car giant said it was putting aside €6.5 billion to deal with the aftermath. A few weeks later, it announced that it was recalling 8.5 million of the 11 million cars affected. The immediate and long-term financial costs to Volkswagen have yet to be accurately tabulated or finalised. But they are predicted to run into the billion; according to a report in the UK’s The Telegraph newspaper, analysts from UBS and Societe Generale placed the costs of settlements to regulators and private consumers, legal fees, recalls, and buybacks at €35 billion and €32 billion. Analysts on Trefis offered a figure of €34.5 billion for the cost of government fines and settlements, private settlements, recalls, and loss of sales. According to the BBC, the fine from the Environmental Protection Agency alone could top €18 billion. Volkswagen’s share price was predictably hammered by the scandal. Before the story broke, its shares had been trading at €165. They immediately fell to €92, before rallying slightly to €105. Scandals such as this are, to an extent, idiosyncratic. They do not follow a market cycle, but come seemingly from nowhere. And while many people had money invested in Volkswagen, it is not the only or last company to go through such troubles. Keith Guthrie is the chief investment officer at Cardano, while Cato Stonex is a founding partner at THS Partners. Independent of each other, they draw parallels www.europeanpensions.net 17 Investment Shocks The VaST and ReCOndiTe quanTiTy Of hOw muCh The final SCandal will COST The COmpany may puT penSiOn fundS wiTh inVeSTmenTS in VOlkSwagen inTO a bind 18 www.europeanpensions.net between the issues engulfing Volkswagen and the legal troubles that assailed BP in 2010 following the collapse of Deepwater Horizon. “What people are trying to quantify,” says Guthrie, “is how big an impact could all the regulatory penalties be on the company? Getting a handle on that is difficult. There are tests cases such as with BP and with what has happened with banks in recent years. You should expect that regulators will go after them in a big way around the world, and there will be substantial costs to that. The regulators will not want to put the company out of business as politicians do not want to be responsible for job losses. But they will extract penalties.” Stonex offers another perspective. He says that Volkswagen being subject to US legal action is the most unknowable quantity. “The worst case scenario,” he says, “is that the company is going to have to buy back all of these cars. In that case, it’s an existential level of cost.” Response The vast and recondite quantity of how much the final scandal will cost the company may put pension funds with investments in Volkswagen into a bind. How should a fund handle their investments when something like this happens? Stonex draws a line between a business going through a normal cycle, and a scandal like Volkswagen’s that has come out of the blue. If the downturn is part of a normal cycle, he says, the best course of action is to try and live through it. In the type of situations that Volkswagen now finds itself in, the reactions of investors and the course they should take begins to get more complex. “There are three quality checks we go through,” says Stonex. “We look at the solidity of the balance sheet, the substantial competitive advantage, and the quality of the management. If any of those is not what you’ve expected, such as lots of debts that have been kept hidden, a new competitor that has breached that advantage, or the management has not behaved as you would expect, you have to re-examine the investment and rethink.” Stonex adds that in his experience, high volatility is the price paid for the equity risk premium, and has to be accepted as such, even if it does at points cause the value of your portfolio to decline by 30 per cent. “These are temporary,” he says, “but they don’t feel good at the time.” The Volkswagen scandal was unprecedented, but not without precedents. Stonex says that if THS Partners had had investments in the now-disgraced car company, the fact that it was not a cyclical waning of the industry would have sounded alarm bells. “We would have been very much affected,” he says, “by the fact that this was not a cycle moving against them or some Investment Shocks temporary and external impact. This was an own goal. They did this to themselves. I think that their credibility—even though not everyone was involved—reflects very badly on their culture. We would feel that the management would have to change and we would have concluded that the potential downside is such—and this is rarely the case—that we would have to exit the investment because of the threat of US legal action.” macro concerns While the VW scandal is huge and may spread further, Guthrie sees little cause for concern, calling it ‘idiosyncratic’. He points instead to huge shifts in the macroeconomic system such as the meltdown on the Chinese stock market in August. The phrases he uses to describe that are “macro” and “lots to worry about”. The meltdown in China—dubbed ‘Black Monday’—saw trillions of dollars wiped off the global financial markets. That was set in motion by a selling frenzy, itself prompted by the loss of the country’s stock market contracting by $3.2 trillion due to concerns about slow growth. Despite the injection of $200 billion by the government to stop the crisis, the fall continued. Guthrie says that while questions could be asked of the entire motor industry, the China crash points to more ‘systemic risk’. “That’s where,” he says, “there is a risk that can cause a reaction in another part of the economy. The situation in China is much more like that. That’s the type of risk we spend time trying to figure out. There are clear linkages through all the commodities suppliers to China. There’s a clear ripple effect if China is slowing down.” Guthrie draws a parallel between China’s ‘Black Monday’ and the US equity market, which went through similar troubles in October 2014 amid a large sell-off. “That happened relatively rapidly,” Guthrie says. “People see that and ask questions— ‘Is there something I’m missing? Has something happened that should have change my probabilities of the world? Is there a risk of another recession’?” Stonex agrees that China may be a bigger problem than Volkswagen, saying that the worries there are more medium-term than those hitting the beleaguered German car manufacturer. Volkswagen, he says, is more of an individual problem. knock-on effects However, the troubles of Volkswagen may affect more than the beleaguered manufacturer. Following the headlines, stock in fellow companies BMW and Daimler fell 10 per cent and 13 per cent, respectively. This was despite neither company being implicated in the wilful manipulation of emissions data. “I think there’s an assumption,” says Stonex, “that if there’s an engineer at one of the companies that has worked out how to game the testing process, that they may be others that have tried to do so. It’s a case of people thinking it’s not isolated. I don’t know whether it is or not but people may have drawn the conclusion.” The question then, as with everything in investing, is less about what has happened than how it could affect everything else. ■ while queSTiOnS COuld be aSked Of The enTiRe mOTOR induSTRy, The China CRaSh pOinTS TO mORe ‘SySTemiC RiSk’ www.europeanpensions.net 19 CONGRATULATIONS TO OUR WINNERS T he inaugural Pensioni & Welfare in handing out 23 sought-after trophies their members, and are dedicated to Italia Awards took place in to the deserving winners. meeting those needs in everything that September at a glittering gala event The Italian pensions space, like many they do. in Milan, playing host to hundreds of others in Europe, is going through a Italy’s pensions and investment elite period of dramatic change and pension consultants and other key providers who gathered at the elegant hotel fund managers, consultants, asset were rewarded for their performance, Melia Milano to celebrate the industry’s managers as well as service providers understanding of the market and use of success. each have their own challenges to innovation. Following this, the asset managers, The awards, which were founded overcome. The European Pensions team by European Pensions, were launched hopes these awards will go some way culminated in the presentation of with the aim of recognising the hard towards recognising and rewarding arguably the most desirable award work and dedication of those working the efforts of those working so hard in of the evening, the Personality of the in the Italian pensions, investment and order to meet the ever-growing needs Year, which went to Renzo Guffanti, benefits sector in Italy, with over 20 of their members and clients, against a president of the CNPADC (Cassa pension funds and provider firms going backdrop of increasing longevity and Nazionale di Previdenza e Assistenza home with coveted trophies on the economic uncertainty. Dottori Commercialisti). night. Antonio Ornano, Italian celebrity and Then last but not least, the evening First up were the pension fund Congratulations to all of those who categories that aimed to give went home with trophies on the night television personality, brought a touch recognition to the funds who, with and many thanks from the European of comedy to the evening and did a their entries, not only displayed Pensions team to the judges and fantastic job of hosting the awards. He excellence and superiority in the way sponsors who helped make the event was joined on stage by the judges and they manage their funds, but also boast such a resounding success. We look sponsors of the event who assisted him a real understanding of the needs of forward to seeing you all next year. SAVE THE DATE: 6th October 2016 - Pensioni & Welfare Italia Awards 2016, Meliá Milano For more details on the awards, please visit www.europeanpensions.net/italiaawards or contact [email protected] (editorial) or [email protected] (commercial) WITH THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS Gold Sponsors In association with European Pensions The 2015 categories and winners Open Pension Fund of the Year Property Manager of the Year Innovation Award of the Year Società Reale Mutua di Assicurazioni Antirion SGR SpA MangustaRisk Closed Pension Fund of the Year Alternatives Investment Manager of the Year Pensions Consultancy of the Year Fondo Pensione Eurofer Amber Capital Italia SGR SpA Olivieri & Associati - Consulenza Attuariale Individual Pension Fund of the Year Global Balanced Manager of the Year e Finanziaria Genertellife SpA Candriam Best Healthcare & Benefits Provider of the Year Pre-1993 Pension Fund of the Year Administrator of the Year Previmedical SpA Fondo Pensione Previbank Previnet Outsourcing Solutions Best Employee Benefits Plan of the Year Innovative Pension Fund of the Year IT Firm of the Year UniC.A. PrevAer Fondo Pensione Previnet Outsourcing Solutions Pensioni & Welfare Italia Personality of the Year Best Communication by a Pension Fund Award Insurance Broker of the Year Renzo Guffanti, Presidente, Dottore AXA Italia Europa Benefits srl Commercialista, Cassa Nazionale Asset Manager of the Year Custodian of the Year di Previdenza e Assistenza Dottori Allianz Global Investors Societe Generale Securities Services SpA Commercialisti (CNPADC) Equities Manager of the Year Communication Award Columbia Threadneedle Investments Associazione Previnforma Fixed Income Manager of the Year Risk Management Firm of the Year Franklin Templeton Italia SIM SpA StatPro Italia Conferenza 2016 Le Nuove Sfide 15 Giugno 2016 Hotel Meliá Milano Via Masaccio 19, Milano 20149, italia La Conferenza Pensioni & Welfare Italia: Le Nuove Sfide esaminerà le principali sfide della gestione di un fondo pensione in Italia nell'ambiente di oggi ed offrirà ai fondi pensione, consulenti e gestori di investimento un’informazione aggiornata ed una guida per aiutarli a gestire i loro fondi pensione al meglio. Sito web disponibile a breve Per informazione sulla possibilità di sponsorizzazione all’evento 2016, si prega di contattare: Alessandra Atria Senior Sales Executive +44 (0)20 7562 2438 [email protected] a pe o r u e . w ww t/it s.ne n o i s n e np Country Spotlight country spotlight i ta ly A battle ahead David Adams explores the need for Italy to reduce reliance on the first pillar and grow the second, while navigating the tricky arena of intergenerational fairness WRIT TEN BY DaviD aDams, a freelance journalist strategies, which may improve returns. But other recent changes have included increases in taxation on those returns; and the controversial opening of a three-year window during which individuals can access the Trattamento di fine Rapporto (TFR), a severance pay fund that all Italian employers have to provide. T he past two decades have been almost as eventful for the Italian pensions system as they have for Italian politics. The country has sworn in a new prime minister 12 times in the past 20 years; and there have also been at least nine significant reforms to the pensions system. Some were aimed at making the system’s first pillar more sustainable; some at encouraging growth of the second pillar. But even after all of those reforms the latest issue of the Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index, published in October 2015, gives Italy an index rating of 50.9, meaning it just scrapes into an overall ‘C’ grade, the category for pensions systems with “some good features, but also ... major risks and/or shortcomings that should be addressed”. Whether recent reforms have helped the sustainability and adequacy of the system as a whole is debateable. They have included greater flexibility for second pillar pension schemes’ investment First pillar reform Italy still spends 16 per cent of GDP on state pension provision, a greater proportion than any other country in Europe except Greece, but thanks to a series of reforms the first pillar system is now mainly contribution-based. Previously it was a defined benefit final salary scheme that could provide replacement ratios of 75 per cent. In 2011 the then labour minister Elsa Fonero famously wept as she announced reforms that converted the first pillar into a notional defined contribution system (in reality it is pay as you go); and increased the state retirement age to 66, with full state pensions payable after 42 years of contributions. “If you look at it from the angle of the employee all the reforms will make retirement income smaller than it used to be,” says Candriam Risk global head of client relations for Europe and the Middle East, Renato Guerriero. “But when you had a first pillar guaranteeing 80 to 90 per cent www.europeanpensions.net 23 Country Spotlight of your final salary, not considering contributions you have made, this kind of system was not responsible and was unfair.” Although these changes have made the first pillar more sustainable, the current system creates intergenerational conflict, says the European Association of Paritarian Institutions (AEIP) director, Francesco Briganti. “Future pensions will be lower for younger, active workers who have to pay contributions of around 30 per cent of gross salary [but] will never see the same pension income as current pensioners,” he explains. There is also the problem of older people working for longer and thus preventing younger workers from advancing along a career path. Aon Hewitt Consulting managing director in Italy, Claudio Pinna, has sympathy for older workers who ITALY STILL SPENDS 16 PER CENT OF GDP ON STATE PENSION PROVISION, A GREATER PROPORTION THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN EUROPE lose jobs in their 50s then find it difficult either to get another job or to retire, but he is unimpressed by proposals from left-wing politicians and trade unions that more people should be able to access their pension pots earlier. “We already have a very high public pension expense and if you introduce this proposal these expenses will increase immediately,” he points out. Expanding the second pillar Instead, the answers to the demographic and financial 24 www.europeanpensions.net challenges facing the pensions system surely lie in further expansion of the second pillar. “In a few years the ratio between active workers who pay contributions to social security and retired people will decrease dramatically, so the current level of pension is not sustainable forever,” says Mercer’s retirement leader and principal for Italy Roberto Veronico. “There is a strong need [for] complementary pensions.” At first glance it seems strange that only about 25 per cent of private sector employees have joined a second pillar scheme, particularly as they have generally performed well to date. A ministerial degree of 2014 has also given second pillar pension funds more flexibility in their investment strategies. Previnet senior manager, pension fund services and international clients, Martino Braico, thinks this is important. “Basically, funds can invest in whatever they want – so long as their investments match their approved policies,” he says. But you don’t need to look far to start finding reasons for low take-up. One is the very high contributions taken out of salaries for first pillar pensions – around 30 per cent of gross salary, meaning most workers have little left over to save elsewhere. Another is that the second pillar uses an ‘exempt, taxed, taxed’ (ETT) approach, rather than the EET arrangement used in most second pillar systems. And even the ‘E’ element, contributions, are exempt from tax only up to around €5,000 per year. New rules Italy’s 2015 ‘stability law’, which increased taxes on pension fund investment returns, has also been unhelpful. The nominal rise was from 11 to 20 per cent, but this masks the fact that returns on Country Spotlight IN A FEW YEARS THE RATIO BETWEEN ACTIVE WORKERS WHO PAY CONTRIBUTIONS TO SOCIAL SECURITY AND RETIRED PEOPLE WILL DECREASE DRAMATICALLY investments in for Italian and some foreign government bonds are now taxed at 12.5 per cent. That means returns on most portfolios are taxed at between 12 and 17 per cent – but it also encourages funds to invest in assets that will probably deliver lower returns than would higher risk investments. Briganti is also concerned that the forthcoming EU financial transactions tax will also apply to second pillar pension schemes, depressing investment returns further. The existence of the TFR may also be a factor in some workers’ unwillingness to use the second pillar. It is calculated at 6.9 per cent of annual salary, with additions for inflation, and is usually paid as a lump sum. If accumulated throughout a whole career it can provide a pension of about 15 per cent of final salary. But it is unlikely to provide anything like the same returns as a second pillar pension. Following the passage of the stability law and until June 2018, workers can access TFR funds on a monthly basis. If a large number of Italian workers chose to do this it would undermine second pillar pensions. Fortunately, notes Briganti, few employees are doing this at present, because they value the TFR as a long-term investment. Unfortunately the potential value offered by a second pillar pension is not yet widely understood. In 2007 the Italian government briefly ran a scheme reminiscent of auto-enrolment in the UK, with workers enrolled in second pillar schemes unless they actively chose to opt out. Take-up was low, due to some of the factors listed above. But some industry observers now wonder if a more active drive to push workers into the second pillar would be useful. “If I were in the government I would try to push more people into occupational pensions, because having your risk spread across two pillars, or even three, is very sound from a financial point of view,” says Guerriero. Another measure that was under consideration for a while was the introduction of full portability of capital between second and third pillar pensions. “So a worker could ask his employer to move his contribution to a third pillar product and ask a previous pension fund to move his capital to a new third pillar product,” Briganti explains. But he is concerned that private pensions providers would be able to spend more on marketing than would the second pillar schemes, which could lead to workers joining an inappropriate scheme. “I am not sure this measure would really help pensioners,” he says. Whatever the next 12 Italian prime ministers decide to do with the pensions system they will face demographic challenges, says Briganti. “Active workers are paying twice: high contributions to the first pillar, taxes on investment returns and then maybe they will pay indirectly through the financial transactions tax,” he points out. “All the burden is on the younger generation; not enough contributions are made by the older generation.” He wants better incentives to save in the second pillar and reduced contributions to the first pillar. If such measures are not taken, he suggests, the next 20 years will certainly see more clamour for further reform, amid increasing intergenerational strife. ■ www.europeanpensions.net 25 Case Study Case study: Fondenergia David Adams speaks to Fondenergia director Alessandro Stori, an Italian pension fund for workers in the energy sector currently managing €1.8 billion of assets for over 40,000 members Which have been the most significant of the changes made to the Italian pensions system in recent years? We had nine reforms in 20 years, but the most important is the last major one in 2011, under Monti/ Fonero, the reforms for the first pillar. Under this reform the retirement age was increased, which means that now our retirement age is one of the highest in Europe. This is having some positive results from the point of view of sustainability. But on the other hand, people now have to work for longer than they did before. There is an argument that you could have some more flexibility in the retirement age, so you could leave your job one or two years before the retirement age, with your pension reduced by 1 per cent or 2 per cent for each year. What other helpful changes have the government introduced to help encourage more Italian workers to save for retirement? Workers can now check on the social security website to see the estimate of their future pension. This was a change that was talked about in the very first reform 20 years ago, when it was said that this service would be available ‘in a few months’. So we needed to wait 20 years for this! 26 www.europeanpensions.net Which of these changes are creating problems for Italian pension funds and Italian workers seeking to save for retirement? Would your organisation like to see any of these changes reversed? At the end of 2014 the government increased the taxation rate for pension fund returns from 11 per cent to as much as 20 per cent, depending on the composition of your portfolio. We would like to see a reverse of this change – but we know it is not easy and so is not something we are likely to see soon. Are there any other reforms or alterations to the Italian pensions system that your organisation would like to see? What many people are asking themselves is, should we go towards a compulsory second pillar system? This is a question with a difficult answer. Some second pillar funds never reach a sustainable participation rate. Part of the reason is the nature of Italian industry, with many small companies where there is no help from trade unions to encourage people to join a pension scheme. We need some kind of mixed system in which small companies should be, not forced, but given a better incentives to help their workers to join the second pillar. One thing that would help would be to simplify some of the rules that make it harder to administer the schemes and make it difficult to explain to potential members how the scheme works. For example, we have three different systems of taxation on contributions to the second pillar: one that applies to members who have joined before 2000, another for those who joined between 2001 and 2006; and finally a much simpler method that applies from 2007 onwards. We want simplification of this system. To these changes I would add, on the investment side, some changes in the regulation, to give funds the ability to invest directly in alternative investments, perhaps with some pooling with other pension funds. The main thing we miss is a big publicity campaign by the government to convince Italian workers that second pillar pensions are a good thing for them. We have had one campaign, in 2007 and that’s it. When you watch TV you can see promotion of almost everything else sponsored by the government, but you don’t see anything around the second pillar system. We need to convince Italian workers that it is a good idea to do more than rely on the first pillar to pay a retirement income. ■ European Pensions nsions European Pe European Pensions agement: Scheme man Investment: ment: eme manage Sch Administrat Com modities investors Why some ng on the are now sitti this space sideline in ion for a balance The need mation and between auto rvention human inte Costs y and efficienc Cost control European within the d space Pension fun 5 201 November Investment: Proper ty t class is Why the asse popularity growing in s sion scheme amongst pen European Pensions magazine is now also available as an e-edition for tablets (iPad and Android devices), and can also be read on a PC. ead Italy / Adm A battle ah odities / Costs / Comm inistration on the uce reliance Italy to red the need for second d grow the first pillar an ia pension / Fondenerg rty / Pension fund / Prope onships board relati Plus: up News roundy: Case stud a Fondenergi Interview: Brian Hayes Irish MEP ships rd relation market Pension boa rises in the winners react to surp uld a Awards 2015 sho Itali funds Welfare sion funds cks - how Pensioni & pen for sho 1 on nt 20-2 act e me See pag - the imp 17 Inv est ts unIon s.net eanpension November www.europ 2015 l ma 44 capIta rke 02/11/2015 10:19:55 dd 1 ber2015.in cover_octo The new interactive digital format allows readers to easily search, browse and navigate the latest news stories, in-depth analysis, features, commentary and even adverts. All content is hyperlinked for a richer online experience. Through the print magazine, website, twitter, videos and now the digital edition, European Pensions ensures that you always receive the latest news from the pensions industry, in the most convenient format for you. To sign up, visit www.europeanpensions.net Regulation MiFID II R E G U L AT I O N The meaning of MiFID II Michael Hufton explains just what MiFID II means and why it matters WR IT T E N BY MicHae l Hufton, f o und er a nd Ma nag i ng d i r ec to r, i ng ag e i r M iFID II is the most maligned and misunderstood piece of legislation to come out of the European Union since the ban on curved bananas. Much of the financial establishment would have us believe that MiFID is a bank-bashing measure that crimps competitiveness and will cost jobs. It is nothing of the sort. MiFID II is all about consumer protection and it should result in substantially better retirement outcomes for millions of people across the EU28 by reducing cost. Grandiose claims. Let me explain. Work by Towers Watson has shown that, for the average pension fund, transaction costs borne by the fund can amount to more than all other costs combined. Compression in average investment management fees, largely the result of growth of passive funds, exacerbates the problem – it means transaction costs account for an increasing proportion of the total cost burden. Point being if fund trustees want to improve returns to end clients, a laser focus on cost pass-through can be at least as important as attention to management fees. Payment for ‘service’ What is striking is that whilst trustees understand this, few put formal policies in place to manage dealing commissions incurred on their behalf by the fund managers they employ. Managing dealing commissions downwards can have a significant impact on fund costs 28 www.europeanpensions.net and performance. A typical institutional execution only commission rate would be of the order of 5-6 bps, with some funds still paying rates in the region of 8-10 bps. Yet via direct market access (DMA) and other efficient execution technologies the real cost of best execution is more like 1-3bps. It’s a significant difference – with the gap often described as payment for ‘service’. But what exactly is this service? The cost of research is already stripped out from these numbers. The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) estimated that in 2012, of a total £3 billion of client money spent on dealing commissions in the UK market, £500 million of that went on corporate access – arranging meetings between investment managers and the executive management teams of quoted companies. Meeting with the management teams of investee companies is a key part of the investment process for many managers, but using client funded commissions to pay for that corporate access was banned by the FCA in June 2014. Fund management houses have removed corporate access from their broker voting criteria – but there is precious little evidence of change to market practice in this area. Over 90 per cent of corporate access remains intermediated by an investment bank, but it is now provided to clients ‘for free’. Yet at a system level, there is little evidence of commissions paid falling. Companies are not paying for these meetings either - corporate broking in the UK market is a free service for all but the smallest companies. So if neither institutions nor corporates are paying, who is? It would seem likely that corporate access is the ‘service’ being paid for within fatter than necessary execution rates – or alternatively it’s embedded within research spend. This UK analysis is equally applicable to other jurisdictions and has formed a core part of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)’s MiFID II proposals. Research is another matter entirely – and is typically commission funded, either bundled or via a commission sharing agreement (CSA). In the UK, corporate access explicitly does not qualify as research, so cannot be bundled with and paid for along with research service – precisely what happens in much of the rest of the world. The language the FCA uses to describe this is “an overpayment for eligible service in order to remunerate an ineligible service”. Changing behaviour Regulation could change behaviour in two ways. Final, detailed rules for MiFID II are not yet out – but under ESMA’s final technical proposal to the commission, corporate access would be treated as an inducement. Europe would be going further than Regulation MiFID II the UK rules. It would mean access is not commission eligible and has to be separately priced on a standalone basis. It could not be provided or accepted ‘for free’ - or bundled within execution or research spend. Secondly, the FCA’s Wholesale Competition Review is investigating bundling and price transparency in corporate and investment banking. This report, due to be released at the turn of the year, could influence the provision of ‘free’ service on the other side of the same coin – to the corporate. A forced unbundling of corporate access from both research and execution could prove material in helping investment managers reduce what they pay in dealing commission. But whatever the final outcome from MiFID, pension fund trustees should have policies in place regarding dealing commissions incurred to their funds by third party investment managers. What rates are being paid? Are those rates as low as they could be? How is the manager paying for research and corporate access and how are those payments being determined? Provision of ‘free’ corporate broking services to corporates is a similar distortion, remunerated via transaction fees, which in many cases appear to be inflated. Ultimately all these costs are borne by the end investor. Being aware of them and managing them downwards has to be a good thing. Underlying issues It is worth stepping back a bit to consider the underlying problems. Low interest rates mean we are in a low return environment. Simply put, in a 7 per cent interest rate environment, losing 0.5 per cent in frictional costs along the way doesn’t seem too bad. But in a 0.5 per cent world it’s a major problem. Work by the London Business School has shown that over the lifetime of a pension, reducing charges by 1 per cent would result in a 38 per cent higher income in retirement for the individual. So costs matter a lot in ensuring adequate retirement provision. View this in the context of chronic, systemic pension underfunding - and the urgent need for new, efficient, low-cost solutions comes clearly into focus. MIFID II Is all aboUT ConsUMer ProTeCTIon anD IT shoUlD resUlT In sUbsTanTIally beTTer reTIreMenT oUTCoMes For MIllIons oF PeoPle aCross The eU28 In his September 2015 report to the Treasury, Edi Truell, chairman of the London Pension Funds Authority, highlighted an unfunded pension deficit at the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) of £500 billion, equivalent to a third of the entire UK national debt, and recommended the NHS increase its annual contributions to the scheme from £5.7 billion pa, 14 per cent of total annual payroll cost, to £32 billion pa, equivalent to 75 per cent of the annual wage bill. The Bank of England increased the cash contribution to its pension scheme in 2014/15 to 50.4 per cent of payroll. Again on Towers Watson numbers, average contributions to pension funds are around 10 per cent of wages. Since the crisis we have seen a systemic transfer of risk in retirement provision the world over from institutions to individuals as sponsored, defined benefit schemes have closed and defined contribution has become the norm. Furthermore, one of the most important results of changes to pension legislation is that people are likely to hold their funds for much longer periods. Removal of the requirement to purchase an annuity can extend the lifespan of the average person’s pension fund to 50 years or more. This means an even greater need to focus on cost - as small amounts compounded over such long time periods have a huge impact. Putting this in context, for the UK as a whole, the FCA estimates that over a 30 year period, every 1 basis point improvement in trading costs could represent an additional £37.5 billion in client returns. This is why it is a matter for regulators, because this is an issue where the impact will be felt by millions of individuals in retirement. It should be a focus of attention for us all. Pension underfunding is an acute problem and drives an immediate need for change to drive cost out of the system. Modern technology enables that change by providing new, efficient, low cost solutions – and new regulation will overcome inertia and vested interest to mandate that change. This is how we will avoid the banana skins which, left unchecked, have the potential to become the next financial crisis. ■ www.europeanpensions.net 29 Investing in Property investment A stable footing Andrew Williams analyses the reasons why European pension funds are increasingly turning their attention towards property and what areas within the asset class are being closely examined WRIT T E N BY A n dre W W i l l i Am s, f r eel Ance j o ur nA l i s t A n increasing number of pension funds across Europe are choosing to devote a greater share of their investment portfolios to property. So, what is the role of property within European pension fund portfolios? Why are European pension funds increasingly turning towards property investments and what areas of investment are UK and European pension funds turning to within the property asset class? Attractive returns According to LaSalle Investment Management international director, global research & strategy, Robin Goodchild, unlevered property provides attractive income returns and diversification benefits within a multi-asset class portfolio. In those portfolios where part of the assets are expressly selected to match liabilities, he says that property is usually assigned to what he describes as the growth assets but, in the UK at least, low risk properties let on long leases with inflation-linked rent increases can be included within the liability matching assets. Meanwhile, although he believes that most schemes tend to focus on the income and diversification elements of property, Legal & General Property research director 30 www.europeanpensions.net UnlEvErEd propErty providEs AttrActivE incomE rEtUrns And divErsificAtion bEnEfits within A mUlti-AssEt clAss portfolio Rob Martin argues that a key advantage of the asset class is that net income from property is highly stable, providing schemes with a very predictable cash flow. “The yield itself is also relatively high compared to most competing asset classes. As schemes move towards the decumulation phase, we believe this cashflow element of property will become increasingly important for pension fund investors. Property also has the potential to provide growth and hedge inflation through the long-term increase in rents and the ability to add value through asset management,” he says. In view of the fact that diversification is a key factor for many schemes, Martin also believes that the direct ownership of property has in most market conditions provided a very effective means of diversifying wider equity and fixed income holdings and smoothing overall portfolio returns. “Set against this, property is a management intensive asset class, which adds cost as well as complexity. The lot sizes are relatively large and take more time to buy and sell than liquid equity or fixed income. Furthermore, the costs of buying and selling are relatively high and hence investments are most appropriately made with an expected five to 10 year or longer holding period,” he adds. That said, he still highlights the fact that European pension funds are increasingly turning towards property investments because they recognise that it can provide attractive risk-adjusted returns, especially at a time when the returns from sovereign bonds are so low. Moreover, he says that pension funds are learning how to earn the illiquidity premium property offers. Investing in Property “It is the income characteristics that we see motivating many schemes. With yields on a range of income-oriented investments having been depressed by a low interest rate environment, pension funds are searching for alternative assets that can provide relatively higher but still consistent levels of yield,” he adds. Elsewhere, John Forbes, who led the PwC real estate practice for over 25 years, and who is now an independent consultant advising real estate investment managers, investors and others in the real estate industry, points out that property is an attractive asset class for pension funds in an environment where attractive returns are hard to find. “For defined benefit pension schemes and traditional life products, real estate provides an element of liability matching and an attractive income. There are a variety of ways of investing in property, directly and indirectly. The underlying asset can provide a reliable long-term income stream and an element of liability matching. Indirect investment via funds or real estate investment trusts (Reitss) is a trade off between performance, volatility, liquidity and risk - [but] returns are attractive relative to fixed income,” he says. Areas of investment This perspective was first laid out in the 2012 report for the Association of Real Estate Funds, Unlisted funds, lessons from the crisis - which identified the fact that investing in real estate often entails a trade off propErty is An AttrActivE AssEt clAss for pEnsion fUnds in An EnvironmEnt whErE AttrActivE rEtUrns ArE hArd to find between a variety of factors, including risk, volatility and performance. A key finding was that many pension funds were investing in open-ended real estate funds ‘not because they wanted the liquidity traditionally associated with openended vehicles, but because they did not want to be tied into the fixed timetable of closed-ended vehicles’ leading many managers of openended funds, with the support of institutional investors, to place restrictions on liquidity. “At the same time, defined contribution pension schemes are becoming increasingly important. Many of these schemes need greater liquidity so there is an opportunity to create innovative fund structures to meet their needs. The growth in number and scale of listed Real Estate Investment Trusts (Reits) has also helped,” Forbes adds. In his view, there are a further two other areas of significant innovation in the property space. The first is that fact that pension funds are increasingly looking to get greater exposure to real estate as an asset class through lending, “either directly or more usually through debt funds”. The second is the fact that the definition of real estate itself is also expanding with the greatest area of growth currently in investment in alternative real estate, residential, student accommodation and healthcare “due to the pressure of capital in more mainstream assets”. Goodchild agrees that, although most pension fund property portfolios comprise office and retail buildings, they are also increasingly looking at other property types, such as logistics warehouses and industrial estates, student accommodation, hotels and healthcare assets. “In the UK, pension funds are also starting to invest in mainstream www.europeanpensions.net 31 Investing in Property residential ‘build-to-rent’ projects,” he adds. Martin reports that Legal & General Property is also witnessing investors becoming “more sophisticated with their property investments.” Whereas historically schemes may have focused purely on a diversified exposure to property, he reveals there is now a greater understanding that as property is such a diverse asset class, there are “many different grades” of assets and fund strategy that can be used to achieve different objectives. “For pension funds, the most obvious example of this is the interest in long-income funds. These are funds designed specifically to meet the needs of liability matching investors - the income from the assets is secured by long-term leases to investment grade covenants, typically with terms that link the income to inflation, and hence provide a very effective solution for schemes who need both high income security but also a hedge to inflation,” he adds. 32 www.europeanpensions.net indirEct invEstmEnt viA fUnds or rEAl EstAtE invEstmEnt trUsts (rEits) is A trAdE off bEtwEEn pErformAncE, volAtility, liqUidity And risk variation In terms of the exact ways in which European pension funds investing in the asset class, Forbes explains there is a “massive variation” - with some choosing direct investment and other getting involved via funds or Reits, equity or debt. Meanwhile, Martin stresses that investment choice “very much depends on the size of scheme and its own objectives for a real estate allocation”. “Large schemes with a desire to take a very active role in shaping their exposures may still choose to own a segregated portfolio of assets. Our experience is that the majority of schemes will focus on pooled vehicles to achieve both diversification and a lower level of management intensity,” he says. “A strategy that a number of schemes are adopting is to mix holdings in pooled funds investing directly in property with allocations to listed property companies (i.e. Reits). This blends a link to the underlying asset class through direct property with the greater liquidity that is provided by a listed exposure,” he adds. Finally, Goodchild points out that the bulk of European pension funds’ money is invested in low risk, income producing assets held either directly or through units in unlisted funds. “A small portion is invested in higher risk, value-add and opportunistic funds which offer capital growth rather than regular income. Most Dutch and some Swiss pension funds have significant holdings in public real estate globally, accessing tax-efficient Reits around the world. However, most other pension funds focus on property solely in private markets,” he says. ■ Investing in Commodities investment A tricky pick Whilst commodities remain an important asset class within many pension fund portfolios, Lynn Strongin Dodds examines why some investors are sitting on the sideline in this space WRIT T E N BY Lyn n S tr ong i n D o D D S, A Fr EEL A n CE J o U r nA L i S t C urrent environment The halcyon days of the super cycle are long gone and commodities have seemingly become the pariahs of the investment world. The UK and the Dutch, two of Europe’s largest investors in the sector, have already scaled back or withdrew and they are unlikely to venture back anytime soon. However, fund managers still believe this asset class has an important role to play. “There are three main reasons why pension funds in Europe and other countries put the asset class into a portfolio – diversification, inflation hedge and price Commodities hAve seemingly beCome the pAriAhs of the investment World appreciation, although this has not been bourne out over the past three years,” J.P. Morgan Asset Management global head of pensions advisory & solutions Tony Gould states. “Inflation also may not seem like a big issue but pension funds in Europe have their liabilities linked to inflation and there is a desire to hold real assets such as commodities.” It is easy though to see why investors are wary. The rout started two to three years ago due to a classic imbalance of supply and demand. A main driver has been China’s painful transformation from the world’s factory to a consumerled economy that has translated into less dependency on resources. However, the country’s sluggish growth rate has sent a shiver down the collective spine with its latest 6.9 per cent GDP figure – the weakest since the financial crisis propelling prices into another tailspin in October. www.europeanpensions.net 33 Investing in Commodities Bloomberg commodity index, a broad basket of 22 commodity futures, slid 0.7 per cent on the news with oil and base metals being the biggest casualties. Brent, the international crude benchmark, dropped as much as 3 per cent back below $50 a barrel, while copper and aluminium lost 1 per cent and 1.5 per cent to $5,201 a tonne and $1,554 a tonne respectively. shale gas and opec The other ongoing theme is the shale gas revolution and the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries’ (Opec), decision to keep the taps open. The policy is beginning to bite with US supply now forecast to average 13.8m b/d in 2015 and 14m b/d in 2016, revised downwards by 100,000 b/d and 200,000 b/d respectively. However, although there might be some bankruptcies on the horizon, several shale gas operators have responded by making their operations more efficient, renegotiating contracts with service companies and, most significantly, cutting production costs and spending on new wells. “Many shale gas producers are still making money,” Russell Investments director Nick Spencer says. “They are adjusting production based on prices and focusing on the better quality fields which so can withstand prices between $45 and $50 b/d.” As for agriculture, the big question mark is over the impact of the El Niño weather phenomenon that occurs when winds in the equatorial Pacific slow down or reverse direction. This causes ocean temperatures to rise over a vast area, which in turn can significantly disturb weather patterns around the world. Government forecasters in the US and Australia have recently warned that El Niño could be the severest in nearly two decades, triggering a spike in prices in several agricultural sectors such as sugar, dairy, palm oil and what. Given the backdrop, it is not surprising that many investors are sitting on the sidelines. Second guessing the bottom as well as the weather is always a tricky exercise and views are divided over allocations. “We believe that commodities are an important strategic asset and a complement to other real assets such as infrastructure and real estate,” Spencer comments. “However, while we see value, we still see more potential risks on the downside and our multi-asset growth strategies have an almost zero weighting in commodities.” JLT Employee Benefits senior investment consultant Aniket Bhaduri adds: “It would be adventurous to predict the price. A prudent approach would be to wait for important events to play out and for any green shoots to appear. We would not recommend going back into the sector at this time.” selectivity and strategy For those that do venture forth, selectivity is the mantra and many advocate an active approach to capturing the returns. The theory is that benchmarks may offer a broad exposure but specialist managers can identify individual commodity exposure plus extract returns through playing the contango and backwardation curve. “Active management should make a big difference in commodities investing as anticipation of supply/ demand fundamentals successfully can insulate from price shocks,” Old Mutual Asset Management head of international business Oliver Lebleu says. “More conservative investors will given the bACkdrop, it is not surprising thAt mAny investors Are sitting on the sidelines 34 www.europeanpensions.net Investing in Commodities given the high volAtility of Commodity indiCes, Asset AlloCAtion is typiCAlly betWeen 2 to 5 per Cent probably opt for investing via bonds or equities exposed to the sector, whilst more speculative investors will perhaps choose direct exposure.” Goldman Sachs Asset Management managing director Kathleen Hughes also notes that European pension funds typically access commodities through indices and the futures. Few schemes have exposure to physical commodities or use equities, although the correlation over the longer-term is high (typically in excess of 80 per cent). There are though periods of high drift and these usually occur when commodity exposure is most beneficial. However, in some jurisdictions investing in commodities and/or derivatives is restricted and equities may be used as a proxy. Given the high volatility of commodity indices, asset allocation is typically between 2 to 5 per cent with ‘less sophisticated’ plans in the zero per cent to 2 per cent range, she adds. GSAM is a proponent of the active school and invests without being tied to a particular benchmark. “There are relative value opportunities as well as directional market opportunities that an active manager can make use of,” Hughes analyses. “It is not an easy field as information evaluation works differently than in equity markets and standard risk management approaches don’t capture the tail risk of many commodity markets appropriately but with experience active commodity investing may lead to similarly uncorrelated returns to traditional asset classes while volatility can be calibrated to investors’ preferences to less or even just half of that of passive/ index investing.” Fulcrum Asset Management director of research, commodities Fiona Boal adds: “If there is anything that we have learnt in the last five to six years is that to fully reap the rewards of commodities you need a long-time horizon and active approach. I think index investing is dead. People are sophisticated when looking at equities and fixed income and I think they have also moved away from the benchmarks when investing in commodities.” Fulcrum uses carry strategies as part of its wider premia approaches in its commodity fund to execute trades with calendar spreads acting as signals across energy, agriculture or metals. Spreads can be just the mechanical process of maintaining a long or short position through a roll period when the front month or spot contract goes off the board or putting on a position designed to benefit from a change in the differential. “We take it back to the underlying activity in the physical markets,” Boal says. “For example, if the future curve is in contango, we can reap profits through short positions in the commodity future and rolling it forward.” Columbia Threadneedle, on the other hand, is looking more tactically across the spectrum because of the higher than expected market turbulence, according to EMEA head of commodities David Donora. “Opec’s behaviour is making the oil price so much more volatile and that bleeds into other commodities. The lower oil price is having huge ripples across the global economy and it will take a bit of time for that to feed through to the consumer. At the moment we are more short term in response to market conditions and are looking at where the opportunities are.” This has translated into an overweight position in sugar and coffee due to strong fundamentals and overall underweight in base metals. However, Donora is more bullish on the long-term prospects of copper because of an improved supply outlook, despite the slowdown in demand from China and increased supply in the last couple of years. Significant cuts in production, most notably by mining giant Glencore, is expected to help restore the balance. ■ www.europeanpensions.net 35 IORP II Directive Interview INTERVIEW Solving Europe’s pension puzzle As lead negotiator on the IORP II Directive, Irish MEP Brian Hayes has said Europe faces a “demographic crisis”, which is why it is necessary to update the current directive for future generations. Natalie Tuck speaks to him about his proposals for the new directive and what needs to be done to solve Europe’s pension problems WR IT TEN BY Natalie tuck You have said there is a “demographic crisis” in Europe, can you explain your concerns regarding this and why there is a need to update pension legislation? At the moment we have about four people working for every one pensioner. If things remain the same and there is no further change in structure or demography it could become two to one within a period of 40 years. It’s really important that we recognise Europe is getting older and we’ve got to make provision for people as they get older. Secondly, there’s enormous pressure on pillar one pensions state pensions) because governments are in deficit across the European Union. Long term, we’ve got to encourage people to save and occupational pensions are a crucial element of that. They’re not the only element and it would be wrong to pretend that the pension problems Europe faces will be resolved simply by IORP II, that’s not the case. As lead negotiator on the IORP II Directive you have made several proposals as to what the new directive should include, can you tell us what these are? And how they will help to ensure better pension provision for Europe? Most importantly there should be no-one-size-fits-all approach.We need to recognise that there are six or seven countries that have very 36 www.europeanpensions.net established IORPs in place; nothing should happen that might affect those countries in a negative way, that’s very important for me. Secondly, I want to formally and legislatively recognise the importance of pensioners as a social instrument. It is a very unique thing we have in Europe, employers and employees sitting down as trustees to work on a scheme. It’s not a normal financial instrument, it’s a social instrument. The third big issue that I’ve taken up is the question of solvency. I do not believe that IORPs should be considered as part of Solvency II. I think that’s crucial because IORPs are not insurance products. I don’t think it would be fair to pensioners, beneficiaries and members. I think where deficits emerge it is better that those deficits are plugged over a period of years with the growing economy and economies of scale rather than simply by adding more costs. I’ve taken that out and it’s not going to remerge. Fourthly, I have a lot of proposals on the cross-border IORPs. I think we need to see more cross-border IORPs. I’m very optimistic that we can increase the number from 84 at the moment, which has been in place since the first directive. IORP I has not been successful in establishing a proper cross-border market and I think there are real barriers there. Therefore, I have proposed we should tweak the proposal on being fully funded, at the moment crossborder IORPs have to be fully funded throughout. I’m having discussions with different shadow rapporteurs about that issue and the Commission to see if we can produce a balanced approach that would recognise risk and opportunity at the same time. I also think having to have two authorisations on transfers of crossborder IORPs is a real barrier as IORP II Directive Interview well, so have proposed that only one should be needed. I have also stripped out a lot of the Commission’s proposals on the members’ benefits statement. There was too much detail, I’ve made it a general principles approach because we already have some really high standards across Europe when it comes to the pension benefits statement. I’ve also taken out some of the delegated acts that were originally there for EIOPA, thereby ensuring that we’re clear about what we agree as co-legislators when we agree it. You would like to ensure individual member states’ pension systems are respected whilst applying EU standards to domestic systems. How can this be done smoothly and without conflict? I think it is about recognising where a domestic system is in place and doing well and not disturbing it. I think what I’ve said on Solvency II, on stripping out the pension benefits statement, and what I’ve said in terms of recognising the social instruments behind IORPs is an example of an acceptance of a no-size-fits-all approach. I think if people read the report they will come to that conclusion. What has been the response from the European Parliament on your proposals? I’m in the middle of discussions. We expect the report will read before the ECON committee in December for consideration in terms of a vote. Between now and December, I am in discussions with the shadow rapporteurs. I’m sitting and listening to the views of my colleagues on how we can improve the report. I have a very open mind about how we can do that and I’m confident that we can have a good outcome. During an ECON meeting you said you did not want the new IORP Directive to be a ‘bureaucratic nightmare’ for pension funds. How are you going to ensure this doesn’t happen? I have made it clear that we should have a general principles approach rather than a very prescriptive approach. I’ve also been clear to make sure that there would be no extra cost to pension schemes as a consequence of IORP II. I think that would be a disaster quite frankly. We’re trying to get people to save and to make sure more people save within pension schemes and we encourage more occupational pension schemes. I think I’ve tried to reflect that principle in my thinking. I THINk IT IS AbOUT RECOgNISINg WHERE A DOMESTIC SYSTEM IS IN PlACE AND DOINg WEll AND NOT DISTURbINg IT You said that the IORP II Directive cannot solve all of Europe’s ‘outstanding pension problem difficulties’, what further steps could be taken to solve these problems? I think we need to ally our long-term investment strategy now with pension provision. I mean the Commission’s European long-term investment funds (ELTIF) proposal that is now in place is a wonderful opportunity to get long-term investment going in Europe. There’s also the developments on the Capital Markets Union (CMU). We need to be able to ally pension needs with those long-term investment needs in Europe. I’m also interested in the potential proposals that may come from the Commission on Pan-European Pensions (PEPs), which would be a third pillar private pension scheme based in a 29th regime operation, where people would pay into a European-wide pension scheme. I think that has the potential to really revolutionise pension cover provision, especially in eastern and central Europe or the Mediterranean where the level of occupational pensions is very small. What are your thoughts on EIOPA’s proposal of the holistic balance sheet? I’m not in favour of it because I think it’s going to lead to more cost and while I’m very conscious of the work that EIOPA do, I think we need to have a realistic debate. A lot of these pension schemes are predicated on growth into the future. I know that the low interest or no interest environment, which provides very little yield, is really challenging for those pension schemes. I think the holistic balance sheet is really Solvency II by the back door. I think it would undermine a lot of the progress that we’re trying to make. The pensions stress test was also launched earlier this year, which received criticism from the industry. Do you think it has been worthwhile? EIOPA has a job to do and I respect its work and we’re likely to see next year a further examination of stress tests. I think these are worthwhile exercises as it’s important we highlight where schemes are in deficit and where issues need to be resolved. We’ve got to solve those problems by having better regulation, by having more cross-border IORPs and better economies of scale rather than by imposing more costs. ■ www.europeanpensions.net 37 Management Relationships t hings haven’t been going too well for the Keva pension fund in recent times. At the start October the Finnish fund - which provides pensions for local government, the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland and Kela, the country’s social insurance institution - announced that its CEO had resigned. Jukka Männistö’s resignation letter cited a crisis of confidence between himself and Keva’s board. It was handed in almost two years on from when his predecessor, Merja Ailus, presented her own notice following a fringe benefits and personal expenses scandal. The fallout from Ailus’ abruptlyended tenure resulted in Finland putting new governance rules in place at the start of this year. These focused on openness and clear governance guidelines in relation to financial transactions involving individual board members. Männistö’s walkout is unlikely to provoke a similar response, but it has acted as a reminder of the various conflicts of interests that those running pension funds across Europe have to occasionally confront, and overcome. Even in countries with pension systems as tightly run as in the Netherlands and Germany, discord may be starting to find its way into board meetings on a more regular basis. Seeds of discontent KAS Bank pension fund trustee Tamis Stuker says that it has been highly unusual to have strong disagreement leading to resignations within Dutch funds up until now. Traditionally, he says, the governance model followed in the country has favoured parity with half the board members appointed by the employer and half by employees. “By law I am obliged to consider 38 www.europeanpensions.net scheme management Balance of power With heightened funding concerns, tensions could be set to rise across European pension boards as traditional power bases are challenged, finds Marek Handzel WR IT TE N BY Ma r ek H a nd z el, a f r eel a nce j o ur na l i s t the benefits of decisions for all stakeholders, including the sponsors, retirees, active members and even the Dutch National Bank; every possible interest group you can think of. “That combination doesn’t really give you a whole lot of leeway to favour one group over the other. “ What’s more, Dutch funding and investment and funding discussions usually take a very prescriptive route. “Financing is fairly straightforward as there is a set of rules that you have to adhere to. You can discuss the amounts and how you exactly follow the rules, Management Relationships but that’s more about the details.” Nevertheless, as Stuker points out, the increasing burden of retirement provision can lead to more serious disputes, particularly when employers decide to terminate their DB agreement with the pension fund. “When that happens you have to set up an extra buffer to make sure that you are able to pay all the benefits that you need to. So you do need money to keep operations going for a while even though the fund is closed.” This has not gone unnoticed by the country’s regulator, DNB. In February of this year, it issued guidance on how funds should spot conflicts of interest and take measures to ensure that their decision-making was “balanced and transparent”. Across the border in Germany, a similar trend could creep in, as Stuker’s colleague, Frank Vogel, explains. The sales managing director for KAS Bank says that pension liabilities have come into focus at companies who offer pension benefits, as they have become much more closely linked to actual pension assets. “Funding levels in this sector lie on average between 50-60 per cent,” he says. “The unfunded side on the balance sheet is causing more headaches and one factor is the decreasing discount rate which has a huge impact on those liabilities. “Set at 5.04 per cent in 2012 it is now expected to be around 3.8 per cent in 2015, based on Bundesbank assumptions, and could be as low as 1.23 per cent by the year 2024. This decrease could lead ThE incrEaSing BurDEn of rETirEmEnT proviSion can lEaD To morE SEriouS DiSpuTES to a doubling of pension liabilities on the balance sheet. This will certainly be a burden that has a huge impact on those companies and will lead to tension.” Germany may be able to ride through some of the pressure hoisted on board dynamics however, thanks to a certain prevailing attitude and the structure of its corporate pension boards. Pension boards are always made up of the corporate sponsor’s employees and many Germans are reluctant to bite the hand that feeds them, says Vogel. Further alleviation is also provided through the popularity of direct insurance retirement saving plans and Pensionskasse, says Lutz Hoheisel, a partner with law firm Squire Patton Boggs in Frankfurt. These heavily regulated vehicles, with their ultra-conservative investment strategies and ring-fenced governance structures, don’t allow for any conflicts of interest to creep into proceedings. Drawing battle lines Where heads have clashed more frequently has been in the UK. Broadstone actuarial director John Broome Saunders says that heated discussions have always existed within the country’s huge DB sector. Nowadays though, the nature of conflicts has changed somewhat. In the past, he says, one classic issue would be that of a finance director acting as a trustee and having a strong influence on the direction of funding discussions to the possible detriment of scheme members. Today, however, the mirror opposite can be true. “Often if you don’t have professional trustees, then the lay trustees are either receiving, or expect to receive pensions from the www.europeanpensions.net 39 Management Relationships ThErE arE SiTuaTionS WhErE ThE EmploYEr DoESn’T fEEl aBlE or Willing To puT ThE monEY in ThE plan ThaT ThE TruSTEES fEEl iS nEcESSarY scheme in the future. And therefore you do tend to find that there is potential for conflict there,” says Saunders. Choosing which inflation index to calculate benefit increases is a standard acid test. CPI, the measure now used to calculate the state pension by the UK government, has historically always been less generous than the RPI index. Many trustees therefore opt for the old RPI index, which can only mostly be explained by self-interest. Other scenarios where trustees and sponsors can clash is over de-risking. Plans to buy out schemes are often driven by trustees, says Saunders, but their motives need to be questioned. “Is it being driven by trustees because they see it as the best way to secure their benefits? Or is it trustees wanting it because they think it’s the best thing for the scheme as a whole? If it’s the former, then that’s questionable. It’s the employer who should be ultimately making those decisions.” In the UK, however, the relationship between trustees, pension managers and sponsors can be one where the latter find that they are walking on eggshells. Trustees, as Saunders underlines, 40 www.europeanpensions.net have the ability to wind up a scheme. This nuclear option, as he calls it, is an incredibly powerful weapon in their negotiating armoury. “Just to threaten to use it is enough to scare quite a lot of employers,” he says. Although trustees can threaten Armageddon, ultimately however, unlike some of its continental neighbours, there is an arbitrator that UK schemes can turn to. “There are situations where the employer doesn’t feel able or willing to put the money in the plan that the trustees feel is necessary and in those circumstances you wouldn’t normally see a trustee board resigning, that doesn’t happen,” Squire Patton Boggs partner Judith Donnelly says. “Instead, they would refer the issue to The Pensions Regulator and then the regulator would impose its own funding plan.” Across the Irish Sea, trustees now have similar, if not stronger, levels of power to those of their UK colleagues. Two cases in the last couple of years, involving the Element Six and Omega Pharma pension schemes, have cemented trustees’ influence in Ireland. The first case saw the schemes’ trustees battle off a challenge from members who claimed a breach of trust and conflict of interest in the trustees’ acceptance of a funding plan. The second found in favour of the trustees of the Omega Pharma DB scheme in their claim for deficit contributions against the scheme’s employers. After having to go all the way to the Court of Appeal, the trustees succeeded in obtaining €2,439,194 to plug a deficit gap. Both results mean that it would take a bold employer to challenge trustee funding decisions, and a very confident membership to confront the scheme’s financial guardians. ■ Pensions Administration ADMIN Robots versus humans Nick Martindale explores the need for a balance between automation and human intervention within pensions administration WRIT T E N BY N ick Ma r T i Nda l e, f r eel a Nce j o ur N a l i s T T echnology is becoming an increasingly important part of the pensions landscape, both in terms of engaging members and in the behind-the-scenes administration functions that are required for any scheme to run effectively. The need for technology “The technology underpins the quality of the administration and the member experience,” says the UK’s Pensions Administration Standards Association (PASA) board member Michele HironsWood. “Good technology not only maintains high levels of data integrity through data validation but also allows for sophisticated automation and process management, which are key enablers to member self-service functionality.” Indeed, the level of automation that can be achieved without manual intervention is becoming a core consideration for trustees when looking for a provider, adds fellow PASA board member Geraldine Brassett. “In an ideal world a straightforward case should flow through from employer to member without ever being touched by an administrator,” she contends. The recent pensions freedoms reforms in the UK have only served to make this more important, says adds Premier head of administration services Dan Taylor. “Trustees need to be evaluating whether providers’ systems are flexible enough to handle a more complex administrative landscape of defined contribution de-accumulation options such as UFPLS and drawdown,” he says. “They should also be making sure that platforms have full end-to-end straight-through-processing solutions to reduce risk and delays in members’ investment options being implemented.” www.europeanpensions.net 41 Pensions Administration Providing a balance Yet this does not mean the role of the administrator is redundant, or that technology is the only factor that should be considered when selecting a partner. “To only focus on the technology would be to ignore a very large part of what makes a client/provider relationship successful – the culture and the people in each organisation,” says Mercer UK retirement administration business leader Rich Tuff. “A well matched partnership will help ensure a shared vision and delivery of what makes an outstanding service. This is very much a ‘people business’ and a focus on only one facet could prove expensive in the long run.” Profund Solutions managing director Malcolm Johnson believes technology is there to help, rather than replace, the traditional administrator, freeing them up to focus on higher-value activities. “With the constant pressure on administrators to undertake more complex tasks at higher volumes, the value that automation can bring to support the role of the administrator has never been more important,” he says. “Low-volume, high-complexity tasks such as transfer value calculations, which were typically undertaken by the actuary or by spreadsheet, have become highvolume and more complex tasks, as members look to understand the value of their pension benefits. Having such calculations automated within the administration system itself can not only save the trustees money in actuarial fees, but allows administrators to provide a faster and more efficient service to members,” Johnson adds. Alongside this, many providers and schemes will be required to administer defined benefit (DB) schemes for many years to come, adds Brassett. “The need for 42 www.europeanpensions.net administrators with strong technical DB knowledge will remain,” she says. “In addition, while many DB schemes have undertaken extensive data cleaning, the guarantees and grandfathered benefits that still feature in many designs mean that, in some cases, automating calculations is not cost-effective and cases will continue to need to be processed manually,” Brassett explains. To only Focus on The Technology would be To ignoRe a veRy laRge PaRT oF whaT makes a clienT/ PRovideR RelaTionshiP successFul - The culTuRe and The PeoPle in each oRganisaTion The human touch There is, however, a shift away from the ‘all-round’ administrator, she says, and a trend towards providers training individuals to support particular schemes where there is less automation or a different model to standard provisions. There are other factors, too, which need to be considered when selecting a provider. “Of equal, if not greater, importance is the level and quality of resourcing, so how many administrators are allocated to a contract and what type of professional training and support they receive,” suggests Taylor. “Even in the most technologically advanced service you still need good quality people turning the handle and being on hand to answer increasingly technical member enquiries.” Brassett points out that trustees are now expected to become much more involved in the governance of administration, so administrators need to be able to respond rapidly and effectively. “Trustees are increasingly asking for information on disaster recovery and business continuity so it is important to ensure that these aspects are robust at the outset,” she says. Full potential When it comes to technology, trustees also need to be sure they are getting the full functionality they are shown in any sales presentation, warns Veratta business development manager Tom Nimmo, including checking the ability of the administrators to use this. “Even market-leading systems will only be effective if they are used correctly and to their full potential,” he says. “Something to look out for is ensuring that system automations such as member benefit calculations and letter production will be implemented for the scheme. The criticality of using systems properly means that administrators are as important as ever.” The longevity of the system is another factor that should be taken into account, adds Trafalgar House Pensions Administration business operations manager Phil Claridge. “Questions should be asked around the technology on which the administration platform is based, how flexible and futureproof it is, the support and upgrade structure, how easy it is to automate and what access can be made available to members,” he says. “The member access aspect in particular is becoming more important, particularly in the DC space. The more members can do themselves, the less strain there is on providers and the more cost-effective the service can be.” Pensions Administration Just how well schemes are using their budgets to get the right administrator is open to debate. “There are still huge opportunities for improvement in the marketplace,” says Taylor. “We regularly see schemes that are being overcharged and underserved by their administrators. Trustees are reluctant to change as they see the process as too complex, too high risk and too much work. This reluctance has ultimately resulted in falling standards across the market.” Tuff, meanwhile, points out that many third-party administrators (TPA) spend millions of pounds each year on system development, but also stresses the need for them to invest in their own staff and in member-facing applications. “Demonstrating commitment to the TPA market should include training and development spend as well as technology spend,” he says. “Creating a workforce of ‘button pressers’ benefits no one, and an experienced, knowledgeable workforce will provide a far superior service to clients and members alike.” The pension sector as a whole also has room for improvement, particularly when compared to its sister banking industry, contends Claridge. “While the banking industry has long since moved to an online self-service model, the majority of pension schemes still don’t have a member website,” he points out. “This needn’t be a huge expense for pension schemes as many modern administration platforms should provide some level of online access as standard.” Often, it is the schemes themselves rather than the administrators that are the issue, says Nimmo. He identifies two issues as particular problems in preventing schemes from fulfilling the administrative needs of their members: poor quality data and the need for system migration and calculation automation. “There is normally a significant cost associated with these exercises and it can be offputting for many pension schemes,” he says. “However, adopting a modern administration system can rapidly offset the initial set-up costs so it’s something that all pension schemes should consider at regular intervals.” Ultimately, trustees will have to find the right balance between ensuring their administrator has the latest technology, in a form that allows it to benefit from any future improvements, with the other elements that are so important to the overall success of a scheme’s operation. Taylor, though, sounds a note of caution. “Trustees will undoubtedly spend more time looking at the platforms administrators use as they underpin cost, risk and member service options,” he says. But they need to be cautious and not be seduced by state-ofthe-art online platforms that distract from an erratic, poorquality core service. Trustees also need to engage with their members to better understand what they actually want and need, instead of pursing digital engagement strategies with memberships that would prefer more traditional communication channels.” ■ www.europeanpensions.net 43 Capital Markets Union r e g u l at i o n Adding complexity David Shearer explores the Capital Markets Union, securitisation and the impact on pensions WR IT TEN BY Dav iD She are r, par tn e r at g lo b a l l eg a l p r ac t i ce, no r to n r o S e F ul b r i g h t t he securitisation regulation announced as part of the EU’s Capital Markets Union package is intended to assist in its overall aim of achieving higher levels of economic growth. Securitisation, in this context, means the repackaging of an exposure or pool of exposures into debt obligations that are repaid from the proceeds of back exposures and are tranched into different layers of credit risk. However, it threatens to become a patchwork of competing and possibly overlapping regulatory bodies with investors still subject to regulation by their sectoral regulators. Who will regulate the originators, sponsors, original lenders and issuers is as yet less clear. For issuers who are not currently regulated as an institutional occupational pension fund (IORP), bank, insurer, Ucits, or alternative investment fund (e.g. a manufacturing concern that wishes to securitise its receivables or a property company that wishes to securitise its rental income), it is left to member states to designate one or more competent authorities to regulate them. The exact basis on which such designation is to take place is left to the relevant member states – it would be unfortunate if one of the results was multiple regulators seeking to claim jurisdiction in relation to the same issuers. 44 www.europeanpensions.net What does this mean for pensions? IORP investors may need to familiarise themselves with the requirements of a range of different regulators of securitisation issuers, bearing in mind that some may apply the rules differently to others. They may also need to be alert to situations where an IORP regulator takes a different view to the regulator of an issuer. Unless the relevant competent authorities adopt a safe harbour regime in relation to differing opinions between regulators, certain IORP investors may need to follow the approach approved by more conservative of the regulators. One potential concern to IORP investors will be whether the determination by a competent authority in a different jurisdiction to the IROPs that there has been a breach of the regulation will also cause the relevant securitisation to be deemed to be in breach in the IORP’s jurisdiction as well, with potential implications for the ability to continue to hold that securitisation or for the solvency capital treatment of that securitisation. It is slightly too early to say whether, as intended, the regulation will consistently regulate all securitisations where the issuer or investor is in Europe. Each EU jurisdiction is to appoint competent authorities to act as regulators of investors and issuers within their jurisdiction. The degree of extra-territoriality applying in respect of the securitisation regulation is only likely to become clearer once the relevant sanctions regimes have been published. This will demonstrate the degree to which a non-EU located issuer will be expected to comply with the issuer obligations under the securitisation regulation. The exclusion of non-EU issuers from the European securitisation market (were this to be the effect of the securitisation regulation) would not necessarily be positive for the European issuers – some investors might choose not to allocate funds to the asset class if they felt it was not sufficiently liquid and trading non-EU bonds when European issuance is quiet would be one way of maintaining liquidity and critical mass during quiet periods in Europe. Due diligence The due diligence requirements previously applying to banks under the capital requirements regulation will now apply to IORPs. In addition, with the introduction of positive requirements for issuers, all investors (including IORPs) will be required to verify the satisfaction of those positive issuer obligations by the issuer. Thus various, quite detailed transaction structuring and documentation requirements that are Capital Markets Union supposed to be the responsibility of the issuer to implement will nevertheless be the responsibility of investors to double check. This suggests that the decision making process around investments in securitisations will be time consuming and potentially costly. IORPs are going to have to ensure they have sufficiently documented (and observed) processes in place to ensure that any securitisation they invest in meets all the requirements imposed, not only on the occupational pension fund, but also the issuer. It is maybe too early to say that the securitisation regulation amounts to a charter for lawyers and advisers who will scrutinise securitisation documentation on behalf of IORPs and report back to them on compliance with the various regulatory requirements, but it does not seem an altogether unlikely outcome. What the penalty will be for IORP investors that fail to comply with such due diligence requirements is not yet clear. The draft prudential requirements directive published concurrently with the securitisation regulation only applies to credit institutions and investment firms. However, a second directive on the activities and supervision of IORPs is expected later this year, which may aim to impose a new solvency capital regime. It may be indicative that the penalty for banks or investment banks that fail to comply with the due diligence requirement will be, for a first offence, a risk weight increase of at least 250 per cent (capped at 1,250 per cent) of the risk weight otherwise applied to the offending position. Such capital requirement increase is to be greater for each subsequent breach, with no upper limit (and no ‘slate wiping’ provision – a breach occurring 50 years after the previous breach would, in principle, still attract a higher penalty than the previous one). Whether a similar regime will be adopted IORPs remains to be seen. Simple, transparent and standardised (STS) securitisation The securitisation regulation creates a new category of STS securitisation. In fact it creates two such categories of STS securitisation, one for non-asset backed commercial paper (ABCP) and the other for ABCP securitisations. The intent is that the two should be broadly similar, but recognise the structural differences between the two types of securitisation. The requirements include that the underlying exposures be homogenous in type, performing, to borrowers with good credit and be full recourse to the borrowers. The securitisation is to be clearly documented, selfliquidating, any interest rate or currency mismatches be hedged and the portfolio not actively managed. There are also requirements, novel in Europe, for the provision of static and dynamic pool data and cash flow models. For ABCP, there are restrictions on the maturity mismatches (underlying assets not to have a maturity of more than two years) and requirements for sponsor liquidity support. While it may become clearer during the implementation phase, it is not entirely clear that any issuer will be able to comply with the hedging requirements. While securitisation swaps do not need to be cleared, the collateralisation requirements for OTC derivatives have not been disapplied by the securitisation regulation. There is only a reference in the recitals to an ‘appropriate level’ of collateralisation being required, bearing in mind the secured nature of the swap obligations. This appears to have been drafted completely disregarding that in a properly structured securitisation there will be no assets available for collateralisation at all. Banks and investment banks will receive, subject to meeting the requirements of the prudential regulation, better regulatory capital treatment for STS securitisations than for non-STS securitisations. What regulatory benefit there will be to occupational pension funds for investing in STS rather than non-STS securitisations remains to be seen. The future of securitisation for pension funds Should IORPs expect to be inundated with new securitisation papers following the adoption of the securitisation regulation? Sadly, the answer is probably not. Issuers, previously unregulated in this market, will now have to come to grips with their newly regulated status. Likewise, the regulators will need to get to grips with the market and their role in it. The scope of the securitisation market in Europe is also likely to be circumscribed by this regulation, making it impossible to create securitisations that fall outside the scope of chapter two (which is currently possible if you can find an investor who is not bound by the capital requirement regulatory risk retention rules and willing to buy it). The pre-securitisation regulation position in this regard is arguably, in a market dominated by institutional investors, the appropriate balance between compliance and freedom of contract. This regulation, sadly, puts regulation and stasis ahead of dynamism and free movement of capital. It also doesn’t offer investors any real protections not in existence prior to the GFC, while offering plenty of new disincentives to issuers and it will likely be increasing compliance costs for all involved in the market. ■ www.europeanpensions.net 45 Pension fund Costs SCHEME MANAGEMENT A question of cost Edmund Tirbutt assesses levels of cost in the European pension fund space and whether schemes will place greater importance in this area in the near future WR IT TEN BY E dmun d TirbuT T, A FrE E LAnCE J O ur nA L i S T C ost control, as in any area of business, remains a significant issue for European pension funds but major improvements have been made in this respect during the last decade. The main drivers have been tighter regulation, technological advance, an increasingly competitive marketplace and an awareness of the need to pull out all the stops to tackle deficits. Cost efficiency Cardano head of innovation Stefan Lundbergh observes a big emphasis on cost efficiency in both the Netherlands and the UK, where he is primarily involved in advising occupational pension funds, and also 46 www.europeanpensions.net in Sweden – where he lives. “A lot of unhealthy business practices have been exposed and dealt with via regulation, and the industry is much more healthy than 10 years ago,” he says. “We are not noticing any trends for costs to increase. In fact it’s the other way around as people are becoming much more cost aware.” Punter Southall head of international Julia Whittle also believes that, if anything, costs have been getting better rather than worse, and points to greater transparency being evident in quotes she receives. “When we get quotes from providers in different countries they tend to be much clearer about the costs involved than before,” she comments. “So we don’t have to go back and ask further questions.” Aegon investment director Nick Dixon observes that around 10 years ago the annual management charge on a good passive fund used to be around 50 basis points and that it is now seven or eight basis points, whilst during the same period the charge for an actively managed fund has reduced from around 165 basis points to around 80. The provider’s fee – covering plan administration – has also reduced from around 60 to 65 basis points to around 35 whilst the cost of advice has also fallen, but by a far more modest margin. Dixon says: “Fees have been more resilient but typically they have shifted from an up-front fee and commission to an ongoing charge and, overall have come down a bit. I am not aware of pension costs generally going up in any European countries but they may seem to be higher to some people because inflation is lower. If you are now getting gross returns of 3 per cent and costs of 1 per cent then costs of one-third of returns may look worse than in past years when annual returns were 8 per cent or 9 per cent and costs could well have been around 2 per cent.” In Ireland, Trustee Decisions managing director James Kavanagh can negotiate annual management charges down to around 40 basis points for active funds. “I think, certainly since the late 1990s, independent trustees have been more proficient in understanding charges,” he states. “Fifteen years ago it was a different world but we are now in a new paradigm and we know that if we have scale we can drive managers down. Charges in Ireland are quite high for individual pensions but not for group ones.” Interestingly, however, statistical Pension fund Costs research by the OECD has found that, even for individual pensions, costs either decreased or stayed the same in most European countries between 2004 and 2014. There was a slight increase in Switzerland but the only significant increase occurred in Poland, and this can be explained by the recent major changes to the country’s private pensions systems. Improvements Nevertheless, many commentators who testify to a downward trend in pension costs tend to qualify their statements by pointing out that there still remains room for improvement. Whittle says: “There is still some way to go and we can’t afford to get complacent. “I think that some sort of European directive on costs would be useful, but there is nothing in the pipeline.” According to the OECD’s financial affairs division private pensions analyst Stephanie Payet, some countries can still do better than they are doing currently. “Estonia, Spain, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia and the Czech Republic still have charges well above average, she explains.” Indeed, Novarca CEO and founder Marcel Staub believes that costs will become such an issue with European pension funds that in five years’ time people won’t touch investments if they don’t understand the costs in the same way that they haven’t been prepared to invest where they haven’t understood the risks since the 2008 financial crisis. He says: “There is a general change in environment in which people are starting to think about costs. You only get a good performing asset if the relationship between return, risk and cost is healthy, and I feel that if you don’t have full transparency in these three areas you shouldn’t be taking an investment decision. A lot of the yOU ONLy GET A GOOD PERFORMING ASSET IF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RETURN, RISK AND COST IS HEALTHy reason that European pension funds don’t get the right relationship between the three is that costs are not transparent.” Transparency Staub acknowledges that regulation has the single biggest impact on transparency and that transparency has the single biggest influence on cost, meaning that pension funds in some countries have a head start. For example, private equity funds have to show degrees of transparency to Swiss pension funds that they don’t have to do anywhere else. Similarly, although ‘bundled brokerage’ – which sees research fees being embedded in brokerage – is not actually illegal anywhere, it is perceived as bad practice in both the Switzerland and the UK. But his main message to European pension funds in all different regulatory regimes is “not to close your eyes”. In particular, he feels many are guilty of false economies and need to spend more on resources to save costs in the long run. He continues: “A lot of pension funds are understaffed and should man up. For example in Switzerland very few pension funds have a Bloomberg Terminal but virtually every asset manager in the world has one. The whole issue about cost is having good information and understanding it but most pension funds run on a very small budget and they may think that spending $2,000 a month for a Bloomberg desk is too expensive, even though they may be spending hundreds of thousands of dollars a month on asset management fees. “Most investment funds have a choice of share prices, and Bloomberg can tell you about these and about whether you are getting a good rate from your bank. We’ve seen hedge fund of funds structures where the costs have eaten up the entire investment after six or seven years but in many cases the pension funds hadn’t even noticed because the overall return was still good.” Dr. Ashby Monk, executive and research director at the Global Projects Center, Stanford University, agrees that if European pension funds knew what they were paying for they might choose to do things differently. “A lot of fees are not being supervised in a rigorous manner and so there is a complacency amongst big asset managers,” he says. “If we really dug in and explained to European pension funds the difference between gross and net returns they would really get onto it. Most people view the bits they save from fees and costs as being irrelevant but there are huge benefits in understanding them. “There is no standard market price in private markets, which are a bit like secondhand car sales. But Sweden is more efficient than most other European countries because they are very professional, and the Netherlands and Denmark are also good at cost control.” Monk even goes so far as to suggest that remuneration for external advisers should rise in line with investment performance because at the moment it’s hard to understand why some advisers are earning their fees. This certainly seems revolutionary but if Staub’s predictions about the importance that pension funds will attach to costs in five years’ time prove true it is not hard to see it happening. ■ www.europeanpensions.net 47 Pension Talk In their own words... Industry personalities’ comments on the hot topics affecting the European pensions space On the Irish pension fund levy not continuing into 2016 “The pension fund levy has done its job and is no longer needed to fund the 9 per cent VaT rate because it is more than made up by increased activity and employment. So i can confirm that the remaining pension fund levy of 0.15 per cent introduced for 2014 and 2015 will end this year and not apply in 2016. The original 0.6 per cent levy ended in 2014.” irish Minister for finance Michael noonan 48 www.europeanpensions.net On the need for Italian pension reform “if you look at it from the angle of the employee all the reforms will make retirement income smaller than it used to be. But when you had a first pillar guaranteeing 80 to 90 per cent of your final salary, not considering contributions you have made, this kind of system was not responsible and was unfair. “if i were in the government i would try to push more people into occupational pensions, because having your risk spread across two pillars, or even three, is very sound from a financial point of view.” candriam risk global head of client relations for europe and the Middle east renato Guerriero franceSco BriGanTi european association of Paritarian institutions (aeiP) director “Active workers are paying twice: high contributions to the first pillar, taxes on investment returns and then maybe they will pay indirectly through the financial transactions tax. All the burden is on the younger generation; not enough contributions are made by the older generation.” roBerTo Veronico Mercer’s retirement leader and principal for italy “In a few years the ratio between active workers who pay contributions to social security and retired people will decrease dramatically, so the current level of pension is not sustainable forever. There is a strong need for complementary pensions.” Pension Talk On the need for a balance within administration between automation and human intervention “The technology Dan Taylor Premier head of administration services “Trustees need to be evaluating whether providers’ administration and the member systems are flexible enough to handle a more experience. Good technology not only complex administrative landscape of defined contribution de-accumulation options such as maintains high levels of data integrity UFPLS and drawdown. They should also be making through data validation but also allows sure that platforms have full end-to-end straightthrough-processing solutions to reduce risk and for sophisticated automation and process delays in members’ investment options being management, which are key enablers to implemented.” underpins the quality of the member self-service functionality.” rich Tuff Mercer uK retirement administration business leader “To only focus on the technology would be to ignore a very large part of what makes a client/provider relationship successful – the culture and the people in each organisation. A well matched partnership will help ensure a shared vision and delivery of what makes an outstanding service. This is very much a ‘people business’ and a focus on only one facet could prove expensive in the long run.” Pensions administration Standards association (PaSa) board member Michele hirons-Wood On how to manage investment shocks, such as the Volkswagen scandal and the crashing of the Chinese stock markets “There are three quality checks we go through. We look at the solidity of the balance sheet, the substantial competitive advantage, and the quality of the management. if any of those is not what you’ve expected, such as lots of debts that have been kept hidden, a new competitor that has breached that advantage, or the management has not behaved as you would expect, you have to re-examine the investment and rethink.” KeiTh GuThrie cardano chief investment officer “The China crash points to more ‘systemic risk’. That’s where there is a risk that can cause a reaction in another part of the economy. The situation in China is much more like that. That’s the type of risk we spend time trying to figure out. There are clear linkages through all the commodities suppliers to China. There’s a clear ripple effect if China is slowing down.” ThS Partners founding partner cato Stonex www.europeanpensions.net 49 Premium Providers Guide To advertise in Premium Providers Guide contact Sam Ridley +44 (0)20 7562 4386 BULK ANNUITIES Rothesay Life Ltd Sammy Cooper-Smith T: 020 7552 7505 E: Sammy.Cooper-Smith@ rothesaylife.com www.rothesaylife.com Rothesay Life is one of the leading providers of regulated insurance solutions in the UK market for pensions de-risking, with over £15 billion of business written. Rothesay Life’s risk management strategy has been designed with a focus on maintaining the financial strength to withstand volatile markets and a changing regulatory environment. We bring a high degree of security in the long-term provision of pensions through: - meticulous and precise management of risks to maintain balance sheet strength; and - robust operational processes. In execution, we seek to maximise value for our clients through creating and delivering tailored solutions and optimising market timing whilst minimising execution risks. We offer a full suite of insurance solutions including bulk purchase annuities and buy-out solutions to assist trustees and corporate clients in addressing their de-risking objectives. DATA AND ADmINISTRATIoN INVESTmENT mANAGERS PIMCO Europe Ltd Nations House 103 Wigmore Street London W1U 1QS Tel: + 44 20 7872 1300 Fax: + 44 20 7973 0023 Web: www.pimco.com PIMCO is a leading provider of specialist investment solutions. With 11 offices across the major financial markets and over 35 years' experience servicing pension funds, we are committed to deploying our expertise in developing innovative investment solutions to meet their objectives. We work closely with our clients to understand their particular investment requirements and to develop tailored solutions, which might include our broad fixed-income capabilities or strategies such as equities, commodities or real estate, which we implement using fixed-income based portable alpha techniques. Moreover, we have well developed platforms for LDI, Absolute Return and Asset Allocation solutions. PIMCO Europe Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS) in the UK. Premium Providers Guide To advertise in Premium Providers Guide contact Sam Ridley +44 (0)20 7562 4386 INVESTmENT mANAGERS Cairn Capital 27 Knightsbridge London SW1X 7LY T: +44 20 7259 4800 W: www.cairncapital.com Cairn Capital is an independent full-service credit asset management and advisory firm. We operate in areas of credit including corporate bonds, ABS, loans and real estate debt ranging from investment grade to high yield with an emphasis on the European credit market. Our ortfolio management expertise spans pooled investment funds and segregated managed accounts. Our advisory mandates have included analysis, valuation and monitoring of large pools of complex credit assets for institutional clients. Cairn Capital has built relationships with and manages assets for UK and non-UK pension funds. Discretionary assets under management across our credit funds, managed accounts and CLOs total $2.6 billion. We also have a further $4.7 billion of legacy assets under management and $14.2 billion of assets under long term advice.* * As of 31st March 2014. Figures include assets under management and advice for Cairn Capital and its affiliate, Cairn Capital North America Inc. PENSIoNS ADmINISTRATIoN Technology and Administration Solutions Embracing technology and flexibility to deliver • Global administration solutions • Market leading online tools • Flexible benefits administration and total rewards statements Towers Watson is represented in the UK by Towers Watson Limited. Copyright © 2014 Towers Watson. All rights reserved. TW-EU-2014-41066. November 2014. towerswatson.com Westgate, 120-130 Station Road, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 1WS T +44 1737 241144 F +44 1737 241496 WINNER Clive Witherington +44 1737 273860 [email protected] Mike McMillen +44 1737 273173 [email protected] Advertise your services directly to our subscribers using our Premium Providers Guide includes full online listing for more details contact: Sam Ridley [email protected] +44 (0)20 7562 4386 www.europeanpensions.net T R U S T E D H E R I T A G E A D V A N C E D T H I N K I N G Intelligent outperformance Many investors see Schroder ISF* QEP Global Core as the intelligent alternative to passive investing – using strong analytical techniques combined with experienced fund manager insight to capture the best opportunities from over 15,000 global stocks. With a proven track record of outperformance**, the fund combines active management and exceptional global diversification to deliver consistent long-term outperformance. Take the smart approach, visit www.schroders.com/qep For professional investors or advisers only. *Schroder International Selection Fund is referred to as Schroder ISF. **Source: Schroders, I Acc share class, the fund outperformed over several calendar years between 1999 and 2014. Source for ratings: Morningstar OBSR, awarded to I Acc share class, as at 31 August 2015. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, prices of shares and the income from them may fall as well as rise and investors may not get the amount originally invested. Issued in September 2015 by Schroder Investment Management Ltd., 31 Gresham Street, EC2V 7QA. Registration No. 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. For your security, communications may be taped or monitored. w47492