12_Ed Tschupp_Public-Private Partnerships at Lihue WWTP

Transcription

12_Ed Tschupp_Public-Private Partnerships at Lihue WWTP
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS ON
KAUA‘I
LĪHU‘E WWTP R-1 UPGRADE
HWEA CONFERENCE
FEBRUARY 2011
HONOLULU, HAWAI‘I
A PROJECT DEVELOPED BY KAUA‘I LAGOONS
RESORT
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE COUNTY OF
KAUA‘I
3
LĪHU‘E WWTP
 OWNED AND
OPERATED BY THE
COUNTY OF KAUA‘I
 2.5 MGD DESIGN,
CURRENT ADF 1.2
MGD
 ADJACENT TO KAUA‘I
LAGOONS RESORT
GOLF COURSE –
LONG TERM
CONTRACT FOR R-2
WATER
 DEVELOPER
Kaua‘i Lagoons
Līhu‘e WWTP
Airport
LĪHU‘E WWTP
CAST OF CHARACTERS
 KAUA‘I LAGOONS RESORT – PROJECT
DEVELOPER
 COUNTY OF KAUA‘I – OWNER/OPERATOR
 AUSTIN TSUTSUMI & ASSOCIATES – DESIGN
ENGINEER
 HARVEY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION –
CONTRACTOR
 AQUA ENGINEERS – KAUA‘I LAGOON’S
REPRESENTATIVE
 BRIANT CONSTRUCTION – CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
 MAJOR EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS:
Why would an otherwise rational Private Developer choose to
partner with a government agency in Hawai‘i on an infrastructure
development project?
Sometimes, the Project just makes too much sense, despite all the
apparent (or perceived) obstacles – this can be a formula for a
WIN/WIN/WIN project.
WHY? – INDEED (THE
DETAILS).
 Kaua‘i Lagoons Resort and the County have long
had a Contract under which the Līhu‘e WWTP R-2
Effluent is the source for the Golf Course irrigation
water supply
 30-year Agreement executed in 2001 for up to 1.5
MGD
 The Agreement specified R-2 Effluent water quality
 Kaua‘i Lagoons Resort’s development plans
necessitated upgrading water quality to meet R-1
requirements
 The logistics and future operation considerations of
doing the Upgrades at the Līhu‘e WWTP were
quicker easier and less costly than the alternative
BENEFITS FOR THE
DEVELOPER
 No commitment of land and resources for a separate
wastewater facility, which would have been
necessary with a stand-alone “polishing plant”
 Permitting additional treatment at an existing facility
much easier than permitting a new wastewater plant
 Solids handling, filter backwash and backup or “offspec” effluent disposal issues much more
straightforward
 The improvement is considered a contribution of
wastewater treatment capacity, qualifying for an
offset of County’s “WTCA” fee for new development
($3.1 million)
 Negotiated an increased reservation of capacity
BENEFITS FOR THE COUNTY
 Upgrade to R-1 facility is consistent with County’s
strategic goals and objectives
 County CIP resources not tasked with the project
design and construction – ultimately saving money
for County and our rate-payers
 Rapid execution of the Project, compared with
typical County project execution timeframe
 Project design robust and expandable, a foundation
for expansion of R-1 system for multiple other future
users
 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY
BENEFITS
LĪHU‘E “GATEWAY” IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
THE R-1 UPGRADE
IMPROVEMENTS
Līhu‘e WWTP
processes include
primary clarification,
biological treatment,
secondary
clarification and
disinfection
(chlorine).
The Project added tertiary Filtration and UV
Disinfection. The “FDS” equipment was installed
between the existing effluent pump station and the
Reuse Irrigation system.
R-2 EFFLUENT
SITE PLAN
FDS SETTING
LĪHU‘E WWTP SITE
PROJECT MILESTONES
 Early 2008 – Project conceptualized
 May 2008 – Right of Entry for Design executed
 July 2008 – Obtained County Council conceptual
approval
 March 2009 – Implementing Agreement executed
 June 2009 – Planning Department approval
 July 2009 – Construction Bids solicited
 August 2009 – Construction contract executed
 January 2010 – Major construction completed
 March 2010 – DOH conditional approval
 August 2010 – DOH final approval
CONSTRUCTION PICTURES
LESSONS LEARNED/CONCLUSIONS
 This Project is a successful example of a Public –
Private Partnership. Key elements:
Well capitalized, motivated developer willing to work
positively with the community and to “run with the ball”
 County agency recognizing opportunity for mutual
benefits and to allow different style of project execution
 Assembling experienced professional team for the
Project
 Stakeholder involvement (Mayor, Council, DOH)

 The Project built capacity for current and future
Sustainable Water Reuse, Improved Water Quality,
met Private Partner Needs and saved Public Funds.
20
MAHALO!