Novel complex models for cancer target validation
Transcription
Novel complex models for cancer target validation
Novel complex models for cancer target validation - the PREDECT project Emmy W. Verschuren, PhD FIMM-EMBL Group Leader IMI2 Info Day 2014 26.08.2014 © FIMM - Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland www.fimm.fi PREDECT Answered the 2009 Call Topic 1 New tools for target validation to improve drug efficacy 26 eligible proposals Topic 2 Molecular biomarkers 27 eligible proposals Topic 3 Imaging biomarkers for anticancer drug development 10 eligible proposals Academic Coordination of the IMI-PREDECT Consortium 1. FIMM Nordic EMBL Translational Institute II. New consortium and research plans III. Young and dynamic team Approximate One Year Negotiation and Preparation Phase ... • Spanning three major pathologies • Integrated by bioinformatics and systems biology tools Breas Prostat Lun Bioinformatics and Systems Biology 9 Academic 3 SME 7 EFPIA WPL/CoL 20 Partners, 26 PIs, over 60 active scientists + support personnel Full project review by Scientific Review committee in Brussels (July 2010) Project Focus & Working GANNTs Contact Launch Meeting at Institute Curie (March 2011) Postdoc Recruitment Campaign Organisation Expertise David Tuveson Cambridge GEMMs & therapeutics Pasi Jänne Dana Farber Cancer Institute Lung cancer, efficacy of EGFR targets Andrew Ewald Lawrence Livermore Johns Hopkins In vitro complex models, breast cancer 3D models, Imaging Peter Sorger MIT and Harvard Systems Biology Allan Balmain UCSF comprehensive cancer center Mouse genetics and prostate cancer models Mina Bissell Organisational Structure & Committees Telcons & Meetings SAB Meeting at the AACR (April 2011) ∼ 20 M€ www.predect.eu 5 year project (Feb 2011-2016) Project & Grant Agreement .. With an Effective Partner Communication & Decision Flow MANAGEMENT John Hickman DSc. (Servier) Steve Wedge PhD. (AstraZeneca) Emmy Verschuren PhD. (FIMM) .. With an Effective Partner Communication & Decision Flow MANAGEMENT John Hickman DSc. (Servier) Steve Wedge PhD. (AstraZeneca) Ralph Graeser (Janssen) Emmy Verschuren PhD. (FIMM) .. With an Effective Partner Communication & Decision Flow MANAGEMENT 9 PHARMA John Hickman DSc. (Servier) Steve Wedge PhD. (AstraZeneca) Ralph Graeser (Janssen) Emmy Verschuren PhD. (FIMM) + .. With an Effective Partner Communication & Decision Flow MANAGEMENT 9 PHARMA 12 SME / ACADEMIA + 1. FIMM & U. of Helsinki, FI ! 2.VTT, FI ! 3. Cardiff University, UK ! 4. EPFL, CH ! 5. Weizmann Institute, IL ! 6. Radboud U. Nijmegen Medical Center, NL ! 7. Erasmus U. Medical Center Rotterdam, NL ! 8. U. Tartu, EE ! John Hickman DSc. (Servier) Steve Wedge PhD. (AstraZeneca) Ralph Graeser (Janssen) Emmy Verschuren PhD. (FIMM) 9. Dr. Fischer-Bosch Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, DE ! 10. Biomedicum Genomics, FI ! 11. IBET, POR ! 12. Oncotest, GER + ! At UH: Emmy Verschuren, FIMM Olli Kallioniemi, FIMM Johan Lundin, FIMM Juha Klefström, Inst. Biom. Outi Monni, FuGu Panu Kovanen, HUS Network of European Scientists (∼25 PhDs/Postdocs) ! www.predect.eu Researchers: ~ 70 scientists in 26 labs in 12 EU countries includes more than 25 PhDs and Postdocs Project Implementation SC MANAGEMENT TEAM IPC Chair: Hickman Vice chair: Graeser Chair: Hickman Vice chair: Graeser Members: WPL, WP coL, legal representatives Members: All partners Members: WPL, WP CoL Project office Decision making (every 6 months) Continual follow up and guidance PROJECT OFFICE Advice (every year) Support WPL + CoL WPL + CoL WPL + CoL WP1 Breast WP2 Prostate SAB EAB Balmain, Bissell, Ewald, Jänne, Sorger, Tuveson Forsse, Smith Advice (every 1.5 years) Annual follow up and guidance WPL WP3 Lung WP5 Dissemination WPL + CoL WP4 Platforms, databases, bioinformatics and systems biology STEERING HICKMAN IMPLEMENTATION MANAGING ENTITY OF IMI JU FUNDING VERSCHUREN COORDINATION IMI JU PREDECT Scientific Advisory Board Contact Organisation Expertise David Tuveson Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Pancreatic cancer, GEMMs, therapeutics Pasi Jänne Harvard Lung cancer therapy Mina Bissell Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory In vitro complex models of breast cancer Andrew Ewald Johns Hopkins 3D models, imaging, morphogenesis Allan Balmain UCSF comprehensive cancer center Mouse genetics and cancer models Two SAB meetings since 2011; next one planned for 2015 PREDECT Science Networking PREDECT’s Mission To validate NOVEL COMPLEX IN VITRO models, to improve on pre-clinical ONCOLOGY target DISCOVERY ‘Can we do better than xenografts or cells grown on plastic ?’ Complex Models to Reduce Attrition Rates ? PhRMA Annual Member Survey, 2011 “ re-structuring the flow-chart of drug discovery to provide early go/ no-go decisions on novel targets, so reducing attrition rates in clinical trials “ Assess Mice as Surrogate Cancer Models ❖ Widely studied mimic of human cancer (subtype) ❖ In vivo maintenance of human patient tumours ❖ Source for perturbable ex vivo organotypic models ❖ Continuous and relatively consistent supply of tumour tissue Xenograft Patient tumorgraft GEMM PREDECT-validated in vitro target validation models Tissue Slices 3D / Bioreactor Project Organisation Pathologies and Model platforms ! ! Breast Prostate ER+ Mol. Path. ! CRPC NSCLC KRAS; LKB1 Tissue Slices 3D Mol. Models Path. ! In vivo Models Project Organisation Pathologies and Model platforms ! ! Breast Prostate ER+ Mol. Path. ! CRPC NSCLC KRAS; LKB1 Comparative Modelling I. Mouse vs human II. In vitro vs in vivo III. Steady state vs perturbed Tissue Slices 3D Mol. Models Path. ! In vivo Models The PREDECT Concept Tissue Slices 3D Co-culture 3D Bioreactor 3D Spheroids 2D on Plastic reconstruction deconstruction = PREDECT starts at both ends of complexity, with stepwise increases / decreases in complexity. Every step is compared to each other and primary tumors. Collaborative Molecular Pathology Platform & TMA Biobank Partner & EFPIA clinical samples 2D on Plastic 3D in Matrix 3D Co-culture 3D Bioreactor Tissue Slices Mouse models Towards Systems Pathology ! FIMM TMA biobank ❖ Web Microscopy shared PREDECT portal ❖ Digital archive and data analysis ❖ Quantitative imaging of cellular responses ❖ Stainings with validated set of 20+ antibodies to measure signaling, pathology, cell type, proliferation, stress Olli Kallioniemi Johan Lundin Shift from upward to downward causation; functional ‘wiring’ of molecules Towards Quantitative Model Validation Antibody stainings Quantitative Pathology Heatmap LUNG CANCER PROSTATE CANCER BREAST CANCER PREDECT Models Outstanding Questions ! ❖ What does a go/no go look like, which read-outs are critical ? !❖ How will successful efforts be transferred to industry ? Image Generation, Annotation and Analysis Pipeline Partners Complex tissue samples Bioinformaticians Metadata archive Molecular Pathologists and Biologists TMA staining, Image digitisation Olli Kallioniemi, Johan Lundin, Sami Blom, Nina Linder, Yinhai Wang, Anne Grote,Tauno Metsalu, Jaak Vilo Image Generation, Annotation and Analysis Pipeline Partners Complex tissue samples Bioinformaticians Metadata archive WebMicroscope Data Hub vs Molecular Pathologists and Biologists TMA staining, Image digitisation Visual Automated image analysis http://vimeo.com/user21191613 Olli Kallioniemi, Johan Lundin, Sami Blom, Nina Linder, Yinhai Wang, Anne Grote,Tauno Metsalu, Jaak Vilo Rigorous Tissue Slice Culture Method Optimisation Tumour collection Slicing Culture Protein analysis >> Do cultured slices mimic the biology of its in situ tumour (viability, proliferation, signalling) • Culture method matters • Careful in vivo vs ex vivo analysis is required, and is not trivial • Differential stress-related expression changes are reason for caution, but can now be systematically taken into account Emma Davies, Simon Barry, Hanneke van Zoggel,Wytske van Weerden, Meng Dong, Matthias Gutekunst, Heiko van der Kuip, Katja Närhi, Emmy Verschuren Stirred Bioreactor 3D Model Analysis Functionality and heterogeneity of expression, here of the Estrogen Receptor, can also be established by imaging. TMA embedded Confocal analysis Catarina Brito, Marta Estrada,Vitor Santo, Micheal Barbier,Yolanda Chong Cross-Oncology Project Collaboration Proximity Ligation Assay technology to probe wiring of signalling pathways Ola Söderberg, Uppsala University PREDECT Impact ❖ Synergistic exchange of expertise on cancer modelling !❖ Unique collaborative molecular pathology biobank platform established !❖ Opportunity for industry to reach out to pre-clinical ‘hospitals’ worldwide (eg CAPR) !❖ Interactions with other IMI and global Public-Private Partnerships, setting a standard (eTRIKS, Oncotrack, Quic-Concept) ❖ ! Awareness on the power and limitations of the current preclinical pipeline ❖ Adoption of select complex models in project laboratories, and industry PREDECT Project Challenges ! ❖ Harmonisation and Prioritisation !❖ IP issues of using mouse models in industry !❖ Sustainability of TMA-based pathology infrastructure !❖ What are the measures of success; what will change practice in industry? !❖ EFPIA partner long-term perspectives & company support ❖ Postdoc publication and career uncertainties View towards Horizon 2020 Knowledge Expectations Ageing population Patient empowerment The right prevention and treatment for the right patient at the right time ‘Now is the time for change’ ! ! Integration of multi-stakeholder interests (scientific, technological, regulatory and healthcare) €€’s Acknowledgements ! Orion-Farmos Research Foundation PREDECT Management John Hickman DSc For Servier Ralph Graeser PhD Laurence Lapôtre Kurt Salmon Janssen And all IMI-PREDECT consortium partners for Collegiality, Dedication and Partnership!