Salary statistics 2012
Transcription
Salary statistics 2012
Salary statistics 2012 Salary statistics 2012 5 Preface 6Table 1.1 September 2012 by university graduation year 7 Table 1.2 September 2012 by year of birth 8Figuree 1.1 Comparison of average salary by university graduation year 9Figuree 1.2 Comparison of average salary by year of birth 10Tariffs for lecturing and consultancy work Salary statistics for private employees 2012 13Preface 14Table 2.1 September salary 2012 by university graduation year 15Table 2.2 September salary 2012 by year of PhD examination 15Table 2.3 Recommended and ascertained starting salaries 16Table 2.4 September salary 2012 by year of birth 17Table 2.5 September salary 2012 by position 17Table 2.6 September salary 2012 by staff responsibility 18Table 2.7 September salary 2012 by place of employment 18Table 2.8 September salary 2012 by position 19Table 2.9 September salary 2012 by industry 19Table 2.10 September salary 2012 by work area 2 20Table 2.11 September salary 2012 by position and university graduation year 22Generally about salary ratios 22Table 2.12 Salary ratio by gender 23Figuree 2.1 Salary ratio 2012 by place of employment 23Figuree 2.2 Salary ratio 2012 by industry 23Figuree 2.3 Salary ratio 2012 by work area 24Figuree 2.4 Number of holiday days 25Table 2.13a Employment in current position 25Table 2.13a Employment in firm 26Figuree 2.5 Employee benefits 26Figuree 2.6 Non-competition clause associated 27Table 2.14 Annual bonus payments 27Table 2.15 Continuing/Further education 2012 28Figuree 2.7 Access to share-based payment 28Figuree 2.8 Exercised option for share-based payment 28Table 2.16a Work area 29Table 2.16b Industry 29Table 2.16c Organizational grading 29Table 2.16d Employment location Contents Salary statistics for public sector employees 2012 31Preface 32Table 3.1 September salary 2012 by university graduation year 33Table 3.2a September salary 2012 by salary grade in the new salary system 33Table 3.2a September salary 2012 by salary grade for civil servants 34Table 3.3a September salary 2012 by place of employment and university graduation year 36Table 3.3b September salary 2012 by place of employment 36Table 3.3c September salary 2012 by place of employment in the regions 37Table 3.4a September salary 2012 by position 37Table 3.4b September salary 2012 for PhD Fellows 37Table 3.5a-d Bonuses and additional work 39Generally about salary ratios 39Table 3.6 Salary ratio by gender 39Figuree 3.1a Salary ratio by place of employment 40Figuree 3.1b Salary ratio by place of employment in hospital pharmacy in the regions 40Figuree 3.2 Are you covered by a local union representative? 41Table 3.7 Breakdown by salary grade – new salary system 41Table 3.8 Members by job titles 41Table 3.9 Members with staff responsibility 41Table 3.10 Continuing and further education Salary statistics for the pharmacy sector 2012 43Preface 44Table 4.1 September salary 2012 by university graduation year 45Table 4.2 September salary 2012 by year of birth 46Table 4.3 September salary 2012 by salary grade with differential allowance 47Table 4.4 September salary 2012 salary comparison by university graduation year 48Table 4.5. Organizational grading 48Table 4.5.1 Pharmacy employees September salary 2012 (average) by organizational grading excluding. performance-related pay 48Table 4.6 The extent of management responsibility 48Table 4.6.1 Pharmacy employees, September salary 2012 (average) by staff responsibility excluding. performance-related pay 49Table 4.7 Number of days attended continuing education within the last 12 months 49Table 4.8 Distribution by continuing education areas 49Table 4.9 Employed at pharmacy 49Table 4.10. Employment in current position 49Table 4.11 Personnel benefits Negotiations 50Negotiations 3 Salary statistics 2012 We have gathered salary statistics here for members of Pharmadanmark employed in private firms, in the public sector and in pharmacies. The salary statistics were collected for the three areas in order to provide greater transparency regarding salary conditions and to thus make it easier to make comparisons across sectors. Comparisons across sectors are particularly interesting for those who are considering changing jobs from one sector to another. The general salary concept used is gross salary, which is salary including personal and employer pension contributions, plus the value of benefits, but excluding overtime payments, bonuses, performance-related pay, one-off payments and on-call duty payments for pharmacies. From the Figurees for this year, you can read that: The vast majority of salaries have continued to develop above the level of prices (inflation is expected to be approx. 2 per cent) and real salaries are therefore increasing, but salaries are developing at different rates depending on the area of employment, seniority and position: • In the private sector, salaries increased significantly in the previous year, and continued to increase more than for comparable groups. The frequent changes of jobs in the private sector may be an important reason for these favourable salary increases, see Table 2.13. • The public sector has seen a far higher increase than last year. • In the pharmacy sector, the increase has more than doubled compared to last year. The pace of salary growth in both the private sector and the pharmacy sector is significantly higher than last year, while the public sector has only experienced a moderate increase compared to last year. There are still large differences in the salaries offered in the private sector compared to the public sector and in pharmacies. The private sector continues to have the highest salaries. A private employee receives an average of approx. DKK 9,100 more the an employee in the public sector and DKK 8,100 more than an employee in a pharmacy. But regardless of the sector, it is important to remember that a high salary is not the only thing to focus on. Besides the salary, there are other important factors to consider, such as paid maternity leave, an attractive holiday scheme, pension etc. This is especially true when signing a contract, since it is more difficult to negotiate improvements at a later date. The overall response rate for the salary statistics survey was 62 per cent this year. Good luck with the negotiations! Pharmadanmark Antje Marquardsen, Chairman. 5 The salary includes both the employee's and employer's pension contributions and the value of benefits, but excludes overtime pay and bonuses, one-off payments and performance-related pay. Ta ble 1. 1 Septem ber 2 0 12 by unive rsit y graduat ion ye ar Year of graduation Number Private Number Public Number Pharmacy -1976 34 70,417 21 55,166 1977 9 70,442 4 54,274 1978 8 67,074 6 47,760 1979 14 70,660 5 53,367 1980 12 81,105 6 54,067 1981 9 69,327 4 64,609 1982 12 70,428 7 54,250 1983 13 69,196 6 56,562 1984 9 71,009 8 51,396 1985 21 71,173 13 52,945 1986 21 64,364 7 52,846 1987 27 74,003 8 55,831 1988 18 69,814 12 62,786 1989 22 68,662 11 55,403 1990 25 69,631 13 55,947 1991 35 70,663 8 60,596 1992 38 69,765 9 57,469 1993 35 68,064 12 53,826 1994 26 63,312 11 51,669 1995 29 69,031 13 55,947 1996 37 62,029 12 48,503 1997 32 59,891 12 50,272 1998 42 61,579 19 48,354 1999 49 61,573 15 48,598 2000 45 59,538 15 47,920 2001 50 55,617 23 46,332 2002 60 56,169 19 47,406 2003 65 53,630 22 44,365 2004 89 53,447 23 44,138 2005 49 49,675 32 45,553 2006 73 49,570 23 42,915 2007 52 47,056 24 42,496 2008 63 44,060 20 39,643 2009 69 42,002 26 37,955 2010 75 41,387 14 33,729 2011 67 41,128 18 34,020 2012 15 39,071 8 31,711 Unspecified 1 Total 1,349 56,745 510 47,654 For comparison, the average salary was used. It is still the private sector that has the highest salaries. The comparisons do not take account of paid/unpaid lunch breaks. 6 54 52,332 18 52,638 16 52,067 11 52,180 10 52,160 11 52,572 12 50,836 8 51,844 8 52,715 12 50,783 17 53,747 7 52,185 14 50,328 17 51,397 6 49,156 14 50,089 12 50,455 11 49,028 13 52,313 11 50,486 14 48,458 13 47,994 9 48,502 10 49,364 16 50,224 23 49,858 12 48,166 21 48,785 20 50,796 22 49,240 26 46,805 14 45,850 33 44,935 25 43,000 30 41,368 29 40,415 14 39,917 3 616 48,668 Ta ble 1 .2 Se p te mb e r 2 012 by yea r of bi r th Year of birth Number Private Number Public Number Pharmacy -1951 37 71,622 26 54,861 1952 11 62,927 8 51,370 1953 17 71,174 5 47,603 1954 16 77,052 5 55,809 1955 10 62,768 6 55,754 1956 17 72,414 10 54,492 1957 19 73,987 7 56,258 1958 15 67,548 13 54,568 1959 19 67,322 8 53,710 1960 21 73,170 7 47,754 1961 25 65,253 8 60,530 1962 25 64,788 17 59,969 1963 35 72,284 10 56,916 1964 24 68,405 8 57,015 1965 37 68,107 11 56,155 1966 23 72,294 10 51,667 1967 29 69,212 10 55,078 1968 29 64,310 9 53,328 1969 24 66,941 14 52,589 1970 30 65,777 9 53,381 1971 37 59,133 13 48,534 1972 61 57,857 22 48,450 1973 57 60,560 10 48,919 1974 54 56,292 28 47,528 1975 61 58,410 28 45,160 1976 74 52,197 18 45,894 1977 77 52,846 29 42,991 1978 71 49,887 21 45,098 1979 59 50,204 29 43,015 1980 67 46,510 24 41,338 1981 46 45,526 17 42,398 1982 47 43,344 21 39,758 1983 48 41,776 10 35,746 1984 49 41,990 13 34,373 1985 49 39,920 13 36,451 1986 - 29 39,282 13 32,090 Total 1,349 56,745 510 47,654 71 22 11 9 17 14 13 11 10 15 11 14 12 12 13 9 8 10 10 11 13 23 20 17 19 18 27 20 23 18 24 14 19 20 20 18 52,160 52,630 54,175 49,509 52,600 50,883 52,576 52,483 51,633 52,574 49,800 51,491 49,109 51,040 50,262 48,533 50,428 49,401 49,432 50,875 48,355 47,985 50,103 48,033 48,204 47,376 48,738 48,710 46,651 46,784 45,066 43,055 42,039 42,467 40,658 40,119 616 48,668 7 The salary is calculated as in Table 1.1, but is distributed according to year of birth. Fi g u re 1. 1 C om p a r i s on of a verage salar y by universit y graduat ion ye ar 90,000 n Public 85,000 n Pharmacy 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 8 2011 2012 2010 2009 2007 2005 2006 2003 2004 2001 2002 1999 2000 1997 1998 1995 1996 1993 1994 1991 1992 1990 1989 1987 1988 1985 1986 1983 1984 1981 1982 1979 1980 1977 1978 0 -1976 Example, year of graduation from university 1997: Private employees have an average salary that is almost DKK 11,900 higher than the average for pharmacy employees with the same level of seniority. Public sector employees have an average salary that is about DKK 9,600 lower than the average for the private sector employees and thereby approx. DKK 2,300 higher than the average for pharmacy employees. n Private 2008 The three employment areas are each represented by a different. F i g ure 1 .2 C omp a ri s o n o f avera g e s a la r y a ccordi n g to yea r of bir t h 90,000 n Private n Public 85,000 n Pharmacy 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 1985 9 1986- 1983 1984 1981 1982 1979 1980 1977 1978 1975 1976 1974 1973 1971 1972 1970 1969 1967 1968 1965 1966 1963 1964 1961 1962 1959 1960 1957 1958 1955 1956 1953 1954 1952 -1951 0 Tariffs for lecturing and consultancy work If you are offered a job as a lecturer or other types of small engagements, you can see guidelines below for what you should charge as a fee for the task. There are no general agreements on remuneration for lecturing. Pharmadanmark therefore recommends that you agree on remuneration in advance. An agreement for remuneration should include: •Payment of costs for materials, slides, overheads, rental of presentation equipment, etc. •Payment of the cost of transport, hotel and other expenses. •Fees for the lecture. The fee should as a minimum, be: •Per lesson of 45-60 minutes/per started hour: DKK 2,613 •Remuneration for participation in a subsequent discussion or similar per hour: DKK 784 Indicative minimum rate for consultancy work The hourly fees for freelance/consultancy/self-employed work for temporary assignments must take account of self-paid vacation, holidays, illness, child's illness, in-service training, administration and unemployed periods between jobs. On this basis, the negotiating committee in Pharmadanmark has set an indicative minimum rate for consultancy work equivalent to two times the hourly salary received by a comparable permanent employee, according to Pharmadanmark's private sector salary statistics. For example: A graduate from 2002 accepts an assignment as a consultant. Gross salary according to the salary statistics: DKK 56,169 per month Hourly salary: 56,169/160 hours = DKK 351 per hour. Consultancy rate: 351 x2 = DKK 702 as hourly fee. 10 Salary statistics for employees in the private sector 2012 The following part of the salary statistics shows the salaries of employees in the private sector. The negotiating committee has set the recommended starting salaries (including pension) as follows: The statistics are based on reports from members of Pharmadanmark working in the private sector. The response rate this year was 62 per cent in the private sector, which is a good increase compared to last year. 1 January 2013: DKK 39,000 per month 1 July 2013: DKK 40,000 per month Salary increased by 4.7 per cent in the past year, taken together and weighted by the number answering per year of graduation from university. Salary levels and salary growth were among the highest when compared with other groups. The recommended starting salaries and the subsequent actual salaries from the last 12 years are presented in Table 2.3. The actual starting salary in 2012 was somewhat higher than last year and slightly higher than the starting salary we recommended. We take this as an indication that, despite the crisis, firms are still willing to pay a competitive salary for academic labour. You can use the statistics during the annual salary negotiations or to negotiate a new contract. If the negotiations take place after 1 January 2013, you should include an annual increase of 4.7 per cent. It may also be useful to use the interactive salary calculator on Pharmadanmark's website www.pharmadanmark.dk. Good luck with the negotiations! The negotiating committee expects that the relatively positive trend will continue in the foreseeable future. However, a small number of firms remain reluctant to hire new employees and salary increases here will here be at a more modest level. 13 The salary includes both the employee's and employer's pension contributions and the value of benefits, but excludes overtime pay and bonuses. The lower quartile (25% percentile), median salary and upper quartile (75% percentile) is listed for each university graduation year. Percentiles describe the percentage of observations that are below a given value. The median is the middle observation, i.e. equal to the 50% percentile. The table also shows the percentage increase relative to the average salary last year. The total salary increase, weighted by the number for each university graduation year, from September 2011 to September 2012, was 4.7 per cent. Ta ble 2 . 1 Septem ber s ala r y 2012 by year of universit y graduat ion, e xcluding bonus Year of graduation Number Avg. salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. Annual increase % -1976 34 70,417 58,837 68,460 71,848 5.9 1977 9 70,442 53,360 69,408 81,450 -1.0 1978 8 67,074 53,572 66,238 80,130 -4.3 1979 14 70,660 62,000 72,611 78,800 4.7 1980 12 81,105 68,829 79,413 95,106 9.9 1981 9 69,327 54,000 66,924 72,757 12.6 1982 12 70,428 60,688 65,439 71,229 7.3 1983 13 69,196 58,550 70,500 76,033 -5.9 1984 9 71,009 67,787 69,650 72,900 10.5 1985 21 71,173 61,106 68,445 77,960 13.3 1986 21 64,364 56,871 61,580 73,260 -4.2 1987 27 74,003 60,500 69,000 75,600 11.8 1988 18 69,814 59,000 65,567 72,423 2.3 1989 22 68,662 60,200 65,770 73,917 2.6 1990 25 69,631 60,000 65,988 75,600 -2.3 1991 35 70,663 57,770 64,500 74,200 -3.3 1992 38 69,765 59,400 66,013 76,400 5.9 1993 35 68,064 53,350 63,540 83,080 -4.4 1994 26 63,312 54,010 60,465 72,459 -1.7 1995 29 69,031 58,300 67,500 78,029 1.7 1996 37 62,029 55,184 58,600 68,084 5.4 1997 32 59,891 52,696 57,541 66,910 1.2 1998 42 61,579 51,944 60,758 67,800 4.8 1999 49 61,573 52,217 57,750 67,308 3.7 2000 45 59,538 51,300 56,000 63,750 5.8 2001 50 55,617 48,725 52,668 61,601 3.1 2002 60 56,169 50,650 54,696 60,095 6.3 2003 65 53,630 48,400 51,750 56,657 1.0 2004 89 53,447 46,990 50,850 57,224 7.8 2005 49 49,675 44,900 48,000 52,215 1.6 2006 73 49,570 43,450 46,209 50,913 7.7 2007 52 47,056 42,804 46,100 51,324 7.8 2008 63 44,060 40,740 44,000 45,812 5.2 2009 69 42,002 39,441 42,300 45,340 3.4 2010 75 41,387 38,500 40,350 43,440 11.1 2011 67 41,128 37,300 38,900 42,040 8.5 2012 15 39,071 36,967 38,000 39,600 Total 1349 56,745 45,000 53,419 64,883 4.7 14 Ta ble 2 .2 Se p te mb e r s a l a r y 2 0 12 accordi n g to Ph D g ra du ation ye ar (1-ye ar groups) Year of PhD graduation Number Avg. salary+benefits 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. -1992 15 83,289 53,800 65,000 1993 2 1994 3 1995 3 1996 3 1997 6 71,537 61,050 70,129 1998 3 1999 6 72,409 58,300 67,235 2000 4 2001 7 63,245 55,300 65,068 2002 3 2003 7 59,507 49,945 54,105 2004 7 59,656 52,000 52,724 2005 8 57,161 53,250 55,616 2006 11 54,578 46,500 52,140 2007 13 51,531 48,284 51,800 2008 12 53,825 49,025 50,145 2009 20 52,753 45,930 49,125 2010 14 46,261 41,000 47,819 2011 10 44,794 43,450 43,907 2012 5 41,041 38,150 39,988 Total 162 58,914 48,050 53,017 96,171 83,130 93,025 70,100 71,010 74,577 61,429 58,880 55,085 52,713 54,438 49,225 44,900 45,620 65,000 Ta ble 2 .3 Re c omme n d e d an d a s cer ta i n ed s ta r ti n g s a la r i es Salary survey year Recommended Actual Deviation in DKK Deviation in percent 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 24,500 25,300 25,500 26,100 26,700 28,000 29,800 30,700 33,300 32,762 33,477 32,871 35,758 36,684 39,000 37,700 37,000 38,400-38,700 24,114 25,329 25,366 26,301 27,114 28,669 28,921 31,741 33,186 31,883 31,759 33,919 34,549 37,453 36,605 36,188 37,890 39,071 -386 29 -134 201 414 669 -879 1,041 -114 -879 -1,718 1,048 -1,209 768 -2,395 -1,512 890 371-671 -1.6 0.1 -0.5 0.8 1.6 2.4 -2.9 3.4 -0.3 -2.7 -5.1 3.2 -3.4 2.1 -6.1 -4.0 2.4 15 The salary includes both the employee's and employer's pension contributions and the value of benefits, but excludes overtime pay and bonuses. Percentiles describe the percentage of observations that are below a given value. The median is the middle observation, i.e. equal to the 50% percentile. There is no calculation of percentiles when less than five people responded in a group. The recommended starting salary for 1 July, which is determined in September the year before, is listed for each year of salary statistics, and the subsequently ascertained salary for new graduates which is compiled in September of the given year. Deviations from the recommended starting salaries are also calculated. The salary includes both the employee's and employer's pension contributions and the value of benefits, but excludes overtime pay and bonuses. Percentiles describe the percentage of observations that are below a given value. The median is the middle observation, i.e. equal to the 50% percentile. Ta ble 2 . 4 Septem ber s ala r y 2012 by year of bir t h (1-year groups) e xcluding bonus Year of birth Number Avg. salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. -1951 37 71,622 58,366 68,510 73,285 1952 11 62,927 55,718 63,405 71,848 1953 17 71,174 62,000 70,000 78,200 1954 16 77,052 59,250 74,174 85,435 1955 10 62,768 51,000 61,962 71,018 1956 17 72,414 66,077 70,708 75,903 1957 19 73,987 60,600 72,000 91,318 1958 15 67,548 61,240 68,445 74,280 1959 19 67,322 60,208 66,650 74,275 1960 21 73,170 59,000 64,050 76,620 1961 25 65,253 57,000 62,900 72,410 1962 25 64,788 56,595 63,686 69,519 1963 35 72,284 60,000 67,275 75,800 1964 24 68,405 57,790 64,215 75,350 1965 37 68,107 54,700 64,883 82,310 1966 23 72,294 59,700 66,930 75,250 1967 29 69,212 54,765 63,100 76,700 1968 29 64,310 58,150 60,130 70,718 1969 24 66,941 57,244 64,057 73,471 1970 30 65,777 56,286 63,806 77,875 1971 37 59,133 51,175 55,000 62,472 1972 61 57,857 51,567 56,650 61,313 1973 57 60,560 52,000 57,020 67,350 1974 54 56,292 50,020 52,737 60,100 1975 61 58,410 49,500 56,593 65,068 1976 74 52,197 47,000 50,650 57,190 1977 77 52,846 48,540 51,750 57,500 1978 71 49,887 43,598 48,400 52,589 1979 59 50,204 44,038 48,000 54,300 1980 67 46,510 42,130 45,450 49,100 1981 46 45,526 41,766 44,613 49,225 1982 47 43,344 38,720 43,218 46,209 1983 48 41,776 38,990 42,200 44,761 1984 49 41,990 38,800 40,700 42,806 1985 49 39,920 37,400 38,808 40,999 1986- 29 39,282 36,600 39,265 42,400 Total 16 1,349 56,745 45,000 53,419 64,883 Ta ble 2 .5 Se p te mb e r s a l a r y 2 0 12 by pos i ti on , exclu di n g bonus Position Number Avg. salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. + benefits Managing Director Head of Division/Head of Department Product Manager Senior Specialist Section Leader/Department Leader Project Manager Specialist Academic staff member Other Unspecified 24 45 13 91 136 69 210 583 114 64 96.731 87.364 65.474 64.575 67.994 60.781 55.710 49.199 53.249 57.424 80.599 71.261 59.800 57.450 58.998 51.000 45.500 42.900 39.285 44.250 91.961 83.130 64.125 64.308 66.987 60.090 54.704 48.127 48.670 51.790 105.150 97.641 72.199 72.100 74.743 68.445 64.860 54.100 62.000 66.978 Total 1.349 56.745 45.000 53.419 64.883 Ta ble 2 .6 Se p te mb e r s a l ar y 2 0 12 by pos i ti on , i n clu di n g bonus Personnel responsibility Number Avg. salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. + benefits None 1-2 employees 3-5 employees 6-10 employees 11-20 employees 21-40 employees More than 40 employees 1,099 45 45 66 56 22 16 53,011 63,627 68,955 71,276 71,259 83,143 112,481 43,978 53,401 58,837 58,600 63,125 67,650 89,115 51,000 60,200 67,570 68,980 67,652 80,625 115,581 60,357 72,000 72,459 80,080 81,079 98,422 129,569 Total 1,349 56,745 45,000 53,419 64,883 17 The salary includes both the employee's and employer's pension contributions and the value of benefits, but excludes overtime pay and bonuses. Percentiles describe the percentage of observations that are below a given value. The median is the middle observation, i.e. equal to the 50% percentile. The salary includes both the employee's and employer's pension contributions and the value of benefits and bonuses. It can be seen from Table 2.7 that the average annual bonus is about DKK 2,294 per month, which is an increase of about 10 per cent compared to 2011. The salary includes both the employee's and employer's pension contributions and the value of benefits and bonuses. Table 2.8 shows that there is a correlation between bonus and hierarchical classification. T a ble 2 . 7 Sep tem ber s ala r y 2012 by place of employme nt , including bonus Place of emp. Number Avg. salary 25th Median 75th Average Avg. sal. 25th Median 75th pctl. pctl. bonus +bonus pctl. pctl. A-consult A/S 9 Actavis A/S 6 ALK Abello A/S 72 Biogen Idec Denmark ApS 14 Coloplast A/S 18 Dako Denmark A/S 9 Eli Lilly Danmark A/S 7 Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S 36 Ferrosan A/S 11 Fertin Pharma A/S 10 H, Lundbeck A/S 102 LEO Pharma 121 MSD Danmark ApS 10 Novartis Healthcare A/S 14 Novo Nordisk A/S 371 Pfizer Danmark 13 Pharmakon A/S 18 Sandoz A/S 15 Takeda (Nycomed) 77 Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS 17 Other company 385 Unspecified 14 62,498 50,292 55,835 61,769 58,941 57,127 72,493 56,035 46,691 55,120 58,089 56,968 55,279 53,676 54,119 74,104 57,025 47,836 68,695 46,961 56,940 51,243 51,000 37,625 44,923 50,000 46,514 41,000 54,195 43,656 38,900 40,000 47,700 45,998 48,550 43,195 44,099 61,500 50,563 40,250 55,974 38,250 44,921 40,740 59,479 41,908 53,955 59,387 53,011 44,286 63,000 51,263 47,191 46,567 55,238 56,080 54,265 48,600 51,503 64,883 54,602 46,440 67,198 43,350 53,400 45,843 71,750 45,372 63,268 64,500 67,650 49,950 85,955 62,647 52,600 60,958 62,986 64,125 57,537 67,000 61,001 81,767 64,228 52,000 72,991 53,000 66,908 53,360 1,681 2,792 1,316 6,522 2,787 4,315 8,206 2,849 2,023 308 1,886 665 3,878 3,500 2,354 7,181 0 4,116 2,762 432 2,536 1,226 64,179 53,084 57,151 68,291 61,728 61,442 80,699 58,884 48,714 55,428 59,974 57,632 59,157 57,176 56,473 81,286 57,025 51,952 71,457 47,392 59,476 52,469 51,000 37,625 45,048 50,000 48,400 41,000 55,112 45,784 38,900 40,000 47,700 45,998 53,800 43,195 45,620 65,666 50,563 40,825 57,500 38,250 45,034 40,740 64,526 43,825 54,174 64,238 54,371 44,286 63,000 52,398 51,357 47,692 55,638 56,200 55,965 54,017 53,520 68,167 54,602 46,600 67,500 43,600 55,200 47,093 71,750 47,872 64,934 73,600 72,650 51,200 95,808 66,732 56,517 60,958 64,133 65,510 62,490 69,700 64,508 88,217 64,228 60,333 74,432 53,417 69,408 55,840 Total 56,745 45,000 53,419 64,883 2,294 59,039 46,000 55,042 67,338 1, 349 Ta ble 2 . 8 Sep tem ber s ala r y 2012 by posit ion, including bonus Position Number Avg. 25th Median 75th Average Avg. sal. 25th Median 75th salary pctl. pctl. bonus +bonus pctl. pctl. Managing Director Head of Division/ Head of Department Product Manager Senior specialist Section Leader/ Department Leader Project Manager Specialist Academic staff member Other Unspecified Total 18 24 96,731 80,599 91,961 105,150 13,747 110,478 86,329 100,000 124,358 45 13 91 87,364 65,474 64,575 71,261 59,800 57,450 83,130 64,125 64,308 97,641 72,199 72,100 8,142 4,698 2,535 95,507 70,172 67,110 72,667 63,550 58,105 91,250 108,804 68,167 79,699 65,650 74,760 136 69 210 583 114 64 67,994 60,781 55,710 49,199 53,249 57,424 58,998 51,000 45,500 42,900 39,285 44,250 66,987 60,090 54,704 48,127 48,670 51,790 74,743 68,445 64,860 54,100 62,000 66,978 3,388 2,878 1,841 1,138 1,974 2,695 71,382 63,659 57,551 50,336 55,223 60,119 61,318 53,400 46,464 43,898 39,600 45,050 69,323 61,667 56,167 49,033 49,325 53,404 77,573 73,213 67,643 55,770 63,000 68,605 1,349 56,745 45,000 53,419 64,883 2,294 59,039 46,000 55,042 67,338 Ta ble 2 .9 Se p te mb e r s a l ar y 2 0 12 by s ector, i n clu di n g bon u s Industry Number Avg. 25th Median 75th Average Avg. sal. 25th Median 75th salary pctl. pctl. bonus +bonus pctl. pctl. Biotechnology 87 Wholesale or other trading 20 Generic human medicine 52 Humane medicine 841 Other pharmaceutical industries 60 Other industries 130 Unspecified 159 53,778 51,360 50,649 57,941 42,763 45,900 40,380 46,500 49,022 52,163 46,989 54,438 63,600 56,531 58,504 65,999 2,292 2,580 1,650 2,293 56,071 53,939 52,298 60,234 42,763 47,278 40,615 47,367 51,717 52,163 48,664 56,277 68,258 62,699 59,658 67,842 53,391 55,854 56,708 43,158 43,140 43,758 50,150 53,750 53,419 62,800 66,077 65,000 1,855 2,214 2,707 55,246 58,068 59,415 44,012 44,000 44,683 51,391 54,488 55,000 62,800 66,942 67,969 Total 56,745 45,000 53,419 64,883 2,294 59,039 46,000 55,042 67,338 1,349 Ta ble 2 . 10 Se p te mb e r s ala r y 2 0 12 by wor k area , i n clu di n g b onus Area of work Number Avg. 25th Median 75th Average Avg. sal. 25th Median 75th salary pctl. pctl. bonus +bonus pctl. pctl. Analysis R&D Clinical trials Quality Control/QC Quality Control/QA Production Registration Sales/Marketing Other Unspecified Total 24 263 152 57 217 101 231 54 95 155 1,349 53,921 47,231 57,339 47,550 58,127 46,775 50,885 42,306 56,350 43,440 55,253 44,660 54,754 44,000 70,723 57,520 54,974 43,422 57,682 45,100 50,285 53,800 55,920 48,400 53,115 51,000 51,944 65,822 52,326 53,400 64,775 67,650 63,578 57,000 64,800 60,830 62,407 76,033 63,100 67,650 1,510 1,970 2,178 1,447 2,460 2,217 1,845 7,293 1,610 2,555 55,432 59,309 60,305 52,332 58,810 57,470 56,599 78,016 56,583 60,237 47,231 48,070 47,025 42,900 44,817 45,366 44,921 60,950 44,125 45,317 52,685 54,977 57,483 48,400 56,308 53,520 52,634 72,567 53,325 55,112 66,625 68,100 67,108 58,417 67,570 63,767 65,000 82,700 65,908 70,133 56,745 53,419 64,883 2,294 59,039 46,000 55,042 67,338 45,000 19 Bonuses are not evenly distributed by sector and area of employment. It is especially within the areas of sales and marketing that bonuses are used as part of the total salary package. Bonuses are used most frequently in the wholesale sector or other retail businesses. The salary includes both the employee's and employer's pension contributions and the value of benefits, but excludes overtime pay and bonuses. Percentiles describe the percentage of observations that are below a given value. The median is the middle observation, i.e. equal to the 50% percentile. Percentiles are not calculated for groups with less than five responses. Ta ble 2 . 11 Septem ber s ala r y 2012 by posit ion and graduat ion ye ar, excluding bonus Year of graduation Position Number Avg. salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. -1977 1978 - 1982 1983 - 1987 1988 - 1992 1993 - 1997 20 Managing Director 1 Head of Division/Head of Department 6 90,163 71,848 80,523 Product Manager 0 Senior specialist 9 68,219 60,940 68,510 Section Leader/Department Leader 4 Project Manager 1 Specialist 4 Academic staff member 8 56,038 51,430 57,383 Other 4 Unspecified 6 61,076 51,000 62,715 Managing Director 4 Head of Division/Head of Department 4 Product Manager 0 Senior specialist 9 70,674 67,785 72,875 Section Leader/Department Leader 6 76,525 57,000 69,191 Project Manager 5 71,451 67,305 69,873 Specialist 6 68,660 62,000 73,306 Academic staff member 14 61,135 55,109 60,706 Other 4 Unspecified 3 Managing Director 4 Head of Division/Head of Department 3 Product Manager 2 Senior specialist 10 67,614 58,550 68,624 Section Leader/Department Leader 14 78,720 67,570 73,045 Project Manager 3 Specialist 21 68,917 64,050 70,900 Academic staff member 22 57,590 54,267 5,7111 Other 3 Unspecified 9 67,781 57,700 70,500 Managing Director 5 95,901 84,270 85,000 Head of Division/Head of Department17 92,969 75,600 88,300 Product Manager 2 Senior specialist 20 66,977 60,054 65,660 Section Leader/Department Leader 16 70,795 64,246 70,365 Project Manager 3 Specialist 26 64,476 60,600 64,215 Academic staff member 31 58,518 50,387 59,000 Other 8 65,196 57,488 62,950 Unspecified 10 73,401 59,175 62,650 Managing Director 6 82,432 70,300 82,495 Head of Division/Head of Department 8 91,976 80,982 85,350 Product Manager 0 Senior specialist 15 63,070 58,285 60,800 Section Leader/Department Leader 27 72,964 68,084 72,459 97,641 76,101 61,951 69,241 80,626 94,040 71,018 76,900 66,077 74,280 81,608 73,350 60,600 77,960 99,900 112,000 75,000 76,354 67,275 65,096 69,459 89,695 99,590 105,940 67,450 78,120 continued on the next page ... Ta ble 2 .1 1 Se p te mb e r s a la r y 2 0 12 by pos i ti on an d g radu ati o n year, excluding bonus Year of graduation Position Number Avg. salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. Project Manager 13 66,146 58,500 67,500 Specialist 13 59,329 56,300 59,700 Academic staff member 60 56,178 51,738 55,092 Other 10 69,083 53,500 62,313 Unspecified 7 57,524 50,875 54,765 1998 - 2002 Managing Director 2 Head of Division/Head of Department 3 Product Manager 4 Senior specialist 18 60,301 54,032 57,694 Section Leader/Department Leader 33 67,318 60,475 65,150 Project Manager 20 63,833 58,740 62,151 Specialist 47 59,304 50,298 58,300 Academic staff member 104 52,633 49,150 52,043 Other 9 60,120 53,808 60,908 Unspecified 6 53,596 45,664 50,103 2003 - 2007 Managing Director 2 Head of Division/Head of Department 4 Product Manager 2 Senior specialist 10 57,915 49,000 59,157 Section Leader/Department Leader 26 60,028 55,400 59,203 Project Manager 17 51,051 46,800 51,000 Specialist 50 50,232 45,000 48,920 Academic staff member 169 48,089 44,330 47,234 Other 36 54,641 43,029 49,325 Unspecified 12 47,937 44,005 48,750 2008- Managing Director 0 Head of Division/Head of Department 0 Product Manager 3 Senior specialist 0 Section Leader/Department Leader 10 52,128 46,440 49,950 Project Manager 7 44,182 36,350 46,514 Specialist 43 42,383 38,900 42,130 Academic staff member 175 41,863 38,700 40,600 Other 40 37,804 32,450 35,300 Unspecified 11 42,194 40,000 42,682 Total Managing Director 24 96,731 80,599 91,961 Head of Division/Head of Department45 87,364 71,261 83,130 Product Manager 13 65,474 59,800 64,125 Senior specialist 91 64,575 57,450 64,308 Section Leader/Department Leader 136 67,994 58,998 66,987 Project Manager 69 60,781 51,000 60,090 Specialist 210 55,710 45,500 54,704 Academic staff member 583 49,199 42,900 48,127 Other 114 53,249 39,285 48,670 Unspecified 64 57,424 44,250 51,790 75,730 63,100 59,325 75,700 67,969 67,198 72,630 67,717 67,350 55,143 65,844 54,105 67,000 65,700 54,500 55,300 50,850 58,725 53,300 55,000 48,386 45,300 43,824 40,370 43,500 105,150 97,641 72,199 72,100 74,743 68,445 64,860 54,100 62,000 66,978 21 Generally about salary ratios The salary ratios reflect a difference in salary levels, where we have compared the relationship between a person's actual salary and the average salary. The figures in the tables are adjusted to remove the effect of seniority and position. The salary difference between men and women reduced marginally again this year. Ta ble 2 . 12 Sala r y rati o by gende r 2009 2010 2011 2012 Gender Male 103.1 102.7 Female 99.0 99.2 22 102.5 99.1 101.6 99.4 For example, if a firm pays its employees an average of five per cent more than its competitors, this will result in a calculated salary ratio of 105. F i g ure 2 .1 S a l a r y ra ti o 2 0 12 by pla ce of em p loy m en t Fi gure 2.2 Salar y rat io 2012 by sect or Place of employment Industry Wholesale or other trading 95.5 Actavis A/S 99.0 ALK Abello A/S 94.1 Generic human medicine 104.3 Coloplast A/S 102.1 Humane medicine Other pharmaceutical industry 91.8 105.0 Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S 96.9 Other 120.8 Eli Lilly Danmark A/S 93.2 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 97.5 Ferrosan A/S Fertin Pharma A/S 94.6 106.2 Biogen Idec Denmark ApS Dako Denmark A/S 96.7 Biotechnology 97.2 A-consult A/S Use Figure 2.1 to assess the relative salaries at the largest firms. Remember that the figures take account of seniority and position. 89.4 H. Lundbeck A/S 98.4 LEO Pharma 98.2 Fi gure 2.3 Salar y rat io 2012 by w orking area 105.3 MSD Danmark ApS 108.4 Novartis Healthcare A/S 101.7 Novo Nordisk A/S Pharmakon A/S 98.5 Sandoz A/S 99.2 97.5 104.7 Clinical trials 94.8 Quality Control/QC 99.4 Quality Control/QA 106.6 Takeda (Nycomed) 91.8 Analysis R&D 111.2 Pfizer Danmark Area of work 97.2 Registration Other company 97.1 Sales/Marketing 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 100.1 Production Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS 100.4 108.3 100.9 Other 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 23 90.9 per cent of employees have six weeks of holidays or more. At least six weeks of holidays can rightly be said to be the norm in the pharmaceutical sector. Fi g u re 2 . 4 H ow m a n y day s of holidays do you have per yea r a bove fi ve weeks ? 89.2 88.9 90.7 % 90 82.9 80 70 60 50 40 Quotas n Year 2009 n Year 2010 30 20 n Year 2011 10 n Year 2012 0 9.1 Less than 5 days 24 6.7 4.1 2.4 2.9 5 days 8.7 6.4 8.0 More than 5 days Ta ble 2 .13 a E mp l oy me n t i n cu r ren t pos i ti on 2009 2010 2011 2012 0-1 Year 48% 1-2 Year 27% 2-3 Year 12% 3-4 Year 5% 4-5 Year 4% More than 5 yrs 5% 46% 30% 12% 5% 3% 4% 48% 25% 14% 6% 3% 5% 49% 24% 13% 6% 3% 5% Ta ble 2.13.b Employment in firm 2009 2010 2011 2012 0-1 Year 31% 1-2 Year 21% 2-3 Year 13% 3-4 Year 8% 4-5 Year 9% More than 5 yrs 19% 27% 25% 13% 7% 7% 20% 30% 22% 13% 9% 6% 20% 32% 19% 15% 9% 5% 20% 25 The tendency for very rapid changes of job still appears to apply. About half of all respondents have held their current job for less than one year. The level of job changes between firms was at the same level as the preceding year. Taken together, the number of job changes is still considered to be high, despite the strained labour market. An increasing number of employees receive benefits. % 8% 7% 6% 6% Subscriptions Only about 20 per cent of employees lack some form of health care provision. There were no major changes in the other areas. The popularity of home computers as a fringe benefit continues to decline after the change to the tax rules. Figure 2.6 D oe s your e mployme nt cont ract i n cl ud e a non-compet it ion clause? Fi g u re 2 . 5 E m ploy m en t i n firm 90 90 88 90 87 80 70 13% 12% 10% 11% Company car 60 50 43% 45% 48% 51% Free telephone 40 Quotas n Year 2009 n Year 2010 22% 21% 19% 17% Union membership fees paid n Year 2012 0 33% 33% 28% 24% 73% 71% 78% 79% Health care scheme 57% 57% 55% 58% Internet connection 0 10 13 10 12 10 Yes Home computer 26 10 10% 10% 9% 7% No benefits 20 n Year 2011 7% 8% 7% 7% Other 30 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 % No The small changes that occur over the years with regard to the proportion of employees subject to non-competition clauses, may be random. Ta ble 2.14 Annual bonus payme nt s 2009 2010 2011 2012 Recipients Average Minimum Maximum Pctl,s 25th 50th 75th 559 47,653 2,035 952,966 20,000 33,333 52,079 483 50,396 1,000 826,882 20,000 35,000 60,000 525 715 52,568 51,940 1,012 1,200 650,0001,043,461 20,500 20,000 40,000 37,000 60,000 60,000 Ta ble 2.15 Cont inuous and fur t he r educat ion 2012 Number of days Company expenses Recipients Average Minimum Pctl,s 25th 50th 75th Maximum 1,346 5 days 0 days 1 days 4 days 6 days 180 days 1,316 16,745 0 0 10,000 25,000 300,000 27 The number receiving a bonus increased compared to last year. However, the average size of the bonus payments decreased slightly. An average of five days per year were spent on continuing education and the average cost for the employer was DKK 16,745, which is a decrease compared to last year. 31 per cent have access to share-based payments, of which 80 per cent have used the possibility. Fi g u re 2 . 7 Is th ere a n opti o n for share -based pa y m en t i n you r fi r m ? 70 % 59 60 59 60 Analysis R&D Clinical trials Quality Control/QC Quality Control/QA Production Registration Sales/Marketing Other 62 50 40 35 36 32 30 31 Quotas n Year 2009 n Year 2010 20 Total 10 6 n Year 2011 n Year 2012 8 6 7 0 Yes No Don't know Fi g u re 2 . 8 H ave you exerci s ed an opt ion for s h are- ba s ed pa y m en t? 80 % 79 80 75 76 70 60 50 40 Quotas n Year 2009 30 21 23 24 19 20 n Year 2010 n Year 2011 n Year 2012 10 1 0 Yes 28 Table 2.16a Work area 2009 2010 2011 2012 No 1 2 1 Don't know 2.3% 20.2% 12.1% 4.8% 15.7% 7.4% 19.4% 6.1% 11.9% 3.7% 20.4% 10.7% 5.3% 16.8% 6.8% 18.3% 5.0% 13.0% 2.5% 21.3% 11.0% 4.9% 17.9% 7.7% 18.2% 4.2% 12.3% 2.0% 22.0% 12.7% 4.8% 18.2% 8.5% 19.3% 4.5% 8.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% Table 2 . 1 6 b I n d u s t r y 2009 2010 2011 2012 Biotechnology 9.3% Wholesale or other trading 1.4% Generic human medicine 4.9% Humane medicine 66.3% Other pharmaceutical industry 4.5% Other industries 13.6% Total 100% 8.6% 8.6% 7.3% 1.5% 5.3% 65.8% 1.7% 5.6% 67.0% 1.7% 4.4% 70.0% 5.4% 13.4% 5.0% 12.1% 5.0% 10.9% 100% 100% 100% Ta ble 2 . 1 6 c O rg a n i z a t i o n a l g ra di n g 2009 2010 2011 2012 Managing Director Head of Division/ Department Section Leader/ Department Leader Product Manager Project Manager Senior specialist Specialist Academic staff Other 2.5% 1.5% 2.2% 1.9% 4.2% 4.6% 4.5% 3.5% 11.8% 0.9% 6.5% 6.5% 16.6% 46.8% 4.2% 11.7% 0.9% 8.2% 6.7% 15.1% 47.2% 4.0% 11.1% 0.5% 6.2% 7.8% 16.5% 47.1% 4.0% 10.6% 1.0% 5.4% 7.1% 16.3% 45.4% 8.9% 100% 100% 100% 100% Ta ble 2.16d Place of employment 2009 2010 2011 2012 A-Consult 0.0% Actavis 1.3% ALK-Albelló 3.7% Amgros 0.0% AstraZeneca 0.7% Biogen Idec 0.0% Boehringer Ingelheim 0.0% Coloplast 1.3% Dako Denmark A/S - Eli Lilly 0.0% Ferring 3.3% Ferrosan 1.4% Fertin Pharma 0.9% Genmab 1.5% GlaxoSmithKline 0.7% LEO Pharma 7.7% Veloxis Pharmaceuticals (tidligere Lifecycle Pharma)0.7% Lundbeck 8.8% MSD Danmark ApS - NeuroSearch 1.3% Novartis 1.0% Novo Nordisk 25.1% Paranova 0.3% Pfizer 0.7% Pharmakon 1.8% Sandoz A/S - Takeda (Nycomed) 7.4% Xellia 0.0% Other company 30.4% Total Total 100% 0.8% 1.1% 4.5% 0.3% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 1.6% - 0.0% 3.2% 1.2% 1.0% 0.5% 0.4% 7.9% 0.5% 0.9% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.5% 1.5% - 0.7% 2.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.6% 8.5% 0.7% 0.4% 5.4% 1.0% 1.3% 0.7% 0.5% 2.7% 0.8% 0.7% 9.1% 0.7% 7.9% - 1.7% 1.5% 23.3% 0.0% 0.6% 2.5% - 6.0% 0.9% 31.8% 0.5% 8.5% - 1.1% 1.1% 24.6% 0.0% 0.7% 2.0% - 5.1% 0.9% 32.7% 7.6% 0.7% 1.0% 27.8% 1.0% 1.3% 1.1% 5.8% 1.3% 28.8% 100% 100% 100% 29 The tables show how the respondents are divided into employment areas, organizational placement and place of employment. Salary statistics for public sector employees 2012 The statistics can be an important tool when you and your trade union representative e.g. assess your salary and negotiate new bonus payments for you. This is the 12th year in which Pharmadanmark has prepared salary statistics for the public sector. 2012 has seen good increases in public sector if we take account of budgetary constraints in the public sector. This is also the clear message from Statistics Denmark, which has calculated that the increase in the average salary in the 3rd quarter of 2012 was 2.5 per cent for municipal employees and 3.6 per cent for employees in the regions. In the regional and municipal workplaces, no new funding was allocated in 2012 for the New Salary system, so that there were only sporadic pay bargaining for individual positions. The statistics show, however, that the average salary growth was 3.3 per cent. The average gross salary increased by DKK 300 compared to 2011. The response rate this year was 53.6 per cent, i.e. 6.9 per cent lower than last year. If necessary, you can contact the secretariat to obtain further advice on salary and salary statistics. In the state sector, the annual salary negotiations were based on a framework for negotiations of around 0.9 - 1 per cent of the payroll locally for the rank and file positions. 31 Salaries include the employee's and the employer's pension contributions. 25%, 50% and 75% percentiles are indicated for each cohort of graduates. Percentiles describe the percentage of observations that are below a given value. The median is the middle observation, i.e. equal to the 50% percentile. For civil servants and members of the Pharmacy Pension Scheme (Apotekervæsenets Pensionsordning – AP), the salary figures are calculated with the value of the relevant pension schemes. There was one respondent who omitted to specify their university graduation year. Ta ble 3. 1 Sep tem ber s ala r y 2012 by year of universit y graduat ion, e xcluding one -off payme nt s and per for m an ce-rela ted p a y Year of graduation Number Average salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. Annual increase % -1976 21 55,166 48,506 52,573 57,134 -3.3 1977 4 1978 6 47,760 46,283 46,777 50,052 -4.4 1979 5 53,367 49,627 51,974 57,380 -1.2 1980 6 54,067 48,000 52,923 56,411 2.9 1981 4 1982 7 54,250 51,959 52,998 56,023 4.0 1983 6 56,562 50,910 53,711 62,235 8.6 1984 8 51,396 49,653 50,196 53,191 -9.4 1985 13 52,945 46,653 49,576 54,927 -1.9 1986 7 52,846 46,729 54,651 56,846 -7.2 1987 8 55,831 46,711 54,611 63,084 4.3 1988 12 62,786 51,652 54,606 75,862 6.0 1989 11 55,403 50,752 53,306 62,100 3.0 1990 13 55,947 47,972 50,375 59,552 12.3 1991 8 60,596 44,717 50,083 83,018 22.1 1992 9 57,469 51,324 56,171 61,458 2.1 1993 12 53,826 47,918 51,160 57,102 3.8 1994 11 51,669 46,450 52,724 57,882 3.7 1995 13 55,947 51,228 54,105 58,907 3.8 1996 12 48,503 45,510 47,863 51,526 -4.8 1997 12 50,272 45,293 47,152 54,316 2.8 1998 19 48,354 44,678 46,815 51,479 0.9 1999 15 48,598 44,267 47,715 53,559 -2.2 2000 15 47,920 43,702 47,276 52,249 6.8 2001 23 46,332 43,315 45,822 49,566 2.4 2002 19 47,406 44,087 46,655 49,297 5.3 2003 22 44,365 42,693 43,864 46,281 -0.2 2004 23 44,138 41,524 43,791 46,853 -1.1 2005 32 45,553 43,962 45,682 47,904 3.2 2006 23 42,915 39,840 42,693 44,423 2.9 2007 24 42,496 40,806 42,462 44,374 6.0 2008 20 39,643 37,751 39,256 41,055 8.7 2009 26 37,955 34,433 36,235 40,724 13.5 2010 14 33,729 32,228 34,065 35,335 4.9 2011 18 34,020 31,535 32,281 33,027 2012 8 31,711 29,984 32,209 33,090 Unspecified 1 Total 510 47,654 42,103 46,282 52,005 3.3 32 Ta ble 3 . 2 a Se p te mb e r s a la r y 2 0 12 by s a la r y g rade i n th e n ew salar y syst em, e xcluding one -off payme nt s and p e r f o rma n c e - re l a te d p a y Salary point, new pay scale Number Average salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. 4 43 34,116 31,535 32,486 5 22 36,937 34,184 35,552 6 16 39,927 37,256 39,852 8 357 47,866 43,579 46,588 19 Special consultants 31 51,678 48,619 52,249 20 Chief consultants 21 60,146 54,927 57,513 Total 490 46,677 41,716 46,054 34,570 38,299 42,404 51,161 55,282 63,690 Specialist consultants and senior consultants employed on collective agreement terms are included in the table. 51,337 Ta ble 3 . 2 b Se p te mb e r s ala r y 2 0 12 by s a la r y g rade for ci vi l ser vant s, e xcluding one -off payme nt s and p e r f o rma n c e - re l a te d p a y Salary scale/ salary level for public servants Number Average salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. 38/51 9 71,095 63,538 72,215 75,052 39/52 8 77,894 71,155 78,993 84,455 Total 17 74,295 67,655 74,258 81,121 33 For civil servants and members of the Pharmacy Pension Scheme (Apotekervæsenets Pensionsordning – AP), the salary figures are calculated with the value of the relevant pension schemes. Ta ble 3. 3a Septem ber s ala r y 2012 by place of employme nt and ye ar of universit y graduat ion, e xclud i n g on e- off p a y m en ts an d per formance-re lat e d pay Graduation year Place of employment Number Avg. gross 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl -1976 1977-1981 1982-1986 1987-1991 1992-1996 1997-2001 2002-2006 Unspecified Total Hospital pharmacy Other Unspecified Total The Danish Medicines Agency Hospital pharmacy Other Unspecified Total KU, PharmaSchool KU, Other The Danish Medicines Agency Statens Serum Institut Hospital pharmacy Other Unspecified Total The Danish Medicines Agency Hospital pharmacy Other Unspecified Total KU, PharmaSchool KU, Other The Danish Medicines Agency Statens Serum Institut Hospital pharmacy Other Unspecified Total KU, PharmaSchool KU, Other The Danish Medicines Agency Statens Serum Institut Hospital pharmacy Other Unspecified Total 0 21 55,166 47,475 52,573 5 59,105 49,476 56,359 20 52,890 46,741 51,101 0 25 54,133 46,777 51,902 6 49,564 47,755 49,361 12 53,778 49,653 52,911 23 54,164 47,642 53,016 0 41 53,378 48,741 51,959 7 61,183 47,482 54,368 5 53,576 46,790 54,011 7 53,406 50,334 53,749 8 47,913 47,172 48,032 11 69,364 51,930 74,827 14 57,520 50,752 55,324 0 52 58,107 48,699 53,749 15 53,084 48,249 53,300 17 57,778 51,159 53,520 25 50,494 45,409 48,398 0 57 53,348 47,430 51,958 6 46,477 44,478 46,007 8 44,298 42,004 44,192 11 48,741 45,787 47,359 12 47,798 43,895 47,055 17 48,196 45,822 49,566 30 49,104 43,969 46,542 0 84 48,041 44,478 46,784 6 41,010 40,151 40,152 20 41,502 39,233 41,549 25 46,398 44,374 45,787 10 46,090 44,483 46,127 24 47,642 45,063 47,364 34 44,009 41,828 43,670 0 119 44,846 42,240 44,374 58,078 56,411 55,344 56,385 50,572 55,252 57,867 55,704 78,801 59,552 54,843 50,019 81,998 63,538 63,306 56,171 61,458 57,215 57,086 46,815 46,845 51,923 50,587 51,807 55,638 51,725 40,850 43,274 47,972 48,340 49,283 45,397 47,252 continued on the next page ... 34 Ta ble 3 .3 a Se p te mb e r s ala r y 2 0 12 by pla ce of em p loy m en t and year of universit y graduat ion, e xcluding o ne - o f f p a y me n ts a n d p e r for m a n ce-rela ted p a y Graduation year Place of employment Number Avg. gross 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl 2007- KU, PharmaSchool KU, Other The Danish Medicines Agency Statens Serum Institut Hospital pharmacy Other Unspecified Total Unspecified Unspecified Total Total KU, PharmaSchool KU, Other The Danish Medicines Agency Statens Serum Institut Hospital pharmacy Other Unspecified Total Total 6 34,461 30,982 33,592 16 36,230 31,901 36,177 17 40,357 38,299 42,404 8 37,468 32,937 38,441 36 37,897 33,587 35,900 27 37,084 32,228 38,808 0 42,204 39,658 41,603 110 37,617 32,789 37,256 1 1 30 47,366 40,152 46,517 58 43,662 39,233 42,092 88 48,015 44,374 47,013 43 45,913 42,535 46,127 126 49,534 41,518 48,488 164 48,039 42,255 45,864 1 510 47,654 42,103 46,282 510 47,654 42,103 46,282 39,233 39,760 44,374 40,982 41,115 41,004 42,798 41,099 51,079 46,790 52,249 48,924 53,991 52,566 52,005 52,005 35 Salaries include the employee's and the employer's pension contributions. 25%, 50% and 75% percentiles are indicated for each cohort of graduates. Percentiles describe the percentage of observations that are below a given value. The median is the middle observation, i.e. equal to the 50% percentile. The table shows the average salaries by graduate age divided by places of employment. Figures are only included if there are at least five respondents, otherwise they are included in the category "Other". Quartiles appears only if there are five or more respondents. For civil servants and members of the Pharmacy Pension Scheme (Apotekervæsenets Pensionsordning – AP), the salary figures are calculated with the value of the relevant pension schemes. For civil servants and members of the Pharmacy Pension Scheme (Apotekervæsenets Pensionsordning – AP), the salary figures are calculated with the value of the relevant pension schemes. For civil servants and members of the Pharmacy Pension Scheme (Apotekervæsenets Pensionsordning – AP), the salary figures are calculated with the value of the relevant pension schemes. Ta ble 3. 3b Septem ber s ala r y 2012 by place of employme nt , excluding one -off payme nt s and p er for m a n ce- rela ted p a y Place of employment Number Average salary Median 75th pctl. KU, PharmaSchool KU, Other DTU, The Technical University of Denmark SDU, Syddansk Universitet The Danish Medicines Agency Statens Serum Institut Danish Environment Protection Agency Professionshøjskole Danish Regions – except hospitals Hospital pharmacy Hospitals, other Other Unspecified 30 47,366 40,152 46,517 58 43,662 39,233 42,092 16 50,313 43,292 50,957 5 42,180 39,233 39,233 88 48,015 44,374 47,013 43 45,913 42,535 46,127 11 50,496 44,819 50,910 1 16 49,531 44,569 46,964 126 49,534 41,518 48,488 50 44,883 40,636 43,546 65 49,617 43,791 46,817 1 51,079 46,790 57,261 43,048 52,249 48,924 55,472 Total 510 52,005 47,654 25th pctl. 42,103 46,282 51,942 53,991 48,396 53,306 Ta ble 3. 3c Sep tem ber Sala r y 2012 according t o place of employme nt at hospit al pharmacy, e xclud i n g o n e- o ff pa y m en t an d per for m an ce-relat e d pay Place of employment Number Average salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. The Capital Region of Denmark Region Zealand Region of Southern Denmark Central Denmark Region Northern Jutland Region Unspecified Total 36 56 14 26 17 13 0 47,528 49,273 52,856 52,571 47,841 36,752 38,979 44,192 45,561 36,456 47,364 46,754 49,653 51,807 46,990 52,946 51,193 56,067 56,359 51,044 126 49,534 41,425 48,488 53,997 Ta ble 3 . 4a Se p te mb e r s ala r y 2 0 12 by pos i ti on , exclu di n g one -off payme nt s and pe rformance -re lat e d pay Position Number Average salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. Head of Division Office Manager Section Leader/Department Leader Deputy Manager Team Leader Chief Consultant Special Consultant Academic/scientific staff member Hospital pharmacist Scientific assistant Assistant professor/researcher/post,doc Associate professor/senior researcher Professor Other Unspecified 6 2 26 4 8 6 21 164 7 11 67 45 7 96 40 57,746 49,476 57,781 64,885 55,693 51,094 53,769 60,360 52,099 53,602 51,949 45,291 82,068 37,280 41,457 49,226 63,892 49,212 43,315 48,217 49,917 50,910 42,475 77,052 30,852 39,233 45,190 57,513 42,081 32,835 51,176 54,128 52,573 45,614 81,912 31,875 40,985 47,794 63,468 48,030 44,684 54,170 54,927 55,282 48,243 86,998 34,390 43,500 51,974 71,714 54,898 48,534 Total 510 47,654 42,103 46,282 52,005 Table 3.4b September Salary 2012 for PhD students, excluding one-off payments and performance-related pay Number Average salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. PhD students 94 32,651 30,852 Total 94 32,651 30,852 31,869 34,862 31,869 34,862 37 Salaries include the employee's and the employer's pension contributions. State employed PhD students earn 17.1 per cent pension of 85 per cent of the pension-earning salary. The level of qualification allowance decreased significantly compared to the 2011-percentiles, and are now on a par with 2009. PhD students are not included. Ta ble 3. 5a Septem ber s ala r y 2012 – qualificat ion allow ance Qualification allowance 2009 2010 2011 Number, who have received Average Minimum Maximum Percentiles 25% 50% 75% 452 6,819 660 24,866 3,985 6,287 9,038 577 9,496 908 27,516 5,717 8,838 12,035 560 9,162 - 38,430 4,832 8,682 12,051 2012 468 7,043 317 23,242 3,896 6,621 9,639 Ta ble 3. 5b Sep tem ber s ala r y 2012 – pe rformance -re lat e d pay and one -off payme nt 12 mont hs The level for allocations of performance-related pay and one-off payments is not very different from the previous year. PhD students are not included. A growing group of members perform overtime. However, there is not a correspondingly large group who receive overtime payments. PhD students are not included. Performance based pay and lump sum payments, 12 months Number, who have received Average Minimum Maximum Percentiles 25% 50% 75% 2008 2009 2010 2011 71 20,490 4,000 92,119 10,000 15,000 20,000 83 22,103 4,000 72,000 10,000 15,559 25,000 69 17,554 2,000 57,000 12,000 15,000 20,000 92 38,546 5 60,000 10,000 14,000 20,000 Ta ble 3. 5c Septem ber s ala r y 2012 – ove r t ime payment 12 mont hs Overtime pay, 12 months 2009 2010 2011 2012 Number, who have received Average Minimum Maximum Percentiles 25% 50% 75% 12 37.002 5,922 72,524 17,636 38,979 52,250 13 39.382 500 135,000 10,589 30,000 62,801 12 19.070 160 51,818 11,000 18,500 20,500 13 43.587 30 63,492 2,300 9,950 34,000 Ta ble 3. 5d Sep tem ber s ala r y 2012 – ove r t ime hours 12 mont hs Overtime hours, 12 months 2009 2010 2011 2012 Number, who have had Average Minimum Maximum Percentiles 25% 50% 75% 124 207 9 1,196 60 120 275 142 174 3 800 77 100 239 121 180 7 950 64 110 235 170 178 6 1,500 50 114 250 38 Generally about salary ratios The salary ratios reflect a difference in salary levels, after we have adjusted for the effect of seniority and job category. If a workplace pays its employees an average of five per cent more than others, it will mean that the salary ratio for that workplace will be 105. Fi gure 3.1a Salar y rat io by place of employme nt Place of employment 100.4 99.1 99.3 99.1 KU, PharmaSchool 98.5 99.1 99.2 99.1 KU, Other When the salary ratio for a workplace increases compared to the previous year, this is only an indication that the salaries are higher than for other workplaces that year. DTU 97.9 96.2 96.7 96.5 97.1 SDU, Syddansk Universitet 100.3 100.7 102.2 102.0 The Danish Medicines Agency Table 3.6 September salary 2012, salary ratio by gender Statens Serum Institut Gender Male Female 2009 101.0 99.7 2010 100.3 99.9 2011 100.8 99.8 2012 100.4 99.9 104.1 99.7 Danish Regions – except hospitals 99.7 96.5 96.5 96.6 100.9 96.7 101.6 98.60 100.7 Danish Environment Protection Agency 97.80 100.7 102.6 100.4 100.8 Hospital pharmacy 99.8 98.8 99.1 100.5 Hospitals, other 99.9 98.8 98.1 Unspecified 96.2 Other Quotas 98.5 n Year 2009 100.2 99.9 n Year 2010 n Year 2011 n Year 2012 85 90 95 100 105 39 Generally, there are small increases relative to 2011. Fi g u re 3. 1b Sala r y rati o a ccording t o w orkplace in h os pi tal p h ar m acy i n th e re gions 2012 Place of employment 102.3 (37 employees) 104.1 (45 employees) 99.6 (54 employees) 100.6 (56 employees) The Capital Region of Denmark 99.6 (18 employees) 102.9 (9 employees) 100.3 (17 employees) 104.4 (14 employees) Region Zealand 101.9 (28 employees) 101.6 (25 employees) 100.3 (16 employees) 98.5 (26 employees) Region of Southern Denmark 97.3 (27 employees) 97.6 (34 employees) 99.8 (23 employees) 102.7 (17 employees) Central Denmark Region 102.4 (15 employees) 101.1 (8 employees) 100.8 (10 employees) 100.2 (13 employees) Northern Jutland Region Unspecified 101.5 (55 employees) 95 100 105 80 Quotas n Year 2009 % 77.9% 90 76.0% 85 Figure 3.2 Are you cove re d by a local unio n re pre se nt at ive? 78.8% The number of members who are covered by a trade union representative seems to be constant with minor fluctuations. Since there are few union representatives and the population of public sector employees is relatively small, both in absolute numbers, the percentages are sensitive to small changes, which may explain the variations. 78.7% 100.7 (125 employees) 101.5 (121 employees) 100.4 (175 employees) 100.8 (126 employees) Total 70 n Year 2010 60 n Year 2011 50 n Year 2012 n Year 2010 n Year 2011 n Year 2012 10 0 Yes 40 No 24.0% 20 22.1% 30 n Year 2009 21.3% Quotas 21.2% 40 Ta ble 3 .7 B re a k d ow n by s ala r y g rade – n ew s ala r y syst e m New pay scale 2008 2009 2010 2011 3 4 12.0% 10.1% 13.2% 5 4.5% 6.6% 4.8% 6 6.9% 4.2% 7.5% 8 70.2% 70.6% 62.5% Special Consultants 5.2% 6.5% 6.8% Chief Consultants 1.1% 2.0% 2.7% Unspecified 2.6% 11.5% 9.2% 4.8% 63.1% 5.2% 3.5% 2.8% Ta ble 3 . 9 M e mb e r s w i th s ta ff res p on s i bi li ty Personnel responsibility Number Percent 1 - 2 employees 25 21.6% 3 - 5 employees 22 19.0% 6 - 10 employees 13 11.2% 11 - 20 employees 19 16.4% 21 - 40 employees 25 21.6% More than 40 employees 12 10.3% Total 116 100.0% Ta ble 3.8 Me mbe rs by j ob t it le s Position Number Percent Head of Division 6 1.0% Office Manager 2 0.3% Section Leader/Department Leader 26 4.3% Deputy Manager 4 0.7% Team Leader 8 1.3% Chief Consultant 6 1.0% Special Consultant 21 3.5% Academic/scientific staff member 164 27.2% Hospital pharmacist 7 1.2% PhD students 94 15.6% Scientific assistant 11 1.8% Assistant professor/researcher/post.doc. 67 11.1% Associate professor/senior researcher 45 7.5% Professor 7 1.2% Other 96 15.9% Unspecified 40 6.6% Total 604 100.0% Ta ble 3.10 Cont inuing and fur t her educat ion and training Continuing and further education Number Percent Professional competency developmentg 282 46.9% Management development 67 11.1% Personal competency development 69 11.5% Other further education 21 3.5% No answers 162 27.0% Total 601 117.8% 41 The table shows the distribution of professional, personal or managerial competence. It was possible to tick more than one box when responding. Salary statistics in the pharmacy sector 2012 The following part of the salary statistics includes salaries for pharmacists in private pharmacies. The Association of Danish Pharmacies has published data, which the association says covers salary payments for September 2012. This data forms the basis for the statistics in this area. The "response rate" is therefore 100 per cent. Salary bonuses from the salary bonus fund are not included. Like last year, this year we obtained additional information from the pharmacists employed in pharmacies. 66 per cent have answered these questions. This data relates to organizational placement, staff responsibilities, training/education and benefits. It follows from the responses that almost a quarter are deputy managers, and that 44 per cent have staff responsibility to a greater or lesser extent. Only 15 per cent have not participated in educational activities. Naturally, continuing education varies in extent and price. On average, participants estimated that the pharmacist spent nearly DKK 8,160 per participant. Like last year, the vast majority of the further education related to specific treatment areas, quality assurance and management, while e.g. medication review and information recording had lower participation. It is also noteworthy that benefits are not very prevalent. This year, 10 per cent received benefits, which is a decrease of 2 per cent compared to last year. Those who have received benefits, received goods with a value of over DKK 700 on average, equal to last year's figures. Like last year, we unfortunately noted that incentives of this type do not really exist in the pharmacy sector. Salary statistics are individual-oriented. This means that part-time employees are converted to full-time positions and are included with the same weighting in calculating the average increase percentages. The increases do not therefore reflect increases in average salary, but only for the average increases within each group. The statistics cover 616 people. Converted to full-time employees, this corresponds to 505. Students, employees over 67 and non-members are not included. The average wage is estimated at DKK 48,668 per month, excluding performance-related pay and on-call payments Compared to last year, the average increase rate, weighted by the number per graduation cohort, was 3.9 per cent. Performance-related pay is not included in the salary statistics, as the paid performance-related pay varies significantly from month to month and there are very few pharmacy employees who receive performancerelated pay. In September 2012, a total of DKK 11,000 was paid in performance-related pay. This is a decrease compared to last year, where the figure was DKK 13,600. The salary growth of 3.9 per cent was slightly higher this year than last year, when the average rate of increase was 1.7 per cent. This is primarily due to the fact that there was an agreement on a general increase in the pay grade of 0.8 per cent from 1 April 2011, while from 1 April this year there was an agreement on a somewhat higher increase of 1.7 per cent of the payroll for salary grades, general bonus, pay for meeting participation and on-call payments. The increases are distributed unevenly for the different graduate cohorts. The youngest cohorts contributed to increasing the salary increases, which was expected, since the youngest pharmacists' salary will automatically increase in accordance with the pay grades for the first four years of employment. from the salary statistics that there was an average salary increase compared to last year for pharmacists on all three salary grades. No grade stagnated. Of the 616 pharmacists covered by the salary statistics, 137 only get the pay grade salary and any seniority bonuses, and 16 only get the pay grade salary, differential allowance and seniority bonuses. So 25 per cent of the employed pharmacists do not get personal bonuses or new salary bonuses, or in other words, they do not share in the individually negotiated bonuses. This has not changed from last year or the year before. Function and qualification allowances increased by 1.6 per cent since last year. In the same period, the "Other" category (personal allowances and availability payments) decreased by 4.1 per cent. The personal allowance and availability allowance decreased by the same nominal value by which the function and qualification allowance increased. Last year, the increase in the function and qualification allowance was 2.7 per cent. There is therefore much to suggest that again this year, the new salary fund has not been implemented adequately, and that we will therefore once again be in a situation where the salary grade will be increased by the new salary system funds that have not materialised. Again this year there has been a decrease in the average on-call allowance, which is due to fewer on-call duties being handled by pharmacists. It can be seen 43 The table is calculated by year of university graduation. The gross salary includes salary grade payments, differential allowance, seniority bonus and qualification allowance, personal allowance, etc. but does not include on-call payments and performance-related pay. The salaries include pension contributions. 25%, 50% and 75% percentiles are indicated for each cohort of graduates. Percentiles describe the percentage of observations that are below a given value. The median is the middle observation, i.e. equal to the 50% percentile. The column second from the right shows the average on-call payment for each cohort. The column on the far right shows the percentage salary increases and the total average increase is shown at the bottom, weighted by number. Table 4.1 September salary 2012 (average) by year of university graduation, excluding performance-related pay Year of graduationNumber Shift work premium Annual increase % -1976 54 52,332 50,595 52,445 54,547 637 1977 18 52,638 50,595 52,658 56,117 478 1978 16 52,067 46,719 53,143 56,728 1,675 1979 11 52,180 50,595 52,503 54,380 2,716 1980 10 52,160 47,111 51,920 58,602 554 1981 11 52,572 52,225 54,247 54,813 3,018 1982 12 50,836 49,904 51,594 53,413 2,929 1983 8 51,844 47,960 51,415 54,747 0 1984 8 52,715 50,719 52,867 55,675 4,375 1985 12 50,783 48,035 50,738 53,538 534 1986 17 53,747 51,123 52,816 55,348 3,368 1987 7 52,185 48,584 51,081 56,805 895 1988 14 50,328 47,184 49,336 52,330 1,031 1989 17 51,397 48,774 52,713 53,639 1,615 1990 6 49,156 45,329 49,867 52,187 981 1991 14 50,089 47,555 49,200 54,073 2,801 1992 12 50,455 46,846 48,807 50,806 1,041 1993 11 49,028 45,809 49,127 52,212 1,888 1994 13 52,313 48,734 49,888 55,618 1,264 1995 11 50,486 49,127 50,467 53,450 1,708 1996 14 48,458 45,972 48,108 51,997 866 1997 13 47,994 47,098 47,684 48,153 3,253 1998 9 48,502 44,976 48,117 49,653 2,739 1999 10 49,364 48,127 49,998 51,150 966 2000 16 50,224 48,395 49,616 52,648 1,108 2001 23 49,858 45,972 48,709 51,580 566 2002 12 48,166 45,015 47,785 50,781 527 2003 21 48,785 44,962 47,661 51,797 2,803 2004 20 50,796 47,646 50,105 53,235 908 2005 22 49,240 45,972 48,536 52,962 1,308 2006 26 46,805 43,578 45,940 48,885 1,712 2007 14 45,850 43,578 45,119 47,355 2,200 2008 33 44,935 42,444 44,361 46,490 1,784 2009 25 43,000 42,031 42,734 44,361 913 2010 30 41,368 39,729 41,096 42,031 2,230 2011 29 40,415 39,729 39,729 40,896 2,393 2012 14 39,917 39,729 39,729 39,729 1,169 Unspecified 3 Total 616 48,668 43,578 48,540 52,611 1,583 1.5 3.8 3.0 2.3 1.4 -0.1 4.6 -0.3 5.5 2.7 1.3 3.3 4.3 3.5 4.7 2.5 0.9 3.5 4.4 3.2 1.8 2.8 3.2 5.8 2.2 2.2 3.8 3.8 7.2 8.1 3.1 8.2 8.4 7.2 5.2 4.3 44 Avg. gross salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. 3.9 Ta ble 4. 2 Se p te mb e r s a l a r y 2 0 12 ( a vera g e) by year of bi r th , excluding pe rformance -re lat e d pay Year of birth - 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 - Unspecified Total Number Avg. gross salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. Avg. Shift Annual work premium increase % 71 52,160 49,904 52,226 54,703 821 1.9 22 52,630 51,812 53,143 54,201 2,126 3.1 11 54,175 53,651 55,255 57,513 656 0.7 9 49,509 45,972 46,015 52,925 3,460 3.8 17 52,600 51,978 54,247 55,298 751 2.7 14 50,883 48,584 51,814 54,342 926 0.2 13 52,576 50,086 51,302 55,263 2,149 5.8 11 52,483 51,133 51,855 52,816 4,506 2.8 10 51,633 48,768 51,168 54,035 2,363 2.3 15 52,574 49,863 54,291 56,520 1,670 2.4 11 49,800 47,184 49,975 52,330 1,073 1.9 14 51,491 48,731 51,803 52,809 1,866 3.7 12 49,109 46,164 48,495 53,207 1,525 4.8 12 51,040 46,517 52,251 54,234 2,544 5.0 13 50,262 47,050 50,901 52,212 1,822 4.3 9 48,533 45,972 49,682 50,338 1,433 3.2 8 50,428 47,312 49,229 54,973 4,925 0.9 10 49,401 45,972 49,699 50,526 545 1.2 10 49,432 47,931 48,545 51,997 122 2.7 11 50,875 49,653 50,467 52,962 1,342 4.1 13 48,355 45,972 48,122 50,632 0 3.0 23 47,985 44,962 47,684 49,472 1,585 3.9 20 50,103 46,733 48,305 52,890 3,290 2.2 17 48,033 46,811 48,548 50,525 369 0.8 19 48,204 45,759 47,655 50,897 1,096 5.4 18 47,376 43,578 46,716 51,150 1,494 5.4 27 48,738 44,361 48,864 50,887 934 3.7 20 48,710 44,532 47,622 53,330 1,287 6.1 23 46,651 44,312 46,490 48,885 784 6.8 18 46,784 42,617 44,981 49,021 514 5.8 24 45,066 42,649 44,096 45,679 2,695 7.7 14 43,055 40,866 42,247 45,526 1,026 5.7 19 42,039 40,866 42,031 42,831 1,867 5.5 20 42,467 39,729 41,667 43,826 2,797 6.2 20 40,658 39,729 39,729 41,175 1,626 4.8 18 40,119 39,729 39,729 39,729 3,234 0 616 48,668 43,578 48,540 52,611 1,583 3.8 45 The table is calculated by year of birth. The salaries include pension contributions, but exclude performance-related pay. 25%, 50% and 75% percentiles are indicated for each cohort of graduates. Percentiles describe the percentage of observations that are below a given value. The median is the middle observation, i.e. equal to the 50% percentile. The column second from the right shows the average on-call payment for each cohort. The column on the far right shows the percentage salary increases and the total average increase is shown at the bottom, weighted by number. The table is constructed based on the different salary grades. Pay grade 3 is subdivided by differential allowance. Salaries are inclusive of pension contributions, but exclude performance-related pay and on-call payments. T a ble 4 . 3 Sep tem ber s ala r y 2012 by grade w it h differe nt ial allow ance, e xcluding on-call payme nt s a n d per for m an ce-rela ted p a y Old pay scale point 0 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 New pay Compensation Number Avg. salary 25th pctl. Median 75th pctl. scale pointallowance, DKK 1 2 3 3 1302 3 2368 3 2785 3 3375 3 3968 73 51 313 23 13 16 54 73 40,484 42,963 48,602 52,275 52,599 53,225 53,723 54,548 39,729 41,794 45,972 49,819 51,844 50,583 51,535 52,339 39,729 42,617 47,768 51,472 52,742 52,634 53,184 53,651 41,063 43,938 50,632 54,328 53,701 55,593 55,289 56,191 Total 616 48,668 43,578 48,540 52,611 25%, 50% and 75% percentiles are indicated for each cohort of graduates. Percentiles describe the percentage of observations that are below a given value. The median is the middle observation, i.e. equal to the 50% percentile. The column furthest to the right shows the percentage wage increases. 46 Annual increase % 3.1 4.3 3.0 3.0 3.4 2.7 2.0 3.2 Ta bl e 4.4 Se p te mb e r s a la r y 2 0 12 ( a vera g e) , s a la r y com p osit ion by year of universit y graduat ion, e xcluding p e r fo r ma n c e - re l a te d pa y Graduation Number year Grade sal. + compensation Function + qualification Other Duty/Shift Seniority -1976 54 47,195 1,917 1,003 1977 18 46,660 1,989 1,729 1978 16 46,467 2,868 638 1979 11 47,109 1,934 743 1980 10 46,214 2,531 1,500 1981 11 46,858 2,007 1,531 1982 12 46,470 1,795 576 1983 8 46,527 1,730 1,492 1984 8 47,018 2,186 1,416 1985 12 45,821 2,794 572 1986 17 46,735 3,658 960 1987 7 45,896 1,828 2,410 1988 14 44,968 2,810 498 1989 17 45,229 2,950 1,105 1990 6 44,957 1,368 1,235 1991 14 43,736 2,776 1,524 1992 12 43,831 2,407 2,222 1993 11 44,405 2,358 524 1994 13 44,161 4,717 1,224 1995 11 43,883 3,712 932 1996 14 43,578 2,042 957 1997 13 43,578 1,883 323 1998 9 43,150 2,335 1,421 1999 10 43,578 3,333 538 2000 16 43,578 4,519 181 2001 23 43,578 2,649 2,156 2002 12 43,031 2,936 603 2003 21 43,449 2,766 974 2004 20 43,578 3,844 1,459 2005 22 43,578 3,162 818 2006 26 43,178 2,693 566 2007 14 43,578 1,449 823 2008 33 42,345 1,932 658 2009 25 40,820 1,816 363 2010 30 40,085 1,055 228 2011 29 39,729 686 0 2012 14 39,729 117 71 Unspecified 3 Total 616 43,989 2,359 888 637 478 1,675 2,716 554 3,018 2,929 0 4,375 534 3,368 895 1,031 1,615 981 2,801 1,041 1,888 1,264 1,708 866 3,253 2,739 966 1,108 566 527 2,803 908 1,308 1,712 2,200 1,784 913 2,230 2,393 1,169 2,217 2,261 2,095 2,394 1,915 2,176 1,995 2,095 2,095 1,596 2,394 2,052 2,052 2,112 1,596 2,052 1,995 1,741 2,210 1,959 1,881 2,210 1,596 1,915 1,945 1,475 1,596 1,596 1,915 1,683 368 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,583 1,433 47 The table shows the wage composition by graduation cohort. It shows the grade, including the value of any differential allowance, seniority bonuses and function and qualification allowances granted under the new salary system. The column "Other" shows the value of any personal allowances and availability payments. The salaries include pension contributions, but exclude performance-related pay. The column second from the right shows the average seniority payment for each graduate cohort plus pension. Second from the right is the average on-call payment for the individual graduation cohorts. On-call payments are including pension. The calculations in Tables 4.5 to 4.11 are based on responses gathered in the questionnaire sent to all pharmacists employed in pharmacies. 403 pharmacists employed at 216 pharmacies have submitted answers. Ta ble 4 . 5 O rg an i z ati on a l g rading Job title Number Pharmacists 268 Deputy Manager 88 Total 356 Percentage 75.3% 24.7% 100.0% Table 4.6 The ex t ent of management resp o n si b i l i t y Number Percentage 1-2 employees 7 3.9% 3-5 employees 24 13.4% 6-10 employees 36 20.1% 11-20 employees 70 39.1% More than 20 employees 42 23.5% Total 179 100.0% Table 4.5.1 Pharmacy employees September salary 2012 (average) by organizational grading excluding performance-related pay Position in organisation Number Average Average gross salary 25% quartile Median 75% fraktil duty allowance Farmaceut 256 47,767 43,578 Deputy Manager 86 54,246 51,997 Unspecified/Ukendt 274 47,759 43,578 Total 616 48,668 43,578 47,835 54,078 47,427 51,912 56,594 51,123 1,410 1,710 1,705 48,540 52,611 1,583 Ta ble 4 . 6. 1 Ph a r m acy em ployees, Se pt embe r salar y 2012 (average ) by st aff re sponsibilit y excludin g per for m an ce-rela ted p a y Staff responsibility Number Average Average gross salary 25% quartile Median 75% fraktil duty allowance 1-2 employees 6 46,654 42,281 3-5 employees 20 47,748 43,427 6-10 employees 35 50,563 47,260 11-20 employees 69 52,431 49,888 More than 20 employees 41 52,812 48,704 No staff responsibility Unspecified/unknown 445 47,622 43,578 Total 616 48,668 43,578 48 46,013 47,248 51,797 52,878 54,354 52,305 52,498 54,158 54,399 56,859 4,553 1,303 1,944 1,373 2,092 47,387 51,133 1,513 48,540 52,611 1,583 Table 4.7 Number of days attended fur ther education Number Percentage Did not participate at all 59 15.1% 1-2 days 119 29.0% 3-5 days 141 35.0% 6-10 days 72 17.9% More than 10 days 12 3.0% Total 403 100.0% Ta ble 4.8 D ist ribut ion by cont inuing e ducat ion are as Number Percentage Review of specific therapies/drugs 115 28.5% Information 48 11.9% Clinical pharmacy 59 14.6% Quality assurance 116 28.8% Management 93 23.1% Medicine review 49 12.2% Patient safety 47 11.7% Finance 41 10.2% Other 118 29.3% No response 60 14.9% Total Ta ble 4. 9 E mp l oye d a t ph ar m acy Number Prior to 1980 23 From 1980 to 1989 47 From 1990 to 1999 49 From 2000 to 2009 187 2010 or later 91 Total Ta ble 4. 1 1 Pe rs on n e l b e nefi ts Subscriptions to newspapers/journal Home PC Membership fee to associations Free telephone (land line/mobile) Bus fare/train fare Internet connection Other No response Total 397 403 100.0% Percentage 5.8% 11.8% 12.3% 47.1% 22.9% 100.0% Ta ble 4.10 Employment in curre nt posit ion Number Percentage Prior to 1990 16 4.5% From 1990 to 1999 33 9.3% From 2000 to 2009 185 52.4% 2010 or later 119 33.7% Total Number Percentage 20 15 3 6 1 2 20 349 5.0% 3.7% 0.7% 1.5% 0.2% 0.5% 5.0% 86.6% 403 100.0% 353 100.0% 49 Negotiations Use the statistics to inform yourself about what others like you typically receive in salary and benefits. Based on the statistics, you can get an idea of the salary level you should be at. Average or higher flyer – why stay on the average? You need to consider how you are placed in relation to the average and to the percentiles. Include your background, industry knowledge, experience from work, etc. It is also relevant to include other circumstances when evaluating salary, for example paid maternity leave, extra vacation, bonuses, pensions, training, overtime pay, flexible working hours, working from home, health insurance, etc. Good advice on salary negotiation Preparation • Before the negotiation, you and your boss should exchange figures and other factual information that will be used in the negotiation process • You must consider what is important to you. Prepare alternatives to your requirements and consider what is of most value to you. The negotiations Set a limit for the minimum you can accept from the negotiations. Sometimes it can be the status quo, and at other times it may be a substantial salary increase. 50 What should your proposal be? • Let your proposal be ambitious and realistic • Make a proposal for what you would be very satisfied to receive as the outcome of the negotiations • Perhaps supplement your salary proposal with a proposal for attractive fringe benefits • Be sure to maintain a constructive dialogue • Be open and listen, ask open-ended questions • Be persistent, even if you feel that your arguments and claims are being rejected. Evaluation of the salary negotiations Did you experience an unsatisfactory result at your last salary negotiation. You might consider whether it is time to change jobs. Experience shows that academics often achieve good salary increases when changing jobs. If you need advice on your salary, you are welcome to contact Pharmadanmark. You can also get more tips on wage negotiations at www.pharmadanmark.dk Good luck with the negotiations! Pharmadanmark Rygårds Alle 1 2900 Hellerup Telephone + 45 3946 3600 fax +45 3946 3639 [email protected] www.pharmadanmark.dk Published by Pharmadanmark December 2012 Graphic Design: Nina Grut MDD Printing: Jørn Thomsen Elbo A/S