School Year Report Card

Transcription

IRN# 050351
Crestview Local School District
531 E Tully St, Convoy, OH 45832-8864—Van Wert County
2011-2012 School
Year Report Card
Current Superintendent: Michael Y. Estes (419) 749-9100
9OUR$ISTRICTS
$ESIGNATION
%XCELLENT
Number of State
Indicators
Met out of 26
26
Performance
Index
(0-120 points)
102.8
State
Indicators
4HE$ISTRICT2EPORT#ARDFORTHE
SCHOOLYEARSHOWSTHE
PROGRESSDISTRICTSHAVEMADE
based on four measures of
performance.
State
Indicators
Indicators
AYP
3rd Grade Achievement
1. Reading
2. Mathematics
4th Grade Achievement
3. Reading
4. Mathematics
5. Reading
6. Mathematics
7. Science
8. Reading
9. Mathematics
10. Reading
11. Mathematics
12. Reading
13. Mathematics
14. Science
Performance
Index
Performance
Index
Value-Added
Measure
Value-Added
Component
Score
✓
+
Value-Added
Adequate
–
9EARLY0ROGRESS
= met
= above
= below
The combination of the four
measures is the basis for
assigning state designations
to districts, buildings and
COMMUNITYSCHOOLS
Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)
The six designations are
s%XCELLENTWITH$ISTINCTION
s%XCELLENT
s%FFECTIVE
s#ONTINUOUS)MPROVEMENT
s!CADEMIC7ATCH
s!CADEMIC%MERGENCY
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)**
20. Reading
21. Mathematics
22. Writing
23. Science
24. Social Studies
Attendance Rate
25. All Grades
State
Indicators
To meet a test indicator for grades
3-8 and 10, at least 75% of students
tested must score proficient or higher
on that test. Other indicator requirements are:
11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests, 85%; Attendance
Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%.
/NTHE7EBREPORTCARDOHIOGOV
Reading
Mathematics
Writing
Science
Social Studies
2010-11 Four-Year Graduation Rate
26. District
Value-Added
Measure
Met
Value-Added
Component
Score
= Met
✓= met
+ = above
– = below
Your District
2011-2012
Similar Districts *
2011-2012
State
2011-2012
The state requirement is 75 percent
93.2%
88.1%
88.4%
87.7%
79.0%
79.8%
85.9%
87.5%
89.1%
83.8%
83.3%
78.4%
82.9%
82.6%
81.4%
81.7%
73.6%
79.2%
76.8%
67.5%
72.5%
92.4%
91.0%
91.1%
86.2%
86.7%
79.9%
85.9%
89.7%
87.8%
83.0%
79.5%
73.6%
95.0%
85.0%
95.0%
88.7%
90.3%
84.5%
83.0%
79.6%
71.5%
91.1%
87.3%
93.7%
83.5%
91.1%
91.3%
90.7%
92.9%
86.3%
88.7%
86.0%
82.6%
87.1%
76.7%
81.6%
95.2%
95.2%
96.8%
92.1%
95.2%
95.9%
95.7%
96.6%
92.7%
93.4%
92.6%
89.9%
93.0%
85.6%
87.8%
96.3%
95.7%
94.5%
97.3%
93.3%
79.7%
Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .
Similar Districts are based on comparing demographic, socioeconomic and geographic factors.
-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders.
*
**
2
Your District’s Assessment Results Over Time
All students in the district for a full academic year are included in the results.
State
Indicators
The State
Indicators
are based on state
assessments, as WELL
as on attendance and
graduation rates.
To earn an indicator
FOR!CHIEVEMENTOR
Graduation Tests, at
least 75% of students
must reach proficient
ORABOVEFORTHEGIVEN
assessment. For
the 11th grade Ohio
Graduation Tests
indicators, ACUMULATIVE
85% passage rate for each
assessment is required.
d
e
w
3
Performance Index
The Performance
Index reflects the
Performance
Index
ACHIEVEMENTOFEVERYSTUDENT
enrolled for the full academic
YEAR4HE0ERFORMANCE)NDEXISA
WEIGHTEDAVERAGETHATINCLUDESALL
tested subjects and grades and
untested students. The greatest
WEIGHTISGIVENTOADVANCEDSCORES
THEWEIGHTSDECREASEFOREACH
PERFORMANCELEVELANDAWEIGHTOF
ZEROISGIVENTOUNTESTEDSTUDENTS
This results in a scale from 0 to 120
points. The Performance Index can
BECOMPAREDACROSSYEARSTOSHOW
DISTRICTACHIEVEMENTTRENDS
Performance Index Calculations
for the 2011-2012 School Year
Percentage
X
Untested
0.0
X
0.0
=
0.0
Limited
2.0
X
0.3
=
0.6
Basic
9.5
X
0.6
=
5.7
33.1
X
1.0
=
33.1
Accelerated
30.2
X
1.1
=
33.2
Advanced
25.2
X
1.2
=
30.2
(Includes every student enrolled in
the district for a full academic year)
=
102.8
2011-2012
2010-2011
2009-2010
102.8
102.2
98.8
Value-Added Measure
Value-Added
Component
Score
ratings for the 2011-2012 school year.
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
✓= met
+ = above
– = below
Grade 8
Reading
Mathematics
Legend
9OURDISTRICTS6ALUE!DDEDRATINGREPRESENTSTHEPROGRESS
YOURDISTRICTHASMADEWITHITSSTUDENTSSINCELASTSCHOOLYEAR
)NCONTRASTACHIEVEMENTSCORESREPRESENTSTUDENTSPERFORMANCEAT
a POINTINTIME!SCOREOFh!BOVEvINDICATESGREATERTHANONEYEAROFPROGRESS
HASBEENACHIEVEDh-ETvINDICATESONEYEAROFPROGRESSHASBEENACHIEVED
h"ELOWvINDICATESLESSTHANONEYEAROFPROGRESSHASBEENACHIEVED
Value-Added
Measure
/NTHE7EBREPORTCARDOHIOGOV
=
= Met
=
4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Progress
Grades 3-8 and 10
and
Met
Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met
Met
NR
Met
Met
Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met
Met
NR
Met
Met
Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met
Met
NR
Met
Met
Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met
Met
NR
Met
Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met
NR
NR
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met
Met
NR
Met
Legend
*
N/A
NR
Met
Not Met
Class of 2011 Four-Year Graduation Rate Information
Class of 2010 Five-Year Graduation Rate Information
All
Students
American Indian/
Alaska Native
Asian or
Black,
Econ.
Disadvtgd
All
Students
American Indian/
Alaska Native
Asian or
Black,
Econ.
Disadvtgd
>95.0%
--
--
--
--
>95.0%
--
--
--
--
Limited English
--
--
Multi-Racial
--
White,
Limited English
Disabilities
--
>95.0%
--
--
Multi-Racial
--
White,
Disabilities
--
>95.0%
5
State and Federally Required District Information
Black,
American
Indian/
Alaska Native
Asian or
MultiRacial
Islander
White,
NonDisabled
Students
Students
Disabilities
Migrant
NonEcon.
Disadvtgd
Econ.
Disadvtgd
Limited
English
Female
Male
Percentage of Students Scoring Limited
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
------
------
------
0.0
-6.3
---
0.0
-0.0
---
1.4
0.0
3.2
0.5
2.8
0.8
0.0
1.3
0.0
3.2
3.9
0.0
14.3
5.3
6.3
------
0.3
0.0
2.7
1.5
2.0
2.9
0.0
4.6
0.0
6.9
------
1.7
0.0
2.6
1.0
6.7
0.8
0.0
4.1
0.9
2.0
18.8
-12.5
---
18.2
-27.3
---
9.1
5.6
8.8
13.4
4.2
5.8
1.6
6.5
11.1
3.2
28.6
25.0
23.4
21.1
12.5
------
4.7
4.0
5.3
4.5
2.0
17.7
10.3
16.0
28.0
10.3
------
8.2
3.3
11.3
17.8
6.7
10.6
8.2
7.3
8.3
4.1
25.0
-37.5
---
45.5
-45.5
---
34.7
43.1
33.6
25.3
15.3
34.1
42.9
34.1
26.3
12.7
41.6
50.0
36.4
31.6
31.3
------
27.9
32.0
28.9
22.4
6.0
48.0
65.5
44.0
36.0
34.5
------
32.5
40.0
33.8
25.7
6.7
38.0
46.9
35.1
28.7
22.4
35.4
50.0
24.9
32.0
19.4
38.8
54.0
25.8
32.2
14.3
16.9
25.0
13.0
26.3
31.3
------
42.2
62.0
26.2
38.1
18.0
23.4
24.1
19.4
18.7
17.2
------
33.3
53.3
24.2
29.7
23.3
37.1
44.9
23.3
32.4
14.3
19.5
1.4
29.5
28.9
58.3
20.6
1.6
32.3
30.4
66.7
9.1
0.0
13.0
15.8
18.8
------
24.9
2.0
36.9
33.6
72.0
8.0
0.0
16.0
17.3
31.0
------
24.2
3.3
28.1
25.7
56.7
13.5
0.0
30.2
29.6
57.1
Percentage of Students Scoring Basic
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
------
------
------
Percentage of Students Scoring
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
------
------
------
Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
------
------
------
37.5
-0.0
---
36.4
-18.2
---
Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
------
------
------
18.8
-43.8
---
0.0
-9.1
---
Your District’s Students 2011-2012
--
Student
non-
877
--
Students
non--
--
2.6%
2.5%
93.2%
33.2%
--
17.0%
= Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
Under the federal
No Child Left Behind
Act, states are
required to report
certain data about
schools and teachers.
$ata presented here
are for reporting
PURPOSESONLYAND
are not used in the
computation of the
state designation
for districts and
schools.
--
--
School Teacher Information
%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
74.2%
0.0%
73.8%
0.0%
--
0.0%
100.0%
--
100.0%
0.0%
--
0.0%
6
Determining Your District’s Designation
$ETERMININGYOURDISTRICTSREPORTCARDDESIGNATIONISAMULTISTEPPROCESS4HElRSTSTEPISTODETERMINEAPRELIMINARYDESIGNATION
WHICHISBASEDONTHEFOLLOWINGCOMPONENTSTHEPERCENTAGEOFINDICATORSMETTHE0ERFORMANCE)NDEXAND!90DETERMINATION
94%-100%
or
100 to 120
and
Met or Not Met
=
75%-93.9%
or
90 to 99.9
and
Met or Not Met
=
0%-74.9%
or
0 to 89.9
and
Met
=
50%-74.9%
or
80 to 89.9
and
Not Met
=
31%-49.9%
or
70 to 79.9
and
Not Met
=
0%-30.9%
and
0 to 69.9
and
Not Met
=
4HEPRELIMINARYDESIGNATIONRESULTSFROMIDENTIFYINGTHE
HIGHERVALUEBETWEENTHEPERCENTAGEOFINDICATORSMETBY
YOURDISTRICTANDYOURDISTRICTS0ERFORMANCE)NDEX
!90THENISEVALUATEDTODETERMINEITSEFFECTONTHE
PRELIMINARYDESIGNATION4HEREARETWOWAYSINWHICH
!90CANAFFECTTHEPRELIMINARYDESIGNATION
)FADISTRICTMEETS!90INTHECURRENTYEARITCANBE
RATEDNOLOWERTHAN#ONTINUOUS)MPROVEMENT
)FAN%XCELLENTOR%FFECTIVEDISTRICTDOESNOTMEET!90
FORTHESAMETWOORMORESUBGROUPSFORTHREE
CONSECUTIVEYEARSITSRATINGWILLBEDECREASEDTO
%FFECTIVEOR#ONTINUOUS)MPROVEMENTRESPECTIVELY
/NCETHEPRELIMINARYDESIGNATIONISDETERMINED6ALUE!DDED
THEFOURTHMEASUREINTHEACCOUNTABILITYSYSTEMISEVALUATED
TODETERMINETHEIMPACTIFANYONTHEDISTRICTSlNAL
designation.
1. )FYOURDISTRICTSDESIGNATIONEITHERISINCREASEDORDECREASED
due to AYP, Value-Added has no impact on the designation
ANDTHEPRELIMINARYDESIGNATIONBECOMESTHElNALDESIGNATION
)FYOURDISTRICTEXPERIENCESABOVEEXPECTEDGROWTHINTHE
CURRENTYEARYOURDISTRICTSlNALDESIGNATIONWILLINCREASEBY
one designation.
)FYOURdistrictEXPERIENCESBELOWEXPECTEDGROWTHFORAT
LEASTTWOCONSECUTIVEYEARSYOURDISTRICTS final
designation WILLDECREASEBYONEDESIGNATION
Value-Added
Component
Score
✓= met
+ = above
– = below
and
or
and
or
and
or
and
or
and
or
)NALLOTHERCASES6ALUE!DDEDWILLHAVENOIMPACTONTHEDESIGNATIONANDTHEPRELIMINARYDESIGNATIONWILLBECOMETHElNALDESIGNATION
7
4HE.ATIONAL!SSESSMENTOF%DUCATIONAL0ROGRESS.!%0
OFTENREFERREDTOASh4HE.ATIONS2EPORT#ARDvISTHEONLYNATIONALLYREPRESENTATIVEAND
continuing assessment that enables the comparison of performance in Ohio and other states
INVARIOUSSUBJECTAREAS3CHOOLSANDSTUDENTSWITHINEACHSTATEARESELECTEDRANDOMLYTO
be a part of the assessment. Not all students in the state or in a particular school take the
ASSESSMENT$ATAAREREPORTEDATTHESTATELEVELONLYANDTHEREARENOINDIVIDUALSTUDENTOR
EVENSCHOOLSUMMARYRESULTS4HEASSESSMENTSARECONDUCTEDINMATHEMATICSREADINGSCIENCE
WRITINGTHEARTSCIVICSECONOMICSGEOGRAPHYAND53HISTORY
4OVIEW/HIOSMOSTRECENT
.!%0RESULTSGOTO
HTTPEDUCATIONOHIOGOV
ANDSEARCHFORKEYWORDh.!%0v

School Year Report Card

Transcription

Similar documents