Global Topologies - Data Science Institute
Transcription
Global Topologies - Data Science Institute
Global Topologies Globalization and Security GSAPP Columbia University F05 Advanced Studio 0.1 Mario Gooden, Adjunct Associate Professor with Jamie Palazzolo [email protected] The Cultural Landscape uses geographic concepts to emphasize where people and human activities are located, why they are located in particular locations, and what significance these observed arrangements represent. That significance reveals relationships of power defined by parameters of technology, race, class, gender and sexuality. That these set of relations can be understood as space is to theorize that space is "heterogeneous" and that "we live inside a set of relations that delineate sites, which are irreducible to one another, and absolutely not superimposable on one another.... one might attempt to describe these different sites by looking for the set of relations by which a given site can be defined." In the aftermath of September 11, security and the ongoing threat of terrorism have entered into the restructuring of cultural values, everyday life, and the cultural landscape. Many changes have taken place in the United States and in various countries around the world as the intensity of the potential threat was brought into sharper focus as a result of the September 11th attacks. Changes include new airline screening policies; tightened patrolling of the nation’s borders and ports; the fortification of government facilities; ongoing police and national guard presence at potential “high value” targets; the enactment of new laws and regulations, and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security to oversee and direct these new measures. While public concern and questions have arisen over issues of safety, civil liberties, and national identity, much larger questions regarding the relationships (and or cause and affect) between the politics of representation and globalization on the one hand and security and terror have gone unasked. In The Violence of the Global, Jean Baudrillard examines the relationship between universalization, globalization and the singularity of terrorism. He states that terrorism is not the product of a traditional history of anarchism, nihilism, or fanaticism but It is instead the contemporary partner of globalization. While universalization has to do with human rights, liberty, culture, and democracy, globalization, by contrast, is about technology, the market, tourism, and information, which at this point appear to be irreversible. “In the Enlightenment, universalization was viewed as unlimited growth and forward progress. Today, by contrast, universalization exists by default and is expressed as a forward escape, which aims to reach the most minimally common value…Universalization is vanishing because of globalization. The globalization of exchanges puts an end to the universalization of values. This marks the triumph of a uniform thought over a universal one. What is globalized is first and foremost the market, the profusion of exchanges and of all sorts of products, the perpetual flow of money. Culturally, globalization gives way to a promiscuity of signs and values, to a form of pornography in fact.”1 Hence, as globalization, security, and terror reshape the cultural landscape what are its affects upon the issues of space and "new" ways of seeing power/knowledge structures, hierarchies, boundaries, and borders in our political and socio-economic world? The singularity of terrorism avenges the singularities of those cultures that paid the price of the imposition of a unique global power with their own extinction. ---Jean Baudrillard Global Topologies Globalization and Security GSAPP Columbia University F05 Advanced Studio Mario Gooden, Adjunct Associate Professor with Jamie Palazzolo [email protected] Furthermore, suffice it to say that if making architecture involves the design and construction of inhabitable space in which people exist in relationship to one another then … What is the role for architecture in this cultural landscape? How can architecture be instrumentalized to ask the high order questions and to interrogate the discourse between globalization and security and their new spatial conditions? Presently, the responses to the issue of security are to design fortified bases for high rise buildings able to withstand truck bomb blasts; to install metal detectors, x-ray machines, and privacy partitions at airports; to design bullet proof security vestibules in the lobbies of government facilities; and to erect jersey barriers around potential targets and at the entry to sensitive sites such as transportation tunnels, financial centers, and some transportation hubs. These solutions might hardly be called architectural. Yet for all the focus on static sites, fluid sites such as ports and marine terminals have not received thoughtful consideration. In fact, The Department of Homeland Security’s fact sheet describing security measures for ports merely restates the ongoing mission of the U.S. Coast Guard. Break-bulk: Cargo that is packaged or bundled, not containerized, such as bananas or coffee. Historic map of 1879. Hamilton Avenue is the main street seen here terminating at the Waterfront. As the world economy has grown more integrated, international trade has become one of the most powerful driving forces of the American economy. With most of that trade moving by ship, the maritime industry provides a vitally important link between the U.S. and a rapidly expanding global economy. New York is home to the largest container port on the East Coast. The Port of New York/ New Jersey handled 3 million cargo containers weighing 18.8 million tons in 2000 and the port is home to nearly 10,000 ships per year. Situated along the Buttermilk Channel at the terminal of Hamilton Avenue, the history of the industrial waterfront in the Red Hook section of Brooklyn dates back to the 1700’s. Presently the Red Hook Marine Terminal operated by American Sevedoring for the Port Authority of New York of 100 acres with four active container cranes, over a million square feet of warehouse space and two major bulk-handling yards. The terminal serves as an entry port for specialized commodities such as coffee and cocoa from Central and South America. 0.1 Global Topologies Globalization and Security GSAPP Columbia University Advanced Studio F05 0.1 Mario Gooden, Adjunct Associate Professor with Jamie Palazzolo [email protected] Standing outside the entry to the Red Hook Marine Terminal in June of 2002, senator Charles Schumer declared that New York is dangerously unprepared for a nuclear terrorist threat from a device or weapon loaded onto a ship or truck and while in the Wake of September 11 the U.S. Coast Guard has increased its inspection of ships entering New York Harbor only some ships are inspected. The redevelopment of the Red Hook Marine Terminal at piers 7 thru 12 in Brooklyn to serve as a combination container / cruise terminal confronts the topology in which globalization and security are in constant flux among the imports and exports of break-bulk cargo and the arrival and departure exchanges of tourist passing through custom’s gateways at the water’s edge. Additionally, the redevelopment of the port must accommodate the revitalization of the waterfront with greater public access as part of the Brooklyn Waterfront Trail. Hence, the context for this studio’s investigations is situated in cultural contexts [fluid global] and a physical context [The new Red Hook Marine Container / Cruise Terminal]. Under the forces of 21st century globalization, these sites offer opportunities for strategic assessment, calibration of gradients of public and secure uses, and deployment of specific spatial, architectural, and urbanistic implications and possibilities. Studio Purpose How can architecture be critically deployed as an instrument in the network of commercial exchanges, human flows, tourism, public space, and port security? How can architecture spatialize this cultural context and confront the restructuring of social and cultural values brought on by the evermore present need for security? For globalizations most profound affects are not economic but cultural. Globalization is reordering societies all over the planet. “The battleground of the twenty-first century will pit fundamentalism against cosmopolitan tolerance. In a globalizing world, where information and images are routinely transmitted across the globe, we are all regularly in contact with others who think differently, and live differently, from ourselves. Cosmopolitans welcome and embrace this cultural complexity. Fundamentalists find it disturbing and dangerous. Whether in the areas of religion, ethnic identity, or nationalism, they take refuge in a renewed and purified tradition--and, quite often, violence.”2 According to Anthony Giddens, … globalization is essentially a dialectical phenomenon; it produces opposites. We know that globalization doesn’t produce a unified or conflict-free world; it produces a world of many divisions. Globalization produces fundamentalism. Fundamentalism is the other side of the cosmopolitanism of global communications. It’s not accidental that fundamentalists make use of the mass communications and modern forms of identity, which they also pretend to condemn. Global Topologies Globalization and Security GSAPP Columbia University F05 Advanced Studio Mario Gooden, Adjunct Associate Professor with Jamie Palazzolo [email protected] Mapping is a means of envisioning cultural space in such a way that individual subjects might develop some meaningful sense of location within a foreign terrain that was once familiar but has now been rendered virtually incomprehensible by the forces of postmodernism (the arrival of information technologies allegedly having demolished traditional categories of time and space).”i3 Studio Design The overall approach will be experimental with regard to both program and design methodology. The studio will be divided into two sections, which will operate at multiple scales. The first section will explore the relationships between the global and the local through a mapping of exchanges and flows to understand the sets of relationships within the contexts [cultural <--> physical]. The mapping will reveal conditional relationships and operational characteristics of the fluid economies of the contexts. The second section will be an investigation and design intervention at the Red Hook Marine Terminal for its redevelopment as a combined container / cruise terminal. In January 2005, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and New York Governor George Pataki announced the signing of a long-term lease agreement that will allow the creation of a modern cruise terminal on the Brooklyn waterfront. The lease agreement reached between the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the City's Economic Development Corporation (EDC), enables the EDC to take control of Piers 11 and 12 and proceed with the design and construction of the $30 million facility. The new cruise facility will be the Northeastern port of call for Norwegian and Carnival Cruise Lines. The studio project will entail the examination of the arrival and departure sequence at the landside entry to the container terminal; the design a new set of architectural interventions for terminal gate operations, terminal management offices, government inspection facilities, banking & insurance facilities; and a strategic intervention in the relationship between the container terminal and cruise terminal operations in order to allow for public access to the waterfront. The intention of the studio is to instrumentalize architecture within the confluence of flows between commercial exchanges, tourism, and public space in this cultural landscape reshaped by security and the threat of terror. 0.1