The Hungarian Alanian archaeology of the Huns

michelangelo.cn
EARLY MIDDLE AGE EUROPEAN ARCHAEOLOGY.
THE ALANIAN ARCHAEOLOGY OF HUNS AND GERMANS.
THE ARCHETYPES OF THE MIDDLE AGE GERMANIC ARCHAEOLOGY
The following artefacts are all Hungarian because they represent the Mother Isten (Gold Idol).
“Ostrogothic”
“
T
”
Sarmatian, 6+6,
Lower
“Hunnish”,
Ostrogothic” + “Ostrogothic “Ostrogothic”
Moygrad
agar
Hunnish”
Austria
uterus + breast Minisinsk Basin +breast +uterus “Attila und..” meaningless breast+offspri Attila und.. S. Marino, IT
Above: “Sarmatian” is not my label, it is the Hermitage’s label. The similar artefacts found in Europe are instead often
labelled “Hunnish” or “Germanic” in Western Europe! The Sarmatian artefact is still showing the breast and the uterus of
the Mother Isten and the spaces are always divided in 3, 6, or 9 smaller spaces. The Hunnish ones are low quality, senseless
replicas of Hungarian idols, without sacrality (breast and uterus disappeared). The Ostrogothic ones were made by Alanlans
and were still consecrated.
Cloisonné and enamelling was a Sarmatian marker from the 1st c. B.C. in Tillia Tepe. According to Alex Nagel (Smithsonian
Institution) some enamelled artefacts (Alma Ata Museum) are as ancient as 7 th c. B.C., next line: funny, they are similar to
the Tillia Tepe artefacts! (1 st: the same antlers design of the Deer Stones. Double headed animals: 2 nd and 3rd, which is not a
mask, Alex; but a double headed hornid. 4th, very similar to Tillia Tepe Hornids. In any case all Hungarian!):
A
Sarmatian, 3rd A.D., Alma
Ata Institute of History
B
Russia, 375-425 A.D.,
Hermitage
C
Volgograd, Sarmatian
crown, +475 Hermitage
D
Kiev Historical Museum,
11th-13th A.D.
E
Tarim Basin
+ Rhombus +”triskelion”
The above artefacts show the archetypes of the “mushrooms” that shall appear around the belt buckles that the IndoGermanists maintain being Ostrogothic!
If you read the books of Т. А. Габуев: “Аланский всадник. Сокровища князей I-XII веков”, and of Л.
Т. Яблонский, “Прохоровка” … you find out that the archetypes of all the archaeology that has been
labelled Hunnish, Ostrogothic, Visigothic, Germanic, Merovingian, Gepidic, Frankish… was Sarmatian,
most originated from the Kingdom of Alania: it belonged to the Sarmatians that Attila had enslaved in
Central Asia and in Northern Ossetia: the hundreds of belt buckles found in Central Europe (some with
Hungarian protorunic scripts) surrounded by Central Asian mushrooms and Alanian heads of Turuls
(peculiar heads: the eye fills in the entire head!) were Sarmatian.
Т. А. ГАБУЕВ: “АЛАНСКИЙ ВСАДНИК”:
The above swords are dated 1200 AD: they are very similar to the “Attila’s!” sword and to the Magyar
swords of the Honfoglalas time (Mother Istens, Baby Istens, Trees of Life and Birth Symbols:
palmettes for Hungarian archaeologists!!! (“Hungarian archaeology at the turn of the Millennium”).
Prokhorovka
Северная Осетия, Правобережный район
The above artefacts show the archetypes of the Turuls and the Turul heads (symbolic: only eye and beak!), that shall appear
around the belt buckles, and of all the enamelled and inlayed belt buckles that the Indo-Germanists maintain being Germanic!
HERE IS HOW THE GERMANS SEIZED THE HUNGARIAN
ALANIAN ARCHAEAEOLOGY, OR THEY HAVE ATTRIBUTED
IT TO THEIR FRIENDS, THE HUNS!
(WHILE THE HUNGARIANS WERE DISPUTING THE
FINNO-UGRIC THEORY!)
“OSTGERMANISCHE” (“Attila und die Hunnen”) [UNGARISCHE!]
“Frauengrab von Untersiebenbrunn, Niederosterreich”
Note: “Niederosterreich” could be translated “just out of the north western borders of present day Hungary”, historical Hungary.
Compare the following image with the previous one.
Here are the corresponding Hungarian symbols that travelled with the Hungarians along several millennia:
Tilia tepe
Pazyryk
Kingdom of Alania
Avar
Tillia T.
Oka, RU
Tarim Basin
SarmGoldI.
Kingdom of Alania
The art of the “Ostgermanische Frau” was Hungarian, symbolic, religious art.
If you look for each of the above line symbols in Magyar Art (> “Sacred Symbols” and “Art designs”), you find out that they
were designs that the Hungarians brought with them along several millennia.
I am grateful to the authors of the book “Attila und die Hunnen”: without them I would have never known that the Hungarian
Sarmatians had left so much in today German speaking territories!
Furthermore, the above artefacts could not even be Hungarian artefacts carried by a “Ostgermanische Frau”: they were
Hungarian, carried by a Hungarian, because it was not an Indo-European habit to leave treasures in the graves, and because
those Sacred Symbols were meaningless for an “Ostgermanische Frau”… as they are to all the Indo-Germanists!
How could they label a Hungarian treasure …GERMANISCH?
They could because while the Hungarian intelligentsia was writing fairy tales, the Germans seized the Hungarian Heritage and
labelled it… “Germanic”!
In the same cemetery there is another grave (above), a grave of a child, and the treasure of that grave (image below) contained the same
things found in the female’s grave and some other objects:
A bone comb decorated with dotted circles as the bone combs of the Hungarians were decorated (rather
consecrated) along several millennia.
A terracotta pot similar to the hundreds that the Hungarians left in their graves during the Bronze and iron Age
(right: Kirgizstan).
A glass bottle decorated with a 3 loop spiral similar to the decoration that for millennia decorated the hilts of Hungarian swords (3 Lines,
symbol of femininity, maybe symbol of the Mother Isten). The bottle has the same profile as the Hungarian bottles had from Pazyryk to
the Unikum (See “Anthropology”).
However, the grave also contained 2 cicadas. The Chinese Cicadas were brought to Europe by the Mongolic Huns: therefore, according to the
fans of the Huns, that child was Hunnish, the grave was Hunnish, the entire cemetery was a Hunnish cemetery… “all the Eurasians were Huns”
(Borbála)!
Whichever was the ethnicity of that child, his funerary treasure was Sarmatian. Thus: either the child was Sarmatian, or he was a Mongol, and
the Mongols had to use Sarmatian jewellery because they were unable to produce their own one.
He could even have been an Ostrogoth who was using Sarmatian jewellery (as many others did) and who had sacked a Hunnish camp.
What can in no way be claimed is that he spoke German, or Hunnish or Daco-Roman because the only evidence of it could only
have been an audio CD with his voice in his grave. No audio CD has been found in his grave… and the grave goods do not justify
a “Germanisch” or “Hunnish” labelling.
See “The fairy tale of the Huns”
Some Indo-Germanists are not yet aware that Nazism is over, and they still pretend working for the Ahnenerbe!
They asked me 48 Euros plus freight for buying the catalogue of their exhibition and see the Hunnish archaeology exhibited in the Speyer
Museum. I got a book filled in with Hungarian archaeology! It was a good investment! I am grateful to the authors of the book “ Attila und
die Hunnen”: without them I would have never known that the Hungarians had left so much in German speaking territories!
This archaeology in that book is 100% Hungarian and belongs to the Sarmatians.
See other Germanic “Hunnish”, Gepidic, Ostrogothic, Visigothic, Merovingian, Longobardic… artefacts On “Dacia Erdely” and “Szekely Varese”.
See also: "Der sarmatische Hintergrund der germanischen Voelkerwanderung," (Sarmatian background of the Germanic
Migrations), G. Vernadsky, Saeculum, II (1952), 340-347
GEPIDIC, VISIGOTHIC, OSTROGOTHIC… “GERMANIC ARCHAEOLOGY”
(compare it with the Alanian archaeology!)
Wolfshein (Kreis mainz-Bingen) Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden museum, Die Hunnen, page 125. “Iranian” script on 2nd one.
Sarmatian, Aral lake,
History museum Moscow.
Attila und die Hunnen
Jaguszowice, Kielce, Poland, Krakow Arch. Museum “Ostrogothic”, (Sarmato425 A.D. “Furstengrab von Germanischer eliten!”
Avar!) Kubrat treasure
The Germans never arrived to the Aral lake!!
Stalingrad!!
The only time they moved in that direction, they were stopped in
“Fürstengrab, germanische Elite!”: Sarmato-Avar!
Left: Visigothic, British Museum.
The Kubrat and the Krakow artefacts and one of the above belt buckles show a typical Hugarian Sacred Symbol that
became the standard decoration for the cover of Bibles until the 16 th century A.D. (see “the 10,000 years Hungarian
continuitas” > Rappenroad):
Sarmatian,
Tomoikin M.,UA
“Ostrogothic”
(Avar!)
Ucrainian
church, Rome
Byzantium Bible Varese 8th c. AD
with Istens
S.Pietro Cocquio
Campionesi,
Modena
Avar, Barete
Holy Crown
Budapest
Last in above line: the same bible cover motif is on the Holy Crown.
FÜRSTENGRAB, GERMANISCHE ELITE
MEROVINGIAN TIME ARCHAEOLOGY:
(from a Russian book I bought at the Hermitage: “EPOCHA MEROVINGOV”, publisher “State Hermitage”).
The mushrooms, the Turul’s heads, and the decoration (crowns of spirals, S shapes, 6
ray suns, double Spirals, Dotted Circles, Baby Istens “Tulips!”, the Bible cover
motif…) all make the following artefacts HUNGARIAN.
An artefact is Hungarian if it is congruent with the 10,000 years continuity in art and
religion, regardless of the nationality of the carrier, regardless of the current borders
of states where it has been found, regardless of the language the carrier spoke,
regardless of the genetic pool of the carrier, regardless of the empire that was
hegemonic at that time (“The Merovingian time”), regardless of the Academic titles
of the author!
Mushrooms and Turul Heads (as in Alania: a beak and a eye):
I hope that somebody shall continue this work with the hundreds of images he can collect from my computer and from European museums.
There are many interesting artefacts for this work that are in the Metropolitan Museum (Middle Age, Europe).
The last above image: it is transitional art: it is symbolic and the animal has a Sacred Symbol on the thigh (Hungarian), but it appears to be a
lion, not a Leopard, it shows off a male sex, and the paw end (claw or talon) is Indo-European: it belongs to a bird of prey. The same paws are
shared by other artefacts, which cannot be Merovingian:
“Ori dei cavalieri delle steppe”, page 48 and 49, Treasure Museum, Kiev, UA
The second artefact is considered, by some creative archaeologists, evidence of alien landing in Ucraine!
The hypothesis of E. Fermi (the Hungarians were aliens) is supported by that image!
It is symbolic Hungarian art on the way to Indo-Europeanization!
(Sarmato?)-Celto-Pannonico: Gandstrupp cauldron, DK (See Erdely Dacia, Abstract)
Gandstrupp cauldron
Sarmatian
Sarmato-Alanian, Hungary
The process of Indo-Europeanization brought the same paws and the same monsters in CeltoPannonico art and in Sarmato-Germanic art!
HUNNISH ARCHAEOLOGY
As I wrote in the page “Archaeology, the tool for finding the Oshaza”, if you choose a small number of the right artefacts of an ancient
“Scythian” culture (Line 1, “Hunnish”) and you compare them with a small number of selected artefacts from another Eurasian culture, you
may easily “unequivocally prove” statements like this: “the Huns were Hungarians” . (The Indo-Germanists can teach you the method better
than I can. They can use even no artefacts for the purpose of labelling a culture as Indo-European!).
However, if you simply add another line (Line 3, Pannonico)…
Line 1.
Hunnish archaeology: Hungarian symbols of sacredness, made by Hungarian slave goldsmiths!
(“Attila und die Hunnen”):
Line 2.
Honfoglalas archaeology:
Tamga
pannonia
Line 3.
Bronze Age Magna Pannonia archaeology:
…you find out that the statement is wrong and should be replaced by: the Hungarians were Pannonici, from whom the Huns had lent (or
robbed) some symbols.
Bronze Age
Kingdom of Alania
Hunno-Ostrogothic
Hunno-Ostrogothic
How can 2 of the above artefacts be labelled Hunnish or Ostrogothic if
1. That design (lunula) accompanied the Hungarians along several millennia (pendants, ear rings, bracelets…)
2.
3.
4.
5.
Magyar
The 3rd artefact is a replica of an Alanian jewel.
All of them have a Hungarian Sacred Symbol on them: the 3 circles design (the Alanian ones have 3 inlays)
The 4th design has not 3 circles but 3 times a 3 circle design, the same design that makes the pendants of the Holy Crown!
Right: Prohorovka, L. T. Yablonski
The Huns have left little archaeological evidence in Europe: their archaeology was Chinese and the rest of the archaeology that has been
attributed to them or to the Ostrogoths is Sarmatian from the Kingdom of Alania.
The archaeology of the Huns is not congruent with the archaeology of the Hsiung Nu, but with that of the Sarmatians: it was Sarmatian
archaeology, mostly originated in the Kingdom of Alania and on the route from Kangju to Caucasus.
Let us analyse some other cases of erroneous attributions of artefacts to the Huns.
pettini pest, Tamgas, orecchino lunula, diadema sarmata, mother isten Arco e hit and run technologia
SARMATO-ALANIAN ARCHAEOLOGY IN HUNGARY:
A Szeged-Nagyszéksóson előkerült fejedelmi kincs leletei 1
There is much more but I did not have time to collect it.
Michelangelo