Moving Around - Saskatoon StarPhoenix
Transcription
Moving Around - Saskatoon StarPhoenix
background Moving Around One benefit of living in a city is the opportunity to easily access a range of places and activities - homes (yours, family’s and friends’), work, social events, cultural events, sports and recreation, and health services. Currently, 85% of commuters in Saskatoon travel to work by private automobile. As the city grows this will increase traffic congestion and commute times and reduce air quality. There should be options for moving around the city that are affordable and accessible, including by private automobile but also by public transit, cycling and walking. Using alternative travel modes has many benefits, including reduced congestion, road and parking facility cost savings, improved public health and safety, and pollution and emissions reduction. Providing options for moving around the city is important to achieving a high quality of life for everyone. Regina Winnipeg Hectares of Green Space per 1000 people in Major Canadian Cities Halifax Ottawa 1.4 Montréal Toronto (source: Green Space Acquisition and Stewardship in Canada’s Urban Municipalities) Our car-oriented city Beginning in the 1950s, a strong economy, inexpensive land just outside of the urban area, the desire for single family homes on large lots, increased vehicle ownership, and work places being geographically separated from living spaces all contributed to outward growth, single-use developments and heavy reliance on the automobile. Vehicle ownership has tended to increase in line 7.8%with the 6.9% 7.2% overall increase in Saskatoon’s population. In Saskatoon, 85% of people traveling to work do so by private vehicle. In comparison with other Canadian cities, Saskatoon has the second highest percentage of private vehicle use at 78.7%. 4.6% 4.8% 5.5% 50% 50% 40% 40% 100% 30% 100% 30% At 90% 20% 90% 20% 80% 10% 80% 10% Montréal At 2.4% saskatoon has the highest percentageToronto of cyclists 1.6% winnipeg edmonton calgary Regina Winnipeg Halifax 25.5% 27.2% 25.9% 19.7% 50% 13.5% 11.4% winnipeg 40% 10.3% 30% How Saskatonians move around compared to other cities How Saskatonians move (source: Statistics Canada Census 2006) around compared to other cities 20% 10% 30% 40% 0.67 0.63 integrated record production/distribution 50% libraries 40% landscape architecture services 60% Toronto post-production, motion picture, video industries 50% (source: GreenApple Canada Smart Transporation Ranking Report) Montréal newspaper publishers % of labour force walking, cycling or taking public transit to work (2001) 60% Halifax Ottawa Winnipeg periodical publishers 0% art dealers Regina motion picture and video production Saskatoon architectural services (source: Statistics Canada Census 2006) Edmonton Calgary graphic design services Vancouver creative/arts schools winnipeg edmonton edmonton calgary calgary regina saskatoon regina 0.2% Montréal Toronto At 78.7% Saskatoon has the second highest 19.6% 60% percentage of people driving has a motor vehicle second highest At 78.7% Saskatoon the 18.9% 18.0% percentage of people driving a motor vehicle canada saskatoon Ottawa 0.3% How Saskatonians move 10% canada 1.9% At 78.7% Saskatoon has the second highest 1.4% percentage of people driving a motor vehicle At 7.5% Saskatoon has the lowest aroundAtcompared to other cities percentage ofCanada people traveling passengers 7.5% Saskatoon hasasthe lowest (source: Statistics Census 2006) percentage of people traveling as passengers 20% 2 regina canada How People Move Around Saskatoon 0 At 7.5% Saskatoon has the lowest percentage of people traveling as passengers At 6.2% Saskatoon hasinone of the highest Aboriginal Population Major Canadian Cities At 6.2% Saskatoon has one of the highest percentage of pedestrians (total percentage of city population) percentage ofForce pedestrians (source: Statistics Canada Labour Characteristics) 30% (souce: Statistics Canada Census 2006) 0 At 6.2% Saskatoon has one of the highest percentage of pedestrians 9.9% 2.5% Calgary other 2.4% cycle walk 3.7% 20% 10% 9.2% At0.6% 3.7% Sakatoon has the lowest At 3.7% Sakatoon the lowest percentage of public transithas users 0 percentageEdmonton of public transit users Saskatoon Vancouver 40% 30% 9.8% 4.4% saskatoon 50% 6.2% public transit 40% 60% shared vehicles 50% 78.7% 7.5% personal vehicle 60% At 3.7% Sakatoon has the lowest percentage of public transit users 2.4% has the has highest At saskatoon 2.4% saskatoon the highest percentage of cyclists percentage of cyclists 70% 0 70% Halifax Ottawa 80% As the city has grown, reliance on the car has resulted in 70% 70% more time spent driving. Travel time from downtown to the city limits in any direction almost doubled between 2002 60% 60% (10-12 minutes) and 2009 (18-20 minutes). 6.5% 6.2% There is the potential to lower this mode share given that Edmonton 85% of Saskatoon’s employed labour force lives and works Saskatoon Vancouver Calgary Regina in Saskatoon. City Park, Nutana and the Central Business Winnipeg 100% 100% District currently have the greatest number of people that Unemployment Rates in Major Canadian Cities (year ending 2009) 90% live and work in the same neighbourhood. 90% (source: Statistics Canada Labour Force Characteristics) 80% 9.1% 9.4% 40% 40% 30% 30% winnipeg other Mode Share in Saskatoon edmonton cycle 0 regina 1.6% calgary 2.4% saskatoon 3.7% canada 6.2% public transit shared vehicles personal vehical 78.7% 7.5% walk 10% 10% 0 Following 20 years of ridership decline, recent initiatives, such as the U-PASS, have increased the use of transit significantly since 2003. 20% 20% Mode Share Comparison with Other Cities (souce: Statistics Canada Census 2006) (source: Statistics Canada Census 2006) courtesy wikipedia trekphiler The transit system Efficient public transit reduces traffic congestion and reduces pollution. Accessible and affordable transit should also meet the needs of the elderly, students and low-income earners who would otherwise have limited mobility. 15,000,000 14,000,000 13,000,000 12,000,000 11,000,000 Saskatoon is working to improve its transit service. Although transit ridership decreased between 1983 and 2005, a major service change resulted in a 26% ridership increase between 2006 and 2009. This demonstrates that people are willing to take public transit if the system is more efficient. 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 2009 2007 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1993 1991 1989 1987 Passengers Carried by Public Transit in Saskatoon (source: City of Saskatoon) 93% of those working in Saskatoon live in the city 7% of those working in Saskatoon travel from surrounding communities 35,000,000 30,000,000 190 from Prince Albert 25,000,000 Rheinland 20,000,000 Langham 280 15,000,000 Blumenheim 235 Warman1400 1870 Martensville $0 from Asquith 140 from Vanscoy 235 People commuting into Saskatoon to work concentration of commuters employment lands City of Saskatoon limits Rural Municipality of corman park (source: City of Saskatoon) operating expenditures $ 130 from Aberdeen transit revenue $ number of passengers c Discovery Ridge Hidden Ridge Estates Cedar Villa Furdale Grasswood Riverside Estates Wood Meadows Ashwood Merril Hills Estates Caso Rio Estates Bedford Acres Beaver Creek Deer Meadow 2003 2001 1999 1997 River’s Edge Estates Saskatoon Transit Revenue and Eagle Ridge Estates Expenditure Comparison 1995 1993 1989 1987 1985 Cathedral Bluffs 1991 5,000,000 Osler Dalmeny 470 10,000,000 1983 Inter-regional transit systems will become more important as the population in the communities surrounding Saskatoon continue to grow. Currently, 12,425 people commute to work in Saskatoon from other municipalities and 4,525 Saskatoon residents leaving the city to work elsewhere. Of those travelling into the city to work, the greatest percentages come from the Rural Municipality of Corman Park, Martensville and Warman, respectively. The greatest percentage of outbound commuters travel from their residence in Saskatoon to work in the Rural Municipality of Corman Park, Martensville, and Vanscoy. 1985 However, compared with the rest of Canada, Saskatoon still has a low mode share for walking and cycling or taking public transit to work at 11.4% compared with Vancouver at 18.0%, Calgary at 18.9% and Ottawa at 25.5%. At 3.7%, Saskatoon has the lowest transit mode share among all major Canadian cities. All of these cities have rapid transit infrastructure and extensive bike lane systems. 1983 6,000,000 105 305 BACKGROUND INFORMATION SASKATOON SPEAKS 3 Planning for growth provides an opportunity to map out an efficient transit network and ensure development supports a high level of service on key routes. Transit and the importance of transit hubs and corridors Saskatoon has undertaken a number of initiatives to encourage transit ridership including, the Direct Access Rapid Transit (DART) system which has limited stops and frequencies as low as 10 minutes, the installation of bike racks on buses, and an increase in the number of accessible low floor buses. The U-PASS subsidized student transit system for the University of Saskatchewan has 16,000 registered undergraduate students. These programs have been major trip generators. Transit oriented development complements these trip generation programs. Transit oriented development concentrates new residential and commercial development along major transportation corridors serviced by frequent transit service or in close proximity to transit terminals. Typically, the neighbourhood has a centre with a transit station or stop surrounded by developments that accommodate large amounts of people in offices, commercial and residential buildings. As you move away from the transit hub, the building types accommodate fewer people, lower density. The higher overall densities of this type of development help to support transit service, whereas lower density neighbourhoods do not have the population numbers to support frequent service. Transit hubs provide key places where services, housing and institutions can locate so that they are easily accessible to everyone via an efficent transit service. Because they have a mix of uses and lots of people living and working in them, transit oriented developments also have many attractive amenities, like shopping close to home, and their design encourages walking and cycling. 1914 Transit System in Saskatoon light rail network city of saskatoon limits lawson heights terminal confederation terminal place riel hub downtown terminal centre terminal Transit System in Saskatoon today dart network bus network cycling routes major transit terminals city of saskatoon limits 4 market mall terminal Fig. 31: Street patterns in different eras Evolution of the Street Grid grid (prewar) fragmented grid, cul-de-sacs (1950s-70s) curvillinear streets and cul-de-sacs (1970s-90s) 31: Street patterns in different eras Gridiron (prewar) Fragmented grid, cul-de-sacs (1950s–70s) Curvilinear streets and cul-de-sacs (1970s–90s) eras Gridiron (prewar) mented grid, cul-de-sacs (1950s–70s) Fragmented grid, cul-de-sacs (1950s–70s) Curvilinear streets and cul-de-sacs (1970s–90s) Curvilinear streets and cul-de-sacs (1970s–90s) What does a typical neighbourhood cost to build and operate? Walking and cycling Although Saskatonians like to walk and cycle for recreation, a small percentage (6.2%) walk or cycle to work. The harsh weather conditions in the wintertime factor into this. The keys to encouraging more walking and cycling are to: design streets and paths that are safe and comfortable for pedestrians and cyclists; and plan communities so that residents have the opportunity to walk or cycle to shops, services, schools, transit stops and places of employment. a typical neighbourhood cost to build and operate? annual passenger revenue Capital Costs of building a neighbourhood ighbourhood cost to operate? Annual Costs of operating & maintaining a neighbourhood (source: Costing Mechanism to Facilitate Sustainable Commuity Planning, CMHC 2005) annual (source: Costing Mechanism to Facilitate Sustainable Commuity Planning, CMHC 2005) roads (arterial and local) other (police, fire, transit, recreational facilities) schools storm sewers sanitary sewers storm water treatment water distribution wastewater and water treatment roads (local and arterial) other (water distribution, sanitary sewers, school transportation, recreational facilities) police services transit services fire services wastewater and water treatment waste management services passenger revenue uilding a to Facilitate ng, CMHC 2005) annual passenger revenue reational facilities) ent The evolution of the street network The street network plays an important role in how people move throughout the city. Over time Saskatoon’s street network has undergone a series of transformations illustrated in the accompanying map. The pre-war grid layout connects streets at regular intersections, making it easy to move from place to place along a connected network of streets. The network of cul-de-sacs, crescents and other curved streets of the inner suburban areas were built between the 1950s and 70s, and the even less interconnected network of the outer suburbs were developed between the 1970s and 90s. Departing from the grid network results in less walkable neighbourhoods and busier main roads. *excludes schools Annual Costs of operating & maintaining a neighbourhood (source: Costing Mechanism to Facilitate Sustainable Commuity Planning, CMHC 2005) roads (local and arterial) other (water distribution, sanitary sewers, school transportation, recreational facilities) police services transit services fire services wastewater and water treatment waste management services There are a number of initiatives to support bicycling. The Bicycle Facility Network Study (2003) identifies 5.6 km of existing multi-use pathways and 12.6 km of existing on-road cycling facilities located in Saskatoon. There are dedicated on-road bike lanes along Spadina Crescent in the Downtown and in other locations in the city. *excludes schools Annual Costs of operating & maintaining a neighbourhood (source: Costing Mechanism to Facilitate Sustainable Commuity Planning, CMHC 2005) roads (local and arterial) other (water distribution, sanitary sewers, school transportation, recreational facilities) police services transit services fire services wastewater and water treatment waste management services *excludes schools courtesy flickr uofsadvancement Outside of the city centre, few of Saskatoon’s main roads are designed to encourage walking and cycling. BACKGROUND INFORMATION SASKATOON SPEAKS 5 There are a number of ways to share your vision and help shape Saskatoon’s future! For more information please visit saskatoonspeaks.com. Produced September 2010 Efforts were taken to ensure the accuracy of information. Updates to any of the content will be posted to the website. We encourage everyone to return the information book for re-use at all Saskatoon Speaks events and activities. 6