Can we clean fruit stained from copper applications?
Transcription
Can we clean fruit stained from copper applications?
Can we clean fruit stained from copper applications? Kiwifruit Journal May/June 2012 Shane Max and Greg Clark - ZESPRI Growers who experienced some copper related fruit staining from late summer applications should avoid additional copper application and consider ® using Citrox BioAlexin if protection is still considered necessary. The application of fruit cleansing sprays when copper fruit staining is first seen may assist to clean marginal out of grade fruit. Unfortunately, it will not improve marking on fruit whose skin was damaged in early summer. Light veinal damage of leaves does not appear to be having any significant detrimental effects on the vines performance, however, growers need to be wary about applying repeated applications of copper to canopies where no new growth is occurring, as copper sprays are very persistent. While copper products offer proven protection against Psa leafspot, the rapid introduction of copper sprays to our industry has resulted in some growers experiencing problems. Typically, new agrichemicals require several years of experimental field testing to understand appropriate rates, spray timing and spraying conditions, however, the urgent need to have effective bactericides to control Psa has meant this was not possible. Best practice had to be developed from what was known of other crops and the limited experience manufacturers and growers had had with kiwifruit here and overseas. Eighteen months on, we are a lot more knowledgeable on what constitutes best practice much gleaned both from various trials and grower experiences. While most growers managed to apply copper without causing fruit damage, there are instances where damage has occurred. Most of the reported cases were when copper was applied during the typical oil sensitive period. This was often associated with applications of high copper rates, immediately prior to large rainfall events and/or slow drying. The fruit typically developed a dark stain and/or russet on the skin. If this occurs while the fruitlets are very small, the marking can disappear over time – diluted by fruit growth. If it occurs once fruit are larger, the skin russet becomes increasingly noticeable especially when viewed under direct sunlight. Some applications in late summer gave fruit staining more typical of the traditional water stain seen in the late season. Why this is occurring is unclear, it may be excessive copper washing off leaves or fruit, or it may be copper interacting with previously damaged or aging leaves forming organic copper compounds that then deposit on the fruit surface. To see if it was possible to remove this stain we investigated the effect of dipping stained, out of grade Hayward fruit, in the laboratory in KiwiLustre (Lactic acid and phosphate) a common fruit cleansing spray used in the industry. We also looked at the fruit skins under high magnification to try to understand what damage was occurring. The KiwiLustre solution was prepared at the same concentration as the label rate (500ml/100l) giving a solution with a pH of 3.5. ZESPRI Group Limited or a subsidiary company of ZESPRI Group Limited (ZGL) makes no warranty or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information, photographs or other published material (“Published Material”) in this publication. Published Material authored by a person other than ZGL reflects the view of the author and not the view of ZGL. The Published Material may be subject to copyright and shall not be reproduced in any manner without first obtaining the written consent of ZGL. ZGL shall not be liable to any person for loss, injury or damages arising from that person’s reliance on the Published Material. © 2012 –1– Following dipping, the fruit was allowed to dry on the lab bench and was assessed the next day. While dipping did have some impact on the stained fruit most remained similar and still out of grade (refer to Table 1.) Interestingly, stains on fruit left in the lab for 12 days at room temperature appeared lighter or more ‘merged’. When brushed by hand the majority of fruit appeared acceptable for export. Tim Jerram from Hume Pack and Cool also assessed fruit in a similar manner with a range of products and concentrations. These were from fruit damaged in December and January. His conclusion was that, on Hayward fruit, cleansers could remove the lighter stains off fruit, with the best effect seen when the fruit where dipped a second time, however, a proportion still remained out of grade as it was more of a russet damage than a water staining. No treatments affected the copper damage on Gold3 or Gold9. Table 1. ZESPRI Group Limited or a subsidiary company of ZESPRI Group Limited (ZGL) makes no warranty or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information, photographs or other published material (“Published Material”) in this publication. Published Material authored by a person other than ZGL reflects the view of the author and not the view of ZGL. The Published Material may be subject to copyright and shall not be reproduced in any manner without first obtaining the written consent of ZGL. ZGL shall not be liable to any person for loss, injury or damages arising from that person’s reliance on the Published Material. © 2012 –2– Close up imagery taken of the fruit prior to dipping indicated the Hayward fruit marking appeared to be a black marking at the base of the fruit hairs (Table 2 – Picture b). It is likely that the hair removal also removed some of the black colouring. How much the time lapse between dipping and final assessment assisted this is unknown. However, this observation would suggest growers experiencing copper related staining may benefit from applying fruit cleansing sprays when the stains are first noticed rather than immediately preharvest. It is also recommended that growers should check their orchard for any signs of staining prior to copper applications. Those growers who have been utilising a copper protectant programme through the season may be better to use Citrox ® if further protection is deemed BioAlexin necessary while fruit are still on the vines. Table 2 ZESPRI Group Limited or a subsidiary company of ZESPRI Group Limited (ZGL) makes no warranty or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information, photographs or other published material (“Published Material”) in this publication. Published Material authored by a person other than ZGL reflects the view of the author and not the view of ZGL. The Published Material may be subject to copyright and shall not be reproduced in any manner without first obtaining the written consent of ZGL. ZGL shall not be liable to any person for loss, injury or damages arising from that person’s reliance on the Published Material. © 2012 –3– Leaf vein marking The range of copper ‘brews’ put on in spring gave a range of phytotoxicity symptoms ranging from yellowing and leaf drop to leaf margin burn, to light vein browning on the underside of leaves. Where serious damage occurs photosynthesis capacity is no doubt reduced and where this occurs on leaves close to developing flowers and fruit, they will not have access to the same level of carbohydrates compared to those with healthy subtending leaves. What was far more common, and debated more widely, was the impact of leaf vein browning. Table 4 Table 3 The pictures in Table 4 show where leaves have been cut and a transect cut made across the healthy and blackened leaf vines. It is interesting to note, that while the top and bottom surface of damaged veins are affected, the internal vascular cells appear sound and are functioning. This observation is further supported by the fact that there are no wider leaf symptoms. A series of pictures from an A.chinesis leaf picked in March is shown here (Table 3 &4). A close up shows the exterior of the vein appearing blackened and badly affected. Note the hairiness of the leaf under-surface. This hairiness (abundance of trichomes) allows considerably more spray to accumulate compared to the top-leaf surface and may be contributing as to why the veins are more sensitive here. While low levels of copper phytotoxicity from moderate copper use may not be impacting leaf function, this would require more comprehensive testing to confirm. Even more important is whether spring copper applications are diminishing leaf size and what is the flow on affect to this, if any. Trials are planned offshore to better understand this. Results will be reported back to New Zealand prior to spring. ZESPRI Group Limited or a subsidiary company of ZESPRI Group Limited (ZGL) makes no warranty or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information, photographs or other published material (“Published Material”) in this publication. Published Material authored by a person other than ZGL reflects the view of the author and not the view of ZGL. The Published Material may be subject to copyright and shall not be reproduced in any manner without first obtaining the written consent of ZGL. ZGL shall not be liable to any person for loss, injury or damages arising from that person’s reliance on the Published Material. © 2012 –4– Please note, post-harvest dipping is not an approved practice. Acknowledgements Thanks to Tim Jerram from Hume Pack and Cool for his input into this article. ZESPRI Group Limited or a subsidiary company of ZESPRI Group Limited (ZGL) makes no warranty or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information, photographs or other published material (“Published Material”) in this publication. Published Material authored by a person other than ZGL reflects the view of the author and not the view of ZGL. The Published Material may be subject to copyright and shall not be reproduced in any manner without first obtaining the written consent of ZGL. ZGL shall not be liable to any person for loss, injury or damages arising from that person’s reliance on the Published Material. © 2012 –5–