How rankings can stimulate the internationalization of higher
Transcription
How rankings can stimulate the internationalization of higher
Can rankings stimulate internationalization of higher education - Poland case study Bianka Siwinska, PhD Executive Director Perspektywy Education Foundation Board Member Academic Cooperation Association ACA IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Rankings and internationalisation Plan of presentation 1. Reflections on „Internationalisation 2.0” 2. „Study in Poland” Project 3. Perspektywy University Ranking 4. Rankings in HE policy 5. Conclusions . IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Internationalisation 2.0 Change on the paradigmat . IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Internationalisation 2.0 New internationalisation . Internationalisation 2.0 Definition 2.0 PREVIOUS: "Internationalisation is the process of integrating an international, intercultural, or global dimension into the purpose, functions or delivery of postsecondary education.” (Jane Knight) NEW: “Internationalisation is the purpose, function, and way of operation of HEI typical for the globalised world." IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Rankings and internationalisation . New skills needed for new world - Internationalisation for XXI century IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Plan of presentation 1. Reflections on „Internationalisation 2.0” 2. „Study in Poland” Project 3. Perspektywy University Ranking 4. Rankings in HE policy 5. Conclusions . IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Internationalisation in Poland Poland in the EU since 2004 2005 . Internationalisation in Poland 2005 • • • • International students – 8819 Programmes in foreign languages – 100 Students studying in foreign language – 3000 Foreign teaching staff – 800 • Students in Poland – 1.926.122 • Internationalisation ratio - 0,46% IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Internationalisation in Poland CRASP – Perspektywy strategic partnership . IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Internationalisation in Poland „Study in Poland” project IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Internationalisation in Poland „Study in Poland” project IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Internationalisation in Poland „Study in Poland” project IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Plan of presentation 1. Reflections on „Internationalisation 2.0” 2. „Study in Poland” Project 3. Perspektywy University Ranking 4. Rankings in HE policy 5. Conclusions . IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 What about the rankings? IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Perspektywy University Ranking Awards Ceremony IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Perspektywy University Ranking Awards Ceremony IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Evolution of Perspektywy Ranking 24% 100% 9% 75% 15% 50% ACADEMIC POTENTIAL 15% 25% 26% 0% First five years IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 11% Evolution of Perspektywy Ranking 24% 100% 9% 75% 15% 50% ACADEMIC POTENTIAL 15% 25% 26% 0% Plus INTERNATIONALIZATION IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 11% Evolution of Perspektywy Ranking 24% 100% 9% 75% 15% 50% ACADEMIC POTENTIAL 15% 25% 26% 0% Plus INNOVATION IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 11% Evolution of Perspektywy Ranking 24% 100% 9% 75% 15% 50% ACADEMIC POTENTIAL 15% 25% 26% 0% Plus ACADEMIC POTENTIAL IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 11% Evolution of Perspektywy Ranking 24% 100% 9% 75% 15% 50% ACADEMIC POTENTIAL 15% 25% 26% 0% 2000-2015 IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 11% International students in Poland IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Internationalisation in Poland 2015 (2005) • • • • International students – 57.119 (8819) Programmes in foreign languages – 530 (100) Students studying in foreign language – 17.500 (3000) Foreign teaching staff – 1750 (800) • Students in Poland – 1.405.133 (1.926.122) • Internationalisation ratio – 4,1% (0,46%) IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Internationalisation ratio 2005-15 IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Methodology INTERNATIONALIZATION - 15% 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Programmes in foreign languages (4%) Students studying in foreign language (4%) International students (3%) Foreign teaching staff (1%) Student exchange (outbound) (1%) Student exchange (inbound) (1%) Multicultural composition of student body (1%) IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Plan of presentation 1. Reflections on „Internationalisation 2.0” 2. „Study in Poland” Project 3. Perspektywy University Ranking 4. Rankings in HE policy 5. Conclusions . IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Rankings in HE policy Statements without sequel… (2010) The actions initiated by the government will lead to the Polish universities entering Europe’s top 50. (2015) We should not fetishise rankings, but we should not underestimate them either. For example the fact that absence of Polish universities in the international rankings makes it difficult to draw foreign investors to Polish science and economy. IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 What do we lose? 1. Science without boarders 2. Boloshak 3. Russian Study Abroad Initiative 4. …. IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Rankings in HE policy „Studies for the Best” – unsuccessfull attempt . IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Plan of presentation 1. Reflections on „Internationalisation 2.0” 2. „Study in Poland” Project 3. Perspektywy University Ranking 4. Rankings in HE policy 5. Conclusions . IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Rankings and internationalisation Conculsions There is evidently a strong link between rankings and internationalisation. Fundamental question: How to measure internationalisation of a university or a system in a good and informative way? More importance should be attached to the institutions’ and systems’ ability to prepare young people to function in the new, globalised and digitalised world .– both when reflecting upon internationalisation and when establishing the key criteria for quality evaluation in rankings. IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016 Thank You! Bianka Siwinska Perspektywy Education Foundation [email protected] IREG-8, Lisbon, May 6, 2016