1 Appendix A. Generic layouts, Rondo and Sonata
Transcription
1 Appendix A. Generic layouts, Rondo and Sonata
Graham G. Hunt (University of Texas at Arlington): “Formal Loosening and Diverging A Sections: A Formal-Function-Based Approach to Rondo Finales with Incomplete Second Refrains.” Society for Music Theory, Annual Meeting, October 30, 2015, St. Louis, Missouri. Appendix A. Generic layouts, Rondo and Sonata-Rondo forms Or D 1 Graham G. Hunt (University of Texas at Arlington): “Formal Loosening and Diverging A Sections: A Formal-Function-Based Approach to Rondo Finales with Incomplete Second Refrains.” Society for Music Theory, Annual Meeting, October 30, 2015, St. Louis, Missouri. Appendix B1. Movements with incomplete second refrains (lacking a PAC in the home key), organized by refrain's overall theme-type (per Caplin’s typology; fonts indicate movement’s overall form) Bold: Sonata-rondo forms (Type 4 in Sonata Theory); bold/italics: Expanded binary rondos (Type 41-exp in Sonata Theory) No Bold: Straight Rondos; (-rondo): Sonata-Rondo Converting to Rondo by omitting secondary theme in “recap” Appendix B2. Movements with incomplete second refrains, organized by the theme type of the diverging portion of the refrain 2 Graham G. Hunt (University of Texas at Arlington): “Formal Loosening and Diverging A Sections: A Formal-Function-Based Approach to Rondo Finales with Incomplete Second Refrains.” Society for Music Theory, Annual Meeting, October 30, 2015, St. Louis, Missouri. Appendix C. Incomplete 2nd-refrain pieces, sorted by divergence location (instant/internal) and technique *5 – refrain, or portion thereof, becomes part of a descending-5th sequence, referencing opening of Type 3 sonata development 3 Graham G. Hunt (University of Texas at Arlington): “Formal Loosening and Diverging A Sections: A Formal-Function-Based Approach to Rondo Finales with Incomplete Second Refrains.” Society for Music Theory, Annual Meeting, October 30, 2015, St. Louis, Missouri. Appendix D. Reference, Formal-Function Terms/definitions (From Caplin 1998) (in order referred to in the paper) Abridged refrain: In rondo form, a restatement of the refrain that consists of A or A’ of the original small ternary, and reaches home-key authentic cadence Incomplete refrain: In rondo form, a restatemtn of a refrain that lacks a home-key authentic cadence Period theme: Simple (8-measure) theme consisting of an antecedent phrase and consequent phrase Sentence theme: Simple (8-measure) theme consisting of a presentation phrase and a continuation (and/or cadential) phrase Hybrid 1 theme: Simple (8-measure) theme combining functions associated with both sentence and period, Antecedent phrase + continuation phrase Hybrid 3 theme: Simple (8-measure) theme combining functions associated with both sentence and period, Contrasting basic idea phrase + continuation phrase Compound theme: 16-measure theme, a complex version of the simple theme-types Compound period: antecedent (presentation+Continuation) + consequent (pres+contin) Compound sentence: presentation (c.b.i.+c.b.i.) + continuation Small Ternary theme: 3-part theme: Exposition (A), contrasting middle (B), recapitulation (A’) Presentation The first phrase of a sentence; consists of a unit (b.i.) and its repetition, supported by a prolongation of tonic harmony Continuation The second phrase of a sentence – fuses continuation (destabilizing formal function) and cadential (concluding formal function; provides requisite conditions for thematic closure, and is supported by cadential progression(s) Antecedent First phrase of a period – basic idea (b.i.) followed by contrasting idea (c.i.), then weak cadence Consequent Second phrase of a period – repeats prior antecedent but concludes with an authentic cadence. Often replaces contrasting idea (c.i.) with purely cadential idea (cad.). ECP Expanded Cadential Progression: An expansion of the cadential progression to the extent of Supporting a complete phrase (at least four measures) Abandoned Cadence Failure to realize an implied authentic cadence by eliminating the cadential dominant in root position, or by inverting that harmony before its resolution Deceptive Cadence Failure to realize an implied authentic cadence by replacing the final tonic with another harmony, which nonetheless represents the end of the prevailing cadential progression “one more time” Following an evaded [or deceptive] cadence, the repetition of the previous cadential idea or phrase 4 Graham G. Hunt (University of Texas at Arlington): “Formal Loosening and Diverging A Sections: A Formal-Function-Based Approach to Rondo Finales with Incomplete Second Refrains.” Society for Music Theory, Annual Meeting, October 30, 2015, St. Louis, Missouri. Bibliography (Selected) Caplin, William. 1987. "The 'Expanded Cadential Progression': A Category for the Analysis of Classical Form." Journal of Musicological Research 215-257. Caplin, William. 1998. Classical Form: A Theory of Formal Functions for the Instrumental Music of Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fillion, Michelle. 2012. "Form, Rhetoric, and the Reception of Haydn's Rondo Finales." In Engaging Haydn: Culture, Context, and Criticism, by Mary Hunter and Richard Will (eds.), 187-210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Galand, Joel. 1995. "Form, Genre and Style in Eighteenth-Century Rondo." 17 (1): 27-52. Hepokoski, James and Darcy, Warren. 2006. Elements of Sonata Theory: Norms, Types, and Deformations in the Late Eighteenth-Century Sonata. New York: Oxford University Press. Huguet, Joan Campbell. 2015. Formal Functions and Voice-Leading Structures in Beethoven's Early Sonata-Rondo Finales (Ph.D. Dissertation). Rochester, NY: Eastman School of Music. Hunt, Graham. 2014. "'How Much is Enough?': Structural and Formal Ramifications of the Abbreviated Second A Section in Rondo Finales from Haydn to Brahms." Journal for Schenkerian Studies 8: 1-51. 5 Formal Loosening and Diverging A Sections: A Formal-Function Based Approach to Rondo Finales with Incomplete Second Refrains Society for Music Theory, Annual Meeting St. Louis, Missouri October 30, 2015 Graham G. Hunt University of Texas at Arlington [email protected] [Appendix A.] Generic layouts, Rondo and Sonata-Rondo forms Or D Example 1a. Movements with incomplete second refrains (lacking a PAC in the home key), organized by refrain's overall theme-type (per Caplin’s typology; fonts indicate movement’s overall form) Bold: Sonata-rondo forms (Type 4 in Sonata Theory); bold/italics: Expanded binary rondos (Type 41-exp in Sonata Theory) No Bold: Straight Rondos; (-rondo): Sonata-Rondo Converting to Rondo by omitting secondary theme in “recap” Example 1b. Movements with incomplete second refrains, organized by the theme type of the diverging portion of the refrain Example 2. Incomplete 2nd-refrain pieces, sorted by divergence location (instant/internal) and technique Example 3a. Illustration of “instant” divergence locations in sample theme types Sentence theme Continuation phrase Presentation phrase b.i. b.i. * (post-cadential) *Cad Hybrid 3 theme type c.b.i Presentation (c.b.i.) b.i. c.i. Continuation Contin contin * (post-cadential) *Cad 16-measure period Antecedent (internal sentence) b.i. b.i. Consequent (internal sentence) contin b.i. b.i. contin HC PAC Small ternary (ABA'; sample) A (period) Antecedent b.i. c.i. HC b.i. A (period) B Consequent ci/cad PAC post-cadential Antecedent b.i. model-seq standing-V HC b.i. Consequent c.i. b.i. HC ci/cad PAC Example 3b. Illustration of “internal” divergence locations in sample theme types Sentence theme Continuation phrase Presentation phrase b.i. b.i. * (post-cadential) *Cad Hybrid 3 theme type c.b.i Presentation (c.b.i.) b.i. c.i. Continuation Contin contin * (post-cadential) *Cad 16-measure period Antecedent (internal sentence) b.i. b.i. Consequent (internal sentence) contin b.i. b.i. contin HC PAC Small ternary (ABA'; sample) A (period) Antecedent b.i. c.i. HC b.i. A (period) B Consequent ci/cad PAC post-cadential Antecedent b.i. model-seq standing-V HC b.i. Consequent c.i. b.i. HC ci/cad PAC Example 4. Illustrations of specific divergence techniques “Lights out” minor tonic (Haydn: Cello Concerto Hob. VIIb:2, iii) 2nd refrain (incomplete) A section (of small ternary:) antecedent with modal repeat Antecedent (internal sentence) b.i. 2 m. 103 b.i. (resp) contin 2 4 Consequent (internal sentence) Antecedent=>pre-core b.i. b.i. contin refrain ends; minor i! C section (interior theme) follows HC (d:) HC (no PAC) (HC) (end of antecedent) i (d: HC) follows “Ib7” or V7/IV (Haydn: String Quartet op. 64/6 iv) 2nd refrain (incomplete) A section (of small ternary:) antecedent + compressed, modulating consequent Antecedent (internal Hybrid 3) b.i. 2 Eb: m. 83 c.i. 2 contin 4 Consequent (H3)=> pre-core b.i. Ib7! HC m. 91 -> f: c.i. contin compr. f: HC (no PAC) refrain ends; C section (core) follows Fragmentation / sequencing (Mozart: Piano Concerto K. 450 iii) Mozart 450 iii 2nd refrain (incomplete) 16-measure period: antecedent + compressed, modulating conseq Antecedent (internal sentence) Bb: b.i. 2 m. 113 b.i. (seq) contin 2 4 Consequent (H3)=> pre-core bi=>mod seq sequence fragm. HC m. 121 -> g: refrain ends; C section (core) follows g: HC (no PAC) Example 5. Haydn: Symphony 97 iv: Opening refrain A section (of small ternary:) 16-measure period Antecedent (internal sentence) b.i. 2 C: m. 1 b.i. (resp) contin 2 4 Consequent (internal sentence) b.i. 2 HC m. 9 b.i. 2 contin 4 V:PAC (=>HC) Haydn: Symphony 97 iv, 2nd (incomplete) refrain 2nd refrain: dissolving [compound] consequent Example 6. Brahms, Symphony #2 iv Example 7. Mendelssohn, Scherzo op. 81 #2: Opening refrain Example 7. Mendelssohn, Scherzo op. 81 #2 – 2nd (incomplete) refrain A E D Loosening “chain” Antecedent: [ornamental changes]; Consequent: c.i. eliminated [74]: Ib7 (74) – Sequence/fragmentation (74-77) – fragmentation (77) – modulation to d (78) – no PAC in a minor Example 8. Haydn, Trumpet Concerto, Hob. VIIe: 1, iii: Opening refrain Loosening elements Extension of presentation phrase: contrasting idea looped twice; compressed continuation, assymetrical grouping structure: 8-measure presentation+3-measure continuation; post-antecedent standing on the dominant (rare in periods; per Caplin 2013, 135) Example 8. Haydn, Trumpet Concerto, Hob. VIIe: 1, iii: Second (Incomplete) refrain Loosening chain (in addition to loosening devices in place in original: Ornamental changes: flute in m. 128, full orchestra Forte entrance (m. 138); brief “Ib7” (m. 142)sequence + modulation (m. 143); sequence (m. 150), lack of PAC in home key Incomplete 2nd-refrain pieces, internal divergences only Example 9. Beethoven, Symphony 8, iv, 1st and 2nd refrains (compound antecedent only) Loosening chain: Expanded continuation (from original refrain) – extended expansion (m. 105) – sequence of continuation’s opening (m. 109) – extension of continuation phrase – no cadence Example 10. Strauss, String Quartet op. 22, iv, 1st and 2nd refrains (compound antecedent only) Loosening EVENT: Compressed continuation, abandoned cadence, modulation (to F), beginning of model/sequence Example 11. Incomplete refrains diverging just before, during, or after the cadence Just before cadence [during cadential function]: Haydn: Symphony #93 iv Tchaikovsky: Violin Concerto op. 35 iii At cadence / overwrite Haydn: String Quartet op. 71 #2 iv Beethoven: Piano Sonata Op. 10 #3 iv After the cadence [post-cadential]: Brahms: Piano Trio op. 87 iv Brahms: String Quintet op. 111 iv Example 12. Beethoven, Piano Sonata op. 10 #3 iv (2nd refrain) Example 13a. Brahms, Piano Trio op. 87 iv Example 13b. Brahms, String Quintet op. 111 iv (2nd refrain), end of A section [Example 2]. Incomplete 2nd-refrain pieces, sorted by divergence location (instant/internal) and technique Refrain 2 A [trans?] Couplet 2 C Refrain 2 => Pre-core Transition; Couplet 2 A C Main Theme => Transition; Subord. Theme [“P”] [“TR”] [“S”]