Muncan Poster - Water Journal

 It is for some time known that paramagnetic/diamagnetic properties of matter,
including water could be measured (Fig.1a), and that these are a result of complex
dynamics – constant making and breaking of water clusters [1]. The method of Optomagnetic spectroscopy introduced by Koruga et. al [2,3] is based on the polarization
properties of water and in result gives a summarized magnetic properties
(paramagnetic and diamagnetic) of the sample (Fig1b) [3], among other useful
information. Thus, Opto-magnetic spectroscopy was shown to be a valuable tool with
great potential in various biomedical and other applications [3-5].
 Aquaphotomics is a scientific method which gives insight into water organization
through specific “water-mirror” approach, using near infrared light [6]. Using near
infrared spectroscopy and Aquaphotomics it is possible to observe and analyze water
molecular vibrations in relation to other molecular vibrations and function of the whole
analyzed system under various perturbations [6,7].
 So, what happens to water and its magnetic properties in cancerous tissues? Or what
happens to water exposed to light? Or plants in dark and light ambient? How
anesthetics change para/diamagnetic properties of tissues? How water reacts to the
words spoken to it? And does water really remember?
C9H13NO3
Ficus Benjamina
By cell phone
15
10
Lbefore
120
140
160
180
200
L-1h
D-1h
Water
-10
-15
Wavelength difference [nm]
[R-B]&[W-P]
100
50
0
100
θ=53°, Brewster angle
RGB
40
Reflected polarized light
Electric component
Relative intensity x 1000 [n.a.u. ]
Reflected white light
Electromagnetic
component
50
0
100
105
0
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
Magnet1
Magnet2
Magnet3
-20
115
120
125
130
-100
100
20
110
-50
Adrenalin ampula 1 1000 PLACEBO
0
100
110
120
130
-100
WAVELENGTH DIFFERENCE [nm]
100
110
120
130
-50
WAVELENGTH DIFFERENCE [nm]
105
110
115
120
125
-100
WAVELENGTH DIFFERENCE [nm]
0
100
130
120
130
-100
WAVELENGTH DIFFERENCE [nm]
Adrenalin 6C PLACEBO
100
50
50
0
100
110
120
130
0
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
-50
-50
-100
110
-50
WAVELENGTH DIFFERENCE [nm]
100
0
100
50
Adrenalin C200 TEL
Adrenalin 200C PLACEBO
100
-50
-50
0
-100
50
50
50
-100
WAVELENGTH DIFFERENCE [nm]
WAVELENGTH DIFFERENCE [nm]
Wavelength difference [nm]
NIRS & Aquaphotomics– selected results
[Red Channel – Blue Channel]& [White – Polarized]
RGB
130
Adrenalin C200
100
100
WAVELENGTH DIFFERENCE [nm]
-40
RGB
120
-100
INTENSITY (n.a.u. x 1000)
Intensity x 1000 [n.a.u.]
θ=90°
110
-50
60
Method I
Opto-Magnetic Imaging Spectroscopy (OMIS)
Adrenalin C6
Adrenalin ampulla 1:1000
100
INTENSITY (n.a.u. x 1000)
100
INTENSITY (n.a.u. x 1000)
-5
Opto-Magnetic Imaging Spectroscopy (OMS) – selected results
Dbefore
0
INTENSITY (n.a.u. x 1000)
5
INTENSITY (n.a.u. x 1000)
Fig.1b) Opto – magnetic spectra of pure water
Fig.1a) Paramagnetism/Diamagnetism of water
By thought
INTENSITY (n.a.u. x 1000)
Wavelength difference [nm]
20
INTENSITY (n.a.u. x 1000)
[R-B]&[W-P]
By electrical device
(workshop)
INTENSITY (n.a.u. x 1000)
Realitve Intensity x 000 [n.a.u]
Relative intensity x 1000 [n.a.u. ]
[R-B]&[W-P] - average spectra of plant leaves
Adrenalin C6 (homeopathic solution) and Adrenalin ampulla 1:1000 aquagrams are
very different comparing to other aquagrams.
Wavelength difference [nm]
Fig.2. Principles of Opto-Magnetic Imaging Spectroscopy
Method II
Near Infra Red Spectroscopy (NIRS) &Aquaphotomics
Mucose
White
Polarized
 NIR spectrometer: Hamamatsu TG 9113GC (Hamamatsu,
 OMIS: Water has a characteristic opto-magnetic spectrum,
Adrenalin has its own opto-magnetic spectrum, different to
water. Homeopathic solutions C6 and C200 have spectra
similar to both substances – water and adrenalin. Placebo
solutions (pure water) have different spectra comparing to
water, and in some cases similar to the Adrenalin
Japan)
 Sample cell: quartz cell, path length 1mm
NIR water spectrum
 Mode: Transmittance
Cancer
Aquagram
White
Polarized
 NIRS & AQUAPHOTOMICS: Results show that the
Adrenalin ampulla 1:1000 and Adrenalin C6 homeopathic
differ strongly comparing to other solutions. When excluded
from comparative aquagrams, the rest of the solutions
show similar organization of water molecules, where only
concentration of typical water molecular species varies.
[R-B]&[W-P] – averaged spectra for 34 patients
Relative Intensity x 1000 [n.a.u.]
15
Fig.3 Basic principles of Aquaphotomics and an example of aquagram derived from NIR water
spectrum
10
5
0
100
110
120
130
-5
-10
Wavelength difference [nm]
Mucose
Cancer
140
150
1) Paramagnetic/Diamagnetic (P/D) property of water may be determinate by proton magnetometers based
on Overhauser effect (measuring changes in nT) and by Opto-Magnetic Imaging Spectroscopy- OMIS
(qualitative method giving relative P/D change in normalized arbitrary units, during light-water interaction).
2) Since those two methods are compatible and complementary we used OMIS to characterize skin, plants,
mucosa tissue of colon and different drug types of medicines, including placebos
3) Applying anesthetics on skin leads to diminished paramagnetic properties
4) After exposure to sun, paramagnetism of plants’ leaves is increased
5) Paramagnetic properties of adenocarcinoma tissues are decreased comparing to healthy mucosa tissue of
colon
6) OMIS diagrams of paramagnetic/ diamagnetic properties of water, adrenalin, homeopathic solutions of
adrenalin and different placebos are different. This is also confirmed by using Aquaphotomics. These are
very preliminary results and more research is necessary for final conclusion.
Relative intensity x 1000 [n.a.u]
[R-B]&[W-P]
15
10
1)
Koruga ,D., Nikolic,A., Mihajlovic,S., Matija L., Nanomagnetic behavior of fullerene thin films in Earth magnetic field in dark and under polarization
light influences, J. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Vol.5. No 10, 1660-1664 (2005)
2)
Dj. Koruga, A. Tomic, System and method for analysis of light - mater interaction based on spectral convolution, US Patent application number
20090245603, (2009 )
3)
Dj. Koruga, S. Miljkovic, S. Ribar, L. Matija, D. Kojic, Water hydrogen bonds studied by opto-magnetic fingerprint technique, Acta physica polonica
A, Vol.117 -5 (2010) 777-781
4)
Papić-Obradović, M, Kojić,D., Matija,L., Opto-Magnetic Method for Epstein-Barr Virus and Cytomegalovirus Detection in Blood Plasma Samples,
Acta Physica Polonica A,Vol.117 (5), pp. 781-784, 2010
5)
Jelena Muncan, A comparative study on structure and properties of water by opto-magnetic and IR spectroscopy, Contemporary materials, Vol.III1, 2012 (ISSN: 1986-8669) (proof of acceptance No. 04/3-121/12)
6)
R.Tsenkova, Introduction to Aquaphotomics: dynamic spectroscopy of aquaous and biological systems descibes peculiarities of water. Journal of
Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 2009. 17: p. 303-314.
7)
Matija,L., Tsenkova,R., Miyazaki,M., Bamba, K, Munćan, J., Aquagrams: Water spectral pattern as characterization of hydrogenated nanomaterial,
FME Transaction,Vol.40, No.2, 51-56, 2012. (ISSN:1451-2092)
5
0
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
-5
-10
Wavelength difference [nm]
Before
After
This research has been partially funded by Ministry of Science and
Technological Development of Republic of Serbia, through Projects
III 41006 and III 45009
Jelena Muncan,
Djuro Koruga,